HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 172-93RESOLUTION NO. I 72- 93'
A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, OVERTURNING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION
APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
APPROVING SEGMENT I OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD 2010 GENERAL PLAN
(LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT 3-93).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 and THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1993,
on Segment I of a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan,
notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty-one (21)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, such Segment I of the proposed amendment to the Land Use
Element of Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan is as follows:
SEGMENT I:
DEWALT CORPORATION representing RIVERLAKES
RANCH/UNIBELL has applied to amend the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan consisting of a change from
LR (Low Density Residential, less than or equal to 7.26 dwelling units per
net acre), HMR (High Medium Density Residential, greater than 7.26 and
less than or equal to 17.42 units per net acre), HR (High Density
Residential, greater than 17.42 and less than or equal to 72.6 dwelling units
per net acre), and MC (Major Commercial) to LMR (Low Medium
Density Residential, greater than 4 and less than or equal to 10 dwelling
units per net acre) on 70.6___ acres.
and
WHEREAS, for the above-described Segment, an Initial Study was
conducted, and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration with mitigation was prepared;
and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and
adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's
CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff and the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 47-93 on September 16, 1993, the Planning
Commission recommended disapproval of Segment I and this Council has fully
considered the findings made by the Planning C~t~f14~00~ as set forth in that
Resolution; and ~.
ORIGINAL
WHEREAS, Dennis DeWalt has filed an appeal of the decision of the
Planning Commission for the above-described project; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public
hearing on WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1993, on the appeal and above described
Segment I of the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been
given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield
Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council, on the basis of written and verbal testimony
overturned the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approved this request;
and
findings:
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following
1. All required public notices have been given.
2. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) have been followed.
3. Based on the initial study, staff has determined that the proposed
project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration
was posted on August 11, 1993.
4. Conditions of approval attached to the project as Exhibit "A" are
included in the project to mitigate impacts.
5. The proposed amendment of the general plan is compatible with
existing designations and development adjacent of the site.
6. Conditions of approval from previous general plan amendments
(Riverlakes Ranch/Unibel Specific Plan) are applicable to this project. (See attached
Exhibit "C".)
7. That on the basis of written and verbal testimony, the request for
LMR has been determined to be consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan and the Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific
Plan.
8. The appeal by Dennis DeWalt is hereby approved, overturning the
recommendation of the Planning Commission and approving General Plan Amendment
3-93, Segment I.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
correct.
1. The above recitals and findings, incorporated herein, are true and
adopted.
2. The Negative Declaration for Segment I is hereby approved and
3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports
and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to
the City Council, is hereby received and accepted.
4. The City Council hereby overturns the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and approves the appeal filed by Dennis DeWalt.
5. The City Council hereby approves Segment I of the proposed
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General
Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "B," attached hereto and
incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally located within the
boundaries of the Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan, north of Rosedale Highway
between Meacham Road, Baron Avenue (proposed), Friant-Kern Canal and Main Plaza
Drive subject to conditions listed in Exhibits "A" and "C."
5. That Segment l, approved herein, be combined with other approved
segments described in separate resolutions, to form a single Land Use Element
Amendment, GPA 3-93.
.......... o0o ..........
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held
#0¥ 1 0 ~ by the following vote:
NOES: COUNCIL ~'~/'~,( .. ~r~]~,O~ .
ABSTNN: COUNCILMEMBERS ~'1 [1'~ [, .-
~ENT: ~UNGILMEM~RS ...... V~
Assistant CITY CLERK and Ex OfficiO5 Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED NOV 1 0 l.~
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI, CITY ATTORNEY
T CITY ATTORNEY
RD:pjt
res\r393sl.cca
December 2, 1993
ORIGINAL
EXHIRIT "A"
General Plan Amendment 3-93, Segment I
Specific Plan Amendment 2-93
Zone Change No. $491
Conditions of Approval
Planning:
In order to mitigate the impacts of any natural to urban land conversion on the San Joaquin kit
fox (a State and Federally-listed Endangered Species), the applicant must, prior to ground
disturbance, follow the Advisory Notice, detai!ing the linerun Mitigation Measures established for
the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation PLan.
Specifications and standards in the Riverlakes Ranch~UnibeH Specific PLan, as amended, and
conditions of approval in City Council Resolution Nos. 80-90. 81-90 119-91 and 232-91 and
RiverLakes Ranch/UnibeH Agreement No. 90-74 Partial Amendment of Development Agreement
86-54 shad be applicable to this site.
Prior to the issuance of a buildlug permit within the project site, $3.65 per square foot of
a.~.,.~able space, as defined in Section 65995 of the Government Code, shall be paid for the
purpose o£ providing school facilities.
Public Works:
Offers of dedication will be required to allow for the construction of the entire portion w~thln the
project area of Main Plaza Drive and Baron Avenue to collector standards. Such offers ~hnll
include sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas for landscaping as
directed by the City Engineer. The offers of dedication, fully executed, shall be submitted to the
City prior to development or recordation of any subdivision map or certificate of compliance
within the GPA area.
With the first development within the General Plan Amendment area, Main Plaza Drive from
Meacham Road from its existing southerly tern'anus to Baron Avenue, and Baron Avenue from
Main p]n?a Drive to Coffee Road shall be constructed. Minimum improvements will consist of 32
feet of pavement with 8 feet wide graded shoulders. With the Baron Avenue construction, a left-
turn %vorm" shah be constructed in the median isLand of Coffee Road.
The appllcant shall submit a comprehensive drainage study covering the General Plan Amendment
area. The drainage study should include. but not necessari ,ly be limited to, drainage calculations,
pipe sizes and locations, the drainage basin size. and construction phasing. The existing basin at
the northwest corner of the project shall be eularged to accept the drainage from this area, and no
additional drainage basin will be allowed within the GPA area.
The drainage study shad be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. and any required
flowage easements for enlargement of the drainage basin site or pipelines shall be deeded to the
City, ptior to recording of any subdivision map or certificate of compliance or review of any
improvement plan within the project area.
p:393sl.ea
OR(GINAL
EXHIBIT "B"
GPA 3-93, SEGMENT I
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2-93
~R
~R
OS-P
TO
HMR
HR
HMR
ORIGINAL
20
T295. R27E
EXHIBIT C
Previous conditions of approval:
GPA 1-90, Segment III - Rivertakes (from City. Council Resolution No. 80-90).
Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan (from City. Council Resolution No. 81-90).
Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan Amendment/Zone Change .5149 (from
Citv Council Resolution No. 232-91~.
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "C"
Condi51ons of Approval
GPA 2-90, £e~men% ilI - - =~= Ranch
Amendmenu to Riveriakes/UniDeit Land Use Designations.
All land use maps and specific plan proposals of the appli-
cant are conditions of approval except as modified by the
following conditions of approval.
2. Deny the General Commerclai designation for the southwest
corner of Norrls and Coffee Road. Designate the site
SuburDan Residentiai with the stipulation that the site be
used as a church szte.
2. Qen? the General Comme~c~ai designation at the southwest
corner of Hageman Roaa and Coffee Road. The 8-acre s~te
shall be changed from.to High-Medium Denslay Res~dent~ai,
and the eight acres of the adjoining 16-acre High-Medium
Density site to the west shall be designated Low Density
Residential.
The 23-acre Low Density Residential site along the southeast
corner of Creekside Drive and Hageman Road shall be
increased in size to 31 acres.
Approve the southwest corner of Coffee Road and MeaLy Avenue
for ten acres of General Commercial.
The use designation cf the 5-acre site at the northeast cor-
ner of Callowav Drive and Meacnam Road snai! be Office
i~mmercltl ~:n :no £~uiat~cn %na~ ~ses snaii ~e cenerai!l
ziass~fied as pro£ess~cnai c:fice, church, 2r~en% ustc,
medical, dental or cn~id care fac~!in~es.
The General Sommerclai
Calloway Dr~ve an~ Hageman Road snail De six acres rather
nnan five acres.
approved as ShOWn on 5no General Plan Amendment 1-90,
Segment I!I/Riveriakes Ranch £pec!fic Plan Amendmen~ maP.
resldent~ai classification nav~ng zero-ic~ line ceveicpment
~nai! be cn isus tangent from a m~n~mum cf 4,000 souare feet
6,000 square feet in area.
ORIGINAL
Exniolu
Page
Amendments uc Land Use Designation names for non-Unibeil
portion of the Soeclfic Plan Policy Document
!0. APprove name change for land use desiunations as follows:
!1.
12.
14.
a. Single Family Estate (1.8 units per acre) to Rural
Residential (1.8 units per net acre).
b. Single Family Estate (3.5 units per acre) to SuburDan
Residential (3.5 units per net acre).
c. Single Famlly detached (5.0 units per acre) to Low Density
Residential (5 un~[s per net acre).
d. Muitipie Famliy-Momiienome (10 units per acreJ ~o Low Medium
Density Residen=ial-Mobilehome (10 units per net acre).
e. Office Retail to Office Commercial.
f. Industrial to Light Industrial.
g. Apartments to High Medium Density Residential.
Total Dwellina Units
The total number of dwelling units for Riverlakes Ranch/
Unibell shall not exceed 4,430 dwelling units.
?he aDDiicant snail 3cnfer wzzn %he North ~'=~ ~'~ -=~ c
.......... a .... totage
Dlsur~cu, %~e Friend-Kern Water Users Authorizy and the
agree tc ~ence requirements and access locations. Phe
agreement s~all 2e suom~uted to t~e P!ann~n~ Commission fcr
approval pr~or 50 recordation cf any subdivision map. AS a
~nimum the canals snail be fenced with a six-foo~ chainlink
fence.
~ac1 ......
?he recreeulcn !aci!!u~es agreement between 5he aDgiicant
and t~e North BaKersfield Recreation and Park D~stric% snail
School Facilities
xnlD,.
Page
2910 Plan Center Concept
15.
Applicant snail submit a master development plan fcr devel-
opment of the 121 acre site designated as Major Commercial.
The master development plan snail be approved in the same
manner as a Planned Commercial Development as specified in
%he City Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.54.
16. NO development shall be allowed in the Major Commercial site
until approval of a master development plan.
LaKe Management
17.
Applicant shall submit evidence that the Final LaKe Plan has
seen reviewed and approved by the following agencies: Kern
County Health Department, Kern Mosquito Abatement District
and the Water Quaii~y Control Board.
18.
The lakes shall be accessible at all times to Kern Mosquito
Abatement District personnel for control purposes and shall
be managed in compliance with requirements of local, state
and federal agencies.
Archaeoloay
19.
Prior to development, applicant through the California
Archaeological Center at California State University
Bakersfield shall submit a report based on an archaeological
inventory analysis.
~0iic Worms
20.
9ffers o~ dedica5~on w~il De r~culred w~%nln 5he SPA
area to allow for the construction of Calloway Drive
t~e north boundary of t~e project, of Coffee Road (1/2
width) to arterial ~tandards from Rosedale Highway nc
Norris Road, of Hageman Road to arter~ai s%andards ~rom
Coffee Road to Calloway Drive, cf Olive Dr~ve tc arte-
rial standards from Coffee Road ~o Calloway Drive, and
cf Norris Road ,1 2 width) to cc!!ector standards from
Coffee Road to the west boundary cf the project. Suc~
for landscaping as directed by the City Engineer. The
ri~nn-c/-wav z~Jtn cf ~ ztan~ar~ ~r~eri~! ~ !i~' with
.... and addin~cna± 5tea
%o permit 10' of iandsca~ing behind the combination
%or is 90 fz. ^~ztn additional w~denlng
~n~ addl~lcnai area zs perml~
Riverlakes Ranch
Exhibit C
Page 4
21.
22.
23.
25.
The developer snail make a financlai contribution tca
Wests~de Freeway Development Fund in lieu of the spe-
cific long term mitigation outlined in the Traffic
Study. The amount of the contribution shall be six hun-
dred seventy-five thousand dollars ($675,000.00) and
included in the amended Development Agreement.
Offers of dedication for the above-referenced streets
within each ~eveiopment phase area shown on Exhibit 10C
in the Specific Plan Document shall be submitted, fully
executed, to the city prior to issuance of a building
permit or recordation of any subdivision map or certifi-
cate of compliance within that phase. Additional offers
of dedication for portions of the above streets outside
the phase area oelng developed may be required during
development.
Any road crossings required to be constructed over new
waterways created by the ap91icant/developer/subdivider
shall be constructed solely by the applicant/developer/
subdivider to the full ultimate width of the street.
Golf cart crossings at public roads will be
Public Works Department for traffic impacts.
gation measures will be required.
reviewed by the
Traffic miti-
Construct transition areas as required by the
for all approacnes [o and departures from the
paved area.
City Engineer
new ultimate
City Engineer, and using traffic index values estasiioned Sy
The applicant shall supmir a comprehensive drainage s~udy.
The drainage study should ~nciude, Put not necessariiy oe
limited to, drainace calculations, pipe s~zes and locations,
drainage sas~n sites and s~zes, and ccnstructlon phasing.
Any tentative maps suPm~uted within the GPA area snail be
conditioned to conform zo this drainage study and pay appro-
...... ~-n ==== ~ nra!na~e _~u~v snail be suomi~ted -~
and approved Dv the ClLy Engineer pr~cr no the aDprovai cf
any improvement or development plans within the GPA area.
.h- required drainage basin s~es and necessary == ° '
shall be deeded to the City prior to recordation cf any SUD-
sulidlng permlt 'slsnin %he GPA area.
Phasing 0£
Riverlakes Ranch
Exhibit C
Page f
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
All new cuDdivisions and developments will be
connect to existing sewer services within the
%he time of development.
required to
GPA area at
The applicant s~ali suumlt a comprehensive landscape and
wall concept plan for approval by the Planning Commission
prior to submittal of any tentative cuDdivision map or
development plan within this area.
Comply with existing and future requirements of the State
Division of Oil and Gas for oil well facilities within the
GPA area and the City of Bakersfield municipal code relating
to drilling for and production of hydrocaroon substance.
The developer shall be responsible for paying all fees
and/or c~arges related to amending the existing assessments
to conform with the new land use designations. The City
shall require that the developer perform an appraisal or
other land valuation method approved by the City confirming
that the amended property value/lien ratio is in conformance
with existing City requirements.
In addition, any change in land use within the Rancho
Laborde Planned Drainage Area shall necessitate a modifica-
tion to the fee structure of the PDA. The modification
shall be prepared by the developer and approved by the City.
NO subdivision maps or certificates of compliance snail De
recorded until SUCh modification is made and approveu.
Phasing cf wnoie ~ndependen5 ~ysLems wlll De ~ermlzte~.
Norris Road, Coffee Road and gageman Road are future Dike-
ways on Lne "21keways Xas%er ?fan." The zorsh ~Je c~
Hageman shall be constructed to a half width 96' curd 50
CUrD standard as required for arterlai streets w~Ln Dike
lanes and Norris Road snail be constructed 5o a 74' curd 50
curd standard as reuulred for collector streets with bike
lanes as stated in une circulation element cf %he 29!0
General Plan. A bike path along %he west side cf Coffee
Road s~ail be outside 5ne rlgnt-of-way fur that street.
' ~ ~ed led ~ ~: ~ · ~su~c~ '~==~-~ cc~cur-
renuiy wiun a revised Development Agreement.
AJS/meg
r,, s3ea. 2
ORIGINAL
~JORR1S ROAD
GPA 1-90,
SEGMENT Iii
RIVERLAKES RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT
I_-.
EXHIBIT C
Riverlakes
EXHIBIT
Zoec~ic ~an Tex~
Coolicon: snail suDml: one }Pec!='' :'an cex~ cons:sO:nO c=
3hooters A aria B for ~iveriaKes Rancn/UniDeil ana Rivertakes
Ranch oro3ects resPecciveiy and orecare a Riverlakes Ranch
clan mad aeoicting stanaaras and wall aria ianascaolng for
Riverlakes Rancn ana Riverlakes Rancn/Unioell.
~ . q ~ Plan: "Development of
AdO :o Page Q, Item ~ of the
local stree:s is likely to reauce ~ne maximum number of
units since conformance ~o m~n~mum is: size exciuaes 'deal
streets ana easemen%s."
Add ~o Page 46, :tem 2: "The L£Z acres oesienateo as major
commercial snould be pereloped as cne core of the northwes%
"censers" concede.
Setbacks for lots sharing an immeOia:e boundary with cne
golf course or lakes shall be 20 fee~ for the fron: yard ang
15 feet for the rear yard.
The linear landscape park/buffer loca:eO on the west side of
Coffee sh~ll be developed as follows:
a. Minimum landscape setback of 25 ft. for commercial lang
uses and a minimum width of 50 ft. for medium ang high
Oensity residential long uses and 84 ft. for suDuroan and
low density residential land uses.
3. C3ns~rucced concwrrenz!? w~h the :~'5t SUDOiV'Sion or
-3il3~ne segmen~2:
') Norrls ta Olive
S) ~ageman cs CreeKs]~e
ORIGINAL
o
.ertltie ano Deoes~r]an ~ngress and egress So She dian
],ens~:¥ Resioent]a~, ~ion Medium Density, ,ow Density
:es]aentiai ano Suburban Residential ~ites aojacent :a
~offee Eoad snail be limiteo to Norris Roao, Olive Drive,
nageman Roao ano CreeKside Drive. Driveways or other access
~oaos for residential uses shall not allow venicie access to
Coffee Roa~.
~age 18, Item 6 - Add: The public oeoestrian anO bicycle
~a:n along the Friant-Kern Canal will be oeleted from the
plan.
Page 22, ~tem 10. Add: Where faults may potentially affect
critical or essential facilities, including out not limited
zo fire stations, nosoitals, police stations, government
aomlnistrat~ve offices one ambulance facilities, snouid be
covereo by a specific ~eoioglc ~eoort prepared ~tr each SUCh
location. The Precise Plan for their development snail snow
~uilding placement tom=area to open space/parKinq lots. If
necessary, specific geological reports shall be prepared for
sites which overlay historical faults.
~tem #39 would be modifieO to read, "The applicant shall
mitigate the effects of the existing steam cleaning sump to
standaros set forth by the City of Bakersfield Fire
Department, Hazardous Materials Division prior to developing
th~s site or prior ~o oeveloping residential uses within 300
feet that are located within the project."
~aoe 12 qection a ? l.b. and ~xniDi: 'J-$ Mod~F,, ~xhibit
]S-S SD S~Ow ~ ~' ~,]Oe ~lmewa~Ks 19 luGInc ur ~::
'' oca! 'E~eezs 7~,ai! ~ave ~ mlnlmum ~=en:--=-~ay ~stn ef
50 feet.
:age :2, £ect~on B.S.B ano Page _, ....... n _~.;.-
:uantities of seveiopment ano the applicant':- DroDortlonate
'~ne -_ime She eeveioDmen; agreemenz 's amendec.
: ~: ]Z -eC'lO~ ~.]. 7 - LDDrova~ ....... =~ ,, Cm'~ Sqe
*'mnt-of-~ay of the :r,ant-Kern and Sziloway ]anais may
District, etc.).
ORIGINAL
ZDec:~-: ~ian
~xnibi: C
~age
]4.
!5.
!6.
18.
!9.
:age 2~, Section 9.4.~
snail be aDoroveo by Cne
~DA Dian.
Any SuD-recen~ion
~v ano conform
basins and sumDs
rage 25, Section 9.4.3 F nai oeslgn of lake systems Der-
coining to stormwater runoff shall incorporate methobs to
prevent initial stormwacer flows from polluting the lakes
wniie at the same time benefiting from the dilution capacity
from major storm flows. This system snail be aDproved by
the City Engineer.
Page 25, Section 9.4.3 Revisions ~o the PDA shall be
a:proved by t~e City. Should these revisions require an
increase nn PDA fees, such increase snail be proportioned
over t~e GPA area only.
~age J~, _ec,,on ,_.~.4.~ ~roDer~',' DrODOSeO ~ Scormwater
retention will either be dedicaced to ~ne City or De within
an easement gran:ed to tne City for this use. Approval will
be required from the affected utility companies for the use
of their easement areas for stormwater detention. A mainte-
nance district will be required to maintain these areas.
Page 36, Section 11.4.7.2c and Exhibit 36-B Wrought iron
fences shall be on private property and not within City
right-of-way or easements. These fences shall De maintained
by en~ities other cnan the City of Bakersfield.
~age 47, Section iZ.8 Petroleum facilities shall observe
~eouireo setbaCKS from s~reet right-of-way.
ORIGINAL
8 , -EGEND
~ - - - ~'~ 16
i,~ _ ~
" '~ ~ GPA 1-90,
~ SEGMENT !11
~ ~'~~RIVERLAKES RANCH
--,~ ,- ,,.. -. ,o SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT
EXHIBIT C
EXHIBIT C
R_r%,~LAI~S RANCIt/I. INIBELL SPECI~riC I'L~
14~i2.9012
$peci~h~ Plan AmendmemoDra/'t II
February 11, I991
Revisea February. 22. 1991
lh, m ~1
R~
! &l',~ USE PT.AM
{:=ktbit 10-A
Delete '(Mobile Home Park)' designation from Low-Medium Density. residential
parc~ at southwest portion of project along the south side of Meacham Road.
Delete 'Mobile Hon~ Park' re~-rmm~ f~om Land Use Plan Summar~ under th~
hendin~: Ltmw-Medium DertsiW'
Seelion XI {11.5.3 Residential Land Use Concept} p.44
Dele+,. paragm-aph A.. 'The Low-Medium Density-Mobile Home Park
Classification...,' In its entiremy. Renumber suon~_qive para~'aphs accordingly.
T~,,,, #2
o Aa'a "Rl~,~lr~s M~i~, Landscspe plm~- a~ by, The Ci~ ot ~
~ Commiuion October 18.1~o, to ~ p, ived~as i~mch/Unib~{l Spenae
Plan, Terimic,l
o R~piac2 Exl~its 37-A and 37-B with rtndsed 'Wall and Fenc~ Plan" u
~bit 37-A and {~-vise text accordingly.
o Add Exhibit 38-A, "Master Landscape Plan" and rewse t~xt accordingly.
[tmn s'3
Exhibit A, Condition 5d. ot City Council Resolution No. 81-90
Add the following lan~uaee: 'ConsU'uct a six foot high masom'v wall atop a two
foot high bemm along the west boundary of the Linear Park which homers Hi§h-
Medium Densiiy rpaidential land us~.'
Item
USE PTAN ~,a, ibit 10-A
("f~t'"IYf &'rfoN FI'.AN Exhibit lI-A
Rename north/south collector from Hagennan Ro~d to Rosedale Highway from
'Rivena~:es ~,ancn ~nve to Norm Viiiage Drive- ano eiiect a at£C~t C~alTle
change on all reconted maps and approved plans.
Item
RF~ Section IV (4.3 Clrculagon Sy~tsm D-ai~nationat p.12
Add suu paragraph ic. to reaa as toilows ",~c. ai Collectors: ~ foot ngnt-of-way
vath two rraff'ic lanes ~n an exuanded pavement secuon: umvide~eest j~.~ local
S~ without access to aaiacent reslde~ntial
para§rapns.
OR,G.
EXHIBIT C
Speofic Plan Amendment-Draft II
Revised February 22, 1991
Pa~ Two
Item #6
RE:
Seclton IV (4.3 CL.~-~l~io~ System Desig~alio~.~) p.]~
Revise sub-paragraph lc. to read: "Local Streets: Located m minimize through
traffic; provides direct access to ad~acont property with two traffic lanes, a
minimum flow-line to flow-line wMth of 40' and a right-of-way width of 60'."
Revise sub-para~n'aph ld. to read: "Residential cul-de~ac streets: Provides di~cl
a~ to ad'~:ent property with two traffic lanes, a minimum flow-Une ~ flow-line
width o~ 36' and a right-of-way width of 60'. The right-of-way width of straight
cul-de-sac st~e~ less than 500' in length may be 52'.'
RE:
Se~toa IV (4.4 Circulation Pla~ pJ3
Add new paragraph 6. to read as follows: "Local Collector~, as depicted on the
Cbculation Plan, shall be treated as major roads which prohibit di~-et acorns to
adjacent pmpe~. Wan and landscape treatments wm be developed at the edges
of these sm~s and as such, double fronta~ residmeal lois MIi be permitted alon~
l~m #8
RHg Serffoil IV ((~t~xLidion Plan) ~hmit I~-A
0 R~ Cll~'u~ion Plsl~ to ~horl~n the leg~th of th~ north~n most Local Collectl~
to ~t of ~h~ glm~nm.y Soltool site (~ ~ Exhibit 14-A attache).
Design Standards) p O
Revis~ the last sentence of paragraph 2. to read: 'Such rear yard setbacks for the
main reindeuce may be ~luced to 15 feet prowded no more than 20 percent of the
requm~ yant aros ls cover~ by the residerico. Other acc~sory buffclings or
stmctures.(e.g., pools, gazebos and covered patios) shall comply with the
Baka~field Mumopal Code, Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance) for setbacks.
ORIGINAL
SeXton XI (11.52 Design Standards) p.43
Add paragraph 5. to read: "It is iecog~ni,~nt that due to the unique open space and
rec~aiional amenities provided by the goff course and lakes, residential
neighborhoods adjacent to either the Soft course or the central south lake shall be
pernutted the/oilowing setback modificanons i'Residential neighborhoods" shall
be defu~t as the land use 'bubbles' depicted on the Land Use Plan which are
adiacent to the golf course or south lake and described as Suburban, Low DensiV/and
Low-Medium Density):
a. Front yard setbacks may be reduced to 20' provided the following are met:.
(1) No more than 50% of the residences wnthin anv one neighborhood which
do not share a rear property. Une w~th either the goif course or take
shall be pertrotted to have a 2~ front yard setback.
EXHIBIT C
$peofic Plan Amendment-Draft II
Februa~ n, 1991
Revised Febroa~ 22, 1991
Pa~e Three
(2) When a residence is pernutted a 20' front yard setback. each side yard
setback shall be a nurdmum of 6'.
(3)
Residences which locate the garage door parallel to and at the 20'
front yard Mibsck line shall be required to install roll-up garage doors
with automatic garab, e door operas. Residences with garage doors
perpendicular to the 20' front yard setback line (i.e., are &ccc~sible front
the direction of the side yard) shall not be required to inslali roll.up
gm~ doors with aummaOc gare~e door opener. Reside~es may locate
livin~ Sl~Om at the 20' front yard setl~ck line and the garase space at or
behind a 25' ~Mmck line.
It is intended that through the pt,.ceding setback modifications. a more
modulated streetscape is achieved throush varying front yard setbacks
while at the same lima preserving desired densities through increased
s~de yard se'cbac~s.
ORIGINAL
ITEU
Concept Land Use Plan
RIVERLAKE8 SPA (02111191)
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT C
RIVERLAKES RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Bakersfield, California
6-18-90