Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10-02 HMBP 1523 Panama Ln STE 101 Wings Stop.pdfCurrent Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Occupant Name:Wingstop Inspection Date:10/02/2024 Street Number:1523 Occupant Code:113903 Street Name:Panama City:Bakersfield Street Type:Lane Postal Code:93307 Inspector:Pisano , Liseth State:California Occupant Suite:E-101 Passed:No Inspection Type:Hazmat Annual Violations Violation Code Description HSC 6.95 25507 Failure to adequately establish and implement a business plan when storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable quantities. HSC 6.95 25508.2 Failure to annually review and electronically certify that the business plan is complete and accurate on or before the required due date. HSC 6.95 25505(c)Failure to have a business plan readily available to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training. HSC 6.95 25508.1(a)-(f)"Failure to electronically update business plan within 30 days of any one of the following events: 1) A 100 percent or more increase in the quantity of a previously disclosed material. 2) Any handling of a previously undisclosed hazardous materials at or above reportable quantities. 3) A change of business address, business ownership, or business name. 4) A substantial change in the handler's operations that requires modification to any portion of the business plan." HSC 6.95 25505.1 Failure to notify property owner in writing that the business is subject to the Hazardous Materials Business Plan and has complied with its provisions. HSC 6.95 25505.1 Failure to provide a copy of the business plan to the owner or the owner's agent within five working days after receiving a request for a copy from the owner or the owner's agent. 19 CCR 1 5030.3(a)(1); HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1), 25508(a)(3)Failure to electronically submit the Business Activities Page and/or Business Owner Operator Identification Page, or failure to report complete or accurate information on these forms. HSC 6.95 25506, 25505(a)(1), 25508(a)(1), 25508(a)(3)Failure to electronically submit complete and accurate hazardous material inventory information for all hazardous materials on site at or above reportable quantities. 19 CCR 1 5040.1, 5040.2; HSC 6.95 25507.1(a), 25508(a)(1)Failure to electronically submit the emergency response plan and procedures when not meeting the agricultural Complete Inspection Report - With Documents Facility Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 handler exemption requirements. HSC 6.95 25505(a)(2), 25508(a)(1), 25508(a)(3)Failure to electronically submit a site map with all required content. 19 CCR 1 5030.10(a); HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4), 25508(a)(1), 25508(a)(3) Failure to establish and/or electronically submit an adequate training program in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material. *Verify agricultural handler exemption HSC 25507.1 19 CCR 1 5030.10(b); HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4)Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years. 4006.1.1 Maintenance and style. Signs and markings required by Section 4006.1 shall not be obscured or removed; shall be in English as a primary language or in symbols allowed by this code; shall be durable; and the size, color and lettering shall be approved. Violation Count:13 Inspection Fee:0.00 Type First Name Last Name Signature Date Signature Graphic Owner/Rep.Daisy Cervantes 10/02/2024 Inspector Liseth Pisano 10/02/2024 Business must report in the California environmental reporting system, also known as CERS. Inspection Documents Violation Documents Location Attributes:Commercial Hood; Fire Safety; Sprinkler System Signatures Inspection Notes Documents Admin Information Page 2 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Fire Safety Inspection Exterior Question Answer Notes Address visible from street?Yes Hazardous or dead vegetation or combustible material on property No Fire lanes painted and maintained Yes OS&Y in good condition and secured unobstructed Yes FDC are accessible Yes Audible alarm for sprinkler system in good condition Yes Knoxbox present, keys secured and correct keys Yes Private fire hydrants maintained and tested Na 3ft Clearence maintained around fire hydrants Yes Interior Question Answer Notes Fire Extinguishers must be maintained, tested and inspected Yes Exit signs fully illuminated in normal and emergency mode Yes Exit doors operable from inside without special knowledge or a key Yes Exit isles, hallways and stairs clean of obstructions Yes Circuit breakers properly labeled Yes Electrical outlets and junction boxes properly covered Yes Extension cords not being used in lieu of permanent wiring.Yes No items stored 24" non-sprinklered or 18" sprinklered ceilings.Yes No visible penetrations in ceiling tile or holes in drywall Yes Fire Alarm Question Answer Notes Fire alarm system tested and maintained Yes Fire Sprinkler Question Answer Notes Fire sprinkler system serviced and maintained Yes Commercial Hood Page 3 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Question Answer Notes Kitchen hood extinguishing system serviced within the last 6 months Yes Kitchen hood has been properly cleaned and serviced Yes K class fire extinguisher is present and serviced Yes Hazmat Question Answer Notes Facility has reported into CERs No CERs has been updated or certified for current year No Carbon monoxide detector present and working Yes Page 4 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 UST DW Inspection Annual UST Inspection Question Answer Notes Facility ID# EPA ID # Facility has valid permit to operate? UST operating permit application for facility and tank information submitted. A complete and accurate response plan has been submitted, approved and maintained Owner/Operator has not made false statment or representation of required documents. Failure to submit the Designated Operator ID form within 30 days of installing a UST system or within 30 days of change. Failure to have a properly qualified service technician test leak detection equipment as required every 12 months, sensors, lineleak detectors, ATG Failure to conduct secondary containment testing or meet one of the following requirements: Within 6 months of install and every 36 months thereafter. Failure to submit secondary containment testing results on the secondary containment test form to the CUPA within 30 days after the test. Failure to notify CUPA within 48 hours prior to testing. Leak detection equipment has an audible and visual alarm as required Failure to continuously monitor the interstitial space of double-walled tank with an audible and visual alarm system The UST system shuts down the pump or stops the flow when a leak is detected Failure of the double wall pressurized piping to be continuously monitored with a system that activates an audible and visual alarm or stops the flow at the dispenser when a leak is detected Failure of leak detection equipment to be installed, calibrated, operated and/or maintained in accordance with manufacturers instructions Page 5 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Failure of UST system to be designed and constructed with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of hazardous substance into the secondary containment Failure of leak detection equipment to be installed, maintained and located such that equipment is capable of detecting a leak at the earliest possible oppertunity Leak detection equipment disabled or tampered with in a manner that would prevent the monitoring system from detecting and/or alerting the owner/operator of a leak Failure of a UST system installed on or after July 1, 2003 and before July 1, 2004, to be designed and constructed with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of hazardous substance stored in the primary containment into t he secondary containment and capable of detecting water intrusion into the secondary Failure to properly affix tag/sticker on each monitoring equipment being certified or replaced Failure to maintain the interstitial space such that a breach in the primary or secondary containment is detected before the liquid or vapor phase of the hazardous substance stored in the UST tank is released into the environment Failure of UST system installed on or after July 1, 2004, to be designed and constructed with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of the liquid or vapor phase of the hazardous substance stored in the primary containment into the secondary and capable of detecting water intrusion into the secondary containment Failure to install a line leak detector Failure of line leak detector monitoring single wall pressurized piping to meet the requirements Failure of the functional line leak detector to have the capability of detecting a release of 3.0gph, restrict or shut off the flow of product through the piping when a leak is detected Failure to keep water and debris out of secondary containment failure to maintain secondary containment piping to allow liquid to flow into the sump in the event of a leak Page 6 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Failure to maintain secondary containment Spill bucket is installed and has functional drain valve Failure to operate UST system to prevent unauthorized releases including spills and/or overfills Overfill prevention system has not been overridden and meets the overfill requirments Failure to submit and maintain current certification of financial responsibility or other mechanism of financial assurance Failure to maintain on-site, or off-site at a readily available location if approved by the UPA, copies of the Designated Underground Storage Tank Operator Visual Inspection Report and all attachments for 36 months Failure to comply with one of more of the following Designated Operator inspection requirements DO employee training is current for at least one employee on site and a training logbook is kept Failure to maintain monitoring records for 36 months and for the release detection equipment for 60 months Failure to maintain records of repairs, linings, and upgrades on site, or off site if approved by the UPA Failure to submit and have current UST monitoring plan readily accessible at the facility Failure to maintain written agreement between UST Owner and Operator Failure to record any unauthorized releases from the primary containment Failure to comply with any of the applicable requirements of the permit issued for the operation of the UST system Failure to demonstrate to the UPA that the equipment and methods used to monitor the UST system are certified by an independent third-party as complying with the standards set forth Red tag has been removed, defaced, altered, or otherwise tampered with so that the information on the tag is not legible Page 7 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Owner/operator deposited or allowed for the deposite of petroleum or a hazardous substance into a UST that has a red tag affixed to the fill pipe Results of Inspection: Commercial Hood Question Answer Notes Kitchen hood extinguishing system serviced within the last 6 months Kitchen hood has been properly cleaned and serviced K class fire extinguisher is present and serviced Hazmat Question Answer Notes Facility has reported into CERs Carbon monoxide detector present and working CERs has been updated or certified for current year Page 8 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 HazMat - HMBP Administration/Documentation Question Answer Notes Did the facility adequately establish and implement a business plan when storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable quantities in CERS? No Did the facility annually review and electronically certify in CERS that the business plan is complete and accurate on or before the required due date? No Does the facility have a copy of the business plan readily available with responsibilities for emergency response or training for review? No Did the facility update CERS within 30 days of any one or more of the following events: 1) A 100 percent or more increase in the quantity of a previously disclosed material. 2) Any handling of a previously undisclosed hazardous materials at or above reportable quantities. 3) A change of business address, business ownership, or business name. 4) A substantial change in the handler's operations that requires modification to any portion of the business plan. No Did the facility inform the property owner in writing that an HMBP is required for the facility? No Did the facility provide the property owner a copy of the HMBP upon request?? No Did the facility report complete or accurate information in the Business Activities Page and/or Business Owner Operator Identification Page in CERS? No Did the facility report complete and accurate hazardous material inventory information for all hazardous materials on site at or above reportable quantities in CERS? No Did the facility adequately establish an emergency response plan in CERS?No Did the facility submit a site map with all the required content in CERS?No Training Question Answer Notes Did the facility submit an adequate training program with safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material in CERS? No Page 9 of 10 Occupant:Wingstop Inspection Date: 10/02/2024 Current Date:04/04/2025 12:19 Did the facility provide initial and refresher training to all employees and maintain records for 3 years? No Operations/Maintenance Question Answer Notes Does the facility have adequate signage for hazardous materials storage?No Are hazardous materials separated form incompatibles?Yes Release/Leaks/Spills Question Answer Notes Did the facility fail to report a release or threatened release of a hazardous material to the unified program agency and to Cal OES? N/A Page 10 of 10