HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 30-91RESOLUTION NO. 30-91
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED
AS ANNEXATION NO. 346, WIBLE NO. 8
ANNEXATION (WARD 6).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakers-
field, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the
Government Code, held a public hearing on THURSDAY, JANUARY 10,
1991, on the proposed annexation of certain properties to the
City of Bakersfield known as WIBLE NO. 8 ANNEXATION, notice of
the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakers-
field Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 8-91 on January 10, 1991,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the annexation by
this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE,
City of Bakersfield that
follows:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
it hereby finds and determines as
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
part
3. That a plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3340, which was adopted
February 13, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared
and posted on DecemlDer 19, 1990.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That t~e territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
- 2 -
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Streetr Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on FEB 2 ? 1991 , by
the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARDS, OeMOND, SMITH, BRUNNL PETERSON, McDERMOTT, SALVAGOIO
NOES; COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCtLMEMBERS: .N/gA/E
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS'
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED FEB 27 ]99~
CLARENCE E. MEDDERS
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
LML/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.WIBL8.1
2/17/91
EXHIBIT 'A'
WIBLE NO. 8
ANNEXATION NO. 346
A parcel of land situated in Section 25 and 26 of T. 30 S., R. 27 E., M.D. M.
in the County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as
follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the West line of the East q0 feet
of said Section 26 and the North right of way line of the Arvin-Edison intake
canal, said point also being on the existing corporate boundary of the City
of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) South 00° 36' 02" West, along said West line, a distance of 393.20
feet to a point on the Westerly prolongation of the South line of Parcel 3 as
shown on Parcel Map No. 4385 filed in Book 19 of Parcel r~ps at Page 105 in
the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (2) South 89° 17' 18" East, along said prolongation line and South
line, a distance of 60 feet to a point on the East line of the West 30 feet
of said Section 25, also being on the East right of way line of l;ible Road
(County Road no. 50);
THENCE (3) South 00° 36' 02" West along said East line, 925.27 feet to a point
on the South line of the ~rthwest quarter of said Section 25 (also being on
the center line of Berkshire Road, County Road No. 782);
THENCE (4) South along the East line of the %~st 30 feet of the Southwest
quarter of said Section 25, a distance of 2607.69 feet (more or less) to a point
on the North line of the South 30 feet of said Section 25 (also being on the
North Right of Way Line of Hosking Avenue, County Road No. 782);
THENCE (5) West along s~id [~orth line, 30 feet to a point on the East line of
said Section 26;
THENCE (6) Continuing I~est along the North line of .the South 30 feet of said
Section 26, a distance of 30 feet to a point of the West line of the East 30
feet of said Section 26;
THENCE (7) South along said West line, also being the West Right of Way line
of Wible Road (County Road No. 50), a distance of 30 feet to a point on the
South line of said Section 26;
THENCE (8) .;~s~ along said South line, 635 feet to a point on the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (9) North, West, North and East along said existing corporate boundary
line to the point of beginning.
Containing 106.29 Acres (more or te~s)
R?f: !h
P.O.B.
$~C~ 26
(9)
~. (9)
(4)
(9)
(5,6)
(81 -~"~( 7 )
?
ANNEXATION NO. 346 R~SOLUTION NO,
ANNEXATION OF
WIBLE No. 8
TO THE CITY OF BAI~I~qEL.D
SCALE:
4OO 0 400 ~00 1200
EXHIBIT "B"
z$
;ERVICES
~k~nning
~arks and Recreation
'oli.~.e Protection
~i~e Protection
Cons truct ion
Pla intenance
Swe ~pi ng
Light lng
~I~ Control
)ther (~FUSE)
~)30:A~If4. 346.1
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
"WIBLE NO. 8"
ANNEXATIOfq NO. 346
1'R]ich Presently I Check Services Uhich Indicate How Services Provided
Agency
Provides Ser~ce City/District ~qil! Provide ~y City/District will ~ Finenced
(i.e., general tax rate or s~cia!
U~n Future Date assessmnt. )
Annexakion (s~cify)
COUN~ X GENE~ TAX ~ES
U~i
COUN~iY X DE~LOPr~NT GENE[~ TAX ~t~ES
COUN~ N/A
SHERIFF & HIGI~CAY OATROL X GENE~L TAX ~[~3ES
CI~/C~N~
JOINT AG~ErqENT N/A GENE~ TAX R~S
COUN'IY X GENE~L & ~S TAX ~U
UP~ N~.; ST~E~ I;ILL BE CONSTRUC~D BY
C~Ji4'~ X DE~LOPf~NT PRIVATE D~LOPf~]NT A~]I) DEEDED '~ C
C~N'~ X GENE~L & ~S TAX R~f~E
NO SERVICE X GENE~L & ~S TAX R~5~E
U~n
COUN~ X Develop~nt GENE~ TAX ~eE
C~JUqY X GENE~L TAX RE~E
~]/A X GENE~ TAX ~NUE
~../A X N/A
PRIVATELY Cf)f~T}~C~;i) X USER FEE
CITY
E X H I B ~ T "C"
-I-
RTY :wrn
applicant city.
Pi~.ase pro~ide the fo]lowing information, wh'~n applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicat~ location from which service
will ~ provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, ~ib~ary, etc.)
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield .]re administered
through the City Police l)epactm~nt lo(:~ted at the s/w corner of Truxtun
%venue and Eye Street aloout 6~mi]es north of the annexation.
~ire-Station 13 (City) is within 1 mile of tile territory on the west of
~.~ln_ Road, southerly of the Arvin-Edison Canal.
?arks and Recreation-Upon development of residential area, the open space
~ler~nt of the adopted ,~etropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Pla~ provide.~
~ minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 100(] popu]3tion.
~ibrary-N/A
;treets-The City Corporation Yard on Trux~un A-<~nue west of Freeway 99
will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
acco~mmodate Public Pbrks Department efforts.
~onstruction/
laintenance-~intenance and personnel wil~ b~ dispatched from the Yard
on a r~gular basis for preventative maintenance as needed.
Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance, sw.~eping
;w~eping and lighting.
,ighting
Set-ice I~ve! Capncit¥
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis.
The annexstion will not affect CITY/COUNTY fire
service cap,bi]les.
hours.
N/A
There will b~ no reduction in the rang~ capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services wi~' be_ on a
regular basis and "as needed".
;ewer-An existing City trunk sewer in Stine Road extends as far south as
Hosking Avenue, then west to tie ~nto Treatmqnt Plant No. 3 (See
Further ~,;~, v~;.
,.om~n~s in Section "~'
Satur-The ar~_a is within the boundnry of the California Water Service
Company service area.
)ther-(Refuse)-Present refuse collection is provided by a franclse refuse
co]lector. W]]en annexed, service will bx? provided by the City with
the same collector is at all possible.
)30 :ANrl. 346.2 ~ ;~ -2-
Adequate cap~city exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City Refuse pick up is twice a week.
RTY:wrn
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing !e%el
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon
time of full buildout of this territory, additional .Dotice personnel may be
required to maintain the current level of City service. Streets and other municipal
improvements resulting from development will increase the maintenance responsibility
of the City but will not affect the existing level of service.
IV.
%{ould city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? As development occurs the developer provides and pays
for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No upgrading or change in
facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is
zoned County A (Exclusive Agriculture .
Indicate and explain proposed prezonlng in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of li~Testock
on property, etc). The territory is prezoned City R-1 (Single Family Dwelling)
Zone over the ma]ority ~rtion (78.32 net acres). A 19.09 (net) area on the west
side of Wib!e Road between Berkshire .Road and the Arvin-Edison Canal is prezoned
City C-! (Limited Comm~.rcial) zone. The overall impact on the territory will ~
conversion of existing agricultural land to lowdensity residentis1 development.
?
D30:ANN.348.3 -3- RTY:wrn
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of cor~unity
facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than
the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. The present City refuse
collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independ-
ent co~.anies. NO special assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf collec-
tion, school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon deve-
lopment of subject area. The City is currently proceeding with and assisting in the
formation of an assessment district to provide sewer service to the territory and a
sizeable area extending easterly.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in area equal 1.103006% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed
a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City and the
remaining to the County for providing health care and social service. (Rate as shown
on 1990-91 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Bo
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If
so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased to 1.107047% of assessed
market value which equals the City bond rate of 0.004041% and the total property tax
rate of 1.103006%.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00?
if the house is used as the principal residence, the $7,000 home owners exemption
leaves $43,000 for taxing purposes. The City bond rate of 0.004041% amounts to a
difference of $1.74 more per year on a house of this value.
D30:ANN.348.4
-4-
RTY:wrn