Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UNDERGROUND TANK #3-C-2/15/90
S ~~ ~? U 0 " o d ~ w Wo ~Z~ w ~... A „ ~ Q o ~zH ~ o~~ a N N I~ a r~ C ~W~ o ~,Woa ~A~ o ~ ~~ .~ ~ .-~ :. ~, _, ,z . 690 000 I FEET I .! i" . ' ~18 : -,-~. TANK FACILITY ~ LOCATION Oo 35°22'30' -' 1 19°O(Y 319 zo~so~ a.? MI. I 710000 FEET '- · TEHACHAPI 42 MI. ' ,-o~e~'' o~ Happed, edited, and published by the Geological Su~ey ' ~. ~ ~ _ · ~ Control by USGS and USC&GS . : ~ ~ Topography from aer,al photographs by multiplex methods ' o.I ..... ~e : *; .. and by plane.table surveys 1954. Aerial photoiraph, taken 1952 ~l / . ' ..: . . Polyconm prelect,on. 1927 North American datum ~] / ~sb' i. 10 O00-foot grid based on Ca fern a coordinate s stem zone 5 ~] ~ ~ ~ Red tint indicates areas in which o"'Y ,an(lmark buildings are shown ,o,,cS~/ .., . ." '. Dashed land lines indicate approximate ocafions V : ' ~ ~' Unchecked elevations ale shownjn brown ' ' UTM-~R-ID AN0-19.73 MAGNETIC NORTH ........ ........ '7- .............................................................................. ~ ..... DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET . lO00-meter Universal Transverse Mercator 8rid ticks, : ' ~. ; zone 11, shown in blue · Revisions showh in purole compiled from aerial photographs taken 1968 and 1.973. This information not field checked , Purple tint indicates qxtens on of urban areas . '. .. ,:, gate i fence [' I . ~. TANK ~3 (500 qallon diesel) ' ~no pump or p/p/ng DIEFEL:S , PAl NT "=~ 'TANK '*4 (SOO ~,7, ~ a solvent) %.r ii· ei TANK *I (2000 gallon unleaded) :~ ~ -,r, dispensers ...... fence -. e~SAMPLE LOCATI~I SCALE ~KE STREET (at 2' and 6') 1'-30' ¢ANAL PLATE GROUNDWATER RESOURCE D IEFEL'S PAtNT COMPANY INDUSTRIES-(805)O~$-7700 .. environmentalt~ot~hnical services BAKERSFIELD, CALl FORNIA PrO~t N~mb~r PLOT PLAN PROVIDE DRAWING O_~F PHYSIC~'' LAYOUT OF FACILITY USING ~-r.R__OVIDED BELOW. ' ~LT. OF THE FOLLOWING ~.~TION MUST BE INCLUDED IN ORDM~,_ OR APPLICATION TO BE " 'Tia/~K($),':PXPIN~ & DIS~ENSE/R(S), INCLUDING LENGTHS ~ DIMENSIONS ': ..... '_ ANY WATER W~-~'b OR SURFACE WATERS: WITHIN 100.' 'RADIUS OF. FAC~'ITy ;": ' "' :" ':; ' "";~' [~ TANK '~ (500 qallo~ ~'. /.. , ,- -. ~,~. · v',~ ' 'i . :-."/:::..:' ' ~": ' .' DIEFEL'~, '., ~... ,. . PAINT G:': ~ - , -.;.~. ~ T~ · I (2000 g~ll~ ~I~ ~ ~J TANK '2 [1000 gallon solvent) ~i~¢O~r~ lAKE STREET . · SAI'IPLE LOCATION SCALE (al, 2' and 6') _1'-30' D.ief'e! ' ~ Paint Company ....... ' 1030 Alta V/~.t.a ......................... Figure ~. 1 Location. of 'Proposed Borings Scale. 1" = 30' 25' - o o ' o ~ ~,. ~ - ',- - I~_ ~ o- : .~'~ ~ ~.. ',1~.--.-~'- _-~,' . ' ..-'F,,~ .. ~.--- -,-,.~ ,. ,e o \ .... · . ,, ....... N~ ' .' ' 'of Tank Facility V~c~n~ty Oi I Cantar ~uadran~l~ 69O ~--~' / TANK FACIblTY --.. .- ;, LOCATION · 35022'30~ , , ..... 119000' ~19 ~)TEHACl4API6'r ~.~2 M~. 1 710000 FE[~ 57'3b' .... O~ Happed, edited, and published by the Geological. Survey ~F>~. Contro~ by USGS and USC&GS . . ' ~ Topography from aerial photographs by multiplex methods and by plane.table surveys 1954. Aerial photographs taken 1952 Polyconic projection. 1927 North ·American datum lO,O00-1oot grid based on Calilornia coordinate system, zone 5 2o~,ts /27 Red'tint indicates areas in which only landmark buildings are shown Dashed land lines indicate approximate locations ,, lO00-me(er Universal Transverse Mercl. to} grid t~cks~ Zone 11. shown in blue Revisions shown in purple compiled Irom aerial photographs · · laken 1968 and 1973. This information not field checked I'uH)le tint in(h(:'al.~; ~xh,nsmn (~ urban areas DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 'UNCONFINED AND EQUIVALENT WELLS USED FOR CONTROL SPRING 1988 TANK FACILITY LOC ATI 0 N F'iqui:e ~I..'7. Depth to Ground Water , . GROUNDWATER· SURFACE , ' ELEVATION MAP i. UNCONFINED AND EQUIVALENT I~ ' WELLS USED FOR CON3'P, Ok. i SPRING 1988 !- TANK FACILITY .-, .: LOCATION GROUNDWATER" QUALITY I: !i.,... UNCONFINED AQUIFER TANK FACILITY LOCATION '1 Figure 4.4' Ground %4'ater Quality (Unconfined) ~f ~ N T U ~'A C O UN T y ,. -: ...... f-- DEPTH TO pERCHE ' ' ' ~; """: 'i'!'i'l i: :-i-;-:l', ::' GROUNDWATER '/_: SUMMER 1987 ..I SOUTHERN' SA,N. ..' .,'::" .' .. . '~ISTR~CT ...... , ...... ~ .... .... ~, L- ~ t - ,~ '. . t' ':.. ' UTILITY "" · '~ , ,' ..~: ',-~- " ' NORTH KERN ' S, HAFTER "" ' . %-~.,,....'-?""" "'" : r. '"' \ TANK' FACILITY · LOCATI 0 N DISTRICT. - I,,~.,, ") % " ,. ', .... ['' ; }" . *:LEBEC' ~" ..... % LC~TACr , Figure q . 5 Depth t0 Perched Ground ~ater TANK FACILITY, LOCATION L gate fence · m .................... ~--i ..... - ..... - ..... : ...... - ...... ~- ~: -TANK.~:~ '(500 qallondiesel) : ,- - - - ~' .:-i ...................., ' ' ........ ' ......... ' ............ PAl'N/'" ............ ., ,:,-, ~ TANK '4 (500 gallon solvent.) . ~ J~ TANK '1 (2000 gallon unleaded) l ~5 I ~ ~ 'TANK '2 (1000 gallon solven[) < dispensers (for tanks '1 &~2) , fence, $ SAMPLE LOCATI~ SCALE LAKE SIREET (at 2' an~ 6') 1'-30' I ~NAL PLATE GROUNDWATER RESOURCE D IEFEL'S PAINT CoMpANy ....................... _eh ,jror;men,al/~ot~hniml-~vi~- ..................... :BAKERSFIELD-, ~L,I~ORNIA Pro~ec~ NumDer PLOT PLAN / / ... . i~, , . :: · '' Bakersfield City Hap - -ic..~. ............ : ....... : Scale: ....... 1 ....... ~ 0 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER UNCONFINED .AND EQUIVALENT -WELLS USED FOR CONTROL..,. SPRING 1988 TANK FACILITY LOCATION TION #22W 41om(,I y ,,4fee Figure 4.2 Depth t° Ground ~ater GROUNDWATER SURFACE' ELEVATION MAP UNCONFINED AND FQUIYALENT WELLS USED FOR CONTROL': SPRING 1988 '":':':ii' 1.- ? i .... ,4 ~. ::i TANK FACIUTY LOCATION /, TION R22W ' ,'' F!gure 4.3 Ground W~ter Elev~tion GROUNDWATER QUALITY MAP UNCONFINED AQUIFER- TANK FACIUTY LOCATION /,, ~ I Figure. 4 4 Ground Water Quali'ty (Unconfined) ~E NTUMA CGUNTY . ' DEPTH TO PERCHED 6ROUNDWATER, 'SOUTHERN SA~, SUMMER 1987 N~TH KERfl TANK' FACIUTY LOCATION .. [ Area Map'*1 : UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 0 "1 3 "1- 1 ~ 34 9vi i 4 0 0 10 ::::::! ............. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ A~RESS ,' ..... x ' :2. 2700 ~M"' ST.:; ?S~. 300/ ~S~g~, CA: 9330~ ~ME'. '" ' ' -':' ...... : - :: ..... . . -. . ~ . : ...... . 1030' ~TA VISTA~ DR., B~RSFIELD, CA 93305' ~.'?:~ ' -~'~ : '~'~ ',.: ::; .~'::~:~2::'~ '.~.~..~-,~: .~ ~ ': ~ L~AL A~Y ~Y ~ME ~NTA~ PER~N -~ P~NE ~ KC~SD ~ "' ~ LYDIA V. VON SYDOW ~ ~05) 86i-~636', ~z _ CENT~ V~Y ' ~ (1) ~ . ~ L~T(~N~ ~ ~ D ~ GASOLINE ' ~ u~ ~UR~ ~ D~HAR~ C~SE(~ ~ :; ... . .' , : , ~ ~ ~E~ONEO~Y _ ' , ~E~ ONE O~Y ~ ~ ~ ~,~,R.~O _ ~ "R~""A~S~E~"E~DERWA~ ~ 'R~ED~TION~ ~ :.:.:~,~ CA~D(C~UP~M~IEuORUNNECE~AR~ CHE~PROPRIA~TION(~. .~ ~ ~AVA~&DI~(ED) '[~ ~ .~F~EP~T(~ ~ ~ ~CEDB~G~AT~N(I~ ~' C~SI~(CD) '~' '7 ~ '-~CAVA~&~EAT(~ ' ':: ~ F~MP&~ATG~UNDWA~R(G~ ~ R~SUPPLY(R~ ~ .~NTAINM~TBARRIER(CB) ,~ ~ ~T~N.~QUIRED(NA) ~ T~A~ENTAT~O~P(H~ ~ ~IL~S) ~ VA~UM ~CT~ ] ~- O~ER(O~' ~ [~gS~[GA~[ON CO~gD 02/15/90. ' GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Blker~fleld. CA 93301 (805) 861.-3502 .. · ~-ci/.~ · Telephone (805) 861-3836 ............. ' ,,~~~. Telecopler (805) 861.3429 Director '~,'~ ' ' ~." , . · R ESOU ROE M~/~~~-E, NT AGENCY .. February 15, 1990, · - .~::~i':~i:!~":!,,2,.:::~:.:: ' ~ ....... " ' .. .... '"' . - . .. ~:.:'.. '~. :- i .... ~ ' - .. ~,~--,. ::L.,i.:ii,~:?:'::.,~:~:~ '~:":.::,-'-. ,','' ,~g.~ ~F~F.:L~,~ . . ~:; ,~:',.... .., , ,.:, , ,,. '~'.~. ., .',. ~ ,' :.',..~ ~ '.': .'~ ,, ~, , ~ ~ .' , .,~, . , , _'.. :-, ' :~:~i,]: :./':.~L~L~.'.:' 1030 Alta Vista .':' .' .. . -. '.'- . .:~ '.. .~ ' _': :':'.-::::,~::'~ ~::~V~:~:::~:?:],..:'." ': ~...~.:::~/F~.;?~. Bakersfield CA 93305 .... SUBJECT: Location : 1030 Alta Vista,:. Bakersfield,. CA : Known As : Deifels Paint ~ "'::', This lette~ confims the completion of site 'inVestigation and remedial action'~t 'the above site. With the provision that, the info~ation provided to this agency was accurate and representative of existing conditions,, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of 'any liability under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Nor does it relieve yo~ of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which, cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or othe~ise pose a threat~ to water quality or public health. . .:,~... Additionally, be advised' that changes in the present or proposed, use of the site . may require further site characterization and mitigation, activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage. -- ~f you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Joe Canas at (805) 861-3636. ~'" ~'ris B'urger~.. ~. ~. Program Manager , Environmenta] Health Services Department' .. . . . CB:cd -- - col t~ 1'40010. b : ' ~'~ GeoPlus Consulting Services ' ' ~----~C~ Thomas W. Ladd, California Registered Geologist:#3568 ~-~ltl ~ / : 1400 Easton Drive- Suite152 · ?/11 Y ' · Bakersfield,CA 93309' i ~ ".~.~";~',:,(805).327-11 .~'.L. · ~ ,, ' · -, , .~ . ~ -. - . :,::i~,,.~:~¢i~':'*":-:~:,' - .... . Environmental Health Services Department '. , .~:,.. - '1700 "N" Street - Suite 300 . , :~.,,,. , , , . Attention: Mr.. Joe Canas ' :" ' ' ' ',"';:,;' U,.';', pleased to meet with you and discuss the results further. ''~e look forward to hearing from regarding our conslusions, ,'"~':, Sincerely, '~ , .,. w/ e~clo~re ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · o~ ... ............ :....:.~>~.~..~.:..::..~.~.~,.".,~... .. -e.e~,.one · = , ' C~honed ' ''" Will call. again . ' ' .... "' . Holding on line' ~" ' '. Long'distan~e*'call '. :"'- ':' - :" Returned-your'coil' Came to see you"'.:.' '." ...'. Waiting t~-s~e~you .-., :!. ..CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING ~ · . ..: ': Site Specific Time Accounting~n~et Permit # .,./3~.:~..~..~:~-.~i.;~. ,.-.. ~.......: : Site Specific. Status Changes: '-' N~i ' "' ""- '"' ~':::' ' "?"" ..................... : ''~ -' ........ '" .~g ,:.... .:..:).~....-- '.-:',', ., : ....... -::'. ........ ':'- .-:-- '.' ': : f ..... :: :":':tt~:,::' :-:,i'~ :-:%:'"7':-': :.: :2-~.'.~:.:::':- :' :"-1' .~:":.":' :-~: ~::i.: ~:' ::':. "-:,'{J -~'.':- :,. :'," -..:'.-...... ' . ,': .... ...:..'-- ::.-...::'~ ~:., ~..-'.::.:, ,.-:. :.. ..... ::-':.. -.,:,-:: ~[.!-,::.: :.: ~[ [ ' _ ........... , . ..... :.?? .:::. '.... :: :..'..: '.'::. '][ .... :-;'~' .-:-,':L:. ...... :.:,z ,..-~ .... ... ;.'.' :" ':'"": ..... ' "" :" ' ' ' '"' ' ' ..... '" . ,. [ ]. ~ ~. ....... :.:. ,:, ,,.:..;, .~ ,-::, ....: ., ~, .. ,... , . .. .... , ... .... · :, ...,., -.... .... ..., ...~ .,.,...:-:.?. .......:-. ~.~: -[ -.. .-..: .': i'.:.:i ? :-::-':'::',:";.'v'~.'; '.': :-'f~," ':-.::,' ' ..... ' .... "'" ' ' ' .... · .. '· .·.......'::.l::::·..: ',?:',:..(?:.: ..: l:~;-:.,....::'. ,..:.... ~.; .....: -·.........':. '3 '.' -. >' .'." -.., ,.-.:.~'-~ .':--:.::-~.":-.-" i:: ..... .:..-'.- 't-'-.:/!':'.:i'...:.' >.' '-:-'.' ..... · ~:.'-:','t Data Entered By: '""-: ........ "' .... ' ..... '" ...... '' ............ ' .... , ,C:-j':/,~%::::'~,:,~'< ,- -~'~;-:~zZq%~:~-tJ' ;.- ' '.ti·. .... . .,: · ~.>t? , _ . · .... .Date. : :' -' '-' '~- ' " ' '"I '"'"""" '"' : / · . ' "...' · .: "' ,'].:¥.?.".<' ,].[:'.'[~:'.J.:" -: :.: i,;~: .:<'::~,.2";?:~'v:i.'~ ,';' ::: , '..'..' '. ".- "'.." . ~'." - ............. " ..... ! . t '.'{.".: ~w~T OPTIONS FOR LEAKING'za · :-.'Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet.... ". ' ~ermit #~.~'ig ~ O/D ~ Site Sl~cific Sta~ Changes: ...- · E~ployee # ~.,. ""'I ~ "~' ' ': .. .: : ' :-~' . ...... .. ~kmcli~ (Local, State, of Federal) · ' ~ ' '"' "":~ ~eeg°ry Activitylcode Description' ... , '. ..... . .... :i(10ths)!lH°urs .'" ,/I/ .. · :. . :... ~' .! ~ I I Ente=ed By: Date: C.O.L.T. ~trE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET ~ploy~ S~gnatu.e I ','~',::'..:'-: ~ .:. '_. ....: ...~...~ ....... ~ ............ - ......; ....~___' ..... £-~========= ' . =====_~_====_;===~__=__~._~___~.__.== · : ~ .....:. . '. . ,., · ~, . , '. ' ..~' :'~ ' .. . 'Env. Health 580 4113 137 (12/88) C.O.L.T. '5~fE SPECIFIC TINE ACCOtJNTIN6 SHEET "' : Add.ess .......... - Pe~t $ Site ~cific S~s ~es: ~loyee $ : ' ' Data Entered By: · Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~(~(i:~i~ Site Specific Status Changes: · Employee # Employee. Signature Site Name or Addre, ss Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Category Activity DateCode- Code Description ( t0ths ) Notes: C(lgTRACT OPTIONS FOR T.RAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # /4 O 0 ;0 C~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # ~E~.l°yee Signature /}~ (t Ii:. FundingCode-(L°cal' State,.. of Federal) Category Activi Hoes Date Code Description (.10ths ) Notes: Data Entered By: Date: En¥. Health 580 ~113 ~37 (~e¥. 5/89) .CI~,~iiACT OPTIONs FOR T,l~3~Vd~NG · Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet .,:i,:~i:?' -. . .': ,:-......~..~' -. .: ... . . .. ...-. . .~.- ... . .. .... :.:- . .-... .~ ... - . · -... · ' :.-i .' . '.-".' :.;:-'-.:.'.~ °e~o~s ~o~ ~,~ ~ .' .'. ' .'." ':. :....' .',~':' .i': ..... · '. . , :. Site Specific T&me Accounting Sheet '- . . ...... v ~e~m~t # 14,~0/,0 C, "' ' . .- si~e Spe~ifi~ statu~ cb~es:~ ~ ' ...-,.~ >~... .. ' r~ ! ,,',. -~ -'. · Date ny ~ct, ivit~/ ~ouns ... Notes: '~J' ~' ' - . .: ~,.,'1~.~ ~.,-'~: ~'; ' ~ ' ' " " ' " /" - · . .' .... -'-.~ ~ : .... -. .,. .. .. -' ...., .- .':'r l~:)a~a E:~e~ed ~y: Date: O--.A~ACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING " Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Ipermit # ;~)I0 " Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # " . Employee Signature /~ ~'--~'t/ Site Name °rAddres/~ ~x~/¢[~) ~r'-~o4.~- Funding (Local, State, of Federal) .- Date ~eegOry- Act. iVity - ' ' ..... ~:--: ......... ---~-~ '::~-~'-=~ .... r? ..... ---Hours ...... - uo~e Description (lOths) . Notes: .-. . _ .. . ~loyee ~ ~loyee Si~--e 4:~(~ Site N~e or ~ess/~'~d ~.~, ~ing (~cal, S~te, of F~e~l) ~O~ Activity "O~S Date ~e ~scription ( 10~s ) No~es: : · :~ Enter~ By: ~te: En~.Mealt~ 580 41~3 ~ (Re~.5/89) C~.~ OPTIONS FOR T,RAKING '- Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # /400.~ O ~" ~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # - /~ Employee .Signature ?/~, .:~'~(¢~t~ ' Put.ling (Local, State, of Federal) ~i~ (~cal, S~te, of F~e~l) .~ ..... ._ Ho~s .'- ~.~: , . ...... ' . , h~ ~ter~ By: ~te: ~ ~,v.~ea~ 580 4113 1~ (Rev. 5/89} . Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ; '~/¥-~ ~0'" Site Specific Status Changes: .. Employee # ' ~, .,,.~ Employ Signatur ' Site Name or Address., /, .' /.~ ~. -: Funding (Local, Sta%e, of Federal) Code Description '...' -" (10tbs) ,, ....., Notes.- · . ., : .. · .'.'.. · p,.. ::,/ .~ ...... ,~ ~ ~,>:-..,~.~.~..,,.._~..~7:.....~..?. .~, ~,, ~ ..,..~¥,. ..... . , , .. ~ -. t.:' - ' .. ' ..... - ' -."-: ';'. ,- Data EnteredBy: .... :,,, , - - Date: .' Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet .... "-' Permit # ;~ :.o ~.P ~ Site Specific Status Changes: · · Employee # Site Name or ~ares~." ~'., > /i / Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat~egory Activity Hours · Date uo~e Code Description (10ths) ~ ~'~'/~ '-~: ~.. / ~-. ~. '3 · Notes: Il ~ ~ ," ./4/. "/ ~.~ "' · . .,, ,, · ,:, .... ¥. ..~.~.,", .3t~, ~,, ' ,,~,../ 7'-''~''~- F", " ":'~ . ' /: r ' ~'" ~ ' " ' ' " ,' -',. ' ' ~ . , /.. . . ,,.../ ,,~ . . ~ . · ~., .- ~,.(." .~ . , . . :. ' ~ ~.. ~-,,,_.~ --~-:~- , ~ ~ter~ By: ~te: ~. ~ea~tn 580 4113 1~ (Rev. 5/89) C~,~d~CT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accodnting Sheet !Permit # .. "" Site Specific Status Changes: ~mployee # Employee Signature ..~ .~. .... Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Date uo~e ~¢ue Descript/on . '?:,:': ' (.10ihs Data Entered By: · -~ ,. Date: · .'~ .' Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet :~. Permit # /~.OO ~.{,3& .' Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # · ;' ~%md/ng (Local, State, of Federal) .*** : - Category ActiviTy · : . ': · Hours .I .- Notes: ,- Data Entered By: Date: £~¥. ~ealt~ 580 4113 137 (Re¥. 5/89} KERN COUNT'~- 2700 ,~' Street. Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA g3301 .. gnV~onmental'He~thSerwices Department · 1400 Easton Drive -.Suite 152 " ' Attn: Thomas W. Ladd Re: .Site Characterization De~fel~s Paint " 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield, CA Dear Mr.-Ladd: .. After review of your site characterization and wo=kglan outline this Degart~ent a~rees with'your p=ogosal to do the in/t/al work which must define the full lateral and vertical extent of the. cont~i~ation. However, if the three 9=ogosed borings cannot define-the extent of cont~ination additional borings will be required. Include~ is a 9ermit a991~catlon to comDlete, if groundwater is e~=ounte=ed and our requirements If you have any questions, Please call '861-3636, Dan Starkey,_REHS ~ , ~ , Enviro~ental Health'Specialist I Hazardous Material~ Management Program Ds:dr 3-6-89 ................................. staf'f;haz\geoplus ltr ......... ; ....... : ~ ...... enclosures: Permit application Soil Boring . · -cc: 'Deifil's Paint -' File M. Wedde!l KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT' 2700 M Street HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California .. ' ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson, Mailing Addre~: , DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reichard {805) 861-3636 FOR A PERMi. T'"TO (CIRCLE ONE) IANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSTRUCT, RECONSTR0CT, · - DEEPEN OR DESTROY AiWELL IONITORING WELL APPLICATION ' FACILITY NAME ..... HOME PHONE NO. ' ' ;" '': ~P~TCATiON ADDRESS WORK PHONE NO. ORILLiNG .......... ' ~ON,~A~O~ o LICENSE NO. ';~-:O-'¢-O-~O'~E""~~ ADDRESS PHONE NO. :.TARTING DATE ON APPROVE'~-9]~ ( )'rE3, ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. :~OPU.5~ ADDRESS . PHONE NO. ~OMPLETION OATE ON APPROVE~ LiST ( ):¥E5 .iTHOLOGY LOGGING REVIEWED BY: REGISTRATION ~: .......... D : RE~aTR~,~uN :: ,~P~n TO GROUNDWATER & FLOW ut~C~Ot, PERFORMED "Y ,.08 SITE: T R SEC. 40 ACRE SUB. ~IRECTIONS TO WELL ~ENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE PER~IT 1. Permit aoDiications must be submitted ~o the. Health Department at least 10 workino days prior ~o ~he orooosea s~art~na aa~e. 2.Well site a:Droval is re~uire~ before beginning any work related ~o well construction. It is lawful ~o continue work ~ast ~he s~aQe at which an ins:ec[ion is reouired unless inspection is waived or comoiete~. S. ~her required insoec[ions include: conductor casing, all annular seals; and final construction features. __ 4. A ohone call to the Oeoartment office is reouired on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 2~ hours before the ~lacement of any seals or'.plugs. 5. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Oeoartment reoresentatives. B..Any misreoresen.tation or non-comoliance .ith reduired Permit Conditions~ or Ordinance will result in issuance of a 'Stop Work Order.~ i '' 7.A cody of the Oeoartmen't of Water Resources Oriller's Reoort as well as coces of logs and water eualitv' analyses must be Submitted to the Health Oeoartmenc within I~ days~ after comoletion of the work. ' 8. A well destruction aoDlication must be ~iled with this Deoartment if a well is being destroyed that is no~ in conjucrion with a test t~oie oermi~. : ..... '. g.-The'oermit is void on the-.nine~ieth-{~O)-caienoar day a~.ter, date o~ issuance if workhas-not been s~arte° and reasonable orogress coward comoletion maoe. Fees are not refundable nor transferaoie. ~. i0. I have ~ead and agree to comoiy with the General Conditions noted above.. OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE APPLICATION APPROVED BYi DATE: CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION ORILLtNG METHO0 NELL ~ WELL ~ NELL ~ WElL ;ELL DEPTH z ~ ~ROUNO ELEVATION i~...L' :ASING INSIDE DIAMETER ~ASING ~I~TcRIAL~ & ~AUGE ~ )CREEN MATERIALS & ~AUGE FYPE OFBENTONITE .. )LUG & DEPTHS ~NNUL~$ SEAL~NF ~TE~IAL G DEPTH :iLTER PACK MA~E..~_ ~u.~N SLOT _ENGTH 3E~LANT PLACEMENT 4ETHOD 4ELL CAP LOCKABLE ~AOILITY PLOT PLAN - P~ovide a descriotion of the facility to be monitored, Include: location of tanks, prooosed mon'itorino and placement, nearesc ~treet or intersection, location of any water wells or surface waters within a 500' Paulus of facil.ity. Please at~acn. WELL DIMENSIONS - Provide a detailed drawing of well(s), include: deoth'of well, casinq, length, screen/filter pack length, annular sealants, and well caD. Note any irregu)arit~es. .- Please attach. ZONE OF INFLUENCE - Provide mathematical calculations that determine, the zone of influence for the so~l FOR VADOSE ZONE WELLS at each site ~aking into account the monitoring method being used. Please attach. NOTE: If this aoolication is nat comolete it will be returned. ~.*~ ,· ~? KERN CO.UNT% 2?00 'M' Street, Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA93301 F~v~omaenta.[He~,thSet'v~ces , (805) 8~1-~6, ...... : ~~~~. . Ma~ch 6, 1989 .; Bakersfield, CA 93309 . Re: Policy on Sealing Soil Boring , , Dear Mr. Ladd: ' This letter is to clarify our stand on how soil borings shall be sealed at all sites. Please inform all'..contractors Who may planning borings of these retirements: 1. Soil bo~ings that enco~ter .contamination must be completely sealed wi~h an approved sealan~ material. (I~em ~3) 2. Soil borings ~ha~ do no~ encounter contamination may be filled ~o within 5 fee~ of grade with native soil and the remaining hole plugged wi~h appro~d material. (Item ~3) 3. Approved grout t~e 'for soil borings are as follows:~ A. Neat cement =rout shall be composed of one sack of Portland cement (94 po~ds)~ to 4 1/2 to 6 1/2 gallons of Clean water'and a maxim~ of 5% Bentonite may be added to the mixture.. B. Sand-cement =rout shall be composed of not more than two par~s by weigh~ of sand and one'part of Portland cement ~o 4 1/2 to 6 1/2 gallons of clean water per sack of cement and a m~im~ of 5% Bentonite may'be added to ~he mix~ure Mr. Ladd March 6; i989 " Page 2 .~. 4. All soil borings ,~at may impact ground water are. considered "wells"''~nd a permit from the Hazardous~ -~ Materials Management Program must be 'obtained before ? further work is star,ed.. A fee is also required. " If you have any questi6ns, please call 861'3636'. '' Dan Stark .' , . Environmental Heal'~h Specialist I ~ Hazardous Material~ Management Program DS:dr March 6, 1989 staff.haz\ladd.ltr SITE INVESTIGATION DEIF£L'S PAINT 1030 ALTA VISTA ~AKE'RgFIELD', KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared " for Doi fei ' s Paint ~ eom¢Iiane~ w~th tho r~ul~tion~ of Kern County gnvironmentai Health Services Departmen~ GeoBlus Consatting Services 1400 Easton Drive - Suite 152 Bakersfield, California 93309 (805) 327-1122 Hay 9, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS · LISTING· OF FIGURES 1 . INTRODUCTI ON 1 . ! . Purpose ! . 2. Background . '... 9.1. Facility Identification 3.1.Z. Facility Owner .. , . 3. 1 . 3. Owner Address 3. ~. 4. Own.r 3.1.5. Facility Location 3.2. Descrip%ion o£ Facility and History 3.3. Underground Storage Tank 3.3 1 . Tank Description and Use 3 3 2. Age of Tank 3 3 3. Soil Contamination 3 3 4. Tank Inventory and Monitoring 3 3 5. Tank Repair 3 3 6. Past Spills or Leaks 4 .SITE CHARACTERIZATION , 4.1. Land Resources ...................................... 4~ t-.-1 . Topo. grap,hy, and. Fhysiograph~ .... 4. 1 .2 Soil, S~ratigraDh¥ and Structure 4..2. Water Resources 4. 2.1 . Surface Hydrology · 4..2.3. Perched Ground Water , . 5. iDENTIFYING THE CONTAMINANT PLUME .' ~ 5.1. Preliminary Site Assessment ....... , . 5.Z 2. Depth of Borings 5.2 3.- Sample Procedures 5.2 ~. Sample Description ..' .' 5.2 5. Sample Analyses . 5.3; Vertical and Lateral Extent of Contaminant Plume 5.4. Interpretation of Results 5.~. 1 . ·Plume Map 5.4.2. Volumetrics of the Plume C 5.4.3. ·Cross-Sectional Profile 6. ~emedi.~l Action AIternatives 6. ~ . Vapor Extraction Method 6.1.1. Effective Cost 6. 1 . 2.. Treatment Time Excavation and Transfer Method 6.2.1. Effective Cost 6.2.2. Treatment Time No Action Alternative "' 6. 3 . 1 . Effective Cost ~'..:~': 6.3.2.: Treatment Time 7. Environmental Risk Assessment 7. t . ComDarison of Treatment Methods 7. 2 . Risk Management 8 . $umma r y - LISTING OF. FIGURES -' Figure 3. 1 Facility Loca-tion Bakersfield City Hap ,, Scale' 1" = 0.62 miIes Figure 4.1 Topographic Map Showing Drainage of Tank Facility Vicinity Oil Center Quadrangle Sca!e: 1" = 2,000' Figure 4.5 Depth to Pe~ched Ground ~ater Figure 5.1 Location of Proposed ~orings Figure 5.2.A. Soil Analysis , #1011 ID: S-4-2'. Depth Figure 5.2 B Soil Analysis #1012 ID' S-4-6' Depth Figure 5.2 C Soil Analysis #1013 ID' S-4-10' Depth Figure 5.3 Plat Map of Boring Locations Deifet's Paint Figure 5.4 Plume Map Del fel's Paint Scale 1" = 10' Figure 5.5 Cross~Sectionai Profile Deif.ei ' s Paint Scale 1" = 10' SITE INVESTIGATION DEIFEL'S PAINT 1030 ALTA VISTA BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1. INTRODUCTION " This site investigation report has been prepared"~'or --, Deifel's Paint by Thomas ~ Ladd of GeoPlus Services,' in compliance with the regulations of' the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) for the purpose of allowing KCEHSD to review the results, analyses and interpretations of data collected from the area below which had been located an underground storage tank facilit'y (site), owned by Dei fei's Paint. ~ackground The tanks were removed May, 1988 under permit #A3680-14: Chemical analyses.of soil samples below a waste solvent storage tank showed contamination by organics.. A Site Characterization and ~orkplan Outline prepared by GeoPIus Consulting Services was submit%ed to KCEHSD January '4, 1989. The workplan was approved by KCEHSD March 6 and borings were drilled at the site April 10, 1989 by Melton Drilling Company. Soil samples were chemically analyzed by SMC Laboratory, Inc. and reported April 24, PAGE i GeoPI u's 1 . 3. Scope · The scope of this study .and re, port is focused on and discussing the alternatives of remedial action ::~ . lessen, alleviate, abate, correct, or clean-uD the ef'fect~ : .'''' : .......: "'Characterization and Workplan Outline·.i.nfo:mation pa'akag~':¢/;:[2?';~[>?:-..:" · ~ ....... .After reviewing the Prfo'r inf'ormation package,' on G~n~ral Information, git~ eharaet~ri~ation and .. Preliminary Site Assessment were used with only moderate revision and made a part .of thi~ report. '" PAGE 2 GeoPius I 2 . CERTIFICATION I, Thomas %;. Ladd-, living at 249 El Cerrito Drive, Baker'sfield, I am a graduate of the University of the Pacific, ~%ockton, ~ rn'ia, with a Bachelor of Science Degree in ,Gao CaIi fo I0gy, ~'~:':: '"" ': ~ ~-e--- o.f~--~t-he~'~Un iv er-S~"i'-~'¥-::~f:~A'r -i~:Z:o'n~a~::=T-u'c:s:o n--; ~A ,a Ma~ter of Science Degree in Geology,. 1975 . I am a Registered Geologist, License Number 003568, certi~ie'd ~he ~%ate of California, Board of Registration of GeoIogi~t~ Geophysicists. I am a'Registered Environmental A~es~or, R~g.i.stration Number REA-0063[, c~rtified by the S{afe of California, Environmental Af.f'air~ Agency. I am a consultant, DBA GeoPIus Consulting Services and President of Tetra Oil 'Company,' a California corporation with a business office at 1400 Easton Drive, Suite 152, Bakersfield, California, 93309. I ha?e been requested by DeifeI's Pain% to prepare this report and information package for their reference and account. Neither GeoPlus Consulting Services nor Tetra Oil Company nor any of it~ officers, directors, staff or associates .have any PAGE 3 GeoPIus of its affiliates or subsidiaries, or the properties which are the, subject of this information. I cer~f~ under penal~ o-f law that I have pe=~onalI'~ e~amined and am~familiar w~th the ~nformat ~on submitted in. %hi~ report and information package .and ail at tachmen~; and that, ba~ed on m~ the information, .I believe that the information i~ true, accUrate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penaltie~ for 'submitting faire information, includin~ the 9o$$ibility off ne and impri$onmen~ . , Signature ' . Thomas %/. Ladd ~a¥ 9, ~989 PAGE 4 . GeoPIus ~:"~' -.. 3 GENERAL INFORPIAT I ON 3.1. Facility Identification Deifei's Paint 3.-1.2. Facility Owner: The 'DeifeI Corporation 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield '"a'''orn~au lz~ i 93305 3. 1.4. Owne= Contact Bob Hathaway ., ':. (805) 325-72011 3. 1 5 Facility Location 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield, California 93305 Dei re! 's Paint is I.ocated at the northwest corner of Alta Vista and Kentucky Streets in the City of Bakersfield,. County of Kern, State of CAiifgrnia (Figure 3.1). 3. 2 Description o'f Facility and History Del fei's Paint is an' operat ng paint supply company serving the auto, home and industrial markets 3.3. Underground Storage Tanks 3. 3. 1 . Tank Descriptions and USes Located at the facility were 4 underground storage tanks. One tank. of specific interest in regards to this PAGE 5 GeoPlus workplan is identified as Tank 4. Tank 4.was a 500 galIon tank used for waste solvent storage in the operations of processing and mixing paint. '.-:=~ ~=~:~:--~==~?~e~=~='~-~-~=~3~=~.=~-~2~. ~:.. ~A g e"---o' f- T'a'~k 's'< ~r~?~-~':~- ~-.':~--='=-=-'=~ ...... c=~',:'~'aTM ~7~-~-j~!~,~;~ ........................ The age of Tank 4 is unknown at the time of this report preparation. 3 3 3 Soil Contamination' "'- .............................. = ......... ' ...... ' ......... ~-'-O n",.M a.¥=-~*S-.v-+~.~-~'~'~'~u'r-'-=' ~ ~'~' '=~'~%"~'~d~t.r*~m-~h-~ '::-~=~-":~-- ~ ' ground. Laboratory result~ of the Inventory an~ ~onito£~ng ~a of T~nk ~ ~s u~k~own at the t~m~ o~ this ~eport preparation. the ~me 0~. th~s report preparation. SITE CHARACTERIZATION 4.1.1. Topography and Physiography The facility is located in the north central area of the City of Bakersfield, County-of Kern (Figure 3.1).. The gradient of 40' per mile to the south-southwest (Figure, '. 4.1) 4. 1.Z. Soil, Stratigraphy and Structure The soils of the region are classified on the basis' of the'ir relative permeability. Soil permeabi'iities govern " the infiltration rates of the ~oi l~ which in turn influence the depth to which fluids reach, in a given period of time. Other factors af fect'ing the depth Of infiltration are rainfaI'l duration'and Volume. The soils at the site are classified as moderately permeable. These soils are medium-to-fine-textured ~oils developed on recent and older alluvium, nonmarine terrace deposits, flood ~asins, ~nd other .secondar~ deposits. In many cases these soils have moderate accumulations of clay or high concentrations of lime in ~he subsoils. A generalized description of' the stratigraphy includes the Recent-Pleistocene sea, ion of unknown thickness of surface alluvium which grades into undifferentiated Kern (' 'PAGE ? GeoPIus River-Chance nonmarlne sands and silts. Th'is section of continental origin consists of b{lff and green sand with clay and silt and has a maximum thickness of about 3,500' Below i~ remote. Theme formation~ inei~de Miocene m~rine mediment~, 01igoeene eontinent~1 s~ndm ~nd Jur~m~ie b~ement . incline to the southwest. '~aulting ham been observe~ older formations by the drilling of the numerou~ oi ~elIs in the nearb~ Kern River Oil Field to the north. .. . 4. 2. ~ater Resources 4.Z. 1 . Surface Hydrology 5 ~ -' Thc facility is in a vicinity drained by overland flows over the flat. Percolation into the subsurface prevented' by adncrete and asphalt covered surfaces of city development. Typically runoff is nonexistent for most of the year and usually occurs only following infrequent intense precipitation events during the winter months. There is no major natural drainage in the'vicinity; however, the facility is located adjacent to the East Side Canal. Figure ~. 1 shows the facility location relative to -the local drainage in this area. 4.2.2. Ground Water The alluvium is the prinicipai aquifer in the region · where -the facility is located'. In the facility vicinity, PAGE 8 GeoP I. us The ground water in this aqui-fer is Iargelg unconfined, but there may be areas where partial or local confinement mag ground water recharge ~ouree. The 0round water movement -' %he facili%y area i$ $ou%heas%ward (Figure 4.3). Waterz '- ' ~ produced from 'thi~ zone have a .total di~$olved $olid~ (TDS) . . . :" ~,:..: ._~: ~.....~ . The depth to perched ground water ~ ~hown on'Fi~ur~ . 4.5. These perched ground water accumulations are the re~uI~ of imDermeaSle shallow cla~ bed~ re~trictin~ the downward percolation of wa%er~. The perched ground water~ < are generally much scl ~i~r ~han the ground wa~er underneath, making them undesirable. A% %he site perched 'ground wa%er wa~ not encounter during the augering to a depth of 40 I: PAGE" 9 GeoPIu~ 5. IDENTIFYING THE CONTAMINANT PLUME Figure 5.2A, B, and C show the soil analyses below ~ Tank 4 at two, sia and ten foot d tbs. ; " Three vertical borings were drilled at the Tank 4 .- ~ site for the purpose of taking so.il samples. ~ Figure"51 i:'':'.'~'i shows the boring locations relative t© the I0c'ation of tanks that were removed from the site. The .boring were tape .. surveyed and a location plat map was prepared as Figure {" 5.2.2. Depth of Borings The vertical depth, drilled for the three borings are as follows' DP-l=30' , DP-Z=30", and DP-3=40' In each of the 'borings the drilling was stopped as a result of on-sit6 evaluatio.n~ indicating penetration through %he' contaminant and into clean s0ii had been reached. 5 . 2 . 3 . Sample Procedures The'drilling was performed with a truck-mounted driller rig using 8-1/4" hollow stem augers. The augers acted as continuously advancin'g steel casings preventing te~t holes from caving above the levels to be sampled. Soil samples were obtained by lowering a ~pI itspoon sampler inside the hollow stem auger and driving it into undisturbed PAGE 10 GeoPlus soils. The s~mpler was.equipped with brass liner tubes designed to fete{ye intact soil specimens. The sampler was l~and cleaned wit.h liquid Soap and tape water prior to-each _sampl-ing ~a.c.ii.on'. Clean brass liners were~.plac.ed_ insi.de_._the' sampler . ~ . \. The drill crew consisted of a 'driller and a helper. Field exploration was supervised by a. geologist Who wam field conditions, soil sample handling and preservation, .and cont. rol of the field equipment cleaning~ process. .~.::~-'.~ Teflon seals were p!~c~d over the ends of fha' tuba samples ~hen capped with pressure fitted plastic caps, saaled wi Ih adhesive [ape and labeled. ~ : · · ' : .. The ~ample~ were placed in an iced insu!a~ed ch~s~ packed for preservation, aBd transported to 5MC Laboratory for analysis. 5.2.4. Sample Description Sample Ii%hologic descriptions and .loqs have been prepared for DP-1 , DF-Z , and DP-3 and are presented At %achment 5 . 1 Gener:iI,/, %he Ii %ho!oqy czn 5e described as clayey silt to fine :and, brown in color, unconsolidated, cement ab~eni , porosity and permeabi li~y fai'r. .' Geolog cally, soil is a technical term describing the earth ma%eriai tha~ has been modified or alter'ed norm~: soiI-fcrmi~g proaessa~ o~ phys. icaI, chemical and biological agen%~'. 'The soil horizon extends from the PAGE 1 1 ,. GeoPIus surface to the dep'th of unaltered par.ent material. ~ should be noted ~hat in the hazardous materials remediation trade, "soil" is commonly used as a nontec'hnicaI term above the water table. Byconvention of the trade this report has used the term soii'as the non-technical term to include all earth material abdve the water table 'unless . 5 Z ~' ' ~ampie Analyses :.{'' A 'total.of 20 soil samples were taken' from the three '/',~.. ~The borings and l0 soil samples submitted for analysis, results of chemical analysis of the borings are 'presented in Attachment $.2. The chain of cUstody is included as (" A~.tachment 5.3. 5.3. Vertical and Lateral Extent of Contaminant Plume A review of the chemical analysis of boring DP-3 ~uggests that contamination abruptly decreases at the depth of from 410 micrograms p. er gram (ugm/gm) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons t~ not detected at the 27.5' depth sample interval. The vertical penetration of t,h~ ~plume~does not e~tent to 27.5' and has been estimated to be 25' The lateral 'e~tent of ' ~he plume is define by DP-Z where ail ~amples analyzed resulted at levels less the 'the minimum detection levels. The lateral extent of the plume is estimated to have a diameter of 10' circling the DP-3 bor ng at the center of Tank PAGE ~2 I GeoPIu~ '°5. 4. Interpretation of Results A map and a cross section h~ve been prepared in order to assist, in the iI!ustration, and interpretation of the 5.4.1. Plume ~-ap A map (FiGure §.4) showing the depth from the surface to the base of the contamination and its areal :" depth of the Dlume at the center location is Drojected ZS' .The blume is absent in DP-Z thereSy definin~ the . ....... - .... boundary limits. S.4.2. Volumetrics of the Plume ' ' For the Durpose of calculations, the'volumeiri'c /' confi~ur%tion of the blume appears to be a near cylinder in shape. Using the formula for the volume of a cylinder and the Dlume Darameters of a ZS' depth and a 10' diameter discussed in Sec%i6n 5.3, the volume of contaminated soil calculates to be 1764 cu.ft. (73 cu.yd.) j:" 5.4.3. Cross-Sectional Profile ' A graphic presentation (Figure 5.5) of the TPH data portrays diagrammatically the pbs'trion and occurrence of the plume in the cross-section.al prof i,Ie view. P'AGE 13 GeoPIus Fiqure 5.2 A Soil Analysis - Labor'uCor"¢ No. ~1005 through 10£3 Pro3ect No... 29018. "L~'LL "[U: S--~-2 ugm/gm MOL,ugm/gm : t-Bu Cy Lbenzene 20 0.2 .., s -Bu [,y tbenzene' ' ND 0.2 -. 2,5;~enzofu~an : · ND ' 0.2 ChloroDenzene ND 0.2 '{' [, 4'-DicnloroDenzene ND 0.2 .... '..... · , . I, 3-bZcnlorooenzene ND .,'. O. 2 metno.~ of Analyszs: .EPA 5030/8020 rIQL '~: ~t~n~mun Ouantttation Level · Figure 5 Soil Analysis L-aDor'ator¥. No. 1005 t~rougla 1015 Pro.jeot__N° ...... 2.9.0~8 RE~UL : 'Off ~N~YSIS n"PYopylDenzene ~ lO6 2 ,.-5-8enzofuran , ND .. (' ChtoroOenzene ND lO t, 4-DZc~lorobenzene ND Z. ~- bZonZouobenzene ND 10 . t,2-Dtcnlorobenzene 71 method of Analysts: SP~ 50~0/8020 '' mOL: =: r~nzmun ~uan~t=aCZon Level u,:~m/gm.: microgram per graa ~1[) ~ blo~ deteo , #1013 ID S-q-lO' Depth · LnSbrator¥'No.- 1005 through 1015 Pro3ect No; 29018' ,. ., RESUL]'~ OF ANALYSIS IsopropylSenzene '80 10 Styrene 4~ ~0 ' ~" " n-PropylSenzene ~44 10 '- ' . '? t-SutyiDenzene l~i 10 . ,.:- . . i, 2,4-Trime'thylbenzene 2~6 10' n-~utyl~enzene . 740 10 ~'~, S-8enzofuran ND 10 CI~ ioroPenzene ND 10 ~, ~;- D ~chlorobenzene ND I0 I ,~-DZchloro~enzene 'ND 'IO- i, 2--Dichlorobenzene ;. ~6 lO !~: Af tachmen't 5. 1 roi low~ ,. WATER SHEET LEVEL . ~ ' TIME , ·DRILLER . · -CASING - : DRiVING'CONTRACTOR :DRIVER RIG DATE /0 ..... PHOJf-:CT I,do. · WATER ~ SHEET i DAT E ,,START DEPTH ,: DNtLLING CONTRACTOR DRILLER RIG '. DA'rE SAMPLING METHOO ! MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED AND DRILLING CONDITIONS LEVEL / OF " TIME DRILLER ~ ~RI~ER RIG. · DATE : . ~ ~ i~;> .~, OZ U REVIE:.WED BY ';~ DATE ~'"~'~ ~-' ' 1 ~ ~ "' · [ . ~ATER ~ SHEET~ TiME DRILLER DATE START 'DEPTH ~ ~ ~TYIME: [DRILLING CONTRACTOR MAT~IALS EN COUNT ER E D_.A NO :~DRI~I N G~.COND. LT-ION S- ..,~-: ........ WATE~t I SHEET . LEVEL . ... TIME DRILLER D~ILLING CONTRACTOR { DNI~ER R~ ' LOGGER .... wE ~ N/S -- IE/W ELEV. : 'CON~T. SUNFACE CONDITIONS ,~. ~ ..... MATERI'AES----~ENCOUNT, ERE D~-A N D:-=D RI -I~1~: ! NG---C 0 NDrT IONS ~ ,. PROJECT No. ~: WATER · ~HEET ~ · .;. ~ DATE '-'?"~ START:. FINIB~ ~'. ,. :. DEPTH - ~ ~- , .: '.: .- " DHI~ING CONTRACTOH ~ D~I~ER HmG ..... : DATE DATE . ..... · :-: ..... :.~ :~.: .' .... ~:"--" ':"' bHI~ING M~THOO .:-'' "'".:'7~::~:.~.¥:.:'::?:'~:~'~I '"f~:;~" ~" '" LOGGER ". ~ · ...... ..... - ..... ~ ..... < ~>' "'~' -- ~' ~Q m ....... MATEHIALS ENCOUNTERED AND D~i~ING CONDITIONS .~,~,,.:. ...... · 1 · ,. ~//~ ...... ~ ' ~ ,, ~ -- ... ~ ; .~' ~. - ..:._ :::, .~;: ·. :~,~:.: .- ~.~~X=- ,~. ,, , ,.:.//~ -. ' ~ ~ . ' 'i ~ - "~' / " ~7~'- ~ ~': ~"~:"'~ ~; ~.' . SMC- ,, Laboratory - Client'Name; Oeo Plus Consulting Address : 1400 Easton Drive #152 .... ": '"~:'"' ..... ' ' Bakersfield CA 93309 Date of ·report. : 4-24~89 h~bor~to~'y. No, 900 ~hrough 909 Project: Ace tone .. ND 0,1 Ethyl Ether ND 0,1 Butyl Acetate ND 0.1 I~oamyl Acetate ND 0.1 Isobutyrate * ND 0.1 Methanol · ND 0.1 Ethanol ND. 0.1' 1 PA ..... ND 0.1 t2Bu tan01 ND 0.1 s-Butanol ND O. 1 Isobutano[ ND 0.1 n-Butanol ND 0.1 ' Method of Analysis' 3810/8015 (Solvent Scan). MRL = Minimum Reporting Level ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND. : Not; detected S t an Comer 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, cA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 : P.O. Bo~ 80835 . Bakersfield, CA 93380 . FAX (805) 393-3623 Laboratory No. 900 t'hrough 909, Project: DP Project No. DP 4-10-89 ~901 ID: DP-- !-30 ugm/gm ~IRL, ugm/gm ~lethyl I.'t,~'m~.~t,e ND 0.1 . . Ace tone NB O. 1 .: E.t~hy[ Ethe~' ND 0.1 Bul, yl A~:el;~t',e' ND 0. 1 lsoamy[ Acetaee ND . 0.l Ethanol ' ND' 0.1 -' '~ - -.'" t-Butanol . ND O. 1 s-Butanol ND 0.1 Isobutano[ ND O. 1 n-Butanol ND 0.1 ; LaboratOry No.' 900 through 90'9 Project: DP Project .o. ~. ~-. -:?.~?~_:_. : ~:~-?~: -_-_ ~ ~ '~'~:-~' : ' ~'~- i" ~ .... · i-': ~ - : . ..... ~. ~.;.' ' . /~' . F.~'~",'-~- ~ ......... ~SULTS OF ANALYSIS ~" ~902 ID: DP-2- 10 ugm/gm ~L., Ugm/gm ~ .~ ~ethyl Formate .ND' 0.1 ~ .... Acetone ND 0.1 ' ' ..... .~'~ : Ethyl Ether ~ . - ND' '0.1 ;~;, - "":'~'i.",~. ,: : Propyl Acetate -. :' _ ND ~-".:-: ': '.' ....i/ : MIBK '"' - .... ND ; ..... ::..:.f~:0. ::""~'" ~' ).~_',:: ~" IsobutYl Acetate ,~ -.- ND : ':-' :..~'0 :":. "~'"' ~: ' Butyl Acetate " .ND 0.1 ~ ~ Isoamyl Acetate ND .'0.1 . ~, i~' ' ~. ,Isobutyra~e : ND ,0.1 ~:~ Methanol ND .', --':.::0,1 ' ~-'. Ethanol . ' - - .... ';' :":: -'- ·'.:.'-.'1PA '. : ,, _..:. ..... ' ..... :,.'- ....... .-'"ND ' ======================== ...... ~ ; ND ":-:' "<::: ':'.0'. 1' ':'!:' :t-Butanol ND '" '"" 0 1 : ~-Butanol ' ' ' ': ND' 0.1' n-B'utanol ..: ~ . .ND 0..1 .--' ND · :' 0..1 :..~:~::~. · ~ ~ ~" . Laboratory No. 900 through 909 Project: DP · . Project' 'No. DP'4-10,. Refihanol ND ';~ 0.I t-Butan°l ND . · Stan Comer ............................ Laboratory No, 900 through 909 Project: DP ..~,?,.., ? '' : . "$904 ID: DP-2-30 'Ugm/gm MRL,Ugm/gm I '~ .... . ., eFormate ~ ....'..' -] ...... isobutyl' Acetate . ND 0.1 ~", '""- .... Butyl Acetate ND 0..1 .~ It:oamyi Acetate ND .......... 0.1 } 1 PA ND 0.1 ':~ Laboratory. No. 900 through 909 Project: .DP i~ Project No .'DP " '~. #905 ID: DP-3-15' ugm/gm MRL,Ugm/gm. .., ' · ~.~.~ ':."Acetone . 2.5 : ' ND ' F~: 0 .'1 . .i/i, -" ..EghT1 Egher ' : ,.... :.:[ ~ . : ' *'1 ..... 6 :S.:(..L:O,:I "' ,',: :,,:-..(:)"-.,i .:: ':' Ethyl Acetate ' · '::".~ '.' ND . .,.:. . :,~ - ........... :-'Benzene-"" .............. "' ~:~= ........... ~:~' ~;'e'F'"--~';~: ...... 0 ;':47:-'--'-:-u~ ....... 0'.~i' --~--'~: - .' [.'- ...... ".: Propyl Acetate ~' ND .... "0.1 :~ ~ -. .. '..~,- ~IBK ..',. ND . ..':.:'0,.1 . ... j( ' Isoamyl Acetate 1.4' · "0.1 ~." .,?:.Isobutyrate . 2.6 .- ' 0.1 : Methanol 0.10 . . -.0.1 :'. ' ':' ~:'~ : :'~' "-' t-Butanol , "" ' ~0 10 ~':"~';:.'?;?:'~0.1 i:' -- s-Butanol . . ND '. ~'(',0 1 ":' ~ ; Isobutanol ND 0 ,.1- :'... , Stan. Comer ' "Laboratory No. ·900 through 909 Projeci:. DP i " ' ' Project No. DP 4'~10.89:· - -:::' -~:) ::: ':?:'i" ::i': RESULTS 'OF ANALYSIS '-'-, ~::~:':~::--=-.--: ::: .,. , . .. ·- ~'~"~9'06' ID: DP-3-20~ ugm/gm ~L,ugm/gm ,' · ,~" ~ :' : ', MethYl Formate ' ' · ND ' ' 0.1 . .::.-· :-"::: ~" ':'<--~to~-:. '~ ~ 4'.~ : .0..:: .' ~' ' '." ~?~"":- ~'MEK · ' ' - 1.9 -0.1 ..' . : ':':::? ': ' .'::~:~:.'">:~:?:>'-.>~: ~t~' · : ':"'0. :0'. ~S ' ::' ' '~ ' :-'" :J ': ,'3: :::;' :'::~: .... - ' ' - ,-' -' . · ' ' ' : ............ ~-: ...... ::_~: ...... :.::::~..:,;-~::~:Benzene~ ................................ :.. ....... · . '.' :.- : 0 '. 54 ::, : .... ': .'-. ' .~-'..'<.'-.:':~MIBK · . . · - ~ . ._ ' ND -'::' :.'.-:'~.':':~:': :: ':<':: ~uty: Acetate : ' :.. ,: '":-," "0.~4 : ' ? :: ' ' '.-Isoamyl Acetate ' '1.4 t': Isobutyrate 3.9 0 : , 'Methanol 0.10 '0.:1 ' : Ethanol ' . ' ,- ,0.12 , '... ",:: ':. :..: 1PA .... 0..13 ' : :-~. '.....t-Butanol , .-:,::-. :::,:,. :.'.:0.11 . ~-Butanol 0.10 < Is°butanol ND 0.1 :.': .: '::- n-Butanol .... ND O. 1 · .. . : ..... , ..... . :...'.. ,:< ::~ ~,Laboratory No. ..900 throUgh 909 ProjeCt: DP ..... ~',.. · project No. DP.4 ' I sobutanol ND 0, .1 .... -: ~ ' : . . . :'"~i..Laboratory qo. 900 through 909 Project: DP ' ., .. . :,:.. , - ...... :~.,,-..-, ? :'. . .'::':<>.L.~:R~.S~L~S".O~~ A~ALYS~S ' ' " : . ~-. ." ""~.:':~ . ~ ' , '.'. ~.,.':.:.:':?..:..:j..': :...' :' ',, . .'- ~ ' .. . . :' "::~ I. ~.~. :.,":~..~. :"~-~.~:.:::.~:~?:(~:~::~:~{~:~'~ :.~-.:~.:': '.. '.. · . : :-:'. :;:j~n' :" ~::~:::_:/'0'?l' ========================= "':: :.- -. '~-:z:7:~:.~':~:.,:::P:'g.[:'~:'Propyl- Acetate - .-' ~ - ND .. :- 0.1 '' :',. ,:-'~r',.' .:,,:.~.~,Isobutyl Acetate - ND ~.0.~1 -.'~":' ' ',~"~,Butyl Acetate , ND ~ ' 0. ~- """" .'<.:~X[~',. '~- ~(.~.-~'~. ~,~-' ~-.:.".Isoamyl Acetate .~ ND . ' 0. ~. ,'~-[.~? i'?:: :l~?~':~e thano 1 ND -" -.~/D. 1 - ' .:'-'~'¢.'~:~ :"'~'::~.:i:~; ':~hano~ . · ND .~-~,,?:~:~/~::~ .'~'-: ..... ~'. 't ' ' -' ' ,- ~ " -' '",:.-'': -''.:' ' - ~::': :' :.':"' "IPA ND . .1 ': :~.:::~'-~':~ ~-Bu~ano~ ND 0. s-~u~anol ND 0. .~ ~ . Isoku~anoL ND 0.1 · ".- :~-Bu~anol ND ' 0 ' ' . -. . . F .~r~ 21; . :, .'::. ::~ .. '. ~ ': . '~. . ': . . ...~ ~- :. .. .:.:::.-.'.".:~; ' ~ .... '-- ..: '"":'~ '.: ' ....:.''... !: .~ ': :': .' '. ~ ~ ,.:., ':..:: ::: .. · ~Laboratory No. 900 through 909 .. Project :, . DP . ~":i' _ .... . ' Pr. oject No.' DP 4.-10-89 LabO~rator¥ No.~: 900 through 1909 ':' Proje'ct No. DP 4-10-89 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS< .... .~.=.~ ......... # 905.~..~,...:ID :~ Dp, 3715 .. i.,-Chl°romethane ND 0.1 ~ " "'.!../Bromomethane ND 0. ' ' <{ ':Diohlorodi fluoromethane ', 'ii'Vinyl Chloride . 'Chloroethane * · ND 0 " ' <...~..~)Methylene .Chloride ND 0.1 ~ .'[/: ' -':',.':;:%~' Trichlorofluoromethane ' ND - ..:. 0 "~:.' :~(~'),'~'] :~ ':~[[[~,?::'[!~ ,:l'Dichlor°ethylene' ~: . - :.'. ,...,.-, ..'.:, 1 ~ X.-Dzc~loroethane .. ND ~"' "".?:.: ,~ '."'. f':'. ;:~ ~'.',' .Chloroform .' '. [.' ',:" -. : .... , .:." ~1 ~ 1'~ 1-Trichlorethane .: Carbontetrachloride ND 0 ' ~' Bromodichloromethane. ND 0. ,. ..~:' 1 ~ 2-Dichlorpropane ND 0. i ' , ' . '.:::' 'tranS-1 ~ 3-Dichloropropylene ", '.. ".ND (:.. , Dibrom°chloromethane ' ~' ND " -0.1 ' ' 1 ~ 1 ~ 2-Trichloroethane ND 0.1. ~ cis~l ~ ~-D.ichloropropylene' ND 0 j' 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND 0.1 ' Bromoform ND " 0.2~' ~."' l~l~2~2-Tetrachloroethane * ND ., 0.1. ~ Tetrachloroethylene * 0.13 0.1 . .: Method of AnalySis: EPA 3810/8010 *Co-elute M~L = Minimun Reporting Level · u~.~m/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detecte~ Stat: Comer - .......... '~' LabOratory No.~ 900 through 909 prOject: DP ..... RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ...... .... :. ;" ~90g' ID' DP-3-20 i' ugm/gm MRL,ugm/g .'.. ~.~,: .Carbontetrachloride . ND 0.1 .:" "..~ ~' Bromodichloromethane 'ND 'O..1 ~. Dibromochloromethane ND 0 - , .Bromoform , ND 0.2 ; 1,1,2,.2-Tetrachloroethane * ND O 1 ~. ~.'Tetrachloroethylene * 0.10 0.1 Method of Analysis: EPA '3810/8010 *Co-elute · MRL = Minimun Reporting Level ' ~...~:.., ugmYgm = micrograms per gram ND = Not de~ected i Laboratory No 900 through 909 Project" DP Project No., '.':~:~-RESULTS OF ANALYSIS . 8905,"'.ID: DP-3-15 ~ . : ugm/gm MRL,ug ".Benzene. .' ' '" 0 47 0 ' '~'~.~7_,._ :."./ :'Toluene .. : 0.10. 0. .::~.:':?...'~..:~._,~ EthYlbenzene_ .. . .. . ND 0. 1 ::.'~'-"'.'"/: "' o-XyXene ' ' . ' ND 0,1' ..Isopropylbenzene~ .'.. "': :;:.::~::~:'.TPH -: .... '~ .:. '. ~- '--:- "-. 430. 8906 ID: DP-3-20 u~m/~m . ~L,uzm/~m ~'. Benzene 0.54 .' Toluene .~ ~ 0.47 .I: :~"/.JsEthylbenzene .... ~ : . IsoprOpylbenzene ' ND . 0 . . - Method of Analvsis: California DOHS LUFT manual - MRL = Minimum Reporting Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per 'ND = Not detected ~-. .. !"".!',~. GeoPlus Consulting Services ,, ~. .. '(8o5) ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD PROJ~ ~AME~ ........... :~-:' PROJECT REPORT R~ULTS TO: c-7~o .~ , , , :" SURVEY SAMPLERS ~ ,',.~. · . . '.:: .,.:... 3./. -%'.~.:-:'.. ~:'.~ ~ 5C.~. )P-2- /o / . .~ - :... , ., "-'~0':~ " ~'~": - ~a , /' . ,. . :.. .. .-;... .. ' I ~'- ~EI~ ~R ~~RY BY: DAT~ / TI~ ' ~,. ,,. . ~ , , ,, Correct analysis of a site: is critical to the success of the remediation project. Evaluating the geologic setJ'ing to understand how the contamination spreads and knowing what the properties of the contaminant are makes' a complex subsurface '~,,-:'~.': contamination ~roblem treatable. Hydrocarbon solvents are a '.'.'!>~..,.~. :.u.. ...., :., ' important factors understood,, the most practically, used Soil" -' '" "i:''''' clean-up procedure for the volatile organic solvent would b,e the. vapor extraction method. ~ ~here the contamination zone is not extensive, excavation of the soil and transSer oS the soil to permitted landfilI is also an acceptable procedure. These two ~ cleanup alternatives, as well a~ a no action alternative, will b~ discussed further. 6'.1. Vapor The v'~apor .ex'traction method is ideally, suited to remove.volatile organic vapors.' Hydrocarbon'solvent's volatility make~ it very easy to remove it from ~oils, simply by dr'awing air through the soil. The vapor extraction system is designed to vaporize the volatil-e organics by pulling air through contaminated soil. Absorbed pollutants are volatilized and removed through a ventilation collection system. Vapors are then passed through an exhaust system where they are treated to meet local ........ regulatory limits. PAGE 14 .- GeoPIus The following speci/icaiions are /or a standard model using a regenerative blower'. Max. Flow 98 SCFM Max. Pressure 56" ' St~andard HP 1 . 0 HP · Air treatment i~ controlled by activated carbon drum~ . converter may be optionally instal'led per local air 'quaI.i.ty ~'"'~'-''v- 6. 1 . 1 . Effective Cost The co~t of equ'ippin9 the tank si~e %o adequately vent the contaminant plume would include the following: Equipment Hardware ~ 4,000 -"' Carbon canisters ~ $1 , 000/Unit 10 EEL Exhaust ~en~or 8, 0'00 Automatic Alarm 300 Technical Per~onneI 4,700 5 Cased ~ells 3,700 Coun~'~ Permi ts 500 Contingencies (10%) 3,000 TOTAL S34, 200 The %o.~aI cleanup cos~ in ~he application of ~he vapor e~trac~ion method is estimated in %he range of $34 Z00 . 6. 1 2. Treatment Time The e~timated time to reduce the contaminant t0 acceptable levels is 9 to 12 months. Excavation and Transfer Method PAGE 15 GooP I.~s --' I t. has b'een projected tha. t the vertical extent of the contaminant plume, does not ext, end below 25' in depth with diameter of 10' The total vol!ume of ~his cylinder shaped plume was calculated to be 1964~ cu. ft. (73 cu. Yd.) . Relatively, the contaminant plume is not extensive allowing :. the excavation of the soil and itransfer to a permitted landfill to be technicall¥ feas:ible. · , ' , ' '.. . ......... _ ~. .~ . ,:,! .... : .. . .:,:.: ~.. -: . ,.' _ .:,.~ -':,, ..... <: .... -' . -... -.:.<~, ?.-j,., , ~ . . ' ,'~. ..... 'i :.. -:,~'::~:5:~-,::~.[?_'-.,'-.-.:-. ........ ..:.. .... .-' .: .:::,:.,.'- ....... - .... .-:: ".:--~-~,~ '.:,.?.:.,, . ' ..... :~-'~ ~,'?.:? ..... , ....... county Planning '" ' ...... .rev · and approval: to the 'department..?:'A ' . ::,'.:-:?".:: :"-'.. :'":.:"::"'~.. preliminar~ design of the pit for the purpose of this report would be excavated by a bench cut method 'to a maximum depth .. . :... ,. ~ . ::of 2~' The-total amount: of soil removed is estimated_., ,~:., :''- 2 SOO Cu ft (73 cu.yd.) or 130 tons. of soil wouI'd be hauled ~o a permitted landfill. The clean ~oil would be backfilled into the pit 'upon completion of the 9roj'ec~. 6. 3. I . Effective Co~t ' The di~po~aI fee for ~oiI ~ontaminated with p~t. roleum derived ..product~ i~ $80./ton. Assuming that 130 .. ~ons of contaminated ~oil i~ ~o' be [ran~ferred, the di~po~aI fee amount~ to ~0,400. ' Adding the ~i~e excavation; transportation and technical per~onneI fee~ of approximately $10,600, the total clean up co~t by excavation i~ e~timated upward' in the range of J21 000 6 . 3. 2. Trea-tmen~ Time The estimated, ti'me to excavate and remove the FAGEi 1~ .' GeoPIus cOnt'a'minant and restore the' location is 8 to ~0 weeks (Thi~ does not include the time necessary for .a civil engineer's development of a plan nor for the :county to. review and. approve that plan).' (' & 4.' No Action Alternative . -.. ~!._ A favorable relationship of porosity and permeability 5 '. '""~'-~" has allowed the migration of the contaminant plume to a .: [~{i~":/' f(~'.'~[discontinuing the recharge of the plume. · It is -spe~ulated .,! .... ", · .. that the continued transport downward of 'the Plume would be slow. .The clayey silty soils at the site restricts the ~! downward migration of the plume. · ,.,.';,. , · ~igure ~.2 shows that the water table is encountered at a depth of 220" . With a vertical distance o~ between the base of: the plume and the water table, the environmental risk to the wa%er table appears t6 be remote. In a no action alternative it is our opinion that the plume migration would be relatively stable. The chemical analyses show that the lighter solven't volatile organic constiue'nts are only slightly greater than the minimum! reporting levels suggesting significant volatilization, in the soil may have already occurred:. &. ~. 1 . Effective Cost · ' The cost of implementing a ho.action approach is no doubt the least expensive of ail the alterntaiv, es to .a. PAGE 171 GeoP us contaminated site clean up. Such minimal cost ,of a no action plan may ,include a future test and evaluation process of the plume to recalcula~.e, t'he risk of the no action al ternat ive . This cost may be in the amount of $5, 000 . 6. 4. 2. Treatment Time " : In the sit~ assessment it wa's: not determined 'whether bacterial population was sub~tantially present and capable : PAGE 18 : GeoPlus Risk a,~sessment is a logical analytical approach to evalu;ate and estimate the probable health e.f fect$ or adverse 'environmental impacts of a particular contaminated site, the mitigation -~ technologies, cost effectiveness and public perception. If the ,. ; ri'~k is considered not significant, a no action alternative is · J'/practicable. . If the risk is considere4 significant, remediaI'~;~': ::~<:Y~'~ ,".alternativ,~s are selected which are technically feasible ,,--.,eliminate tlhe contaminant to a nonsignificant risk. Ri~ ,, ~:': "?l-: :.:'~:-' ~- ' "::~--'c:?:: .,--.' assessment is used ~o evaluate alternative strategies and to select that approach which achieves the optimum balance between 'reduction of risk, -implementation costs, and ,other factors 'of concern in the specific pr. eject situation. ? 1. Comparison of Treatment ~ethofls The following chart summarizes the remedial action alternatives of this specific site. ~ ~' COMPARISON OF TREATMENT METHODS' : Vapor ~ : No : Extraction : Excavation : Action Treatment 'Time 1 yr. 2 mos. .~ Z0-100 yrs. Environmentally Safe moderate moderate uncertain T. ransfered to .~. :~ Another Environ Yes Yes . No Capital Invest. $34,200 $21,000 None Cost Per Cu Yd "~' of Contaminant , $468.~? $287.67 None :~. . .~ · -. , · , · ~, ., ,,.: ]~:'< .. ., ~ 7.g. Risk Management In review of the treatment methods, reliance on the no action alternati~ve would require a long '~reatment period, vapor extraction would be Very expensive, and requires extended time and use of the site amd soil excavation and transfer is also ezpensive. Considering only the implementation costs and the treatment time, the selected alternative to clean up the site would be excavation. Ail the treatment methods, must go through the risk management process and a recalculation of the risk after mitigation· The risk management is Critically effected by the environmental impact risk assessment; in other words, is · PAGE 20 ~ GeoP[us :, t~'e specific site's risk considered significan[t? ~]ecause the source is removed, the presence of the' cla~ey siI,ty soils at the si'te and a water, table, of .220' , it is our ......... ~- ................ ~:- ...... : ........ .~..~o.p i. nio.n.?t..ha::t.:.:.:~he-.-da.ta-~.-su.g 9 e.s::t s?:-:tha.t:-..,t-.he.-~env i.r~o.nmen ~ a.I ._.r.i sk ........ ::-? ~o human heaI~h and ~afe%y and ~o adverse environmen~aI impac~ is not signif'ican~ at this site and a no action '~ alternative is re~sonable and p.racticaI in remediating thi~ ~ _... . . ...., .. ,-',~,~ . PAGE 21 ~ ,GeoPIus Deife!'s Paint is an operating paint supply company serving .- ....... ._the-a-uto,.-'home:---a-nd' 'i~ndus-t--ri'al ~'ma:-r-k-et-s .... 1050 Alta Vista, Bakersfield, California. Four tanks were removed .. -~' in 14a¥, 1788. The found below a tank identified as Tink_ 4. Three borings Were ' ~.~?~J~d.n.hLl .e~d..-~n d .sa mp:i.' e,s~. :-r'e:-t r:'i=e,v:ed :':';?' .s:' lateral extent of the contaminant at the tank ~i~e Chemical ....... ' ...... 25' d~p ~nd 10' in diamot~r. ~th th~ r~ovaI of th~ ~urc~ and ~:~':'<"' '~? considered relatively stable Transport downward to potenti"alI : ~' ~ aontaat th, wator tabI~ at a d~th of 220 i~ r~mot~. Th~ dat'~ ~u~t~ that th~ ~nvironm~ntal ri~k to human h~alth and ~af~tg :'.' and to adverse environmental impacts is not significant .at thi~ site and a no aation alternat'iv~ in r~a~onabl~ and praatiaaI in remediating thi~ ~pecifi.a contaminant plume. PAGE 22 GeoPIus SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND WORKPLAN OUTLI'NE ; ' 1030 ALTA VISTA BAKERSFIELD -KERN COUNTY ' .... for Di~feI' s Pain[ GeoPIus Consul~ing Services lq00 gaston Drive ~ Suite 152 Bak~rsfield, CaI. ifornia 93309 ,(805) 327-1122 January 4, 1~89 GeoPlus Consulting Services (805) 327-1122 CERTIFIED MAIL #P710218384 ' RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ~ ENvISONMENTAL HEALT[' Kern County Health Department Bakersfield, California 93301 Attention: Hs. Janis Lehman Environmental Health Specialist Re: 'Site Characterization and ~orkplan Deif. el's Paint 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: On behalf of Deifel's Paint we submit the referenced report for your review and consideration. At your request -we would be Dleased to meet with you and discuss the workDIan further. ~e look forward to your approva~ of the Dian in order that we may begin our evaluation Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Thomas ~. Ladd 'T~L'ms~ enclosure cc: Dei.fel's Paint w/encI. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 · INTRODU~TI ON 1 . 1 . Purpose 2. CERTIFICATION .... - · - .: .. . - ' _: .... '-.:: :f::?, ..... 3. 1. Faci. lit. y Identificat ion -- ::::::~::-,~ - 3. 1. 1. Facility 3 1 2 F~cility Owner 3 1 3 Owner AddreJs . . . 3. 1.4. Owner Contact 3. 1 .5. Facility Location 3.Z. Description of Facility and History 3.3. Underground S~orage Tank 3 3 1. Tank Description and Use · ' 3 3 Z. Age ,, 3 3 3. Soil Contamination 3 3 4. Tank Inventory and Monitoring 3 3 5. Tank Repair · 3.3 6. Past .Spills or Leaks 4. SITE CHARACTER'IZATION 4. 1. Land Resources 4.. 1 . 1 . Topography and Physiography 4.1.2. Soil, Straiigraphy and Structure 4. 2. Water Resources , 4. 2. 1. Surface Hydrology 4.2.2. Ground Water · 4.2.3. '~Perched Ground Water S.l.1. Location of Borings, Depth and Rationale' 5.1 i. Preliminary Site Assessment HEALTH AND SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS LISTING OF FIGURES' F cure 3.1 Facility Location ..... .: ...... ; .................... : ............ - ..... '= ....... - ..... Ba k e r.s.f, i e Id ~.C i t.y..Ma.p... =~._ . .:=~-.. :,. :., ................ Scale: 1" = 0.t2 ....................miles. Figure 4.1 Topographic Map Showing Drainage of Tank Facility Vicinity ',~' Oil Center Quadrangle :-'~ Scale: $." = 9-,000' '" ,... .'.,:: .. ...... ~::" . .... .. '.:.:..' · ., . .. ,,... .., . Figure '4.3 Ground Water Elevation : Figure 4.4 Ground ~ater Quality (Unconfined) Figure 4.5 Depth to Perched Ground ~ater Figure 5. I Location of Proposed Borings Scale: 1" = 30' Figure 5.2.A Soil Anal~si~ ~10'11 ID' S-4-2' Depth ~igure 5.2.B Soil Analysi~ ~1012 ID: 5-4-6' Depth Figure 5.Z.C ~oiI Analy~i~ ~'i013 ID: S-4-10' Depth · SITE CH.ARACTERIZATION AND WORKPLAN OUTLINE DEIFEL'S PAINT · 1030 ALTA VISTA 1. INTRODUCTION This report and .information package has been prepared for DiefeI's Paint by Thomas W. Ladd, of GeoPIus Consulting Services, for the purpose of allowing the Kern County Hca th Department to review a site characterization of an area . 'b~low which had been locat'ed an underground storage tank (facility) operated by DiefeI's Paint. Four tanks were removed from'the site in May, 1988. Analysis of soil samples retrieved during the preliminary site assessment showed Contamination to be present below a tank, identified as Tank 4, 'that contained solvent· DiefeI's Paint ha,s requested GeoPlus Consulting Services to assess the facility by' additional field investigations to pursue the concerns identified in the preliminary site assessment. Thi~ information package reviews in summary the site characterization and describes the workplan in order 'ito identify whether or not' major environmental liabilities e~ist. PAGE 1 GeoP l'us Pain January 1989 .... Z. CERTIFICATION ._I, Thomas W. Ladd,· living at 249 El Cerrito Drive, Bakersfield, I.:-am a graduate of the Un. iversity of the Pacific, Stockton, .'California, wi:th a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology, '197Z, · and a graduate of the University of Arizona, Tucson, irizona,'with a Master of Science Degree in Geology, 1975. ' I am a Registered Geologist, License Number 003568, cer(ified by the State of California, Board of Registration of Geologists and . Geophysicists. i am a Registered Environmental Assessor Registration Number REA-00631, certi fied bY the 5tare California, Environmental AffairS Agency. I am a consultant, DBA GeoPlus Consulting Services and President of Tetra Oil Company, a California corporation with a business office at . 1400 gaston Drive, Suite 152, Bakersfield, California, 93309. I have been requested by Diefei's Paint to prepare this report and information package for their reference and account. Neither GeoPlus Consulting Services nor Tetra 0ii Company nor any .,,, of its officers, directors, staff or associates have any / PAGE 2 GeoPius Pain January 1989 .corporate, personal or fiduciary interest in Diefel's Paint or. an}, of its affiliates or subsidiaries, or the properties which are the subject of' this information. I certify under penalty of law that I have personally ezamined and am familiar with the-information submitted in.this report and information'package and ali attachments; and that ba~.ed on my th~ iniormation, I. b~li~v~ that th~' information and complete. I' am awar~ that th~r~ are significant p~nalti~s for submittin~ iaI~ information, inaludin9 th~ 9o~ibility oi iin~ and imprisonment. January q, 1989 PAGE ~ GeoPI'us Diefe! '~ Pai January 1989 3.1. Facility Identification 3. 1.~. Facility Name: Di'efel's Paint 3. 1.2. Facility Owner; 3. 1.3. Owner Address '" ' ~ ' '~. 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield, Californla 93305 3.1.4. Owner Contact Bob.Hathaway (805) 3,25-72011 3. 1.5. Facility Loaation: 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield, California 93305 DiefeI's Pain~ is located at the north'west corner of Alta Vista and Kentucky Streets in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, S~ate of Cai i forn'ia (Figure ~. 2. Description of Facility and History Diefei's Paint i~ an operating paint supply company ~erving O ~he auto, home and industrial market~.' 3.3. Underground Storage Tanks 3.3.1. Tank Descrip%ion~ Xnd U~es Located at the facility were 4 underground ~{orage PAGE 4 ' CeoPIu~ Diefai ' xin% January 1989 workplan is identified.as Tank 4. Tank 4 was a 500, gallon tank used fi0r waste solvent storage in the operations of processing and mixing paint . The age of Tank 4 is unknown at the time of report preparation. ~=ound. Labo=ato=~ =esu~ts of the so~ he~ow Tank ,4 showed contamination to be 9=esent. 3.3.4. Tank ~nventory and ~nvento=~ and mon~to=~ng ~ata of Tank 4 ~s unknown at the t~me of th~s. =ego=t · flepa~= on Tank 4 and associated 9~9~ng ~s unknown the t~me of th~s =epo=t 3.3.6. Past Sp~s or Leaks ~nc~de'nts of 9asr sp~s or ~aks are unknown at the ~me of th~s =epo=t PAGE 5 GeoPlus Diefei ~ P~zn' January [987 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 4.1. Land Resources 4.1.1. 'Topography and Physiography ~ The f.aciiity is located in the north central area of the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern (Figure 3.1). The topography o e Is wi Iat area with a gradient of 40 feet per mile to the south-southwest (Figure 4.1.2. Soil, Stratigraphy and Structure The soils of the region are classified on the basis of their relative permeability. Soil permeabiIities govern the infiltration rates of the soils which, in turn, influence the depth to which fluids reach in a given period of time. Other factors affecting the depth of infiltration are rainfall duration and volume. %;ithout detailed' evaluation of the site area the soils in the Vicinity of the facility probably range f'rom permeable to relatively impermeable soils. Permeable soils are medium-textured soils g._eneraIiy developed on recent alluvia! fans, flood basins, and' 'other secondary deposits having either undeveloped o'r 0nly slightly developed soil profiles. Modera~ely permeable soils are medium-to-fine-teKtured soils'developed on recent and older alluvium, marine and nonmarine terrace depo's'its, PAGE 6 GeoPlus flood basins. , and other[i secondary deposits. In many cases these soils have moderate accumulations of clay or hfgh concentrations of lime 'in the subsoils. Relatively ..... ~'-i'-mp:e r m'e~a-b-t:e-'--:--s:o-i?~l:s--'a~r.~e~-'-~s::im~i:'l:a~r ~::i-ri~t~-~"~ t u:r'e~-'*~"n.'d~' -d ~:'9:e'I."o:pme n't: .t-o-:--:" ._-::-: -_.:~- the moderately permeable soils.. These soils may contain excessive salinity or concentrations of alkali in the · surface o,z subsurface horizons,'-reducin~ pe'rmeability. :- . .- i. '../: ' ..-- ,- : , . .;~ . . .- .~,.,, . .: -: .~ ;' ..., , . . ' 'cemented hardpans in the subsurface, horizons which are " · :. .- .. .. relativelF impervious to the downward movement of fluids· ~ · A generalized description of the stratigraphy includes the Recent-Pleistocene section of unknown thickness of surface alluvium which grades into undifferentiated Kern River-ghinac nonmarine sands and silts. This section of continental origin consists.of buff and green ~and with and silt and has a maximum thickness, of about 3,500 feet. Below the .Chanac formation, impact from the facilit~ contamination is remote. These formations include Mi. oaene marine sediments, Oligocene continental sands and Jurassic basement . Structurally, the formations in the facility area incline to the southwest. Faulting has been observed in the older formations by the'drilling of the numerous oil wells' in the nearby Kern R'iver Oil Field to the north. 4.2. Water Resources 4.2.1. Surface Hydrology PAGE 7 GeoPIus · . flows over the fiat. Percolation into the subsurf, ace is prevented by concrete and asphalt covered surfaces of city the year and usually occurs only following infrequent intense precipitation event:s during the winter month~.. .. There i~ no major natural drainage . . Canal.. Figure 4.1 show~ the facility location relative to · . the local drainage, in 'thi~ area. ' ~ ' 4. Z, 2, .. Ground ~ater The alluvium i~ the prinicipal aquifer in the region where the facility is located. In' the facility vicinity, %hi~ aquifer is found at a depth of ~ Z20 feet (Figure 4.2). The gr.ound water in this aquifer i~ Ia'rg'ely unconfined, buth there may De areas where partial or local confinement may occur. Historicall~, the Kern River has. been the major ground water re'charge source. The ground water movement in the facility area is southeas.~ward (Figure 4'3). water~ produced from thi~ zone have a total di~olved ~olid~ (TDS) concentration of ~ 500 mg/1 (Figure 4.4). 4.2.3. Perched Ground ~ate~ The depth to perched ground water ~ shown on Figure 4.5. The~e perched ground water accumulat'ion~ "are the re~ul t of impermeable shallow.clay beds restrictin~ the ,, downward percolation of waters. The perched ground waters PAGE 8 GeoPlus Diefel ' "':in% January 1789 are g:enerall¥ much saltier than the ground wa.ret underneath, making them undesirable. At the facilit¥, per'ched ground water may. be encounter within 1S' to g0' of the surface. PAGE 9 ' 'GeoPlus Paint i January 5. PROPOSAL FOR IDENTIFYING CONTAMINATION PLUME 5. 1.1. Location of Borings, Depth and Rationale It is proposed that three vertical ~est borings be drilled to the total depth o.f 40 feet at 10-foot: radial is chosen as the estimated depth to adequately access and evaluate the vertical liability of conta~mination. ~hould .' on-site evaluation indicate the p.resence of contamination and the borings have not penetrated the base .of .the plume, additional footage will be drilled. The fluid infiltrati'on i~ by gravity and capillary diversion. The postulated, contaminant would-move in a radial pattern and therefore the proposed boring plan of 10-foot radial spacing (Figure 5. 1) is' also believed adequate to evaluate the facility in. order to assess the 'IateraI extent of the potential solvent leaks. - Should additional borings be recommended by on-'site evaluation, these borings will be drilled to expand the boring ~lan radius by stepout locati'ons of 10-foot-intervals. 5.1.2. Sample Collection Procedures A state certified hazar'dou's waste .-laboratory will perform the analysis of borings. SM~ Laboratory, 9155 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, is proposed as. the analytical· PAGE i0 GeoP l'us Diefei ' iht January 1989 <.., laboratory [o receive the field samples. Ail samples will be obtained b'y laboratory personnel or. individuals -knowIedgeable of E.P.A. Policy No. $%4846, sampiing ............. ~., _-~ =~,-. procedures. 5. 1..3. On-site Evaluation Preliminary evaluation o soil contamination will be ·' ' performed on-site by the use of & volatile organic C~rbon ,.., ~, ~,~, An~Iy~ie~i ~erfor~ed by the designated ~n~iy~ed for ~on~tituen~ representative ~tored ~ ~pe~ified by EPA ~, ~,~. S~pIe Description ~egi~ter~d G~olo~i~. The foIIowing ~t~nd~r~iz~ wrf~f~n description i~ recommended. - Soil , ~ediment or rock type.. - CoIor and Texture - Cement and/or ma~ri~ materiaI~ -' - 'Sedimentary Structure~ - Porosity and permeability ; : PAGE 11 GeoPiu$ Diefei' I' ~nt January 1989 .'-.[':,: 5.1.6 Preliminary Site 'Assessment Figure 5'2 (A, B, & C) show fhe soil analyses below the tank at two feet, six feet and. ten feet, respect'ivelg. $.2. Water Sampl. ing ~ ; : : It' is proposed the water samplling of }viciini'ty water WelI's ..' s~ali not be. performed at this time. ~' '-'. ' In order to lessen the risk of:,encounterfng perched ground -. water in the area of highest potentfaI of contamination, the following drilling procedure is prop'osed, 1. First test boring shall be the perimeter hole located 30' [rom the center o[ the tank center., This shall minimize the drill contact with the contamination.Plume and test for the depth of the perched ground'water. 2. If perched ground water is not encounte'red, continue. .' soil sampling as outlined in Paragraph 5. 1..1. 3. If perched ground water is encountered, discontinue drilling deeper, backout, of hole, and grout. Cent&act Kern Coun't~ Health Department in order, to change drilling program for possible monitoring well installation. -' 4. Drill and sample remaining test bor'ings to the. i°p of .perched ground water. DO not penetrate perched ground water without Kern County Health Department aPProval. PAGE 12 GeoPiu~ .. . ~p~y .. ,.. ,, ~'.. ~: ' · fence . . ..:;. · ,,.~'. O.ie~e.l's Paint Comp~n~ Figure ~. 1 ,Lobation. of Proposed Bortnq~, . Figure 5.2.A Soil Analysis : i~ .,-' #1011 ID: S-4-2' Depth - Laloor'a~ory No. 1005 through 1015 Project No. 29018 - - ~ .... :' ~ , ;~i :~ 'j~' I~ ~ L-BI.J ~ylbenzene - 20 : 0.2 t , . . ': s-BuCylDenzene ' ND 0 2 - ~' ~' ~ ' , hlorobenzene ND 0.2 ' . ~ ~j I, 2--Oichioro~enzsns. l. S O. 2 " ~etno~ of Analysis: E~A 50~0/8020" ) ' ugm/~Jm : mioFogFam per 9ta~ ,, NO :, Noc deCecte~ j.~. ~ . ": ~::~'- ... J f, ' ; Figure 5.Z. -~o~I Analysis #1012 ID: $-4-6' DePth. J ' , '-'~' Ei,nzene ' ''. '..u. gm~gm MOL,.ugm/gm ~?;~:.~:~.{.;-. m-Xylene [44 .10 . ". -.:~; 1 sopropylDenzene 231 10 ' Styreoe ~ ~ n-PropylDeAzene 106 lO "- :-~ 955 10 ' ~;~' 't-~u ty tDenzene ~25 10 :'~'~'~ .',' .... i 2 4-Trimethylbenzene 456 10 . :~-~ · n-Butylbenzene i ,'480 10. ;.. Ch~ o~o~enzene . '~;: ; ~ i 4-Oica'loroDenzene ND ~0 i, ~-Dicnlorobenzene ND ~0 ~- I, 2-D~c~oroOenzene I~etho~ o~ Analysis: EP~ 5030/8020 ' MQL'= Fl~nzmun Quanti~ation Level ND = NOC Oe~ected~ ::~ ~"Can "~' · ........................ -' Figure 5. 2 ~oil Analysis #1013 ID: "- E~hylDenzena ND J o-Xylene 127 10 > t-Butyl~enzene 151 10 s~Bu tYlDenzene ND ' 10 - I, 2,4-Trime thylBenz,ene 296 10 ~< n-Bu tyi~enzene 740. 10 2, ~-Senzofuran ND 10 .~ CI~ loroDenzene ND 10 i, ~-Dichloro~enzene ND I0 : 1., 5-Dichlorobenzene ND 10 ~ ,2-Dicnloro~enzene ~ 56 10 . Methoa of An~ly~i~: EPA 5030/8020 ~,. MQL~ = H.~nimun Quantitation Level u~m/~m = ,.icro~ram per Cram ND = Nog de~cteO . · {~' DiefeI ~ Pain ? }" Janluary 1989 HEALTH AND ~AFETY CONSlDERATIOIXI$ F~deral OSHA procedures shall be follow~d to protect the health and ~afe%~ of workers carrying· out the proposed workplan. PAGE 13 GeoPIus ? 5610 DISTRICT BLVD., SUITE 106 groundWater resources inc. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93313' General Engineering Contractor Class A License No1520768 November 17~ 1988 Ms. Janis Lehman Kern county Health Department Environmental Health Division 141~ Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Tank Abandonment (#A680-14) Diefel's Paint Company Dear Ms, Lehman, Enclosed are the analysis results' for the soil samples that 'were retrieved at 2 ' and ]6' below-the 'disp'enser pad that was associated with the ~ tK~k~i]~A-~'"~'~-~' --~'~-e~ from the Diefel ' s Paint Company site o~; May 1257i!;~,98:8 .idh~r~ P~]r~{'it #~680-14. The- soil samples we're taken on'".N0vember :;7, 198.8 , usin'~ an e.xtendable hand auger. The So'il was plaged in teflon capped glass jars, chilled,":and immediately transported under chain of custody to SMC .Laboratory. ..-.'..'". '" . { :i:, ' Ii' you have any ques%ions 'or ~eq~'ire anyr ~f~urther information, please feel-free to call ~5-7700. Wer'~. ., truly yours; Thomas :5. Hele Project Hana~er Encls. .. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 9383, B.AKERSFIELD, CA 93389 (805) 835-7700 OTHER LOCATIONS: LOS ANGELES (213) 724-3147 · PLACENTIA 1714} 528-2415 gte fen~ ' L~ TANK ~3 (500 qallon dle~el) ' .. PAINT .. no p~ '~ TANK '4 C500 gallon T ~o~Pe~r Rad (~ks r~ed ~25~8) r g~ omW N - ~ SAHPLE L~ATI~ SCALE STREET '(~t 2' ~n~ 6') PLATE 6ROUNDWATER RE,SOURCE DIEFEL'S PAINT COFIPANY INDUSTRI ES-( 805)83;5-7700 10;30 ALTA VISTA ] envtronmentoi/Oeot~'hnloal services I~AKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Project NumDer ........ 29018 PLOT PLAN . - 0 V SMC' Laborato Analytical Chemistry Client Name: .Groundwater Resources, Inc. Address : 5610 District Bivd , Suite 106 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date samples receiyed : 11-07-88 Date analysis .completed: 11-14-88 Date of 'report : 11-14-88' Laboratory No. 2477 and 2478 Project No. 29018 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS #2477 ID: G22 2' Below Dispenser ugm/gm MRL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 .Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND 0.1 · m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 'Isopropylbenzene ND .0.1 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 TPH (Diesel) ND 10' Method of Analysis: California DOHS LUFT manual MRL = Minimum Reporting Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer 3155 Pegasus Drive · · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 Laboratory No. 2477 and 2478 '~ Project No. 29018 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS #2478 ID: G-6 6' Below Dispenser ugm/gm MRL,ugm/gm ~ Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 . .Ethylbenzene .............................. · .... ' ND -. 0.1 . p-Xylene m-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.! TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 TPH (Diesel) ND 10 Method of Analysis: California DOHS LUFT manual MRL = Minimum Reporting Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer- · . ? · .............. . ... :,-. j : .. , .' ~ . - ,, '* Rel~quis~d. , bg .... :(Signature) ~/TJme. :Recetv,ed,bg :(sgnata'e).. ;:¢;~*.~ Re~.Jished. ,, . :" ~.'bt.':(Stgnature),,'::.. Da!e/Time. ~_(Si~,ture) -- _?,~?':~.'~.,'~-... ~ . . ~ ~ . :'. . . .. Ii Rel~qutshed.bu:_ ----- -~, -:(Sianat~e~ DaCe/Time. k: :Recei~ed,fo~ Laborat~g bU.: Date/T~e Remark.'" ' · ";' ' ' ' Slate of California-~Health and Welfare Ager~[ Department of Health Service~ Form Approved OMB'No. 2050---0039 (Expin~[J-88) Toxic Substances Control Division Please for use elite Sacramento, California WASTE MANIFEST ~1"!1~'1~'1'' I'"'1"1 :'1 'Zl I I I J .: o! . ' is not required by Federal law; ',' 3..Ge~eral°r's'Nam~nd~ ~/ ~ ~":/~ Mqi/~g/~/Addres~ ~ ~. . A. S[at~Manif~t D~ent Number -':: . .. · .: .. . : B. Slate General~a ID ' .. ::.:: .. 5. Transporter I Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number C. State Tr~spo~s ID. 7. Transpo~er 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number · E. Slate Transpo~er's ID 9. ~esigaaled Fac I ty Name ~ S te..A~dreas I0.. US EPA ID Number G., Slate FaCt ily'a ID ~[~,~ 0~:' co:,~cr~ ~,' ' ' .' '-.. ' ' . :~:':':l:Vi'['l' 1' / I I I I '1 I I I' r I '.-: ......... - · . 12. Containers [ 13. Tots · 11. US~T Description(Including Proper ~ipping Name. ~zard Class. and ID Number) ~ Quami~ ~: ' - ' ' NO. Type ' .' IWW/Vt ~' ." - ' · '·" ' · "'" ' .- ' ' · .· ' ' ' ' "- c'' ' ' ''' 'I'l I'ill / d. ' ' / ' : · ' : · ' " ' , ,~"~' I I ! !'! J. Additional Descriptions for Materials Liot~ ~e ,., · . ... - -.. :- :' :-':.". ~ ....-.'. '..~.' .: .. K. Handling C~e8 ' . ~-, .. : - : .'.. ~'-.''~:r ''': : ': '' -.': '":''" .':':'' ' '~':: ":::" ''':"':''':' a." =' ' · ' . b. "",''. " ' ':~ "' " _: .. ~k~ .. :.~.X'V.?':' .:<:' .-:..',':.}: ~.::.'~:.:~. :' .:'....:..:'.:::..:::.:"::-.:~:::.'.~:/~:A?:::..:/,:?:V'}:.".}~::.~>::./:I ~. -.-.. :.:... ~.,..:. A..:.~:.(:.:::.: :..,:.:-:'::..v. ~.::~:-..:?~-..~:.'::...... ,.'>..: :~ :'~::~:::.,L.':...":~.: .?-' ~::: .~:-?~,'.,...:' :'I ' ::~.': "- ': ' ': '~ '';~, '~- :::?'"-":"-?.' :' "' ~: '" . . , ./~:.- .... · . .., -:.. -? :. :::- .- . . <.-. -.?.:.::.- ,..~ '.:. : ..... - -.~. ' . ..' ..,- . .' .- : :,::; ::. 15. Special Handling Iqslrucliona and Additional Inlormation ;: '~ ,' ':' ' ' . ' ~ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of Ibis consignment are lully and accurately described above by proper'shipPing name and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transpo~ ~y highway according to applicable international and.national oovernment regulations. ,' I! I am a large quantity Generator, I ce~ify that I have a pro'ram in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste Generated to the deoree I have determined to ~e economically practicaDle and that I have selected the practicable metho~ of treatment, storage, or ~isposal cuffently available to me which minimize8 the present and future threat to human heallh and tAe environment; OR, if I am a small quantity oene~tor,'l have made a. good leith etto~ lo minimize my waste oeneration and select the be~t waste manage~t melhod.~hat is .available to me and that PfintedlTy~d Name I 81unalure , ~ ~)" ... ~ [ /' / 17. Transpo~e~ 1 Acknowled~eman~ of Receipl of ~atedals - , ITy~ Name . ~ Month Oay Yea~' 1~, Tra~spo~el 2 Ack~owled~eme~l ol Receipl ol Male~iall Printed~Typed Name I 8ignatule . Month Day: 'Year I !11111' 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or.Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manliest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name I Signature Mont.h..D~ Year I DHS 8022 A (I/87) · ' INSTRUCTIONS ON THE BACK EPA 8700--22 YELLOW: GENERATOR RETAINS (Rev. 9-86) Previous editions are obsolete. ' ' I ~ /RECYCLING, INC.,y/ TANK DISPOSAL FORM 2202 'S(~uth' Milliken Avenue · Date: (714) 947-2888 ,. DE~INATION: 'SPECtAL INTRUSIONS: ~ME OU~ ~ Se~ices Rendered Cost ~ Disposal ~e 1~.~ TANKS REC~VED ~. GAL~NS ~PE N~ ~NS ~AL ~tensive ~ading Time 1~.~ F' ~ ~ D ~4 ~ Fiberglass Tank Disposal ~ ~ Tank ~.~' 1~. 12 ft. Bobtail Disposal F~ 2~.~ / 2~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.32 TOTAL CHARGES $ ~ 7~ D D 3.~ ~ ~ ~ 3.~ ~ ~ ~ D 3~2 All fees incurred are per load unless specified. 1~ D D 4.~ Te~ms are net 30 days from date ot lnvoic~ 1~ D ~ 4.~ Contractor's signature represents acceptance of.terms for payment, and confirms that tank NO. OF TAN~ ~AL N~ ~NS removal complies with State law~ ~ CE~I~CA/E OF TANK DISPO~L I DE~RU~ION THIS IS ~ CE~I~ THE RECEI~ AND ACCE~ANCE OF THE TANK(S) ~ SPECIFIED ABOV[ ALL MATERIA~ SPECIFIED HAVE BEEN ~MPL~ELY DE~ROYED FOR SCRAP ~RPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR COPY ATER RESOURCES C'ONTROL DIVISION .OF WATER QUALITY UST CLEANUP PROGRAM .. SITE SPECIFIC QUARI'ERLY REPORT 06'114189 CONTRACTOR NO; 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: L SUBSTANCE: 12031 SITE NO: 140010 FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y' SITE NAME: DEIFEL'S PAINT DATE REPORTED: 09722~'8:8 ' ADDRESS: 1030 ALTA VISTA DATE CONFIRMED: 09/22/88 CITY/ZIP ' ~AKERSFIELD 93305 CATEGORY: L ~ SITE STATUS cO~TR~CT CASE TYPE: U RESPONSE: ~ R~ SEARCH: S OATE UNDERWAY: -OATE CONPLETED: t PRELIMINARY U DATE UNDERWAY: 01109/89 DATE COMPLETED: ASSESSMENT RB. EDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: & ? DArE COMPLETED: INVESTIGATION REMEDIAL ACTION: DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED: POST~ REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED: · ACTION MONITORING ENFCRCEMENT ACTION TYPE: DATE TAKEN: TAKEN =-~ RAP 'REQUZRED DATE APPROVED: 'J CASE CLOSEd: OATE CLOSED: ;'~ DATE EXCAVATION STARTED~ REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: :'~{ RESPONSZBLE PARTY ~i CONTACT NAME:' BOB HA'THANAY ~j COMPANY NA~E: DEZF'EL CORPORATZON . ADDRESS: 1030 ALTA V~STA - ..~ CZTY/STATE: BAKERSFIELD CA 93305 ,,~ GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (80S) 861-3502 STEVE McCALLEY "~" "~'~ * R E.S-0'U R C E M?~;?A.G'E;:M~ N T A G E N C Y Director DEPARTMENT OE~-ENVI~NMENTAL August 22, 198.9 Bob Hathaway Deifel Corooration '1030 Al'ta "Vista Bakersfield, CA 93305 Dear Mr. Hathaway: r ' This .is to inform you that this Department has completed the review of the site characterization results and mitigation options explored for the.Deifel's Paint facility located at 1030 Alta Vista Drive in Bakersfield, California. Based on .the information provided in the report, it appears 'that a significant threat to groundwate= does not presently exist. The contamination identified may in the future pose an environmental problem caused by hydrological forces. In order to prevent any further migration of the identified contamination an impermeable barrier (asphalt/ConCrete) must be placed above the former tank location. Should you have any questions regarding the above matter, please feel free to contact me at (805) 861-3636. Str~cerely, /Joe Canas Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program Jc: Jg 5610 DISTRICT BLVD., SUITE 106 groundwater resources inc. BAKERSFIELD, CALIF(DRNIA 93313 · General Engineering Contra~or · ~,~ ~ ~ ClassALicenseNo. 520768 June 9, 198.8 Ms. Janis Lehman -:Kern Count'y'Heal%h 'Department ................. ' .... ' .......... Division of Environmental Health ' Hazardous Materials Section 1415 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Diefel's paint Company Permit #A680-14 Dear Ms. Lehman, Four tanks ,were removed from the Diefel's Paint Company site at 1030 Alta Vista in Bakersfield, California on May 25, 1988, under Kern County Health Department Permit #A680-[4 and 'Bakersfield Fire Department approval. The tanks were decontaminated on site and then' hauled to AMR in Ontario for recycling. The resul~in~ rinsate was t~anspor%ed under manifest to Gi'bson Oil for disposal. The soil samples were taken beneath the center of each. tank. 'This was done because all of the tanks were approximately the same length (%he size of the 500 gallon ~ank). It was the ~iame%er of each tank that changed to accommodate the larger fluid volumes. The dispensers were located approximately 5.' from the east end of tank #2. They were sitting on a concrete pad that was 2"thick and attached to the buildin&. No soil samples were taken in this area because it is still covered by con'~rete and i.t was felt that the samples taken beneath tank #2 were Within an acceptable d.is~ance of the dispensers An. additional sample was taken at lO feet beneath tank #4 in an attempt to define the vertical extent .of contamination. The samples indicate fha% contamination is still present at lO feet but the levels ha~e decreased from 6 feet. -MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 9383, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 [805') 835-7700 OTHER LOCATIONS: LOSANGELES (2131 724-3147 PLACENTIA (714) 528-2415 Ms. Janis Lehman Kern County Health Department DiviSion of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Section June 9, 1988 Page Two Attached "are ~he soil sample results, chain in custody, tank tracking sheet, and manifest for the rinsate'. If you require any further information or have any further questions~ Please call 8~5-7700. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Mele IAM: dj i Enclm. cc: M~. Bob. Hathaway SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry Client Name: Groundwater Resourc~ Industries Address : 5610 District'Bivd., Suite 106 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date-analysis completed.: 6-02-88 Date, of report : 6~03-88 ~-,~ Laboratory No. 1005 through 1013 Project No. 290'18 #1005 ID: S-1-2 Ugm/gm MQL,u'gm/gm " Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 Ethylbenzene ND 0.1 , p-Xylene ND 0.1' 'm-Xylene ND 0.1 o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TVH ND 1.0 #1006 ID: S-1-6 -ugm/gm MQL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.1 Toluene ND 0.1 ,_ Ethylbehzeqe ND 0.1 p-Xylene ND' 0.1 m-Xylene ND 0~1 _ o-Xylene ND 0.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1 TVH ND 1.0 Method of 'Analysis: California DOHS LUFT manual MQL = Minimum Quantitation Level TVH = Total Volatile Hydrocarbons , ugm/gTM ~ microgram per gram ND = Not detected Stan Comer~ 3!55 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 P.O. BOX 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 Laboratory No. 1005 through 1013 Project No. 29018 · ---- ....... RESULTS OF :'ANALYSIS " :~'~ ..... ~ ~' ~ ..... ~": ...... " .... :?~ #1007 ..ID: S-2-2 ugm/gm 'MQL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.2 -- Toluene 'ND' 0.2 .. m-Xylene ND 0.2 " ' o-Xylene ND 0.2 Isopropylbenzene : ND 0.2 Styrene ND 0.2 n-Propylbenzene ND 0.2 t-Butylbenzene ND 0.2 s-Butylbenzene ND 0.2 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.2 n-Bulytbenzene ND 0.2 2,3-Benzofuran ND' 0.2 Chlorobenzene ND 0.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene -' ND 0.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 Method of Analysis: EPA 5030/8020 MQL = Minlmun Quantitation Level ugm/gm = microgram per gram ND = Not detected i Laboratory'No. 1005 thr. ough 1013 Project No. 290.18 · ~RESULTS OF ANALYSIS .#1008~ ID: S-2-6 ugm/gm 'MQL,ugm/gm Benzene -ND. 0.2 -Toluene ND 0.2 p-Xylene ND 0.2 m-Xylene : ND 0.2 o-Xylene ND 0.2 IsoprOpylbenzene ND 0.2 Styrene ~ ND 0.2 n-Propylbenzene ND 0.2 t-Butylbenzene ND 0.2 s-Butylbenzene - ND 0.2 1,2~4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.2 n-BUlytbenzene ND 0.2 2,3-Benzofuran ND 0.2 Chlorobenzene ND 0.2 1,4-Dich~orobenzene ND 0.2 1,3,Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.2 Method of Analysis: EPA 5'030/8020 MQL = Minimun Quantitation Level ~ugm/gm = microgram per gram ND = Not detected S~an Comer-I ' La~orator'¢ No. L,O05 throu,.~h i015 Project No. '29018 RESULTS OF ANALYSZS ~$1009 ID: S-3-2 ugm/' 9m M~L, ugm/'gm Benzene ND ' 0.1 TPH' (Diesel) ND 10 '. 0il & Gr. ease . 32 20 .~ lOlO ID: S-3-6 ugm/gm blGL, ugm/gm Benzene : ND O. 1 · TPH (Diesel) ND 10 0il ~ Grease ND 20 MethoO of'Analysis for 8enzene/TPH, (Diesel : Oaii-fornia DOHS LUFT manual Me~hod of.Analys~·s rom Oil'& Grease: EPA' 9071 MQL = hlinimum Quanti~ation Level ugm/gm = microgram per 9cam ND = Not deSmotmd .... -~: ...... t]abora'tor--¥":--No -~005, through 101-3 ....... Pro.]eo~c No RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ~10ll ID: S-4-2 ugm/gm MQL,ugm/gm · Ethylbenzene ~xlD O. 2 - ...:. p-Xylene ND 0.2 " _.,., ' ,. 0.2 0.2 0 ~ .... -- 0.2 ~' 0.2 ;'i.', 0.2' s-Butylbenzene ND 0.2 0.2 0.2 £, :3-Benzofu ran ND 0,2 Chlorobenzene ND 0.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND O. ~ I, 3-DiohioPobenzene ND 0.2 Method of Ana~'x'sis: EPA 5050/8020 MQL : Mi6imun Quantitation Level O~]m/gm = microgram peF gram ~,5 t a iq C:ome r' L'abora'tory No. 1005 'through 1015 Pro.ject NO'.' 2901¢ RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ~1012 ID: S-4-6 ugm./gm M~L, ugm/gm 10 10 10 10 lO S-Bu tylbenzene ND 10 2,5-Benzofu ran ND LO Chloro~enzene · ND .10 [, 4-.Dtchlorobenzene ND · 10 i, 3-Diohlo~obenzene ND 10 Method of anal'¢sis: EPA 5030/8020 MQL = ~iinimun ~uantiCa.tion Level ugm//gm : microgram per gra'm ND = hlo~ de'tek, ted LaboratorY' No. 1005 through 10i3 Projeot No. 29018 RESULTS OF ANALYS.'IS " ~1015 ID: S-4-10 ugm/gm MQL, ugm/gm Toluene ND LO E~hyZbenzene ND 10 10 s-Bu ~ylDenzene ND 10 · 2, o-uenzofuran ND lO Chlorobenzene ND I, 4-Dichlorobenzene ND i , ~-Diohlorobenzene ND 10 Method of Analysis: EPA 3050/8020 MQL = Minimun Quantitation Level ugm/'gm = miorogcam per gram INDUSTRIES CHAIN 0~: CUSTOI)¥ RECORD' ~/;~ '~.. ,.. ':. !213) 724-3147 S ~,n P~JECT NU~-IBER ~ o~ ,,: . , Relinquished bg' :(:Signature) <D)te ~tme Received for Labo~atorg bg: Date ~e Remar~ :-,,~:,:~: ;' ,'?~ '~:~:e~"'~'.:~*': . .. . , : ¥ ~ .'.. CC: 2700 M STREET COUNTY HEALTH.DE?ARTMI ~EA.m OFFICER MAILING ADDRESS Leon M Hebertson. M.D, 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 .- ~ ~, DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (805) 861-3636 .~l'~ Vernon $. Reichard ., Se~tembeT 22, ~988 ~ob Eathaway Diefel ' s Paint ,.Company . ' 1 Bakersfield, California 9330.5 Dear Mr' Hathaway: / This Department has recently reviewed the Preliminary site assessment results for your facility located at 1030 Alta Vista in Bakersfield, California. TheSe results indicate that contamination is present in the soils below where tank ~4 was previously located. , It therefore required by the Kern County Underground Tank Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3912.5.O3, that a site characterization study be performed in order to define the full extent of contamJnatjon. Enclosed is this department's outline for a site characterization study. A site characterization proposal must be submitted to this department within 30 days from the date of this letteE. The proposal must be approved by this department before any work is started. It was stated Jn a cover letter that accompanJed the p~eliminary site assessment results that no samples were taken under the dispenser island because it was appro.xJmately five feet from the tank excavation. In this letter the five foot distance was termed an "acceptable distance" as a reason for not sampling the dispenser area. This is not an "acceptable distance'.], it will be necessary to sample under the dispenser island, as per the 'Permit to Abandon requirements. . If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636 Sincerely, ~a~a~o~s Hate~a~s Ha~age~ent JL: cd cc: G.R.I. enc 1 osur e DISTRICT OFFICES · '~ -- 2700 M STREET nN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM H~L~ OFRCER MAlUNG ADDRESS Leon M Hebe~son, M.D, 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DI~SlON BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 .....- DIRECTOR OF EN~RONMENTAL HEAL~ ~rnon & Reichard (805) 861-3636 .-' ; ~ :~::: :~' :-'-~ - '= -' ....... ~'= ....... -7-,:_ --' :~ PERNIT FOR PERK4NENT CLOSURE PERNIT NUNBER A680-14 .. OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY FACILITY NANE/ADDRESS: Ot~IER(S)'NANE/AD~RESS: CONTRACTOR: -Deifel's Paint Company Delfel Corporation Groundwater Resour'ces"~.~':'-' 1030 Alta Visa 1030 Alta Vista 5610 District Blvd.-#106 Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA" Llcense No. 520768 Phone #(805) 325-7201 Phone #(805) 835-??00 PERlqIT FOR CLOSURE OF PEP~tIT EXPIRES August 11~ 1988 . 4 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE ~ay 11, 1988 · ., ~ Janis ~e~man ~ ..................... POST ON PRF2qISES .................... CONDITIONS AS POLLO~: 1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits ~hich may be required by other.regulatory agencies prior to beginning work. .-. 2. Permitee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating closure action. 3. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Health and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handout #UT-30. . - .4. A minimum of t~o samples must be retrieved beneath the center.Of the tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. A -minimum of four samples must be retrieved one-third of the way in from the ends of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and slx feet. 5. If any contractors other than those listed on permit and permit applicatlon are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by the specialist listed on the permit. - 6. A minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two feet and slx feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the dispenser area(s). ?. All leaded/unleaded gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, ..... ~¥-l~ne','--and -"total .... p:~0~l'~:ui .... h'ya~oc-~r-b~s.'--~ Ai~ .... 2i'-~'~"£--~"am~i-~s .... ~u§t be'-' analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons and benzene. Ail solvent samples must be analyzed using EPA me~hod 8020. DISTRICT OFFICES Delano · Lamont · Lake Isabella · Mojave · Ridgecrest · Shafter · Taft PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE PERMIT NUMBER A680-14 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY " 8. copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Health Department within five days of waste disposal. 9. All applicable state laws' fo'r 'hazardous waste disposal, transportation, or treatme.~t must be adhered to. The Kern County Health Department must be notified before..moving and/or' disposing-of ~ny, contaminated soil. · _ 10. Permit'tee is responsible for making · sure .that "tank: disPos'lti°n tracking 11. Advise this office of the' time 'and':'date of the Proposed sampling with"48 hours advance notice.- 12. Results must be submitted to .this office within ~hree days of analysis completion. OlVtSlO.q OF EIIVIP. O.q~EIITAL IIEALTII ' '. APPLI~ATIO~ OAT~, 1700 PLO~ 6IREgT, ~KRS~IRLD,. CA ~3508 ~ O~ TANKS TO DE AD~DOHED - (80~) 861-3630 LENOTli OF PIPINO ~ AB~DON ~PLI OATION FOR PERMIT FOR PgR~NT OLOSURE/~DON~NT OF UND~ROROUND TIIX9 ~PLI~TXON IS FOR ~OVAL, OR ~DO~MENT IN P~CE (FILL OUT ~ APPLI~TIOtl PER ..... PROJECT COn,ACT IPilO~ ~ ~S~C/T/~ t~U~/~O~TIO~ OrlL~) I o~aa i~s~s9 , r~ mov~-co.~c~o~ ..... [--. .......... :--'"~'"7-= '7"; ...... I~R~ss ~lO.--~jfff/c~~~-J~'-''l~.o.s '.7'P' ' '~2P::"~'~ ..... ~ ". W~~/~ c~ " .... - "' , - Clt~J, tlCAI. COMPOSITION OJ~ HAT, RIALS STORED . ~ ,, ~ ~*~u~-~(~,~ ~',~ ~~ ~ ' to/~7/' N~88T iAtSR NEL~ - giVE DIET.CE ~O DE~CRI. BH TYPE ZP HITilIH 600 ~RET , ISOIL TYPE AT FACILITY ~818 ~OR 8OIL TYPE ~D OROUNDNAT~ DEPTII DETB~I~TIOII ' .. /~ . · :)EECRXBll HON RESIDUII Ill TARK(8) ~34D PIPINO 18 TO BE RIDIOVRD AItD DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE T~SPORTATIOll ~D D~SPOC&L COI~i~A:IIES)s ~scRxB. noT. :.~ ozs~osA~ ..?.oo ~o Dzs~osA~ ~o~Tzo..o., , T1119 lO~ ~9 BHHN COHPLETED UNDER P[I~ OF P~URY ~D TO Tile HEET OF NY KNOWLEDGE I~ TRUE 'AND CORRECT, COUNTY NEALTH DEPAJ~TMENT ' PTD ,~.~ ' ~ISIOH 0P KHVIRONMKHT~ H~LTfl ~PLICATION DATE PLONSR STREET, B~gRSPIBLD~* CA 93305 ~ OF T~KS ~ BE ~NKD 0~ ) 861--3636 LENGTH 0F PIPING T0 AB~DON ~ APPLiCATiON FOR *PERMZT FOR PER~HENT ' HAZARDOUS SUBST~CE8 STORAGE FACZ THIS APPLICATIDN IS ~0R ~ REMOVAL, 0R ~ AB~DONMGNT IN P~CH (PILL OUT 0N~ APPLICATIDN PER FACILI~) rt W. Hathaway I b~vs- .325-7201 ......... ~-.~.-:~ m ,m,~s- 872-6552 ' ~' N~K ~DRES9 mN~BST CROS9 8~BKT fel's Paint 1030 Alta Vista Drive '. Kentucky Street Ale~ Deifel .,. J 1030 Al*ta Vista Drive ,J ~05. )325-~01 REMOVAb CONT~CTOR 81TS ~8KSSMKNT CONT~CTOR ~DRESS ---~' . PHONK · .. . ( *~.~ '.. ) -- COMPENSATION ~ INSURKR PHONE T~T NILL ~YZB S~PLES ADDRKSS PHiS CHEMICA~ COMPOSITION O~ ~TKRI~S STORED ~K P VOLUHS CH~I~ 8TOR~ (NON-CO~ERCIA~ N~8) DATB9 8~RED CHBMI~L PREVIOUSLY 2 1000 ~neral Spirits ,o12-10-87 ~nkno~n~ ~ 500 ~nkno~n possibly ~esel fuel) jo, ~ 500 ~nknown poss~bl lacquer wash) ~o, " ~ bUU' Pa~ nt/th~ nner waste present " MATER TO FACILI~ PROVIDKD BY IDKPTH TO GROUND~AT~ City of Bakersfield ~ · FOTAL NUNBER 0F 8~PLKS TO BE ~ALYZSD IS~PLES ~ILL DR ~ALYZSD FOR~ , DESCRIBE HOW RESIDUE IN T~Kt8) ~D PIPING 19 TO BE REMOVED ~D DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE T~SPORTATION ~D DISPOS~ COMP~IK9) DESCRIBE BOTH IHS DISPOSAL MgIIIOD AND 810NA~RS , ' TITHE Presi dent . ~TK 5/27/87 (Form N~P-140) · KERN COUNTY 2700 '~' $~eec. S~e. 300 8akersf~eid. CA 93301 ." Eav'J.ronsenr. a.]. ~e~t,.b Depaz'cmen~ 89 Bob Hathaway Deifel Corporation 1030 Alta Vista SUBJECT: Location: 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield', CA 93305 Known As: Deifel's Paint PE~IT ~: ~140010 Dear Bob Hathaway: This.letter is an official notice ~o inform you Chac the property described above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Healgh co be the si;e of an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank. This nocicre is sent co you because our records indicate cha~ you are a responsible for this proper~y. As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and ~ork relating co the 'above described property and the cost for oversight of chese activities. California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern.County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48 requi~e a determination of Che ChreaC Co the environment as a result of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY S~LL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE C~CTERIZATION, FEASIBILI~ STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION P~N FOR KERN COUNTY E~IRO~E~AL. HEALTH'S REVIEN AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE NO~ IS INITIATED. Enclosed you vill find ~gachmenC "A" Handbook U?-35, which sCaCe~ the minimum required site workplan ac;ivi~ie~, the necessary requirements fo~ selecting environmental contractors qualified =o perform this work, a glossary of terms, example illustrations, and a section discussing the . answers to co--only asked questions. The cost incurred by Kern CounCy Environmental Health for the oversiEh¢ of ~he work for the si~e characteriza¢ion,' .feasibility study,· remediation action plan, si~e remedia¢ion, and onEoinE, monitorinE is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs are 'recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two ways described below. It is your.responsibility to select ~he method of oversiEh~ cos~ recovery, under the terms of the (A) State con~ract or (B) County of Kern Local AEreement Option. These options ONLY pertain ¢o costs associated wish oversiEh~. (A) STATE CO~CT The SCare LeakinE UnderEround StoraEe Tank Pilo~ Pr°Eram provides a mechanism for the S~ate to reimburse the County for County oversiEht. The County will conduc¢ ~he necessary oversiEh~ and bill the S~ate Water Resources Control Board under this State DISTRICT OFFICES contract. The State will 'then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site. (B) COUNTY LOCAL AGREEMENT Kern County Envir0~m~.ntal.Health is p~oviding this option for those who pay the ~COunty dire'ztl'y ~nd performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand. dollars) with t~e County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party must-enter into a' Count~'agreement, attachment "B". To safeguard the environment, the environmental sensitivity (Attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed grouhdwater contamination. Only site's~'~er~i~n'~-~"~be'~6n2en~if~nm~nfa~l~'-~ensit~ may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an 'environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Option Agreement; however, the County of Kern reserves the right to Cancel any Local Option Agreement, should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area. It is necessary for you to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of th~s letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice: either the State Contract or the County's Local Agreement option. If you select the County's Lo,al Agreement, please sign the Local Agreement, enclosure "B", and return it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars)'made payable tO the County of Kern;. addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Underground Storage Tank Contract Admini'strator. If you select the State Contract, please indicate that you have made this selection and that you have read attachment "D", the official notification, ina letter sent to the address indicated above2 Failure to respond in writing to this notice within ten (10) calendar days'Will automatically result in oversight cost recovery'for your site(s) to be placed under the terms of the State Pilot Program for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks' Enclosure "D" will then serve as the official notification o.f your enrollment into the State Pilot Program for Underground Storage Tanks. - If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, ~Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative Officer Environmental Health attachments KERN COUNTY 2700 '~' ~treet. ~e. 300. 8akersfieid. CA93301 ~v~onmen-t.~l. He~ Dep~ar~en~ · ' ATTACHMENT "D" (805) 861-3636 · ~" .February 6, 1989 Bob Hathaway ~ Deifel Corporation 1030 Alta Vista · Bakersfield, CA 93305 SUBJECT: Location: 1030 Alta Vista Bakersfield, CA 93'305 Known As: Deifel's Paint PERMIT #: 140010 Dear Bob Hathaway: This letter will .serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State. Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding, to this packa§e within ten (10) calendar days or throu§h your own selection of the State Contract option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below: Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above site are funded, in whole, or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(ies) have been identified as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED chat pursuant co Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all'direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies while overseeing the cleanup of the above underEround storage tank site, and the above Responsible Party or Part£es shall make full payment of such ~osts within 30 days of receipt of a detailed inv~ce from the State Water Resources Control Board. If you should'have any questions regardin§ this. matter, please contact John'Nilo~, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative.Officer Environmental Health attachments DISTRICT OFFICES ": :'"" '" "' :" ' " ' '~<. ~ ( ;'.ECEiPTFO, 2~';i:~_'CERTiFiED:'MxiL NO INSU~NCE ~VE~GE PROVIDED ' · ' . . . . . - ' ' .- MAIL S~to a -' .... ..St e;dZlP ~e' ~~ ~e~j} : .. ~. .... . .... ..., .,~... ' ' .. . .. · · . ' . .' -:'.:'..". -.. ' ..... ' ; '.'.'.'. Postage ~, -:.:... '>~; s >~;:-.... ' -. ce~ifi~ Fee . SPecial oelive~ Fee · ' ' ' ' ' Restricted Detive~ Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered ~ Return Receipt showing to whom, ~ Date, ana Address of Dehve~ · . . .. 3 TOTAL Postage and Fees S ~ Postmark or Date . ., . , . '. ~' -... ~ .... .. ..... : ~ ' .. . :. .... 17OOFIowerStreet ._~ COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME ,EA'THOF~CE. t Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Telephone (805) 861-3636 · · DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · Vernon S. Relchard INTERIM PERMIT - FERMI T.~i 4OO 10C ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986 EXPI RES: .JULY 1, 1989 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES -- .-- ..... ~ '~-:STORAGE--$ACILITY~-~ ............. - ?~- --.--~NUMBER -OF-nTANKS=~-2= FACILITY: -' .. - <' .~ I OWNER: ..... . .... . .. DEIFEL'S INC'. ~ . '.DEIFEL'S : , ......... - ... 1039 AnTA VISTA DRIVE ~ 1030 ALTA VISTA DRIVE .. . BAKERSI~'IEI'.D, OA . , : .. :i'1 ~- BAKERSFIET.D, CA 93505 ~:-·:-.TANK #'-,' -- AGE(IN YRS}"., suBSTANCE CODE *~__' PRESSURI'ZED PIPING? .:. ,._:.... ~ · . 1,2 16 ' ' MVF 3 - NO .. . NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING . . _ .-. 'AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE * * * POST O'N PREMIS'E'S DATE PERMIT MA/T,~D: AU~ 2 5 1986 .... DATE ~ERMI~ CHECK LIST RE2XJI~IF~: .... ....... ........ Division o£ Environmental He.h,,, - Ap~i ication 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfie-l'd,~ 93305 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND · ~HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of Applicati'0n (check): ONe--~ Facility r~Modification of Facility ~][Existing Facility r~Transfer ~f .09?e~_r~shiP A. f~ergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days '-:':";~:~'~s Tank~S)'Loca~ed on an Agricultural Farm? '[2] No Is Tank(s)Used Primarily roi7 <ricultural Pu?~es?~Yes T R o _ SEC (Rural Locations ~nl¥} Operator ~9'//~ 'Contact per~3n a. 'Water to Facility Provldecl by ~Depth to' Groun~,m Basis for Soil 'D/PO and Ground~at~ Dap ons ..... C. Contrac~or CA Contrac~0r"s [Ac'ense ~k)o Addres~ Zip Talephonm P~oposed SLatting Data Proposed Ccmpletion Date Worker's C~pansation Certification ! Insurer D. If This Permit Is ~or Modification of An ExiSting Facility, Briefly Dascribe;Modificatl~s roposed , E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ! %~aste Product Motor Vehicle . Unleaded Regular Premium Diesel Waste .. ! O ,, Tank t Christal Stored (non-q~erctal ~} CAS ! Ill known} Cl~a~loal Pr~vto~l. S~r~! G. Transfer of Ownership ' Date of~--ansfer : AF./Z~ previous 0~ner ' previous Facility Nm ........ '. .. ! understand that the Pemitting Authority may revt~ and modify or"termtnata the transf.r of the Permit to Opsrate this ~dergro~. storage facility upon r~ceiving this c~mpleted form. true' aha correct. ~RTE~'SE~ICN, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIATE ~,,Z~ i~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~ ~minm ~ Sron~ ~er (de~ri~) 3. Priory Contai~nt '~ ~te In~tal~ ~ic~e~s (Inches) Ca~clty (~llons) ~nufacturer Ii · 4. TanR Secondary Cont~lmnt - · ' "~l~all ~Dthettc Uner. ~LIn~ Vault ~ne ~m~om Uot~r (Oe~ri~): ~ufacturer: 5. Tank Interior ~ ~Ot~r (de~ri~): ....... ~.~6.~-~-=Tank--Co rr 6s ibn-- p r oteC~l on r or ~lt O~m ONom OOther (~emrt~)': Ca~lc Proration= ~ne ~es~ ~rent S~tm O~rlflcl~ 7. Leak ~e~tion, ~nttort~, a~ Interception '~Vadose Zone ~itorl~ ~ll(s) ~~ ~t~ut ~ner ~ Pre.ute ~n~r tn ~ular S~ of ~ble ~all ~nk~ one ~~m ~er 8. Tank Tightness ~ank Re. Ir , ~. ~ Re~ir~? DYes .~ D~kno~ ~rator Fills, C~tr01s, & Visually ~nitors ~vel ~Ta~ F[~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~uto Shut- Off Controls Th~kne~ (i~s) .' Y~" Dieter ]~' ~nufacturer. ~,~Z~ ~essure .~tton ~Gravtty · ~'~roxt~te ~ of ~ ~ lvant z~ ~Ft~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rrent ' ~crificial l~yle~ ~rap ~Electrical Isolati~ ~VtnYl Nrap ~Tar ~o~ ~None ~her (de~rt~): ~ c. U~ergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~Other (de~ri~): TANK { '~' (FILL OUT SEPARATE FO~J.:. FOR EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE' BOXES · 1, Tank is: []Vaulted ON0n-Vaulted [-~Pouble-~all Si le-Wall 2. Ta~' Material "~C~eel I~Stainless Steel []PolyvinyI Chloride[] Fiberglass-Clad Steel ~']Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic []Concrete ~Altnintn •Bronze r~Unkrlown [] Other (describe) ' 3, Dri?.~ Containment . ' .... ~==-?:=?-e~=~te Ins~,a--=-f~--e~---T~ickness. (-Inches)<==~_~Ca~acit¥=~(Gallons) ....... .= ~=Manufactul:er l'lPouble-Wall O Synthetic Liner. •Lined Vault ~None OLl~n~n , OOther (describe): .., ' Manufacturer: i ONatsrial ' ThickneSs (Inches) ,.. Capacity (Gals.) i 5. Tank interior L~' ' ' ~,,,1 - !i .' '--'~~~ I-IEpoxy 'r'lPhenolic' []Glass [:]Clay,~u.,.-,.,.lnld I'1~: ' 6. Tank Corrosion Protec"cibn _'~~ "~~ass~lad rTPoly~thylene Wrap •Vinyl Wrapping ~Tar or Asphalt ~TUnkno~ ON•ne ['1Other (describe)s ' . Cathodic Protection~ ~ione l'llmp~essed Current System. r'lsacrl~Scial Describe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interceptiog' ~ ..... .... [] red•se Zone Nonitoring I~ll'(s) I-IU-Tube Without' L/net I-ltl-Tube with Cmpatible '~.iner Directing Flow to I~onitorirq r~vapor D~tsctor* I'lLlquid Level Sensor* [~Conductivit¥ S~or* · r-! Pressure sensor in An~ular Space of Double '~all Tank _ii. Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitoring t~ll or ~nnular Space ~Dall¥ ~Gauqing & I~nventot~ Reconciliation r'lperiodic Tlgh~n~ n None LJ Unkno~ [] Other b. Plpin~ Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pcessuriz~d Plpl~j" Honitoring S~p with Race~m¥ F1Sealed Concrete ~y *Describe ~ake & l~xJeI~ 8. Tank Tightness , ' ...... ' ' Ham T~ls Tan~ B~en Ttght/l~.l Tasted? ~Lyes ['~N~ ~]UnkllO~l Date oE La~c Tiqhtn~ Test Results of Test /V~ ~'¢~;~ Test Nmne ,~';~. ~/:~'.~,~//:~.. Testin9 Conpany ~ 9. Tank Repair ' / , 'Da~e(s) of Repair(s) . . . ". Describe Repalrs . . . 10o Overfill Protecti~n ' "- · [~Operat~o~' Fills~ Control~, & Visually Non&tots Level [-]Tapa Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves .i-1 .Auto Shut- Off Controls ~]Capacitsnce Sensor •Sealed Fill Box :l~J~lOne [-itlnlmo~ l-lUther: . . ' List. Nake & Nodel Fo~ Above Devices __ 11. Piping '- . . ..... ' " a. LtMerground Piping: ~E~Yes I"INo. OUnkrlo~ l~aterial ~~ Thickness (inches) Y• !' Diameter ] ~" Manufacturer z/~z-.~/~ ~ .I-]Pressure ~uc~GraviCy .'Approximate.~fength ~R~ /~/ . ............. b~ Underground Pf! - )1 ng---CorrosiOn-Protect ion"-: ...........'.-7-- .......... ~ lvanized l-]Fiberglass-Clad [:]Impressed C~rrent' r-lsacri~icial Anode 1yeth¥1ene Wrap [3glec~rica! Isolati~ [:]Vinyl Wrap '[-ITar o~ Asl~alt .OUnkno~m []None I-lUther (deSCribe)': c. Underground Pipirg, Secondary Contair~ent: C]Doubl.::-Wall E]Synthetic Liner System ~None [-]Unkno~ PERt4IT CHECKLIST This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received an__~d that the. Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of monitoring requirements. Please complete this form and return to KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided Check: Yes .No .~ A,; The packet I received contained: , l) co.er Lette¢, Permit Check,irt, Interi .. ermit, PhaSe I nte -im Permit . Operator), Chapt~15 (KCOC #6~41), Explanation of' Sub~'~an~-~ Codes, .' Equipment.Lists an~ Return Envelope. '" . ' ' ' ~ 2) Standard Inventory Control ~onitoring Handbook #UT-10. ![ a) Inventory Recording Sheet b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet~with summary on reverse 'c) Trend Analysis Worksheet~'/ ~"/ 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) ! .J/~ B. I have examined the information on 'my Interim Permit', Phase I Nonitoring Requirements,' and Information Sheet (Agreement between O~ner and Operator), and find owner's na~e and address, facility name and address, operator's na~e and address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). f C. I have the following required equipment (.as described on page 6 of Handbook): .. 1) Acceptable gauging instrument 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) 1,/' ~ 3) Water-finding paste ~/ D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner' of-this facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a dopy of agreement between owner and operator)'. - ~'/ E. I have enclosed a copy. of.Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if tanks are identical, one chart wii1 suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). " '6'"~__ F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at. this facility have had · calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered device repairman if out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration. Check FOrm" found in the Appendix of Handbook).' L-''~' G. Standard Inventory Control ~onitoring was started at this facility in accordance with procedures described in Handbook #UT-10., Written Contract I, Alex Deifel, owner of underground°storage tanks loca- ted at .1030 Alta Vista Drive, Bakersfield, Ca., 93305 . have entered into this written~contract'~with. Deifel's Pai. nt, the operator of Same, to i~ulfill a requirement · ~ of my Permit to Operate, #140010C I have orovided the ~ operator with a copy of the Permit to Operate and Chapter · i 15 of' the Ordinance. . . .... ~ .-'i D ~ Tf'6 l' s P a i n t, O.p e r.a t o r o f .u n d e v g.6'a'~'n.d ~-~:-~=~:~-~'~'~-.:';'~:~:~ located at 1030 Alta Vista Drive, Bakersfield, Ca., 93305, has received from Alex 'Deifel, owner of same, a copy.'of .~' Permit to Operate ~140010C and Chapter 15 of the Ordinance describing fines and penalties for non-compliance. .I. have read and understand my responsibilities under this Permit and agree to do the following: -- monitor the underground .tanks as specified in in the Permit to Operate. .-- maintain appropriate records as required by the Permit to Operate. -- implement all reporting procedures as requi,red by--~h~p~rm~,:to Operate. -- p~operly close t~e underground tanks as required by PePmit to Operate. Signed ~ Owner x ~ .' ''/~--/~- r~ Date ' *//~/~ Date · ~,. '~ ' TANK J~ND WBLDINO Q U A El T Y Y Q u CAN ~ E ~ KErn ~OOOe~ 321 WEST KATELLA AVENUE · ORANGE. CA:LIFOR~ MA~}I~ON Z000 Cation Gauge Chart .-'75-1/Z" ID x 101" Shett - Fiat Heads D Denotes depth of contents in inches. GAL 'Denote~ contents at that depth D t GAL . D GAL ' D . GAL . .,D' GAL''.-...',~. '-." .' .' .... L~;=:.'. - '2 15 21 459 ., 40 1087 59 ' '¢~lhg~ 1695;:-.:' .' 3 27 " '22 490 41 1121 60 1722 . ..~ 4 41 ' 23 521 42 1155 61 1750 5 57 24 552 '4.3 1189 62 1776 6 75 25 584 44 122 3 63 1802 7 94 26 617 45, 1256 64 1827 8 114 27 649 46 1290 65 185l 9 ~ 36 28 682 47 1323 66 1874 10 159 29 7'16 48 1356. 67 1896 11 182 30 748 49 1388 68 1917 ' 12 207 31. 781 50 .1421 69 1937_.~ 13 '232 32 815 51 1453 70 --1955 14 '258 33 849 52 1485 71 1971' 15 285 34 883 53 :'1516 7Z 1986 16 312 '35 917 54 1547 73 2000 17 340 36 '951 55 1577 74 2010 18 .369 ~7 985 56 1607 75 2018 19 399 38 1019 57 1637 75-1/2 2020 DU -200~-- t;'l I KE...,~o.ooo5 321 WEST KATELL.A AVENUE - ORANG[_, ' ' 000 ~atLon ~10 Gaugu U:dergroun'd T[nk G~uge' Chart ~D. xTg-1/g" Long .- Ftat Heads'. · D Denotes depth of conteats ininches. -GAL Denotes contents at that'depih, ~,.~,. a 9 18 233 ~ 34 544 50 846 . t 17 19 251 35 564 51 862 - -t Z6 gO 270 -- 36 584 "5Z ~ 37 21 288 37 604 53 893 . I, . ~8 22 307 38 624 54 908 7 60 23 326 39 644 5g 923 8 73 Z4 346- 40 663 56 ~' 936 9 86 ~5 365 ? [ 41 . 683 57 : , 949 10 101 g~ 385 4Z , 702 58' 961 ,. 11 116 Z7 405 43 721 59 972 12 131 Z8 425 44 7 39 60 993 ,. 13 147 29 445 45 '758 61 992 · 14 163 30 465 46 776 62 1000 15 180 31 485 " '47 794 63 1006