HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 4184ORDINANCE NO. __~L,L8 4
AN ORDINANCE UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION, DENYING THE APPEAL BY THE
SIERRA CLUB, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
AMENDING SECTION 17.06.020 (ZONE MAP NO. 104-07) OF
TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM A (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-1 (ONE FAMILY DWELLING) AND A-HD
(AGRICULTURE-HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT) TO R-1-HD (ONE
FAMILY DWELLING- HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT) ON 160:!:
ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PALADINO
DRIVE, WEST OF THE PROPOSED MORNING DRIVE
ALIGNMENT, IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,
T29S, R29E. (FILE #03-1133)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure set forth in the provisions of Title
17 of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing on a petition from Aera Energy, L.L.C. to change the land use zoning of those certain
properties in the City of Bakersfield generally located North of Paladino Drive, west of the
proposed Morning Drive alignment, in the northwest quarter of Section 7, T29S, R29E as
shown in Exhibit "B".
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as a result of said hearing, did make
several general and specific findings of fact which warranted a negative declaration of
environmental impact and changes in zoning of the subject property from A (Agriculture) to R-1
(One Family Dwelling) and A-HD (Agriculture-Hillside Development) to R-1-HD (One Family
Dwelling- Hillside Development); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10-04 on February 5, 2004 the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the
Municipal Code to approve Zone Change 03-1133 as delineated on attached Zoning Map No.
104-07 marked Exhibit "C" and more specifically described in attached Exhibit "D", subject to
conditions and mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the
recommendations made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2004, The Sierra Club filed an appeal to the
Planning Commission's recommendation on this project; and
WHEREAS, responses to concerns presented by the Sierra Club were prepared
and considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in recommending approval of the
negative Declaration and are hereby made part of the record for the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the facts presented in the staff report and evidence at the above
referenced public hearings support the findings contained in this resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield conducted and held a public
hearing on WEDNESDAY, March 24, 2004, on the above described Zone Change No. 03-1133,
notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before
the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general
circulation; and
ORiGiNAL
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Negative Declarations, as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation
Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff, Planning Commission and this Council; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was advertised and posted on November
10, 2003 in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the general plan designation for this area allows residential
development, with which the R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and R-I-HD (One Family Dwelling -
Hillside Development) zones are consistent; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered and hereby makes the following
findings:
1. All required public notices have been given
The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been
followed as follows:
In accordance with adopted guidelines of the San Joaquin Valley Air
Pollution Control District, the agency with jurisdiction over the affected
resource, the project's impacts to air quality, as projected in an Air Quality
Study prepared by W.Z.I. Inc. (January 2004), fall below the thresholds of
significance.
In accordance with CEQA Section 21083.3 b. and CEQA Guidelines
Section 15183, this project is consistent with the development density
established by the existing zoning and adopted General Plan, for which an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified on December 11, 2002.
There are no significant impacts which are peculiar to this project or parcel
which were not considered in the General Plan EIR.
There are no significant impacts which are peculiar to this project which
were not analyzed in the EIR prepared for the adopted General Plan.
There are no potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts
which were not discussed in the EIR prepared for the General Plan.
Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and agreed to
by the applicant to adddress air quality, cultural resources, wildfires, and
biological resources.
None of the requirements for a subsequent EIR or negative declaration
pursuant to CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and
15163 are present. The proposed zone change will not cause new
significant environmental impacts that were not previously discussed in the
General Plan EIR or an increase in severity of previously discussed
impacts. No major revisions are necessary to the previously adopted
General Plan. Accordingly, the City finds that adoption of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration is appropriate and that no subsequent or
supplemental EIR is necessary.
2 ~ "'
O~GtNAL
The public necessity, general welfare and good zoning practica justify the
requested change of zone from the existing zoning district to R-1 (One Family
Dwelling) and R-I-HD (One Family Dwelling - Hillside Development) zones.
Based on the evidenca in the record, as required by Section 21082.2 of the State
of California Public Resources Code (CEQA) for the purpose of documenting
significant effects, and the mitigation measures proposed to address impacts on
biological resources, it is the conclusion of the Lead Agency that this project will
result in impacts that fall below the threshold of significance with regard to
wildlife resources and, therefore, must be granted a "de minimis" exemption in
accordance with Section 711.4 of the State of California Fish and Game Code.
Additionally, the assumption of adverse effect is rebutted by the above-
referenced evidenca and the conclusion of the Final Environmental Impact
Report that the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would
reduce project and cumulative impacts on biological resources to a level that is
less than significant.
Responses to the December 3, 2003 Sierra Club letter are hereby incorporated
into the Negative Declaration by reference.
SECTION 1.
as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield
1. All of the foregoing recitals are hereby found to be true and correct.
2. The appeal submitted by the Sierra Club is hereby denied.
3. The Negative Declaration is hereby approved and adopted.
4. Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield
be and the same is hereby amended by changing the land use zoning of that cartain property in
said City, the boundaries of which property is shown on Zoning Map. No. 104-07 marked
Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and are more specifically described in
attached Exhibit "D" subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit "A".
SECTION 2.
This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal
Code and shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of its
passage.
......... o0o .........
ORIGINAL
the
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted, by
Council City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
APR 1_ ~ ?.1~4 the by the following vote:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER COUCH, CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGG[O
COUNClLMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
P~ELA A. McCARTHY, C,~C
CITY CLERK and Ex Officie(,Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED APR i ~. 2004
Mayor o tf he C~y of Bakersfiel~
APPROVED as to form
VIRGINIA GENNAR~
City Attorney
Exhibits: A. Oonditions of Approval B. Location Map
O. Zone Map
D. Legal Description
LP/S:~Zone Change\03-1133\CC\ord
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "A"
ZONE CHANGE 03-1133
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL/MITIGATION MEASURES
Mitigation Measures
Air Quality
1. Mitigation Measures for Construction Equipment Exhaust
The following mitigation measures should be utilized during the construction phase of the project
to reduce construction exhaust emissions. These mitigation measures are stated in the GAMAQI
guidance document as approved mitigation for construction equipment:
· Properly and routinely, maintain all construction equipment, as recommended by
manufacturer manuals, to control exhaust emissions.
· Shut down equipment when not in use for extended pedods of time to reduce emissions
associated with idling engines.
· Encourage ride sharing and use of transit transportation for construction employee
commuting to the project sites.
· Use electric equipment for construction whenever possible in lieu of fossil fuel-fired
equipment.
· Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may
include ceasing of construction activity during the peak-hour of vehicular traffic on
adjacent roadways.
Mitigation Measures for Fugitive Dust Emissions
Construction of the project requires the implementation of control measures set forth under
Regulation VIII, Fugitive PM,0 Prohibitions of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
The following mitigation measures, in addition to those required under Regulation VIII, can
reduce fugitive dust emissions associated with these projects:
· All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for
construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water,
chemical stabilizedsuppressant, covered with a tarp or other suitable cover, or vegetative
ground cover.
· All onsite unpaved roads and offsite unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized
of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
· All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut & fill, and
demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions utilizing
application of water or by presoaking.
· When materials are transported offsite, all material shall be covered, oreffectively wetted
to limit visible dust emissions, and at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of
the container shall be maintained.
· All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from
adjacent public streets at the end of each workday. (The use of dry rotary brushes is
O~IG[NAL
ZC 03-1133
Exhibit "1"
Page 2
expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit
the visible dust emissions. Use of blower devices is expressly forbidden)
· Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of
outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions
utilizing sufficient water or chemical stabilizedsuppressant.
· Within urban areas, trackout shall be immediately removed when it extends 50 or more
feet from the site and at the end of each workday.
· Any site with 150 or more vehicle trips per day shall prevent carryout and trackout.
· Asphalt-concrete paving shall comply with San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District Rule 4641 and restrict the use of cutback, slow-cure and emulsified asphalt
paving materials.
· Cease grading activities during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph over a one-
hour period).
· Limit construction-related vehicle speeds to 15 mph on all unpaved areas at the
constructions site.
· Wash off construction and haul trucks to minimize the removal of mud and dirt from the
project sites.
Cultural Resources:
3
Portions of project may be located in the Sharktooth Hill bone bed. Prior to grading and/or
earth-disturbing activities at elevations between 600 and 700 feet, subdivider shall:
3.1 .Submit a map delineating the areas within 600 and 700 feet elevation of the subdivision to
be disturbed.
3.2 Retain a qualified paleontologist to attend a pre-grading meeting, and set forth in the procedures
to be followed during the monitoring program.
3.3 A full-time paleontological monitor that is trained and equipped to allow rapid removal of
fossils with minimal construction delay shall be on the project site during ground
disturbance activities within 600 and 700 feet elevation.
3.4 If fossils are found within an area being cleared or graded, earth-disturbing activities shall
be diverted elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage of the fossils. If construction
personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor shall immediately divert construction
and call the monitor to the site for fossil salvage.
4
The project paleontologist shall prepare, identify and curate all recovered fossils. Upon
completion of grading, the project paleontologist shall prepare a summary report documenting
mitigation measures and results, with itemized inventory of collected specimens.
Paleontologist shall submit the report to the City of Bakersfield, and any other appropriate
agency, and transfer fossil collection to an appropriate depository.
5
If during construction activities or ground disturbance, cultural resources are uncovered, the
subdivider shall stop work and retain a qualified archeologist for further study. Subdivider
shall notify the proper authorities and be subject to any mitigation measures required of the
archeologist. (Recommendation of a Cultural Resources Study prepared by Hudlow Cultural
Resource Associates, dated October 2003).
OR~G~,~,L
ZC 03-1133
Exhibit "1"
Page 3
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
6
Every tract and parcel map shall contain an advisory notice within the conditions of approval
recommending that property owners use plant materials which are fire resistant. A
comprehensive list is available from the fire department (mitigation against wildfires).
Biological Resources
7
With submittal of any subdivision map, the applicant shall provide a biological study of the
property. The study shall include, but not be limited to, an evaluation of habitat suitability for
Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard (BNLL). If property is suitable habitat for BNLL, BNLL surveys
will be acquired prior to grading.
Conditions of Approval
8
With submittal of any subdivision application on the property, the applicant shall provide offers
of dedication for road access to property adjacent to the northeast boundary of the property
as approved by the Public Works Director and Planning Director.
9
Future development plans (including subdivision) shall provide an open space corridor which
preserves the sides and bottom of the canyon proposed for a trail east of the future park site
as shown in the Specific Parks and Trails Plan for Northeast Bakersfield. The open space
corridor shall link to the park site (Condition added by the City Council).
10
No vehicular access shall be allowed to or from the east side of the project area (Condition
added by the City Council).
IE~(HiBiTtB
I-n
ORIGIN&L
EXHIBIT C
ZONE CHANGE 03-1133
) R-1-HD
A-HD TO R-1 A-HD TO
R-1-HD
A TO R-1
A-HD
TO I:1-1
A-HD TO
R-1-HD
A TO R-1
A~I~D TO R-I~"ID
-' A TO R-I' 'HO
~,-HO TO
R'-I
104 '
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.
PROPOSED ZONING
NW QUARTER SECTION 7, T 29 S, R 29 E
R-1 ZONE AREA "A'
COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHI? 29
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
THENCE l.) NORTH 00°02'40', WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
A DISTANCE OF 1657.08 FEET;
2.) NORTH 79004'34'' EAST, LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
A DISTANCE OF 640.35 FEET;
3.) NORTH 50o05'20'' EAST, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
DISTANCE OF 1354.24 FEET;
4.) NORTH 89o50'29'' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET;
5.)
SOUTH 47021'40'' EAST, LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION
7, A DISTANCE OF 530.11 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7;
6.)
7.)
8.)
9.) SOUTH 29°50'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 675.00 FEET;
10.)SOUTH 64o25'43'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 757.35 FEET;
11 .)NORTH 54°23'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 711.46 FEET;
SOUTH 39°07'51" WEST, LEAVING THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 270.95
FEET;
SOUTH 02~09'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET; ~~
SOUTH 65°33'29'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1100.00 FEET;
I. L8 7~g5
12.)NORTH 89°50'12" EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 237.54 FEET;
13.)SOUTH 00o13'04'' EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 324.86 FEET;
Page l of 4
14.)SOUTH 89°50'29'' WEST, LEAVING THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 250.00
FEET;
15.)SOUTH 44°02'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 551.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7;
16.)SOUTH 89"50'32" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 2030.25
FEET, RETURNING TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 7.
CONTAINING 101.73 ACRES+
R-1-HD ZONE AREA "B"
COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH
00002'40'. WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF
1657.08 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7, SAID POINT ALSO
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS PROPOSED ZONE AREA;
THENCE 1.) NORTH 79°04'34'' EAST, LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION
7, A DISTANCE OF 640.35 FEET;
2.) NORTH 50'05'20" EAST, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
DISTANCE OF 1354.24 FEET;
3.)
SOUTH 89°50'29'' WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
A DISTANCE OF 1668.28 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 7;
4.)
SOUTH 00"02'40" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7, A
DISTANCE OF 985.61 FEET RETURNING TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING FOR THIS PROPOSED ZONE AREA.
CONTAINING 23.70 ACRES±
Page 2 of 4
R-1-HD ZONE AREA "C"
COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE A_ND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH
89°50'32" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 2030.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS PROPOSED ZONE AREA;
THENCE 1.)
NORTH 89"50'32" EAST, CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF
634.62 FEET, TO THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7;
2.) NORTH 00°13'04'' WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7, A
DISTANCE OF 395.13 FEET;
3.)
SOUTH 89°50'29" WEST, LEAVING THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 250.00
FEET;
4.)
SOUTH 44°02'22'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 551..13 FEET TO A POINT IN
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7,
SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS
PROPOSED ZONE AREA.
CONTAINING 4.01 ACRES:i:
Page 3 of 4
R-1-HD ZONE AREA "D"
COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, coUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH
89°50'32'' EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 2664.87 FEET TO THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH 00°13'04'' WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 2642.60 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 7 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS PROPOSED ZONE
AREA;
THENCE 1.) SOUTH 89050'29'' WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 7,
A DISTANCE OF 388.60 FEET;
2.) SOUTH 47°21'40'' EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 530.11 FEET;
3.) SOUTH 39°07'51" WEST, LEAVING THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 270.95
FEET;
4.)
5.)
6.)
7.)
SOUTH 02°09'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET;
SOUTH 65°33'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1100.00 FEET;
sOUTH 29 50 29 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 675.00 FEET;
SOUTH 64°25'43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 757.35 FEET;
8.) NORTH 54°23'49'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 711.46 FEET;
9.) NORTH 89°50'12'' EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 237.54 FEET;
10.)NORTH 00°13'04'' WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 1922.75 FEET.
RETURNING TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7
AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS PROPOSED ZONE
AREA.
CONTAINING 31.99 ACRES±
Page 4 of 4
OR!GIN,'~L
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
County of Kern )
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield;
and that on the 16th day of Apdl , 2004 she posted on the Bulletin Board at City
Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following: Ordinance No. 4184, passed by the
Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2004 and
entitled:
AN ORDINANCE UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION, DENYING THE APPEAL BY
THE SIERRA CLUB, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND AMENDING SECTION 17.06.020
(ZONE MAP NO, 104-07) OF TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE
BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE BY CHANGING THE
ZONING FROM A (AGRICTULTURE) TO R-I (ONE
FAMILY DWELLING) AND A-HD (AGRICULTURE-
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT) TO R-I-HD (ONE FAMILY
DWELLING-HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT) ON 160+
ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PALADINO
DRIVE, WEST OF THE PROPOSED MORNING DRIVE
ALIGNMENT, IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, T29S, R29E. (FILE# 03-1133)
Is~ PAMELA a. McCARTHY
City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield
By:
Clerk
,"'
ORIGINAL ~