Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 131-94RESOLUTION NO. I 8 1 ' 9 4 A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS THAT NO WRITYEN PROTEST HAS BEEN FILED AND ORDERING THE TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS PROCEEDING NO. 1159, ANNEXATION NO. 379, BRIMHALL NO. 3 ANNEXATION, ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND INCLUDED IN THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD SEPARATION OF GRADE DISTRICT (WARD 4). WHEREAS, Resolution of Application No. 130-93, dated July 28, 1993, was submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the annexation of territory to the City of Bakersfield designated as Proceeding No. 1159, Annexation No. 379 (Brimhall No. 3), the exterior boundaries of which are described in Exhibit "A" and shown on the map marked Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing upon said proposal was held before the Commission on June 28, 1994; and WHEREAS, following said public hearing the Commission, on June 28, 1994, adopted its Resolution Making Determination, being Resolution No. 94-15, recorded in Minute Book 41 of said Commission; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 1994, the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield set WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 10, 1994, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. (or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed annexation and the owners of land within the said territory were duly informed of their right to file written protests against the annexation with the City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexation; and WHEREAS, said territory lies outside the Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District; and WHEREAS, Section 8290 of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California provides that the unincorporated territory of a county which was not included within a separation of grade district at the time of formation of such district, and which subsequent to formation of such district is annexed to or otherwise included within a city which is a part of such district, shall immediately upon such annexation to such city be included within the district and shall thereafter become a part of the district to the same extent as such city; except such portion or portions thereof which the City Council has determined will not be benefitted by inclusion in the district; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 1994, the Council of the City of Bakersfield adopted its Resolution No. 111-94 specifying that unless excluded by the City Council, all portions of proposed Brimhall No. 3 Annexation shall, upon annexation to the City of Bakersfield, be included within the Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District, and setting WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 10, 1994, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. (or soon thereafter as the matter could be heard) in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time, date and place to hear any objections to proposed annexation and inclusion within said district and said notice was published as required by law; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly conducted by and before the City Council at its meeting of August 10, 1994, in all respects in accordance with Resolution No. 111-94. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. In accordance with Sections 57075 and 57078 of the Government Code, it is hereby found that written protests, if any, filed and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the hearing represent landowners owning less than 50 percent of the assessed value of the land within the territory to be annexed. (Uninhabited) 2. That the said territory designated as Proceeding No. 1159, Annexation No. 379 (Brimhall No. 3), and described herein, and every part thereof, is hereby ordered annexed to the City of Bakersfield. 3. That the Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this resolution ordering a change of organization, along with any required remittance to cover the fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County. 4. That the Executive Officer of the Commission is hereby requested to prepare and execute a certificate of completion and make the filings required by Part 4, Chapter 8 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Organization Act of 1985 and record a certified copy of the certification of completion with the recorder of Kern County, with the surveyor of Kern County and with the Clerk of the City of Bakersfield. 5. In accordance with Section 8294 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council has heard all relevant and pertinent objections, if any, to inclusion within the Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District of any portion or portions of the territory described as Brimhall No. 3 Annexation, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on the map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth. 2 6. In accordance with Section 8295 of the Streets and Highways Code, at its discretion, the City Council determined that all portions of the territory should be included in the Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District, as all such territory is benefitted by such inclusion. 7. In accordance with Section 8296 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Clerk shall notify the Secretary of the District and shall furnish such Secretary with a certified copy of this resolution. 8. That the Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this resolution to James R. Parker, Jr., c/o Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District, P.O. Box 2205, Bakersfield, CA 93303. ......... 000 ........ 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Co9ngi][ of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on A~6 ~ o ~ , by the following vote: AYES: COONCILMEMBER. S. McOERMO'Ff, EDWARDS, De~MOND, SMITH, BRUNNI, ROWLES, SALVA(IGIO NOES: COUNCILMEM~c.R!~ ( ~ ( ~.~._ . ,,t~NT: COUNCILMEMbERS ' V"~('~v~ ~-~ ' ' CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AUB 1 0 1~ MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: JUDY SKOUSEN CITY ATTORNEY BY: · MARINO Assistant City Attorney MO:pjt July 15, 1994 res\rsgd.b3 4 EXHIBIT "A" BRIMHALL NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 379 A parcel of land being a portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast comer of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 30 according to the official plat thereof, said comer also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bake~$tield; THENCE (1) departing from said corporate boundary, South 00°52'03" West aJong the East line of said quarter-quarter section, a distance of 542.93 feet (+/-) to an angle point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (2) Southerly, Westerly, Northerly and Easterly aiong said existing corporate boundary to the Point of Beginning. Containing 21.08 acres (more or less) 07/09/93 [2) ' '~ r_-- S.W. Cor, See. 30 ~ ANNEXATION NO, 379 RESOLUTION NO, ANNEXATION OF BRIMHALL No. :5 TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 21,08 -* ACRES SCALE: 200 0 200 400 600 N ,.xxxxxx- EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARY i m PROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUNDARY EXHIBIT "B" oAL-_.o '¥JAP .,OF L.-iND$ - ~ J, J-:'" _,=~,,~ b~ Z EJX/JYA/'l '/