The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 023-2021RESOLUTION NO. 02 3-2021 RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH UNION AVENUE AND ASTOR AVENUE INTERSECTION, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93307 (GPA/ZC NO. 19-0405). WHEREAS, McIntosh & Associates, representing Price Environmental Services, LLC (property owner), submitted an application with the City of Bakersfield requesting an amendment to the land use map designation of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan from LR (Low Density Residential) and SR/LR (Suburban Residential/Low Density Residential) to SI (Service Industrial) on 2.64 acres and an amendment to Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code to change the Zone District from R -S -IA (Residential Suburban One -Acre Minimum Lot Size) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) on 2.64 acres (1.45 acres in the City limits and 1.19 outside the limits to be prezoned M-1), located at the northwest corner of the South Union Avenue and Astor Avenue intersection, Bakersfield, California 93307 (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Negative Declaration for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 3, 2020, and approved Resolution No. 60-20, which recommended that the City Council approve the Project; and WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before the City Council to consider the approval of the amendment as required by Government Code Section 65355, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the staff report, and the Planning Commission's deliberation, and action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows: 1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 60-20 are hereby adopted. 3. The Project is hereby approved subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit A and located on the map as shown in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein. 4. The Project approved herein is hereby made part of the 111 amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan for calendar year 2021 in accordance with Government Code Section 65358 (b). Page 1 of 2 M t o JORIGNAL ---------000-------- HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of February 2021, by the following vote: GrES COLINCILMEMBER: ARIAS, GONZALES, WEIR, SMITH, FREEMAN, GRAY, PARLIER NOES: COLINCILMEMBER: _ %16 N E ABSTAIN: COLINCILMEMBER: Woo ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBER: NbNE JULIE DRIMk IS, C CITY CLERK -and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of -the City of Bakersfield APPROVED FEB 17 2021 "'�( lr4*44 � 6 KAREN GOH MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorn By VIRIDIANA dKi.I.XRDO-KING Deputy City Attorney Exhibit: A Conditions of Approval B General Plan Amendment Map Page 2 of 2 o�gAKF�N m c7 O ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE NO. 19-0405 .CITY ATTORNEY 1. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not limited to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant, and/or property owner and/or subdivider ("Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments, commissioners and boards ("City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including without limitation any CEQA approval or any related development approvals or conditions whether imposed by the City, or not, except for CITY's sole active negligence or willful misconduct. This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued. The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, falling under this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in its sole discretion, shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm or attorney chosen by another entity or party. For orderly development .PLANNING 2. Prior to the development of the site, the property owner shall provide the Certificate of Completion to the Planning Division showing that annexation of the northern portion of the project site has been approved by the Kern County Local Area Formation Commission and that the area has been legally annexed into the City. For orderly development 3. The property owner shall have to undergo additional Planning Division review including, but not necessarily limited to, additional environmental review per CEQA if the owner intends to further develop the site beyond the baseline condition at the time of approval of the General Plan Amendment. For orderly development vGRIGNALL SPARCIS-0405 SCARLETFIREDR LR GC LR LR �I LR LEGEND ` (GENERAL PLAN LR 3 t FORTDENISONAVE LAND USE) E AMBURKET MIDNIGHT CT s WAY ejV =i6 U1 a RR Rural Residential o LR m o a LR LR LR 2.5 gross a(res/dwelling unit $ m LR 3 o ER Estate Residential CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1 dwelling unit/tial acre LN ry PS R (ALDERWOOD SI SR Suburban Residential 54 dwelling units/nal acre _ SIAR County::5 4 dwelling unifsjnef acre LR E LR LR SI ER City::5 7.26 dwelling units;net acre R -1A LR Low Density Residential W 51.26 dwelling units/net acre 'a LMR Low Medium Density Residential z > 4 bul S 10 dwelling units/net acre HOSKING AVE z Y E HOSKING_AVE HMR High Medium Density Residential " 3 I >7.26 units but �W o LR I 517.42 dwelling unils/net acre GC HR High Density Residential VALLARTA SPECTACULAR BID DR >17.42 units but VIEW AVE LR GC r 512.6 dwelling units/net acre LR LL 3 LR I H( Highway Commercial OARA AVE LMR A I GC General Commercial • ALYSNEBA�DR MC Major Commercial CITY- LIMIT---+ OC Office Commercial L pS Golden Valley LR W MUC Mixed Use Commercial AEGEAN High School HR LI light Industrial AGILE WAY LR �IAVF ••� W SI Service Industrial LR •.... z HI Heavy Industrial SORIA 1 LR P Public Facilities v ORIA • SRILR . R ADMIRAL DR LMR PS Public/Private Schools FROM: LR & SR\LR I PT PubliciransportafionCorridors P -SW Solid Waste Facilities ASTOR TO: SI LR o OS Open Space AVE ......... CITY LIMIT••—••—•••As7DR AVE•— —.1 OS -P Parks and Recreation LMR ' THUNDER GUL(N OR a OS•SSlopes exceeding 30% l < a I o � R-IAResource- 1 LR LR I Intensive Agriculture I I SI a 20 acre minimum parcel size J J I SRILR - UNBRIDALED DR. I I W o R -EA Resource - l LMRILR I W o Extensive Agriculture QLR 20 acre minimum parcel size I ,COUNT FLEET WAY 80 acre min (Williamson Act) 1 LL R -MP Resource - NUDSON OR oc HUDSON DR ; LR •�. 3 LR Minerals B Petroleum 0 z �••�••� ........ EITY� LIMIT S acre minimum parcel size a UER Urban Estate Residential z e cWesfern Rosedale Plan o LMRILR o a 0.5 acre net minimum parcel size 2 a i LMRILR 2 ER WM West Ming Specific Plan J J Z ..r I � MC KEE RD PMC KEE RD I I I?S j LIEB LN R BAKERSFIELD N J McKee I McKee N a a Elementary Middle SR/LR I 2 School I School LMR/LR o LMRILR s LMR/L I SR r NE AVE I I t Feet 0,01 At DREY AVE EY p: a os -p GC GC 0 330 660 BURY Document Name: 20ao 08_02