Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 132-2021RESOLUTION NO. 13 2 2 0 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL TO UPHOLD THE APPEAL AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 7383 DATED JULY 1, 2021, IN THE E (ESTATE) AND E -CH (ESTATE - CHURCH) ZONE DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REINA ROAD AND OLD FARM ROAD WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure set forth in the provisions of Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, Montbatten Place Residents, filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map 7383 located at the northwest corner of Reina Road and Old Farm Road, as shown on the attached (Exhibit "B"); and WHEREAS, Montbatten Place Residents, the appellant, filed a written appeal with the City Clerk on March 15, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City Council, through the City Clerk, set the time and place of the hearing as Wednesday, May 5, 2021, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, ;Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before said City Council on said appeal, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title Sixteen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was continued to June 2, 2021; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2021 the public hearing item was referred back to staff for re -advertisement at a future date since staff and applicant were working a solution; WHEREAS, the public hearing was re -noticed for July 16, 2021; and WHEREAS, the applicant amended Tentative Tract Map 7383 (Exhibit A-3) to incorporate comments made by the appellant in their stated appeal, and the amendments were reviewed by City staff and found to remain in compliance with CEQA. WHEREAS, testimony was heard during the public hearing of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Jonathan Zumwalt, representing Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno, a Corporation Sole, filed an application requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map File No. 7383 ion that certain property in the City of Bakersfield as shown on the attached (Exhibit "A-3"); and WHEREAS, the original Tentative Tract Map 7383 consisted of 24 residential lots, one sump lot, and one 15.67 -acre lot as a remainder on approximately 26 acres for single- family residential development, zoned E (Estate) and E - CH (Estate - Church) as shown on attached Exhibit "A-2"; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Planning Commission, did set Thursday, March 4, 2021, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before the Planning Commission to Page 1 of 4 � m �ORIGiNA1 consider the Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 16 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the application was deemed complete on January 15, 2021; and WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to CEQA and the City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff and the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted and it was determined that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment and an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Project No. ZC #11-0271, was prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and i WHEREAS, as a result of the written appeal to the approved map, Staff and applicant were directed to look into a possible solution; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2021, applicant submitted Tentative Tract Map 7383 dated July 1, 2021 (Exhibit A-3) which consists of Dolcetto Street designed as a cul-de-sac. WHEREAS, the amendments to Tentative Tract Mao 7383 were reviewed by City staff and found to remain in compliance with CEQA. WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the staff report, and the Planning Commission's deliberation, and action. WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield Planning Department (1715 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California) is the custodian of all documents and other materials upon which the environmental determination is based; and WHEREAS, the facts presented in the staff report, environmental review, and evidence received both in writing and by verbal testimony at the above referenced public hearing support the findings contained in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby make the following finding: 1. All required public notices have been given. Hearing notices regarding the amended Project were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the amended Project area and published in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation, 10 days prior to the hearing. 2. Staff determined that the proposed activity is a project and an initial study was prepared for the original project (Project No. ZC 11-0271) of the subject property and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on December 14, 2011 by the City Council for the original project, and duly noticed for public review. Page 2of4 � m ORIGNAL i 3. Said prepared an Addendum to said Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. No changes were determined and said Mitigated Negative Declaration with Addendum are the appropriate environmental document to accompany approval of the; Project. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no further; environmental documentation is necessary because no substantial changes to the original project are proposed, there are no substantial changes in circumstances under�which the project will be undertaken, and no new environmental impacts have been ;identified. The Project will not significantly impact the physical environment because mitigation measures relating to ZC 11-0271 have been incorporated into the Project. 4. Urban services are available for the proposed development. The Project is within an area to be served by all necessary utilities and waste disposal systems. Improvements proposed as part of the Project will deliver utilities to the individual lots or parcels to be created. 5. The application, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. (Subdivision Map Act Section 66473.5) The proposed density and intensity of development are consistent with tie SR (Suburban Residential) land use classification on the property. Proposed road improvements are consistent with the Circulation Element. The overall design of the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the goals and policies of all elements of the General Plan. 6. Mineral right owners' signatures may be waived on the final map pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 16.20.060 A.1. The applicant has provided evidence with the Project application that it is appropriate to waive mineral right owners' signatures because in accordance with BMC Section 16.20.060 A.1., the party's right of surface entry has been by recorded document prior to recordation of any final map. 7. The conditions of approval are necessary for orderly development and to provide for the public health, welfare, and safety. 8. The appeal is upheld and Tentative Tract Map 7383 dated July 1, 2021 is approved. i i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein, are true and correct. I 2. The decision of the Planning Commission is upheld, subject to mitigation measures and conditions of approval shown in attached Exhibit A-1. 3. The appeal is upheld. 4. Tentative Tract Map 7383 dated July 1, 2021 by the Licensed Land Surveyor is hereby approved, subject to the mitigation measures and conditions of approval shown in attached Exhibit A-1. --------- 000 ------ — Page 3 of 4 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on July 14, 2021, by the following vote: COLINCILMEMBER: ARIAS GONZALES, WaR, SMITH, FREEMAN; GRAY, PAR ER NOES: COLINCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COLINCILMEMBER: 0104 ABSE COLINCILMEMBER:�/��, t- _ J LIE DRIMAKIS, CMC CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED JUL 14 2021 KAREN GOH MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA!GENNARO City Attorn By - 1191 y I l� IRIDIANA G LARDO-KING Deputy City Attorney Exhibits: Location Map with Zoning Amended Tentative Map Page 4 of 4 o`<$AKF9�, I,- ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A-1" TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 7383 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NOTE to Subdivider/Applicant: It is important that you review and comply with requirements and deadlines listed in the "FOR YOUR INFORMATION" packet that is provided separately. This packet contains existing ordinance requirements, policies, and departmental operating procedures as they may apply to this subdivision. PUBLIC wORKS 1. Approval of this tentative map does not indicate approval of grading, drainage linespnd appurtenant facilities shown, or any variations from ordinance, standard, and; policy requirements which have neither been requested nor specifically approved. 2. Prior'to grading plan review submit the following for review and approval: 2.1. A drainage study for the entire subdivision. Drainage from this tract shall be kept on site. The proposed sump and storm drain shall be privately maintained. A flowage and drainage easement shall be recorded accepting public water prior to approval of the grading plan. 2.2 If the project is discharging storm water to a canal, a channel, or the Kern j River: In order to meet the requirements of the City of Bakersfield's NPDES 1 permit, and to prevent the introduction of sediments from construction or from storm events to the waters of the US, all storm water systems that ultimately convey drainage to the river or a canal shall include both source control Best Management Practices (BMPs) and structural treatment control BMPs. 2.3 A sewer study to include providing service to the entire subdivision and ;showing what surrounding areas may be served by the main line extensions, if applicable. 2.4 .Sewer service will be provided by North of the River Sanitary District (NORSD). Please contact NORSD for their planning, design, and construction requirements. 3. The following conditions must be reflected in the design of the improvement plans: 3.1. ! Final plan check fees shall be submitted with the first plan check submission. 3.2. Per Resolution 035-13 the area within the Tract shall implement and comply !with the "complete streets" policy. Complete streets will require pedestrian :and bicycle access to the Tract from existing sidewalks and bike lanes. If ;there is a gap less than '/4 mile then construction of asphalt sidewalks and bike lanes to the tract will be required. 3.3. ;Install traffic signal interconnect conduit and pull rope for the frontage in all arterials and collectors. Install conduit and pull ropes in future traffic signal locations. 3.4. In addition to other paving requirements, on and off-site road improvements may be required from any collector or arterial street to provide left turn channelization into each street (or access point) within the subdivision (or 'development), where warranted and as directed by the City Engineer. Said channelization shall be developed to provide necessary transitions and TJ S:\TRACTS\7383\Appeal\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits -8 July 2021 \Appeal\ -Revised Condition6Q �pKF9 of Approval.docx �, % M ORIGINAIQ Exhibit "A-1 " TTM 7383 Page 2 of 9 deceleration lanes to meet the current CalTrans standards for the design speed of the roadway in question. 3.5. j Off-site pavement and striping construction will be required to transition from the proposed/ultimate on-site improvements to the existing conditions at the time construction commences. Transitions must be designed in accordance with City Standards and/or the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. If existing conditions change during the period of time between street improvement plan approval and construction commencement, the street improvement plans must be revised and approved by the City Engineer. 4. The subdivider is responsible for implementing the following: 4.1. The phasing map as submitted may be unbalanced with respect to the required improvements along the tract frontages. Therefore, in order to promote orderly development, each phase shall be responsible for an equal dollar amount of frontage improvement. Prior to recordation of each final map for any phase that does not construct its share of the improvements, the difference between the cost of the frontage improvements constructed and the phase share shall be placed into an escrow account. The money deposited in this account would be for the use of the developer of any future phase responsible for more than its share of improvements. The final per lot share will be based upon an approved engineer's estimate. In lieu of the use of an escrow account, the developer may choose to construct with each j phase its proportionate share of the frontage improvements, with approval of the City Engineer. 4.2. !The following conditions are based upon the premise that filing of Final Maps will occur in the order shown on the map with Phase 1 first, then Phase 2, then Phase 3, etc. If recordation does not occur in that normal progression, then, prior to recordation of each final map, the City Engineer shall determine the extent of improvements to be done with that particular phase. 4.2.1. The following shall occur with Phase 1: 4.2.1.1. Construct Reina Road for the full extent of the street lying within the tract's boundary. 4.2.1.2. Construct Old Farm Road for the full extent of the street lying within the tract's Boundary. 14.2.1.3 Construct the trail along Old Farm Road per the Western Rosedale Specific Plan. (Equestrian Trail standard) 4.2.1.4. Construct Dolcetto Street and Mountbatten Place to local street standards (60 feet R/W) from north boundary line of Lot 1 to west boundary line of Lot 12. 4.2.1.5. A 14' wide access with 2" AC paving would be required from Dolcetto Street to the sump entrance. A private flowage and drainage easement would be required for the 20' wide access easement, shown on the final map. No structure or building shall be built on or over the easement. A 14' access gate for entry into Lot A is required and shall be located at the northwest corner of Lot A, being the point where the access easement terminates. 14.2.16. Prior to recordation or concurrently with recordation of each final map, subdivider shall create a Homeowners Association (HOA) and I TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appeal\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits -8 July 2021 \Appeal\.Revised Conditions of �AKF Approval.docx O � M vORIGINAL Exhibit "A-1" Page 3 of 9 TTM 7383 CC&Rs for the subdivision, as approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer to maintain the common areas including, access road to Lot A (private sump), any landscaping within the 20' wide easement, and private Lot A. Prior to recordation, subdivider shall submit HOA and CC&Rs to the City for review and approval. * If the number of phases or the boundaries of the phases are changed, the developer must submit to the City Engineer an exhibit showing the number and configuration of the proposed phases. The City Engineer will review the exhibit and determine the order and extent of improvements to be constructed with each new phase. The improvement plans may require revision to conform to the new conditions. 4.3. 'The subdivider is responsible for verifying that existing streets within the boundary of the tract are constructed to city standards and he will reconstruct streets within the boundary if not to standard. 4.4. The use of interim, non-standard drainage retention areas shall be in accordance with the drainage policy adopted by letter dated January 24, 1997, as modified by the October 20, 2000. 4.5. In order to preserve the permeability of the sump and to prevent the ;introduction of sediments from construction or from storm events, Best Management Practices for complying with the requirements of the Clean Water Act are required. 4.6. All lots with sumps and water well facilities will have wall and/or slatted chain link fence and landscaping to the appropriate street standards, at the building setback with landscaping as approved by the Public Works and Parks Directors. Public access to public sumps for maintenance shall be provided by public streets unless otherwise approved. 4.7. Drainage basins shall be reviewed and approved by both the Public Works Department and the Water Resources Department. 4.8. Install blue markers in the street at the fire hydrants per the Fire Department requirements. 5. Prior to recording the first final map: 5.1. The City Council must have taken final action for inclusion of this tract within the Consolidated Maintenance District. 5.2. 'If it becomes necessary to obtain any off site right of way and if the subdivider is unable to obtain the required right of way, then he shall pay to the City the up -front costs for eminent domain proceedings and enter into an agreement and post security for the purchase and improvement of said right of way. 6. Prior;to recording each final map: 6.1. All facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision identified by the approved drainage study shall be constructed in accordance with the plans approved by the City Engineer, and all easements required shall be provided. 6.2. The subdivider shall submit an enforceable, recordable document approved by the City Attorney to be recorded concurrently with the Final Map which TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appea l\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits -8 July 2021 \Appeal\ -Revised Conditions of Approval.docx o`� 6AKF9� V ^ ORIGINAL`S Exhibit "A-1 " Page 4 of 9 TTM 7383 will prohibit occupancy of any lot until all improvements have been completed by the subdivider and accepted by the City. 6.3. The subdivider shall submit an enforceable, recordable document approved by the City Attorney to be recorded concurrently with the Final Map containing information with respect to the addition of this subdivision to the consolidated maintenance district. Said covenant shall also contain information pertaining to the maximum anticipated annual cost per single family dwelling for the maintenance of landscaping associated with this tract. Said covenant shall be provided to each new property owner through escrow proceedings. If the parcel is already within a consolidated maintenance district, the owner shall update the maintenance district documents, including a Proposition 218 Ballot and Covenant, which shall be signed and notarized. 7. Priorlto Notice of Completion: 7.1 The storm drain system, including the sump, shall be inspected and any debris removed. 8. Street Name Signs (SNS): 8.1 Metro Size SNS shall be installed at the intersection of local streets with Arterial and collector streets. 8.2 ! Standard SNS shall be installed at all other locations. WATER RESOURCES 9. Prior to recordation of each final map, subdivider shall record a covenant affecting each lot prohibiting the pumping and taking of groundwater from the property for any use off the property; provided, however, such pumping and takirig may be carried out by the authorized urban water purveyor which provides water service to the subdivided land, or by a county -wide governmental entity with' water banking powers, and such pumping is part of an adopted water banking program that will not have a significant adverse impact on the grouIndwater levels or diminish the quality of water underlying the subdivision. Orderly development and as required by BMC Section 16.40.101.B. 10. The Developer shall form a new Maintenance District for future maintenance of storm drain sump facilities. Undeveloped parcels within an existing Maintenance District are required to update Maintenance District documents. Updated documents, including Proposition 218 Ballot and Covenant, shall be signed and notarized. (Note - If already within a maintenance district, the maintenance district form! may need to be updated) FIRE SAFETY DIVISION 11. Pipeline Easements. TJ\S:\TRACTS\73!83\Appeal \CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits -8 July 2021 \Appeal\_Revised Conditions of Approval.docx o`��AK�9N Fri ORIGINAL Exhibit "A-1 " TTM 7383 Page 5of9 11.1i Concurrently with recordation of any phase that includes the pipeline easements or portions thereof, subdivider shall show the easements on the final map with a notation that structures including accessory buildings and swimming pools, are prohibited within the easements and record a corresponding covenant. 11.21 Prior to or concurrently with recordation of any phase that includes the pipeline easements or portions thereof, subdivider shall show on the final map that no habitable portion of a structure may be built within 50 feet of a gas main, or transmission line, or refined liquid product line with 36 inches of cover, and record a corresponding covenant. 11.3 No structure may be within 40 feet of a hazardous liquids pipeline bearing refined product, within 48 inches or more of cover. If a pipeline meets this criteria, the 40 -foot setback line shall be shown in the final map and a corresponding covenant shall be recorded prior to or concurrently with recordation of any phase that is affected. 11.41 No habitable portion of a structure may be built within thirty (30) feet of a crude oil pipeline operating at twenty percent (20%) or greater of its design strength. 11.5 Prior to or concurrently with recordation of any phase within 250 feet of the pipeline easements, subdivider shall record a covenant disclosing the location of the pipelines on all lots of this subdivision within 250 feet of the pipelines. Public health, safety and welfare. RECREATION AND PARKS 12. Priorito recordation of a final map, the subdivider shall pay an in -lieu fee based on a park land dedication requirement of 2.5 acres per 1000 population in accordance with Chapter 15.80 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. If the number of dwelling units increases or decreases upon recordation of a final map(s), the park; land requirement will change accordingly. Refer to BMC Chapter 15.80 and the Planning Information Sheet regarding calculation and payment of in -lieu fee. This ;subdivision is located within the boundaries of the North of the River Recreation and Park District. BMG Chapter 15.80 requires the Planning Commission to determine if a subdivider is to dedicate park land, pay an in -lieu fee, reserve park land or a combination of these in order to satisfy the City's park land ordinance for North of the River Recreation and Park District. Staff is recommending this condition in accordance with BMC Chapter 15.80. 13. PriorJo recordation of each final map, the subdivider shall provide the Planning Department written proof/verification from North of the River Recreation and Park District that said project is within the North of the River Recreation and Park District maintenance district. i CITY ATTb'RNEY TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appeal\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits_8 July 2021 \Appeal\ -Revised Conditions of �SAi(4�9 Approval.docx O k ORIGINAL Exhibit "A-1 " TTM 7383 Page 6 of 9 14. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not ilimited to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant, and/or property owner and/or subdivider ("Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments, commissioners and boards ("City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including without limitation any CEQA approval or any related development approvals or conditions whether imposed by the City, or not, except for CITY'S sole active negligence or willful misconduct. This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any ;decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued. The ;City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, falling under this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The 'City, in its sole discretion, shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm or attorney chosen by another entity or party. PLANNING 15. This subdivision shall comply with all provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, and applicable resolutions, policies and standards in effect at the time the application for the subdivision map was deemed complete per Government Code Section 66474.2. 16. The subdivision shall be recorded in no more than two phases. Phases shall be identified numerically and not alphabetically. Orderly development. 17. Prior; to recordation of each final map, subdivider shall submit a "will serve" or "water availability" letter or other documentation acceptable to the Planning Director from the water purveyor stating the purveyor will provide water service to the phase to be recorded. Reqbired for orderly development and provide for the public health, welfare and safety by ensuring water service to the subdivision at the time of final map recordation because the water purveyor has included an expiration date in the initial "will serve" letter. 18. In the event a previously undocumented well is uncovered or discovered on the project site, the subdivider is responsible to contact the Department of Conservation's Division of Geologic Energy Management (GEM) (formally Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR)). The subdivider is responsible for TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appeal\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edifs_8 July 2021 \Appeal\ Revised Conditions of O'SAK49N Approval.docx t- m ORIGINALb Exhibit "A-1 " ! Page 7 of 9 TTM 7383 i any remedial operations on the well required by CaIGEM. Subdivider shall also be subject to provisions of BMC Section 15.66.080 (B.) i Police power based on public health, welfare and safety. 19. Upon the development of the Designated Remainder, the developer will either apply for a subdivision map or a Certificate of Compliance for the Designated Remainder. i Subdivision Map Act Section 66424.6 20. Priorii to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall construct a 6 -foot high masonry wall, as measured from the highest adjacent grade, along the common property line depicting residential lots abutting the E -CH (Estate -Church) zoning. BMC Section 16.28.170 K allows Planning Commission to require wall based on a finding that it is necessary for orderly development. 21. Priori to recordation of a final map, subdivider shall submit and obtain approval of a Substantial Conformance application, which depicts the cul-de-sac design of the southern terminus of Dolcetto Street with all residential lots within Tentative Tract Map 7383 fronting on Dolcetto Street and Reina Road. The Substantial Conformance map shall reflect the design shown in attached Exhibit A-3, and be subject to, but not limited to the following: • All lots shall meet City standards in lot size and dimensions; • S;treet improvements for Dolcetto Street shall meet City standards, as approved by the City Engineer. • Subdivider shall submit evidence of approval from North of the River Sanitation District (NORSD) related to sewer service, location of manholes, and easements. • Subdivider shall be required to show and construct/relocate street irnprovements including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, utilities, and adjacent driveways, at the eastern terminus of Montbatten Place, as approved by the City Engineer. • Subdivider shall construct a minimum six (6) foot high wall as measured from Highest side, at the terminus of Montbatten Place right -of way, as approved by the Planning Director. Safety and orderly development. MITIGATION MEASURES ZONE CHANGE #11-0271 (ORDINANCE NO. 4654) 22. Prior! to ground disturbance, the developer shall have a qualified biologist survey the Ilocafion for species covered under the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan incidental take permit for urban development (Tipton kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, San Joaquin antelope squirrel, & Bakersfield cactus) and TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appea1\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits -8 July 2021 \Appeal\_Revised Conditions of <(�A�F.p Approval.docx O ORIGINAL Exhibit "A-1 " TTM 7383 Page 8 of 9 comply with the mitigation measures of the permit. Survey protocol shall be that recommended by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Developer shall be subject to additional mitigation measures recommended by the qualified biologist. A copy of the survey shall be provided to the Community Development Department and wildlife agencies no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance. The current MBHCP expires on February 28, 2022. To ensure take of covered species does not occur after the expiration date, fees must be paid no later than August 31, 2021 and all covered activities must be completed by the MBHCP expiration date of February 28, 2022. As determined by the City, only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or building permit will be eligible to pay fees under the current MBHCP. Early payment or pre -payment of MBHCP fees shall not be allowed. The ability of the City,to issue urban development permits is governed by the terms of the MBHCP. Urban development permits issued after the 2022 expiration date may be subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation Plan, if approved, or be required to comply directly with requests of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Orderly development. Updated to current MBHCP implementation agreement. 23. Prior to ground disturbance, the subdivider shall have a qualified consultant survey the Location for burrowing owl, and comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711). A copy of the survey shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to ground disturbance. Survey protocol shall, be that recommend by the State Department of Fish and Game. The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711). The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 C.F.R. 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws generally requires that project -related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of the nesting cycle (March 1 - August 15, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. 24. Prior to ground disturbance, the subdivider shall have a qualified consultant survey the ;location for kit fox, and comply with the provisions of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan. Survey protocol shall be that recommended by the State Department of Fish and Game. Subdivider shall be subject to the mitigation measures recommended by the consultant. A copy of TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appea l\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edifs_8 July 2021 \Appeal\ -Revised Conditions of�v6AK4C9 Approval.docx �.n �ORIGINAL Exhibit "A-1 " TTM 7383 Page 9 of 9 the i survey shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to ground disturbance. 25. Prior; to any ground disturbance, all employees, contractors or other persons involved in the construction of the project shall attend a "tailgate" session informing them of the biological resource protection measures which will be implemented for the project. The orientation shall be conducted by a qualified biologist and shall include information regarding biological resources of the local ared, reasons why biological resources are to be preserved and reviewed by a qualified biologist to determine significance, examples of possible biological resources, summary of applicable environmental law, procedures to follow if a possible listed species is found, and measures intended to reduce impacts. I 26. Within 15 days of holding said "tailgate" session, the biologist shall submit a summary report to the Planning Director verifying the following: 1) when and where the session took place; 2) topics discussed in the session; 3) session attendance roster. Submittal of said report will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts on biological resources. Mitigation measures (Condition Numbers 20-24) as recommended by Pruett & Associates, Preliminary Biological Assessment, Jan. 201 1) ; 27. If during construction activities or ground disturbance, cultural resources are uncovered, the subdivider shall stop work and retain a qualified archeologist for further study. Subdivider shall notify the proper authorities and be subject to any mitigation measures required of the archeologist. i 28. If human remains are discovered during ground disturbance, all work shall stop and, provisions of the state Health and Safety Code section 7050.5 shall be observed by qualified professionals. i Mitigation measures (Condition Numbers 25-26) as recommended by Hudlow, Cultural Resources Survey, Jan 2011). TJ\S:\TRACTS\7383\Appea l\CC Appeal Hearing 7-14-21 \Viri Edits -8 July 2021 \Appeal\ -Revised Conditions of Approval.docx i o`� 0AKF9� F- m ORIGINAL TTM 7383 mz �1 _µDA' e l16AA I-MER[ATEIIDAYE• - - LONGVIfW'DR- W-LONE'WILLOW—� a a LEGEND R-1 R_1 DR R_1 ° R-1 °[:R�-113LUFF AVE aoE (ZONE DISTRICTS) READCOUNTRY ORx- c-gR1 -- --MANTOVA,AVE- - R-1 m R_1LL a u R-1 One Family Dwelling R-1 0��o R.1 "CH R 1 E E - 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size - LARKIN DR - 8 o R-1-4.5 One FamilyDwelling CITY OF BAKERSFIELD _ QUIET PASTURE DR• - �.APPLEVALIEYCT - B 8 L •SAN hHIIIATO AVE 4,500 sq.ft. min lot size a tl E Estate --�m- —..— ——-—OLIVE-D&W—- _ —- - -- - - — —— � —-—— � -� — ��— -OLIVE DR -.——�-.—- r � 1D,000sq.ft.minlotsize ®— a ti ° E a EqR1 a R_1 s 3n B R -S Residential Suburban ° y. SPOLETO AVE- v - - R-1 ��� a - 24,000 sq.ft./dwelling unit E�HD'AVE �, -- - - - AURORA,VALLEY,AVE -max, =a m �SUMMIT�POINP@T- - -R-54-)ResidentialSuburban I, 2.5, 5 or 10 min lot size R-1 R-2 Limited Multiple Family Dwelling R-1 B E a E a R-1 ° R-1 E a P Y g a ° 4,500 sq.ft. min lot size (single family) MARRADI,AYE- -B -•-MARLA,AVE - - •�` „ ,�5„'„ 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size (multifamily) a a-DARLINGTONAVE- - Ea R-1 °e 1,500 sq.ft.lot area/dwelling unit e a R-1 R-3 Multiple Family Dwelling a a a W a E y 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size a - = WYALENTANO•AYE - B •� (HERRY,VALLEY AVE- m u .. 1,250 sq.ft.lot area/dwelling unit -MARTINSVILLEAVE, -• a a a a �< a R-4 High Density Multiple Family Dwelling R-1 a R-1 R-1 q R -1R-1 E a 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size o fl a ji I z a 600 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit AVE- - - - s a - 0AI(OTA HILLS•AYE -tel - p R -H Residential Holding Frontier B R-1 v' pt_1 c-TALLADEGA CTd J 20 acre min lot size High School a - o YA Agriculture E o Veterans a E E 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size �° m• KNIGHTS BRIDGE PL - - Elementary R �, - <&•.. A -20A Agriculture G, g- 'IRWINDALEAVE- - SILVER CROWN AVE - 0 s - w C a o E School a _ 20 acre min lot size w cc ¢ a a E a E E PUD Planned Unit Development W a E TT Travel Trailer Pork .raalrtEEc,31-57AVE-R-1 -- W a ° a a CO E � r- 'ANDRETTI AVE - - - Ya - a - MH Mabilehome < a - •TRAFALGAR ®QUARE OR- - - C-0 Professional and Administrative Office a E E E (-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Regional Commercial -+ - •^CHA6(lS40REST LN .- a E m a ~ C -C Commercial Center g a a - m HARVICK'AVE a,. - .- - •YAABOROUGH AYE- •• [-B Central Business a •MONTBATTENPL- R-1 a g ° T7383 E 4 3 E - PCD Planned Commercial Development E E M-1 Light Manufacturing - - aPLUINAS•4i'OO(r LN e - a It 3 a a E - NEW HAMPSHIREAVE- _ - "CHAMPIONS AVEC - -- M-2 General Manufacturing a pal - M-3 Heavy Industrial a � r P Automobile Parking - - - - - Je, - - - REINA RD- -A- - - � -REINA RD - � , u �ti3 RE Recreation - -e! -1- - w e s e” - - ' uN-� - - Ch Church Overlay ® - G° -SUNLIGHT ® 3 R-1 0> a ` RJ1 0 OS Open Space U - - IACKSONVILLEAVE - ® - �INDIANAPOLIS'OR-A•- - - PACIFIC HARBOR •� HOSPHospital Overlay �0 3- R-1 e o r V 8 - AVE < 3 - R-1 m ' AD Architectural Design Overlay o R-2 R-1 R-1 B R-1 ff R-1 00 FP -P Floodplain Primary ^- MORNING SONG ST - R-1 - ° `� FP -S Floodplain Secondary W m - --CHILDRESS,ST- - --CHILDRESSST - - - `� - 'R `°-•PACIFIC•BREEZEAVE•z AA Airport Approach R-1 ® o w ° 3 y a a e DI Drilling Island 3 a o a o R-1 3 - R-1 -R-1 � R_1 OCEAN WAVE •- a PE Petroleum Extraction Combining -EVENING BREEZE AVE- - R-1 a R-1 ,.. _ z .pg, o R-1 S( Senior Citizen Overlay R. ® w - (DLORA00 AYEw - - LL-KFNSETH Si - 3 °` HD Hillside Development Combining �o R-1 a w R-2 I 3 0 p SANG BRIDGE WM- West Ming Specific Plan R_1 R 1 o R-1 ^R.1 8 (T =JACKSON LAKE DR a = 8 •TRA(KSIDF DR•• � �- - - m e. TRACKSIDE DR; a,.a n tt D - - m a �PACIFIC SHORES DR' - R1 a r � 11 4 - -YAMPA RIVER ST a R-1 x R_1 R-1 a R.1 al® R.1 BAKERSFIELD t- STATET MOLOKAI OR- a - •a- RODEO,AVE• - ® R-1 a - - YALLEYFORGf WAY - �J'-v" " R-1 Q 0FBRESTWAY - r a a - a ® R-1 n R-1 R-1 ® R.1 fWAY V a a nHASYAIILN- d u P.U.D. R-1 Feet MEADOWS ORS - -J"' _ - SUNDANCE CANYON DR u 'REVOLUTION RD' �• - y a = -3 a I D R-1 a a R"1 c R-1 R-1 AlAMO m R-1 a - R-1 R-1 SUNDAttCE W 0 350 700 �B a - ANY `✓ B PHILADELPHIA ufl �`�S r�;LAKE,�a� 'OAHU LN TIo R_RAMBLERAVF-• = a HfsNCO�KWAY a�_�^N°1` AYE v - g u __ 1 D.—nlName:2a21_0108_ttm -- — - - - -EXHIBIT A-3 -- -- ---- - ---- - - -- - �6URVE�MD, -a TRACT NO. 7383 �IIm�G �l I I sur �° TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP �..�°' �I I I I � ��: I�w• ]°.� � Efir k� .m 9'Gvnd fe u. aAe a V `, I C I n I Iy Y D P OWNER/SUBDMDER: The Roman CotAolic Bishop of Fresno, a Corporolion Sola NO SCALE LEGEND REFERENCE MA11: SURVEYOR: ZLIMWALI' � susm+mw aaxourc -,�A Ivcx. vo svx izu aos, caavnrvx vx,s SCALE 1 "=100' -) <.11.012 Twcz szw, umm < ac w ex. v, vvs o- NOTES: E�1 Im vvmosm mm zmuric �]ew eic.)�waorn (cxuscp , °EN"" ri A, 20 IR a <vaal h a�W a awm "mrtb ar.a' paq. as oa,1 iwv a zzAs<sr. Y �' f+ of T LP3' sgTB c� ..m � �+' 7B �"cs as. rr .✓ RFMAINTIFR A16_. a 'r 23 O 3 } RAR LK BASIS OF BEARINGS: $ Inmie'sv mvm<i''r°u.Ao em 1`'"T°,waw av�.o'i'mav<e<. IAlE � u, • <d4 v.�e.. ] BENCH MARK:.n I $ ca' ro' a' to' 12' I A — RIO RIV DOLCETTA ST, h]MOUNTBVIEN PLACE _ a.m mss 'tr . ws]r r ' •b . w ¢ RFJNA ROAD Is— caumm) 7 ,ls2,.ns I II 0 P-1-fa ONE SHEET ONLY A