HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 112-96RESOLUTION NO. 1 1 2 ' 9 6
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 390, DENNEN NO. 1 ANNEXATION
(WARD 7).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on MONDAY, APRIL 1, 1991, and THURSDAY, APRIL 4, 1991, on the
prezoning for the proposed annexation of certain properties to the City of Bakersfield known
as DENNEN NO. 1 ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place of hearing having been
given at least twenty-one calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield
Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation: and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 18-91 on April 4, 1991, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the prezoning for the annexation by this Council and
this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in
that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described
territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government
Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set
forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners
and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to
the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance
No. 3360, which was adopted May 8, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment.
A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on March 14, 1991.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of
Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for
this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice
of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxmn Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Judy Skousen
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Traxran Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... o0o ........
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
O~;T ~) 9 1996 , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER DeMONO, CARSON, ,~11TH,..~IcDERMOTT, RO~VLES, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER /t(,/(J~t ,~_~,
ABSTAIN: COUNCfLMEME:~R /t~/0P¥
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER .X~/L,4~ ~._
ACtingciTY C~I~RK and Ex Offi~o Cl~k ~!~ the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED OCT 0 9 1996
~BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
MO:pjt
September 24, 1996
res\rd 1 roa
3
EXHIBIT "A"
DENNEN NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 390
A parcel of land being a portion of the southwest I/4 of Section 24 and the north V~ of Section 25 of
Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the common south 1/4 comer of said Section 24 and north 1/4 comer of said Section
25 as monumented by "California Division of Highways Brass Cap Set in Concrete Flush" located
within the right of way for Bakersfield Bypass (State Route VI KER 99), said 1/4 comer being
designated as 655,152.739 feet North, 1,692.891.593 feet East per the California Coordinate System,
Zone 5;
Thence North 89° 19' 12" West, along the section line common between said Sections 24 and 25, a
distance of 860.70 feet to a point on the west right of way line of said Bakersfield Bypass, also being
a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield and is the TIlLrE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence (I) southerly, wastefly, northerly, easterly and southerly, on and along said existing corporate
boundary (circumventing said enclosed county territory) returning to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 92 acres (more or less)
ANNEXATION OF
DENNEN No. I
EXHIBIT "B#
,~qNI;XAIION NO 390
(DENNEN NO. l)
PI,AN FOIl PROVIDING SERVICES
SERVICI!S _Agency _Which l'rcscnIt¥ Provides Check Services Which City/I)ist~ ici Will Indicate ! [ow Se~x, ices Provided By
Sen, ice Provide Cily/District w be F nanced (i.e.,
general tax rale or special assessment.)
Upon Future Dale
Annexation (specify)
Planning. COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks and l{ecrcalic, n COIJNTY CITY GENI~RAI. TAX P, EVENI. IES
l.ibrmy COIINTY N/A
Police Prolccli,.m St IF. RIFF & I IIGI tWAY PATROl. CITY GENERAL TAX REVENIJES
Fire i;iotcction CiTY CiTY (SEE PAGE 2) GENERAl, TAX i~VENUES, 1"i1(I".
FUND
.'qb cc~ Ct ~[JN'I'Y CITY GF. NI!RAI, AND GAS TAX
REVENIJI.;S
Construclitul ('(II IN'I'Y IJ/D BY PRIVATF. I)EVELOPMIiNT
Nlailllt.'llilDcc ('t )lIN I'Y CITY GIiNliRAI. AND (iAS TAX
REVENUES
Sweeping CtTY GENI~RAI. AND GAS TAX
REVENUF. S
. !.ighting CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Fti~.>d Control COUNTY CITY GENF. RAI, TAX REVENUI!S
Seweralce CITY CITY USER FEE
Watcr CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE USER FEE
CO.
Other (REFUSE) PRIVATE I CITY USER FEE
O:XLEOAL~ANNEX388.RTY
U/D - UPON DEVELOPMENT WITHUN ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
EXHIBIT "C"
lndicale locatiou liom which servi*zc
,,','ill be i)rovidcd (i.e. ucarcsl lil'e
slaliolL libraly, crc ~
POLICE-AIl police services iu thc City ofl3akersficld arc administered through thc City
Police Department located at thc s/w comer of Traxtua Avcuue and Eye Street
approximately 5 ½ miles 11oi'111 of thc al.,ncxation.
FIRE-Service will be provided by City Slatiou No. 13 located on Stine P, nad I/4 mile south
of Panama l.ane pm'stmnt ~o cxchsnge wherein City pn~tects ccrtaio property within the
C,.mnty's jurisdiction. Thus, the City docs incur the cosl of providiog lire protection and fl`.e
fire fired collection fi'om the City's taxpayers must be transli:rrcd to tile City.
PA RKS AND RECREATION- IJpon any further development in the territory, the open
space element of the Metropolitan Bakerslield 2010 General Plan provides Ibr a minimum
of 2.5 acres of park space per 1,000 populatiou.
l,lll RA
('ONS I l,llt('l tON/MA tN I'I.~NAN(/F. tSWEI,'.PINIitI,I{;IITIN(;-~/I;mticlua~cc ;md
pcrsoancl ,,','ill bc dispatched llxall (lie Cily Yard on a regnlar basis for prcvcnlativc
ligbtiug.
SEWER-An existing City trank se;vcr line in Panama Lane and Dennen Avenue is available
for service to the territory whereby treatment would be provided by City Treatment Plant
No. 3.
WATER-'FIle tecritory will continue to be served by the California Water Service Company.
OTllER-(Refuse)-When a]mexed, service will be provided by the City either by City forces
or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector.
indicalc li'cqttcucy aud availabilily
of service (i.e., street sweeping,
24 boor patrol is pJx)vidcd ii`. thc inlmcdiatc vicinity of this
ammxation. Firsl priority response is approximately 7.00 ulinutcs
or less.
}:irc pix)tcclion is provided on a 24-{iour basis. Thc auncxalion
will not alt'cci City or County Fire sc~vice capability or response
lime.
Existing ncighbo,-l`.ood Parks (City and County) arc open to thc
public at reasonable hours.
N/A
l'hclc xxiil bc no Icdttctioil ill thc rangc capacily of thc City to
I:,rovidc Iht llCCCSS;ll~y public woik scl'vices lo this al'ca. Services
will be on a regular basis aud "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
III.
WI~ effects, ii'any, would annexation of lids temtory have on the existing level of city/dimrint services (i.e., need
for artclifinnal emergency serrate personnel or construction of new facilities, ere)? The annexation of this territory
will not affect the near term level or capability of the Cit,: to provide needed services. Uvon annexation of this
ter~torv, additional police offienrs may required to maintain the current level of city service. Any future dedicated
streets or vublic created within the temtorv xvill increase the future maintenance reanonsibili[y of the City but will
not affect the existing level of service.
IV.
Would city/district require any' upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants,
mete.): ~so, wouldcity/&:~aSctorremdents be responsible for financing? As future development nncurs, the
develooer pray/des and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No tmm'adinu or ehan~e in
facilities will be required in the territory Ibr armexafion.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territoD,. The portion of the territory north of Panama Lane is
Count3, M S (Mobilehome Subdiv/sion) zone and County C-2PD (Commercial. precise development) zone between
Panama Lane and the mobilehome division. The portion south of Panama Lane is County' R-I CLow-dnnsitv
residential) zone except for a shall half acre portion at the northwest comer being County C-1PD (nei~hborhood
comrller¢iak orecise development) zone.
Indic. ate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would acura' as a result of
annexation such as maintenance of livestock on proper~, etc.) The overall imrmct on the territory will be
conversion of existin~ aaricultural land to residential and commereial development south of Pnnama Lane. The
area north of Panama Lane will be ~rezoned City MJ:I (mobilehome) zone and City C-2 (Commercial`} zone. The
entire portion south of Panama Lane is orezoned City R-I (oneofamitv dwelling'} zone.
List ci~'/dismct services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate,
shorter emergency response time, use of commum~ facilities, etc. CiW Polic¢ Should be ableT6 _respond In a more
timely manner than oresent Counw Sheriff services. The vresent City refuso onllection rate is anbstantiallv lower
than fees connw residents now var to independent companies. No soecial assessment or charges for s'tn~t
sweeping, leaf collection, street liahting energy costs and fire hydrants upon development of subieet area. CRv
government also provides increased poiitiaal representation for residents within the coruorate limits.
VIII
A.
Please provide the following information relanve to ci~,/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.178700% (eortion of area north of
Panama Lane) and 1.134805% (remaining portion south of Panama Lane~ of assessed market value. This
represents the total Cror~ertv tax rate. When armexed a designated percentage oftbe total oropertv tax of the area
will accrue te the City and remainder to the County lbr providing health care arid social services. (Rate as shown
on 1995-96 County Audaor-Controller Fax P, ale I. st
Would affected area be subject to an?,' bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain. No. the last listed
(1992-93) City bounded indebtedness has been r~aid off and the current (1995-96~ tax rate list shows no ei_ty
bonded indebtedness.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a ?rope,n7,.' with a market value of $50,000.007
The property rate xvill not increase due to a,~nex:~on and re-assessment will r~ot occur due to annexation.
G:~LEGAL ,ANNEX353.RTY
RTY:cah