The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZC No. 22-0025PJ: VMS:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2022\22-0025 (75 E. White & 2572 S. Union)\01_Hearing & Noticing Documents\Draft\01_ZC 22-0025_Staff Report.Docx CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: October 3, 2024 AGENDA CATEGORY: 5.b TO: Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Paul Johnson, Planning Director DATE: September 27, 2024 FILE: Zone Change No. 22-0025 STAFF PLANNER: Veronica Martinez, Assistant Planner REQUEST: Zone change to change the zone classification from M-3 (Heavy Industrial) to M-2 (General Manufacturing) in order to allow the continued operation of a trucking yard. APPLICANT: Swanson Engineering, Inc. OWNER: FBT, Inc. Attn: Bob Swanson Dave Laut 2000 Oak Street, Suite 150 2572 S. Union Ave Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA 93307 LOCATION: 75 E. White Lane & 2572 S. Union Avenue APN: 172-140-05; 172-160-14 PROJECT SIZE: 69 acres CEQA: Mitigated Negative Declaration STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (1) Adopt Resolution ADOPTING Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act; (2) Adopt Resolution APPROVING the change in zone classification from M-3 to M-2 and recommend same to City Council. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project site is partially developed with an existing trucking yard. Surrounding properties are developed as north – the Bakersfield Municipal Airport and industrial uses; east – industrial development; south – existing trucking yard; and west – trucking yard and commercial development. BACKGROUND AND TIMELINE: •May 31, 1978 – The site was annexed to the City of Bakersfield. This project site was included as a portion of this annexation area (Annexation 261). •November 17, 1999 – The City Council approved change of the zone classification of 3,461 acres generally located between E. Brundage Ln and E. Pacheco Rd, Mt. Vernon Ave on the east and the majority of parcels with frontage lying on the west side of S. Union Ave on the west from the existing Casa Loma Specific Plan designation to RS-2.5, RS, E, R-2, R-3, C-2, M-1, M-2, M-3, and OS ~ BAKERSFIELD TI-E SOOIO OF~ &I,, Zone Change No. 22-0025 zones (Ordinance 3935). •August 11, 2009 – The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a Conditional Use Permit to operate a concrete and asphalt recycling facility on a portion of the 69-acre site. The development was not completed and has since expired (Conditional Use Permit No. 09-0315). •January 14, 2022 – A site plan review application was received simultaneously with Zone Change No. 22-0025 to allow the expansion of the existing truck yard consisting of 1,202 trucking yard spaces and 418 car passenger-vehicle spaces. •May 23, 2023 – A code violation was issued for the property due to the unauthorized operation of a trucking yard without the necessary entitlement approvals (23-4813). PROJECT ANALYSIS: Zone Change. The proposed zone change from M-3 (Heavy Industrial) to M-2 (General Manufacturing) will facilitate the continued operation of a trucking yard consisting of 1,202 truck parking spaces and 418 car passenger-vehicle spaces. A trucking yard is listed as a permitted use in the M-2 zone pursuant to the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code but is not listed as a permitted use in the M-3 zone. The applicant requests a zone change to allow the continued operation of a trucking yard on approximately 69 acres. The development will also consist of 2 (two) commercial coaches for security and a site manager. The property will be paved for truck storage and drive aisles. Ingress and egress to the site will be provided from E. White Lane and S. Union Avenue. The facility will be open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Site Plan Review. If the zone change is approved to M-2 as requested, an application for site plan approval is required. A Site Plan Review (No. 22-0026) is also being processed as a ministerial action. Pursuant to BMC Section 17.08.060, no construction of any improvements which requires a building permit for renovation of improvements shall be permitted without first obtaining site plan approval. The proposed truck yard has been through a preliminary review by the Site Plan Review (SPR) Committee, as listed below, for compliance with City development standards. The Development Services Director may then approve, conditionally approve, or deny the site plan. There is no requirement for Planning Commission consideration unless the Development Services Director’s decision is appealed. • Development Services Department/Building Division • Development Services Department/Planning Division • Fire Department •Water Resources • Public Works Department/Engineering Division • Public Works Department/Traffic Division • Public Works Department/Solid Waste Division • Recreation and Parks Department (as needed) Compatibility with Land Use Element. Staff has reviewed the proposal for compatibility with the applicable goals and policies contained within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Land Use Element and finds the following: •Policy 31. Allow for a variety of industrial uses, including land-extensive mineral extraction and processing, heavy manufacturing, light manufacturing, warehousing and distribution, transportation-related, and research and development uses. The project is consistent with a variety of industrial uses such as transportation-related uses for trucks. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with Policy 31. •Policy 38. Minimize impacts of industrial traffic on adjacent residential parcels through the use of site plan review and improvement standards. The project is required to obtain a site plan review that adheres to the City's standards and guidelines. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with Policy 38. •Policy 75. Provide adequate land area for the expansion of existing uses and development of new uses consistent with the policies of the general plan. The project site is located on existing industrial land near industrial land uses. Therefore, adequate land is available for the project, and the project expands existing industrial land. Therefore, the project is consistent with Policy 75. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND DETERMINATION: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Staff prepared an initial study to review the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Initial Study was based on the following project-specific analysis and technical studies: Air Quality Assessment; Biological Resources Study; Phase I Cultural Resource Survey; and Traffic study with Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis. The Initial Study determined that compliance with the recommended mitigation measures, local ordinances, state laws, and construction to the standards of the Uniform Building Codes will reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) was prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA. The MND was circulated for a 30-day public and agency review period from June 21, 2024, to July 22, 2024 (SCH No. 2024060954), and no comments were received. Comments Received. As of this writing, no public or agency comments have been received in response to the Initial Study. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Public notice for the proposed project and environmental determination was advertised in The Bakersfield Californian and posted on the bulletin board in the City of Bakersfield Development Services Building, 1715 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California. All property owners within 300 feet of the project site were notified by United States Postal Service mail regarding this public hearing in accordance with city ordinance and state law. Signs are required as part of the public notification process and must be posted between 20 to 60 days before the public hearing date. Photographs of the posted signage and the Declaration of Posting Public Hearing Notice signed by the applicant are on file at the Planning Division. Comments Received. As of this writing, no written public comments have been received in response to the public notice. CONCLUSIONS: Consistency with General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposal is consistent with land use goals and Zone Change No. 22-0025 Zone Change No. 22-0025 policies as contained in the General Plan, which encourages continuity of existing development and allows incremental expansion of infrastructure. Additionally, the project would encourage infill of a vacant expansion area. As noted above, any future development will comply with all applicable regulations and design standards as identified in the Zoning Ordinance. Recommendation. Staff finds that the applicable provisions of CEQA have been complied with, and the proposal is compatible with the existing land use designation and land uses in the surrounding area. Based on information in the record, Staff recommends your Commission: (1) Adopt Resolution ADOPTING a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; (2) adopt Resolution APPROVING the zone change from M-3 (Heavy Industrial) to M-2 (General Manufacturing) and recommend same to City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Map Set •Aerial •Zone Classification •General Plan Designation Mitigated Negative Declaration with Attachments Planning Commission Draft Resolution •Adopt MND with Attachments •Approve ZC with Attachments MAP SET ZONE CHANGE 22-0025 AERIAL I:"! ~ BAKERSFIELD t Feet 0 500 1,000 MAP PACKAGES ZONE CHANGE 22-0025 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD I 'I I '\ ·-·h II I \ ' ~i ~ ...... -...... -< ;. _______ _ ··-··-··-··~ M-1 ! [·-··-··-··-··-••iiiP . . . M-1 PAEHEE0 M-1 . () .. 0~ C: iQ ~:--; --; I-< -< : ! M-1 R-2 R-2 R-1 Zone CLR Commercial Zone Designations -C-2 Regional -Commercial Industrial Zone Designations -M-llight -Manufacturing ~ M-3 Heavy Industrial Residential Zone Designations R-S-2.5A Residential ~ Suburban -2.5 acre minimum 11 R-1 One Family I I Dwelling R-2 Limited Multiple [=i Family Dwelling Zone - I unit/2,500 sq. It. R-3 Limited Multiple ~ Family Dwelling Zone - I unit/1,250 sq. It. ~ MH Mobile Home --Roods c:::] Parcels_ExportFeatures EZJ SITEParcels_ExportFeatu I:"! ~ BAKERSFIELD t Feet 0 500 1,000 MAP PACKAGES ZONE CHANGE 22-0025 RR LR Land Use-CLR RESIDENTIAL LMR LowMedium - Density Residentiol:> 4 units but<:; 10 dwelling units/net acre HR -High Density - Residential,> 17.42 units but<:; 72.6 dwelling units/net acre HMR -High Medium Density Residential:> 7.26 units but<:; 17.42 dwelling units/net acre LR -Low Density Residential,<:; 7.26 dwelling units/net acre RR-RurolResidenlial: 2.5 gross acres/ dwelling unit COMMERCIAL - GC-General Commercial INDUSTRIAL -LI -LIGHT INDUSTRIAL -SI-Servicelndustriol -HI -Heavy Industrial PUBLIC FACILITIES -P-Public Facilities PT-Public -Transportation Corridors RESOURCE R-IA -Resource-_ Intensive Agriculture: 20 acre minimum parcel size --Roods c::::I Parcels_ExportFeatures E:Z:ISITEP□rcels_Exporlfeotu I:"! ~ BAKERSFIELD t Feet 0 500 1,000 MAP PACKAGES Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ZONE CHANGE LOCATED AT 75 EAST WHITE LANE & 2572 SOUTH UNION AVENUE (ZC NO. 22-0025). WHEREAS, Swanson Engineering, Inc. (applicant) on behalf of FBT, Inc. (property owner), is requesting an amendment to Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code to change the Zone District from M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) to M-2 (General Manufacturing) on approximately 69-acres located at 75 East White Lane & 2572 South Union Avenue, as shown on attached Exhibit “B”, (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted and it was determined that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Planning Commission set Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Project as required by Government Code Section 65353, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Mitigated Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by City staff and the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield Development Services Department (1715 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California) is the custodian of all documents and other materials upon which the environmental determination is based; and WHEREAS, the facts presented in the staff report, initial study, and special studies, and evidence received both in writing and by verbal testimony at the above-referenced public hearing support the following findings: 1. All required public notices have been given. Hearing notices regarding the Project were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the Project area and published in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation, at least 20 days prior to the hearing. 2. The provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been followed. Staff determined that the proposal is a project under CEQA. Page 2 of 2 3. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is the appropriate environmental document to accompany its approval as the Project will not significantly impact the physical environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield Planning Commission as follows: 1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by the City Council. 3. The project is subject to mitigation measures found in Exhibit A for the Project located on the map as shown in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October 2024, on a motion by Commissioner _____and seconded by Commissioner ______, by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED ______________________________________ DANIEL CATER, CHAIR City of Bakersfield Planning Commission Exhibits (attached): Exhibit A: Mitigation Measures Exhibit B: Location Map By: VM/S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2022\22-0025 (75 E. White & 2572 S. Union)\01_Hearing & Noticing Documents\Draft\PC\PC RES ENV.Docx By VM/S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2022\22-0025 (75 E. White & 2572 S. Union)\01_Hearing & Noticing Documents\Draft\PC\ExhA Mitigation_75 E. White Ln.docx EXHIBIT A MITIGATION MEASURES ZONE CHANGE NO. 22-0025 Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant/developer shall submit documentation to the Planning Division that they are compliant with air quality control measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. The documentation shall specify that the Project has complied with the SJVAPCD’s Indirect Source Rule (Rule 9510). Biological Resources Impact Mitigation Measures: 2. Prior to ground disturbance and/or construction activities, the applicant/developer shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and United States Fish and Wildlife Service requirements related to listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Geology and Soils, Cultural Resources, and Tribal Resources Impacts Mitigation Measures: 3. Prior to construction and as needed throughout the construction period, a construction worker cultural awareness training program shall be provided to all new construction workers within one week of employment at the project site. The training shall be prepared and conducted by a qualified cultural resources specialist. 4. During construction, if paleontological or cultural resources are encountered during construction or ground disturbance activities, all work within 50 feet of the find shall immediately cease and the area cordoned off until a qualified cultural and/or paleontological resource specialist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards can evaluate the find and make recommendations. If the specialist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and excavation. All reports, correspondence, and determinations regarding the discovery shall be submitted to the California Historical Resources Information System’s Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center at California State University Bakersfield. 5. During construction, if human remains are discovered, further ground disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, Public Resources Code 5097.97, and Senate Bill 447 shall be followed. In the event of the discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c) shall guide Native American consultation. Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures: 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall participate in the Exhibit “A” Mitigation Measures Zone Change No. 22-0025 Page 2 of 2 Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program by paying the adopted fees in place for the land use type at the time of development. R-1 ZONE CHANGE 22-0025 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD M-3 COUNTY M-1 r·-··-··-··-··-·· : CITY M-1 ■■-■■-■■-■■-■■-■■-■■-.. M-1 ! r-··-··-··:::-··1 (Y"). a::! R-3 R-1 i z 0 z ::J I M-3 • CSOlJN-TIY, PAEHEE0 C-2 M-1 R-1 R-3 M <( £!l z. z. w M-1 w R-1 R-1 ci:::; et::· <(, al' ~. ~\l WHFT-E I et:: w al R-1 et:: <( \.!) T""f R-1 a:: M- M-3 R-5 R-5 R-5 R-5-2.SA >.-w l.(l M-1 ..... ~ ~---■■-■■-■•-·1 __ ~ '----1 R-2 R-1 LEGEND (ZONE DISTRICTS) R-1 One Family Dwelling 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size R-1-4.5 One Family Dwelling 4,500 sq.ft. min lot size E Estate I 0,000 sq.ft. min lat size R-S Residential Suburban 24,000 sq.ft./dwelling unit R-S-( } Residential Suburban I, 1.5, 5 or 10 min lot size R-2 Limited Multiple Family Dwelling 4,500 sq.ft. min lot size (single family} 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size (multifamily} 1,500 sq.ft. lat area/dwelling unit R-3 Multiple Family Dwelling 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size 1,150 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit R-4 High Density Multiple Family Dwelling 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size 600 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit R-H Residential Halding 20 acre min lot size A Agriculture 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size A-10A Agriculture 20 acre min lot size PUD Planned Unit Development TT Travel Trailer Park MH Mobilehame (-0 Professianal ond Administrative Office (-1 Neighborhood Commercial (-1 Regional Commercial (-( Commercial (enter (-B Central Business PCD Planned Commercial Development M-1 Light Manufacturing M-1 General Manufacturing M-3 Heavy Industrial P Automobile Parking RE Recreation Ch Church Overlay OS Open Space HOSP Hospital Overlay AD Architectural Design Overlay FP-P Flaadploin Primary FP-S Floodplain Secondary AA Airport Approach DI Drilling Island PE Petroleum Extraction Combining S( Senior Citizen Overlay HD Hillside Development Combining WM-West Ming Specific Plan I:"! ~ BAKERSFIELD t Feet 0 500 1,000 MAP PACKAGES Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE DISTRICT FROM M-3 (HEAVY MANUFACTURING) TO M-2 (GENERAL MANUFACTURING) LOCATED AT 75 EAST WHITE LANE & 2572 SOUTH UNION AVENUE (ZC NO. 22-0025). WHEREAS, Swanson Engineering, Inc. (applicant) for FBT, Inc. (property owner), is requesting to change the zone district from M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) to M-2 (General Manufacturing) on approximately 69-acres located at 75 East White Lane and 2572 South Union Avenue, as shown in attached Exhibit “A” (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the applicant and/or property owner has indicated the purpose of the Project is for compliance with the zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project (SCH No. 2024060954) has been recommended; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Planning Commission set Thursday, October 3, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and change to the zone district, as required by Government Code Section 65353, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the facts presented in the staff report, initial study, and special studies, and evidence received both in writing and by verbal testimony at the above referenced public hearing support the following findings: 1. All required public notices have been given. Hearing notices regarding the Project were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the Project area and published in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation, at least 10 days prior to the hearing. 2. The provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been followed. Staff determined that the proposal is a project under CEQA and an initial study was completed. 3. The public necessity, general welfare, and good planning practices justify the Project. 4. The Project is compatible with the zone districts and development of surrounding properties and is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield Planning Commission as follows: 1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The Project is hereby recommended for approval by the City Council, incorporating the change into the official zoning map as described in Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 17.06.020 located on the map as shown in Exhibit A and as specifically described in Exhibit B, all of which are incorporated herein. 3. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October 2024, on a motion by Commissioner _____and seconded by Commissioner ______, by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED ______________________________________ DANIEL CATER, CHAIR City of Bakersfield Planning Commission Exhibits (attached): Exhibit A: Conditions Exhibit B: Location Map Exhibit C: Legal Description By: VM/S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2022\22-0025 (75 E. White & 2572 S. Union)\01_Hearing & Noticing Documents\Draft\PC\PC RES ZC.Docx By VM/S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2022\22-0025 (75 E. White & 2572 S. Union)\01_Hearing & Noticing Documents\Draft\PC\ExhA Mitigation_75 E. White Ln.docx EXHIBIT A MITIGATION MEASURES ZONE CHANGE NO. 22-0025 Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant/developer shall submit documentation to the Planning Division that they are compliant with air quality control measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. The documentation shall specify that the Project has complied with the SJVAPCD’s Indirect Source Rule (Rule 9510). Biological Resources Impact Mitigation Measures: 2. Prior to ground disturbance and/or construction activities, the applicant/developer shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and United States Fish and Wildlife Service requirements related to listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Geology and Soils, Cultural Resources, and Tribal Resources Impacts Mitigation Measures: 3. Prior to construction and as needed throughout the construction period, a construction worker cultural awareness training program shall be provided to all new construction workers within one week of employment at the project site. The training shall be prepared and conducted by a qualified cultural resources specialist. 4. During construction, if paleontological or cultural resources are encountered during construction or ground disturbance activities, all work within 50 feet of the find shall immediately cease and the area cordoned off until a qualified cultural and/or paleontological resource specialist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards can evaluate the find and make recommendations. If the specialist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and excavation. All reports, correspondence, and determinations regarding the discovery shall be submitted to the California Historical Resources Information System’s Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center at California State University Bakersfield. 5. During construction, if human remains are discovered, further ground disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, Public Resources Code 5097.97, and Senate Bill 447 shall be followed. In the event of the discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c) shall guide Native American consultation. Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures: 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall participate in the Exhibit “A” Mitigation Measures Zone Change No. 22-0025 Page 2 of 2 Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program by paying the adopted fees in place for the land use type at the time of development. R-1 ZONE CHANGE 22-0025 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD M-3 COUNTY M-1 r·-··-··-··-··-·· : CITY M-1 ■■-■■-■■-■■-■■-■■-■■-.. M-1 ! r-··-··-··:::-··1 (Y"). a::! R-3 R-1 i z 0 z ::J I M-3 • CSOlJN-TIY, PAEHEE0 C-2 M-1 R-1 R-3 M <( £!l z. z. w M-1 w R-1 R-1 ci:::; et::· <(, al' ~. ~\l WHFT-E I et:: w al R-1 et:: <( \.!) T""f R-1 a:: M- M-3 R-5 R-5 R-5 R-5-2.SA >.-w l.(l M-1 ..... ~ ~---■■-■■-■•-·1 __ ~ '----1 R-2 R-1 LEGEND (ZONE DISTRICTS) R-1 One Family Dwelling 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size R-1-4.5 One Family Dwelling 4,500 sq.ft. min lot size E Estate I 0,000 sq.ft. min lat size R-S Residential Suburban 24,000 sq.ft./dwelling unit R-S-( } Residential Suburban I, 1.5, 5 or 10 min lot size R-2 Limited Multiple Family Dwelling 4,500 sq.ft. min lot size (single family} 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size (multifamily} 1,500 sq.ft. lat area/dwelling unit R-3 Multiple Family Dwelling 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size 1,150 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit R-4 High Density Multiple Family Dwelling 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size 600 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit R-H Residential Halding 20 acre min lot size A Agriculture 6,000 sq.ft. min lot size A-10A Agriculture 20 acre min lot size PUD Planned Unit Development TT Travel Trailer Park MH Mobilehame (-0 Professianal ond Administrative Office (-1 Neighborhood Commercial (-1 Regional Commercial (-( Commercial (enter (-B Central Business PCD Planned Commercial Development M-1 Light Manufacturing M-1 General Manufacturing M-3 Heavy Industrial P Automobile Parking RE Recreation Ch Church Overlay OS Open Space HOSP Hospital Overlay AD Architectural Design Overlay FP-P Flaadploin Primary FP-S Floodplain Secondary AA Airport Approach DI Drilling Island PE Petroleum Extraction Combining S( Senior Citizen Overlay HD Hillside Development Combining WM-West Ming Specific Plan I:"! ~ BAKERSFIELD t Feet 0 500 1,000 MAP PACKAGES r PARCEL 1: APN: 172-140-05 Exhibit "A" Legal Description FBT, INC. Zone Change ( The East half of Lot 14; the East half of Lot 15; all of those portions of Lot 13 and Lot 18, which lie West of the center line of the Kern Island Canal, all in Section 17, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M ount Diablo Base and Meridian, City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California, as shown on Sa les Map No. 1 of Kern County Lands of J.B. Haggin, recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Kern County on May 3, 1889. EXCEPTING THEREFROM t hose port ions of Lot 13 and Lot 14 described as follows: Com mencing at a 3" brass cap in a lamp hole, same being the East quarter corner of Section 18 of said Township and Range, also being a point on the center line of County Road No. 782, also known as "White Lane"; thence East, 1235.00 feet along the center line of said County Road No. 782 to the True Point of Beginning; thence southerly 430 feet along a line perpendicular to the center line of said County Road No. 782; thence Easterly 456.00 feet along a line parallel with the center line of said County Road No. 782 to the center line of the central branch of the Kern Island Canal; thence northwesterly along t he center line of said canal to the centerline of said County Road No. 782; thence westerly along t he cent er line of said County Road No.782, a distance of 202.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 63.60± acres gross PARCEL 2: APN: 172-160-14 Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 2754, per M ap recorded January 16, 1975 in Book 12, Page 100 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County recorder of said County, also being a portion of the Southwest quart er of Section 17, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, situated in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California. Containing 4.50± acres gross 1 of 1