HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 35-96RESOLUTION NO. 3 5 ' 9 6
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING THE
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield recognizes that planning for trails and
support facilities provides a benefit for its residents consistent with the policies of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a Specific Trails Plan containing policies, standards,
identification of trail alignments and support facilities, financing and typical design
standards has been prepared, as shown in attached Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, from time to time, the Specific Trails Plan may be amended to
include trail plans for other locations within the city, identified as a "Phase" of the
Specific Trails Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, through its Secretary, did set,
MONDAY, July 17, 1995 and THURSDAY, July 20, 1995, at the hour of 5:30 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtan Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the
time and place for a public workshop before said Planning Commission on said items;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, through its Secretary, did set,
MONDAY, September 18, 1995 and THURSDAY, September 21, 1995 and continued
to MONDAY, October 16, 1995 and THURSDAY, October 19, 1995 at the hour of 5:30
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,
California, as the time and place for a public hearing before said Planning Commission
on said items, and said public hearing was held in the manner set forth in the
Bakersfield Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 80-95
transmitting the Commission's recommendation for approval and adoption of the
Specific Trails Plan and implementing ordinance to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, through the City Clerk, did set,
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 10~ 1996, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers
of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a
public hearing before said Council on said items, and said public hearing was held in the
manner set forth in the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council referred the Specific Trails Plan and related
ordinance to the Urban Development Committee for further review; and
WHEREAS, the Urban Development Committee discussed said items in
meetings held, January 17 and 29, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Urban Development Committee submitted a report to the
City Council recommending approval of the Specific Trails Plan and related ordinance
with some changes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, through the City Clerk, did set,
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6, 1996, at the hour of 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a
public hearing before said Council on said items, and said public hearing was held in the
manner set forth in the Bakersfield Municipal Code and State Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and
adoption of the Negative Declaration, as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's
CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff, Planning
Commission and Council; and
WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an Initial Study was
conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on June
19, 1995 and September 1, 1995 in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the physical constraint of the topographic features of the
Phase 1 planning area severely limits design and construction to accommodate the
physically disabled on the trails, especially the river access trail where it is designed to
provide the least disturbance to the environment; and
WHEREAS, several speakers made comment at said hearing held before
the Council; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered said written and verbal comments
submitted by the public, and responses to those comments presented by staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND AND RESOLVED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD as follows:
1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.
2. The provisions of CEQA have been followed.
3. The Negative Declaration is hereby approved.
4. The natural environment would be materially damaged by
compliance with the standards for providing accessibility for the physically disabled.
5. The Specific Trails Plan is consistent with the objectives, goals and
policies of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
6. The Specific Trails Plan dated February 12, 1996, as shown in
attached Exhibit "A," is adopted.
......... 000 ........
3
I HEREBY ~.ERTIFY that the foregoing Resolutio. was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
M~R 0 fi 1~ , by the following vote:
A~ES: COUNClLMEMI~ER DeMOND, CARSON, SMITH, t/~OE~/~OTT,
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ~0rLL
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ~)~O~J~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER k
Acting CITY CLERK and Ex Officio (~lerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
I~AE 0 6 1~
APPROVED
BOB PRICE c/
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
Deputy City Attorney
JENG
February 20, 1996
res~rstp.cc
4
EXHIBIT "A"
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
FOR THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FEBRUARY 12, 1996
Prepared by:
City of Bakersfield
Planning Department
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3733
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
Purpose: The purpose of the Specific Trails Plan is to implement the policies of the
Kern River Plan Element and other elements of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
such as the Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and Parks Elements. Adoption and
implementation of the Trails Plan achieves several goals of the General Plan: 1) provide public
access to and along the Kern River with a comprehensive trails system; 2) provide alternate
modes of transportation; 3) provide for an integrated circulation system; and 4) help conserve
sensitive habitat.
Summary: The Specific Trails Plan identifies trail alignments and support facilities
and provides for acquiring land dedications, improvements, maintenance, and development
standards for multiple use trails. Multi-use trails include use by pedestrians, hikers, equestrians
and bicyclists. Support facilities provide public parking areas to access trails. Policies of the
Specific Trails Plan require that new residential development provide its proportionate share of
land dedication or payment of in-lieu fee for trails and their improvement. However, developers
adjacent to the river are subject to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the general
plan. These developers shall be required to dedicate the river access trail and support facility
and associated road access.
The Specific Trails Plan sets the general policies and development standards. Each identified
benefit area to be served by a trails plan is designated as a "phase" of the Specific Trails Plan.
As trail plans are identified for certain areas, the Specific Trails Plan will be amended to include
each subsequent phase. For example, Phase 1 covering northeast Bakersfield, in the general
vicinity of Alfred Harrell Highway, Rancheria Road, Highway 178 and the Kern River has been
included as a subsection of Chapter 2.
To ensure consistency, concurrent amendments to the KRPE and Circulation Element may be
needed to incorporate portions of the proposed trails system. The city engineer will revise or
prepare engineering design standards to reflcct development standards of the Trails Plan.
Implementation: The Specific Trails Plan is proposed to be adopted as a planning
document by which all new development must be consistent. Implementation of the
requirements are similar to the city's park land and park development requirements. An
ordinance would be adopted requiring the residential development's proportionate share of land
for trails be dedicated or an in-lieu fee paid at the time of recordation of a final subdivision map.
A fee based on a development's proportionate share to construct the trails would be collected at
the time of building permit issuance. A resolution would be adopted setting the fee in
accordance with the Specific Trails Plan formulas which calculate a development's proportionate
share. Construction of the support facilities would be funded by grants, the general fund,
donations or other methods.
For the Phase 1 planning area, it is estimated that the fee for a one family house to be $23 for a
fee in-lieu of land dedication and $120 for development costs (for a total of $143 per house).
For a multiple family unit, the fcc in-licu of land dedication is estimatcd at $18 and $90
development costs (for a total of $108 per unit).
X'STP'EXS i February IZ 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER If: PROPOSED TRAIL
ALIGNMENTS, SUPPORT FACILITIES
AND LOCATION MAPS FOR PHASES
CHAPTER III: ACQUISITION AND
IMPROVEMENTS
CHAPTER IV: MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
CHAPTER V: DESIGN STANDARDS
GLOSSARY
REFERENCES
i
ii
I-1
II-1
III-1
IV-1
V-1
G-1
R-1
TECHNICAL APPENDICES: The following Appendices under separate cover
on file in the Planning Department:
Appendix 1: Data and Calculations
Appendix 2: August 3, 1994 Scoping meeting participant list.
Case Summaries of Parcel Map 9900 and Tentative
Parcel Map 9899.
Summary of applicable general plan policies.
Appendix 3: Aerial photos.
ii
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.
Purpose. This document is the City of Bakersfield's "Specific Trails Plan" to satisfy
the policies and implementation measures contained in the Kern River Plan Element of
the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. In accordance with the policies of the
General Plan, this "Specific Trails Plan" (hereinafter referred to as Trails Plan) has been
prepared to identify alignments, and address provisions for dedications, acquisitions,
improvements, maintenance, and development standards of multiple use trails. The
multi-use trail system provides facilities for pedestrians, hiking, equestrians and bicyclists,
as well as support facilities such as public parking areas. This Trails Plan will indicate
how trials connect with similar existing or planned trails or other public property or with
easement areas of the Kern River Plan Element and surrounding areas.
Each subdivision, residential, commercial, or other development 2 project shall conform
to the adopted Specific Trails Plan herein, and standards approved by the city engineer.
The advisory agency, as defined for purposes of this plan, shall have authority and
responsibility to review, approve, conditionally approve or deny said development
projects to ensure that each project conforms with the policies, trails, support facilities
and standards of this Trails Plan. The city engineer shall be responsible for staff review
of projects, making recommendation to the advisory agency, and implementation of the
policies, standards, and requirements of this Trails Plan.
The intent and purpose of the Trails Plan is to implement the policies of the Kern River
Plan Element (KRPE) and other elements of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General
Plan, such as the Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and Parks Elements. 3 Adoption
and implementation of the Trails Plan achieves several goals of the General Plan. First,
the Trails Plan provides public access to and along the Kern River, and a comprehensive
trails system for the lands within the boundaries of the KRPE. Secondly, it provides and
promotes trail connections to the KRPE area and alternate modes of transportation for
residents. Thirdly, the Trails Plan attempts to balance the need for trails with the
existence of sensitive biological resources and natural features of the area. Lastly, the
Trails Plan supports an integrated circulation system, minimizing conflicts between
different types of trails and recognizing trail planning efforts by other agencies. The
Trails Plan shall be adopted as a policy document supported by ordinances and
resolutions, subject to required public hearings.
l "Kern River Plan Element", Chapter 111, Policy 3.1.3 and 3.5.3; Chapter V, Implementation - Policy 5.3.
2 See Glossary for definition of "development" project. This is the same definition as stated in the Kern
River Plan Element, Appendix, page A-I.
3 See Technical Appendix for summary of general plan policies applicable to this Trails Plan.
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I
The trail segments and support facilities shown in this Trails Plan do not preclude amendment
to this Trails Plan to provide additional or alternate trail alignments within the planning areas,
or the consideration and addition of other planning areas. A Trails Plan for each reach of the
Kern River within the KRPE, will be adopted as part of this Trails Plan.
In conjunction with these policies, applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act (§ 66478.1
eq seq) are used in preparing the Trails Plan. Also, the Trails Plan takes into consideration
trails and support facilities provided through previous approvals. 4
To ensure consistency, concurrent amendments to the KRPE and Circulation Element may be
needed to incorporate portions of the trails system included in this plan. The city engineer will
subsequently revise or prepare engineering standards to reflect the development standards
shown in this plan.
While the area governed by the Kern River Plan Element generally reaches from the mouth of
the Kern River Canyon westward to Interstate 5, the Trails Plan will initially address selected
reaches of the Kern River within City jurisdiction, eventually resulting in a comprehensive
Trails Plan for the entire area governed by the Element. Areas selected for specific trails plans
will be referred to as "Phases." For each segment of the KRPE a Trails Plan is proposed,
opportunities will be provided for property owners and other interest groups to comment, in
addition to the required public notice and hearings.
How To Use This Plan.
The organization of the Trails Plan consists of the chapter headings listed below.
Specific Trails Plan Chapters
Chapter I.
Chapter II.
Chapter 1II.
Chapter IV.
Chapter V.
Glossary
Introduction.
Proposed Trail Alignments, Facilities and Location Maps.
(Specific trails plans for different areas along the Kern River shall
be adopted as "Phases.")
Dedication and Improvement.
Maintenance and Operations.
Design Standards.
Technical Appendix under separate cover.
Parcel Map 9900 and Tentative Parcel Map 9899.
I-2
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I
Chapter II and corresponding Map 1.1 shows the planning area for Phase 1 of this Trails
Plan. The trails system shown on Map 2.1 describes the location, type, character and
relationship to the trail system for the Phase 1 Planning Area along the south side of the
Kern River from Rancheria Road westward to Alfred Hartell Highway.
Other chapters provide guidelines, policies and implementation measures in support of
the Trails Plan, and are to be used as a planning document in evaluation of proposed
projects within the area.
Amendment Procedure.
The actual trails shall closely match the alignments shown in this plan, and be subject to
design standards. Deviations in the alignments may be allowed based on factors such as
public safety, topographic constraints or sound engineering practices. If deemed
necessary by the city engineer, such a change may require public notice and hearing in
accordance with the amendment provisions of this Trails Plan.
An application to amend this Trails Plan shall be made in writing to the planning
director. The planning director shall provide the forms for such an amendment, and
may prescribe filing deadlines, collection of processing fees, the type of information to
be provided, and any administrative procedure necessary to comply with federal, state
and local regulations. No application shall be deemed complete unless it complies with
such requirements.
The planning director shall determine application completeness. Upon said
completeness determination, and in accordance to the type of request as described
below, the matter shall be promptly set and noticed for a public hearing before the
appropriate advisory agency. Said notice shall be advertised in a newspaper of local
distribution at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date. Property owners within 300
feet of the project site and subject trail location shall be notified by mail at least ten (10)
days prior to the hearing date.
The Advisory Agency shall cause to be made by its own members, or members of its
staff, the investigation of facts bearing upon the application as will serve to provide all
necessary information to assure that the action on each application is consistent with the
intent and purpose of this Trails Plan. Any amendment is subject to environmental
review in accordance with state and local regulations and policies. The City Council
shall have final authority.
I-3
STP. I February 12, 1~6
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall have authority to initiate
amendment, amend with or without condition and deny amendment to the Trails Plan
upon determining such amendment is consistent with the purpose of this Trails Plan and
that the public's interest, health, safety or welfare.
Secondly, the Planning Commission shall have authority to review, amend or
conditionally amend or deny amendment requests to the Trails Plan concurrently with a
related project that is subject to Title 16 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. An
example of a project subject to Planning Commission review under this circumstance
includes an application for a tentative tract, which upon engineering design or other
professional evidence, indicates a trail alignment as shown on the Trails Plan should be
relocated.
Thirdly, the Planning Commission shall have the authority to review, amend or
conditionally amend or deny amendment requests to the Trails Plan for all other
"development" projects, which propose related amendments to the Trails Plan. The
types of "development" projects and related amendments include but are not limited to
Site Plan Review, grading plans, parcel map waivers, or other permits.
The decision of the Planning Commission is final if not appealed to the City Council in a
timely manner in the proper form in accordance with Section 16.52 of the Bakersfield
Municipal Code.
City Council. The City Council shall consider applications which do not have
related applications as described in the above-mentioned paragraphs. City Council shall
be authorized to review, amend with or without condition, or deny any request for
amendment, and hear appeals of decisions made by the Planning Commission or Board
of Zoning Adjustment. The City Council may initiate review or amendment of this
Trails Plan.
Board of Zoning Adjustment. The Board of Zoning Adjustment shall have authority
to review, amend with or without condition or deny an amendment request when such
request is related to and concurrently heard with application for conditional use permit
or zoning modification to be heard by the Board of Zoning Adjustment.
I-4
STP, I February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I
AMENDMENT RECORD
DATE APPROVED
FILE NO. & DESCRIPTION
I-5
STP. I February 12, 1996
MAP 1
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLANNING
GENERAL PHASE LOCATIONS
~OSEDALE
SEE INDIVIDUAL PHASE M/~S FOR
CI'IY LIMITS AND PRECISE BOUNDARIES
AVE.
z
'A' KERN RIVER PARKWAY
PLAN
'B' PHASE
CHAPTER II.
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENTS, FACILITIES AND
LOCATION MAPS.
Location: Kern River Parkway.
For the area within the Kern River Plan Element west of Manor Street to Stockdale
Highway Bridge, a specific trails plan was approved as part of the Kern River Parkway
Plan in 1988. The Kern River Parkway Plan trail alignments are hereby incorporated by
reference.
2.1. Location: South Side of the Kern River, Generally Between Rancheria Road
westward to Kern River County Park (Lake Mina area). (Map 2)
Background. Due to interest of the property owners and other development pressures,
the Trails Plan will first consider as the Phase 1 Planning Area, the area on the south
side of the Kern River, generally located between Rancheria Road westward to Kern
River County Park (Lake Ming area). Map 1.1 depicts the planning area for the trail
alignments shown on Map 2.1. The uniqueness of the area shown on Map 1.1, as
recognized by the Kern River Plan Element, the imminent urban development, and the
foothill topography, lends itself at this time to planning a comprehensive Trails Plan and
integrated circulation and transportation systems to serve those future residents.
Recent subdivision activity and major infrastructure projects, like construction of the
northeast sewer trunkline, are examples of forthcoming urban development. It is
expected that trail connections to the east side of Rancheria Road and westerly of
Alfred Harrell Highway will be adopted in future phases.
During the recent subdivision application process for two parcel maps in this reach of
the Kern River, Tentative Parcel Map 9899 and Parcel Map 9900, it became apparent
that a focused evaluation for providing trails was necessary. The property owners,
interest groups and the City agreed to certain trail alignments, types of trails and support
facilities, such as parking lots, in accordance with Subdivision Map Act Sections 66478.1
eq seq and policies of the KRPE. These agreements were incorporated into each
subdivision's conditions of approval. Refer to the appendix for more description of the
river access and trail conditions of these parcel maps. To a great extent, the alignments
resulting from these parcel maps have been reflected in this Trails Plan.
In addition, the Olcese Water District is expected to expand its treatment plant facilities
located along the south bank of the Kern River, on the north side of Parcel Map 9900.
The expansion of the facility shall accommodate public access along the Kern River. It
is likely that public access easements adjacent to the facility would be adjusted to
provide both security for the facility and public access to and along the river. These
adjustments would not require amendment to the Trails Plan as long as the city engineer
finds the adjusted alignments substantially in conformance with providing contiguous
access to and along the river.
MAP 2
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN - PHASE 1
PLANNING AREA
· KERN RIV~
· qOLF COUR$£
HIGHWAY
pALADINO DR.
16
~ 22
11
14
RIO BRAVO
~OLF
BOUNDARY UH£
23
II-2
MAP 2.1
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN - PHASE 1
RANCHERIA ROAD TO ALFRED HARREL.L HIGHWAY
KERN
R/VER
GOU~
COURSE
2i
15
C/FY
COUNTY
~ -- 2.1 .A PAVED
MULTI-USE
TRAIL
(o~o. i)
.... 2.1.8 BIKE
TRAIL -
CLASS I1
(DL~C. 2)
.... 2.1.C
ROUTE -
CLASS
.... 2.1.D RIVER
ACCESS TRAIL
(mAC.
-----. C~TY/COUN'rY
UNE
..... 2.1.E UNPAVED
MULTI-USE
TRAIL
....... 2.1 .F COMBINAllON
TRAIL
(D~. ~)
(~) 1/2 ACRE
PARKING AREA
(2.1.2)
{~) 2 ACRE
PARKING LOT
(2.1.1)
T29S, R29E sero,
11-3
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER II
Aerial photographs (1990) were initially used to identify the trail alignments (See
Specific Trails Plan Technical Appendix on file with the planning director). Additional
reference was made with 1985, and 1980 aerial photos to determine historical use of
trails within the planning area. Trail alignments agreed to with previous project
approvals were also consulted. These alignments have then been drawn on Map 2.1
contained in this Chapter. Upon development or as more detailed development plans
are approved, the actual trail alignments shall be surveyed and delineated to the
satisfaction of the city engineer.
Phase 1 Proposed Trail Alignments. (Refer to Segment Number on Map 2.1)
Based on discussions with property owners, recreational groups including bicycle,
equestrian, fishermen, hiking interests, and environmental groups, general agreement to
the trail alignments and characters are described below. Conceptual agreement to the
proposed trail alignments resulted from a scoping session held with interested parties on
August 3, 1994.~ However, further evaluation of these trail segments is necessary for
assurance that the trails can be provided to acceptable engineering standards, and result
in reasonable relationships with future development and topography of the land. Design
standards for the improvement of the trails and facilities are discussed in Chapter V.
The physical constraint of the topographic features in the Phase 1 planning area severely
limits design and construction to accommodate the physically disabled on the trails. In
particular, the unpaved multi-use trails, and unpaved river access trail are designed to
provide the least disturbance to the environment. Design and construction for disabled
access would be materially detrimental to the environment; therefore not included in this
Trails Plan.
Trails extending east of Rancheria Road are expected to be determined in the future.
These trails would connect to the trails shown for Phase 1, including the river access trail
along the Kern River.
Segment 2.1.A. Paved Multi-Use Trail. A minimum 16 foot wide dedication for a
paved multi-use trail outside of and adjacent to the street right-of-way located as follows:
Commencing from the existing recreational parking lot located at the
southwest corner of Rancheria Road and the Rancheria Bridge, on the
west side of Rancheria Road southbound, then;
STP. H
See Technical Appcndix for participants atteudiug the August 3, 1994, ~oping mceting.
ll-4
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER II
Westbound along the north side of Old Walker Pass Road, then;
Northbound along the east side of Alfred Harrell Highway, along an
existing drainage channel. Where constrained by topography or
engineering standards, the Paved Multi-Use Trail may physically share
(Combination Trail 2.1.F) or have separate alignment with the Unpaved
Multi-Use Trail which also runs adjacent to the east side of Alfred Harrell
Highway, then;
Northbound to connect with Rudal Road, west of the parking lot of the
Kern River Golf Course, at the City boundary.
Segment 2.1.A is proposed as a minimum 16 foot wide trail with a paved tread width of
12 feet. Diagram 1 shows the design standard for this trail. Diagrams l.a. and 1.b.
provide design cross-sections for cases where residential masonry wall or open space is
located adjacent to the paved multi-use trail. Diagrams l.c. and 1.d. provide design
standards for major street - local street - trail intersections, subject to approval by the
city engineer.
The intersection of Alfred Harrell Highway and Old Walker Pass Road will be a
controlled intersection, ultimately becoming fully signalized. Several types of trails
converge at this intersection, where safe interconnection may be made between trails.
Segment 2.1.A would terminate at Rudal Road and connect with other pedestrian ways,
Class II and Class III bicycle trails provided and/or proposed by the County of Kern or
Kern Council of Governments in the Lake Ming, CALM Museum and Kern River Park
2
area.
Segment 2.1.B. Class II Bicycle Trail (Lane). A minimum 5 foot wide Class II bicycle
trail (lane) within the street right-of-way as indicated by Diagram 2. Width and striping
shall be in accordance with city standards for street improvements.
Segment 2.1.B is located along Alfred Harrell Highway, Rancheria Road and Paladino
Road. A Class II bike lane is proposed for both sides of Alfred Hattell Highway,
between Old Walker Pass Road and Highway 178. The Class II bicycle lane would also
be extended to both sides of Paladino Drive, east from Alfred Harrell Highway to
Highway 178.
2 "Kern River Bikeway Extension Study," by Quad Engineering for the Kern Council of Govcrmncnts,
(June, 1989).
II-5
STP. 11 February 12, 1990
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER II
This segment would connect to Segments 2.1.A., 2.1.C., 2.1.E., and 2.1.F., at the
intersection of Alfred Harrell Highway and Old Walker Pass Road. Access to parking
facility 2.1.1 would be available from Rancheria Road.
Segment 2.!.C. - Class 1II Bicycle Route. Segment 2.1.C., as shown in Design
Standard Diagram 3, would be the signed bicycle route which connect Segments 2.1.A.,
and 2.1.B. along Alfred Harrell Highway to areas north of the planning area via Rudal
Road in the unincorporated portion of the County. From Rudal Road, trail uses have
opportunities to connect with other Class II and Class III bicycle trails provided and/or
proposed by the County of Kern or Kern Council of Governments in the Lake Ming,
CALM facility and Kern River Park area.
Segment 2.1.D. - River Access Trail. A public river access limited to pedestrians use
is located along the south side of the Kern River in the flat area from Rancheria Road
westerly. Access trail shall be between the south edge of waters of the Kern River to a
line measuring a minimum of 10 feet south of the existing fisherman's trail or a
minimum 10 feet south of the riparian area dripline, whichever is farther from the
water's edge.
This segment of the river access trail continues westerly along the south side of the Kern
River, adjacent to the bluff area. The river access trail shall be in an area south of the
water's edge to a line along the bottom of the bluff within the boundaries of Tentative
Parcel Map 9899.
The river access trail then continues northwesterly along the south side of the Kern
River, along the bottom of the bluff. The access trail shall be a minimum dedication of
10 feet wide measured from the base of the bluff along the entire east line of Parcel 4,
parcel Map 9900, to the river and to be arranged to include the existing foot trail along
the river. The access trail may deviate from the base of the bluff to avoid conflicts with
the water treatment plant. The subdivider is responsible for initial improvements to the
river access trail which the advisory agency deem necessary for unobstructed public
access. The 3 foot tread width would be unpaved. To preserve the integrity of the river
access trail, the City may elect to pave areas with erosion problems which become costly
to maintain or pose a hazard. Maintenance by the City may include removal of
overgrown trees, brush or debris which inhibit access would be allowed as the need
arises. The river access trail also includes the approximately 400 feet of trail from the
river access trail to the (parking) support facility 2.1.2, and a public local street to the
support facilities.
II-6
STP. H February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I!
Applicants shall be responsible to dedicate the trail in a condition so that there is clear passage
for pedestrians. Applicants shall modify fences within the river access trail to provide for
pedestrian passage. Fence modification to allow such access shall be required at the time of
recordation of a final map. Applicant shall be entitled to retain existing fences or add fencing
for purposes related to on-going ranch or farm operations as long as pedestrian passage is not
impeded along the river access trail.
In addition, public river access trails also connect to the parking area and support facilities
shown on Map 2.1.1 and described below as Facilities 2. l.1, and 2.1.2.
Segment 2.1.E. - Unpaved Multi-Use Trail. Segment 2.1.E. represents the unpaved multi-
use trail. Diagram 5 shows the typical design standard as an unpaved ten foot wide trail with a
six foot wide unpaved tread width. This trail meanders throughout the planning area as shown
on Map 2.1. Generally, the trail path can be described as follows:
Commencing from the recreation parking area (Facility 2.1.1) at the Rancheria Bridge
westward to approximately the east side of the existing equestrian facility; then
southbound generally along a ravine which now separates existing agricultural uses, then
crossing Old Walker Pass Road to the north side of Highway 178; then westbound along
the north side of Highway 178 for approximately 500 feet to follow a contour trail
northwesterly to approximately the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of Section
1l, Township 29 South, Range 29 East, MDBM. to rejoin with a trail branch described
in the following paragraph.
Trail branching westward just south of the existing equestrian center. The trail
alignment is along a westerly to southerly direction along existing dirt farm roads; which
cross Old Walker Pass Road to rejoin the alignment describe above.
The trail then runs westerly along the land contours for approximately 2,500 feet to the
south side of Old Walker Pass Road; then continues along the south side of Old Walker
Pass Road to the intersection of Old Walker Pass Road and Alfred Harrell Highway. At
Old Walker Pass Road and Alfred Harrell Highway the trail splits into three alignments:
1) to the west side of Alfred Harrell Highway, to cross by existing culvert or the future
traffic signal.
2) to continue southerly along the east side of Alfred Harrell Highway to terminate at
Highway 178.
3) to connect with the Combination Trail (Diagram 6) which runs along the east side
of Alfred Harrell Highway. The northern terminus of this segment is Rudal Road.
II-7
STP. H February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER II
Segment 2.1.F. - Combination Trail. The 22 foot wide Combination Trail is
proposed as an alternate design standard to provide both paved (portion of Segment
2.1.A.) and unpaved (portion of Segment 2.1.E.) multi-use trails along the east side of
Alfred Hartell Highway, north of Old Walker Pass Road (Diagram 6). The
Combination Trail may be necessary in some areas due to physical and design
constraints. Otherwise the paved and unpaved multi-use trails will be improved in
accordance with the design standards described in Chapter V.
Associated Support Facilities.
Facilities 2.1.1, and 2.1.2 are to provide primary staging points for public access to the
Kern River and to all trails within the planning area. The land for these support
facilities shall be provided by the applicant in conjunction with the river access trail in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and general plan. Facility 2.1.2 shall be
developed to adopted City standards.
Facility 2.1.1. Depicted as ~) on Map 2.1, a 2 acre public parking lot located near
the southwest corner of Rancheria Road and the bridge at the Kern River. The parking
lot at grade adjacent to Rancheria Road is paved.
A paved vehicle ramp provides access from the upper parking lot to a lower 2 acre
parking area which is covered with gravel and compacted dirt. A portable toilet and
trash bin are located here. This lower parking lot is a portion of a 7.7 acre public
recreational access to the Kern River as required by the Federal Energy Regulation
Commission for Olcese Water District's (licensec) Rio Bravo Hydroelectric Project.
Connections to Segments 2.1.A, 2.1.B, 2. I.D and 2.1.E of the trail system will be made
from these parking lots.
Facility 2.1.2. Depicted as ~ on Map 2.1. A minimum 1/2 acre public parking lot
located within Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 9900, in the northeast quarter section of Section
10, T29S, R29E. The parking area located shall be more specifically located upon
further subdivision of this area so as not to inhibit or discourage pedestrian access to the
river. The parking lot location shall be outside of the proposed Highway 178 re-
alignment corridor. Also, a public access road shall be dedicated connecting this facility
to another public road, such as Old Walker Pass Road, or future (public) local street.
Upon acquiring Facility 2.1.2 and a public road, Facility 2.1.2 would replace the 1A acre
parking area which is currently reflected as an easement obtained through approval of
Parcel Map 9900. The parking area is located southerly of Facility 2.1.2 in Parcel 6 of
Parcel Map 9900, approximately 500 feet north of Old Walker Pass Road.
11-8
STP, ll Febntary 12, 1996
CHAPTER IlL
ACQUISITION AND IMPROVEMENT
Each "developmenf' ~ project shall conform to the adopted policies and requirements of
the "Specific Trails Plan," and its design standards approved by the city engineer. No
permit or approval shall be granted for a development project, until full compliance with
the provisions of this Trails Plan.
The primary intent of this Chapter is to provide land and improvements for a functional,
inter-connected public trails system and support facilities to service area residents. The
city engineer shall review projects for compliance with the Trails Plan, and make
recommendations to the decision-making body in order for projects to comply with the
Trails Plan.
PLANNING FOR MULTI-PURPOSE TRAILS.
Bicycling.
In 1991, the United States had an estimated 96 million bicyclists. Approximately 54%
(52 million) of the bicyclists were adults (persons 16 years and over) and 46% (44
million) were children. Of the adult bicyclists, only 4 million were considered as bicycle
commuters. Adults overwhelmingly cycle for recreational purposes, or for occasional
short trip destination points. However, data shows that there was over a 33% increase
in the number of bicyclists from 72 million in 1983 to 96 million in 1991. More
significantly, the number of bicycle commuters increased over 170% in less than a
decade. It is projected that in the early 1990's there was an annual increase of about
15% in the number of bicyclists. 2
In a 1991 survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the public
indicated strong support for increasing the use of bicycling as an alternative mode of
transportation. Over 25% of those adults surveyed stated they would sometimes
commute to work by bicycle if safe bicycle lanes were available; if safe, separate
designated paths on which to ride; or if their workplace offered showers, lockers and
secure bicycle storage. 3
See Glossary for definition of "development."
"Bicycle Reference Boo,~ 1995," (Washington D.C.: Bicycle Institute of America, 1995) p. 39.
"Ihe National Bicycle and Walking Study," (Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Tran~ortation, 1994,
Publication No. FHWA-PD-94-023) p. 30.
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER ili
The 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS) conducted by the
Research Triangle Institute, interviewed over 48,000 people about their personal travel
within a recent 24 hour period. Results indicated that only 20% of trips involve travel to
and from work and 2% for on-the-job travel. Personal or family-related business
(shopping, school, medical related) accounted for 42% of trips. The remaining 25%
were social or recreational trips. Only 0.7% of all trips were made by bicycling. 4
Although many studies acknowledge that bicycling is not widely used for practical
transportation, there is tremendous growth potential in use of this mode of
transportation. Many factors influence a person's decision to use bicycling as a
transportation mode. Generally, factors are categorized into "individual factors" and
"environmental factors."
Individual factors include demographic variables, attitudes and values. Age is the most
significant demographic variable. As age increases, bicycling becomes less popular,
especially for utilitarian purposes. Although attitudes toward bicycling are generally
positive, overcoming individual attitudes and values as barriers to bicycling as a travel
mode is difficult. Increasing the acceptance and use of bicycling as a practical mode of
transportation must address factors such as social acceptance, quality of life, economics
and beneficial values related to health and environment.
Most bicycling trips are for recreation, exercise or short distance personal errands.
When focusing on bicycle commuting, individual factors concern perception of traffic
safety, distance, lack of routes, and convenience.
Environmental factors include physical environment and infrastructure features which
could encourage or discourage bicycling. Land use, weather, topography are the
significant environmental factors. Planning land uses and transportation systems to be
bicycle friendly significantly promotes bicycling. Bikeway design and location to provide
convenient access and linkage to a route network is essential in early land use planning.
4 "Ibid.," p. 10 and 11.
1II-2
S TP. 111 Febn~aty 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER !II
The presence of a university consistently contributes a high number of bicycle
commuters. Other significant factors are short commute distance and availability of
primary bicycling facilities (safe bicycle lanes, paths, lockers). Excluding university
towns, "cities with higher levels of bicycle commuting have on average 70% more
bikeways per roadway miles and six times more bike lanes per arterial mile." 5
Not only by removing perceptions of danger and lack of good routes, but providing the
safe and convenient routes are key to increasing the utilitarian use of bicycling. These
improvements in bicycle facilities should make bicycles a more desirable mode of
transportation.
Walking and Hiking.
As with bicycling, exercise and recreation are primary reasons for walking and hiking.
Trip distance appears to be the dominant factor in a person's choice of whether to walk
or use other transportation modes. The longer the distance the less likely walking would
be used. Several studies support this supposition. ~
Although walking appears to be a more common activity than bicycling, walkers do not
identify themselves as a class of travelers, like for instance, bicyclists. Distance and
travel time appear to be the primary deterrents to increasing levels of utilitarian walking.
However, a number of survey respondents indicated that certain enhancements to the
pedestrian environment, like designated pathways, surface improvements and landscaping
would make walking more appealing.
Equestrians.
Equestrians have had a long history in the local area. The continuing popularity of
horseback riding, especially along the Kern River and in the surrounding foothills has
been well documented. ? Recreation appears to be the primary reason for equestrian
use of trails. Several local groups support preservation and creation of trails for
continuing equestrian use. A private equestrian stable is located within the planning
area. It is likely that this facility will continue operations.
5 "Case Study No. 1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are and Are Not Used More Extensively as
Travel Modes," National Bio,cling and WMking Study, (Washington D.C., 1992, Publication No. FHWA-PD-92-
041) p. 1 -3.
6 Ibid., pages 26 - 27.
7 "Kern River Plan Element," Metropolitan BakersfieM 2010 General Plan, pages 3 - 4.
III-3
STP. III February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER III
Trails in the Phase 1 Planning Area.
The majority of the planning area is currently vacant or used for orchards or other
agricultural purposes. There are some residential homes located within the planning
area. Most of the property is zoned for residential use. There are some commercial
and industrial zoned areas near Highway 178.
With construction of the northeast sewer trunk line and more favorable economic
expectations, increased development activity within the planning area is likely to occur in
the next few years. Recent increase in subdivision activity in the planning area indicates
that property owners are preparing for development. In addition, the area's major
streets, such as Alfred Harrell Highway and Rancheria Road, have been historically used
by local bicyclists for recreational and competitive cycling because of the scenic views
and access to regional recreational facilities, like Lake Ming and Hart Park.
As described in the introduction, essential elements in addressing the growth of bicycling
as well as encouraging it include early land use planning, design and location of bicycle
routes and facilities. Addressing some of the key "environmental" factors, such as
providing safe and accessible bicycle routes and support facilities, may be mutually
beneficial in improving "individual" factors to improve bicycling as a viable alternative
transportation mode.
Current conditions indicate that a trails plan, including multi-use trails and support
facilities, for the planning area is needed at this time. Because of the planning area's
location in relation to the rest of the city, its generally undeveloped state, and unique
topography, this area is likely to develop into an identified "neighborhood" of the
community which can be further enhanced by implementation of the trails plan. The
multi-use trail system would provide a transportation network for residents to travel for
shopping, school, recreation and commuting.
It is expected that there will be approximately 26,273 people residing within the planning
area at full build out. These residents would be able to use the multi-use trails for
reasons similar to the general American population. The land use relationships of the
planning area favorably enhances residents' opportunities to travel short distances to
local commercial and recreational areas within and adjacent to the planning area.
Commuters would be able to access connecting routes for travel around the city.
~ 11I-4
$TP. 11I February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER I11
Federal, state and local policies support increasing the planning, construction and use of
bicycles as a practical, safe and convenient mode of transportation. 8 The U.S.
Department of Transportation has developed a federal action plan to support and
promote bicycling. Action items include: providing technical guidance; integrating
consideration of bicyclists and pedestrian needs in planning, design and operations of
transportation systems; funding; education/promotions; research; and serving as a
national role model. 9
The Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan contains goals, policies and a master
plan to provide for bicycle facilities. Policies include design standards, operations and
planning for bicycle facilities to be integrated into improvement programs and
development projects. ~0
Pursuant to those policies, this chapter states the standard for which each new
residential dwelling unit shall be responsible for providing fee dedication and/or payment
of fee in-lieu of dedication, improvement and maintenance of these trails. This chapter
also provides that such developments may be required to reserve land for future
acquisition by the city.
ACOUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRAILS AND SUPPORT FACILITIES.
Residential Develooment.
The advisory agency, defined herein, shall require each applicant, property owner,
subdivider or proponent of a residential development (hereinafter referred to as
applicant) within the Planning Area to dedicate and/or reserve land, pay in-lieu fee, or
combination thereof, for the purpose of providing trails. Compliance with this
requirement shall be made prior to or contemporaneonsly with recordation of a final
map or certificate of compliance, issuance of a permit or approval of any application as
defined as a "development" project.
8 National Bio,cling and Walkh~g Study, p. VI; Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, p. II-17, II-21,
II-30, Ill-16 through III-19, II1-29 through 111-32.
9 "National Bicycling and Walkbtg Study. p. XI.
~0 "Circulation Element, Bikeways" Metropolitan BakersfieM 2010 General Plan, 1990, p. III-28 through
I11-32.
III-5
STP.111 Febnuuy 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER ili
The advisory agency shall determine whether the applicant shall dedicate, reserve, pay
in-lieu fee, or combination thereof. The amount of land to be dedicated as a trail or
fees paid shall be determined on the basis of the residential development's proportional
share as calculated by the standards contained in the corresponding tables showing the
standards for each phase and formulas contained within this chapter. Table III-1 states
the standards for the Phase 1 Planning Area. The amount of a development's
requirement was based on the following, which include but are not limited to, type of
subdivision or development project, and residential density (average persons per dwelling
unit based on the latest available federal decennial census) in that development project,
and design standards. The residential density data shall be maintained by the planning
director and may be amended from time to time based on the most recent available
federal decennial census. The city engineer shall maintain, and as needed, amend the
design standards of this Trails Plan.
When only a portion of a trail is located within land to be developed, such portion shall
be dedicated or reserved for trail purposes and an in-lieu fee computed pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter shall be paid for the value of any additional land that would
have been required to be dedicated pursuant to this chapter.
For the purposes of this chapter, the number of new dwelling units shall be based upon
the number of buildable parcels indicated on the subdivision map, when in an area
zoned for one dwelling unit per parcel. When all or part of the subdivision is located in
an area zoned for more than one dwelling unit per parcel, the number of proposed
dwelling units in the area so zoned shall be determined at a density rate of 4.77 dwelling
units per acre, or the maximum number of dwelling units allowed as condition of
approval by the City Council. Further, in the case of a one family dwelling subdivision
located within a multiple family dwelling zone, then the number of one family dwelling
units shall be the number of buildable parcels indicated on the subdivision. All
subdivisions adding residential units and subsequent development of additional units
shall require payment of in lieu fees and/or dedication of land pursuant to this chapter.
This Trails Plan shall not relieve property owners from continuing to provide access as
required through agreement with other agencies or instruments recorded with the
County Recorder.
III-6
STP. III FeLvua~y 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER III
Non-Residential Development.
Non-residential developments may be subject to reserving trail alignments within the
project's boundary as shown on the Trails Plan. For non-residential development, which
may impact development of a continuous trail system consistent with the Trails Plan, the
City shall determine the amount of land to be reserved which is necessary to effectuate
the intent of the Specific Trails Plan. Such reservations shall be consistent with the trail
alignments as shown on the Trails Plan. As a condition of granting of a permit or
approval of an application defined as a "development" project, the applicant for non-
residential development shall enter into an agreement with the City whereby the City
may purchase the land which has been required to be reserved. The terms of such
agreement shall be determined on a case-by-case basis and shall be consistent with, and
make reference, to, the terms of the Specific Trails Plan.
Other than the river access trail, no trails may be activated for public use outside the
boundary of a residential subdivision, except where required for orderly development of
the trail. The intent of this provision is to provide for trail connections between
urbanized areas over land which is not developed due to the physical features such as
topography or drainage. Such connections may be necessary to implement a continuous
trail system consistent with the goals of the Trails Plan. It is not the intent that this
provision be used to provide access through working ranch or farm operations.
Dedication for Multi-Use Trails.
As a condition of approval of a development project, the applicant shall provide an offer
of dedication to the city in accordance to the provisions contained in this Trails Plan, for
trails located within the applicant's project boundary. The irrevocable offer of
dedication shall be made in fee by grant deed, or other instrument approved by the City
Attorney. Said offer shall be made prior to or contemporaneously with recordation of a
final map or certificate of compliance, issuance of a permit or approval of any
application as defined as a "development" project. The city may accept the offer of
dedication for the trails at any time the city council or city engineer deem appropriate.
Reservations shall be subject to Section 16.41 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code.
I11-7
STP. III Febrt4ary 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER III
TABLE II1 - 1
PHASE 1: STANDARD FOR DEDICATION OF TRAILS
Standard
Type of for Trails
Dwelling Unit Per Dwelling Unit
One Family
66 Square Feet
Duplex 54 Square Feet
Multiple Family
51 Square Feet
Mobile 1tome
47 Square Feet
The amount of trail to be required for each phase shall be calculated pursuant to the
following formulas. Formula A calculates the proportional amount of trail to be
dedicated by a residential development to serve that development.
FORMULA A
Amount Required For Trail Dedication
Number of
Dwelling Units
Phase Standard for
X Trails by Type of
Dwelling Unit
Amount Square
= Feet of Trail
Dedication
III-8
STP. III bYbmaty 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER III
Dedication and Improvement of Class I! and III Bike Trails and River Access.
In addition to and separate from the requirements of dedication and improvement for
the multi-use trails herein, an applicant shall be required to dedicate and improve Class
II and Class III Bike Trails within the street right-of-ways in accordance with this Trails
Plan and city street design standards.
Further, an applicant shall be required to dedicate and improve public trails to and along
the Kern River for public river access depicted in this plan in accordance with the provisions
of the Subdivision Map Act and the General Plan. The dedication and improvement of the
public trails to and along the river are not included in the fee structure used for this Trails
Plan. An applicant is to dedicate the river access trail, dedicate or offer to dedicate the
support facility, a trail connecting the river access trail and the support facility and a public
street of local street design standards to access the support facility. The only improvements
that the applicant is required to provide for the river access trail is to dedicate the river
access trail that is clear of obstacles and provides pedestrian access through fencing allowing
for a primitive trail passible for pedestrians.
The applicant shall be required to improve the road when the area is converted to urban
use (i.e., residential subdivision or urban use approved through site plan review) and Old
Walker Pass Road is available for connection. Compliance with this Trails Plan shall
constitute full compliance with Sections 66478.4 through 66478.8 of the Subdivision Map Act
regarding public access to and along the river for new development.
Fee In-Lieu of Dedication of Fee Title.
When a fee is to be paid in-lieu of multi-use trail and/or facility dedication, as determined
by the advisory agency, the applicant shall, in-lieu of dedicating land, pay a fee equal to the
value of the land which would otherwise be required for dedication pursuant to Formula A
of this Chapter. The amount of in-lieu fee shall be calculated in accordance with the
following formulas. Fair Market Value is determined by appraisal in accordance with
appraisal report policies as described in this Chapter and Bakersfield Municipal Code
Chapter 15.80.
The fee shall be paid prior to, or contemporaneously with, recordation of a final map or
certificate of compliance, issuance of a permit or approval of any application as defined as a
"development" project. The total amount may be rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
III-9
STP. III February 12. 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
FORMULA B
Formula for Fee In-Lieu of Trail Dedication
Number of Phase Standard Fair Market Amount of
Dwelling X for X Value of Land = In-Lieu Fee
Units Trail by Type of (per Square Foot) Required for
Dwelling Unit Trail
Said in-lieu fee collected and accrued interest shall be used only to acquire necessary trails.
The second priority of said monies shall be to improve and enhance existing trails and
support facilities.
Determination of Fair Market Value.
The fair market value of land shall be determined by a written appraisal report prepared
and signed by an appraiser acceptable to the planning director. The appraiser qualifications
and contents of the appraisal report shall be as described in Bakersfield Municipal Code
Section 15.80.100. The costs of all appraisals shall be borne by the project proponent or
subdivider. The appraisal shall be based on the value of unimproved real property for the
land within the boundary of said subdivision or development.
Reservation.
Applicant shall also reserve any trail not required to be dedicated which shows a trail within
a residential development project boundary for the purpose of City acquisition of the trail.
Reservation and acquisition procedure shall be in accordance with the Bakersfield
Municipal Code.
Non-residential developments may be subject to reserving trail alignments within the
project's boundary as shown on the Trails Plan. For non-residential development, which
may impact development of a continuous trail system consistent with the Trails Plan, the
City shall determine the amount of land to be reserved which is necessary to effectuate the
intent of the Specific Trails Plan. Such reservations shall be consistent with the trail
alignments as shown on the Trails Plan. As a condition of granting of a permit or approval
of an application defined as a "development" project, the applicant for non-residential
development shall enter into an agreement with the City whereby the City
may purchase the land which has been required to be reserved. The terms of such
agreement shall be determined on a case-by-case basis and shall be consistent with, and
make reference, to, the terms of the Specific Trails Plan.
III-10
STP. 111 Febntary 12~ 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER Iil
lmorovement.
The improvement of all trails is necessary for the general use and benefit of the lot owners
in the planning area and for facilitating alternate modes of transportation for the local
neighborhood. The acquisition and improvement (construction) of trails is necessary to
ensure consistency with and implementation of the general plan and more specifically this
Trails Plan. Construction of trails may be combined with the construction of parks servino
the olanning area to orovide an intel,rated recreational facility. Proposed funding sources
for the improvement of the support facilities include general funds, grants or donations.
At the option of the advisory agency, the applicant/proponent shall either 1) pay a fee
proportionate to the development's requirement for the improvement of trails, or 2)
construct and improve all or a portion of the trails or facilities required herein to serve
the development, or 3) based on a finding of orderly development or public health,
welfare or safety, construct and improve trails or facilities in excess of the development's
proportional amount with reimbursement pursuant to city approved agreement, and/or 4)
a combination thereoff
Improvement and construction of the trail or facility by the applicant shall be subject to
the policies, procedures, and standards contained within this Trails Plan, and any related
improvements (ex. streets, medians) and security requirements required by the city
engineer.
Said fee shall be paid, prior to or contemporaneously with issuance of a residential
dwelling unit building permit. The amount of the fee for shall be calculated in
accordance with the following formulas. The total amount may be rounded to the
nearest whole dollar.
FORMULA C
Formula for Fee !n-Lieu of Trail hnorovement
Phase Standard
for Trail per
Type of
Dwelling Unit
Trail Improvement
X Cost per
Square Foot
Amount of
= Improvement Fee
Required for Trails
per Dwelling Unit
The city engineer shall establish and from time to time, may review and revise the
construction costs of trail improvements used in Formula C in order to make cost
adjustments due to inflation, updated labor and material costs, revision of design
standard, or other related factors. The city engineer shall keep this cost information on
file in his office available for public inspection.
III-11
STP. III February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER IiI
The in-lieu fee collected and any accrued interest shall be used only for the purpose of
constructing and improving trails to Trails Plan standards to better serve the residents.
Secondarily, the in-lieu fee may be used to acquire or enhance trails and support
facilities.
Credit. The City Council shall determine whether credit for trails and/or support
facilities and/or improvements may be given, and the amount of credit, except as otherwise
described in the Trails Plan for a phase. An applicant may request credit to be applied to
future development projects within the planning area by providing all or a portion of trails
and/or improvements.
A. The procedure for application requesting credit shall be as follows:
1. Applicant shall make a written request for credit to the planning director.
The request shall be in the form and guidelines established by the planning director
in accordance with state and local regulations.
The request shall include enough information for the planning director to
evaluate the feasibility of the request. The applicant's request, at a minimum, must
include the applicant's name, address, phone number, and affiliation to the property
(ex., applicant, property owner, subdivider, or agent), the applicant's specific proposal
to provide trails, support facilities and/or improvements, which may be applied
toward trails and facilities and/or improvements of future development; identify the
property for which the credit would be applied; how much credit is requested;
location, type and how much trails and/or facilities and/or improvement is proposed
to be provided by the applicant; and when the applicant proposes to complete such
dedication or improvement. Other information may be required as deemed necessary
by the planning director.
2. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of such a written request, the planning
director shall respond to the applicant indicating the results of the his or her
preliminary review. The preliminary review shall determine completeness of the
application.
3. Once the planning director determines the request to be complete, in
consultation with the city engineer, the planning director shall prepare a
recommendation and, if needed, an agreement for the city attorney's review and City
Council's consideration.
II1-12
STP. III February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER II!
4. Credit shall be permitted only upon approved agreement between the city and
the applicant. Said agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the amount of
credit allowed and for which property that the credit may apply, the applicant's
responsibilities, date to complete dedication and/or improvement, concept design with
proposed facilities consistent with this Trails Plan, and bonding requirements deemed
necessary by the city engineer and/or parks superintendent.
5. A request for credit may be submitted at any time. However, credit may only
apply when an agreement is approved by the City Council. For instance, in the case
of a subdivision conditionally approved to provide dedication of a trail, said
dedication requirement must be satisfied prior to recordation of a final map either
with the dedication or an approved agreement which includes the project site. The
final map shall not be allowed to record based on a "pending" credit agreement with
the City Council.
6. The advisory agency may approve, or conditionally approve a development
project to include credit provisions permitted by an approved agreement with the
city. Said agreement must indicate that an applicant has been permitted to apply
credit toward a development project or be allowed to provide none or a portion of
the trail or facility dedication and/or improvement than what would ordinarily be
required by this Trails Plan.
7. This Trails Plan does not prohibit the advisory agency from approving,
conditionally approving or denying an applicant's offer to dedicate trails or facilities
and/or improvement of such, in excess of the requirements as set forth by this Trails
Plan for a particular development project.
B. The amount of credit shall be determined on a case by case basis in accordance with
the following guidelines:
1. The amount of credit for dedication shall directly relate to the Standard and
formulas for trails and facilities contained in this Trails Plan.
III-13
STP. 111 Febntary 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER III
2. The amount of credit for improvement of a trail or support facility shall be
governed by the applicant either entirely or proportionally completing the
improvement to the standards of the Trails Plan and related City standards. Any
improvement or portion of improvement to a trail or facility shall be subject to its
approval and acceptance by the city engineer. The amount of credit shall be based
on the development's proportional requirement of the trail or facility based on an
engineer's estimate pre-approved by the city engineer. The applicant shall be
required to submit documentation, to the satisfaction of the city engineer, verifying
the costs paid for any improvement.
However, the applicant and the City are not excluded from entering an
agreement for reimbursement for the applicant's costs which are over and above his
development's proportional requirement. Such reimbursement would be dependent
on fees collected from within the planning area.
3. Credit given for dedication and/or improvement of trails and/or support
facilities shall not apply toward any other requirements of the Bakersfield Municipal
Code, including but not limited to, park land or development, habitat conservation,
the extraordinary amenity in an optional design subdivision, or public benefits of a
subdivision.
4. An applicant may request credit toward a development's park land
requirement up to 0.7 acre per 1000 population, if he proposes to locate a public
park adjacent to the support facility. Credit may also be requested for park
development requirement if the applicant constructs the support facility as part of the
park, and the park configuration and access is beneficial to serving the residents as
well as providing access to the river.
5. Subsequent development of additional dwelling units or other types of
development shall be required to conform with policies and standards of this Trails
Plan.
Credit for Phase 1. Trails within the Phase 1 planning area will receive credit towards an
applicant's park land requirement pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 15.80.
Said credit shall be in the form of reducing the park land standard from two and one-half
(2.5) acres per 1000 population to two (2.0) acres per one thousand (1000) population.
Therefore, at the time of recordation of a final subdivision map for residential development,
a subdivider shall be required to provide park land at a rate of 2 acres per 1000 population,
as well as providing for trails required by this Trails Plan.
III-14
STP. III Febrtiaty 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER III
Approximately 60.7 acres of park land would be needed to serve the residents of the Phase
1 planning area. The trails in Phase 1 cover about 11.7 acres. The 11.7 acres covered by
trails is 19.28%, rounded to 20%, of the 60.7 acres of park land. The 20% (one-half (0.5)
acre per one thousand (1000) population) reduction in the park land standard closely equals
the amount of acreage covered by the Phase I trails. Therefore, the amount of acreage
covered by trails is given full credit towards park land requirements. The intent of this
provision is to result in a combined total amount of park and trail acreage which would
have closely equaled the expected amount of park land if the amount of park land were to
be calculated at the rate of 2.5 acres per 1000 population.
III-15
STP. 11I Feb~lary 12, 1996
CHAPTER IV.
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
New development within the planning area shall be required to be included in a
maintenance district or other method as aporoved by the City Council for the purpose of
providing funds for maintenance and operations of the trails, except for the river access
trail and the support facilities. The method of maintenance di:triet may also include
provisions for parks, landscaping or other facilities of public benefit. As determined by
the City Council, those property owners benefitting from the public improvements shall
be assessed and required to pay their proportionate share of the costs to maintain and
operate the trails Plan.
Maintenance and operations costs and expenses include, but are not limited to, litter
control, necessary repairs or replacements, utilities, care, supervision and any or all other
items necessary for the proper maintenance and operation of the trails.
The river access trail and related support facilities are proposed to be maintained and
operated through the general fund., and not the maintenance district.
IV-1
CHAPTER V.
DESIGN STANDARDS
Development and improvement of trails required of the Trails Plan shall be in
conformance with the design standards of this chapter. Design standards include, but
are not limited to the following: width of dedication, width of tread, tread pavement
materials, fencing, signage, striping or markings, grading, engineering design, and
landscaping.
This chapter provides a text description of each type of trail standard as well as
illustrations of depicting a cross-section of the trail standards. Upon adoption of the
Trails Plan, the city engineer shall prepare, maintain and have available for the public,
trail design standards. The city engineer shall approve all plans for construction of the
trails to ensure conformity with the design standards. The city engineer may allow minor
deviations from the standards, if such deviations are based on sound engineering
evidence, or to provide for the public health, welfare or safety.
Paved Multi-Use Trails. (Diagram 1) A Paved Multi-Use Trail is a trail separate
from motor vehicle lanes. Diagram 1 depicts the typical trail cross section design width
of sixteen (16) feet including a paved tread of twelve (12) feet, graded shoulders on each
side of the tread of two (2) feet minimum wide. Alternate design standard Diagrams la
and lb are applicable when circumstances require street landscaping or with or without a
masonry wall adjacent to a Paved Multi-Use Trail. When the Paved Multi-Use Trail is
adjacent to a required street landscaped area, a portion of the trail, less the paved tread
width may be allowed to overlap the landscape easement as shown in Diagrams la and
lb, and as approved by the city engineer.
The paving material for the tread shall be of an impervious material, such as asphalt,
concrete or other permanent material as approved by the city engineer. The minimum
two (2) foot wide graded shoulder on each side of the bicycle path provides the
minimum two (2) foot horizontal clearance to obstructions. The vertical clearance to
obstructions across the clear width of the bicycle path should be a minimum of eight (8)
feet.
Diagram 1.c. is the design standard for the Paved Multi-Use Trail crossing a local street.
Diagram 1.d. depicts the typical signing and marking detail for this type of crossing.
The Paved Multi-Use Trail design standards included in the Trails Plan may be revised
by the city engineer and immediately implemented where he/she deems a revision is
necessary for the public health, welfare and safety.
V-1
STP. V Febntary 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER V
Class 11 Bicycle Lane. (Diagram 2) Class II bicycle lanes are striped lanes within
the paved area of streets and highways for the preferential use by bicycles. The bicycle
lane is intended to promote an orderly flow of traffic, by establishing specific lines of
demarcation between areas reserved for bicycles and lanes to be used by motor vehicles.
Class II bicycle lanes are usually located on major streets. Where parking is prohibited
on the major street, the bike lane shall be minimum of four (4) feet wide with a solid
white stripe on the pavement measured four (4) feet from the face of the curb, but in no
case shall it be less than three (3) feet wide measured from the gutter lip where curb
and gutter is constructed. If parking is allowed on the street, bike lanes shall be a
minimum of five (5) feet wide and located on the street side of the parking spaces. A
solid white stripe on the pavement is measured from curb toward the street centerline.
Class III Bicycle Route. (Diagram 3) Class llI bicycle trails are commonly referred to
as bike routes. These routes are intended to provide continuity to the bikeway system.
They are established along through routes not served by Class I bicycle paths, Class II
bicycle lanes, or Paved Multi-Use Trails, or to connect discontinuous segments of the
bikeway system. Class III facilities share the street pavement with motor vehicles. Class
III routes are identified by placing "Bike Route" signs along roadways.
River Access Trails. (Diagram 4) River Access Trails are prima~y public access to
and along the Kern River. The trails to and along the river are limited to pedestrian
use. The width of river access public trails shall be ten (10) feet wide. The tread width
shall be a minimum of three (3) feet wide and unpaved. However, in order to preserve
the integrity and primitive nature of the river access trail, the City may elect to pave the
trail in areas with erosion problems which become costly to maintain or pose a hazard.
The area of disturbance should be limited, but the City should keep the trail reasonably
clear of brush and debris to allow passage. Maintenance by the City may include
removal of overgrown trees, brush or debris which inhibit access would be allowed as the
need arises. Applicants shall be responsible to dedicate the trail in a condition so that
there is clear passage for pedestrians. The river access trail also includes a trail of
approximately 400 feet in length connecting the trail along the river to the support
facilities.
Applicants shall modify fences within the river access trail to provide for pedestrian
passage. Fence modification to allow such access shall be required at the time of
recordation of a final map. Applicant shall be entitled to retain existing fences or add
fencing for purposes related to on-going ranch or farm operations as long as pedestrian
passage is not impeded along the river access trail. The river access trail also includes
the approximately 400 feet of trail from the river access trail to the (parking) support
facility 2.1.2, and a public road to access the facility.
V-2
S TP. V February 12, 1996
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
CHAPTER V
Unoaved Multi-Use Trails. (Diagram 5) Unpaved Multi-Use Trails shall be ten
(10) feet wide and an unpaved tread width of six (6) feet. It is recommended that the
vertical clearance be a minimum of ten (10) feet in height, and horizontal clearance be
at least two (2) feet on each side of the tread. Adequate vertical and horizontal
clearance shall be maintained.
Combination Trails. (Diagram 6) This trail provides a minimum of twenty-two
(22) feet wide for parallel Paved Multi-Use Trail and Unpaved Multi-Use Trails. The
paved portion of the combined trail shall have a twelve (12) foot wide paved tread with
two (2) foot wide unpaved shoulders on each side. See the description for the Paved
Multi-Use Trail (Diagram 10 shown in this chapter.
There should be a four (4) foot high rail fencing, or other physical barrier approved by
the city engineer, located on the two (2) foot wide unpaved shoulder of the paved trail
adjacent to the unpaved trail. The unpaved trail shall have a tread width of six (6) feet.
Support Facilities. Public parking areas shall be a minimum of one-half (1/2) acre
in size and accessible from a publicly maintained street. Parking areas shall be improved
to conform to Bakersfield Municipal Code Title 17 as to design (size, location, angle) of
parking spaces, type of permanent impervious pavement, and landscaping. Access to the
river also requires the applicant to provide a public road to the support facility. Said
public road shall be at a minimum a local street improved to the city's design standard.
The intent is to provide public access, especially to river access trails to a public parking
area accessibly located to the trail system and in an optimum size, configuration and
design for the public's convenience. The support facility will have a trail segment
connecting it to the river access trail.
A support facility includes, but is not limited to, paved parking area, landscaping,
benches, signage, trash containers or bins, and security lighting, miscellaneous items
deemed necessary by the city engineer, and restrooms for each parking area. Signs with
poles or supports related to traffic movements, trail and facility use, directional and/or
informational may be allowed for the public safety as approved and deemed necessary by
the city engineer. Funding for the construction of the support facilities would likely be
from the general fund, grants or donations.
V-3
STI~ V Febniary 1~ 1996
MULTI-USE TRAILS
DESIGN STANDARDS
DIAGRAM 1.
PAVED MULTI-USE TRAIL
GRADED
12' TREAD WIDTH
PAVED
16' WIDTH
._j 2'
MIN.
GRADED
V-4
DIAGRAM 1 a.
PAVED MULTI-USE TRAIL
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
WHEN MASONRY WALL IS REQUIRED
CUR8
STREET
PAVEMENT
WIDTH VARIES
PROPERTY
UNE
-1
~' SIDEWALI<
LANDSCAPE
WIDTH VARIES
MOW STRIP
WIDE STRIP LOTS
LANDSCAPE WIDTH VARIES DEPENDING ON
STREET CLASSIFICATION
16' ~DTH -I
PAVED MULTI-USE TRAIL
BIKE PATH CROSSING LOCAL STREET
DIAGRAM 1 c.
DESIGN STANDARD
~ SlDEWALK-x , ~'
DIAGRAM 1 d.
SIGNING AND MARKING DETAIL
R1-2
~1
w7g ~J n
u~ R1-2
W80 '"',
I
W79
c~ W80
LOCAL
STREET
LEGEND
R1-2 YIELD SIGN
W79 BICYCLE SYMBOL SIGN
W80 XING PLATE
* IF 150' MIN. SEPERATION NOT A'FrAINABLE. A GRADE SEPERATION WOULD BE REQUIRED
WITH CLEAR~CE PEr REFERENCE STANDARD
REFERENCE: CAL TRANS HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 1000, "BIKEWAY PLANNING AND DESIGN"
109414
V-6
DIAGRAM 2.
CLASS I1: BIKE LANE
(STRIPED LANE ON STREET)
L 4 MN.I'
BiKE LANE PARKING PROHIBITED BIKE LANE
(TYPICAL COLLECTOR)
PARKING STALLS _
BIKE B KE PARKING
L.~E STRIPED PARKING LANE
(TYPICAL COLLECTOR)
DIAGRAM 3.
CLASS III: BIKE ROUTE
(SIGNED STREET)
CURB
MOTOR VEHICLE LANES
BIKE ROUTE SIGNAGE; NO STRIPES
,40511
V-7
DIAGRAM 4.
RIVER ACCESS TRAILS
TREAD WIDTH
(PAVED OR UNPAVED)
10' WIDTH
DIAGRAM 5.
UNPAVED TRAILS
6' UNPAVED
TREAD WIDTH
10' WIDTH
DIAGRAM 6.
COMBINATION TRAILS
~ 4' HIGH
(MATERIAL APPROVED
BY PARK
SUPERINTENDENT)
' 2' =[= $'
]~ 2' ] 12' PAVED ~ UNPAVED'--
UNPAVED TREAD UNPAVED TREAD
SHOULDER SHOULDER
22' WIDTH
SLOPE EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE MAY BE NEEDED
V-8
SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN
GLOSSARY
ADVISORY AGENCY-
1. For projects subject to Bakersfield Municipal Code Title 16, the advisory
agency shall be as defined by Section 16.08.020 of this Title.
2. For projects subject to the authority of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, such
as Conditional Use Permits or Modifications, the Board of Zoning Adjustment
shall be the advisory agency.
3. For general plan or specific plan amendments, zone changes, or other
"development" approvals not specifically listed in this section, the Planning
Commission shall be the advisory agency.
4. For grading plans, site plan review, building permits or other ministerial
permits, the planning director shall be the advisory agency.
DEVELOPMENT - "For the express purpose of clarification and exclusive use of
terminology with the Kern River Plan Element, the following definition of "Development"
is provided.
"Development" means any action taken requiring a permit and/or
application to seek amendment, approval or authorization under provisions
of any grading, zoning, parcel map, or final map subdivision ordinance.
"Development" includes actions, such as grading permit approval, zoning
change, conditional use permit, modification, variance, tentative parcel map
approval, and tentative subdivision map approval. "Development" includes
converting an existing legal land use entitlement to another specific
purpose by altering the intended density, intensity or use of an existing
authorized entitlement."
ENGINEER DESIGN STANDARDS - are those standards approved by the city engineer
for construction of improvements of the trails and support facilities.
TRAIL - is the right-of-way course, path alignment or area for which a applicant has
given an interest to the City of Bakersfield for the purpose of public trails and associated
facilities such as parking areas, and for the operation and maintenance of those trails
and associated facilities.
TREAD - is the area within the trail which has been designated as the primary course to
be traveled. For instance, in the case of Paved Multi-Use Trail, the paved tread should
be 12 feet wide, although the dedication is 16 feet wide.
G-1
REFERENCE LIST
Bicycle Reference Bool~ 1995, (Washington D.C.: Bicycle Institute of America,
1995)
Highway Design Manual, Caltrans, July 1, 1990.
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan and Appendices, City of Bakersfield,
Kern County, Kern COG, Golden Empire Transit, March 1990. (Includes the
Kern River Plan Element, adopted 1988 by reference.)
Metropolitan Baket~fieM 2010 General Plan EIR, SCH # 8907032, City of
Bakersfield, Kern County, Kern COG, Golden Empire Transit, September 1989.
The National Bicycle and Walking Study, (Washington D.C: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1994, Publication No. RHWA-PD-94-023.)
"Case Study No. 1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are and Are Not Used
More Extensively as Travel Modes," The National Bicycle and Walking Study,
(Washington D.C: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1992, Publication No.
RHWA-PD-92-041.)
Subdivision Map Act, as amended, State of California Government Code.
Subdivision Design Manual, City of Bakersfield Public Works Dept., July 1989, as
amended.
Title 16, Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, Bakersfield Municipal Code.
R-1