HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/04/24 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL POST(183 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
POST -MEETING AGENDA
BAKERSFIELD SPECIAL MEETING
PHF SOUND COIF �A�de 91U) ,i ^'i ,�.
November 4, 2024, 5:30 p.m.
City Hall North Conference Room A
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Committee Members:
Manpreet Kaur
Bob Smith
Bruce Freeman
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
a. Agenda Item Public Statements
b. Non -Agenda Item Public Statements
3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a. Adoption of August 27, 2024, Regular Meeting Minutes
Staff recommends adoption of minutes.
4. REPORTS
a. Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan Update
Staff recommends receive and file report.
*1. PowerPoint presentation
b. Chronic Nuisance Properties Update
Staff recommends the Committee discuss and receive and file the report
*1. PowerPoint Presentation
C. Update on the City Facility Assessment and City Space Downtown Planning
Staff recommends receive and file.
*1. PowerPoint presentation
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
8. ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD
Date:
You may address the Council under Public Statements on any matter related to City Business.
Comments regarding public hearing matters will be heard under the Public Hearings portion of the
agenda and a Speaker's Card is not necessary for those items.
All persons desiring to address the Council on an item listed on the agenda shall speak during
the Agenda Item Public Statements portion of the meeting. Please identify the item you wish to
speak on below. Speakers will be limited to two (2) minutes per person, twenty (20) minutes per agenda
item. Note: The Consent Calendar as a whole constitutes one agenda item.
All persons desiring to address the Council on a general item of interest within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the Council that is not listed on the agenda shall speak during the Non -
Agenda Item Public Statements portion of the meeting. Speakers will be limited to two (2) minutes
per person, (20) twenty minutes total. Speakers who do not identify the topic on which they wish to
speak will be presumed speakers for Non -Agenda Item Public Statements and called during that portion
of the meeting.
The purpose of the speaker's cards is to facilitate orderly and relevant public statements during
the appropriate portions of the meeting.
Name: VCx_, ..O—
Agenda Item No:
Non -Agenda Item.
Address: e
Phone
'SpcaAcr . earl become a pan of the Public Record in accordnec wish the Pobhi Rc ,d, Act- Any mfn-6— you provide on this form i, a ilahlc . the Public.
•
BAKERSFIELD
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 4, 2024: Adoption of minutes
TO: Planning and Development Committee
FROM: Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
DATE: October 25, 2024
SUBJECT: Adoption of August 4, 2024, Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of minutes.
BACKGROUND:
Adoption of meeting minutes
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Action to adopt the minutes will have no impact on the General Fund.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:
1. August 27, 2024, Regular meeting minutes
Page 2 of 66
U 1,21
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
`u MINUTES
�^mrroau�.,
SPECIAL MEETING
August 27, 2024, 5:30 p.m.
City Hall North Conference Room A
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Members Present: Bob Smith, Bruce Freeman
Members Absent: Manpreet Kaur
Staff Present: Gary Hallen, Assistant City Manager, Viridiana Gallardo-King,
Deputy City Attorney, Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
1. ROLL CALL
Meeting was called to order at 5.30 p.m.
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
a. Agenda Item Public Statements
None
b. Non -Agenda Item Public Statements
None
3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a. Adoption of April 25, 2024, Regular Meeting Minutes
Moved by: Bruce Freeman
Staff recommends adoption of minutes.
Approved
4. REPORTS
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
1
Page 3of66
a. Review of Sign Ordinance in Commercial Centers and Enforcement of
Sign Standards
Development Services Director Burns made staff comments and provided
a PowerPoint presentation.
Moved by: Bob Smith
Staff recommends receive and file and provide direction
Approved
PowerPoint presentation
7. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
8. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 6.05 p.m.
MANPREET KAUR, CHAIR
JULIE DRIMAKIS, CITY CLERK
2
Page 4of66
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 4, 2024 AGENDA CATEGORY: Reports
TO: Planning and Development Committee
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
DATE: October 28, 2024
SUBJECT: Update on Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends receive and file report.
BACKGROUND:
For nearly 30 years, the City of Bakersfield (City) and County of Kern (County) successfully implemented
the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP). The MBHCP was a regional habitat
conservation plan and state permit that allowed impacts to federal and state listed species resulting from
urbanization and related development activities. Although extensive energy was expended over the last
ten years in efforts toward preparation of a new habitat conservation plan, the MBHCP and associated
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) expired on January 1, 2023, without a subsequent plan in effect.
On February 8, 2023, staff presented a draft Habitat Conservation Plan that was determined to be
approvable by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), collectively referred to as the Wildlife Agencies. The draft plan included:
• A Grading Hold process. Incidental take of protected species authorized via the release of the
"hold" on grading permits.
• Habitat Mitigation Fee increasing from $2,145 to $14,070 per gross acre.
• The 5-day grading permit application review time was unchanged.
• Avoidance and Minimization Measures remained similar to the MBHCP.
• An Urban Kit Fox Artificial Den Program was to be established, with a Kit Fox Biologist added to
City staff.
• A Public Education Campaign with a website and Public Education Specialist position was to be
added to City staff.
• A Disease Treatment & Monitoring Program.
• Funding for one (1) employee with CDFW was included, enhancing CDFW response times and
availability.
• The City and the County were permittees within the new proposed HCP.
• The term of the new HCP/ITP was to be thirty years.
At that meeting, Council expressed concern over the per acre mitigation fee and directed staff to identify
amendments to the proposed draft HCP that would reduce per acre mitigation costs. Staff has continued
discussions with council members along with various developers to understand the range of fee that
would minimize public concern. Staff has been evaluating ways to get this extremely important program
across the finish line which requires a contract amendment that our City Council will not approve without
some certainty that CDFW and USFWL are tentatively in agreement.
Page 5of66
BAKERSFIELD
Number of Permittees
The February 2023 report identified that the County of Kern was not supportive of the HCP as proposed,
which included a per acre mitigation fee of $14,070 with two permittees (the City and County) and a fee
of $15,681 if the City was the sole permittee to the plan. Moving forward, The County of Kern has
communicated that they will not participate in the City's habitat mitigation planning efforts. Therefore,
the current proposal is for a single-permittee plan.
Costs
While the draft HCP presented to the City Council in February 2023 initially suggested a single-permittee
fee of $15,681 per acre, preliminary assessments and cost revisions suggest the possibility of reducing this
figure to approximately $11,000 per acre. Preliminary evaluation and revisions of costs indicate the
potential to reduce costs down to approximately $11,000 per acre. This cost estimate is based on the
assumption of 7,325 acres of development and 5,500 acres of habitat designated for conservation.
The changed assumptions include:
1. It takes people to administer any HCP. The reductions outlined below provide a net sum of 3 FTEs,
down from five. 2.5 FTEs would function as the HCP staff at the City, and % FTE would be dedicated
to the Bakersfield HCP at CDFW. The revised administrative costs are:
a. Principal planner (50% time down from 100%)
b. Associate planner (50% time down from 100%)
c. Accountant clerk (50% time down from 100%)
d. GIS support (50% time)
e. Real estate specialist (50% time) Real estate support would be subcontracted.
f. CDFW biologist (50% time down from 100%)
2. The proposed kit fox program is designed to address the urban kit fox program. USFWS and CDFW
expressed that this is the heart of the new program and desire that it be retained as much as
possible. The kit fox program costs are:
a. Retain full-time on -call biologist (no change)
b. Public education staff (25% time down from 100%)
c. Public education budget ($12,500 per year, down from $50,000 per year)
d. Retain research and disease treatment (no change)
e. Retain den program (no change)
The public outreach component of the program has been significantly reduced. It could be
anticipated that outreach be provided in the form of web -based educational content as part of
the HCP's web content.
3. The land acquisition ratio would change as would the land acquisition strategy.
a. Reduced the number of transactions as a result of larger land acquisitions and fewer
acquisitions as a result. The assumption would be that each transaction is 100 acres in
size (not 50 acres), and that a few larger purchases are better.
b. Reduced mitigation ratio (0.75:1), or % acre of habitat conservation for each acre of
development, because proposed development lands are currently under intensive
agricultural practices. A total of 5,494 acres of high -value land will be permanently
protected.
4. The fee collected to support the program is proposed to be split into two payments. A portion of
approximately $4-5000 to be paid at grading permit issuance and remainder $6-7000 at final
Page 6of66
•
BAKEIRSFIELJ►.
T1 -OUNDQF PAK ion or close of escrow of the actual building permit. As part of the process the city may
need to bridge the gap of funding between the timing at year end or as determined. This would
be part of the analysis.
CDFW Discussion
City staff met with CDFW and Wildlife Agency staff on October 71h to discuss options as outlined above.
CDFW is not able to utilize a part FTE thus that potential cost is an all or nothing item. The latter is tied to
timing of reviews. It was agreed that when a submittal is made to CDFW, it could be earlier in the process
to minimize the impact to the overall project. The second issue is the ratio of replacement habitat land.
The proposed ratio of 0.75:1 is not acceptable as proposed. However, both CDFW and the Wildlife Agency
strongly voiced the opinion of a focused urban kit fox program. Under this new focus the ratio will most
likely go down further, perhaps even zero or 0.25:1. During the meeting CDFW also brought up that the
Burrowing owl will most likely be added the endangered list and thus need to be added to our proposed
plan. It was clear from the conversation that the City needs to pivot and thoroughly explore this option to
understand the cost and development implication.
FOLLOW-UP ACTION
City Staff needs to have a few more meetings with CDFW staff to fully understand the elements of a
focused urban kit fox program. The intent is to provide dens and travel corridors within the developments
to support the species. For example, an artificial den could be constructed in the corner of a fenced sump
area along with an opening large enough for a kit fox to get through but not a dog or larger predator.
There would need to be a pathway to get to and from the sump for the kit fox to travel. There are a lot
of built -out sumps and parks that could have habitat added. Staff need to understand space needs and
operational constraints. Staff have said that ideas like conservation easements over golf courses are not
likely to happen. Clearly this is a different direction than the current plan. There are many unknowns as
this will be the first of its kind plan. Staff needs to determine and fully understand the scope of the plan
changes to be able work with the consultant to evaluate the cost of the plan changes to the current
document.
CONCLUSIONS
City staff will continue to work with CDFW and the Wildlife agency to develop a habitat conservation plan
that is acceptable to the City, Developers and Agencies. This change in concept will take some time to
arrive at solutions acceptable to all. I see this as an opportunity for Bakersfield to be a leader in innovation
toward a complex environmental issue. CSUB and its consultants are working on a similar program for
their campus. Staff can reach out and work together to develop strategies that work for both. I see an
urban Kit fox program as one that will take time to develop long term proven strategies. Partnering may
provide the research necessary to track success and overall health of the kit fox species under this
approach. Staff realize the strong desire to have the coverage of an HCP and associated ITP. Staff will
work diligently toward getting a plan prepared for approval and adoption. Once the scope and
understanding of added urban kit fox elements, staff will bring a follow-up report back to this committee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
COUNCIL GOAL:
Choose an Iitei n.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 7 of 66
(03
B AKIER;SFIE"LD
THE SOUND OF 5Mt,0jkf '�Re#V
MEMORANDUM
August 8, 2024
TO: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Manpreet Kaur, Chair
Bruce Freeman
Bob Smith
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
SUBJECT: Update on Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan
BACKGROUND
History
For nearly 30 years, the City of Bakersfield (City) and County of Kern (County) successfully implemented
the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP). The MBHCP was a regional habitat
conservation plan and state permit that allowed impacts to federal and state listed species resulting from
urbanization and related development activities. Although extensive energy was expended over the last
ten years in efforts toward preparation of a new habitat conservation plan, the MBHCP and associated
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) expired on January 1, 2023, without a subsequent plan in effect.
On February 8, 2023, staff presented a draft Habitat Conservation Plan that was determined to be
approvable by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), collectively referred to as the Wildlife Agencies. The draft plan included:
• Grading Hold process was retained. Incidental take of protected species was authorized via the
release of the "hold" on grading permits.
• Habitat Mitigation Fee rose from $2,145 to $14,070 per gross acre.
• The 5-day grading permit application review time was unchanged.
• Avoidance and Minimization Measures remained similar to the MBHCP.
• An Urban Kit Fox Artificial Den Program was to be established, with a Kit Fox Biologist added to
City staff.
• A Public Education Campaign with website and Public Education Specialist position was to be
added to City staff.
• A Disease Treatment & Monitoring Program would have been established.
• Funding for one (1) employee with CDFW was included, enhancing CDFW response times and
availability.
• The City and the County were permittees within the new proposed HCP.
• The term of the new HCP/ITP was to be thirty years.
At that meeting, Council expressed concern over the per acre mitigation fee and directed staff to identify
amendments to the proposed draft HCP that would reduce per acre mitigation costs. Staff have continued
Page 8of66
discussions with council members along with various developers to understand the range of fee that
would minimize public concern. Staff have been evaluating ways to get this extremely important program
across the finish line which requires a contract amendment that our City Council will not approve without
some certainty that CDFW and USFWL are tentatively in agreement.
Number of Permittees
The February 2023 report identified that the County of Kern was not supportive of the HCP as proposed,
which included a per acre mitigation fee of $14,070 with two permittees (the City and County) and a fee
of $15,681 if the City was the sole permittee to the plan. Moving forward, The County of Kern has
communicated that they will not participate in the City's habitat mitigation planning efforts. Therefore,
the current proposal is for a sing le-permittee plan.
Costs
While the draft HCP presented to the City Council in February 2023 initially suggested a single -perm ittee
fee of $15,681 per acre, preliminary assessments and cost revisions suggest the possibility of reducing this
figure to approximately $11,000 per acre. Preliminary evaluation and revisions of costs indicate the
potential to reduce costs down to approximately $11,000 per acre. This cost estimate is based on the
assumption of 7,325 acres of development and 5,500 acres of habitat designated for conservation.
The changed assumptions include:
1. It takes people to administer any HCP. The reductions outlined below provide a net sum of 3 FTEs,
down from five. 2.5 FTEs would function as the HCP staff at the City, and % FTE would be dedicated
to the Bakersfield HCP at CDFW. The revised administrative costs are:
a. Principal planner (50% time down from 100%)
b. Associate planner (50% time down from 100%)
c. Accountant clerk (50% time down from 100%)
d. GIS support (50% time)
e. Real estate specialist (50% time) Real estate support would be subcontracted.
f. CDFW biologist (50% time down from 100%)
2. The proposed kit fox program is designed to address the urban kit fox program. USFWS and CDFW
expressed that this is the heart of the new program and desire that it be retained as much as
possible. The kit fox program costs are:
a. Retain full-time on -call biologist (no change)
b. Public education staff (25% time down from 100%)
c. Public education budget ($12,500 per year, down from $50,000 per year)
d. Retain research and disease treatment (no change)
e. Retain den program (no change)
The public outreach component of the program has been significantly reduced. It could be
anticipated that outreach be provided in the form of web -based educational content as part of
the HCP's web content.
3. The land acquisition ratio would change as would the land acquisition strategy.
a. Reduced the number of transactions as a result of larger land acquisitions and fewer
acquisitions as a result. The assumption would be that each transaction is 100 acres in
size (not 50 acres), and that a few larger purchases are better.
b. Reduced mitigation ratio (0.75:1), or % acre of habitat conservation for each acre of
development, because proposed development lands are currently under intensive
agricultural practices. A total of 5,494 acres of high -value land will be permanently
protected.
Page 9of66
4. The fee collected to support the program is proposed to be split into two payments. A portion of
approximately $4-5000 to be paid at grading permit issuance and remainder $6-7000 at final
inspection or close of escrow of the actual building permit. As part of the process the city may
need to bridge the gap of funding between the timing at year end or as determined. This would
be part of the analysis.
CDFW Discussion
City staff met with CDFW and Wildlife Agency staff on October 7" to discuss options as outlined above.
CDFW is not able to utilize a part FTE thus that potential cost is an all or nothing item. The latter is tied to
timing of reviews. It was agreed that when a submittal is made to CDFW, it could be earlier in the process
to minimize the impact to the overall project. The second issue is the ratio of replacement habitat land.
The proposed ratio of 0.75:1 is not acceptable as proposed. However, both CDFW and the Wildlife Agency
strongly voiced the opinion of a focused urban kit fox program. Under this new focus the ratio will most
likely go down further, perhaps even zero or 0.25:1. During the meeting CDFW also brought up that the
Burrowing owl will most likely be added the endangered list and thus need to be added to our proposed
plan. It was clear from the conversation that the City needs to pivot and thoroughly explore this option to
understand the cost and development implication.
FOLLOW-UP ACTION
City Staff needs to have a few more meetings with CDFW staff to fully understand the elements of a
focused urban kit fox program. The intent is to provide dens and travel corridors within the developments
to support the species. For example, an artificial den could be constructed in the corner of a fenced sump
area along with an opening large enough for a kit fox to get through but not a dog or larger predator.
There would need to be a pathway to get to and from the sump for the kit fox to travel. There are a lot
of built -out sumps and parks that could have habitat added. Staff need to understand space needs and
operational constraints. Staff have said that ideas like conservation easements over golf courses are not
likely to happen. Clearly this is a different direction than the current plan. There are many unknowns as
this will be the first of its kind plan. Staff needs to determine and fully understand the scope of the plan
changes to be able work with the consultant to evaluate the cost of the plan changes to the current
document.
CONCLUSIONS
City staff continue to work with CDFW and the Wildlife agency to develop a habitat conservation plan that
is acceptable to the City, Developers and Agencies. This change in concept will take some time to arrive
at solutions acceptable to all. I see this as an opportunity for Bakersfield to be a leader in innovation
toward a complex environmental issue. CSUB and its consultants are working on a similar program for
their campus. Staff can reach out and work together to develop strategies that work for both. I see an
urban Kit fox program as one that will take time to develop long term proven strategies. Partnering may
provide the research necessary to track success and overall health of the kit fox species under this
approach. Staff realize the strong desire to have the coverage of an HCP and associated ITP. Staff will
work diligently toward getting a plan prepared for approval and adoption. Once the scope and
understanding of added urban kit fox elements, staff will bring a follow-up report back to this committee.
Page 10 of 66
LL
U c/) v 0
Q �7 or- U
0
V_
U_
0
CL
CL
LL
++
M
—0
U
—0
Q)
Y
x.
y
� u
""'III it
a
✓
�/�1��
Ills,
Q�'
u
M
ry
t
49
� rae
;.,. �u,
B
co
.',.,LJ
url
i.
00
a'-
.
C.
46
l
o
,
S4
� p
oft
4
w Q, uJ
m„ x
®
af
Q
o <
®
a w
U
C Q J U
y
oWz
®
®
� .�. t
X Q --o W
T R � �
l6 U U
O
(0
V
-6
S C S
C
N
Q
o
y o W
O N
W o
z cn
in U m in
cn O
Y ER
Bozo
m
m
.�,1) " ,aOM N 1 11 W ,a
i ,r 151 "Mae,
. I
..
11
SZ
i Q
cu
Q O
or_
C6
m -0
U
N
0
L
O
t_r_
Lu
+r
4-
L
U
O
u
L
Q
Y
N
O
Lu
m
LZ
•�
C6
U
_0
,"-OUND.""-P' wj""q" ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 4, 2024 AGENDA CATEGORY: Reports
TO: Planning and Development Committee
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
DATE: October 28, 2024
SUBJECT: Update of Chronic Nuisance Property and Vacant Building Registry Progress
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Committee discuss and receive and file the report
BACKGROUND:
Code Enforcement staff rank Chronic Vacant Nuisance Buildings for properties that have a Posted
Substandard Building and have multiple Code Enforcement cases, Bakersfield Fire Department calls for
service and BPD calls for service. This list is used to set a priority level for each Chronic Vacant Nuisance
Building identified for evaluation and the properties are integrated into a GIS system for mapping.
The Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Evaluation Group which consists of staff from the City
Attorney, Code Enforcement and Economic & Community Development meet regularly to review the
properties for potential remedies which include Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, Receivership or
Purchase program.
In February 2024 the Bakersfield City Council approved an ordinance to create a vacant building registry
to proactively address chronic nuisance and vacant properties in the City. Code Enforcement staff
implemented the Commercial Vacant Building Registry Program within the downtown and old town
kern areas effective March 2024. All commercial vacant buildings that are expected to be vacant for
thirty (30) days shall be registered. This registry is maintained through the Rocksolid (Bakerfield Mobile
APP). The registration shall include the identity of all record owners, the street address of the vacant
building, a local contact. The vacant, commercial, building is required to have posted signage: no
trespassing signs, and emergency contact signs, on the building. Staff developed a Commercial Vacant
Building Registry page on the Code Enforcement website to assist property owners with the
requirements and registration process.
Chronic Nuisance Property/Commercial Vacant Building Registry Progress
Attached please find exhibit "A" the Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Annual Report 2024
outlining the progress over the last year toward addressing chronic nuisance properties. Our intent is
to continue to provide this same data on an annual basis to measure progress and review any need to
explore other options.
CONCLUSIONS
City staff continues to take steps forward in systematically addressing our chronic nuisance properties.
The Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Evaluation Group will continue to meet to assess
appropriate action for these properties.
Page 21 of 66
•
BAKERSFIELD
NEXT STEPS
Staff will take the direction of the Committee. Potential options include:
Receive and File the report
Provide Alternate direction to Staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption of the update will not result in any further financial impact on the City General Fund.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Community Character & Quality of Life
Safety and Resilience
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 22 of 66
(03
B AKIER;SFIE"LD
THE SOUND OF 5Mt,0jkf '�Re#V
MEMORANDUM
November 4, 2024
TO: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Manpreet Kaur, Chair
Bruce Freeman
Bob Smith
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
David Paquette, Code Enforcement Manager
SUBJECT: Update of Chronic Nuisance Property and Vacant Building Registry Progress
BACKGROUND
Code Enforcement staff rank Chronic Vacant Nuisance Buildings for properties that have a Posted
Substandard Building and have multiple Code Enforcement cases, Bakersfield Fire Department calls for
service and BPD calls for service. This list is used to set a priority level for each Chronic Vacant Nuisance
Building identified for evaluation and the properties are integrated into a GIS system for mapping.
The Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Evaluation Group which consists of staff from the City
Attorney, Code Enforcement and Economic & Community Development meet regularly to review the
properties for potential remedies which include Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, Receivership or
Purchase program.
In February 2024 the Bakersfield City Council approved an ordinance to create a vacant building registry
to proactively address chronic nuisance and vacant properties in the City. Code Enforcement staff
implemented the Commercial Vacant Building Registry Program within the downtown and old town
kern areas effective March 2024. All commercial vacant buildings that are expected to be vacant for
thirty (30) days shall be registered. This registry is maintained through the Rocksolid (Bakerfield Mobile
APP). The registration shall include the identity of all record owners, the street address of the vacant
building, a local contact. The vacant, commercial, building is required to have posted signage: no
trespassing signs, and emergency contact signs, on the building. Staff developed a Commercial Vacant
Building Registry page on the Code Enforcement website to assist property owners with the
requirements and registration process.
Chronic Nuisance Property/Commercial Vacant Building Registry Progress
Attached please find exhibit "A" the Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Annual Report 2024
outlining the progress over the last year toward addressing chronic nuisance properties. Our intent is
to continue to provide this same data on an annual basis to measure progress and review any need to
explore other options.
Page 23 of 66
CONCLUSIONS
City staff continues to take steps forward in systematically addressing our chronic nuisance properties.
The Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Evaluation Group will continue to meet to assess
appropriate action for these properties.
NEXT STEPS
Staff will take the direction of the Committee. Potential options include:
1. Receive and File the report
Page 24 of 66
(03
• U N D • F 5b44kr f,
CHRONIC NUISANCE VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT 2024
The Code Enforcement Special Projects Team identified 127 properties in 2024 as chronic, vacant,
and nuisance buildings. This includes properties that were posted as substandard or had sustained
fire or structural damage.
Receiverships Update
There are currently eleven active cases for potential receivership action. Four properties have been
forwarded to the City Attorney's office for court review and processing, while seven properties are
completing Code Enforcement's administrative process.
Abandoned building Posted
Substandard April 2016
Demolitions Update
Structure suffered fire damage
Posted Substandard May 2012
Abandoned building Posted
Substandard May 2015
Since 2024, a total of twenty-one demolitions have been completed, ten of which were carried out
by property owners.
1105 3'd St Structure fire
1105 3'd St demolished by
owner
306 Northup St Structure suffered
fire
306 Northup St demolished
by owner
The City has completed eleven demolitions through the administrative process for Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings.
705 33r° St suffered fire damage 705 33'd St after being demolished by
October 2023 the City April 2024
305 Monterey St. suffered fire damage
April 2024
305 Monterey St demolished by
city August 2024
Page 25 of 66
11/6/2024
There are seventeen active demolition cases in progress, under contract or in various stages of the
Code Enforcement administrative process.
815 Gage St suffered fire damage.
Demolition in progress by the owner.
1030 19' St Code Enforcement in the early
stages of the administrative process for
demolition.
Rehabilitations Update
314 Augusta St set for demolition in progress.
5543 Buena Vista Rd
Demolition in progress.
1519 Flower St demolition in progress
1412 Chester PI awaiting
demolition in progress.
There are fourteen properties under construction, or which have owners actively working to obtain
building permits for repair or rehabilitation.
931 Monterey St before
rehabilitation
931 Monterey St after
rehabilitation April 2024
Properties To Monitor Update
1414 E California Ave before
rehabilitation
1414 E California Ave after
rehabilitation April 2024
2200 Brundage Ln before
rehabilitation
2200 Brundage Ln after
rehabilitation April 2024.
Eleven properties evaluated by the group were determined to be ineligible for acquisition,
demolition, or receivership action. Code Enforcement will continue to monitor those properties.
Seventeen properties identified as chronic, nuisance, vacant buildings are pending evaluation by
the group to categorize the appropriate remedy. Code Enforcement staff will compile relevant
records to assist with the analysis of these properties.
Page 26 of 66
Posted Substandard Buildings Update
There are currently 322 buildings identified which have been posted substandard
and unfit for occupancy. There have been 459 follow-up inspections of posted
substandard buildings to verify their status in 2024.
There were five joint enforcement operations conducted by staff from the Code Enforcement
Special Projects and Rapid Response Teams, Bakersfield Fire Department Arson Units, and Bakersfield
Police Department Impact and Animal Control Units. These operations focused on inspecting vacant
buildings posted as unfit for occupancy and enforcing violations related to unlawful occupancy and
other offenses.
During the joint enforcement operations, 25 vacant buildings were
inspected, resulting in 26 arrests by the Bakersfield Police Department
for violations related to entering or occupying posted buildings, as well
as other misdemeanor and felony warrants. Animal Control impounded
two dogs. No individuals accepted services or were transported to local
shelters. Code Enforcement staff boarded up a total of 22 buildings to
re -secure them against entry.
ECONOMIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPDATES
The Economic and Community Development Department (ECD) started outreach efforts with property
owners of chronic nuisance or blighted properties within the City of Bakersfield to review potential
redevelopment opportunities with them.
Staff assessed the qualifications of projects and attempted to match them with available programs
with the potential to revitalize blighted properties into beneficial uses.
Since 2023, ECD staff has engaged 56 property owners through solicitation and is pursuing seventeen
properties through the tax default acquisitions through the Kern County Tax Collector's Office. To date,
most of the properties pursued by ECD align with priority areas, such as the Prosperity Neighborhood
Initiative, the Transformative Climate Communities program, and future redevelopment plans. Six
properties have been acquired; one is pending a final sales contract. Four properties are pending
communication from the owners which have expressed interest. Seventeen properties are being
pursued through the County's tax default sales process, known as Chapter 7 sales. Twenty-one
received solicitation letters and are pending further responses. Eighteen notified staff that they are not
interested in selling their properties. Seven properties are no longer being pursued for various reasons
(e.g. sold to another buyer, owner is actively rehabbing). 26 properties that the City has pursued had
structures demolished either by the City or the property owner in 2023 or 2024.
Fire damaged URM building on
Balser Street Posted Substandard
July 2017
Both buildings were demolished
by the owner with grant
assistance through ECD
Fire damaged URM building on Both lots currently in escrow
Balser Street Posted Substandard with ECD for redevelopment.
July 2017
Page 27 of 66
Active Demolition Cases
#
ADDRESS
WARD
TYPE
CASE #
STATUS
1
3801 Mt. Vernon Ave.
3
ADB
23-7259
Active
2
1017 Espee St.
2
ADB
24-0822
Active
3
430 S Williams St.
2
ADB
23-11373
Active
4
1412 Chester PI
2
ADB
24-2703
Active
5
1101 In o St
2
ADB
24-3197
Active
6
508 S Haley
2
ADB
24-3269
Active
7
1914 16th St.
2
ADB
24-3443
Active
8
1308 E California Ave.
2
ADB
24-3672
Active
9
426 Chester Ave.
2
ADB
24-3734
Active
10
625 19th St.
2
ADB
24-3846
Active
11
4415 Wilson Rd
1
ADB
24-4416
Active
12
324 E 4th St.
2
ADB
24-5065
Active
13
511 Bernard St.
2
ADB
24-5568
Active
14
815 Gage St
2
ADB
24-0000978
Active
15
1519 Flower St
2
ADB
24-0000964
Active
16
314 Augusta St
2
ADB
24-0001142
Active
17
5543 Buena Vista Rd
5
ADB
24-0001133
Active
Page 28 of 66
Completed
Demolition Cases
#
ADDRESS
WARD
TYPE
CASE #
OWNER/CITY
1
913 Watts Dr
1
ADB
23-8453
Demolished by City
2
705 33rd St
3
ADB
23-8529
Demolished by City
3
6501 Gosford Rd
5
ADB
23-11223
Demolished by Owner
4
829 Chester Ave.
2
ADB
22-3381
Demolished by Owner
5
3109 California Ave.
2
ADB
23-8882
Demolished by Owner
6
326 Jefferson St
2
ADB
23-10840
Demolished by Owner
7
310 E 21 st St
2
ADB
23-10323
Demolished by Owner
8
3207 Union Ave
3
ADB
23-5267
Demolished by City
9
3601 S. Chester Ave #56
1
ADB
23-4271
Demolished by City
10
4415 Wilson Rd.
1
ADB
24-0382
Demolished by City
11
1509 Potomac Ave
2
ADB
23-0050
Demolished by City
12
718 E 19th St
2
ADB
24-0499
Demolished by City
13
238 Dr MILK
2
ADB
24-0037
Demolished by Owner
14
425 East 21 st St.
2
ADB
24-0779
Demolished by Owner
15
730 N St
2
ADB
23-1278
Demolished by City
16
1228 Chester PI
2
ADB
23-11091
Demolished by City
17
1105 3rd St
2
ADB
24-1505
Demolished by Owner
18
305 Monterey St
2
ADB
24-2694
Demolished by City
19
1105 3rd St
2
ADB
24-1505
Demolished by Owner
20
306 Northup St.
2
ADB
24-2488
Demolished by Owner
21
615 33rd St
3
ADB
24-0227
Demolished by City
Page 29 of 66
Rehabilitation
by Owner
#
ADDRESS
WARD
TYPE
CASE #
STATUS
Permits /Status
1
3508 Horne St.
1
PM
19-6326
Closed
Permit #23-5567 Final Insp AP 10/11/23
2
413 Texas St.
2
ADB
23-1753
Closed
Permit #23-12373 Final Insp AP 10/30/23.
Permit #22-13156 Final Insp AP 10/30/23
3
416 Bill Ave.
2
ADB
23-5074
Closed
Permit #22-16412 Final Insp AP 11/9/2023
4
1020 Gage St.
2
ADB
12-1439
Closed
Permit #23-3764 Final Insp AP 11/29/23
5
300 Tyree Toliver St.
6
PM
12-7068
Closed
Permit #21-12701 Final Insp AP 1/12/24
6
1721 De Wolfe St
2
PM/BLDC
22-1867
Closed
Permit #23-2884 Final Insp AP 2/20/24
7
1200 11th St.
2
PM
06-1482
Closed
Permit #23-10389 Final Insp AP 3/1/24
8
1116 West Point Dr
3
ADB
23-7491
Closed
Permit #23-10513 Final Insp AP 3/5/24
9
2200 Brundage Ln
2
PM
14-0237
Closed
Permit #20-8348 Final Insp AP 4/18/24
10
7102 Rogue River Dr.
6
ADB
23-4816
Closed
Permit #23-12259 Disapprove Final Insp AP
4/25/24, Permit #23-10760 no inspections
11
2105 23rd St
2
ADB
23-6529
Closed
Permit #23-13437 Final Insp AP 11/20/23
Permit #24-1989 Final Insp AP 3/5/24 . Permit
#23-13371 Final Insp AP 4/24/24 .
12
2100 Earlene Ct
7
ADB
22-6034
Closed
Permit # 24-5725 Final Insp 6/21/24 Permit
# 24-5095 Final Insp AP 6/21/24
13
3712 Harmony Dr
3
ADB
17-1511
Closed
Permit # 23-9487 Final Insp 8/10/23 Permit
# 22-5237 Final Insp AP 7/27/23
14
440 19th St
2
ADB
22-1667
Closed
Permit # 23-11292 Final Insp AP 1/8/24
15
931 Monterey St
2
ADB
22-4050
Closed
Permit # 22-5237 Final Isp AP 7/27/23
16
1414 E California Ave
2
ADB
17-7429
Closed
Permit # 18-1365 Fina Insp AP 5/10/21
17
3905 Rickey Way
6
ADB
18-4735
Closed
Permit # 23-12622 Final Insp AP 10/20/23
Page 30 of 66
# ADDRESS WARD
TYPE CASE # STATUS
1
802 Union Ave.
2
ADB
17-7457
Active
2
631 Bernard St.
2
ADB
18-0014
Active
3
6300 Dennen St.
7
ADB
18-3658
Active
4
601 Melba Ln.
2
ADB
22-0294
Active
5
500 H St.
2
ADB
23-3068
Active
6
3412 Harvard Dr.
3
ADB
21-4768
Active
7
2688 Oswell St.
3
ADB
14-0658
Active
8
207 H St.
2
ADB
22-1194
Active
9
1400 18th St.
2
BLDC
22-2347
Active
10
1313 Niles St.
2
ADB
22-6467
Active
11
1001 S. Owens St.
2
ADB
17-0789
Active
12
200 E 19th St
2
ADB
24-2745
Active
13
5905 Camp St.
1
ADB
19-2485
Active
14
6100 Quaking Aspen
6
ADB
23-1324
Active
15
5703 Alice Springs Ave
1
ADB
22-0353
Active
16
1125 Snyder Ln
2
ADB
1009106
Active
17
2011 Chester Ave
2
ADB
22-5582
Active
18
330 S. Chester Ave
2
ADB
18-2698
Active
19
2604 Fairview Rd.
7
ADB
18-7690
Active
20
3604 K St.
3
ADB
14-2252
Active
21
820 Real Rd.
2
ADB
18-0964
Active
22
700 Hogan Way
6
ADB
22-3806
Active
23
1418 Terrace Way
2
ADB
17-7671
Active
24
239 18th St.
2
ADB
15-4733
Active
25
318 Vernal PI
2
ADB
17-7612
Active
26
721 Grace St
2
ADB
13485
Active
27
80 Union Ave
2
ADB
21-5412
Active
28
1500 Pacheco Rd
1
ADB
19-5107
Active
Page 31 of 66
ECD Property Status Update
Project Area
Property Status
Old Town Kern
Maritn Luther
Downtown Area
Other
King Area
Property Acquired/In
4
1
0
1
Escrow
In negotiations/set to
2
1
0
2
be appraised
Solicitation Letter
2
9
2
8
Sent
Declined Offer
6
7
0
5
Pursuing Through Tax
1
8
0
8
Default
Sold to another
buyer/No Longer
1
2
2
1
Pursuing
Total
16
28
4
25
Properties Under Escrow/Purchased
Address
APN
Neighborhood
Status
812 Baker St.
016-060-07
Old Town Kern
Purchase Complete
808 Baker St.
016-060-08
Old Town Kern
Purchase Complete
800 Baker St.
016-060-10
Old Town Kern
Purchase Complete
1509 Potomac Ave.
018-091-14
Southeast
Purchase Complete
1201 Niles Street
015-240-20
Old Town Kern
Purchase Complete
901 Union Avenue
009-502-10
Southeast
Purchase Complete
ECD Property Pursuit - Demolished Properties
Project Area
Property Status
Old Town Kern
Maritn Luther
Downtown Area
Other
King Area
Property Demolished
By the City/Owner in
7
11
0
8
2023 or 2024
Page 32 of 66
Commercial Vacant Building Registry Update
As of October 2024, there are a total of 60 identified properties within the service area (downtown
and oldtown kern).
0 20 of the 60 properties have been identified as occupied
o 2 of the 20 properties have been moved from vacant to occupied following the
Commercial Vacant Building Registry program.
#
ADDRESS
STREET
WARD
OWNER
6
440
19th St
2/DT
HAKOBYAN TONIK
8
2401
M St
2/DT
24TH & M ASSCS L P
• 40 of the 60 properties are identified as commercial vacant buildings.
0 10 of the 40 properties currently have an active building permit or planning review
application.
0 18 of the 40 properties are following the sign requirements. There have been no
citations issued to non -compliant properties at this time.
#
ADDRESS
STREET
WARD
OWNER
1
2000
Chester Ave
2/DT
MONTANA FAMILY L P
2
1 2014 2016
Chester Ave
2/DT
MARTINEZ JOSE
3
1219 1231 /1225/1219
19th St
2/DT
BKFD LLC
4
1822
M St
2/DT
1822 M. ST LLC
5
2407
Chester Ave
2/DT
COHN SHELL FMLY SURV TR
6
716
19th St
2/DT
SAGUARO INVESTORS LLC
7
902 906
19th St
2/DT
SAGUARO INVESTORS LLC
8
1917
N St
2/DT
AMIDI PARTNERS LLC
9
2020
G St
2/DT
BAKFLD FIREFIGHTERS
HISTORICAL
10
3105
F St
2/DT
SAMERAH CORP
Page 33 of 66
a +Emdo& st
L.a Crests
j
Page 34 0 88
O
V
W
c
O
X
N
0
p
-0
0 0
07
U
c
Q O
N
O
U O
Q
�w
�0 0
c
U
O)Q
O Z
c
N CL
a
O
O
v0i
L
C
11
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 4, 2024 AGENDA CATEGORY: New Business
TO: Planning and Development Committee
FROM: Gary Hallen, Assistant City Manager
DATE: October 31, 2024
SUBJECT: Update on the City Facility Assessment and City Space Downtown Planning
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends receive and file the City Facility Assessment Update.
BACKGROUND:
City of Bakersfield engaged with Moss Adams a consulting firm to provide the City a Facility Assessment
in order to address a referral from Council Member Freeman that requested we investigate the City Space
in the downtown as well as City wide.
This is not a space planning exercise but more a point in time assessment of the condition of our major
system, space and very general space utilization. Moss Adams was tasked with reviewing how the City
makes decisions on major systems improvements and space, as well as assisting on advising the City's
policy and short/long term planning tools concerning space and facility improvements.
Some of the outcomes from Moss Adams report are listed below:
• Develop a multi -year strategic business policy to articulate the vision, goals, and performance
measures for the City's properties with supporting financial plan
• Complete a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis for all City
buildings
• Create a deferred maintenance program and incorporate into GIS/ESRI
• Establish a more comprehensive and more formal Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), one exists for
a 5 year duration and a 10 year plan for facilities in industry standards.
A more formal facility assessment presentation will be provided to the Committee at the meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There will be no financial impact to the City, with the action of the presenting the Facility Assessment.
When the City takes further action on space planning and improvement a detailed cost will be outlined at
the time of those actions.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 43 of 66
X S + I X \ + I x S + I x \ + I x S + I X S + I X \ + I X S
+ I x \ + I x S + I x S + I x \ + I x \ + I x \ + I x \ +
I X S + I X \ + I x S + I X S + I X S + I X S + I X \ + I x
S + I X \ + I X \ + I X S + I x S + I x S + I X S + I X S
+ I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I x \ + I x \ + I x \ + I X \ + I
X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X
+ I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ +
I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I
x \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I x \ + I X \ + I X
+ I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ +
I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X
+ I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X
+ I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I
X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X
\ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ +
I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I
X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X
+ I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ +
I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X \ + I X
+ I x \ + I X \ + I X \ + I x \ + I x \ + I x \ + I X
wwwww�
wwwww�
�m o�unm,
n��II�``rimauuut�
Illlmnlm�ulmmm
uu�
i
IOIUiIIUIU�
�l4!llrG(
�uljfgmauwJN
cu
a)
E
O
�
O
U
a)
C:
a)
cu
O
ch
=3
�
-0
>
a)
U
o-0
>
cu
i
7
CU
a)
o
cn
M
O
�.
cn
0
a)
C)
O
a)
co
-0
-0
U
a)
0
-0
a)
E
-
U
a)
a)
a)
a)
>
0
cu
a)o
V
O
CU
>
2
-0
cu
E"0
`t
a)
a
a)
o
a)
O
to
0
a)cu
m
ca
a)
�
C:
a)
a)
v,
a)
cu
70
cu
a)
O
N
-
cu
U�
cu
cu
O
_0
:
C:cu
N
N
cn
O
O
E
�
a)
�
cn
ca
cu
0
CU
E
cu
U
a)
cn
N
a)
cn
a)
E
=
cu
cu
cn
a)
O
}'
ca
Q
N
cn
a)
cn
(u
�
O
0)
V
O
O
a)
O
U
cu
U
E
4c-u-
0
0
0)
cu
0-
0
�
�
O
N
N
N
.0
cn
0)
N
U
E
to
0
N
_0
Q
0
o
0
L
OU
X
N
E
O
cn
O
O+
0
O
X
L
O
L
U
cn
cn
L
U
0
cn
Z
70
_
a�
a�
uS
_
cn
U
o
�
0
0
Q
-0
a�
o
�
E
cn
0)
2
U
(�
O
cj
0)
N
o
O
m
7C3
Q
O
70
_
N
70
a
C/)
70
O
N
a)N
>
N
O
w
C�
U
�
0
(1)
7C3
(1)
0
0
0
0 cn
0
0
0
ti
a�
rn
cv
0-
m
70 >%
(a
},
7
N �
O
70
N �
(u
N
m N
O O
Q
cn
_ E
N N
N -0
C:
-r- a)
a)
0.0
a)O
-0
CU
0- N
a)N
U
�
(c
E E
_a)
N
3: O
O
U
+
O
co
E
C/)
L-
i
--' O
o
co
(u
OQ
=3
CU
rn
QL
O
N
cu
N
}'
Q.
a)a)�
U
�
0
a) a)
C:
N
�
(U
0-a)(D
O �
c
-0
-0
E C
(0)
a)
N
N
C
cu
cu
U (D
ca
o
O
O
— 0)
-0
O
ca O
O
E
o
cu
O C/)
=3
C
--,
(U
v_)>
O
N=370
CDN
�
_O
U
N
O
X
U
cu U
..,
(a
W
Q
2
>
O....
-IM�x
E
O
O
C: a)
a) O
(u _0 0
i � � a)
,� o E
a) a a) a)
� '3 E
cu cu L— U
U 0 cu
C
0) U CDL
cn
C: () cn
0.6)=3 O
a) U) i--0
CU
(a a) a)
a) � 0
cn
a) �
X � cn
g a) cu 0)
0 -0 E
c) � i —
O 70
cu -a �
O Q a)
C: ��cu
(U
cu
cn _=3 cn L
O
cn 75 .0 O
(D C: }' U
> "0
N ca C: cu
CU
0) Q U 0-cu
a) O cu cn
Ocn CU Q a)O
Q-.0
i (a cn (u
N U Q
?' a) U cu
cn
+r U
i C: cu
E 0 .O T- c:
cu -�i
Q N � cu
(u
_O � - a)
N C 'tn L;- (a
O
0 E U U
cu
Q
U
0)
a)
cu
cn
0
0
rn
a�
rn
cu
0-
70
c
ca
_C/)
ca
O
0)
O
(u
(u
Q
�U
a�
cc
a)U
E
"M
c
-0
0)
cu
(a
0)
-
O
-0
U
LO
N
U
o
N
U
a
cn
G)
i=
3:
_
O
++
O
a
O
Q
E
0)U
_
U
�
E
a)
0
4-
0
0
LO
0)
cu
0-
0
70
ca
c
(a
C/)
ca
L-
a)
U
O a)
�
X O
O
O
(a
70
cu
O
D
O
(D
E
.0
N
U
•"
>+
-
E
O
>+
(D
cu c
c
Q
cu
C
cn
O
0)
Q
a)—
-0
"
Q -a
O
" CDL
_
0
�
=
ca
N
N
O
N
�
H
o
LO
N
�
0 0
0
rn
(Ucu
C: =3
-C
co
Q
-0•O
o���
0-
ca >
cu
a
cam
3:z
a)(�o
�a)�
ccn �a
o
>
C:
0
o
E�_
CD-
A
�i
= O
O
�
O
Q
U ca
>
�_
< r
Q U
�
C:
a)
=
a) c:
O
(a
u..u....
-a
c N
a
0
O"
(U
a)
�
O
�
t�
to
U
C1....a
1..-
0
o
a)
ca
-I°M.x
Al
(u
O
U
U
ca
70
c
ca
c
O
(u
U
E
E
O
U
N
cn
ca
N
U
-0
cca
—
Q
ca
0
5
C:
O
U
N
U
CD
N
N
a
a
°'
o
N
_�
E
N
o
a)
o
a
Q
a)
E
a
o
�
�,
U
cmcn
a
a)
r_
a)
c
a
H
0
0
N
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
N
O
a)Q � CL
C: (U "
O -1-, Q
CU N
U O
C cn
:3 (a N
E (a
O O N
U >,
a U
E ca
o c o
(D
CU —Cu
0) ca
L )
cn a) U a) U
cn
N .-. O
0 (a � a)O 3: c -0
>
O o E
cn >;
c o
U ca
��� E
a�
�cu
i.�
O�
m i C: CU
o�E°)
0 )
aCUa
o)-a
cn a)
a)U
O
O N
0 CT
>
Cn 4
H
a
W
O
Nr_
I.L
O
a
0
0
CM
Lo
N
0)
fB
d
a)
U o
L�
a) a) c
> ca
O o
-r- 0- cn
a) .E �
ca _ O
cn
O
� � Q
O
0
C: a)
(U -
0 O E
O
U U
-0 C
CU
a) � cn
0 a) cn
ca
ca ca
E E
(U (U
0) U n
Q
-0
cn cn � cu
ca
-0 0) C: O
0 c
W " Q U
(U
v 0)�
Cfl N U 'i
a) Q
Ncai a
_cam a)
oQ
a) o
aai _
O o
Q
:
cca N
a) ca 0) a)
Ea)�
c� ccu
X a. .
W o a
H
0
0
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
O
ca N N
E cn cc-:
o ca
c 0
ca i
O U U
O O (D CL
to
.> ca
O N CU C:
U O
o cn
cn a)
ca N
a) a)
CU
C: O C:
cu N
(D
(D O X O
70 0) a)
U N Q
a)Q. U i N ca
: N C: >'
N N
Q.
0) 0)
O >
cnU)c�a�cca
o
U U 0 N
N }'
ca to
(a U 0)
V _O
cu _0 -0
M (U = (U
Q- U
(a
Q.
E (� p a) cn N E Q
N cn�
a) (a _�
c�Q� N
0
0
LO
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
N
N
O
N to
Q
(u
cu
_Q o t
N c
O
(u
N Q
(u
Q }'
N E
U O
(u
Q },
cn cn
-Fu cn
E cu
O C:
(u
(u
C: cn n
N N _0
E N �
N 0) ca
C c
wU U
N 'm
N' a
_ a) a)
°Q � m
a)
a) U =
c O
_ cn 0
E c
a)
i E
� o a
N
O
O
ca
0
0
E
U
H
0
0
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
cn N
CU
E
(u
_0 -0O
� C
(U N N
N E cu
0 80)
to O
N � U
N +� F N
> cu
O
�+— E
-_ N ca
� > �_ N
Q 4-
O N
N
O
O .O ca
Q N cn N c
O O X
Q +O
U C/)
� •— N
CU
U -0
E N a)�
N (U O
N � cu
CA
O N
cn
U E
a)
ca -
is � cu �
ti
ca
_ U cu
C C: ca U
+'6)QO
_ 0) N
N
o '—
E " — o
o ���
0
U cu
� � Q
ca
0
ti
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
o U
c 0
a)
O� a)
ca
ccaaE�
O -1-.- a)
a)
�ca—
ca a)
ca a)
> U O
U N (a
(a i cn O
a) � > c Q.
a) }, O
� U C
O 0).-
0 O � �
>, O Q
+� -0 m cn X
Ucuv cn a)
a) a) 0 W
ca —
U
cn
a) )
� `(a O
E 3: ca
i—>'' O C:
C
U a) C:
70 ca
0 E
cu
cu
QL a)
M�� a E
a)
>"ca
_ Q-�
o � CD- .C:
tiO0 EM
c CL
" W m
a �� o-0
�0>mCU
_ )
� C:
E a)
a)
o
cn w 0 N 0 0
0
0
00
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
N
N
O
N to
Q
(u
cu
_Q o t
N c
O
a) Q
a)
(u
Q }'
N E
U O
(u
Q �
cn cn
-Fu cn
E cu
O �
LP (u
(u
N N
E a)
a0) (u
(u
� �
5
w }' U
U)
1� (D 'm
N
N' a
_ a) a)
°Q � m
a)
a) U =
c O
_ cn 0
E c
a)
i E
� o a
rl-
N
O
O
ca
0
0
E
U
H
0
0
rn
LO
(1)
rn
cv
0-
70
(a ca
0) C/)
a)
70
�CU
Q70
70 N C
0 Q
CU
O O
C Q C
O' > cOn
(u C a)
(1) (u Q
a) 70 O >,
-0U
0.— a)
U �
O U) N N
Qom— cn
N :3 a)
(U -0 �
cn N U !E m
V O L) O
O a) cn
Q� C a)
O O a)
>cn N a) O
CU
_0 � �
()
O
C)
C/) 0)
O Q O
U -E —(D E
() () I-- a)
�Q.oE
"0— a)
�C: >
—00
tiCUI.-Q
cu
o "0 E E
cn O
.—
r cn a)
0
Ecu: C:
00cn
(DO
a)> �
CDL
W U) 0
0
H
a
0
0
(1)
rn
cv
0-
70
c
ca
ca
O
0)
(u
a)
a)
U
ca
U
0
70
a)
Z
ca
a)
�a
O
0)
E
a)
0)
O
J
ti
0
CL
0
a)
E
a)
c�
2
cn
a)
0)
ca
ca
U)
O
E
(u
cn
(u
cn
O
U
ca
Q
E
O
cn
cn
cn
ca
ca
n
ca
O
5
U
a
.N
0
CL
0
'i
a
N
O
0
0
a�
E
U
H
0
4-
0
0)
cu
0-
ca
c
O
a)
(U
E
O
c:
E
U
E
U
ca
�
0)
Q
cu
�
0
U
U
0—
0)
C
0)
O
0)
.cnX
ca
cn
a)
a)
"0
O
O
a)
>
a)
=3
a)
U
C
N
o
O
E
0
c
Q
O
()
�
Q
O
cn
o
a)�
a)
CDL
a)
�
cn
O
C
a)
+�
_
(a
>
U
a)
70
a)
a)
cn
CDL
ca
~
U
O
Q
70
C:
_
Q
:
a)
_0
a)cu
cn
70
C
U
70
(a
8,0
—
cn
a)
in
a)
r-
Q70
O
E
`u
m
a)
a)
O
N
�
�
U
>
'V
w
_0
Q
0
0
N
a�
rn
cv
0-
O
(u
U
O
70
N
N
(a
N
U
(a
U
•�
N
O
L
-0
cu
Q
c
(�
=3
>
O
(u
cu
N
_0
>
(u
a)
E
N
cn
0)
-0
�
_0
_0
O
O
Q
O
-r-
CDLQ
-r-
cn
a)
cu
c
�
U
�
a)
O
�cu
N
o
_0
a)
C
N
1-.
N
_
CT
>
cn
O
_0
N
_0
cacu
O
o
00
N
_
O
0cn
:
�
Q.
(�
CU
cn
C:
Y
a)—
N
70
U
—
C:
(u
—
a)O
CT
c
Lr-
Q.
to
O
a)
a)
a)
C
U
0
cn
0
0
CM
N
0)
fB
d
70
c
ca
L-
ca
N
LO
N
(a
O=
cu O
N N �
C/) Q
U
U
(D
cu
- 0 O
(U -
-0 a)
cu
Q
N (u
C: Q ca
O O
U
N
Q �% n
0) � _0
E- U C:
ocu
� O
CD
a)U
N c a
_ C: a)
O ca
vc Li �
WL- 0
CL
= O, N
a' �
EO
aM ca
M a) c�
N
O
ca
0
0
a
E
U
0
0
a�
rn
cv
0-