HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 145-03RESOLUTION NO. I 4.5 ' 0 3
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. 03-0014 OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN.
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REINA
ROAD AND ALLEN ROAD. (Ward 4).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on Monday, June 16, 2003,
and THURSDAY, June 19, 2003, on Case No. 03-0014 of a proposed amendment to the Land Use
Element of the General Plan, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty
(20) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper
of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, such General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014 of the proposed amendment to the
Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan is as follows:
General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014:
Marino & Associates applied to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield General Plan consisting of changes as follows: Land Use Designation
Amendment from R-IA (Resource-Intensive Agriculture) to LMR (Low Medium
Density Residential) on 55 acres and to GC (General Commercial) on 25 acres. The
project site is located at the northwest corner of Reina Road and Allen Road; and
WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and a
Negative Declaration with mitigation was prepared; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative
Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures, have
been duly followed by the city staff and the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 104-03 on June 19, 2003, the Planning Commission
recommended approval and adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014 subject to conditions
and mitigation listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the finding made by the
Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, Policy No. 14 of the Conservation/Soils and Agricultural Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan requires the City of Bakersfield to evaluate ten (10) factors
when considering projects that propose to convert designated agricultural land to non-agricultural
uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has evaluated the ten (10) factors provided under
Policy No. 14 of the Conservation/Soils and Agricultural Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
General Plan and finds the following:
2,)
3,)
Soil Quality
Finding - The soil types of the project site (Milliam sandy loam, 0-2 percent slopes
and Wasco sandy loam) are some of the most common soils within the Valley Floor
of Kern County. The soil types are not unique or found only on the project site.
Therefore, the conversion of the project site to urbanization is appropriate for the
area.
Availability of irriqation water
Finding - The subject site is not unique for farmland in the area in having an
adequate supply of domestic water for uses proposed. Therefore, the conversion of
the project site to urbanization is appropriate for the project site and area.
Proximib/to non-agricultural uses
Finding - The project site is located adjacent to an existing 60 acre residential
subdivision with another 40 acre subdivision that has been recorded and being
constructed. These subdivisions are east of the project site. Therefore, the
conversion of the project site is the expansion of urban uses and appropriate for the
area.
4.) Proximity to intensive oarcelization
5.)
6.)
Finding - The areas east and southeast of the site are planned for residential
development, Therefore, the conversion of the project site to urbanization is
appropriate for the area.
Effect on properties subiect to "Williamson Act" land use contracts
Finding - The project site currently contains a Williamson Act contract, however, the
proposal is to cancel the contract and pay the appropriate fees, The conversion of
the project site to urban development would not prohibit any adjacent agricultural
land or agricultural land in the general area from growing crops or participating in the
Williamson Act program. The project would not require any property in the general
area under an existing Williamson Act contract to begin the notice of nonrenewal or
cancellation process. Therefore, the conversion of the project site to urbanization is
appropriate for the area.
Ability to be provided with urban services (sewer, water, roads, etc,)
Finding - The City of Bakersfield has determined that the City and North of River
Sanitary District will be able to provide all City services to the project site. The project
site is within the sphere of influence boundary of the North of Bakersfield Sanitary
District and will be annexed to the distdct prior to development of the site, Therefore,
the conversion of the project site to urbanization is appropriate for the area.
~.~iGtNAL
7.)
8.)
9.)
Ability to affect the application of aqricultural chemicals on nearby aadcultural
properties
Finding - In Kern County, farmers are required to obtain site-specific permits from the
Kern County Agricultural Commissioner for the purchase and use of many
agricultural chemicals. The Agricultural Commissioner evaluates the proposed
chemical application to determine whether it is near sensitive areas such as
residential areas or schools. State law requires the Agricultural Commissioner to
ensure that chemical applicators take precautions to protect people and the
environment. Based on this evaluation, the Agricultural Commissioner may deny the
application or require specific use practices to mitigate any potential hazards. Such
practices include method of application, time of day, consideration of weather
conditions, and use of buffer zones. When such permit conditions are in place, they
have the force of regulation and are strictly enforceable. The Kern County
Agricultural Commissioner prohibits the aerial application of restricted chemicals
within a quarter mile of any residential area or active schools.
The proposal will not affect the application of agricultural chemicals for property
located adjacent on the south side of the project site because that property is located
within a quarter mile of an existing residential subdivision. The properties to the east
of the project site do not contain agricultural land. The project site is located within a
quarter mile of a number of residential homes and other uses that may restrict aerial
application. Based on the requirements of the Kern County Agricultural
Commissioner and the existing land uses surrounding the project site, it is unlikely
the proposal itself would have any affect on the application of agricultural chemicals
on nearby agricultural properties. Therefore, the conversion of the project site to
urbanization is appropriate for the area.
Ability to create a precedent-setting situation that leads to the premature conversion
of prime agricultural lands
Finding - The project would not create any situation that would lead to the premature
conversion of adjacent or area agricultural land. The project site is bounded by a
designated Arterial on the north, designated Collectors south and east, single family
residential development on the east. Each of these factors provides a buffer that
would prevent the project from prematurely converting agricultural land.
Demonstrated Droiect need
Finding - The proposal is a logical expansion of residential and commercial
development in the northwestern portion of the City of Bakersfield. The project site is
adjacent to an existing and future residential area. The existing city limit line is
located adjacent along the east side of the project site, and the proposal is to annex
the site to the City of Bakersfield. The Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan
encourages the orderly outward expansion of new urban development that maintains
continuity of existing development and allows incremental expansion of infrastructure
and public services. The proposal complies with the General Plan's criteria. As well,
the proposed 25 acre commercial designation at the southwest corner of Kratzmeyer
Road and Allen Road is needed to provide commercial services for both thy ~¢,~.,.~¥,
proposed growth and existing population in the general area. There are no existing
25 acre commercial designations within a one mile radius of the proposed
commercial site. The proposal meets the objectives and policies of the Housing
Element by providing housing and locating the residential development in close
proximity to commemial development that would provide services and jobs.
10.) Necessity of buffers such as lower densities, setbacks, etc
Finding - The project site is bounded by an Arterial designation on the north,
Collector designations on the south and east, single family residential development
on the east. These factors will serve as buffers for adjacent agricultural land.
Therefore, the conversion of the project site to urbanization is appropriate for the
area; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY,
July 30, 2003, on the above described General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014 of the proposed
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, notice of time
and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by
publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings:
The above recitals and findings ara true and correct and constitute the Findings of
the Planning Commission, incorporated herain.
That the applicant by prior written agraement to comply with all adopted mitigation
measures contained within the Negative Declaration.
That a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014 is hereby
racommended for approval.
The General Plan Amendment 03-0014 is hereby approved to LMR (Low Medium
Density Residential) on 55 acres and GC (General Commercial) on 25 acras as
requested by the applicant and recommended by staff, with mitigation measures
adopted in the Negative Declaration and conditions of approval for the project.
That the infrastructura exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types of
density and intensity of the development.
As to General Plan Amendment 03-0014 the recommended amendment to the Land
Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, consisting of changes to
the land use designations from R-IA (Resoume-lntensive Agricultura) to LMR (Low
Medium Density Residential) on 55 acras and GC (General Commercial) on 25
acras, as raquested by the applicant and shown on attached map in Exhibit "B",
located at the northwest corner of Reina Road and Allen Road, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends adoption of such Land Use Element Amendment
of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, subject to mitigation and conditions of
approval shown on Exhibit "A", and racommend same to City Council.
4 ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND FOUND BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BAKERSFIELD as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein, are true and correct.
The Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014 is hereby
approved and adopted.
The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers
relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to the City
Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved.
That pursuant to Policy No. 14 of the Conservation/Soils and Agricultural Element of
the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan the City Council made specific findings.
The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment No. 03-
0014 of the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield General Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit
"B", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally
located at the northwest corner of Reina Road and Allen Road, subject to conditions
of approval shown on Exhibit "A".
That Case No. 03-0014, approved herein, be combined with other approved cases
described in separate resolutions, to form a single Amendment to the Metropolitan
Bakersfield General Plan.
That this resolution shall not become effective until July 30, 2003, at such time as
other General Plan Amendments are reviewed by the City Council of the City of
Bakersfield.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on JUL 3 0 Z003 , by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER COUCH, CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
COUNCILMEMBER ~
COUNCILMEMBER ~
COUNCILMEMBER ~
APPROVED
JUL 3 0 2003
r~, CITY CLERK and Ex Officio~l~rk of the
Council of the Ci~ of Bakersfield
MORE SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE
5
HA~VE'~"'[-. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
BART THILTGEN
City Attorney '
MO:djl
S:\GPA 2nd Qtr 2003\03-0014\ResolutionsVes,gpa_cc.doc
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No. 03-0014
Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map creating parcels less than twenty acres in size or
the issuance of a building permit for any urban or non-agricultural uses, the applicant/developer
shall provide proof to the City of Bakersfield that the Williamson Act Contract Cancellation fee
($300,000.00 for the 80 gross acre site) outlined in the May 16, 2003, letter from the Kern
County Assessor's Office has been paid. If the development of the property is phased, said fee
shall be $3,750.00 per gross acre for the land that has an approved subdivision or proposed to
be developed as an urban or non-agricultural use. (Condition).
If human remains are discovered at any time on the project site, work shall halt and the Kern
County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
In the absence of an archaeological monitor, a qualified archaeologist and the local Native
American community, shall be notified. If any other archaeological artifacts are discovered
during site development, all work shall stop until the find has been evaluated by a qualified
archaeologist or historian. (Mitigation Measure).
If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified
archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. (Mitigation Measure).
If the service requirements exceed the capability of the California Water Service Company's
existing facilities or if the extension of the Company's facilities is necessary, service would be
provided in accordance to Rule 15 of the State Public Utilities Commission Rules and
Regulations. (Mitigation Measure).
Intersection street improvements for the year 2023, which are needed to maintain or improve the
operational level of service of the street system in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table 1
below. The table also identifies those improvements not covered by the Regional
Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program and the project's percentage share for the cost of all
non-RTIF (local mitigation) improvements. (Mitigation Measure).
Page 1 of 10
GPA / ZC 03-0014
Conditions of Approval
Page 2 of 10
Table 1
Future Street Improvements
and Local Mitigation Percentages
Local Mitigation Project %
No. Intersection Total Improvements (Improvements not Share for Local
Required b~/2023 covered by RTIFI Miti~lation
1 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 WBL, Install Signal- 1 NBL, 4.02%
at Santa Fe Way 1 WBR, 1 SBL, 1 EBL, 1 EBR 1 WBL, 1 SBL, 1 EBL ~
2 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal - 1 SBR, 1 EBL Install Signal - 1 SBR ~ 3.79%
at Zachary Avenue
3 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal - 1 NBR, 1 WBL Install Signal - 1 NBR ~ 4.19%
at Rudd Road
4 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 WBL, Install Signal - 1 NBL, 4.58%
At Allen Road 1 SBL, 1 EBL, 1 EBT 1 SBL~
5 Snow Road at Allen Install Signal - 1 EBR, 1 SBL Install Signal - 1 EBR, 9.00%
Road 1 SBL
6 Snow Road at Old Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 EBL, Install Signal - 1 NBR, 2.75%
Farm Road 1 SBL, I WBL 1 EBL, 1 SBL, I WBL
7 Snow Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 EBL, - .....
Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 WBL
8 Snow Road at install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 NBR, --- '"
Calioway Drive 2 WBL, 1 SBL, I SBR, 1 EBL,
1 EBR
9 Kratzmeyer Road at Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 EBL, install Signal - 1 NBL, 4.41%
Santa Fe Way 2 I SBL, 1 WBL 1 EBL, 1 SBL, 1 WBL
10 Santa Fe at Rudd Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 EBL, Install Signal - 1 NBL 0.78%
Road = 1 WBL 1 EBL, I WBL
12 Kratzmeyer Road at Install Signal - 2 NBL, 2 WBL, 2 NBL, 2 WBL, 1 SBL, 24.88%
Allen Road 1 SBL, 1 EBL, 1 SBT, 1 EBR, 1 EBL, 1 SBT, 1 EBR,
1 NBR 1 NBR
13 Olive Ddve at Old Install Signal Install Signal 18.03%
Farm Road
14 Olive Ddve at Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 EBL 9.10%
Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 EBL
~ 7th Standard Road has current projects sponsored by the City of Shafter and County of Kern to widen
the roadway to fourlanes and improve the interchange with SR 99, These projects are fully funded
through the STIP and other funding sources.
2 Project shall pay proportionate share of improvements to improve current configuration. It is anticipated
that the crossing at the BNSF Railroad will be grade separated and the existing intersections will be
eliminated and reconfigured.
Source: Traffic Study for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at Allen road and Kratzmeyer
by Ruettgers & Schuller, April 2003.
GPA / ZC 03-0014
Conditions of Approval
Page 3 of 10
Table 1 (Continued)
Future Street Improvements
and Local Mitigation Percentages
Local Mitigation Project %
No. Intersection Total Improvements (improvements not Share for Local
Recluired by 2003 covered by RTiF) Miti~lation
18 Reina Road at Santa Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 NBR, 1 WBL, 1 SBL, 12.49%
FeWay 2 1 SBL, 1 EBL 1 EBL
19 Santa Fe Way at Install Signal - 1 NBL, I SBL, Install Signal - 1 NBL, 5.29%
Renfro Road 2 1 EBL 1 SBL, 1 EBL
20 Reina Road at Allen Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 SBL, 29.65%
Road 1 SBL, 1 SBR, 1 EBL, 1 SBT 1 SBR, 1 EBR, 1 SBT
22 Reina Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 WBL, 1 EBL 12.36%
Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 EBL
24 Olive Drive at Install Signal --- "-
Calloway Drive
25 Olive Drive at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 2 WBL, - .....
Riverlakes Drive I EBL
26 Noriega Road at Install Signal - 1 WBR, I SBL 1 WBR, 1 SBL 19.64%
Allen Road
28 Noriega Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1WBL, --- ---
Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 EBL
29 Noriega Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, I WBL, ---
Verdugo Lane 1 SBL, 1 EBL
32 Hageman Road at Install Signal --- --
Jenkins Road
33 Hageman Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 2 WBL, 1 NBL, 1 SBL 4.17%
Santa Fe Way 1 SBL, 1 EBL
34 Hageman Road at Install Signal - 1 EBL, 1 SBR 1 SBR 11.39%
Allen Road
35 Hageman Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL ~, -- --
Old Farm Road I WBL, 1 EBL
36 Hageman Road at Install Signal- 2 NBL -- --
Jewetta Avenue
~ Currently under construction.
2 Project shall pay proportionate share of improvements to improve current configuration. It is expected
that this intersection will be reconfigured to reflect the circulation element in the future.
Source: Traffic Study for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at Allen road and Kratzmeyer
by Ruettgers & Schulier, Apdl 2003.
GPA / ZC 03-0014
Conditions of Approval
Page 4 of 10
Table 1 (Continued)
Future Street Improvements and Local Mitigation Percentages
Local Mitigation Project %
No. Intersection Total improvements (Improvements not Share for Local
Required by 2023 covered by RTIF) Mitigation
40 Hageman Road at Stdpe for full lane usage ---
Coffee Road
41 Meacham Road at Install Signal ---
Allen Road
42 Rosedale Hwy at I NBL, 1 EBL, I SBL, 1 WBL 1 SBL 0.53%
Allen Road (1.6%¥
43 Rosedale Hwy at 1 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 NBR, I WBL, - .....
Calloway Ddve 1 WBT, 1 SBT, 1 EBL, 1 EBT
~ State project share calculation.
Source: Traffic Study for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at Allen road and Kratzmeyer
by Ruettgers & Schuller, April 2003.
(Mitigation Measure).
It is anticipated that the residential portion of the General Plan Amendment / Zone Change
project site will pay the current per lot fee for the Regional Transportation Impact Fee.
(Mitigation Measure).
The project shall construct roadway improvements along its frontage, pay the proportionate
share for the local mitigation improvements identified in the above table, with the residential
portion paying the standard per lot rate and the commercial portion of the project paying the fees
as shown in Table 2 below. (Mitigation Measure).
The Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) street improvements located within the study
area of the Traffic Study are presented in Table 2 below, along with the project's responsibility
for contribution to each improvement and the total RTIF fee calculation. This RTIF fee
calculation is made for the commercial portion of the project proposal only. (Mitigation
Measure).
STREET
NAME
Allen Rd,
Table 2
Regional Transportation Facilities List - Metro Bakersfle
LIMITS NUMBER NUMBER
FROM TO LENGTH of LANES of LANES
MILES
Allen Rd. Reina Rd.
~Rd.
Allen Rd. Meacham
Allen Rd. SR 58 Brimhall
Allen Rd. Palm Ave.
Allen
1.00 2 6
edmhall Rd.
7fl3 Standard Snow Road 1.00 2 4
Snow Road Norris Road 0.50
Norris Road Olive Ddve 0.50
Olive Ddve
~ Rd.
Fdant Kern Canal
Moacham SR 58
AT & SF RR
Meacham 0.50
0.50
Coffee Rd. Snow Road 1.00 6
Snow Rd. Non'is 0.50
Coffee Rd.
SR 58 Bdmhall Rd 1.00 2 6
Coffee Rd. Brimhall Rd.
Truxtun 0.40
Coffee Rd. .5 mi s/o SR 58
Fmitvale Ave. Snow Norris
Fmitvale Ave. 600' s/o Snow
Fruitvale Ave. , Ave.
Fmitvele Ave. , Ace.
Fmitvale Ave.
Renffo
Renfm
SR 58
0.50 2 4
0.50
0.75 2 6
Santa Fe Way
AT & SF RR
Allen Rd
0.50 2 6
Old Farm
Farm Jewetta 0.50 6
0.50 2 6
0.50 2 6
1300' E 0.25 6
Page 5 of 10
2020
Model
Volumes
pact Fee Program
NOTES
32,000
38,950 AT & SF
32,000
50%Funded~
AT & SF
16,000
12,934
12,934
32,000
16,000
Widen Cutve~t~ Canal
~mde Cmss~
32,000
61,255
Project
Cost
Regional Transportation
LIMITS IMPROVEMq'
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
NAME MILES
Jenkins Rd.
pattee Way
Fmitvale
Frditvele
Jewetta Ave.
Jewetta Ave. n Rd.
Jewetta Ave.
Jewetta Ave. Snow
Mohawk
Rosedale H~
Olive Dr.
Meacham Rd.
Table 2 (Cont.)
Facilities List - Metro Bakersfield Trans ~ortation Impact Fee Program
NUMBER NUMBER 2020
of LANES of LANES Model NOTES
Volumes
0.13 2 6
1.00
0.50
Reina
Jewetta Ave.
Jewetta Ave, Meacham Rd
Main Plaza Dr. Bdmhatl Rd.
No,tis Rd.
Rivedakes
Norris Rd.
No~s Rd, ~_.olfee
Nowls Rd. Pa'~ Way
Old Farm Rd.
Old Farm Rd.
Olive Dr.
Olive Or.
Olive Dr,
Reina Rd.
1.00 0 4
1.20 0 2
Rivedakes 0.50 0 6
Riverlakes Coffee
0.25 4
Olive Dr. Coffee
OliveDf. Rivedakes
Olive Dr. Coffee Fruitvale 1.00
Olive Df. Fruibtale Mohawk St. 0.50
r Ave. 0.25
4
Ave.
32,000
32,000
16,000
16,000
16,000
16.ooo ~
& Fr. Kern
Project
Cost
$812
$140
Renfro Rd.
1.00 2
RenfTo Rd. 1.00
Renfro Rd. Rosedale Hw~ Bfimhall Rd. 0.50
~ Relna Rd.
7th Standard
Nlen
CO~
'-~-~'R 99 ram~
SR g9
Callowa Canal
SR 99
SR 65
F~_dant-Kem Canal
0.50
0.50
Page 6 of 10
23,059
Widen 99 Int.; G~
32,000 Reconstruct Callowa~/&
Table 2 (Cont.)
Reg List - Metro pact Fee Program
~IMITS IMPROVEM"r NUMBER NUMBER LANES 2020 - Project Project Project
STREET FROM TO LENGTH of LANES of LANES Funded Model NOTES Traffic % Cost
NAME MILES Sthped Proposed by FEE Volumes ADT
Snow Rd. Verdugo 16,000 Install signal 324 2.02% $2~428
Snow Rd. Verdugo Calloway 0.50 2 4 2 16,000 324 2.02% $5,577
Snow Rd. Calloway 16~000 Install signal 358 2.24% $2,687
Snow Rd. Calloway coffee 1.00 2 4 2 16~000 48 0.30% $1,843
Snow Rd. coffee FnJitvale 1.00 16~000 34 0.22% $1~317
Snow Rd. Rivedakes Dr. 16,000 Install signal 48 0.30% $362
Snow Rd. coffee 15~519 Instati signal 34 0.22% $266
Snow Rd. Patton Way 12,061 Install signal 34 0.29% $343
Snow Rd. Fruitvale 21~224 Install signal 34 0.16% $196
SR 58/Rosedale Heath 16,000 Install signal 90 0.56% $672
SR 58/Ro~.~!e .5 mi wig RenfTo Allen Rd. 1.50 2 6 4 32,000 R/W & const, cost based on program Unit C 90 0.28% $13~287
SR 58/R,'-~"'~· Renffo 32,210 Install signal 172 0.53% $642
SR 58/Rosedale Jenkins Rd. 21~843 Install signal 138 0.63% $757
SR 58/Rosedale AJlen Rd, 33,387 Signal modification 145 0.43% $173
SR 58/Rc---,~,~I,~ Allen Rd. Jewetta 1 4 6 2 42,465 R/W & const, cost based on program Unit C 90 0.21% $3~185
SR 58/Ro-~:lale Jewelta Catiowa¥ I 4 6 2 46r120 69 0.15% $2~.56
SR 58/I~,'.,~m~,, Calloway Coffee 1 4 6 2 65,360 103 0.16% $2,387
SR 58/F~,w~e~e Coffee Fruitvale I 4 6 2 58,735 69 0.12% $1,771
SR 58/Rosedale Fruitvale Mohawk St. 0.5 4 6 2 51,740 55 0.11% $804
SR 58/Rn*,~l~ Mohawk St. Gibson 0.75 4 6 2 77,095 55 0.07% $810
SR 58/Fh',e,,a~!e Old Farm Rd. 42r465 Install signal 69 0.16% $195
SR 58/Rosedale Jewetta 16~000 Worms 55 0.34% $413
SR 58/F~n~lele AT & SF RR 49~522 Widen RR Grade Sep. (Jewetta) 55 0.11% $534
SR 58/I~e~e Coffee Fruitvale 58~735 Widen Faint Kem Canal bridge 69 0.12% $464
SR 58/R~'--~e Coffee Fruitvale 58,735 Widen 2 Canal Bridges 69 0.12% $704
SR 58/Rosedale Vefdugo 46.120 Signal modification 69 0.15% $0
SR 58/Rosedale Calk)way 66,935 Signal modification 165 0.25% $296
SR 58/Rosedale Coffee 94~015 Signal modification 103 0.11% $0
SR 58/I~,w,~l~,le Main Plaza Dr. 65,360 Install signal (50% funded) 69 0.11% $53
SR 58/R,~,,~e!e Patton Way 58,735 Install signal 69 0.12% $141
SR 58/I~e Fruitvale 62,562 Signal modification 55 0.09% $106
SR 58/F~ ~,~'.--~ Mohawk 113,725 Install signal 55 0.05% $58
SR 58/Rosedale Landco 77,095 Signal modification 55 0.07% $86
SR 58/I~ ~ ~,~,~ie G!h~ 89,930 Signal modification 55 0.06% $74
SR 58/I~.-,t~l~ AT & SF RR 77~095 tmprove RRX ~ AT & SF (wig Landco) 55 0.07% $71
Verdugo Rd. Reina Rd. 16,000 Install signal 193 1.21% $%447
Verdugo Rd. No~ega Rd. 16r000 Install signal 400 2.50% $2~997
~¥f~dugo Rd. Meacham Rd. 16~000 Install signal 172 1.08% $1~292
I ~11~ Costs 12,033,678 35615 0.30% $22~754
Freev~llyS 12,033~678 50% of Beltway R/W and SR 178 35615 0.30% $13~789
A~dmia~-afion 12~033,678 Computer Tracking System (City & County) 35615 0.30% $296
TOT~.S $422,445
Page 7 of 10
GPA / ZC 03-0014
Conditions of Approval
Page 8 of 10
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
The GC (General Commercial) area shall be modified in order to provide a local street along the
south side of the site. This local street shall be aligned with the street proposed to the east of
Allen Road. The GC site shall have 25 acres gross. (Condition).
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a new legal description stamped and
signed by a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer, prior to the City of Bakersfield
City Council meeting when this item is to be presented to the City Council. (Condition).
With submittal of a Land Division or Lot Line Adjustment application, provide dedication of
Kratzmeyer Road, Allen Road, and Reina Road to arterial and collector standards. (Condition).
Submit a comprehensive drainage study to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
Site any drainage retention facility on the periphery of the GPA area to facilitate future expansion
or consolidation of drainage facilities as adjacent area develops. The study shall be approved
and any required retention site and necessary easements dedicated to the City. (Condition).
Submit verification to the North of River Sanitary District manager of the existing sewer systems
capability to accept the additional flows to be generated through development under the new
land use and zoning. (Condition).
Payment of median fees for the frontage of the property within the GPA request. These fees
may be paid prior to recordation of any map or approval of improvement plans. (Condition).
Access to the arterial and collector streets will be limited and determined at time of division or
development. Determination of whether a right turn lane is required at the access street(s) will
also be made at the time of division or development. A full access opening will only be
considered if the developer funds and installs a traffic signal at the site entrance. Said signal will
only be permitted if a signal synchronization study is s~Jbmitted and approved, which shows
progression is not adversely affected. (Condition).
The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the Consolidated
Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidate
Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site
Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of this GPA area.
(Condition).
Local Mitigation:
Pay the proportionate share of the following mitigation measures (not paid for by the Regional
Impact Fee) as indicated in Table 7 of the Traffic Study for the project. Based upon the project
trip generation, 20% is attributed to the residential and 80% to the commercial. An estimate and
fee schedule shall be developed by the applicant and approved by Public Works prior to
recordation of a map or issuance of a building permit.
GPA / ZC 03-0014
Conditions of Approval
Page 9 of 10
18.
19.
a. Snow Road/Allen Road - Install signal, add south bound left turn lane, east bound right tum
lane, 9.00% share.
b. Snow Road/Old Farm Road - Install signal, add south, east and west bound left turn lanes,
north bound right turn lane, 2.75% share.
c. Kratzmeyer Road/Santa Fe Way- Install signal, add north, east, south and west bound left
turn lanes, 4.41% share.
d. Santa Fe Way/Rudd Road - Install signal, add north, east and west bound left turn lanes,
0.78% share.
e. Kratzmeyer Road/Allen Road - add 2 north and 2 west bound left turn lanes, add south
bound and east bound left turn lanes, east and north bound right turn lanes, 24.88% share.
f. Olive Drive/Old Farm Road - Install signal, 18.03% share.
g. Olive Ddve/Jewetta Avenue - add east bound left turn lane, 9.10% share.
h. Santa Fe Way/Reina Road - add north, east, south and west bound left turn lanes, 12.49%
share.
i. Santa Fe Way/Renfro Road - Install signal, add north, south and east bound left turn lanes,
5.29% share.
j. Reina Road/Allen Road - add north, south and west bound left turn lanes, south and east
bound dght turn lanes, south bound through lane, 29.65% share.
k. Reina Road/Jewetta Avenue - add west and east bound left turn lanes, 12.36% share.
I. Nodega Road/Allen Road - add west bound right turn lane, south bound left turn lane,
19.64% share.
m. Hageman Road/Santa Fe Way - add north and south bound left turn lanes, 4.17% share.
n. Hageman Road/Allen Road - add south bound right turn lane, 11.39% share.
o. Rosedale Highway/Allen Road - add south bound left turn lane, 1.60% share.
(Condition).
Regional Transportation Impact Fee:
The Traffic Study for the project provided an analysis of the project share of the impact fee for
the commercial portion at $422,445 ($32.27 per tdp). If the commercial development is
submitted for site plan review after adoption of the Phase 3 Impact Fees, the RTIF calculation
shall be updated to reflect the new facilities list.
Pay the computed commercial fee and the standard full regional transportation impact fee as
adopted at the time of development for the residential portion of the project, (Condition).
Prior to recordation of tract maps within the residential areas or the issuance of building permits
for the commercial area, within the GPNZC project site, the developer shall select and
implement one or a combination of the following measures and/or programs to result in a
reduction in ROG and NOX emissions with an equivalence to 283 agricultural engines, with the
commercial area being responsible for 80% of the reductions and the residential area being
responsible for 20%:
(a)
In the event the City adopts an Indirect Source Rule fee or other similar fee to reduce
air quality impacts prior to the recordation of subdivisions for the residential area or
issuance of building permits for the commercial area of this project site, thi~'~?ct
GPA / ZC 03-0014
Conditions of Approval
Page 10 of 10
20.
21.
22.
23.
shall be subject to the fees in effect at the time.
(b) Mitigation programs such as, but not limited to, the following:
Car crushing of older model cars. This may be achieved in conjunction with an
established entity such as the Remove Program.
2, Modification to stationary diesel engines, such as for agriculture use.
3. Modification of fleet vehicles and/or other mobile sources.
4. Financing of a project acceptable to the Air Pollution Control District.
(Condition).
If one or more of these programs are selected by the developer, proof of compliance with these
measures must be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and the Air Pollution
Control District prior to issuance of building permits for the commercial area or recordation of
residential tract maps for the residential area. Proof of compliance may include documentation
of the year, number, and type of cars crushed, location and type of engines modified (photo
documentation) and quantification of emissions reduced by Air Pollution Control District or the
Air Quality consultant. Mitigation may be proportionate to the air quality impacts of the area
proposed to be mitigated. (Condition).
Due to changes is the methodology or science, or due to changes in the assumptions made in
the analysis at the time of approval, the developer will always maintain the right to requantify
and reevaluate air quality impacts. (Condition).
Access shall be provided for both pedestrian and vehicles along the west and south sides of the
commercial site. (Condition).
The commercial site shall have a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) overlay zone.
(Condition).
MO:djl
Printed: 06/24/2003 2:32:29 PM
S:\GPA 2nd Qtr 2003~03-0014~Admin SE\Council Cond - Exh A.dcc
EXHIBIT "B"
Map
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 03-0014
KRATZMEYEF
ROAD
SR
SNOW .°.0..D
SR
11 R-IA TO GC
R-IA TO
LMR
ROAD
OLIVE DRIVE 12
R-ia
SR
NORIEGt
SR
ROAD
T29S, R26E