HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 52-95RESOLUTION NO. 5 2" 9 5
A RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION
PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 385, KINGSLEY
NO. 1 ANNEXATION (WARD 6).
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed annexation is
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15319 and 15303; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory. pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation the prezoning is Residential
Suburban.
6. That for this proposed annexation the general plan designation is
Low Density Residential.
7. That for this proposed annexation, the prezoning therefore, Ordinance
#2995 New Series adopted by the City Council on October 16, 1985, and an Initial Study
was prepared and posted for the prezoning on June 14, 1985. It was determined that the
proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment.
8. That the territoW proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Judy Skousen
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
~IAR 2 ~ ~ , by the following vote:
AYES: COONCILMEMBER DeMOND, CARSON, SMITH, McDERMOTT, ROWLES, CHOW, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER
ABSENT: COUNC~ER
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED ~AR 2 2 1~S
BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
Assistant City Attorney
MO:pjt
March 2, 1995
res\roakl.cc
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION Appendix I
TO:
Office of Pianning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
County CIerk
County of Kern
1115 Truxtun Ave,
Bakersfieid, CA 93301
FROM: (Pubiic Agency)
City of Bakersfieid
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfieid, CA 93301
Project TitIe: Kin~sIev #1Annextion
Project Location-Specific: Southside of Kineseiv Street and northeast corner
of Talisman and Castro Lane.
Project Location-City: BakersfieId Project Location-County: Kern
Description of Project: Annexation
Name of Publlc Agency Approving Project: Citv of Bakersf±eld & Kern County
LAFCO.
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Bakersfield
Exempt Status: (Check One)
X
Ministerial (Sec.21080(b)(1); 15268));
Declared Emergency (Sec,21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec, 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number, CEQA
Section 15061¢3)
Statutory Exemptions, State code number,
Reasons why proiect is exempt: This proiect acknowied~es the existin~
residential zonzno and iand use for the proiect area· Residential
development is permitted bv right bV the existin~ zonin~ and most of the area
is aireadv deveioped,
Lead Agency
Contact Person:M, Ortiz
Area Code/Teiephone/Extension: {805) 326-3788
If filed by applicant:
· Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2, Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency
~2~i~pro j ect ? Yes No
Signature:~ ~,~. Date: ~-~'~ Title: Associate Planner
x Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR:
Signed by Applicant
p:kl .ne
Revised October 1989
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 385
"KINGSLEY NO. 1"
A parcel of land being a portion of the southwest quarter of
Section 1, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., County of
Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the north right of way
line of Kingsley Lane (Co. Rd. No. 1491) and the east line of
Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 6617, filed for record in Book 29 of
Parcel Maps, Page 129 in the office of the Kern County Recorder,
said point also being on the existing corporate boundary of the
City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) departing from said corporate boundary line, South
89'56'26" East, along said street right of way line, 612.98 feet to
a point on the east right of way line of line of Castro Lane (Co.
Rd. No. 50);
THENCE (2) North 00'09'19" East, along said east line, 60.20 feet
to a point on the north line of the south 285 feet of the west 145
feet of Lot 43 of Section 1, T. 30 S., R. 27E. per "Kern County
Sales Map No. 1 of Lands of J. B. Haggin" filed for record May 3,
1889 in the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (3) South 89'56'28" East, along said north line, 145.00
feet;
THENCE (4) South 00'09'19" West, 315.00 feet to a point on the
south right of way line of Talisman Drive ( Co. Rd. No. D-476);
THENCE (5) North 89'56'28" West, along said south line, 125.03 feet
to the beginning of a 20.00 foot radius curve concave to the
southeast (Co. Rd. No. 3072);
THENCE (6) Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle
of 89'54'13" an arc distance of 31.38 feet to a point of tangency
on the east right of way line of Castro Lane (Co. Rd. No. 50);
THENCE (7) South 00'09'19" West, along said east line, 85.48 feet
to a point on the easterly prolongation of the north boundary line
of Tract No. 2396 filed for Record in Book 12 of Maps, Page 46 in
the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (8) North 89'56'26" West (N. 89'56'56" W. Per Tr. No. 2396)
along said prolongation line and north tract boundary line, 378.48
feet to a point on the existing corporate boundary line of the City
of Bakersfield;
THENCE (9) Westerly and Northerly along the various courses of the
existing corporate boundary to the point of beginning.
Containing 6.23 Acres (more or less)
F:EXH022495
RTY:wrn
PRE*CHECKED by
KERN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFF~C.--
Dat~ ~- 2~'~-
,~ Approved by
PARCEL MAP
NO. 6617 ~ (I)
LANE
(e)
I
ROSE MARIE
L A FRANCE
(:3)
RADIANCE
DRIVE
~ .. ~., ~ . -~.
DRIVE
DRIVE
DRIVE
ANNEXATION NO, ~ R~SOLUTION NO,
ANNEXATION OF
KINSSLEY No. I
TO THE CITY OF SAXEI~SFIELO
_~,,~$ ~ ACRES
SCALE:
1~ o I~ ~
~ EXISTING C~A~ ~
AVENUE
MING
ANNEXATION NO. 385
(KINGSLEY NO. 1)
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
Planning COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks and Recreation COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Library COUNTY N/A
Police Protection SHERIFF & HIGHWAY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
PATROL
Fire Protection CITY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES,
FIRE FUND
Street COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Construction COUNTY
Maintenance COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Sweeping COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Lighting COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Flood Control COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage CITY CITY USER FEE/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Water CALIFORNIA WATER USER FEE
SERVICE CO.
Other (REFUSE) PRIVATE CONTRACT CITY USER FEE
o:^38~ EXHIBIT "C"
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location Service Level Capacity
Indicate location from which service Indicate frequency and availability
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire of service (i.e., street sweeping,
station, library, etc.) response time for emergency services,
rec. programs, etc.
POLICE-all police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through
the City Police Department located at the shy corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye
Street about 2 1/2 miles northerly of the annexation.
FIRE-Service will be provided by Station 7 (City) 3/4 mile southwest of the
territory at the northeast corner of Akers Round and Sorrano Avenue, pursuant
to exchange wherein City protects certain property within the County's
jurisdiction. Thus, the City does incur the cost of providing fire protection and
the fire fund collected from the City's taxpayers must be transferred to the City.
PARKS AND RECREATION-Wilson Park is approximately a half mile
southeasterly at the northeast corner of Wilson Road and Hughes Lane.
LIBRARY-N/A
STREETS-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works
efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANC EdSWEEPING/LIGHTINC~-Maintcnance and
personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
SEWER-Existing city sewer trunk lines are located within the annexation area in
Castro Lane and Kingsley Lane and two of the residences within the territory are
now connected to these mains by City/County rental agreements.
WATER-The territory will continue to be served by the California Water Service
Company.
OTHER-(Refuse)-When annexed, upon development, service will be provided by
the City either by City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this
annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00
minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The
annexation will not affect City/County Joint Fire service
capability.
All city parks ale open to the public at reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide thc necessary public work services to this
area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the
existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional
emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)?
The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level
or capability of the City to provide needed services. Additional
police officers most likely will not be required to maintain the
current level of city service. The amount of countv roadwav being
annexed is a minimal increase to the maintenance responsibility of the
City and will not affect the existing level of service.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to
serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so,
would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? N__o
uoGradin~ or change in facilities will be required in the territory for
annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The
territory is zoned E 1/2-RS (Estate 1/2 acre miminum. residential
suburban combininG) zone in the County. This is basically a one-family
OCCUPancY with a minimum lot area of 1/2 acre allowing the keeDin~ of
fowl and animals for domestic use and livestock not exceeding one adult
animal Der 1/4 acre of lot area.
Vl.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on
present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as
maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The entire territory is
orezoned to City R-S (Residential Suburban) zone. The City R-S zoning
is compatible with the existing County use orovidina a 24,000 sGuare
feet minimum lot size and Dermittina the same animal, fowl and
livestock uses.
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly
benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency
response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should
be able to resoond in a more timeiv manner than oresent County Sheriff
and State Highway Patrol services. As residential development occurs,
the oresent City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than
fees county residents now Day to independent comDanies. No soecial
assessment or char~es for street sweeping, leaf collection, school
crossing ~uards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants. City
Government also orovides increased oolitical representation for
residents within the cormorate limits.
VIII
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and
county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area
eGuals 1.125454% of assessed market value. This represents the total
Drooertv tax rate. When annexed a designated oercentaGe of the total
oroDertv tax for the area will accrue to the City and the remainder to
the County for orovidinG health care and social services. (Rate as
shown are from 1994-95 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the
city/district: If so, explain. NO The Citv's bonded indebtedness
has been paid off and the current (1994-95) tax rate list shows no city
bonded indebtedness.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market
value of $50,000.00?
The DroDertv rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment
will not occur due to annexation.
0:A381
RTY:cah