The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFA0000182 Bakersfield Travel Plaza 2201 Taft Hwy SB989SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Date of Testing: Facility Address: Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Technician Conducting Test: Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: License Number: Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date:_________________________ Bakersfield Travel Plaza 05/04/2018 2201 Taft Highway, Bakersfield, CA 93313 Sonja Gill 661-378-1612 4/20/2018 None present Confidence UST Services Kyle Self ✔ A, Haz, C61-D40 804904 CA UST SERVICE TECHNICIAN ICC 08/30/2018 INCON TS-STS 09/29/2018 Diesel Annular ✔ Diesel secondary piping ✔ Diesel STP sump ✔ UDC 1-2 ✔ UDC 3-4 ✔ UDC 5-6 ✔ ✔ Water was hauled off by conﬁdence UST services. 05/04/2018 SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Tank # Tank # Tank # Tank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)} ✔ ✔ Calibrated gauges 0.00” Diesel ✔ 20,000 Steel Unknown Diesel 5 min 10:30am -10.00hg 11:30am -10.00hg 1 hour 0.00” 0.00" SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: Length of Piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) ✔ ✔ Calibrated gauges 0.00” Diesel Fiberglass Inron 3.00” 200.00’ Diesel Test boot 5 min 11:00am 5.00 psi 12:00pm 0.00psi 1 hour 5.00psi 0.00” ✔ SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Sump # Sump # Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: Sump Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested1 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) Please see incon results ✔ ✔ TS-STS 0.00” Diesel 39.00” 77.00” Fiberglass 42.00” 47.00” Dirty with mud 4.00” above highest penetra ✔ Immediately ✔ ✔ 5 min 15 min 0.002” ✔ ✔ ✔ SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: UDC # UDC # UDC # UDC # UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) ✔ ✔ Immediately NOT TESTED PER NEEDS BOOTS REPLACED. SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Bucket Diameter: Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)