HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.9-7431PW-STD-24-306-00092/19/2025
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
2
Table of Contents
1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................ 3
3.0 DESIGN APPROACH ............................................................................................... 3
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 4
Soil Map .................................................................................................. back of report
Hydrology Calculations ........................................................................... back of report
Inlet Sizing Calculations .......................................................................... back of report
Basin Sizing Calculations ........................................................................ back of report
Drainage Exhibit ...................................................................... sleeve in back of report
Reference ............................................................................... sleeve in back of report
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
3
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose for this drainage study is as follows:
· To provide proper storm water runoff conveyance within the street R/W in
accordance with the City of Bakersfield requirements and guidelines.
· To provide an economical and reasonable design sizes for catch basins
· To check curb capacities can handle the projected discharge.
2.0 GUIDELINES
The following design standards were used in the development of this study:
1. Initial times to concentration (roof to gutter) are 15 minutes for R-1 Development.
2. The entire site is Soil Group C – Delano sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes. The soil
group was obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Soils Survey. A Soil Map
is enclosed with this report.
3. The runoff coefficients were updated from the Approved Hydrology & Hydraulics
Report for Tract 6137 dated July 2005 since the lots sizes on the layouts changed:
· 0.40 - Residential Development
· 0.85 - Pavement with Landscaping
3. Rainfall intensity curves used are those shown on Plate D-1 of the City of Bakersfield,
Subdivision & Engineering Manual.
4. Sub-areas using multiple run-off coefficients are given a weighted average based on
the area relative to each coefficient.
3.0 DESIGN APPROACH
The contributing areas to the existing retention basin are zoned residential with collector & arterial
streets therefore were modeled as such so that the improvements were accurate. This report also
studies the required pipe sizes for the main lines leading from Goldstone Street and the future
Phase 3 to the existing retention basin. The project area for the storm drain improvements are
dictated by the hilly terrain that is present. More specifically the improvements are designed to
benefit all areas bounded to the east by Grand Canyon Drive, to the north by future Phase 3, to
the south by Paladino Drive and to the west by South Fairfax Road that takes storm drain runoff
into the Basin Drainage Area.
Future Drainage Area (portions of Phase 2, 3, & 4) are the most upstream end tributary areas
discharging into the proposed storm drain system. Catch Basin #5 collects a portion of Goldstone
Street and future residential lots in Phase 4 (Drainage Areas 1.1 & 1.2). Drainage Areas 2.1 and
2.2 will discharge into a catch basin (CB #1) located at the intersection of Black Opal Avenue and
Goldstone Street. Area 3 has its own weighted coefficient value from a small portion of Paladino
Drive and the residential lots along Black Opal Avenue and Chalcedony Street. CB #2 will collect
the discharge produced by this area then drain into MH-6. Two catch basins (CB #3 & CB #4) will
be located on Black Opal Avenue, east of the Sunstone Street knuckle, will collect the discharge
produced by Area 4 and Area 5.1 & 5.2. A future catch basin will collect the discharge produced
by Drainage area 6 at the end of Sapphire Avenue cul-de-sac.
The flows for the sizing of the pipes were estimated utilizing the City of Bakersfield Rational
Method in accordance with the Subdivision Standards. Flows were computed for the 10-year
event using the formula Q = CIA, where Q is the flow in cubic feet per second, C is the runoff
coefficient, I is the intensity in inches per hour, and A is the catchment’s area in acres. Since the
main purpose of this report is the storm drain system leading to the basin and the curb capacities
were determined based the 10-year storm event.
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
4
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The flows from the 10-year event in all the pipes in the storm drain system will be analyzed with
the Hydraulics Study which will be submitted with the Improvement Plans. An addendum may be
necessary to accurately reflect any future proposed grading and improvement plan set.
The main objectives of this study were to delineate the drainage areas and meet the design
standards set by the City of Bakersfield. The runoff coefficients used in this study were updated
from the previously Approved Report. The depth of the existing basin is +15 deep with a design
water surface elevation (DWS) of 753.70’. The basin will have a total water depth of 8.0’ with a
minimum of 1’ of freeboard. The existing basin will be able to store 13.18 AF of storm water. The
required volume for the entire tract is 11.53 AF which has an excess volume of 1.65 AF. The
existing sump will have revised the location for the access ramp since it was too close to the
proposed outlet structure.
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
SOIL MAP
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/27/2024
Page 1 of 4392043039204703920510392055039205903920630392067039203903920430392047039205103920550392059039206303920670326790326830326870326910326950326990327030327070327110327150327190327230
326790 326830 326870 326910 326950 326990 327030 327070 327110 327150 327190
35° 24' 52'' N 118° 54' 28'' W35° 24' 52'' N118° 54' 10'' W35° 24' 42'' N
118° 54' 28'' W35° 24' 42'' N
118° 54' 10'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 30 60 120 180
Meters
Map Scale: 1:2,040 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Aug 31, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available.
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/27/2024
Page 2 of 4
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
138 Delano sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes
C 3.9 35.4%
139 Delano sandy loam, 2 to
5 percent slopes
C 7.2 64.6%
Totals for Area of Interest 11.1 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/27/2024
Page 3 of 4
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/27/2024
Page 4 of 4
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RATIONAL METHOD
(In accordance with City of Bakersfield Standards)
TABLE OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS
R-1, 6000 SF 0.42
JOB TITLE:TRACT 7431 - PHASE 1 R-1, 6750 SF 0.4
DATE:Feb-25 R-1, 7500 SF 0.38
R-1, 10000 SF 0.34
Rational Values:R-1, 15000 SF 0.27
Event: 10 YEAR Values: 5, 10, 50 R-3, R-4, M-H 0.8
M.A.P. 6 in./yr. Values: 6, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 Commercial 0.9
Water Well Site 0.1
Curve Values Parks 0.15
a: 2.38 I=a+bTc (Tc<20min.) Grasslands, Type A Soil 0.15
b: -0.058 Grasslands, Type B Soil 0.25
P60: 0.550 I=K1*(6.02*Tc)^(0.17*LN(p60/K1) Grasslands, Type C Soil 0.35
K1: 40.00 (Tc>=20min.) Grasslands, Type D Soil 0.45
Pavement with Landscaping 0.9
Backyards 0.05
Lawn-landscape 2% slope 0.10 0.17
Lawn-landscape 2-7% slope 0.15 0.22
Lawn-landscape 7% slope 0.20 0.35
SUBAREA C I A rslt Tc L dH Sg Q Street V Trial Tc Roof to Tm D Curb
NAME Runoff Intensity Total Time Length Elev. Gutter Flow Type Vel. MIN. Gutter Travel Pipe Cap
Coef. IN/HR Area Conc. Feet Diff. Slope CFS FPS Time Time Dia. In
AC. MIN. Feet Ft/Ft MIN. MIN. In.
FUTURE AREA 0.40 1.19 22.61 20.56 1000 5.0 0.50% 10.80 60 3.00 20.56 15 5.56 -
PIPE 7 92 6.11 0.25 18
20.81
AREA 1.1 0.40 1.15 2.98 21.71 1000 10.4 1.04% 1.37 60 2.49 21.71 15 6.71 2.77
AREA 1.2 0.40 1.19 3.17 20.60 857 8.6 1.00% 1.51 60 2.55 20.60 15 5.60 2.89
AREA 1 (Total)0.40 1.15 6.15 21.71 1000 10.4 1.04% 2.82 60 3.18 21.71 15 5.60 3.94
PIPE 8 15 1.60 0.16 18
23.70
PIPE 6 0.40 1.18 25.59 53 12.12 6.86 20.81 0.13 18
20.94
PIPE 5 0.40 1.18 25.59 409 12.06 6.83 20.94 1.00 18
21.94
PIPE 4 0.40 1.14 25.59 261 11.66 6.60 21.94 0.66 18
22.60
PIPE 3 0.40 1.11 25.59 43 11.41 6.46 22.60 0.11 18
22.71
Tc CALCULATIONS
TRACT 7431 - PHASE 1
FL from AREA 1.1 TO CB 5
FL from AREA 1.2 TO CB 5
REV-Hydrology_10_yr.xls
McIntosh Associates
10800 Stockdale Highway #103
Bakersfield, CA 93309 10 yr Calc
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
SUBAREA C I A rslt Tc L dH Sg Q Street V Trial Tc Roof to Tm D Curb
NAME Runoff Intensity Total Time Length Elev. Gutter Flow Type Vel. MIN. Gutter Travel Pipe Cap
Coef. IN/HR Area Conc. Feet Diff. Slope CFS FPS Time Time Dia. In
AC. MIN. Feet Ft/Ft MIN. MIN. In.
TRACT 7431 - PHASE 1
AREA 2.1 0.40 1.24 3.34 19.60 1000 24.8 2.48% 1.66 60 3.63 19.60 15 4.60 3.00
AREA 2.2 0.40 1.26 3.47 19.34 694 7.6 1.09% 1.74 60 2.66 19.34 15 4.34 3.08
AREA 2 (Total)0.40 1.24 6.81 19.60 1000 24.8 2.48% 3.38 60 4.48 19.60 15 4.34 3.81
PIPE 18 15 1.91 0.13 18
19.73
PIPE 17 0.40 1.23 3.34 53 1.65 0.93 19.73 0.94 18
20.67
PIPE 16 0.40 1.19 3.34 469 1.59 0.90 20.67 8.69 18
29.36
AREA 3 0.40 1.33 7.76 18.04 1000 26.7 2.67% 4.16 60 5.48 18.04 15 3.04 3.76
PIPE 15 15 2.36 0.11 18
18.15
PIPE 14 0.40 0.92 11.10 96 4.12 2.33 29.36 0.68 18
30.04
AREA 4 0.40 1.19 4.89 20.65 1000 11.3 1.13% 2.33 60 2.95 20.65 15 5.65 3.54
PIPE 12 15 1.32 0.19 18
20.84
AREA 5.1 0.40 1.17 2.50 21.16 884 12.5 1.42% 1.17 60 2.39 21.16 15 6.16 2.62
AREA 5.2 0.40 1.22 1.88 20.01 462 0.0 0.00% 0.92 61 1.54 20.01 15 5.01 3.18
AREA 5 (Total)0.40 1.17 4.38 21.16 884 12.5 1.42% 2.05 60 2.81 21.16 15 5.01 3.32
PIPE 13 25 1.16 0.36 18
21.52
PIPE 11 0.40 1.16 18.49 107 8.54 4.83 21.52 0.37 18
21.89
PIPE 10 0.40 1.14 18.49 46 8.44 4.77 21.89 0.16 18
22.05
PIPE 9 0.40 1.13 18.49 208 8.39 4.75 22.05 0.73 18
22.78
PIPE 2 0.40 1.11 44.08 313 19.59 6.23 22.71 0.84 24
23.55
FL from AREA 5.2 TO CB 4
FL from AREA 2.1 TO CB 1
FL from AREA 2.2 TO CB 1
FL from AREA 5.1 TO CB 4
REV-Hydrology_10_yr.xls
McIntosh Associates
10800 Stockdale Highway #103
Bakersfield, CA 93309 10 yr Calc
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
SUBAREA C I A rslt Tc L dH Sg Q Street V Trial Tc Roof to Tm D Curb
NAME Runoff Intensity Total Time Length Elev. Gutter Flow Type Vel. MIN. Gutter Travel Pipe Cap
Coef. IN/HR Area Conc. Feet Diff. Slope CFS FPS Time Time Dia. In
AC. MIN. Feet Ft/Ft MIN. MIN. In.
TRACT 7431 - PHASE 1
AREA 6.1 0.40 1.14 5.74 21.91 1000 5.0 0.50% 2.62 60 2.41 21.91 15 6.91 4.03
AREA 6.2 0.40 1.13 4.39 22.31 1000 5.0 0.50% 1.98 61 2.28 22.31 15 7.31 3.65
AREA 6 (Total)0.40 1.13 10.13 22.31 1000 5.0 0.50% 4.56 60 2.58 22.31 15 7.31 4.59
PIPE 19 77 2.58 0.50 18
22.41
PIPE 1 0.40 1.08 49.82 59 21.56 6.86 23.55 0.14 24
23.69
PALADINO DRIVE 0.85 1.80 0.76 10.00 500 15.0 3.00% 1.16 60 3.91 10.00 0 2.13 2.60
PIPE A 7 0.66 0.18 18
10.18
FL from AREA 6.1 TO FUTURE CB
FL from AREA 6.2 TO FUTURE CB
REV-Hydrology_10_yr.xls
McIntosh Associates
10800 Stockdale Highway #103
Bakersfield, CA 93309 10 yr Calc
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
INLET & PIPE SIZING CALCULATIONS
INLET
PE SIZING CALCULATIONS INLET
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Feb 12 2025
<Name>
Curb Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = 3.50
Throat Height (in) = 4.00
Grate Area (sqft) = -0-
Grate Width (ft) = -0-
Grate Length (ft) = -0-
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.083
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.031
Local Depr (in) = 2.00
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by: Known Q
Q (cfs) = 2.82
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 2.82
Q Capt (cfs) = 2.82
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 6.97
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 10.00
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Catch Basin 5 - Drainage Area 1>
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Feb 12 2025
<Name>
Curb Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = 5.00
Throat Height (in) = 4.00
Grate Area (sqft) = -0-
Grate Width (ft) = -0-
Grate Length (ft) = -0-
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.083
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.031
Local Depr (in) = 2.00
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by: Known Q
Q (cfs) = 3.38
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 3.38
Q Capt (cfs) = 3.38
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 6.94
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 9.93
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Catch Basin 1 - Drainage Area 25
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Feb 12 2025
<Name>
Curb Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = 7.00
Throat Height (in) = 4.00
Grate Area (sqft) = -0-
Grate Width (ft) = -0-
Grate Length (ft) = -0-
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.083
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.031
Local Depr (in) = 2.00
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by: Known Q
Q (cfs) = 4.16
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 4.16
Q Capt (cfs) = 4.16
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 6.94
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 9.92
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Catch Basin 2 - Drainage Area 3>
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Feb 12 2025
<Name>
Curb Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = 3.50
Throat Height (in) = 4.00
Grate Area (sqft) = -0-
Grate Width (ft) = -0-
Grate Length (ft) = -0-
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.083
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.028
Local Depr (in) = 2.00
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by: Known Q
Q (cfs) = 2.33
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 2.33
Q Capt (cfs) = 2.33
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 6.59
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 9.75
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Catch Basin 3 - Drainage Area 4>
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Feb 12 2025
<Name>
Curb Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = 3.50
Throat Height (in) = 4.00
Grate Area (sqft) = -0-
Grate Width (ft) = -0-
Grate Length (ft) = -0-
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.083
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.025
Local Depr (in) = 2.00
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by: Known Q
Q (cfs) = 2.05
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 2.05
Q Capt (cfs) = 2.05
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 6.40
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 10.02
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Catch Basin 4 - Drainage Area 5>
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
Inlet Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Feb 12 2025
<Name>
Curb Inlet
Location = Sag
Curb Length (ft) = 3.50
Throat Height (in) = 4.00
Grate Area (sqft) = -0-
Grate Width (ft) = -0-
Grate Length (ft) = -0-
Gutter
Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.083
Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.020
Local Depr (in) = 2.00
Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00
Gutter Slope (%) = -0-
Gutter n-value = -0-
Calculations
Compute by: Known Q
Q (cfs) = 1.16
Highlighted
Q Total (cfs) = 1.16
Q Capt (cfs) = 1.16
Q Bypass (cfs) = -0-
Depth at Inlet (in) = 5.57
Efficiency (%) = 100
Gutter Spread (ft) = 8.57
Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0-
Bypass Spread (ft) = -0-
Bypass Depth (in) = -0-
Catch Basin 6 - Paladino Drive Area
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
INLE
INLET
PE SIZING CALCULATIONS INLET BASIN
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
TRACT 7431
BASIN SIZING CALCULATIONS
1 754.7
753.7 745.7
8.00 feet
Abtm =58,959 sq ft = 1.35 acres
Amid =71,602 sq ft = 1.64 acres
Atop =85,293 sq ft = 1.96 acres
Provided Sump Capacity =574,213 Cu. FT 13.18 AC-FT
TABLE OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS TR 7431 C x A =
R-1, 6000 SF 0.42
R-1, 6750 SF 0.40 144.40 57.76
R-1, 7500 SF 0.38
R-1, 10000 SF 0.34
R-1, 15000 SF 0.27
R-2 0.55
R-3, R-4, M-H 0.8
Commercial 0.9
Industrial 0.8
Parks 0.15
Grasslands, Type A Soil 0.15
Grasslands, Type B Soil 0.25
Grasslands, Type C Soil 0.35
Grasslands, Type D Soil 0.45
Pavement with Landscaping 0.85 22.50 19.13
Backyards 0.05
Lawn-landscape 2% slope 0.17
Lawn-landscape 2-7% slope 0.22
Lawn-landscape 7% slope 0.35
n C x A =76.89
TR 7431 Total
166.9 =Acres 166.90
0.15 X n C x A =11.53 AC-FT
1.65 AC-FT
10.0
Required Sump Capacity = 0.15 x C x A =
acres dedicated to the City Park (omitted from these calcs [154.4-10.0])
Depth from Design Water Surface =
Provided Sump Capacity
Freeboard (ft)=Lowest Inlet Elev =
Water Surface Elev =Bottom Basin Elev =
Total Difference of
Bottom Area of Sump
Half Depth Area of Sump
Area of Design Water Level
Prismoidal Formula: Volume = 1/6 x(Abtm+4Amid+Atop) x D
Volume = 1/6 x (1.35+6.58+1.96) x 8.0 = 1/6 x (9.89) x 8.0
Required Sump Capacity
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
LOCATION AREA (Ac) LOCATION AREA (Ac)
A1 0.70 A25 4.00
A2 0.70 A26 0.60
A3 0.70 A27 1.00
A4 0.80 A28 0.60
A5 0.70 A29 0.70
A6 1.00 A30 10.00
A7 0.50 A31 0.70
A8 0.80 A32 0.80
A9 1.60 A33 0.60
A10 0.70 A34 -
A11 1.90 A35 -
A12 2.60 A36 1.10
A13 3.90 A37 1.10
A14 4.40 A38 -
A15 1.20 A39 -
A16 0.90 A40 1.50
A17 0.60 A41 1.50
A18 0.60 A42 16.90
A19 4.80 A43 2.30
A20 6.30 A44 5.60
A21 5.40 A45 10.50
A22 0.80 A46 10.70
A23 3.80 A47 18.50
A24 3.10 A48 19.90
A25 4.00 A49 19.80 Refer to the Approved Post Development Catchment
Map by The Keith Companies (TKC) in the Reference
R-1, 6750 SF 0.4
Pavement, drives & roofs 0.85
TRACT 7431
TKC: AREA BREAKDOWN F
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
DRAINAGE EXHIBIT
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
DREFERENCE EXHIBIT
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
PW-STD-24-306-0009
2/19/2025
LIMESTONE AVENUESAPPHIRE AVENUECOBALTCINNABAR STREETSTREETGYPSUMGOLDSTONE STREETFOSSILWOOD ST.
GOLDSTONE STREET
PLATINUM STREET
SUNSTONE STREET PITTS AVE.BLACK OPAL AVENUEBELLA DR.CHALCEDONY STREETEXIST.DRAINAGEBASINBOOSTER PUMPPARCELEXISTING CITY PARK SITE10.00 AC. GR.M
A
R
B
L
E
S
T
.AVENUESTREET(NOT A PART)SHELL CREEK
C
O
U
R
TJADE
FOSSIL CREEK DRIVE
N E W G E N E N G I N E E R I N G G R O U PKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROJECTSITEPW-STD-24-306-00092/19/2025
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W WW WWWWWW
W
W WWW
W
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWUEUEUEUEUEUEUEG
G
G
G
GGGGGGG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
UEUEUEUEUEUEW W W UEUEUEUEUEG
G
GBLACK OPAL AVENUEAVENUEAVENUE AVENUEJADECINNABAR STREETSTREETCHALCEDONY STREETFOSSILWOOD
AVENUEGOLDSTONE STREET
M
A
R
B
L
EGOLDSTONE STREETSAPPHIRELIMESTONEGYPSUM STREETPLATINUMSTREETST.
S
T
R
E
E
T
COURTFOSSIL CREEK DRIVESHELL CREEKCOBALT
COBALT AVENUE(NOT A PART)SUNSTONE
N E W G E N E N G I N E E R I N G G R O U PKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPW-STD-24-306-00092/19/2025
EXIST. DRAINAGE BASINPRIVATELY MAINTAINEDEXIST. CALWATERPARCELSUNSTONE STREET
LIMESTONE AVENUESAPPHIRE AVENUEGOLDS
FOSSILWOODSTREET
SAPPHIRE AVENUEGOLDSTONE STREET
SEE SHEET 3
MATCH LINE BLACK OPAL AVENUEPALADINO DRIVEN E W G E N E N G I N E E R I N G G R O U PKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREFERENCE
PW-STD-24-306-00092/19/2025