HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 3507ORDINANCE NO. 3 ~ 0 7'
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE SEVENTEEN OF
THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING
MAP NO. 102-18 BY CHANGING THE ZONING OF 7.94 ±
ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH7vVEST
CORNER OF HAGEMAN ROAD AND VERDUGO LANE
FROM AN A-20A (AGRICULTURE-20 ACRE MINIMUM
LOT SIZE) ZONE TO A C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure set forth in the provisions of
Title 17 of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, the Planning Commission held
a public hearing on a petition to change the land use zoning of those certain properties
in the City of Bakersfield generally located at the northwest corner of Hageman Road
and Verdugo Lane~ and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 61-92 on November 5, 1992, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17 of
the Municipal Code to approve a zone change on the subject property from an A-20A
(Agriculture-20 acre minimum lot size) zone to a C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone
as delineated on attached Zoning Map No. 102-18 marked Exhibit "A", and this Council
has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as a result of said hearing, did
make several general and specific findings of fact which warranted a negative declaration
of environmental impact and changes in zoning of the subject property from an A-20A
(Agriculture-20 acre minimum lot size) zone to a C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone
and the Council has considered said findings and all appear to be true and correct; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and
adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's
CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff, the Planning
Commission and this Council; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was advertised and posted on October
13, 1992, in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the general plan designation for this area allows commercial
development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered and hereby makes the
following findings:
1. All required public notices have been given.
ORIGINAL
2. The provisions of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have
been met through the preparation of an initial study and a negative declaration which
indicate no significant environmental impact will occur as a result of the proposed zone
change.
3. That the proposed Zone Change No. 5368 is consistent with the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
4. The proposed zoning will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment.
5. Conditions of approval attached to the project as Exhibit "C" are
included in the project to minimize and/or mitigate impacts, and to ensure that the
density allowed by the general plan is not exceeded.
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined after due consideration of
said petition and the recommendations of the Planning Commission herein on file,
together with the reasons advanced at the hearing for changes in zoning of said
properties, that the zone changes should be authorized.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield as follows:
1. All of the foregoing recitals are hereby found to be true and correct.
2. The Negative Declaration is hereby approved and adopted.
3. Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map No. 102-18) of the Municipal Code of
the City of Bakersfield be and the same is hereby amended by changing the land use
zoning of that certain property in said City, the boundaries of which property is shown
on the map marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and are more
specifically described in attached Exhibit "B."
4. Such zone change is hereby made subject to the conditions of approval
listed in Exhibit "C."
SECTION 2.
This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield
Municipal Code and shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days from and after
the date of its passage.
-2-
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and
adopt~d~y the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
$ ~ , by the following vote:
~¥ES:C.O~C,.NEI,~4~.EDWARDS, DEMOND, ~..I~[~t~ BRUNNI, KANE, MCDERIdOTT, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNCILMF-M~ES¢3 ..................... ~'~ ~ ~.
ABSENT COUNCILME MBERS: ,~/0/~1~: '
ABSTAIN COUNCILMEMBER,~'
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED FEB __
BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
res\o5368.cc
-3-
ORIGINAL
m
rtl
CiTY OF 8AK£RSFIELD
ZONING MAP
SEC. 18 I 29s
LEGEND
102 -18
EXHIBIT "B"
Zone Change No. 5368
FROM AN A-20A (AGRICULTURE-20 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) ZONE TO A
C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) ZONE:
All of Lot 81 of Tract 5494 in the City of Bakersfield. recorded
A0ril 21, 1992, in Book 39 of Maos at Page 82. in the Office of
the Kern County Recorder.
EXCEPT that portion being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot, from which
point the Southwest corner thereof bears S88°56'46"W, 379.67
feet; thence along said South line, N88o56'46"E, 122.75 feet and
S89o54'48"E, 309.80 feet; thence N45°26'36"E, 28.46 feet to a
ooint on the East line of said Lot; thence along said East line
N00o47'59"E, 280.75 feet and N2"40'12"E, 89.36 feet; thence
N89o54'48"W, 460.30 feet; thence S0°05'12"W, 392.44 feet to the
point of beginning.
Containing 7.94 Acres, More or Less.
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT
Conditions of Approval
Zone Change No. 5368
Local traffic mitigation fees shall be paid in accordance with GPA 4-89, Segment
V. The traffic study prepared for that segment projected specific densities for the
project area and analyzed the traffic generated from those densities. The
applicant shall provide documentation in the form of an engineering analysis to
confirm that a C-I use will not exceed the trips anticipated in the original
proposal for the Polo Grounds. If the analysis indicates a higher amount of trips
from the zone change area, then the subdivider/developer creating the trips shall
pay additional proportionate traffic mitigation fees.
2. All applicable conditions of GPA 1-91, Segment III, shall be complied with.
The previously approved drainage plan submitted for this area by the applicant
required the project area to retain its drainage on-site. The City will not maintain
new drainage facilities for the area, and it does not appear that capacity remains
in existing facilities to accommodate drainage from the project area. Upon
subdivision/development, provisions satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be
provided to ensure perpetual maintenance of any required drainage facilities for
the project area.
ORIGINAL
(Prepared October 29, 1992 - DR)