HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/18/95MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Held Monday, December 18, 1995, 12:15 p.m., City Council Chamber, City Hall, 1501
Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California.
1. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS:
Present:
JEFF ANDREW, Chairperson
STEPHEN BOYLE
MATHEW BRADY
KENNETH HERSH
ROBERT ORTIZ
WADE TAVORN
Absent:
DOUG DELGADO
MICHAEL DHANENS Alternate
ADVISORY MEMBERS: Present:
JUDY SKOUSEN, City Attorney
JACK LaROCHELLE, Engineer IV
DENNIS FIDLER, Building Director
STAFF: Present:
STANLEY GRADY, Planning Director
JIM MOVIUS, Principal Planner
MARC GAUTHIER, Principal Planner
JENNIE ENG, Associate Planner
LAURIE DAVIS, Recording Secretary
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
Mark Ashley presented a speaker's card and requested the commission restrict
the meeting of December 21st to hearing the Marketplace issue only. If this is
not possible he asked that the agenda be changed so that general plan
amendments follow the discussion concerning the Marketplace. He requested this
because of the number of people expected to be present and the size of the issue.
He asked for clarification of the December 21st meeting, December 30th time
frame and January 4th meeting concerning how they relate to one another. Ms.
Skousen said these issues could be discussed at the December 21st hearing.
Minutes, PC, 12/18/95
Page 2
Jill Kleiss spoke after submitting a speaker's card stating they had just received
word that they had won the lawsuit concerning the Marketplace matter.
Regarding placement of the Marketplace issue on the agenda as the last item, she
felt this was not an oversight. She felt the EIR had been pushed through at an
accelerated rate creating a shortened public review time. She stated the
commission has the power to schedule the Marketplace first on the agenda.
Randy Wheeler submitted a speaker's card and stated he had an application on
the agenda in front of the Marketplace, and it had been scheduled early in
September. There are other residents in the city planning to attend to speak to
this issue. He asked that the agenda remain the same as it is at the present time.
Responding to question by Commissioner Hersh, Mr. Grady said the general plan
issues are minor and one item has been withdrawn. The item which would take
the most time would be the Marketplace EIR.
Chairman read the notice of right to appeal as set forth on the agenda.
3. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
4a.
None
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE #P95-0050'& TENTATIVE TRACT
5673 (PHASED)
Mr. Grady stated a letter had been received from the school district which would
require mitigation should the commission deny one of the three projects
concerning subject area. If they are approved the condition would not be placed
on this item. He asked that Agenda Item #5.3 be taken first at the December
21st meeting because if it is not approved a condition would need to be placed on
approval of Agenda Item #5.2.
Staff report recommending approval was given.
Responding to questions by Commissioner Hersh, Mr. Grady said nothing would
be lost for the city with this proposed change. He clarified the PUD contained
smaller lots, this would be a standard lot subdivision in an R-1 zone. The PUD
had private recreational amenities, however this subdivision would not. If the
applicant were to construct homes on small lots within the R-2 zone it would fall
within the current subdivision ordinance.
Minutes, PC, 12/18/95
Page 3
Mr. Grady responded to questions by Commissioner Brady, saying the' ordinance
went into effect December 8, 1995. There is a portion of R-2 property within the
Silvercreek development at Panama and Ashe Road zoned R-3. The proposed
changes would be from R-1 to R-2 at Panama and Ashe Road.
This item was continued to Thursday's meeting.
& b. PUBLIC HEARING - GPA 3-95, SEGMENT V & ZONE CHANGE #5669
5.2a.
&b.
Staff report recommending approval was given. Mr. Gauthier asked that the
following wording be added to the motion for the general plan amendment:
"subject to conditions on Exhibit "A."
These items were continue to Thursday's meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - GPA 3-95, SEGMENT VI & ZONE CHANGE #5672
Staff report recommending approval was given. Mr. Gauthier said he would need
to add a condition outlined in a memo of December 14, 1995, requiring
archaeological studies.
Commissioner Boyle asked if there were an advantage or disadvantage to the city
of having all R-2 property in one location. Mr. Grady said it would depend on
whether this property is developed as R-2 small lot single family subdivision. He
said this size piece does not appear to staff as an over concentration.
Mr. Gauthier asked that the motion be taken from the December 14, 1995 memo.
ReSponding to questions by Commissioner Hersh, Mr. Grady explained the small
lot ordinance requires an element of public benefit rather than an open space
amenity. In the existing ordinance an applicant can request credit because of the
amount of parks in a particular area.
Responding to questiOn by Commissioner Brady, Mr. LaRochelle said there is no
scheduled buildout of Ashe between Harris and Panama; it is expected to be done
with development. There is an update of the transportation impact fee ordinance
which contains Ashe Road in it, therefore if it becomes part of a plan the city
may accelerate its construction as part of the impact fee program.
This item was continued to Thursday's meeting.
Minutes, PC, 12/18/95
5.3a.
&b.
5.5
5.6
6.1
Page 4
PUBLIC HEARING - GPA 3-95, SEGMENT VII & ZONE CHANGE #5673
Staff report recommending approval was given.
Responding to question by Commissioner Hersh, Mr. Grady said the applicant
has indicated their intent to build 249 units.
This item was continued to Thursday's meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - GPA 3-95, SEGMENT VIII & ZONE CHANGE #5671
PUBLIC HEARING - GPA 3-95, SEGMENT X
Responding to question by Chairman Andrew, Mr. Grady stated a letter had been
received requesting Segment VIII and associated rezoning #5671 and Segment X
be withdrawn.
PUBLIC HEARING - GPA 3-95, SEGMENT XII:
Staff report recommending approval was given.
This item was continued to Thursday's meeting.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDING - TRACT 5220 - CONVERSION
OF PUBLIC STREETS TO PRIVATE STREETS FOR KENDALL WAY AND
6.2
WEYBRIDGE DRIVE
Staff report recommending approval was given.
This item was continued to Thursday's meeting.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDING - VACATION OF ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR JEWETT AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD
Staff report recommending approval was given.
This item was continued to Thursday's meeting.
Minutes, PC, 12/18/95 Page 5
7. MARKETPLACE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT -- TIME SET FOR
PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR
Mr. Gauthier stated the consultant would give a 10-15 minute presentation then
public comments would be taken on the draft EIR. Flexibility is available to the
commission concerning holding a second meeting on this issue. It is not required
legally. He asked that crowd control be maintained. He stated a recommended
action will be available in memo form. He asked that any changes to mitigation
made by the Commission be tied to an environmental impact.
Responding to question by Chairman Andrew, Mr. Grady stated the reason staff
feels this item should not be moved forward is because there is not any other
item on the agenda which will create any additional time constraints. The general
plan amendments have not in the past been postponed to another date in order
to reserve an agenda for one lengthy item.
Discussion continued with regard to proceedings for the meeting on December
21, 1995. Commissioner Hersh felt if the 21st is the only date in which the
commission will review the EIR all comments should be in at that time. Ms.
Skousen said a meeting has been scheduled for January 4, 1996. In the event all
comments are not received by the 21st of December, they will be available for the
meeting of the 4th because the comment period ends on December 30, 1995. Mr.
Grady clarified additional public comments can be taken by the commission on
January 4, 1996, however this is not recommended.
Responding to question by Chairman Andrew, Commissioner BoYle said he would
not want to limit testimony to 3 minutes, but would be in favor of some type of
limitation. This could be determined at the hearing when the commission is
aware of how many people are present to speak.
Commissioner Hersh said he would like to play the time limit issue by ear
because of the situation of this being heard around the holidays and the fact this
is this commission's first time in hearing this type of issue.
Commissioner Brady said he would not be in favor of any time constraints or
categorizing them and determining how long people may speak. He was also not
in favor of moving the Marketplace EIR issue ahead of general plan amendment
requests on the agenda. He felt commissioners need to declare all letters and
correspondence received asking staff how they should approach this. Ms. Skousen
felt the commission may want to categorize the letters and declare them by issue.
Commissioner Brady said he tried to avoid taking in information through
correspondence .because he felt it would be extraneous to testimony taken at the
21st meeting. Ms. Skousen said if letters were not read, they need not be
declared because they have not been received as ex parte communication.
Minutes} PC, 12/18/95
Page 6
Commissioner Tavorn stated his comments had been expressed by both
Commissioners Brady and Hersh. He was concerned about all of the
communication received and the method for declaring it.
Chairman Andrew agreed that the other agenda items would not take a great deal
of time and therefore, did not feel the Marketplace EIR issue needed to be
moved ahead.
Responding to question by Commissioner Boyle, Ms. Skousen advised the
Commission not to make comments regarding this issue until the City Attorney's
Office indicates that the litigation is complete. Copies of the court order will be
provided to the Commission.
8. COMMUNICATIONS
A) Written
None
10.
B) Verbal
None
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Hersh felt it would be in the Commission's benefit that the City
Attorney 'give an update regarding the Riverlakes Ranch project which was
previously heard concerning impact fees and the application which was withdrawn.
Ms. Skousen stated this could be scheduled for a meeting in late January. She
stated she would give a complete history and update on the process.
A.
Committees
Chairman Andrew asked Commissioners Hersh and Boyle to scheduled the
following Wednesday for a Sign Committee meeting.
DISCUSSION AND ACTION REGARDING POSSIBLE CANCELLATION OF
THE NEXT PRE-MEETING.
Minutes, PC, 12/18/95 Page 7
11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, meeting was
adjourned at 1:27 p.m.
Laurie Davis
Recording Secretary
Planning Director