HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 27-95RESOLUTION NO. 2 7 - 9 5
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND APPROVING APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 384 , MADISON NO. 1 ANNEXATION
(WARD 1).
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), held a public
hearing on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1995, on the proposed Negative Declaration
for the proposed annexation of certain properties to the City of Bakersfield known as
MADISON NO. 1 ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place of hearing having been
given at least twenty-one calendar days before said hearing by publication in the
Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the
proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on January
12, 1995, and published in the newspaper January 16, 1995; and
WHEREAS, this annexation is to facilitate development of housing for low
to moderate income families; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation, the Casa Loma Specific Plan was
adopted by the City Council on August 6, 1986, and the Board of Supervisors on August
25, 1986, and an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed
project would not have a significant effect on the environment.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by City staff and
the City Council and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby
approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
~ity Clerk
itv of Bat~ersfiem
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
C~ity M~a_n age r ....
~:itv ot lJal~ersnem
1501 Traxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
dy .Skousen
ity Attor.ney ~ ..
itv of BaKersriem
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 00o ........
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
FEB 0 8 1~5 , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEmBER DeMOND, CARSON, S~ITH, McDErMOTT, ROWLES, C~OW, SALV&C~GIO
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ~ 0~1-~
ABSENT: COUNCILEmBER (~ ( ~ ~
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED Ir~B 0 $ E~
BOB P CE~/~
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
Assistant City Attorney
MO:pjt
January 31, 1995
res\roamad.cc
3
EXHIBIT "A"
MADISON NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 384
A parcel of land being a portion of Section 8, T. 30 S., R. 28 E.,
M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Cor~nencing at the southwest corner of the northeast 1/4 of said
Section 8, as shown on Parcel Map No. 5723 filed for record in Book
24 of Parcel Maps at Page 174 in the office of the Kern County
Recorder;
THENCE North 00'05'32" East, along the west line of said 1/4
Section, a distance of 990.84 feet to the northwest corner of the
west 1/2 of the south 1/2 of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of
the northeast 1/4 of said Section 8;
THENCE North 89'54'19" West, along the westerly prolongation of the
north line said sectional segment, 30.00 feet to a point on the
west right of way line of Madison Street (Co. Rd. No. 1211) also
being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Bakersfield and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
TEENCE (1) South 89'54'19" East, along said prolongation line and
north line, 684.28 feet to the northeast corner of said sectional
segment;
THENCE (2) South 00'04'24" West, 330.26 feet to the southeast
corner of said sectional segment;
THENCE (3) North
sectional segment,
of Madison Street
89'54'25" West, along the south line of said
624.39 feet to a point on the east right of way
(Co. Rd. No. 1211);
THENCE (4) South 00'05'32" West, along said right of way line,
690.56 feet a point on the south right of way line of Watts Drive
(Co. Rd. No. 1146);
TEENCE (5) North 89'54'36" West,
line, 30.00 feet to a point on the
the City of Bakersfield.
along said south right of way
existing corporate boundary of
THENCE (6) westerly and northerly along said corporate boundary
line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
F:EXH11895
RTY:w~n
Containing 6.14 acres
(more or
less)
PRE-CHECKED~
KERN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE
CASA LOMA
PARK
9
L
'
~t
BAKERSFIELD
AIRPA~K
(2)
ANNEXATION NO, SO~4 R~.SOI.UTIO~
ANNEXATION OF
MADISON No. I
200 0 200, 400 60O
N '*~*~**'~**~ EXISTtHE; COJ~PORAT[
EXHIBIT"
PL~.N FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 384
(MADISON NO. ;)
AGENCY WHICH PRESENTLY cHEcK SERVICES WHICH INDICATE HOW SERVICES
PROVIDES SERVICE CiTY/DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE PROVIDED BY CiTY/DISTRICT WILL
SERVICES Upon AnneXatl°n Future Date BE FINANCED (LE., GENERAL TAX
.... (SlmCify) RATE OR SPECiAL ASSESSMENT.)
Planning COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks and Recreation COUNTY (see page 2) U/D GENERAL TAX REVENUES
l.ibra ry COUNTY N/A
Police Protection SHERIFF & HIGHWAY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
PATROL
Fire Protection CITY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES,
FIRE FUND
Street COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
(~nstruction COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND (;AS TAX
REVENUES
Maintenance COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS ]'AX
REVENUES
Sweeping NONE CITY GENERAl. AND (}AS TAX
REVENUES
I.ighting NONE CITY U/D GENERAL TAX P. EVENUL:S
EIood Control COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage NONE CITY U/D USER FEE/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Waler CALIFORNIA WATER U/D USER FEE
SERVICE CO.
Olhcr (RF. EUSE) I'RIVATE CITY U/D USER FEE
ENT
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location ~fil;~g~L~R1g~
Indicate location from which service Indicate frequency and availability
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire of service (i.e., street sweeping,
station, library, etc.) response time for emergency services,
rec. programs, etc.
POLICE-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through
the City Police Department located at the say corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye
Street about 4 1/2 miles northwesterly of the annexation.
FIRE-Service will be provided by City Fire Station No. 5 located a little over a
mile to the southwest at South Chester Avenue and Planz Road pursuant to
exchange wherein City protects certain property within the County's jurisdiction.
'lhus, the City does incur the cost of providing fire protection and the fire fund
collected from the City's taxpayers must be transferred to the City.
PARKS AND RECREATION-The proposed annexation area is within the
boundary of thc Casa Loma Specific Plan. ]he Parks and Recreation Element
notes no future park sites are scheduled for development in the specific plan area.
The proposed housing development project being annexed will incorporate it's
own recreational center and green space.
]LIBRARY-N/A
STREETS-'lhe City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works
efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING-Maintenance and
personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
prevenlativc maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
SEWER-An existing 10" city sewer main in Madison Street at Watts Drive,
approximate 680 feet south of the area, is available for service. This line is
connected to City Treatment Plant No. 2.
WATI~R- Ibc territory will continue to be served by the California Water Service
Company.
OTHER-(Refuse)-When annexed, upon development, service will be provided by
the City either by City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this
annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00
minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. ]he
annexation will not affect City or County Fire service
capability or response time.
.Existing neighborhood Parks in the specific plan area are
open to the public at reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide the necessary public work services to this
area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
III .
IV.
Vl.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the
existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional
emergency service Dersonnel or construction of new facilities, etc)?
The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level
or capability of the City to provide needed services. UPon time of
full buildout of this territory, hiring of additional Dotice officers
should not be reGuired to maintain the current level of city service.
The amount of Public roadway (Madison Street) acquired by the
annexation will increase the future maintenance responsibility of the
City but will not affect the existing level of service.
would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities tc
serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so,
would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? As
development occurs, the developer provides and oavs for major
facilities and dedicates them to the City. No upGradinG or change in
facilities will be reGuired in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject
property is located within the boundary of the Casa Loma Specific Plan
area adopted AuGust 25, 1986, incorporating a land use element which
designates the land use for this area as code 5.2 (Medium Density-
Residential). This classification is primarily intended for small
multiple-family structures, such as duplexes, triplexes, and mobilehome
parks which reGuire a full array of urban services, with a minimum of
2,722 souare feet of site area Der unit and yielding a maximum of 16
units Der net acre.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on
present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as
maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The city DroDoses nc
change to the adopted 5.2 (Medium Densitv-Residential) or more
restrictive zoning of the Casa Loma SPecific Plan. Zonina will be the
same whether the area is in the Citv of the County pursuant to the
conditions of the specific Dlan. The entire area is presently vacant
and undeveloped.
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly
benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency
response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should
be able to respond in a more timeiv manner than present County Sheriff
services. The present City refuse collection rate is lower than fees
county residents now pay to independent companies. NO special
assessment or charges for street sweepinG, leaf collection, street
liGhtinG energy costs and fire hydrants upon development of subject
area. City Government also provides increased political representation
for residents within the corporate limits.
VIII
A.
Pleaseprovide the following information relative to city/district and
county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s in area. The existing tax rate in the area
eGuals 1.125454% of assessed market value. This represents the total
property tax rate. When annexed a designated percentage of the total
property tax for the area will accrue to the City and the remainder tc
the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as
shown on 1994-95 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
So
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the
city/district: If so, explain. No-The last listed (1992-93) City
bonded indebtedness has been paid off and the current (1994-95) tax
rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness.
Co
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market
value of $50,000.00?
The proDertv rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment
will not occur due to annexation.
0:A354
4