HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 63-91RESOLUTION NO. 63-91
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED
AS ANNEXATION NO. 351, WIBLE NO. 10
ANNEXATION (WARD 6 AND WARD 7).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakers-
field, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the
Government Code, held a public hearing on THURSDAY, MARCH 7,
1991, on the proposed annexation of certain properties to the
City of Bakersfield known as WIBLE NO. 10 ANNEXATION, notice of
the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakers-
field Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 23-91 on March 7, 1991,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the annexation by
this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Cisy of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
part
3. That a plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of crganization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3352, which was adopted
April 10, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared
and posted on February 14, 1990.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on APR 2 4 1991 __ , by
the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EOWARDS, De.M~ND, SMITH, i~RUNNI, PETERSON, McDERMOTT, SALVAGGIO
NOES~ COUNCILMEMBERS ~'VD~/~
ASSENT COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN COUNCILMEMBERS'
CITY CLERK and'ER Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED APR 2 4 ~99!
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
LML/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.WIBL10.1
4/17/91
- 3 -
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 351
A parcel of land being a portion of the South 1/2 of Section 25, Township 30
South, Range 27 East, M.D. M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the point of intersection of the North line of Lot 30 of Said
Section 25 as lots are shown on "Sales Map No. 1 of Lands of J. B. Haggin"
filed May 3, 1889 in the office of the Kern County Recorder and the East
Right of Way line of Freeway 99 (State Route Vl-Ker-99) also being a point
on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; thence South
11° 31' 00" East, along said East Right of Way line, 65.713 feet to the true
point of beginning;
THENCE (1) South 78° 29' 00" West, 190.00 feet to a point on the West Right
of Way line of said Freeway 99, said point also being a point of intersection
with the East line of Parcel "A" as shown on Parcel Map No. 4351 filed in Book
19 of Parcel Maps, Page 188 in the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (2) South 00° 37' 09" West, along the East line of said Parcel "A", a
distance of 716.15 feet to the Northeast corner of Parcel "C" of said Parcel
~ap No. 4351;
THENCE (3) North 89° 11' 30" West along the North line of Parcels "B" and "C"
of said Parcel Map No. 4351, a distance of 440.70 feet to the Northwest corner
of said Parcel "B";
THENCE (4) South 00° 36' 40" West, along the West line of said Parcel "B" a
distance of 470.00 feet to a point on the North line of the South 30 feet of
said Section 25 also being on the North Right of Way line of Hosking Avenue
(County Road No. 782);
T~ (5) North 89° 11' 30" West, along said North line, 220.32 feet to a
point on the West line of said Parcel "A";
THENCE (6) Continuing West along said North line, 2613.70 feet (more or less)
to a point on the East line of the West 30 feet of said Section 25;
THENCE (7) North, along said East line, also being the East Right of Way line
of Wible Road (County Road No. 50), a distance of 1440.26 feet to a point on
the North line of the South 152 feet of Lot 24 of said "Sales Map No. 1 of
Lands of J. B0 Haggin";
THENCE (8) East along said North line 175 feet to a point on the East line of
the West 205 feet of said Lot 24;
THENCE (9) South along said East line, 152 feet to a point on the South line
of said lot;
THENCE (10) East along said South line, 1116.63 feet to the Southwest corner of
Lot 22 of said "Sales Map NO. 1";
33:WIBLE10 RTY:lh
THENCE (11) North along the West line of said Lot 22, a distance of 1289.08
feet to a point on the South line of the North 30 feet of said lot;
THENCE (12) East along the South line of the North 30 feet of Lots 22 and 21,
also being the South Right of Way line of Berkshire Road (County Road No.782)
a distance of 1321.76 feet to a point on the West line of Lot 20 of said "Sale
Map No. 1";
THENCE (13) South 89° 14' 56" East, along said South Right of Way line, 360.78
feet to a point on the West Right of Way line of Freeway 99;
THENCE (14) Continuing South 89° 14' 56" East, 194.44 feet to a point on the
East Right of Way line of Freeway 99, also being a point on the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (15) Southeasterly along said existing corporate boundary to the point of
beginning.
Containing 153.32 Acres (more or less)
33:WIBLE10.P2 RTY:lh
\
(13)
24
22
Z$
(6)
(2
(3)
P, O.B.
ANNEXATION OF
WIBLE No.lO
200 0 200 400 &bO
EXHIBIT "B" I
SEC~3.6 -F.$OS. R.27E ~\/I.D. M~
SERVICES
Planning
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
"WIBLE NO. 10"
ANNEXATION NO. 351
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or s~ecial
Upon Future Date assessment. )
Annexation (speci fy)
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
UPON
COUNTY X DE~nSLOPMENT GENEraL TAX ~VENI~S
COUNTY N/A
SHERIFF & HIGHWAY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY
JOINT AGREEMENT N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
UPON NEW STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY
COUNTY X DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO CI
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
NO SERVICE X GENERAL & GAS TAX REA;ENUE
Upon
COUNTY X Development GENERAL TAX REVENUE
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE
N/A X GENER;J~ TAX REVENUE
N/A X N/A
PRIVATELY CONTRACTED X USER FEE
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
33 :ANN. 351P1
E X H I B I T "C"
-1-
RTY:lh
applicant city.
Please provide the following information, whea applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Service Level Capacity
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
Avenue and Eye Street about 61~miles north of the annexation.
Fire-Station 13 (City) is 1 mile west of the territory on the west of
Stine Road, southerly of the Arvin-Edison Canal.
Parks and Recreation-Upon development of residential area, the open space
element of the adopted Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan provide~
a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1000 population.
Library-N/A
Streets-q'ne City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Freeway 99
will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works Department efforts.
Construction/
Maintenance-Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the Yard
on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed.
Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping
Sweeping and lighting.
Lighting
Sewer-An existing City trunk sewer in Stine Road extends as far south as
Hosking Avenue, then west to tie into Treatment Plant No. 3 (See
Further sewer comments in Section VII).
Water-The area is within the boundary of the California Water Service
Company service area.
Other-(Refuse)-Present refuse collection is provided by a francise refuse
collector. When annexed, service will be provided by the City with
the same collector is at all possible.
33:ANN.351P2 -2-
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis.
The annexation will not affect CITY/CCIJNTY fire
service capabilies.
Ail City parks are open to the public at reasonat
hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public work~
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City Refuse pick up is twice a week.
RTY:lh
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon
time of full buildout of this territory, additional ~olice ~ersonnel may be
required to maintain the current level of City service. Streets and other municipal
improvements resulting from development will increase the maintenance responsibility
of the City but will not affect the existing level of service.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? As development occurs the developer provides and pays
for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No upgrading or change in
facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is
zoned County A (Exclusive Agriculture). And A-1 (Limited Agriculture) Zones
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc). The territory is prezoned City R-1 (Single Family Dwelling) Zone,
R-2 (Limited Multiple-Family Dwelling) Zone, R-S (Residential Suburban), Zone, A
(Agriculture) Zone and A-20A (Agriculture 20 Acre Minimum) Zone.
See Zoning upon Annexation (5097) Plat, attached as Page 5, for Zoning areas.
33:ANN. 351P3 -3- RTY:lh
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of conunity
facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than
the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. The present City refuse
collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independ-
ent companies. No special assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf collec-
tion, school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon deve-
lopment of subject area. The City is currently proceeding with the formation of an
assessment district to provide sewer service to the territory and the surrounding area.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in area equal 1.213748% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed
a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City and the
remaining to the County for providing health care and social service. (Rate as shown
on 1990-91 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If
so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased to 1.217789% of assessed
market value which equals the City bond rate of 0.004041% and the total property tax
rate of 1.213748%.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00?
If the house is used as the principal residence, the $7,000 home owners exemption
leaves $43,000 for taxing purposes. The City bond rate of 0.004041% amounts to a
difference of $1.74 more per year on a house of this value.
33:ANN.351P4 -4- RTY:lh
ZONING UPON ANNEXATION 5097
WIBLE NO. 10
PANAMA LANE
A-20A R-1
A-20A
26
R-1
A-2OA
r
o
I
I-------t
RS I C-2
· c-~ j
I
!
- C-1PD
A-1
T30S, R~7E
A-1
A
BEi~SI-mE ROAD
A TO A-20A
C-2-D
C-2
C-1
R-1
00,000)
1800
I
A
R-1
36
PUD
R-t
R-1
-5-