HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 232-91RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 2 - 9 I
A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS AND APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO THE RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL
SPECIFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield referred proposed
Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on April 18, 1991, on Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan, notice of the time
and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before said
hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general
circulation; and
WHEREAS, such Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan Amendment is as
follows:
RIVERLAKES RANCFUUNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
MILAZZO & ASSOCIATES representing Unibell
International has applied to amend the Riverlakes
Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan of the Land Use Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan as shown on the
attached map marked Exhibit "A" and in the Specific Plan
text (Exhibit "B");
and
WHEREAS, the project does not have the potential for causing a
significant effect on the environment and under the California Environmental Quality
Act Guidelines "general rule" (Section 15061 State Administrative Code) is exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt from the Department of Fish
and Game Notice of Determination fees; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 28-91 on April 18, 1991, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of the Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell
Specific Plan Amendment subject to conditions, and this Council has fully considered the
findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in the resolution; and
ORIGINAL
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on Wednesday, June 5,
1991, and approved this amendment to the Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan, but
failed to include certain conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public
hearing on WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1991, on the above described specific plan
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General
Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar
days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper
of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, the City Council made the following findings:
1. All required public notices have been given.
2. The provisions of CEQA have been followed.
3. The project does not have the potential for causing a significant effect
on the environment and under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
"general rule" (Section 15061 State Administrative Code) is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act.
4. Proposed amendment is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield
2010 General Plan and the adopted Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan.
5. The public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning
practice justify the amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings, incorporated herein, are true and
correct.
2. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports
and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to
the City Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved.
3. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
4. Public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning
practices justify the proposed specific plan amendment.
5. The proposed specific plan amendment will be compatible with future
development in surrounding areas and development on the project area.
ORIGINAL
6. The City Council hereby approves and adopts Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell
Specific Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
2010 General Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "A",
attached Specific Plan text (Exhibit "B") and conditions of approval (Exhibit "C").
.......... 00o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held
O[O ,~,- 4 1991 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARDS,tOeMOND,~MiT:L BRUNNI, PETERSON, McDERMOTL SALVAGGIO
NOES; COUNCILMEMBERS:
.~ENT COUNCiLMEMBERS: .~'~1 t 7* H
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS'
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED 0~C -- 4 1991
CLARENCE MEDDERS
MAYOR of the Cid' of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI ~//'-
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
RD:pjt
Attachments: Exhibits "A" through "C"
a:cc.rrr
ORIGINAl.
EXHIBIT "A"
8 LEGEND
__jj NORRIS ROAD ]g ~ ~I~R ~
~ ............ ZONE CHANGE 5149
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "B"
RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
14912.9012
Spedtic Plan Amendment-Draft II
February 11, 1991
Revised February 22, 1991
Item #1
RE: LAND USE PLAN Exhibit 10-A
o Delete "(Mobile Home Park)' designation from Low-Medium Density residential
parcel at southwest portion of project along the south side of Meacham Road.
o Delete "Mobile Home Park" reference from Land Use Plan Summary under the
heading: Low-Medium Density.
RE: Section XI (11.$.3 Residential Land Use Concept) p.44
o Delete paragraph A., "The Low-Medium Density-Mobile Home Park
Classification...,' in its entirety. Renumber successive paragraphs accordingly.
Item #2
RE:
o
o
o
Comprehensive Wall and Landscape Concept Plans
Add "Riverlakes Master Landscape Plan," approved by The City of Bakersfield
Planning Commission October 18, 1990, to the Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell Specific
Plan, Technical Appendix.
Replace Exhibits 37-A and 37-B with revised "Wall and Fence Plan" as
Exhibit 37-A and revise text accordingly.
Add Exhibit 38-A, "Master Landscape Plan" and revise text accordingly.
Item #3
RE:
o
Exhibit A, Condition 5d. of City Council Resolution No. 81-90
Add the following language: NConstruct a six foot high masonry wall atop a two
foot high berm along the west boundary of the Linear Park which borders High-
Medium Density residential land uses."
Item #4
RE: LAND USE PLAN Exhibit 10-A
CIRCULATION PLAN Exhibit 14-A
o
Rename north/south collector from Hageman Road to Rosedale Highway from
"Riverlakes Ranch Drive" to "North Village Drive" and effect a street name
change on all recorded maps and approved plans.
Item #5
RE:
o
Section IV (4.3 Circulation System Designations) p.12
Add sub paragraph lc. to read as follows: "Local Collectors: 60 foot right-of-way
with two traffic lanes in an expanded pavement section; provides access to Iool
streets without access to adjacent residential properties." Re-number successive
paragraphs.
ORIGINAL
Spedtic Plan Amendment-Draft II
February 11, 1991
Revised February 22, 1991
Page Two
Item #6
RE:
O
Section IV (4.3 Circulation System Designations) p.12
Revise sub-paragraph lc. to read: "Local Streets: Located to minimize through
traffic; provides direct access to adjacent property with two traffic lanes, a
minimum flow-line to flow-line width of 40' and a right-of-way width of 60'."
Revise sub-paragraph ld. to read: "Residential cul-de-sac streets: Provides direct
access to adjacent property with two traffic lanes, a minimum flow-line to flow-line
width of 36' and a right-of-way width of 60'. The right-of-way width of straight
cul-de-sac streets less than 500' in length may be $2?
Item #7
RE:
0
Section IV (4.4 Circulation Plan) p.13
Add new paragraph 6. to read as follows: 'Local Collectors, as depicted on the
Circulation Plan, shall be treated as major roads which prohibit direct access to
adjacent property. Wall and landscape treatments will be developed at the edges
of these streets and as such, double frontage residential lots will be permitted along
these Local Collectors.
Item #8
RE: Section IV (Circulation Plan) Exhibit 14-A
o Revise Circulation Plan to shorten the length of the northern most Local Collector
to east of the Elementary School site (see revised Exhibit 14-A attached).
Item #9
RE:
0
Section XI (11.5.2 Design Standards) p 43
Revise the last sentence of paragraph 2. to read: "Such rear yard setbacks for the
main residence may be reduced to 15 feet provided no more than 20 percent of the
required yard area is covered by the residence. Other accessory buildings or
structures (e.g., pools, gazebos and covered patios) shall comply with the
Bakersfield Munidpal Code, Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance) for setbacks.
Item #10
RE:
0
Section XI (11.5.2 Design Standards) p.43
Add paragraph S. to read: "It is recognized that due to the unique open space and
recreational amenities provided by the golf course and lakes, residential
neighborhoods adjacent to either the golf course or the central south lake shall be
permitted the following setback modifications ("Residential neighborhoods" shall
be defined as the land use "bubbles" depicted on the Land Use Plan which are
adjacent to the golf course or south lake and described as Suburban, Low Density and
Low-Medium Density):
a. Front yard setbacks may be reduced to 20' provided the following are met:
(1) No more than 50% of the residences within any one neighborhood which
do not share a rear property line with either the golf course or lake
shall be permitted to have a 20' front yard setback. ~ ~l~(~,yO~
ORIGINAl.
Specific Plan Amendment-Draft II
February 11, 1991
Revised February 22, 1991
Page Three
(2) When a residence is permitted a 20' front yard setback, each side yard
setback shall be a minimum of 6'.
(3)
Residences which locate the garage door parallel to and at the 20'
front yard setback line shall be required to install roll-up garage doors
with automatic garage door opener. Residences with garage doors
perpendicular to the 20' front yard setback line (i.e., are accessible from
the direction of the side yard) shall not be required to install roll-up
garage doors with automatic garage door opener. Residences may locate
living spaces at the 20' front yard setback line and the garage space at or
behind a 25' setback line.
It is intended that through the preceding setback modifications, a more
modulated streetscape is achieved through varying front yard setbacks
while at the same time preserving desired densities through increased
side yard setbacks.
Rear yard setbacks for the main residence may be reduced to 15' provided no
more than 20 percent of the required yard area is covered by the residence."
ITEM
ITEM
Concept Land Use Plan
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91)
RIVERLAKES RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
· Bakersfield, California
6-18-90
Exhibit 10-A
SECTION XI RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
11.5.3 Residential Land Use Concept
ITEM ~,1 ~
The Suburban Residential Classification is intended to pro-
vide for the development of single family detached housing
with permitted density up to 4.0 units per acxe. It allows for
the development of custom and semi-custom housing on
estate type lots ranging from 10,000 to 12,000 square feet in
area.
The Low Density Residential Classification is intended to
provide for development of single family detached housing
which permits densities up to 7.26 units per acre. It allows for
the development of merchant type housing (i.e., non-custom
"tract" housing) on smaller lots no less than 6,000 square feet.
The Low Medium Density-Single Family Detached Classifi-
cation is intended to provide for development of a variety of
detached forms of housing (zero-lot line or patio homes) on
lots no less than 4,000 square feet in area with permitted den-
sities up to 10.0 units per acre.
The Low Medium Density-Mobile Home Park Classification
is intended to provide for the development of single family
detached housing with densities up to 10.0 units per acre. It
allows for the location of mobile homes on lots no less than
5,000 square feet in area.
The Low Medium Density-Single Family Attached Classifi-
cation is intended to provide for the development of one and
two story residential dwellings with permitted densities up
to 10.0 units per acre.
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91}
DEVL=LOPM~NT STANDARDS
ITEM ~2
RIVERLAKES
ORIGINAL
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91) Exhibit 37-A
RIVERLAKES SPA (O2/11/91)
Master Landscape Plan
RIVERLAKES
LEGEND
R/VERLAKE$ OR~E
ITEM ~2
ORIGINAL
Exhibit 38-A
Riverlakes
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval
Ranch/Unibell Specific Plan Amendment
Specific Plan Text
Applicant shall submit one Specific Plan text consisting of
Chapters A and B for Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell and Riverlakes
Ranch projects respectively and prepare a Riverlakes Ranch
plan map depicting standards and wall and landscaping for
Riverlakes Ranch and Riverlakes Ranch/Unibell.
Add to Page 9, Item 1 of the Specific Plan: "Development of
local streets is likely to reduce the maximum number of
units since conformance to minimum lot size excludes local
streets and easements."
Add to Page 46, Item 3: "The 121 acres designated as major
commercial should be developed as the core of the northwest
"centers" concept.
Setbacks for lots sharing an immediate boundary with the
golf course or lakes shall be 20 feet for the front yard and
15 feet for the rear yard.
5. The linear landscape park/buffer located on the west side of
Coffee shall be developed as follows:
Minimum landscape setback of 25 ft. for commercial land
uses and a minimum width of 50 ft. for medium and high
density residential land uses and 84 ft. for suburban and
low density residential land uses.
Constructed concurrently with the first subdivision or
parcel map adjacent to Coffee Road within each of the
following segments:
Norris to Olive
2) Olive to Hageman
3) Hageman to Creekside
Linear parks adjacent to residential land uses shall be
constructed by the applicant and placed in a maintenance
district. Landscaped setbacks at commercial land uses
shall be constructed and maintained by each respective
parcel owner/developer.
Construct a masonry wall eight feet in height along
the west boundary of the linear park for all residential
land use designations between Olive to Hageman that
interface with the park.
ITEM ~3
RIVERLAKES 8PA (02/11/9i) ORIGINAL
ORN31NAL
ITEM ~8
ITEM
RO~DA[[
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91)
LEGEND
ARTERIAL (without bikeway)
110' R.O.W c~
1
5.5' Landscape Easement
5.5' SideWalk
10' Parkway
ARTERIAL (with bikeway in paved area)
110' R.O.W
96' ,
8.5' La~ndscal~e Easement
5.5' Sidewalk
10' Parkway
COLLECTOR (without bikeway)
90' £.O.W ~.
68'
2.5' Landscape Easement
5.5' Sidewalk
8' Parkway
COLLECTOR (with bikeway in paved area)
90'. R.O.W
t
74' ~
5.5' Landscape Easement
5.5' Sidewalk
8' Parkway
COLLECTOR-Alternate Section
90' R.O.W ~.
t §.S~j~-- 52' min.-le8'
5.5' Sidewatk
8' min.-16 max. Parkway
LOCAL COLLECTOR
60' R.O.W ~.
5.5' Landscape Easement
5.5' Sidewalk
8' Parkway
Circulation
RIVERLAKES RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Bakersfield, California
June 12, 1990
Exhibit 14-A
SECTION IV RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
o
Maintain adequate traffic safety.
Locate pedestrian and bicycle paths within street fight-of-
way widths as well as where feasible along portions of the
lake development. These paths shall provide for transporta-
tion linkages as well as for recreational opportunities.
4.3 CIRCULATION SYSTEM DESIGNATIONS
Public and private development of the circulation system
shall correspond to the following system classification:
a. Arterial Street: Generally located at one mile intervals;
four or six traffic lanes with a 110-foot right-of-way.
See Exhibit 14-A
ITEM
Collector Street: Generally located at half-mile intervals
with four traffic lanes and a 90-foot right-of-way. The
project shall also include a "Collector-Alternate Section"
designation for Riverlakes Drive as detailed in the Subdi-
vision Design Manual and shown on the Circulation Plan
providing two traffic lanes within a 90 -foot right-of-way
and increased landscaping between right-of-way and curb
line. A meandering sidewalk within this parkway will be
incorporated.
Local Streets: Located to minimize through traffic; pro-
vides direct access to adjacent property; two traffic lanes
with a 60-foot right-of way.
See ExM'bit 19-A
do
eo
Residential cul-de-sac streets: Provides direct access to
adjacent property; two traffic lanes; with a 60-foot right-
of-way. ~ ITEM .f6
Bikeways: Located primarily along routes shown on the
Open Space Plan, within Arterial and Collector street sec-
tions, and conforming to the Metropolitan Bakersfield
Bikeway Master Plan. Bikeways shall also be located in
landscaped parkways along Coffee Road, Riverlakes Drive
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91 )
CIRCULATION
~?~ ~l~l~907~ Page 12
SECTION IV RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
4.4 CIRCULATION PLAN
and along portions of the south lake development. Pave-
ment width for right-of-way widths for arterials and col-
lectors incorporating bike lanes shall conform to the Cir-
culation Element of the General Plan.
See Extu'bit14-A
See Exlu'bit19-A
The road circulation system and bikeway system shall be
located and constructed as shown on the Circulation and Open
Space Plan respectively and shall be consistent with the
adopted Metro Bakersfield Bikeway Master Plan.
It is understood that arterials, collectors and intersections
with local streets are only conceptually depicted on the Spe-
dtic Plan maps, and that these may undergo minor adjust-
ment and realignment as either Planned Unit Development
and/or Tract Maps are prepared and submitted for approval.
These refinements do not require revisions to the Specific
Plan.
Per City of Bakersfield Subdivision design standards, it is
understood that potential secondary ingress/egress points
from residential areas to collector and arterial streets (e.g.,
Norris Road, Olive Drive, and Hageman Road) will be pro-
vided as required.
Along Norris Road, such access points, if provided, shall
occur at roughly one-third points from Coffee Road to Cal-
loway Drive.
Access points into residential developments shall be sepa-
rated from signalized intersections per City of Bakersfield
Subdivision design standards.
Acess from residential land uses directly to Coffee Road shall
be prohibited except from Norris Road, Olive Drive, Hage-
man Road and Riverlakes Drive. Driveways or other access
roads for residential uses shall not allow vehicle access to
Coffee Road.
ITEM '~? ]B,--~
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91)
CIRCULATION
~,9o~ Page 13
SECTION XI RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
Mobile Home Parks shall be developed in accordance with
City of Bakersfield Zoning Ordinance except as otherwise
provided herein. Perimeter fenc'mg, wall and other criteria
shall apply as if for a single family detached residence per
these guidelines.
11.5.2 Design St~adards
Setbacks, lot size, building height, parking, and other devel-
opment standards shall comply with the residential require-
ments of the City of Bakersfield Zoning Ordinance where ap-
plicable, except where provisions of this Spedtic Plan are
more restrictive or as approved by the City of Bakersfield as
part of a planned P.C.D. Zone, a P.U.D. Zone or final subdi-
vision tract map.
ITEM
Rear yard setbacks on all single family detached lots in the
Suburban and Low Density Residential land use areas shall
be 25 feet from rear property line to the main structure. Such
rear yard setbacks for the main structure may be reduced to
15 feet provided no more than 20 percent of the required yard
area is covered by buildings or structures.
Side yard setbacks on all single family detached lots shall be
15 feet from side property line on comer side yards with
direct vehicular access, and 10 feet on comer side yards
without direct vehicular access. Direct vehicular access is
prohibited on sides of comer residential lots with setbacks of
less than 15 feet.
All residential single and multiple family lots in the Subur-
ban, Low Density and Low Medium Density Residential land
uses with rear property lines adjacent to either lake or golf
course development shall have minimum front and rear yard
setbacks of 20 feet and 15 feet respectively.
ITEM 'f10
RIVERLAKES SPA (02/11/91)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Riverlakes Ranch Specific Plan Amendment/Zone Change 5149
Planning
Insert "along any street" into subparagraph a.(1) of Section XI, 11.5.2 of proposed
paragraph 5 as follows:
No more than 50 percent of the residences along any street within any one
neighborhood which do not share a rear property line with either the golf course
or lake shall be permitted to have a 20' front yard setback.
Insert "rear" into proposed amendment - the second sentence of paragraph 2,
Section XI, 11.5.2 and also into subparagraph b. of proposed paragraph 5 of
Section XI, 11.5.2 as follows:
Second Sentence: Such rear yard setbacks for the main residence may be reduced
to 15 feet provided no more than 20 percent of the required rear yard area is
covered by the residence.
Subparagraph b: Rear yard setbacks for the main residence may be reduced to
15' provided no more than 20 percent of the required yard area is covered by the
residence.
Insert the following language into the specification text as paragraph number 3 of
Section XII, 12.1.
The Riverlakes Design Standards Review Committee shall approve all building
plans for consistency with the specific plan development standards prior to
submission for City of Bakersfield review and approval, and may, as empowered
by subsequent Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, inspect work to determine
whether or not it is being performed or has been performed in compliance with
such standards.
Within 60 days of the date of this project approval: The applicant shall provide
verification from the office of the County Clerk of payment of filing fees for filing
of a "Notice of Determination" for benefit of the California Department of Fish
and Game as required by AB 3158 (Section 1005 Public Resources Code).
Approval of this project shall not be considered operative, vested, or final until
such time as the required verification of fees and a copy of the "Notice of
Determination" stamped by the County Clerk which indicates payment has been
made.
OR(GINAL
Exhibit "C"
Riverlakes Ranch
Specific Plan Amendment/
Zone Change 5149
Page 2
Item #5 - Section IV (4.3 Circulation System Designations)p. 12, add a new
subparagraph 1.c. as follows:
"Local Collectors: 60-foot right-of-way with two traffic lanes in an expanded
pavement section; provides access to local streets. In accordance with Section
16.28.170 E. of the City Municipal Code, the advisory agency shall make a
determination that topographical conditions permit no other reasonable form of
platting when approving tracts having double frontage lots between local streets
and local collectors. Local collectors which are functionally classified as collectors
shall be designed to geometric standards for collectors.
Item #6 - Section IV (4.3 Circulation System Designations)p.12, revise the
existing sub-paragraph 1.d. as follows:
Residential cul-de-sac streets: Provides direct access to adjacent property with
two traffic lanes, a minimum flow-line to flow-line width of 36' and a right-of-way
width of 60'. The right-of-way width of straight cul-de-sac streets less than 500' in
length may be 52'. Cul-de-sac streets which are extensions of local streets shall
have a flow-line to flow-line width of 40'.
Item #10 - Section XI (11.5.2 Design Standards) p. 43, add a new sentence to the
second paragraph of a.3. as follows:
The preceding setback modifications shall not be considered to supersede more
restrictive setbacks required for traffic lines of sight.
a:zc5149
ORIGINAL
}linutes, P1/C, 4/18/91
i1. AMENDMENT TO RIVERLAKES RANCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN
Page i0
Subject property is located between Norris Road~ Rosedale Highway,
Coffee Road and Calloway Drive.
Applicant proposes to delete the MH designation from maps, delete MH
reference from specific plan text; incorporation approved comprehensive
wall and landscape plan into specific plan; revise specific plan exhib-
its to reflect specific plan amendments; rename "Riverlakes Ranch
Drive" to "North Village Drive", revisions to specific plan definitions
of local collectors, local streets and local residential collector
streets, revision to a location of local collector streets; and modifi-
cation of front and rear yard setbacks upon meeting specified perform-
ance standards.
Commissioner Anderson declared a conflict of interest. His firm is
presently providing services to the applicant.
Commissioner Marino declared a conflict of interest. A portion of
property in Riverlakes affected by the wall and landscape plan within
]00 feet of property is owned in fee by his employer.
Public hearing was opened.
Ms. Bonnie Godfrey, project manager for Fruitvale Properties who own
property at the southeast corner of Calloway and Meacham asked for
clarification as to whether the mobilehome designation is proposed to
be deleted from their parcel.
Mr. Hardisty replied that the designation for mobilehome is completely
removed from the plan and be treated as an appropriate density of resi-
dential development not specifiying a particular construction type.
Ms. Godfrey commented that they are not ready to give up the
mobilehomes designation at this time.
Mr. Michael Dhanens with Milazzo and Associates represented Unibell
Internation Co., Ltd., clarified that it was their intent to modify
the Riverlakes Ranch Unibell Specific Plan document. They had no
intent to try to delete that reference from Fruitsale Properties owner-
ship. Mr. Dhanens commented they reviewed the staff report and condi-
tions of approval as well as the memo from Planning Department dated
April 18, 1991 which revised Condition #3 of Exhibit A and was amenable
with one request referring to Public Works Condition #5, last sentence
and asked that they be allowed to revise it to read as follows, "Local
collectors which are functionally classified as collectors shall be
designed to geometric standards for collectors".
Mr. Kleopper was amenable.
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing was c'1osed.
~inutes, P1/C, 4/18/91 Page 11
i1. AMENDMENT TO RIVERLAKES ~NCH/UNIBELL SPECIFIC PLAN (continued)
Motion was made by Commissioner Powers to adopt resolution making find-
~ngs approving the requested specific plan amendments shown on Exhibit
A subject to conditions of approval shown on Exhibit "A" with the fol-
lowing changes to include the memo from the Planning Department dated
April I9, 1991, and Exhibit "A", page 2, Public Works Condition #5,
last sentence shall be changed to read, "Local collectors which are
functionally classified as collectors shall be designed to geometric
standards for collectors", and note this does not include the Fruitvale
Properties land use designations at this time. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Frapwell, and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Bjorn, Messnet, Powers, Rosenlieb,
Frapwell
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: Commissioners Anderson, Marino
ABSENT: Commissioner Cohn
12. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 17.53 (SITE PLAN REVIEW) OF THE BAKERSFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE
This item was continued from the April 4th hearing so that the BIA
could submit their comments. Staff met with the BIA to address their
nts in which the BIA is in concurrence with staff.
ring was opened.
azzo referenced the Landscape requirements and standards
ent of an irrigation Dian be submitted to the Building
ith final development plans for review and permit
ifferent irrigation companies bid on the jobs and
once. t ?h y._k~ow tpeyX~ the awared the project, they submit their plans
to the Bulld'ing DepartShr. Mr. Milazzo requested that the requirement
f subm'oltted~r.ri,~ati?n ~ns be changed to only be required to submit
irrigation specifications th~ would then be produced in shop drawings
Mr rH d'sty co. a ~ mmented that it was h~ the city's intention to require
x t i~ spec f icatio~~ o sun ch things asX-~rinkler heads, it was to
nsur th l~n checkers that water would~e delivered to the landscape
r s iaea n accordance to the need of the plan~x~
D' ~s sin M H~isty s~gg.~sted amending/6 of B on page 9 to
d "S~'~ f~oirrigation" etc. ~
There being no others wishing to speak, public hearing waclose~