HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 68-91RESOLUTION NO. 68-91
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED
AS ANNEXATION NO. 352, RENFRO NO. 2
ANNEXATION (WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakers-
field, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the
Government Code, held a public hearing on THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7,
1991, on the proposed annexation of certain properties to the
City of Bakersfield. known as RENFRO NO. 2 ANNEXATION, notice of
the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakers-
field Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 24-91 on February 7, 1991,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the annexation by
this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield. that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, tkerefor, Ordinance No. 3353, which was adopted
April 24, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared
and posted on November 29, 1990.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
- 2 -
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" $treet~ Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on MAY 8 1991 , by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARDS..,OeMO~ND. SMITH. ORUNNI. PETERSON. McOERMOTF, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS'
CITY CLERK and Ex officio Clerk of
Council of the City of Bakersfield
the
APPROVED MAY 8 1991
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
~AWRENCE ~ LUNAH~I ~._
CITY ATTORNEY of-th~ City of Bakersfield
LML/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.RENF2.1
4/29/91
- 3 -
EXHIBIT "A"
RENFRO NO. 2
ANNEXATION NO. 352
A parcel of land situated in Sections 34 and 35 of T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M.,
County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the south line of the north ~of the
southeast 1~4 of the southeast 1~4 of said Section 34 and the west line of the east
55.00 feet of said section, said point also being on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) West along said south line, a distance of 1269.73 feet to the south-
west corner of the north ~of the southeast ~4of the southeast l~4of said Section;
THENCE (2) North along the west line of the southeast 1~4 of the southeast l~4of
said Section, a distance of 661.68 feet to the northwest corner thereof;
THENCE (3) West along the south line of the northwest l~4of the southeast ~4 of
said section, a distance of 1324.29 feet to the southwest corner thereof;
THENCE (4) North along the west line of the northwest l~4of the southeast 1,4of
said section, a distance of 1323.35 feet to the northwest corner thereof;
THENCE (5) North along the west line of the northeast l~4of said Section 34, a
distance of 45.00 fee5 to a point on the north line of the south 45.00 feet of
said l~4section;
THENCE (6) East along said north line, also being the north right of way line of
Johnson Road as defined by offer of dedication on map of Tract No. 2892 filed in
Book 14 of Maps, pages 90 and 91 in the office of the Kern County Recorder, a
distance of 2647.72 feet to a point on the east line of the northeast ~of said
Section 34;
THENCE (7) East along the north line of the south 45.00 feet of the northwest 1~4
of said Section 35, a distance of 30.00 feet;
THENCE (8) South along the east line of the west 30.00 feet of the northwest 1,4
of said section, a distance of 45.00 feet to a point on the south line thereof;
THENCE (9) South along the east line of the west 30.00 feet of the southwest ~
of said Section 35, a distance of 661.79 feet to a point on the existing corpo-
rate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
T~IENCE (10) West and south along said existing corporate boundary line to the
point of beginning. ~
CONTAINING 102.43 ACRES (+~ KER~-~
COt.. ~, -
Date
33 :ANN. 352 RTY: lh
,I
(6)
ROAD
(4)
(3)
T~ 29 ,S. R., 26 E.
(2)
(I)
ANNEXATION NO. 352 RESOLUTION NO,
ANNEXATION OF
RENFRO NO. 2
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
_10~.43 ~: ACRES
SCALE:
200 0 200 400 600
N ........~x~.e cam~?~ mou.o~
EXHIBIT "B"
.SEC. 3
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 352
(RENFRO NO. 2)
SERVICES
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service Cit~/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or s~ecia]
Upon Future Date assessment.)
Annexation (specify)
Count~ X General Tax Revenue
North Bakersfield
Recreation and Park Dist. No Change General Tax Revenue
County No Change General Tax Revenue
County and Highway Patrol X General Tax Revenue
City/County Joint
Agreement No Change General Tax Revenue
County X General and Gas Tax Revenue
Upon
County --- Development Private Development
Count~ X General and Gas Tax Revenue
N/A X General and Gas Tax Revenue
N/A X General Tax Revenue
Upon
County X Development General Tax Revenue
Upon
N/A X Development S~ecial Assessment/~Jser Fee
Upon
N/A X Development User Fee
N/A X I User Fee
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
33:ANN.RENF1
EXHIBIT "C" -1- RTY: lh
I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the southwest corner of
Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 9 miles easterly of the annexation.
Fire-Fire response to this area will be administered from County Fire
Station No. 65 located at the northeast corner of Calloway Drive and
Rosedale Highway.
Parks and Recreation-Developers shall provide park acreage or pay in-lieu
fees in accordance with adopted standards of the North Bakersfield
Recreation and Park District.
Library-Not applicable
Streets-
Construction/Maintenance; Sweeping; Li~htin$: The City Corporation
Yard on Truxtun Avenue, West of Freeway 99 will provide necessary facili-
ties, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts. Main-
tenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular
basis preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets,
construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer- Existing sewer service is now located at Stockdale Highway and
Jenkins Road. However, the territory is proposed to be served by a
future sewer trunk line in Renfro Road and connecting to a future Allen
Road trunk system.
Water-The territory will be annexed to the service area of the City of
Bakersfield system, Ashe Water Division.
Other-REFUSE - Upon annexation, the City will provide collection either
by City forces or by contract with any present contracted collector if
possible.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour bg :s.
The annexation will not affect City/County
joint fire service capability or response time.
District parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
Not applicable.
There will be no reduction in the range
capacity of the City to provide the necessary
public works services to this area.
Services will be on a regular basis and "as
needed."
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pick up is twice a week.
33:ANN.RENF2 ~ -2- RTY:lh
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon
time of full build out of this territory, additional City police officers will be
required to maintain the current level of service. Street improvements resulting
from proposed development will increase the maintenance responsibility of the
City but will not affect the existing level of service.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would City/District or residents
be responsible for financing? The City will, at time of development, require upgrading
and changes in existing facilities. As development occurs, Developers shall provide
and pay for major l~rovements and facllltles and dedicate them to the City. Future
residents of the project possibly will be assessed for a sewer assessment district ~f
established.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. This territory is presently
zoned A (Exclusive Agriculture) in the County.
VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.)The territory is centrally divided by the future right of way for the
Kern River Freeway being prezoned City A (-Agriculture) zone. The territory north of the
freeway alignment is prezoned City R-1-12,000 (one-family dwelling, 12,000 square feet
minimum lot size) zone, R-l-10,000 (one-family dwelling, 10,000 square feet minimum lot
size) zone and R-1-8,500 (one-family dwelling, 8,500 square feet minimum lot size) zone.
The remaining territory, south of the freeway alignment, is prezoned City R-2 (limited
(limited multiple-family dwelling) zone and C-1 (Limited C~m,~rclal) zone.
See attached zoning plat (Pg. 5) for land use locations.
The major effect on present land use is the conversion of agricultural zoning to pre-
dominantly low-density residential use.
33:ANN.RENF3 -3- RTY:lh
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit
from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response
tir~, use of cormsunity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State
Highway Patrol services. Current City police standard is a higher sworn
officer per 1,000 population percentage compared to the County standard.
Refuse service will be provided by the City and will result in savings to
the owners w~thin this annexation. No special assessments or charges for
street sweeping, leaf collection, school crossing guards, street l~ghting
energy costs and fire hydrants upon any future development of subject
area.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area
equals 1.127179% of assessed market value. This represents the total
property tax rate. When annexed, a designated percentage of the total
tax of the area will accrue to the City. (Rate as shown on 1990-91
County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district:
If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004041% of
assessed market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.131220%.
(Rates as shown on 1990-91 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of
$50,000.00? The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $1.74 on
a house of $50,000 market value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate.
(Figure includes deduction for home owners exemption).
33:ANN.RENF4
-4-
RTY: lh