HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 3429ORDINANCE NO. 3429
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE
BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER
15.84 IMPLEMENTING A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT
FEE ON ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT.
WHEREAS, in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
it has been established that land development shall not be
permitted unless adequate transportation facilities exist or are
assured; and
WHEREAS, in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
the policy has been established that land development shall bear
a proportionate share of the cost of the provision of the new or
expanded transportation facilities required by such development;
and
WHEREAS, in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
Circulation Element (Implementation Measure 33) it has been
established that a Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance is a
method of ensuring that land development is adequately supported
by a regional transportation system; and
WHEREAS, the Circulation Element designates the regional
transportation system required to support the adopted Land Use
Element; and
WHEREAS, a transportation impact fee is necessary to provide
a regional transportation system which is closely, systematically
and reciprocally related to the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a transportation impact fee is necessary to provide
a share of the funding which enables local agencies to comply
with the adopted congestion management plan level of service
standards on our local state highway system; and
WHEREAS, payment of the fee specified in this ordinance is
deemed to satisfy regional transportation mitigation requirements
for projects other than major commercial and industrial
developments or significant zone changes and general plan
amendments; and
WHEREAS, alternative funding is anticipated to cover the 70%
unfunded portion of the project list and such alternative funding
will be considered in determining mitigation necessary until
December 31, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 54992 of the California
Government Code have been satisfied as they relate to revision of
planning, zoning, development and related processing fees; and
ORIGINAL
WHEREAS, the City Council, at the regularly scheduled
meeting of November 20, 1991, and the Kern County Board of
Supervisors, at the regularly scheduled meeting of ,
held public hearings to consider a fee for the purpose of
providing the necessary regional transportation facilities called
for in the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
2010 Plan; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices have been given; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of CEQA have been followed; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is in the public interest, necessary
for public convenience, health, welfare and safety; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield and the Kern
County Board of Supervisors have made the following findings in
accordance with the requirements of Section 66000 of the
California Government Code:
1. The fee established is for the sole purpose of
providing transportation facilities as established in the
Regional Transportation Facilities List, as depicted in Exhibit
"A", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth
herein.
2. There is a reasonable nexus between the fee's use and
the type of development projects on which the fee will be imposed
because the fee is calculated in relationship to the trip
generation potential of that development and that development's
impact on the regional transportation system.
3. There is a reasonable nexus between the need for a
regional transportation system and the types of development
projects on which the fee is imposed because all residential,
commercial and industrial projects do, to a measurable degree,
increase the need for a regional transportation system.
4. There is a reasonable nexus between the amount of the
fee and the cost necessary to provide a regional transportation
system as depicted on the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General
Plan.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of
a fee to provide a regional transportation system.
-2-
ORIGrNAL
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as
follows:
SECTION 1.
Chapter 15.84 is hereby added to the Bakersfield Municipal
Code to read as follows:
Sections:
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Chapter 15.84
Transportation Impact Fee
84.010
84.020
84.030
84.040
84.050
84.060
.84.070
.84.080
.84.090
.84.100
Short title.
Purpose.
Definitions.
Imposition of transportation impact fee.
Computation of fee.
Payment of fee.
Use of funds.
Refund of fee paid.
Exemptions and credits.
Appeal.
15.84.010 Short title.
This ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the
"Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance".
15.84.020 Purpose.
A. This ordinance is intended to implement and be
consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
B. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the use
and development of land so as to assure that new development
bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital expenditures
necessary to provide a regional transportation system consistent
with the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan.
C. This ordinance will be reviewed annually and in no
instance in the period prior to January 1, 1994, will the fee be
raised more than the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase.
D. The CPI to be used as a base shall be the "All Urban
Consumers, West - C" as published by the U.S. Department of
Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
ORIG!NAL
15.84.030 Definitions.
Whenever used in this chapter, unless a different meaning
clearly appears from the context, the words set out in this
section shall have the following meanings:
A. "Administrator" means the City Public Works Director or
designee.
B. "Building permit" means an official document or
official certification which authorizes the construction,
alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling,
rehabilitation, erection, demolition, moving or repair of a
building or structure. In the case of a change in use or
occupancy of an existing building or structure, the term shall
specifically include Certificates of Occupancy, as those terms
are defined in Section 308 of the Uniform Building Code 1991 and
subsequent editions as may be adopted by the City Council.
C. "Capital improvements" means transportation planning,
preliminary engineering, engineering design studies, land
surveys, right-of-way acquisition, engineering, permitting and
construction of all the necessary features for any transportation
facility projects including, but not limited to:
(a) Construction of new through lanes.
(b) Construction of new turn lanes.
(c) Construction of new frontage or access roads.
(d) Construction of new bridges and widening.
(e) Construction of new drainage facilities in
conjunction with new roadway construction.
(f) Purchase and installation of traffic signalization
(including both new and upgrading signalization).
(g) Construction of curbs, medians, sidewalks, bicycle
paths and shoulders in conjunction with new roadway
construction.
(h) Relocating utilities to accommodate new roadway
construction.
(i) Other capacity increasing improvements, such as
transportation systems measures.
D. "Expansion" of the capacity of a road means all road
and intersection enhancements and includes, but is not limited
to, extensions, widening intersection improvements, upgrading
signalization and improving pavement conditions.
E. "Fee payer" means a person commencing a land
development activity which generates or attracts traffic and who
is applying to the City of Bakersfield, for the issuance of a
building permit for a type of land development activity specified
in 15.84.050 (A) of this ordinance, regardless if the fee payer
owns the land which is to be developed.
-4-
ORIGFNAL
F. "Land development activity generating traffic" means
any change in land use, or any construction or expansion of
buildings or structures, or any change in the use of any building
or structure that attracts or produces vehicular trips.
G. "Level of service" means a qualitative measure that
represents the collective factors of speed, travel time, traffic
interruption, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and
convenience and operating costs provided by a highway facility
under a particular volume condition as set forth in the 1985 (or
current edition) Highway Capacity Manual.
H. "Regional Transportation Facilities List" means those
projects in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 Plan area which
constitute some of the regional facilities needed to maintain a
level of service "C" or not to permit the degradation of roads
which are currently below level of service "C" as shown in the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan - Circulation Element.
I. "Site-related improvements" means capital improvements
and right-of-way dedications for direct access improvements to
the development in question. Direct access improvements include
but are not limited to the following:
(1) Site driveways and roads.
(2) Median cuts made necessary by those driveways or roads.
(3) Right turn, left turn, and deceleration or acceleration
lanes leading to or from those driveways or roads.
(4) Traffic control measures for those driveways or roads.
(5) Access or frontage roads not identified on Regional
Transportation Facilities List.
15.84.040 Imposition of transportation impact fee.
A. Except as provided in 15.84.090 of this ordinance, any
person who applies to the city for the issuance of a building
permit to make an improvement to land for one of the uses which
is specified in 15.84.050 of this ordinance, and which will
generate or attract additional traffic, shall be required to pay
a transportation impact fee in a manner and amount set forth in
this ordinance.
B. In the case of structures, mobile homes, or
recreational vehicles which are moved from one location to
another, a transportation impact fee shall be collected for the
new location if the structure, mobile home or recreational
vehicle is a type of land development listed in 15.84.050 of this
ordinance, regardless of whether transportation impact fees had
been paid at the old location, unless the use at the new location
is a replacement of an equivalent use. If the structure or
mobile home so moved is replaced by an equivalent use, no
transportation impact fee shall be owed for the replacement use.
In every case, the burden of providing past payment of
transportation impact fees or equivalency of use rests with the
fee payer. ~B~K~
-5- ~
OAIG!NA.L
15.84.050 Computation of fee.
A. At the option of the fee payer, the amount of the fee
may be determined by the schedule set forth below or under
subsection B of this section. The reference in the schedule to
square feet refers to the gross square footage of each floor of a
building measured to the exterior walls, and not usable,
interior, rentable, non-common or other forms of net square
footage. Fee to be reduced by 25% for those housing projects
affordable to "low income" families as defined by Department of
Housing and Urban Development. This fee will be waived entirely
for those projects able to demonstrate that the fee (alone) will
move the cost of the housing from low to moderate.
METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD DEVELOPER IMPACT FEE
SUMMARY SHEET
TABLE I
LAND USE TYPE
TYPE ".. FEE .'
so. PER'u
RESIDENTIAL
:Single Family,
Multi-Family
PER LIVING UNIT
Detached i
2
iNON-RESIDENTIAL PER ADT* TRIP
$1,179
$ 828
PROJECTED
:..' . ~NCOME '] ':
.:. .....[.' .' ...:
$141,708,191
$ 12,183,323
Heavy/Service Industrial 3 $
Light Industrial 4 $
OFFICE COMMERCIAL
Under 100,000 sq.ft. 5 $
100,000-199,999 sq.ft. 6 $
200,.000 sq.ft. & over 7 $
87
38
33
39
41
$ 4,285,611
$ 4,651,668
$ 3,720,954
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
Under 10,000 sq.ft.
10,000-49,999 sq.ft.
50~000-99,999 sq.ft.
100,000-199,999 sq.ft.
200,000-299,999 sq.ft.
300,000-399,999 sq.ft.
400,000-499,999 sq.ft.
500,000-999,999 sq.ft.
1,000,000 sq~ft. & over
TOTAL REVENUE DEVELOPED BY FEE
* ADT: Average Daily Traffic
(with retail under 10K @ 50%)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
-6-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
39
25
28
31
35
44
53
64
71
$ 47,982,813
$214,532,560
ORIGINAL
Because of the benefit to our community resulting from
additional jobs and economic vitality brought on by office
commercial development and industrial development the fee is
reduced by 50%.
Land use type will be determined by the administrator.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) for the various type traffic
generators will be determined using the report Trip Generation:
An Informational Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers
(latest edition).
1. If a building permit is requested for a building with
mixed uses, then the fee shall be determined according to the
above schedule by apportioning the space committed to uses
specified on the schedule.
2. If the type of development activity for which a
building permit is applied is not clearly specified on the above
fee schedule, the administrator shall use the fee applicable to
the most nearly comparable type of land use on the above fee
schedule. The administrator shall be guided in the selection of
a comparable type by the reports titled Trip Generation: An
Informational Report, Institute of Transportation Enqineers
(latest edition). If the administrator determines that there is
no comparable type of land use on the above fee schedule, then
the administrator shall determine the fee by:
(a)
(b)
Using traffic generation statistics from the above
named sources; and
Applying the procedure set forth in paragraph B of this
section.
3. When change of use, redevelopment, or modification of
an existing use requires the issuance of a building permit, the
impact fee shall be based upon the net increase in the impact fee
for the new use as compared to the previous use. However, should
the change of use, redevelopment or modification result in a net
decrease, no refunds or credits for past transportation impact
fees paid shall be made or credited. The administrator shall be
guided in this determination by the above referenced sources.
B. If a fee payer decides not to have the transportation
impact fee determined according to paragraph A of this section,
then the fee payer shall prepare and submit to the administrator
an independent fee calculation study for the land development
activity for which a building permit is sought. The independent
fee calculation study shall measure the impact of the development
in question on the road system by following the prescribed
methodologies and formats for the study established by the
administrator. Such study shall be subject to the approval of the
administrator. Any decision of the administrator pursuant to
this section may be appealed as set forth in section 15.84.100.
-7-
15.84.060 Payment of fee.
A. The fee payer shall pay the transportation impact fees
required by this ordinance to the administrator prior to the
issuance of a building permit for which the fee is imposed. For
structures other than residential structures, the fee payer shall
pay the transportation impact fees prior to issuance of the
building permit. No building permit may be issued for any non-
residential development listed in 15.84.050(A) of this ordinance
until such fee has been paid.
B. In lieu of cash, the transportation impact fee may be
paid by the use of credits which are created in accordance with
the provisions of 15.84.090 of this ordinance.
C. All funds collected pursuant to this ordinance shall be
deposited into the appropriate Transportation Impact Fee Trust
Fund and used solely for the purposes specified in this
ordinance.
15.84.070 Use of funds.
A. Funds collected from transportation impact fees shall
be used for the purpose of capital improvements to transportation
facilities associated with the "Regional Transportation
Facilities List". Such improvements shall be of the type as are
made necessary by the new development. No funds shall be used
for periodic or routine maintenance. Funds collected may also be
used to reimburse city's street capital improvement budget for
funds previously expended to acquire segments of the Kern River
Freeway right-of-way. Funds shall be used exclusively for
capital improvements within the city or for projects outside this
area which are a direct benefit to the city.
B. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are
issued for advanced provision of road capital improvements for
which transportation impact fee may be expended, impact fees may
be used to pay debt service on such bonds or similar debt
instruments to the extent that the facilities provided are of the
type described in paragraph A above.
C. Each fiscal year, the administrator shall present to
the City Council a proposed capital improvement plan for road
construction projects as set forth in Section 15.84.030(C). Such
plan shall indicate the approximate location, size, time of
availability and estimates of cost for all improvements to be
financed with transportation impact fees. Such plan shall be
adopted by the City Council following a noticed public hearing as
set forth in Government Code Section 66002.
-8-
OFII(]!NAL
15.84.080 Refund of fee paid.
A. If a building permit expires, is revoked or is
voluntarily surrendered and is therefore voided, and no
construction or improvement of land has been commenced, then the
fee payer shall be entitled to a refund, with interest at five
percent (5%) per annum, of the transportation impact fee paid as
a condition for its issuance.
B. Any funds not expended or encumbered by the end of the
calendar quarter immediately following five (5) years from the
date the transportation impact fee was paid shall be returned to
the then current owner or owners of lots or units of the
development project or projects on a prorated basis, with
interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum.
15.84.090 Exemptions and credits.
A. The following shall be exempted from payment of the
transportation impact fee:
1. Alterations or expansion of an existing building or use
of land where no additional living units will be produced over
and above those in the existing use of the property, the use is
not changed, and where no additional vehicular trips will be
produced over and above those produced by the existing use.
2. Construction of accessory buildings or structures which
will not produce additional vehicular trips over and above those
produced by the principal building or use of the land.
3. The replacement of a lawfully permitted building,
mobile home or structure, the building permit for which was
issued on or before the effective date of this ordinance or the
replacement of a building, mobile home, or structure that was
constructed subsequent thereto and for which the correct
transportation impact fee, which was owed at the time the
building permit was applied for, was paid or otherwise provided
for, with a new building, mobile home, or structure of the same
use and at the same location, provided that no additional
vehicular trips will be produced over and above those produced by
the original use of the land.
4. A building permit for which the transportation impact
fee thereof has been or will be paid or otherwise provided for
pursuant to a written agreement, zoning approval or development
agreement which, by the written terms thereof, clearly and
unequivocally was intended to provide for the full mitigation of
such impact by enforcement of the agreement, zoning approval or
development order, and not by the application of this ordinance.
5. A building permit which does not result in any
additional generation or attraction of traffic as determined by
the administrator.
-9-
ORIGINAL
B. Credits:
1. No credit shall be given for site-related improvements,
local roads or payments to special assessment or taxing
districts.
2. All other capital improvements for approved projects on
the Regional Transportation Facilities List except for those
improvements deemed site-related shall be credited against
transportation impact fees in the amounts to be established
pursuant to paragraph B.3. of this section. However,
determination of whether a capital improvement will be approved
for credit purposes lies exclusively with the administrator,
unless the improvement is not site-related and is required under
a state or city development approval, in which case credits shall
be given to the extent required by law.
3. When a fee payer requests that a credit be created for
construction of any item on the "project list" including
dedication of right-of-way for an approved road permitted by
paragraph B.2. of this section, he shall submit a project
description in sufficient detail and with complete cost estimates
consistent with the unit costs established via the Regional
Transportation Facilities List support data to permit the
administrator to evaluate the request. Credit requests for land
dedication of roads listed in the Regional Transportation
Facilities List require:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Deed to convey title to the appropriate governmental
body;
Title report prepared within sixty (60) days of
submission thereof;
Value based upon one or more current appraisals
prepared by fully qualified independent real property
appraisers. Selection of appraisers shall be subject
to approval by the administrator.
Credits for land dedication shall be created when the
title to said land has been accepted by the city.
4. Credits for construction shall be created when the
construction is completed and accepted by the appropriate
governmental body for maintenance.
5. Fee payers claiming credits for construction shall
submit documentation sufficient to permit the determination of
whether such credits claimed are due and, if so, the amount of
such credits. The amount of credit shall be actual documented
costs, not to exceed the facility's Regional Transportation
Facilities List Total Cost.
C. Exemptions or credits must be claimed by the fee payer
at the time of the application for a building permit.
-10-
ORIGINAL
15.84.100 Appeal.
Any decision made by the administrator in the course of
administering this ordinance may be appealed to the City Council
by filing a written notice of appeal within ten days after the
decision with the City Clerk, setting forth the grounds for
appeal. The cost to file a notice of appeal shall be adopted by
resolution of the City Council. The City Council shall hear such
appeal at a regular meeting no later than 3 weeks following the
filing of the appeal with the City Clerk. The appellant shall be
given notice of the appeal hearing no less than 3 days prior to
said hearing. The Council may, upon said hearing, sustain or
overrule the decision of the administrator, which decision shall
be final and conclusive.
-11-
O~IG~NAL
SECTION 2.
This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the
Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective on the same
date as the equivalent county ordinance, not less than sixty (60)
days from adoption of this ordinance by the City Council.
.......... ooo ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on JAN 2 9 1992 by
the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWA,",~S, D.;MOND. SMITH, BRUNNI, PETERSON, MCDERMOTT, ~ALVACC~C
NOES;COUNCILMEMBERS: E..~,~)/.~.~.~5 ,
ASSENT COUNCILMEMBERS: /VZ~N'a
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this JAN 2 9 1992
BY E~NCE ~'~' KevinL. McDermott, Vice-Mayor
C E. MEDDERS
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
I
CEEN M. LUNARD NI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
- 12 -
ORIGINAL
$169,653,000 $299,348,000 ($299,348,000) $169,653,000 33 0 $56,000,000
$46,000,000 $150,000,000 $0 $196,000,000 50 20 $53,000,000
$23,066,000 $85,730,000 $0 $108,796,000 50 20 $28,700,000
$1,913,000 $36,249,000 ($36,249,000) $1,913,000 50 0 $956,500
$~00,000 s~3,~30,000 so s~3,230,000 50 20 s2,676.000
~0 SlS,~sg,ooo so s~a,~69,000 0 20 s3,633,800
$245,640,000 $697,718,000 ($430,689,000) $512,669,000 $147,420,300
So s4,000,000 $4,000,000 0 50 S2,000,000
i ii?:ii~~ : : : : $0 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 0 50 $2,000,000
l~:i;~:~:~(e~(w~[en): : : : :: $0 $1,920,000 Sl ,920,000 0 50 $960,000
i~ ~:;!~:~ ~ ~.Ri~t[~) : $0 $1,610,000 $1,610,000 0 50 $805,000
[::=~i~ii~::~N ~: :~: i -:: : ~: SO $4,ooo,ooo $4,000,000 0 50 S2,000,000
?:: .:~i~::~ .-~-i?: i ;=:~ i?-: .~.?= ~::~= ::~. :..;: :::i;':'r' :.. :=.!~:~;:::?::~:::.:: ':i:i? ':
$0 $5oo,ooo $500,000 0 50 S~50,000
?~ii~R'~:~~~):: · ::?: ·: So S340,000 ~40,000 0 50 S~70,O00
so s3~o.ooo $340,000 0 50 s170,000
?;:i:~=:~:C~v:~i=.:= ~:: = = = : SO s5;o,ooo $510,000 0 50
$0 $280,000 $280,000 0 50 S~40,000
SO S~50,000 s150,000 0 5o S75,000
$0 $320,000 $320,000 0 50 $160,000
so ~0,000 $550,000 0 50 s275,000
:..:.'::~/::.i::.i::~ :::.i:.: : -: : ::. ~ .. ~ Ga~ali a~ ~ $5,3s0,000 $5,360,000 $2,680,000
kmtripf2.wkl
.
kmtripf2.wkl ~
Page 1
13-Jan-92
$0 $17,000 $17,000 0 50 $8,500
$0 $17,000 ,$17,000 0 50 $8,500
!~ ~ ~ !~arme?s (wldefl) $0 $17,000 $17,000 0 50 $8,500
$0 $25,000 S25,000 0 50 S12,500
$0 $~7.000 $17.000 0 50 $8.500
~:::~~F~(~) : $0 $7,000 $7,000 0 50 $3,500
so $~o.ooo $1o.ooo o $o ~.ooo
$0 $17,000 $17,000 0 50 $8,500
iii~!~:i~i~ i ~ :: i i $0 $2.8,000 $28,000 0 50 $14,000
$0 $150.000 $~50.000 0 50 $75.00o
$0 $31,000 $31,000 0 50 $15,500
So $~2.000 $~2.000 0 so ~.000
s0 $1~ .000 $1 ~.000 0 5o $5.500
$0 $10,000 $10,000 0 50 $5,0001
i ii::~i~ @ ~:: ii: :. :. $0 $~50.000 $150.000 0 50 $75.o00
i~ $0 $31,000 $31,000 0 50 $15,500
ii::~i~ ~ ~i $0 $~50.000 $150.000 0 so; $75.0oo
$0 $20.0001 $20.000 0 50 $~0.000
:.il ~~i~en) :: so $~7.000 ~ $~7.000 0 50 S8.500
ii~::~ ~ ~): ; ~ $0 $10.000! $10.000 0 50 $5.0o0
$o $13,ooo $13,ooo o 50 ~,~oo
$0, $~3.000 $13.000 0 50 $6.50o
$0 ~ $~0.000 $~0.000 o l 50 $5.000
$0 $20.000 $20.000 0, 50 $10.000
:ar-me~ ~ $0 $48,000 $48,000 0 50 $24,000
~0 ss70,000 $670,000 0 ~0 ~.~,000
$0 $1,584,000 $1,584,000 0 50 $792,000
:: ~N::~@~ : $0 S87.000 $87.00o 0 50 S43.500
~ ~ai~Reioc~!S $0 $2,389,000 $2,389,000 $1,194,500
kmtripf2.wkl ~ *
Page 2
13-Jan-92
SO $1,053,000 $1,053,000 0 50 $526,500
~ R"~n~ B~ ~ (~0 !~a[i~s) . $0 $oo,ooo $90,0001 0 50 $45,000
so $1,500,0oo $1,soo,ooo 0 50 $TSO,ooo
$0 $77,000 $77,000 0 50 $38,500
$0 $102,000 $102,000 0 50 $51,000
$0 S98,000 S98,000 0 50 $49,000
SO $3.ooo.ooo SO,ooo. OOo 0 50 $1 .soo.ooo
~0 $62.oo0 SO2.0OO 0 so S31.ooo
;~i::~~i~ i ~ ii:. i i::i: ~0 Si .soo.ooo $1.500.000 0 5o $?5o.ooo
~0 $7,512,000 $7,512,000 $3,756,000
so $1.320.oo0 $1.32o.ooo 0 50 ssoo.ooo
$0 $1,156,000 $1,156,000 0 50 $578,000
i:.::i;:.~ ~i~ ~ ~i~ so Sa. Ooo.ooo $2.ooo.ooo o 5o $~ ,ooo,ooo
So $18,296,oo0 $18,296,000 so,148,ooo
SO S480.ooo $480.oo0 0 50 $240.0oo
SO $7,000,000 $7,000,000 0 50i $3,500,000
SO so.ooo.ooo so.ooo.ooo 0 so $5.000.oo0
SO ~.ooo.ooo so.ooo.ooo 0 50 $5.000.000
: : So $5.ooo.ooo ~,ooo,ooo o 5o SO,OOO,OOo
so ~,ooo,ooo so,ooo,ooo 0 50 $3,000,000
~ i~n~ Ave~kJe ~ ~ ?. ~ ~ F~'~i P; (widen) $0 $1,120,000 $1,120,0OO 0 50 $560,000
SO $44,600,000 $44,600,000 $22,300,000
kmtripf2.wkl ~ .~~
r _ ~?dt..~,.~ Page 3 13-Jan-92
IMPROVE RAILROADGR~DECROSSlNGS Jr Row ' j' C~'r~TXON ~' O"He~4,UNUm "'mr~u coat ' t~ Roww. coNm~!~;
Pa.ama Road ~ ^~,i. Branch .............2.':L. '_' 'T' "~".' S,00.00b' ' 7 ~ ! .. ~ .....$,~' .; "b~0
Panama Lan.e. ~_Su_n.,~t ,B. ra.~h
Pacheco Road Sunset Branch
Mullet Road t) Artfin Branch
Casa Loma Drive ~ Buttonwillow Branch
Stockdale Highway G Buttonwillow Branch
8. H. 58 {b A. T. & S. F.IB. P. Connection (West ~'La
Hageman Road ~ A. T. & $. F.
Noffts Road Li S. P..Spur
Norris Road Lt S. P. Spur
Ranfro Road e) Buttonwillw Branch
Allen Road ~ Buttonwillow Branch
Buena Vista Road Li Buttonwillow Branch
Old River @ B,,ttonwdlow Branch
South Chester Avenue ~ Buttonwillow Br,~lch
..... ii'~i~'(~R~ar i~r~G'a @ 9. ~'. Spur .......................
Unlen Avenue ~} Bultonwillow Branch
.............. Ss?b!olal - Improve Railroad Grade Crossings
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $10Q,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $100,000 $100,000 0
$0 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
50 $50,000
I $850,000
........................... Sul~ta] - Traffic '~;~i~ .............. ~0; $~ 1:~ ......
IMPROVEMENTS ... i ......... ~0, .~111.552.~0_L. $111.552.000 ~ I ~5,776,0~ {
kmtripf2. wkl r"(7.R_%.~%'b?'~ Page 4
13-Jan-92
$680,245 $3,077,184 $3,757,429 20 20 $751.486
$137,300 $1,028,100 $1,165,400 20 20 $233,080
$2,862.500 $8,837,500 $11.700,000 20 20, $2,300,000
$7.125.000 $11,872.500 $18,997,500 20 20 ! $3,800,000
$341,800 $2,232,100 S2,573,900 20 20 $314,780
$0 $1,403,048 $1,403,048 20 20 $380,610
$3,750,000 $750,000 $4,500,000 20 20 $900,000
$16,635,066 $32,555,735 $49,190,801 $9,798,660
$7,688,000 $1.537,600
$7.688.000 $1.537,600
$262.275.066 $849,513,735 $430.689,000 $681.099.801 $214,532.560
~. ~ :::. ::i :: $681,099,801 $214,532,560
!:ii!?i~ :: il: !: i::~{:~r~ {~mii~!~ : ($77,654.000)
$603.445,801 $214,532,560
$1,111,788,801
$1,034,134,801
kmtripf2.wkl
Page 5
13-Jan-92
CAPITAL IMPFIOVEMENT PLAN
__ Regional Tran ~porta!ion F.acilities
i' _ ": ....PROJECTS ....... _Y__EARj_$.I,,0(?0'S):__' "
F ' ,C. rosstown' i~r~7~way -_S.:_R, 99 to S, R. 178 ' . ................................
Kern River Freeway- Stockdale, .H..w.~( t_o_. S, H, 99
Southern Beltw.a..y...?..W__est Beltway to Cottonw~ood
S. H, 178 - Oswell Street to_ .AJ.f,re..cl_Harrel Hwy
S, H, 99 - Ming Avenue to S. H. 204
S. H, 58 - Real Road to Cottonwood Road
MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
KERN RIVER BRIDGES
Allen Road ~ Kern River
Calloway Ddve @ Kern River
Mohawk Strqe~.e Kern River
Chests, A~enue ~t Kern River (widen)
Manor Street e Kern River (widen)
Fairfax Road @ Kern River
CANAL BRIDGES
Panama Lane L~ An/in Edison west (widen)
S. H. 58 @ Friant Kern (widen)
S. H. 58 e Carloway west (widen)
S. H. 58 @ Carloway east (widen)
Allen Road @ Cross Valley
Carloway Drive ~ Cross Valley
Ashe Road e An/in Edison
Mohawk Street @ Cross Valley
Mohawk Street ~) Carloway
Stlne Road e Arvin Edison (widen)
Manor Street e Kern Island/Eastslde
South H Street e An/in Edison (widen) .....
North Chester Ave~'~"~ Beardsle,~/..(Widen)
_._O_swell Street @ Arvin Edison
cipf2.wkl * Funds to be made available for protection of rights of way, as needed, for each freeway alignment.
· ' .....;· ! ·;" .....,s~6~:~.~_ x
_'__ ' * * ' ~ $196 000
: .- ......; -; .........;. . .. ~~..
· .;_:.:"..~'T.!'.'L:..'E'.'::._;~' ....i1."1~__i~i~
O
: -:- ......;...! ....2...:._"
I .- $784 $924 $600 $695 $
SUBTOTAL - Freeway Projects rll
YEAR ($1,000's)
: .....
~ :.:....! ......_~_~_.._. 3_ ......_,__'-
~ ; S873; $1,127 ! $2,000
"'] .........] ........:,.ooo' z
........... ]" , .... ~'~ ~ :~,d r-
" ; : .... $i,~,tb' -I
Subtoil - Kern River Bridges ~J"' ......... ~ ....... i ......... ' ' '
:ten) $ 0I 0 = S3 ,- .............
. "'_j s3~'~" i"-_-._ .i. "-.-'
,
.... ,__s~o_ ...........................
......... . : $340 ....... ~ .... S51
" ~ ....6 oI '$5oo_ .....::']: ......""" 'n
"' :: "'J: ......~ ....i - ':':. ~':
; , ~ 55oo
": ......._..'T .......T ";"'s26o ....=i
__ : ' ~" $150'
..... _: ....$ 5 ....... . ....'i~: r-
den
...... i"';~ ........
..... ::: ....i___"'! '7 ......i .....s:5;
Page I
PROJECTS
CANAL CULVERTS
Panama Road e Farmer's .(,w.i.d...e.,n) __
Panama Lane @ Buena Vista (widen)
i
Panama Lane ~) Stine (wi,deq)
..... ,P.,a..n.,a..m,~.,.Lq._n..e_..~.. I~a_r_mer's (widen).,
Panama Lane e Kern Island (central branCh}
Pacheco Road e Buena Vista (widen)
Pacheco Road e Farmer's (widen)
Pacheco Road ~ Kern Island (widen)
White Lane e Kern Island (wid?_n.),
White Lane e Kern Island Central Br. (widen)
! Muller Road e Eastside
I .
James
Case Lama Drive @ Kern Island
Stockdale Highway ~ River
Olive Drive ~ Beardslay
Ranfro Road {~ James
Ranfro Road ~ RIver
Allen Road @ Buena ~/ista
Allen Road ~ River
._.B.u. Bn.a.._V!s_ta Road ~ B_ue.n.~ ~iste (widen)
Buena Vista Road ~} River (widen) ......
!'" Fruiiv'~l'~' Xv~'~u~ ~ I~;~rdsle"'~'i;Ni'clen)
;..
; ~lew Stine Road ~ Stine (widen)
':""~'~venue ~ Kern Island (widen) __
Heley Street ~) Eastside, .(widen)
Fairfax Road ~ Ee,.s. tSide (widen)
S. H. 184 ~ .,Eps. T~!q~ (widen)
13-Jan-92
qlt\~
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FOR
Regional Transportation Facilities
5:ii~:.~iii!i;~iiiiii~i i::iii!:ii;i:.~ii:.Z:.i~i~:;Ei:'~E~:;::E:::~:1
......... J ....... .............. .... ..............;.;; ..........
Subtotal - Canal Culverts
$10
$10
$13
$17
$t7
$17
$25
$31
$3~
$12
$10
$17
$7
$t7
$28
$ t 50
$3t
$n
$~0
$3~
$150
$~50
$~8
$20
$t7
$~3
$~0
$20
Page 2
PROJECTS
RELOCATE CANALS
Panama Lane @ Farmer's
..... ~acheco Road @ Kern Island .....
.... S~i~ '~'~tTee~'~ !~!~.d. (S. H. 119 t~hi~9..~~
S. H. 1~ e Eastside ............... ~ $87
Subtotal - Rel~m Canals ..... x ..........
"~RAINAGE CULV~hTS, BRIDGES AND'btTGHES
Panama Road e Caliente Creek Bypass
Shal~e A~nue Box Cul~s (10 I~tions)
Shalane Avenue Bridges (3 Io~ti~s)
College Avenue Box Cul~ns (8 Ionlions)
Paladino Dri~ Box Culve~s (5 locations)
A~red Harrel Rwy Box Culverts (7 Io~tions)
Morning Dh~ Box Culve~ (1 I~ation - S.R.178 to AIf. Harrell)
Morning D~ Bridge (1 lar~ & 1 small) '
Edith Road Box CulveRs (4 locations - S.R.~ to AIf. Harrell)
Edi~n Rpad Bridges (~ I~tions) ·
Subtotal - Drainage Culvem, Bri~s and Ditches .............. j
STATE H~ BRIDGESIINTERCHANG~S
Taft Highway @ S. H. 99 (widen)
Panama Lane @ S. H. 99 (widen)
White Lane @ S. H. 99 (_w_iden_L
Olive Drive @ S. H. 99 (widen)
7th Standard R~i~d @ S. H. 99 (widen)
Fairfax Road @ S. H. 58 (widen)
Fairfax Read ~'~. H. 178 (intercha~'~]"e)
Fairfax Road @ Alfred Harrel Hwy (widen)
Morning Drive @ Alfred Harrel H_w_y (!nterchange)
_Stare _Hwy. el:!~q~.~!_n..t_e_.rchanges
CAPITAL IMPFIOVEMENT PLAN
FOR
R_eg.!o.n_a!. T~'ansportation Facilities
....................... Y__EAR (Sl ,Q00'S)
1 2 3 4
$48
$100
$471
$960
$1,000 $680
$1,700
$849
$670
$1,584
$1,053
$90
$1,500
$77
$1 O2
$98
$30
$3,000
$62
$1,500
$1,680
$1,156
$2,000 $4,000
$1,700
$2,000
13-Jan-92
Page 3
PROJECTS
RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATIONS
S. H. 58 ~ A. T. & S: .F. (w..i.d_.e..n..).
Oli_ve .D..r!~.e..@ S. P.
7th Standard Road @ S~ ~. ' ...........................
CalloweX Drive e A. T. & S.F. _ ..............
Coffee Road el A. T. & S. F.
' Mohawk Street 'e) A. T. & S.F. ""
Oswell Street el A. T. & S. F.IS. P.
'Morning..D_n.'.ve_@ ~,.~;'~'~. F.IS. P..' ............
Mr. Vernon Avenue e A- T, & S. F.IS. P. _(w!. .d~..n)
Subtotal - Railroad Grade Separation. s`
"iMPROVE RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING.S"
' ~anama Roa{~ @'~Tvin Branch
Panama L~e (i) Sunset Bra~'~h ...............
Pacheco Road Sunset Branch
Muller Road @ An/in Branch
Case Loma Drive @ Buttonwi~w Branch
Stockdale HIghway ~ Buttonwillow Branch
S. H. 58 e A. T. & S. F.IB. P. Connection (1Vest of Landco)
Hagamen Road ~ A. T. & S. F.
Norris Road e S. P. Spur
Norris Road @ S. P. Spur
Ranfro Road ~ Buttonwillow Branch
Allen Road el Buttonwillow Branch
Buena Vista Road @ Buttonwillow Branch
Old River el Buttonwillow Bran{~h
South Chester Avenue e Buttonwillow Branch
North Chester Avenue ~ S. P. Spur
! Union Avenue el Button_willow Branch
i ....... Suht. o..t~!..-.. I_..m. prove_Ra. il_ro_a_d Gra~l.e..C. rossings
CAPITAL IMPFIOVEMENT PLAN
FOR
Raglone! Transportation Facilities
t7" ........... YEAR ($1.000's)
1 2 _.. 3 4
$547
$1,054
$100
$100
$100
$480
$7,000
$6,000
$6,000
$453 $5,000
$6,000
$4,946
$6,000
$1,120
$1 O0
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
13-Jan-92
Page 4
CAPITAL IMPFIOVEMENT PLAN
FOR
Regional Transportation Facilities
::::::::::::.::? S~:::: ~ ~ ;Me{r~ ~ ~ ~::i:~;i :'; i $3,757
:~:.::; S~ ~ ~ ~ $1,165 $0
$11,700
; ~ :~;~:~:~ S~:~:: ~ ~:: ~:~N ~ ~:: ~:~ ~:~:~?~:::?:~:::~:~:::~ :~:~ ~:~ :~:.?::: ::::;~ ;::~:~;~ ?:~?: ~: ~;~::~ ~::~:'~ ~;~ :' ~;:'~::$ 2,574
o C T
13-Jan-92 (7./=jy~cj Page 5
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)
County of Kern)
CAROL WILLIAMS,
That she is the
of Bakersfield;
Being duly sworn, deposes and says:
duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City
and that on the 5th day of _ February , 19 92 she
posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of
the following: Ordinance No. 3429 passed by the Bakersfield
City Council at a meeting held on the 29Eh day of _ January .... 1992
and entitled:
NSAOPD
/s/ CAROL WILLIAMS
CITY CLERK of the City of Bakersfield
DEPUTY City Clerk