Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 89-93RESOLUTION NO. 8 9 - 9 ~ A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 1993-94 BUDGET AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S REPORT, LEVYING ASSESSMENTS AND AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS BY THE KERN COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, DMSIONS 1 THROUGH 13. WHEREAS, the Report of the Public Works Director, including the 1993-94 budget for Maintenance District No. 2, Divisions 1 through 13, complying with the provisions of Section 13.04.130 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, having heretofore been filed with the City Clerk as required by Section 13.04.130 of that Code, and the requirements of Section 13.04.140 and 13.04.160 having been met, the City Council has this date held a noticed public hearing as required by Sections 13.04.210 and 13.04.220 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Report of the Public Works Director, including the aforementioned budget, and has considered and heard any and all protests which may have been filed against the amounts of the assessments or to the fairness of the benefit formula or formulae. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals are found to be true and correct. 2. The Report of the Public Works Director, attached hereto, including the 1993-94 budget for Maintenance District No. 2, Divisions 1 through 13 and the assessments therein contained, is hereby approved, such budget is hereby adopted and such assessments are hereby levied. 3. The reservation of the right to perform maintenance work by City forces or by private contractor is hereby made. 4. The City Clerk shall transmit the assessments levied herein to the Director of Public Works with instructions to submit said list to the Kern County Auditor-Controller and Tax Collector, and such other County officers as may be required, for placement of such assessments on the secured roll of the County and request that said assessments be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes. .......... o00 .......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by, the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on UUN 0 9 L~5 , by the following vote: ~A.~$.~ COUNClLMEMBER~: ~DWARD~ DeMOND, S~TH ~111I, KANE, M~ SALVAGGIO : COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS: ~ O ~ ~ ' ABSTAIN COUNCILMEMBERS' CITY CLERK and ~;x Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield BOB PEICt~. ~YOR of the Ci~ of Bakersfield ~~~ON~D as to form: CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S REPORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 City of Bakersfield Fiscal Year 1993-94 City of Bakersfield Maintenance District No. 2, Divisions 1 through 13 are generally described in Exhibit "A" and are specifically as shown on the Map and Assessment Diagram under Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth, for the various areas of benefit within Maintenance District No. 2, a district within the City of Bakersfield. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 13.04 of Title 13 of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, referred to as the Maintenance District Procedure, the Public Works Director makes and files this Report and proposed assessment of and upon all parcels of property within the Divisions of the district for the cost of maintaining and operating public parks, public street medians and other public street landscaping improvements. The improvements for Divisions 1 and 3 through 12, generally include, but are not limited to: Public Street Landscaping Improvements consisting of; turf, plant forms, shrubs, ground cover, trees, lighting, irrigation systems, conduits, water mains and/or sprinkler systems. Divisions 1, 3 through 7 and 10 through 13 also include Public Street Median Improvements consisting of; plant forms, irrigation systems, conduits, water mains and/or sprinkler systems and ornamental planting, including turf, shrubs, ground covers, and trees. Divisions 2 through 5 and 8 also include Public OBI(~{NAL Park Improvements which consist of; turf, plants, shrubs, trees, irrigation system, conduits, water mains and/or sprinkler systems, play equipment, picnic tables, drinking fountains, barbecue pits, and security lighting. The improvements in this maintenance district are of a public nature. The assessment includes the cost of necessary repairs, replacements, water, equipment, electricity, care, supervision and any and all other items necessary for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. For many years, parks, street medians and other landscaping improvements in the City were traditional tax revenues. After Proposition available for maintenance and operation street maintained through 13, in 1978, funds of local public present the City's improvements were substantially reduced. At budget does not allow for maintenance and operation of local public improvements of the type described above. Thus, absent funds for maintenance and operating costs from a source other than general tax revenues, the City does not permit new parks, public street median or other public street landscaping improvements to be constructed within the City. The funds generated as the result of this district are utilized strictly for the purposes of and applied to the maintenance and upkeep of public parks, public street median and other public street landscaping improvements within the district. Maintenance District No. 2 has been specifically designated to address park maintenance and operation, and maintenance of public street median and other public street landscaping improvements affected. The land uses as follows: Division and all parcels within the district are for all Divisions within the district are 1; consisting of single-family homes and multi-family units. Division 2; consisting of single-family homes, multi-family units and a private school. Division 3; consisting of single-family homes, multi-family units and nonresidential development. Division 4; consisting of single family homes, multi-family units and non residential development. Division 5; consisting of single-family homes and multi-family units. Division 6; consisting of single-family homes and multi-family units. Division 7; consisting of nonresidential development. Division 8; consisting of single-family homes and nonresidential development. Division 9; consisting of single-family homes. Division 10; consisting of single-family homes and nonresidential development. Division 11; consisting of single-family homes, multi-family units and nonresidential development. Division 12; consisting of single- family homes, multi-family units and nonresidential development. Division 13; consisting of nonresidential development. The area within the boundaries of each Division receives the greatest benefit from the improvements and maintenance thereof. Sensory benefits from installing street landscaping, walls, fences and parks, open space the lot or benefits of the street landscaping, include some noise attenuation, esthetic enhancement, enjoyment and recreation. The benefits accrue to all parcel owners within Maintenance District No. 2. The inure to all lots or parcels uniformly, and are assessed on a per dwelling unit or Equivalent Dwelling Unit basis. Park use and enjoyment is likely to be most directly susceptible of enjoyment by each resident. These benefits are, therefore, uniformly assessed on a dwelling unit or Equivalent Dwelling Unit basis. No assessment for park benefits are made on the nonresidential lots and/or parcels in the district. The benefit formula for Maintenance District No. 2 is set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. Maintenance District No. 2, Divisions 3 and 5 has added landscaping which is benefitted by a single tract and a separate zone of benefit has been created specific to that Tract so that all costs associated with the maintenance of the additional landscaping is charged to that Tract. A petition was received by Community Services, signed by a substantial number of property owners within Maintenance District No. 2, Division 5 to construct new lighting at the entry feature at Haggin Oaks Drive. The petition indicated that the property owners wanted the additional cost of labor, materials, maintenance and operation of the new lighting to be added to their assessment. This request is being accomodated. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ED W. SCHULZ, Public Works Director of the City of Bakersfield, by virtue of the power vested in me and the order of the Council of said City, hereby submit the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget as set forth in Exhibit "D" and Assessment Roll as set forth in Exhibit "E", attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth, upon all parcels of property within all Divisions of Maintenance District No. 2, subject to be assessed to pay the cost of maintenance and operation in said district. Dated: ED W. SCHULZ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY OF BAKERSFIELD EXHIBIT "A" City of Bakersfield Maintenance District No. 2 is described as a district within the City of Bakersfield, generally County of Kern, generally bounded by Stockdale Highway on the north, Freeway 99 on the east, Pacheco Road on the south, and the City Limit on the west. Division 1 A Division Bakersfield of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of generally bounded by Stockdale Highway on the North, Gosford Road on the east, Ming Avenue on the south, and the Arvin- Edison Canal on the west. Division 2 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by Outingdale Drive/Kearsarge Way on the north, (including all lots fronting on Outingdale Drive and Kearsarge Way), Ashe Road on the east, Ming Avenue on the south and E1 Portal Drive on the west (including all lots fronting on E1 Portal Drive). Division 3 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by White Lane on the north, Gosford Road on the east, the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way on the south, and Old River Road on the west. Division 4 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the Bakersfield generally bounded by Ming Avenue on the north, Oak, Arvin-Edison Canal and Gosford Road on the east, the south, and Old River Road on the west. City of Scarlet White Lane on Division 5 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by Ming Avenue on the north, Arvin- Edison Canal on the east, the south line of Tract No. 5103 on the south and the east line of Tract No. 4562 and the centerline of Scarlet Oak Drive on the west. Division 6 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by Ming Avenue on the north, Gosford Road on the east, the Arvin-Edison Canal on the south and the west. Division 7 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within Bakersfield generally bounded by Stockdale Highway the Arvin-Edison Canal on the east, Old River Road on the west. the City of on the north, Ming Avenue on the south, and Division 8 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by Stockdale Highway on the north, Jenkins Road on the east, the Cross Valley Canal on the south, and Renfro Road on the west. Division 9 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 Bakersfield generally bounded by Ming Avenue No. 4363 on the east, Tract No. 4289 on the Drive on the west. within the City of on the north, Tract south, and E1 Portal Division 10 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by White Lane on the north, Old River Road on the east, the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way on the south, Buena Vista Road on the west. Division ll A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by Stockdale Highway on the north, Old River Road on the east, White Lane on the south and Buena Vista Road on the west. Division 12 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by White Lane on the north, Mountain Vista Drive on the east, Pacheco Road on the south and Buena Vista Road on the west. Division 13 A Division of Maintenance District No. 2 within the City of Bakersfield generally bounded by Stockdale Highway on the north, Allen Road on the east, Tract No. 4445 on the south, and Tract No. 4444 on the west. MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 1 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) MING AVON F:XHIRIT 'R" "~ =- MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 2 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) DR. SEC. 9 26 MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 3 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DNISION 4 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) EXHIBIT 'B' MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 5 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) _ i- ~ ~ ~IN~ A VENUE NORT~ L/N£ OF TRACT 4699 EXHIBIT 'B' MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 6 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) SO, LAURELGLEN BLVD. ROSWELL LANE EXHIBIT "B" MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 7 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) SEC, 6. 50/27 DAY EXHIBIT 'B' i MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIA~iRAM FOR ~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 = DIVISION 8 sc,~: ,-. 2®. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA N/W .................. (AMENOMENT NUMBER 1~ DIS~ICT BOUNDARY CITY (3) § F~ ,~, DISTRICT BOUNDARY ~S/W CORNER OF THE N/W (2) 1/4 OF SECTION 2 T3DN R26E 25' S/E CORNER OF THE N/W--~j~ 1/4 OF SECTION 2 LEGEND: T505 R26E. [X) CORRESPOND ~TH DESCRIPTION IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. EXHIBIT 'B' MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 9 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMEtER l) EXHIBIT 'B' MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 10 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) [1~) (12) z LCE WHITE 0o) DISTRICT BO'LJN OAR Y~/'/ LEGAL DESCRIP~ON COURSE NUMBERS (9) ASPNALTO RAILROAD R/W J LANE DISTRICT B~JNOARY Ld (2) (4) (8) i7) ,,? EXHIBIT 'b' MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 11A AND 11B BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~: ,..= ~oo. (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) ~/ ~ 3 (14) LJAy ~ Y~q~TE LAN£r (~) ~21 M! AND ASSESSMENT DIA¢ ~,M FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 12 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) GALF S, ENSTAD EXHIBIT "B" MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DNISION 13 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (AMENDMENT NUMBER 1) ~ ~ STOCKDAL[ HWY BAY EXHIBIT "B" MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BENEFIT FORMULA Each parcel shall be assessed at the following rates: For each assessable non residential parcel the assessment shall be the sum of (1) and (2) as defined below. For each assessable residential parcel the assessment shall be the sum of (1), (2), and (3) as defined below. (1) shall equal the dollar amount budgeted for the maintenance and operation of the MEDIAN LANDSCAPING (M) within the district, adjusted for prior year fund balance or deficit; Multiplied by (a): The number of Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) for the parcel, and; Divided by: (b): The total number of EDU's in the district. (1) = M x a b (2) shall equal the dollar amount budgeted for the maintenance and operation of the STREET LANDSCAPING and WALLS (S) within the district, adjusted for prior year fund balance or deficit; Multiplied by (a) : Divided by (b): The number of EDU's for the parcel, and; The total number of EDU's in the district. (2) = S x a b NOTE: (2) shall equal zero dollars for anv developed or undeveloped church parcel. (3) shall be the dollar amount budgeted for the maintenance and operation of the PARKS (P) within the district, adjusted for prior year fund balance or deficit; Multiplied by (a): The number of EDU's for the parcel, and; Divided by (b): The total number of EDU's in the district. (3) = P x a b EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 2 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) shall be calculated by use or potential use per zoning as follows: USE EDU 1.0 Single Family (Detached) 1.0 Dwelling Unit Agricultural Zone Undeveloped R-1 zoned 5 acres or more. Undeveloped R-1 zoned, or with 1 single family residence, less than 5 acres. Multi-Family (Attached) Dwelling Unit R-2, R-3 Undeveloped R-2, R-3 Non Residential (including Churches) Mixed Use DIVISION 1 ONLY Single Family Dwelling Unit (Vineyard) Multi-Family Dwelling Unit (Shores) Multi-Family Dwelling Unit (Edgewater, Brookhaven, Springs) Non Residential assessment (Castle & Cooke) landscaping assessment Non Residential assessment (Parkside Partners) 4/acre i/acre 0.71/unit 0.7t/unit 6/acre 1.0 0.86/unit 0.58/unit 24.26 17.60 7.56 Rounded down to the nearest whole number. Rounded down to the nearest whole number. Number of units shall equal the acreage multiplied by12 rounded down to the nearest whole number. Rounded to nearest .01 Each calculated per the above. for median for street for median EXHIBIT "C" Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION I SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff S®rvice~ or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities, and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $53,153.90 $3,569.00 $o.oo I $49,584.9or EXHIBIT "D' SHEET 1 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 2 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (Ci~ Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Util;fies, and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $21,891.50 $2,726.00 $6,609.90 $12,555.601 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 2 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 3 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 -- 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (Ci~ St~ff Services o~ Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities. end Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $245,365.10 $22,662.00 $48,019.95 $174,683.151 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 3 OF 13 EXHIBIT "D" MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 4 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City $te~f Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities. end Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $290,185.20 $24,674.00 $52,482.87 $213,028.331 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 4 OF 13 EXHIBIT "D" MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 5 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO, 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Servlce~ or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities, end Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $109,181.40 $13,106.00 $22,737.66 $73,337.741 EXHIBIT 'D" SHEET 5 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 6 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Services or Contract. Supplies. Materials, Utilities, and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $42,796.75 $5,612.00 $0.00 $37,1S4.751 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 6 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 7 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities, end Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $66,195.80 $9,562.00 $0.00 $56,633.80 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 7 OF 13 EXHIBIT "D" MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 8 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (Ci~ Staff Se~ices o~ Contract, Supplies, Materiels, Utilities, and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $29,984.60 $5,100.00 $7,337.88 $17,s46.721 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 8 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 9 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities, and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $10,349.85 $664.00 $0.00 $9,685.85 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 9 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 10 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Services or Contract. Supplies. Materials. Utilities. and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $26,605.35 ($209.00) $o.oo $26,~t4.351 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 10 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 11A SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Services or Contract. Supplies, Matar[eis, Utilities. and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $60,269.10 $5,838.00 $0.00 I $54,431.1ol EXHIBIT SHEET 11 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION tlB SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993- 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Ste, ff Services or Con~e, ct. Supplies. MateriaJs. Ut[l~es. and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $67,974.55 $6,763.00 $0.00 I $61,211.551 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 11 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 12 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO. 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials, Utilities, end Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance / (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $11,923.05 $2,835.00 $0.00 [ $9,088.0 [ EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 12 OF 13 EXHIBIT 'D' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 DIVISION 13 SAID ASSESSMENT IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BENEFIT FORMULA ATTACHED HERETO, 1993 - 1994 BUDGET Gross Budget Amount Required (City St~ff Services or Contract. Supplies, Materials, Utilities, and Overhead Costs) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance ! (Deficit) Less: City Contribution NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $2,629.30 $403.00 $0.00 $2,226.301 EXHIBIT "D" SHEET 13 OF 13 EXHIBIT "E" Maintenance District Assessments on file in the City Clerks Office.