HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 32-91RESOLUTION NO. 32-91
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 348, MT. VERNON NO. 5
ANNEXATION LOCATED SOUTH OF BELLE TERRACE
AND WEST OF MT. VERNON AVENUE (WARD 1).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California;
and
WHEREAS, an Inital Study was conducted and it was deter-
mined that the proposed project, as mitigated, would not have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is; made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected territory
desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation, the Casa Loma
Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council on August 6, 1986
and the Board of Supervisors on August 25, 1986, and an environ-
mental assessment was conducted and it was determined that the
proposed project would not have a significant adverse effect on
the environment with mitigation. A Negative Declaration with
mitigation was prepared and posted on February 17, 1991.
7. As mitigation, an archaeological survey is required
for the project area prior to site disturbance. The report is to
be submitted to thE? California Archaeological Inventory at Cal
State Bakersfield for review. A letter from the California
Archaeological Inventory verifying that any measures of the
report have been completed shall be submitted to the City
Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit.
8. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107--86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration with mitigation for this proposed annexation is
hereby approved and[ adopted.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
10. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
- 2 -
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, BaKersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on F£8 2 7 ~995 , by
the following vote::
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EOWAROS, D,eMOND. '~-T-H. BRUNNI. PETERSON. MC3[~.t.;C.'T. SALVAGGIO
NOES; COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIlEMBERS'
CITY and Ex O ' o CIerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED J:F~ 2 ? 1991
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
LML/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.MT-V5.3
2/17/91
- 3 -
MT. V~NON N0. 5
A~EXATION 348
The Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.M.,
County of .Kern, State of California, also being described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of said Section
4, also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Bakersfield;
· i~I~NCE (1) North 01° 07' 14" East along the We_st line of said Southeast quarter
section, 2639.41 feet to the Northwest corner thereof, also being a point on
the existing City corDorate boundary;
· i~m~CE (2) East, South and West along said corporate boundary to the point of
beginning.
Containing 161.65 acres (~)
D29 ANN. 348
RTY:lh
P. O.B.
~ ' I
~ s~c 9
MUNICIPAL FARM
CiTY OF BAKERSFIELD
~EC IO
EXI511NG CORPORATE BOUNDARY i~:.~--
pROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
EXHIBIT "B" ,,'~
ANNEXATION OF
MT. VERNON No. 5
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
.161,65 +- ACRES
9 SCALE:
400 0 400 BOO 1200
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
~intenance
S~eping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
"MT. VERNON NO. 5"
ANNEXATION NO. 348
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment. )
Annexation (specify)
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
UPON
COUNTY X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY N/A
SHERIFF & HI(]~'~AY PATROL X GE~'rERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY
JOINT AGt~F2,iENT N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUN'i~f X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
UPON N~.q STREETS WILL BE CO~ISTRUCTED BY
COUN'Fi X D~A~LO?~ENT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO C1
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX Rhg~NUE
NO SERVICE X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVE~JE
Upon
COUNTY X Development GENERAL TAX REVENUE
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE
N/A X GENF~riAL TAX REVENUE
N/A X N/A
PRIVATELY CONTRACTED X USER FEE
t)30 :ANN. 348.1
E X [! I B I T "C"
-1-
RTY:wrn
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will ~ provided by the
applicant city.
Location
Indicate l~ation from which service
will be provided (i.e, nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
'olice-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
trough the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
.venue and Eye Street about 4~miles northwesterly of the annexation.
'ire-Stat]on 41 (County) is located 1 mile north at r,{t. Vernon Avenue and
'irginia Avenue and will service the subject area per City/County Joint
'owers Agreement.
'arks and Recreation-Martin Luther King Jr. Park is located 2 miles to
he northwest. Wayside Park is located 2 miles to the West
,ibrary-N/A
itreets-
Construction~laintenance-~]e City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue
west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel
and services to accommodate Public ~'~orks efforts, gaintenance
and pe_rsonnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular
basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes
streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
~w~r An existing City trunk sewer line in ~]t. Vernon Ave. is available t¢
this area for connections. Effluent would then be treated by City
City Wastewater Treatment Plant ~2.
~ater-The area will b~ serviced by the California Uater Service Co.
~ther-(Refuse)-Service will {~ provided by the City either by City forces
or by contract with a Franchise Refuse Collector.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time_ for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis.
The annexation will not affect CITY/COUN'Uf fire
service capabilities.
All City parks are open to the public at reasonabl
hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will ~ on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists in Plant #2 for proposed
area.
Adequate capacity exists.
City Refuse pick up is twice a week.
RTY:wrn
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services.
Street improvements resulting from proposed development will increase the mainten-
ance responsibiltiy of the City but will not affect the existing level of service.
The demand for police protection in the area should not affect the City's officer
per 1000 population standard because no residential development is proposed.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? The City will, at time of development, requir-~ upgrading
or changes in existing facilities. As development occurs, Developers shall provide and
pay for major improvements and facilities and dedicate them to the City.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property located
within the Casa Loma Specific Plan boundary adopted August 25, 1986 which designates
land use for this area as 7.2 (Service Industrial). A small portion of the area at
the Southeast corner is designated 7.2/3.3 (Combined service industrial and public
facilities).
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc). The City proposes no change to the adopted 7.2 (Service Industrial),
or 7.2/3.3 (Comgined Service Industrial, Public Facilities), or more restrictive zoning
of the Casa Loma Specific Plan. Zoning will be the same whether the area is in the
City or the County.
D30:ANN.346.3 -3- RTY:wrn
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time_, use of co~mnunity
facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than
the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. Current City police
standard is a higher sworn officer per 1,D00 population percentage compared to the
County standard. Refuse service will he provided by the City and will result in
savings to the owners within this annexation. No special assessments or charges for
street sweeping, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon any future
development of subject area.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existing tax rate in area equal 1.158160% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed
a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City.
(Rate as shown on 1990-91 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If
so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004041% of assessed market
value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.162201%. (Rates as shown on
1990-91 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00?
The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $2.02 on a building of $50,000 market
value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate.
D30:ANN.346.4
-4-
RIFf: wr n