HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 37-00RESOLUTION NO. 3 7 "' 0 0
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO.
413, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROSEDALE
HIGHWAY, EAST OF COFFEE ROAD (WARD 4).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance
with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on
MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1997, and THURSDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1997, on the prezoning
for the territory, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 110-97 on December 18, 1997, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of the prezoning by this Council and this
Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization,
to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State ef California.
WHEREAS, the property owner has agreed to annex to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the property upon annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield
that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is
marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners
of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the
City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed
to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance No.
3819, which was adopted January 28, 1998, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A
Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on November 7, 1997.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the
environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of
Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
Pamela A. McCarthy
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Bart Thiltgen
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution,
with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern
County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... o0o ........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
I~PI~ ~, ¢; 21~[~fl . by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNC~LMEMBER CARSON, DEMOND, MAGGARD, COUCH, ROWLES, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
COUNC~LMEMBER N' ~p ~1 ~
COUNC~LMEMBER ~ ~, N ~
COUNCILMEMBER I~l ~,1~/~
CITY CLERK and Ex Offici~,/Clerk of the
Council of the City of BakerSfield
APPROVED APR 2
BOB~iCRi(~E/ ~
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BART J. THILTGEN
City Attorney
CARL HERNANDEZ Ill
Assistant City Attorney
MO:pas
March 27, 2000
S:~Annexation~ANN413(2),ROA.wpd
EXHIBIT "A"
"ROSEDALE NO. 9"
ANNEXATION NO. 413
A parcel of land being a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 21 and a portion of the northwest
t/4 of Section 28, T. 29 S., R. 27 E., M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the north 1/4 corner of said Section 28 shown as a found monumented corner per
Record of Survey filed in Book 15 of Record of Surveys at Page 105 in the office of the Kern
County Recorder, said corner being calculated as 2, 327, 563.92 ! 7 feet North and
6,238,756.8163 feet East per California Coordinate System (N.A.D. 83) Zone 5;
Thence N 89° 46' 45" W, along the north line of said Section 28, a distance of 603.70 feet to
intersect the northwest corner of that land granted to Valley Boats, Inc. per Grant Deed filed for
record in Book 6943, Page 2150, O.R. in the office of the Kern County Recorder;
Thence N 00° 13' 56" E along the northerly prolongation of the west line of said Valley Boats,
Inc, parcel, a distance of 80.00 feet to intersect the north right of way line of Rosedale Highway
(State Rt. VI-KER-58) said point being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Bakersfield and is the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence (1) departing from said corporate boundary, S 89° 46' 45" E, along the north right of way
line of Rosedale Highway, 151.81 feet to intersect the northerly prolongation of the east line of
said parcel granted to Valley Boats, Inc.;
Thence (2) S 00° 13' 56" W, along said prolongation line and east line of said Valley Boats, Inc.
parcel, a distance of 205.00 feet to an angle point thereon;
Thence southerly and westerly along the exterior boundary of said Valley Boats, Inc. parcel for
courses (3) through (7) as follows:
Thence (3) N 89° 46' 45" W, 4.11 feet;
Thence (4) S 00° 13' 56" W, 10.00 feet;
Thence (5) S 89° 46' 45" E, 4. t 1 feet;
Thence (6) S 00° 13' 56" W, 525.82 feet;
Thence (7) N 89 ° 46' 45" W, 151.81 feet to intersect the existing corporate boundary line of the
City of Bakersfield;
Thence (8) N 00° 13' 56" E, along said corporate boundary line, 740.82 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.58 acres (more or less)
G:\sub\SHA RED\RONL2000\Annex 413 - Exhibit A,wpd
COURSE LIST
P.O.B.
S, 89'46' 45" E
~_FO'~MERLY
2,327,563.9217 N. ( N.A.D* 83 )
6,238,756. 8163 E
SECTION LiNE '- J
20 20-
CtTY OF BAKERSFIELD ANNEXATION NO. 400,
'ROSEDALE NO. 6*', RESOLUTION NO.
CER% OF COMPLETION RECORDED
A PN: 366'060'10
)®
N,89°46
(7)
APN:368'060'~2
E57.00'
PROPOSED
ANNEXATION
VICINITY MAP
Rt
FRUITVALE
SCHOOL
~ CO. RD
ANNEXATION NO, 41;5
RESOLUTION NO,
ANNEXATION OF
ROSEDALE NO. 9
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
2.58 ± ACRES
SCALE: ( FEET )
~ ~, EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARY
~ ~ ~ PROPOSED ANNEXATION ~I[~IAR
EXHIBIT "B" ~¢
PLANS FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 413
(ROSEDALE NO. 9 )
AGENCY WHICH CHECK SERVICES WHICH INDICATE HOW SERVICES
SERVICES PRESENTLY CITY/DISTRICT WILL PROVIDED BY CITY/DISTRICT WILL BE FINANCED
PROVIDES SERVICE PROVIDE (I.E., GENERAL TAX RATE OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.)
Upon Annexation Future Date
(Specify)
Planning COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks & NORTH BAKERSFIELD GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Recreation RECREATION & PARKS
Library COUNTY N/A
Police SHERIFF AND CALIFORNIA CITY & HIGHWAY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Protection HIGHWAY PATROL PATROL
Fire Protection COUNTY COUNTY GENERAL TAX REVENUES, FIRE FUND
Street STATE STATE GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
Construction STATE .GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
Maintenance STATE STATE GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
Sweeping N/A
Lighting N/A
Flood Control COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage CITY USER FEE/PRIVATE CONNECTION
Water CITY CITY USER FEE
,9t~e~' (I~..tEFUSE) PRIVATE CONTRACT CITY USER FEE
EXHiBiT "C"
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station
library, etc.)
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e., street sweeping, response time for
emergency services, recreation programs, etc.)
POLICE - All police services in the City of Bakersfield are adnfinistered through
the City Police Department located at the s/w comer of Tmxtun and Eye Street about
4 1/2 miles Southeast of the annexation.
FIRE - Service will be provided by County Station No. 65 located on the North side
of Rosedale Highway easterly of Calloway Drive pursuant to exchange wherein
County protects certain property within the City's jurisdiction. Thus, the City does
incur the cost of providing fire protection and the fire fund collected from the City's
taxpayers must be transferred to both City and County.
PARKS AND RECREATION - The annexation area is within the jurisdiction of
the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District and is subject to the adopted
standards of the District.
LIBRARY - N/A
STREETS - The City Corporation Yard on Tmxtun Avenue West of Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works
efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING - Maintenance
and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed.
SEWER - A City sewer main on the North side of Rosedale Highway has been
extended East of Coffee Road. A section of the line has been completed
approximately 1700 feet West of the territory.
WATER - This area will be continue to be served by the City of Bakersfield
Resources Department.
OTHER - (Refuse) - When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by
City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this
annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes
or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation
will not affect City/County Joint Fire service capability.
All District parks are open to the public at reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to
provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services
will be on a regular basis and "as needed."
Adequate capacity will exist.
Adequate capacity exists
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
G~b\SHARED~QI~2000~Xamex413 Plans for Providing Services.wpd
2
III.
IV.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
What effects, if any would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district
services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc.)?
The annexation of this territory_ will not affect the near term level or capability of the Ci_ty to provide
services. Upon completion of the proposed commercial development in the ar~a. additional police
officers should not be required to maintain the current level of City service. Any street
improvements resulting from development would be a requirement of the State (Rosedale Hwy) and~
will not affect the existing level of service. The portion of Rosedale Highway adjacent to the,
territory_ will continue to be maintained by the State.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (Roads,
fire hydrants; mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? As
development occurs, the developer provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the
City or State. No upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing County zoning in affected territory. The annexation area is zoned
County M-2 (Medium Industrial) zone.
Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. ,L~st effects on present land use that would occur
as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.): The annexation is pre-
zoned City M-2 (General Manufacturing) zone.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire
insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc.: City Police should
be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol
services. The present Ci_ty refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now
pay to independent companies. City Government also provides increased political representation
for residents within the corporate limits.
io
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.293250%
of assessed market value). When annexed a desi~ated percentage of the total property
tax for the area will accrue to the City and the remainder to the County for providing
Health Care and Social Services. (Rates shown are from 1999-2000 County Auditor-
Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain:
No - Previous last shown (1992-93), City bonded indebtedness has been paid offand the
current 1999-2000 tax rote list shows no City bonded indebtedness.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000? The
property_ rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to
annexation.
G 5Sub\SHAREDkRONL2000~Annex413 Exhibit C-3.wpd
3