Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UNDERGROUND TANK-C-14/14/90
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION Applicati.on No. Date APPLICATION In conformity with provisions of Pertinent ordinances, codes anclZor regulations, application' is made by: Name of Company : Address to display, store, install, use, oPerate, sell or handle materials or processes involving or-creating con- ditions deemed hazardous to life or proPerty as follows: Permission co ir, at:ell oue rater: oil and solvent teak - 25,000 ~a-~[ unk,, -' N~'. ~erehtold is the per.tree, - Perm i~..~....{~.4.(..~..~. .......... B y .~. :..~..-....~.0.~ ~ ........ ...~.-~ ............................ Date Fire Marshal · BAKERSFIELD FIRE, DEPARTMENT ' 'BUREAU OF FIRE. PREVENTION / 22 ~~ t978.. - / O.~ .. APPLICATION Na~ of C~ ~r~ tO disploy~ ~re, install, use, ~rate, sell or handle ~teria[s or pr~es~ invol~ or cr~i~ diti~s dee~ hazar~us to life or pro~ as follows: inst.ll t~ ta~s. ~tee ts Bob Uolfe. ~te ~ ' Fire Mam~l ............ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT 19 SopesdJe~ 19]~ BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION - ~ Dote APPLICA'I~ION Application In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes.and/or r~julatio~, ~i~plication is · ay: ' ,. . N~e of Coml~ny -' Addm~ " to display, store, install, use~ operate, sell or handle materials or processes 'invOIv{ng or creating con- ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows: : : Permit denied B .-, .... SEE lv~FR'~ It,ISTALLATtOIq . TOP OF I~LAI,4D 'top D~lvew^¥- . t <[_-_.__.-_ I _"%c~ t"',,','~ ~'z M,N. l/ , ,, ¢0v~, Ii'- I~'~ RISER .................................. ~ '~ %uC'I'ON LINE TO PUI~P~ I .~LOPE' 2" IN I0'-0 ~E~[JCING ELL .... I;~ M~,N~40LE Ii L ~.- ELL t kOO~q-O0~ kO'/l'/-OOZ ('/l'/) -00E~ / OR~VE ,---- 2" T~'t' 4' sr'o zi~ z "' I.u ,3 ?_'.~U~,TIO, N LINE PIPe ---~' ~"VENT L{NE ,SLOP~ ~."~N I~° ?-'PIPE ol - 4'PLU6S / ' -,'~ ..,3 / ' TO PUMP, F/ ('2-2"ELL$ t"lN I0' UP To PUMP ~.J. Ur~tO~i~ -- I~ " j .... 4"X D.T. J~I. JSHI - / ~' &.J. UNION I / · EUSHING (~ OF TANt~ I ~ ~ ~.- 2' ELLS, ' ~v'I ?." 5UC1'10 ~ : ~ 4'ALUMiI,.IUIVi SLIP TU~SE , k(30[0'005 lO' ~ k00Z.0 -004 % 1' ' Ew , ~ A07~4-003 ('~:' I { k,,j..~,~, Cu'r TO For 0~ JOB 5LOPE (1:%0} 'I'AN~ bO~,~N TO FILL PROVIDE DRAWING OF PI~S!CkL LAYCUT OF ., ~ OF ~ FO~WING I~O~TICN MUST BE INCLUDED ~;~ PR~S~: ~~' T~(S], PIPI~ & DISPOSER(SI, [NCLUDH.~G r~S ~ DI~SIONS ~' PRO~S~ S~LING ~ATIONS DESI~A~D BY ~IS S~L "~ ~ ~T ~ OR I~ECTION .~W ~ WATER ~I.~ OR SU~ACE WA~ WI~IN 100' ~IUS OF FACILI~ t .~~L BERCHTOLD EQLT~PM]ENT CO]~[PANY F I l~lJl:tl~ · ADVANCED ~NVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS ~C- 330 E~t 19th Strut ~ ~e~el~ ~o~ ~ of Kern Gasoline Tank Diesel Tank //17,18 #15,16 · Island · 0 Proposed Boring 0 Optional Borin~ · ~ample Si~ PI~ m~L BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT COMPANY 880 East 19th Street 'ADVANCEO ENVII'IONMENI'AL CONCEP, S INC, Bakersfield, California County of Kern ,~' · - CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TAN · Site Sp ,ecffic Time, 'Accounting Sheet Permit · : - · : ~T Site Specific Status Changes: Employee · Employee Signature .' ,' i Site Name or Adclmss, ': -' Funding (Local, Slate, of Federal) Category Activity Houm Date Code Code Description ( 10ths) Notes: , :' i' ,." ;,., : ~' ! : .--.- ....... ,.,~ '~ /. /..'[ ;. Data Entered By: Date: EeL Health 580 411~ 137 {REV. 51119) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANK~ .., Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit · ] ;. ~.;: ..... Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature .") "' Site Name or Address . ;. : /,,.-' :, ..~ ... Funding (Local. Slate. of Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code Code Description (10ths) i,.l~,i , . · ,_, .. ,..~.., ~) ~.; //. ,,f, · Notes: "'] '.tx[ ," ,~.t,, "''' ~ "'; ,:~.¢.. ! ', ¢ :' °'-~ .~:4 '.'":'~ ~L.,,'.,, ~ ..." ."~ ".~? ~ .' ,. ,:. ,- / /-'.' . ,., · t '";;' . .,, .. ,; ;, . .. · .~ I '. ~ " ." .?. ,, .. .... --.' · / i ..,..., ...... .., .. / / · ~ / ; ,. : ¢ , - ... ", ,,. -. ~' · ! -.'. ./ ! ¢." -' ; / ..... / : .., ¢ ... / · .' ..,' ,.. ., , ~.. · ~ / .... · . ,,,, ,..' .; ~ 0 ! ,; . / .~ !~ -.~. ~" ~. . .... · , ..¢ ~'.~ .. ~'~ ~ ~- . . ;. ;,q /% % ~ ~- .~ ~' ,; -. ~ .~.,-'. , ~. ,. , ,.?..,~_. ' i' Data Entered By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit ¢ , -- Site Specific Slatus Changes: Employee ¢ Employee $ig~lature ' Site Name or Address Funding (Local, Slate, of Federal) Category .Activity Hours Date Code Code Description (10ths) Notes: / - . , .. , ., ., ..:. :'. ;-.- ..... .... .. ,, . , · . ,: i... .. .-' '...' ;.,' I ," / ,- " ., i.' : ~ · - .: ~.. . .. · . .,,~.. .,: .' .... ;. ~. . .. ...... /-'/. Data Entered B~t: ,,- ~ Date: _ Err~ Health ~ 41 t'l I~? (REV 5180) SAte Specific Time Accountip&/ Sheet Permit # ,-.~. ,.-,:2 SAte Sgecifi¢ S~a~us Changes: Employee # , ~oyee signature / Site Name or A~lress (Local, State, of Fecleral)' : ~Cat_ecjory ~=tivity Hours Cocle Desortt~c. ton ( lOt~s · / ~-~z...,~.,.o ~-. " /, ~ ~.~. /,;~ 2 / ' /?. ~; ~ ~ " / ,.. , ~/ ~/ / . ~-.,,.,~ ' · · ;, '~ - '~r .-' '..'~ /..i ~.' ! .~,,../ /' i.' .., ,~, ' "-~..'~, ~ ~ · .,, · . ....:._.. . · .~,,~ ;~-¢,;' '~¢,' -~, .- ~ / Da~a Entere~ By: Date: Site Specific T/me Accounting Sheet Pezmit # .., .__.~.·~....- ~ q Site Sgecific Stanm Changes: / '.~,..,m..------ Fupa~ (Local, State, of Federal) ~' Category ,Activity Hours Date Code Description (1Orbs) ., '.l i,~ Notes: m · '~ '/" '"-'~ /'"'~'"' "~ ""~.~- '1,"~ '" ' i:~ ,..~ ," "/5" ,,z /;., ,/ ' ,' ,'. .... .,' ,. ,~ ~, .... .,...,_~..,,,...,.,,.~.." !,-~ ~., l,,~ ..,,.~/.Z ,, ,: .,& ..-..,,~.,.~,~,../~ · ; . /~ // .- z .../ -.,, ~ i ,., /' , ;, · .~ · '"' " "/' '~ ':': *rt,. ,.'"--' '" ~' ' /'/ /' ~ " ;' ;,. ~,..r,z~-" Data ~te~e,,i. ~: ~ --= Date: £nv. Health ~80 AXX3 ~37 (Rev. ~ OPTIONS FO~ LEAKI~ TAN~ SAte Specific Time Accounting Sheet C~TR~T OPTI~S FO~ LEAKI~ ~ SAte S~eoific T/me ~=c~t~ ~eet Site J ~es: O~H~T OPTI~ FOR LEAKING ~ Site Specifio Time Accounting Sheet P~mit # . ..... :~ .-~ Site Specific Status Changes: Bite Name or Acldres~ :;.~ ' I /,¢ · ....=,~ , :.'.~ !~/,-~ ~:.'-'.; .... ~_.,' Pur~ng (Lo~al, State, of Fedsral).?' ; Date Cocle DesertptzLo~ ( lOths ) Notes: ~ (~TI(~S FOR LEAKING ~ Site Specific Tiros Ac¢oun~'~.g Sheet. ~1~ Si~~ ~ '' ~te ~e ~sorip~i~ (10~s) ~es : ' /~; " ~.'-'.~,~/'" ~r'4,.' ~.~, / ~, 1~ ~. ~ _~.: .~ .... ~ ~e=~ By: ~ ---- ~e: , Env. Health 580 4113 1~ (Rev. 5189) SAte Sgeoifi¢ Time Accounting Sheet · ' s~eci~i ~ez~it # = ~ ~ ,., Site c Starts s.' ~o~e # Site Name or Address" ; ' ..... ~',,/i"' E1,m~j (Lcx3&l, State, o~ P~i)' Code De=cri~..~ ( lOtba). ,v / / ' £. ~ L -/?. ~ .~. ./ I°''--~' .~. ,', t~&~ ~ ~* ~...~. .,'~. ; ~ ~ '. '.~ · ~ · ,' ./~ · ~ .~ - / " [ . ~ ~ .... .. :.~...,~ .~ ~ ~ ~,~, ~ -,. ~ ,.~ ~ ~t~ By: ~e: ~ OPTIONS FC~ LEAKING Site Specific T/me 3=counti~ Sheet Permit # ~ "~ .m ~.~ ~ Site Specific S~at~s Chsm&jes: Employee %$ Fun~i~ · (Local, State, of Fe~erai) ~' ' Date ~egor~ Aotivit-f Hours Code Dascri~fcion (10ths) Notes: ,Data ~.,-~tes-ed By: ~ --' Date: ~ QPTIC~S FOR LEAKING ~ SAte Specific Ti~ Accountinc/ Sheet Permit # ...... ;.. SAte Specific Status Changes: Site Name or Address ~ '; :.: Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category ~ctivity Hours ' Date Co~e Descrtl~cion (lOChs) . ~.., l.~,.,~ .~ I . ~... ,....~., ['' .~.. ., . ~. , ... ,, _ _ ..~ .- ~ ~ ..,...~ i[..~.... ! °' - . ' Data Entere~ By: Date: CC~fRACT QPTICNS FOR LEAKING SAte Specific T/me 3=counting Sheet Permit # I ~'~,~ ~ ~ SAte .specific Status Changes: En~ployee # .' . .,-~.j~ '-'. Fu.,",d/ng' (Local, State, of Federal) .:' ,,,-~,~., ? ~ ~.2... . ..~,~ ~ ,~4 "'" ,; ' "'" " .,.~/ , .,, , , ,. - :., ....:_ "' _ "?';,, ' ; ;q ':-, -' -~,'.~ ~ : '~': ~' .. =,.~. z?.':, ,.' .'.~.',.,, · 'r' °.'' · .' /~ ,' , ". ~ ·: '..".;,~-, ~ ..... '?~L_-' ·, : '-'. -.'- ' -; ~..:~ ; ,' -F.' ,~ ,-" " ' Data Entered By: ~ ~_. Date: E~v. ~ OPTI~ FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specifio T/me Acoounting Sheet Permit # ,- ..o.,, ;~ .., Site Specific Status Changes: n~ (Local, State, of Federal) / Datel Cxzle Description Notes: Data Entered By: Date: C~NTR~LT OPTICS FOR LEAKING ~%NF~ SAte Specific Time Aocounti~z~ Sheet Permit # ; .-..~ . . ~ Site Specific Status Changes: Funcling (Local, State, of Federal) .:' Date Code Description (10tbs) Notem: ~ OPTIONS FOR n~.~NG T. ANFuS SAte Speoific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # -. ', Site Sge¢ific Status Changes.. EmDloyee # Employee Signature . . .,,,. Site Name or ;~a~ss . · . .,,. .,_ FuDging (Lo~al, State, of Federal) CONI~LT OPTI(~S FUR LEAKI~ Site Speoific Time Accounting ~e~ ~script~n (10~s) Env, CONI~AC~ OPTIONS FO~ LEAKING Site Specific Tim~ Account/rig S~et Permit # : ..,-.~:,.~--~-.' SAte S~e~ific Status Chan~es: Employee # SAte Name or ~ldress" :'-~ .,, ! Fun~ing (Local, State, of Federal) (XI~I~L~T OPTIONS FOR T.~*.,~I'N~ Site Specific T~ ~c~~ ~te ~es: -- ~ OPTI(~S FC~ LEAKING Site Specific T/me Acoount/r~j Sheet P~t ~ ~,'~ . .~ .~ Site ~ifi~ S~ ~es: ~l~e Si~~ ,"/ / ~ ~ite ~ ~~ss '~ ; / / / ~'- · .. ,~ .... ~.,.= ~,! ,~..~.~,~. ~ (~, S~te, of F~i) .~~ ~ :~scri~ (10~) ~s: : ..i~,~. ., . . / ~., , / < ~ .... ~. ,. , .,,' ~: ,~ , . .'. .. , -.,. ~ . '> ,~, ~ '-. ~ ' . -i ~ OPTI~SS FC~ T.~J~I'NG ~ Site Specifio Time Accounting Sheet Pe,Kmit :11:' '_". '. ,;.ltl Site Specific ~tatus C2mncjes: ~mployee Signature ,, : Site Name or ~l~ress...' ' .. ' - .7 Fu~ng (Local, State, of Federal) Date Co~e Description ( 10ths 1 Note~; Data Ent~.~-ed By: '"~1 ="' Date: ~=nv, He-~lt~ .%80 4].}.3 13'/ (Rev. Site Sgecifi¢ Tim~ Acoounting Sheet Permit # .: .~ .. : :.~ Site Specifi¢ Status Cha~&/es: EmploMee # Fuudia; (L~al, State, of Fede=~) Date Code · Desoript/an (1Orbs) Data Entered By: · Date: Site Specific Time ~=coun~ng Sheet Permit # ; - ., Site Specific Status Chamjes: Employee Signature .... ..~ Site Name or ~ess .- Fur~ling (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity 'Hours Date Co~e Dascrip~ion ;(10tbs) Notes: Data ~ntez~ ~y Date SAte Specific T/m~ Accounting Sheet Permit # ! :- ~... :.? Site Specifi= Stat~s Cha~es: E~91oyee # Employee Signat~re .~: : I 'SAte Na~ or~klress '' ' .~.;,:i' ' ' ' Put, ling (Local, S~ate, of Fe~ .er_al) '/ Acti i Da, re Cod. e Descrip~io~ (1Orbs) I/'-'J., .: :'? , ~ /.?. L~oteB: ~"~_-~,,~..~-~.,,'~ .._~..~. · ~,.,-.-, ,,- -.,: Site Specific Ti~ ~-count/ng Sheet Permit # :: .:... , .-. Site Specific S~a~us Changes: Employee Signature SAte Name or ~ess ~ (Local, S~ate, of Federal) Category ~=tivi~y Hours Date Code Descri~cio~ ( 10tbs ) Notes: '" KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT · '" Division of Environmental Health , ~ '~ ·" "='" · SERVICE AND COMPLAINT FORM Date ~. __ ~ - ~m..- .-.. ,,-~ ..' __. '[('.-,/- /'t(-.! ~. i''?-~ ,.'- ,',-.''. [] Service Request E~. Complaint ~;T r~o...~~gned~ to: ' ~" ' ' ' '; bp. "/' "~' ~-~ ':': ,,,,,,, ,,,, .~, ~.- . , ~, ~ o,... . l ~c,~ /.~ ~-~ DIr~Uon8 Reporting Person, ;Kldres~ , Phone - "'Aedr.._ Phone Property Own~..r.~, .'\, )' 3~_.~.-~,, ('\ ~"" ~ '""T- "~, ". '~' .. .~.....-~, . :"~ ("l, ~, · ~,-.2L ~'" ~eson fo~ RW,..,.,~ ~ 9 · \ ,... ',.__~., ~.~.- ~ .. 2 i. ~.(.... .. . ..X ':X.. i q-"" ,,~,. Information ' ~ J[ '..' · ~ .-:. ~ . ... --:_-..L_ INVESTIGATION _ -. .__, ~o..,.,...,no,,,,.. .?._ /~_/~.,.. ~ of results Investigated by /' /- '/' Date ,, _.~, '_' KCHD sao 2760 372-t=H (R.11-a0) NOTES t '';SEE.YOU / SEE!YOU WHI. LE YOU WERE OUT I '".'e,,',,,.....Zd.: .¢..:// ~, Telep~on&d Witl call again · ~ Holding on line # ................ Please call Long distance call Returned your call Came to see you Waiting to see you Date: Signed: ~,~, FILE CONTE.~ITS SUMMARY PERMIT #: /~-O0 I~ ENV. SENSITIVITY: Activity Date # Of Tanks Comments WATER RESOURES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY UST CLEANUP PROGRAM SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT CONTRACTOR NO: 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: SUBSTANCE: 8006619 SITE NO: 150019 FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y SITE NAME: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT " DATE REPORTED: 11/23/89 -- ADDRESS: 330 E. 19th ST. DATE CONFIRMED: 11/23/89 CITY/ZIP: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 CATEGORY: SITE STATUS CASE TYPE: S CONTRACT STATUS: 4 EMERGENCY RESPONSE: RP SEARCH: S DATE UNDERWAY: 11/23/89 DATE COMPLETED: 11/23/89 PRELIMINARY DATE UNDERWAY: 11/17/89 DATE COMPLETED: 12/22/89 ASSESSMENT: C REMEDIAL C._ DATE UNDERWAY:/~f/~tl~/~ ~ DATE COMPLETED:~.~°//~/~ o INVESTIGATION: REMEDIAL ACTION: C__ DATE UNDERWAY: ,f/f~o DATE COMPLETED: ///~/ ~d POST REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: / / DATE COMPLETED: ACTION MONITORING ENFORCEMENT ACTION TYPE: DATE TAKEN: TAKEN: RAP REQUIRED: DATE APPROVED: CASE CLOSED: y DATE CLOSED:///?~/~O DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: /D/.I~dREMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: RESPONSIBLE PARTY CONTACT NAME: MARK BERCHTOLD SPECIALIST: ~ COMPANY NAME: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CORP. SENSITIVITY: NES ADDRESS: 330 E. 19TH ST. VERIFIED (X) CITY/STATE: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 DATE OF REPORT: 01/05/90 RE. . URGE MANAGEMENT Ad NCY Environmental Health Sewices Department ~NDALL L. ABBO~ s~ mcC~ ~ ~v, r~s, DmECTOr DIRECTOR air Pollut~ ~trol ~t~t DASD PRICE m ~ a. tODDY. ~O ~IST~ DI~CTOR ~ing & D~e~t ~ ~ent ~ J~, NCP, Di~C~R RONMENTAL SER CES DEPAR E November 14, 1990 Steve Berchtold Berchtold Equii~ent 330 East 19th Street .. Bakersfield, CA 93305 S~: Location : 330 East 19th Street Bakersfield, CA Known As : Berchtold Equi~ent Permit # : 150019 Dear Mr. Berchtold: This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is rec~,i ~ed at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. A~altionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site may rec~e further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Joe Canas at (805) 861-3636, Extension 588. Chris Burger ~~ Hazardous Materials Specialist IV Hazardous Materials Management Program CB :ch colt\lSO019, h 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 'ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC" 6 November 1990 Federated Insurance COmpany Post Office Box 586 Citrus Heights, Cs]i¢ornia 95611 C/o RLW Equipment -~ -... " Subject; Exmvation P~mediatiOn Project: ~' "Berchtold Equipment Company _ tbdmz',~la~ C,a]lfomia Dear Bob: Advanced ]~nviro-m~--tal Concepts, Inc. (AEC) is pleased to provide thi, m, mrn~ry letter report for site closure at the above referenced location. Included herein are the laboratory results and chain-of-custody doc-mentation as well as the site di~Er~m showing sample locations. Excavation was performed in accordsnce with AEC's work plan submitted in August 1990. The work was centered around soil boring B-l, described in AEC's site assessment report of March, 1990. Soil sampling was conducted under the supervision of Mr. Joe Canas, Hazardous Materis]s Specis]i.% Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services (KCDEHS). One (1) sample was collected on Saturday, October 20, 1990 and six (6) .~rnples were collected on Sunday, October 21, 1990. A total of seven (7) soil samples were collected during the excavation project; five (5) from the excavation itself (four (4) sidewall, and one (1) floor); and two (2) composite samples from the clean stockpiled soil that was used as bac]dU]. The following protocol was observed during the excavation process: 1) A CAT-235 truck-mounted excavator was used to remove and stockpile the clean overburden soil from surface to a depth of approximstely ten (10) feet; 2) Excavated soil was contim_ml]y field screened ]_]~.g a photoionization detector (P[D) and odor until a positive response was indicated; 3) Diesel impacted soil was then stockpiled separately for tinnier to another location under an approved mitigation method; 4) The excavator was ramped down into the excavation to a depth of appro~imstely sixteen (16) feet in order to reach the base of the plume at forty (40) feet; and 5) Excavation of the diesel impacted soil was considered complete when neither PID readings nor hydrocarbon odors were evident. 1 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND 4,400 ASHE ROAD #205 ° BAKERSFIELD CA93313 805/831-1646 FAXS05/831-1771 Letter Report Ad--ced Eavi~,,meat~l ConceI~ lac. The foflowing protocol was observed during sample collection: 1) The excavator scooped a bucket of soil from appr~/m~tely two (2) feet below the last -- detected part of the diesel plume and brought the sample to surface grade for collection; 2) A q~]~]iSed hydrogeologist pushed a 2-inch ai~meter'by 6~inch long brass sleeve into an undisturbed portion of the soil, ensuring that no headspace was present; ,; 3) The brass sample tube was sealed with teflon tape, caPped with plastic end caps, and ' secured with duct tape. The tube was then labeled, put.in a sealed zip-lock ba~ and placed in a chilled ice chest with blue ice at 4° Centigrade or less; 4) All soil ~mples were recorded on a chain-of-custody document to ensure ~mple integrity -_ ~and traceability;, and ~.~ 5) Ans_]yses for the required parameters were performed on 'the soft samples by SMC Laboratory, a California Certified Laboratory. The ~n~!yses specified and performed on the soil samples were in accordance with EPA methods 3540/8020 for TPH-diesel and EPA methods 3810/8202 for BTXE. ,~,nslytical results are tabulated below (units are in ugm/gm). Laboratory reports are attached, and sample locations are shown on l~mre 1. Xyle~ Sample LD. TPH-diesel B~-n~ne T~luene Ethylbenzene Total SPL-1 125 ND ND ND ND All five (5) confirmatory soft ~mples from the excavation were non-detect for the constituents analyzed. Sample depths ranged from 28 to 41-feet below surface grade. Two (2) composite samples (SPL-1 and SPL-2) were collected from the clean backfill stockpile. Each composite was collected by obtaining equal quantities from five (5) separate locations around the soil pile, one (1) foot beneath the surface. ~mple SPL-1 was collected near the crest and SPL-2 from around the base of the soft pile. Sample SPL-2 was non-detect for TPH-diesel and BTXE. Sample SPL-1 yielded 125- ugm~gm TPH-diesel and non-detect for BTXE. This is probably the result of one (1) or two (2) excavator buckets of diesel impacted soil having been stockpiled for bs~k-fi]! at the crest of the pile just prior to the decision to begin separate stockpiling for removal. Yerbal approval to use t~s material for bsck~fi]] and to begin ba~]~fi]]ing the excavation itself was first obtained from Mr. Joe Ca~s, KCDEHS, after informing him of the laboratory results. · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND * 4400 ASHE ROAD #205 · BAKERSFIELD CA93313 805/831-16,46 FAX 805/831-1771 SnmmRry Letter ]{epo~d; .Adivanced l~.--~rnam~.ota] C~aceIda, IBc. The diesel impacted soil was transferred to 5300 District Boulevard on October 21st and 22nd where it was used for fin material to level out an old concrete loading dock are~ The soil was therefore contained within the concrete loading bay area.and, to our understanding, subsequently sealed at grade level by paving. A total volume of 832-cubic yards of soil was trsn~orted to the site. A copy of the approval letter for the above described soil mitigation method is. also attache~ Based on the sample ~nAlyses, the site work described her~Jn~ and verbal communicatious with the appropriate Kern County authorities, Adwnced ~nvironmelltal Concepts, ~ recommends t~i~ site for This Work h~_s been perfo~ned with generally accepted environmental science and geological practi~es clxrrently used 'in California at this ~ime. Recommenclstious are based upon info~mRtion collected duxing the excavation process and Iaboratory results obtained immediateJy followixq~ the field work The soil samples were collected on a finite grid, therefore the qns]ytical resuJts are representative of discrete sample points and are not to be miscon.qtrued to represent unsamp]ed subsurface areas. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is givem '- Sincerely, This s~mmsry report has been prepared by: Joel S. Pomerene Registered Geologist #4724 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND . 4400 ASHE ROAD #20.'5 · BAKERSFIELD CA933'~3 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry Client Name: Advanced Environmental Concepts Address : 4400 Ashe Road, Suite 206 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Attention : Mr. Joel S. Pomerene Date samples received ~ 10-22-90 Date analysis completed: 10-22-90 Date of report : 10-22-90 Project Name: Berchtold Equipment Co. 330 E. 19th Street Bakersfield, CA RESULTS OF A~ALYSIS: 3883 ID: SE-28' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-Xylene ND 0.005 o-Xylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ND 10.0 Method of Analysis for BT×: 3810/8020(FID) Method. of Analysis for TPH(Diesel): 3540/8020(FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram (ppm) ND = None Detected Laboratory Supervisor 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 ° FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: 3884 ID: F-40' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-Xylene ND 0.005 o-Xylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ND 10.0 3885 ID: SW-41' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene. ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-Xylene ND 0.005 o-Xylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ND 10.0 3886 ID: NW-40' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-Xylene ND 0.005 o-~ylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ND 10.0 Brian ~mp s 6~n ....... Laboratory Supervisor RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: 3887 ID: NE-35' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-×ylene ND 0.005 o-Xylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ND 10.0 3888 ID: SPL-] ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 EtbylbenzeDe ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-Xylene ND 0.005 o-Xylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ]25 10.0 3889 ID: SPL-2 ugm/gm MDI,,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 p-Xylene ND 0.005 m-Xylene ND 0.005 o-Xylene ND 0.005 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.005 TPH (Diesel) ND 10.0 Brian ~6mPso6 - ~ .. - - Laboratory Supervisor ALLEY GASOUNE ~ DIESEL UST I , LLI , I I ,"11 -A, ' · I-- J J ~ DIESEL PLUME 0 sF..z~' EXCAVA110N UMITS FORMER DISPENSER ISLAND L SIDEWALK EAST19TH STREET o s ,o ~s ~ ~ · Sample Location ~ ~'.~· Boring LocalJon Scale: 1" = 20' - N - ~~rL - Site Plan - ~.v,.o..~.,A. co.c~.T, ~c. Berchtold Equipment Company .FIGU RE P.O. eox 4o~ ...... 330 East 191h Street e~K~nsF~o, c^ .=. County of Kern · Bakersfield, CaBomia 1 October 4, 19g0 SLeve, Berchtol d 230 East 19th Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 RE: Site Mitigation Workplan Approval Dear Mr. Berchtold: This Department has completed tile review of the site remediation workplan for your facility located at 330 East 19th Street in Bakersfield, California. The initial proposal for removal of diesel contaminated soil and introducing it into an asphalt formulation plant has~been approved. A more recent proposal has presented the idea of utilizing the excavated soil as backfill in another location. The excavated soil would be placed into a cement encased area with clean overfill. The second proposal addressed above is also an acceptable mitigation method for designated soil waste. The excavati~)n should be perfomed in accordance with the excavation workplan prepared by your consultant American Environmental Concepts Inc. Please advise this office of your final mitigation decision. Should you have any question regarding this notice please do not hesitate to contact me at (805) 861-3636 extension 588. Sincerely~ Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program JO:cas \berchtld. ltr ~,ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC.= Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc~ is pleased to present the followin~ Soil Excavation Work Plan for Berchtold Equipment Company County of Kern o B~kersfield, Californi~ This work pi,an ~ been prepared for. Berchtold Equipment Company August 1990 Mr. E. G. Berchtold * ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MINO - 4400ASHEROAE) #206 · BAKERSFIELD CAC~2,313 805/831-1646 ° FAX 805t831-1771 Soil Excavation Work P!sn Advanced Enviro-mental Concepts, Table of Contents Subject Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Scope ~f Work 1 1.3 Schedule 1 .... 2.0 BACKGROUND 2 3.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 2 3.1 Site Description 2 3.2 Regional Geology 2 3.3 Local Hydrogeology 3 4.0 WORK PLAN 3 4.1 Excavation Methods 3 4.2 Sampling Methods 3 4.3 B~ekS'l] and Compaction 4 5.0 RI~fAR,KS/SIGNATUB,F~ 5 Appendices: A) ~ B) Health and Safety Plan · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH OESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAI~ #206 BAKERSFIELD CA93313 805/831'1646 FAX 805/831'1771 Soil Excavation Work Plan Advanced F~vironment~l Concepts, Inc. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This work plan describes the procedures to be employed to excavate diesel impacted soil in the vicinity of the former locaton of a 10,000-gallon underground c~iesel storage t~,k (UST) operated by the Berchtold Equipment Company, 330 East 19th Street, B~k~.rslield, C~llforni, (Figure 1). This work plan has been authorized by Mr. E.G. Berchtold, and the proposed excavation will be supervised by Mr. Joe C-nas, Hazardous Materials Specialist, Kern County Environmental Health Department (County). The excavaton work described in this work plan has the following objective: Excavate the soft around the former 10,000-gallon UST location to a depth' sufficient tn .... remove the remojning diesel impacted soil from the area (approximately 25' x 25' x 35' or 810 cu. yards). The affected soil will be placed on and covered by visquene on-site for subsequent segreg~ton and loading on the trucks for transport to Granite Const~ucton. 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of services described in this work plan include: · il.,~ .:.~'~'~ --+ '! ~! ~ 1. Excavate and field screen with a photoionizaton detector (PID) the soil around the former 10,000-gallon tank location (Figure 2). Surface dimensions of the excavation will be approximately twenty-five (25) feet in diameter. ~imum depth is expected to be thirty-five (35) feet. 2. Separate clean soil from diesel impacted soft and stockpile for later bac~4il]ing of the excavation. 3. Place impacted soil on visquene sheeting and then envelope the spoils pile. Initiate transport of soil upon approval from the County. , ~ ! .~ ~ . 4. Collect confirmatory soil samples from the sidles 'anal floor of the~excavation and~ analyze for TPH-diesel by California Department of Health Services (CA-DHS) extractable method, and for volatile aromatics (BTXE) by EPA Method 8020. 5. Backfi]! the excavation with the clean excavated soil and sufficient borrow import to bring soil up to surface grade. The bach4ill will be compacted on approximately one (1) foot lifts using the excavator bucket. 6. Provide a written report detailing the excavation proje~ including. 1) excavation methods, 2) sampling methods, 3) analytical results, 4) conclusions, .and 5) recommendations. 1.3 Schedule AEC antcipates initiating the services described in this work plan within one (1) week upon Pmjcc~ ~ 90V-4~93 1 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MiND · ,4400ASHEROA© #206 E~AKERSFIELD CA93313 8051831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 Soil Excavation Work. Plan Advanced Environmental Concept~ Inc~ approval by the lead regulatory agency and authority to proceed from Berchtold Equipment Company. The report of operations will be submitted to the Client within one (1) month after completion of the above described field work. 2.0 BACKGROUND On or about November 17, 1989 RLW Equipment was contracted to excavate, transport and dispose of four (4) underground fuel storage tnnks and dispensers. Soil samples collected beneath the tanks and dispensers e~hibited elevated levels of refined hydrocarbons. A site assessment was required by the County to evaluate the verQcal and lateral extent of the hydrocarbon migration in the subsurface. On February 28, 1990 a site assessment was performed on the subject property by AEC. The analytical results of the investigation indicated that the diesel had migrated to a depth of 35-feet and had 15-feet of lateral movement. The County has approved a soft treatment plan consisting of excavation and transporting the diesel impacted soil to Granite Construction Company, at which point the diesel/soil mixture will be incorporated in an asphalt. '3.0 PHYSI~ CttARA~ISTIC~ 3,1 8ire Description The Berehtold Equipment Company is located on the north 'side of East lffr~h Street in the City of Bakersfield. Primarily commercial and light industrial properties surround the subject site. The property where the fueling station was located is mainly used for the storage of grading and excavation equipment. 3.2 Regionsi Geology The subject property is sited in the Southern San Joaquin Valley (Valley) which is a part of the Central Valley of California. The Valley forms the southern two-thirds of the Central Valley and is characterized as a broad structural trough. It is bordered on the east by the Sierra Nevada Range and on the west by the Coast l~ange (Diablo and Temblor Mountains). The Central Valley extends 250-miles southeastward of the confluence of the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers to the Tehachapi and San Emigdio Mountains. The width ranges from 25-miles wide near the Kern River to approximately 55-miles wide near the Kings River, with an approximate average width of 40-miles. Geology of the southern valley consists of Pre-Tertiary basement complex overlain by m~Hne and non-marine sedimentary rocks of tertiary age. These' rocks are composed of consolidated sandstones, siltstones, and shales which thicken from northeast to southwest. The Valley was once an inland sea of comparatively shallow depth that continued to subside due to the ever increasing load of sediments transported from the higher elevations. These deposits consist of gravels, sands, silts, and clays. The majority of the groundwater pumped from the central Valley floor occurs within these relatively unconsolidated continental deposits. Pmj~c~ ~ ~ov-a~ 2 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MINE) · 4~.00 ASHE ROAD. 1t206 BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646, FAX 805;831-~77~ Soil Excavation Work Plon Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc~ 3.3 Local Hydrogeology The site is located approximately 420-feet above mean sea level in an area of minimal topographic relief. The facility is sited on Recent alluvial fan deposits which consist of clay, silt, sand and gravel. From grade to a vertical depth of 15-feet a brown, poorly indurated, slightly sandy silt was identified. A white and brown, medium to coarse-grained sand was logged from 15-feet to 23-feet~ From 23-feet to 25-feet a silty sand was identified, followed by a slightly clayey silt to 32-feet. An unconsolidated, medium to coarse-grained sand was logged to 37-feet followed by a compact silt to a total depth of 45-feet. The depth to the primary water table is estimated at 215-feet, and shallow perched water has been identified at sites within l-mile of the site at 70-feet below grade level. The site investigation did not encounter any perched water zones. 4.0 WORK PLAN AEC proposes to excavate the soil around the former 10,000-gallon t~n{~ location and place the gasoline impacted soft in a visquene envelope. The top eight (8) feet is expected to be clean and win be field screened and stockpiled separately for later baek~ill (Figure 2). The stockpiled material will be sampled and analyzed for TPH-diesel and BTXE to ensure that it is below Recommended Action Levels (tL~L's). 4.1 Excavation Methods' ~,~)~'~:;~x ~\.~'j0! . ~.~~ A Track-Mounted Excavator with a depth reach of approximately 28-feet will be used to ensure complete removal of the impacted soil. The soil sample obtained from 35-feet in Boring B-1 yielded levels below 100-ppm for TPH-diesel, and a benzene concentration less that 1-ppm. The soil will be excavated in a roughly circular pattern with a diameter of 35-feet, centered on soil boring B-1. The soil to 8-feet below grade level (BGL) is expected to be clean, and will be stockpiled separately for later use as backfill In order for the excavator to reach a depth of 35-feet, it will be necessary to bench one Side of the excavation, thus allowing the excavator to dig from inside the open pit. All soil win be field screened with a photoionization detector (PID) during the excavation operations to ensure proper segregation of the impacted soil. Visual and olfactory inspection win also be conducted periodically. 4.2 Ssmpling Methods The diesel impacted soil occurs in a zone between 8-feet and 30-feet BGL and boring B-1 yielded concentrations in the range of 10,000 to 30,000-ppm TPH-diesel. Upon removal of the impacted soil around the 30-foot depth level, soil sampling will be conducted to confirm successful remediation by excavation. The excavator bucket will be used to collect representative soil samples from the sides' of the excavation near the 30-foot level. These sidewall samples will be obtained from the cardinal compass points of the excavation. Another sample will be collected fxom the excavation floor. Proj~: .*_Ec ~ov-629~ 3 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD #206 BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 Soil E~cavation Work Plan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. The excavator bucket will bring each soil sample to the surface for laboratory sample collection. The following procedure will be used during ~mple collection. 1. A qualified AEC representative, wearing clean latex gloves, will tap a 2 1/2-inch diameter by 6-inch long brass sleeve into an undisturbed portion of the soil; .. 2. The brass sleeve will be sealed with teflon tape, a plastic end cap, and duct tape; 3. The brass sleeve will be removed from the bucket and after ensuring that no head space is present~ the other end will be sealed and capped; 4. The brass sleeve win then be labelled and stored in a cooler with dry ice; ' ' 5. All soil ~mples will be documented on a Chain-of-Custody record to ensure sample integrity and traceability; 6. The soil samples will then be delivered to SMC Laboratory for ~n~lysis; 7. All soil samples will be analyzed for TPH-diesel by California Depar~unent of Health Services extractable method and for aromatic volatiles (BTXE) by EPA Method 8020. L~/' , A~oJyses will be performed by SMC Labs, a California Certified Laboratory; J~ ~.~ 8. Soil samples collected from the stockpile will be composlted from each 50-cubic yard volume by 10-cubic yard increments. These will be analyzed by the same methods as~ ~, describe in Item 7.. -- -~\~ ~.3 Backfill and Compaction Upon laboratory confirmation of successful excavation remediation of the diesel impacted soil to levels below the recommended action levels and upon approval of the lead regulatory agency, the excavation will be baelrfilled with dean soil. The dean stockpiled soil will be returned to the excavation and compacted in roughly one (1) foot lifts using the excavator bucket. Additional dean fill soil will be trucked on-site to make up the difference between the impacted soil that is placed on the spoils pile. The excavator is expected to be able to achieve 00% relative compaction. The excavation will be backfilled to surface grade or a few inches below, in preparation for resurfacing by Berchtold Equipment Company. Pmjec~ AEC 90V-~ 4 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 13AKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/8:31-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 Soil Excovation Work Plon Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. 5.0 REMARKS/SIGNATURER This work plan represents AEC's professional opinions. These opinions are based on currently available data and were arrived at in accordance with accepted hydrogeologic and environmental engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is given. _ This work plan has been prepared by: This work plan has been technically reviewed by: California t~egistered Geologist #4724! ~No. 4724 P~j~: A~ ~v-r~z~ 5 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND . 4400ASHE F~OA© #206 E~AKEF~SFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 f, · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD, #20t5 · BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 8051831-1646 · F,~0~ 805/831-1771 ~ .. Ma~ed, edited, and published b~ the Geo~ogica~ Sumey. · '"..' and by plane-table surveys I954. Aerial photographs taken i952 " ' ' ' /.':',' ;; ;~,,:~: Red t n[ ~ndicates'areas In which only landmark buildings ar~ shown BEALTH & SAFETY PLAN · ENVIRONMENTAl. CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND * 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 " BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1846 " FAX 805/831-1771 S°il Excavation Work Plan Advanced Environmental Concep~ Inc. Health & SafetY Plan Berchtold Equipment Company Introduction: A Site Safety Plan (SSP) tins been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site soil assessment/remediafion. It's purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materi~ls that may be encountered at the site. The S~P establishes personnel responsibilities, personal protective equipment standards, decontamination procedures and emergency action plans. Ad,ranged Environmental Concepts, Inc~ seeks to enter the property described above for the purpose of conducting a site assessment, consisting of backhoe excavation and sampling, to remove hydrocarbon impacted soil. Soft ~rnples will be collected following the complete excavation of affected soil. All possible efforts will be made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to be chemically analyzed will be collected in a brass sleeve, capped with lined plastic lids, sealed with tape and placed on ice in a cooler immediately. All Chain- of-Custody protocol wi]] be followed. Excavation equipment will be brought to the site and operated by: UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME This ~ describes means for protecting all on-site personnel from deleterious contamination of personal injury while conducting on-site activities. As described below, we will strive to meet all requirements promulgated by the California Department of Health Services. Responsibilities of Key Personnel'_ All personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities: Mr. Jonathon I~ Buck wi]] serve as Project Manager and on-site Geologist. He will also serve as Site Safety Officer (SS0). As SSO, Mr. Pomerene will assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of the SSP. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to the site. Compliance with the SSP will be monitored at all times by the SS0. Appropriate personal protective equipment, listed below, will be available and udli~.ed by all on-site personnel. Prior to beginning work, the SSO wi]l conduct a training session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel will be made aware of hazards at the site and will utilize Material Safety Data Sheets for information on compounds to be encountered. Mr. Buck will also be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting and securing samples and assuring sample integrity by adherence to Chain-of-Custody protocol. ·ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 BAKERSFIELD CA 93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 Soil Excavation Work Plan Environmental Concepts, Inc. All on-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforeseen hazards. After documenting their understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for which they believe they are ~lified. Provisions of this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. Job Hazard Analyses: Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equipment~ such as the danger of falhu~ objects or moving machinery. Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. "-An excavation 'cor~tr~ct0r has been employed to deliver and operate all excavating equipment. Qns]!fied personnel only will have any contact with this equipment. All on-site personnel, including the excavation contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to excavating equipment. Latex sampling gloves will be worn by persons collecting or hsndling samples to prevent exposure to contaminants. Gloves will be changed between samples and used ones discarded, to avoid cross-contAmination. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor cont~mln~tion levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using a Photoionization Detector (PID). Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 5-ppm, in the breathing space. Furthermore, no on-site smoking, open flame or sparks will be permit-Ced in order to prevent accidental ignition. Risk Assessment Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel, and benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most are highly flammable. Threshold Limit Values (TLV's), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL's) and Toxicity levels (LD50, oral- rat), all in mg/kg (ppm), are listed below: Compound TLV STEL Toxici .W Gasoline 200 300 .... Diesel 50 75 .... Benzene 10 25 4894 Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene 100 150 4300 Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard. Applicable MSDS forms are attached. Exposure Monitoring Plsn: A PID will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV's, protective measures will be taken. Passive dosimeter badges will be placed in downwind locations if PID readings indicate high levels of volatile organics in the breathing space. · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD #206 BAKEFISFIE~LD CA93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 Soil Excavation Work PI~ Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. Personal Protective Equipment: Personnel on-site will have access to respirators with organic vapor cartridges, l~eplacement cartridges will be available on-site as needed. When handling s~mples, the on-site Geologist will wear latex gloves. Hard hats will be worn by all personnel on-site when in proximity of drilli.,- equipment. Work Zones and Security Mea~u-es: Access to the site will be restricted to authorized personnel. A set of cones, placards or wide yellow tape, surrounding the site, will define the perimeter, if needed. The Project Manager will be responsible for site security. Decentsmlnstion Measures: Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning or placing equipment on possible contsmins_ted soil. All personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck and face with soap and water before fsking a break or leaving the site. P~espirators will be washed with soap and water following each day's use. Excavation and ~mpling equipment used will be decontsmiuated by steam-cleaning. Sampling equipment will be deconfsmlnated before each ~m~ ple is taken. General Safe Work Practices: On-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contsminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SSO, including respirator fit. Excavation and sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before being brought on-site. Split-spoon sampling equipment will be cleaned before each use. Augers will be steam-cleaned between borings. The on-site Geologist will oversee operations and log borings. The S~mple Coordinator will assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. Tr~inin~ Requirements: The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include all points of MSDS forms, contaminant proper~es, warning signs, health hazard dats~ risk from exposure and emergency first aid. All chemicals are to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. Medical Surveillance Program: Ac~cording to CFR 29, 1910.120, Paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators thirty (30) days or more AEC ~ov-a2~ 3 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400ASHEF~OAD #206 E3AKEF~SFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 FAXS05/831-1771 Soil Excavation Work Plon Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc~ during one (1) year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically. All site personnel win be required to have had a complete chemical physical within the past year. Record Keepings. Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to con*~miuant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory protection, MSDS forms and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre- site ~raining meeting. Exposure records on each job will be kept for thirty (30) years to meet requirements. Included will be names and social security numbers of employees, medical evaluations, on-the-job logs from entry to exit, firs~ aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons and personal air monitoring records· Con~inooenc~ Plans: In the event of an accident, inj .ury, or other emergency, the Project Director, Senior Project Manager, or other person, will notify the appropriate government agencies or Individuals as follows: Kern County Environmental Health Department (805) 861-3636 Police, Fire or Ambtfio~ce Emergency 9-1-1 Nearest Emergency Hos0ital Kern Medical Center 1830 Flower Street Bakersfield, California (8O5) 326-2OOO Pmjec~ AEC ~0V~93 4 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 E~AKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 ~ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC~ 29 Angnst 1990 Mr. Joe Cane_s, Environmental Health Specialist Kern County Environmental Health Department Hazardous Materials Division 2700 "M" Street ~300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Regarding. Soil Excavation Work plan Dear Mr. Canas: Enclosed, for your approval, is the work plan designed and submitted by Advanced Environmentld Concepts, Inc~ (AEC) on beha]¢ of Mr. E.G. Berchtold, Berchtoid Equipment Company, for the soft excavation project to be performed by AEC on the following property: Berchtold Equipment Company County of Kern - Baker~e]d, California Upon review of the work plan, should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (805) 831-1646. Sincerely, Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. drogeologist mia Registered Environmental Assessor #01508 Enclosure (1) cc: Bud McNabb, RLW Equipment · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DEStON IN MiND · 4400ASHE ROAD e206 · F~AKERSFIELD CA g33 .~ 805t831-1646 FAX 8051831-177! E N V.I R 0 N M E N TAL TESTING LABORATORY RESULTS Client: Advanced Environmental ConCepts Report Date: 8/8190 -- Client Address: 4400 Ashe Road #206 Lab P.N.: 1119 - 13 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Client P.N.: N/A Project Name: Barchtold Equipment Date Sampled: 7/19/90 Project Address: 330 East 19th Street Date Analyzed: 7/24/90-7/26/90 Bakersfield, CA Physical State: Solid Flash Point Modified EPA 1010 pH Sample ID (°C) EPA 9045 B~I @25' NO FLASH UP TO 100 8.26 NE); Not Detectable The Laboratory Results are only a portion of the Laboratory Report. Page 4 E NV.I R 0 N MEN TAL TESTING LABORATORY RESULTS Client: Advanced Environmental Concepts Report Date: 8/8/90 Client Address: 4400 Ashe Road #206 'Lab P.N.: 1119 - 13 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Client P.N.: N/A 4 ,, Project Name: Berchtoid Equipment Date Sampled: 7/19/90 Project Address: 330 East 19th Street Date Analyzed: 7/23/90-7/26/90 Bakersfield, CA Physical State: Solid TPH, Cyanide, Extractable Total Sult'de CA DHS EPA 9010 EPA 9030 Sample ID mq/kq _mg/kCl mq/kq B-1@25' ND 0.8 0.2 IDetection Limit, m~/k~ 5.0 0.02 1.0 I The Laboratow Results are only a portion of the Laboratory Report. Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY RESULTS Client: Advanced Environmental Concepts Report Date: - 8/8/90 .,~ Client Address: 4400 Ashe Road #206 Lab P.N.: 1119 - 13 ,~ Bakersfield, CA 93313 Client P.N.: N/A Project Name: Berchtold Equipment Date Sampled: 7/19/90 Project Address: 3,30 East 19th Street Date Analyzed:_ 7/23/90-8/15/90 ...... · Bakersfeld, CA Physical State: Solid Sample ID B-1 @25' Detection Conc. Umts parameters f_ma/k(]) (mq/kq) Antimony (EPA 7040) 3.8 2 Arsenic (EPA7060) 3.3 0.05 Barium (EPA 7080) 53 1 Beryllium (EPA 7090) ND 0.5 Cadmium (7130) ND 0.5 Chromium (EPA 7190) 9.4 0.5 Chromium V1 (EPA 7196) ND 1 Cobalt (EPA 7200) 6 0.5 Copper (EPA 7210) 8.6 1 Lead (EPA 7420) 5.2 0.5 Mercury (EPA 7471) ND 0.02 Molybdenum (EPA 7480) ND 2 Nickel (EPA 7520) ND 0.5 Selenium (EPA 7740) ND 0.05 Silver (EPA 7760) ND 0.5 Thallium (EPA 7840) 2.4 2 Vanadium (EPA 7910) 26 2 Zinc (EPA 7950) 64 0.5 ND; Not Detectable The Laboratory Results are only a portion of the Laboratory Report. Page 2 Suite G Huntin¢on Beach California E N V.I R 0 N M E N T A L T E S T I N G. 9264~ Tel 714.842.6077 ~BO~TORY REPORT ~ 714.842.1891 Cli~t: ~ ~ro~l ~¢s ~ Date: ~1 ~ Cli~t ~dr~s: ~e R~d ¢~6 ~b P.N.: 1119 - 13 ~k~sfield, CA 9331 3 CI~ P.N.: ~A ~ct: ~n ~ ~oj~t ~e: ~to~ Equi~ent ~te ~p~: 7/1 9/~ .... ~oj~t~dress:' 3~stt9~Str~t ~te~: 7/21/~ ~sfield, CA .. Da~e ~: 7/2~-~1 ~i~l Stale: ~1~ Quality Assurance/Quality Control Summary QC Percent Acceptable Percent Acceptable Parameter fMethod/ ]'voe Recovery Ranae Reoroducibilitv Ranae TPH, Extractable (CA DHS} M 96 40-140 101 40-140 M = Matra Spike / Spike Duplicate L = Laboratory Control Sample Spike / Spike Duplicate Reviewed ~'AP-I~roved The samples were r~,~l by ~ ~H ~, ~. h a ~ ~e, ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~-d-~ ~d, ~ ~p~ ~ T~ T~ ~, ~. ~ ~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~u~ r~i~. ~ ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~p~ ~r~ ~ ~ m~ ~ app~ to ~ ap~ ~ ~ smi~ ~p~. ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ cl~ to ~ it ~ a~. ~ ~s ~e ~a ~ d ~ ~ Re~. Page CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ~ Rush 72-~ H~ . ~ = a ~n Dam T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r / "~ , , ~ ,,ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC · June 24, 1990 RLW Equipment 2080 South Union Bakersfield, California 93301 Attn: Mr. Bud McNabb RE: Disposal of Diesel Impacted Soil at Berchtold Equipment Dear Bud: The diesel impacted soil at the Berchtold Equipment Company can be disposed of at the Grsnlte Construction asphalting facility provided that the soil is not classified as a B. CtLA Hazardous Waste. In defining if a waste is classified as a I~CtLA waste or simply a hazardous waste, the following criteria must be established: 1) The corrosivity of the diesel/soil (pH should be between 5 - 9). 2) The reactivity of the diesel/soil (does it react with water to produce a toxic gas such as cyanide). 3) The toxicity of the diesel/soil (heavy metals, bioassay). 4) The ignitability of the diesel/soil (flash point) If the hazardous waste is within the guidelines for the aforementioned parameters for corrosivity, reactivity, ignitability and toxicity the waste is classified as a non-RCRA waste. The hazardous waste has to then meet the following. 1) The recyclable material must be mixed with other materials. 2) After mixing the recyclable material with other materials, it must be demonstrated that hazardous constituents failing the STLC (soluble threshold limit concentrations) have chemically reacted so as to be physically inseparable, from the resultant product (i.e incorporated in asphalt). To demonstrate this it'will be necessary to perform the Waste Extraction Test (WET) on the final product. The concentration of the hazardous constituent in the extract must be multiplied by the dilution factor inherent in combining the .recyclable material with the other materials. Background levels of hazardous constituents added by ingredients other than the recyclable material may be subtracted from the final WET concentration. The final WET concentration should be less than the applicable STLC. (NOTE: if we analyze a diesel sample from the site for Title 22 metals, and the results are all below the STLC concentrations then it appears that the aforementioned is non-applicable. 3) After mixing the recyclable material with other substances, it must be demonstrated that the recyclable material adds no hazard to the recycling operation or to the final product. 4) The final product must be available for use by the general public. It appears that based on the above stated requirements, the soil/diesel mixture will probably be eligible for reuse in Granite Constructions asphalting 'process. Advanced F, nvir~nmental Concept~ Inc. recommends testing the soil from the diesel excavation and the soil from the waste oil excavation for corrosivity, ignitability, toxicity (heavy metsl.), and reactivity. ~f the analytical results appear favorable, present our recommendations to Mr. Joe C~ns~. Kern County Environmental Health for final approval. AEC is pleased to have the opportunity of helping you with this environmental concern. Should you have any additional questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at (805) Sincerely, ' /'." t"..,- " '~ '4 O:~ CALi~'O?'' ° ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400ASHE ROAD. e206 · BAKERSFIELD. CAg3313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-177i ............. GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street. Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield. CA 933~1 (805) 861-3502 .~~~ Telephone (805) 861-3636 STEVE McCALLEY .' ~/,~ .~,~_ Telocopler (805) 881-3429 m-~,o, R E'SOU R C E ~~~'~:" NT AG EN CY DIE" AR T~~MENTAL Hay 7, 1990 Marty'Berchtold Berchtold Equipment Corp. ....... 330 E.~ lgth Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Re: Results of the Site Characterization and Mitigation Actions Proposed. Dear Mr. Berchtold: This Department has completed the review of the site characterization results for the Berchtold Equipment Company, located at 330 East 19th Street, in Bakersfield, California. The results indicate that hydrocarbon contamination is confined to a depth of approximately thirty feet and a lateral~ limit of about forty feet. Your contractor has recommended that excavation and disposal or microbial treatment be pursued as a method of mitigating the contaminated area. Other mitigation actions which should be investigated include "no action" and removal of diesel contaminated soil for asphalt formulation. Each of the two suggested mitigation actions would require a workplan addressing the requirements in UT-35 Site Characterization and Site Remediation Manual. The "no action" alternative can only be considered after confirmation that groundwater will not be impacted and the exposure risk to the public is minimal. The evaluation on whether removal of contaminated soil for asphalt formulation will be accepted is based primarily on acceptance into a asphalt formulation facility. Should you have any questions regarding this notice, I may be contacted at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, ./'Joe Canas Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program JC:cd ...... cc.: ...... jonathan Buck canas\berchtol.let -ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC' . ap g zg, z990 l~rll Coonty l~,nvironmental ~ ~~nt 2~00 "M" ~eet · ~ ]e~e~ ~ ~ ~e~ o~ ~s~oa coace~ ~e dep~ ~ ~" ~ st ~e ~~ ~pmeat ~ ~' ~ G~o~dwa~ was eacou~te~ed ~t app~o~te]y 6~-feet below ~e ]eve] at ~ ~. ~o~e~ ~ ~t ~ ~ve ~sc~se8 ~ o~e~ co~~ ~ ~e ~ ~ ~t ao~ of ~ ~ ~oa~b [ ~ve aot pemon-117 worked at thl, ~, ~ ~de~nd th*t ¢o~dw~ ~pp~m-te]~ 80-feet be]~ ~e level ] do ~ot ~ve i~o~Qoa do~e~Q~8 ~e aq~e~ ~ess, ~e~ ~ea~ o~ ~ other ~te~ p~ete~, boweve~, ~e ~ossib~ e~ ~t ~e ~~ sJ~e. ~ ~oa ~ve ~ccess Lo docamea~Qoa coace~8 ~ wste~-be~ ~oae, ~ wo~d app~ecia~ it ~e~ much ff ~s ~o~Qoa co~d be s~ed, ~ it wo~d be]p immense]~ d~ ~Te ~oe, ~o~ ~e co~e~ co~ce~ ~e e~mated volume of ~p~d soQ p~o~ ~ ~Z. It shoed ~ead Z~' ~ 6' ~ 6' = ~0-cubic feet o~ 20-cubic ~. Z apo]o~e fo~ ~s e~o~ ~d hope iaco~ve~eace. ~ou bare ad~Qo~ cornmeal, o~ ~eq~e mo~e i~o~Qoa, piece do aot besiate to coaa~ ou~ o~ce Jon~th"n k Bu~ '~" ~ C~o~ ~e~ered ~n~ronmen~ ~e~or ~0~ · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS ~NITH OESIGN IN MIND · 4400ASHEqOA© #206 ~AKER?,FIELE") C,,,'~ !L'-~3;:~80,5/831 'i6,~6 · FAX 805/831-1771 ~ 7/~ -~ ~./' '~ I ~ ~ // .~ // ~ ~ ~(~ ~ ~GI ~ f ~ ~ , MONTE VIST~ ~'DR/ / ~/' I ~ I r GILMORc AV/ // ~ J ~~ :~ ~ e/U~ t~nOST <l~-u ~' ~ "' ' "~~'t I' z ~ ~ / ~' ~ 0 s~ ST , < ' I ~z- iRAN< ~M ~ , '.. % z ~ < ~ [B' ' ' SO. ~ .~E/_~[~/~¢,~ % I~ 26TH!I · ST ~ ~S~,%~ ~ ~ ".~'~ l , ,~ .~ , / ~a~ ~, /~r ~ ~ ~ al24 :H~ ST i ~: ~ ~ [ J ~ ~{~t~] ~I~/ ~' .~ 8 .. ~,,,,,, ;,, o,*.~,,T ~1. .. , ,..~ ,iN~ i ~l:a ~i_ .~._. i ;. r. EE.~; ~ ~ ~[~ I - 3.0 ~ ~: ~ sz i 3.~ST ' ~ 3.o ~ ~ o :~ ~ ~Y~ ~! ~ O. ~ UlSANK, ~ =J ~i OI ST I ~' J ANKST I -',/ : ~lg ~1~1~ ~l~ L~ J~~ &AV~ z J J [ z ~ EGGERSk. ST ; ~ : ~ oJ ,5~1 P ~ J ~l ~ ~. J.~ I < > ~ ~ ~ : w ~./ ..... -- O LLOYD 3 ~ ~ /APACHE AV TE~RAC~ ~ 'I I ' ' ' 5 ' DR ~ BRAVE AV I , ~ O CL~E~NO ~ LESTEI ~ m ST ~ 0 ~ .'" ~ - '- =... III,,o,,..~~ ~': "' , "o~ o"'.p~ s ,, ~ '~' ,. "'- '"'*"'~' ~.~ ,, ,,, ·,. ~ . ~', ~ :,~/' ., ~ '- ~ .,~-~..~' ~ '- ~ '?~:'?"~'::~'~':~"~"" __-- .~,~,~..:~,:~;'.'~.~:.,.,_. .. ~ ~ ~' , ,,~'~C . ~~o ~ ~om -.~ls~ SQUIRE ~ - ; ~ ~ OR ~' i ~ ~ DR ~ ' -- ~' t :'~.~:['i:~q~L%~'~ , ,. - ~ ~ , -. '- t, ~ ................ · .............. "' I~' ..... · ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SITE A~SESS~ Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. underground storage tank, (2) tile location of the removed 6,000-gaHon g~sollne underground storage tank and (3) the location of the removed 550-gallon waste oil underground storage tank. The soil profde at the site consists of a brown silt (iL) from grade level to a depth of 15- feet· The sand content and level of induration increases with depth. From IS-feet to 23-feet a white, brown, unconsolidated, medium to coarse grained sand (SW) was logged. A silty sand (SM) was logged from 23-feet to 25-feet at which point a brown, semi compact, slightly clayey slit (ML) was observed to 32-feet. An unconsolidated, medium to coarse grained sand (SP) lens was logged to 37-feet at which point another brown, moderately compact, silt (iL'L) was identified. At 45-feet, total vertical depth of this investigation, a brown, compact, silty clay (CL) was logged. 6.2 Extent of Hydrocar~ Migration Borings B-l, B-2 and B-3 were located to assess the lateral and vertical migration of diesel range hydrocarbons proximal to the removed diesel tank. B-I was drilled through the assumed center of the diesel plume. Backfdl material was encountered to a depth of 16-feet. The backfdl and native soil had a distinct diesel odor which continued to a vertical depth of 30-feet. Photoionization detector (PI_D) readings indicated elevated levels of hydrocarbons coinciding with the malodorous intervals. B-2 and B-3 were sited 12-feet east and 8-feet south of B-1 to define the lateral extent of the diesel migration. B-2 and B-3 were sampled in native soil at intervals of 5-feet, beginning at 5-feet BGL. No odor or hydroc.arbon concentrations (PID) were detected until the 25-foot level was reached, at wlfich point a very faint odor was detected in 1]-2 (did not register on the PI_D) and at this level (25-foot) a strong odor was encountered in B-3. The ensuing samples that were collected in B-2 and B-3 exhibited no odor and did not register on the PID. SMC l-~horatory results indicate that the diesel plume has migrated to a vertical depth of 30-feet BGL and has extended radially a distance of approximately 15-feet from B-1. The diesel plume has migrated radially from it's source, through a permeable sand lens located at 25-feet BGL. It appears that the silt encountered at 28-feet BGL has temporarily impeded the vertical migration of the diesel fuel, however, it has also acted as a pathway for the lateral movement (Appendix C). The volume of diesel impacted soil relative to B-1 is approximately 30' x 6' x 6' = 1,080-cubic feet or 40-cubic yards and the volume of impacted soil relative to B-2 and B-3 is 15' x 15' x 5' = 1,125-cubic feet or 42-cubic yardz. B-4 was drilled through the suspected center of the gasoline plume discharged from the underground storage tank previously located in tile alley. Backfdl material was identified to a depth of 13-feet. The bac{d'dl and native soil had a "varnlsh-Hke" odor, commonly associated with degraded gasoline, to a vertical depth of 25-feet BGL. PID results indicated elevated levels of hydrocarbons to a depth of 20-feet, however, 8M(Z l-~horatory results indicate non-detectable levels at 15-feet, 25-feet and 35-feet BGL. The conclusion for the lack of correlation between the PID readings and the in-house laboratory results is a reflection of the degraded nature of the gasoline constituents. The g-asol}ne impacted soil appears to be conl'med to the eastern limits of the excavation and has, primarily, impacted the backfdl material. The volume of gasoline impacted soil relative to B-4 is approximately 13' x 5' x 5' = 325-cubic feet or 12-cubic yards. · 5 ENVIrlONMENfAL CONCEPfS Wilt{ DESIGN IN MIND ' 4,100 ^SHE ROAD ~206 BAKE~.qVIF. LD C'A03313 BOS/R31-1'¢4'8 FAX PI05/1~,3'1-1771 · ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC' Berchtold Equipment Cam~ 330 East 19th Street C, ounty of F~ra . Bakersfield, C, aliforaia report ha~ been prepared for:. RWL EQUIPMENT and BE~HTOLD EQUIPMENT COMPANY --Mm'c.h 1990 · EFJVIIRONMEI',~'TAI._ CONCEPTS ',NITH OE~IGN IN MIIWD * 4400 A~HE ~O,A 0 ~t 206 BAF, E~?~Fi_FL © '~ ', 'FI'-~ ~ ~ '4l}5/R~ ~ - I E A6 FAX 80,5,831 - 1771 · TABLE OF CONTENTS Page, LO INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 BACKGROUND 1 3.0 ~ CHARA~C~ 2 3.1 Site Description 2 3.2 c oloo 2 3.3 Local Geology 3 3.4 HydroiDW 3 4,0 A,~5~~ AC"I'IV1TIF~ 3 4.2 De~nkamimd~n ~ 4 5.O ANALYTICAL RESTmTS 4 6.0 FEA~TRIL1Ty b'TUDY 4 6~. F.~tent of Hydrocarbon Mi~o~afion 5 6.3 Remedls~ Action Alternatives 6 7.0 RFf,~MMFAqDATION,~ 7 · 0 T,TMI~A~IONS 8 9.0 CLO~G 8 APPENDICI~: · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND 4400 ASHE ROAD, #206 " E~AKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-16a6 FAX 805/831,1771 LO INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a soil investigation, conducted by Advanced Environmental Concepts, I~ (AF_~, to determine the extent of hydrocarbon impaction resultin~ from the -nsuthorized discharge of product from a removed 10,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank, a removed 6,000-gallon gasoline underground storage t~,l~ (alley) and a removed 550-gallon waste oil underground storage tank (mslutenance shop). Ail tanks were located at the BmT3~ld Equipment Comps~ F~, 3S0 East This soil investigation was authorized by Mr. E. G. Be~h~d and performed under the direct supervision of Mr. Joe Canas, tts~lous Mater~h Sp~i~i/st, K~n County Euvlr~mnental Health Departmenk The site characterization was performed on February 28, 1990, in accordance with the Kern .County approved work plav~ designed and submitted by AEC. The subject site is located in the east-central portion of Bakersfield, Californi~ This locale consists primsdly of industrial and light commer~is! properties (Fixture 1). Contained in this report is background information regarding existing site ~bsmcteristics, regional and local hydrogeological profiles and the project history. Also included in the following sections are the objectives and investigational scope, detailed investigative procedures and subsequent findings..Finally, AEC provides an evaluation of said find~,~os and msl~es related conclusions and recommendations. The report appendices contain soil boring logs (Appendix A), ChsiB-of-Custody documentation/analytical results (Appendix B) and cross-sections depicting the horizontal and vertical extent of the hydrocarbon impaction (Appendix C). 2.O BACKGROUND On or about November 17, 1989 RLW Equipment was contracted by Berchtold Equipment Company to excavate, transport and dispose of four (4) underground fuel storage tanks, dispensers and associated plumbing from the facility located at 330 East 19th Street, Bakersfield, Ca]iforn/a Two (2) soil samples were collected at vertical depths of 2-feet and 6-feet from beneath the ends of the removed gasoline and diesel tanks, beneath the center of the removed waste oil tank and below the removed dispensers. The collected soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), volatile aromatics .(BTXE), Oil & Grease, Total Lead and TOX. Results of the laboratory analyses are s~mmsrized in the following table (units are in mg/kg): Sm~ple [ TP~--G TPH-D Benzene Toluene X¥1ene Eth¥1benzene Oil/Grease lead NW Gas 2 · ND ND ND ND ND NW ~as 6' ND ND ND ND ND SW Gas 2' ND ND ND ND ND SW Gas 6' ND ND ND ND ND SE Dsl 2' 7270 .75 .79 5.03 1.41 SE Dsl 6' 2710 .10 .12 2.06 .49 NE D~i 2 ' ND ND ND ND ND NE Dsl 6' ND ND ND ND ND Alley Gas 2' 13,091 5.47 232 2320 309 Alley Gas 6' ND ND ND ND ND Alley Gas 2' ND ND ND ND ND Alley Gas 6 ' ND ND ND ND ND W/O @ 2' ND ND ND W/O @ 6' ..... - ........... 94, ND . ND 1 - ENVIRONMENTAL ~ONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MINE) · 4400 ASHE ROAD. $206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 Sa',w~le J T~H..-~ TPH-D Benzene Toluene X¥[ene R'~hyLbenzene Oi.1/Grea~e L~ad TOX Dsl disp. 2' 16.3 ND .07 .27 .03 Dsl disp. 6' 13.6 ND ND .05 ND GaS disp. 2' ND ND ND .30 .02 Gas disp. 6' ND ND ND ND ND The analytical results indicated concentration levels for diesel, gasoline and oil & grease that exceed recommended action levels for hydrocarbons in soil, as established by the Depara-ent of Health Services 3.0 ~'TE CHARA~CS The following sections summarize the project site features and conditions along with regional and local geological and hydrological ch_~mcteristics. The Berchtold Equipment Fm~'lity is sited on the north side of East 19th Street appro~m-tely 1/4-mile east of Un/on Avenue in the County of Kern, Bakersfield, Californ/a On-site improvements include a single story br/ck office/maintenance shop structure and equipment storage yards which occupy surrounding lots. On or about November 17, 1989, four (4) underground fuel storage tanks, dispensers and associated plumbing were removed from said property by RLW EqtfipmenL The tanks were located as follows: (a) one (1) 10,000-gallon gasoline and one (1) 10,000-gallon diesel, aligned north-south and plumbed into an east-west trending dispenser island, were located in the earth moving equipment storage yard, due east of the office buildin~ Co) one (1) 6,000-gallon gasoline tank was removed from the alley (east-west alignment) located north of the above described storage yard; and (c) one (1) 5§0-galion waste oil tank was removed from the west side of the shop building. The subject property is located in the Southern San Joaquin Valley (Valley), which is a part of the Central Valley of Califomim The Valley forms the southern two-thirds of the Central Valley and is characterized as a broad structural trough. It is bordered on the east by the Sierra Nevada Range and on the west by the Coast Range (Diablo and Temblor Mountains). The Valley extends 250-miles southeastward from the confluence of the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers to the Tehachapi and San Emigdio Mountains. The width ranges from 25- miles wide near the Kern River, to apprwrimately 55-miles wide near the Kings River, with an approximate average width of 40-miles. Geology of the southern Valley consists of a Pre-Tertiary basement complex overlain by marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks of Tertiary age. These rocks are composed of consolidated sandstones, siltstones and shales which thicken from northeast to southwest. The Valley used to be an inland sea of comparatively shallow depth that continued to subside due to the ever increasing load of sediments transported and deposited from higher elevations. These deposits 2 o ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ' 4400ASHEROAO #206 ° BAKERSFIELD. CAg3313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 consist of gravels, sands, silts and clays. The majority of the groundwater pumped from the Valley floor occurs within these relatively unconsolidated continental deposits. 3.3 Local Geology _ The investigated property is sited on a large alluvial fan, created from sediments transported and deposited by the Kern River, and is situated in a low-energy flood plain environment consisting of weakly consolidated to unconsolidated, poorly bedded sands, silts and silty clays. The site is located in the K~_~ County Water Age~y lm.,~o~uent Distriffa Kern River water is re~:_b-~ged to groundwater by (a) deliberate spreading in ree_hArge areas, (b) losses in unlined canals or (c) by percolation in the Kern River Chsnnel_ Current depth to groundwater is appro~m-~ely 215-feet and the hydraulic gradient appears to be to the southeast. "Perched" groundwater was not encountered during the drilling operation and it is estimsted at depths greater than 50-feet. 4.0 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES On February 28, 1990, four (4) soft borings were drilled on the subject property, positioned to define the lateral and vertical miooration of diesel and gasoline in the subsurface (Figure 2). Concurrently with the soil borings, a backhoe, then hand auger, were used to excavate soil in the location of the former waste oil tank to assess the vertical miooration of waste oll and associated by-products. The borings were advanced using a truck-mounted Mobile B-64 drill rig, equipped with 8-inch O.D. continuous flight, hollow-stem augers. Boring B~4 was drilled at the eastern end of the gasoline tank located in the alley, to assess the vertical extent of gasoline migration in the subsurface; boring B-1 was drilled through the south end of the diesel tank and was positioned to determine the vertical extent of diesel toleration; boring B-2 was located 12-feet northeast of B-1 and boring B-3 was positioned 8-feet east of B-L Soil samples were collected at intervals of 5-feet, generally commencing at 5-feet below grade level (BGL), with the exception of B-1 and B-4 which were located above 15-feet of backfill material. Samples were obtained by driving a thin-walled steel sampler, equipped with three (3) 2 1/2-inch x 6-inch brass sleeves, a minimum of 18-inches into previously undisturbed soil. The sampler was driven ahead of the augers using a 140-1b. slide h~mmer with a 30-inch vertical fall. After each sampling interval, the sampler was extracted from the bore-hole and the three (3) brass sleeves were removed. The bottom sleeve was retained for laboratory analysis and prepared by placing teflon tape and plastic caps over each end, then securing the caps with duct tape. The samples were labeled, placed in sealable pl~stic bags, recorded on Chain-of-Custody records and placed in an ice chest cooled with dry ice. Soil exposed at each end of the center brass sleeve and the cuttings, were er~mlued for lithological purposes and any obvious hydrocarbon impaction. IAthologic descriptions were logged according to the Unified 3 ° ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ' 4400ASHEROAO.#206 " E~AKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 ALTERNATIVE #~ Excavation, transportation and disposal to a State permitted facility would involve physically removing the soils containing hydrocarbons in excess of the EAL, and disposing of them, under msnifest, at an approved landfill This alternative is feasible, due to the fact that the con~mluated soil is accessible by the heavy equipment stored on-site, and this is the most expeditious method of site mitigation. The negative aspects of this alternative are (1) the disposal costs (approximately $200.00/c~ yd.) and (2) the responsibility for the soil is that of the generator, if the landfill is required to mitigate it's hA~.~dons wastes. The short term and long term risks to humsn health and the environment is negated because the source of any future environmental concern has been completely removed from the site. However, the disposed of soil is compounding the current environmental concerns that exist at the State Certified Landfills. ALTERNATIVE #3: Bioremediation involves either treating the impacted soil aboveground or in-situ. The aboveground treatment alternative is more time et~cient and effective than the in-situ method, however, this discussion win center on both alternatives. In the above,round treatment the soil is excavated and spread inside a bermed area to a uniform thickness of between one (1) and three (3) feet, primarily to ~e soil oxygenization and homogeneous dispersion of the microbes and nutrienta A microbe/nutrient/water mixture is applied to the soil at specific intervals then mi~ed by use of a tractor or rototiller. A monitoring program is then implemented to chart the degradation progress of the contaminants. The treatment system consists of a hydraulic delivery system and the holding/~n4~ tanks. The in-situ treatment method invoIves applying the microbes/nutrients to the contaminated soil via injection wells screened in the con~2rnlnsted intervals. A mixing tank is placed above the well and hydrostatic head pressure would allow continual percolation of biologically active material through the contnmlnated zones. NOTE: The soil type (sand) found on-site is very conducive to either an aboveground or in- situ treatment program. Obviously the aboveground system would treat the soil much faster th~n an in-situ system, however, the in-situ system would not impede business operations due to space constraints. Both treatment methods are suppose to achieve non-detectable levels in hydrocarbon concentrations. The cost for an in-situ or aboveground bioremediation treatment is based on volume and is quoted at a price/cu, yd. rate. If the volume of impacted soil is between 300-cu. yds. and 1,000- cu~ yds. the average price is $125.00/cu~ yd. and decreases as the volume of soil increases. 7.0 RECOMME.~ATIONS Due to the elevated levels of hydrocarbons found in the soil proximal to the former diesel and waste oil tank locations, Advanced Falvironm~-ntai ~glgep~ II~ recommends that Bemhtold Equipment Company choose either the excavation and disposal alternative or a microbial treatment. 7 o ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ° 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 E~AKERSFIELD, CA 93313 805/831'1646 FAX 805/831'1771 ENVIRO~NTAL Srl~ ASSESS~NT Advanced F~v4onmental Concepts, Inc. 8.O LIMITATIONS This work has been performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental science and en~neering practices. Conclusions and recommendations are based upon information co]]ected and compiled during this investi~tiorc No other warranty, expressed or implied, is giverc 9.0 C~OSING Advanced Euv4onme~xtal Concepta, ~ appreciates the opportunity to ~ of se~ ~ ~W ~t ~d ~~ ~~ ~ on ~ proj~. ~ there ~o~d ~ ~y que~o~ or ad~o~ ~o~ion r~ed re~ ~ repo~ pl~ do not h~i~te ~ ~n~ o~ o~ ~ (~ ~1- 1~. ~ En~o~en~ Site ~es~ent ~ been pre~ed b~ ' ~v~ ~m~l ~ 8 °ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND 4a00 ASHE ROAD. #206 BAKERSFIELD. CA 93,313 805/831-1646 FAX 805/831-1771 , . . .:.: .- .. ~y,'~ .?;.'; · . -: ;.; :' ;" ..... ~ z i . ":' " '" ' ' ' ' ',: .... ';.- '. .~.' -.: ; .,- . . _. .:..~... .-. :,. ._ 2., .~ ..',. · ...:;, ,: ..,.~/': ,. .., .. .. .:.:. .... ./.%, ..... -,. : · .. ., ~ .' : . ._.;; · ... - .; ' _ ; , . · *' . . -- . . ..... . ..... · .,. ~?.. -- -.?... ,...? .... - .; . : ..:,.;;''/. ~:, -: ..."~._ -. ..... .:;._., . - .' i ; ;' .~;'..,;: ........ "' '". "'" ;:v ". : - - ' .. - ~"', ,;. ',; -*... ,i ""-'";'c. · *' ;" ,' " '" ~" ''~'' -* . · . . .,: . '.;.', . , .;_;:'.-/- ,.;. .; .' .,, - . :. ;; .... .' _.' , : - ......,.: -, ,. - , .; . · : ,- -~.... ..,. ,,..~:. ~, ,.: .......",,,'*,~;, · . . , ~ .;. .-..:.. .~-..,. . ....... . . ~ .. - ;';.._ :: _ . ._ -. * ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · t 4400ASHE. F~OA[~.#20§ * BAKERSFIELD. CACJ3313 · 8051831-1641~ * FAX 805/B3~-1771 CONMTRUCTION ~. PID m ~ ~' c~ SOU, DESCIIIPTION I. ' (pm) , , , , ,, , " 3 I 4 L l'> L " 'i' .... SAND: White, brown, unc°ns01idat~,~. 28o 1~ --33--- .... · (SW) med to coarse grained, sl 21 ~ · · moist, mod diesel odor ., · .L____ .... ~t ] Lol,~ffed liy: I Buck Total Depth: 45' reel, [fS.porvL~ed Ily: Pate t)ri~led: .... 2/27/90 to - -]l)inmel:er o!' 11o~ ' |Water l~nemmtered: feet ' Acivnneed lgnvironmentni Uoneep[% Inc. NAME: Borchtold Fza~Snrnt-nt ..... 4400 Ashe Road ff:~00 811'g: 330 E. 10th 'Street PLNI'E Bakersfield, cMirornia D38 IH Bakersfield. California Project Number: 90P19 Log of Bo ri.ag !Page of I III J I I I I I I CONSTRUCTION PID ~ MOll. DESCRIPTION _ ~ . (~) mod sandy, no moisture, mod .. diesel odor- 13 ~ SILT: Bro~. gray, s~ co~act~ 626 18 ~ . . (CL) sl clavey~ no moisture. : diesel ~or 5 22 35 S~: ~ite-bro~. unconsolidat~ ~ t moistur~ 7 sl diosol ~or ~ SILT: Rro~. m~ c~n~et_ (CL) c]aF~ no moisture, no ~or 0 28 ~ ,.. __ C~Y: Bro~, c~pact, sl silty, 8.rface Elevation: ~t [ Lo,ed ~y: J. Buck To~ Depth: 45' ~ee~ I S.porvlsed By: Date Drilled: 2/27/90 to ....... inches ..... Dinmeter of Ro~: ~ : 8,, I Wa[er B.eouR[ered: ~ee[ Adv~eed gnvironmen~ Co.eept~, lne. NA~B: Berchtold Equi~ent dd00 ~she Road ff~0~ 81TB: 330 E. i9th Street PLATB Proj~[ N~ber: ~0P19 L o g o f ~ o r i n g P~e I I I I I ~ ] . SILT. Bro~, sl consolidate, v ~ ~ ~ . (~) sl sandy, no moisture, no ~ . ' ~or 5 ~ J ' - SILT: Bro.-tan, si'consolidate. ~__~ J .'}--,.~ . (~) v sl sandy, no moisture, nc ~ ~ .' . ~or -~ -t I SILT: Bro.-tan. smi compact, s~ ~ J I . no ~o~ " ' D I I' ' ~7 I' I · 17 ~ : ' i~_~ . 16~ . . -0- 27 ~ ~ . ~ ~- j . ...S~LW S~ (SM) 24 Il -- 8.rfnc~ glevntion:~e --~.~ 1- Lo~d liy: J. Buck ...... -"' .... Date Drmed: ...... 2/27756 7 ~ .= J Diameter or l~.rin~ ' 8" ' '- i,,el,es - . J W~ter ~llcoolltered: reef Adv~eed gnvironmen~ goneept~, Inc. NAMe: .BerchCo~d Equ~enC 4400 ~he Rond ~0~ 81Tg: 330 E. ~9~h S~ee~ PhA'I'~ D~er~field, C~ErornJn gB~l~ Bake~sE~e~d~ ~ B-2 Proj~tN~ber: ~0P19 Log of Bo ring ['age of III, I I I Ill II CONSTRUCTION PID !eft ~d' 8OI!, DESCRIPTION 17 ~ ~ -0- 2~~ SILT: Bro.-tan. sl eonsolidnt~, 27 · (~) slv fine grained s~nd. no __ moisture.r.,~o odor 17 ~ ~__ '-; 25 ~ SILT: Bro~. tmn. mmd cmmnmc~_ si Surface ElevatiOn: ~t Lo.ed By: J. Buck To~ Depth: 30' feet .[ S.pervlsed By: ...... Date Dr~led: .... 2/27/90 to Diameter or Bo~g: ~ 7 8" inches / Water Encountered: feet Advanced Environmen~ Concepts, Inc. NAME: Berchtold Eoui~ent 4400 A~he Road ~20~ 8rl'E: 330 E. 19th Street P~TM Bakersfield, California g8818 Bakersfield, ~lifo~ia B-2 Proj<tNmber: ~0P19 Log of Boring I've of I I WELL ..bo~-to~, CONSTRUCTION PiD - ~.. ca I I ! SILT: Brown. mod compact, $l sand : .~ML) no moisture, no odor . · SAND: White, brown, unconsolidate -0- · . (SP) med to coarse grained, no 17 moisture, no odor 22 · SAND: White, brown, unconsolidate. 26 ' · ._(SP med to coarse rained no -0- 34 i · moisture, no odor S.r£ace F~levntion: ~'h'Jet I- LoRged Il.v: J. Buck TotId Depth: 35' feet ~,porv{.~ed By: Date Drilled: ' 2/27/90 to " ',~, I)inmeter of {]ori.g~ ...... ~" inehe~ Writer Encountered: feet Adv~ced ~nvironmen~ Coneept~, Inc. ~AME:.Berchtold ~ui~ent 4400 ~he Rend ~206 SITE: 330 E. 19th' Street PLATE Proj~t~mber: ~0P19 Log o[ Boring Page o[ Soils Classification System (USCS) and Chain-of-Custody documentation was followed to ensure ~mple integrity and traceability. Upon completion of the above described procedures, the four (4) borings were backfined to grade with a cement/gel mix. The cuttings generated from the soll borings were contained in DOT approved 55-gallon drums that were labeled with (a) project name, (b) boring and footage of cuttings, (c) date, and (d) sampler/company. Prior to commencing drilling operations, the augers and associated drilling equipment was thoroughly cleansed, using a high pressure steam cleaner. The rinseate was transferred to DOT approved 55-gailon ch-,ms. In addition, the soil sampler and hand auger were washed in an Alconox solution and rinsed with deionized water (prior to initial use and between each sampling intemral) to preclude the possibility of cross-contamination between samples. 5.0 ANALYTI~ RE,.qULT~ Soil sample analyses were performed by SMC I~homtol~ to determine the presence and concentration level of diesel and gasoline range hydrocarbons, Oil/Grease and TOX at the subject ~te. The results are tabulated below .(units are mg/k~ and can be found in (Appendix B). Sample ~D TPH-G TPH-D Benzene Toluene X¥1ene g~h¥1benzene Oil/Grea~e Tox B-1 @ 20' 9300 0.33 0.48 5.1 ND B-1 @ 30' 32000 13,0 7.6 31.3 ND B-1 @ 40' ND ND ND ND ND B-2 @ 20' ND ND ND ND ND B-2 @ 25' 400 ND ND ND ND B-2 @ 30' ND ND ND ND ND B-3 @ 25' 14000 0.64 0.27 8.9 ND B-3 @ 30' ND ND ND ND ND B-3 @ 35' ND ND ND ND ND B-4 @ 15' ND ND ND ND ND B-4 @ 25' ND ND ND ND ND , B-4 @ 35' ND ND ND ND ND W/O @ 19' ND ND ND ND ND W/O @ 15' ND 20 W/O @ 19' ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND W/O Spoils 220 ND ND ND ND 1600 6~0 FEASIBILITY~Y 6.1 Sol]sPrbfile Three (3) areas of the s~bject property were investigated for hydrocarbon impaction at the Berchtold Equipment Fac~. (1) the location of the previously removed 10,000-gallon diesel 4 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ' 4400 ASHE ROAD.#206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1640 · FAX S05/831-1771 ~1~1~*~ ~r'l~E .~.~SESS]~ENT .thl~vallced Envh-onmental Concepts, Inc. underground storage tank, (2) the location of the removed 6,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank and (3) the location of the removed 550-gallon waste oil underground storage The soil profile at the site consists of a brown silt CMIO from grade level to a depth of 15- feet. The sand content and level of induration increases with depth. From 15-feet to 23-feet a white, brown, unconsolidated, medium to coarse grained sand (SW) was logged~ A silty sand (SM) was logged from 23-feet to 25-feet at which point a brown, semi compact, slightly clayey silt (MI.) was observed to 32-feet. An unconsolidated, .medium to coarse grained sand (SP) lens was logged to 37-feet at which point another brown, moderately compact, silt (CL) was identified. At 45-feet, total vertical depth of this investigation, a brown, compact, silty clay (CL) was loggecL 6~ Extent ~f Hydr~arbon ~ Borings B-l, B-2 and B-3 were located to assess the lateral and vertical mi~o~-at/on of diesel range hydroc/~rb0ns pro~mgi to the removed diesel tank. B-1 was drilled through the assumed center of the diesel plume. Backfill material was encountered to a depth of 16-feet. The backfill and native soil had a distinct diesel odor which continued to a vertical depth of 80-feet. Photoionization detector (PID)readings indicated elevated levels of hydrocarbons coinc/r]inE with the m~odorous intervals. B-2 and B-3 were sited 12-feet east and 8~feet south of B-1 to define the lateral extent of the diesel migratiorL B-2 and B-3 were sampled in native soil at intervals .of 5-feet, beginning at §-feet BGL. No odor or hydrocarbon concentrations (PID) were detected until the 2§-foot level was reached, at which point a very faint odor was detected in B-2 (did not register on the PID) and at this level (25-foot) a strong odor was encountered in B-3. The ensuing samples that were collected in B-2 and B-3 exhibited no odor and did not re~/ster on the P~D. SMC T~horatory results indicate that the diesel plume has m/grated to a vertical depth of 80-feet BGL and has extended radially a distance of appro~mstely 16-feet from B-1. The diesel plume has mlg~ated radially from it's source, through a permeable sand lens located at 25-feet BGL. It appears that the silt encountered at 28-feet BGL has temporar/ly impeded the vertical migration of the diesel fuel, however, it has also acted as a pathway for the lateral movement (Append/x C). The volume of diesel impacted soil relative to B-1 is appro~/mately 30' x 6' x 6' = 1,080-cubic feet or 40~ubic yards and the volume of impacted soil relative to B-2 and B-3 is 15' x 15' x 5' = 1,125-cubic feet or 42-cubic yards. B-4 was dril/ed through the suspected center of the gasoline plume disc_h~rged from the underground storage tank previously located in the alley. Backfill material was identified to a depth of 13-feet. The backt'fll and native soil had a "varnish-like" odor, commonly associated with degraded gasoline, to a vertical depth of 26-feet BGL. PID results indicated elevated levels of hydrocarbons to a depth of 20-feet, however, SMC Laboratory results indicate non-detectable levels at 15-feet, 25-feet and 36-feet BGL. The conclusion for the lack of correlation between the PID readings and the in-house laboratory results is a reflection of the degraded nature of the gasoline constituents. The g~soline impacted soil appears to be cont'med to the eastern limits of the excavation and has, primarily, impacted the backfill mater/al. The volume ~of gasoline impacted soil relative to B-4 is appro~m~tely 13' x 6' x 6'.= ~26-cubic feet or 12-cubic yards. ............. .~_,.~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ 5 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DEStGN IN MIND ~ 4400ASHEROAQ #206 BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646' ' FAX 805/~31-1771 Increasing concentrations of Oil & Grease (with depth) in the waste oil ex~vation prompted a more thorough investigation. The open-air canopy, covering the area where the waste oil tank was previously located, negated the use of a drill rig for obtaining samples, thus a backhoe with an 18-foot reach was'utilized to excavate the soil to a depth of 14-feet and 18-feet, at which point a hand auger was used to' obtain undisturbed soil samples:.' .,.,.~..~..?- ,, ~ . . S~C ].,alx~z~,,or~ z~ml:~ical, res~ for Oil & Crease, T~-~..~oli~e and ]~ ina~cate non- detectable levels at 15-feet and 19-feet BGL. TOX is 20 rog/kg at 15-feet and non-detected at 19-feet. A composite satnple was collected from the waste oil spoils pile and the results indicate 1600 rog/kg Oil & Grease, 220 mg/kg TPH-diesel and the aromatic constituents were non- detected. The soil surrotmding the removed waste off t~nlr is ej:Leemely~sandjt..and appears to be backfill The spoils pile consisted of excavated soil from-grade level to 14-f..e~t. ~therefore, that is the projected volume of impacted soil. :: ........................... ~[~.~ ~-~ ' The volume of Oil & Grease impacted soil relative to the excavation around the former waste off tank is approximately 14' x 10' x 10'.= 1400-cubic feet or 52-cubic yards. 6.3 · ~! Action Alternatives ~ ~nvironme~/aI Cancepts, Inc. recommends the following three (3) remedial alternatives for the hydrocarbon contamination at the Berchtold F~Iuipment 1) No-action alternative; 2) Soil excavation, removal and transportation to a permitted disposal facility; and 3) Bioremediation of the impacted soil either in-situ or aboveground. ALTERNATIVE #1: The no-action remealsl alternative involves leaving the soils in-situ, that exhibit hydrocarbon levels in excess of recommended action levels (BALL then capping the contaminated area with a relatively impermeable layer of asphalt or concrete. This alte,rnative would require approval of the Kern County gavi~onmental Health Department. To be eligible for this remediation alternative, the site location must satisfy specific parameters associated with depth to groundwater, site geology and contaminant concentration levels. It is not likely that the Berchtold Equipment Facility will be eligible for this alternative because the site does not satisfy the following criteria based on the "Leaching Potential Analysis-Diesel" as outlined in the LUFf Manuak ....... . ........... (a) Perched groundwater depth is estim-ted at 70'feet BGL (9 points) - tures a0 points) (c) Average annual precipitation is less the 10-inches (10 points) (d) No avail~ble man-made conduits (10 points) (e) Coarse grained soil (9 points) The site scores a total of 48 points which correlates to the following m~x'imum allowable levels of diesel-range hydrocarbons that can be left in place; 1,000-ppm and .3/.3/1/1 for TPH and BTXE constituents, respectively. Unfortunately, the hydrocarbon concentration levels exceed these proposed limits. 6 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WiTH DESIGN iN MINE) ' 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 ' BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-16a6 F,'~X 805/831-1771 CONSTRUCTION PID ~ wj SOll, DESCRIPTION 11 x ~ SILT: Bro~, sl compact, sl ~cderate !5 ~ .~ _ (S~) sandy/clayey,_ no moisture, 27 mod diesel ~or 22 ~ ~ '' SILT: Bro~ m~ cm~ct~ sl ~D 2~ ~ ~~ ~ (~) clayey, no moisture, no · diesel ~or 27 ~ 29 3S S~: ~ite, brom, mconsoiidatm · · (SP) m~ to coarse grained~ ~_ . moisture, no diesel A~ Surface Elevation: ~t Lo.ed By: J. Buck To~l Depth: 35' Feet S.pervised By: ...... Date Drilled: ........... 2/27/90 to .... Dimneter or B0ri. pg: 8" inches Water Encountered: Feet Advanced En~ronmen~ Concepts, Inc. N~E: Berchtold ~ui~ent 4400 ~he Road ff206 SITE: 330 E. 19th Street P~TE ~kersfield, CMifornJa 93313 Bakersfield, ~lifomia Proj~Nmber: ~0P19 Log o[. Boring Page WEL~ .aborato~ Fi. It CONSTRUCTION PID oj ~] SOIl, DESCRIPTION ,' , (P~) . . 5 ~ F L L F L . SILT: ~ bro~, s~ c~act. 1580 1 _~) sandy, stron~ ~asoHne ~or S~: Bro~. unconsolidated. 680 13 · (SW) to m~ ~rain~. no moisturP 20 no silt[ m~er~te gasoHne ' ' od0~ 15 · . S~D: Bro~ sl consolidate, v 1290 19 (SW) fine'to fine grain~, sl [ ' silty, no ~isture, m~ gasoline ~or --~ 12-~ ' ' - S.rface Elevation: 35" ~.t Lo~ed Iiy: J. Buck - Date DrOled: .......... 2/27/90' to II)in,net. er ~ Bnri,,~ ........... 8" ...... inches [ Water Encountered: feet Adv~eed Environmen~ Concepts, Inc. NAME: BerchLo~d Equ~enL 4400 Ashe Road f206 SITE:. 330 E. 19th Street PI~'I'E B~ers~eld, C~ifornln 9331~ .Bakersg~eld~ B-4 Proj~tN~ber: ~OP~9 Log of Bo ring · ~e of II I I I II I CONSTRUCTION PID ~d $O!!, DESCRIPTION " (pprn) ~ c~ I I I II 45 12 '' :20 '-'~ I 27 SAND: Brown-tan, semi commact, v ]~_t '' (SP)fine to fine ~raine~. sl to ~ __ mod silt. v s~ odor 20 ~ · :. 10 30 :n ~1~ - SILT: Dark brown, mod compact., ~ ~ (~) m~ Clayey~ no ~or mil -,, .,~ * ' S~: ~ bro~, unconsolidat~, 24~ , .~ no s~~__ grained, no ~or 4: F . Surface ~levation: Lo~ed lty: J. Buck To~ Depth: 35' Feet 8.per~ised 'Dn{e Dried: .......... 2/27/90 ~o ........... Diameter of Bori.~ 8" ...... inches Water Encountered: Feet Advanced En~ronmen~ Concepts, Inc. NAME: Rprahtnl~ Fn~ ~nr ~ 4400 ~he Road ~20~ SITE: X~O E. 1qth Srr~r P~TE ~ersfiel~ CMifor~a 93313 Bak~r~fi~ d, C~1 i Fn~i~ Proj<tN~ber: ~0P19 Log of Boring Page SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry Client Name: Advanced Environmental Concepts Address : 4400 Ashe Road, Suite 206 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date samples received : 02/27/90 Job Site: Berchtold Equip. Date analysis completed: 03/01/90 Date of report : Laboratory No. 664 through 687 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS # 665 ID: B-4~l§' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.! p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.! o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623 Laboratory No. 664 through 687 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS # 667 ID: B-4~25' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm. Benzene ND 0.1 _ Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 ,Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 # 669 ID: B-4~3§' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND· 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer ' Laboratory No. .664 through 687 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS # 677 ID: B-2~20' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 ~o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) ........ ND 10~ _. ....... . ...... . .... # 678 ID: B-2~25' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) 400 10 # 679 ID: B-2~30' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0,1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) ND 10 Method of Analysis for BTX: 3810/8020 (FID) Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm : micrograms per gram ND .: Not detected Laboratory,No. 664 through 687 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS # 670 ID: B-l~20 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene .33 0.1 Toluene .48 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND' 0.1 ~ p'Xylene 2.0 0.1 m-Xylene .1.7 0.1 o-Xylene 1.4 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 ~PH (Diesel) 9300 10 # 672 ID: B-l~30 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm - Benzene 13 0.1 ...... ' .... Toluene 7.6 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene 19 0.1 m-Xylene 14 0.1 o-Xylene 8.3 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) 32000 10 # 674 ID: B-l~40' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Eth¥1benzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) ND 10 Method of Analysis for BTX: 3810/8020 (FID) Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer Laboratory No. 664 through 687 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS # 680 ID: W/O~lS' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Oil and Grease ND' 20 TOX 20 20 681 ID: W/O~19' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.! Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 -~ p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Oil and Grease ND 20 TOX ND 20 682 ID: W/O Comp. Spoils Pile ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) 220 10 Oil and Grease 1600 20 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID) Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID) Method of Analysis for Oil and Grease: EPA 9071 Method of Analysis for TOX: 9020 MDL '= Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer Laborator~ No. 664 through 687 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS # 685 ID: B-3~25' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene .64 0.1 Toluene· _ .27 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene 3.9 0.1 m-Xylene 3.0 0.! o-Xylene 2.0 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 . ~ TPH (Diesel) 14000 10 -#. 686 ID: B-3~30' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm ' Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.! o-Xylene ND O.l Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) ND 10 # 687 ID: B-3~35' ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TPH (Diesel) ND 10 Method of Analysis for BTX: 3810/8020 (FID) Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Name Clmnt Pto/e(:t a ~, Page = Oomoany: Talle Company: aos~ ..... CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ~ 8C 1771 BAKE D. CA CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Dam ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ z ~r/~~ i i ~~, I ' F~ .-1~I ~ . .O. C) ] ~ ; ; -,,, - C~OSS-SECTIONS · ENVIRONMEN rAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400ASHEROAQ ~206 · BAKERSFIELD, CAg3313 · 8051831-1646 ° FAX 805/831-177! \ UnderlFound Sim'age Timl~ : J,:- u~~ s~~ ~-, ~'---~/ u~~ s~~ . -:.~ " ~o~)~"- ~ '_ . ~0~) __ ~ __~~, ~., EAST 19th STREET ....... _. '1 ~, - '- :' .j,. ,~ ,. / , . · Diesel 'Tank ' : i . -:.~- asOlin, Tank ., . I'-. .', .. _ --:.->:~-. ::~ _-~ ~o-.' - [] · [] : :'.": II[~" . .. .-~ . , . , -~. ~ ~ ~ _, , .' .... . · :.. .,'... ,., ! - · · .::'.": :'..?'! ::",:~: ,20 r ~ ' ~' 30' m m ND n~ .~. · . ~ ~ · ~ - . ~ ~ .... 40* ,;' ' ; ' , '. ,~ .. ": -' .' ~, ~ ..... ,;1: '.. ' ' ' ' ',~ .h ' ' ~ RANDALL L. ABBOt' 2700 M Street, SuP~e ~30 Agency Director Bakersfield. CA 933'- 1 (805) 861-3502 Telephone (805) 861-~.E~36 Telecopier (805) 861-3.t29 STEVE Mc CALLEY Di,e~ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES October 4, 1990 Steve Berchtold 230.East 19th Street Bakersfield., CA 93305 RE: Site Mitigation Workplan Approval Dear Mr. Berchtold.' This Department has completed the review of the site remediation workplan for your facility located at 330 East lgth Street in Bakersfield, California. The initial proposal for removal of diesel contaminated soil and introducing it into an asphalt formulation plant has been approved. Amore recent proposal has presented the idea of utilizing the excavated soil as backfill in another location. The excavated soil would be placed into a cement encased area with clean overfill. The second proposal addressed 'above is also an acceptable mitigation method for designated soil waste. The excavation should be performed in accordance with the excavation workplan prepared by your consultant American Environmental Concepts Inc. Please advise this office of your final mitigation decision. Should you have any question regarding this notice please do not hesitate to contact me at (805) 861-3636 extension 588. Sincerely ~/J~o~e Canas Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program JC.'cas \berchtld.ltr ~,ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC" 18 February1990 PROJECT:. # 90C19 K~_~n County F~v~onm~n*~l Health Depar~ Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 ~C Street, Suite 300 BakerSfield, California 93301 Attn: Mr. Joe Canas Dear Mr. I have received your review of the Berchtold Equitmaent Campany workpi~n and have made the necessary corrections per your letter dated February 15, 1990. Please find enclosed, for your approval, our revised "site plan" (borings B-4 and B-5 will be advanced to 25-feet below grade level and sampled at 5-foot intervals). Laboratory analyses for the gasoline tank will be TPH/BTX~. Please advise if you want 418.1, Total Lead and EP Tox for the waste oil tank~ The client has been informed that these are the normal analyses performed for waste oil. Should you have requirements different than those indicated or if you have any comments regarding the revision, please do not hesitate to contact this office at (805) 831-164~ Once again; thank you for your time and concern in this matter and I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, Jon.~l'.h~n T,_ Buck xPj~ject Hydrogeologist JLB:ja cc: RLW Equipment * ENVIRONMEFITA[ ~ON(~'EPr.~ /VITH DESiON I['J MIND ~mqollne T. nl~ 17lc:el 10' d~lT,18 d~15,18 __LEGEND Proposed i~orh,g ....................... · 8nmple Locntlons ~f~~L BF~RCIITOLD EQUIPMENT (JOMPANY ~ I ~ ~I~0 East 10th Street 2 GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Slreet, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakerlfleld, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 . ._o,........ Telephone (805) 861-3636 STEVE McCALLEY .,.,.' '"-. Telecopler (805) 861-$429 · "':' ~ i".:E N T Oi,ecto, R ESOU RC E ~ AG EN CY DEPART ."MENTAL February 15, 11190 jonathan Buck Advanced Environmental Concept Inc, 4400 Ashe Road #20§ Bakersfield, CA 93313 RE: Site Characterization Workplan for the Berchtold Equipment Company Facility Dear Mr. Buck: This Department has completed the review of the recently submitted site characterization workplan for the Berchtold Equipment Company, located at 330 East 19th Street in Bakersfield. The approval to proceed with implementation of the workplan will be granted upon receipt of your revised site plan. The site plan must be revised to include the agreement to perfo~ the two optional borings indicated. Other modifications required, included the moving of B-2 and B-3 so that they are staggered distances from Bo1. This will provide better data to effectively delineate the extent of contamination. Should you have any questions regarding the above matters, I may be contacted at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, e Canas Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program JC:cas \buck.ltr ~ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC~ SITE ASSESSM~.NT WORK PLAN 330 P~t 19th Street This work plan has been prepared for. RLW Equipment February 1990 · E~ V RONM~:NTA_ r.O¢' CEPTq NIT'H OESIGN IN MIND · 440CASH~OA~ ~??q.~. qqHr~'~' ~ /~ ~ '' g[)~,8':~' Ir.~.F' ¢~A~' ,HOf~ 8-~' 177~ ~ Env~onml~lf~. CoIll~pt~ ~ TARLE OF CONTENTS Page LO INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Scope of Work 1 1.3 Schedule i 2.0 SITE 'n'rSTORY 2 3.0 WORK PLAN 3.1 Boring Locations 3 3.2 Boring Methods 3 3.3 Soil Sampling 3 3.4 Soft Analyses 4 4.0 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND 4 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY P~L 5.0 REMA'a'KS / SIGNATURES 4 APPENDICES: (A) Maps: Site Location and Boring Location (B) Laboratory Analyses Report (C) Health and Safety Plan · F.N~VIF~ONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH [~E.qlCiN IN MINO · SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN Advised Env~nmental Concepts, LO , .n~FI~ODUCTION The following work plan describes the procedures necessary to investigate the lateral and vertical extent of possible soil contamination in an area below the removed east 10,000-gallon underground diesel storage tank operated by Bmmhtold Eq~pment Company. RLW F. al~pment (Client) has authorized Ad. meed Environmental Cm~cepta, Inc. (AEC) to prepare this work plan for a soil assessment to be performed at the at the following location (Appendix A): RE~IY)LD F~UIP~T YAt~D 330 Frost 19th Street Currently, the lead regulatory agency for this project is the K~ Co~mty F_m,h~mmo~! H~a~th L1 PURPOSE The proposed soil assessment investigation has the following objective: To assess the lateral and vertical extent of possible diesel migration in the vic~ity of the previously removed 10,000-gallon under~round diesel storage tank * 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of services described in this work plan includes: 1. Locating accessible underground utilities using Underground Services Alert (USA). 2. Augering three (3) soil borings to a depth of approximately 25-feet in the vicinity of the removed underground storage tank excavation (Appendix A). 3. Collecting soil samples at 5-foot intervals using a split spoon sampler lined with clean brass sleeves. The soil samples will be field screened using a Photoionization Detector (PI])) with a 10.2 eV lamp. Selected samples will be analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydroc~__rbons (TPH) and volatile aromatics (BTXE) at a California Certified Laboratory. 4. Preparing field sample description logs. ~ ..:., -~ ,.,.~ ...-'. C .' 5. Preparing a final report det~ill-g the results of the soil investigation which will include drilling methods, ~mpling methods, analytical results, extent of possible cont.2mln~ntS, conclusions and recommendations. 1.3 .SCgEDULE Adv~ En,~ Concepts, lin-_ anticipates commenc~g the services described in this work plan within one (1) week of approva~ by KCE~ and authorization to proceed from Clhm~. · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH OESIGN IN MIND · #206 [~AKERSFIF[ D, (;A ~*.2:~ 13 ~05 [4:t 1 1t~,~,[:, f-:A,X HOf, H:~ 1 17 ? 1 SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN ~ Envi~nmental Coucepts, lne~ All drilling will commence only after applicable permits have been obtainecL A detailed report of findings described in Item 5 of Section 1.2 above will be subnfitted within thirty (30) days from project completion. 2.0 SITE m~qTORY Berchtold Equipment Company contracted RLW Equipmemmt to excavute, transport and dispose of four (4) underground storage tanks and dispensers from the property located in the County of lrmim at 330 East 19th Street, Bakm'sfield, Calif~ on or about November 17, 1989. Eighteen (18) soil samples were collected at vertical depths of 2-feet and 6-feet below the bottom of the tanks and dispensers. The soil samples were analyzed for TPH, BTXE, EP Tox, Oil & Grease and total leach Results of the laboratory analyses are s. mmsi-ized in the following table (units are 'rog/kg) (Append/x B). Sample # TPH B~n~n~_ Toluemme Xy{~-~- Ethyllxmzemm Gresse Lead 4 ND ND ND ND ,t/2 ND 5 7270 .75 .79 5.03 1.41 · § 2710 .10 .12 2.0§ .49 ['. 9 13,091 5.47 232 2320 309 '" - ' 10 ND ND ND ND ND 13 ND ND ND 14 94 ND ND 15 16 .07 .03 .20 .07 y i 16 13.64 ND ND .05 ND "£ '- ~' "'~ ' "' ~ ' ' 17 ND ND ND .30 .02 '~;~ , 18 ND ND ND ND ND ~" The analytical results indicate that an nn~uthorized release of diesel has occurred and must be investigated. The northern most g~soline tank exhibited excessive levels of TPH and BT~ at a depth of 2-feet, however, results indicate non-detectable concentrations at a depth of 6-feet. The waste oil results indicate non-detectable levels at 2-feet, however, at the 6-foot level the concentrations for Oil and Grease increased to 94 mg/kg. 2 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIC~N IN MIND · *- -.. · ..... i i~ .i_~ '-h .~.. . ..~'.,":,' ":".' .' :". : ' -~ :- - -' .... '...,',_..-~ ~:.,.. -': ..... ':~ ~.~' :'. .,~ .... .~;~:~-* ,i,. ',-'., -~ ' . L .~ ~.'' " :"j.' ":'~ .... . . :... ,r' ~.~.-. ' ,. ''~ ' ' '"'"" '' ;i'1'' ' ..... L'.?,h':.'¥ ' ~' ~ ~' ....... ~" ..... ' ' ' ........ '..~...., ~ :, .. ,. :"' ~:. . .._, r - - · :,...:. ,.~.~ .... :~.',,.' , . ~. .: ...... ~-'. . ..... .: .-~ ;~ ,:, :., .. ]'~; ;: ....:~:...:.... .:~ :-:. ,~:;' ..-. :; . ~.- .......... - ..,.."..: .,': .'u ."- . ... . h.D.".:]~4L:.',-,.,'~,.;'-':" :~' '.. ' .' ' ~":," ' . _ : .: . 1. . , . ....:~.., .~..: ,..'.~- .:.~.?:_ ................ ~'. .. :' ~." ~:~ ..... .:. .~. .,..... .......... e E~ONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN M~D · 4400ASHEROAO. e206 " BAKERSFIELO. CA93313 " 8051831-1646 ' FAX 8051831-1771 ~ . ". 3.,' ,. '"' .. ---' ~., ..: ........... :.~, :~[~_ '--' ... .'., , : , ,. -~. "_:~ .... ~ :" ,:. ~ - .... . .~: ..-,, ,:-.- ':;": ........... ..... . ..... ....[.....'., . ';'-."'-. · . ":-....'~' ..: '.:. . -.- -. _ . - ..... , :: .. :..~...:~_' .... :-'. .., ~ :[.' ~:[.. .? -, ' _.-... -.. _.. : ' -: - '' :... · ~.~ .: .. i. .._ ' _.. : - - ~..--:~-. . . . ..... . . .......: -.. -: .~;,-; · . ..... ~:. ~,:... ~: ?:[ _::". : _ . ........ · . .~, .- [., ".:/. - .... . ........... · ..... -. ,,. :. ~ '...._ .. . . ,... ,..,. ,..: .. ,' ' , ,' .. .. ~ : ,~:,,- :. ...., _ .., , . : ..... · ENV~ONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH OESIGN IN M~D · 4400 ASHE ROAD. e206 ~ BAKERSFIELD. CAg3313 ~ 8051831-1646 ~ FAX 8051831-177l S1~ A~SFA~]~[]~,]~]'I' WO]~ PLAN A/~ne~ F~nmental Concepts, Inc. One (1) brass sleeve from e~c_h samPl/ng interval will be field screened using the PID. The results will be recorded on the field log and will also be a q-s]itative method for choosing specific samples for laboratory analysis. The soil samples will be analyzed by a Californ/a State Certified Laboratory/n accordsnce with State guidelines and EPA methodology. Samples will be analyzed for TPH and BTXE. Advanced F~v~onmental C~cepts, Inc. haq an /n-house policy of rotating the use of State Certified Laboratories. We are currently using BC Labs, SMC Laboratories and Terra Tech Labs. 4.0 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PR/YlYX~L Sample identification and Chain-of-Custody procedures ~ designed to assure sample validity and q-s!ity and to document ~mple possession from the time it is collected to the time of issuing results. The container for e_-ch sample submitted for analysis will have a label af~ed with an identifying description of sample location, depth, date, time and sampler. A properly completed Chain-of-Custody form will be submitted to the analytical laboratory along with the samples. The q,,llty control officer at the laboratory will verify integrity of samples submitted, number of containers, time received and proper sample volume. 5.0 REMARKS [ SIGNATUKF~ This work plan represents Advs~ Environmental Concepts, I~'~.'s professional opinions that are based on currently available data and were arrived at in accordance with standard, accepted hydrogeolo~ic and environmental engineerin~ practices. Date ~tnviroumental .Assessor #01508 · Ei',JVlRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH E)ESIGr4 IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD #206 BAI<ERSFIELO C'A~)33~3 · 805/83~ 10,1Fi · FAX 8©h/R31-1771 ~VIRO#~£NTAL PETROL£UI/ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So bkLion Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-1 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equil~nt Corr~oany ..... . ..... ~1 West 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov~89 23-Nov-89 Minion Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. m~thod. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis Cormnents: California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 ~NVIBON~£NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUB J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-2 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equitxnent Company ~2 West 6' Gasoline .... DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: IT-Novz89 l?-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim~. Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected - 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. ~t?~d. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 ENVlROI~I~ENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROL~U~ J..J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equi~f~nt Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-3 S~le Desc: Berchtold Equi~nt Company . #3 West 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim%~a Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g O. 04 O, 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 06 O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. f~thod. Individual constituents by EPA ~t?~d 8020. As Received Basis Co~nents: California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~'102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROL£{/Ii~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 'PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatic-~ (SOIL) RL.W Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-4 S~f~le Desc: Berchtold Equil~nt Co~oany . _ . ............ $4 West 6' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. r~ethod. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis Cor~nents: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 EIVVIRONI~ENTAL LABO RATO RI FS, INC. PETROLEU¥ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-5 Sample Desc: _ Berchtold Equipment Co. fi5 East 2' Diesel ...................... DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Minimum Reporting Analys is Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g' O. 75 O. 02 Toluene ug/g O. 79 O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 1.41 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g 1.65 O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g 2.40 O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 98 O. 02 To~al Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g 7270. O0 10. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T Ma~al Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~r~ hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel st~daz~ as outlined by t~ Califor~ia D.O.H.S. The petrole~ hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D[~'[H.S-i Cert..102 ENVIRONMENTAL PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petrole~, Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equi~r~nt Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89' Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab 'No.: 9184-6 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Co. ~6 East 6' Diesel ......... DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g O. 10 O. 02 Toluene ug/g O. 12 O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g O. 49 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g O. 65 O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g 1.02 O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 39 O. 02 Total Pet. Hyd~arbons ug/g 2710. O0 1 O, O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Co~ents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~, hydrocarh~ns utilizir~ a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The petrole~ ~drocarbor~ are' in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Oert. ~102 ENVIRONI/£NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93.307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab' No.: ' 9184-7 S~le Desc: Berchtold Equil~nt Co. $7 East 2' Diesel ~ DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Uni%s Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02' Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 10. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T -Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Co~nents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~l~ hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The petroleums hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. Califorr~ia D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 £1VVIRON~£NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUI4 J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) .RLW Equipmen% Date of 2080 So [}nion Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 ~Bakersfield, CA 93.307 Attention: Bud McNabb .. Lab No.: ' 9184-8 S~r~le Desc: Berchtold Equirz~ent Co. $8 East 8' Diesel ...... DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Minim~J Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g. none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-X¥1ene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Pet. " Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 10. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T Manual Methyl (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Co,~ents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~, ?~drocarbons utilizir~ a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The petrole~, hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONI/ENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEU¥ J' J' EGMN. REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW EquiPmen% Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb ,. Lab No.: 9184-9 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equiuf~n% Co~f~; .... $9 Alley 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMP~ED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim~0 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 5.47 0.02 Toluene ug/g 231.98 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 308.65 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g 469.41 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g 1113.52 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g 746.71 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g 13091.31 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S. L, U. F.T. ~mthod, Individual constituents by EPA ~mthod 8020, As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRON/~£1VTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 P~rgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equil~nt Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-10 S~r~le Desc: Berchtold Equipment CorrJpany $10 Alley 6' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim~. Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0 02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0 02 Total Petroleum HycLrocaLr~xons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L. U, F.T. ~thod. Individual constituents by EPA met~zx~ 8020. As Received Basis California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 ENVIRONI~ENT,4L LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM . J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Eeport: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-11 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Compar~ -- #11 Alley 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim~, Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 · Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbor,~ ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. r~thod. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 £NVIRONI~£NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEU~I '~* d' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. EHGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 P~rgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-12 Sa~le Desc: Berchtold Equi~nt Company $12 Alley 6' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene , ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L. U .'F. T. T~thod. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis C~nts: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ~,NVIRONI/~,NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUI, I d' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 l.,:~.r,,q ;.QUT~,'J]~ Date ReL:~::)rted: 11/30/89 Page 1 2080 S UNTON Date Received: 1;1/20/89 }' O BOX 640 Laboratory No.: 9184-13 BAKERSFIW./.n, CA 93302 Attn.: BUD MCNABB 834-1100 S~,mple Description: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COT.T.W. CTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #13 SHOP 2' WASTE OIL TOTAL CONTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article II, California Administrative Code) Const ituents Sample Results P.Q.L.. Units Method R__e Lead None Detected 2.5 m~/kg 6010 TOX None Detected 20. mg/k~ 9020 O'; 1 & Grease None Detected 20. m~/kg 413.1 (See Last Page for Comments,. Definitions, Regulatory criteria, and References) RecjulatoryCriteria Constituents STLC, m~/L TTLC, m~/kq Lead 5.0 1000. Comment: All constituents reported above are in m~/kg (unless otherwise stated) , ,,~ an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to d~termin~ total levels. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique emplo%~=d. N.D. = None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L. ). I.S. = Insufficient Sample STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: (.1) "Test Methods for Evaluatin~ Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020. · , ENVIt~ON/~£1VTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUB J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 RLW EQUIPMENT Date Reported: 11/30/89 Page 1 2080 S UNION Date Received: 11/20/89 }' O BOX 640 Laboratory No.: 9184-14 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 Attn.: BUD MCNABB 834-1100 S;.,mple Description: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE coLr.FCTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #14 SHOP 6' WASTE OIL TOTAL CONTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article II, California Administrative Code) Const ituents Sample Results P.q.L. Units l~thod Lead None Detected 2.5 mg/kg 6010 1 TOX None Detected 20. mcj/k~ 9020 t Oil & Grease 94.. 20. mg/k~ 413.1 2 (See Last Page for Comments, Definitions, Regulatory Criteria, and References) RecoulatoryCriteria Constituents STLC, m~/L TTLC, m~/kg ]z.ad 5.0 1000. Comment: All constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated} an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total }'.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. N.D. = None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). I.S. = Insufficient Sample ~rLC = Soluble Tkreshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: (l) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods ~or Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes" , EPA-600, 14-79-070. ENVIRON¥~NTAL =,,,,=,,,,,,,,, LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEU¥ J' J' EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petrole,~a Hydr~arbons (SOIL) RLW Equi~x~nt Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: B~d McNabb Lab No.: 9184-15 S~r~le Desc: Berchtold Equi~r~nt Co. $15 Diesel Dispenser 2 ..... DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS C~LLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Minim~, Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g O. 07 O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g O. 03 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g O. 07 O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g O. 12 O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 08 O. 02 Total Pet. Hydrocarborm ug/g 16.34 10. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T -Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis TOTAL PETROLE[~ HYDROCARBONS: ~antification of petrole~n hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. Tbs- petrole~n hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 ~iVVIRONI/~NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petrole~. Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equi~nt Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-16 S~le Desc: Berchtold Equipment Co. $16 Diesel Dispenser 6 DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Miniram~ Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 05 O. 02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g 13.64 10. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F. T Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Cotm~n ts : TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~. hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The Petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 E~lin Analyst ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BTX/TPH DIESEL Quality Control Data RLW Equipment BTX Spike ID: 9184-4 2080 So Union Ave TPH Spike ID: 9226-1 Bakersfield, CA 93307 A~mlysis Date: 21-Nov-89 Attention: Bud McNabb Units: ~=/g Quality Control for Lab Nos: 9184-5, 9184-6, 9184-7, 9184-8, 9184-15, 9184-16 One s~le in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative mea-~une of the accuracy of tb~ analysis. The comparison of the spike with a duplicate spike is a ~asure of the relative precision of the analysis. Conc. Conc. Dup in Spike Added to Spike Spike Spike Constituent San~le Spike % Rec % Rec RPD Benzene 0.00 5.02 93.01 94.85 1.96 Toluene 0.00 5.16 97.24 98.84 1.63 Ethyl Bermene 0.00 5.01 101.19 102.05 0.85 p-Xylene 0.00 5.06 100~06 100.27 0.21 r~Xylene 0.00 5.01 104.44 104.61 0.16 o-Xylene 0.00 5.00' 102.32 102.97 0.63 TPH Diesel 0.00 100.01 96.07 97.62 1.60 QC Co~nts: Spiked Sz~le Concentration - S~le P~ncentration % Recovery = X 100 (P~ncentration of Spike) RPD (Relative Percent Difference) = Spiked Sample Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sample Conc. X 100 (Average Concentration of Spikes) £1VVIRONYE. NTAL PETROLEUM ' J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 ~Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-17 ,Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $17 Gasoline Dispenser 2 DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPS: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Ming~a Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g O. 02 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g O. 07 O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g O. 12 O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 11 O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHODi TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA .~thod 8020. As Received Basis Cortn~nts: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PEI'ROLE~/M J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable A~tics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-18 San~le Desc: ~erchtold Equil~nt Co~ny ~18 Gasoline Dispenser 6 DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim~. Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. ~thod. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis Cor~ments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 £NVI~ON~£NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROL£UB J. J. EGLIN. REG. CHEM. ENGR, 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BTX/TPH GASOLINE Quality Control Data RLW Equipment Spike ID: 9184-4 2080 So Union Ave Analysis Date: 23-Nov-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Sample Matrix: Soil Attention: ~ud McNabb Units: ug/g Quality Control for Lab Nos: 9184-1, 9184-2, 9184-3, 9184-4, 9184-9 .... 9184-10,-9184-1I, 79184-12, 9184-17, 9184~I8 One sample in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative measure of t~ accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spik~ with a duplicate spike is a Treasure of the relative precision of the analysis. conc. conc. Dup in Spike Added to Spike Spike Spike Cormtituent S~r~le Spike -% Rec % Rec RPD Benzene 0.00 5.02 93.01 94.85 1.96 Toluene 0.00 5.16 97.24 98.84 1.63 Ethyl Benzene 0.00 5.01 101.19 102.05 0.85 p-Xylene 0.00 5.06 100.06 100.27 0.21 m-Xylene 0.00 5.01 104.44 104.61 0.16 o-Xylene 0.00 5.00 102.32 102.97 0.63 TPHGas 0.00 301.06 87.44 88.11 0.76 Spiked Sample Concentration - San~le Concentration % Recovery = X 100 (Concentration of Spike) RPD (Relative Percent Difference) = Spiked S~ple Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sample conc. X 100 (Average P~nc, of Spikes) " BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO. L- 3 7 ....Date. Rec'6: Il -~0- ~ 7 Client: Sampler:., I Sample Type: Analysis Requested: Name: Name: ~lO0 fC~K~. K~ 'Water ~ Other:- Ad.ess: Ad.ess: I ' Soil (specify) ~.i~h~y:. ~,~: ~: ~.~i~ ~y:, ~: ~im~: Commm~: Date Rec'd.: ti/-e?O-8~ . ". BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO. L- Clie~t: , Sampler: ,' Sample Type: Analysis Requested: Name: :.: Nam : - -'Water Other: j Oil Lab ~ Des~pfion: Other Tes= Re~nq~sh~ By: .Date: T~e: Receiv~ By: Date: Time: Comments: V.Uow: ~c t -b Cop" AG~I£UL TU~ LABORATORIES, Inc. ~T~OL£U~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGL 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REPORT FOR 9184 11-20-89 ADDRESSES TO BE USED SAMPLES WERE SUBMITTED BY: RLW EQUIPMENT 2080 S UNION P O BOX 640 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 Attn: · BUD MCNABB 834-1100 REPORTS WILL BE SENT TO: ' ~. RLW EQUIPMENT. . ......................... . ................ ,. 2080 S UNION P O ~OX 640 ~AKERSFIELD, CA ~3302 Attn= BUD MCNABB 834-1100 ~ILL WILL BE SENT TO: RLW EQUIPMENT 2080 S UNION P O BOX 640 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 834-1100 SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS ....... BC LAB NO RUSH DUE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TO APPEAR ON REPORTS 9184-1 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE ~1 WEST 2' GASOLINE 9184-2 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE $2 WEST 6' GASOLINE 9184-3 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE !1/17/89 SAMPLE $3'WEST 2' GASOLINE 9184-4 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE $4 WEST 6' GASOLINE 9184-5 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/~7/89 SAMPLE #5 EAST 2' DIESEL 9184-6 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE $6 EAST 6' DIESEL 9184-7 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: S;tMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #7 EAST 2' DIESEL 9184-8 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #8 6' DIESEL 9184-9 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #9 ALLEY 2' GASOLINE 9184-10 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: .SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE $10 ALLEY 6' GASOLINE 9184-11 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11'/17/89 SAMPLE #11 ALLEY 2" GASOLINE 9184-12 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #12 ALLEY 6' GASOLINE 9184-13 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE $13 SHOP 2' WASTE OIL 91B4-14 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE AG~I£UL LABORATORIES. Ir-lc. ~T~OL£U~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGL 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-491 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REPORT FOR 9184 11-20-89 SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS BC LAB NO RUSH DUE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TO APPEAR ON REPORTS 11/17/89 SAMPLE 914 SHOP 6' WASTE'OIL 9184-15 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE 915 DIESEL DISPENSER 2' 9184-16 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE ~ 11/17/89 SAMPLE 916 DIESEL DISPENSER 6' 9184-17 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE 917 GASOLINE DISPENSER 2' 9184-18 N BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE 918 GASOLINE DISPENSER 6' REQUESTED ANALYSIS SAMPLES: 9184 - 1,' 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18 ORGANICS: BTX (gas), TPH (gas) SAMPLES: 9184 - 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 16 ORGANICS: BTX (diesel), TPH (diesel) · SAMPLES: 9184 - 13, 14 TOTAL: Pb, Digestion, TOX, Oil & Grease OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THIS SET OF SAMPLES BC SAMPLING TIME: 5.50 HOURS POST SCRIPT NOTES: 1. If this Acknowledgement Report indicates any discrepancies, please contact BC Laboratories at 805-327-4911. 2. Some Chromatography (Organic) testing may not be listed on this report. :~ ....... . ...... :,, ~; '~,..~ ~ ':-. ! ~,~'.'~ . .. - . . -'~,. ' . _ ... '.:,. ,,., ,. ....... . ~-: : '"-'?:,.~. .'.[;, ..... ~: - ".' ?.~7 -- ,.. . · -' - - "~'' ,:.,~ ~ ~..~+, ?;~',.:..'_~ . . "..;.- ' ~?~,~.. ' ~ ..... "['"~. ".~:; ._ .;:' - '"'""' ~ '2:.. ~:',' " · . ~' . .' ' . , ........ -.,. :.. ::,.:-~,~ ...... : .- .,,:.~:..'"". ., ~. ~,,.-... -' , '. ;,... . ,,~-::.~ ~:-, , .., . ,..~-. , ,. -.'.:~.: ,. · . -~.--~ .:,, . . _. ~ ...... ...... : .', ,. . - L -, : '.. :" :.':" ~:' ".: :--' .~' ~':'" :?' ;' ' ' · -- '" : - ~ ~.:.: '.-:-, .; :'~::'~':;":" . _ .-.:.. . ~.. : : ~ ,. · ~...,' ~:..: ' . ..~ ..... ~:' . :. . :-.- ".'~ '' -....~- , - -. ' .~" :'. '. ... i ...... · .,.,. ,.~'~" , ' '. · ~ .,-'. . ' - - ;. : . , . ~:.:' ',," :L"-. ., " ' ' - T ~., .... : -- ~.- .... .. . -. ~ .- ...... ," ':,'. : .-. . ......... : .... .. . . . .. ...... : · ...~ ,., ~ , ~., ........ :. ,,:, :, ,,. .~ ~ -: ., -. . ~.. ;.~ . , ':.'.. -...: ..... ,~,:?'..,. . · . . - ._ :.. :~ ' . _ . ~ ..... ~ ~,..¥ ... ~. ~ , ,: , - . , '.:, . ~ .., ..,-~--',' ? .-' :.,'. ,,~ . ~,,, : ~. ?-.~. ~.,,,,, ,.,, :~:~...i ...... ~ ,,~-~; ....... .. , , ., .,. .,-,.- . ..... . , [ .. .... ., ~..;~ :.. ~ .. -.-:~;:-." '.':~: .. - .. . .::'. :...,:'.:-, .: :. .,, ~ . .... ., ,"~ .. _ _, :::?:~ '~., ~,,., . - ...... · ENV~ONMENTAL ~NCE~S W~H DESIGN IN ~ * ~ 4~00ASHEROAO.~0B · BAKERSFIELD. CAO~13 · 805/B81-1~8 ' FAX 805/831-1771 SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN ~ Fazv~onmental Colleepts, Iz~ for P,a~~ California Introduction: A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site soil assessmentJremediation. ~ It's purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from direct .~Irln contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially bo~rdous materials that may be encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal protective equipment standards, decont~mlnstion procedures and emergency action Adw~ ~ Caneepts, l~_ seeks to enter the property described above for the purpose of conducting a site assessment, consisting of up to three (3) borings, to further evaluate the extent of soil and/or groundwater impaction- Soil samples will be collected at 5-foot intervals during exploratory drilling using a California modified split-spoon sampler through a hollow-stem auger. All possible efforts will be made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to be chemically analyzed win be collected 'in a brass sleeve, capped with lined plastic lids, sealed with tape and placed on ice in a cooler immediately. All ChAin-of-Custody protocol will be followed. Drill/ng equipment will be brought to the site and operated b~. Mer on Company 7101 Dow~ing Avenue Bakersfield, California CONTRAC=IX)R'S LICENSE # C-57 508270 This SSP describes means for protecting all on-site personnel from personal injury while condUcting on- site activities. As described below, we will strive to meet all requirements and standards established by the California Department of Health Services. All personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mr. Jonattmn L Buck will serve as Project Manager and on-site Geologist. He will also serve as Site Safety Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Buck will assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of the SSP. Personnel ~ be required to document their full understanding of the SSP before admi.~sion to the site. Compliance with the SSP dill be monitored.at all times by the SSO. Appropriate personal protective equipment, listed below, dill be available and utilized by all on-site personnel. Prior to beginning work, the SSO dill conduct a tr~inlng session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel dill be msde aware of hazards at the site and dill utilize Material Safety Data Sheets for information on compounds to be encountered. · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH OES~GN ~N M~ND · 4400 ASHE ROAD #206 · BAKERSFIELD CA9331'3 ~¢),~:8,31 1.¢~,~, · FAX ~-~0::./R.'~1-1771 SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN Advamed Env~nmeIltal Concepts, :. Mr. Buck will also be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting and securing samples and assuring sample integrity by adherence to Chain-of-Custody protocol. All on-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforeseen hn~.nrds. After documenting their understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herei~ Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO and correctech On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for which they believe they are q, mli~ech Provisions of this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. Job Hazard Ana/yse~. I-la~.~rds likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of ~'slllng objects or moving machinery. Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. An excavation contractor has been employed to deliver and operate all excavating equipment. Q,,Aii~ed personnel only. will trove any contact with this equipment. All on-site personnel, including the excavation contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close pro~mlty to excavating equipment. Latex sampling gloves mvlll be worn by persons collecting or h~nd]{n~ sainples to prevent exposure to cont~2min~nts. Gloves will be ehsnged between samples aud used oues discarded, to avoid cress-cont~minstion- Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor contamlnstion levels on-site exceed action levels as deteru~ned using a Photoionization Detector (PID). l~urthermore, no on- site smoking, open t~me or sparks will be perlnltted in order to prevent accidental ignition. R/zk ~ment Summary. Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel, and benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most are highly flammable. Threshold Limit Values (TLV's), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL's) and Toxicity levels (LD50, oral- rat), all in rog/kg (ppm), are listed below: Compound TLV STEL Toxicity Gasoline 200 300 -- Diesel 50 75 .... Benzene 10 25 4894 Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene 100 150 4300 Exposure Monitoring Plan: A PID will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV's, protective measures will be taken. Passive dosimeter badges will be placed in downwind locations if PID readings indicate high levels of volatile organics in the breathing space. 2 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · A400ASHERO,AO #206 · BAKERSFIELD CA?t33~3 · 805'~31 ',¢%~.($ FAX 80~/831-177t SITE ASSESS~.NT WORK PLAN Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. Personnel on-si~e ~ ~ve ~ess ~o resp~$o~ ~ o~c ~por ~es. ~p~emen~ ~es ~ be a~le on-~te ~ ne~ed. ~en ~ ~ple~ ~e on-~te G~lo~t ~ w~ ~tex ~es. ~d ~ts ~ be wo~ by ~ pe~o~el on, site when ~ pro~m~ of ~H~ ~pmen~. Wo~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to the ~te ~ be re~ to auto. ed pe~o~eL A set of cones, pl~ or ~de y~ow ~pe,'~o~ the rite, ~ dele the ~eter, gneed~ ~e ~ ~er ~ be r~po~ble for rite s~W. ~~~n M~ Avoi~ce of con~mln~on when~er po~ble ~ ~e b~ me.od for p~t~om Common ~e · ~s ~t on-rite ~o~el avoid dt~, le~nlng or p~ ~pment on ~ble ~n~mlna~ ~ ~ pe~o~el ~ be ~ to ~vh the~ h~n&, n~ ~d f~e ~th ~p ~d ~ter ~fore ~n~ a bre~ or 1~ the ~te. ~sp~to~ ~ be ~h~ ~ s~p ~d ~ter fo~o~ ~ &~s ~e. Ex~on ~d ~plln~ ~pment ~ ~ be d~ont~mln~t~ by ~e~e~nln~, ~plin~ ~pment ~ be d~on~t~ ~fore ~ ~ple ~ ~e~ General Safe Work Practices: On-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SSO, including respirator fit. Excavation and sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before being brought on-site. Split-spoon sampling equipment will be cleaned before each use.. Augers will be steam-cleaned between borings. The on-site Geologist will oversee operations and log borings. The Sample Coordinator will assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include all points of MSDS forms, contaminant properties, wurning signs, health hazard data, risk from exposure and emergency first aid. All chemicals are to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site bn~rds. Medical Surveillance Progranr According to CFR 29, 1910.120, Paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators thirty (30) days or more during one (1) year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above 3 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400.A. SHE F~©,~FD #20~ o. BAKF~$FIF_LE) CA.q3312 ~-]05/~31 16,~[~ · ;:AX ~,0!'~1R2,1 1771 SrrE A~SE~S]~_iNT WOl{.l{ PLAI~ Adv.[iced Envirflnmelltal Concepts, Inc. established perrni,~sible exposure l;mlts ~re required to be monitored medically. All site personnel will be required to trove had a complete chemical physical within the ~ year. Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to cont~m{rumt l~A~ds on the job site accorH{-g to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received tr~{n{ug on the ~P, respiratory protection, MSDS forms and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training meeting. Exposure records on ~A~h job will be kept for thirty (30) years to meet requirements. Included will be ~smes and social security numbers of employees, medical evaluations, on-the-job logs from entry to exit, first aid a~lm~tered, visits on-site by outside persons and personal air monitoring records. In the event of an accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project Director, Senior Project M~n%~er, or other person, will notify the appropriate government agencies or individ,,sls as follows: 1. Kern County Environmental Health Department (805) 861-3636 2. Police, Fire, or Amb-lsnce emergency (911) 3. Nearest Emergency Hospital: Memorial Hospital 420 34th Street Bakersfield, California 93302 (805) 327-1792 / 4 · E¢4VIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND 4,f, 00ASHEFtOA© ¢206 · I~AKERSF'IELE).CA~-~3313 ~05f8:~1 lf~,~6 FAX ~0:~/831-1771 p 540 625 751 " I RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO iNSURANCE ~ MAn. Postage Ce~itied Fee S~cial Oelive~ F~ Restncted Delivew F~ Return R~eipt showing to whom a~ Date Deliver~ showing to Return Race pt Oate, and Address of De iveW Postage anO F~s Postmark or Date 0 SENDER: Complete Iteme I and 2 when additional sef~cee are desired, and complete' l~eme 3 and 4. Put .y.our add. ress in the."RETUR__N TO" Space on the reveme aide. Failure to do this will prevent this cer(I f~m b~. lng .r~t~. m..ea to ~.ou. The return recelpl;~ will provide you the name of the person delivered t_o,an(! .the date of de. Ivory, Por additional fees the following sswicee are available. Consult posm~aater tot Leee and Check. box(eel for additional ssrvice{al requested. _ ,,l~,l~Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee'a address. 2. D Restricted Delivery u Reg~ered []'m~umd [] E.xl:~es~ Mall ~ Return Recelot for Men=handlse or agem and DATE DELIVERED. ~ -- Address//~ '. 8. Addressee'e Address- (ONZ,im ~ 6. Signature -- Agent X GARY J. WICKS 2700 ,M St.re~,~Sulte 300 ~,Agency ~lrector Blkerlfleld, CA 93301 (805} 861-3502 .. r'~'~ ·: :-~/:~-~.:~ ~. Telephone (~5) 861-~ STEVEDir~torMCCALLEY .' ~~,u~/... ' :..~:.,. Telecopler (805) 861-~29 R ES O ~ R C E ~~ENT A G EN CY January g, 1990 Mark Berchtold Berchtold Equipment Corp. 330 E. lgth Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 SUBJECT: Location: 330 E. lgth Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Known As: Berchtold Equipment PERMIT #: 150019 Dear Mr. Berchtold: This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank. This notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a responsible party for this property. As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED. Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum required site work plan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting environmental contractors qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms, example illustrations, and a section discussing the answers to commonly asked questions. The cost incurred by'Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two methods described below. It is. your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery under the terms of (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option. These options only pertain to costs associated with oversight. (A) STATE CONTRACT The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs incurred by the County and the State, pertaining to your site, under the State terms explained below: Whereas thc Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associaled with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at t he above site are funded, in whole or in part, irom the Hazardous Subst'ancc Cleanup Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agcnciea while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such co~ta within :30 days of receipt ol a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board. - (B) COUNTY OF KERN LOCAL AGREEMENT OPTION Kern County Environmental Health is providing this option for those who prefer to pay the County directly and avoid the addition of. State costs. Prior to the County's performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party must enter into a County agreement, attachment "B". The environmental sensitivity (attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed by Environmental Health to determine the potential threat for groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Agreement Option; however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Agreement Option, should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area. It is necessary for you to respond, in writing., within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice: either the State contract or the County's Local Agreement Option. If you select the County's Local Agreement, please complete and sign the Local Agreement, (attachment B), and return it with .your check for $1,000.00 {one thousand dollars} made payable to the County of Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Accounting - Local Agreement Option. If you select the State contract, please indicate, in writing, that you have made this selection and that you have read the above official notification. Failure to .respond within ten {10} calendar days to this notice will automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s} to be placed under the. terms of the State contract for Leaking Underground Storage lanks. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Susan Gonzales at (805) 861-3636. Envir°nment~ Steve McCalla~Y~eDalth Servibe~epirector /" ~artment attachments UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SiTE REPORT EMERGENCY _ , H~ STA~ OFFI~ OF EMERGEN~ ~ER~I~S ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ YES ~ RE~RTBEENFILED? ~ YES REPORT~TE~ .~'~ ~ C~E. ' NAME OF INDIVIDUAL ~ILING ~RT ~i -- ~ ~ I SIGNA~ ~ A~ESS" ~E~ ~ ~A~ Z~ F~ILIW N~E (IF APPLICA~ O~TOR ~DRESS , O~ER ~ m L~AL AGENCY A~CY ~ME ~NTACT PER~N P~NE ~ REGION& BOAffO ..... I ProNE (1) / NAME QU~ LOST (G~LONS) OATEDI~RED Y ~WDI~RED ~ IN~ORY~ROL ~ SU~URF~MONITOR~ ~ ~ISA~E~IT~NS ! X Mt 2~¢DI%Y~q ~ TANK~ST CATE DI~HARGE BE~N M~OD USED TO S~P DI~HARGE (CHECK ~L ~T ~PL~ ~S~'~HARGEBEENSTOPPED? ~ REPAIRT~K ~ R~AIRPIPING ~ C"~mPR~EDURE '~TANKLE~ ~ UNKNO~ [~ ~. ~ FI.ERG~S ~ OVERFILL ~ RUP~AILURE ~ ~ ~ECK ONE ONLY ~ECK ON'E ONLY ~ ~ ~SI~ IN~STI~TION IN PR~RESS (DEFINING ~ OF PROG~M) ~ C~ IN PR~RESS ~ SI~ED O~ (~NUP ~MP~D OR UNNE~AR~ ~ ~ NO~TIONT~EN ~ POST~NUPMONITORINGINP~RE~ ~ ~FUN~AVA~mPR~ED ~ EV~UATI~C~UP~RNATI~S CHECK ~PROPRIATE ACT~N(S) (SEE B~K FOR ~TAI~) ~ ~ CAPSI~(CD) ~ ~VA~&D~E(ED) ~ REMO~FR~PROD~T(FP) ~ EN~EDBIODEGR~ATION(I~ ~ ~ CONTAINMENTBARRIE"(~) ~ ~VA~&TREAT(En ~ ~MP&~TGROUNDWA~R(Gn ~ REP~E SUPPLY (RS) ~. ~. TR~TMENTATH~P(HU) ~ NO<TIONREQUIRED(NA) ~ O~ER(O~ ~ , ~ '. ,- , ,, £NVIRONI~ENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUm4 J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aror~tics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So bklion Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb L~b No.: 9184-1 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment ~1 West 2' Gasoline DATE' SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 1T-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level ~enzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 · m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 . Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S. L, U. F, T. method. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUIi~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So .Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA . 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-2 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equil~nt Company $2 West 6' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLL~.CTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g. none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U~F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis ConTents ~' California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 By ~. ~. Eg~i~i ' ' ~ f~nalyst ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROI. EUB J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD.,' BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-3 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $3 West 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLIED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected. O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g O. 04 O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 06 O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis Cormnents: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUI~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb L~b No.: 9184-4 S~le Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $4 West 6' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMP~ED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting ConstitUent Units Results LeVel Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis Co~ments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL · LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUI~I J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Re~ort: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-5 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Co. $5 East 2' Diesel DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 0.75 0 02 Toluene ug/g 0.79 0 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 1.41 0 02 p-Xylene ug/g 1.65 0 02 m-Xylene ug/g 2.40 0 02 o-Xylene ug/g 0.98 0 02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g ~ 7270.00~/ 10.00 TEST t~l'I-IOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F. T l:ian~.l Method (~arbon Disulfide Extract±on). Indiv±dual consti'~.entq by' EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Com~0ents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petroleum, hydrocarbor~s utilizing a diesel stanr]~rd as outlined by t?~ California D.O.H.S. The petrole~mm hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined.' C-~lifornia D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-6 Sample Desc: Berchtold EquiI~nt Co. $6 East 6' Diesel DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLY: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Minim~, Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 0.10 0.02 Toluene ug/g 0.12 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 0.49 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g 0.65 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g 1.02 0.02 o-X¥1ene ug/g 0.39 0.02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g ., 2710.00 j~ 10.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T Msnual Methyl (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual cormtituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received -Basis Corm~ents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: ~3__~ntification of petrole~, hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The petrole~, hydrocarbons are in additior, to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 /~,~.' ~'ii~,- ' Analyst ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So 'Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-7 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Co. $7 East 2' Diesel DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLY: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g, none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 10.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O,H. S. L.U.F.T Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide ,Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020, As Received Basis Co~aments: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~f~ hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel stand~rd as outlined by the California D,O.H.S. The petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined, California D,O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petrole~. Hydrocarbons · (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of' ~ 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: B~d McNabb Lab No.: 9184-8 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equil~ent Co. $8 East 6' Diesel DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ' ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 10. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L. U, F. T Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Co~m~ents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~, hydrocarbons ntilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABO RATO RI F?,, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGUN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-9 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $9 Alley 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALysIs COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: (DEPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Minim~a Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 5.47 O. 02 Toluene ug/g 231.98 O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 308.85 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g 469.4~ O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g ~!!13.52' ~' , 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g 746.71 ~' O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D. 0.H.S.L.U. FUT. method. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR'. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of' 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No..' 9184-10 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company ~10 Alley 6' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ' ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. r~thod. Individual constituents by EPA met?~x~ 8020. As Received Basis Conm~ents: California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102 By (J nalyst LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD.i BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-11 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $11 Alley 2' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: CfiI"IP~: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02. p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-X¥1ene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S. L,U,F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis Con~ents: California D.O,H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: B~d McNabb Lab No.: 9184-12 ~le Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $12 Alley .6.' Gasoline DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLFI~: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVlRONI~ENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUJ/J J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 R[,W EQUIPMENT Date Reported: 11/30/89 Page 2080 S UNION Date Received: 11/20/89 P O BOX 640 Laboratory No.: 9184-13 BAKERSFIW. T.D, CA 93302 Attn.: BUD MCNABB 834-1100 S~.nmple Description: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COT.T.W. CTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #13 SHOP 2' WASTE OIL TOTAL CONTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article II, California Administrative Code) Constituents Sample Results P.Q.L. Units Method Ref. Lead None Detected 2.5 m~/kg 6010 TOX None Detected ~ 20. m~/k~ 9020 OJ 1 & Grease None Detected 20. ag/kg 413.1 2 (See Last Page for Comments, Definitions, Regulatory Criteria, and References) RecjulatoryCriteria Constituents STLC, m~/L TTLC~ n~/kq Lead §.0 1000. Comment: Ail constituents reported above are in m~/k~ (unless otherwise stated) an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (~rLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size usedandanalytical technique employed. N.D. = None Detected (Constitn~_ent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). I.S. = Insufficient Sample STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: (1) "Test Methods for Evaluatin~ Solid Wastes", SW846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis' of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020. ( ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 RLW EQUIPMENT Date Reported: 11/30/89 Pa~e 1 2080 S UNION Date Received: 11/20/89 P O BOX 640 Laboratory No.: 9184-14 BAKERSFIk~r.n, CA 93302 Attn.: BUD MCNABB 834-1100 Sample Description: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO.: SAMPLE COT.T.ECTED BY: DAVID RITTENHOUSE 11/17/89 SAMPLE #14 SHOP 6' WASTE OIL TOTAL CONTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article II, California Administrative Code) Constituents Sample Results P.q.L. Units Method Ref. Lead None Detected 2.5 m~/k~ 6010 Oil .& Grease (/~.. 20. m~/k~ 413.1 2 (See Last Page for Comments, Definitions, Regulatory Criteria, and References) RecjulatoryCriteria Constituents STLC, m~/L TTL~, mG/k~ I~ad 5.0 1000. Comment: All constituents reported above are in mg/kG (unless otherwise stated) nn an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTL~) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total lew~Is. P.Q.L.'= Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of anal%rte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. N.D. = None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). I.S. = Insufficient Sample STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration RF.,FERENCES: -: ~ (1) "Test Methods for Evaluatin~ Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods ~or Chamical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-040. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUkl J' d' EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petrole,mn Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: B~d McNabb I~ab No.: 9184-15 Sample Desc: Berchtold EquiPment Co. $15 Diesel Dispenser 2' DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected- O. 02 Toluene ug/g O. 07 O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g O. 03 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g O. 07 O, 02 m-Xylene ug/g O. 12 O, 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 08 O, 02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g 16.34 10, O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T Manual Methyl (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis Co~ents: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petroleum hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert.. ~102 ..... ~Z~.' ~in- ' - Analyst ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUti~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 04-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb Lab No.: 9184-16 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Co. $16 Diesel Dispenser 6' ._ DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS C01',r,~CTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 20-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 21-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g 0.05 0.02 Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g 13.64 10.00 TEST METHOD: TPH for Diesel by D.O.H.S, L.U.F.T ~Manual Method (Carbon Disulfide Extraction). Individual constituents by EPA Method 8020. As Received Basis TOTAL PETROLE~ HYDROCARBONS: Q~_~ntification of petrole~r~ hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard as outlined by the California D.O.H.S. The Petroleum hydroca~,bons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 - An yst ( ENVIRONMENTAL LABO RATO RIFS,' INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR, 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BTX/TPH DIESEL Quality Control Data RLW Equipment BTX Spike ID: 9184-4 2080 So Union Ave TPH Spike ID: 9226-1 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Analysis Date: 21-Nov-89 Attention: Bud McNabb b~: ug/g Quality Control for Lab Nos: 9184-5, 9184-6, 9184-7, 9184-8, 9184-15,'9184-16 One sample in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spike with a duplicate spike is a measure of the relative precision of the an~ysis. Conc. Conc. Dup in Spike Added to Spike Spik~ Spike Constituent San~le Spike % Rec % Rec RPD Benzene 0.00 5.02 93.01 94.85 1.96 Toluene 0 00 5.16 97.24 98.84 1.63 Ethyl Benzene 0 00 5.01 101.19 102.05 0.85 p-Xylene 0 00 5.06 100.06 100.27 0.21 m-Xylene 0 00 5.01 104.44 104.61 0.16 .. o-X~lene 0 00 5.00 102.32 102.97 0.83 TPH Diesel 0 00 100.01 96.07 97.62 1.60 'Spiked Sample Concentration - Sample Concentration % Recovery = X 100 (Concentration of Spike) RPD (Relative perCent Difference) ..... - Spiked Sample Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sample Conc. X 100 (Average Concentration of Spikes) ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUI~ J' J' EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable -Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb [mb No.: 9184-17 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company _ $17 Gasoline Dispenser 2' ~ . DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g O. 02 O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g O. 07 O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g O. 12 O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g O. 11 O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD' TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA method 8020. As Received Basis Cx~aments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC. PETROLEUI~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. '4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) RLW Equipment Date of 2080 So Union Ave Report: 03-Dec-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Attention: Bud McNabb 5ab. No.: 9184-18 Sample Desc: Berchtold Equipment Company $18 Gasoline Dispenser 6' DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPS: 17-Nov-89 17-Nov-89 23-Nov-89 Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 Toluene ug/g. none detected O. 02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g . none detected 5. O0 TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by EPA r~thod 8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROI.£UM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BTX/TPH GASOLINE Quality Control Data RLW Equipment --- -- Spike ID: 9184-4 2080 So Union Ave Analysis Date.~ 23-NOv-89 Bakersfield, CA 93307 Sample Matrix: Soil Attention: Bud McNabb Units: ug/g Qu~ity Control for Lab Nos: 9184-1, 9184-2, 9184-3, 9184-4, 9184-9 9184-10, 9184-11, 9184-12, 9184-17, 9184-18 One sample in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spike with a duplicate spike is a measure of the relative precision of the ' analysis. Conc. Conc. Dup in Spike Added %0 Spike Spike, Spike Constituent Sample Spike % Rec % 'Rec RFD Benzene 0.00 5.02 93.01 94.85 1.96 Toluene 0.00 5.16 97.24 98.84 1 63 Ethyl Benzene 0.00 5.01 101.19 102.05 0 85 p-Xylene 0.00 5.06 100.06 100.27 0 21 m-Xylene 0,00 5.01 104.44 104.61 0 16 o-Xylene 0,00 5.00 102.32 102.97 0 63 TPHGas 0.00 301.06 87.44 88.11 0 76 ~ Conro~nts: Spiked Sample Concentration - Sample Concentration % Recovery = X 100 (Concentration of Spike) (Relative "Pe~e~- Di£f~ence) "'= ......................................................................... Spiked Sample Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sable Conc. ! X 100 (Average Conc. of Spikes) Da? Re¢'d: 1l 7 BC CHAIN O14 CUSTODY NO. L- 3 / ~ Client: Sampler: Sample Type: Analysis Requested: · ' 100 0)f~lC~(, ~,-~ Water ~ Other: ~ ~ ~ ]~ ~ m Nme: Name: ~ Soil (specify) ~ ~ o ~ ~ Ad--ess: Ad~ess~l - ~ . ~ ~ ~ Lab g Desc~pfion: ~ ~~ ~Q Other Tests ~ Re~n~ui~h~By: . ' Date: Time: Receiv~ By: Date: Time: Comments: Client: Sampler: Sample Type: Analysis Requested: , Name: Name: ., 'Water Other: Attn: ~ Sludge ~ - Oil Lab ~ Des~pfion: Other Tests Re~nq~Shed By: Date: Time: ~ Receiv~ By: Date: Time: Comments: State of California---Health and Welfare Agency Department 0! Hea~tl~ ~erwces Form Approved OMB No. 2050---0039 (Expires 9-30-91 Toxic Substances Control Division .;",gaas'. i .iht or type. (Form designed for use ce elite ~ typewriter). Sacramento, California WASTE MANIFEST "'. ,~; ~':'~' I.('~,L~ ';'1~'~¢1~.~1..~,~ .~:"', I ~.lt of .~ is not required by Federal law. 885.35172 7. TranSporter 2 O~ompany Nam~ 8. US EPA ID Numbm G; State Tmnelx~ter'e,iD,: 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Addre~ 10. ~. US EPA ID Number (~ Still Facility's ID ;~.~ 11. US DOT Delcdption (Including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Cilia, sad ID Number) · Quantity Unit EPA'Fot he5 , . . E b. State ' R : A EPA/Other T o II I !!!1 R c. State - ; ' EPA/Other II I IIII d. State . EPA/Other J. Additional De: ~.~ptions for Matra'isis Liete~ Above ~ K. HaMling Co<lea for Wastes Listed Above I 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information · ~k;'~,'~: ~''' '~- ~ . ,~. 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable international and national government regulations. If I am a large quantity generator, I certi~ that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and that i have selected the practicable melhod of treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human health snd the environment; OR, if t am a small quantity generator, I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and select the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford. ~I F Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day Year I T 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials R A Printed/Typed Name J Signature Month Day Year N (~ 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ~ Printed/Typed Name t Signature . Month Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space L I 20. Facility Owner or Operelor Certification of receipl of hazardous malerials covered by this manitesl e[cept as holed in Item 19. . T ( ..../ ' ...... y I Printe~typedNan~e / ,~ /~ .~' I Signature ~ / ~ Month Day Year / DHS A (t/ae) Not Write Below This Line EPA (Rev. 9-88) Previous editions ere obsolete. GREEN: HAULER RETAINS DIRE~R OF ~NM~ H~ Facility ~ame Kern Cowry Permit ~ Thl~ for~ Is to be returned, to 'th~'~ern.cOunt~iealth'i '~' ~::~,, ...... ':: holder of the per. t'[ '~lth nUaber' noted above-ts"respO Section 2 - ~o be filled out ~ contractor "decontamlnatin~ tank(s): '.... ':qr'.*'.'Y:.; ..:~, a,.. luthortzed representative of contractor ~ertlfles by at~ln~ belo~ that tank(s) have been decont~lnated In accordance ~lth Kern Co~t~ Health ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ . .... .....:.. .... - " Title Section ~ -~ ~e ,filled o~ and ~ ~ ~ authorized yepresentatlve of. 'the ._,' ' treatmen[, ~torage, or disposal ~actltty _accepttnE ,tank(s): '- - Facility N~e :' .-~ ." -~ .... .... ~: ' ~'" :.'- -." "- ' (Authorized Representative) .. ' :'.:-,'.'.."- ,:~:',':' . * * * ~ILING INS~UC{ION8: Fold tn half and staple. : ~?oo mower m,eet KEHH COUNTY I IEb, I.-H'I DEPAHTMENT HE^U. OFFICER Bakersfield, Calllomla g3305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 ' ' EHVlRONMEhI1AL HE^L]H DIVISION ..- DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . Vernon S. Reichmd Facility Name 'ii Kern County Permit * * UNDERGROUND 'rANI{ DISPOSI'I'IO~ T~CKING RECO~ .Y ' ,~Thl~ ~or~ 1~ to b~ returned to the l{o~n Countg ll~alth ~ay~ of acceptance of tank(s) by dlsposa/ or recycling facility. The .. holdee og the per. It ~ltl~ utmber noted above that thl~ for~ 1~ completed and returned. Section I - T~ bt~ filled out ~ .t~D~[ }'elnoval contractor: 'Tauk Removal Co,,tractor:~Z ~ ~eetlon ~ - .T~ ~ filled out ~ conttmctor "deconknmtnatlllg tank[s~ . Authorized representative of contractor certifies by signing below that ..<~..'~a~lk(s} have been decontaminated In accordance .lth liern Count~ lloalth .... Depar~n t requirements. Section 3 -T~ b~ filled ~. p~ ~.~qfli ~,X at~ author/zed representative o~ the '" ' treatment, storage, or disposal faolllty accepting tank{s~: /7. Date Tanks No. of Tanks (Authorized Repr-~;en~atlve) * * * blAILING 1NSTIIUCTiONS: ffoJ. d 1~1 ha,if and staple. (Form #11blblP-150) DI.~ {HICT OFFICES Oeln.o I.nmo,, ~ke I~nl)ella MoJave Rldgecro. st . Shelter ~t GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Slreel, Suite 300 Agency Director Beker,qleld, CA 93301 . (805) 861-3502 · .1..,.?>,.~.:~,,,~%:~.::...> Telephone (805) 861-3636 STEVE McCALLEY - ": ':~ .' ~;,f~~:, ......... Telecopler (805) 861-3429 Director R E'"' 'S 0 R E ~~~'"" ' ' ' · U ,C ~..G_.'.~i'ENT AG EN CY ' ,' ' t~~,~~''~',' :i',. ' - ' ',., · · · DEPARTS' ,~'.~:~MENTAL-------' . · '.: '',..: :.:'-":: ..: '.:'" . ~~_~_________~,.,¢~,4t~/,,'/,~Z<,:,,. .' . · . · . . · . . . .- . ... ' · '.. ' , . . . , : . . ,~~~;, . ~ . - ...... . ..:....,:,.... '"': "PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE .,::~;!.' -., .'-: ':-' "-~;:": PERMIT NUMBER a --: ................................... '.~-'~-Ii~ :.:'. ': · --': ;-' .,- . ; ....... -. '.' ........ . .... , -r: ...... : - ......... :' --; ..... . - .-z: .:£-:-¢' ' .~ .... ~:,'-:-":',';¢z,-',",~:~ ' ' "- ..... : _.:Z '7~'.:_;;:~_L .~_:": ..... _'.':--:-'-"::-_::,?':.~- -::::.-_.~. ~ . _ . . . -... -: :,,:.: :-:;..- .~ .. '., ~....'::_~..... ::....; . ..:..:, ..... HAZARDOUS ':...' :.:u.' _:. % .... ':.- ...... ..: :,-,:~. , .... '~ :..' . ..' -.',':- ~'"SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY .: , .,,: ..... :,,-. ,:-.- ---....-_ : :..., .-:.--::- . :-':-.-'- ..... : ,..,., .' "'.- ::...:.:?~,';~ '. :'..'.' _,.::. ,'::::t: i...:'::': ;?-: ,. -':....":~:.-.-:,:. :".':,.'i . :.'..-::::-'-:.'.::'.. '-:.':; ::. ,:.}"'-_~ i?:.~,.'-..}::-?:.,~.. ::.... '.'-i.":: ::': :' .::: - · . :> ::~' ...:..... :. ~;.,:' .>': . . . ?'~.. ,. . ...':, ..,~:-:. ~.:~..',.~.~:~.:,-.:' ::>.::_,,:: :: :,.': :-: ., ;..., .., ,.,., ,'.~:.~:.~.:;,.. ~: :.:' ? - ,. ..... .~. ..~;~,'i~::- . ,-".~f':':,.!~'::.' ...... '.~?',:4~. ' '.'.. ' . · -'.,': .:..y:t'~ ,,~,..-~.:?'~:'.z~..:. ,. ;:. ::. F, ACILIT,Y .NAME/ADDRESS.. :,:..:.~:?::-;:OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: ;>:,:,:~ CONTRACTOR: >.:~:.:-:~:'~':,,,;:..::,~ .:: ' -,?L:,',.:-:'~:-~ ~.~..-~.~ :~:.. '.-~ ~ , '- .,.- ,, ,~.'4:''~,:, .::'.L::'::: :',:'% ', '- ~.-: . <..'," ". ..~' '-- .' .~ ': ': .'~!?::~".- -:- ".. ' .'":~.,.". · , ~ .' '~, :' '.". '-". Berchtold Equipment '"'-: '-" : ".': ~:' Berchtom Equipment Corporation :'RLW Equ'ipmen~ -':'-'~:._ }~}:i.::,:::':- _ $30 E. 19th Street -.,-- , ....... ~.---~-,,,.350 E 19th Street ............... , ....... ~ ....... -.. · , - ,. .,.... ,, ~:--,.-- :.-.- .,,.--?. t.~,-,-:; · :..., .:...~,.~.,~., . ;~.~.~ :2080 S. Umon Avenue ,,.:.,.~>.,~:.;. -,. '~ ...... · Bakersfield, CA ~'> ::~':"~V-'~;;' -";~'. .~:7~:~:;~i';:K?Bakersfield CA ' '~ ;::,:~':~":.?.~,~;.n=v,,,.,r~,,t,~ 'c.,a ,'q::.,. . ' ....... :. ". . -' ' ' . . '.'"."-~'.' - ........~ '~ '~ ..... ' ....... :'-"Y.;,License ~¢4074 ":"-' >~" ~>:-t"', -'- ,. - Phone: (805) 3~3-7817 - Phone: (805) 834-L100 -. "...,~', : "PERMIT FOR. CL. ~ SURE OF ' ," ~ . ~,_:~ :. ,:._ ~PERMIT EXPIRES. :i:. ': Fe~ruarg '14~ 1990 ~ TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE November 14~ 1989 LOCATION APPROVED BY ., . : T ronda R. Crumpler, R.E.~.S. Ha~rdous Materials Specialist ............. ' ........................................................................ POST ON PREMISES .......................................................................... CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. It is the r~ponsibility of thc P~mitt~ to obtain permits which may be r~uired by oth~ regulato~ agcnci~ prior lo be~nning work. (i.e., City Fire and Building Departments) 2. Permitt~ must notify t he Hazardous Materials Management Program at (805) 861-3636 two working days p~or to tank removal or abandonmcnl in place lo arrange for required insp~tions(s). 3. Tank closure activiti~ must be per Kern County Environmental Health and Fire Department approved methods ~ d~cfibed in Handb~k UT- 30. 4. It is thc contractor's r~ponsibility to know and adhere to all applicable la~ regarding the handling, transportation or tr~tmcnt of hazardous materials. _ 5. Thc tank removal contractor must have a qualified company employee onsitc supc~ising thc tank removal. The employ~ must have tank ~moval experience p~or to working unsupe~iscd. 6. K any contracto~ other than th~c listed on permit and permit application arc to be utilized, prior approval must ~ ~anted by the specialist listed on the permit. Deviation from the submilted application is not allowed. 7. Soil Sampling: a. Tank size 1~ than or ~ual to 1,0~ gallons - a minimum of two sampl~ must be ret~cvcd from beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximalely two f~t and six f~t. b. Tank size ~at~ than 1,~ to 10,000 gallons - a minimum of four sampi~ must ~ retrieved one-third ~ the way in from thc ends of each tank at depths of approximately two f~t and six feet. c. Tank size ~eater than 10,0~ gallons - a minimum of six sampl~ must ~ retrieved on-rough of the way in from the ends of each tank and benealh the cent~ of each tank at deplhs of approximately two feet and six f~t. · 8. Soil Sampling (piping ama): ~' ' ' A minimum of two sampl~ must be retrieved at deplhs of approximately two feet and six f~t for eve~ 15 linear f~t ~ pipe run and under thc ......... dispenser ar~.' ........... . PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE PERMIT NUMBER A 1077-15 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM SUBSTANCES STORAGE.FACiLITY ' 9. Soil Sample analysis: ' :; .:-' -, ..-.' ' :',i. ;-': "- a. Ail soil sa mples retrieved from benes t h gasoline (leaded/unleaded) tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, ,- and total petroleum hydrocarbons (for gasoline) ...... , ,, , . _. .... ,: .: .... . ..... bl . All soil samples retrieved from beneath diesel tanks and appurtenances must be a~'Myzed ~°r total petroleum hYdrocarbons-(fol diesel) '~' '. -;;.". ""~-"J'?'and benzene. '" ": " "-' · '-' ......... : " "'~'-~- · -~' ~- ' -'ii "'All soil samples retrieved from beneath waste oil tanks and appurtenancesmust b~ a~-alyzed for total Organic halides, lead, oil and'g~as~-: d. All soil samples retrieved from beneath crude oil tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for oil and grease. ~.,., '......: ,, '. :~ i' ':;..-' e. ' '! "Ali soil samples retrieved from beneath tanks and appurtenances that contain unknown substances must be analyzed for a full range of '. :.,,f .:." .' '.~substances that may have boen stored within tl~ tank. : ' 10. · The followiag timetable lists pre-and post-tank removal requirements:' . ' ' ''' .... -" ';~ak~-.liVll I !.'. '- '.~:'~.--'" .':* - .:' -":"' · :'~ ..!,~- ,' -" :~b' ' - ' submitted to Hazardous Mal~ials Management Program -': ~" ': . ,~.Tra~portai~on and tracking forms ~nl to Hazardous ~ ~",~!. ' '. `f} .:L?~ No later than ~ working days'for traniportation and 14 working - - Malerials Managemenl Program. ~1 hazardous waste days for thc tracking form after tank ~moval "', · '~ ' ' man~ts must be signed by the r~eiver of the · ' " ' -- " hazardous waste . - ' - - ' : ' '~ - '. '',.. ,:.,- .~,::. "~:~,' .. '..'; ". ~'" '.:: ~?:::::.~! ..:~.,;,.,..... ~,, ~.::':,L: ': · . , Samplepro~amanalysis,, , to ..... Hazardo~.Mat~als~ _- '....Management....,....C:"'., '.': '.,' :'('i-'.~,,' '~,,: No later than 3 ~rking days after ~mpletion of analysis .:~.'~:~:x: ,- 11. PurRin~/lnerting Conditions: ' a. Liquid shall ~ pumped from tank prior to purging such that I~ than 8 gallons ~ liquid remain in tank. (CSH&SC 41~00) b. Tank shall be purged through vent pipe discharging at least 10 f~t above ~ound level. (CSH&SC 41700) c. No emission shall r~uit in ~o~ det~table'at or ~yond.propeny line. (Rule 419) .... d. No emission shall endanger the health, safety, comfort of repine ~ any pe~on. (CSH&SC 41700) e. Venl lin~ shall remain attached to tank until the insp~tor a~v~ to autho~ze removal. RECOMMENDATIONS/GUIDELINES FOR I~EMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS This department is responsible for enforcing the Kern County Ordinance Code, Division 8 and state regulations pertaining to underground storage tanks. Representatives from this department respond to job sites during tank removals to ensure that the tanks are safe to remove/close and that the overall job performance is consistent with, permit requirements, applicable laws and safety standards. The following guidelines are offered to clarify the interests and expectations for this department. I. .Iob site safety is one of our primary concerns. Excavations are inherently dangerous. It is the Contractor's responsibility to know and abide by CAL~OSHA regulations. The job foreman is responsible for the crew and any subcontractors on the job. As a general rule workers are not permitted in improperly sloped excavations or when unsafe conditions exist in the hole. Tools and equipment are to be used only for their designed _ function. For example, backhoe buckets are never substituted for ladders. 2. Properly licensed contractors are assumed to understand the requirements of the permit issued. The job foreman is responsible for knowing and abiding by the conditions of the permit. Deviation from the permit conditions may result in a stop-work order. 3. Individual contractors will be held responsible for their post-removal paperwork. Tracking forms, hazardous-waste manifests and analyses documentation is necessary for each site in order to close a case file or move it into mitigation. When contractors do not follow through on necessary paperwork, an unmanageable backlog of incomplete cases results. Ii this continues, processing time for completing new closures will increase. TRC:cas \a 1077-15 t/09/89 I~voi ce Nbr. 25316 9.9:50 am KERN COLINTY PLANNING &: DEVELOPMENT ' ~7~0 'N' Street (80~) 861-28"5 .... A...H REGISTER ~'L.N Er~IIIP'~,FNT ~ustomer P,O.~ I ~tn By ],Order Date I ShSp Date v~a Terms -:!10~89-1 ] L..JD i !1/09/89 ! 1!/09/89 NT ne Descrfip~fion 0t..~8~t4fy Prfice I. tn~t Dfis'c To~'i 1 TANK PLAN CHECK 1 100.00 E 100.00 I?0A Order Tota] t00.00 Amount Due 100,00 ,....... Payment Made By Check 100,00 THANK YOU t lhrrg~AL USE ONLY: · - .,,ISoo qq.... ., Prlo'13--15 KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT / {_ ~ ~.~ 2700 'lq" STREET, SUITE 300 APPt)C~T]ON DAT~ r / BAKERSFTELD, CA 93301 , m, ?xNxs ~ RE ,a,umoN,o · (805) 861-3636 L~G~f OP PTPTNO TQ APP:.I :AT! ON FOR PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT OF UNDERnROUND '- HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILI~ ~ R~XOVAL. OR ~ ~a~oo~ t~ P~C~ fPTLL 0~ o.~ APPLf~TTON PER FACfL~I THfS APPL~TfON FOR I -- 3WN~R / IADDRESS -' ]PROPO~ PROd S CAT~ ~l~ORH[~ L~C[H$~ I ~RK~'S CgHPEIISATIO~ ¢ INSURER ~' ~ORXER'S C~HPENSATION I NSURER PRONE , ' ' - ~ rANK ~ VOLUME ~l~l~: ~D (NON-CO~ERCtAL NAME) Ok~S S~8.~ · I OIEHICLL PR~TOUSLY ~OR~D WAT£R TO F*C:y'%'Y PROVTGF. n BY ~z ~ ;ASIS~.FOR SOiL ~PE ~D GROUNDWATER/ Og~lt~ OET~INATiON~.~. -- ~ w<~~ ~ t., ,~* ' ~7 /~ '; + ~ 'OTAL ~UNBER OF S~PL~S TO BE ~NAL~SD S~PL~S WILL a[ ANALYZ~ FOR:~ ~SS~IBE llOW RESIDUE IN T~KIS) AND PIPTNG I~ ~ ~g R~O~ ~NO DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE ~N~PO~ATION ~O DISPOSAL C~AN{ES): = = ~'~ ~,.-)~- ~,.. · · -t~...:;~ '~Tn~ :HPfl~NATTO~ ~'~ n~ ~ ~n~ nP . A~PL~D ~W P~NAL~ O? P~RJU~ *HO ~ ~l~ BE~T O~ ~ XNOWLE~O~ IS ~O~ AND CORNe~. /~ ::~' T~TL~ .... · . [' DATE ~ " GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director · ' Baker.field. CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 " .. ...~r'. ..... -:".~ Telephone (805) 861.3836 STEVEDirectorMCCALLEY ' ,~..-rr,' '")~ : Telecopler (805) 861-3429 R ESOU R C E ~~i~EN'T AG EN CY PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: "'OWNER(s) NAME/ADDRESS: .... CONTRACTOR: ............ · Berchtold Equipment Berchtold Equipment, Corp. R.L.W. Equipment 330 E. 19th Street 330 E. 19th Street 2680 So. Union Ave. Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA 93307 License #294074 Phone: (805)-871-4667 Phone: (805)-834-1100 323-7817 PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES November 14, 1989 _3 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE August 14~ 1989 Turonda R. Crumpler, R.E.H.~. Hazardous Materials Specialist ........................................................................... POST ON PREMISES .......................................................................... CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be required bY other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work. 2. Permittee must notify the Hazardous Materials Management Program at (805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or (inerting and filling) to arrange for required inspections(s). 3. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating closure action. 4. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook UT-30. .. 5. Soil Sampling Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or constituents to be sampled for which are described below and in Handbook UT-30 must receive prior approval by the Environmental Health Department.' a. (Tank size from 1,000 to 10,000 gallons) -a minimum of four samples must be retrieved one-third of the way in from the ends of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. b. (Tank size greater than 10,000 gallons) - a minimum of six samples must be retrieved on-fourth of the way in from the ends of each tank and beneath the center of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. 6. If any contractors Or disposal facilities other than those listed on permit and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must-be granted by the specialist listed on the permit. - PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSUREPERMIT NUMBER A1000-15 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY 7. Soil Sampling (piping area) a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the dispenser area(s). 8. Sample analysis ........ _a..Al! (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, and total petroleum~ hydrocarbons for gasoline. . b. All Diesel samples must be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons for diesel and benzene. 9. Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal. 10. All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation, or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health Services Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any contaminated soil. 11. Permittee is responsible for making' sure that "tank disposition tracking record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within 14 days of tank removal. 12. Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 48 hours advance notice. 13. Results must be submitted to this office within three days of analysis completion. TRC:cd crumpler \ 1000-15.pta GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 . Telephone (805) 861-3636 ] i'' ' ~" 1'~ * ' ~ ' ' ~ ' Telecopler (805) 861-3429 STEVE McCALLEY ~:~,,.~,..~---/' - '.,:. - Director RESOURCE MANAG E~M.E NT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH~.SERVICES PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE "--,..~~~' PERMIT NUMBER A1000-'15 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: Berchtold Equipment Berchtold Equipment, Corp. R.LW. Equipment 330 E. 19tla Street 330 E. 19th Street 2680 So. Union Ave. Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA 93307 License #294074 Phone: (805)-871-4667 Phone: (805)-834-1100 323-7817 PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES November 14, 1989 3 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE August 14, 1989 LOCATION APPROVED BY ~ . ~ Turonda R. Crumpler, R.E.H.~ Hazardous Materials Specialist ........................................................................... POST ON PREMISES .......................................................................... CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work. 2. Permittee must notify the Hazardous Materials Management Program at (805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or (inerting and filling) to arrange for required inspections(s). 3. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating closure action. 4. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook UT-30. 5. Soil Sampling Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or constituents to be sampled for which are described below and in Handbook UT-30 must receive prior approval by the Environmental Health Department. a. (Tank size from 1,000 to 10,000 gallons) -a minimum of four samples must be retrieved one-third of the way in from the ends of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. b. (Tank size greater than 10,000 gallons) - a minimum of six samples must be retrieved on-fourth of the way in from the ends of each tank and beneath the center of each tank at depths of approximately .two feet and six feet. 6. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those listed on permit and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by the specialist listed on the permit. PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSUREPERMIT NUMBER Al000-15 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY 7. Soil Sampling (piping area) a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the dispenser area(s). 8. Sample analysis a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons for gasoline. b. All Diesel samples must be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons for diesel and benzene. 9. Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal. 10. All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation, or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health Services Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any contaminated soil. 11. Permittee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within 14 days of tank removal. 12. Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 48 hours advance notice. 13. Results must be submitted to this office within three days of analysis completion. TRC:cd crum pier \ 1000-15.pta 2700 M Street. Suite 300 Bekerefleld, CA 93301 GARY J. wICKS Telephone (805) 861-363~ Agency Director -, -~- Telecopler (805) 861-$429 (805) 861-3502 STEVE I~cCALLEY '" ~ " .'.ENT: AG ENCY DEPART~I'~~N~i'~NMENTAL November 2, 1989 RLW Equipment ATTN: Bud McNabb 2680 S. Union Avenue Bakersfield, California g3307 RE: BerchCold Equipment Corp. - Tank Abandonment Gentlemen: This office has reviewed your request to utilize the underground fuel storage tanks located at 330 E. 19th Street, Bakersfield, California, known as Ber(:htold, for dse ofStorage as fire water supply at another location. It has bee~l our policy to have tanks abandoned as per ))andbook UT-30 and Kern County ..... ection 8 48 270 (A) (B) (C) (D) which states, "No Ordinance Code_ (K_C 0 C ) S J ~ L~ ~.~c< the nerson undertakes all of the I close an underground ~a.~ ~. .... _~' ~,, o~a -non a file review person.shal . . . ' 'n a erm~:... --~ -~ .o following actions ,~te.r ~!~t ob~a~;~anc~ for the tank removal and d~sposal d cu~.~'ent Depa~t~n~ po/l~y, d v~, _,~ ~ +~o ~nllowino conditions are an not be ran~ed until process could ~ g ~atisfactorily completed: 1. Abide by the Permit to Abandon conditions. 2. Follow established guidelines in Handbook UT# 30 for abandonment and soil sampling.. 3. 'DemJnstrate co the permitting authority that there has been no significant soil contamination and, or groundwater contamination. 4. Supply written certification from tank cleaning company which states the tanks are emptied and cleaned to Lower Explosive Limit of below 5~ and/or oxygen (0~ below 12~. 5. Supply written approval from the Kern County Fire Department Fire Protect'~on Program that the tanks, When cleaned of fuel residue meet m~n~mum specification for storage of i!re supply water the ' ' other authorities. established by the Fire Department and 6. One week after the ta[,ks arc. filled with'water, the contents will be sampled, and analyzed as to chemical makeup, and analysis results submitted to Kern County Envircnmental Health Services for review. RLW Equipment November 2, 1989 Page 2 The vari-ance, '-if issued after the above' conditions-aremet the folloWing compliance activities would be associated with it. 1. Laboratory analyses of the stored water must be done one week and six months after the tanks are filled and once a year for 3 years. Costs incurred as results of such testing and analysis shall be the responsib'ili~ty of either the facility owner and/or the contractor. '- 2. A reduced pressure-device,-approved by the Kern-County-Environmental Health Services Department shall be installed~in the supply line. 3. Reuse' of the underground tanks for fuel storage and/or hazardous substance will be permitted only if the tank meets all the requirements for new tank installation which include secondary contaminant requirements, overfill protection, etc. Utilization of the tank for any other purpose but storage of fire supply water would be done in violation of the variance conditions and the Kern County Ordi~nance Code Section 8.48.270. 4. The permit of variance for tank disposal can be revoked for non- compliance with any Kern County.Ordinance Code, including but not l!mited to the items specified in this letter. This type of reuse oi a tank has not been allowed; if a hazardous mixture is detected in testing, and~!or the tanks do net meet the requirements above, the tanks will need to be aispo..~ed of as per Handbook UT 30.' If you have any quest':ons regarding the requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me a'L (805) 861-3636. Turonda R. Crumpler, R.E.H.S. Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program TRC.-cas Enclosures cc: Kern County Fire Department File \rlw.l%r (805) 8~1-3636 LKN(ITH OF PIPIN~ AIaPLZCATI:ON ~OR PERMIT FOR CLOaURB/~DO~~ OF ~BRQROUE a~oous suas?~c~s s?o~8 THIS IS I . . _...=_._ ,.,_,..,_.. l_>j j: '-- ~~ ~T ~I~ ~E ~ ~ p~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~/, o ~. ~ . . ~ ~/~. ' ~ , ~ , ~ ~ , - ~ ~ , , ~H~I~ ~ITI~ OF ~i~ ~ ~ rANK ~ ~L~ ~I~ ~ (~~Cl~ ~) ~ . ~ /~. ~ ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ IVw ~ ~ =~° , ./n' ~, ~/~i ,, ~ ', ,, I~TBR TO I~ACILITY PROVIDBO BY o../, / w./-.- t /.>.' NEAR~3T MATER NBLL - QIV~ DIiTA~CE AND DIL~IB~ ~ I11' #ITHIN ~OO PEET BASIS ~ SOIL TYPE AND GROIJNDMATER DEPTH DirrERMINATION _~',-,,,,, /-. ~.., /z,,~. ~ .~. ,,z. ~? - ~ ~ /~--~ '-T; -- ," - ,- - TO~A~ Nu~u~x o~ SAaPL~ TO BE ANALYT~O ISANPLm up-r-;BK ANALY~ / ~- /~ I '-/-YF ~ 7-x DESC311B! HOM RESIDUE IN TANKII) Alii) PIPIN6 I$ TO BI HSNOVKD AND DISPOSKD OF IIICLUD~ I&TIOII ~ DISPOS~J. CI:BIPANI~-q): ~ 7";.. :. /~. .~, ;. , . ../ , ~,./ ~,,.,..,.:,/$,,., s.,z ~.~.~ ,'[. ,. /- d "~ ~ /~ ,,~ . - . ~ ! DESCl~nE ~ THE DISPO~L METHOD ~ DISPOSAL LOCATIO~f ?ANKfS) · f, PLEASE PROVIDE INIMRNATION REQURST~ ON .llVl~OE (FOrm #lO01P-140) R E C E I P T PAGE 1 -~/89 ................. Invoice Nbr. 1 2~205 3:25 pm~ KERN COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 2700 'M' S~reet . _8akmrs~e3d .CA 93301. Type of'order N ..... (8'05) 861-2615 CASH REGISTER R L W EQUIPMENT H080889-1 I LJD !' 0S/08/e9 I 08/08/89 t I NT Line Description Quantity Price Unit Disc Total 3 TANK PLAN CHECK 1 100.00 E 100.00 I?0A Order Total 100.00 Amount Due 100.00 Payment Made By Check 100.00 THANK YOU~ 1700Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN'~ HEALTH OFFICER Bakerstleld, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 , ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Relchard INTERIM PERMIT PERMIT~el 5OO1 9C TO OPERATE: ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986 EXPI RES: JULY 1, 1989 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY' NUMBER OF TANKS= 4 FACILITY: ~ OWNER: BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT COMPANY I BERCHTOLD, E.G. 330~ EAST 19TH STREET I P.O. BOX 3098 BAKERSFIELD, CA ~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93385 TANK # AGE(IN YRS} SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING? 1,2 6 MVF 3 NO 3 9 MVF 3 NO' 4 6 NO 3 NO NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE * * * POST ON PREMISES DATE PERMIT MAILED: .... . . ' .': DATE PERMIT CHECK LiST RETURNED: · .,~ ' '.' Kern County Health Departme~t~ Division ot Environmental Hea~ ' Application . ~ _ ~ ~_. _ ~> ~-- 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, ~A 9]305 ~PLI~TION FOR PE~IT ~ OPE~TE ~E~R~ ~~US SUBST~CES S~E FACILI~ ~ o~ Application (ch~k): ~New Facility ~ification of Facility ~isti~ Facility ~ansfer of ~ershi~ A. ~ergen~ 24-~ur Contact (n~e, area c~e, ~one): ~ ~3 ~/7 Facility ~ ~~L~ _ ~; ~~ ~ ~. of T~ks ~ ~ of B~in~ss (check): ~line s~ti'on ~er '(de~ri~) ~d ~ ~ ~Z~;~, f- Is T~k(s) ~cat~ on ~ Agricultural Fa~? ~Y~ ~ ~~~ Is Tank(s) Us~ ~i~rily for ~ricultural ~r~ses? ~Yes ~ .F~ ~3~3o9~, B~, ~.~ Facility Addre~ ~O ~, ~ ~. ~F~/~ C Nearest Cro~ St. 1~.~ 93~ T R SEC ' (RUral ~atio~ ~ly) ~er ~ress ~.~, ~ 30~ Z'ip f33F~ ~le~ne M~ ~ 7~/7 O~rator Con,ct ~rs~ ~dress ....... Zip ........................... Tele~one -~- .... B. ~r ~ Facili~ Provid~ by ~ /~ ~p~ ~' Gro~~r d~~~ ~sis for Soil ~ a~ Gro~ter ~P~ ~temtnatfo~ . ~/j ~ C. Contractor ~ Contractor' s ~ce~e ~. ~dr e~ Zlp ~le~ pro~s~'"'S~rti~ ~te pro~s~ C~pleti~ ~te Worker's C~~ti~ Certification ~ Insure~ · D. If ~is ~mit Is For ~ification Of ~ ~isti~ ~cility, Briefly ~ri~ ~ifi~ti~ Pro~ E. T~k(s) S~re (~eck all ~t a~ly): Tank ~ ~s~ Pr~uct ~tor Vehicle Unle~ R~ular Pr~t~ Dte~l ~ste F. Ch~i~l ~sition of ~tertals Stor~ (~t ~ces~ry for ~tor v~icle f~ls) Tank ~ Ch~l Stor~ (n~c~rcial ~e) ~ ~ (if k~) ~~1' Pr~i~sly S~r~ (i~ different) G. Transfer of Ownership Date of-~-ansfer Pre~ious Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept ~ully all obligations Of Permit No. issued to · I understand that the Permittir~] Authority may review and n~dify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~%dergroc~d storage facility upon receiving this c~upleted form. Tnis .fora has been c~upleted under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. TANK ~ ~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ;~r.~. APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: [-]Vaulted ~Non-Vaul ted ~]Double-Wal 1 ~Single-Wal 1 2. ~ Material Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel []Polyvinyl Chloride []-]Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [~ A1tlnin~n [~ Bronze ['~Unknown [] Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) _ Manufactgrer 4. Tank Secondary Co~ta'inment [~Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner [~Lined Vault ~None []Unknown [']Other (describe): Manufacturer: []Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank fnterior Lining ---~Rubber []Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic []Glass []Clay [t~li,~d [][]nkno~ [-~Other (describe): ....... 6.- Tank Corrosion Protection --]~Galvanized ~ass-Clad []Pol~thylene Wrap []Vinyl Wrapping P~iTar or Asphalt []Unknown []None []Other (descrihe): Cathodic Protection:. []None []Impressed Current Syst~- ~]Sa~rifi¢laI ~%~de Syst~ Describe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) OGroundwater Monitoring' Wail(s) [] Vadose Zone Monitoring Nell (s) [~ U-Tube Without Liner []U-Tube with Compatible Liner Directin~ Flow to Monitorirg Wall(s)* [] Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor' [] Conductivit~ Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank [] LiqUid Betrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well' or Annular Space Daily Inventory Reconciliation ~J Periodic Tightness Testing None ~u~jirg & Unknown ~ Other b. Piping~ ~lo~-~estric~ing Leak Detector(s) flor Pressurized Piping~ [] Monitoring S~np ~r~th Recem¥ [] Seale~ C~rete Rece~¥ [~]Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Race~m¥ r~None [] Unknown [] Other *Describe Make & ModeI~ 8. ~en Tightness Testmd? []Yes []No [~Unknom~ Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testin~ Ccmpally 9. Tank ~ Tank Rapaired? []Yes ~No rTUnknown ~ Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. O~erfill Protection Tape rator Fills,' Controls, & Visually Monitors Level Float Gau~e []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box [-~None [~Unknown Other: List Make & Model For A~ Dm~ices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: ~Yes []No []Unknown Material .~-~.--~.'~/ Thickness (inc~h~s) {'.~ ~' Diameter / ~" Manufacturer ~Pressure ~Sucti6n []Gravity -~p?Sx'imate Lang._th b. ~ Unoerground Pi~frg Corrosion Protection : '' ~ .................... DGalvanized I-]Fiberglass-Clad ~Imp~essed Current ~Sacrificial Anode []Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolati.on ~Viny!~Wrap []Tar or Asphalt~ []Unknown []None ~Other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairm%ent: []Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner b~;stem ~]None []Unknown []Other (describe): TANK ~ ,~_ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR E~CH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: r]vaul ted ~Non-Vaul ted r]Double-Wal 1 I-] Single-Wal 1 2. ~ Material Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel r]Polyvinyl Chloride l~Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluminum [] Bronze []Unknown [] Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Dste Installed Thickness !,Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 4. ~a'nk Secondary Contai'lmaent ' []Double-Wall ~]STnthetic Liner rlLined Vault ~lNone rlUnknown [] Other (descr ibc): Manufacturer: []Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank .Interior Linin~ ---~Rubber rlAlkyd E]EPOx¥ E]menoltc rlGlass []Clay []Unlin~! rqOther (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --l~GalvaHized-l~ff6~Tass-Clad []Pol~thylene Wrap [2]Vinyl Wra~ing ~1?ar or Asphalt []Unknown []None []Other (describe): Cathedic Protection: ~INone r~impressed Current System rlSacrific[&l' ~de System 5e--s~ribe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitorir~, and Interception a. Tank: [2]Visual (vaulted tanks only) UIGround~ter Monitoring' Wmll(s) r'lVadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [21U-Tube Without Liner r]u-Tube with Cumpatible Liner Directi~ Flow to Monitoring rlvapor [mtector* ~ ~.iquid Level Sensor' [] Conductivity S~nsor' [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank ' [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fram U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular S[~ace [] Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation '.~i'Periedic ?lghtness Testing rlNone rlUnknown [] Other b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Pipin~ [] Monitoring Sump with Race~y l-1 Sealed Concrete Race~y DHalf-Cut Cumpatible Pipe ~aceway []Synthetic Liner Rece~y E~None [] Unknown [] Other *Describe Make & Model: 8. ~en Tightness Tested? [2]Yes []No ~]Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing Ccmpany 9. Tank ~ Tank Repaired? UlYes ~]NO r'lUnknown Dote(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection rator Fills, Controls, & Visually ·Monitors r~-vel pe Float Gauge [2]Float Vent Valves [] ~uto Shut- Off Controls []Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box []None []Unknown []Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices ll. Pip~ng a. Underground Piping: ~lYes rqNo []Unknown Material ?hickness (inches) //,¢-" Dta, eter z3" Manufacturer ? r'lPressure ~Suction []Gravity '~A~prOximate [~ngth of Pipe l~m ~-~" · b. Underground Pi~ing Corrosion Protection : ........ []Galvanized []Fiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current [2]secriftcial Anode E]Polyethylene Wrap []Electrical Zsolatton []Vtqyl Wra~ []Tar or []Unknown []None ~Other (describe): //~>~ /~?.:- ,~k/ .,':~;~,,.;~ c. Underground PipitS, Secondary Containment: []Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System P1None []Unknown []Other (~escribe): TANK ~ __~__ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK) --FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: [-]Vaulted ~-~ Non-Vaul ted ~Double-Wal 1 ~-~Single-Wal 1 2. Ta~ Material ~Carbon Steel [-]Stainless Steel [~Polyvinyl Chloride [~Fiberglass-Clad Steel ~] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [-] Concrete [] Al~elin~n [] Bronze l-lUnknown [] Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 4. Tank Secondary Containment l-~Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner [] Lined Vault ~None ~lUnknown I'~Other (describe): Manufacturer: ~lMaterial ThiCkness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lining ----~Rubber ~Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic ~Glass (]Clay ~t~lin~d [][~kno~ rTother (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --~Galvanized -~U~---~ass-Clad []Pol~thYlene Wrap []Vinyl Wrappi£~] ~Tar or Asphalt []Unknown r~None []Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: ~]None []Impressed~ Current System ~lSacrifi¢ial A~ System DeSCribe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interce~)tion a. Tank: []visual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitorirg' Well(s) [~Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) []U-Tube Without Liner C]~u-Tube with Compatible Liner Dlrectin~ Flow to Monitoring Well(s)* [] Vapor Detector*, [] Liquid Level Sensor' [] Conductivity Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank7 [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space ~lDaily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightness Testing r'] None 0 Unknown [] Other b. Piping= Flo~-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurize~ Piping= · []Monitoring St~p with Race~y []Sealed Concrete Rece~my (]Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner Racevmy ~None [] Unkno,~n 0 Other *Describe Make & l~X~el: 8. TightnessTank ' s ~s en Tightness Tested? []yes []No ~Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing Ccmi~any 9. Tank ~ Tank Repaired? []Yes ~No []Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection a rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors bevel pe Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box []None []Unkno~ Other: List Make & Model L~olr Alcove Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: .~-lYes []No ~Unknown Material Thickness (inches) //<~- ~ Diameter ./,~ ~' Manufacturer ? I-IPressure ~Sucti'on ~Gravity '~oproximate Length 6f Pipe ---b.~ Underground Pi~i~g Corrosion Protection : []Galvanized (]Fiberglass-Clad []Im[xessed Current []Sacrificial Anode []Polyethylene Wrap []Electrical Isolation ~V%nyl Wrap []Tar or Asphalt []Unknown [-1None [~Other (describe) (~,~.L:,., ~;~<¥ ~.,.?j .~.~ c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairm~ent: (-]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System ~None [']Unknown []Other (describe): Facility Name ~ ~/p ~ CD Permit TANK ~ /~ (FILL OLIT SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaulted ~Non-Vaulted l-]Double-Wall I-~Single-Wall 2. ~ Material --~Carbon Steel i-]Stainless Steel [~Polyvinyl Chloride n Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Altillintel [] Bronze rlUnk~lown Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer . a . //?, ,, .... ... 4. Tank Secondary Containment .~lDouble-Wall []Synthetic Liner nLined Vault ~None []L~known [] Other (describe): Manufacturer ~ ['1Material Thick~ess (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lining ~Rubher ['1Alkyd ~lEpoxy ~lPhenolic []Glass ['lClay~ ~J~llinmc] I-IL~ OOther (describe): 6". Tank Corrosion Protection ---~Galvanized -]~'~-~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap []Vin¥.~l .Wr?_~lllg []Tar or Asphalt i~Unknowl% ~]None ~'Other (describe):_ Cathodic Protection. ~None C]Impressed Current System ~]Sacrifi¢lal ~ System. Describe System & EquiI:ment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitorir~, and In~~' ~. ~ank: []Visual (vaulted~ ~-~' only) U]Ground~ater Monitorir~' Well (s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring ~ell(s) ['1U-Tube Without Liner [~U-Tube with C~npatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring [] Vapor Detector* n Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivi1:~ Sensor- ~ Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wal.1 Tank [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube,_Monitoring Well or ;%nnttla. r space [~Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation ~Periodic Tightnes~ T~tlng rlNon. [] unkno~ rlo~he~ .... . ,. b. ~iping~ Plo~e-Rest:ricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurize~ l-lMonitoring ~p wfth Race%my []Sealed Concrete Rac~¥ ~'lHalf-Cut Cempatible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner Race~¥ [] Unkno~ ClOthet . 8. ~en Tightness Tested? []Yes []No Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test . Test Name Testing C~mpany . 9. Tank. Re,alt Tank Repaired? []Yes ~o ['1Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) .,, Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection -~-C~aparator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Colltrols B Capacitance Sensor nsealed Fill Box []None ~Unkno~al Other: List Make & Model f~lr Above Devices a. Under, round Piping: ~-q'Yes [~No [~Unknown Material Thickness (inches) ~ ' Diameter / ~ Manufacturer ~. ? []Pressure ~Suc[iOn '"['1Gravity ApproXimate Length of p~pa 'RLI1/~.,' ' .. b. Undergroul%d Piing Corrosion Protection : []Galvanized [~Fiberglass-Clad []Imlxessed Current [1Sacrificial []Polyethylene Wrap [-]Electrical Isolation []Vinyl Wra~ r'lT&lr olr A~.lt r'lunknoval []None [~Other (describe).- ['~,....~ ~-"~?_ ~..';~: ~:.,-',~/ ~'~ ~, ,~'.'~'~ ,"~':~.'-" ~'~' C. Underground Piping, Secondary Contaiment: rlDouble-Wall []Synthetic Liner System IT']None C]Unknom []Other (describe) :__ Permit Questionnaire Normally, permits are sent to facility' Owners but since many Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before returning this form with payment: _~ 1. Send all information to Owner at the address' listed on invoice (if O~ner Is different than- Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information) · 2. Send all information to Owner at the following corrected address: 3. Send all Information to Operator: Name: Address.: (Operator can make copy or permit for Owner). CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. D. JOHNSON October 7, 1991 - BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Lee Sattley Tucker Properties P. O. Box 429 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CLOSURE OF 1 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE TANKS LOCATED AT 21st & KERN STREET IN BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. PERMIT ~ BR0010 Dear Mr. Sattley This is to inf6rm you that this department has reViewed the results for the preliminary assessment associated with the Closure of the tanks located at the above stated address. Based upon laboratory data submitted, this office is satisfied with the assessment performed and requires no further action at this time. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3797. ./~Ha~zaAr~ou~sn;°a~er~ial Specialist Underground Tank Program