HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/20/91MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Held Thursday, June 20, 1991, 5:30 p.m., City Council Chamber, City
Hall, 1501Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California.'
1. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS:
Present:
KATE ROSENLIEB', Chairperson
JIM MARINO, Vice Chairperson
STEVE ANDERSON
TERI BJORN
DAVID COHN
STEVE MESSNER
DARREN POWERS
C. ROBERT FRAPWELL, Alternate
ADVISORY MEMBERS: Present:
LAURA MARINO, Deputy City Attorney
FRED KLOEPPER, Assistant Public Works
Director
CAL BIDWELL, Building Director
STAFF: Present:
JACK HARDISTY, Planning Director
MIKE LEE, Assistant Planner~
MARC GAUTHIER, Principal Planner~
ISABEL WILLIAMS, Recording~Secretary
2. COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN 1-91 (CENTERCAL PROPERTIES)
Commissioner Bjorn declared a conflict of interest. The applicant is a
client of her law firm.
Applicant requested a continuance to the next regular meeting.
Motion was made Commissioner Marino to continue this matter to the July
18, 1991 meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and
carried. · .j~
AGENDA ITEM #9.A.1) was inadvertently placed under communications
instead of an action item. A request was made to move it to AGENDA
ITEM #3.2. Motion was made by Commissioner Powers to move the item.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Marino, and carried.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
Page 2
3. APPROVAL OF ACCESS' (G.W. WILLSON)
Applicant ~equested determination on adequacy of access to parcels cre-
ated by Parcel Map Waiver 13-90 located at 2660 Sunny Lane.: The parcel
map waiver'divides one C-2 zoned parcel-int-o eight parcels for develop-
ment as residential apartments. Seven of the proposed parcels do not
have approved access.
Earl Smith and Hubert Dobbs, property owners of subject property were
present. ~
Motion was made by Commissioner Marino to find that the easement shown
is adequate for the purposes of access in accordance with the June 17,
1991 memo labeled Exhibit A. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Powers, and carried.
4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9626 (PORTER-ROBERTSON ENGINEERING)
Chairperson noted this item is categorically exempt.
Tentative parcel map is located on the west side of Valley Street,
south of Hickock Avenue and contains two lots on 42.65 acres, zoned R-1.
Public hearing was opened. _.
Mr. Randy Bergquist with Porter-Robertson was present and requested
deferral of Public Works Condition II as listed in the memo dated June
19, 1991 with the following addition, "until future subdivision of the
construction of sewers within Vista Montana Drive."
Mr. Kloepper was amenable and suggested the following verbiage to be
placed just in front of the second sentence; "At the time of develop-
ment on, _or division of, either parcel main lines for dry line system
shall be' installed in Vista Montana Drive."
Mr. Bergquist referred to Building Department Condition 1 and requested
that soils report and grading plan be submitted and approved .prior to
issuance of building permit. ~
Mr. Bidwell replied that it would appear that these parcels would be
broken down into single family lots and said that the Preliminary
soils-report and grading plan could be deferred until further subdivi-
sion or prior to the issuance of a building permit.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was closed.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
Page 3
4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9626 (PORTER-ROBERTSON ENGINEERING) (continued)
Motion was made by Commissioner Marino to make all ~indings set forth
in the s%'aif report and approve Tentative Parcel Map 9626 subject to
the conditions outlined-in Exhibit A and amended by the June 20, 1991
Planning Department memo, the June 19, 1991 Public Works memo with the
following changes to said June 19th memo, Condition II, the first two
lines shall read, "Municipal sewer service is not immediately a~ailable
in the subdivision. At the time of development on or division of
either ~arcel, main lines for a dry line system shall be installed in
Vista Montana Drive in conformance with the approved master sewer study
for the area." Page-4 of 6, Exhibit A, Building Department Condition 1
shall read, "A preliminary soils report and grading plan shall be sub-
mitted and approved prior to further subdivision or the issuance of any
building permit." Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and
carried.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9463 REVISED (PORTER-ROBERTSON ENGINEERING)
This item is categorically exempt.
Commissioner P~ers declared a financial conflict of interest. His
employer own~ property within 300 feet of subject property.
Commissioner Bjorn declared a conflict of interest. The applicant is a
client of her lawfirm.
Tentative parcel map is located on the northeast corner of Coffee Road
and Brimhall Road, and contains 4 parcels on 5 acres, zoned M-2.
Public hearing was opened.
Mr. Berg~uist requested that the words, "or easement" be inserted
between agreement and between in Condition 5.
Mr.. Hardisty was amenable.
Mr. Kloepper noted that on the top of page 2 of 6 should be Tentative
Tract 9463 and not 5488, and same on page 3 of 6.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Messner to make all findings set forth
in the staff report, and to approve proposed Tentative Parcel Map 9463
subject to the conditions outlined in Exhibit "A" and as amended by the
Planning Department memo dated June 10, 1991, and Planning Department
Condition 5 page 6 of 6;-Prior to recordation of a final map, a common
access agreement or .easement between Parcel 1 and Parcel 3 shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning'Director and City Attorney.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Anderson, and carried.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
Page 4
6. TENTATIVE TRACT 5441 REVISED (PORTER-ROBERTSON ENGINEERING)
Commissioner Bjorn declared a conflict of interest. The applicant is a
client of her lawfirm.
Commissioner Marino declared a conflict of interest. His employer owns
property in the area.
'Tentative tract is located on the northeast corner of Hageman Road and
Jewetta Avenue, and contains 363 lots, including one 2.3 acre church
site on 107 acres, zoned R-1 and RS. Phasing has been requested.
Public hearing was opened.
Mr. Fred Porter' represented the engineering firm.
Chairperson Rosenlieb ~sked Mr. Porter if he was~aware of a Fire
Safety Control Condition, page 8 of 11.
Mr. Porter was amenable. He referred ~o Fish and Game fees and sug-
gested that Planning Commission write a letter to Fish and Game
requesting a DeMinimis finding.
M~. 'Hardisty replied that a memorandum has been provided explaining the
reasons why in staff's opinion the fee is required but he agreed with
Mr. Porter's opinions.
'C0mmissioner~Messner commented that he was in favor of writing letters
but did nOt want to put the city in jeopardy.
When asked by Chairperson Rosenlieb as to a continuance so that a let-
ter could be written, Mr. Porter indicated did not want a continuance.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing waS closed.
Motion was made by'Commissioner Powers to approve and adopt the
Negative Declaration, to make all findings set forth in the staff
report, and to approve proposed Tentative Tract 5441 (Revised) subject
to the conditions outlined in Exhibit A of the staff report with the
following changes; Fire Safety Control Condition 4 to read: No struc-
ture shall be built within 100 feet of any oilwell unless the well has
been properly abandoned. ~f the California Division of Oil and Gas
certifies that such a well has been properly abandoned; structures may
be built no closer than 10 feet from such abandoned well. The devel-
oper must provide a copy of such certification to the city prior to
issuance of any building permit for a structure less than 100 feet from
an oilwell. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Frapwell.
It was noted that Fire Safety Control Condition 3 should be replaced
with the change in Commissioner Powers motion, and Condition 4 should
be completely deleted.
Commissioner. Powers .amended his motion to indicate that.
~seconded by Commissioner Frapwell, and~carried.
Motion was
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/.91
7. TENTATIVE TRACT 5494 (SEQUOIA ENGINEERING)
Page 5
Commissioner Marino declared a conflict of interest. His employer owns
property in 'the area
Tentative tract is located on the southwest corner of Noriega Road and
Verdugo Lane, and contains 120 lots on 40 acres, zoned A-20A.
Publi~ hearing was opened.
Mr. Bob Smith wit~'Sequoia Engineering was present.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Powers to approve and adopt the
Negative Declaration, to make all findings set forth in the staff
report, and to approve proposed Tentative Tract 5494 subject to the
conditions outlined in Exhibit A of the staff report, and include
Public Works memo dated June 20, 1991 with the following changes; small
"a" shall be a capital !'A", and item 1 shall be changed to item 2, and
"this" shall be change to "the" in the next word of the last sentence.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and carried.
8. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD 2010 GENERAL PLAN
AND ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The staff report was waived.
Public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak either in
favor or opposition, public hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Anderson to adopt'Resolution No. 34-91
making findings approving the Negative Declaration and approving the
June 1991 Draft of the Housing Element and recommend same to the City
Council for adoption. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and
carried by the ~following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
9. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT I: JAMES C. LUNDY, ASU &
ASSOCIATES (agent for SARA ADLER)
Applicant requested amendment to the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan changing land use designa-
tion from High Density Residential, greater than 17.42 and less than or
equal to 72.6 dwelling units per net acre) to OC (Office Commercial) on
41,100 +/- square foot. site, and concurrent amendment to the
Bakersfield Zoning'Ordinance changing the zoning district from Limited
Multiple Family' Dwelling, minimum lot area, 1,250 square feet per
dwellin~ unit~ to Commercial and Professional Office) zone on a 41,100
square toot s~te located on the west side of Oswell Street between
Bernard Street and Pico Avenue.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
Page 6
9. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT I. & ZONE CHANGE #5126: JAMES C.
LUNDY, ASU & ASSOCIATES (agent for SARA ADLER)
public hearing was opened.
Mr. James. Lundy representing Sara Adler indicated he was amenable to
the conditions listed in the staff report.
There being no one present to speak either in favor or opposition, pub-
lic hearing was closed.
Commissioner Cohn asked about a potential increase in traffic.
Mr. Kloepper replied that it will be an increased t~affic situation but
not to the extent that will decrease the level of service.
Commission was concerned as to the height of the building that will be
built, and placing a condition as to preventing an overlook problem.
Chairperson Rosenlieb reviewed wi,th Mr. Lundy a list of conditions from
a pre9i'ous-General-Pl~an Amendment 2-89, Segment~-Ii.
Mr. Hardisty suggested a continuance of this item to be heard later in
the meeting so that copies could be made of the conditions relevant to
this project and allow Mr. Lundy some time to review the conditions.
Motion was made by'Commissioner Powers to continue this item to be
heard just prior to Agenda Item 7.4a. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Marino, and carried.
10. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT III, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5169 &
REINA NO,. i ANNEXATION: (BATEY DEVELOPMENT)
Commissioner Marino declared a conflict of interest. His employer owns
property in the vicinity.
Applicant proposes a development of 220 +/- units of single family res-
idential homes on 73.79 acres, with 54,500 square feet of neighborhood
commercial on 6.15 acres located at the southwest corner of'Reina Road
and Jewetta Avenue.
public hearing was opened.
Mr. Brian Batey with Batey Development was present and amenable to the
conditions listed in the staff report and the Public Works memo dated
June 19, 1991.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was clOsed.
Commission indicated their concern for an increase in traffic if the
developer decides to build more units that originally stated.
Commission suggested adding a condition of putting a cap as to the num-
ber of~units ~to be.built on this property.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91 Page 7
10. GENERAL _PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT III, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5169 &
REINA NO. 1 ANNEXATION:~ (BATEY DEVELOPMENT) (continued)
.Commissioner Messner proposed a condition that maximum single family
residential shall be 220 units plus 5 percent.
Motion was made by Commissioner Messner to adopt the resolution making
findings, .as~set foNth in the staff report, approving-the Negative
Declaration, with mitigation listed in Exhibit B with the following
change; single family residential units shall be limited to 220 plus 5
percent, and approving GPA 2-91, Segment III,'consisting of an amend-
ment to the Land Use Element from R-IA (Resource Intensive Agriculture)
to LR (Low. Density Residential) on 73.79 acres and GC (General
Commercial) on 6.I5 acres, subject to conditions of approval listed in
Exhibit A of the staff report, and recommend same to the City Council.
Commissioner Bjorn referred to Conditions 4 and 6, page 2 of the June
19, 1991 memo and asked where in Exhibit A are they written.~
Mr. Kloepper referred to Public Works memo dated May 31, 1991
Commissioner Messner amended his motion to incorporate the changes on
the.June 19, 1991 Public Works memo. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Powers, and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Bjorn, Messner, Powers,
Rosenlieb, Frapwell
NOES: Commissioner Cohn
ABSTAINED: Commissioner Marino
-Motion was made by Commissioner Messner to adopt the resolution making
findings, as set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration, with mitigation listed in Exhibit B with the following
change; single family residential units shall be limited to 220 plus 5
percent, and approving concurrent zoning upon annexation request #5169,
consisting of a change-from County A (Agriculture) to City R-1 (One
Family Dwelling) and City C-1 (Limited Commercial) zones,.subject to
conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A, .and incorporating the
public Works memo dated June 19, 1991 memo, and recommend same to the
City Council. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and carried
by the following roll call vote:
AYES:' Commissioners Anderson, Bjorn, Messner, Powers,
Rosenlieb, Frapwell
NOES: Commissioner Cohn
ABSTAINED: Commissione6 Marino
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/9~ Page 8
10. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 2-91, SEGMENT III, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5169,
AND REINA NO. 1 ANNEXATION - (BATEY DEVELOPMENT) (continued)
Motion was made by Commissioner Messner to adopt resolution making
findings, as set forth in the staff report and approving~Negative
Declaration, with mitigation listed in Exhibit B with the following
change; single family residential units shall be limited to 220 plus 5
percent and approying Reina No. 1 Annexation, and incorporating the
Public Works memo dated June 19, 199 memo, and recommend same to the
City Council. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and carried
by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
Commissioners Anderson, Bjorn, Messner, Powers,
Rosenlieb, Frapwell
Commissioner Cohn
Commissioner Marino
11. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT IV, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5165,
AND NORIEGA NO. 1 ANNEXATION (CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING)
Staff report wa~ waived.
Planning Department requested a continuance to the next GPA cycle to
permit the completion of the required environmental document.
Motion was~made by Commissioner Anderson to continue this item to the
nex~ GPA cycle. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and
carried.
12. GENERAL kLAN-AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT I & ZONE CHANGE #5126: JAMES C.
LUNDY, ASU & ASSOCIATES (agent for SARA ADLER)
This item was continued from an earlier hearing on tonights agenda.
Chairperson Rosenlieb asked Mr. Lundy for comment§ regarding the condi-
tions.
Mr. Lundy asked.why Condition 3 was imposed on the development.
Mr. Hardisty replied that was to provide continuity in the streetscape
and give it something of a less intrusive presence on Oswell.
Mr. Lundy indica'ted his concern with limitations on access to the
project because there may be a looping situation around the building
for circulation along with parking, an additional setback might
adversely affect the development, and the station to the north has pav-
ing right up to' the sidewalk. Items 2 and 4 are agreeable as amended
with the buffer on the 'west side.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
12. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT I & ZONE CHANGE #5126:
Page 9
JAMES C.
LUNDY,. ASU & ASSOCIATES (agent for SARA ADLER)
Commissioner Powers asked about additional findings in order~to insert
the three conditions.
Mr. Hardisty replied they would be added as conditions of approval and
those conditions would simply reinforce the findings that the land use
approval is compatible with the adjacent land uses and consistent with
good planning.
When asked by Commissioner Powers as to the requirement Of a typical
landscape setback, Mr. Hardisty replied that none is required, but the
landscaping effect could be fairly well done in a 10-foot strip.
Commissioner Cohn indicated his concern with setback in the landscape.
requirement on the west side.
Mr. Hardisty replied that the minimum requirement setback in a C-O zone
is 20 feet on the rear yard. It is also consistent with the Fire
Department setback for fire access.
When asked by Chairperson Rosenlieb that item 5 may be incorporated,
Mr. Lundy replied he was amenable.
T-here being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Powers to adopt·resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration with mitigatioh measures listed in Exhibit "B", and approv-
ing the requested HR (High Density Residential) to OC (Office
Commercial) subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit
"A", with the addition of the following conditions, and recommend same
to the City Council:
o
Building height shall be limited to two stories.
Any second story windows overlooking residential
use shall comply with the overlook policy.
Overlook protection shall apply for the property
to the west for present and future development.
Provide landscaping to a minimum depth of 10 feet
behind the sidewalk in order to approximately
match landscaping depth to the multi-family
dwellings south of the site.
3. ~ The perimeter of. the rear yard shall be landscaped
with large crown evergreen trees placed 30 feet on
center to screen subject site, buildings and
mechanical-devices from view of residences to the
south and west of the Site.
4. Ail lights indoor and outdoor shall be limited in
-mounting height and shielded to prohibit glare and
. the illumination upon adjacent properties and
right,of_way. ~-
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
12% GENERAL ~LAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT I & ZONE CHANGE' #5126:
Page 10
JAMES C.
LUNDY, ASU &~ASSOCIATES (agent for' SARA ADLER) (continued)
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the follow-
lng roll Call vote:i
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Messner,
Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: Commissioner Cohn
Motion was made by Commissioner Powers to adopt resolution making find-
~ings as-set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration with mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "B" and approv-
ing the R-3-D to OC zone change subject to the conditions of approval
listed in Exhibit "A'", and recommend same to the City Council with the
changes previously referenced in the prior motion. Motion was seconded
by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Messner,
Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: Commissioner Cohn
13. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT V, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5168 &
MEACHAM~NO. 1 ANNEXATION (SEQUOIA ENGINEERING)
Applicant proposes a development of 71 units of single family residen-
tial homes on the. 20.46 acre site located at the northwest corner of
Calloway Drive and Meacham Road. Applicant is also requesting concur-
rent zoning upon annexation from County Estate-Residential Suburban-
minimum 10 acres to City'R-1 along with annexation of 20.46 acres to
the City.
Public hearing was opened.
Mr. Bob Smith with Sequoia Engineering was present and amenable to the
conditions listed' in the staff report.
There being no others wishing to speak either in favor or opposition,
public hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Powers to adopt the resolution making
findings as setl forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration, with mitigation listed in Exhibit B, and approving GPA
2-91, Segment V, ~consisting of an amendment to the Land Use Element
from SR (Suburban Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 20.46
acres, subject to conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A of the
staff report', and recommend same to the City Council. Motion was sec-
onded by COmmissioner Messner,~and carried by the following roll call
vote:
'AYES: Commissioners Marino~, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
.... Mepsner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
Minutes, Pi/C, 6/20/91 Page 11
13.GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT V, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5168 &
.MEACHAM NO. 1 ANNEXATION (SEQUOIA ENGINEERING)
Motlion was made by Commissioner Powers to adopt the resolution making
findings set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative.
Declaration, with mitigation listed in Exhibit B, and approving concur-
rent'.zoning upon annexation request #5168, consisting of a change from
Count~ E(10)RS (Estate Residential Suburban-minimum 10 acre parcel) to
· City Rql (One Family Dwelling) Zone, subject to conditions of approval
listed in Exhibit A, and recommend same to City Council. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the following roll
call vote: ·
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
~ ~ Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
Motion was made.by Commissioner Powers to adopt resolution making find-
ings set forth in the staff report, approving Negative Declaration,
with mitigatiom listed in Exhibit B, and approving Meacham No. 1
Annexation, and recommend same to the City Council. Motion was sec-
onded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
A 20,MINUTE BREAK WAS TAKEN.
14. GENERAL PLAN~AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT VI, ZONE CHANGE #5158 RIVERLAKES
RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (MILAZZO & ASSOCIATES, Agent for
RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL)
Commissioner AndersOn declared, a financial conflict of interest. His
firm is providing services for the applicant.
Existing Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell land use designations were approved
by GPA 1-90, Segment III and Riverlakes Ranch/Unib~ll Specific Plan.
The acreage and'location of the land use designations were generalized.
This amendment would change General Commercial from 10 +/- to 15 +/-
net acres, High Medium Density Residential from 16 +/- to 15 +/- net
acres and High Density.Residential from 17 +/- to 13 ~+/- net acres with
c~ncurrent amendment'to the Zoning Ordinance changing C-1 from 10 +/- to
17 +/- gross acres.
Public hearing was opened.
Mr. Michael Dhanens.with MilazZo and Associates was present and amena-
ble to ~he conditions listed in the staff report as well-as to the memo
dated June 14, 1991.
There being no others Wishing to speak, public hearing was closed..
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91 Page 12
14.GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT VI, ZONE CHANGE ~t5158 RIVERLAKES
RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (MILAZZO & ASSOCIATES, Agent for
~RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL)
Mr. Kloepper noted that on the memo of June 14, 1991, the acreage shows
8.7 and should be 6.7.
Motion was made by Commissioner Messner to adopt resolution making
findings as set forth in staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration with mitigation measure listed in Exhibit "B", and approv-
ing changing GC (General Commercial) from 10 +/- to 15 +/- net acres,
HMR (High Medium Density Residential) from 16 +/- to 15 +/- net acres
and HR (High Density Residential) from 17 +/- to 13 +/- net acres sub-
ject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A with the follow-
ing changes; Condition 3 shall begin, "On the c6mmercial site; Add
Condition 7 as referenced in Public Works Department memo dated June 14,
1991 with the change of 8.7 acres to 6.7 acres, and recommend same to
City Council. ·Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and carried~
by the following roll call vote:
AYES
Commissioners Bjorn, Cohn, Messner, Powers,
Rosenlieb, FrapweI1
NOES None
ABSTAINED: Commissioners Marino, Anderson
Motion to_adopt resolution making findings as set forth in staff
repont,-approving the Negative Declaration with mitigation measure.
listed in Exhibit "B", and approving the C-1 zone change request from
10 to 17 +/- gross acres subject to the conditions of approval listed
in Exhibit A with the previously mentioned modifications, and recommend
same tO the City Council. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers,
and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Bjorn, Cohn, Messner, Powers,
Rosenlieb, Frapwell
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: Commissioners Marino, Anderson
15. GENERAL PLAN 'AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT VII, ZONE CHANGE #5166: CASTLE &
COOKE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Commissioner Anderson deClared a financial conflict of interest.
The subjeCt site consists of 10.7 acres located at the southwest corner
of Paseo Vista Boulevard and Buena Vista Canal.
Applicants propose 37, single family lots.
Public' hearing was opened.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
15: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT VII, ZONE CHANGE #5166:
COOKE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (continued)
Page 13
CASTLE &
Ms. Becky Ullman with Castle & Cooke' Development Corporation and
Roger McIntosh with Martin-McIntosh Engineering were present and amena-
ble to the conditions listed in the staff report.
Public'hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Marino to adopt resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration with mitigation measure listed in Exhibit "B", and approv-
ing the requested High Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit
"A,, and recommend same to the City Council.' Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Powers, and carried~by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Bjorn, Cohn, Messner,
Powers, Rosenlieb, Frapwell
NOES: None
Motion was made by Commissioner Marino to adopt resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration with mitigation measure listed in Exhibit "B", and approv-
ing the requested R-2 to R-1 zone change subject to the conditions of
approval listed in Exhibit "A", and recommend same to the. City Council.
Motion Was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and carried by the follow-
ing roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner Marino, Bjorn, Cohn, Messner,
Powers, Rosenlieb, Frapwell
NOES: None
16. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT ~III, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5131,
AND BRIMHALL #1 ANNEXATION
Amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan changing the land use designation from RR to SR on approx-
imately 46.5 acres and GC on approximately 3.5 acres generally located
eas.t of Jewetta Avenue, between Brimhall Road and Palm Avenue.
Public hearing was opened.
Mr. Carl Moreland with Telstar Engineering handed the Commission copies
of an assessor's map showing the two subject parcels and requested they
be allowed to have the left and middle part in C-1 which would be con-
sistent and match the approved Tract 5417 except for the east 330 feet.
There being.no othecs wishing to speak, public hearing was closed.
Minutes, Pi/C, 6/20/91 .. Page 14
16.GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT VIII, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5131,
-AND BRIMHALL #1'~ANNEXATION (continued)
Motion was made by Commissioner Cohn to adopt resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report approving t~he Negative
Declarati°n and recommend same to the City Council. Motion was sec-
Onded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:. Comm£ssioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
Motion was made by Commissioner Cohn to adopt resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report, denying the request GC (General
Commercial) on approximately 3.5 acres and approvi.ng General Plan
Amendment 2-91, Segment VIII as consisting of a change of land use des-
ignation from RR (Rural Residential - 2.5 gross acres per unit) to SR
(Suburban Residential - less than 4 dwelling units per net acre) on
approximately 50 acres with conditions as listed in Exhibit "A" and
mitigation as listed in Exhibit "B" and recommend same to the City
Council. Motion. was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES' Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
Motion was made by Commissioner Cohn to adopt resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration and recommend same to the City Council. Motion was sec-
onded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
Motion was made by Commissioner Cohn to adopt resolution making find-
ings as set forth in the staff report, approving~zoning upon annexation
#5131 consisting~of a change of zone from County zoning of E-10-RS
(Estate 10-Acre Residential Suburban) to the City designation of E
(Estate) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) with conditions as listed in
Exhibit "A" and mitigation as listed in Exhibit'"B" and recommend same
to the City Council. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Cohn, Messner,
Rosenlieb
NOES': Commissioners Marino, Bjorn, Powers
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91 Page 15
16. GENERAL ·PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT VIII, ZONE UPON ANNEXATION #5131~
AND BRIMHALL #! ANNEXATION (continued)
Motion was made by Commissioner Cohn to adopt a Resolution with
required findings as set forth in the staff report, a~proving the pro-
posed Brimhall #1 Annexation and recommend same to the City Council.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and carried by the follow-
ing ~oll call vote: ·
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
17.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT IX
The project area is located on the-north side of McKee Road, west of
Highway 99. The requested amendment to the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan from High Density
Residential to Low Density Residential on approximately 37.81 acres.
Public hearing was opened. There was no one present wishing to speak
either in favor'or opposition, public hearing was Closed.
Motion~was made by Commissioner Messner, to adopt the resolution making
~findings as set forth in the staff report, approving the Negative
Declaration, with mitigation listed in Exhibit "A" and approving~GPA
2-91, Segment IX consisting of an amendment to the Land Use Element
from~High Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, and
recommend same to the City Council. Motion was seconded by
~Commissioner Powers, and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Marino, Anderson, Bjorn, Cohn,
Messner, Powers, Rosenlieb
NOES: None
18. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT X
A proposal to amend the text of the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield _0~0 General P.~_an to remove the requirement
for a public hearing before the Planning Commission for Class "A" site
Plan Review .Projects and uses in Civic Center, Hospital, and Church
zones within the City of Bakersfield.
Public hearing was opened.
Mr. Devereux, Government Relations Representative for 'the Association
of Realtors spoke in opposition.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was closed.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91 Page 16
18. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-91, SEGMENT X
Chairperson Rosenlieb commented that this is merely a clean-up measure.
The site plan review has been implemented withmuch support from the
BIA, and the BAR.
Commissioner Marin0 agreed with Chairperson Rosenlieb further comment-
ing that if they met with the BIA, and the Board of Realtors and
reviewed .this with them that this is not that big of a problem, they
would concur.
Commissioner Powers commented that he would like to see~it referred to
the General Pl:an Committee for further study.
Mr. Hardisty sugges'ted carrying this item to the next GPA cycle.
Motion was made .by Commissioner Marino to continue this item to the
next General Plan cycle, and direct staff to call a meeting between the
General Plan Committee, Board of Realtors, and the Building Industry
Association committee's. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner;'
and carried.
19. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - AMENDING CHAPTER 17.52 (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT) ZONE OF TITLE 17 (ZONING ORDINANCE)
Staff requested a continuance of this matter.
Public hearing was opened.
Motion was made by,Commissioner Powers to continue this hearing to the
July 18, 1991 meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner,
and carried. ·
20. siX-MONTH REVIEW OF P.U.D. 4709 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AUBURN
STREET A~PROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE EAST OF FAIRFAX ROAD
Staff submitted a written report which-indicated no further appiication
for construction plan check or project review has been submitted to the
city, a field check on June 12, 1991 indicated no developer activity on
site.· The site appeared to be relatively free of trash.
21. DECISION WHETHER TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
IN JULY 1991
Commission decided not to have a special meeting and proceed with i~ts
regular meeting of July 18, 1991.
22. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSIONER CHAIRPERSON AND ViCE CHAIRPERSON FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92.
Moti-on was made by Commissioner Bjorn to nominate Commissioner Marino
as'Chairperson. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Powers, and.
carried. .~
Motion was made by Commissioner Cohn to nominate Commissioner Anderson
as Vice. Chairperson. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Messner, and
carried.
Minutes,.P1/C, 6/20/91 Page 17
23 COMMISSION COMMENTS
~' Chairperson Rosenlieb Stated her appreciation of the report that the
Parks/Environmental Quality Committee has put out.
Commissioner Messner commented that the committee agreed that another
meeting is desirable since it appears that progress~.~an be made.
ChairperSon Rosenlieb thanked the recording Secretary for all her dili-
gent work, and.all her help. She will be missed very much. She also
thanked staff for'their help and support for her year as ~Chairperson,
as well as the Commission.
Commissioner Powers thanked Chairperson Rosenlieb for her diligent
efforts.
Commissioner Anderson quoted the-following from a letter dated May 23,
1991 from the Department of Fish and Game, "We believe the project will
invo~e elimination and destruction of at least some habitat in combi-
natiQn with similar~tosses on other projects, and they are becoming
cumulatively important.", and commented that it does not seem they are
going to approve any DeMinimus that is submitted'to them.
In response, Mr. HardiSty indicated that that is the basis of the fee
for supporting the Department of Fish and Game, and that their position
is conversion from a quasi natural state affects wildlife in the State
of California, and therefore we owe them $1,250 for eaCh negative
declaration.
Commissioner~cohn c~mmented on the Reina and Meacham Annexations and
the fact that traffic studies are not adequate. The school districts
indicte there is not enough infrastructure to suPport proposed
developments. Those concerning should be. looked at mor~ carefully
and perhaps leav~ those areas i'm anlagriculture state.
Mr. Hardisty suggested that staff be given a month to prepare three
working papers evaluating lack of school facilities, problems of traf-
fic and problems'Qf agricultural conversion.
Commissioner Marino commented that the Commission should submit their
committee preferen'ces.
Chairperson Rosenlieb commented that she would like to see staff not
incorporate the DOG's wish list in any future conditions.
Chairperson R0senlieb commented that as chairperson she restructured
the commit~tees and every Commissioner ser~es as chairman of one com-
mittee and every commissioner s~rves as an alternate to one committee,
and she ~would like to see that continued in the future. She also com-
mented that the Chairperson should meet with new commissioners and fill
them in with respect to making motions, etc.
Minutes, P1/C, 6/20/91
Page 18
24 'ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before Commission, meeting was
adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Isabel Williams
~ Se~etary