HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 83-95RESOLUTION NO. 8 3 - 9 5
A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING SEGMENT
V OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT
OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD 2010 GENERAL PLAN
(CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 1-95).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on MONDAY, March 13, 1995, and THURSDAY, March 16, 1995, on Segment
V of a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan, notice of
the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty-one (21) calendar days
before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of
general circulation; and
WHEREAS, such Segment V of the proposed amendment to the
Circulation Element of Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan is as follows:
SEGMENT V:
The City of Bakersfield has applied to amend the Circulation
Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan,
adopting a specific plan line for State Highway 178,
previously adopted by the State of California in the year
1960. The portion of specific plan line to be adopted by the
City is located in northeast Bakersfield and begins at the
existing Route 178, approximately 3,000 feet west of the Kern
Canyon/State Route 178 interchange and continues
northeasterly a distance of approximately five miles to the
city boundary;
and
WHEREAS, for the above-described Segment, an Initial Study was
conducted, and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and
adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's
CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff and the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 23-95 on March 16, 1995, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of Segment V and this Council has
fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
ORIGINAL
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public
hearing on WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 1995, on the above described Segment V of the
proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following
findings:
1. All required public notices have been given.
2. The provisions of CEQA have been followed.
3. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the
environment because the project only protects an existing alignment. All environmental
impacts related to right-of-way acquisition and freeway construction will have to be
mitigated by the State of California to the greatest degree possible.
4. The proposed amendment of the General Plan is compatible with
existing designations adjacent to the specific plan line and the general area of the
specific plan line.
5. The specific plan line is necessary for the future development of the
surrounding area both as a planning tool and preservation measure.
6. The specific plan line is necessary for the future construction of the
State Route 178 Freeway from Bakersfield to Lake Isabella.
7. Adoption of the specific plan lines will not cause displacement of
people or residences.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings, incorporated herein, are true and
correct.
2. The Negative Declaration for Segment V is hereby approved and
adopted.
3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports
and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to
the City Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved.
2
4. The City Council hereby approves and adopts Segment V of the
proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "A," attached
hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally located in
northeast Bakersfield and begins at the existing Route 178, approximately 3,000 feet west
of the Kern Canyon/State Route 178 interchange and continues northeasterly a distance
of approximately five miles to the city boundary more specifically described in Exhibit
5. That Segment V, approved herein, be combined with other approved
segments described in separate resolutions, to form a single Circulation Element
Amendment, GPA 1-95.
......... O00 ........
ORIG,N,~L
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
M^Y 1 1 1995 , by the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBER DeMOND, CARSON, SMITH, McDERMO'I'r, ROWLES, CHOW, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNCiL~?JB~R ........ ./~n~
ABSTAIN: C ~; L;;,~ C i L~,,",E,~,~I[~ L;~ N OF/~.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER /[I/~D ~'
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED MAY I ? 1995
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
LAURA C. MARINO
Assistant City Attorney
RED:pit
April 13, 1995
res\r195S5.cc
4
ORIGh~AL
EXHIBIT "A"
GPA 1-95, SEGMENT V - CIRCULATION ELEMENT
STATE HIGHWAY 178 - SPECIFIC PLAN LINE
~0
PALAOINO 0
£PEC/£/C
LIN£
COUNTY
PARK
178
11
13
179% R2g[
EXHIBIT 'B"
DESCRIPTION
STATE ROUTE 178
SPECIFIC Pr.~N LINE
From one ndle easC of Morning Drive east to the City Limit
line at the noz~ch line of Section 1, T. 29 $., K. 29 E., M.D.B.& M.
All those portions of Sections 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 16, 17, 19 and
20 of T. 29 S., R. 29 E., M.D.B.& M., City of Ba~er;fieid, County
of Kern, State of California, Being a strip of land 210 feet wide,
lying 105 feet on each side of the following described line:
Coneuencing at the intersection of the centerlines of State Route
178 and Morning Drive;
THENCE (1)
T~.NCE (2)
THENCE (3)
THENCE (4)
THENCE (5)
THENCE (6)
THENCE (7)
THENCE (8}
THENCE (9)
THENCE (10)
THENCE (11)
THENCE (12)
N. 89"47'22" E., 4965.28 feet to the beginning of a
4999.74 foe: radius curve concave northwesterly, being
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Northeasterly along said curve ~hrough a central angle
of 40o20'48' an arc distance of 3520.73 feet;
N. 49°26'34" E., 7326.52 feet to ~he beginning of a
4999.78 foot radius curve concave northwes=erly;
Noz~cheastarly along said curve through a oentral angle
of 08°20'45· an arc distance of 728.28 feet;
N. 41°05'49' E., 1512.35 feet to the beginning of a
4999.78 foot radius curve concave southeasterly;
Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle
of 12°23'52" an arc distahoe of 1081.86 feet;
N. 53°29'41" E., 5458.30 ~eet to the beginning of a
4999.78 foot radius curve coneave southeuterly;
Northeasterly along said curve through e central angle
of 20o38'54- an a=c distahOe of 1801.83 feet~
N. 74"08'35' E., 1072.53 feet to the beginning of e
4999.78 foot radius curve concave northwesterly;
Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle
of 11~15'00" an arc distance of 981.71 f~et;
N. 62~53'35· E., 2675.18 feet to the beginning of s
1149.95 foot radius curve concave westerly;
Northeasterly and nor~h~sterly along said curve
through a central angie of 85019'57" an arc distance of
1712.66 feet;
THENCE (13)
N. 22o26'22" W., 609.63 feet more or less to :he north
line of section 1, T 29 S., R 29 E., M.D.S.& M.
The sidelines of said strip :o be shortened or
lengthened :o intersect said section line.
ORIGINAL