Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 244-91RESOLUTION NO. 24~ - 9 ]. A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 364, WIBLE NO. 11 ANNEXATION (WARD 6). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1991, on the proposed annexation of certain properties to the City of Bakersfield known as WIBLE NO. 11 ANNEXATION, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 72-91 on September 19, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the annexation by this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter- described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. ORIGINAL 5. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation, therefore, Ordinance No. 3416, which was adopted November 20, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on August 21, 1991. 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 J. Dale Hawley City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Lawrence M. Lunardini City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301. ......... 00o ......... ORIGINAL 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on 0 F_C ~ 8 lg gl , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARD'~, DeMOND, SMITH, ~R~N;;;, PETERSON, McDERMOTT, SALVAfiGIO NOES: COUNCILMEMBEP~S: ~SENT COUNCILMEMBERS ~STAIN COUNCILMEMBERS CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED DEC 1. 8 ~991 MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield MO/pjt Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C l:roa.wll December 6, 1991 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A" WIBLE NO. 11 ANNEXATION NO. 364 A parcel of land being portions of Sections 35 and 36 in Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D. M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the East line of the West 30 feet of said Section 36 and the North line of Lot 9 of said section as lots are shown on "Sales Map No. 1 of lands of J. B. Haggin" filed May 3, 1889 in the Office of the Kern County Recorder, said point also being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (1) departing from said corporate boundary, South 00° 35' 06" West, along said East line (also being the East line of Wible Road, County Road No. 50) a distance of 1318.28 feet to a point on the center line of McKee Road (County Road No. 782); THENCE (2) South 00° 35' 49" West, continuing along the East line of Wible Road (County Road No. 50), a distance of 2597.57 feet; ~HENCE (3) North 89° 03' 31" West, 89.76 feet to an angle point on the North line of Taft Highway (State Route IV-KER-119); THENCE (4) South 88° 33' 20" West, along the North line of Taft Highway, 240.21 feet to an angle point thereon, said point also being on the North line of the South 30 feet of said Section 35; THENCE (5) North 89° 03' 31" West, along said North line, 1681.83 feet to a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (6) Northerly, Easterly, Northerly and Easterly along said existing corporate boundary to the point of beginning. Containing 120.80 Acres (more or less) D36:EX.A3 RTY:lh ORIGINAL ~ 26 30 $ R ~7 E (e) 2 T .31 (6) (2) 25 I Z9 ANNEXATION NO, ~ RESOLUTION NO. ANNEXATION OF WIBLE No. 11 I~Q ~-(~* = ACRES SCALE: __ ,~;~---o 4oo coo ,~o N '-',-~-'~-~ EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNOARY 11 ~ PROPO~O ,~INEXATIO~ BOUNDER II EXHIBIT 'B' PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES ANNEXATION NO. 364 WIBLE NO. 11 SERVICES Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection Fire Protection Streets Construction Ma intenance Sweeping Lighting Flood Control Sewerage Water Other (REFUSE) oC~T¥ o.~, D36 :ANNEX364 A~ency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed (i.e., ~eneral tax rate or special Upon Future Date assessment. ) Annexation (specify) COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES UP(IN COUNTY X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX R~A;ENUES COUNTY N/A SHERIFF & HIGH~AY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMENT N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUES COUNTY X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES NEW STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY COUNTY X PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO C COUNTY X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES NONE X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES UPON N/A X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES UPON N/A X DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT/USER FEE UPON CALIFORNIA ~TER SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT/USER FEE FRANCHISE COLLECTOR X USER FEE CITY EXHIBIT "C" RTY:lh I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Location 'Indicate location from which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc.) applicant city. Police- Ail police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 7 miles north of the annexation. Fire- Station 13 (City) is within 1 1/2 miles of the territory on the west side of Stine Road, southerly of the Arvin-Edison Canal. Parks and Recreation- Upon development of residential areas, the open space element of the adopted Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan provides a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1000 population. Library- N/A Streets- The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accomodate Public Works efforts. Construction/ Maintenance- Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance, Sweeping sweeping and lighting. Lighting Sewer- An existing City trunk sewer in Stine Road extends as far south as Hosking Avenue, then west to tie into Treatment Plan No. 3 (See further sewer co~ents in Section VII). Water- This area is within the boundary of the California Water Service Company service area. Q~ther- (Refuse) - Present refuse collection is provided by a franchise O O~ refuse collector. When annexed, service will be provided by the ~ .~. City either by City forces or by contracts with the same collector ~ ~ if at all possible. Cl~6:ANNEX364.2 -2- Service Level Capacity Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency services, rec. programs, etc. 24 hour patrol is provided in the i~ediate vicinity of this annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation will not affect City/County Joint Fire service capability. Ail City parks are open to the public at reason- able hours. N/A There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide the necessary public work: services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed". Adequate capacity exists. Adequate capacity exists. City refuse pickup is twice a week. RTY:lh III· What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon time of full buildout of this territory, additional police officers will be required to maintain the current level of city service. Streets and other muni- cipal improvements resultinq from develog~ent will increase the maintenance re- sponsibility of the City but will not affect the existinq level of service. IV. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc. ): If so, would city/district o~r residents be responsible for financing? As development occurs, the developer provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No upgrading or chanoe in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation. Developers shall enter into agreement with the City to pay for a proportionate share of costs for future traffic signals at desiqnated locations in the area and also for future wideninq of the State Route 119 Overcrossinq at State Route 99. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is zoned County A (Exclusive Agriculture, 20 acre minimum lot size) over the major portion of the territory and approximately 9 acres at the southeast corner are zoned County C-2 PD (General C~m'~ercial, Precise Development combining). Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc. ) The territory is prezoned City R-1 (Single Family Dwelling) Zone; over the major portion of the territory. The 9 acres (+/-) at the southeast corner of the project are prezoned City C-2 (Cc~nercial). The overall impact will be the conversion of existing agricultural land to Low-Density Residential Development. D36 :ANNEX364.3 -3- RTY: lh:wrn ORIGINAL List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of co~nunity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. The present City refuse collection rate is sub- stantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independant companies. No special assessment or charqes for street sweeping, leaf collection, school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon developn~nt of subject area. Develobers will provide dry sewers in any new projects and connections will be made when development extends the Stine Road trunk sewer easterly to serve the area. VIII. A. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.104619% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated percentage a designated percentage of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List). Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased to 1.107121% of assessed market value which equals the City bond rate of 0.002502% and the total property tax rate of 1.104619% If How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00? If the house is used as the principal residence, the $7,000 homeowners exemption leaves $43,000 for taxing purposes. The City Bond rate of 0.002502% amounts to a difference of $1.08 more per year on a house of this value. D36:ANNEX364.4 -4- RTY:lh ORIGINAL