HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 15-91RESOLUTION NO. 15-91
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 343,
STINE NO. 7 ANNEXATION (WARD 6).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakers-
field, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the
Government Code, held a public hearing on THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15,
1990, on the proposed annexation of certain properties to the
City of Bakersfield known as $TINE NO. 7 ANNEXATION, notice of
the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakers-
field Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 52-90 on November 15, 1990,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the annexation by
this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
City of
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3335, which was adopted
January 9, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was deter-
mined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared
and posted on October 25, 1990.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Lawrence M. Lunardini
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
2
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on ~AN ~ 0 ]991 , by
the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: EDWARDS, DeMOND. SMITH, ORUNNI, PETERSON, McOERMOT[, SALVAG610
NOES; COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED JAN ~ :3 1991
CLARP. NCE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
d-Y J-", ."~'.c .
LAWRENCE M. LUNA~)INI
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
LML/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.STIN7.1
1/23/91
- 3 -
EXHIBIT "A"
STINE NO. 7
ANNEXATION NO. 343
A parcel of land situated in the West half of Section 26 and the East half of
Section 27 in Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., County of Kern, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northwest ~ of the Southwest 14 of said
Section 26, distant South 89°43'13" East, 1321.74 feet from the West ~ corner of
said Section, also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City
of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) South 00°00'31" East, along the east line of the Northwest 1~ of
the Southwest ~ of said Section 26, and Southerly prolongation thereof, 1648.87
feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 2665 filed in Book 11
of Parcel Maps at Page 184 in the office of the Kern County Recorder;
THENCE (2) North 89°38'16" West along the South line of said Parcel 1, and
Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 1321.65 feet to a point on the West
line of said Section 26;
THENCE (3) Continuing North 89°38'16" West, 30.00 feet to a point on the west
line of the East 30.00 feet of said Section 27, also being the West right of way
line of Stine Road (Co. Rd. No. 157);
THENCE (4) North 00o00'43" West, along said West line, 1646.97 feet to a point
on the South line of the Northeast ~ of said Section 27, also being a point on
the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (5) North, East, South and East along the various courses of said
corporate boundary to the point of beginning.
CONTAINING 56.45 ACRES (More or Less)
D29:ANN.343 RTY:lh
x
~P.O.B.
Fi27E
Line, E. ~0', S, E. I/4, Sec. 27
(i)
i (S)
I
S. Line Sec. 26 ~
.~_C 35
· 'm---E. Lin~, W. I/~, S.W. I/4, See. EB
ANNEXATION NO, $45 RESOLUTION NO,__
ANNEXATION OF
$TINE No, 7
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
5~. 45 *- ACRES
SCALE:
200 0 200 400 600
'~ .... "'-'-'- EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARY
11 ..................PROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
EXHIBIT "B"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES ANNEXATION NO. 343
"STINE NO. 7"
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
D30:ANN.343.1
Agency Which Presentl~
Provides Service
Check Services Which
COUNTY
NORTH BAKERSFIELD RECREAT-
ION AND PARK DISTRICT
COUNTY
SHERIFF & HIGHWAY PATROL
CITY/COUNTY
JOINT AGREEMENT
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
City/District Will Provide
Upon
Annexation
x
NO CHANGE
NO CHANGE
X
Future Date
(specify)
Indicate How Services Prdvided
By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., genera| tax rate or special
assessment.)
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
N/A
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
NO CHANGE
x
X
X
NO SERVICE I X
COUNTY I X
COUNTY
*COUNTY (SEE PAGE 2)
CALIF. WATER SERVICE CO.
X
X
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
NEW STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO CITY
IGENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
PRIVATELY CONTRACTED
GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
USER FEES/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PAYS CAPITAL COSTS
IUSER FEES FOR INDIVIDUAL SERVICE
I USER FEE
E X H I B I T "C"
-1-
I. PJease provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police-Ail police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
Avenue and Eye Street about 7 miles south of the annexation.
Fire-Station 13 (City) is within 1~ mile of the territory on the west side
of Stine Road, southerly of the Arvin-Edison Canal.
Parks and Recr~inn-Upon development of residential areas, the open
space element of the adopted Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
provides a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1000 population.
Library-N/A
Streets-The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Freeway 99
wit! provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works Department efforts.
Sewer-An existing City trunk sewer in Stine Road extends as far south as
Hosking Avenue, then west to tie into Treatment Plan No. 3.
Water-The area is within the boundary of the California Water Service
Company service area.
Other-(Refuse)-Present refuse collection is privded by a francise refuse
collector. When annexed, service will be provided by the City with a
portion of the service by contracts with the same collector is at all
possible.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
24 hour oatrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis.
The annexation will not affect City/County Joint
Fire service capability.
N/A
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
D30:343.2 -2-
RTY:wrn
ItI.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new fscilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon
time of full buildout of this territory, additional police personel may or may not
be required to maintain the current level of City service. Streets and other muni-
cipal improvements resulting from development will increase the maintenance respon-
sibility of the City but will not affect the existing level of service.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? As development occurs the developer provides and pays
for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. The proposed annexation area is
within a bridge district currently under consideration by the City to widen the Stine
Road crossing at the Arvin Edison Canal.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is zoned
A (Exclusive Agriculture) in the County over the majority portion of the territory.
The Northerly 4.68 acres is zoned E (5) RS (Estate-5 acre residential suburban) in
the County and ~ 2.75 acre portion of the Southwest corner of the territory is zoned
E (1~ RS (Estate - ~ acre Residential Suburban) County.
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc). The territory is prezoned City R-1 (Single Family Dwelling)
Zone; The overall impact on the territory will be conversion of existing
agricultural land to low-density residential development.
D30:ANN.343.3 -3 RTY:wrn
VII ·
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community
facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond ina more timely manner than
the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. The present City refuse
collection rate is substantfally lower than fees county residents now pay to lndepen-
dant companies. No special assessment or charges for street sweeping, leaf collection
school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon develop
ment of subject area.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative [o city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in area equal 1.103006% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed
a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City and the
remaining to the County for providing health care and social service. (Rate as shown
on 1990-91 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Be
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If
so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased to 1.107047% of assessed
market value which equals the City bond rate of 0.004041% and the total property tax
rate of 1.103006%.
Ce
Row will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00?
If the house is used as the principal residence, the $7,000 home owners exemption
leaves $43,000 for taxing purposes. The City bond rate of 0.004041% amounts to a
difference of $1.74 more per year on a house of this value.
D30:ANN.343.4
-4-
RTY:w,