HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 213-91RESOLUTION NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 360, HALEY NO. 1 ANNEXATION
(WARD 2 OR 3).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public
hearing on THURSDAY, JULY 18, 1991, on the proposed annexation of certain
properties to the City of Bakersfield known as HALEY NO. 1 ANNEXATION, notice of
the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before
said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general
circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 58-91 on July 18, 1991, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the annexation by this Council and this Council
has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of
organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-
described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City
of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the
Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as
though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and
it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation,
therefore, Ordinance No. 3406., which was adopted October 23, 1991, an Initial Study
was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a
significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted
on June 27, 1991.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption
of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and
City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed
Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Traxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Traxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Traxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
2
......... 00o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
OCT 2 3 1001 , by the following vote:
ES, COUNCILMEMBERS;, EDWARDS, DeMONO, 9MtTH, BRUNNI, r..,,..,~,~.,, McDERMOTr, ~ALVAGGIO
NC-E S; COUNCILMEMBERS:
,~$E NT COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED OCT 2 3 1991
CLARENCE E. MEDDERS
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MO/pjt
Attachments
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
a:roa.hl
3
EXHIBIT "A"
HALEY NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 360
A parcel of land being a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16 and a portion
of the West half of Section 21, Township 29 South, Range 28 East, M.D. M., County
of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the Westerly Right of Way line of Haley
Street (County Road No. 2625) and the Southeasterly Right of Way line of State
Freeway Route 178 (VI-KER-178), said point also being on the existing corporate
boundary;
Thence departing from said corporate boundary and following said freeway right
of way line for the next nine (9) courses:
THENCE (1) South 71° 12' 56" West, 520.86 feet;
THENCE (2) South 57° 30' 47" West, 242.30 feet;
THENCE (3) South 53° 41' 30" ~st, 193.26 feet;
THENCE (4) South 58° 13' 57" West, 193.68 feet;
THENCE (5) South 47° 02' 31" V~st, 471.65 feet;
THENCE (6) South 47° 44' 19" West, 361.81 feet;
THENCE (7) South 45° 42' 21" West, 169.42 feet;
TH~CE (8) South 45° 10' 17" West, 300.05 feet;
THENCE (9) South 37° 21' 59" West, 53.47 feet to an angle point on the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (10) Northwesterly and northerly along said corporate boundary to the
point of intersection of the West line of said Section 21 and the South Right of
Way line of Bernard Street (County Road No. 219), said point being an angle
point on said corporate boundary;
THENCE (11) Again departing from said corporate boundary, North 89° 48' 00" East,
along a prolongation of said South Right of Way line (Bernard Street) 83.44 feet
to a point on the Easterly Right of Way line of Beale Avenue (County Road No. 552);
THENCE (12) North 16° 18' 10" East, along said Easterly line and prolongation
thereof, 258.50 feet to a point on the Northerly Right of Way line of Bernard Street
(County Road No. 552);
THENCE (13) North 73° 41' 25" West, along said Northerly Right of Way line, 80.00
feet to the Westerly Right of Way line of Beale Avenue (County Road No. 552);
THENCE (14) South 16° 18' 10" West along said Westerly Right of Way line, 40.00
feet to the Southerly line of that portion of vacated Bernard Street;
THENCE (15) North 73° 41' 25" West, along said Southerly line, 83.45 feet to an
angle point thereon;
36:HALEYNO.1 RTY:lh:wrn
THENCE (16) North 21a 12' 01" West, 13.30 feet to a point on the East Right of
Way line of River Boulevard (County Road No. 219);
THENCE (17) North 00° 03' 55" West, along said East Right of Way line, 91.12 feet
to a point on the South Right of Way line of Knotts Street (County Road No. 552);
THENCE (18) North 05° 45' 34" West, 100.79 feet to the end point of a 20.00 foot
radius curve, (concave northeasterly) on the East Right of Way line of River
Boulevard (County Road No. 219);
THENCE (19) North 00° 03' 55" West, along said East Right of Way line 2158.02 feet
to a point on the South Right of Way line of Columbus Avenue (County Road No. 1897);
THENCE (20) North 89° 56' 05" West, along said South line, 15.00 feet;
THENCE (21) North 00° 03' 55" West, 55.00 to a point on the North line of said
Section 21;
THENCE (22) Continuing North, along the East line of the West 55.00 feet of the
Southwest 1/4 of said Section 16, a distance of 55.00 feet to an angle point on the
existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (23) East and along the various courses of said existing corporate boundary
to the point of beginning.
Containing 159.23 Acres (more or less)
36:HALEYNO1P2 RTY:lh
(21)
1095
(23)
STREET
%,¸
SERVICES
Planning
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
(HALEY NO. 1)
ANNEXATION NO. 360
A~ency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., ~eneral tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment.)
Annexation (specify)
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNI% NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY & HIGHWAY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY
JOINT AGREEMENT NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
COUNTY EXISTING GENERAL GAS TAX REVENUE
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
NO SERVICE X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE
COUNTY (SEE PAGE 2) USER FEES/SPECIAL ASSESSmeNT
CALIF. WATER SERVICE CO. NO CHANGE N/A
PRIVATELY CCNTRACTED X USER FEE
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
E X H I B I T "C"
36:ANN.360 -1- RTY:lh
I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
Avenue and Eye Street about 3 miles southwest of the annexation.
Fire-City Fire Stations No. 4 and No. 8 are about 3/4 miles westerly and
northeasterly of the area.
Parks and Recreation-Jefferson Park is adjacent to the area at the south-
west corner of Bernard Street and Beale Avenue.
Library-N/A
Streets-The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Freeway 99
will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works Department efforts. Maintenance
personnel will be dispatched from the Corporation Yard on a
regular basis for preventative maintenance and "As Needed" repair
including street construction and maintenance, sweeping of streets
and street light maintenance.
Sewer-The area is now served by the County Panorama-Mt. Vernon Sanitation
District and the area will remain under the jurisdiction of the sanitation
district until further determination is made.
Water-The territory is now served by and will continue to be served by
California Water Service Conpany.
Other-(Refuse)-~en annexed service will be provided by the City by
contract with a franchise collector or by City forces.
Service level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the i~nediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour
basis. The annexation will not affect City/County
joint fire service capability or response time.
All City parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range or
capacity of the City to provide the necessary
Public Works Services to this area. Service
will be on a regular basis "As Needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
36:ANN.360P2 -2- RTY:lh:wrn
III ·
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will have
minimal affect on near term level or ca~ability of the City to provide needed ser-
vices. The project may or may not require additional City Police Officers to main-
tain the current level of city police protection.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? The City will not require any upgrading or c~-~n~es in
existing facilities as a prerequisite for annexation. In case any additional deve-
lopment should occur, the developer shall provide and pay for major improvements or
facilities.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The sub~ect territory
is presently zoned R-1 (Low-Density Residential), R-2 (Medium Density Residential),
R-3 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Neighborhood Cc~ercial), C-1 PD neighborhood
uu~rcial-precise development combining) and C-2 (General Co~nercial) in the County
Vie
Indicate and explain proposed pr. zoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc). The proposed prezoning or Zoning Upon Annexation will be
City R-1 (One Family Dwelling), R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling, one dwelling
per 1,250 square feet) and C-1 (Limited Cc~ercial). See attached map for
specific zoning areas (Page 5).
36:ANN.360P3 -3- RTY:lh
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
d,~c~ea,~ in fir~e insurance ~ate, shorter emergency response time, use of cor~aunity
facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than
the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol. Current City Police standard is
higher sworn officec ~oer 1,000 population percentaQe compared to the County standard.
Refuse service will be provided by the City and will result in savin~s to the owners
within this annexation. No special assessments or charQes for street sweeping, leaf
collection, school crossin~ Quards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existin~ tax rate in are,~ ~]~l 1.129392% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed
a designated percenta.c~e of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City. (Rate
as shown on 1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If
so, explain. Yes, the tax rate fo~ City bonds equals 0.002502% of assessed market
value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.131894%. (Rates as shown on
1991-92 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List)
How will c,l~ ~ --~r~nc~ in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00?
The yearly tax would increase by the a~rount of $1.25 on a house of $50,000 market value
due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate.
36:ANN.360P4 -4- RTY:lh
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP
SEC. 21 1 295
LEGEND
105-21
R28!