Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK (#2)-C-11/6/95 ENVIRONME L HEALTH SERVICE.EPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 DIRECTOR ~ Bakemfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX HAZARDOUS MATERIAL~ PERMIT #: DW 1293.06 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DW 1294-06 MONITORING WF~LL(S) PERMIT DW 129~-06 OWNER'S NAME: Nella Oil Company DATE: December 13, 1994 FACILITY NAME: Former Beacon Station, #571 FACU2TY LOCATION: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA DRILLING METItOD: Hollow Stem Aug, er CONTRACTOR: Krazan & Associates, Inc. LICENSE NO.:' C 57 - 499908 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR Fugro West TYPE OF MONITORING W~l.l.(S) Destruction of three (3} wells NUMBER OF WEIJ~ REQ~ TO MONITOR FACILITY: N/A GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 2. Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. 3. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 4. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 5. All wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminated site where degradation may occur must be destroyed after 2 years or prove no degradation is occurring or has occurred. 6. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a'STOP WORK ORDER." 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report, as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses, must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit' is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 10. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth N/A. .........THIS PERMIT MUST BE SIGNED BY EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER. OWNER'S SIGNATURE f-. DATE i CONTI~-CTOR'S SIGNATURE ~ DA'~E PERMIT APPROVED By: Starkey :~- Hazardous Materials Specialist DATE: December 9, 1994 DS:ea$ ~starkeykdw1293.m46 FUGRO WEST, INC. i ,~'~ 3140 North Argyle Ave. '- . Fresno, CA 93727. December 7, 1994 ~ TM: (2O9) 292~J6 Fsx: (200) 294-1533 Mrs. June Warren KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 'DEPARTMENT 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Permits to Abandon Monitoring Wells Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Project Number: 93-49-1091 Dear Mrs. Warren: I am sending you the completed permit forms for the destruction of three 4-inch diameter, 45 foot deep PVC monitoring weiis at Former Beacon Station 571 looted at 1102 34th Street in Bakersfield, California. We have set a tentative date with Krazan & Associates, Inc. to destroy the wells on December 12, 1994. The well abandonment is being done to complete site closure as required in the Kern County. Environmental Health Services Department letter to Ultramar dated November 29, 1994. If you have any questions regarding the permits, please contact our office at your convenience. Yours faithfully, FUGRO WEST, INC. Gary L. Kramer Project Geologist GLK:np Enclosures A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the world .~DEC. 0? '94 1.0:2,5 KERI"t CO El'IV HL. TN (~05)S6.t-342_9 P.2 EaN'VIRONMEaNTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMEa~ ___ ,. ~D OU$ ~vLA~ NL&NAOF_%~ENT PROOP. A~ appauu~,, D~e 2700 "M" $"~--'~r, STJIT~ 300 No. of were BAK.F. RSFIELD, CA 93301 FrO No. MW Circle One: -O~ CONS~U~ MOD~ For 0ffira Us~ O~ I , I II _ ~ I I _ I u~e No. ~a ~e: ~6 Cl~l (Fd-~gS7 w.c ~o,: C. ENVIRONMENTAL DG=OI~MATION D. ?RO.fE:CT EqFOI~MATION Progose~_' Stun ~ate: Ig/13/qy __ Pr~9osed Completion Date:_ /2.. g ' ~, , _ _. ir ,, I I · ' "' HMI23 DEC CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION ! II ~R PACK Wo,, 3 go, o W~, 3 LOC~NO ~t~_ C~ I .... I , II I I I FA~ PLOT P~ Pr~de a description of thc facili~ to be mc~tor=~, includ~g: lac~tion o~ t~, proposed monitofint and placement, nearest street or inte=ection, loCation of any ~L DIMENSIONS Pr~d, a d~tailed drawing of well(s). Inciude: depth ?~ well. sc~Hlter pack l~ngth, annular sealanu, and well ca=. Not~ any i~e~mrmea. ZONE OF I~~C~ Infomation on zone of i~uenc=, such ~ mathematical calculatiom ct field t~: data, V~OSE ZONE ~ may be required upon r~ of th= app~cadon. NO~: If app,=rios ~ not complete it may be ZT00 "M" S~, S~ 300 B~5~, ~ 93301 ~o No. o ~ o o/~ CONS~U~ MOD~ For & FA~ ~FO~~ON __ ,,--, IIII I Il I I I __ II I II I II I I I I _ I III , Ill I I C. ~~0~~ ~O~~ON I ~ I I I I I D. PRO~ Pm~s~ S~n Dat~: tZ/13/qy HMI23 ., SSB 9~-1091-03- I" ' I PM'rIB 3 LOCATIONS OF WATER SUPPLY WELLS FORMER BEACON STATION NUMBER 571 1102 34TH STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ATTACHMENT 2 Site Plan Showing Well Locations and Onsite Utilities 34th STREET ~.~ ~ -- GROUND-WATER ELEVATION SCALE: 1" = 30' x,i,,, -- MONITORING WELL LOCATION 383,75 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE LiNE ~ .......................... ELEVATION ABOVE MEAN ~ LEVEL (fee~ POTENTIOMETRJC SURFACE ~ FUGRO WEST, INC. FORMER BEACON STATION 571 , 1102 34TH STREET PROJECT NUMBER PLATE 2 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93-49-1091 ATTACHMENT 3 Monitoring Well Installation Reports for MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3 Slated for Well Destruction ' MONI ..ING WELL INSTALLATIOn[ _.PORT Well No. M~.I- 1 Project Former Beacon Station #571 Location ,1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, Ca Project No. SSB 90-1089 Installed By ~,,~elton Dril!in~ Date ,5/.8/92 Method of Installation: Type of Well Instld. '~4onitorin~ Ground El~v. 409.48 feet Top of Riser Elev. 409.17 feet d Cap: Locking PVC I.D. of Well Casing 4-inches a: 44 Ft. Type of Pipe Schedule 40 PVC Type of Backfill Around b: 15 Ft. Riser Neat Cement c: 28.67 Ft: --~ Top of Seal Elev. 385.50 feet d: o.3 . m: Type of Seal Material. Bentonite Clay Pellets e: ! 7 Ft. a f: 3 Ft. Top of Filter Elev. 382.50 feet g: 23.93 Ft. Type of Filter Material .~3 Pre-~':~ashed ~[onterey Sand Size of Openings 0.020 inches -- Bottom of Well Elcv. 365.50 feet ,' "" , Bottom of Boring Elev. 365.48 feet. [, . !- Diameter of Boring !0 inches SSB E~nvironment~l Com.~uIcc~ml:~, linc. 5740 East Shields Avenue, Suite 103, Fresno. CA 93727 (209) 292-5736 ,, ' MON ',ING WELL INSTALLATIO~ ;PORT Well No. Project Former Beacon Station #571 Location 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, Ca Project No. SSB 90-1089 Installed By MeJ ton Drilling Date 5/7/92 Method of Installation: Type of Well Instld. ~'lonitorinC ~',%11 Ground El~v. 409.68 feet Top of Riser Elev. 409.52 feet d Cap: Locking PVC I.D. of Well Casing 4-inches a: 43.50 Ft. Type of Pipe Schedule 40 PVC Type of Backfill Around b: !5 Ft. Riser Ne_~t Cement ¢: 28.02 Ft. ---~-- Top of Seal Elev. 385.50 feet d: 0.16 m: Type of Seal Material, Bentonite Clay Pellets e: 17 Ft. f: 20 Ft. Top of Filter Elev. 383.50 feet 24. 18 g: Ft. #3 Pre-'T~shed L~onterey Sand. Size of Openings 0.020 inches Bottom of Well Elev. 366.50:e,_t c ~ , .... ,. Bottom of Boring Elev. 366.15 feet - [-, Diameter of Boring !0 feet SSi~ l~mvir~ommemc~i 574.0 East Shielcls Avenue. Suite 103. Fresno. CA 93727 ' (209~ 292-5736 ' ' MON .lING WELL INSTALLATIOn. -:PORT Well No. P~-3 Project Former Beacon Station ;'.~571 Location !102 34th Street, Bakersfield, Ca Proje~ No. SSB 90-1089 Installed By Melton Drilling Date 5/8/92 Method of Installation: Type of Well Im~tld. Honitoring ['fell Ground El~v. 409.20 feet Top of Riser El~v. 408.84 feet d Cap: Lockino~ PVC I.D. of Well Casing 4-inches a: 44 Ft. Type of Pipe Sched.le 40 PVC Type of Backfill Around b: !5 Ft. Riser Neat Cement c: 28.34 Ft. ----~-- Top of Seal Elev. 385.50 feet d: 0.3(3 ~=t: Type of Seal Material ..Bentonite Clay Pell=.ts e: 17 Ft. a f: 3 Ft. Top of Filter Elev.. 382.50 feet 23.70 g: Ft. !(':1 Type of Filter Material #3 Pre-,,asned~'' ' Monterey Sand e 0.020 inches Size of Openings Bottom of Well Elev. 365.50 feet ~ ' ....', Bottom of Boring Elev. 365.20 feet I .. !- Diameter of Boring !0 inches ~B I~mvir'ommem~;~l Oom~ul~m~, Imo. 5740 East Shields Avenue, Suite 103, Fresno, CA 93727 (209) 292-5736 ' ' OPTIC~S FOR LEAKING Specific Time Ac¢ountin~ Permit # Employee Signature Site Name or Address/A Fur~_ng (Local, State, of Federal) Date Code DescriDtion /4~ NOtes: ., ' ' '~ '." ,'"" ' '~ /: ,., I ., /....,/ ~ - ~/ ., .~ ,:, ..; . , ' ' ""' '~ ~ OPTICS FOR LwAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accountin~ Sheet Permit # ;~ Site Specific Status Changes: EmDloyee Signature ~.__ Site Name or Acklre~, ~/~//,~ /'~. I ~ ([~ocal., Stat. e, of Federal) ActiVity Hours Date Code Description ~( 10ths Note~: >; ,. .~_ / .:-: . /', ,. / / : -~.,,~':/.',~:/ .:~ ...'~ 4/~.,~,. . .,. :, .~..:,,._~.,,, t ?,. ~ o :. ~~ :.j .;... :: /I .: ,; I ' ~' ..., ' (' <:.'Y' '-;, ' ~ 'f,"-, "i ;-, /'i '"~-- En¥,H~llh ~]0 ~11~ 1~7 'Site Specific. Time Accounting Sheet pern~t # 6)(~ O0 ~ Site Specific Status Changes:. Punding (~al, S~te, of Federal) .. Date ~eegory Activity '.' H~urS' Oode Description ' · (10~_~) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~(~ ,...).~/~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature /"? /'~ Site Name or Addre~;t,/ Punding (~ocal, State, of Federal) cat~or~ Activity Hoes ,Date Code- Code Description (10~hs) Notes: /'":_., ,. ~, .c.,...,, ...¥ ..',-:"' '"'"'-r"-:'"'"'"- ,.,. ,':,'',., ,~ :.~*--'-".-. ': M'.,, .' .~. ,.q, ":, ,-.,.., ~_-,',,../-.'~.,.. · ": ...:~ -~ ¥. ~ - i ,.' ' " ; ' " :'" / /': * "?' ~v~ :" ~*,'~,"/: · ~, ,t' -' '.,' / ;:.',' / /3/ _~ ' ,, .. · ~ . -. .... ..., . . .... ..rz:~.~,::..,..: , :,,.:,..? ~.. . . / .., ,.~ ~.~< .,.'L.:~ ,Ca,- :'': ./t--: , -" Data Entered By: Date: /, Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # O ~_(~C~/~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee -- - Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code Description (1Orbs) Data Entered By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or AMdress ,Funding (Local, State, of Cat. egory Activity Hours .Date uo~e Code Description (10ths) , ,,, ,I,0 Notes: \k ' ~ · / Data Entered By: ' 0 ~ ' Date: ~' ~. FOR LEAKING TANKS Site, Specific Time Accounting Sheet ' Permit. # DC (DO ~ I Site specific St~u~ Change~:: Employee $ Employee Signatur~ 0t~ 9 Site Name or ~'~,_il, O,I (L.I . ......... Funding (Local, State', of Federal) ityDescription ~e/ ................. l~ ¢/¢o o~ i~ ~,_~ ............ ~o'des :: ~.,,.~ ~-~: ~ ~/,~ ~L.,_~ .... ,2L ~Z~"~.'"'."'"..' ~ - P '' / ~ ~t~ By: ~te: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # 060012 Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # 13 %7%$i~ 4 Employee Signature.:. .... . ...~. ...... ..~. Site Name or AddreSs ~...-.~ ~ ~ , .~, ..,.,. Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat, egory ~Activity Hours Date uo~e Code Description ( 10ths $/' 2 C¢ / ~ ,¢ .:; L J :~PO~,'.'2/DA'ZA .,~V Z E';'; 0.5 Data Entered By: Date: KERN ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL'TH SERVICEE~DEPARTMENT SERVICE AND COMPLAINT FORM [] Service Request [] complaint CT No. Assigned tO:_._.~~____ I.ocatlon City . ' ' Directions O0-°~';~_~L~-: -- J./'~..- Reporting Person _ ./-~Z-b- ~ . A~dres, IWoperty Ovvne~ Address I:~tone Information RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION Complainant notified of results .................... Investigated by ..... · Date Environmental Health 580 4113 2029 (Rev. 9,~9) KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT SERVICE AND COMPLAINT FORM Oate.__~.~_'~t~_.~..~.._ Time:. ............. ~ Service Recluest [] Comolaint CT No.. ................. Assigned to: ........................................................... I.ocatlon ........................................................................................................ City___ Directions ................................................................................................................................... - Rel~ortlng Person .............................................................. Address .............. Phone ......... Prol:)erty Own er .................................................. /3, dd tess ............. _~.~.~--~...~.Z/~ ..... Z,,4-,~--~'',' ~-\& ...... ~ ~/_-.j.... I:~lo.e.~':'..~.~ Reason for Reclues, ...... ~-'="~~ .............. ~_ ......... 3~+ ......... ~...~L_ ....... .~,.~. ....... ~ .~_~.~.~_,.__~-~. ........ ~ ....... ..~.~.7~_~,~;z) .... ~ ..... :,:-_~:~ ......... ,~.,~~__~-y___._~...~./O .J~_'~:.~ ..... ~ ..... ~...~ .... ~.,:~.. ........ .?~ ....... ~..~ ........... ~-~,~;;;.o-.~-~---~ ..... ~'.~_ ............ RESULTS OF I NV ESTI GATION .................................................................................................................................. Coml31ainant notified CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS ~ e Specific Time Acc~ntinj ~- i permit cf (~ ~ 1~., Site Specific Statt~ Changes: Employee # Employee Signature /~__.~ (//~_...._._~. Site Name or Address//// Funding (Local, Stat~, of Federal) IDate J Categ°ryl/I Ac'tivity I Hours .Code Code Description (lOths) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~ ~, (~ O l~- Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code Code Description ( lOt ~hs) Notes: Data Entered Bv: Date: " ~.. iERN COUNTY HEALTH DE~ARYMEI "": '. ': ....... ' SERVICE AND COMPLAINT FORM. Date ' Location City ' ° Directions · Reporting Pe~son Address - . Pl~one . '" Information ____' - · Taken by RESULTS OF ' · ." '" Coml31alnant notified of results :investigated by Date KCHD 580 2760 372-EH (R.11-80) ......... ~ ..... ]TRACT OPTIONS FOR r.~3~I~ T_ANI4i ..... ~te Specific Time Accotmting She~.. Permit # (.~ ~c O?'~ I~ ,~.. ~. Site Specific S~ ~es: ~loyee ~ , ~. ~ployee Si~e....'" ~ .~,~.~ ~_ ~.~ ~< _~' ~- site ~e or ~ess t ~,~,~'%, ~C ~ ~i~ (~cal, S~te, of F~e~l) Date ~e ~scription (lO~s) ~o~es: Specific Time Accounting -, Permit # ~'~/h Site' Specific Status Changes:, ' Employee # " Employee Signature ' Date C~o~eegOry A*tivity H~'~ Cole. l~scription (10~:1~) ' ~ ~t~ By: rfRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING T. ANI%' · dire Specific Time Accounting Shee-~ · Permit # O ~ O O / ~-- Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Addres~y~~~ F~ing (Local, State, ~eegory Activity Hours 'Date Code Description (lOths) Notes: .. , Da~ f~t~red By:(¥.~.' - ~~~ Date: Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit #..,.,<~"": ,~,,~7 iX Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature /"~.~ /~ , ~'~ Site Name or A~res~ ~ ~ Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Date ~gory Activity '" Hours ' Code Description ( lOChs ) Notes: (T Data Entered By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR ]',RAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ', -, Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or A~_~ress Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat~ egory Activity Hours Date uo~e Code Description (10ths) ?'_ ,,.,'_~/ __ Notes: , . , ,,~, , , '1 " ,' ,;f,I · ~ . / / -~- ; / i h~ ~ter~ By: ~te: - . .., .;:~ Site Specific Time g~¢ounting Sheet' Permit # ,./}?,/~ ~ O IQ__ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature /~, / ~ ~-_ Site Name or Addres~.s.'//. Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Notes: ,,' ~, ,' .. /, . ./,,~ . .- _:.: ,.' >, ,,/ --.- ~ . . I ,., · ' :.. ,:~ ~.- ~. '~ " ~'". · ~ ~ i'~ ':' -';' · Data Entered By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR L~.AKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # -; Site Specific Status Chan~es: Employee # Employee Signature '.i?-- ..-.' ?,-~.,---- Site Name or Address ...~ :-.{ .'. ii ,' i ~ Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat. eg°ry IActivity ' Hours Date uo~e iCode Description (10ths) ': ", ~. '..'.' .h:.. ! .... :_'?. ? Notes: ..... .. ..',~ , / .' "~ .... ' ' '"' ;'7:'>' >,: ~:"'~'~ ' i ' ~ ~' '~ " '~ ~""'"'"" '~"' ~ I ' "" ~ ~ ' ' " Data w. ntered By: Date: Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # 0{~; d~PO (7.- Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Da e ~eegOry Activity Hours m~_~ Code Description (lOths) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~ ~ ~)~ ~ ~__ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat~ egory Activity Hours DaTe ~o~e Code Description ( 10ths ) Notes: - - / ~ Enter~ By: Date: Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~_.(~ [2-- Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category ,Activity Hours Date Code Code Description (lOths) Notes: Data Entered By:u Date: CONTRACT OPTiONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ,.~ (~,~_(~ (2 Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code Code Description (1Orbs) Notes: Data Enter~ By: Date: C~_S ,:b~CT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TA~ ite Specific Time Accounting Sheet * Permit # ~ ¢~¢;~ I..~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # F_mp~ Signature Funding (Local, Slate, of Federal) Category .a~cavity Hours /Da~/c,// Code Code Description (.10tbs) Data Entered By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # (~ (.q ~) q3 I ~-~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code Code Description (1Oths) Notes: Data Entered By:. Date: Env. Heallh 580 4113 137 (REV. 5/89) Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet IPermit # tQ~ C~O ;2- Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site or ~daress Funding (Local~ State, o~ Federal) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # _/~0 ~/~ Site Specific Status Chanqes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code- Code Description (10the) Data Entered By: Date: ~nv. Hea~th 580 4113 1~7 (Rev. 5/89) (. Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # O~l 9__ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Site Name or Funding (Local, State, o Cat_ egory Activity ){ours Date Code- Code ~scription (lOths) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) ~eegOry Activity Hours Da~_/ Code Description (lOths) Da~ Entered By: D~t~: , ~R'fRA~ OPTIONS FOR r,WAKING TF Permit # O Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # / Employee Site Name or Funding (Local, State, Category Activity Hours Date Code- Code Description (10ths) Data Entered By: Date: Env. Hea~tfl 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89) Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Employee Signature Site Name or Funding (Local, State, ~~1) Code Descript_ton Data Entered %y~:' ' ' ' Da~e: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # 0~~-- Site Specific Status Chan~es: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cateqory Activity Hours Code- Code Description (lOths) ~tes: ~ ~t~ By: ~te: c.,, u.~m+h AAA 411 ~ 1~ IRev. 5/89) cOnCS ~o~ ~NG sn~ee ' ific Time Accounting per~t # (~ O Ol~ Site Specific Status Changes.:. Employee # ..:. , ... Employee signature % ~ , ,: ... Funding ..(Local, S~te, of Federal) Cat~ory Activity Hou~s- Date Code Description . (1Orbs) ~tes: " / L /;ILk',,......,.. Data Entered By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS SAte Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ,.')/",. ~ ,,-).~,.~,..... Site Specific Status Changes: EmPloyee # Employee Signature ,"? "~ site Name or Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat. egory Activit~ Hours Date uo~e Code 'Description ! ( 10ths Notes: · ,. .. .'" . .-~ , ,; .: , [~, ,?--r ~.. ,_.,~-., ~..~ , ~. %.../,r ~ :~-..~ I :'~ 4--f) --'t',-.<.~.r' ',"+-3,~ ~ .... _~..~, . ' -'---..~ ,~,. : ' ; ~'~,V /" --?~-- .... · 'c,,_, :.,./ / .... ., ~ · ~ ;' -? '::t -- " ' ~?..,... ~.~r.,,.~ ~' . , I . . ;...-~: _.: Specific Time Accounting Shee~ Permit # Employee # Site Name or Addre~\{~ Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity Hours Date Code- Code Description (10ths) Notes: -. v , Data ~t~ed By: Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # /~/ Site Specific Status Changes: ,.'/,~. ,0 0 / Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or AddreSs :. >/'..~ /?',, ,.../>~ ; / ~t~o~ Activity Hoes Date Code- Code Description (10ths) ~otes: ': ' '" i /~ /',''// · .~,."~. -.-~,, , !.;:<,..:.~. ....... ,~' z7 c.;_.~.~z: r . .~,~,.,~ , :?_// ~, ,,~ ~.., ,, ~, ~, . :t . -,'-.': ,.. 'J .~ -,(.. .'~'~-~.- ~'~,,., ~ ,',.-~ ~ ~te~ By: ~te: En~.~ea~. 580 ~113 ~ (Re~,5/89) 'Permit # Site Specific Status ChangeS: i Employee # Fundin~ (Local, State, of Federal) Category AcUvity Date Code Code Description (lOths) Data Entered By:. Date: Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # .9 :~ (? ,, ) ! ~_ Site Specific Status. Char~es ~ (~al, S~=~, of ~i) Date ~eegory Activity Code Description (lOths) (X1TfRAC20PTIQNS FOR LEAKING TANKS SAte Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # i?~{/~ m. I. ] ~ ~lll/ Site Specific Status Chan~es: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address ~"~' (:~al, State, of Fed~'~l) eatmor etivit IHo s coae Description ; ( 1 ot.hs) Notes: . /j' . , f / / · -~./-' _.~':; /, / / ,' "'":' ?"'~'b' : ('"'~ ',mE ."'-' ~tZ~..->'- "~', .... %, r'~".' ~, :? .~,.':,.', ~--"..'*~ , ' t~ ,...,~ _~ r ~ ~; :'-," ...: , .' CZ(>' -' Data Entered By: Date: Env. Nealt~ 550 42~3 ~7 (~e~. 5159) Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # O~65/2_ Site Specific Status'Changes: Employee # Employee Site Name orA d dress Funding (Local, State, Federal) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~~--~-~--- Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, Category Activity Hours Date Code- Code Description (10thc) I1% ¥ ! --' - '- - "~'~--.'~ , . ' Data ~ntered By: ' ~ ~ I:~te: Env. Health 580 4113 1~ (Rev. 5/89) Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet rpermit # ~)/W 00( ~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # ,, o' ~~ (~1, State, ~f F~e~l) C~t~o~/ ~tivity ~tes: . .- , CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR r,~AKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ,~, Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature ...'./.~,, ~ Site Name or Ac]dress,/ ^ ,' "/ ' ' · ., ./.~//~~'~.!, / ~ (goeal, State, o£ Fede:~l) Code- Code ]:~sc~±~tio~ ( 10t.~b.a ) ~tes: , /' . ,. ,; ~ ~._._'~.~ / · ' / / '," ?,/ .. ,~ :.. ;~' '" , ,'~ -'i.~..~_~.~, - ,"'~ Env, Health 5~0 STEVE IP,~cCALLEY, R.E.H.S. - g~ DIRECTOR .C 0 U N T Y Environmental 2700 'M" Street, Suite 300 Health Bakemfietd, CA 93301 November 6, 1995 Services (805)861-3636 (805)861-3429 FAX Department REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION Randall Stephenson Ultramar, Inc. P. O. Box 466 Hanford, CA 93232-0466 SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) CASE Location: Former Beacon Station, #571 Known As: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA Site No~: 060012 Dear Mr. Stephenson: This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage tank(s) currently located at the above-described location. Enclosed is the Case Closure Summary for the referenced site for your records. Based on the available information, including the currem land use, and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no further action related to the underground tank release is required. This notice is issued pursuant to a regulation contained in Title 23, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2721(e). (If a change in land use is proposed, the owner must promptly notify this agency.) Please telephone Dan Starkey at (805) 861-3636, Extension 8757, if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, SMc:ch Enclosure cc: Fresno Regional Board, 3614 E. Ashlan Ave Fresno, CA 93726 State Board, Underground Tanks Program slarkey\060012.a FUGRO WEST, INC. ,JAN 0 5 {995 ~ 3140 Nollh Argyle Ave. January 4, 1995 Fresno, CA 90727' Tel: (209) 292-S'/~$ . Fax: (209) 294-1533 Mr. Randall ~ Stephenson - ~' ' ULT~AM.~LR INC. $25 West Third Street Hartford, California 93230 Re: Monitoring Well Destruction Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Project Number: 93-49-1091 Dear Mr. Stephenson: Fugro West, Inc. personnel supervised the destruction of three monitoring wells on December 13 and 14, 1994, at Beacon Station Number 571 located at 1102 34th Street in Bakersfield, California. All well construction materials including casing, cement and well gravel were first drilled out by Krazan & Associates using a hollow stem auger rig. Upon removal of the auger, the boreholes for MW-1 and MW-2 collapsed up to a depth of approximately 25 feet, while MW-3 collapsed up to a depth of 12 feet. The boring for MW-3 was redrilled to a depth of 26 feet and was grouted through the augers with a sand-cement slurry from a depth of approximately 26 feet below ground to the surface. The borings for MW-1 and MW-2 were pressure grouted from approximately 25 feet below ground to the surface. Ms. Jane Warren of the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department witnessed the cementing operations on all three wells. All materials removed from the wells were placed on plastic at the site and covered with plastic. After characterization, the material will be removed from the site for disposal. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office at your convenience. Your faithfully, FUGRO WEST, INC. Jan E. Alt'SOn CA Registered Geologist No. 4435 A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the world ORIGINAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- o w R/: U Fi~with DWR ~LL COMPLETION REPORT4 ,, Page,. 1 of :1 ~ Refer to in,truction Pamphlet. STAI~ ~ NO.tSTATION NO. . Owner's Well No. , ~-1 r ~-2r ~-3 No. . Permit No. Date Permit cgo[oc[c Loc wg[L ownga ORIENTA~ON (~) V~ ~ ~,~ (S,~ Name D~ FR~ ] 'DE~ TO R~ WA~.~(F[) BE~W SURFA~ Mailing Add~ 525 ~ ~ s~ DESCRIPTION ~O~ ~ ~32~0 Ft. to Ft. ~ ~mbe ~1, ~am ~, ml~, ac. m~ WELL LOCATION : :~y~ ~ 40-f~t d~p Addr~ 1102 34~ S~t ', ', mtm~s ~e ~ill~ out ~q County , ', holl~ st~ auq~s. ~e holes APN ~k ,,, Page Pardi , , . ._ To~hip ~ange S~tion ~ ; LOCATION SKETCH ACTIVITY (~)-- ' ' NOR~ ~ ~ MOD~A~ON IREP~ , , < (~) ~ WA~R SUP~Y T I ~ ~ CA~OIC PRO~C · · PLEBE BE AC~A~ & COMPL~ , , DRILLING + ~ M~OD FLUID , , ' WATER LEVEL & YIELD OF COMPLETED WELL -- , , DEP~ OF STA~C WATER LEaL (Ft.) & DA~ M~SURED ~ ' ESTIMA~D YIELD' (GPM) & ~ST ~PE TOTAL DE~H OF BO~iNC (F~t) TEST LENG~ (Hrs.) TOTAL DRAWDOWN (Ft.) CASING(S) DEPTH ANNULAR MATERIAL DEPTH BORE- ./ ) FROM SURFACE FROM SURFACE HOLE TYPE ( TYPE DIA'.,~ ~= ~! ~ MATERIAL./ INTERNAL GAUGE SLOT SIZE CE. (Inches} ~ ~' ' ... x- GRADE DIAMETER OR WALL IF ANY MENT TONI'rEFILL FILTER PACK Ft. to Ft. - ~ ~. (Inches) THICKNESS (inches) Ft. to Ft. (~_.) (/_.) (,/) (TYPE/SIZE) ]--ATTACHMENTS (/) CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I, the undersigned, certify that this report is complete and accucate to the best o! my knowledge and beliet. __ Geologic Log __ Well Construction Diagram NAME Krazan and Associates (PERSON. FIRM. OR CORPORATION) (tYPED OR PRINTEO) -- Geoohysical Log(s} __ Soil/Water Chemical A.alyses 215 West Dakota Avenue Clovis CA 93612 AOORESS CITY STATE ZIP ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, IF IT EXISTS. Signed -'~ '~'~'""~ 12/22/94 499908 w~tt 0m~terrA~ORlZEO ~EP.f~m~,~ OATE S,C~EO DWI~ ~8~,F:V ?.~) IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDE~'/'OSE NEXT C~N~CUTIVELY NUMBERED FORM Ultramar 525 W. Third Street Hanford, CA 93232-0466 Ms. Flora Darling ~ Kern Co Envr Health Dept 2700 "M" St Ste 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 #1 Quality and Service FUGRO WEST, INC. 3140 North Argyle Ave. June 2, 1994 Sui~ lo4 Fresno, CA 93727 Tel: (209) 2025736 Fax: (209) 294-15.'.'.~ Mr. Randall K. Stephenson ULTRAMAR INC. 525 West Third Street Hartford, California 93230 Re: Second Quarter, 1994 - Monitoring Well Sampling Report Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield. California Project Number: 93-49-1091-Q294 Dear Mr. Stephenson: Fugro West, Inc. obtained quarterly water samples on April 25, 1994, for laboratory analysis from three ground-water monitoring wells at the former Beacon Station Number 571, located at 1102 34th Street in Bakersfield, California. A vicinity map showing the approximate site location is presented as Plate 1. The water encountered in each monitoring well was from a perched water zone which occurs at a depth of approximately 27 feet below the site. The regional ground-water table occurs at a depth of approximately 250 feet below the site (Kern County Water Agency 1990 Water Conditions Report). Elevations of ground water were determined for each well by subtracting depth to ground-water measurements from well head elevations. A site plan is presented as Plate 2 which shows the site facilities, monitoring well locations, ground-water elevations, flow direction, and gradient for April 25, 1994. The ground-water gradient was less than 0.01 and the flow direction was toward the southeast. Depth-to-ground-water data for the site is presented in Table 1. All monitoring wells on-site were found to be dry. from December of 1992 through June of 1993. According to Kern County Water Agency Personnel. the site is underlain by a former channel of the Kern River. The site is also located near the existing location of the river; above normal seasonal rains and above average discharge from Lake Isabella into the Kern River might account for the strong recharge noted at the site. Prior to sampling, water from each well was subjectively analyzed for odor, clarity, and floating product. No odor or visual evidence of product was noted in water from any of the monitoring wells. A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the world Former Beacon Station 93-49-1091-Q294 June 2, 1994 Each monitoring well was purged and sampled as per the protocols presented in Appendix A, Temperature, specific conductance (EC), and pH were monitored as the wells were purged. The final measurements of these parameters for each well are presented in Table 2. TABLE 1 DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, Cali[ornia Monitoring Well Head Depth to Ground-Water Change In Well Date Elevation Ground Water Elevation Elevation MW- 1 06/27/92 409.17 34.09 375.08 09/15/92 33.23 375.94 + 0.86 12/14/92 Well Dry. ....... 04/28/93 Well Dry. ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry. ........ 10/14/93 29.54 379.63 .... 01/21/94 27.72 381.45 + 1.82 04/25/94 27.52 381.65 +0.20 MW-2 06/22/92 409.52 32.97 376.55 --- 09/15/92 31.87 377.65 + 1.10 12/14/92 Well Dry. ........ 04/28/93 Well Dry ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry. ........ 10/14/93 29.17 380.35 .... 01/21/94 27.59 381.93 + 1.58 04/25/94 27.40 382.12 +0.19 MW-3 06/22/92 408.84 37.06 37l. 78 .... 09/15/92 33.23 .375.61 +3.83 12/14/92 41.55 367.29 -8.32 04/28/93 Well Dry. ........ 07/07/93 Well Dp ........ 10/14/93 29.48 379.36 .... 01/21/94 27.64 381.20 + 1.84 04/25/94 27.42 381.42 +0.22 TABLE 2 TEMPERATURE. SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (EC). AND pbl READINGS PURGED WATER FROM MONITORING WELLS AT Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield. California Monitoring Well Temperature (°F) EC pH MW-1 68.3 2.52 6.5 MW-2 72.4 272 6.7 MW-3 66.7 276 · 6.8 Former Beacon Station 93-49-1091-0294 June 2, 1994 Ground-water samples were collected and transported using the sampling methods and chain-of- custody procedures presented in Appendix A. The samples were transported using chain-of- custody procedures generally described in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, S.W.-846, U.S. EPA, Second Edition, Samples obtained from each well were transported to a State certified laboratory for analysis for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 602/Purge-and-Trap; and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) by Modified EPA Method 8015/Purge-and-Trap. A summary of the results of these and previous analyses is presented in Table 3. The complete laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Appendix B. TABLE 3 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF GROUND-WATER SAMPLES Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 341h Street Bakersfield. California Well Date B T E X TPI-Ig MW- 1 06/22/92 3.0 5.3 17 12.3 390 09/15/92 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0,5 < 0.5 < 0,5 < 50 MW-2 06/22/92 6.8 2.6 7.2 18.6 270 09/15/92 2.8 0.8 <0.5 3.4 60 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 MW-3 06/22/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 09/15/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1 < 50 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 1 O/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 I)4/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 Results in micrograms per liler (ug/I) or parts per billion (ppb) B -- Benzene: T -- Toluene: E = Etl~ylbenzene: X = Xylenes TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < = Less than the laboratory method detection limit · = Well Dry. Former Beacon Station Nu 571 93-49-10~1-Q294 ~ June 2, 1994 " ' Laboratory analysis of the water samples collected on April 25, 1994, indicate that no gasoline constituents were detected above the method detection limits in any of the three monitoring wells. A copy of this report should be forwarded to Ms. Flora Darling at the Kern County Environmental Health Department and to Mr. John Noonan at the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board at the following addresses. Ms. Flora Darling KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2700 'M' Street. Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Mr. John Noonan CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Yours faithfully, FUGRO WEST, INC. ~Scott A. Baldwin Environmental Technician Jan Alfson Senior Hydrogeologist CA Registered Geologist No. 4435 EX,RAiN DAI~ SAB:JA:np JLIN~ 30, 19-34 -4- VICINITY MAP FUGRO WEST, INC. FORMER BEACON STATION 571 1102 34TH STREET PROJECT NUMBER BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA PLATE 1 93-49-1091 ~ ! i~ ,. w I I I 34th STREET SITE PLAN FUGRO ~ST, ~C. GRO~D-WATER ELEVATION, DI~CTION OF FLOW ~D G~IENT FOYER BEACON STATION 571 PROJECT NUMBER 1102 34TH ST~ET PLATE 2 I BAKERSFIELD, C~IFO~ 93-49-1091 APPENDIX A SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES r-~O SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES Ground-Water Sampling Methods A ground-water sample was collected from each monitoring well. Prior to sampling the well, approximately four well volumes were removed to bring fresh formation water into the well. Three well volumes were purged using a PVC bailer. The fourth well volume was purged using three disposable bailers. The ground-water sample was collected using an individually wrapped disposable bailer. The ground-water sample was placed in the appropriate glass containers with teflon-lined lids. Each sample was labeled and' immediately placed in an ice chest and cooled to 4°C using blue ice. Sample Shipment and Chain-of-Custody Procedures Complete records were kept on each sample including sampling date, sample type, location, and other pertinent information. The sample containers were banded and sealed with chain-of-custody seals. The samples were cooled to 4°C at the site and maintained at that temperature until delivered to a State certified laboratory,. Chain-of-custody procedures, generally described in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846. U.S. EPA, Second Edition. were followed. A chain-of-custody form accompanied the samples from the place of collection to the testing laboratory., and through the completion of the analytical process. The chain-of-custody form included project identification information, the sample type and number, the date and time of sampling, the chemical analyses requested, and the identity of the person taking possession at each change of custody. APPENDIX B LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION May 3, 1994 Sample Log 9248 Scott Baldwin Fugro West, Inc.- Fresno 3140 North Argyle, Suite 104 Fresno, CA 93727 Subject: Analytical Results for 3 Water Samples Identified as: Project # 93-49-1091-Q294 (Beacon 571) Received: 04/26/94 Dear Mr. Baldwin: Analysis of the sample(s) referenced above has been completed. This report is written to confirm results communicated on May 3, 1994 and describes procedures used to analyze the samples. Sample(s) were received in 40-milliliter glass vials sealed with TFE lined septae and plastic screw-caps. Each sample was trans- ported and received under documented chain of custody and stored at 4 degrees C until analysis was performed. Sample(s) were analyzed using the following method(s): "BTEX" (EPA Method 602/Purge-and-Trap) "TPH as Gasoline" (Modified EPA Method 8015/Purge-and-Trap) Please refer to the following table(s) for summarized analytical results and contact us at 916-753-9500 if you have questions regarding procedures or results. The chain-of-custody document is enclosed. Approved by: ~e°~i}orKicfh~em~t Western Environmental Science & Technoloav · 45133 County Road 32B · Davis. CA 95616 . 916 753-9500 · FAX: 916 757-4652 ~ Sample Log 9248 9248-1 Sample: W-27.42-MW3 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q294 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 04/25/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2072d Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) ug/~ Value ug/~ Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 99 % ~ Sample Log 9248 Sample: W-27.52-)fW1 From : Project ~ 93-49-1091-Q294 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 04/25/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2072d Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) ug/L Value ug/L Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 99 % ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ime in ~econd~ Date Rnaluzed: 0~-28-9~ ~itra Sarkhosh Column : O.53mm ID X 30m DBWRX (JSW Scienti{ic) Senior Christ ~ Sample Lo9 9248 9248-3 Sample: W-27.40-~fW2 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q294 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 04/25/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2072d Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) ug/L Value ug/L Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 99 %  . ~ c~ ~) ~ ~ ~ time in zecondz o~ m Oa~e ~nal~zed: 0~-28-9~ Micra Sarkho~ Column : O.53mm I0 X 30m OBW~X (J%W Scienti{ic) Senior C~mi~t Western EnvironmentRI Sci~.ncp Ullramar Inc. BEACON CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT Beacon Station No. Sampler (Print Name) Date I Form No. " ANALYSES q'-2--C-9'-f t of / Projecf No. Sampler (Signature) Project Location Affiliation ~ ~ Samplo ~o./Idontification ~ato lime lab ~o. m - -  ' ' ..!.~.'~'. ~elinquish~~~~~b~: (Si~naturo/Affiliation) · ~t~ 1'2jolime ~ecoived~. ...... b~: {Si~naturo/~ffiliafion) ~ ......... Dato lime gelinquished b~: (Si~naluro/~ffiliation) Dato lime fleceiv~ b~: (Si~naturol~liafion) Dato~. lime Relinquished by: (Signature/Affiliation) Date Time ~eive¢ pY: (Signature/Affiliation) ....... '~-' -!'~! ()_....0~¥'-~ C)(~ C) Vt,~d Dale Time Bill Io: U~TRAMAR INC7 ~f 40 ~, ~~ ~[0'/ 525 West Third Street Hantord, CA 932~ .... ~,1 · x Atlenlion: WHITE: Return to Client with Repeal YELLOW: Laborato~ Copy PINK: Originator Copy Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hartford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 September 14, 1994 Ms. Flora Darling Kern County Environmental Health Dept 2700 "M" St Ste 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 SUBJECT: BEACON SERVICE STATION NO. 571, 1102 34TH STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Ms. Darling: Enclosed for your review and files is a copy of our consultant's THIRD QUARTER, 1994-MONITORING WELL SAMPLING REPORT for the above-referenced Ultramar facility. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, ULTRAMAR INC. Ra6dall K. Stephenson Environmental Specialist II Marketing Environmental RKS/jj Enclosure: Fugro report dated September 7, 1994 cc w/enc.: Mr. John M. Noonan CRWQCB - Central Valley Region 3614 E Ashlan Ave Fresno CA 93726 BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality and Service Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3.,.'..'..'..'..'..~)2 Information Services Hanford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 ENVIRONMENTAL PRO,.1ECT QUARIERLY STAIUS REPORI DATE REPORT SUBMITTED: September 13, 1994 QUARTER ENDING: September 30, 1994 SERVICE STATION NO.: 571 ADDRESS: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA COUNTY: Kern ULTILAMAR CONTACT: Randall K. Stephenson TEL. NO: 209-583-3324 BACKGROUND: In November, 1989, during installation of overfill equipment, soil samples were collected from small excavations at the fill ends of the UST's. Analysis of the samples indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the samples. Based on this information, a soil gas survey was performed and four soil borings were drilled at the site during March, 1990. Two additional borings were drilled during October, 1990, in an attempt to install two monitoring wells. The wells were not installed due to auger refusal from a cobble interval at approximately 30 below surface. In April, 1992, a successful attempt was made and three monitoring wells (MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3) were installed and quarterly monitoring was initiated. SUMMARY OF THIS QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES: Ground-water sampling of all the wells was conducted by Fugro West, Inc., on July 13, 1994. BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #l Quality and Service Beacon Station No. Bakersfield, CA Quarter)y Monitoring Report Third Qtr. 1994 RESULT OF QUARTERLY HONZTORZNG: Ground-water elevations in the monitoring wells have increased an average of 0.95 feet since the previous sampling event. Analytical results for this quarter indicate that gasoline hydrocarbons are non-detect in the monitoring wells. PROPOSED ACTIVITY OR WORK FOR NEXT QUARTER: The fourth quarter 1994 sampling event is tentatively scheduled for July, 1994. A report for this event will be prepared and submitted upon completion. FUGRO WEST, INC. ~ 3140 North Argyle Ave. Suite 104 September 7, 1994 Fresno, CA 93727 Tel: (299) 292-5736 Fax: (209) 294-1533 Mr. Randall K. Stephenson ULTRAMAR INC. 525 West Third Street Hanford, California 93250 Re: Third Quarter 1994. Ground-Water Monitoring Report Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Project Number: 93-49-I091-Q394 Dear Mr. Stephenson: This report documents the results of quarterly ground-water monitoring conducted on July 13, 1994, at the subject site (Plate 1). The monitoring, conducted by Fugro West, Inc., (Fugro) included measurements of depth to ground water, subjective analysis for free product, ground-water purging and collection of ground-water samples. All field activities pertaining to events in this report were conducted according to the Sample Handling Procedures included in the Attachments. GROUND-WATER ELEVATIONS Prior to purging, Fugro personnel obtained depth to ground-water measurements. Ground-water level data from June 1992 to date are summarized in Table 1. On the bas'is of current measurements, ground water flows to the south-southwest (Plate 2) at a gradient of <0.01 ft/ft. Ground-water levels have increased an average of 0.95 feet compared to the last monitoring event'. GROUND-WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSES Ground-water samples were collected from three wells. All samples were analyzed for concentrations of: · TPH. as gasoline, by modified EPA Method 8015. · BTEX by EPA Method 602. A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the world Beacon Station Number 571 -'~a~a~n Bakersfield. California Project Number:. 93-49-1091-Q394 Analytical results from June 1992 to date are summarized in Table 2. The laboratory report and the chain-of-custody form for the current sampling event are attached. Laboratory results indicate that no gasoline constituents were detected above the method detection limits in any of the three monitoring wells. We recommend that a copy of this report be forwarded to the following agencies. Ms. Flora Darling KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2700 'M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Mr. John Noonan CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Yours faithfully, FUGRO WEST, INC. David A. Sholes Project Geologist CA Registered Geologist No. 4,321 EXPIRATION DATE s^.:DA$:.p -- Page 2 -- PLATES: PLATE 1 .................................. VICINITY MAP PLATE 2 .................. POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP TABLES: TABLE 1 ................. DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA TABLE 2 ............ ANALYTICAL RESULTS: GROUND WATER ATTACHMENT 1: SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES 2: LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM 3: FIELD DATA SHEETS PLATES VICINITY MAP FUGRO WEST, INC. FORMER BEACON STATION 571 1102 34TH STREET PROJECT NUMBER BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA PLATE 1 93-49-1091 ' / ~ .... 1 ' MW-2 /'¢¢' , ,; ~ .............................. ~?.r.~ ! i ~ W ~ o '..~7~ ............... i i i Z 34th STREET ~s~ 5e ~ GROUN~WA~R ~A~ON SCALE: 1" = 30' ~ ~ MON~ORING WELL LQCA~ON 382.~ ~ ~OM~IC SURFACE LIN~ .......................... ~L~A~ON A~OVE M~N S~ L~L (feet) POTENTIOMETRI~ SU~A~E FUGRO ST, FORMER BEACON STATION 571 1102 34TH S~EET PROJECT NUMBER PLATE 2 BA~RSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93-49-1091 TABLES TABLE 1 DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA Beacon Station Number 571 1102 341h Street Bakersfield. California Monitoring Well Head Depth to Ground- Change In Well Date Elevation Ground Water Elevation Water Elevation MW- 1 06/22/92 409.17 34.09 375.08 .... 09/15/92 33.23 375.94 +0.86 12/14/92 Well Dry ........ 04/28/93 Well Dry ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry ........ 10/14/93 29.54 379.63 .... 01/21/94 27.72 381.45 + 1.82 04/25/94 27.52 381.65 +0.20 07/13/94 26.58 382.59 +0.94 MW-2 06/22/92 409.52 32.97 376.55 .... 09/15/92 31.87 377.65 + 1.10 12/14/92 Well Dry ........ 04/28/93 Well Dry. ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry ........ 10/14/93 29.17 380.35 .... 01/21/94 27.59 381.93 + 1.58 04/25/94 27.40 382.12 + 0.19 07/13/94 26.45 383.07 +0.95 MW-3 06/22/92 408.84 37.06 371.78 .... 09/15/92 33.23 375.61 +3.83 12/14/92 41.55 367.29 -8.32 04/28/93 Well Dry ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry ........ 10/14/93 29.48 379.36 .... 01/21/94 27.64 381.20 + 1.84 04/25/94 27.42 381.42 +0.22 07/13/94 26.46 382.38 + 0.96 TABLE 2 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF GROUND-WATER SAMPLES Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Well Date B T E X TPHg MW-I 06/22/92 3.0 5.3 17 12.3 390 09/15/92 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * I0/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 07/13/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 MW-2 06/22/92 6.8 2.6 7.2 18.6 270 09/15/92 2.8 0.8 < 0.5 3.4 60 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 07/13/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 MW-3 06/22/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 09/15/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1 < 50 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 07/13/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 Results in micrograms per liter (ug/l) or parts per billion (ppb) B = Benzene: T = Toluene; E = Ethylbenzene: X = Xylenes TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < = Less than the laboratory method detection limit · = Well Dry ATTACHMENT I SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES Ground-Water Sampling Methods A ground-water sample was collected from each monitoring well. In order to bring fresh formation water into the well prior to sampling, approximately three well volumes were removed using a PVC bailer. One additional well volume was purged using individually wrapped disposable PVC bailers. Finally, the ground-water sample was collected using a precleaned individually wrapped disposable PVC bailer. The ground-water sample was placed in the appropriate glass containers with teflon-lined lids (VOA Vials). Each sample was labelled and immediately placed in an ice chest and cooled to 4°C using blue ice. Sample Shipment and Chain-of-Custody Procedures Complete records were kept on each sample including sampling date, sample type, 16cation, and other pertinent information. The sample containers were banded and sealed with chain-of-custody seals. The samples were cooled to 4°C at the site and maintained at that temperature until delivered to a State certified laboratory.. Chain-of-custody procedures, generally described in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. SW-846. U.S. EPA. Second Edition, were followed. A chain-of-custodv form accompanied the samples from the place of collection to the testing laboratory., and through the completion of the analytical process. The chain-of-custody form included project identification information, the sample type and number, the date and time of sampling, the chemical analyses requested, and the identity of the person taking possession at each change of custody. ATTACHMENT 2 LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM July 25, 1994 Sample Log 9834 Scott Baldwin Fugro West, Inc.- Fresno 3140 North Argyle, Suite 104 Fresno, CA 93727 Subject: Analytical Results for 3 Water Samples. Identified as: Project # 93-49-1091-Q394 (Beacon 571) Received: 07/14/94 Dear Mr. Baldwin: Analysis of the sample(s) referenced above has been completed. This report is written to confirm results communicated on July 25, 1994 and describes procedures used to analyze the samples. Sample(s) were received in 40-milliliter glass vials sealed with TFE lined septae and plastic screw-caps. Each sample was trans- ported and received under documented chain of custody and stored at 4 degrees C until analysis was performed. Sample(s) were analyzed using the following method(s): "BTEX" (EPA Method 602/Purge-and-Trap) "TPH as Gasoline" (Modified EPA Method 8015/Purge-and-Trap) Please refer to the following table(s) for summarized analytical results and contact us at 916-753-9500 if you have questions regarding procedures or results. The chain-of-custody document is enclosed. Approved by: S%nkor Chemist Western Environmental Science & Technology · 45133 County Road 32B · Davis, CA 95616 · 916 753-9500 · FAX: 916 757-4652 ~ Sample Log 9834 9834-1 Sample: W-26.46-MW3 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q394 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 07/13/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2094FF Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) u,,L Value ~L Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 92 % O N 0 0ate Rnal~zed: 07-t'?-~ ~ ark Column : 0.53mm I0 X 30m {3BWRX (J~iJ Scientific) mi~t Western Environmental Science & Technology · 45133 County Road 32B Davis, CA 95616 · 916'753-9500 ' FAX: 916 757-4652 ~ Sample Log 9834 9834--~ Sample: W-26.58-MW1 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q394 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 07/13/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2094FF Matrix : Water' Measured Parameter (MRL) ~/~ Value ~/~ Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 92 % c o N 'E o DaTe ~nal~zed: Column : 0.53mm IO ~{ 30m OB~i%X <J~W Scienti{ic) Western Environmental Science & Technology · 45133 County Road 32B · Davis. CA 95616 . 91.6 753-9500 ' FAX: 916 757-4652 ~ Sample Log 9834 Sample: W-26.45-MW2 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q394 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 07/13/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2094FF Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) ~/L Value ug/~ Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 93 % Coiu~ : 0.~3mm I~ X 30m OB~aX (J~ Sciemti~ic) Senior Chemist ~ Western Environ~entel Science ~ technology · 45133 County Road 328 · Davis, CA 95~16 · ~ 753-9500 · FAX; 91~ 757-4652 Ullr. mar Inc. BEACON CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT Beacon Station No. Sampler (Print Name) Date . Form No. '- ANALYSES Project~ No. -~/--~ ~ Proj~l Location Affiliation ,~ ~ Satanic Nolldenli~lion Dalo Timo Lab No. m~ - ~ ~EMA~KS ~-~,~--m~l ~ RECEIVED INrrlAL_~ ~~ ~]~y D~te Time Received bY: (Signalure/Affiliali°n) I~ Dale Time Relinquish~ by: (Signature/Affiliation) Dale' Time Received by: (Signature/Affiliation) Dale Time Relinquish~ by: {Si~na~ure/Afliliaion) Dale Time R~ceived ~: (Signalure/Afliliation) ~%~ Dale Time Bill lo: ULTRAMAR I~G. Re..To:~~ ~ ~_ ~,~ ~ Wes~ ~,i~ S~ee~ ~UD ~. /~ ~lU~ Hanford, CA932~0_ WHITE: Relurn Io Clienl wilh Re~d YELLOW: Laboralo~ Copy PINK: Originator Copy ATTACHMENT 3 FIELD DATA SHEETS SAMPLING IN'FORMATION Arrival Time: ~; 0 0 Depa~ure ~me: Number of We~: 4" ~ 2" Other Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hartford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 June 10, 1994 Ms. Flora Darling Kern County Environmental Health Dept 2700 "M" St Ste 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 SUBJECT: BEACON SERVICE STATION NO. 571, 1102 34TH STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Ms. Darling: Enclosed for your review and files is a copy of our consultant's SECOND QUARTER, 1994-MONITORING WELL SAMPLING REPORT for the above-referenced Ultramar facility. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, ULTRANAR INC. Environmental Specialist II Marketing Environmental RKS/jj Enclosure: Fugro report dated June 2, 1994 cc w/enc.: Mr. John M. Noonan CRWQCB Central Valley Region 3614 E Ashlan Ave Fresno CA 93726 BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality and Service Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale PO. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hanford. CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582~0241 ENVIRONMENTAL PRO,.1ECT QUARIERLY STATUS REPORI DATE REPORT SUBNITTED: June 9, 1994 QUARTER ENDING: June 30, 1994 SERVICE STATION NO.: 571 ADDRESS: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA COUNTY: Kern ULTRAHAR CONTACT: Randall K. Stephenson TEL. NO: 209-583-3324 BACKGROUND: In November, 1989, during installation of overfill equipment, soil samples were collected from small excavations at the fill ends of the UST's. Analysis of the samples indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the samples. Based on this information, a soil gas survey was performed and four soil borings were drilled at the site during March, lggO. Two additional borings were drilled during October,'lggO, in an attempt to install two monitoring wells. The wells were not installed due to auger refusal from a cobble interval at approximately 30 below surface. In April, 1992, a successful attempt was made and three monitoring wells {MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3) were installed and quarterly monitoring was initiated. SUMMARY OF THIS QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES: Ground-water sampling of all the wells was conducted by Fugro West, Inc., on April 25, 1994. BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality and Service Beacon Station No. Bakersfield. CA Quarterly Monitoring Report Second Qtr. 1994 RESULT OF QUARTERLY NONITORING: Ground-water elevations in the monitoring wells have increased an average of 0.2 feet since the previous sampling event. Analytical results for this quarter indicate that BTEX constituents and TPHg were not detected. PROPOSED ACTIVITY OR WORK FOR NEXT QUARTER: The next quarterly sampling event is scheduled for July, 1994. Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584~6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W, Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hanford. CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 November 15, 1994 Ms. Flora Darling Kern County Environmental Health Dept 2700 "M" St Ste 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 SUBJECT: BEACON SERVICE STATION NO. 571, 1102 34TH STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Ms. Darling: Enclosed for your review and files is a copy of our consultant's FOURTH QUARTER, 1994-MONITORING WELL SAMPLING REPORT for the above-referenced Ultramar facility. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, ULTRAMAR INC. Randall K. Stephenson Environmental Specialist II Marketing Environmental RKS/jj Enclosure: Fugro report dated November 1, 1994 cc w/enc.: Mr. John M. Noonan CRWQCB - Central Valley Region 3614 E Ashlan Ave Fresno CA 93726 BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality and Service Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hanford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 ENVI RONNENTAL PRO,.1ECT QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT DATE REPORT SUBMITTED: November 14, 1994 QUARTER ENDING: December 31, 1994 SERVICE STATION NO.: 571 ADDRESS: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA COUNTY: Kern ULTRAMAR CONTACT: Randall K. Stephenson TEL. NO: 209-583-3324 BACKGROUND: In November, 1989, during installation of overfill equipment, soil samples were collected from small excavations at the fill ends of the UST's. Analysis of the samples indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the samples. Based on this information, a soil gas survey was performed and four soil borings were drilled at the site during March, 1990. Two additional borings were drilled during October,'1990, in an attempt to install two monitoring wells. The wells were not installed due to auger refusal from a cobble interval at approximately 30 below surface. In April, 1992, a successful attempt was made and three monitoring wells (MW-l, MW-2, and MWo3) were installed and quarterly monitoring was initiated. SUMMARY OF THIS QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES: Ground-water sampling of all the wells was conducted by Fugro West, Inc., on October 11, 1994. RESULT OF QUARTERLY MONITORING: Ground-water elevations in the monitoring wells have increased an average of 1.02 feet since the previous sampling event. Analytical results for this quarter indicate that gasoline hydrocarbons remain non-detect in the monitoring wells. BEACON A Member of the Uitramar Group of Companies #l Quality and Service Beacon Station No. 5 Bakersfield. CA Quarterly Monitoring Report Third Qtr. 1994 PROPOSED ACTIVITY OR gORK FOR NEXT qUARTER: The .first quarter 1995 sampling event is tentatively scheduled for January, 1995. A report for this event will be prepared and submitted upon completion. FUGRO WEST, INC. ~ ...... ' 3140 North Argyle Ave. November 1, 1994 Suite 104 Fresno, CA 93727 Tel: (209) 292-5736 Fax: (209) 294-1533 Mr. Randall K. Stephenson Environmental Specialist ULTRAMAR INC. 525 West Third Street Hanford, California 93230 Re: Fourth Quarter, 1994. Ground.Water Monitoring Report Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Project Number: 93-49-109i-0494 Dear Mr. Stephenson: This report documents the results of quarterly ground-water monitoring performed by Fugro West, Inc. on October 11, 1994, at the subject site (Plate 1). The monitoring included measurements of depth to ground water, subjective analysis for free product, ground-water purging and collection of ground-water samples. All field activ/ties pertaining to events in this report were performed according to the Ground-Water Sampling Methods included in Attachment I. GROUND-WATER ELEVATIONS Prior to purging, Fugro West, Inc. personnel measured depth to ground water in each monitoring well. Ground-water level data from June 1992 to date are summarized in Table 1. On the basis of current measurements, ground water flows to the south-southeast (Plate 2) at a gradient of <0.01 ft/ft. Ground-water levels have increased an average of 1.02 feet compared to the las't monitoring event. GROUND-WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSES Ground-water samples were collected from three wells. All samples were analyzed for concentrations of: · TPH, as gasoline, by modified EPA Method 8015. · BTEX by EPA Method 602. A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the wodd Beacon Station Number 571 --~0 Bakersfield. California l Project Number:. 93-49-1091-Q494 Analytical results from June 1992 to date are summarized in Table 2. The laboratory report and the chain-of-custody form for the current sampling event are attached. Laboratory results indicate that no gasoline constituents were detected above the method detection limits in any of the three monitoring wells. We recommend that a copy of this report be forwarded to the following agencies. Ms. Flora Darling KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield. California 93301 Mr. John Noonan CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Yours faithfully, FUGRO WEST, INC. Environmental Technician David A. Sholes Project Geologist CA Registered Geologist No. 4,321 SAB:DAS:np -- Page 2 -- PLATES: PLATE I .................................. VICINITY MAP PLATE 2 .................. POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP TABLES: TABLE 1 ................. DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA TABLE 2 ............ ANALYTICAL RESULTS: GROUND WATER ATTACHMENT I: GROUND-WATER SAMPLING METHODS AND SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES 2: LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM 3: FIELD DATA SHEETS " PLATES ~X ~~--~ ............ ~-.,-~---- · - ~ ........... ;~:'. ', II i ,,,~-~-~.~,, ~J, ~,: "~ : J: ~ I' :,j.. ~-"~"~ .... :~ . ~ --.~-. ...... ~ ........ ~'-i~.~ ......... ~ ....... :~,,~--~ ~ t ' .........j " j ~ ~ ~-~- ~ - ~-~ ~. ' ~ ; ~111 = ~ ~/~ ..- , _..__.~ ~(~ v~.~i ~-~~ M ~ .... q---.~-/~ ...,: '-~i ~ ::~-4,,.~.d- ......... ;:::::~., ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ I ~ I I ......... "'.- ~---~ ....... ~ ....... ~ * ~ ,~ ~ .~. ~o · ~ ~ ',,,ii~-~ ~ ~ '~ ........... ..... , ~~:~ =~,~ .... ,._~j , ~-~ , t l~ ~.~- ~*' '. % ~ ~.~1%:'5~*'- ..- ' _ ~J..'. ~.! ............ ~ ................ :.~~--.~-~ ~ .._' . ~ ---- ..r ~ ,. i · ~ , ..... '..?~ ........ ",- .~ .... /~.. . /,~//~ ~ ,~ ~- ' "---~F; ......... ~T-"~" ;~""='"= ...... :;' . ...... ,.~ ,~ = ,, ~ ~ 1~ .... , ~~ ~---~- It ..... ~ ...... ~ ...... e. , , .~ ~ ....... ~t_~..__.~._.~ ..~ ~t ~ ~ '~-'~'~ ~~~,. ~:']_~gJ ~ ..... · - .~,=,- ............ ~ ,- ..... _ · ~,- t~- ......... , VIC ITY FUGRO ST, BEACON STATION 571 02 34TH STREET PROJECT ~MBER ~ ~ ~*~~~rm~, C~IFO~ PLATE 1 93~9-1091 TABLES TABLE 1 DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield. California Monitoring Well Head Depth to Ground- Change In Well Date Elevation Ground Water Elevation Water Elevation MW- 1 06/22/92 409.17 34.09 375.08 .... 09/15/92 33.23 375.94 +0.86 12/14/92 Well Dry ........ 04/28/93 Well Dry ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry ........ 10/14/93 29.54 379.63 .... 01/21/94 27.72 381.45 + 1.82 04/25/94 27.52 381.65 +0.20 07/13/94 26.58 382.59 +0.94 10/11/94 25.57 383.60 + 1.01 MW-2 06/22/92 409.52 32.97 376.55 .... 09/15/92 31.87 377.65 + 1.10 12/14/92 Well Dry ........ 04/28/93 Well Dry ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry ........ 10/14/93 29.17 380.35 .... 01/21/94 27.59 381.93 + 1.58 04/25/94 27.40 382.12 +0.19 07/13/94 26.45 383.07 +0.95 10/11/94 25.43 384.09 + 1.02 MW-3 06/22/92 408.84 37.06 37 I. 78 .... 09/15/92 33.23 375.61 + 3.83 12/14/92 41.55 367.29 -8.32 04[28/93 Well Dry ........ 07/07/93 Well Dry ........ 10/14/93 29.48 379.36 .... 0 I/21/94 27.64 381.20 + 1.84 04/25/94 27.42 381.42 + 0.22 07/13/94 26.46 382.38 +0.96 I0/11/94 25.41 383.43 - + 1.05 TABLE 2 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF GROUND-WATER SAMPLES Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Well Date B T E X TPHg MW-I 06/22/92 3.0 5.3 17 12.3 390 09/15/92 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 07/13/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 10/11/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 MW-2 06/22/92 6.8 2.6 7.2 18.6 270 09/15/92 2.8 0.8 <0.5 3.4 60 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 07/13/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 10/11/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 MW-3 06/22/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 09/15/92 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 12/14/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1 < 50 04/28/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 04/25/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 07/13/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 10/11/94 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <50 Results in micrograms per liter (ugH) B = Benzene; T = Toluene: E = Ethylbenzene; X = Xvlenes TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < = Less than the laboratory, method detection limit · = Well Dry. ATTACHMENT I GROUND-WATER SAMPLING METHODS AND SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES Ground-Water Sampling Methods A ground-water sample was collected from each monitoring well. In order to bring fresh formation water into the well prior to sampling, approximately three well volumes were removed using a PVC bailer. One additional well volume was purged using individually wrapped disposable PVC bailers. Finally, the ground-water sample was collected using a precleaned individually wrapped disposable PVC bailer. The ground-water sample was placed in the appropriate glass containers with teflon-lined lids (VOA Vials). Each sample was labelled and immediately placed in an ice chest and cooled to 4°C using blue ice. Sample Shipment and Chain-of-Custody Procedures Complete records were kept on each sample including sampling date, sample type, location, and other pertinent information. The sample containers were banded and sealed with chain-of-custody seals. The samples were cooled to 4°C at the site and maintained at that temperature until delivered to a State certified laboratory.. Chain-of-custody procedures, generally described in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-$46. U.S. EPA. Second Edition. were followed. A chain-of-custody form accompanied the samples from the place of collection to the testing laboratory, and through the completion of the analytical process. The chain-of-custody form included proiect identification information, the sample type and number, the date and time of sampling, the chemical analyses requested, and the identity of the person taking possession at each change of custody. ATTACHMENT 2 LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN-OF.CUSTODY FORM October 13, 1994 Sample Log 10478 Scott Baldwin Fugro West, Inc.- Fresno 3140 North Argyle, Suite 104 Fresno, CA 93727 Subject: Analytical Results for 3 Water Samples Identified as: Project # 93-49-1091-Q494 (Beacon 571) Received: 10/12/94 Dear Mr. Baldwin: Analysis of the sample(s) referenced above has been completed. This report is written to confirm results communicated on October 13, 1994 and describes procedures used to analyze the samples. Sample(s) were received in 40-milliliter glass vials sealed with TFE lined septae and plastic screw-caps. Each sample was trans- ported and received under documented chain of custody and stored at 4 degrees C until analysis was performed. Sample(s) were analyzed using the following method(s): "BTEX" (EPA Method 602/Purge-and-Trap) "TPH as Gasoline" (Modified EPA Method 8015/Purge-and-Trap) Please refer to the following table(s) for summarized analytical results and contact us at 916-753-9500 if you have questions regarding procedures or results. The chain-of-custody document is enclosed. Approved by: Mitra Sarkhosh Senior Chemist Sample Log 10478 10478--Z Sample: H-25.4~-~3 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q494 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 10/11/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2105Z Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) .g/L Value Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 103 % c --' m"' time in zeconds ~ o Date analyzed: 10-13-8~ ~itra S~k~ Column : O.S3mm ID X 3Om OBU~X (J~U S~en~i~ic) Senior ~e~t Sample Log 10478 10478--2 Sample: W-25.57-MW! From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q494 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 10/11/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2105Z Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) uq~L Value Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 101 % 0 [3ate ~nalgzect: 10-13-S4 Ultra Sarkhosh Column : 0.53mm ID X 30m 0BWAX (JaW Scientific) Senior Sample Log 10478 ~0478--3 Sample: W-25.43-MW2 From : Project # 93-49-1091-Q494 (Beacon 571) Sampled : 10/11/94 Dilution : 1:1 QC Batch : 2105Z Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (MRL) u~/~ Value ~/~ Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 101 % ~ ~- o~ ~ ~ime in seconds Bate ~nal~zed: 10-13-9~ ~lra Sark~h Column : O. S3mm ID X 30m DB~X (J~ Scientific) Senior ~ Ultramar Inc. BEACON CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT Beacon Station No. Sampler (Print Name) ,, Date No. io~ I Sample NoJldentili~tion Date Time Lab No. ~ - - z REMARKS ~- 25.ql -m¢3 10~ll-q~ Iv~3o ~y Rel~qui~h~(Si?nature/Atfilialion) Dele Time Received by: (Signalure/Atlilialion) Dale Time  ~ f I~oo Relinquish~ by: (Signalure/Afliliation) Date Time Dale Time ~~ Received by:~alure/Afliliafion)~~~__ Relinquished by: (Signature/Affiliation) Dale Time Receive~Signalu~ffilialion)~.~i.~ Report To:~..~. B~lO: ' ULTRAMAR INC. ~] ~ ~ ~ 525 West Third Street , WHITE: Relurn Io Clienl wilh Report YELLOW: Laboralo~ Copy PINK: Originalor Copy ATTACHMENT 3 FIELD DATA SHEETS SAMPLING INFORMATION Arrival Time: ~-' ~'1) Departure Number of Wells: 4" '~ 2" '-----' O~er ~,,o.,.~.~.=. ~..~i '3 ~o: i'5'- --/2 ~o7 so. I D,,=~,~. Depth to Omun~t~ Dept~ of Well: Ramar~: Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Stree! 209-§83-3302 Information Services Hanford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 March 25, 1994 Ms. Flora Darling Kern County Environmental Health Dept 2700 "M" St Ste 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 SUBOECT: BEACON SERVICE STATION NO. 571, 1102 34TH STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Ms. Darling: Enclosed for your review and files is a copy of our consultant's FIRST QUARTER, 1994-MONITORING WELL SAMPLING REPORT for the above-referenced Ultramar facility. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, ULTRANAR INC. Randall K. Stephenson Environmental Specialist II Marketing Environmental RKS/jj Enclosure: SSB 93-49-1091-Q194 cc w/enc.: Mr. John M. Noonan CRWQCB - Central Valley Region 3443 Rodtier Rd Ste A Sacramento CA 95827-3098 BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality and Service Ultramar Ultramar Inc. Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hartford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 ENVIRONNENTAL PRO~IECT QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT DATE REPORT SUBMITTED: March 25, 1994 QUARTER ENDING: March 31, 1994 SERVICE STATION NO.: 571 ADDRESS: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA COUNTY: Kern ULTRANAR CONTACT: Randall K. Stephenson TEL. NO: 209-583-3324 BACKGROUND: In November, 1989, during installation of overfill equipment, soil samples were collected from small excavations at the fill ends of the UST's. Analysis of the samples indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the samples. Based on this information, a soil gas survey was performed and four soil borings were drilled at the site during March, 1990. Two additional borings were drilled during October, 1990, in an attempt to install two monitoring wells. The wells were not installed due to auger refusal from a cobble interval at approximately 30 below surface. In April, 1992, a successful attempt was made and three monitoring wells (MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3) were installed and quarterly monitoring was initiated. SUMMARY OF THIS QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES: Ground-water sampling of all the wells was conducted by SSB Environmental, Inc., on January 21, 1994. BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #l Quality and Ser~,ice Beacon Station No. Bakersfield. CA Quarterly Monitoring Report First Qtr. 1994 RESULT OF QUARTERLY NONITORING: Ground-water elevations in the monitoring wells have increased an average of 1.75~/feet since the previous sampling event. Analytical results for this quarter indicate that BTEX constituents and TPHg were not detected. PROPOSED ACTIVITY OR WORK FOR NEXT QUARTER: The next quarterly sampling event is scheduled for April, 1994. ,; MW-1 ~ ~.~ , ~ .................. 7 ............................ ~ 34th STREET // ~, ~, ~ ~ -- ~ROUN~WA~R ~L~A~ SCALE: 1" = 30' ~ -- 3~.75 ~OM~IC SURFA~ ~NE ~ ......................... ~A~ON ABOVE M~N ~ ~EL (f~ ~ FUGRO ~ST, ~C. FORMER BEACON STATION 571 ... 1102 34TH ST~ET PROJECT NUMBER PLATE 2 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93-49-1091 Beacon Station Number 571 SSB 93-49-1091-O194 1102 34th Street Page 2 Bakersfield, California Each monitoring well was purged and sampled as per the protocols presented in Appendix A. Temperature, specific conductance (EC), and pH were monitored as the wells were purged. The final measurements of these parameters for each well are presented in Table 2. TABLE 1 DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Monitoring Well Head Depth to Ground-Water Change In Well Date Elevation Ground Water Elevation Elevation MWol 06/22/92 409.17 34.09 375.08 -- 09/15/92 33.23 375.94 +0.86 12/14/92 Well Dry ..... 04/28/93 Well Dry ..... 07/07/93 Well Dry ..... 10/14/93 29.54 379.63 -- 01/21/94 27.72 381.45 +1.82 MW-2 06/22/92 409.52 32.97 376.55 -- 09/15/92 31.87. 377.65 + 1.10 12/14/92 Well Dry ~ ~ 04/'28/93 Well Dry ..... 07/07/93 Well Dry ..... 10/14/93 29.17 380.35 -- 01/21/94 27,59 381.93 +1.58 MW -3 06/22/92 408.84 37.06 371.78 -- 09/15/92 33.23 375.61 + 3.83 12/14/92 41.55 367.29 -832 04/28/93 Well Dry ...... 07/07/93 Well Dry . - .... 10/14/93 29.48 379.36 ~ 01/21/94 27.64 381.20 +1.84 TABLE 2 TEMPERATURE, SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (EC), AND pH READINGS PURGED WATER FROM MONITORING WELLS AT Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Monitoring Well Temperature (°F') EC pH MW-1 70.6 323 6.7 MW-2 70.6 346 6.8 MW-3 71.7 369 6.7 SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS An Office of Fugro West, Inc. Beacon Station Number 571 SSB 93-49-1091-Q194 1102 34th Street Page 3 Bakersfield, California Ground-water samples were collected and transported using the sampling methods and chain-of- custody procedures presented in Appendix A. The samples were transported using chain-of- custody procedures generally described in Test Methods for Evaluatinl Solid Waste, S.W.-846, U.S. EPA, Second Edition. Samples obtained from each well were transported to a State certified laboratory for analysis for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) b.~_~EPA Method 602/Purne-and-Tra~; and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) by Modified EPA Method_.8.01?Purge-and-Trap. A summary of the results of these and previous analyses is presented in Table 3. The complete laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Appendix B. TABLE 3 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF GROUND-WATER SAMPLES Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Well Date B T E X TPHg MW-1 06/22/92 3.0 5.3 17 12.3 390 09/15/92 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 * * * * * 04/7.8/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 MW-2 06/22/92 6.8 2.6 7.2 18.6 270 09/15/92 2.8 0.8 < 0.5 3.4 60 12/14/92 * * * ° * 04/7.8/93 * * * * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 MW-3 06/22/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 09/15/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < ! < 50 04/2~/93 * * ' * * 07/07/93 * * * * * 10/14/93 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 01/21/94 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 Results in micrograms per liter (ugJl) or parts per billion (ppb) B = Benzene; T = Toluene; E = Ethylbenzene; X -- Xylenes TPHg - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < -- Less than the laboratory method detection limit · -- Well Dry. SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS An Office of Fugro West, Inc. Beacon Station Number 571 SSB 93-49-1091-Q194 1102 34th Street Page 4 Bakersfield, California Laboratory analysis of the water samples collected on October 14, 1993, indicate that no gasoline constituents were detected above the method detection limits in any of the three monitoring wells. A copy of this report should be forwarded to Ms. Flora Darling at the Kern County Environmental Health Department and to Mr. John Noonan at the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board at the following addresses. Ms. Flora Darling KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Mr. John Noonan CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Yours faithfully, SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS An Office of Fugro West, Inc. Scott A. Baldwin Environmental Technician CA Registered Geologist No. 4,32~ SAB:DAS:clb SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS An Office of Fugro West, Inc. SSB 90-1091 I PLATE 1 ', .,~.~ , Oildale ~-. .... ~ . ~_..<  ,~_~ ~-r . ~ ~:~ ~ ~r - - ~ ~...~ ....... ~...~..~.~ I VICINITY MAP FORMER BEACON STATION NUMBER 571 1102 34"1'I-1 STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I ' ~SSB_gO-!09Jl PLA'r~: 2 FENCE ~., Z IS~S 34~ S~EET SCALE: 1' -- 30' "'MONITORING WELL~ INSTALLED MAY OF 1992 SITE PLAN FORMER BEACON STATION NUMBER 571 1102 34TH STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX A SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES Ground-Water Sampling Methods A ground-water sample was collected from each monitoring well. Prior to sampling the well, approximately four well volumes were removed to bring fresh formation water into the well. Three well volumes were purged using a PVC bailer. The fourth well volume was purged using three disposable bailers. The ground-water was collected using an individually wrapped disposable bailer. The ground-water sample was placed in the appropriate glass containers with teflon-lined lids. Each sample was labeled and immediately placed in an ice chest and cooled to 4°C using blue ice. Sample Shipment and Chain-of-Custody Procedures Complete records were kept on each sample including sampling date, sample type, location, and other pertinent information. The sample containers were banded and sealed with chain-of-custody seals. The samples were cooled to 4°C at the site and maintained at that temperature until delivered to a State certified laboratory.. Chain-of-custody procedures, generally described in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, U.S. EPA, Second Edition, were followed. A chain-of-custody form accompanied the samples from the place of collection to the testing laboratory, and through the completion of the analytical process. The chain-of-custody form included project identification information, the sample type and number, the date and time of sampling, the chemical analyses requested, and the identity of the person taking possession at each change of custody. APPENDIX B LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION January 2?, 1994 Sample Log 8458 Scot~ Baldwin SSB Environmental Consul=ants, Inc. 3140 Nor~ Argyle, Suite 104 Fresno, CA 93?2? Subject= Analytical Results for 3 Water Samples Identified as: Project # SS~ 90-1091 (571 currently Arco) Received= 01/25/94 Dear'Mr. Baldwin: Analysis of the sample(s) referenced above has been completed. This report is writ=an to confirm results communic=ted on January 27, 1994 and describes procedures used to analyze =he samples. sample(s) were received in 40-milliliter glass vials sealed with TFE lined septae and plastic screw-caps. Each sample was trans- ported and received under documented c~ain of custody and stored a= 4 degrees C un=il analysis was performed. Sample(s) were analyzed using the roi!owing method(s): "BTgX" (EPA Method 602/Purge-and-Trap) "TPH as Gasoline" (Modified EPA Method 8015/Purge-and-Trap) Please refer to the following table(s) for summarized analytical results and contac= u~ at ~16-75B-9500 if you have questions regarding procedures or results. The chain-of-custody document is enclosed. Approved by: Mitra SarRhosh Senior Chemist Environmental $ci~r~ce & ~'eut~r~olOgy . 45133 CourH¥ Roa~f, 32B . D~v,s. CA 95010 · 910 i'53-9500 · FAX: 9~0 1'57-~652 ~ Sample Log 8458 Sampler W-27.59-IIN2 From = Project # SSa 90-1091 (571 currently Arco) SamaDled t 01/21/94 DilUtion = 1=1 QC Batch t 2048f Matrix = Water Measured ~arameter (M~L) ~/~ Value ~ Benzene (.50) <.50 ~o[uene (.50) <°50 ~hylbenzene (.50) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 118 ~ Sample Log 8458 Sample: W-27.?~1 From ~ Project # SSB 90-1091 (571 currently Arco) Sampled = 01/21/94 Dllu:ion : 1:1 Qc Batch : 2048f Matrix : Water Measured Parameter (M~tL) ~/~ Value ~,~ Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 Ethylbenzene (.SO) <.50 Total Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Recovery 118 % '.¥estern ~ttvirorlmt~n~ai Science & Tfghno[oC~¥ · 45f33 County Rn.q~ .?~ · n.,,,,. ,...~ o,:,~,~ . ., .... ,, Sample Lo~ S458 Sample: W-2?.64-MW3 From : ProJec= # SSB 90-1091 (571 =urren=ly Arco) SamDled : 01/21/94 Dilu=iun = 1~1 QC ~at=h : 2048f Measured Parameter (MRL) ~/~ Value ~/~ Benzene (.50) <.50 Toluene (.50) <.50 E~hylbenzene (.50) <.50 To~al Xylenes (.50) <.50 TPH as Gasoline (50) <50 Surrogate Re¢ove~ 117 Ulffamar Ir~. BEACON CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT '-. Beacon SlalJon No. \ Sampler (Pdnl Name) . 'Date Project No. Sampler (Signalure) Project Localion Affiliation c:_ = Sample NoJIdemit"~,~a, lion Da!e . . . T!me_. Lab_ No. :a ~~- z REUAR, KS 'i~elinquished by: (Signature/Aifil~tiofl) Date Time Received by: (S~i~l~l~) D e Time ~elinquishedby:($ignalm'e/Affilialion) Dale 'ra~e~Rece_.~j~l~i~~L~ D~Ie" Tinge Repo~ To: aia io: ULTRAU,~R IN& ' .... WI-UTE: Relum to Clienl 'with Repod YELLOW: LaboralorV Copy PINK: Od.qina~or Copy ~"~ Ultramar Ultramar Inc. ~ ................ - .................... -Ielecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P,O. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Sen~ices Hanford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 February 24, 1993 Ms. Flora Darling Kern County Environmental Health Dept 2700 "M" St Ste 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 SUBJECT: BEACON SERVICE STATION NO. 571, 1102 34TH STREET, BAKERSFIELD CA Dear Ms. Darling: Enclosed for your review and files is a copy of our consultant's FOURTH QUARTER, 1993 - MONITORING WELL SAMPLING REPORT for the above-referenced Ultramar facility. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, ULTRAHAR INC. Environmental Speci al i st ! ! Marketing Environmental RKS/jj Enclosure: SSB 90-1091-Q492 cc w/enc.: Mr. John M. Noonan CRWQCB - Central Valley Region 3443 Routier Rd Ste A Sacramento CA 95827-3098 BEACON A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 (~uality and Set,vice Ultramar ,, ............ .. Ultramar Inc. - ................................ .Telecopy: 209-584-6113 Credit & Wholesale P.©. Box 466 209-583-3330 Administrative 525 W. Third Street 209-583-3302 Information Services Hanford, CA 93232-0466 209-583-3358 Accounting (209) 582-0241 ENVIRONIqENTAL PRO~]ECT QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT DATE REPORT SUBHITTED: January 19, 1993 QUARTER ENDING: December 31, 1992 SERVICE STATION NO.: 571 ADDRESS: 1102 34th Street, Bakersfield, CA COUNTY: Kern ULTRANAR CONTACT: Randall K. Stephenson TEL. NO: 209-583-3324 BACKGROUND: In November, 1989, during installation of overfill equipment, soil samples were collected from small excavations at the fill ends of the UST's. Analysis of the samples indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the samples. Based on this information, a soil 9as survey was performed and four soil borings were drilled at the site during March, 1990. Two additional borings were drilled during October, 1990, in an attempt to install two monitoring wells. The wells were not installed due to auger refusal from a cobble interval at approximately 30 below surface. In April, 1992, a successful attempt was made and three monitoring wells {MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3} were installed and sampled. Analysis of water samples collected from the wells indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the samples from MW-1 and MW-2. The sample from MW-3 was none detect for hydrocarbons. SUMMARY OF THIS QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES: Ground-water sampling of all the wells was conducted by SSB Environmental, Inc., on December 14, 1992. BEAC )N A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #l Quality and Service Unranrtar Beacon Station No. 571 Bakersfield. CA Quarterly Monitoring Report Fourth Qtr. 1992 RESULT OF QUARTERLY MONITORING: Ground-water was encountered only in MW-3 during this sampling event. The measured elevation had decreased approximately eight feet since the third quarter 1992 sampling event. Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 were dry. Analytical results of the sample collected from MW-3 indicate that dissolved concentrations of hydrocarbons were not detected in the sample. PROPOSED ACTIVITY OR WORK FOR NEXT QUARTER: The next quarterly sampling event is scheduled for March, 1993. SSB En$onm~-ntal Comsuitants An Office of Fugro West, Inc. ~' 3140 North Argyle Avenue, Suite 104, Fresno, CA 93727 (209) 292-5736 March 4, 1994 Mr. Randall K. Stephenson ULTRAMAR INC. 525 West Third Street Hartford, California 93230 Re: First Quarter, 1994 - Monitoring Well Sampling Report Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California SSB 93-49-1091-Q194 D!ar Mr. Stephenson: As per your request, SSB Environmental Consultants, obtained quarterly water samples for laboratory analysis from three ground-water monitoring wells at the former Beacon Station Number 571, located at 1102 34th Street in Bakersfield, California. A vicinity map showing the approximate site location is presented as Plate 1. The water encountered in each monitoring well was from a perched water zone which occurs at _a denth of a_nproximatelv 28 feet below the sitq The perched water zone overlies a regional water table which occurs at a depth of approximately 250 feet bel=ow the site (Kern County Water Agency 1990 Water Conditions Report). Prior to sampling, water from each well was subjectively analyzed for odor, clarity, and floating product. No odor or visual evidence of product was noted in water from any of the monitoring wells. Elevations of ground water were determined for each well by subtracting depth to ground-water measurements from well head elevations. A site plan is presented as Plate 2 which shows the site. facilities, monitoring well locations, ground-water elevations, flow direction, and gradient as of January 21, 1994. The ground-water gradient and flow direction was 0.011 toward the southeast. Depth-to-ground-water data for the site is presented in Table 1. All monitoring wells on-site were found to be dry from December of 1992 through June of 1993. According to Kern County Water Agency Personnel, the site is underlain by a former channel of the Kern River. The site is also located near the existing location of the river; above normal seasonal rains and above average discharge from Lake Isabella into the Kern River might account for the strong recharge noted at the site. Con~ul~sn~;~, Inc. 5740 East Shields Avenue, Suite 103, Fresno, CA 93727 ' ;~ (209) 292-5736 February 17, 1993 Mr. Randall K. Stephenson ULTRAMAR INC. 525 West Third Street Hartford, California 93230 Re: Fourth Quarter, 1993. Monitoring Well Sampling Report Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California SSB 90-1091-Q492 Dear Mr. Stephenson: Aa per your request, SSB Environmental Consultants, Inc., obtained quarterly water samples for laboratory analysis from one ground-water monitoring well at the former Beacon Station Number 571, located at 1102 34th Street in Bakersfield, California. Two additional wells located on-site were found to be dry. A vicinity map showing the approximate site location is presented as Plate 1. The water encountered in each monitoring well was from a perched water zone which occurs at a depth of approximately 32 feet below the site. The perched water zone overlies a regional water table which occurs at a depth of approximately 250 feet below the site (Kern County Water Agency 1990 Water Conditions Report). Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 were dry. Monitoring well MW-3 had approximately 1.5 feet of water in the well. Prior to sampling, water from monitoring well MW-3 was subiectively analyzed for odor, clarity, and floating product. No odor or visual evidence of product was noted in water from monitoring · well MW-3. Elevation of ground water was determined for monitoring well MW-3 by subtracting the depth to ground-water measurement from well head elevation. A site plan is presented as Plate 2 which shows the site facilities, monitoring well locations, and ground-water elevation. The ground-water flow direction and gradient could not be calculated because two of the three on-site wells were dry. Depth-to-ground-water data for the site is presented in Table 1. Monitoring well MW-3 was purged and sampled as per the protocols presented in Appendix A. Temperature, specific conductance (EC), and pH were monitored as the well was purged. The final measurements of these parameters for monitoring well MW-3 are presented in Table 2. Former Beacon Station Number 571 SSB 90-1091-Q492 1102 34th Street Page 2 Bakersfield, California TABLE 1 DEPTH TO GROUND-WATER DATA Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Monitoring Well Head Depth to Ground-Water Change In Well Date Elevation Ground Water Elevation Elevation MW-1 06/22/92 409.17 3~.09 375.08 -- 09/15/92 33.23 375.94 +0.86 12/14/92 Well Dry .... MW-2 06/22/92 409.52 32.9? 376.55 --- 09/15/92 31.87 377.65 + 1.10 12/14/92 Well Dry ....... MW-3 06/22/92 408.84 37.06 371.78 ~ 09/15/92 33.23 375.61 +3.83 12/14/92 41.55 36'7.29 -8.32 TABLE 2 TEMPERATURE, SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (EC), AND pH READINGS PURGED WATER FROM MONITORING WELLS AT Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Monitoring Well Temperature (°F) EC pH MW-1 NA NA NA MW-2 NA NA NA MW-3 56 370 6.5 NA = Not Available SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Former Beacon Station Number 571 $$B 90-1091-Q492 1102 34th Street Page 3 Bakersfield, California A ground-water sample was collected and transported using the sampling methods and chain-of- custody procedures presented in Appendix A. The sample was transported using chain-of-cnstody procedures generally described in Test Methods for EvaluatinR Solid Waste, S.W.-846, U.S. EPA, Second Edition. The water sample obtained from monitoring well MW-3 was transported to a State certified laboratory for analysis for benzene, toluene, cthylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 602/Purge-and-Trap; and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) by Modified EPA Method 801S/Purge-and-Trap. A summary of the results of this and previous analyses is presented in Table 3. The complete laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Appendix B. TABLE 3 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF GROUND-WATER SAMPLES Former Beacon Station Number 571 1102 34th Street Bakersfield, California Well Date B T E X TPHg MW-1 06/22/92 3.0 5.3 17 12.3 390 09/15/92 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 MW-2 06/22/92 6.8 2.6 7.2 18.6 270 09/15/92 2.8 0.8 < 0.5 3.4 60 12/14/92 MW-3 06/22/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 09/15/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 50 12/14/92 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < i < 50 · Analyses are unavailable for this well because the well was dry Results in micrograms per liter (ug/I) B -- Benzene; T = Toluene; E = Ethylbenzene; X = Xylenes TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < = Less than the laboratory method detection limit SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Former Beacon Station Number 571 SSB 90-1091-Q492 1102 34th Street Page 4 Bakersfield, California Laboratory analysis of the water sample collected on December 14, 1992, indicate that no gasoline constituents were detected above the method detection limit in monitoring well MW-3. Ground- water samples from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 could not be obtained because both wells were dry. A copy of this report should be forwarded to Ms. Flora Darling at the Kern County Environmental Health Department and to Mr. John Noonan at the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board at the following addresses. Ms. Flora Darling KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Mr. John Noonan CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Yours faithfully, SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Gar~ L. ~mer Staff Geologist David A. Sholes Project Geologist CA Registered Geologist No. 4,321 EXPIRATION DATE GLK:DAS:c/b JUNE 30, 1994 SSB ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS. INC. VICINITY MAP FORMER BEACON STATION NUMBER 571 1102 34TH STREET BAKERSFIELD, C.,~LIFO RNIA 'SS]{ 90-109].-049~ GROUND.WATER ELEVATION MONITORING WELLS INSTALLED MAY, 1P9"2 SITE DIRECTION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW AND GRADIENT BEACON STATION NUMBER 571 1102 34TI-I STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX A SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES Ground-Water Sampling Methods A ground-water sample was collected from each monitoring well. Prior to sampling the well, approximately three to five well volumes were removed in order to bring fresh formation water into the well. The ground-water sample was collected using an individually wrapped disposable teflon bailer. The ground-water sample was placed in the appropriate glass containers with teflon-lined lids. Each sample was labeled and immediately placed in an ice chest and cooled to 4°C using blue ice. Sample Shipment and Chain-of-Custody Procedures Complete records were kept on each sample including sampling date, sample type, location, and other pertinent information. The sample containers were banded and sealed with chain-of-custody seals. The samples were cooled to 4°C at the site and maintained at that temperature until delivered to a State certified laboratory. Chain-of-custody procedures, generally described in Test Methods for Evaluatin~ Solid Waste, SW-846, U.S. EPA, Second Edition, were followed. A chain-of-custody form accompanied the samples from the place of collection to the testing laboratory, and through the completion of the analytical process. The chain-of-custody form included project identification information, the sample type and number, the date and time of sampling, the chemical analyses requested, and the identity of the person taking possession at each change of custody. APPENDIX B LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION ~ua 12.22.1992 16:44 HO 24 P 2 9urgeable /%romatics ULTPJkMAR INC. Date of 525 WEST 31~.D STREET Report: 12/22/92 HANFORD, CA 93230 Lab ~: 11159-1 Attn.: RANDY ST~PHENSON 209-582-0241 Sample Description: STATION ~571, SSBP0-!091-Q%92, 34TH ST. BAKERSFIELD, CA. W-41.55 M~3, SAMPLED ON 12-14-92 ~ 10:40AM BY SCOTT BA~LDWIN. TEST METHOD: TPH by D.0.H.$. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample ~4atrix: Water Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received ~ Lab: Completed: 12/14/92 12/14/92 12/21/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constitupn~s Results Units' Level Benzene None Detected ~g/L 0.5 Toluene None Detected ~g/L 0.5 E~hyl Benzene None Detected ~g/L 0.5 Total Xylenes None Detected '~g/L 1. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected Mg/L 50. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor cc: SSB EN"VIROITM~NTA. L - RONA/~D GA-°~NETT Ultramar Inc. BEACON ., CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT Beacon Slat(on.N°. ' ......... Sampler (Print... Name)' ............ . ANALYSES /Z--Iq.-~ z_Date ' J Form( of No.{ '" ;: Project No. SamPler (Signature) tS~ojecl ~o(~ati(~n Affiliation .[ ~ ~_. ........ X~~ 0 ~ LUT'r ,:.., Sample No./Ide0!ific~, ,lion ...... ~ D. ~ate .... Time Lab No_, _m_ F- - Relinquished by: (SignalUre/Allilialion) 'Date Time' Received'ky: (Signalure/~lfiliatJ'on) Date Time Relinquished'by: (Signalure/Atfiliati(~n) Date Time Received by: (Signalure/Afliliation) Date Time Relinquished by: (Sigmaiure/^itiliation) Dale Time Receiv~i'byi'"(signature/^lliliation) '" Bate Time 525 Wesl Third Slreel ,_ ? ~ 5'~q,O ~',-~i(~g('~'JO~ Hanford, CA~230. Allenlion: V--~.4.,~ Y,.-- WHITE: Return Io Clio[it wilh Repo~t YELLOW: Labofalory Copy PINK: Originalor Copy