The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFMC 2021 Retest Appendix VI Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form CERS = California Environmental Reporting System, GPH = Gallons Per Hour, ID = Identification, ICC = International Code Council, LLD = Line Leak Detector, NA = Not Applicable, SW = Single- Walled, UDC = Under-Dispenser Containment, UST = Underground Storage Tank, VPH = Vacuum/Pressure/Hydrostatic Page 1 of 6 TYPE OF ACTION ☐ Installation X Repair ☐ 12 Month 1. FACILITY INFORMATION CERS ID 10131349 Certification Date 2/25/2021 Facility Name Lucky 7 #3 Facility Address 726 S. Union City Bakersfield ZIP Code 93307 2. SERVICE TECHNICIAN INFORMATION Company Performing the Certification Advanced Compliance Phone 6617064321 Mailing Address 4007 Brae Burn Dr Bakersfield Ca 93306 Service Technician Performing Test Bradley Hinsley Contractor/Tank Tester License Number 971259 ICC Number 8373948 ICC Expiration Date 8/10/2021 3. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONS Manufacturer and Test Equipment Training Certifications Expiration Date ICC Service Techican 8/10/2021 Veeder-root 2/4/2022 Redjacket LLD 5/23/2021 VMI 1/18/2022 4. CERTIFICATION BY SERVICE TECHNICIAN CONDUCTING TEST I hereby certify that the monitoring system is operational in accordance with California Code of Regulations, title 23, division 3, chapter 16, section 2638; that required supporting documentation is attached; and all information contained herein is accurate. Service Technician Signature Date 2/25/2021 Total # of Pages 5. MONITORING SYSTEM AND PROGRAMMING Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 2 of 6 A separate Monitoring System Certification Form must be prepared for each control panel. Make of Monitoring System Control Panel Veeder-Root Model of Monitoring System Control Panel TLS-350 Software Version Installed 334.00 Attach the post-certification reports if the monitoring system is capable of generating either; X Monitoring System Set-up X Alarm History Report Yes No NA All monitoring equipment is operational per manufacturer’s specifications? X ☐ Secondary containment systems are free of damage, debris, or liquid? X ☐ Are the audible and visual alarms operational? X ☐ All sensors have been: 1) visually inspected for wiring kinks, breaks and residual buildup on floats; and 2) tested for functionality and confirmed operational? X ☐ ☐ Are all sensors installed to detect a release at the earliest opportunity in the secondary containment? X ☐ ☐ The monitoring system set-up was reviewed, and proper settings confirmed? X ☐ ☐ Was the monitoring control panel’s backup battery visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? X ☐ ☐ Does the flow of fuel stop at the dispenser if a release is detected in the under-dispenser containment? X ☐ ☐ Does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system fails to operate or is electrically disconnected? X ☐ ☐ Does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a release? Which sensors initiate positive shut down? (Check all that apply) X Sump X UDC X ☐ ☐ If monitoring system alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring center, is all communication equipment operational? ☐ ☐ X Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy in Section 9. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired in Section 9 Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 3 of 6 6. SENSOR TESTING RESULTS List only sensors tested on date of this certification. List “Sensor ID” as labeled in system programming. Additional copies of this page may be attached to accommodate all sensors tested. Sensor ID Sensor Model Component(s) Monitored Pass Fail L3 794380-208 91 STP X ☐ L8 794380-208 Disp 1/2 X ☐ L9 794380-208 Disp 3/4 X ☐ L10 794380-208 Disp 5/6 X ☐ L11 794380-208 Disp 7/8 X ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy in Section 9. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired in Section 9 Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 4 of 6 7. LINE LEAK DETECTOR TESTING ☐ Check this box if line leak detectors ARE NOT installed. (Do not complete this section.) Simulated release rate verified: (Check all that apply.) X 3 GPH ☐ 0.1 GPH ☐ 0.2 GPH Yes No NA Has the testing apparatus been properly calibrated? X ☐ ☐ For emergency generator tank systems, does the LLD create an audible and visual alarm when a leak is detected? ☐ ☐ X For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict the flow through the pipe when a release is detected? ☐ ☐ X For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off when a release is detected? X ☐ ☐ For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? X ☐ ☐ For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a tightness test? X ☐ ☐ For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected for kinks and breaks? X ☐ ☐ Were all items on the equipment manufacturer’s maintenance checklist completed? X ☐ ☐ Were all LLDs confirmed operational within regulatory requirements? X ☐ ☐ LLD ID LLD Model Lines Monitored Pass Fail 91 PLLD 91 X ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy in Section 9. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired in Section 9 Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 5 of 6 8. IN-TANK GAUGING TESTING X Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. ☐ Check this box if NO tank gauging equipment is installed. (Do not complete this section if either box is checked.) Yes No NA All wiring has been: 1) visually inspected for kinks, breaks and proper entry and termination; and 2) tested for ground faults? ☐ ☐ ☐ Were all in-tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup to ensure that floats move freely, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? ☐ ☐ ☐ Was accuracy of system’s product level readings tested? ☐ ☐ ☐ Was accuracy of system’s water level readings tested? ☐ ☐ ☐ Were all probes reinstalled properly? ☐ ☐ ☐ Were all items on the equipment manufacturer’s maintenance checklist completed? ☐ ☐ ☐ Probe ID Probe Model Tanks Monitored Pass Fail ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ 9. COMMENTS Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired. 91 Relay was replaced, Positive shutdown passed for 91 turbine, and 91 PLLD passed. 10. MONITORING SITE PLAN Advanced Compliance 3704 Littlefalls Ct. Bakersfield, Ca. 93308 661-706-4321 Fax# 661-589-9329 VAPORLESS MANUFACTURING, INC. LDT-890 Leak Detector Test Record Contractor: Advanced Compliance Customer: Lucky 7 #3 Date: 2/25/2021 Location: 726 S. Union Ave. Bakersfield, Ca. Product: 91 UL Technician: Bradley W. Hinsley Submersible Pump Identification Manufacturer: Redjacket Model No.: Serial No.: Notes: Leak Detector Identification Manufacturer: Redjacket Description: PLLD Diaphragm-type: Piston-type: Tamper-proof seal installed: Other Style Leak Detector: Notes: Leak Detector in Submersible Pump Test at Dispenser Operating Pump Pressure (psi): 32 (para. 15) Gallons per hour rate: 3.0 (para. 22) Line pressure with pump shut off (psi): 20 (para. 23) Bleed-back Test with pump off (ml): 110 (para. 26) Step-through time to full flow (secs): N/A (para. 30) Leak detector stays in leak search position (Yes/No): N/A (para. 42) Leak Detector Test Pass / Fail Notes: Pass *Complete thermal expansion test before failing leak detector