HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 19-92RESOLUTION NO. 19-92
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 367, PANAMA NO. 10 ANNEXATION
CvVA RD 7).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1991, on the proposed annexation of certain
properties to the City of Bakersfield known as PANAMA NO. 10 ANNEXATION, notice
of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before
said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general
circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 69-91 on October 3, 1991, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the prezoning of the annexation area to this
Council and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning
Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territow, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
ORIGINAL
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation,
Ordinance No. 3420, which was adopted December 4, 1991, an Initial Study was
conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on
September 6, 1991.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
Ci~ of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
2
ORIGINAL
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
JAN 2 9 $992 , by the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EOWARO~, DeMOND, SMITH, BRUNNI, I~c'l~r'r"R~N. McDERMOl'r, SALVAGGIO
N~S; COUNCILMEMBE~:
~NT COUNCILMEMBEr:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEM~RS'
CI~ CLE~ and
Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the Ci~ of Bakersfield
APPROVED_ JAN 2 9 1992
E E. MEDDEI~S
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
L. McDermott, Vice-Mayor
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MO/pjt
Attachments:
a:roap10.cc
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
3
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT 'A'
PANAMA NO. 10
ANNEXATION NO. 367
A parcel of land being a portion of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 30, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D. M., County of
Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of
said Section 30, distant South 89° 55' 05" West, 1318.88 feet from
the Northeast corner thereof, said point being the Northeast corner
of Tract No. 1348 per map filed in Map Book 5, Page 188 in the
Office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE South 00° 01' 55" West, along the East boundary line of said
Tract No. 1348, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the South
Right of Way line of Panama Lane (County Road No. 782), said point
also being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Bakesfield and is the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE (I) Departing from said corporate boundary, South 00° 01'
55" West, along the East line of said Tract No. 1348, a distance of
1292.78 feet to the Southeast corner thereof, said corner also
being a point on the North Right of Way line of the ARVIN-EDISON
INTAKE CANAL;
THENCE (2) Continuing South 00° 01' 55" West, along the East line
of Lot 14 of "BERKSHIRE FARM TRACT" per map filed in Map Book 1,
Page 38 in the Office of the Kern County Recorder, a distance of
165.00 feet to a point on the South line of said canal Right of
Way, said point also being on the existing corporate boundary of
the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (3) Westerly, Northerly and Easterly along said corporate
boundary line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 21.06 Acres (more or less)
D5 EX.A4RTY
ORIGrNAL
BERKSHIRE
T~q~A c T
:: .<:' ~
'~ I,,~' ,, ~
,
ARVIN-EDiSON ~ (2) i ~'~ iNTAKE CANAL
FARM i
zI 20
ANNEXATION NO. :567 El[SOLUTION NO.
ANNEXATION OF
PANAMA No. 10
TO THE CITY OF DAKERSFIELD
21.06 -~ ACRES
SCALE:
I 200 0 L~ 400 600
N ~-'-'~-~-'-~'-', EXISTING CORfURATE BOUNOARY
[J uummm~r P~D ANNEXATION BOUNOARY
EXHIBIT "B"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 367
(PAN~MANO. 10)
SERVICES
A~ency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., ~eneral tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment. )
Annexation (speci fy)
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX Rg~VENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL ~TAX REVENUES
COUNTY N/A
SHERIFF & HIGH~AY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMENI NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
PRIVATE DhAfELOPMENT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
COUNTY X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
NONE X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
N/A X USER FEE/SPECIAL ASSESSME~rr
SREENFIELD COUNTY WATER
~2MPANY USER FEE
FRANCHISE COLLECTOR X USER FEE
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Street
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Water
Other (REFUSE)
o~T~ o~,
EXHIBIT "C"
36:ANN.367 -1- RTY:lh
I. Please provide tb~ following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location frcra which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
Avenue and Eye Street within 6 miles north of the annexation.
Fire-Station 13 (City) is 2 3/4 miles westerly of the territory on the
west side of Stine Road, southerly of the Arvin-Edison Canal.
Parks and ~creation-Greenfield Park on Monitor Street North of Fairview
Road is within a mile of the annexation area.
Library- N/A
Streets-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accomodate Public
Works efforts.
Construction/
Maintenance-Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City
Sweeping- Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as
Lighting- needed. Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance,
sweeping and lighting.
Sewer-An existing City trunk sewer line in Panama Lane West of Monitor
is available for service to the annexation area and is treated by City
Treatment Plant No. 3.
Water-This area will continue to be served by the Greenfield County Water
C¢~apany.
Other-(Refuse)-Present refuse collection is provided by a franchise refuse
collector. When annexed, service will be provided by the City
either by City forces or by contracts with the san~ collector if at
all possible.
36:ANN.367P2 _¢~ ~ -2-
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the irm~ediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximatley 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis.
The annexation will not affect City/County J. t
Fire service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at reason-
able hours.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
RTY:lh
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services.
U~on annexation or upon time of full buildout of this territory, additional police
officers may be required to maintain the current level of city service. Streets
or other municipal improvements resulting from any additional buildout will not
affect the City's existinq level of service.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/distruct or residents
be responsible for financing? No upqrading or change in facilities will be r-~quired
in the territory for annexation. Any upgradinq would occur on an individual basis
at time of build out of the remainin~ vacant lots pursuant to city building permit
requirements.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Lots 1-5, 50 and 51 (per
Tract 1348) adjacent to Panama Lane are County C H (Highway Commercial) zone. The
majority remainder portion is County R-1 (Low-Density Residential) zone.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.). Lots 50 and 51 (Per Tract 1348) adjacent to Panama Lane are pre-
zoned City C-1 (Limited C~,~rcial) zone. Lots 1 through 5 (Tract 1348) are prezoned
City C-2 (Cum~mrcial) zone. The majority remainder area (including A.-E. Canal) is
prezoned City R-1 (One-Family Dwellinq) zone. The proposed prezoning is compatible
with the County zoning and will present no substantial alteration of present land use.
36:ANN.367P3 -3- RTY:lh
ORIGINAL
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit
fro~ such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter er~ergency response
time, use of c~,~nity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State
Hiqhway Patrol services. The present City refuse collection rate is sub-
stantially lower than fees county residents now pay to indeDendant
ccmpanies. No special assessment or charges for street sweepinq, leaf
collection, school crossinq guards, street liqhting enerc~/ costs and fire
hydrants.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area
equals 1.171828% of assessed market value. This represents the total
Droperty tax rate. When annexed a designated Dercentage of the total
property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the
County for providinq health care and social services. (Rate as shown
on 1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district:
so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased by 0.002502%
of assessed market value which equals the City bond rate.
If
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00?
If the house is used as the princiDal residence, the $7,000 homeowners
exemption leaves $43,000 for taxinq purposes. The City Bond rate of
0.002502% amounts to a difference of $1.08 more per year on a house of
this value.
36:ANN.367P4 -4- RTY:lh
ORIGINAL