HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 23-93RESOLUTION NO. .~ -~ - 9 3
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 372, RENFRO NO. 3 ANNEXATION
(WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor,
Ordinance No. 3505, which was adopted December 9, 1992, an Initial Study was
conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on August
3, 1992.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
ORIGINAL
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Traxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Traxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 .........
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
~l~i~. ~ ~_a~.~_~ , by the following vote:
A~STAIN COUNCILMEMBERS. ~/,~_O~tO ~
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED _FIB_ ~ ~
BOB
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MO/pjt
Attachments:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
res\roa.r3
EXHIBIT "A"
RENFRO NO. 3
A~N~J(ATION NO. 372
A parcel of land situated in Section 34, T. 29 S., R.
Section 3, T. 30 S., R. 26E., M.D.M., County of Kern,
California, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the east 1/4 corner of said Section 3 according to
the official plat thereof;
26E. and
State of
THENCE North 89'00'30" West along the east/west mid-section line of
said Section 3, a distance of 1311.55 feet to a point on the
existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield, also being
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE (1) Departing from said corporate boundary line, North
00'55'22" East and parallel with the east line of the northeast 1/4
of said Section 3, a distance of 2615.49 feet to a point on the
south line of the north 30 feet of said 1/4 section;
THENCE (2) North 89'29'48" West along said south line (also being
the south right of way line of Stockdale Highway), 13.33 feet to a
point on the southerly prolongation of the west line of Parcel "B"
of Parcel Map Waiver No. 741 filed in Book 5885, Page 914, Official
Records in the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (3) North 00'25'26" East, along said west line, 85.00 feet
to a point on the north line of the south 55 feet of said Section
34 (also being the north line of the 55 foot wide "Irrevocable
Offer of Dedication filed in Book 5791, Page 1026, Official
Records, in the office of the Kern County Recorder);
THENCE (4) South 89'29'48" East, along said north line, 1270.13
feet to a point on the west line of the east 55 feet of said
Section 34, said point also being on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE {5) southerly and westerly along said corporate boundary to
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 79.59 acres (more or less)
O:EXH.1893
ORIGINAL
T. 29 S,,
~ , .,....................~,,
/ / ; ,', ~'~
,~ (I) (5) ....
RO. 8 ~" ~:- ~ ~1
......................... r ...............-~...~'"
ANNEXATION OF
RENFRO No. 3
Z9,59. ACRES
400 0 400 800 I~00
EXHIBIT "B"
ORIGINAL
ANNEXATION NO. 372
PLAN FOR PROVIDIN, (RENFRO NO. 3)
~ A~encv Which Presently Provides C~eck Setx, ices Which Indicate How Services Provided BY
~ervjce City/District Will Prox, ide (~itv/Distfict 411 be Financed
Upon Future Date ~
Annexation (specify)
Planning COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENI. J~S
Parks and Recreation NORTH BAKERSFIELD NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES
RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT
Library COUNTY NO CHANGE N/A
Police Protection SHERIFF & HIGHWAY PATROL x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Fire Protection CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMENT NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Streets COUNTY x GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Constraction COUNTY x UPON NEW STREETS WILL BE
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCYYED BY PRIVATE
DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO
CITY
Maintenance COUNTY x GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUF~
Sweeping NONE x GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
Lighting N/A x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Flood Control COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage N/A x UPON USER FEFdINITIAL COST BY
DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE DEVELOPER
Water N/A x UPON USER F'EEdlNITIAL COST BY
DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE DEVELOPER
Othel (REFUSE) N/A x USER FEE
0~8c.~ o:a372 EXHIBIT "C"
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
lK)~C~all police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the City Police
Department located at the s/w comer of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street approximately 8 miles
northwest of the annexation.
~_..~.Fire response to this area will be administered from City Fire Station No. 11 located at
7000 Stockdale Highway.
PARKS AND RECREATION-Developers shall provide park acreage or pay in-lieu fees in
accordance with adopted standards of the North Bakersfield Recreatlonand Parks District.
~BILMIY-N/A
ConstructionfMaintenance:Sweenine:Liehting: The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue,
west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate
Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a
regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
SEWER-Existing sewer service is now located at Stockdale Highway and Jenkins Road and in
Culiacan Avenue at Renfro Road. However, the territory is proposed to be served by a future
sewer trunk line in Renfro Road and connecting to a future Allen Road trunk system.
W__.&.~,~-This territory will be annexed to the service area of the City of Bakersfield system,
Ashe Water Division.
OTHER.{Refuse)-IJpon annexation, the City will provide collection either by City forces or by
contract with any present contracted collector is possible.
Indicate frequency and availability
of service (i.e., street sweeping,
response time for emergency services,
rec. programs, etc
24 hour patrol is provided in the inunediate vicinity of this
annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or
less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-honr basis. The annexation will
not affect City/County Joint Fire sen, ice capability or response time.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to
provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services will
be on a regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capadty exists. (Water well site to be prodded within area
by developer).
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
TY o~
2
Ill.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of
city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of
new facilities, etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or
capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon time of full build out of this territory.
additional City police officers will be required to maintain the current level of service. Street
improvements resulting from proposed development will increase the maintenance
responsibility of the City but will not affect the existing level of service. Adequate fire
hydrants shall be provided by the developer at time of development.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory
(roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)?: If so, would city/district or residents be respons~le for
financing? The City will. at time of development. require upgradi~_g and changes in existing
facilities. As development occurs. Developers shall provide and pay formajor improvements
and facilities and dedicate them to the City. Future residents of the project possible will be
assessed for a sewer assessment district if established. Those items required to be provided
by the developer are more specifically listed in the conditions of approval for General Plan
Amendment 3-92. Segment II. Prezoning No. 5361.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. This territory is presently zoned A
(Exclusive Agriculture) in the County.
Vl.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would
occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.)
annexation area is pregoned City R-1 (One Family Dwellirlg) zone. The territory is now
fallow. but has grown alfalfa in the past. The major effect on l~resent land use is the
conversion of agricultural zoning to predominantly low-density residential use.
ORIGINAL
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in
fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of cornrnunity facilities, etc..City
Police should be able to respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and
State Highway Patrol service, Current City police standard is a higher sworn officer per 1.000
population percentage compared to the County standard. Refuse service will be provided by
the City and will result in savillgs to the owners within this annexation. No ~pecial
assessments or charges for street sweeping. leaf collection. school crossirg guards. street
lighting enerc, v costs and fire hydrants upon any future development of subject area.
VIII
Ao
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existiqg tax rate in the area equals 1.155399% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a
designated percentage of the total proper~y tax of the area will accrue to the City. (Rate as
shown on 1992-93 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Bo
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain.
Yes. the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.002400% of assessed market value. When annexed.
the total tax rate will be 1.157799% (Rates as shown on 1992-93 County Auditor-Controller
Tax Rate List).
Co
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00?
The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $1.03 on a house of $50.000 market
value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate. (Figure includes the $7.000 deduction for
home owners exenlption).
A:A372
RTY: wrn
4
ORIGINAL