HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 37-93RESOLUTION NO. ' 37 - 9 3
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 374, HAGEMAN NO. 1 ANNEXATION
(WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 1993, on prezoning of the proposed annexation of
certain properties to the City of Bakersfield known as HAGEMAN NO. 1
ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten
(10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian. a
local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3-93 on January 7, 1993, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the annexation by this Council and this Council
has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territoW described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
ORIGINAL
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owner of the affected territory desires to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be
given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor,
Ordinance No. 3511, which was adopted March 3, 1993, an Initial Study was conducted
and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on
the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on December 11,
1992.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 .........
2
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
MAR ~ 4 ~ , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEME]ERS: EDWARDS, DeblONO, E;~, BRUNNI, KANE, McDERMOTT SALVAG(~
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ~.) 0 ~.(
ABSENT COUNGt!.MEMI~ER$: ~. [ ~
ABSTAIN COUNCILMEMBERS' ~'.'~ O v~..~
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED MAR 2 4 ~
BOB
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
MO/pjt
Attachments:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
res\roa.hl
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT #A"
HAOEMAN NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 374
A parcel of land being a portion of the north 1/2 of Section 24, T.
29 S., R. 26 E., and the Northwest 1/4 of Section 19, T.29S., R. 27
E., M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the south line of the
north 55 feet and the east line of the west 30 feet of said Section
19, said point being on the east right of way line of Jewetta
Avenue (Co. Rd. No. 366) and on the existing corporate boundary of
the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) Departing from said corporate boundary line, South
00'15'29" East along said east right of way line, 484.45 feet to a
point on the easterly prolongation of the southerly boundary line
of Tract No. 4885 per map recorded in Book 38, Pages 118, 119 and
120 of Maps in the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (2) South 89'46'09" West, along said prolongation line and
Tract boundary line, 1810.41 feet to a point on the west right of
way line of Suzy Street (60 ft. roadway width);
THENCE (3) South 00'19'50" East, along said right of way line,
484.76 feet to a point on the most southerly boundary line of said
Tract No. 4885;
THENCE (4) South 89'46'00" West, along said boundary line and
westerly prolongation thereof, 897.44 feet to a point on the west
right of way line of Old Farm Road (90 ft. roadway width);
THENCE (5) North 00'20'04" West, along said right of way line,
943.95 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Hageman
Road, (being on the south line of the north 55 feet of said Section
24), also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the
City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (6) Easterly along said corporate boundary line to the point
of beginning.
Containing 38.53 Acres (more or less)
0:3893
ORIGINAL
T. 2.9 S., r. 2_6 E., M.D.B. ~ m.
NAC[LL[ AVl.
MAGRUDER AVE
(6)
P,(
SEC,
(I)
ANNEXATION NO. ;~74 RESOLUTION NO,__
ANNEXATION OF
tHAGEMAN No. I
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
58.53 -+ ACRES
EBB-- --o ~oo 400 ~o
N~ ~'~', EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDAKt'
~ PROPO~[B AHNEX&TION BOUNDARY
EXHIBIT "B"
CT.
RM. NO. 2731
TRACr
3~J~l
TRACT
ANNEXATION NO. 374
(HAGEMAN NO.1)
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
SERVICES Aaencv Which Check Services Which Indicate How Services
Presently Provides City/District Will Provided By
Service Provide City/District will b~
Financed (i.e..
Upon Future Date aeneral tax rate or
Annexation (specify) special assessment.)
Planning COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks and North Bakersfield General Tax Revenues
Recreation Recreation and Park
District
Library COUNTY N/A
Police SHERIFF & HIGHWAY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Protection PATROL
Fire Protection CITY/COUNTY JOINT NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES
AGREEMENT
Street COUNTY x GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Construction PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
Maintenance COUNTY x GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Sweeping NONE x GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Lighting COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Flood Control COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage (See page 2) x USER FEE/SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT
Water Vaughn Water Company USER FEE
Other (REFUSE) FRANCHISE COLLECTOR x USER FEE
O:A374 EXHIBIT "C"
Please provide the following information,
be provided by the applicant city.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
when applicable, only for service which will
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability
of service (i.e., street sweeping,
response time for emergency services,
rec. programs, etc.
POLICE-all police services in the City of
Bakersfield are administered through the City
Police Department located at the s/w corner of
Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street approximately 8
miles southeast of the annexation.
FIRE-Station 65 (County) is 2 miles Southeast of
the territory Northeast side of Rosedale Hwy. and
Calloway Drive.
PARKS AND RECREATION-North Rosedale Park is 1/4
mile south of the area and is operated by the
North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District.
LIBRARY-N/A
~?REET$-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun
Avenue west Fwy. 99 will provide necessary
facilities, personnel and services to accommodate
Public Works efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTeNANCE/SWEePING/LIGHTING-
Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from
the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative
maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
SEWER-Ail streets in the area are improved and
incorporate a dry sewer system which will connect
to City's existing Jewetta Avenue Trunk Sewer
System.
~ATER-This area will continue to be served by the
Vaughn Water Company.
0THER-(Refuse)-Present refuse collection is
provided by a franchise refuse collector. When
annexed, service will be provided by the City
either by City forces or by contracts with the
same collector if at all possible.
24 hour patrol is provided in the
immediate vicinity of this
annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00
minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a
24-hour basis. The annexation will
not affect City/County Joint Fire
service capability.
District Parks are open to the
public at reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the
range capacity of the City to
provide the necessary public work
services to this area. Services
will be on a regular basis and 'as
needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
2
Ill.
IV.
V1.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory
have on the existing level of city/district services
(i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of
this territory will not affect the near term level or
ca~abilitv of the City to Provide needed services. Upon
time of complete build-out of this territory, additional
Police officers may or may not be required to maintain
the current level of city service. The existina street
improvements will increase the future maintenance
responsibility of the City but will not affect the
existina level of service. Further analysis of service
capabilities will be conducted at the time of future
build-out.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in
facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire
hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district Qr
residents be responsible for financing? All basic tract
improvements are complete except lots which are vacant.
No uDaradin~ or chan~e in facilities will be required in
the territorv for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected
territory. The entire area is zoned E (1/4) (Estate-i/4
acre min. lot size) in the County.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List
effects on present land use that would occur as a result
of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on
property, etc.) The ProPosed Drezonin~ is City E
(Estate) zone which provides for a minimum residential
lot size of 10,000 s~uare feet.
Proposed prezoning is consistent with existing and
proposed general plan designations.
3
VII.
VIII
A.
So
C o
List city/district services that area will directly or
indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of
cormnunity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely manner than present Countv
Sheriff services. The present City refuse collection
rate is substantially lower than fees county residents
now DaY to independent companies. No special assessment
or charces for street sweepinc. leaf collection. street
liGhtinc energy costs and fire hydrants. An assessment
District possibly will be formed to connect the existinc
dry sewers in the territory to the City system. The area
is now within the HaGeman Road Lift Station service area.
Please provide the following information relative to
city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate
in the area ecuals 1.171367% of assessed market value.
This rePresents the total DroDertv tax rate. When
annexed a designated percentage of the total DroDertv tax
of the area will accrue to the Citv and remainder to the
County for Providing health care and social services.
(Rate as shown on 1992-93 County Auditor-Controller Tax
Rate List).
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness
of the city/district: If so, explain. Yes, when
annexed, the rate will be increased by 0.002400% of
assessed market value which eGuals the City bond rate.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property
with a market value of $50,000.00?
The City Bond rate of 0.002400% amounts to a difference
of $1.20 more Der year on a property of this value.
O:A374
4