HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 225-91RESOLUTION NO. 2 '2 5 - 9 1
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 362, BRIMHALL NO. 1 ANNEXATION
(WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 1991, on the proposed annexation of those certain
properties to the City of Bakersfield known as BRIMHALL NO. 1 ANNEXATION,
notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days
before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of
general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 37-91 on June 20, 1991, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the annexation by this Council and this Council
has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein, is hereby proposed.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation,
therefore, Ordinance No. 3403, which was adopted October 2, 1991, an Initial Study was
conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on May 27,
1991.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtan Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
NOV - 6 11~gl , by the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMSERS: EDWARDS, OeMONO, SMITH, BRUNNI, PETERSON, McSERMOTr, SALVAGGIO
NOES; COUNCILMEMBERS N~AS~
A~SENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
~SSTAIN: COUNCILMEMSERS JV~3 A/~
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED I~OV - 6 1991
CLARENCE E. MEDDERS
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MO/pjt
Attachments
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
c:roa.bl
November 1, 1991
3
EXHIBIT "A"
BRIMHALL NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 362
A parcel of land situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 29
South, Range 27 East, M.D. M., County of Kern, State.of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 30,
distant North 00° 48' 21" East, 557.93 feet from the Southwest corner thereof;
THENCE South 89° 07' 24" East, 30.00 feet to a point on the East Right of Way
line of Jewetta Avenue (County Road No. 589) also being a point on the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield and the point of beginning;
THENCE (1) departing from said corporate boundary, South 89° 07' 24" East,
720.00 feet;
THENCE (2) North 00° 48' 21" East, 102.00 feet to a point on the North line of
the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 30;
THENCE (3) South 89° 07' 24" East, along said North line, 560.26 feet to a point
on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 30,
also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Bakersfield;
THENCE (4) Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along said corporate boundary to
the point of beginning.
Containing 8.01 Acres (more or less)
36:EXHIB.A RTY:lh
-I
~ /' ; 2 SWI/4 SEC 30~
<( · / I
P.O.B.
~ i(2) (3)
.4~ ( I )
:~ (4) .
:=~ (4)
ANNEXATION OF
BRIMHALL No. I
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
8,01 +
~ ACRES
SCALE:
:,bo o 2oo 400 6o0
'>-'-~'-'--- EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNOARY
~ummm,m. PROIN)SED ANNEXATION BOUNO~RY
EXHIBIT "B"
OF LAN D5 : ' F ,~ :.Rixl COU I']
SEC. 31
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATICN NO. 362
(BRIMHALL NO. 1)
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Street
Construction
Maintenance
~Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment. )
Annexation (specify)
UPON
COUNTY X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
NORTH BAKERSFIELD RECREA-
TI(IN AND PARK DISTRICT X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY N/A
SHERIFF & HIGHWAY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMEN% N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
NEI~ STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY
COUNTY X PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO C
COUNTY X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
NONE X GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
UPON
N/A X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENEP~AL TAX REVENUES
~/A X USER FEE/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
~AUGHN WATER CO~IPANY N/A
FRANCHISE COLLECTOR X USER FEE
CITY
EXHIBIT "C"
35 :ANN. 361 -1- RTY: lh
BRIMHALL NO. 1
I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the southwest corner of
Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 6 miles easterly of the annexation.
Fire-Fire response to this area will be administered from County Station
No. 65 located on the northside of Rosedale Highway easterly of Calloway
Drive.
Parks and Recreation-Upon additional future residential development,
developers shall provide park acreage or pay in-lieu fees in accordance
with adopted standards of the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park Dist.
Library- Not applicable.
Streets-
Construction/Maintenance; Sweeping; Lighting: The City Corporation
Yard on Truxtun Avenue, West of Freeway 99 will provide necessary
facilities, personnel and services to accomodate Public Works efforts.
Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a
regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes
streets, construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer-Service to the territory is available from the Jewetta Avenue Trunk
Sewer which is directed to CityWastewater Treatment Plant No. 3.
Water-The territory is within the service area of the Vaughn Water Co.
Other-REFUSE - Upon annexation, the City will provide collection either
by City forces or by contact with any present contracted collector
if possible.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
ti,~ for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24-hour patrol is provided in the in~ediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis
and the annexation will not affect City/County
joint fire service capability or response time.
District parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
Not applicable
There will be no reduction in the range
capacity of the City to provide the necessary
public works services to this area. Services
will be on a regular basis and "as needed."
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pick up is twice a week.
35 :ANN. 361P2 -2- RTY: ih
III·
IV.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. When
future development occurs in this territory, additional city police officers may be
required to maintain the current city level of service. Street improvements re-
sulting from future development will increase the maintenance responsibility of the
city but will not affect the existing level of service.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? The City will not require any upgrading or change in faci-
lities in the territory for annexation. As development occurs, developers shall pro-
vide and pay for major improvements and facilities and dedicate them to the city.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The territory is zoned
County E (10) RS (Estate - 10 acres residential zone).
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on the property, etc.) The Westerly portion (4.59 Acres) of the territory is prezoned
City (Limited Commercial) zone and the remaining Easterly portion is prezoned
City E (Estate) zone.
35:ANN.361P3 -3- RTY:lh
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit
from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response
time, use of con,unity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State
Highway Patrol services. Current City police standard is a higher sworn
officer per 1,000 population percentaqe compared to the County standard.
Refuse service provided by the City will result in savings to lot owners.
There will be no special assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf
collection, school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire
hydrants. The existing Jewetta Avenue trunk sewer line has capacity to
serve the area and is available for development.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and
County taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existinq tax rate in the area
equals 1.164304% of assessed market value. This represents the total
property tax rate. When annexed, a designated percentage of the total
property tax of the area will accrue to the City. (Rate as shown on
1991-92 CountyAuditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district:
If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.002502% of assessed market
value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.166806%. (Rates as shown
on 1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a rm~rket value of
$50,000.00? The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $1.25 on a
house of $50,000 market value due to inclusion of the City ~)nd Rate.
35:ANN.361P4 -4- RTY:lh:wrn