The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutORD NO 4138ORDINANCE NO. 4138 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING MAP NO. 101-1'1 BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM A (AGRICULTURE) TO AN R-1 (ONE FAMILY DWELLING) ZONE ON 55 ACRES AND TO C-21PCD (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL/PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) ON 25 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REINA ROAD AND ALLEN ROAD. (GPA 03-0014). (Ward 4). WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure set forth in the provisions of Title 17 of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on a petition to change the land use zoning of those certain properties being annexed to the City of Bakersfield located at the northwest corner of Reina Road and Allen Road. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 105-03 on June 19, 2003, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code to approve R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and C-2/PCD (Regional Commercial/Planned Commercial Development) zone as delineated on attached map marked Exhibit "B", and this Council has fully considered the recommendations made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as a result of said hearing, did make several general and specific findings of fact, which warranted a Negative Declaration and changes in zoning of the subject property from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and C-2/PCD (Regional Commercial/Planned Commemial Development) zones and the Council has considered said findings and all appear to be true and correct; and WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations, as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff, Planning Commission and this Council; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration for the proposal was advertised and posted on May 9, 2003, in accordance with CEQA; and WHEREAS, the general plan designation for this area allows single family residential development; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings: The above recitals and findings are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this matter. 2. All required notices have been given. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been followed. Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has determined that t.h~e,~ ~ ~iGi[~AL proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and sent to responsible agencies and property owners within 300 feet of the project site. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA. That infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types and intensities of the proposed development. The public necessity, general welfare and good zoning practice justify the recommended change of zone to R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone on 55 acres and to C-2/PCD (Regional Commercial/Planned Commercial Development) zone on 25 acres located at the northwest corner of Reina Road and Allen Road. The project site, with prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014, is designated LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) and GC (General Commercial) on the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Land Use Plan. The recommended zone change will reflect the previously adopted General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014. 9. The recommended zone change is compatible with the surrounding uses. 10. The recommended zone change is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014. 11. That the applicant by prior agreement agreed to comply with all adopted mitigation measures contained within the Negative Declaration for this project. 12. That Zone Change No. 03-0014 is hereby approved as recommended by staffwith mitigation measures adopted in the Negative Declaration. 13. That Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield be amended by changing the land use zoning R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone on 55 acres and to C-2/PCD (Regional Commercial/Planned Commercial Development) on 25 acres on Map No. 101-11, of that certain property being annexed to the City of Bakersfield as described in Exhibit "C" herein attached. 14. That Zone Change No. 03-0014, as outlined above, is hereby recommended for approval with mitigation and conditions of approval shown on Exhibit "A", subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014. SECTION 1. NOW, TH EREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. All of the foregoing recitats are hereby found to be true and correct. 2. The Negative Declaration is hereby approved and adopted. Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield is hereby amended by changing the land use zoning of that certain property bein~ annexed to the City, the boundaries of which is shown on the map marked E~i~E-~',~, "" ITl 2 ~ ~ ~3RIGiNAi_ "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and is more specifically described in attached Exhibit "C". Such zone change is hereby made subject to the conditions of approval listed in attached Exhibit "A", and subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. 03-0014. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of ils passage. ......... 000 ........ I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on AUG P. ? 2003 , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER COUCH, CARSON, BENHAM, MA~=~oAR~, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO COUNClLMEMBER COUNClLMEMBER COUNClLMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk/~f the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AUG 2 7 2003 HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield, APPROVED as to f)3rm: BART THILTGEN- City Attomey " '"" Attachments: EXHIBIT "A" - Conditions of Approval. EXHIBIT "B" - Map. EXHIBIT "C" - Legal Description. MO:djl S:\GPA 2nd Qb' 2003\03-0014\Resolutions\ozc-cc.doc EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment ! Zone Change No. 03-0014 Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map creating parcels less than twenty acres in size or the issuance of a building permit for any urban or non-agdculturel uses, the applicant/developer shall provide proof to the City of Bakersfield that the Williamson Act Contract Cancellation fee ($300,000.00 for the 80 gross acre site) outlined in the May 16, 2003, letter from the Kern County Assessor's Office has been paid. If the development of the property is phased, said fee shall be $3,750.00 per gross acre for the land that has an approved subdivision or proposed to be developed as an urban or non-agricultural use. (Condition). If human remains are discovered at any time on the project site, work shall halt and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). In the absence of an archaeological monitor, a qualified archaeologist and the local Native American community, shall be notified. If any other archaeological artifacts are discovered during site development, all work shall stop until the find has been evaluated by a qualified archaeologist or historian. (Mitigation Measure). If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. (Mitigation Measure). If the service requirements exceed the capability of the California Water Service Company's existing facilities or if the extension of the Company's facilities is necessary, service would be provided in accordance to Rule 15 of the State Public Utilities Commission Rules and Regulations. (Mitigation Measure). Intersection street improvements for the year 2023, which are needed to maintain or improve the operational level of service of the street system in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table 1 below. The table also identifies those improvements not covered by the Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program and the project's percentage share for the cost of all non-RTIF (local mitigation) improvements. (Mitigation Measure). Page 1 of 10 GPA / ZC 03-0014 Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 10 Table 1 Future Street Improvements and Local Mitigation Percentages Local Mitigation Project % No. Intersection Total Improvements (Improvements not Sharo for Local Recluired by 2023 covered by RTIF) Mitigation 1 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 WBL, Install Signal- 1 NBL, 4.02% at Santa Fe Way 1 WBR, 1 SBL, 1 EBL, 1 EBR 1 WBL, 1 SBL, 1 EBL ~ 2 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal - 1 SBR, 1 EBL Install Signal - 1 SBR ~ 3.79% at Zacha~ Avenue 3 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal- 1 NBR, 1 WBL Install Signal- 1 NBR ~ 4.19% at Rudd Road 4 Seventh Standard Rd Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 VVBL, Install Signal - 1 NBL, 4.58% At Allen Road 1 SBL, I EBL, 1 EBT 1 SBL~ 5 Snow Road at Atlen Install Signal - 1 EBR, 1 SBL Install Signal - 1 EBR, 9.00% Road 1 SBL 6 Snow Road at Old Install Signal - 1 NBL, I EBL, Install Signal - 1 NBR, 2.75% Farm Road 1 SBL, 1 WBL 1 EBL, 1 SBL, 1 WBL 7 Snow Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 EBL, - ..... Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 WBL 8 Snow Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 NBR, - ..... Calloway Drive 2 WBL, 1 SBL, 1 SBR, 1 EBL, 1 EBR 9 Kratzmeyer Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 EBL, Install Signal- 1 NBL, 4.41% Santa Fe Way 2 1 SBL, 1 WBL 1 EBL, I SBL, 1 WBL 10 Santa Fe at Rudd Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 EBL, Install Signal - 1 NBL 0.78% Road 2 1 WBL 1 EBL, I WBL 12 Kratzmeyer Road at Install Signal - 2 NBL, 2 WBL, 2 NBL, 2 WBL, 1 SBL, 24.88% Allen Road 1 SBL, I EBL, 1 SBT, 1 EBR, 1 EBL, 1 SBT, 1 EBR, 1 NBR 1 NBR 13 Olive Drive at Old Install Signal Install Signal 18.03% Farm Road 14 Olive Drive at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 EBL 9.10% Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 EBL ~ 7th Standard Road has current projects sponsored by the City of Shafter and County of Kern to widen the roadway to fourlanes and improve the interchange with SR 99. These projects are fully funded through the STIP and other funding sources. 2 Project shall pay proportionate share of improvements to improve current configuration. It is anticipated that the crossing at the BNSF Railroad will be grade separated and the existing intersections will be eliminated and reconfigured. Source: Traffic Study for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at Allen road and Kratzmeyer by Ruettgers & Schuller, April 2003. ~)~IGiNAL GPA / ZC 03-0014 Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 10 Table 1 (Continued) Future Street Improvements and Local Mitigation Percentages Local Mitigation Project % No. intersection Total Improvements (improvements not Share for Local Re(~uired by 2003 covered by RTIF) Miti~lation 18 Reina Road at Santa Install Signal- 1 NBL, I WBL, 1 NBR, 1 WBL, 1 SBL, 12.49% Fe Way 2 1 SBL, I EBL I EBL 19 Santa Fe Way at Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 SBL, Install Signal - 1 NBL, 5.29% Renfro Road 2 1 EBL 1 SBL, 1 EBL 20 Reina Road at Allen Install Signal - 1 NBL, I WBL, 1 NBL, 1 WBL, I SBL, 29.65% Road 1 SBL, 1 SBR, 1 EBL, 1 SBT 1 SBR, 1 EBR, 1 SBT 22 Reina Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 WBL, 1 WBL, 1 EBL 12.36% Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 EBL 24 Olive Drive at Install Signal ..... Calloway Drive 25 Olive Drive at Install Signal - 1 NBL, 2 WBL, - ..... Riverlakes Drive 1 EBL 26 Noriega Road at Install Signal- 1 WBR, 1 SBL I WBR, 1 SBL 19.64% Allen Road 28 Noriega Road at Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1WBL, - ..... Jewetta Avenue 1 SBL, 1 EBL 29 Noriega Road at Install Signal- 1 NBL, 1 WBL, - ..... Verdugo Lane 1 SBL, 1 EBL 32 Hageman Road at Install Signal ...... Jenkins Road 33 Hageman Road at Install Signal - 1 NBL, 2 WBL, 1 NBL, 1 SBL 4.17% Santa Fe Way 1 SBL, 1 EBL 34 Hageman Road at Install Signal - 1 EBL, 1 SBR 1 SBR 11.39% Allen Road 35 Hageman Road at Install Signal - 1 NBL ~, - ..... Old Farm Road 1 WBL, I EBL 36 Hageman Road at Install Signal- 2 NBL ...... Jewetta Avenue ~ Currently under construction. 2 Project shall pay proportionate share of improvements to improve current configuration. It is expected that this intersection will be reconflgured to reflect the circulation element in the future. Soume: Traffic Study for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at Allen road and Kratzmeyer by Ruettgers & Schuller, April 2003. GPA / ZC 03-0014 Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 10 Table I (Continued) Future Street Improvements and Local Mitigation Percentages Local Mitigation Project % No. Intersection Total Improvements (Improvements not Share for Local Required by 2023 covered by RTIF) Mitigation 40 Hageman Road at Stdpe for full lane usage ...... Coffee Road 41 Meacham Road at Install Signal ...... Allen Road 42 Rosedale Hwy at 1 NBL, 1 EBL, 1 SBL, 1 WBL 1 SBL 0.53% Allen Road (1.6%)~ 43 Rosedale Hwy at I NBL, 1 NBT, I NBR, 1 WBL, - ..... Calloway Drive 1 WBT, 1 SBT, 1 EBL, 1 EBT ~ State project share calculation. Source: Traffic Study for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at Allen road and Kratzmeyer by Ruettgers & Schuller, April 2003. (Mitigation Measure). It is anticipated that the residential portion of the General Plan Amendment / Zone Change project site will pay the current per lot fee for the Regional Transportation Impact Fee. (Mitigation Measure). The project shall construct roadway improvements along its frontage, pay the proportionate share for the local mitigation improvements identified in the above table, with the residential portion paying the standard per lot rate and the commercial portion of the project paying the fees as shown in Table 2 below. (Mitigation Measure). The Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) street improvements located within the study area of the Traffic Study are presented in Table 2 below, along with the project's responsibility for contribution to each improvement and the total RTIF fee calculation. This RTIF fee calculation is made for the commercial portion of the project proposal only. (Mitigation Measure), Table 2 Re( ional Trans )ortation Facilities List - Metro Bakersfield Trans Impact Fee Program LIMITS IMPROVEM'T NUMBER NUMBER LANES 2020 Project Project Project STREET FROM TO LENGTH of LANES of LANES Funded Model NOTES Traffic % Cost NAME MILES Stdped Proposed by FEE Volumes ADT Allen Rd. Kratzmeyer 16,000 Install signal 3541 22.13 $26,556 Allen Rd. Reina Rd. 16,000 Install signal 4753 29.71 $35,650 Allen Rd. Nodega Rd. 16,000 Install signal 1881 11.75 $14,105 Allen Rd. Meacham 16,000 Install signal 220 1.38% $1,653 Allen Rd. SR 58 Bdmhall 1.00 2 6 2 32,000 83 0.26% $2,787 Allen Rd. Palm Ave. 32,000 install signal 69 0.22% $258 Bdmhall Rd. Allen 32,658 Install signal 48 0.15% $177 Bdmhall Rd. Callowa¥ 63,425 Install signal 34 0.05% $0 Calloway Dr. 7th Standard Snow Road 1.00 2 4 2 32,000 269 0.84% $4,853 Calloway Dr. Snow Road Norris Road 0.50 32,000 41 0.13% $373 Calloway Dr. Norris Road Olive Ddve 0.50 32,000 103 0.32% $933 Calloway Dr. Olive Ddve Hageman 1.00 32,000 69 0.22% $1,244 Calloway Dr. Nodega Rd. 14,111 install signal (50% Funded) 110 0.78% $469 Calloway Dr. Fdant Kern Canal 32,000 Widen canal bddge 69 0.22% $1,076 Calloway Dr. Hageman Meacham 0.50 2 6 4 23,690 193 0.81% $6 Calloway Dr. Meacham SR 58 0.50 4 6 2 24,670 117 0.47% $2,564 Calloway Dr. SR 58 Bdmhall 1.00 2 6 4 38,950 83 0.21% $4,478 Calloway Dr. AT & SF RR 38,950 Grade Sep. (~ AT & SF 83 0.21% $3,184 Coffee Rd. 7th Standard Snow Road 1~00 2 6 2 32,000 34 0.11% $695 Coffee Rd. Snow Rd. Norris 0.50 32,000 69 0.22% $695 Coffee Rd. Downing Rd 27,050 Install signat (50% Funded) 124 0.46% $275 Coffee Rd. SR 58 Bdmhall Rd 1.00 2 6 3 49,290 69 0.14% $966 Colfee Rd. Bdmhall Rd. Tmxtun 0.40 64,210 55 0.09% $237 Coffee Rd. .5 mi s/o SR 58 49,050 Grade Sep. ~, AT & SF 69 0.14% $2,107 Fruitvale Ave. Snow Norris 0.50 2 4 2 16,000 34 0.22% $1,000 Fmitvale Ave. 600' s/o Snow 16,000 Widen Culvert ~, Beardstey Canal 34 0.22% $215 Fruitvale Ave. Hageman Meany Ave. 0.50 16,000 110 0.69% $3,754 Fruitvale Ave. Meany Ave. SR 58 0.75 2 6 2 16,000 69 0.43% $3,520 Fmitvale Ave. Meany Ave. 12,934 Install signal (50% funded) 69 0.53% $639 Fruitvale Ave. Downing Ave. 12,934 Install signal 69 0.53% $639 Hageman Rd Renfro Santa Fe Way 1.00 2 6 4 32,000 400 1.25% $12,308 Hageman Rd Renfro 16,000 Install signal 386 2.41% $2,893 Hageman Rd Jenkins Rd. 16,000 Install signal 344 2.15% $2,583 Hageman Rd Santa Fe Way 16,000 Install signal 648 4.05% $4,857 Hageman Rd AT & SF RR 16,000 Improve Grade Crossing ~ RR 648 4.05% $4,047 Hageman Rd Santa Fe Way Old Farm 0.50 2 6 4 32,000 install signal 751 2.35% $11,512 Hageman Rd Allen Rd 16,000 Install signal 1398 8.74% $10,488 Hageman Rd Old Farm 16,000 Install signal 696 4.35% $5,218 Hageman Rd , Old Farm Jewetta 0.50 2 6 4 32,000 627 1.96% $0 Hageman Rd Jeweffa 22,351 nsta signal 1157 5.18% $6,214 i- .Ha~geman Rd Jewetta Verdugo 0.50 2 6 4 32,000 751 2.35% $11,313 FI~.~. ,~. Rd Verdugo 19,312 install signal 1054 0.79% $951 Hage~en Rd Verdugo Calloway 0.50 2 6 4 32,000 799 2.50% $12,039 Hagen~n Rd Calloway 1300' E 0.25 2 6 I 32,000 551 1.72% $926 Hage[r~an Rd Calloway 42,668 nsta signal 792 0.27% $0 . J~ _~l~an Rd Col f~..e 61,255 Install signal 939 0.09% $0 Page 5 of 10 Table 2 (Cont.) Regional Transportation Facilities List - Metro Bakersfield Trans Impact Fee Program L~'MITS IMPROVEM'I' NUMBER NUMBER LANES 2020 Project Project Project STREET FROM TO LENGTH of LANES of LANES Funded Model NOTES Traffic % Cost NAME MILES Stdped Proposed by FEE Volumes ADT Hageman Rd Patton Way 26,620 Install signal 186 0.70% $838 Hagernan Rd FnJitva~e 41,172 Install signal 165 0.40% $482 Hageman Rd FnJitvale Mohawk 0.13 2 6 4 26,870 69 0.26% $812 Hagernan Rd Mohawk 41,261 install signal 48 0.12% $140 Jenkins Rd. Hageman Rosedata Hwy 1.00 2 4 2 16,000 55 0.34% $1,765 Jewetta Ave. Snow Olive Dr. 1.00 2 4 2 32,000 324 1.01% $5,528 Jewetta Ave. Olive Dr. Hageman Rd. 1.00 32,000 875 2.73% $14,937 Jewetta Ave. Hageman Rd. Meacham Rd. 0.50 32,000 186 0.58% $1,588 Jewetta Ave. Kratzmeyer 16,000 Install signal 1040 6.50% $7,802 Jewetta Ave. Snow 16,000 Install signal 427 2.67% $3,203 Jewetta Ave. Reina 16,000 Install signal 1116 6.97% $8,370 Jewetta Ave. Nodega 16,000 Install signal 1026 6.42% $7,698 Jewetta Ave. Meacham Rd 16,000 Install signal 117 0.73% $878 Main Plaza Dr. Bdmhall Rd. Rosedale Hwy 1.00 0 4 2 16,000 34 0.22% $624 Norris Rd. Caltoway 16,000 install signal 172 1.08% $1,292 Norris Rd. Rivedakes 16,000 Install signal (50% Funded) 103 0.65% $387 Norris Rd. Coffee 16,000 Install signal 117 0.73% $878 Norris Rd. Patton Way 16,000 Install signal 76 0.47% $568 Old Farm Rd. Reina Rd. 16,000 Install signal 1419 8.87% $10,643 Old Farm Rd. Nodega Rd. 16,000 install signal 331 2.07% $2,480 Olive Dr. Jewetta Callowa¥ 1.20 0 2 2 32,000 648 2.02% $15,740 Olive Dr. Jewetta 14,761 Install signal 1040 7.05% $8,456 Olive Dr. Calloway 28,927 Install signal 530 1.83% $2,200 Olive Dr. Calloway Canal F-K Canal 32,000 Bridges ~ Calloway & Fr. Kern 462 1.44% $14,423 Olive Dr. Calloway Riveriakes 0.50 0 6 4 24,090 358 1.49% $6,394 Olive Dr. Riveriakes Coffee 0.25 4 6 1 24,090 289 1.20% $646 Olive Dr. Coffee 59,039 Install signal 276 0.07% $81 Olive Dr. Riverlakes 24,090 Install signal 344 0.21% $249 Olive Dr. Coffee Fmitvale 1.00 2 4 2 39,750 145 0.36% $1,258 Olive Dr. Fruitvale Mohawk St. 0.50 44,230 48 0.11% $188 Patton Way Meany Ave. Downing Ave. 0.25 0 4 2 16,000 69 0.43% $312 Patton Way Mean¥ Ave. 16,000 Install signal 69 0.43% $517 Patton Way Downing Ave. 16,000 Install signal 69 0.43% $517 Renffo Rd. Santa Fe Way Ha,cjernan 1.00 2 4 2 32,000 276 0.86% $5,800 Renfro Rd. Hagernan Rosedale Hwy 1.00 32,000 270 0.65% $4,350 Renfn3 Rd. Rosedale Hwy. Brimhall Rd. 0.50 32,000 138 0.43% $2,900 Santa Fe Way Reina Rd. 11,576 Instalt signal 1185 10.24 $12,283 7th Standard I Allen Callowa¥ 2.00 2 4 2 16,000 90 0.56% $4,814 7th Standard Calloway Coffee 1.00 15,979 207 1.29% $5,561 7th Standard Coffee SR 99 0.50 23,059 152 0.66% $1,413 7th Standard Calloway 15,979 Install signal 207 1.29% $1,552 fT~,~edard Coffee 23,267 Install signal 152 0.65% $782 7th-~'t~ard SR 99 32,000 Widen 99 Int.; Grade Sep. ~ SP 152 0.47% $21,312 7th Stal~dard N/B SR 99 ramp 24,260 Install signal 55 0.23% $273 7th Stil~ard SR 99 SR 65 0.50 2 4 2 25,558 55 0.22% $464 Sn(~,~d. Jewett Verdugo 0.50 2 4 2 32~000 365 1.14% $3,145 '~ Rd. Calloway Canal Friant-Kern Canal 32,000 Reconstruct Calloway & Friant Kern bridge 324 1.01 % $10,118 Page 6 of 10 Table 2 (Cont.) Regional Trans ~ortation Facilities List - Metro Bakersfield Trans ~,ortation Impact Fee Program LIMITS IMPROVEM'T NUMBER NUMBER LANES 2020 Project Project Project STREET FROM TO LENGTH of LANES of LANES Funded Model NOTES Traffic % Cost NAME MILES Striped Proposed by FEE Volumes ADT Snow Rd. Verdugo 16,000 Install signal 324 2.02% $2,428 Snow Rd. Verdugo Calloway 0.50 2 4 2 16,000 324 2.02% $5,577 Snow Rd. Calfuway 16,000 Install signal 358 2.24% $2,687 Snow Rd. Calloway Coffee 1.00 2 4 2 16,000 48 0.30% $1,843 Snow Rd. Coffee Fruitvale 1.00 16,000 34 0.22% $1,317 Snow Rd. Rivedakes Dr. 16,000 Install signal 48 0.30% $362 Snow Rd. Coffi.~e 15,519 Install signal 34 0.22% $266 Snow Rd. Patton Way 12,061 Install signal 34 0.29% $343 Snow Rd. Fruitvale 21,224 Install signal 34 0.16% $195 SR 58/Rosedale Heath 16,000 Install signa~ 90 0.56% $672 SR 581 Rosedale .5 mi w/o Renfro Allen Rd. 1.50 2 6 4 32,000 ~ & const, cost based on pro, ram Unit C 90 0.28% $13,287 SR 58/Rosedale Renfro 32,210 Install signal 172 0.53% $642 SR 58/Rosedale Jenkins Rd. 21,843 Install signal 138 0.63% $757 SR 58/Rosedale Allen Rd. 33,387 Signal modification 145 0.43% $173 SR 581 Rosedale Alien Rd. Jewetta I 4 6 2 42,465 R/W & const, cost based on pro~ram Unit C 90 0.21% $3,185 SR 58/Rosedale Jewetta Calloway I 4 6 2 46,120 69 0.15% $2,256 SR 58/Rn~,~le Calloway Coffee 1 4 6 2 65,360 103 0.16% $2,387 SR 58/R',~,~=~e Coffee Fruitvale I 4 6 2 58,735 69 0.12% $1,771 SR 58/Rosedale Fruitvale Mohawk St. 0.5 4 6 2 51,740 55 0.11% $804 SR 58/Rosedale Mohawk St. Gibson 0.75 4 6 2 77,095 55 0.07% $810 SR 58/F~n~m"l~le Old Farm Rd. 42,465 Install signal 69 0.16% $195 SR 58/Rosedale Jewetta 16,000 Worms 55 0.34% $413 SR 58/Rosedale AT & SF RR 49,522 Widen RR Grade Sep. (Jewetta) 55 0.11% $534 SR 58/Rn~.~lnle Coffee Fruitvale 58,735 Widen Faint Kern Canal bridge 69 0.12% $464 SR 58/Rosedale Coffee Fruitvale 58,735 Widen 2 Canal Bridges 69 0.12% $704 SR 58/Rosedale Verdugo 46.120 Signal modification 69 0.15% $0 SR 58/R,~w~=~e ' Calloway 66,935 Signal modification 165 0.25% $296 SR 58/Rne~=v.l=le Coffee 94,015 Signal modification 103 0.11% $0 SR 58/Rosedale Main Plaza Dr. 65,360 install signal (50% funded) 69 0.11% $63 SR 58/Rosedale Patton Way 58,735 Install signal 69 0.12% $141 SR 581 Rosedale Fruitvale 62,562 Signal modification 55 0.09% $106 SR 58/Rne,~l=le, Mohawk 113,725 install signal 55 0.05% $58 SR 58/Rosedale Landco 77,095 Signal modification 55 0.07% $86 SR 58/Rosedale Gibson 89,930 Signal modification 55 0.06% $74 SR 581 Rosedale AT & SF RR 77,095 improve RRX ~ AT & SF (w/o Landco) 55 0.07% $71 Verdugo Rd. Reina Rd. 16,000 Install signal 193 1.21% $1,447 Verdugo Rd. Nodega Rd. 16,000 Instal[ signal 400 2.50% $2,997 Verdugo Rd. Meacham Rd. 16,000 Install signal 172 1.08% $1,292 Tronsit Costs 12,033,678 35615 0.30% $22,754 [It'r'e~ays 12,033,678 50% of Beltway PJW and SR 178 35615 0.30% $13,789 Adml'r~tration 12,033,678 Computer Track ng System (City & County) 35615 0.30% $296 TOTALS $422,445 Page 7 of 10 GPA / ZC 03-0014 Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 10 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. The GC (General Commercial) area shall be modified in order to provide a local street along the south side of the site. This local street shall be aligned with the street proposed to the east of Allen Road. The GC site shall have 25 acres gross. (Condition). The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a new legal description stamped and signed by a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer, prior to the City of Bakersfield City Council meeting when this item is to be presented to the City Council. (Condition). With submittal of a Land Division or Lot Line Adjustment application, provide dedication of Kratzmeyer Road, Allen Road, and Reina Road to arterial and collector standards. (Condition). Submit a comprehensive drainage study to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Site any drainage retention facility on the periphery of the GPA area to facilitate future expansion or consolidation of drainage facilities as adjacent area develops. The study shall be approved and any required retention site and necessary easements dedicated to the City. (Condition). Submit verification to the North of River Sanitary District manager of the existing sewer systems capability to accept the additional flows to be generated through development under the new land use and zoning. (Condition). Payment of median fees for the frontage of the property within the GPA request. These fees may be paid prior to recordation of any map or approval of improvement plans. (Condition). Access to the arterial and collector streets will be limited and determined at time of division or development. Determination of whether a right turn lane is required at the access street(s) will also be made at the time of division or development. A full access opening will only be considered if the developer funds and installs a traffic signal at the site entrance. Said signal will only be permitted if a signal synchronization study is submitted and approved, which shows progression is not adversely affected. (Condition). The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the Consolidated Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidate Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of this GPA area. (Condition). Local Mitigation: Pay the proportionate share of the following mitigation measures (not paid for by the Regional Impact Fee) as indicated in Table 7 of the Traffic Study for the project. Based upon the project trip generation, 20% is attributed to the residential and 80% to the commercial. An estimate and fee schedule shall be developed by the applicant and approved by Public Works prior to recordation of a map or issuance of a building permit. GPA / ZC 03-0014 Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 10 a. Snow Road/Allen Road - Install signal, add south bound left turn lane, east bound right turn lane, 9.00% share. b. Snow Road/Old Farm Road - Install signal, add south, east and west bound left turn lanes, north bound right turn lane, 2.75% share. c. Kratzmeyer Road/Santa Fe Way- Install signal, add north, east, south and west bound left turn lanes, 4.41% share. d. Santa Fe Way/Rudd Road - Install signal, add north, east and west bound left turn lanes, 0.78% share. e. Kratzmeyer Road/Allen Road - add 2 north and 2 west bound left turn lanes, add south bound and east bound left turn lanes, east and north bound right turn lanes, 24.88% share. f. Olive Drive/Old Farm Road - Install signal, 18.03% share. g. Olive Drive/Jewetta Avenue - add east bound left turn lane, 9.10% share. h. Santa Fe Way/Reina Road - add north, east, south and west bound left turn lanes, 12.49% share. i. Santa Fe Way/Renfro Road - Install signal, add north, south and east bound left turn lanes, 5.29% share. j. Reina Road/Allen Road - add north, south and west bound left turn lanes, south and east bound right turn lanes, south bound through lane, 29.65% share. k. Reina Road/Jewetta Avenue - add west and east bound left turn lanes, 12.36% share. I. Noriega Road/Allen Road - add west bound right turn lane, south bound left turn lane, 19.64% share. m. Hageman Road/Santa Fe Way- add north and south bound left turn lanes, 4.17% share. n. Hageman Road/Allen Road - add south bound right turn lane, 11.39% share. o. Rosedale Highway/Allen Road - add south bound left turn lane, 1.60% share. (Condition). 18. Regional Transportation Impact Fee: 19. The Traffic Study for the project provided an analysis of the project share of the impact fee for the commercial portion at $422,445 ($32.27 per trip). If the commercial development is submitted for site plan review after adoption of the Phase 3 Impact Fees, the RTIF calculation shall be updated to reflect the new facilities list. Pay the computed commercial fee and the standard full regional transportation impact fee as adopted at the time of development for the residential portion of the project. (Condition). Prior to recordation of tract maps within the residential areas or the issuance of building permits for the commercial area, within the GPA/ZC project site, the developer shall select and implement one or a combination of the following measures and/or programs to result in a reduction in ROG and NOX emissions with an equivalence to 283 agricultural engines, with the commercial area being responsible for 80% of the reductions and the residential area being responsible for 20%: (a) In the event the City adopts an Indirect Source Rule fee or other similar fee to reduce air quality impacts prior to the recordation of subdivisions for the residential area or issuance of building permits for the commercial area of this project site, this project GPA / ZC 03-0014 Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 10 20. 21. 22. 23. (b) shall be subject to the fees in effect at the time. Mitigation programs such as, but not limited to, the following: 1. Car crushing of older model cars. This may be achieved in conjunction with an established entity such as the Remove Program. 2. Modification to stationary diesel engines, such as for agriculture use. 3. Modification of fleet vehicles and/or other mobile sources. 4. Financing of a project acceptable to the Air Pollution Control District. (Condition). If one or more of these programs are selected by the developer, proof of compliance with these measures must be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and the Air Pollution Control District prior to issuance of building permits for the commercial area or recordation of residential tract maps for the residential area. Proof of compliance may include documentation of the year, number, and type of cars crushed, location and type of engines modified (photo documentation) and quantification of emissions reduced by Air Pollution Control District or the Air Quality consultant. Mitigation may be proportionate to the air quality impacts of the area proposed to be mitigated. (Condition). Due to changes is the methodology or science, or due to changes in the assumptions made in the analysis at the time of approval, the developer will always maintain the right to requantify and reevaluate air quality impacts. (Condition). Access shall be provided for both pedestrian and vehicles along the west and south sides of the commercial site. (Condition). The commercial site shall have a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) overlay zone. (Condition). MO:djl Pdnted: 06/24/2003 2:32:29 PM EXHIBIT "B" Map rtl CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ZONING MAP SEC 1 I T 29 S LEGEND 101-11 EXHIBIT "C" Legal Description Zone Change 03-0014 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ZONING Zone Change from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (Single Family Residential): Lots 18, 31 and 32 of the Sales Map of Lands of Kern County Land Company filed January 9,1891 in the office of the Kern County Recorder. Excepting the north 160 feet of Lot 32 of said Sales Map; Also excepting the north 160 feet of the east 80 feet of Lot 31 of said Sales Map; Also excepting the east 80 feet of Lot 18 of said Sales Map. Contains approximately fifty -five (55) acres. Zone Change from A (Agriculture) to C-2 (Regional Commercial) Lot 17 of the Sales Map of Lands of Kern County Land Company filed January 9,1891 in the office of the Kern County Recorder. Also, the north 160 feet of Lot 32 of said Sales Map; Also, the north 160 feet of the east 80 feet of Lot 31 of said Sales Map; Also, the east 80 feet of Lot 18 of said Sales Map. Contains approximately twenty - five (25) acres. All lands are located in the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 11, Township 29 South, Range 26 East, MDB&M. Also being the east half of Assessor's Parcel 462-021-080 REVISED JUNE 1,20~3 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Kern ) PAMELA A. McCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; and that on the 28th day of Au.qust , 2003 she posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following: Ordinance No. 4138 , passed by the Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the 27th day of Auqust 2003 and entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE SEVENTEENOF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING MAP NO. 101-11 BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM A (AGRICULTURE) TO AN R-1 (ONE FAMILY DWELLING) ZONE ON 55 ACRES AND TO C-2/PCD (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL/PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT) ON 25 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER ON REINA ROAD AND ALLEN ROAD. ~si PAMELA A. McCARTHY City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield