HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 243-91RESOLUTION NO. 24.3- 9 x
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 365, CALLOWAY NO. 4 ANNEXATION
(WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1991, on the proposed annexation of certain
properties to the City of Bakersfield known as CALLOWAY NO. 4 ANNEXATION,
notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days
before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of
general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 73-91 on October 3, 1991, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the annexation by this Council and this Council
has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
OR{GINAL
5. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation,
therefore, Ordinance No. 3419, which was adopted December 4, 1991, an Initial Study
was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a
significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted
on September 6, 1991.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 .........
2
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
DEC ~ 8 1991 , by the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARDS, DeMOND, SMITH, BRUNNI, PETERSON. McDERMOTT. SALVAG610
NOES; COUNCILMEMBEP~S:
ASSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS' ./~'A/£
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED DEC ~ 8 1991
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MO/pjt
Attachments:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
l:roa.c4
December 6, 1991
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "A"
CALLOWAY NO. 4
ANNEXATICN NO. 365
A parcel of land situated in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section
19, Township 29 South Range 27 East, M.D. M., County of Kern, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Cor~encing at the Southeast corner of said Section 19;
/~HENCE West, along the South line of said Section 19 North 89° 49' 10" West, a
distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the West Right-of-Way line of Calloway
Drive (County Road No. 522), said point also being on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE South 00° 05' 45" Fast, along said West Right-of-Way line, a distance of
40.00 feet to a point on the South Right-of-Way of Rosedale Highway (State Route
VI - KER-58), said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE (1) Departing frc~corporate boundary, North 89° 49' 10" V~st, along
South Right-of-Way of Rosedale Highway a distance of 809.94 feet to a point on
the Southerly prolongation of the West line of the East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of
Lot 31 of the sales map of lands of J. B. Haggin filed August 20, 1890 in the
Office of the Kern County Rmcorder;
THENCE (2) North 00° 01' 50" West, along said West line a distance of 1373.37
feet to the North line of said Lot 31;
THENCE (3) South 89° 59' 38" East, along the North line of said lot 51 and Lot
32 a distance of 808.5 feet to a point on the West Right-of-Way of Calloway
Drive (County Road No. 522), said point also being on the corporate boundary of
the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (4) Southerly, along the corporate boundary to the point of beginning.
Containing 25.48 Acres (more or less)
36:EX.A2
RTY:lh
ORIGINAL
FL 27 E,
S.E~, 2O
14)
STATE HWY 58 .......
SEC, 29
~ ANNEXATION NO, &SB RE~OLUTION NO,
<~ ANNEXATION OF
· CALLOWAY No. 4
o,
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
~-~ -+ ACRES
SCALE:
400 0 400 ~lO0 1200
~ ]~ ........ EXISTING CORPORATE BOUND&RY
~ PROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUND&R'Y
EXHIBIT "B"
ORIGINAL
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 365
(CALLOWAY NO. 4 )
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
A~ency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment. )
Annexation (specify)
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
UPON
COUNTY X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY N/A N/A
SHERIFF & HIGh%~AY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMEN~ NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX RS~;ENUES
CITY
COUNTY AND STATE & STATE GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
NEW STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY
COUNTY AND STATE PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO C]
CITY
COUNTY AND STATE & STATE GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
.... X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
.... X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
USER FEE/INITIAL COST BY
CITY X PRIVATE DEVELOPER
USER FEE/INITIAL COST BY
VAUGHN WATER COMPANY NO CHANGE PRIVATE DEVELOPER
.... X USER FEE
Street
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
D36:ANNEX365.1
EXHIBIT "C"
RTY:lh
I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police:All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
throught the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
Avenue and Eye Street about 7 miles southeasterly of the annexation.
Fire:Fire protection service will continue to be administered from County
Station No. 65 located on the north side of Rosedale Highway easterly of
Calloway Drive.
Parks and Recreation: The con~ercial development will not result in a
demand for parks or recreational facilities.
Library-N/A
Streets-Construction/Maintenance; Swee~in§; Lighting: The City Corpora-
tion Yard on Truxtun Avenue, West of Freeway 99 will provide necessary
facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts.
Maintenance and personnel will he dispatched from the City Yard on a
regular basis preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes
streets, construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer: Most of the territory is now being served by a city sewer line in
Calloway Drive which connects to the Buena Vista sewer system whereby
sewerage is sent to Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3.
Water:This area will continue to be served by the Vaughn Water Company.
Other(Refuse): ~en annexed and when development occurs, service will
be provided by the City by contract with a franchise collector or by
City forces.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
tima for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the i~mediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis
and the annexation will not affect City/County
joint service capability or response time.
There will be no reduction in the range
capacity of the City to provide the necessary
public works services to this area. Services
will be on a regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
D36:3axrN365.2 ~13~ -2- RTY: ih
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the
existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emer-
gency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc. )? The
annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capa-
bility of the City to provide needed services. Upon time of full
development of this territory, additional police officers may or may not
be required to maintain the current level of city service. Street improve-
ments resultinq frc~ development will have minimal effect on the mainte-
nance responsibility of the city and will not affect the existing level of
service.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve
affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc. ): If so, would
city/distruct o__r residents be responsible for financing? As development
occurs the developer provides and Days for major facilities and dedicates
them to the City. No upgrading or change in facilities will be required
in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The major
portion is zoned C-2 PD (General Cc~mnercial, Precise Development combining)
zone. Also included is County C-2 D (General Ccrmmercial-Architectural
Design) Zone, County M-1 PD (Liqht Industrial-Precise Development combining)
Zone and County E (1) RS (Estate- 1 acre, Residential Suburban) zone.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present
land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of
livestock on property, etc.) The entire territory is prezoned to City C-2
(Cc~m~rcial) Zone.
D36:ANN365.3 -3- RTY:lh
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit
from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response
time, use of co~nunity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely matter than Dresent County Sheriff and State
Highway Patrol services. The Dresent City refuse collection rate is sub-
stantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independant
companies.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and
county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area
equal 1.200876% of assessed market value. This represents the total
property tax rate. When annexed, a designated percentage of the total
property tax of the area will accrue to the City and the remainder to
the County for providing health care and and social services. (Rates
as shown on 1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the
city/district: If so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be
increased by 0.002502% of assessed market value which equals the City
bond rate.
Ce
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value
of $50,000.00? The City Bond rate of 0.002502% amounts to a difference
'of $1.25 more per year on a house of this value.
D36:ANN365.4 -4- RTY:lh