HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.7-314HYDROLOGY STUDY
FOR
The Open Door Network Bakersfield:
Homeless Center Campus
Project # 22047.00
June 2024
Prepared for:
The Open Door Network
1921 19th Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Contact: Lauren Skidmore
(661) 322-9199
Prepared By:
David Fidelino
Checked By:
Sean E. Reed
R.C.E. 64620
10800 Stockdale Hwy, Suite 103
Bakersfield, CA 93311
(661) 834-4814
2
Table of Contents
1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................ 3
3.0 DESIGN APPROACH ............................................................................................... 3
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 4
Soil Map .................................................................................................. back of report
Hydrology Calculations ........................................................................... back of report
Inlet Sizing Calculations .......................................................................... back of report
Drainage Exhibit ...................................................................... sleeve in back of report
Reference ............................................................................................... back of report
3
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose for this hydrology study is as follows:
1. To provide adequate sizing for inlets that capture storm runoff in accordance with the
City of Bakersfield requirements and guidelines.
2. To provide an economical and reasonable design for storm drain conveyance and
disposal facilities.
2.0 GUIDELINES
The following design standards were used in the development of this study:
1. The time to concentration is 10 mins since there are no roof to gutter since the roof drains from
the buildings will discharge directly into the proposed storm drain system.
2. The entire site is Soil Group A – Kimberlina-Urban land Cajon complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes.
The soil group was obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Soils Survey. A Soil Map
is enclosed with this report.
3. The runoff coefficient used is:
· 1.00 - Pavement without landscaping
3. Rainfall intensity curves used are those shown on Plate D-1 of the City of Bakersfield,
Subdivision & Engineering Manual.
4. The run-off coefficient will be 1.00 since the analyzed area is impervious and will have an
insignificant amount of landscaping.
3.0 DESIGN APPROACH
The contributing areas to the two StormTech Drainage Chambers are commercial therefore were
modeled as such so that the improvements were accurate. This report studies the required
capacity for these StormTech drainage chambers and the proposed inlet sizes. The project is
bounded to the east by Kern Street, to the north by Dolores Street, to the south by Chico Street,
and to the west by Tulare Street.
Christy Box Inlet #1 is the most upstream end of the northerly proposed storm drain system which
collects a portion south of Building B (Drainage Area 1). Drainage Area 2 (GI-2) will discharge
into grate inlet located on at the center proposed complex. Area 3 consists of the northerly
parking lot off of Dolores Street which drains into GI-3 and adjacent to the underground storage.
These areas will be tributary to the northern StormTech Drainage Chamber. GI #7 will collect the
discharge produced by Area 7 which is a patio area located within Building A. Drainage Area 4
will consist of a portion of the westerly parking lot off of Tulare Street. The discharge from this
area is captured in GI-4 in the middle of a ribbon gutter north of Building A. Drainage Area 5
consists of the northerly parking lot off of Chico Street which drains into GI-5 and adjacent to the
underground storage. GI #6 will collect the discharge produced by the patio area on the westerly
portion of Building D (Area 6). The southerly drainage chamber will handle the discharge from
Areas 4-7. Christy Box Inlets #1, #2, & #4 were sized to be 2’x2’ with a 50% clogging factor while
accounting for the area of the bars. Christy Box Inlets #3, & #5 were sized to be 2’x3’ with a 50%
clogging. Christy Box Inlets #6 & #7 will be a 1’x1’ opening since it only takes a small area within
a building courtyard.
The proposed storm drain lines were not analyzed since the system will be privately maintained
and located onsite, as verified with the City. The required chamber volumes were calculated
using the City of Bakersfield volume equation (V=0.15 x Ʃ (CxA)). The chambers will be designed
to accommodate the runoff from the parking lots, patios, and portions of the building based on the
location of the roof drains. The total contributing areas equal 2.35 acres; this acreage is divided
into the areas as noted on the following page.
4
Area Acres Coefficient C x A
"STORMTECH" SOUTH DRAIN CHAMBER 1.26 1.00 1.26
VOLUME REQUIRED (AF) = 0.189
"STORMTECH" NORTH DRAIN CHAMBER 1.09 1.00 1.09
VOLUME REQUIRED (AF) = 0.1635
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The main objectives of this study were to design an economical storm drain system and meet the
design standards set by the City of Bakersfield. The proposed StormTech drainage chamber will
be located between Buildings B & C on the northerly part of the site. This chamber will be able to
store 0.172 acre-feet (AF) = 7526 cf, of storm water with a required volume of 0.1635 AF = 7122
cf. The other drainage chamber will be located on the southerly end between Buildings A & D.
This chamber will be able to store 0.196 acre-feet (AF) = 8528 cf, of storm water with a required
volume of 0.189 AF = 8233 cf.
SOIL MAP
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern PartNatural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/6/2023Page 1 of 43916020 3916040 3916060 3916080 3916100 3916120 3916140 39161603916020 3916040 3916060 3916080 3916100 3916120 3916140 3916160318440 318460 318480 318500 318520 318540 318560 318580 318600 318620 318640 318660 318680318440 318460 318480 318500 318520 318540 318560 318580 318600 318620 318640 318660 31868035 ° 22' 20'' N 118° 59' 55'' W35 ° 22' 20'' N118° 59' 45'' W35 ° 22' 15'' N 118° 59' 55'' W 35 ° 22' 15'' N118° 59' 45'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS840 50 100 200 300Feet0 15 30 60 90MetersMap Scale: 1:1,140 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATIONArea of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) SoilsSoil Rating PolygonsA A/D B B/DCC/DDNot rated or not availableSoil Rating Lines A A/D B B/DCC/DD Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D BB/DC C/DD Not rated or not availableWater Features Streams and Canals TransportationRails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads BackgroundAerial PhotographyThe soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at1:24,000.Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can causemisunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soilline placement. The maps do not show the small areas ofcontrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailedscale.Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for mapmeasurements.Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL:Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercatorprojection, which preserves direction and shape but distortsdistance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as theAlbers equal-area conic projection, should be used if moreaccurate calculations of distance or area are required.This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data asof the version date(s) listed below.Soil Survey Area: Kern County, California, Northwestern PartSurvey Area Data: Version 16, Aug 31, 2023Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales1:50,000 or larger.Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available.The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines werecompiled and digitized probably differs from the backgroundimagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minorshifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern PartNatural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/6/2023Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
180 Kimberlina-Urban land-
Cajon complex, 0 to 2
percent slopes
A 3.3 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 3.3 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
11/6/2023
Page 3 of 4
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
11/6/2023
Page 4 of 4
HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RATIONAL METHOD(In accordance with City of Bakersfield Standards)TABLE OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENTSR-1, 6000 SF 0.42JOB TITLE: THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK - 529 DOLORES STREET R-1, 6750 SF 0.4DATE: Nov-23 R-1, 7500 SF 0.38R-1, 10000 SF 0.34Rational Values: R-1, 15000 SF 0.27Event: 10 YEAR Values: 5, 10, 50 R-3, R-4, M-H 0.8M.A.P. 6 in./yr. Values: 6, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 Commercial 0.9Water Well Site 0.1Curve Values Parks 0.15 a: 2.38 I=a+bTc (Tc<20min.) Grasslands, Type A Soil 0.15b: -0.058 Grasslands, Type B Soil 0.25P60: 0.550 I=K1*(6.02*Tc)^(0.17*LN(p60/K1) Grasslands, Type C Soil 0.35K1: 40.00 (Tc>=20min.) Grasslands, Type D Soil 0.45Pavement without Landscaping 1.00Pavement with Landscaping 0.9Lawn-landscape 2% slope 0.10 0.17Lawn-landscape 2-7% slope 0.15 0.22Lawn-landscape 7% slope 0.20 0.35SUBAREA C I A rslt Tc L dH Sg Q Street V Trial Tc Roof to Tm D CurbNAME Runoff Intensity Total Time Length Elev. Gutter Flow Type Vel. MIN. Gutter Travel Pipe CapCoef. IN/HR Area Conc. Feet Diff. Slope CFS FPS Time Time Dia. InAC. MIN. Feet Ft/Ft MIN. MIN. In.AREA 1 1.00 1.80 0.12 10.00 59 1.20 2.04% 0.22 2.27 10.00 0.43 1.30AREA 2 1.00 1.80 0.40 10.00 188 1.16 0.62% 0.72 1.81 10.00 1.73 2.62AREA 3 1.00 1.80 0.25 10.00 124 2.39 1.93% 0.45 2.48 10.00 0.83 1.98AREA 4 1.00 1.80 0.36 10.00 143 2.10 1.47% 0.65 2.14 10.00 1.11 2.20AREA 5 1.00 1.80 0.26 10.00 136 2.26 1.66% 0.47 2.51 10.00 0.90 2.00AREA 6 1.00 1.80 0.09 10.00 64 0.50 0.78% 0.16 1.97 10.00 0.54 1.04AREA 7 1.00 1.80 0.02 10.00 20 0.20 0.98% 0.04 1.97 10.00 0.17 0.23Tc CALCULATIONS THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK - 529 DOLORES STREETHydrology_10_yr.xls McIntosh Associates2001 Wheelan CtBakersfield, CA 93311 10 yr Calc10800 Stockdale Hwy, Suite 103
DINLET SIZINGT
CALCULATIONS
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Sunday, Nov 5 2023
Drainage Area 1 - Christy Box #1
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft)= -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 0.85
Grate Width (ft) = 2.00
Grate Length (ft) = 2.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.022
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.022
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.22
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.22
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.22
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 0.52
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 5.98
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Sunday, Nov 5 2023
Drainage Area 2 - Christy Box #2
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft)= -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 0.85
Grate Width (ft) = 2.00
Grate Length (ft) = 2.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.012
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.012
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.72
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.72
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.72
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 1.16
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 18.07
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Friday, Dec 1 2023
<Name>
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 1.00
Grate Width (ft) = 2.00
Grate Length (ft) = 3.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.020
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.020
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.45
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.45
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.45
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 0.73
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 8.07
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Drainage Area 3 - Christy Box #3
50% clogging
factor
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Sunday, Nov 5 2023
Drainage Area 4 - Christy Box #4
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft)= -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 0.85
Grate Width (ft) = 2.00
Grate Length (ft) = 2.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.020
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.020
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.65
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.65
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.65
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 1.08
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 11.01
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Friday, Dec 1 2023
<Name>
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 1.00
Grate Width (ft) = 2.00
Grate Length (ft) = 3.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.015
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.015
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.47
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.47
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.47
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 0.75
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 10.34
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Drainage Area 5 - Christy Box #5
50% clogging
factor
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Friday, Dec 1 2023
<Name>
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 0.42
Grate Width (ft) = 1.00
Grate Length (ft) = 1.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.008
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.008
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.16
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.16
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.16
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 0.67
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 16.04
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Drainage Area 6 - Christy Box #6
50% clogging
factor
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Sunday, Nov 5 2023Drainage A
Drainage Area 7 - Christy Box #7
Drop Grate Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = -0-
Throat Height (in) = -0-
Grate Area (sqft) = 0.42
Grate Width (ft) = 1.00
Grate Length (ft) = 1.00
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.010
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.010
Local Depr (in) = -0-
Gutter Width (ft) = 1.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Q (cfs)= 0.07
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 0.07
Q Capt (cfs) = 0.07
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 0.39
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 7.47
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
DRAINAGE EXHIBIT
PARKINGNONEW GEN ENGINEERING GROUP"STORMTECH"SOUTH DRAINCHAMBER"STORMTECH"NORTH DRAINCHAMBERNOT A PART
NOT A PART
NOT A PART
NOT A PART
REFERENCE