HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 18-96RESOLVT ON NO. ! 8 - 9 $
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR REORGANIZATION OF
TERRITORY BY ANNEXING TO THE C1TY OF
BAKERSFIELD AND DETACHMENT FROM THE KERN
SANITATION AUTHORIY IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION
NO. 387, POTOMAC NO. 1 ANNEXATION (WARD 1).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1995, and THURSDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1995, on
the prezoning for the proposed annexation of certain properties to the City of
Bakersfield known as POTOMAC NO. 1 ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place
of hearing having been given at least twenty-one calendar days before said hearing by
publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 72-95 on October 19, 1995, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the prezoning for the annexation by this Council
and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as
set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the detachment of the herein described territory from the Kern
Sanitation Authority, pursuant to Section 56000, Division 3, Title 5 of the Government
Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That the nature of the proposed change of organization is
annexation to the City of Bakersfield and detachment from the Kern Sanitation
Authority (Mt. Vernon - Panorama Sanitation District), as described and shown on the
attached exhibits.
3. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territoW proposed to be annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor,
Ordinance No. 3691, which was adopted November 29, 1995, an Initial Study was
conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on August
14, 1995.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
8. That the territoW proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
2
Judy Skousen
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... o0o ........
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the C, itv of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
dAN ~, 4 1~1~' , by the following vote:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER t~-~ ~- '~7~- -
/~ssistant CITY CLERK and Ex OfficiOClerk
Council of the City of Bakersfield
of the
APPROVED
BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
CARL HERNANDEZ
Deputy City Attorney
MO:pjt
January 9, 1996
res~rgpl.roa
EXHIBIT "A"
POTOMAC NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 387
A parcel of land being a portion of the Northwest ¼ of Section 33, T. 29 S., R. 28 E.,
M.D.M, County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the north 1/4 corner of said Section 33 being monumented by "Found K.C.S.
Conc. Mon't. in Lamphole" as shown on SURVEY INVESTIGATION AND
PERPETUATION filed in Book 6 of Maps, Page 107 in the Office of the Kern County
Surveyor, said 1/4 corner being designated as N. 681,440.967, E. 1,709,174.466 by the
California Coordinate System, Zone 5;
THENCE S. 00° 01' 30" W., along the mid-section line of said Section 33 (also being the
center line of Washington Avenue), 1320.25 feet to a point on the center line of Potomac
Avenue (Co. Rd. No. 399);
THENCE N. 89° 53' 30" W., along said center line, 950.52 feet to a point on the easterly line
of the Right of Way for the SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD-ALPHALTO BRANCH, said
Right of Way line being a non-tangent curve, having a radius of 10,647.065 feet, concave
northwesterly, having a radial bearing of N. 71° 47' 02" W. from said point on curve;
THENCE Southwesterly along said Right of Way curve through a central angle of 00° 10'
12" an arc distance of 31.59 feet to a point on the South Right of Way line of Potomac
Avenue, said point being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield and
is the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE (1) departing from said corporate boundary, S. 89° 53' 30" E., along the south line
of Potomac Avenue, 273.60 feet to a point on the West Right of Way line of Monticello
Avenue;
THENCE (2) S. 00° 00' 33" W., along said Right of Way line, 630.00 feet to a point being
the Southeast corner of Lot 8 of GORRILL'S ADDITION to the Town of Kern, filed for
record in Book 1 of Maps, Page 141, in the Office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (3) N. 89° 53' 14" W., along the South line of said Lot 8, a distance of 513.50 feet
to a point on said easterly Right of Way line of the SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD-
ASPHALTO BRANCH, also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City
of Bakersfield;
THENCE (4) Northeasterly, along said corporate boundary line, to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 6 acres (more or less)
I I
RO.B.
/
~ q
VICINITY MAp
4
L
SEC~
ANNEXATION OF
POTOMAC NO. I
IOO 0 I00 200
EXHIBIT
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 387
(POTOMAC NO. 1)
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and
Recreation
Library
Police
Protection
Fire
Protection
Street
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Oth~ (REFUSE)
AGENCY WHICH
PRESENTLY PROVIDES
SERVXCE
COUNTY
COUNTY
CHECK SERVICES WHICH
CITY/DISTRICT WILL
PROVIDE
Upon Annexation
CITY
CITY
Future Date
(specify)
COUNTY
SHERIFF & HIGHWAY
PATROL
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
NONE
NONE
COUNTY
COUNTY
CITY
(SEE PAGE 2)
CITY - U/D
CITY - U/D
CITY - U/D
CITY - U/D
CITY -U/D
CITY
CALIFORNIA WATER
SERVICE CO.
PRIVATE
CITY
U/D - UPON DEVELOPMENT WITHIN ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
1
XNDICATE HOW SERVICES
PROVIDED BY CITY/DISTRICT
WILL BE FINANCED (I.E.,
GENERAL TAX RATE OR
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.)
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
N/A
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
FIRE FUND
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
SCHOOL FUNDING
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
USER FEE/SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT
USER FEE
USER FEE
EXHIBIT
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Locatio13 Service Level Capacity
Indicate location from which service will be provided Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc.) (i.e., street sweeping, response time for
emergency services, rec. programs, etc)
POLICE-all police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through
the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye
Street approximately 3 1/2 miles northwesterly of the annexation.
FIRE-Service will be provided by County Station No. 41 located at the Northeast
corner or Virginia Avenue and Mr. Vernon Avenue pursuant to exchange wherein
City protects certain property within the County's jurisdiction. Thus, the City
does incur the cost of providing fire protection and the fire fund collected from
the City's taxpayers must be transferred to the City
PARKS AND RECREATION-The proposed annexation area is now totally
industrial development.
LIBRARY-N/A
STREETS-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works
efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING-Maintenance and
personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
SEWER-The area will continue to be served by the Kern Sanitation Authority
which has a main in Monticello Avenue that connects to the County's Mt. Vernon
Treatment Plant.
WATER-The territory will continue to be served by the California Water Service
Company.
OTHER-(Refuse)-When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by
City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this annexation.
First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation will not
affect City or County Fire service capability or response time.
F~xisting neighborhood Parks (City and County) are open to the public
at reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide
the necessary public work services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
Ill.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services
(i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)? The
annexation of this territory Will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed
services. Upon time of future development within this territory. additional police officers may or may not
be required to maintain the current level of city service. Any future dedicated streets or public created
within the territory will increase the future maintenance responsibility of the City but will not affect the
existing level of service.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads. fire
hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? As future
development occurs, the developer provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City.
No upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is presently zoned County M-3
PD (heavy industrial - precise development. combining district) which allows for the tow truck company
and automotive dismantling facility now occupying the territory.
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as
a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property. etc.) The City proposes to prezone
the territory to City M-2 (General Manufacturing) Zone which is compatible with above listed existing
land use. The proposed prezoning is consisting with the metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
designation.
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance
rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. The present City refuse collection
rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independent companies. No special
assessment or charges for street sweeping. leaf collection. street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants
upon development of subject area. City government also provides increased political representation for
residents within the corporate limits.
VIII
Please provide the following information relative to city/distfict and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.163202% of assessed market
value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated percentage of the total
property tax for the area will accrue to the City and the remainder to the County for providing health care
and social services. (Rate as shown on the 1995-96 CounW Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so. explain. No, the
last listed (1992-93) City bonded indebtedness has been paid off and the current (1995-96) tax rate list
shows no city bonded indebtedness.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50.000.00?
The property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to annexation.
D ~:ANNEX387.l
RTY:dt