The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 89-96RESOLUTION NO. 8 9" 9 6 A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD 2010 GENERAL PLAN (LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. P96-0284). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 17, 1996, and THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 1996. on a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty-one (21) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, such proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan is as follows: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD has proposed to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan by changing the land use designation from Public Facilities to Light Industrial on 113.21 acres, for property located southeasterly of the intersection of South Mount Vernon Avenue and East Belle Terrace: and WHEREAS, for the above-described amendment, an Initial Study was conducted, and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration with mitigations was prepared; and WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff and the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 60-96 on June 20, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of this General Plan Amendment subject to mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 1996, on the above described proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and . ~.~ findings: WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following 1. All required notices have been given. 2. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been followed. 3. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Mitigation measures as shown on Exhibit "A" are included in the project to ameliorate impacts. 5. The proposed Light Industrial land use designation is compatible with both existing and proposed land uses and zoning in the vicinity. 6. The site is adjacent to areas with similar industrial land use designations, and is located along a major transportation corridor. 7. The project will provide for a logical expansion of industrially designated land consistent with the overall development policies of the 2010 General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings, incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. P96-0284 is hereby approved and adopted. 3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to the City Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved. 4. The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment No. P96-0284. a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally located southeasterly of the intersection of South Mount Vernon Avenue and East Belle Terrace, subject to mitigation measures shown on Exhibit "A". 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on JIJL 1 0 ~8 , by the following vote: ~cti~l(:J CITY CLERK and Ex Offi(~!o Clet'k of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED JUL 1 BO PRI~C~~ MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: JUDY SKOUSEN CITY ATTORNEY MJM: June 26, 1996 res\rcc0284 EXHIBIT "A" General Plan Amendment Case No. P-96-0284 Recommended Mitigation Measures All project grading and construction activities shall comply with applicable provisions of Regulation VIII (Fugitive Dust Requirements) of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Water sprays or chemical suppressants shall be used in all unpaved areas to control fugitive emissions. Prior to final inspection/occupancy approval, all project access roads and parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt-concrete paving. All required paving shall be depicted on site development plans, prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to submittal of an application for site plan review or tentative subdivision approval for the site, a qualified archaeologist shall complete an archaeological study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. All measures recommended by such study shall be completed prior to final site plan review approval or tentative map approval. Proof of such compliance is to be submitted to the Development Services Department and to the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. The following measures shall be required as mitigation for traffic and circulation impacts related to project implementation, as approved by City Traffic Engineer: (See attached table - Traffic/Circulation Mitigation Measures) ~-XRIBIT 'A' (cont.) CONCURRENT GENERAL PLAN AHENDHENT/ ZONE CHANGE - CASE NO. P96-0284 TRAFFIC/ CIRCULATION MITIGATION MEASURES In ~he foliowin8 tame, "Up~rade Existing Signal" means to expand the interscclion to full width and lanease in accordance with the City of Bakersfield Standards, and modify the signal accordingly. L~ewise, "Install Signal'; in additions to installagon ora traffic signal, menn$ to expand the intersection to fldl laneage as desctibcd above. TABLE 7: PROPOSED MITIGATION IMPROVEMENT~ - INTERgECTION~ Note1: "ProJect -C:hare" has been credlted due to an¥ Yeat20~O YearR0a0 Percent project fundingbytheRagMfllllmple~r, ee~m. voru+ P~ct dPr~ 9hmof Proje~ only TraMc Mitigation No. Intersection 1. E. Bmnd~L~,,.&Cdteff4cc~,,R,d. ~ ExfsUngSIgnd/lntersedJon 4..S30 40 0.88% 0.a~% 2. Cdtomvood Rd & WB 58 on/off ramps Ins~, ,Si~ ,~,, 3.1..72 40 1.26% 1.26% 3,. Cottonwood Rd & EB 58 on/~f ramps !ns.bi. fi. 81gng, 0 4.. E. ~ Ln _& INgshington Ave. Instadl ,81~lnal 2,33~ 4D 1.72% 1.72% 5. M~.. Vemon Ave .& _E. Brundage Lane Up,nde ExlsUng 81gnsl/Inlm.~c~on 5,625. 79 1.40% 1.40~ e. ~... V~non Ave & Wi~_ 58 on~ff romps Install 81g~, 3.370., 113 3.35% 3.35% ,7. Ivlt. Vemofl Aw & EB 56 on/off romps InstaO Sign~. 3.,1.9.7. 132 413% 413% ,8. Mt Vernon Ave. & ,G. Ca ,li~ Aw Upgmcle Exisffng SIgnal/IMeraectim 6500 30 0.70% 0.70% 9: Mt Vernon Ave. ,& V,,b~nia Avenue Opgrade Existing 81gnd/Intmseclton 3,670 39 1.09~ 1.00% 11, E. BelleTennce&Mt. V~ltOflAve. 12. E. ensldage Ln & Osw~ St * ... 4~.4:~ ~ O.O0. Z 0.00~ 13. Oswell 8t & WB se omni ramps None * This signal has recently been constructed. Impact has b~en mitigated and no proportionate share payment is required. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT P96-0284 SI 9 10 T~OS, R28E i HI R-IA P mm EXHIBIT B.