HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 108-2022RESOLUTION NO, 10 8- 2 02 2
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND
ADOPTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S
REPORT FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25) TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND
THEIR 2022-2023 BUDGETS, CONFIRMING
THE ASSESSMENTS AND AUTHORIZING
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS BY THE KERN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR. (ALL WARDS)
WHEREAS, Chapter 13.04 of Title 13 of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield
provides for an alternative procedure by which the City Council may provide for the
payment of all or any part of the costs and expenses of maintaining and operating any
public improvements which are local in nature, from annual benefit assessments
apportioned among the several lots or parcels of property within the maintenance district
established therefore; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has filed his report as set forth in Exhibit I,
attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, including the 2022-2023 budgets
for the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts, with the City Clerk's Office, as required by
Section 13.04.130 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed in her office affidavits setting forth the
compliance with the requirements of Chapter 13.04 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code
concerning publishing notice of the hearing on the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts;
and said City Council hereby finds that said notice has been published in the manner
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the above hearing was duly held by the City Council at the time and
place for hearing protests to the fairness of the benefit formulas, the amount of the
assessment on any parcel of property to be assessed and the reservation by the City of
right to elect whether to proceed to perform work by City forces or by private contractor;
and
WHEREAS, any written protests filed with the Clerk at or before the time set for said
protest hearing were considered by said Council.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are found to be true and correct and are
incorporated herein.
2. The Council finds and determines that, for purposes of the majority
protest provisions of Section 13-04.200 of the Bakersfield Municipal
Code, there were not sufficient protests received and, therefore, there
is not a majority protest.
e
S:\PR0JECTS\MAINDIST\2022-2023 MD info\Foltler for City into\TSMD\Directofs Report, Budget, ROI, o q
Resolution\RESOLUTION Tmffic.tlocx in
Page 1 of 3 00RIGINAL
3. The Council hereby approves and adopts the Public Works Director's
Report and 2022-2023 Budgets, and confirms and levies the individual
assessments as set forth in said Public Works Director's Report.
4. The City Council hereby reserves the right to perform the work of
maintenance and operation of the public improvements by City forces
or by private contractor.
5. The Public Works Director is hereby directed to file assessments with the
Kern County Tax Collector and the Kern County Tax Collector is hereby
authorized to collect such assessments. These assessments are exempt
from the procedural requirements of Proposition 218.
S:\PRCJECTS\WrNDIST\2022-2D23 MD info\Folder for City info\TSMD\Director's Report, Budget, ROI,
Resolution\RESOLUTION TrofFlcdocx OF
> en
Page 2 of 3 onlGlvnu
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council J fN the202City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
ll 1 S i , by the following vote:
a
COUNCILMEMBER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBER
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER
V v MI ✓ `�
NZ ARIAS. G ALES, WEIR, SMITH, FREEMAN, GRAY, PARLIER
lr-C. Zi ) TOP.
JULIE DRIMAWS, CMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
JUN 15 2022
APPROVED:
KAREN GOH
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
CITY ATTOR EY
By,
IRIDIANA GALLARDO-KING
Deputy City Attorney I 1
Attachments: Exhibit"I" - Director's Report
Exhibit "A" - Director's Report Benefit Formula
Exhibit "B" - Directors Report Budget
S:\PROJECTS\MAINDIST\2022-2023 MD into\Foltler for City into\TSMD\Directors Report, Budget, ROT, o
Resolution\RESOLUTION Trotfc docx r 7n
Page 3 of 3 0ORICINnLr
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
City of Bakersfield
Fiscal Year 2022-2023
The City of Bakersfield Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts are specifically described in each
of the resolutions establishing the districts and approved by the city council and all are on file in
the office of the City Clerk and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 13.04 of Title 13 of the Municipal Code of the City of
Bakersfield, the Public Works Director makes and files this Report and proposed assessment of
and upon all parcels of property within the districts for the cost of maintaining and operating
traffic signals that benefit the various districts. The assessment includes the cost to operate,
maintain, repair and replace signal poles, most arms, signal heads, controller, cabinet, machine
vision detection system, street light luminaries, conduits, wires and pull boxes, cost of energy,
supervision and any and all other items necessary for the proper maintenance and operation
thereof.
Developers often request permission to install traffic signals on major streets to enhance
access to their development. These "convenience" traffic signals are not required by the Traffic
Authority to regulate traffic flow, but are installed solely at the discretion of the developer of a
commercial site. Such signals do not provide a general public traffic benefit.
Under the "user pay" concept, the private property deriving benefits should bear the costs of
maintenance and operation of convenience traffic signals. On September 28, 1994 the City
Council approved Resolution 161-94 instituting the collection of maintenance and operating
costs of future convenience traffic signals through maintenance districts.
The traffic signals that are operated and maintained under these maintenance districts
benefit the parcels within the various districts. Each parcel is assessed an amount based on
formulas set forth in each of the districts' Exhibit "C" on file with the City Clerk's Office.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GREGG STRAKALUSE, Public Works Director of the City of Bakersfield, by
virtue of the power vested in me and per direction of the Council of said City, hereby submit the
Benefit Formula and Budget for the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts for FY 2022-2023,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and "B" respectively. The Assessment Roll for the Traffic Signal
Maintenance Districts for all parcels of property within the areas of benefit of the Traffic Signal
Maintenance Districts, subject to be assessed to pay the cost of maintenance and operation of
the above described improvements in said territory, is on file in the City Clerk's Office.
Dated: l
GREGG STRA LUSE
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
oF11PKF,�s.
EXHIBI€1 m
OCni,CNP,L�
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
Each parcel in the Traffic Signal Maintenance District shall be assessed the sum of the
amounts as defined below:
Rate:
The rate shall equal the dollar amount shown on the proposition 218 ballot used in the
formation of the Traffic Signal District and approved by City Council at the time of the formation and is
included as if Incorporated herein.
FORMULA
TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT = f (ANNUAL COST OF AN AVERAGE COST OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL
X No of Signals) / % of acreage of
parcel in the district] + ANY COUNTY FEES]"
". Fee will never be greater than
allowed per the prop. 218 ballot(s). If the district formed
before prop 218, than the fee charged at the time prop. 218 passed will be carried over as
the flat rate.
AVERAGE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COST:
The public works department will calculate the
amount of electricity, maintenance & operation costs
are involved with the average traffic signal in the City
of Bakersfield. That amount will be used for this Value.
% ACREAGE
Each parcel within a specific district will be assessed
based upon their acreage within their district. E.g. If
an owner owns 50% of the acreage in a district, then
they will pay 50% of the cost of any signals included
with the district.
COUNTY FEES:
The County Assessors office charges a fee to collect
these assessments on the regular property tax bill. For
the FY 2022-2023 this fee is $0.22 per parcel billed.
o OPKF,ty
i�
EXHIBIT "A" o31�1N^
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
2022-2023
BUDGET
(City Staff Services or Contract Supplies, Materials and Utilities)
Cost per Signal = $3.597.25
No. Of Signals
Budget
TS-1 Marketplace (Ming & Haggin Oaks)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-2 NW Promenade (Rosedale & Coffee)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-3 (Rosedale & Jet way / Rosedale & Coffee)
2
$
7,194.50
TSA (Calloway & Gleneagles & Jewetta @ Milverton)
2
$
7,194.50
TS-5 NW Promenade #2 (Rosedale & Main Plaza)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-6 (E. Brundage & Hayes)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-7 (Mt Vemon & N. Bemard)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-8 (Calloway & Hagerman)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-9 Gosford Village (Gosford & Harris)
3
$
10,791.75
TS-10 The Crossings (Stockdale & Riverrun)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-12 (Panama & Wible)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-13 (Panama & Stine)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-16 (Buena Vista & White Lane)
1
$
3,59T25
TS-17 The Grove (3015 Calloway)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-18 Kaiser Entrance( South H & Berkshire)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-19 Memorial Hospital (34th Street Entrance)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-20 The Grove #2 (Panama South of S. H Street)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-21 Stockdale Hwy(Cancer Center/BCHS Entrance)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-22 San Joaquin Hospital Entrance
1
$
3,597.25
TS-23 Winco Entrance (Panama Lane and Ashe Road)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-24 Riverlakes Gallons (Olive Drive and Calloway Drive)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-25 Artisan Square (Brimhall Road and Allen Road)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-26 Rio Bravo Medical Entrance (Morning Drive)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-27 (Ache Road & Sunrise Crest Street)
1
$
3,597.25
TS-28 (Panama Ln. & East of Wible Rd. (Panama Entrance)
1
$
3,597.25
Gross Budget Amount Required
$
104,320.25
NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
$
104,320.25
� m
�o
`�pRIGINAI
EXHIBIT B