The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFMC 2022Appendix VI Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form CERS = California Environmental Reporting System, GPH = Gallons Per Hour, ID = Identification, ICC = International Code Council, LLD = Line Leak Detector, NA = Not Applicable, SW = Single- Walled, UDC = Under-Dispenser Containment, UST = Underground Storage Tank, VPH = Vacuum/Pressure/Hydrostatic Page 1 of 6 TYPE OF ACTION ܆܆ Installation ܆ Repair ܆ 12 Month 1. FACILITY INFORMATION CERS ID Certification Date Facility Name Facility Address City ZIP Code 2. SERVICE TECHNICIAN INFORMATION Company Performing the Certification Phone Mailing Address Service Technician Performing Test Contractor/Tank Tester License Number ICC Number ICC Expiration Date 3. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONS Manufacturer and Test Equipment Training Certifications Expiration Date 4. CERTIFICATION BY SERVICE TECHNICIAN CONDUCTING TEST I hereby certify that the monitoring system is operational in accordance with California Code of Regulations, title 23, division 3, chapter 16, section 2638; that required supporting documentation is attached; and all information contained herein is accurate. Service Technician Signature Date Total # of Pages 10172773 2/18/2022 Bill Wright Toyota 5100 Gasoline Alley Drive Bakersfield 93313 Confidence UST Services, Inc.(800) 339-9930 2209 Zeus Court, Bakersfield, CA 93308 Aaron Perrigo 1073967 8485827 8/17/2022 FFS 1010993708 7/10/2022 OPW 0148613 8/1/2022 2/18/2022 5 Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 2 of 6 5. MONITORING SYSTEM AND PROGRAMMING A separate Monitoring System Certification Form must be prepared for each control panel. Make of Monitoring System Control Panel Model of Monitoring System Control Panel Software Version Installed Attach the post-certification reports if the monitoring system is capable of generating either; ܆܆Monitoring System Set-up ܆܆ Alarm History Report Yes No NA All monitoring equipment is operational per manufacturer’s specifications? ܆܆܆܆ Secondary containment systems are free of damage, debris, or liquid? ܆܆܆܆ Are the audible and visual alarms operational? ܆܆܆܆ All sensors have been: 1) visually inspected for wiring kinks, breaks and residual buildup on floats; and 2) tested for functionality and confirmed operational? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ Are all sensors installed to detect a release at the earliest opportunity in the secondary containment? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ The monitoring system set-up was reviewed, and proper settings confirmed? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ Was the monitoring control panel’s backup battery visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ Does the flow of fuel stop at the dispenser if a release is detected in the under- dispenser containment? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ Does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system fails to operate or is electrically disconnected? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ Does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a release? Which sensors initiate positive shut down? (Check all that apply) ܆ Sump ܆ UDC ܆܆܆܆܆܆ If monitoring system alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring center, is all communication equipment operational? ܆܆܆܆܆܆ Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy in Section 9. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired in Section 9 Incon TS-1001 6.600 Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 3 of 6 6. SENSOR TESTING RESULTS List only sensors tested on date of this certification. List “Sensor ID” as labeled in system programming. Additional copies of this page may be attached to accommodate all sensors tested. Sensor ID Sensor Model Component(s) Monitored Pass Fail ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy in Section 9. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired in Section 9 S1 LS Annular S2 LS STP Sump Disp Boudreaux Not monitored Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 4 of 6 7. LINE LEAK DETECTOR TESTING ܆܆ Check this box if line leak detectors ARE NOT installed. (Do not complete this section.) Simulated release rate verified: (Check all that apply.) ܆܆ 3 GPH ܆܆ 0.1 GPH ܆܆ 0.2 GPH Yes No NA Has the testing apparatus been properly calibrated? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ For emergency generator tank systems, does the LLD create an audible and visual alarm when a leak is detected? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict the flow through the pipe when a release is detected? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off when a release is detected? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a tightness test? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected for kinks and breaks? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Were all items on the equipment manufacturer’s maintenance checklist completed? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Were all LLDs confirmed operational within regulatory requirements? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ LLD ID LLD Model Lines Monitored Pass Fail ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy in Section 9. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired in Section 9 Tank 1 FX1V 87 Underground Storage Tank Monitoring System Certification Form Page 5 of 6 8. IN-TANK GAUGING TESTING ܆܆ Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. ܆܆ Check this box if NO tank gauging equipment is installed. (Do not complete this section if either box is checked.) Yes No NA All wiring has been: 1) visually inspected for kinks, breaks and proper entry and termination; and 2) tested for ground faults? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Were all in-tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup to ensure that floats move freely, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? ܆܆ ܆܆ Was accuracy of system’s product level readings tested? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Was accuracy of system’s water level readings tested? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Were all probes reinstalled properly? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Were all items on the equipment manufacturer’s maintenance checklist completed? ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ Probe ID Probe Model Tanks Monitored Pass Fail ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ ܆܆ 9. COMMENTS Describe all answers marked “No” or “Fail” and proposed remedy. List all monitoring equipment either replaced or repaired. ܆܆ Tank 1 Incon No Probe warning Probe has been bad, have a new probe on order, will install upon receipt. Appendix VIII Underground Storage Tank Spill Container Testing Report Form CERS = California Environmental Reporting System, ID = Identification, ICC = International Code Council Page 1 of 2 TYPE OF ACTION ܆܆ Installation ܆ Repair ܆ 12 Month 1. FACILITY INFORMATION CERS ID Test Date Facility Name Facility Address City ZIP Code 2. SERVICE TECHNICIAN INFORMATION Company Performing the Test Phone Mailing Address Service Technician Performing Test Contractor/Tank Tester License Number ICC Number ICC Expiration Date 3. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONS Manufacturer and Test Equipment Training Certifications Expiration Date 4. TEST PROCEDURE INFORMATION Test Procedures Used Components Tested 5. CERTIFICATION BY SERVICE TECHNICIAN CONDUCTING TEST I hereby certify that each spill container was tested in accordance with California Code of Regulations, title 23, division 3, chapter 16, section 2637.1; that required supporting documentation is attached; and all information contained herein is accurate. I understand that test procedures shall be made available upon request by the governing authority. Service Technician Signature Date Total # of Pages 10172773 2/18/2022 Bill Wright Toyota 5100 Gasoline Alley Drive Bakersfield 93313 Confidence UST Services, Inc.(800) 339-9930 2209 Zeus Court, Bakersfield, CA 93308 Aaron Perrigo 1073967 8485827 8/17/2022 OPW 0148613 8/1/2022 Lake Test Spill bucket 2/18/2022 2 Underground Storage Tank Spill Container Testing Report Form Additional copies of this page may be attached. Page 2 of 2 6. SPILL CONTAINER DETAILS Test Method Developed by ܆܆ Manufacturer ܆܆ Industry Standard ܆܆ Professional Engineer Test Type ܆܆ Pressure ܆܆ Vacuum ܆܆ Hydrostatic Tank ID Spill Container Manufacturer: Method of Cathodic Protection ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other Is the spill container minimum capacity five gallons excluding riser volume? ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* Method to keep spill container empty ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other Spill Container Test Results ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail Tank ID Spill Container Manufacturer: Method of Cathodic Protection ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Nonmetallic ܆܆ Other Is the spill container minimum capacity five gallons excluding riser volume? ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* ܆܆ Yes ܆܆ No* Method to keep spill container empty ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other ܆܆ Drain ܆܆ Pump ܆܆ Other Spill Container Test Results ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail ܆܆ Pass ܆܆ Fail 1 8. COMMENTS Describe all answers marked “Other,” “No,” or “Fail” and each proposed remedy. * Mark here if: Spill containers do not have a minimum capacity of five gallons and require replacement. 87 OPW