Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UNDERGROUND TANK-C-11/25/86
· I-Hq FIRE WALL~'__: .... ' "~----- '~" ' ~D / P R,(_) P~, S E D ~-'-~ SLAb ~'ITH SI, NI. 0 0 EXIqTING / o,' '/ ~, WAREHOUSE ' ,~ ' '"' '"" '"' "' '1 ""i ,..~" ' "i ..... ~__B_AKER, STREET' Include All the F°l'~ '~ inf°rmaui°n: e~ Location of Tan._{ , Piping & Dispenser(s) Proposed Sampling Locations Indicating Approximat pth of Samples Nearest Street or Intersection Any Water Wells or surface waters within 100' Radius of Facility Approved By Scale FILE CONTENTS SUMMARY PERMIT ~: }SDD/9 ENV. SENSITIVITY: Ng5 Activity Date # Of Tanks, Comments 1700 Flower Street COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, Callfo~rnla 93305 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 , ' DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Relchard November 25, 1986 Mr. Don Felton Culligan Water Conditioning 116 Baker Street Bakersfield, California 93305 Dear Mr. Felton, As per our conversation of November 25, 1986, after considerable review of the site characterization report submitted to this department by Krazan & Associates, it is our position that no further site remediation is needed. This position is contingent upon your'plans to pave over the area of the tank and use the area for parking. If any other use for the area is planned, then further soil excavation wouldbe called for. It should be noted that the existence of contaminated soil on this piece of property will require that any potential future buyers be notified of the contamination, and that an attachment to the property deed may be in order. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions please contact me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerel% . Environmental Health Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program DISTRICT OFFICES Delano . Lamonl . Lake Isabella . MoJave . Rldgecrelt . Shelter . Taft Y RAZAN & A S© C IATES Em, ironmental Field Testing and Sampling ~ Specialized Fuel Seepage Studies Laboratory Soils Testing Soils Engineering Geotechnical Investigations ~ ~' F~ ~ 4 ~ ~/ October 10~. [986 ...... Pro[. No._B86-08[ _ -- Culligan Water 'Conditioning %~.~_ t~-~\ ~ 116 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 \ RE: Culligan Water Conditioning Warehouse Underground Tank Removal Site Characterization Gentlemen: In accordance with our proposal dated August 27~ 1986, we have completed the second phase of soil sampling and chemical analysis at the Culligan Water Conditioning Plant located at 116 Baker Street in Bakersfield, California. The scope and methodology for Phase I and Phase II of this investigation can' be ~ound in the report [or Phase I dated 3uly ~, 1986 and the proposal for Phase II dated August 27, 1986. The purpose of this report is to summarize the findings from Phase I and Phase II and to discuss remedial action alternatives. SOILS PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soil below the site consists primarily o£ mixtures o~ fine sand and silt to a depth o[ approximately 2~ ~eet.. These silty sands and sandy silts occured in layers o~ approximately 3 to 10 ~eet in thickness. In general, these soils were found to be damp, light brown in color, and drilled relatively easy. For a detailed description o£ the soils profile at a particular boring location, please re,er to the log o~ borings which are attached. According to the Kern County Water Agency's water supply report [or 195#~, the depth to groundwater below the site is approximateJy 200 to 2.50 feet (the Phase I report stated 2~0-J00 feet). Main Office: Fresno / Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno. California 93726 ° (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 832-8909 lit Visalia (209) 625-8251 fi. 1 Merced (209) 383-3993 .ge No. 2 Proj. No. t38(,-081 EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION A light fuel odor was noted in boring Nos. I and 2 to a deptl~ approximately 20 feet. No fuel odor .was noted in boring No. 3. Selected samples were analyzed for gasoline constituents. The presence o£ gasoline was' not detected in any o£ the samples below a depth of 15 feet or at a distance greater' than 10 feet frown tile center of the excavation. The results of tile chemical analysis are presented in the following table. TABLE I Concentrations of Gasoline Constituents in Soil Location Concentrations (ppm) of Sample Benzene Toluene Xylenes' Total Volatile Hydrocarbons * 8 ft. 6 232 287 ---- '12 ft. 210 1293 699 ---- **Bi ~ 15 ft. 14 37 83 179 **BI t'a 25 ft. <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 B2 ~310 ft. 9 29 89 1218 62 ,'.a 15 ft. 0.56 3.7 17 122 B2 ,.'a 20 ft. N.D. N.D. N.D. 0 B2 ,.~ 25 ft. N.D. N.D. N.D. 0 B3 .(a 15 ft. N.D. N.D. N.D. 0 B3 ~ 25 ft. N.D. N.D. N.D. '0 *Results from original sa,nples tal<en during abandonment.. *~*Results ~rom Phase I of Investigation (Boring So. 1). · KRAZAN & ASSOCIAfES, INC. Page No. 3 Proj. No. Bg6-081 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES .: ...... .._: .................... Three remedial action alternatives were considered for this site: 1. NO Action. 2. Excavation and Disposal. ...... 3.. Excavation and Airiation. · ........... · ...... - -' ...... ........ - .............. ~--~.:~- ..... These three alternatives were .compared on the basis of capital cost, disruption to normal business activity, risk to groundwater and long term financial liability. Each alternative was noted as very low, low, moderate, high, or very high' on a relative basis. No Action The contamination' present is moderate in level and relatively lhnited in extent. These facts along with the depth to groundwater below the site, make it feasible to leave t. he contaminated soil in place. This alternative would result in a very low capital cost and disruption to business and would provide a relatively low risk to groundwater. Long term financial liability with this option would be low to moderate due to the existence of the contaminated'soil below the site for a period of'several hundred years until biological degradation had occured. Excavation and Disposal This alternative would involve the excavation of a volume of. soil containing tile majority, of the contamination. The volume of sbil which can be excavated is lhnited by the presence of a building on the north and east sides of the tank location. The central core of the plume could be removed either by excavat, ing a 10 foot wide by 10 foot long by l~ foot deep excavation, or by advancing an g foot diameter boring utilizing a drilling rig. The resulting hole, whether excavated or drilled, would need to be backfilled with a material that would be relatively impermeable while providing sufficient strength for any future structures. A suitable material would be a one sack sand/cement slurry. The material removed from the boring or excavation would be hauled to an KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page No. # · Proj. No. Bg6-0gl appropriate hazardous waste facility. This alternative would result in a high capital cost and moderate disruption to normal business activities. The risk to g?oundwater would be very low. The removal of the contaminated soil from the' site would lower long term liability at the site, however, the waste, generator- would still retain some liability for the material stored at the hazardous waste facility. Excavation and Airiation In this alternative, the soil would be removed as in alternative No. 2 (Exca~ati°'~'ahd Disposal) and airiated on the owner's property where it 'would be used as fill after the gasoline in the soil had sufficent time to volatilize. The resulting excavation would be backfilled as in alternative No. 2. This alternative would result in a moderate capital c4st and disruption to normal business activities. Future risk to groundwater '~/ould be very low; long term financial liability would be low. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the levels of contatnination in the soil and the depth to groundwater below the site, it is not believed that-the contamination at this site is of a sufficient threat to groundwater resources to warrant excavation and disposal. Although alternative No. I (No Action) is not without disadvantages, it is felt that this solution would be' the most appr, opriate for this particular site. KRAZAN & ASSOCIA'FES, INC. Page No. 5 Proj. No. B$6-08! If yo.u have any questions or i~ we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, KRAZAN '& ASSOCIA'rES, INC.. Richard M. Stauber Staff Engineer Michael Erwin Principa! Engineer RCE # 18625 ME/RMS/cr 2 c plus invoice herewith KRAZAN & ASSOCIA'FES, INC. MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL NAMES GW Well-graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no lines GRAVELS GP Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines (More than ',~ of coarse GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures "~ · fraction > no. 4 sieve size) _~ .-> c ~ GQ Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures ~ ~ SW Well-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines ~ SANDS :~ c6 SP Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines ~O~ (More than ',5 of coarse . SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures · ^ '' ' fraction < no. 4 sieve'size) ........ SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures ME Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity ' '-~ .~ SILTS & CLAYS · - GL Inorganic clays of Iow to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, ~"5 ~, LL '~ 50 lean clays c '~ OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of Iow plasticity ,~ o4 ME Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts ~ ~ "'SILTS &CLAYS = c CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays _ v LL > 50 OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silty clay, organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and other highly organic soils UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ' COHESIVE SOILS GRANULAR SOILS CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES ' U.S. Standard Grain Size Description Blows/ft. Description Blows/lt. Grain Type Sieve Size in Millimeters very soft < 3 '1 very loose < 5 Boulders above 12" above 305 soft 3-5 loose 5-15 Cobbles 12" to 3" 305 to 76.2 medium(firm) 6-10 medium dense 16-40 Gravel 3" to no. 4 76.2 to 4.76 ' stiff 11-20 dense 41-65 coarse (c) 3" to Y, 76.2 to 19.1 fine (f) ¥," to no. 4 19.1 to 4.76 very stiff 21-40 very dense > 65 Sand no. 4 to no. 200 4.76 to 0.074 hard > 40 coarse (c) n0.'4 to no. 10 4.76 to 2.00 medium (m) no. 10 to no. 40 2.00 to 0.420 line (f) no. 40 ID no. 200 0.420 to 0.014 CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION si~t & Clay below no. 200 below 0.074 GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION _z 40 ~,~,, ~ 30 <m 20 GL / - CH MH 7 ~CL--~ ML &OL 4 I I - O - 10 20 30 40 50 -60 70. - 80 ~ 100 ....... LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY CHART ~ ~Z~ & ASSOCIATES {20~) 2~1-7~7 Proiect CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING Proj. No. B86-081 Boring No. I 1I DATEDRILLEDi Jul·y 1, 1986 TYPE OF BORING: 10-inch Stem Auger HOLE ELEV: GROUNDWATER LEVEL: ......... LOGGED BY: RMS . ~_ ~ - .= .E ~ ~ .~ c o = - ~ 2 ~ SOiL D~SC~PT~ON '~ ~ - ~-o Loose Fine Silty Sand (SM), Dark Brown, Damp, Drills Easy 5-- ~O-- ~s- X 36 Very Fine Sand with Silt (SP), Light Brown, Damp, Drills Easy, Fuel Odor zo- X 20 Fine to Medium Sand (SW), Tan, Damp, Drills Easy, Light Fuel Odor 2s - X 36 *R =,Refusal, greater I(I1AZAN & ASSOCIATES Sheet ... 1 of .__~___ than 100 blows/foot Fresno · Visalia · Bakersfield Project CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING Proj. No. B86-081 Boring No. DATE DRILLED: July 1, 1986 TYPE OF BORING: ]O-inch Stem Au§er HOLE ELEV: ......... GROUNDWATER LEVEL: ......... LOGGED BY: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~'~ ~o~ 3~ X 23 Very F~ne Sandy S~lt (ML) w~th Clay, L~ght B~own, D~mp, D~11s Easy, No Fue] Odo~ 3~ X R F~ne to Hed~um Sand (SW), Tan, Damp, D~11s Easy, No Fuel Odo~ D~]ls Very Ha~d ~t 35 Feet D~lls Very Easy at 36 Feet 40_ X 43 BOTTOH OF BORING 4~ 5~ *R = Refusal, greater I(RAZAN & ASSOCIATES Sheet 2. of 2 than 100 blows/foot. Fresno · Visalia · Bakersfield Project Culligan Water Conditioning 116 Baker Street Proj. No. B86-081 Boring No. i- i Bakersfield',' California DATE DRILLED: Sep'tember 15, 1986 TYPE OF BORING: ............... HOLE ELEV: ..................... -GROUNDWATER LEVEL: ..................... LOGGED BY: RMS = -~ ~ ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION 2" AC Fine to Medium Silty Sand (SM), Dark Brown, Damp, Drills Easy, No .Fuel Odor. 5- Fine Sandy Silt (ML), Light Brown, Damp, Drills-Easy, No Fuel Odor' Firm Below 6 Feet. -,,,,, ~o- xX Fine Sand with Silt (SP), Light Brown, Damp, Drills Easy to Firm,' ;~ Light Fuel Odor. ~- X Fine Sandy Silt (ML), Light Brown, Damp, Drills Easy, Light Fuel Odor. With Clay Below 15 Feet. 20-- X Fine Sand (SP), Light Brown, Damp, Dri.lls Easy, No Fuel Odor. X 25 BOTTOM OF BORING '*R : Refusal, greater I(RAZAN & ASSOCIATES Sheet 1 of 1 than 100 blows/foot Fresno · Visalia · Bakersfield Project Culligan Water Conditioning Proj. No. B86-,081 Boring No. F'~ 116 Baker Street Bakersfield, California' i~ i DATE DRILLED: September 15 1986 TYPE OF BORING: HO1 low Stem HOLE ELEV: .................. GROUNDWATER LEVEL: .................... LOGGED BY: RMS ~ -~ =~ ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ ~ '~- - ~m 2" AC F~ne to Ned~um Silty Sand (5N), Dark Brown, Oamp, ~r~s Easy, ~ No Fue~ Odor. .............. Fine Sand~ Silt (NE),"Ligh~-~ Brown~"Damp, s- Drills Easy, No Fuel Odor. Firm Below 6 Feet. Fine Si~t~ Sand (SM), Light Brown, Damp, Drills Easy, No Fue~ Odor. F~ne 5and~ S~t (NL), L~ght Brown, Damp, . Dr~s Eas~, No Fuel Odor. Nith C~a~ Below ~4 Feet. ~5- X ao- X F~ne 5and (SP), L~ght Brown, Pamp, Drills Easy, No Fue~ Odor. 25 BOTTON OF BORING *1% = 1%efusal, greater I~I{AZAN &.ASSOCIATES Sheet 1 of than 100 blows/foot Fresno · Visalia · Bakersfield LABORATORIES J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PEIWOLEUM MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PtIONE 327-4911 Purgeab le Aromatics I<RAZAN AND ASSOC. Date o't- .... ~3860 'NORTH WINERY .... -~-- ..... ~ ...... .-.- ................ -.~, ............ ..... .... '-REPORT:~9-~3-86 ............. ,.. -,.-_ ..... FRESNO,CALIF. 937,°6 ATTN:RICK STAUBER LAB No.:i64A4 Sample Description: R-P @ 10.0' I)ATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAI'IPI..E COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COI'IPL_E'rEI]: 9- t 5-86 9- 15-86 9'-P2-'86 Repot ~ ing Aha 1 yses Repot- Constituent' Units Resutts I. eve Benzene ug/g 9.47 O. To luene ug/g ~9.0~ O. Ethyl Benzene ug~g ~.62 O. p-Xylene ug/g 3¢~.03 O. m-Xylene ug/g 5~. J9 O. o-Xylene ug/g 41.09 O. Isopropyl Benzene ug/g 5.5A O. TVH . ug/g lJlO.(lEI 0.5 EPA 50~0/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: LOCAT I ON: B86-.-08~] .... ?./_:..---r'"/f ,~,~:,~,,___~1~,-LA B O R ATO R I ES ,~. J. J. EGLIN, REG, CHEM. ENGR. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeab le Aromatics ,, KRAZAN AND ASSOC. Date 3860-NOR] H WI NERY_...= ............ _.- ......... . .......................... REPORT..: 9~B3-86 FRESNO~CAL~F, ~37~ ATTN:RICK ST~UBER LAB No, Samp]e Description: B-2 @ 15,0' DATE/TIME .[)ATE/TINE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAI'IPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPI_EI'ED: 9- 15-U6 9- 15-06 9-82-B6 Reporting A,'~alyses [~.pn, t i,'~g Const i tuen t Uni ts Resu 1 ts Level Benzene ug/g 0.56 O. ! Toluene- ug/g 3.?0 0.i Ethyl Benzene ug/g 1.q9 O. t p-Xylene ug/g ~.18 O. l m-Xylene ug/g 6.~3 O. 1 o-Xylene ug/g 5.9~ O. 1 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g 1.03 O. l TV~I ug/g 128.83 O. 5 EPA 5080/8020 ]'VH: By' Gas Chromatography Zomments: LOCAT I ON: B86-080 BORATORIES · J.J. EGLIN. REG. CHEM. ENGII. ?ET,gOLEUM MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 32Z-491 ! Purgeab le Aromatics KRAZAN AND ASSOC. Date o£ · REPORT: 9-P3-86 3860 NORTH WINERY. : ............... . .............................. --~ ................... ~-. ...................... . .......... FRE~I(I~3'~;'I~I'~"F.'""93?P6 ATTN:RICK STAUBER LAB No.:t6qq6 Sample Description: B-8 @ PO.O' DAf'E/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPI_.E DA'T'E ANAI_YSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVEI.) @ LAB: C(JMPI..ETED: 9-- ! 5--86 9- ! 5-06 9--~.-86 Repot t i ~j ArN,a 1 yses Cons t i tuent Uni ts Resu 1 ts Benzene ug/g none detected Toluene ~Jg/g none de tiec ted Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected p-Xylene ug/g none de~;ec ted m-Xy lene ug/g none detected o-Xyiene ug/g none detected [sopropyl Benzene ug/g none detected TVH ug/g (/. ¢~0 EPA 5080/0080 TVH: Ely Gas 'Chromatography ;omments: LOCAT I ON: DL)6-OBO LABORATORIES CX£IL AAfALY~IS INC. ,..,.? ,. ,. ,o,,~. ,,~. ~,,~. P£TROL EL/M MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PtIONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics I<I~AZAN AND ASSOC. Date of 38~(J~.NOR~H- W~INER-Y ....................... ~--=- ................ . ........... ,~-..--.~REPORT:-9-~3-86- FRESNO,CALIF. 93726 A'TTN:RICK STAUBER LAB No.:.164q? Sample Description: B-.2 8 85.0' DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPI.ETED: c?-15-~6 9-15-86 9-~2-'86 Minimum Reporting Analyses Repo,-ting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0 ! Toluene ug/~ none detected 0 ! Ethyl Benzene ug/g T~one detected 0 p-Xylene ug/g ' none detected 0 I m-X~lene ug/g none detected 0 o-.Xylene ug/g none detected 0 1 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g none detected TVH ug/g 0.00 EPA 5020/80~0 TVH: By-Gas Chromatography Zomments: LOCATION:BD6-080 LABORATORIES J. J. EGL{N, ~EG. CHEM. EHGR. ~IN OFFICE: 4100 PIEAC~ ROLO, BI~RSFIELD, C~. ~5508 PXOHE ~2Z-4~11 Purgeable Aromatics I<RAZAN AND ASSOC. Date 3860 NORTH WINERY ...... REPORT:~2]83186 FRESN0~CALIF. 93'786 ATT~':RiCK S-~AUBE~ .................. i ........ LAB No.:16AA8 ' Sample Description: B-3 @ 15.0' DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAD: COMPLETEI): 9-15-86 9-15-86 M i ~ i m~.im I~epor t i nc] AT~a I yse:~ I~epoc t i i~U Const i tuent Uni ts Resu I ts Leve Benzene ug/g none detected 0 To'luene ug/g none detected 0 1 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0 I p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0 m-Xylene ug/g none detec tecl 0 o-Xylene ug/g none detected Isopropyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0 TVH ug/g O. O0 .0.5 EPA 50~0/80~0 TVH: By Gas Ch~-omatography Comments: LOCA'F I ON: t-]86-0D0 · LABORATORIES J J EG~IN REG CHEM [NGR PEHtO/EL/I/ MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics KRAZAN AND ASSOC. Date of 3860 NORTH.WINERY .............................................. ..~. .......... ~ .......... 8EFTORT:~2~3786 ........ -,,- ............ -, FRESNO,CALIF. 93786 ATTN:RICK STAUBER LAB No.:16qq9 Sample Description: B-3 @ 25.0' DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED ~ LAB: C()MPLETED: 9-°15-86 9-15-86 9-2;~-86 Report lng Aha 1 yses [~epc~," t i Co ns t i tuen t [Jla i t s Resu I t s Leve 1 Benzene ug/g none detected O. ! Toluene ug/g none detected 0.! Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.! p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 m-Xyiene ug/g none detected 0.1 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 [sopropyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.1 TVH ug/g 0.00 0.5 EPA 5080/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography (]~)mments: LOCATION:B86-080 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES ~MP ~ -- ~ ~ <-- O : ~ O~ERVATIONS/coMMENTS SAMPLENO DATE TIME LOCATION ~ ~' ~ -- ~ Z RELINQU~HED BY' DATE~j. RECEIVED BY DA~ RELInQUIShED BY DAT~~ECEI~ED~Y DATE TOTAL NUMBER /e¢ METHOD OF SHIPMENT Signature Sign~ure Signature Signature Print~ Name Prlnt~ Name i PrJnt~ Name Prlnt~ Name ~' I~ fi ~/~/ ~ ~ : SPECIAL SHIPMENT/HANDLING Com~lny Comp=ny' '" QR ~QRAGE REQUIREMENTS Company Core.ny - ' .... ~ ....... Signatutl ';. 5lgnatur~ .. Signaturl '} TIME TIME TIME - Prlnt~ Name ~ Prlnt~ Name p~nte~ Name Printed I . E . Comoanv I~mo.ny . Company ; KRAZAN & A $ S IAT E.S Specialized Fuel Seepage Studies Laboratory Soils Testing Soils Engineering Geotechnical Investigations August 27, 1986 -.. Proj. No. B86-081 Culligan. Water Conditioning 116 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 .......... ~RE: S~ii' 5ampling-/ch~'mical Analysis' (Phase' II) Culligan ~ater Conditioning. Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: Based on the results of the initial exploratory program, the Kern County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health has indicated that it will be necessary to determine the lateral extent of soils contamination due to the abandoned underground storage tank. The following is an outline of the scope of work ~roposed for this phase (Phase II). 1. One boring (Boring No. 2) would be advanced 10 feet west of Boring No. 1 which has been advanced in the approximate center of the tank excavation. 2. Based on field examination of soil samples obtained from Boring No. 2, a second boring (Boring No. 3) would be advanced either between Boring No. I and Boring No. 2 or 5 to 10 feet west of Boring No. 2. 3. Both borings would be advanced to a depth of 25 feet. Soil samples would be obtained 'from each boring at depths of 10, [5, 20, and 25 feet utilizing a ring-lined barrel sampler (ASTM D3550-8~). 4. Two to four samples from each boring would be analyzed for Benzene, Toluene, the Xylenes and Total Volatile Hydrocarbons. Chemical analysis would be performed by B.C. Labs of Bakersfield, California. Main Office: Fresno / Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 832-8909 [] Visalia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993 Page No. 2 Proj. No. B$6-0gl 5. The borings would be logged in accordance with the unified soils classification system. Drilling returns would be barreled and stockpiled on site and the borings would be left open pending results of chemical analysis. The exploratory boring would be backfilled with a cement/bentonite slurry after it had been determined that this would not interfere with any anticipated remedial program. The-drilling returns would be designated based on the results of the chemical analysis. 6. Results of all exploratory work completed would be summarized in a report including scope of work, soils profile and subsurface conditions, extent of contamination, and conclusions. .................. ' '" i'~"~here are any questions or if :~ve Gan Be Of 'f(~rthe'r ~§sistance;-please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Richard M. Stauber Staff Engineer RMS/cr cc: Kern County, ATTN: John Harris KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. · KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Compaction Testing ~ngineered Septic Systems ,, \ \ \ ,~1~ ~ ~ ~ ) Construction Testing Geotechnical Investigations . ?*-.. ..... ~ ' ....... 3uly 25, 1986 ~.)~. ;~ ..~ Proj. No. B86-08I · , ~,[ ..,~.. Culligan Water Conditioning ; 116 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 ,. RE: Culligan Water Conditioning Warehouse Underground Tank Removal Gentlemen, Recently one 550 gallon underground rue! storage tank was removed from the Culligan Water Conditioning Warehouse facility. The site is located in Section 29, Township 29 south, Range 28 east, Mt. Diablo baseline and meridian near the intersection of California Avenue and Baker Street. In' accordance with Kern County ordinance G-39#1, soil samples were obtained at a depth of 2 and 6 feet below the tank bottom and analyzed for gasoline fuel constituents. The levels of gasoline detected in the soil below the tank were in excess of the limits allowed by Kern .County. The purpose of this investigation was to further explore the soils directly below the tank to determine the relative magnitude of the soils contamination. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 1. One boring was advanced in the center of the backfilled tank excavation to a depth of approximately #0 feet. Samples were obtained from this boring at 5 foot intervals, utilizing a ring-lined barrel sampler (ASTM D3550-8#) beginning at a depth of 15 feet. The boring was logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. 2. Both the 15 foot and 25 foot samples were analyzed for Benzene; Toluene, and the Xylenes in accordance with EPA test method 8020. 3. Drilling returns were barrelled and stockpiled on site, ~nd the boring was covered Pending results of chemidal analysis. Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 [] Visalia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993 Page No. 2' Proj. No.. B86-081 SOILS PROFILE The backfill materials consisted· of a fine., silty sand. Native soils were encountered at a depth of 13 feet and consisted of a very fine sand with silt. Fine to medium sand was found below a depth of I7 feet and extended to approximately 28 feet. Below the fine to medium sand, very fine sandy silt with clay was encountered. Fine to medium sand was again noted below a depth of 33 feet and extended to the termination depth of the exploratory boring, #l feet. Very hard drilling was experienced at a depth of approximately 35 feet. This could be indicative of a thin cemented strata at that depth. According to the Kern County Water Agency Water Supply Report, 198#, the depth to groundwater below the site is.approximately 250 to 300 feet. EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION A fuel odor was noted in the exploratory boring to a depth of approximately 25 feet. Chemical analysis of the soil sample taken from 15 feet in the exploratory boring resulted in relatively low concentrations of gasoline constituents being detected. The presence of gasoline constituents was not detected in a sample taken from a depth of 25 feet in the exploratory boring.. The results of the chemical analysis are presented in the following table. TABLE I Concentrations of Gasoline Constituents in Soil Concentrations (ppm) Location Benzene Toulene Xylenes Total Volatile Hydrocarbons '8 ft.* 6 232 287 .... 12 ft.* 210 '1293 699 .... BI 0 I5 ft. I# 37 83 179 BI 0 25 ft. <O.l <0.1 : <0. l <0.5 ~Testing by others Page No. 3 Proj. No. B$6-08l CONCLUSIONS The soil contamination appears to be limited to a depth of approximately 25 feet. The most obvious contamination is limited to a depth of approximately 15 feet. According to the Kern County Water Agency, groundwater is approximately 2~0 to 300 feet below the site. RECOMMENDATIONS If water 'is not allowed free access t6 the area~ the small plume of contamination should present a relatively small risk to groundwater resources in the area. The following recommendations are made to mitigate the risk to groundwater. 1. The exploratory boring should be backfilled to a depth of approximately 5 feet with a bentonite cement slurry. 2. A building is currently planned for the area overlying the contaminated soil. This building along with the adjacent structure should provide an effective barrier to prevent the migration o£ rainwater into the contaminated soil. If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, Richard M. Stauber Staff~ Engineer. Michael Erwin Principal Engineer. RCE # 18625 ME/RMS/cr enc. 2 ¢ plus invoice herewith 1 c Kern County Health Dept. d..LIU. L_I(.4~,I-J. I.-.~ d. zPd~l'F'l,:gdll~ . . Dr~C~[ ^,,~~, . KRAZAN a ASSOCIATES Project Ho. I Drawing N?. ~1~1~ ~Z~,~I~I~- . Merced Fresno Vis~lia Bakersfield MAJOR DIVISIONS SYM BO L'~S TYPICAl' '~"AMES SW Well-graded grevels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no lines ~ GRAVELS GP Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines (More than ',~ ot coarse GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures "~ ~ fraction > no. 4 sieve size) ~, c ~ GQ Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures ~ ~ o° SW .Well-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines ~ SANDS SP Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no lines ~ ~ A (More than ½ of coarse O SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures (.3 fraction <no. 4 siev~ size) SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures ME Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock Ilour, silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with u3 slight plasticity .-I ~ ,?,o ~ SILTS & CLAYS GL Inorganic clays of Iow to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, m o., EL · 50 lean clays Z c '~ OL Organic silts and organic silty clays ol Iow plasticity - ~ ME InOrganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty 'soils, elastic silts ,,, o d SILTS & CLAYS Z ;~ c CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays ,, v 'LL > 50 OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silty clayl organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt Peat and other highly organic soils UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM COHESIVE SOILS GRANULAR SOILS CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES U.S, Standard Grain Size Description Blows/fi, Description Blows/ft, Grain Type Sieve Size in Millimeters very sOft < 3 very loose < 5 .... Boulders above 12" above 305 soft 3-5 loose 5-15 Cobbles 12" to 3" 305 to 76.2 medium(firm) 6-10 medium dense 16-40 Gravel 3" to no. 4 76.2 to 4.76 ' still 11-20 dense 41-65 coarse (c) 3" to ~ 76.2 to 19.1 fine (f) ~" to no. 4 19.1 to 4.76 very stiff 21-40 very dense > 65 hard > 40 Sand no. 4 to no. 200 4.76 to 0.074 coarse ,~ (c) no. 4 to no. 10 4.76 Io 2.00 medium (m) no. 10 to no. 40 2.00 to 0,420 fine (f) no. 40 lo no. 200 0.420 to 0.074 CONSISTENCY CLASSIFICATION Si~t & Clay below no. 200 below 0.074 GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION x 50 uJ CH z 4o m 20 CL ~ CH 10 MH 7 ICL--~ ML& OL O 10 20 30 40 50 60' 70 80 ~ 1OO LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY CHART, ~ ~Z~ & ASSOCIA~S (2~) 291-7~r Project CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING Proj. No. B86-081 Boring No. I 1I DATE DRILLED: July 1, 1986 TYPE OF BORING: 10-inch Stem Auger HOLE ELEV: GROUNDWATER LEVEL:. - ........ LOGGED BY: RMS__ = ~ ~E= ~~ SOIL DESCRIPTION Loose F~ne 5~lty 5and (SN), Dark 8town, Damp, Drills Easy 5-- 10-- ~5- X 36 Ver~ F~ne Sand w~th L~ght Brown, Damp, Drills Easy, Fuel Odor 2o- X 20 ~Sne ~o Medium Sand (5W), Tan, Damp, Drills Eas~, L~ght Fuel Odor 25 -- X 36 *1% = 1%efusal, greater KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Sheet 1 of 2 than 100 blows/foot Fresno · Visalia · Bakersfield DATE DRILLED: dul.y 1 ,' 1986 .. TYPE OF BORING: l__0-inch Stem Auger HOLE ELEV: ......... GROUNDWATER LEVEL: LOGGED BY: RJV]~ £ ~ ~- ~ ~- ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION '~ ~' ~" '~ - ~ ~ -- 3~ X 23 Very Fine Sandy Silt (ML) with Clay, Light Brown, Damp., Drills Easy; No Fuel Odor 3~ X R Fine to Medium Sand (SW), Tan, Damp, Drills Easy, No Fuel Odor Drills Very Hard at 35 Feet Drills Very Easy at 36 Feet 40_ X 43 BOTTOM 0F BORING 4~ '*R = Refusal, greater KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Sheet 2 , of 2 than 100 blows/foot, Fresno · Visalia * Bakersfield [ ZALCO ~E3OIqATES)IqlF=S, Analytical ~ ConsultinG1 Services Culligan Laboratory· No: 8494 116 Baker Street Date Received: 6/16/86 Bake-rsfield, CA 9'3301 Date Reported: 6/16/86 Att. n: Jack Clayton v SOIL SAMPLING REPORT Constituent: 2 feet below 6 feet below. tank tank mg/kg (ppm) mg/kg (ppm) Benzene .6.0 210 Toluene 232 1293 Ethyl Benzene 83 286 Xylenes 287 699 /Jim Etherton - -- '~' ~ / Laboratory Director 4309 Armour Avenue BakerSfield, California 93308 [805] 395-0539 PURGEABLE AROMA¥ICS ANALYSIS (SO[L) KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATIES Date oF ~860 ~est ~i~e~ REPORT: 9-1 Fresno, California 93727 LAB No.: 10556 SAMFLE DESCRIPTION: BORING if[ DEPT~I t5.5' DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE 'DATE ANAI_YSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED ':~) LAB: COMPLETED: 7-1786 7-1-86 9-9-86 M [ N [ PtU REPORT lNG ANAI_YSES REPORT CONST l TUENT UN [ TS RESULTS LEVEL Benzene : ug/g [4.00 O. [ Hexane ug/g n~ne deCected O. 1 Toluene ug/g 3~.59 ,). i Ethylben~ene ug/g i4 39 0.1 Isoprop'/lbenzene ug/g 4 ?t O. I p-Xylene ug/g ~,3 ~5 O. t o-'Xylene uq/g E6 38 O. [ m--Xylene , ug/g .35 79 O. t TVI4 ug/g, t79 38 0.5 .EPA 50EO/80JO TVH:By Gas Chromatography ORATORIES INC PURGEABLE AROMATIC~ ANALYSIS (SO[L) KRA2AN AND ASSOCIATIES Oa'I-.e"af 5860 West Winery ~EP,']~?T: 9- [0.--8~ Fresno, Califo~ia 95727 '. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: BORING If3 DEPTH Oh[E/TIME DATE/ rIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED' ~ LAD: C..]HPLETED: 7- t-86 7-1-86 9-9-86. r,.I l N I r,lU REP OR r l NG Al'IAI_ YS~S RI:-TPOP, 1' [ bis L~ ,EL CONS'r I TUENT UN I TS F~ESIJL TS ~ ' ' Benzene ug/g nqne detected O. ! Hexane ug,"g none detected O. [ Toluene ug,"g r~one detected ,3. l Ethylbenzene ug/g none.detected O. 1 Isopropylbenzene ug/g none detected O. I p -Xy 1 erie ug/g 'none detec ted 0..[ o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 m=Xylene ug/g none detected O. 1 TVH ug/g none detected 0.5 EPA 5020/S020 ' TVH:By Gas Chromatograoh'/ NOTE: LAB.910567, 10569-?1 NOT ANALYZED PER REQUEST KRA. ZAN & AS S O C I AT ES ,..,,o-..,.,,,.,,,..,.~.~....~,,.,, ~.,~.~ , Chain of Custody Record ~oll~ Englne~ . ~ Krazan and A~ciates~ Inc. . A~ORE:. ~R6O Nnrth Wi ner~ 'PAR~ETERS O~NER ~resno. CA ~2726 m ~ ~(209) 291-7337 ~ m ~ ~ < - : Z Z m 0 0 0 OBSERVATIONS/ ~~~ -- ~ ~ COMMENTS ~MPLE NO DATE TIME LOCATION 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ¢ ,~ /oeo ~Ze~6.~-~l~o ,~ ~.0 oo'~ - ~/ /I/~ ~/~ ~.~-~/.0' A~OL p ~ ' ' ~' I RELINQUISHED BY IDATE RECEIVED BY DATE ~ELINQUIS~ED BY DATE 'RECEIVED BY DATE TOTAL NUMBER ' METHOD OF SHIPMENT ~[Z~Z/~ /~O Print. Name Print. Name Print. Name '. SP SHIPMENT/HANDLING Company ' Commlny Company Company ~ OR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS RELINQUISHED BY DATE 'RECEtVED By DA~E RELINQUISHED BY DATE 'RECEIVED By (laborato~} i DATE ./ ITIME ,., :TIME TI~E ~~A/~~ TIME Prlnt~ Name =Prlnt~ Nama P~ntad'Nama I tinted N~m.,, ,. / A~alvtlcal Tec~n~logie~ I~. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TAi~I~UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK)/,.,~ SITE REPORT EMERGENCY STATE TANK ID ~ ~] YES [_~'" N--'~? HAS STATE OFF[CE Of EMERGENCY SERVICES REPORT B ENFILED? YES ~ REPRESENTING ~OCALAGENCY ~ OTHER ICOMPANY OR AGENCY NAME d~ O ADDRESS I > naME CO~TACT ~SO~ m ~ ADDRESS '~ CROSS STREET TYPE Of AREA ~OMMERCIAL ~ INDUSTRIAL I TYPE OF BUSINESS ~ RETAIL FUEL STAT ION LOCAL AGENCY AGENCY NAME CONTACT PERSON. PHONE ~ ~ TSCD i~ ( ) ~_ CAS ~ (ATTACH EXTRA SHEET if N~EDED) NAME QUANTITY LOST (GALLONS) DATE DISCOVERED [ HOW DISCOVERED ~ INVENTORY CONTROL '~ SUBSURFACE MONITORING " I REMOVAL ~ ~ DA~E DISCHARGE BEGAN METHOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE {C~ECK ALL THAT A~PLY) ~ HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED? ~ REPAIR TANK ~ REPAIR PIPING ~ CHANGE PROCEDURES a< ~S ~NO IF YES, DATE I ~MI(~I /DJ SOURCE(S) OF DISCHARGE TANKS ONLY]CAPACITY ~'~ ~ GAL CAUSE{S) ~ ~ :~TANK LEAK ~ UNKNOWN ~OVERFllL ~CORROSION < AGE [ [ I YRS. ~ UNKNOWN U ~ [~ PIPING LEAK MATERIAL ~ RUPTURE/FAILURE ~ SPILL U ~ STEEL ~ FIBERGLASS .~ SURFACE WATER OR STORM DRAIN ~ ~ ~ ~ INDUSTRIAL U~ BUILDING OR UTILITY VAULT ~ ~ ~ ~ AGRICULTURAL ~ OTHER {SPECIFY) El ~ ~ 0 OTHER(SPECIFY) 0 U I COMPLETE A TRACKING REPORT If ANY CLEANUP WORK OR PLANNING HAS STARTED H~C 05 AND ATTACH CLEANUP (10/85) .K R A Z A N & A S S Ot C IA T E S Specialized Fuel Seepage Studies Laboratory Soils Testing Soils Engineering Geotechnical Investigations 3une 27, 1986 "- Proj. No. B86-081- Culligan Water Conditioning 116 Baker Bakersfield, CA 93305 ^TTN: Mr. Don Felton RE'. Exploratory Drilling/Tank Removal Culligan ~I/ater Conditioning Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Felto.n, From our phone conversation of June 18, 1986, it is understood that one 550 gallon 'underground fuel storage tank has been removed from the above-referenced site. In accordance ~vith Kern County regulations, soil samples were obtained from the bottom of the tank excavation and analyzed for gasoline fuel constituents. The levels of gasoline detected in the soil below the tank were in excess of .the limits allowed by Kern County. At this time, it is necessary to explore the soils directly below the tank further to determine the relative magnitude of the soils contamination. The following is an outline of the proposed work to be done in this phase. 1. One boring would be advanced in the center o_f the backfil!ed tank excavation to a depth of approximately 40 feet. Samples would be obtai.ned from this boring at 5 foot intervals, utilizing a ring-lined barrel sampler (ASTM D3550-80). The boring would be logged in accordance with the unified soil classification system. 2. Selected samples from the boring would be analyzed for Benzene, Toluene and the Xylenes in accordance with EPA test method 8020. 3. Drilling returns would be barreled and stockpiled on site .and the boring would be left open pending results of chemical analysis. The exploratory boring would be backfilled with a cement/bentonit~ slurry after it had been determined that this would not interfere with any anticipated remedial program. The drilling returns would be designated based on the results oi the chemical analysis. "" Main Office: Fresno / Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 832-8909 [] Visalia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993 Page No. 2' Proj. No. B$6-081 #. A report would be prepared presenting the results of all the work accomplished in this phase. If there are any questions or il we can be' of further' assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES~ INC. Richard M. Stauber Staff Engineer Michael Erwin Principal Engineer RCE 1118625 RMS/ME/cr KRAZAN ~: ASSOCIATES, INC. AnalyCioal ~ Consultin~j Seevioes ~ Culligan Laboratory No: .8494 116 Baker Street Date Received: 6/16/86 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Date Reported: 6/16/86 Attn: Jack Clayton SOIL SAMPLING REPORT Constituent: 2 feet below 6 feet below tank tank mg/kg (ppm) mg/kg (ppm)~ Benzene 6.0 210 Toluene 232 1293 Ethyl Benzene 83 286 Xylenes 287 699 E Laboratory Director JE/ 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 [805) 395-0539 ~?O0~ower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH O~CER Bakersfield California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 · ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ~ Vernon S. Reichard PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT Permit Number A147 BAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE ~ACILI Facilit~Naae and Address: Ocher Naee and Address: Cull/gan Water Conditioning Culligan Water Conditioning' ....... 116 Baker Street __ , . ............ .. - .........-..- ....... -..,-..ll6Baker Street. ' Bakersfield, CA 93305 Bakersfield. CA '93305 Permit to Abandon Permit Expires' May 16, '1987 1 tank at above Approval Date May 16,1986 location. Approved By .~ /~*,~. ~/ Jo[ Canas ............. : ...... ;POST O~ PRENISES .................. '.' . Conditions as Follows: l. Perm.ittee must obtain a Fire Department permit prior to initiating abandonme.nt action. 2. Abandonment must be per approved methods as described in 'permit application and Fire Department Handout.. 3. All proCedures used must be in accordance with requirements' of Standards and Guidelines developed for implementation of Kern County Ordinance Code $6-3941. A copy of these requirements are enclosed with this permit. 4. A minimum of two sot1 samples at depths of approximately 2' and 6' beneath, the center of the tank must be retrieved and analyzed for benzene, toluene, and xylene. 5, .Advise' this office of time and date of proposed sampling with 24 hours advance notice/ - DISTRICT OFFICES :ivision of Environmental Heal Application Date f'700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 No. of ·Tanks to be Abandoned / A[R:~.ICATI~I~I ~ PE~IT FOR ~ OR PERMANI~T / / ~~ OF L1NDI~ ~ ~ STORAGE FACILIT~ Type of A~lication .(Fill Out One Application Per Facility), [']Temporary Closure/A~andonment ~Permanent Closure/Abandonment A. Project Contact (name, area code, phone): Days %.f]' Y/' -,./ ~f / ": .. Nights Facility A~dress ~? ', ,.'-' -, 'i:...,.- Bakersfield Nearest Cross St. /'-.',.,, _. T R SEC (Rural Locations Only) Owner . Donald G. Felton Telelmhone 324-4718 Address 116 Baker St. Bakersfield, Ca. 93305 Zip Operator Telephone ....... Address ........... ZiP _ B. Water to Facility Provided by California Water Depth to Groundwater 199 feet Soil Characteristics at Facility Silt & Sa[ncIy Basis for Soil Type and ~l~ndwater Depth Deteminations ~alifornia Water C. Tank Removal Contractor Self CA License No. 218379 Address . Zip Telephone Proposed Starting Date 5/19/86 zf%o~osed Ccmpletion.Date Worker's Compensation Certification ~ 27 - insurer E.B.I. Company c/o Cerroon & Black, Mr. Harold Weiner P. O. Box 255228 Sacramento, Ca. 95865 Environmental Assessment Contractor CA License No. Add r es s Zip Te 1 epho ne Proposed Starting Date Proposed Completion Date Worker s Compensation Certification .% Insurer D. Chemical Composition of Materials Stored Tank % Chemical Stored (non-conmlercial name) Dates Stored Chemical Previously Stored (if different) _ - . ^,;,3 ~ C-~I- 1972 to 1985 , _£ .~c, "/-,,i: to to to g.Describe Method for Retrievir~g Samples' Samples Will be Analyzed for Gasoline Laboratorv That Will Perform Analyses of Samples BC Labs Address 4T00 Pierce Rd. Bakersfield Telephone327-4911 This application for: ~removal or ~abandonment in place F. * * PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET BEFORE SUBMITTING RPPLICATION FOR REVIEW. This form 'has been~completed uuSder pehaity of' perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true Kern Count~ Health Dep~rtment ~ Division or Environmental Heal~ Application Da' 3/18/85 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield,. -CA 93305 · APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of Application (check): ~]Ne--~ Facility DModification of Facility ~Existing Facility DTransfer of Ownership Weekends A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days Jack Clayton (805) 398-8820 Nights ' ' ' Same Facility Name Culliqan Water Conditioninq No. of Tanks 1 Type of Business (check): DGasoline Station ~Other' (describe)Water Conditioninq Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? DYes ~No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? []Yes Facility Address 116 Baker St Bakersfield Nearest Cross St. E. California T R SEC (Rural Locat'ions ~nly) Owner Donald G. Felton Contact Person Jack Clayton Address 116 Baker St Bakersfield Zip 93305 Telephone (805) 324-4718 Operator Same Contact Person .... Address ........................................... Zip .................... Telephone ............. B. Water to Facility Provided by California Water S~rvi~pth to' Groundwater ? Soil Characteristics' at Facility Basis for Soil Type ar~ Groundwater Depth Deteminations C. Contractor CA Contractor's License Address Zip Telepho~ Proposed Starting Date Proposed Completion Worker' s Compensation ,Certificatio~ t Insure~ D. If ThiS~ Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications Proposed E. Tank(s) Store (check ali that apply): Tank t Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular Premi,~ Diesel Waste F. Ch~ical C~posi~iom of Materials Stored (no~ necessary for motor vehicl~ fuels) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~mercial name) CAS ! (if known)' Chemical Previously Stored (if different) G. Transfer of Ownership Date of ~-~nsfer N/A Previous Owner PreviOus. Facility Name I, accept fully all obligati'ons of Pemit NO. issued to · I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfer of the Petal% to Operate this ~derground storage facility upon receiving this completed form. ~nis form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and co rr, ee~-~ ~/! ~tJ~/,~ ~ .~i~nature /I ~ Date F~ci!iay Nam~ Cu±i±gan Wa'Uer Co',e~tiontng P=:~nln No ~'- T~K ~ 1 (FILL OUT ~;EPARATE F(.)~ FOR T~K) FOR EA~ SE~ION, CHECK ~ ~PROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaulted ~n-Vault~ ~uble-Wall ~Si~le~all 2. T~ Material . ~Car~n Steel ~Stainless Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~Fiberglass<l~ Steel ~Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~inm ~Bronze ~Other (de~ri~) 3. Primry Contai~nt ~te Installed ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (Gallons) ~nufacturer I'964 o ~ ? 4. Tank Secondar~ Conta'i~ent ~Other (descri~): ~ufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~~r ~kyd ~xy ~enolic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~ ~o~ ~Other (de~ri~): 6 ....Tank Corrosion Protection '~GalVaniz~ ~ass-Cl~ ~l~ylene Wrap ~Vinyl Wra~l~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Cath~ic Protection: ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crific~al ~e ~t~ ~ri~ System & Equi~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vault~ t~ks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~ll(s) ~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U-T~ Wi~out ~ner U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow to Monitori~ ~l(s)* Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Li~id ~vel ~n~r* ~Cond~tivit~ ~ Pressure Sen~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank- ~ Liquid ~tri~al '& Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitori~ ~11 or ~ar ~ ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ri~ic Tigh~e~ ~None ~o~ ~er b. Pipit: Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for Pressuriz~ ~nitori~ S~p ~th ~ce~y ~al~ ~ncrete ~ce~y ~ Unkno~ ~ ~her 8. ~en Tigh~ess ~st~ ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te of ~st Tightne~ Test Results of Te~ Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank Re~i r . Ta~ Re~ir~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) 10. ~erfill Protection O~rator Fili~, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel Ta~. Fl~t ~a~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~ Auto Shut- Off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ & ~el For ~ve ~ices a. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~terial Galvanized Iron Pipe Thickne~ (inches) ~Di~eter ~4-Anufacturer ~Pressure ~tlon ~Gravity ~Dr~te ~ of~i~ ~ 10 rt. b. Undergro~d Pipi~ Corrosion Prote~tio~ : ~lvani zed ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ress~ t~r rent ~crifi~ial ~Polye~Yle~ Wrap ~Electrica! isolat~.3~ ~Vinyl Wrap '~Tar or As~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her (de~r~) . c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Co~t~ · ~a~-: ~Other (de~ri~):