HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 130-93RESOLUTION NO.. ~ ~ 07 9 '~
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION~ PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 379, BRIMHALL NO. 3 ANNEXATION
(WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1993, on the prezoning for the proposed
annexation of certain properties to the City of Bakersfield known as BRIMHALL NO. 3
ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten
(10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a
local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. %93 on February 4, 1993, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the prezoning for the annexation by this Council
and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as
set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that
the owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services
fxom the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax reveneus for benefits
given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
ORIGINAl.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor,
Ordinance No. 3541, which was adopted June 9, 1993, an Initial Study was conducted
and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on
the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on January 5, 1993.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territoW proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 .........
2
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
JUL 2 $ 199~
, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS McDERMOTT, ,ElliptiC, 8, D~MOND, SMITH, BRUNNI, ROWLES, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNCILMEMBET, S
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT; COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY CLERK and Ex OfficiO Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED JUL 2 8 ~
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MO/pjt
Attachments:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
res\roa.b3
June 30, 1993
3
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "A"
BRIMHALL NO. 3
ANNEXATION NO. 379
A parcel of land being a portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., County of Kern, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the
Southwest quarter of said Section 30 according to the official plat thereof,
said corner also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the
City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) departing from said corporate boundary, South 00°52'03"
West along the East line of said quarter-quarter section, a distance of
542.93 feet (+/-) to an angle point on the existing corporate boundary of
the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (2) Southerly, Westerly, Northerly and Easterly along said existing
corporate boundary to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 21.08 acres (more or less)
07/09/93
I S.W, I/4 See. SO
-- J
~ / ~--S.W. Cor. Sec. ~0
,---------------~<~-- - 1..~., .....
I
ANNEXATION NO, ~79 RESOLUTION NO,~ SALES MAP OF LANDS OF KERN
ANNEXATION OF
BRIMHALL No. 3 COUNTY LAND COMPANY
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
21.08 ~ ACRES
SCALE:
~ ~oo o ~oo 4oo ~oo
~ ~ PROPOSED ANNEXATION B~NDA~
EXHIBIT "B"
OR~I~L
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 379
(BRIMHALL NO. 3)
~ Agency Which Presently Provides Check Services Which City/District Will llld/cate How Services
~ervice Provide Provided By City/District will
be Financed (i.e.. eeneral tax
Upon Future Date Irat~ or medal assessment.)
Annexation (Specify)
Planning County CITY General Tax Revenues
Parks and Recreation North Bakersfield Recreation and General Tax Revenues
Park District
Library County N/A
Police Protection Sheriff & Highway Patrol CITY General Tax Revenues
Fire Protection County COUNTY General Tax Revenues
Fire Fund
Streets County CITY General and Gas Tax
Revenues
Construction N/A N/A By Private Development
Maintenance County CITY General and Gas lax
Revenues
Sweeping None CITY General and Gas lax
Revenues
Lighting County CITY General Tax Revenues
Flood Control County CITY General Tax Revenues
Sewerage City CITY User Fee/Special Assessment
Water Vaughn Water Company User Fee
Other (REFUSE) Franchise Collector CITY User Fee
D 4:HAGMN.1 EXHIBIT 'C'
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant to the city.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability
of service (i.e., street sweeping,
response time for emergency services,
rec. programs, etc.
pOLICE-all police sen, ices in the City of Bakersfield are administered through
the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye
Street approximately 6 miles easterly of the annexation.
FIRE-Fire protection service will be provided by County Station No. 65 located
on the north side of Rosedale Hwy., easterly of Calloway Drive pursuant to
exchange wherein City protects certain property within the County's jurisdiction.
Thus, the City does incur the cost of providing fire protection and lhe fire fund
collected from the City's taxpayers must be transferred to the City.
PARKS AND RECREATION-North Rosedale Park is a mile north of the area
and is operated by the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District.
Developer shall provide park acreage or pay in-lieu fees in accordance with
adopted standards of the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District.
LIBRARY-N/A
STREETS-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works
efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING-Maintenance and
personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
SEWER-Service to the territory is available from the existing City Jewetta Avenue
trunk sewer which is directed to City Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3.
WATER-This area will continue to be served by the Vaughn Water Company.
OTHER-(Refuse)-Present refuse collection is provided by a franchise refuse
collector. When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by City
forces or by contracts with the same collector if at all possible.
} 4:HAGMN.2
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this
annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00
minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The
annexation will not affect City/County Joint Fire sendce
capability or response time.
District Parks are open to the public at reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide the necessary public work services to this
area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as neededH.
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
2
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of
City/District services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction
of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or
capability of the City to provide needed services. When proposed development and build-out
of the area occurs. additional police officers most likely would be required to maintain the
current level of cily service. The future street improvements will increase the future
maintenance respons~ility of the Ci[y but will not affect the existing level of service. These
increases in services are not deemed significant.
IV.
Would City/District require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory
(roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would City/District or residents be responsl'ble for
financing? No upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for
annexation. As development occurs. developers shall provide and pay for major
improvements and facilities and dedicate them to the City.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The entire area is Zoned E (10)
RS (Estate -10 Acre Residential Suburban) in the County.
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The
proposed prezoning is City R-1 18.000 (One family dwelling - 18.000 Square Feet minimum
lot size) zone and City RS - 10 A (Residential Suburban. 10 Acre minimum lot size) zone.
Proposed prezoning is consistent with and acknowledges the existing land use and minimum
lot size.
RTY: lh
D 4: HAGMN. 3
3
ORIGINAL
VII.
List City/District services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease
in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City
Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff
services. The present City refuse collection rate is lower than fees county residents now paY
to independent companies. No special assessment or charges for street sweeping. leaf
collection. school crossing guards. street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants. The City's
Jewetta Trunk Sewer system has capacity to serve the area when proposed residential
development occurs. City government also provides increased political representation for
residents within the corporate limits.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to City/District and county taxes: List
existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing t~ rate in the area equals 1.155399% of assessed
market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated
percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and the remainder to
the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 1992-93 County
Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the City/District: If so,
explain. Yes. when annexed. the rate will be increased by 0.002400% of assessed market
value which equals the City bond rate.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000?
City Bond rate of 0.002400% amounts to a difference of $1.20 more per year on a property
of this value.
RTY: lh
D 4: HAGMN. 4
ORIGINAL