Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 201-92RESOLUTION NO. 201-92 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 370, STINE NO. 9 ANNEXATION (WARD 6). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 1992, on the proposed annexation of certain properties to the City of Bakersfield known as STINE NO. 9 ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 36-92 on June 18, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the prezoning for the annexation area and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter- described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territogy described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. ORIGINAL 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners and residents of the affected territoW desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territoW proposed to be annexed. 5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance No. 3487, which was adopted September 30, 1992, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on May 22, 1992. 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 J. Dale Hawley City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Lawrence M. Lunardini City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301. ......... 000 ......... 2 ORIGINAL I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on OCT 2 1 1992 , by the following vote: AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARDS. D~, SMITH, SRUNNI, PETERSON, McOERMOTr, SALVAGGIO NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ~"~/~ r'l 't° ASSENT COUNCILMEMBERS: ,i),~ cY~,ortr'.~ ,~STA~N COUNCILMEMBERS r~ ~tp, CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED OCT 2 ! 1992 VICE -MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: ' of Bakersfield MO/pjt Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C res\roa.s9 3 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A" STINE NO. 9 ANNEXATION NO. 370 A Parcel of land consisting of portions of Sections 34 and 35 of Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the east right of way line of Stine Road (Co. P,d. No. 157) and the south line of Lot 8 of said Section 35 as lots are designated on "Sales Map No. 1 of Lands of J. B. HAGGIN" filed May 3, 1889 in the office of the Kern County Recorder, said point also being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield: THENCE (1) North 89 deg. 05'40" West, along the westerly prolongation of the south line of said Lot 8, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the east line of said Section 34; THENCE (2) North 89 deg. 02'06" West, along the south line of the north 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 34, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the west right of way line of Stine Road; THENCE (3) South 00 deg. 34 34 West, along said west right of way line, 1317.83 feet to a point on the south line of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 34: THENCE (4) North 89 deg. 02'38" West, along said south line, 2645.75 feet to the southwest corner of said 1/4 Section: THENCE (5) North 00 deg. 29'56" East along the west line of said 1/4 Section, 2636.61 feet to the northwest corner thereof, said point also being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield: THENCE (6) Easterly and Southerly along said existing corporate boundary line to the point of beginning. CONTAINING 160.22 ACRES (more or less) ORIGINAL 28 i · (6) 4 RO.B. I(5) T 31 (4) S.LINE, N.E. I/4, SEC. 54 (6) . (2)~ ~'(I) (3)L 9 +--TAFT BAKERSFIELD HIGHWAY ' STATEROUTE ANNEXATION NO. 3?0 RESOLUTION NO, ANNEXATION OF STINE No. 9 TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ~ ACRES SCALE: 400 0 400 800 1200 iI r -- PROPO~D ANNEXATION BOUNDARY EXHIBIT "B" ORIGINAL ANNEXATION NO. 370 (STINE NO. 9) PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES SERVICES Aqency Which Check Services Which Indicate How Services Presently Provides City/District Will Provided By Service Provide City/District will be Financed (i.e., Upon Future Date qeneral tax rate or Annexation (specify) sDecial assessment.) Planning COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES Parks and COUNTY GENERAL TAX REVENUES Recreation Library COUNTY N/A N/A Police SHERIFF & HIGHWAY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES Protection PATROL Fire Protection CITY/COUNTY JOINT NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES AGREEMENT Street COUNTY x GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES Construction PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT NEW STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO CITY Maintenance COUNTY x GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES Sweeping .... x GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES Lighting .... x GENERAL TAX REVENUES Flood Control COUNTY x GENERAL TAX REVENUES Sewerage .... x USER FEE/INITIAL COST BY PRIVATE DEVELOPER Water .... x USER FEE/INITIAL COST BY PRIVATE DEVELOPER Other (REFUSE) COUNTY x USER FEE ~]~\b%'~ a:a370- 9 EXHIBIT "C" 1 Please provide the following information, be provided by the applicant city. Location Indicate location from which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc.) when applicable, only for service which will Service Level CaDacit¥ Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency services, rec. programs, etc. POLICE-all police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 8 miles northeasterly of the annexation. FIRE Station 13 (City) is 3/4 mile North of the territory located on the west side of Stine Road South of the Arvin-Edison Canal. PARKS AND RECREATION Upon development of residential areas, the adopted City Standard provides a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1000 population or in-lieu fees. LIBRARY-N/A STREETS The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched form the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting. SEWER-Sewer service is available from the existing trunk sewer lines in McCutchen Road along the north side of the territory and Stine Ro~d to the nozth which connect to City Treatment Plan No. 3. WATER-The territory has been accepted into the service area boundary of the City of Bakersfield Ashe Water Division. OTHER-(Refuse)-When annexed and when development occurs, service will be provided by the City by contract with a franchise collector or by City forces. 24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation will not affect City/County Joint Fire service capability. Ail City parks are open to the public at reasonable hours. N/A There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed". Adequate capacity exists. Adequate capacity exists. City refuse pickup is twice a week. Ill. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. UPon time of full buildout of this territory, additional police officers will be required to maintain the current level of city service. The City currently maintains 1.4 officers Der 1,000 residents within the city. Street improvement resultinq from development will increase the future maintenance responsibility of the City will not affect the existinq level of service. IV. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district o__r residents be responsible for financing? As. development occurs, the subdivider/developer provides and Days for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No uD~radin~ or change in facilities will be re~juired in the territory for annexation. City General Plan Amendment 2-92, SeGment IX provides a list conditions showin~ items to be provided by subdivider/developer at time of Development of the area. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The major portion of the territory is zoned E 1/4 (Estate - 1/4 acre minimum lot size) in the County except for 8.9 acres in the northeast corner zoned E 2 1/2 RS (Estate-Residential Suburban Combinina 2 1/2 acre min. lot size) County. Vl. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The major portion is Drezoned City R-1 (one-family dwellinc) zone. 11.6 acres in the northeast corner of the area are Drezoned City RS - 2.5 A (Residential Suburban, 2.5 acre min. lot size) zone and 16.3 acres tying directly south of the High School site are urezoned City R-3 (Limited Multiple Family Dwellinu) zone. The maior effect on present land use is the conversion from agricultural to low density residential development and a site for a new hiqh school ORIGINAL VII, VIII A. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should be able to respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State HiGhway Patrol Services. The present City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now Day to independent companies. No special assessment or charges for street sweepinG, leaf collection, school crossing Guards, street liGhtinG energy costs and fire hydrants upon development of subject area. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area eGuals 1.104619% of assessed market value. This represents the total DroDert¥ tax rate. When annexed a designated PercentaGe of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and the remainder to the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List). Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased to 1.107121% of assessed market value which e~uals the City bond rate of 0.002502% and the existing property tax rates. How will the difference in tax rates affecn a property with a market value of $50,000.00? If the house is used as ~he DrinciDal residence, the $7000.00 homeowners exemption leaves $43,000.00 for taxing burDoses. The City Bond rate amounts to a difference of $1.08 more Der year on a house of this value. A:A370-? 4 ORIGINAl.