The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNDERGROUND TANK-C-3/18/92 (2) CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. D. JOHNSON January 8, 19 92 BAKERSFIELD. 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Jonathan L. Buck Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. 4400 ~she Road, #206 Bakersfield, CA 93313 'RE: .Site assessment work plan for the facility located at 231 21st. Street,. Bakersfield, CA. Dear Mr. Buck, This' is to notify you that the 'workplan for the aboVe stated address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the. commencement of work. Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, Unless previously approved. If you have any questions,'please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, ergrounaaraiist =ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC= . SITE ASSESSMENT WORKPLAN · - ~ C.C. Douglass Mfg., Inc. ~ 231 21st street County of Kern . Bakersfield,.California December 199~ 'ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC- I / I Advanced Environmental Concepts, In~ is pleased to present the following. _ -' .I ~ Site Assessment ~ Workplan I C.C. Douglass M~., Inc. 231 21st Street I County of Kern · ]]akersfield, C~__lifornia I I Thi8 worl~lan has been prepared for. I Ms. Debbie Douglass C.C. Don~a~n Mfg., Inc. December 1991 I ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 AsHE ROAD, #206 ' BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/.831-1646 '-.~-FAX 805/83i-1771 Site Asse~m~ ent Workplgn /~lvanc~d Pmvironmental ~oncepts, Ine~ Table Of C°ntent~ 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 ~ 1 19. Scope of Work 1 1.3 Schedule Z.0 BACKOROUND 3.0 WORKPI.,AN 8.1 Borinff Locations and Deptlm 4.0 MP..THOD8 3 4.1 Borin~ Methods 4.~ ~ofl ~nmplin~ 3 4.8 Field Screenin~ of Soil Sample9 4.4 Soft .qnnlysis 4 §.0 SITE SAFETY PLAN 4 6.0 RI~[ARKS/~NATURES B) Health and Safety Pin. Projee~ ARC 91V-I1B · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 ' FAX 805/831-1771 ~ ~ent Workpl-n ~l.vanc~d ~,nvix~nmentsl ~,oncept~ Inc. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Ms. Debbie Douglass has authorized Advanced Environmental Concepla, Inc. (AEC) to prepare this site assessment workplan for soil borings at C.C. Douglass Manufacturing facility. The site is located at 231 21st Street, Bakersfield, California (Figure 1). The lead agency for this project is the Bakersfield City Fire Department (City) and the agency contact is Mr. Joseph Dunwoody. · Specific locations of the proposed borings are shown on the site map (Fignro 2). 1.1 Purpose The soil boring program described in this workplan has the following objective: · Evaluate the vertica~ and lateral extent of hydrocarbon impacted soil originating from one (1) removed 400-gallon gasoline underground storage tznk (UST). 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of services described in this Workplan includes: 1. Locating underground utilities using Client information as well as the Underground Service Alert (USA). 2. Drilling three (3) soil borings to a depth of approximately 30-feet each. B-1 and B-2 will be drilled using a Ferrett drill rig. B-3 will be drilled using a Mobile B-53 and angled into the plume. B-1 will be positioned through the estimated center will be~the, basis for evaluating the vertical of the hydrocarbon plume 8lid hydrocarbon migration. B-2 and B-3 will be positioned at staggered intervals from B-1 and data generated will allow extrapolation of the lateral, plume migration. Because of the permeable lithology of the subsurface soils, AEC is anticipating relatively minor lateral dispersion. Boring B-1 will be terminated when two (2) consecutive five (5) foot samples indicate non-detect (ND) PID readings, or until the Ferrett rig encounters auger refusal. 3. Collecting soil samples at 5-fo~t intervals using a split spoon sampler lined with. clean brass sleeves. The soil samples will be field screened using a Photoionization eV Selected rumples will be analyzed for total (Pm) a 10.2 Ialnp. petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline by CA DH8 method and volatile aromatics (BTXE) by EPA method 8020 at a California Certified Laboratory. It is anticipated that all soil samples from B-1 will be analyzed, and that ~mples at 10-foot intervals will be analyzed from the lateral borings. 4. Preparing soil boring logs according to the United Soils ClasSification System (USCS). 5. Preparing a final report detailing the results of the soil investigation which will results, extent of hydrocarbon impacted soil, include drilling methods, and conclusions and recommendations. ~2 ~V-ll.n 1 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA§3313 , 805/831-1646 '" FAXS05/831-1771 Site Asse~ ent Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc~ 1.3 Schedule Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. anticipates beginning the services described in this within (1) w~ek approval by the City and authorization to proceed from workplsn one upon Douglass Truck Bodies. Drilling will commence only after applicable permits have been obtained. The soil borings should be completed within one (1) daY ~of mobilization to the site. A final report will be prepared summarizing all field operations and laboratory results~ The report will be provided within 30-days of completion of the field work. ~..0 BACKGROIJI~ is located at ~.81 ~.1~ S~eet in Bakersfield, California. B~ed on data from Douglas Manufacturing IIi,W, Inc, the t.,anlr removal contractor, soil ~mples collected exhibited concentrations in excess of ~t~tte recommended action levels (B.P,'s) of 100 ppm total petroleum hydrocarbons a~ gasoline (TPH-g) in soil. The avoilable site data is summarized in the following tables. Units are in milligrams per kilogram (rog/kg) which are equivalent to parts pet' million (ppm). TPH-g Ben~no Toln~no To'ml ~yIb~n~eno IJS? I~ ~.' 15000 ND 4. 8150 4. IJST @ 0'* 1~.000 ND 110 10150 -40 Detection Limit 500 m~/kg 2 rog/kg 2 rog/kg 2 ml~tkg 2 ml~tkg U8T @ 0'*: Detection limit of 1,000 mg/lr, g and 15 rog/kg TPH and BTX~, respectively ND: Non-detected TPIt-g: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons a8 gasoline Depth of groundwater is shown to be approximately 1150-feet on the Kern County Water Agency, Water Supply l~eport, September 1091. However, the poasibility exi~ that "perched" groundwater may be encountered between 40-feet and 004eet bdow grade levd. 3.O WORKPLg~ Ad~net~l Envimnmontel ConeoIfl~, Inc. proposes three (8) soil borings to establish the vertical and horizontal extent of hydrocarbon migration in the vicinity of the former gasoline underground ~omge tank. 3.1 Boring Locations and Depths AEC plans to advance three (3) borings at the locations shown in Figure 2. All borings are proposed to a depth of 30-feet or two (2) consecutive 5-.foo. t.samples yielding non-detect with the P~je~ ~c ~V-~ 2 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400ASHEROAD.#206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 ,, FAX 805/831-1771 Site Asse~qment WoFk~l~n Advanced Environmental Concepts, Ine~ PID, or upon auger refusal. The two (2) iatb~ ~0rings will be advanced to depths equal to the depth of the vertical plume test boring in order to properly evaluate the potential for lateral transport in a permeable zone. 4.O METttOD8 The methods to be employed during implemen~tion of the above ~cope ,.re of work described in the following sections. 4.1 Boring Methods The borings will be advanced using a Mobile Drill B~53 ~ig and a Ferret rig, with an 8-inch or larger hollow stem, continuous ~ght auger in accordance with ASTM Method D 1452-80 for soil investigations and sampling by auger borings. At no time shall any water or other liquid be added to the boring. The augers will be steam cleaned prior to drilling the borings. The lithology and other pertinent data will be recorded on a field boring log in accordance ASTM Method D 2488-84 for visual description and identification of soils. Cuttings and other spoil from the borings will be placed in appropriate 55-gallon containers or on sheets of plastic and covered until verified, with analytical results, whether or not the soil is con~miuated. If the material is contamiuated, a written plan will be submitted by the facility operator to the County for their approval before treatment and/or disposal occurs. Disposal will be the responsibility of the facility operator and occur within 90~days of completion of drilling. 4.2 Boil Bampling Boil samples will be conected through the auger in 2-inch diameter'by 6-inch long brass sleeves driven in a split spoon sampler by a 140-pound hammer with a 30-inch drop in accordance with ASTM Methods D 1586-84 for split-barrel sampling of soil and D 1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler will be washed in an Alconox solution and double rinsed in a clean de-ionized water prior to each use. Sod samples will be driven at selected depths in each boring in order to provide baseline data and confirm prior laboratory results. The total depth of B-1 will extend to 10-feet below the last detected indication of contamination. The blow and will be recorded counts, lithology recovery, on the field logs. Lithology will be described in accordance with ASTM Method D 2488-84 (Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils). Selected soil ~mples will be sealed with teflon tape, capped, sealed with duct tape, labeled in accordance with EPA protocols, recorded on a Chain-of-Custody document, placed in a cooler with blue ice at 4-degrees centigrade, and transported to a California State Certified Laboratory with the Chain-of-Custody for the specified analyses. 4.3 Field Screening of Soil Samples Soil samples will be collected using three (3) 2 x 6-inch brass tubes installed inside a split-spoon ~mpler. The middle ~mple tube will be immediately capped and stored in a chilled .ice chest P,F~C 91V-1113 3 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400'ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 ~ ~ent Workphn Advanced F_.n3d_ronmental upon collection. The bottom tube will be used for lithologic description, and the top tube will be used for field screening. A headspace reading will be collected and noted on the boring log. 4.4 ~oil Analyses The soil samples will be analyzed by a California State Certified Laboratory (SMC Laboratory, Inc. in Bakersfield) with state guidelines and EPA protocols. The samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by CA DHS methods (purge and trap) and volatile aromatic organics (BTXE) by EPA method 8020. All five (5) foot interval Soil ~_mples will be ' analyzed from the vertical definition boring, B-I. Soil samples from the two (2) lateral borings, B-2 and B-3, will be analyzed at staggered ten (10) foot intervals (i.e. B-2 at 5 and 15-feet, B-3 at 10 and 20-feet). The bottom two (2) samples in each boring will be analyzed to confirm the base of the hydrocarbon plume. 5.0 SITE SAFETY PI,AI~ Appendix B contains a Site Safety Plan which complies with Worker PAght to Know Regulations and CAC Title 26. l~jcc~ A~C ~V-ll~Z 4 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 440©ASHEROAD.#206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 j f~te Ammmmient WoFi~plnn Advanced ~nvironmental ~oncept~ i 6.0 I~EMARK~/SIGNATURF~q This workplan represents the professional opinions of Advanced ~,nvironmental C~)ncept~ Inc. These J opinions are based on currently available data and were arrived at in accordance with accepted hydrogeologic and environmental engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is given. I This workplan has been prepared by: Advanced Environmental Concep~ Inc. I This workplan has been technically reviewed by: California Registered Geologist #472~%~NO. 4724~~~/ P~j~ ~c ~V-lln 5 J * ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400ASHEROAD.8206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 ~ 805/831:1646 · FAX805/831-1771 I ~e ~ont Wor~lgn Advanced ]~.nvir~nmenta] ~,oncel~ Inc. Health & Safety Plan Il.fl. Dongh~ ~., Inc. County of Kern . Bakemfield, California Introduction: I A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site soil assessment/remediation. It's purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel I from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materials that may be · encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal protective equipment standards, decont~miuation procedures and emergency action plans. I Advanced gnvironmen~l Concep~ Inc. seeks to enter the described above for the of property purpose conducting a site assessment, consisting of hollow-stem augering and soil sampling, to remove hydrocarbon impacted soil. I Soil ~mples will be collected following the complete excavation of affected soil. All possible efforts will be made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to be chemically analyzed will be collected in a brass sleeve, capped with lined plastic lids, sealed with tape and placed on ice in a cooler immediately. All Chain- I of-Custody protocol will be followed. Drilling equipment will be brought to the site and operated by: Melton Drilling Company · ' 7101 Downing Avenue , . I Bakersfield, C~lifornia Contractor's License #C-57 508270 I This SSP describes for all on-site from deleterious ~cont~miuation of means protecting personnel personal injury while conducting on-site activities. As described below, we will strive to meet all requirement~ promulgated by the California Department of Health Services. I Respon~bilities of Key PersonneE I All personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mr. Jonathan L. Buck will serve as Project Manager and on-site Geologist. He will also serve as Site Safety Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Buck will i assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of the SSP. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP .before admission to the site. Compliance with the SSP will be monitored at all times by the SSO. Appropriate personal protective equipment, listed below, will .be available and utilized by all on-site personnel. Prior to beginning work, the SSO will conduct a training I session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel will be made aware of hazards at the site. ~ ~ ~ ·Pmjcc~ AEC 91V-1113 1 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · ' 44007SHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CAg3313' 805)831-1646 ° FAX 805/831-1771 Site Assessment Work~l~n Advanced Environmental ~Oncepts, ln~ Mr. Buck will also be responsible for keeping field ilo~eS, collecting and securing s~mples and assuring sample integrity by adherence to Chain-of-Custody protocol. All on-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforeseen hazards. After documenting their understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for wMch they believe they are quslified. Provisions of this SSP are mandatory and personnel ~l~ictly associated on-site adhere hereto. Job Hazard A",lFses: Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equiPment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. An excavation contractor has been employed to deliver and operate all excavating equipment. QoRlified will have contact with this All on-site including the excavation personnel only any equipment. personnel, contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to excavating equipment. Latex ~mpling gloves will be worn by persons collecting or handling samples to prevent exposure to contaminants. Gloves will be changed between samples and used ones discarded, to avoid cross-contamination. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor cont~miuafion levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using a Photoionization Detector (PID). Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 5-ppm, in the breathing space. Furthermore, no on-sito smoking, open flame or sparks will be permitted in order to prevent accidental ignition.' Risk ~ent S~lmmRr~: Exposure to chemicals anticipated on~site include gasoline, diesel, and benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most are higMy i~Rmmable. · .... Threshold Limit Values (TLV's), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL's) and Toxicity levels (LD50, oral- rat), all in mg/kg (ppm), are listed below: Compound TLV STEL Toxid .ty Gasoline 200 300 ' Diesel 50 75 .... Benzene 10 25 4894 Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene - 100 150 4300 Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard. ~Foq~aUre Monitorino~ PIRn~ A PID will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV's, ~ ~c ~lV-n~ 2 ' ' ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · : 4400 ASHE ROAD, #206 · BAKERSFIELD. C.A93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1:771 I ! I ~ Assesmnent Workplan Pulvanced Environmental Conceptz, i I protective measures will be Passive dosimeter badges will be placed in downwind · takenl locations PID readings indicate high levels of volatile Organics in the breathing space. I Personal Protective Equipment: IPersonnel on-site will have access to respirators with organic vapOr cartridges. Replacement cartridges will be available on-site as needed. When handling samples, the on-site Geologist will wear latex gloves. Hard hats win be worn by all personnel on-site when in proximity of drilling equipment. I Work Zones and Security Measures: I Access to the site will be restricted to authorized personnel. A set of cones, placards, or wide yellow tape surrounding the site will define the perimeter, if needed. The Project Manager will be responsible for site security. ! DecontaminRtion Measures: I Avoidance of cont~mlnation whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning or placing equipment on possible cont~mlnated soil. All personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck and face with soap and water before taking a break* I or leaving the site. Respirators will be washed with soap and water following each day's use. Excavation and sampling equipment used will be decontaminated by steam-cleaning. Sampling equipment I will be decontaminated before each sample is taken. -. i . General Safe Work Practices: On-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. Appropriate personal I protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SS0, .including respirator fit. Excavation and ,,~__mpling equipment will be steam-cleaned before being brought on-site. Split-spoon I ~mpling equipment will be cleaned before each use. Augers will be steam-cleaned between borings. The on-site Geologist will oversee operations and log borings. The Sample Coordinator will assure that I proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. I Tr.ining Requirements: The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include contaminant properties, warning signs, health hazard data, risk from exposure and emergency first aid. All chemicals are to be covered and the I SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. I Projec~ AEC 91V-1113 3 I * ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · · ' 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 * BAKERSFIELD. C. A93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 I ~e AsseSsment WOl*~l-n Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. I Medical SurveillAnce ProgrRm, ; . According to CFR 29, 1910.]20, Paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators thir~ (30) days or more Iduring one (l) year' or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be~ monitored medically. All site personnel will be required to have had a complete chemical physical within the past year. I l~cerd K~pin~ I Documentation wi]] be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory pro~cfion, MSD~ forms and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre- I site training meeting. ~posure records on each job will be kept for thirty (30) years to meet requirements. ~nc]uded will bo i ~ames and social security numbers of employees, m~diC~d evaluations, on-the~job logs from entry to exit, fir~c aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons and personal air monitoring records. Continoo-ency Plan.n: In the event of an accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project. Director, Senior Project Manager, or other person, will notify the appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows: 1. Kern County Environmental Health Department 2700 M Street Bakersfield, Cslifornia 93306 ¢80~ 861-3636 2. Police, Fire, or Ambulance Emergency 9-1-1 3. Emergency Hospital: Mercy Hospital 2~.15 Trnx~n Bakemfield, California 03300 I I Pm~e~: AEC 91V-1113 4 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · - .a. 400 ASHE ROAD. #2Q6., BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 8Q5(831-1646 · FAX 805/831-177.1 ~ Assessment Workp1An Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc~ have read the Health and Safety Plan and und~nd the contents herein: NAME.: COMPANY Pmjcc~ A~c 91v-Hlz 5 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 · FAXS05/831-1771 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC~ [ , ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT C.C. Douglass Manufacturing, Inc. 231 21St Street County of Kern o Bakersfield, California February 1992 I .... - -ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC' I Advanced P. nvironmental CA)ncept~ In~ is plmmed to pre~ent the followinlg Environmental Site Assessment C.C. Douglass ~lantlfflgturino~, Inc. 231 21st Street County of Kern , B..k~rafield. Califor-i,~ I I I This report hnn been preImed for. Ms. Debbie Do-~a~n I C:C. DOuglass Manufact-udng, Inc.._ February 1992 I · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND * · 4400ASHEROAD.#20~' · {BAKERSFIELD. CA9~313 805/831-1~4~ · - F~_805/831-3771 I l~.nvi_ronm~ntal ~ _~tid~nent _~:]vanced ]~nvi_ronm~nta] Concepts~ Inc. I Table of Contents 1.o INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 BACKGROUND 1 ~.o SITE CHARACTEHJSTICS 2 3.1 Site Description 2 3.2 Regional Geology 2 3.3 Hydrogeolegy 2 4.0 _A~qli'~q.qlkClO4-T ACTIVI*I'I ~ 3 4.1 Deconl~minntion Proc~hlres 3 ~ ~ Borin? 3 4.3 ~ F~unplin~ 3 5.0 ANAL~i~I~CAL RI~.~LIL~ 4 6.0 FEA.~IBII~ SI~tlDY 4 6.1 Soil Profile 4 6.2 ]~nt of Hydrocarbon ]~Tq~ralion Ii 7.0 CONCLU~IIOI~ 5 8.0 RECO~A~ONS 5 9.0 LIMITATIONS 6 10.0 CLOSING 6 Ap_~ndie~: (A) Project M,,~/Figur~ (B) Boring Logs (C) I,~horatol7 Reporl~/Ch~in--of~ Documenl~ Pmjeet: AFC 91V-1113 I° ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 ' BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 I Fmvironmental f~ite .4~se~nent Advanced ]~nv/ronmpJlta] Concepts, Inc. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a soil investigation, conducted by Advanced Environmental Concepts, Ina (AEC), to evaluatethe lateral and vertical extent of hydrocarbon impacted soil adjacent to the former location of a 400-gallon gasoline underground storage tsnk (UST) operated by Douglass Manufacturing Inc. Ms. Debbie Douglass authorized AEC to conduct the investigation following approval of our work plan by the Bakersfield City Fire Department (BCFD). The subject site is located at 231 21st Street, Bakersfield, California. The site characterization was performed on January 25, 1992, in accordance with the work plan prepared by AEC and approved by the BCFD. This investigation was conducted under the supervision of Hazardous Materials Specialist Joe Dunwoody, of the Bakersfield City Fire Department. The site is located in the older of the of subject developed portion City Bakersfield, approximately 1 1/2- miles south of the Kern PAver and 500-feet east of the Kern-Island Canal. The general areais comprised of small corner stores, commercial and light industrial businesses, and some residences (Figure 1). Contained in this report is background information regarding existing site characteristics, regional and local hydrogeological profiles, and the project history. Also included in the following sections are the objectives and scope of investigation, detailed investigative procedures, and subsequent findings. Finally, AEC provides an evaluation of said findings and makes related conclusions and recommendations. The report appendices contain project maps/figures (Appendix A), soil boring logs (Appendi= B), and Laboratory Reports/Chain-of-Custody Documents (Appendix C). 2.0 , BACKGROUND C.C. DoUglass Manufacturing, Inc. contracted RLW, Inc. to remove one (1) 400-gallon gasoline underground storage tsnk from inside a corrugated metal assembly building located on '~vTM Street, adjacent to and south of an east-west trending alley. Soil samples collected beneath the center of the removed underground storage tznk exhibited concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) in excess of state recommended action levels (HAL's) of 100 ppm in soil. The available site data is summarized in the following tables. Units are in milligrams per kilogram (rog/kg) which are equivalent to parts per million (ppm). Xylene~, TPH-g Benzene Toluene Total Ethylbenzene ~mple I.D. CA Dl~q EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 UST @ 2' 5000 ND 4. 350 4. UST @ 6'*' 12000 ND 110 1050 40 UST @ 6'*: Detection limit of 1,000 rog/kg TPH and 5 rog/kg BTXE ND: Non-detected ..... TPI-I-g: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline Pmje~l: AHC 91V-1113' 1 * ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND * 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 * BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 · FAXS05/831-1771 I I Environmental Si~ Asse~mment Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. 'Depth of groundwater is shown to be approximately On the Kern County Water Agency, Water 150~feet Supply Report~ September 1991. However, perched groundwate, r maybe present between 40-feet and 60- feet below grade level. 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS The following sections summarize the project site features and conditions along with regional geologic and local hydrogeologic characteristics. 3.1 8ire D~a'ip~on The Douglas Manufacturing property i~ located on the northeo.~ corner of the intemeetion of ~.1~ and W~ Streets in B~ker~field, C~llfornia. The proper~ is improved with an office complex, open- air storage and parking, and a number of corrugated metal buildings used for the manufacture and assembly of custom truck bodies. The former underground storage tank and dispenser were located inside the west end of a corrugated building. Elevation at the site is approximately 404- feet above mean sea level. Several small commercial businesses surround the site. One block east of the site is Union Avenue, a main thoroughfare developed with hotels, restaurants, and commercial and light industrial businesses catering to the various needs of the local area. 3.2 Regions] Geology The subject property is located in the Southern San Joaquin Valley (Valley), which is a part of the Central Valley of California. The Valley forms the southern two-thirds of the Central Valley and is characterized as a broad structural trough. It is bordered on the east by the Sierra Nevada Range and on the west by the Coast Ranges (Diablo and Temblor Mountains). The Valley extends 250-miles southeastward from the confluence of the San Joaquin and Sacramento PAvers to the Tehachapi and San Emigdio Mountains. The width ranges from 25-miles near the Kern PAver, to approximately 55-miles wide near the Kings PAver, with an width of 40-miles. average (]eology of the southern Valley consists of a Pre-Tertiary basement complex overlain by marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks of Tertiary age. These rocks are composed of consolidated sandstones, siltstones, and shales which thicken from the northeast to the southwest. The Valley used to be an inland sea of comparatively shallow depth that continued to subside due to the ever increasing load of sediments transported and deposited from higher elevations. These deposits consist of gravels, sands, silts, and clays. The majority of the groundwater pumped from the Valley floor occurs within these relatively unconsolidated continental deposits. 3.3 Hydrogeology The site is located approximately I 1/2-miles south of the Kern PAver, and 500-feet east of the Kern-Island Canal. The Kern PAver drains the northeastern highlands year-round during normal precipitation. During periods of excessive precipitation, the river has flooded it's bsnks and deposited sediments of sand, silt, and clay. These sediments comprise the sboJlow "perched" Pmi,:~:' ~ ~lv-~l~ 2 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · :- 4.400ASHEROAD.#206 ° BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 Environmental Site Assem~ment Advan~ W. nvironmental Concepts, aquifers identified in this area. Drilling conducted by AEC through these shallow aquifers at other sites within a mile of.the subject site encountered len.tim~!~r, deposits of fine to coarse-grained water saturated sands interbedded with stiff, plastic clays. Perched groundwater is estimated to be than 40-feet below grade level at the Douglass Manufacturing facility. greater Perched groundwater was not encountered during the drilling of the three (3) soil assessment borings. 4.0 ASSESSMENT ACTIVIT1F~q These sections describe the soil borings, soil sampling' and decontzmiuation procedures employed during the site assessment. 4,.1 Dt-~ontJ~mlnat;ion Pro~~ Pd. or to beginning drilling operations, the augers and associated equipment were thoroughly deaned using a high pressure ~sm cleaner. In addition, the soil 8stapler was washed in an Alconox eolution and rinsed with deiouized water (prior to initial use and beBareen each sampling interval) to minimi~.e the possibility of cross-eont~mlnation be~een ~_mples. 4.2 Soft Borinoos On January 25, 1992, three (3) soil borings were drilled on the subject property and positioned to evaluate the lateral and vertical extent Of hydrocarbon migration in the subsurface soil (Figure 2). The borings were advanced using a truck mounted Mobile B-53 drill rig equipped with 8-inch O.D., continuous flight, hollow-stem augers. This rig has been retrofitted to allow the vehicle and drilling mast access to tight and/or confined spaces. Soil boring B-1 was drilled to a depth of 30-feet and positioned 2-feet off-center of the estimated center of the hydrocarbon plume. B-2 was located approximately 10-feet north of B-1 and drilled to a depth of 30-feet. B-3 was also drilled to a depth of 30-feet and was positioned approximately 5-feet west of the former west t~nk end and dispenser location. 4.3 Soil Sampling Soil samples were collected at five (5) foot interVals in each boring. Samples were obtained by driving a thin-walled steel sampler, equipped with three (3) 2.5-inch x 6-inch brass sleeves, a minimum of 18-inches into previously undisturbed soil. The sampler was driven ahead of the augers using a 140-lb. slide h~mmer with a 30-inch vertical fall. After each s~mpling interVal, the sampler was withdrawn from the and the three (3) brass sleeves were borehole removed. The bottom sleeve was retained for laboratory analysis and prepared by placing teflon tape and plastic caps over each end, then securing the caps with duct ~pe~.. The samples were labeled, placed in sealable plastic bag~, recorded on a Chain-of-Custody document and placed in an ice chest chilled with blue ice. Soil exposed at each end of the center sleeve and the cuttings, were examiued for lithological descriptions and for any obvious signs of hydrocarbons. Lithology descriptions were logged (Appendi~ B) according to the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS) and Chain-of- ~c mv-~ 3 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ,. 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 · 13AKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831:1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 I Pmvironmenta] ~ A~ae~ment Advanced Environmental ~oncepts, lnc~ Custody protocol was followed to ensure samPle integrity and traceability. Upon .completion of the above described procedures, the three (3) borings were plugged with hydrated bentonite chips in order to minimize formation of a vertical conduit for fluid migration. Native .soil was then replaced in the borings, followed by a two (2) foot concrete cap to grade level. Note: the soil from B-1 was stored in DOT 17-H approved drums and this boring was back~illed with bentonite and cement to grade level. 5.0 ANALYTICAL RI~ULTS Soil sample analyses were performed by Laboratory, Inc., a Laboratory SMC State Certified in Bakersfield, California, to determine the presence and concentration levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and volatile aromatics (BTXE) at the subject site by CA DHS method 3810 and EPA method 8020, respectively. The results are tabulated below and the laboratory reports are Presented in Appendix C. Units are in micrograms per gram (~gm/gm) which are equivalent to parts per million (ppm). TPH-g Xylenes, Volaffie Benzene Toluene Total Ethylbenzene Sample LD. 3810/8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 BI-10' 4.1 ND 0.010 0.040§ ND Bl-15' ND ND ND ND ND B1-20' ND ND ND ND ND BL30' ND ND ND ND ND B2-10' ND ND ND ND ND B3-5' ND ND ND ND ND B3-15' ND ND ND ND ND Detedio~ limit 0q~/gm) 1.0 0.~5 0.0{]5 0.005 0.005 ND: Not detected at indicated level of detection. TPI-I-~. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline. 6.1 Soil Profile The soil profile at the site eonsist~ predominantly of interbedded fine to eoame-grained ~nd with a dayey ~ilt at depth. From grade level to ~.2-feet, a m-brown, moderately dense, unconsolidated, medium to coame-gtadned, slightly moist ~md (SW) is present. From ~.~.-feet to approximately ~.?- foot a ten-brown, moderately dense, unconsolidated, fine-grained, slightly moi~ ~md (BP) occum. · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · - 4400.ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 · FAX805/831-1771 Environmental Site Ass~ent Advanced Environmental COncep~ In~ From 27-feet to th8 total drined depth of 30_feet a brow-n, moderately compact, clayey silt (ML) is logged. · · 6.2 Extent of Hydrocarbon Mioomtion I The three (3) soil borings drilled at the site Were positioned to evaluate the lateral and vertical extent of hydrocarbon migration on the north and west margins of the former tznk emplacement. In view of the good lithologic correlation within the area of investigation, it appears that the lateral i and vertical extent of gasoline migration has been adequately evaluated. Boring B-1 was drilled just off-center of the estimated center of the hydrocarbon plume and was positioned to establish the vertical extent of migration. Elevated photoionlzafion (PID) readings (167 ppm) were identified at 10-feet BGL in B-I. PID readings decreased to 0 ppm in the consecutive deeper samples. Borings B-2 and B-3 were drilled to evaluate the lateral migration of the hydrocarbon plume. No evidence of hydrocarbons (PID readings, stain, or odor) were identified in either of these borings. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS I ' · The hydrocarbons lmvo appmrently been ¢ont~!~ed within the ,limit~ of the former ~nl~. excavation. Because of the relatively 8hsllow migration (approximately l~.-feet BGL) it appesm that the mmuthori~.ed I hydroem:bon release w~ from overspffi that migrated through the ba¢ldill sm'rounding the 400-gallon t~nlr. I-lad 8 significant release oeeurrc~l, the hydroesrbons would h~ve descended veffde~.ly through the permeable ~mds and then ~pread latendl¥ over tho clayey silt bed. No evidence of this w~ hotel. ! 8.0 RECOlffi . A ON8 I /~m~l Environm~nt~! ~on~, Inc. normally propos~ three (3) remedial act:ion altermttive~ following a site asse~ment. ~iven the site conditions, these weald be 1) the no-acq~ion alternative, ~.) soil exmvation, aeration, and re-use as ba¢lrfill, or 8) wpor ext:m~don of the impae~d soil either in-~itx~, or ~bowground. I Due to the smsll ye]nme of impacted soil pr~ent (approximately 10 to 15-cubic yard~), AEC recommends that th~ ~oil b~ exmv~t~d, ff[oekpil~d on-~it~, ~nd then a~mt~d in 811owable quanfitie~ b~od on hydrocarbon eoneen~fions. The no-act:ion altermttive is not recommended since the ~reatment ~xpense i8 relatiwly minor. 8oil remedis~on will alleviate clouding of the properly title if a chsngo in land use should occur. The vapor exaction alteruative i8 not cost effective for this small a soil 'volume. Clean borrow impor~ should replace the ex~tvsted soil and be compacted to 00% relatiw compaction. The area should then be sealed with 8 concrete or asphalt esp. AEC re¢ommen~ t~t aeration oft, ho impaled soil b~ permitted on-site. The hydrocarbon concentration and total ~oil volume m'~ ~o minim~ that i8oration of one (1) to ~wo (~.) ym'd~ of ~oil a d~y i~ not expected to pose ~ threat to human health or tho environment. The ~erated soil would be placed on a later of visquene to minlmi~.o tho potential impa~ to ~ny clean m-eas. Upon laboratory ¢onfirnmtion of mfi~,etor7 soil aeration, AEC recommends dispo~ml of the ~oil 8t 8 ~lass 111 landfill. ! ! Pmjc~: AHC 9q.V-111~ 5 ! · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 ° BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 F_,nvironmental Site _*~ent .Advan~ l~.nvironmontal C_,oncepts, Inc. 9.0 LIMITATIONS in accordance with This work has been performed generally accepted environmental science and and engineering practices. Conclusions recommendations are based upon information collected and compiled during this investigation and on the t~nk removal and excavation report of August 29, 1989. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is given. 10.0 CLOSING ' Advanced P. nvironmental Concepts, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of service to Ms. Debhie Douglass, C.C. Douglass Manufacturing, Inc. on this project. If there should be any questions or additional information required regarding this report, please do not hesitate.to contact our office at (805) 831-1646. This Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared by: Advanced F~nvironmental Concept~, Inc. ~Cajlifornia Registered Environmental Assessor #1508~X. /~.~ This Environmental Site Assessment has been reviewed by: Joe, S. Pomerene .... California Registered Geologist #4724 ~~~0. 4724~/ ~p~c ~nv-~l~z 6 · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ~,SHE ROAD. #206 ' BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-16zt6 ' FAX 805/831-1771 .- Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. "Appendix A* PROJECT MAPSfFIGURE.~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND * ' BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1646 · FAXS05/831-1771 mi I ~ -~-- - ~ ........ ~: ..... .,= . ~z, y~,r." ~ ~ ', ,, - ~ , . ~ ... ;..~ : ~ .... · ..--- ~7.. ~,~ ....... - ....... ~ ,, ~YC '~X~ ~o'~ "~'~ ~ -,. ' , ~~~ ~1 ~,~,~ ~'~ ' 18 , /~/..-"~ , ~..,"' · ~. '- , , ~ .. ~ .~.- . ... .v%~.~m m~'~' . 'r- .~ ~, ~~ -' { ]'; ,,~' / ~X --- ..-' ~r"..,.".k~ ".: .. ~ ~. ~... m o ~99:tF ~/ '=~ .~ot--/--'.:l~ H J .' ~.):~.-'2~',.,"~~ ..... .~.~6 .... ."%~:~1~ '~.. ~/1:~ /~"'~'~" ~o. ~ ......... -XD~2~ .-:~~.-': Ik~, ',',~ ~ · ~ - $eeee ~ ..... : ............................... ' I~ ~ ~ .... 'l ~ .... ~,:. o o '. .... I~ ~ ......... ='~~=. ~,z' ' ---i ~ · '-~=~ - . ...... . ..., ., ... ,, ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,. k · .l-~ ' * ~ - ~J,~/ " ~.~,n:'~l}:~ THI ' mST o , ' · /d .~,e// ~ ~ - - ~- ~ ~:~ .,~ ~ , ...: · !! ~ -~- ,~. /.~.,~'~" ~/~, ~ ~ ~? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... · ~ ~ // ,;B ' ' · , .'' .~ ~u.~ ~-~ ~ ~, , I L ,- .... · ..... '- ........~.~.,' . ' ' "'~ '~ ,' .... :: I . __.~.,, . ~2 ......... · [ ..... . . l, SCALE 1.24000 . O. { ~ 0 { MILE / E ...... ~ , ~5' 10~ 0 I~0 2~0 ' 30~) 4~ 5~0 6~ 700C FEET 0'48' m I 5 0 1 KILOMETER 14 MIL~ Qu*DR*NGL[ LOCAJlON DECL(N~IION AT m -8it o ation Map- m...v..c..,.v,.o..,...,co.c.,._ FIGURE ~ ~.o.~,,~ C.C. DO~gla~ ~., I~C. ii!iiiiiiiiiiii STORAGE AND PARKING AREA Toxin'starer .~..,.:::::::::::::::::! ':':':':':':':':':':': ..... .......... DOUGLASS TRUCK BODIES ::::::::::::::::::: : · :.:.:.:':':':':'" ~ ~ i .... _j · CORRUGATED METALWALL :!:i:!:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i _ ..,v..c.E.v,,o..,.,,, co.cE,,, ~. C.C. DOuglaSS Mfg., Inc.' FIGURE P.O. BOX DOUGLASS TRUCK BODIES ~TO STORAGE AND PARKING AREA Al I I=y DOUGLASS TRUCK BODIES MANUFACTURING FACILITY CORRUGATED METAL BUILDING 13-2 m~~~~ :CORRUGATEDMETALWNJ- :::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ESTIlVlATED HORIZDNTAL MISFIA~N :::::::::::::::::::::: ,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:, :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: Estimated Horizontal ~' ~~IE'L Hydrocarbon Migration FIGURE · ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAl CONCEP?~ INCe / P.o. ,ox ,0,~ C.C. Douglass Mfg., Inc. RAKEflSTI~LD. CA ~ 231 2'lst SIm~ 3 DOUGI-AS~ TRUCK BODIES S'FORAGE AND PARKING AREA , ~s'r~ DOUGLASS TRUCK BODIES MANUFACTURING FACIMTY . ^ CORRUGATED METAL BUILDING ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: I~1~ t ) ~ ~I.OCA~OF4IOO. aN.t.~a.4~US'I' i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:i · -' .... I CORRUGATED METAL WALL .........:.:.:.'.'. ~ :i:i:i:i:::::::l:: I.:.:.:.:.:,:,:.:,:.:.: I BORIN(a~TION ".:.:.:'F:':':':':':' ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: O' 10' 2~ ,/~ ':':':':':':':':':':': ::::::::::::::::::::::: L.. i ~~'L Cross Section Location A- A' ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPT' IN~e C.C. Douglass Mfg., Inc. FIGURE ..o. ~ox ~o~7~ 231 21st ~APkl~flsr I~[D. CA 4 I A B-2 B-1 · A" 10' ND ~ ND I ND ~ ND ND ~ ND ' ND ND ~ ND ND ND ! ND · ND 80' ' I ~L' Cross S,~ion A-A.,_ B~ERSrELO. CA ~ I ! I *Appendix B' I I BORING LOC,8 I I I I I I 1 I I · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 ' BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/83~-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 I III .......................... CONSTRUCTION PID aa ~ ca 2 ~ F 4 ' I 5 L 6 L 15 an o SAND :(SW): Tan-brown, moderately '~'~_ dense, unconsolidated, medium 167 15 __., , 22 11 to coarse-grained, non-moist, · moderate degraded gasoline odo 19 ~ 1/, 8 15 o SAND (SW): Tan-brown, moderately 62 12 ' dense, unconsolidated, medium 14 ~ , to coarse-grained, slightly ~v 0 moist, slight degraded gasolin~ 17 ° odor. 10 20 · ~ SAND (SW): Tan-brown~ moderately 12 · dense ~ unconsolidated ~ medium 16 ~ · ', to coarse-grained, slightly ~ · ° moist, very slight gasoline odor. · · SAND (SP): Tan-brown~ moderately __ ~ dense~ ~unconsolidated~ fine 12 ' , grained, slightly moist, no 18 13 apparent odor.. S,,rr,,c lev,,tio,,: ! , o ed ",,: ,.'. Date Drilled: 1/25/92 to I)inmeter or Bori.g: 8" i.ches Water Encountered: feet Advanced Environme.tM Concepts, Inc. NAME: Douglass Manufacturing 4~00 Ashe Road ~206 SITE: 231 21st Street[ PLATE Bakersfield, California g3313 Bakersfield, CA [ B-1 , i i Il .... i I I I I I I II I ! ._JI I~ J~ I I I I WELL ~sbora~o~y Field ~ ~ ~ * . CONSTRU~OH ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION PID m o ~ ~ 20 ~ I . SILT (~): Bro~, ~oderatoly to 21 very compact, clayey in part~ -0- 24 ' slightly moist, no ap~rent __ , gasoline ~or, ~ Bentonite plug to 25-~t. -~ 35 - Dnte Drilled: 1/25/92 to Dinmeter of Bori.~ 8" i.ches W~ter B.countered: feet Advanee~ ~nvlronmen~ Uo.eept~, Inc. ~AMg: Douglass ~anufacguring 4400 ~he Rofl~ ~0O SITE: 231 21st Street P~TE Bnkersfiel~, C~ifornla ~8818 Bakersfield, ~ I B-1 ! IIII .................. *' , . , ,_ ; . , . I 1 CONSTRUCTION PID 2 ' I L A 4 5 I SAND (SW): Tan-brown, slightly 6· * · dense, unconsolidated~ medi,~n -0- 9 6 · · to co~rse-grained, slightly __ moist, no apparent hydrocarbon · · odor. 13 ~ , SAND (SW): T~n-brnwn~ _13- dense, unconsolidted; medium -0- 18 0 to coarse-grained; slightly moist., no apparent hydrocarbon ° · odor. 9 · o SAND (SW): Tan-brown~ 12 dense; unconso] ~ d~ted ~ moist, no ~pparen~ hydrocarbon · ·odor. 8 ' ' SAND (SW): Tan-brown; moderately 12 0 dense; unconsolidated~ med~,~, -0- 18 ~ [] to coarse-grained; slightly ~II ~ , moist, no apparent hydrocarbon oo 6 . odor. ' ' ° SNxlB (SP): Tan-brown, moderately ' ' dense, unconsolidated~ fine- 12 · grained, slightly moist, no .. -0- · ' ~ ' · . apparent hydrocarbon odor. 8,,rfaee Elevntio.: ~e. et ] Logge~ By: J. Buck ' To~M Depth: 30' feet [ S~pervL~ed By: J. Pomerene Dnte Drilled: 1/25/92 to . [ Dmmeter of Bori,g: 8" t,ehes { Water Encountered: feet Advn. ced Environmental Concepts, Inc. ] NAME: Douglass Manufacturing , 4400 Ashe Road ~'~00[ SITE: 231 21st Street PLATE Bakersfield, California 93318 Bakersfield, CA B-2 , Ii ......... I II I I I I I III I I I I _ I I I I I CONSTRUCTION i 8OIL DESCRIPTION PID m . ~ c~ '"'"' 18 ~ ' . 27 21 ~ SILT (~): Bro~. vorv nomp~c.~ clavev 5n hart. ~l~htlv -0- 29 ~ I ~ no ~p~ren% hydrocarbon~ odor,. ~ Bentonite plug to 25-feet. 37 8.r~nce tt[o.: Lo~ed By: To~l Depth: 30' ~eet Supervise~ By: J. Pomerene Dnte Drilled: 1/25/92 Lo Diameter of Borl.g: 8" i.ches Water Encountered: feet I Labo~ai:orlt Field . _q 8OIL DE~CIIlPTION CONSTRUCTION PID ~ ~ c~ [ [ I I I I I I I I 8 , defise~ ' ' ° · unconsohdated, f~ne- -0- 9 6 · . grained, slightly moist, no Il· · apparent hgdr°carbOn Od-Qr' 9 12 10 ~-- SAND (SW): Tan-brown; moder~to]y 14~ ' dense; unconso]idatod; m~d~,~. 227 18 · to coarse-~ra~n~d..~lightly 12 SAND (SP): Brown; mod~rmt~]y 172 21 · . slightly moist[, nn mnn~r~nf 8 m ~ . S~D (SP): ~ite-buff, slightly 9 ~ ~ , dense, unconsolidat~, fine- 174 14 ~ ' , grained, slightly moist, no II ~ . ' apparent hydrocar~n odor.~ II 170 2~ ........ 8.r~nee ~levntion: To~ Depth: 30' ! Water Eneomltered: ren8e ' Feet' Dnte Drilled: 1/25/92 to rh, " i.ebe Adv~eed E.vlro.me.~ Concep[~, Inc. ~ N~E: Douglass Manufacturing 4400 ~},e Rond ~08[ SITE: 231 21st Street PLATE ~ers~e]d. C~]~or.la ~88~8 Bakersfield, ~ B-3 Pro[~[ Number: L o s o f B o r ~ a ~ F~e 1 of 2 II ............. i I I I ~abore~o~y Field ~ . CONSTRUCTION SOIL DESCRIPTION PlD ~ ~ 16 m . SILT (~): Bro~: modor~tply 18 ~ i compact~ clayey ~n p~r~ ~llgh y 1~8 2~ ~ ~ ~-~ moiSt~odor, no apparent, hy~racnr~n ~ Bentonite to 25-feet. ~,. Native to ~rade. J3 LL ~' II S.rf~ce .Vfltlon: Lo~ed By: J. Buck To~ Depth: 30' feet S.pervlsed By: J. Pomormnm Dflte Drilled: 1/25/92 to Din~neter of Bori.ff: 8" hmhes Water gncountered: fee~ Adv~nee~ ~nvironmen~ Uoneept~, Inc. ~AM~: Bougiass ~anufactur~ng ~ ~ 4~00 ~h~ ~oa~ ~00 81T~: 231 21st Street PBAT~ Bnkersfield, C~iforni~ ~1~ Bakersfield, ~ ~ B-3 Proj~tNmber: Log of Boring P~e2of 2 LABORATORy REPORTS CHAIN-OF-~STODY · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 * BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 805/831-1646 ,, FAX 805/831-1771 Client Name: Advanced Environmental Concepts Address : 4400 Ashe Rd. g206 Bakersfield, Calif 93313 Attention : Mr. aon Buck Date samples received : 1-27-92 Date analysis completed: 1-28-92 Date of report : 1-28-92 Project Name: Douglass Mfg. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: g315 ID: B1 10' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene 0.010 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene 0.0061 0.0050 m-Xylene 0.0094 0.0050 o-Xylene 0.034 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) 4.1 1.0 m Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 8020 FID MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm) ND = None Detected Kevin Lagan ~ Analytical Chemist m 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 ·(805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~316 ID: BI 15' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m,o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~317 ID: Bi 20' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-×ylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~318 ID: Bi 25' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m,o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Kevin Lagan ~ Analytical Chemist RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~319 ID: B1 30' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~321 ID: B2 10' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m,o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 I i~323 ID: B2 20' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 I Ke n Analytical Chemist RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~324 ID: B2 25' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 g325 ID: B2 30' ug/g MDB,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 ND 0.0050 p-Xylene m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 i326 ID: B3 5' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ! Kevin Lagan ~ Analytical Chemist RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~328 ID: B3 15' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND '0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~330 ID: B3 25' ug/g MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 i331 ID: B3 30' ug/9 MDL,ug/g Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene ND 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 1 ! Analytical Chemist m m m m m m ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING m m i~2u ~. Deere Ave.. Sama Ana. CA 92705 Tel 714.757.7022 Fax 7t4.757.7274 m m m m m m m m m m m Chain-Of-Custody Record ProjecLAdd~s Da, te f /, Client Project # Turn Around Requested: {__ Immediate Attention I~ Rush 24-48 Hours Analysis Requested TTL Project # Page Lab Use Only Sample Condition " x ..--~ ;~, ,-,ia; '"'- Chilled ,~yes ~.' no Pr~ect Conta t~r~/ ""~! ~"~./ /. ~ Mobile Lab Sealed ,_,~yes ~ no , ample ID 1 Sample Location Il Date Time NumberSample /~/~//'",,'//,/ / //, / ,/~/ Container/Comments elinquishe by Ignature) _ . fi by Time t Company o.ece,v.~y ~'Relinquished by (signature) l Time Time __ Company Additional Comments i920 E. Deere Ave., Suite 130 Sanla Aha. CA 92705 Tel 714.757.7022 Fax 714.757.7274 ~'roj~/~t Name /? ~' . . L ~. / /~ Client Project # Project ,ddress ~/ ~/~ Turn Around Requ.ed: ~ Rush 24-48 Hours Chain-Of-CiJstOdy Record Tll. Project # Analysis Requested Page/ of ~ Lab Use Only Sample Condition Rush 72-96 Hours Chilled ~y~ [] no Mobile Lab ~ Sample ID Sampie Location Date ] Time ~au~l~r / ~[~ r ' ,Xnxi~ure) '~ ~1 ~ Date * Received by (signature) Date ' !--~ ~ Total Number of Containers Company Date me L~ ~./~.~,_~) ived by Labor!~~.~o ture) ~. . ,!.. !! UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SE RVICES !iiFOR LO~:~ ~G E'NC¥1 USE ONi~ REPORT DATE CASE # NAME OF INDIVIDUAL FILING REPORT I PHONE ....... ~ .;" :.I ) ~u REPRESENTING [] owNER/oPERATOR [] REGIONAL BOARD I COMPANY OR AGENC~ NAME ~ [~LOCALAGENCY [] OTHERI /' a: ADDRESS STREET CITY STATE ZIP UJ NAME I CONTACT PERSON PHONE ~ ~ A~'DRESS ; STREET ' CITY ETATE FACILITY NAM E (IF APPLICABLE) OPERATOR I PHONE _o .."..; ,., ..:.". .:.. ., ......~, ADDRESS ~:~ ~ '~ STREET ~ crTY - CO{JNTY ZiP ~ CROSS zO LOCAL AGENCY AGENCY NAME CONTACT PERSON PHONE ,,,o ~ ., , .. . _ , :~Z ~ '" '. ~ .... ~,~REGIONAL ROARD ~.~. PHONE~ ~-. ." a. < :.:- . _~ - ~ (I) NAME ~ ~ QUANTrrY LOST (GALLONS) ~ >, ~' ~;~"~KNOWN u) I~ DATE/aI'DISCOVEREDMI '// ol ~/ DI / YI / ¥ HOW[]DISCOVEREDTANKTEST ~[:~'~ANK[] INVENTORYREMOvALCONTROL [][] OTHERSUBSURFACE MONITORING [] NUISANCE CONDITIONS ~ D. TE D.SC.ARGE SE~. M~OD U~D TO ~TOP DISC.ARGE (C.ECK ALL~P~ = .I .I ol om UNKNOWN [] REMOVE CONTENTS [] REPLACE TANK CLOSETANK ~ ~'SD,SC.A.GE.EE.~TOPPED? [] REPAI. TAN. [] .E.AI.P,P,.G [] CH~GEPROCEDURE SOURCE OF DISCHARGE CAUSE(S) ~,,, ~ [~ 'ANKLEAK ~[~' UNKNOWN []OVERFILL [] RUPTURF-JFAILURE []SPILL ~ ° [] P,P,.GL~ '[] OTHER [] COR.OS,O. ~:I~%N..OWN [] OTHER uJ uJ CHECKONEONLY .~-~NDETERMINED [] SOILONLY [] GROUNDWATER [] DRINKINGWATER-(CHECKONLYIFWATERWELLSHAVEACTUALLYBEENAFFECTED) CHECK ONE ONLY ~i~'--'~ NO ACTION TAKEN J~'"'~PRELIM INA RY SITE ASsEsSMENT WORKPLAN SU BM ITTE D [~] POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION [] LEAK BEING CONFIRMED [] PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT UNDERWAY [] POST CLEANUP MONITORING IN PROGRESS [] REMEDIATION PLAN [] CASE CLOSED (CLEANUP COMPLETED OR UNNECESSARY) [] CLEANUP UNDERWAY CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) [] EXCAVATE & DISPOSE (ED) [] REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) [~ ENHANCED BIO DEGRADATION (IT) --~ [] CAP SITE (CD) [] EXCAVATE&TREAT(E'I) [] r'U~P&TREATGROUNDWATER(GT)[] REPLACE SUPPLY (RS) ~ [] CONTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) [] NO ACTION REQUIRED (NA) [] TREATMENTATHOOKUP(HU) [] VENT SOIL (VS) [] VACUUM EXTRACT (VE) ~ ~7~~' OTHER (OT) O o INSTRUCTIONS EMERGENCY Indicate whether emergency response personnel and equilanent were involved at any time. If so, a Hazardous Material Incident Report should be filed with the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) at.2800 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832. Copies of the OES report form may be obtained at your local underground storage ta~k permitting agency. Indicate whether the OES report has been filed, as of the date of this report. LOCAL AGENCY ONLY To avoid'duplicate notification pursuant-t~.Health and Safety code Section 25180.7, a designated 8overnment emp~0yee .shoul~ sign and date the form in this block. A signature here does not mean that the leak has been determined to pose a significant threat to human health or safety, only that notification procedures have been followed if required. REPORTED BY Enter your name, telephone number, and address. Indicate which party you represent and provide company or agency name. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Enter name, telephone number, contact person, and address of the party responsible for the leak. The responsible party would normally be the tank owner. SITE LOCATION Enter information regarding the tal%k facility. At a minimum, you must provide the facility name and full address. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES Enter names of the local agency and Regional Water Quality Control Board involved. SUBSTANCES INVOLVED Enter the name and quantity lost of the hazardous substance involved. Room is provided for information on two substances if appropriate. If more than two substances leaked, list the two of most concern for cleanup. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT Provide information regarding the discovery and abatement of the leak. SOURCE/CAUSE O I ndicate source(s) of leak. Check box(es) indicating cause of leak. CASE TYPE Indicate the case type category for this leak. Check one box only. Case type is based on the most sensitive resource affected. For example, if both soil and ground water have been affected, case type will be "Ground Water". Indicate "Drinking Water" only if one or more municipal or domestic water wells have actually been affected. A "Ground Water" designation does not imply that the affected water cannot be, or is not, used for drinking water, but only that water wells have not yet been affected. It is understood that case type may change upon further investigation. CURRENT STATUS Indicate the category which best describes the current status of the case. Check one box only. The respons should be relative to the case type. For example, if case type is "Ground Water", then "Current Status" should refer to the status of the ground water investigation or cleanup, as opposed to that of soil. Descriptions of options follow: No Action Taken - No action has been taken by responsible party beyond initial report of leak. Leak Bein~ Confirmed - Leak suspected at site, but has not been confirmed. Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted - workplan/proposal requested of/submitted by responsible party to determine whether ground water has been, or will be, impacted as a result of the release. Preliminary Site Assessment Underwa~ - implementation of workplan. pollution Characterization - responsible party is in the process of fully defining the extent of contamination in soil and ground water and assessing impacts on surface and/or ground water. Remediation Plan - remediation plan submitted evaluating long term remediation options. Proposal and implementation schedule for appropriate remediation options also submitted. Cleanup Underway - implementation of remediation plan. Post Cleanup Monitorin~ in Pro,tess.- periodic ground water or other monitoring at site, as necessary, to verify and/or evaluate effectiveness of remedial activities. Case Closed - regional board and local agency in concurrence that no further work is necessary at the site. IMPORTANT: THE INFOP4~ATION FROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REPRESENTING THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY REMEDIAL ACTION Indicate which action have been used to cleanup or remediate the leak. Descriptions of options follow: Cap Site - install horizontal impermeable layer to reduce rainfall infiltration. Containment Barrier - install vertical dike to block horizontal movement of contaminant. Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose in approved site. Excavate and Treat - remove contaminated soil and treat (includes spreading or land farming). Remove Free Product - remove floating product from water table. Pump and Treat Groundwater - generally employed to remc.'e dissolved contaminants. Enhanced Biode~radation - use of any available technology to promote bacterial decomposition of contaminants. Replace SuDDlY - provide alternative water supply to affected parties. Treatment at HookuR - install water treatment devices at each dwelling or other place of use. Vacuum Extract - use pumps or blowers to draw air through soil. Vent Soil - bore holes in soil to allow volatilization of contaminants. No Action Required - incident is minor, requiring no remedial action. CfA~4ENTS - Use this space to elaborate on any aspects of the incident. SIGNATUR~ - Sign the form in the space provided. DISTRIBUTION If the form is completed by the tank owner or his agent, retain the last copy and forward the remaining copies intact to your local tank permitting agency for distribution. 1. Original - Local Tank Permitting Agency 2. State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Loans and Grants, Underground Storage Tank Program, P.O. Box 944212, Sacramento, CA 94244- 2120 3. Regional Water Quality Contro~ Board 4. County Board of Supervisors or designee to receive Proposition 65 notifications. 5. Owner/responsible party. CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" FiRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. D. JOHNSON March 18, 1992 BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 C.C. Douglas Manufacturing, Inc. 231 21st Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attn: Ms. Debbie Douglas Dear Ms. Douglas, This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results for the site investigation of the unauthorized release associated with the closure of the tank located at the above stated address. Based upon laboratory data submitted and with the provisions that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of existing conditions it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time. Be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and Safety Code, or any other Federal, State, County, and/or City law and/or ordinance for past, present, or future operations. Nor does it relieve the property owner of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. In addition, any future changes in site use may require further assessment or mitigation. It is. the property owners responsibility to notify this department of any changes in site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3797. ... S/n c e,~ e/l~f, .~/ ~ . // Hazardous Maf, e~ial Specialist Underground Tank Program ' MEMORANDUM "WE CARE" March 24, 1992 TO: Valerie Pendergrass FROM: Joe A. Dunwoody SUBJECT: Billing for assessment oversight of the C.C. Douglass Mfg. Inc, Project. The preliminary assessment phase of the soil contamination located on the C.C. Douglass Mfg Inc. property, located at 231 21st Street, is now complete. A total of 9.75 hours were spent on this project and will be billed in the following manner; 2.75 hours, at a rate of $45.00 per hour and 7.Ohours, at a rate of 67.50 per. The total amount is listed below. Please enter the amount on the computer, note the date on the memo and file when completed. 2.75 hrs. * $45.00/hr. = $123.75 7.0 hrs. * $67.50/hr. = $472.50 Total $596.25 cc: Ralph g. Huey ~ / ,e CITY of BAKERSFIELD HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVI S ION FIRE DEPARTMENT T I ME CHARGED 2101 H STREET S. D. JOHNSON BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF ¢ ~ ~ ~/~ ~ ~ 326-3911 BUSINESS NAME: · ' ~ ~ TIME DATE: N~E: CHGD: CO~E~S: SITE IDENTIFICATION S~t Number ' ~r~t Cl~ ZIP County ~~ .Substance Local Agency Regional Board L~D STAFF PERSON CASE ~PE ' ~ Undetermined ~ Soil Only Groundwater ~ Drinking Water STATUS '(Date indi~tes when case moved into status) No Action Taken ~ Leak Being Confirmed Date ~ Prelim. Site Assessment Workplan Submitted Date ~ Preliminary Site Assessment Underway Date ' Pollution Characterization Date Remediation Plan Date Remedial Action Underway Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Date Case Referred to Regional Board Date Case Referred to Dept. of Health Services Date ~ Case Closed REMEDIAL ACTIONS COMMENTS RESPONSIBLE PAR~ IDENTIFICATION (Only if newly discovered or changed) Contact ~, ~ ~O~~ Phone (.~). Address ~ ~ ( Street Numbe~ Street Cl~ S~te ZIP ~e CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CASE CLOSURE CHECKLIST Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program . This checklist, CASE CLOSURE letter, and the Unauthorized Release Report Form (URF) is to be retained by the Regional Board and Local .Implementing Agency as documentation of release and subsequent closure action. All files and reports will be placed on microfiche for review. I. Case Information LUSTIS Case no. URF filing date fO--~1-0 ! Closure date ~' ! ~5 ~ Site name/county o_.- C_.- ~OuC.,~-~, ~ ~ ~ t/ Site address '2~ [ ~. { ~v- ~ ~ City. ~~;eO Zip <~'~O I Phone Table I - Responsible Party Information Responsible party Name Address, City, Zip Phone Property owner ~ ~X ~ ( ) -- Operator 1 ( ) Operator 2 ( ) Operator 3 ( ) H. Release and Site Characterization Information Tank size(s) ~ ~0 ~, u_ Fuel type(s) ~.~v,_, ~ Chemical type(s) and quantity(ies) released Table II - Lateral and Vertical Extent of Contamination. Environment Lateral (ft) Vertical (ft) Contaminant Concentration Range Soil ~ 0 l 0 ~Ao~Dl~o'g.. / ~/000 ag/kg Groundwater ~ ~.. ....._._~=~__ mg/l Soil type at the site e%a~O ~ C~e.~ ~r~,,~&~ :~dkO'~ Source of drinking water under SWRCB POLICY 88-63 Were nearby wells (Domestic, Municipal, Ag, etc.) monitored? Yes No V-, Wells affected (Domestic, Municipal, Ag, etc.) ~/~A~- Highest and lowest depths to groundwater ~ tt ~I ~ ~ Seasonal groundwater gradient(s) and direction(s) Name of Regional Water Quality Control Plan' (Basin Plan) aquifer affected (see attached) Surface water impacted? Yes No ~ Name of surface water body affected /Q/& IH. Soil .Remediation Infltion Soil .remediation :method(s) ,~,)C~) ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ Volume treated and/or removed Contaminated soil disposal site If contamination is remaining, describe concentration range and volume (cubic yards or meters) Table .III - Maximum documented contaminant concentrations in soil before 'and after cleanup Contaminant Method Before After Depth Contaminant Method Before After Depth used (mg/kg) (mg/l~g) (ft) used (rag/kg) (rag/kg) (ft) TPH (Gas) ~O t~-~ ! 2 000 ~ t C) Benzene ~g02~::} NO ~ _ TPH (Diesel) Toluene ~ ! [O · ~ Other fuel Ethylbenzene u 40 ~ Heavy metals Xylene ' ~* tO~:~ 6 Other Other IV. Groundwater Remediation Information . Groundwater remediation method(s) t%]/,Ac - Volume treated and/or removed - If contamination is remaining, describe concentration range and volume (gallons or liters) Table IV - Maximum documented contaminant concentrations in groundwater before and after cleanup. Contaminant Method l~for~ After Depth Contaminant Method Befor~ After Depth -- used (rog/l) (rog/l) (ft) uaed (rag/l) (rag/l) (ft) TPH (Gas) Benzene TPH (Diesel) Toluene Other fuel Ethylbenzene Heavy metals Xylene Other Other V. Closure Does Regional ,Board concur with closure? Yes No Location of reports on file (Agency/Room) Regional Boardoffice ~'e~'C~,c_ U~'~"Staffperson SBR Cheklist.wp 10 Sep~z~er 1993 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGi; TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. MARK ONLY [] I NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION []- 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE ONE ITEM [] 2 ~NTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE ~ 8 TANK REMOVED DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: I, TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN IA. OWNER'S TANK ,. D. C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) II.TANKCONTENTS IFA-11SMARKED, COMPLETEITEMC. '" . . A. ~ MOTOR VEH,CLE FUEL [] 40,L ~B. ~'.~ 'UNLEADEO I--~ 4.GASAHOL ~ 7 METHANOL I I--] 2 PETROLEUM [] ~0 EMPTY ' __i;~PRODUCT [--I ,bPREM,UM UNLEADED [] ~ JET FUEL ~ I ~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED ~ 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW)I Do IF (A. 1) IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #: . . J III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM ~"2 SINGLE WALL -- [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B. TANK ~ BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] S 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP .- (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] ~ RUBBER L,NEO [] ~ AL~D LINING [] 3 EPOX~ LIN,NG [] 4 P.ENOL~ L,N,NG C. INTERIOR LINING [] 5 GLASS LINING ~ UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER ~s UN~NG MATER~AL COMPATIBLE W~T, 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__' D. CORROSION [] I POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION ~ NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTA!NMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) ~ OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) ~ IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCL~ A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTHIFAPPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A(~I SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION /~ SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A IJ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER A'~I BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE C. MATERIAL AND V CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A .U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U. 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U' 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTO R [] 2 LINE T~GHTNESS TESTING [] 3MONITORINGINTERSTITIAL _~9 OTHER ,~_,,~:~~ ' V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] 1 VISUAL CHECK ,~ INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUNDWATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI, TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION I1. ESTIMATED DATE LAST.USED (MO/DAY/YR) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF r~ r--~..~ /~,~_/(--~/ ,~ / ' I SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~)~"~'-GALLONS~ .- 3. WASiNERTTANK FILLED WITHMATERIAL ? YES [] N THIS FOt~M HA,~ BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE. AND CORRECT I APPLICANT'S NAME I DATE ~ (PRINTED & SIGNATURE) LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE 1.0. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW I COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK # PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE PERMIT NUMBER FORM B (7.91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED. FOROO34B-R5 sT ATE WATER RESOURCES CO,TRO, .CARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION-FORM A COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACILEY/SITE ~ ' ~ MARKONLY ~1 N~ PERMIT ~ 3 REN~ PERMIT ~ 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ~ PERMANENTLY CLOSED SiTE [ ONEITEM ~ 2 IN.RIM PERMIT ~ 4 ~ENDEO PERMIT ~ 6 TEM~RARY SITE CLOSURE I, FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS - (MUST BE COMPLETED) DBA OR FACILI~AME NAME OF OPE~ATO~ ADDRESS ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ . ~. ~NEAREST CROSS~STRE~ ~ " P~CEL~(O~DNAL) Ci~ NAME~~ ' '~ ~ STATE ZIP CODE . Sl~ PHONE ~ WI~ AR~ CODE TO INDICATE ~R~RA~ON ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ ~AbAG~CY ~ COU~-AGE~Y ~ STA~-AG~CY ~ FEDE~L-AGE~Y D~TRICTS ~PE OF BUSINESS ~ I GAS STATION~ 3 FARM ~ ~ 42 DiSTRIBUTORpRocEssoR ~ OTHER I~ORRESERVATtONTRUST~ IF INDIAN m' °F TANKi AT SITEI~Ds E. P.A.I.D..(~ti~al) EMERGENCY CONTA~ PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY). optional DAYS: NAME (~ST, FIRS~ PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRS~ NIGHTS: NAME (L~T, FIRS~ PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME (~ST, FIRS~ PHQNF a WITH ARFA PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED) m MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ~/ ~ ~x b i~k~e ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY III. ~ANK OWNER INFORMATION- (MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME OF OWNER CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ~ ~z ~i~icam ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ L~AL-AG~CY ~ STA~-AG~CY ~ COR~RA~ON ~ P~TNERSHIP ~ COU~-AGE~Y ~ FEDE~L-AGE~Y CI~ NAME STATE ZIP CODE PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE IV, BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise. HQ V, PETROLEUM UST FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED m ~ ~x~i~ate ~ 1 SELF-INSURED ~ 2 GUARA~EE ~ 3 INSURANCE ~ 4 SURE~ ~ND ~ 5 LE~ER OFCREDIT ~ 6 ~EMP~ON ~HER VI. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notifi~tion and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked. THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT LICANT' NAME (PRINTED & SIGNATURE) ~ ~ [ APPLICANTS TITLE DATE MONT~DAY~EAR COUN~ ~ JURISDICTION ~ FACIL~ ~ LOCATION COOE - OPTIONAL CENSUS TRACT ~ - OPTIONA[ SUPVI~OR - DISTRICT CODE - O~TIONA[ THI~ FOR~ ~UST BE ACCOMPANIED B~AT LE~T (1) OR ~RE ~ER~IT APPLICATION - FOR~ B~ ~NLE~ THIS I~ A CHAN~E OF ~E INFORMATION FORM A (5-91) FOR0~3A-5 CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. D. JOHNSON November 6, 19 9 1 BAKERSFIELD. 93301 FIRE CHIEF 32~3911 Clint Douglass C. C. Douglass Mfg. Inc. 231 21st Street Bakersfield, Ca 93301 RE: Laboratory results from preliminary site~assessment conducted at the facility located at 231 21st St., Bakersfield Dear Mr. Douglass, Upon review of the recently submitted laboratory results from your facility, this office has determined that the extent of the contamination plume has not been adequately defined and may pose an evironmental risk. This office requires (in accordance with chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code and chapter 16, Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations)~that further assessment be done to define the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination plume. Please submit a work plan for further assessment, to this office, with in 30 days from receipt of this letter. The Work plan should follow guidelines found in: Appendix A - Reports~ Tri - Reqional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investiqation of Underqround Tank Sites; JanUary 22, 1991. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, ~rr~°r~Sun~a~earn~alprSo~er~imalist /(~., '~. Bakersfield Fire Dept. : PERMIT No. 1 i~I~AZARDOUS MATERIALS OlVl,( ~, UN--GROUND STORAGE TANK PF RAM PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION SITE ~/z~< ~~ ~o~/~DDRESS~/- ~/~ZiPCODE ~/ APN FACILI~NA~E ~ ~?/.,~.~ CROSSSTREET"V" TANK OWNER/OPERATOR -~. ~ ~ PHONE No. ~- ~ ~ ~ MA~LING ADDRESS CI~ ZIP CODE CONT~ACTO~ [NFO~MAT~ON COMPANY ~ ~2 ~,~ PHONE No. ~-~-//,~ LICENSE No. ADDRESS ~ ~ · ~wJ~ ~u~. ClW ~ZIPC~DE ~ ~ INSURANCE CARRIER ~,'/I,~ ~. L~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No. ~/~'~ ~JZ PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION ~~'~ ~, COMPANY ~ ~ PHONE No. ~~7'~/I LICENS~ NO. ADDRESS ~/~ d ~ ~, 5 ~/. CI~ ~, 5 ~~IP CODE ~ INSURANCECAEEIER ~/~ ~~~ ~¢,WORKMENS COMP No. ~p~ TANK CLEANING INFORMATION COMPANY' ~ ~ ~¢ug~ PHONE No.~- ADDRESS ~ O/ /-~jZZ~ ~ CI~ ~,~-~>~'/~ZIPCODE ~ WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~A~ ~ ~o~/~ ~ ~/' - NAMEOF~INSTATEDISP~SALFACILI~ ~,~ ~.~ ~ ~'A~~ ~w ADDRESS. ~/ ~'~5 o~ ~/. CI~ ~~IP COOL FACILI~INDENTIFICATIONNUMBER ~ ~ ~ ~/77 TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION COMPANY ~Z~ ~Wr PHONENo. ~/J~o LICENSENo.~~ ADDRESS ~0 ~0 ~;- ~/~ ~ CI~ ~~[PCOOE ~ TANK DESTINATION ~o'/~e~ .~F~ ~/~ , /~c- ~o ~ ~~J~ /~. ' TANK INFORMATION ~ ~ TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAk DATES CHEMICAL STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATrACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL ANO FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THIS F,/~RM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER. PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT. THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED r~U~ PLAN i ' ~ot ?~an must show the following: 1. Roads and alleys 2. buildings ~T 3. location of tanks, piping, and dispensers 4. utilities 5. SCALE 6. water wells (if on site) 7. any other relevent information BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TANK DECONTAMINATION I, ~~~meJ~/~~ _ an authorized agent of ~Ot) ~ here by ~attest under penalty of contrWcting co. perjury that the tank(s) located at 2~ /' ~/5~ -3~ and address being removed under permit% ~/~.(9Of,~ has been cleaned/decontaminated properly and a LEL (lower explosive limit) reading of no greater than 5% was measured immediately following the cleaning/decontamination process. date name (print) signature ,~ HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION ~~---~.~?~ 2130 G Street, (805) 326-3979 Bakersfield, CA 93301 TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM FACILITY ~/~5 O~ER CO~CTOR ~O~TORY TEST ~THODOLOGY P~LI~ARY ASSESSMENT CO. PLOT P~ CONDITION OF TANKS CONDiTiON OF P~P~NC CONDITION OF SOIL 'DATE INSPECTORS NAME~ ~ S~GNATUR~--~ LABORATORIES, INC. 2090 $ (~N~,')N ~pozt.~ 10/23/91 . P O RC)X ~40 T,ab ~: Sa~[~ {)~c~ ipt i,)n: C,C. ~UG~S TANg'R~VA[, (;A~OY,[N~ 'rANK 2', SAMPLED 10. 14 ')1 ~ l:30 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H,S. / L.U.F.T. Manua! Method - Modified EPA 8015 Date Rampl~ Date Samp3~ Date Analy{l~ Col]ect~]: Received ~ l,~b: C~pleted: ~~ue,~ ~. ~ ..... ~ 1.t ~. _.~.i ~.L ~ve ~ Benzen~ Non~ D~tor:t~d mq/k~ 2. TO] u~n~ 4 . mg/kg 2. o-Xylen~ 1 ~0. rog~kg m-X~[enP 150. m~.l/kg. 2. p-Xylem. ~0 mg/kg ~. LABORATORIES, INC. Trot ~ (TNT~r~ I,~b tt: 112'2R-2 BOX (, q n BAK~FI ~H,D. r'A 9 ~ 302 P.M. ~Y DAVID TEST MF.T}lr)D 'rPtl by D.O.II.S, / I.,.H.F.T. Ma,mai Mnt'hod Modified EPA 8015 Benz~nn None Bet e~ e(l rog/kg "' Tol uen- 1 10 - mq / kg E~hy1 Rm~z"n'~ 40. mg/k~ 4~0. mq/k9 }tydror'ar}~nnn (qa~) 12000, rog/kg -- ' ....... ,! ~.o ^m~s ~;.., CHAIN OF CUSTODY - ~ Matrix Sludge (w') OMB No. M ..... .:'~ .;? .::.; ::.!'.: arid ":.. California, Form de.__'-;~:~_~ f~r,~'o~ state UNIFORM: H~RDOUS?:' WASTE MANIFEST'"':'~*'*~ a. ~.~,., ma~~' '- ...... ~' *: ."~". :, ~po~l ": ~ ' ,.:. 7. Tranlpofl~ 2 ~ ........... '...: ....... ..,.:: :. :. .... . '.. - :.. : .': ....... ,..:: .......... . .... .-:::: 9. D~n~ Fa~II~ ~e.~ S~e ~re~, · . ~1~ . ~ US EPA ~ Num~: :..- ' 11. US DOT Description Oncludlng Prop~ Shipping Name, Ha~ Claa~. and ID Num~) Quant~ d. Additional 15. Speclai"H-~mdll~g l,:.:ructlona and Additional infOrmatiOn UJ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTtFICATIOH: ~ hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and.accurately described above by proper shipping name and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transpod by highway according to applicable international and national government regulations. If I am a large quantity generator, t certify that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method cf treatment, storage, or disposal'cun'ently available to me which mlnimizea the present and future threat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a small quantity generator, I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and select the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford. · ' Month Day Year Printed/Typed Name 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Race. gl Materials Month Day Year /Typed Name 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials . Name I Signature Month Day Year I 19. Discrepancy Indication Space Facility Owner or Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as not.em 19. DHS 8022 A Do Hot Write Below This Une EPA 8700---22 (Rev. 0-891 Previous editions are obsolete. W~I~I~: TSDF SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN 30 DAYS To.. P.O. Box 3000, Sacramento, CA 95812 NO 10112 DISPOSAL FORM GOLDEN STAT[' METALS INC, Bakersfield, California 93387 Phone (805) 327-3559 · Fax (805) 327-5749 Contractor's Scrap Metals, Processing & Recycling License No. DESTINATION: G.S.M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93387 EHSD PEHMIT NO: 550 .24 1000 - 6 ~ .61 ~TANK INSPECTION 2ooo .97 ~ RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJECT) 30oo ~.32 ~ LEL READING 5000 2.42 OXYGEN CONTENT 7500 3.28 DISPOSAL FEE gooo 3.82 SCRAP VALUE ...................................................................... ' ......................................... 12000 4.g3 TOTAL All fees incurred are per Icad unless specified. Terms are net 30 days from receipt of tank. Contractor's signature represents acceptance of terms for payment, and confirms that tank removal complies with State laws. .'~TIFICATE ~ TANK DISPOSAL / DESTRUCTION WHITE ~ Con.actor Copy · YELLOW ~ ~le Copy · PINK ~ Perma~nt Copy C. C. DOUGLASS MFG., INC. 231 - 21st STREET ~KERSFIELD, CA 93301 (8)5) 3270258 FAX (805) 327~3894 January 25, 1991 City of Bakersfield Fire Department To Whom It May Concern: I understand that because the services of Joe Dunwoody of your Hazardous Waste Division were required by us on a Saturday that it is necessary for us to authorize time for him on an overtime basis. In speaking with Mr. Dunwoody your regular rate is at $45.00 per hour and that time and a half is $67.50 per hour. Authorization is hereby given for the time incurred for this one day period. Sincerely, Deborah J. Douglass President Permlt questionnaire May 20, 1986 Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many Owners live outside Kern County,. they may choose to--have the permits sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit ~ and check one of the following before returning this form with payment: For PERMIT : 150015C · ' ~,,~o~a~.o.. - · i Send all ~"~" ~ ~ to Owner at the address. listed on invoice iif Owner is different than Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information). X 2. Send all information to Owner at the following corrected address: Clinton C. Dou~ ~ C/O C.C. Douglass Mfg.~ Inc. 2~1 21. st Street Bakersfield, CA 9530i 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit for Owner). 1700 Flower Street COUNTY HEALTH HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION j DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon. S. Reichard · I NI'ERI MTO OPERATEPERMI 'i': ~~~~) PERMI T:~:I 5 0 0 1 5 C I S S U g D : NOVEMBER 1, 19~ UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS S UBSTANC ES STORAGE FACILITY ~~ NUMBER OF TANKS=' 1 FACILITY: I OWNER: C.C. DOUGLASS MFG., INC. I DOUGLASS, CLINTON C. 331 ,P. iST STREET I 231 21ST STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 TANK # AGE[IN YRS~ SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING? 1 2O MVF 3 NO NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING .THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE ** * POST ON PREMI SES DATE PERMIT MAILED: ~'~D'V '~ ~ ].~0 DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED: Division o~ Environmental H~JJJ~ Applicatiol tr 1700 Flower Street, Bakersf~, ~ 93305 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HT~Z;~US SUBSTANCES S"DDRAflE FACILIT~ Type o.f Application (check): rqNew Facility r~Modification of Facility ri~Existir~ Facility nTransfer of Ownership A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days Clint Dou~!ass (805)32?-0258 Nights~-'-+u~_..~. Oou~!ass i80~)>27-0258 Facility Name C.C. Douglass ?'~f~ rnc No. of Tanks 1 Type of Buszness (check): r~Gasoline Station ~1Other (describe) Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Faa? []]Yes ;~No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for A~ricultural Purposes?,. [[]Yes r~No Facility Address ' ~l ~!s% Street, Bakersfie!d~ CA?~;Nearest Cross St. Union Ave. & 21s% St T R SEC (RUral Locations ~ly) Owner Clinton C, Dou~!ass Contact Person Debbie Beaver Address _9D2t_Si~_ Car]~os Way; Bakersfiet~ Zip 9330,9 Telephone 83L~-'6884 Operator Dou~]as Nelson Contact Person Address Rt. ~. BOx ~68E, Bakersfield Zip ?3307 Telephone (805)36~-59~' B. Water to Facility Provided by California Water Service Depth to Groundwater ? Soil Characteristics' at Facility SandT Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Deteminations Visua% C. Contractor CA Contractor' s License No. Addr ess Zip Telephone Proposed Starting Date Propose~l" C~pl~tion Dete Worker's Ccmpensation Certification ! Insurer D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications Proposed E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank _~ Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular Premitm~ Diesel Waste F. Chmical Cmposition of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle' fu~ls) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-commercial na~e)_ CAS ~ (if know~) Chemical Previously Stored (if different) G. Transfer of Ownership Date of' Transfer Previous Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept-fully all obli~'ations of Permit No. issued to · I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and modi'fy or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~dergro~d storage facility upon receiving this completed form. This form has been complet ,e~.~der /pg~lty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct..-- ~-~: o Signature ~< ..,~z'C.~--~..~~:r'', Title Owner Date 3/20/85 FILE ,_'ONTEN'rs IN~.~ITONy ~Pe~mit to Operate I /~/~> Date ~Construction Permit { Date ~Pe~ml~ ~o abandon~ No. "~ Tan~s DaE~ ~ended P~mlt Conditions ~Permi~ ~ppllcation Form, I Tank Sheet~, ~Applica~lon to Abandon ~ank~(s) Da~a ~Copy o~ Written Contract Between Owner 'g 'Oper;tor ~Inmpectlon Report~ ~Corre=pondence - Received ~ · Date Da te ~ Abandonment/Clo~ure Repot ta Sampling/Lab Re~rC~ " ~HV~ C~pilance Check j(MeV "Con~'t~UCtl"o'n ~eckliit) ' ~57D C~pilan~e Check (New Const;uctlon Checklimt) ~HVY Plan Check (Mew Construction) ~STD Plan Check (New Conltructlon) ~HV~ Plan Check (;xistin~ {aclli~y) ~S?D Plan CheoK (,{xlstln9 Factilty) ~'Incomplete Application' rare ~Pe;mlt Application Checklist ~Pe~mi t Inlt;uct lan. ~DI scazded ~Ti~htnea. Test Results -- Da te .... Da Ground~a~e; Drl~ing, Bo=tn~ Location oE Na~e; ~State~ent oE Underground Conduits ~P~ot P~an ~eaturin~ A~ Environ=enta~y Sensitive Data ~PhoCoa ~ConscrUcti~n Drauin~s Location: ~HalE sheet sho~ln~ 4ate ;eceived and ta~y · eel laneous TANK ~ ! (FILL OUT ~E~ARATE F()RM F( EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK A[.I. APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: [-]'Vaulted [~Non-Vaulted I-]Double-Wall ~Single-Wall 2. Tank Material [k~Carbon Steel [-]Stainless Steel [Polyvinyl Chloride []Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluminum [] Bronze []Unknow~ Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer !965 (approx) not known . 5~0 unknown 4. Tan__k Secondary Containment []Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner []Lined Vault ~f].None [-]Unknown []-]Other (describe): Manufacturer: [-~Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.il 5. Tank Interior Linin~ []Rubber []Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic []Glass []Clay ~Unlined [-]Unknown []Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --]~Galvanized --~F~Y~-~'ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap []Vinyl Wrapping [%qTar or Asphalt []Unknown []None []Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: []None []Impressed Current System ~lSacrificial A~odt: System ~ribe System & Equil:ment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) ~]Groundwater Monitoring' W~ll(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) []']U-Tube Without Liner [']U-Tube with Ccmpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring Well(si* [] Vapor .Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor~ [] Conductivity Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank' [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space [] Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Tightness Testi~ []None []Unknown [] Other b. Piping: ~'~Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s)'for Pressurized Piping" [-]Monitoring Sump with Race~ay []Sealed Concrete Race~y []Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner R~ceway [] Unknown [] Other *Describe Make & Model: 8. Tank Tiahtness ~en Tightness Tested? ~]Yes ~kqNo []Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing C{x, pany 9. Tank Repair Tank Repaired? []]Yes ~]NO []]Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection []Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors L~vel DTape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Controls []Capacitance Sensor [-]Sealed Fill Box ~None [-]Unknown DOther: List Make & Model For Above Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: [']Yes ~[~No []Unknown Material Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer ~Pressure [']Suctli'on [']Gravity~ Approximate Length o'f' Pipe Run b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : []Galvanized []Fiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current ~]Sacrificial Ar~e [-]Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation ~]Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or AslR%alt []Unknown []None ~Other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containment: []-]Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner System []None []Unknown []Other (describe): C.C. Douglass. ~'~fg., Inc. 231 2is% Street, Bakersfield, SA 93301