The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNDERGROUND TANK FILE #1 H~Z&,~DOUS ~^z~m;k~s ~Ws~o~ TIME CHARGED BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME: ADDRESS: '~c~ (i3~c-a- ~v- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~ ~' /F---t5 ( ,,~4.v~, 5 PROJECT NUMBER: ~3~ '~ ,J. ,,~'. DATE: NAME: .CHGD: COMMENTS: PROJECT COMPLETION: ' ' DATE: BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME: ...%"r- xf~,.c.e..,¢ 9e ~.., ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DATE: NAME: CHGD: COMMENTS: PROJECT COMPLETION: DATE: TIME .CHARGED BUSI.NES SfDEAP RTMT, NT NAa'vIE: ADDRESS: pROJECT DESCRIPTION: t/x~°oe-- ~-~. PROJECT NUMBER: "~43z- 03,,,,, ~ DATE: NAM3E: CHGD' COMMENTS: PROJECT COMPLETION: DATE: ..-. HAZA~OUS .MATERIAl $ [SION · BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME: ~ V~ .... b,e ~ PROJECT NUMBER: tb .-B ~3x. cLt,~ ~o~ Goo e.~,~,~, '~".~l DATE: NAME: ' CHGD: COMMENTS: PROJECT COMPLE~ON: DA~: "WE CARE" May 20, 1992 TO: Valerie Pendergrass FROM: Joe A. Dunwoody SUBJECT: Billing for assessment oversight of the Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store Project, The assessment phase of the Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store soil contamination is now complete. A total of eleVen (11) hours, at a rate of $45.00 per hour, was spent on this project. The total amount is listed below. Please enter the amount on the computer, note the date on the memo and file when completed. 11 hrsl * $45.00/hr. = $495.00 Billing address is: 300 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Attn: Ralph Bellieomina cc: Ralph E. Huey CITY of BAKERSFIELD HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVI S ION FIRE DEPARTMENT T I ME CHARGE D 2ml H STREET S. D. JOHNSON BAKERSFIELD. 93301 FIRE'CHIEF. / ~' , t ~ 326-3911 TIME DATE: N~E: CHGD: CO~ENTS: , . ~ . ~.~, · ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OONSULTA:NTS December 29, 1999 - ~ ...... ' .7 Mn Howard H, Wines, III City of Bakersfield Fire Department , ~;":':~-':'~ """'~' ~- ' -' Hazardous Materials Division ~ - 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 " Subject: THIRD QUARTER 1999 PROGRESS .REPORT FOR THE SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE ; 300 BAKER.STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (APN 016-320-15-00-2) Dear Mr. Win~s: -' Hoiguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA) is pleased to present this 'Third Quarter lC~99 Progress Report of the ongoing remedial action being conducted In assoCiation with the former UST at the above-referenced property. During the first quaffer of 1999~ Saint Vincent De Paul obtained pre~-approval of costs for active remedlation from the state Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)/Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF). DUring the second quaffer of 1999, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District'- Southern Region (SJVUAPCD-SR) issued ATC Permit #SL3548- 1-0 for the installation and operation of the VES at the. site. During the second quaffer of 1999, the seven VES wells were also constructed, Du~ing the third quader of -"' 1999, the VES unit was delivered to the site and connected to electricity and supplemental fuel as well as the vapor extraction wells, and staff-up system testing was performed. During the fourth quaffer of 1999, full-time Operation of the VES will be initiated. Because the SWRCB/USTCF provided pre-approval for only 3 months of system operation, the YES unit will be shut down at the end of December 1999, pending SWRCB/USTCF pre-approval of costs for additional system operation, SITE DESCRIPTION The': Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store Is located at 300 Baker street, Bakersfield, Kern County, California. The topography at the site is relatively flat, with a slight slope 'to the southwest (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The subject site Is bound on the east by Baker Street, on the south by. Chico Street, and on the west and north by commercial properties. The property Is located in the southeastern quarter of the southwestern quarYer of Section 29, T296, R28E, MDBM, and is Identified as APN 016-320-15-00-2. The property is situated within a developed ENV!IRONME-NTALi SCIENTIST-S-. GEOLOGISTS. ENGINEERS Contaminated si.re Assessme;nt's----Phase I Audits Site Remediation * H~fzardous Waste Managemenl '~ ' 143 S(>uthi'Figueroa Slreet ' 16570 Aslon Street 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite I 3001 Soulh 35th Streei, Suite ~-I I ~ - - -~ ? : .Ventura, California 93001 . Irvine, California 92606 Bakersfield, California 93308 . Phoenix, Arizona'85034 '- "-' ~(805/ 652-0"219 ' ' (949) 44~-6665 (805) 391-0517. - (800) 789-0219 * i602) 426-1000 . . - L.~- ' (805) 652-0793 FAX ' ~ . (949) 724-0446 FAX - (805) 391-0826-FAX (602) 4-26-0113 FAX~ '" =" - Intemeh first last@bra:corn lnternet: .firs~ Jasl@hfa.com lnlernet: firsLJasl@hfa.corn lnternel:_firslJasl@ph,hfa.c_om Mr. HOWard H. Wines, Ill HOLGUIN, BFDHMD ~ Fza~I_L~N December 29, 1999 - Page 2 & ASSC IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS comme'rciol and light industrial area, interspersed with residential properties. A 550-gallon gaioline UST, dispenser, and associated product piping were previouslY removed from the site (see Figure 2 - Plot Plan Showing VES). The praperty owner is Saint Vincent De Paul. The owner contact is Father Ralph Belluomini, 310 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California, 93305, (661) 323-7340. The project consultant contact is Mr. Duane R. Smith, Smith-Gutcher & AssOciates, Inc. (Smith-Gutcher), Post Office Box 60706, Bakersfi.~ld, California, 93386, (661) 871-3207. The soil vapor assessment consultant contact is Mr~ Ma~k R. Magargee, Hdguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (661) 391-0517. BACKGROUND GEOLOGY The site is located in a relatively flat area at an elevation of approximately 415 feet above MSL. The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, 'the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquin Valley. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11 ~000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial ,sediments are older, predominantly lake bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pli0cene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 30,000 fbg. Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments of the Kern River Formation, which form a homocline dipping gently to the southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of poorly indurated and dissected fan deposits (California Division of Mines and Geology,-1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). The site is an area at the foot of rolling hills reaching a maximum, elevation of 900 feet above MSL, located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The Kern River drains a large area of the southern Sierra Nevada, including the highest part of the range at Mount Whitney. The modern river has cut a channel southeast of the site and provides recharge for groundwater along its course. Sedimentary geologic formations, observed at the surface and underlying the site were sourced by the Sierra Nevada and transported via the ancestral Kern River. In the region of the site, the Tertiary sedimentary sequence from top to bottom is nonmarine Kern River Formation, nonmarine Chanac Formation, marine Santa Margarita Formation ~,' . ~- - Mr. Howard H. WineS, Itl : . F. AHAN -. December29,-1999 -Page 3 : &~IATESiiNC ~- -~. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GONSULTANTS - (possibly~inferfingeri-ng ..with'Chonac Formation due fo the tentative 'correl0tibn Of type S0nta iMorgarita Formation west of the Son Andreas Fault), ma'finb Round Mountain Silt, marine ~ Olcese Sand, marine Freeman Silt, marine Jeweff Sa~d and PY. rami~ ~ill'member, marine Vbdder Sand, nonmorine Walker Formation. Of these, only the Kern River, Chanac, Qnd SbntalMargorito formations bre important to the hydrogeology of the site. The Tertiary, nonmarine Kern River Formation is unconformably overlain by bouldery terroce deposits of Quaternary Older Alluvium. Two r~aturally occurring geologic units are 'present in the near surface at the site. The two natural units are the Tertiary (Miocene to Pliocene), nonmarine Kern River Formation, and Quaternary (Pleistocene) Older Alluvium. The Older Alluvium forms a thin terrace deposit lying unconformably on the Kern River Formation. Quaternary Older Alluvium: The middle to lower Pleistocene (Bartow, J.A., 1984, Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Southeastern San Joaquin Valley, California, USGS Map 1-1496), Older AlluviUm is a flat:lying terrace deposit approximately 5 to 10 feet thick that overlies the erosional s(Jrface of the Kern River Formation. The Older Alluvium is composed of very coarse material, with boulders as large as 50 cm In diameter. Clastic material composition includes granitic and dioritic crystalline rocks characteristic of the Sierra Nevada batholiths, quartzite characteristic of pre-bathdithic rocks, and volcanic and related rocks such as andesite and dark siliceous agate typical of the Neogene .deposits of the Mojave Desert. lB'some Idcations, caliche rims have developed between clasts. Kern River Formation: The age of the Kern River Formation includes uPper Miocene and Pliocene and possibly Pleistocene. The Kern River Formation is composed of interstratified f6ngl6meratic deposits and silty claystones, within the fanglomerates are Conglomerate beds ~vith cobbles as large as 20 cm in diameter, and in some areas fanglomerate beds exhibit Cross ilbedding from 2.5 to 5 meters thick. The silty claystone beds, which would serve as Iow-permeability barriers to vertical migration, are laterally continuous to as much as several thousand feet, but are locally truncated by sandy fanglomerate units. Another important factor in considering the potential for migration is the lack of secondary permeability within the Kern River Formation as no secondary cracks, small faults, or gypsum-veins are observed. Chanac Formation: The Chanac Formation of upper Miocene age is not exposed on or near the site, but outcrops in the cliffs southeast of the site along the Kern River bluffs at Hart Park. It is a thinly bedded, chalky siltstone exhibiting many secondary cracks and gypsum veins. ~ ' ~ Mr. Howaid H, Wines, Ill i:._'l HOLGUIN, '~ BFDHMD FAHAN .... . .. December 29, 1999 ~ Page 4 &,ASS(X2IATES, INC. :. ENVIRONMENTAL M~.N~,GEMENT CONSULT-~,NTS · · On-site-soil borings indicate that the. alluvium is characterized by highly permeable, fine-grained to coarse-grained sand interbedded with Iowe-r permeability, silt Zones ranging in depth from 24 to 27 fbg, 35 to 37 fbg, 44 to 57 fbg, land-63 to 70 fbg. The base of gasoline-containinbJ soils is within the silty interval rar~ging in depth from 44~tO 57 fbg. HYDROGEOLOGY - ~urfa~e water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra' Nevada t0 the east, and are transported by five major rivers, the southernmost_being the ' Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 2 miles south Of the Kern River. The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer mapped by the Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) is approximately 200 fbg at the site, with the direction of groundwater flow to the southwest (KCWA, 1994, 1993 Report on Water Conditions, February 1, 1994). The nearest known occurrence of perched groundwater is 2 miles to the southwest at a depth of 20 fbg in the abandoned Kern River cha6nel to the ancient Kern Lake bed (KCWA, 1993, 1992 Water Supply ' Report, May 1993). PREVIOUS WORK Based on a review of available data, analytical results, and conversations with Mr, Smith, on JUne 1,7, 1991, a 550-gallon gasoline UST, dispenser, and associated product piping were removed from the property. The former UST and dispenser were located immediately adjacent to the southwestern corner of the thrift store building, ~Soil samples collected from beneath the location of the UST indicated concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons (see Attachment 1 for a summary of previous work). 'On January 28, 1992, Smith-Gutcher advanced four soil borings (TH-1 through TH-4) to a maximum depth of 70 fbg in and around the area of the former UST, Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected from the soil borings. indicated, gasoline-containing soil to a depth of approximately 55 fbg within an approximate 25:foot radius around the former UST at the site (see Attachment 1). Gasoline-containing soils are believed to extend to at least 20 feet beneath the southwestern co~ner of the thrift store' building. Groundwater was not encountered and is not anticipated above a depth in excess of 200 fbg. The impacted soil consists of highly permeable, fine-grained to coarse-grained sands and silty sands interbedded with a signifiCant interval of sandy silts and silts. The known contaminant at the site has been identified as petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range. The total volume of hydrocarbon-containing soils was estimated to be 3~50 cubic yards, containing an estimated 2~i20 pounds of hydrocarbons in the''gasoline range. This equates to approximately 390 gallons of gasoline absorbed into the subsurface. Approximately 485 pounds of the hydrocarbons is estimated to be present beneath the thrift store building. ~ -' ::'. Mr. Howard H. Wines, I. HOLGUIN, BFDHMD FAHAN December 29, 1999 - Page 5 & A,SSC IATES; INC. ENVII~[Z)NMENT~.L Ix~4ANAC~EMENT GONE~ULTANTE~ HFA prepared a CAP dated June 17, 1996, for the site. A risk evaluation of the gasoline-containing soils at the site was conducted using American Society for Testing and Materials Designation: E-]739 Risk:Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (RBCA)., The results of RBCA Tier 1 and 2 evaluations were that the indoor air inhalation pathway exceeds the Permissible life¥ime l x10-6 exposure levels given the concenfrotic~n of benzene in the soils beneath'the thrift store building and that mitigation, is required to reduce these concentrations to o permissible residual level, which is protective of-the health of the occupants of the building. An RI/FS was conducted to assess the feasibility and cost effectiveness of mitigation te(:hndlogies. The results of the RI/FS analysis were that the time frame for natural biodegradotion is not sufficiently protective of the health of the current occupants of the building; removal of the hydrocarbons through excavation is not feasible or cost effective given the significant depth of the hydrocarbons and the existence of a significant volume of the hydrocarbons beneath the building; the-time frame for in-situ bioventing is not sufficiently p~Otedtive of the health of the current occupants of the building and is not the cost-effective alternative; and in-situ vapor extraction is the cost-effective alternative, which is protective of the health of the current occupants of the building. The BFDESD, in its case review letter dated July 30, 1996, concurred with the conclusions and recommendations of the CAP and requested that Saint Vincent De Paul initiate active soil ~emediation'in the form of in-situ vapor extraction. Saint Vincent De Paul obtained·competitive bids tO implement the CAP and submitted these bids to the State Water Resources Control Board/Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (SWRCB/USTCF) f. or pre-approval of cOsts. The SWRCB/USTCF, in its letter dated June 4, 1997, denied pre-approval of costs to conduct active soil remediation, and requested performance of additional soils investigation to determine whether current concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons in the soils presented a healtl~ risk to the occupants of the building. On September 16, 1997, Smith-Gutcher advanced soil boring TH1 through the location of the former UST to a depth of 45 fbg. Gasoline hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from depths of 15, 20, 30, and 45 fbg (see Attachment 1). Given the results of the soils investigation, significant concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons remained in the soils in and around the former UST including beneath the southwestern corner of the thrift ~tore: building. Upon review of the laboratory analytical results, the SWRCB/USTCF requested that a soil vapor assessment be conducted to determine if gasoline hydrocarbon vapors were present in the near-surface soils, which would present a risk of exposure to the occupants of the builciing. HOLOUlN, BFDHMD FAHAN . -- ~ December 29,-1999 - Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS : · On Ma9 6, 1998, HFA collected soil vapor samples (G-1 through G-4) around the periphew of the - foE~ndation to assess whether gasoline hydrocarbons_ may be migrating into the thrift store bu*ildinO. HFA advanced an AMSTM soil gas vapor probe to a depth of 3 fbg at each location. Gasoline hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in soil v_apor samples G-1 through G-4. -Hqwever, TPH as gasoline and benzene concentrations were not detected in soil vapor sample's G-1 thrOugh G-4 (see Attachment 1). Given the results of the soil vapor survey, the BFDESD, in its letter dated July 28, 1998, required 3 months of operation of the VES to reduce the p(tenti~l migration of gasoline hydrocarbons into.the thrift store building prior to considering the site for closure. D6ring ihe first quarter of 1999, Saint Vincent De Paul obtained pre-approval of costs for active remediation from the SWRCB/USTCF. On April 21, 1999, HFA submitted an ATC permit/PTa application to the SJVUAPCD-SR for the installation and operation of an Emission Control Sy?ems, Inc. (ECS) 250-scfm, thermal/catalytic oxidation unit. On June 9, 1999, the SJyUAPCD-SR issued ATC Permit #S-3548-1-0 for the installation and operation., of an ECS thermal/catalytic oxidation unit at the site (see Attachment 2 for a copy of the ATC permit). From Jane 25, 1999, through July 2, 1999, HFA drilled and constructed seven vapor extraction wells (Vw-1 through VW-7) at the site (see Figure. 2 for vapor extraction well locations). The wells were constructed of 2-inch-diameter, schedule 40 PVC piping with 0.03-inch slotted casing pocked in aquarium sand. Soil boring VW-1 was advanced through the former tank location and screened in the interval ranging in depth from 10 to 50 fbg. Three of the soil borings (VW-2 through VW-4) were drilled in a triangular pattern at locations approximately 20 feet radially from the former tank location and screened in the interval ranging in depth from 10 to 35 fbg. Thee other three soil-borings (VW-5 through VW-7) were drilled in a triangular pattern at locations approximately 20 feet radiallY from the former tank location and screened in the interval ra~nging in depth from 35 to 55 fbg. This pattern is designed to provide separate vapor extraction wells for the near-surface, highly permeable zone and for the deeper,, moderately permeable zone. REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1999 Dpring!the~firSt quarter of 1999, Saint Vincent De Paul obtained pre-approval of costs for active remediation fr°m~the SWRCB/USTCF. During the second quarter of 1999, SJVUAPCD-SR ATC permit #S-3548-1-0 was obtained for the installation and operation of the VES at the site, During,the Second quarter of 1999, the seven VES (VW-1 thrOugh VW-7) wells were also cUnstructed. During the third quarter of 1999, the VES unit was delivered to the site and :: .. - ' ' '-~ M¢;--H°ward:H:. wines, III _; HOLGUIN,. ~ --~ _:. . BFDHMD FAHAN' December29, 1'999-,page 7 & INC. EN~/iROi~4MENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULT_ANTS c~nnected to electricity and supplemental fuel as well as the vapor extraction wells, and start-uP system testing was performed (see Figure 3 - VES Schematic Diagram and Figurei4-VES P¢_ocess Component Description), During the fourth quarter of 1999, full-time operation of the VES will'be initiated. -: C~n August 1'3, 1999, HFA transported 25 drums containing the accumulated gasoline-containing soils from the previous site investigations, and the VES well and piping installation under nbn-h.azardous waste manifest to the Soil Rem Corporation facility in Bakersfield, California, where the soil was recycled through bioremediation technologies (see Figure 3 for a copy of the non-hazardOus waste manifest and Attacl~ment 4 for the certificate of title transferring title of the gasoline-cOntaining soils from Saint Vincent De Paul to Soil Rem Corporation). ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 1999 During the fourth quarter of 1999, full-time operation of the VES will be initiated in accordance' with the conditions of the ATC permit and SWRCB/USTCF pre-approval of Costs Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., trusts that you will find this Third Quarter 1999 Progress Report !o your satisfaction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (661) 391-0517 or at e-mail address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfa.com. ResPectfully submitted, Mark R. Magarg i, Senior Hydrogeologist : Holguln, Fahan & Associates, inc. 'MRM:rd : Enclosures: Figure 1 - Site Location Map ~ Figure 2 - Plot Plan Showing VES ~ Figure 3 VES Schematic Diagram Figure 4 VES Process Component Description ' Attachment 1 Summary of Previous Work " Attachment 2 ATC Permit ? ; Attachment 3 Non-Hazardous Waste Manifest , A~rachment 4 Certificate of Title cc: Father Ralph Belluomlnl, Saint Vincent De Paul Mr. Duane R. Smith, Smlth-Gutcher ., -~ ~:.- ' .... : Mr. Howa H. Wines, ' 7' . '~j iHOLGUIN' ' : BFDHMD ENVirONMENTAL MANagEMENT C~NSULEANT~ ' ' ' .... ...... [-- - ] .... ' : ..... ~ "' 'o '"- ~ "-. "~ '~ ' .-~ '-- ," 'k '" -' ' , ' · *, ,. '~ ...... .~~97~'~ '-":~' ~'"":-"':~' ' - " '. -- ~ ".' '~ ' s~ io, '~"~:'~*~'::~' ~.:'-... "', --- · ,: ..... '" ~; ~ ~ '~.'~, ~,~..,,.~ ..... ,.'"':"G'."'"',, ~"~?~"'~"~,, :~" ~ ~' '~"*' .... , [ , I .... :' II..'.,x,~'," ~,~:FF.T '.',.. i .... ~ , ~ ~ I;.'='. .... ~ : ~ . . -- ~ ....... ~' ~' . '~' ~-...-'~ ...... ._ ..... ...~ , .-.,o¢~L=.~.~1 ,?r.?.:..,,., .;~ ;:::'.', ...~ ~ ,- =-.-, .~,..,U:¢:',, ~ ?.. :..~" ~; ............ ~ ~ - "~1~. ' ~ ~ ~ :-..,, ~-- g .x,.', ~' ~ ~.~.~ d-' ,''~' ~; ,:?;~-."' I~ I I ~---- , ~ ; h~a~r - ~. .', ' ' ' """ , "v,t;~ .' .-,',',,'. ' r' ' '..' "' ~ ~r~'" '~=' ' · ~. ~ - :?' 5,' :?' ", ~ ..; :b ~,",~' .' t',';::y.<, ~ . '~ LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL :o" o., ~ U~L~ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE I -I ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ I .~ , :, ' 300 BAKER STREET ~o . .,,~ ~,~ - -. ~;~ . '~-~,~ 5,~ ~E~T ~J · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ...... 0 _ O;~ == . ~ KILOME~R ' FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP ~ - - - · Mr. Howard H. Wines, III I~I HOLGUIN,FAHAN .... - . BFDHMD December 29, 1999 - Page & ASSOCIATES, iNC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS !, :: IT' Z ASPHALT ' STORAGE YARD [u ' SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE O n EORMER DISPENSER FENCE GATE .---- ~ VW-6 ...... ~, ~VW-1 VW-3 VW-7 ASPHALT PARKING LOT , FORMER :: 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST ~: SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET 0 15 30 · LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL ~ VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET i; '~ · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA i_-'; -. ~ .:: .... VES PIPI-N(~ ~ : - FIGURE 2 -PLOT PLAN SHOWING VEs . ., =; ~. . _. - . HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ : REVI~SlONDATE: DECEMBER 29, 1999: RRI ? ; . F.,~.H.&N ~ December 29, 1999- Page. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS :' 1"25-250 scfm ' : ATMOSPHERE MONITORIN( :' PORT #3 MONITORING ~ , ~i PORT #2 >250 ppmv HYDROCARBONS CARBON CANISTERS ~. ATMOSPHERE MONITORING i PORT #1 ' ' / ~ MONITORING BLOWER WITH PORT #4 t SILENCER BLEED LINE 250-500 ppmv HYDROCARBONS [ CATALYTIC ~ OXIDATION. ATMOSPHERE SUPPLEMENTAL FUEL MONITORINGg__ PORT #5 500-3,250 ppmv ,, ~ THERMAL OXIDATION SUPPLEMENTAL FUEL . NOT TO SCALE ~' ~ LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL oo SAMPLE TAP SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE .310 BAKER STREET X · PRESSURE OR VACUUM GUAGE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA -=,-- ~' i' V~LVE .... __: ~,_ FIGURE 3- VE.S SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM ,.~ '. THERMAL OXIDIZER-- Emission Control Systems, Inc., Model 2501, with flame ~ ~iI. ' ,,, arrester, UV Sensor, and'control panel consisting of high .i and Iow temperature controls and system shut down VACUUM EXTRACTION SYSTEM controls (3 I_~ ' " " ' , . Sutorbilt Model 5M with 10 hp motor '"" ., EG&G Rotron Model DR454 blower rated CATALYTIC PROCESSOR F ' at 250/125 scfm and 4.3" Hg with 1.5 hp ' , ~ ' motor :ATALYTIC OXIDIZER -Emission Control Systems, Inc., Model 2501, with flame z~ FLOW GAUGE - Magnahelic Model 2001-AF arrester, UV Sensor, and control panel consisting of Differential Pressure Air Flow high and Iow temperature controls and system shut ; PRESS'URE GAUGE - Magnahelic Model 2015' down controls ~ '., ~ ... · Vacuum . AIR FILTER - EG&G Rotron fiber filter element KNOCK-OUT DRUM - 28-gallon capacity, PVC ACTIVATED CARBON PIPING - 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC FILTER -Westates Carbon, Inc., Models VSC-200, VSC-400, VSC-1200, or VSC-2000 Activated Carbon Filters (two in series with a minimum of 400 pounds total activated carbon) PIPING - 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC ,, ... : LEGEND : SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL , ..~' ~ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL"THRIFT STORE' ' ~ Q 300 BAKER STREET ' ~ ~-T BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA "o ~ ~ FIGURE 4- VES PROCESS COMPONENT. (3 [D ~' DESCRIPTION ~ T (~ HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INc. ~ E7 ----- " ' REVISION DATE: APRIL 20, 1999: RRI - - ,- FAHAN ~ :- & A,S,SOCIATES, INC. · - ; Eh~VIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEi'~IT coNsULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK rr LU uJ _z ASPHALT J STORAGE YARD I-- ~ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE O n- Q. FORMER DISPENSER ~~__, FENCE GATE '. _ 2 .TH-2 I TH- TH- IA' TH-3 ~TH1 ASPHALT PARKING LOT FORMER 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET 0 15 30 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL )~, .SOIL BORING SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I I LINE OF CROSS SECTION FIGURE 1 - PLOT PLAN [-'[O[,Gtl']Zq', F.,"t~..&.N &/I,.SSOC~.T~_,~, ]:]~I'C. REVISION DATE: DECEMBER 29, 1999: RRI z ASPHALT -~ STORAGE YARD ," SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE O r~ Q_ G-2 · FORMER DISPENSER ~~. -, FENCE GATE ,.. ~ G-3 G-4 I ASPHALT PARKING LOT FORMER 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET 0 15 30 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL · SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING POINT SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: DECEMBER 29, 1999: RRI I THRIFT STORE BUILDING (PROJECTED) FORMER WEST-NORTHWEST 550-GALLON EAST-NORTHEAST A GASOLINE UST A' TH-3 ~ TH-1 TH-2 ' ! TH-4 :::.:.:~:~<;:~;>2.:~:.~<;:~ :~4:~:~4:~;:~;:~;:~:. "~' "~'~.:~:.~:¢~:{~> ~>;-:[:.~-:~¥~:.~.:~:~:~:~:¥:~:¥: r: ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ :?:~:..:: :~>;~>~.:~¢~¢~¢~:¢ :¢[:¢~¢~:~:~¢~:¥:~:~ ~:~:~:?:~:?:~ ~:?:~:?:~¥~:~:~:'~:~:~>~:~ ~¥~:~-:~:~:-~:~:~¥~: 10 ........ 10 · ...:.~:.~:. :~:;~:~:~::C.;C..;~:~C::~: '~:.~::..'..:..'..:.~:;~.C~:~. :; :.:~ ;:.:.:;S W :;:;.:;:;~ :c,:.h:<::<,:<~:..',:..:.:.:,:c,: ?:<,:<,:..:.......-.:.,,.. ......... :c~:c~:c~:c~:c~:c~:c~:c~ :.:~: .:.:.....~.~.~........~.. 20 20 ) -~ 30 30 Q_ UJ 40 40 50 60 60 70 70 TD=70' HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET VERTICAL EXAGGERATION = 3/4 0 10 20 REFERENCE: SMITH-GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., MARCH 1992 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL TH-1 < SOIL BORING DESIGNATION :.~'~'.~' SILTY SAND (SM) SAI NT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE BOREHOLE (DASHED WHERE : POORLY GRADED SAND (SP) 300 BAKER STREET ~:-.'~:-.'-:i:-: WELL GRADED SAND (SW) BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA #/# ~-- TPH AS GASOLINE/BENZENE m S~LT (MLI FIGURE 3 - GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION A-A' CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (mD/kg) ND NOT DETECTED TD = X'"~ TOTAL BORING DEPTH REVISION DATE: JUNE 17, 1996: RRI TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE~, DATE / i SAMPLE TPH AS ~ ETHYL- TOTAL SOURCE i SAMPLEDI DEPTH ID GASOLINE BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES REF ~ [ (fbg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (U) 8020 N/A REPORTING LIMIT VARIES-SEE LABORATORY REPORTS N/A i <0.8 TH-1 ~ 6-17-91 I 9.5 I TH-1-9.5 1,800 <0.8 <0.8 54.3 A ' 6-17-91 I----13.5 'TH-1-13.5 4,300 <2 ~1____ <2 189 A ! 1-28-92 30 TH-l-30 ~ 1,500 3 1 . 24 305 B I 1-28-92 ~ '45 TH-1-45 I 6,000__ 110 730__ 170 960 B 'i 1-28-92 i 50 TH-l-50 500 7 51 15 88 B i1-28-92 I 65 TH-1-65 1. 0.19 0.1 0.079 0.287' B I 1-28-92 / 70 ~ .TH-l-70 ND 0.15 0.044 0.046 0.122 B D-1 i 6-17-91 j 2 I D-1-2 ND ND ND ND ND A I 6-17-91 6 D-1-6 ND. ND ND ND ND A TH-2 ] 1-28-92 25 I TH-2-25 2,000 <5 6 <5 395 B TH-3 ! 1-28-92 20 TH-3-20 ND ND ND ND ND B I 1-28-92 25 TH-3-25 2,600 <21 28 3-~ 413 B ; 1-28-92 45 TH-3-45 11,000 200 1,200 300 1,730 B._ · 1-28-92 60 TH-3-60 __ 2 0.34 0.0341 0.12 0.374 B__ 1-28-92, 65 TH-3-65 ND 0.015 ND ND ND B TH-4 '~ 1-28-92 i 25 TH-4-25 ND NDND __ ND ND~ B [' 1-28-92 ~_ 35 TH-4-35 ND ND ND ND ND B i_ 1-28-92 ~ 40 TH-4-40 3 0.056-- 0.02_ 0.130.255 B ', 1-28-92~ 50TH-4-50 ~ 0.054 0.11 0.065 0.086B I__ 1-28-92 55 TH-4-55 ND 0.026 0.068 ND _ 0,071B ! 1-28-92 r 60 TH-4-60 ND 0.013 0.019 ND 0.015 B TH1 ~. 9-16-97 I 10 TH1@10' ND ND ND ND ND C ', 9-16-97 I 15 TH1@15' 1---- 2,600 __ ND ND ND __ ND C 9-16-97 / 20 TH1@20'I 470 ND ND ND 1.3 C i 9-16-97 I 45 TH1@45' , 9-16-97I 30 TH1@30' 3.61 ND 0.0081 ND 0.26 C , 4,600 33 4801 1401 800c REF: Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Smith-Gutcher & Associates, Inc.'s (Smith-Gutcher's) tank removal sampling dated June 17, 1991. B = Smith-Gutcher's report dated March 1992. C = Smith-Gutcher's report dated September 30, 1997. TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF SOIL VAPOR SURVEY ANALYTICAL RESULTS SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA DATE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLED SAMPLE ID GASOLINE BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) REF EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) 8020 I N/A DETECTION LIMIT 10 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.041 0.01! N/A Former Gasoline DST 5-6-98 G-1 ND ND 0.031 0.07 0.081 0.08! A Southern End of Western Side of Building 5-6-98 G-2 ND ND 0.031 0.07 0.071 NDI A Southwestern Comer of Building 5-6-98 G-3 ND ND 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.081 A Westem End of Southern Side of Building 5-6-98 G-4 ND ND 0.04 0.051 0.05 0.091 A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, current report. ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & ~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2. AI'C PERMIT San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT PERMIT UNIT: S-3548-I-0 ISSUANCE DATE: 06/09/1999 LEGAL OWNER OR OPERATOR: HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES MAILING ADDRESS: 2820 PEGASUS DRIVE STE 1 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 LOCATION: 300 BAKER STREET, BAKERSFIELD EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION SOIL REMEDIATION PROIECT SERVED BY A EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. MODEL 2501 THERMAL/CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND TWO (2) WESTA~ CARBON, INC. MODELS VSC-200, VSC-400, VSC-1200, OR VSC-2000 400 LB (TOTAL) CARBON CANISTERS CONNECTED IN SERIES CONDITIONS 1. Whenever the soil remediation system is in operation, VOC emissions shall be controlled by thermal oxidation, catalytic oxidation, or carbon adsorption. [District NSR Rule] 2. No air contaminant shall be released into the atmosphere which muses a public nuisance. [District Rule 4102] 3. When VOC emissions are controlled by carbOn adsorption, a minimum of two carbon canisters which are connected in series shall be utilized. [District NSR Rule] 4. Sampling ports adequate for extraction of grab samples, measurement of gas flow rate, and use of an FID, PID or other District-approved VOC detection device shall be provided for both the influent and effluent gas streams. [District Rule 1081] CONDITIONS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE This is NOT a PERMIT TO OPERATE. Approval or denial of a PERMIT TO OPERATE will be made after an inspection to verify that the equipment has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and conditions of this Authority to Construct, and to determine if the equipment can be operated in compliance with all Rules and Regulations of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DIVISION AT (661) 326-6900 WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF THE EQUIPMENT IS COMPLETED. Unless construction has commenced pursuant to Rule 2050, this Authority to Construct shall expire and application shall be cancelled two years from the date of issuance. The applicant is responsible for complying with all laws, ordinances and regulations of ali other governmental agencies which may pertain to the above equipment. DAVID L. CROW, Executive Director/APCO SEYED SADREDIN, Director of Permit Services Southern Regional Office *2700 M Street, Suite 275 *Bakersfield, California 93301 *(661) 326-6900* FAX (66 I) 326-6985 conditions Continued: S-3548-1-0 Page 2 5. Laboratory samples shall be taken at the initial inspection, under the supervision of the APCD Inspector. Samples shall be taken from both the influent and the effluent gas stream sampling ports. [District Rule 1081] 6. Laboratory samples shall be analyzed for TPH and BTEX. [District Rule 1081] 7. Measurements to determine the influent and the effluent gas flow rates shall be taken at the initial inspection. Flow rate calculations shall be submitted to the District with the laboratory sample analysis results. [District Rule 1081] 8. Initial compliance with VOC emission rate and control efficiency shall be demonstrated by the results of the laboratory analysis. The results shall be submitted to the District within 60 days of the test. [District Rule 1081] 9. Ongoing compliance with VOC emission rate and control efficiency requirements shall be demonstrated by sampling both the influent and the effluent gas streams with an FID, PID, or other District-approved VOC detection device. [District Rule 1081] 10. Sampling to demonstrate ongoing compliance shall be performed at least once per week for the carbon canisters. [District Rule 1081] 11. The soil remediation system shall be maintained in proper operating condition at all times. [District NSR Rule] 12. The carbon canisters removed from the system shall be sealed vapor tight. [District NSR Rule] 13. Neither the soil ventilation rate nor the effluent gas flow rate shall exceed 125 scfm through the carbon canisters. [District NSR Rule] 14. Either the VOC control efficiency shall not be less than 95%, or the total VOC emissions rate shall not exceed 2 pounds in any one day. [District NSR Rule] 15. The VOC concentration of the effluent gas from the soil remediafion system served by carbon canisters shall not exceed 12.5 ppmv as hexane. [District NSR Rule] 16. Records of the cumulative running time and the measured influent and effluent VOC concentrations shall be maintained. [District Rule 1070] 17. All records shall be retained for a minimum of 2 years, and shall be made available for District inspection upon request. [District Rule 1070] 18. Operation of the soil remediation system shall not exceed 1 year without prior District approval. [District Rule 4102] 19. No air contaminant shall be discharged into the atmosphere for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour which is as dark as, or darker than, Ringelmann 1 or 20% opacity. [District Rule 4101] CONDITIONS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE FACILITY NAME:HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES LOCATION:300 BAKER STREET, BAKERSFIELD conditions continued: S-3548-1-0 Page 3 20. Sampling to demonstrate ongoing compliance shall be performed at least once per month for the oxidizers. [District Rule 1081] 21. When VOC emissions are controlled by thermal oxidation, the minimum operating temperature for the combustion chamber of the thermal oxidizer shall be maintained at or above 1,400 degrees F. [District NSR Rule] 22. The total VOC emission rate from the soil remediation system served by the thermal oxidizer shall not exceed 12.36 pounds in any one day. [District NSR Rule] 23. When VOC emissions are controlled by catalytic oxidation, the minimum operating temperature for the combustion chamber of the catalytic oxidizer shall be maintained at or above 600 degrees F. [District NSR Rule] , 24. The total VOC emission rate from the soil remediation system served by the catalytic oxidizer shall not exceed 3.73 pounds in any one day. [District NSR Rule] 25. Only natural gas shall be used as auxilliary fuel for the combustion of VOCs. [District NSR Rule] 26. The total NOx emission rate from the soil remediation system served by the thermal/catalytic oxidizer shall not exceed 0.1 lb/MMBtu. [District NSR Rule] 27. The total CO emission rate from' the soil remediation system served by the thermal/catalytic oxidizer shall not exceed 0.021 lb/MMBtu. [District NSR Rule] 28. The thermal/catalytic oxidizer shall be eqUipped with an operational temperature gauge to indicate the temperature of the combustion chamber. A continuously recording device shall be utilized to indicate the combustion chamber temperature during operation of the oxidizer. [District NSR Rule] 29. When VOC emissions are controlled by catalytic or thermal oxidation, the soil remediation system shall not be operated unless the combustion chamber of the functioning oxidizer is at or above the minimum operating temperature. The system shall automatically terminate operation if the temperature drops below the minimum operating temperature. [District NSR Rule] 30. The Air Pollution Control Inspector shall be notified in writing when the thermal incinerator will be modified to operate in catalytic oxidizer mode prior to the modification. [District NSR Rule] ~-~-u--m~uu~rc FACILITY NAME:HOLOUIN, FAll/tN & ASSOCIATES LOCATION: 300 BAKER STREET, BAKERSFIELD ~ ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & A~CIATF~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 3. NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST ~ NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Generator's US EPA ID No. IIManifest D°c' N°' ~'"~ 1107 WASTE MANIFEST ............... 3. Generator's Name and Mailing^ddress ..q , · / ~. ~:~ ~-~ ..-~, ~o ~...,,..~, . ~.. 5. Transpo~er 1 Company Name 6. US ~A ID Number ~ Phone C0mpany~ame 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transpoder's Phone , //:: ........... 9. Designated Facili~ Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Faciliys Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Containers 13. Total Quanti~ O. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above E. Handling'Codes for Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above ca this manifest are not s'ubject to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year 17. Transporter 1 Month Day 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement, df Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name/'~/////~ I Signature ~/ Month Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Spice 20. Facility Owner or Operalor: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name I Sig~rla~ture . Month Day ' Yea~ TRANSPORTER #2 FAHAN &,KSSC~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 4. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE CERTIFICATE # '0_0_3_ ISSUED TO: GENERATOR/SITE LOCATION QUANTITY 25_D_mm~ NAME:- Saint =Vincent' DeP aui, ADDREssi'~ TYPE'OF ~' . CONTAMINATION Gasoline Soil Rem 'c~b~;ati°n, . in c 4 he?.. ~b3~ice rtifies : i~ ; ih e: above, deSeri b e d :ma terial,wo.~ received on Au~:! 2_& AU~ :13,!~:i999i:and he rewith:'a~cePts::atle an~iaii:'fittu~.~!:lia~iities per~ain~ng theretO: Soil Rem Corporation, Inc. "' By ;~- / John E. 'Arnold President Date.'. 240 ~ r ~7 - ? ~' 5 .. :~" ',.i "~.'.'-77' ...' '.. _' ........ , ' '~. 5. , ',::.:"7 .: ', 5::":75.'.'. ::-': . ' ' '-.. ~ ¥, FAHAN & , INC. ~ IENVI~ONMENT~L ,,MANAG~EMENT C~,~NSULT~NTS April 21, 1999 Mr, Lance Ericksen /~Pt-'~ 2 2 1999 San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ?.,,,.~r,~,.~_. ~....,,,..~ ..... Southern Region ..... ,t,~,.,. ~,.;..t,~, ..... ~'~" ~'O~" ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 275 'Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: VAPOR EXTRACTION AND EMISSION PROCESSING DESCRIPTION FOR A SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT - SOUTHERN REGION AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE, 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (APN 016-320-15-00-2) Dear Mr. Ericksen: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA) is planning to perform vapor extraction and treatment of in-situ, gasoline-contaminated soils at the above-referenced site. Therefore, HFA has completed the required San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District - Southern Region (SJVUAPCD-SR) application forms including the following: · sPecifications for the proposed equipment (see Attachment 1 for the equipment specifications); · a map showing the site location and the surrounding area within a 1,000-foot radius, site plot plan showing the proposed vapor extraction system (VES) layout, and equipment description diagrams (see Figure 1 -Site Location Map, Figure 2- Plot Plan Showing VES, Figure 3 - VES Schematic, and Figure 4 - VES Process Component Description); · a completed SJVUAPCD-SR Authority to Construct (ATC) permit application form (see Attachment 2 for the SJVUAPCD-SR ATC permit application form); · a copy of the CAP, dated June 17, 1996, that was submitted by HFA to the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Environmental Services Division (BFDESD) (see Attachment 3 for a copy of HFA's CAP). A copy of the letter of approval from the BFDESD dated July 30, 1996 (see Attachment 4 for a copy of the BFDESD approval letter); · a "Screening Level Risk Assessment" using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA)"Air Toxics Assessment Manual" PTPLU modeling technique (see Attachment 5 for the CAPCOA screening level risk assessment); ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS · GEOLOGISTS · ENGINEERS ] I--IOI_GLJ[ , Mr. Lance Ericksen SJVUAPCD-SR Fl~.]'-'l/~ April 21 1999- Page 2 & A~_q.SOCIArI't-~2S, INC. ' ENVIRONMENTAl_ MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · an Emissions Verification Test (E~) plan (see A,achment 6 for the EVT plan); and HFA's check ~ tn ~e amount of ~ to cover ~e ATC permit application filing fee (see A,ochment 7 for a copy of HFA check ~). VAPOR EXTRACTION AND EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION EQUIPMENT HFA's VES will be installed at the subject site for the temporary, in-situ treatment of gasoline-containing soils and will consist of the following equipment (see Attachment 1 for a detailed description of the proposed systems): · Vapor Extraction Wells: Seven vapor extraction wells with a central vapor extraction well screened with 2-inch-diameter PVC casing in the interval ranging in depth from 10 to 50 fbg; three shallow-zone, lateral vapor extraction wells screened with 2-inch-diameter PVC casing in the interval ranging In depth from 10 to 35 fbg; and three deep-zone vapor extraction wells screened with 2-inch-diameter PVC casing in the interval ranging in depth from 35 to 55 fbg (see Figure 2 for well locations). · Blower: Sutorbilt, Inc., Model 5M/EG&G Rotron Model DR454 (maximum design flow rates of 250/125scfm) with electric motors rated at 10/1.5 hp (or the equivalent). Flow measurements will be made using a Magnahelic Model 2001-AF differential pressure air flow gauge and a Magnahelic Model 2015 vacuum gauge. · .Thermal/Catalytic ©xi~Jizer: Emission Control Systems, Inc. (ECS) Model 2501 burner rated at 1.5 x 107 Btu/hr with natural gas as secondary fuel; 600 to 1,400°F design operating temperature; 25,000 ppmv initial design inlet total organic carbon (TOC) concentration; 250-scfm design flow; 98-percent TOC removal efficiency. · Two Carbon Canisters: Westates Carbon, Inc., Models VSC-200, VSC-400, VSC-1200 or VSC-2000 installed in series, with a total of at least 400 pounds of activated carbon, off-site thermal regeneration, and 100 to 125-scfm design inlet and outlet flows. · Hydrocarbon Analyzers: Photovac Gas Chromatograph (GC), Model 10S70; covering an appropriate range within the span of 0 to 50J3C]0 ppmv; design operating temperature of 0 to 40°C; humidity less than 95 percent; and calibrant gas is gasoline at 100 ppmv. · Associated Piping, Valves, Flttln_as, and Connections. ~~._ HOLGLII I Mr, Lance Erlcksen ~ F/\t-IAI~ i SJVUAPCD-SR April 21, 1999 - Page 3 , X._S~_XJATF2~, IN(;. ENVIRONMENTAl_ MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS REMEDIATION PLAN REMEDIATION PHASES The ga~oline-contamlnated soil area will be remediated using a VES consisting of a three-phase treatment process. In Phase 1 of the operation, a thermal oxidation system will be used for treatment. The thermal oxidizer is manufactured by ECS (see Attachment 1). The thermal oxidizer can process total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations of up to approximately 50,000 ppmv. At concentrations greater than this value, atmospheric dilution air must be added to the process stream. The thermal oxidizer utilizes natural gas make-up fuel for maintaining a minimum temperature of 1,400°F to ensure adequate destruction efficiency. Based on the results of previous site Investigations, maximum Initial Influent vapor concentrations to the thermal oxidation system are estimated to be 2,750 ppmv, with benzene representing approximately 1 percent of the extracted vapor stream. Phase 2 of the operation will utilize the ECS unit In the catalytic oxidation mode and will commence when the TPH concentrations in the vapor stream are between approximately 250to 503 ppmv. A 400-cell LTO monolithic catalytic oxidation module manufactured by Allied Signal consisting of platinum, palladium, and rhodium In Corning 200-cell cordlerite ceramic substrate Is placed In the system. The minimum recommended operating temperature at the inlet Is 550°F, with a normal operating temperature at the inlet ranging from 650°F to 700°F. The maximum recommended operating temperature at the outlet is 1,200°F. The maximum recommended Inlet concentration of hydrocarbons is 2D00 ppmv. The maximum Btu requirement Is less than 1 x 107 Btu/hr. Phase 3 of the operation will utilize a carbon adsorption system and will commence when the TPH concentrations In the vapor stream are between approximately 103 and 250 ppmv. The stream will be passed through two carbon canisters in series, with a minimum of 400 pounds of activated carbon, for hydrocarbon removal (see Figure 3). The carbon canister size may vary between 200-pound and 2,00D-pound units, and the selected size will be determined by the required change-out frequency. HFA has prepared a "Screening Level Risk Assessment" using the CAPCOA "Air Toxics Assessment Manual" PTPLU modeling technique (see Attachment 5). The calculations for excess lifetime cancer risk have been performed for benzene emissions for the 98-percent oxidation efficiency scenario at the maximum Inlet TPH process stream concentration. The data analysis is based on the unit operating at a maximum concentration of 3,250 ppmv (25 percent of the lower explosive limit), and a maximum process flow of 250 s;3fm for the 12~month duration of the vapor extraction process. Actual emissions will decay exponentially during the project and represent a significantly lower risk than presented by this analysis. HOL(~UI~ Mr. Lance Erlcksen -- ~-' FAHAN SJVUAPCD-SR ~ April 21, 1999 - Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Despite this, the results of the worst-case analysis Indicate that the vapor extraction project does not present a public health risk. HFA requests that based on the results of the risk assessment, the ATC specify a maximum emission for benzene of 0.048 lb/day, with a corresponding TPH emission of 5.3 lbs/day. Field monitoring of the inlet stream hydrocarbons will be done using the Photovac 10S70 GC. Inlet and exhaust stream hydrocarbons will be sampled and analyzed using TedlarTM bags. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, inc., is interested In obtaining the ATC permit as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this vapor extraction and emissions processing description, please do not hesitate to contact Mr, Mark Magargee at (661) 391-0517 or at e-mall address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfa.com. Sincerely, Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rri Enclosures: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Plot Plan Showing YES Figure 3 - VES Schematic Figure 4 - VES Process Component Description Attachment 1 - Equipment Specifications Attachment 2 - SJVUAPCD-SR ATC Permit Application Form Attachment 3 Copy of HFA's CAP Attachment 4 Copy of BFDESD Approval Letter Attachment 5 CAPCOA Screening Level Risk Assessment Attachment 6 EVT Plan Attachment 7 Copy of HFA Check ~f]64 cc: Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl, Saint Vincent De Paul Mr, Howard W. Wines, Ill, BFDESD Mr. Duane R. Smith, Smlth-Gutcher & Associates, Inc. _~___ FIOLOL~I ,bl Mr. Lance Ertcksen ~ F,&I tAN SJVUAPCD-SR ~ & ~IA-I-PSS, INC. April 21, 1~- Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ~ .' II II :~:J ~'"'""~t~ ,-,,~ -~F'~'= ~ '~'=~ ~-~/"- ./7/" ~ ~..~ ~ .?-) ..' F ...... --- ," ,~ ~ -- _ ~ , '.. ,, ,.:,,?. · " ~ ~'~ ' ; "" 'F' ~ :4 ) ~ ,.' ~. ~ --- ~ - ' ' ~'-'.' · . ~- ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~. .... : ~ '' ' : - ":'":"' "~ ~"t',~ LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL OS 1 MILE ~ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRI~ STORE ~._ I~ .... ~,~ 3~ ~,~ ~FEEI Jj J] 300 BAKER STREET :. :]':-l]-~[-:: ......... .-:-?: 'r .._'::.': E~:~i BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA r:..]::sK' -].::~ :-[.-:~ ~ - ~ ~.-m FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP USGS (')It CENIE{{ ~ 5 MINUIE S[{IIES OUAORANOLE tlO~U~, F~ & ~SOC~TES, ~C. Hal GLJINO Mr. Lance Erlcksen SJVUAPCD-SR ' FAI-tAN April 21, 1999- Page 6 [~ &/~~]~F~Z~, IN(;. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS w w rr F- W w CO z ASPHALT _~1 STORAGE YARD w SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE O cc VWo2 VES UNIT VW-5 FORMER DISPENSER FENCE GATE .... VW-6 ~ :VW-1 VW-3 V~.-' VW-7 ASPR^LI P^RKING LOI FORMER 550-G^LLON GASOLINE USI SC^LE IN FEE1 CHICO $1R[[T 0 15 30 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL ~ PROPOSED VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION 'SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ..... PROPOSED VES PIPING FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN SHOWING VES HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: JUNE 12. 1998: RRI iHOI~C;UI ,~ Mr. LQnce Erlcksen SJVUAPCD-SR j:z-/~j b'~h,,] April 21, 1~- Page 7 & lNG. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS -X ATMOSPHERE MONITORING PORT #3 MONITORING ~ PORT #2 >250 ppmv ~ HYDROCARBONS CARBON CANISTERS MONITORING ATMOSPHERE PORT #1 ~ MONITORING BLOWER WITH PORT #4 ~ ' SILENCER BLEED LINE 250-500 ppmv HYDROCARBONS I CATALYTIC OXIDATION ATMOSPHERE SUPPLEMENTAL FUEL MONITORINGs__ PORT #5 500-3,250 ppmv THERMAL OXIDATION S~PPLEMENTAL FUEL NOT TO SCALE LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL ~ SAMPLE TAP SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 310 BAKER STREET X PRE~SSURE OR VACUUM GUAGE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 3 - VES SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM VALVE ~ FLOW GUAGE HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES. INC. REVISION DATE: APRIL 21, 1998: RFtl THERMAL PROCESSOR THERMAL OXIDIZER - Emission Control Systems, Inc., Model 2501, with flame arrester, UV Sensor, and control panel consisting of high and Iow temperature controls and system shut down VACUUM EXTRACTION SYSTEM controls BLOWER - Sutorbilt Model 5M with 10 hp motor / EG&G Rotron Model DR454 blower rated CATALYTIC PROCESSOR at 250/125 scfm and 4.3" Hg with 1.5 hp motor CATALYTIC OXIDIZER -Emission Control Systems, Inc., Model 2501, with flame FLOW GAUGE - Magnahelic Model 2001-AF an'ester, UV Sensor, and control panel consisting of Differential Pressure Air Flow high and Iow temperature controls and system shut PRESSURE GAUGE - Magnahelic Model 2015 down controls Vacuum . AIR FILTER - EG&G Rotron fiber filter element ACTIVATED CARBON KNOCK-OUT DRUM - 28-gallon capacity, PVC PIPING - 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC FILTER -Westates Carbon, Inc., Models VSC-200, VSC-400, VSC-1200, or VSC-2000 Activated Carbon Filters (two in sedes with a minimum of 400 pounds total activated carbon) PIPING - 2cinch Schedule 40 PVC LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 4 - VES PROCESS COMPONENT DESCRIPTION HOLGUIN, FA/tAN & ASSOC/ATES, INC. REVISION DATE: APRIL 20, 1999: RRI ~ HOL©UIN, ~' FAI-IAN ~ & ~L~TF_~%, INC. ENVltZ:IONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSiJLTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL DESCRIPTION System Overview: Refer to Drawings #ECS-FMEC and #D1-01 for system configuration and Figures 1,2, and 3 for the site location map, piping layout, and wellhead manifold configuration, respectively. The Emission Control Systems, Inc., 250-scfm, direct-fired thermal/catalytic oxidizer is a trailer-mounted, thermal/catalytic VES complete with an entrainment separator, auto-drain system, vacuum pump, direct-fired thermal oxidizer, monolithic catalytic oxidizer, and IRI fuel train. The process stream will enter the VES through a 4-inch flange mounted directly to the entrainment separator. The entrainment separator will remove a minimum of 90 percent of the entrained liquid contained within the process stream. Upon exiting the entrainment separator via a 4-inch flange, the process stream will be compressed into a positive pressure of ~ inches of water. Upon exiting the vacuum pump, volumetric flow rate and VOC concentrations are constantly monitored in the process stream. These parameters are continuously displayed on the stripchart recorder visible through a window in the door of the electrical panel. A pressure switch monitors the process stream and will shut the VES down if preset high and Iow levels are exceeded. The VES unit is designed to treat up to 70 percent of the LEL of gasoline vapor in air while in the direct-fired thermal oxidation mode. If at any time during normal operation the incoming VOC concentrations exceed the preset level as detected by instrumentation, dilution air will be added to the incoming process stream. A state of prolonged and/or excessively high VOC concentrations will cause the VES to enter the shutdown mode. After passing the aforementioned instrumentation, the process stream enters the oxidizer. The oxidizer is a dual-chamber, open flame thermal oxidizer. The VOCs are heated to a temperature of 1~50°F and are oxidized to carbon dioxide and water. Residence time is 1 second. The oxidizer is designed to destroy 99 percent or more of the incoming VOCs contained within the process stream over the operating range of the VES. The oxidizer is lined with 5 inches of a ceramic fiber refractory material, which provides enough Insulation to maintain the surface temperature of the oxidizer at safe levels. The process stream exits the oxidizer via a 10-foot-high, 24-Inch-diameter exhaust stack. When the concentrations of hydrocarbons extracted from the subsurface have fallen to less than 20 percent of the LEL, then conversion from thermal oxidation to catalytic oxidation would Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 2 be more effective in the destruction of gasoline vapors. The maximum anticipated emission of hydrocarbons after conversion to the catalytic oxidation mode will remain below those during the initial thermal oxidation mode. The 40Gcell LTO monolithic catalytic oxidation module is manufactured by Allied Signal and consists of platinum, palladium, and rhodium in Corning 200-cell cordierite ceramic substrate (see Attachment 2 for the manufacturer's VES equipment specifications and process description). The catalyst is new and has a life expectancy of 2 to 5 years. The minimum recommended operating temperature at the inlet is 550°F, with a normal operating temperature at the inlet ranging from 650°F to 700°F. The maximum recommended operating temperature at the outlet is 1,200°F. The maximum recommended inlet concentration of hydrocarbons is 2,000 ppmv. The maximum British Thermal Unit (Btu) requirement is less than 1,000,000 Btu/hr. The inlet vapor concentrations to the thermal oxidation unit are continuously monitored using a LEL monitor, and the outlet emission concentrations from the unit are periodically monitored using a P~D. UNIT DESCRIPTION Mounting: The VES unit is skid mounted. The dimensions of the unit are 10 feet in length by 5 feet in width. Vacuum Pump: The vacuum pump will extract the air/VOC process stream from properly designed extraction wells. At 2~ scfm, the vacuum pump will generate a vacuum of approximately 6 inches of mercury (6-1nch-Hg). The vacuum pump will generate a discharge pressure sufficient to force the air/VOC process stream through the oxidizer and out the exhaust stack. Vacuum Pump, Technical Specifications Process Connection 4 Inches Materials of Construction, Lobes Cast Iron Materials of Construction, Casing Cast Iron Motor Horsepower (hp) 10hp Motor Voltage 240 VAC Motor Phase 3 phase Maximum Amperage 56.6 amps Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 3 Entrainment Separator: The entrainment separator will be placed upstream of the vacuum pump and will remove up to 90 percent of the entrained liquid contained in the process stream. The entrainment separator consists of a "tube within a tube" and has an integral auto-drain subsystem. Entrainment Separator, Technical Specifications Process Connection Size 4-inch flanged Materials of Construction 3/16-inch carbon steel Thermal Oxidizer: After the vacuum pump, the process stream is forced into and through the oxidizer. The cylindrical oxidizer consists of two sections. The first section is the mixing chamber and the second section is the combustion chamber. The mixing chamber consists of the combustion burner and the ceramic throat. As the process stream passes through the throat, the VOCs and air are thoroughly mixed and ignited. The combustion zone provides the retention time necessary to combust the VOCs. The oxidizer is lined with 5 inches of ceramic fiber refractory material. The refractory material provides enough insulation to maintain the surface temperature of the oxidizer at safe levels. An exhaust stack is provided with the VES. The standard height is 10 feet. Thermal Oxidizer, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Shell Carbon steel Materials of Construction, Insulation Ceramic fiber Process Connection 4-Inch flange Nominal Temperature Range 1~50~F Maximum Temperature Rating 1,600~F VOC Conversion 99 percent Supplemental Fuel Propane or Natural Gas Thermal Oxidizer Fuel Consum )tion, Technical Specifications VOC Concentration (ppmv) Fuel Consumption In Btu/hr ,,El0 759,000 1,000 682,000 1 ~00 615,000 3,000 378,000 3,,.~[] 325,000 Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 4 Flame Arrestor: One flame arrestor is placed between the vacuum pump and the oxidizer. Flame Arrestor, Technical Specifications Process Connection 4-Inch flanged. Materials of Construction Aluminum Wetted Parts Aluminum Catalytic Oxidizer: When the concentration of hydrocarbons extracted from the subsurface have fallen to less than 20 percent of the LEU then conversion from thermal oxidation to catalytic oxidation would be more effective in the destruction of gasoline vapors. The maximum anticipated emission of hydrocarbons after conversion to the catalytic oxidation mode will remain below those during the initial thermal oxidation mode. The 400-ceil LTO monolithic catalytic oxidation module is manufactured by Allied Signal and consists of platinum, palladium, and rhodium in Corning 2CO-cell cordierite ceramic substrate (see Attachment 2). The catalyst is new and has a life expectancy of 2 to 5 years. The minimum recommended operating temperature at the inlet Is 55CPF, with a normal operating temperature at the inlet ranging from 650°F to 700°F. The maximum recommended operating temperature at the outlet is 1200°F. The maximum recommended inlet concentration of hydrocarbons is 2,0CO ppmv. The maximum Btu requirement is less than 1,000,000 Btu/hr. Catalytic Oxidizer, Technical Specifications Catalyst Type Platinum/Palladium/Rhodium Materials of Construction, Insulation Ceramic fiber Process Connection 4-inch flanged Nominal Temperature Range 650°F J Maximum Temperature Rating 1,200°F VOC Conversion 99 percent Supplemental Fuel Propane or Natural Gas VALVING The VES has one three-way valve. The three-way valve controls the flow of ambient air into the VES as a function of VOC content In the process stream. A two-position, electrically actuated butterfly valve isolates the VES from the extraction wells. This valve is in the closed position when the oxidizer is below or above the normal operating temperature of the oxidizer. A 10-position butterfly valve will be placed on the vacuum side of the vacuum pump and will provide manual adjustment of the Incoming process stream. Additional process valvtng includes a manual drain valve for the entrainment separator and two stainless steel ball valves Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 5 used in the sample ports. Additional fuel train valving includes a gas cock, an automatic main gas shut-off valve, and a modulating butterfly valve that control the flow of supplemental fuel to the oxidizer as a function of stack temperature. Automatic Dilution Valve: The automatic dilution valve regulates the flow of ambient air into the VES as a function of VOC content in the process stream. Automatic Dilution Valve Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Butyl N Materials of Construction, Body Forged steel Size 4 inches Supplemental Fuel Control Valve: The supplemental fuel control valve is a 1-inch reduced port, butterfly valve that regulates the flow of supplemental fuel into the VES as a function of stack temperature. Supplemental Fuel Control Valve, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Beveled disc Materials of Construction, Body Carbon steel Size linch Manual Dilution Valve: The Manual dilution valve is a 10-position, 4-inch buHerfly valve used to regulate the flow parameters. This valve is placed on the vacuum side of the VES. Manual Dilution Valve, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Butyl N Materials of Construction, Body Forged steel Size 4 Inches Number of positions 10 Sample Ports: Each of the two sample ports will contain one stainless steel ball valve. Sample Ports, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Stainless steel Materials of Construction, Body Stainless steel Size 1/4 inch Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 6 Manual Entrainment Separator Drain Valve: A 1-inch ball valve will be supplied in the auto-drain subsystem. This valve will provide a manual drain capability. Manual Entrainment Separator Drain Valve, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Bronze Materials of Construction, Body Bronze Size linch Gas Cock: A gas cock allows manual shutdown of the supplemental fuel supply. Gas Cock, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Iron Materials of Construction, Body Iron Size linch Automatic Main Gas Shut-Off Valve: The automatic main gas shut-off valve is a motorized valve that will shut off the supplemental fuel supply as a result of selected alarm conditions. Automatic Main Gas Shut-Off Valve, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat Iron Materials of Construction, Body Iron Size linch Reaction Time 3/10 second Isolation Valve: The isolation valve is a two-position valve that will close as a result of an alarm condition. Closure of this valve will isolate the VES from the extraction wells, preventing VOC-laden air from entering the oxidizer. Isolation Valve, Technical Specifications Materials of Construction, Seat I Buiyl N Materials of Construction, Body I Forged steel Size 4 Inches Flame Safety Device: The flame safety device controls the ignition of the burner. Should the pilot light not ignite, the flame safety device will cause the VES to enter the shutdown mode. Flame Safety Device, Technical Specifications Voltage Requirements 110 VAC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 Equipment specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 7 Stripchart Recorder: The stripchart recorder Is placed Inside of the electrical enclosure. Personnel access to the recorder is via a window installed in the door of the electrical enclosu're. The recorder has an integral LED display. The stripchart recorder can accept up to six inputs. The VES will have the following stripchart recorder configuration. Stripchart Recorder Inputs Channel 1 Oxidizer temperature Channel 2 Flow Rate Channel 3 Process LEL Channel 4 Process 02 Channel 5 OPEN Channel 6 OPEN Stripchart Recorder, Technical Specifications Available inputs 6 Scan Cycle 5s/6 points Printer Type Dot Matrix Voltage Requirements 110 VAC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 LEL Monitor: The LEL monitor detects the VOC concentration In the process stream. Should the VOC concentration exceed the preset level, dilution air will purge the VES, lowering the V©C concentration. LEL Monitor, Technical Specifications Range 0-100 percent LEL Wetted Parts Carbon steel Output 4-20 mADC Voltage Requirements 24 VDC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501' Page 8 Flow Measurement Device: Flow Is measured utilizing two devices. The primary device is placed in the flow and generates a differential pressure as a function of volumetric flow rate. The differential pressure is read and electronically transmitted to the stripchart recorder. Flow Measurement Devices, Technical Specifications Range 0-2,500 scfm Wetted Parts Carbon steel Output 4-20 mADC Voltage Requirements ,24 VDC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 Static Pressure Switch, Process: The static pressure device will monitor the process for static pressures that exceed preset high and Iow points. Static Pressure Switch, Process, Technical Specifications Range N/A Wetted Parts Carbon steel Output two contact closures Voltage Requirements 110 VAC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 Static Pressure Switch, Supplemental Fuel: A pressure switch will shut down the VES should the static pressure of the supplemental fuel exceed preset high and Iow points. Static Pressure Switch, Supplemental Fuel, Technical Specifications Range N/A Wetted Parts Carbon steel Output two contact closures Voltage Requirements 110 VAC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 9 Level Switches: Two float-type level switches will control the auto-drain pump and will shut down the VES should the entrained liquid level exceed a preset high level. Level Switch, Technical Specifications Range N/A Wetted Parts Carbon steel Output one contact closure Voltage Requirements 110 VAC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 Oxygen Sensor: The oxygen sensor will transmit an electrical signal to the ambient air controller. Oxygen content shall be maintained above 18 percent to insure complete combustion. Oxygen Sensor, Technical Specifications Range 0-25 percent O2 Wetted Parts Carbon steel Output 4-20 mADC Voltage Requirements 24 VDC Phase Single Amp Rating < 1 PROCESS ALARMS The following alarms are Provided with the VES: · Low oxidizer temperature; · High oxidizer temperature; · High VOC concentration; · Low oxygen concentration; · Low and high supplemental fuel pressure; · Low and high process flow; and · Flame out condition. ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS Utility Requirements: The 250-scfm VES requires one "Y" 208 VAC, three-phase, 10Gamp power connection from a local panel or utility pole. Equipment Specifications ECS Model 2501 Page 10 DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OXIDIZER. Manufacturer:Emission Control Systems, Inc. Model: 2501 Size: 250 scfm Type: Direct-fired thermal Fuel Consumption: 3.25 MBtu CATALYST Manufacturer: Allied Signal, Inc. Model: 400 LTO Size: 250 scfm Ty p e: Monolithic catalytic oxidation Fuel Consumption: 1.0 MBtu VACUUM PUMP Manufacturer: Sutorbilt, Inc. Model: 5M Size: 250 scfm Type: Positive displacement Total KW: 7.45 Horsepower: 10 ENTRAINMENT SEPARATOR Manufacturer: Emission Control Systems, Inc. Model: ES-250 Size: 28 gallon Type: Tube-in-Tube SILENCER Manufacturer: Universal Silencer Modeh UVS-5 Size: 4 inches Type: Discharge TOTAL KW INVENTORY = 7.45 TOTAL HORSEPOWER INVENTORY = 10 MAXIMUM NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION = 1,518,000 Btu/hour or 36,432,000 Btu/day The ECS Model 5000 250 CFM Thermal/Catalytic Vapor Extraction System · ~ t Emission Control Systems we have Choosing Emission Control,S)~slems, with our engineered simple operation and low cost unparalleled level (?f corporate ~ptb, insures our into our complete line of Vapor Extraction customem ~ Systems. Shown here, the ECS Model 5000 · Emission Control Systems ~s the only manufac- is thc most economical member of our line of soil lurer of remcdiation equipment also supplying and grotm(lwater remediation equipment, catalyst, resulting in lower costs to our clients I::vle,sive e~eineeri~&e ((Ihe Model 5000 has and COml)lele quality control. produced: · Our Series 5OOO is permitted with the SCAQMI) and tilt', I,os Angeles Fire I)eparlmenl and we · Thc lowest capilal costs ctlrl'elllly availal)le (m Ih~, m:trl~el today. 111:tilH:till a~l exl{:llsive invenlo~ in our Southern ' California I':Lcilily. As :t result, an ECS Model 5000 · 'l'h{' Iow('$1 opel'alillg o)sls clll'rellllv available can be m,bilized and o,I sile wilhin days. oil IIw tn:lrlsut · A ~Ul)l)lier wilh sulTicit~nt I't'SO~ll'Ct'.~ I() complete.- · 'l'h~. I~wcsl d()xvll trow wiflli, IIw itidusll'y today, ly si:md Iwhilld IIw ~oo(Is alld scl'vices wc. I)ro- · 5iiilph. I'i('hl ~q)<'r:lli()ll millilnizillg (qwr;It(ir vi(iv. ;i llni(I.(' ;~llrilmh' iii Ill(' unvil'Ollllwnl;ll llth'l'l;l('(' ilidllMl'v. DR 454 Ra2 n rafive Blower - Manulaclured in lhe USA P--- . · Maximum.flow 127 SCFM · Maximum pressure 65" WG ~-"'~'."'? · Maximum vacuum 4.3" Hg .,' ' · 1.5 HP standard · Blower construction--cast aluminum housing, impeller and cover · Inlet and outlet internal muffling · Noise level within OSHA standards · Weight: 73 lbs. (33 Kg) ACCF_.SSO~ · Exl. emal mufflers · Slip-on flanges · Inlet and/or Inline filters · For details see Accessories Section OPTIONS · Smaller horsepower motors · 5T5-vott and XP motors · Sudace treatment or plating · Single or three phase motors · Gas tight sealing · Belt drive (motorless) model; for detail see Remote Drive Section PERFORMANCE AT SEA LEVEL A= -' . :. PERFORMANCE AT SEA LEVEL ,..~: AIRFLOW"MalMIN ~ = z. ~ 2 A~nrLOW-SCFM ~nrtow SCr~ DR 454 Regenerative Blower ~ODEL I I~R45.4RSB DRC54WSB DR454R?2 i DR45.4W72 I DR454R86 ~_rt No. 036B5B 036BSB 03§B55 | 035B57 I 035949 ;mot Enclosure T.v~o TEFC ' XP TEFC / XP I TEFC ~otor Horsepower 1.5 1.5 1.5 1,5 t 1.5 olta ,De, 315/230 115/230 230/480 230/460 ~ 575 · hess 1 1 3 I 3 I 3 r eQuenc'~,' (H/.I 60 60 50 I GO I 50 ~sulstlon CIeSS~ F B F ~ B I F EI/~ Ret~ Motor Amos 17.7/~85 17.7/8.B5 4.5/~_~ I 4.5/~25 { 1.8 ~ke~ Rotor ~s ~B/~ 96/48 32/16 3~18 12~ ;~. B~r Amos 19.0/9.5 19.0/9.5 4.8/2.4 4.8/2.4 2.0 ~mmend~ NEMA S~ner Size 1/0 1/0 OD/OD ~ I O0 /eight (Ibs/K~) B7/39 103/47 73/33 92/42 I 73133 :~wer ~mi~tion~ for Conllnuou~ ~y (60 H~ Hz) ~. Pressure-tn. el water 65/52 65/52 65/52 65/52 I 65 ~ Su~ion-ln. of water 59/45 59/45 59/45 59/45 { 59 ~n. Row. Fre~ure-SCFM 0~ 010 0~ .0/0 ~ 0 ,n. FIow-SuCtIon. SCFM 010 O~ 0/0 O~ 0 Air Pudfcation Sy e . VENT-SCRUB V C-200 ~ TO INST~U_I_ I CORROSION RE-~IST~NCE VE~-~CRUBTMadsorbe~ are ~ ' The combination of a~Jvated ~o~ designed for fast and easy ins~lla-2~ and many VOCg ~n cause severe t~on on any hard. fiat su~ace. Place 3 I~ corrosive or elec~ol~ic damage ~e unit ~ close to ~e ~por source - to me~ls, even s~inless steel. ~ ~ssible. ~e only hardware I VE~-SCRUBTMadso~e~ are needed is properly sized pipe or[ designed to prevent these du~ing~ngid or flexible~for con- in no~al se~ice. ne~ion to the inle~outlet po~. For .. outdoor ~e. a ~in guard may be needed to protect VE~-SCRUB~TM exha~ /2~ -- ~ m ~TER~ OF .] CON~U~ION for I~ c= lor nigh,r no~ ill ~l~i~lj:t Vessel: Coated Ca~on Steel ~[emal Coating: Powder Coat Enamel ~~ 34 i~ Internal Coating: Cured Epo~ Under ce~in conditions, some I Piping: ~C chemi~l compounds may oxidize. I decom~se, or pol~enze in the pre~ence of activated car~on. This I L. could result in [empe~ture incre~es~ 2~ FN~ su~cient to cause ignition. ~ a re~ulL particular care must be ~ken wi~ compounds having peroxid~ ' ~ing tendencies. SPE[IFI~TIONS VSC-200-2 Flow' ~ Imaxl 100 PR~SURE DROP Pr~u~.psig (maxi 12 Vacuum (in HgJ 18 8 Tempe~ deg E Imaxl 120 Q~on Ril Volume (cu. ~} 5.3 ~ Cr~ Se~lon Isq. ~l 3.0 ~ if Shipping ~elght (lbs.] ~ ~c ~m~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~. ~ ~ c~~ C ~ ~ B O f ' ~ma~ ~ f~ ~ ~. ~. ~ 0 ~A~ ~aON. INC. 0 ~0 40 ~0 80 100 120 ~3o~1.~.~ Air Purification System VENT- UB,,, VSC-300 VSC-400 EASY TO IN~I'ALL CORROSION rlESI~'I'A. NCE VENT-SCRUB" aOsorbers a~e The comD~natio~ of achva[eQ carDo designed lot fast and easy ~nstalla- and many VOC~ ~n ~use SWore uon on any ha~. ~aL su[[ac~. Place co~osive or elec~l~c damage [~ unJt ~ close to [~ v~po: s(~urce LO rn~tals, even s~[nless steel. as possible. The onlz ha~d~re ~ ' - ~NT-SCRUBTM ad~orbc~ are needed is p~rly sized pipe or j des~cned to preen[ ~hese ducting-- ngid or flexible-- fo~ con- in n6rmal seNice. ReE~ion to t~ enleVoutlc[ por~. For ' outdoor use, a rain guard may be needed to p~[ec[ VE~-SCRUB'sTM eXhaUSt. DIMENSIONS ~ ~ ~,N~ vsc.,oo.~ 40' 3 3/4' S~ O.~ ~C~OO.~ I 4Y t for l~ cont~ ~ higher Unde~ ce~ain conditions, some A tv) ~ [~ I ¢~ M f~ Ij !l MAT~R~ OF _ CONXTRU~ON c~m~cai com~ound~ may oxidize. Ve~el: Coated ~on Steel oe~om~o~e, or ~ol~erize in t~ ~temal Coating: presence of activated carbon. Tt~i~ D could result in ~em~rature increase~ O~ ] Powder Coat Enamel S~EJ .Internal Coating: Cured Epo~ sufficient [o cause ignition. ~ a · o.D. Piping: PVC ~e~ult. particular care must b~ taken with compoun~ having ~rox~d~ [orming lenaen:ies. J 12 Flow* c~ lmaxl 200 300 Pre,urn ps~g JmaxJ 12 400 __ / Vacuum (ir~ Hgl ,Refer [o Wes~tes ~ ]0: _ T~per~ture dog E Imaxl 120 ~ ' 300/ Ca~on Fill Volum leu. ft.) 6.5 12.B ~ 8 / Cm~ Set,on Isq. ~) 3./ 5.2 8/ / Shipping Weight ~lbs.) 320 480 ~ - ~ w~, ~ ~ w~,~ ~ ~ ~ A~IVATE D Air Purification S.,vste . VENT- V$C-1200 VSC-2000 VE~-SCRUB" adsorbcr~ areJ Tl~e cornb~nation o~ activate0 ~rbc designed ~r fast and easy, ~xu~lla- ' ana many VOC's can caus~ severe Uononan~na~.flatsurbce. Place J ~ ~~ [1~ unit as close [0 [~ vapor sourceJ~ ~ [0 mesaS. ~n s~ainl~ss 5t~l. as ~ssible. The only naraware ~ VE~-SCRUB" adsorbe~s are needed i~ p~perly sizeO pipe or~~ d~signed to prevent t~se du~,ng--rigM or flexibl~--~r corn 45-1/2"- - in normal service. nec[ion [o the inl~outlet ~. For 4~" j outdoor use. a rain guard may Do needeO to pmte~t ~N%SCRUB'~" J exl~auSLJ . DIMENSIONS ~-114~ 1 lot I~f ~ lot hi~r flO~ 1700 - 63 114' Ve~el: Under ce~in cond~don~, some 2000 - 86 I~' chemical compo~Os m~y oxidize, D .CoatcO 12 ga, C3~on Steel Oecom~se. o~ polymenzc in l~ 7 g~. Top~o~om presence of activated carbon. ~is ~ --~ ~ -- FN~ External C~[ing: could result in temperatu~ incre~e~ 1~ Pow~e~ Coat Enamel sufficient ~o ~use igni~on. A~ a . ] Internal result, p~iculaT ca~e must be taken FORK LI~ Fusion Bonded Epow w~th compounOs having peroxide. 3/4" ~A~N C~NEL PiPng: PVC ~o~ming [endencies PRESSURE DROP Flow' cfm {maxi 500 5~ Pressure psig (max) 12 12 20,~ .~ ~l ~ Vacuum (in I I~J 15 _ v~'~, T~ratum dog F (n,~x, 120 120 ~ 151/ ~on Fill Volu~ leu. ft.I J3 65 ~ ~ / ~ Cr~s Section (sq. ft.) 12.5 12.5 '6// Shipping ~elght flbs.) 1600 2500 "~C-100H RIm Hgl ~C.~V 15 Im ~ · 12~ C- 1200 ~ to ~r ~ ~r ~- 0 I~ 200 3~ 400 500 ~r~u~. ~ or ~~ ~]o~_~ ~o FL~V ISCFM) ~ of ~ ~r~ ~,' ~]~ ;~]-~o~ ~x ~.~STATES CARBON Inc~ VAPOR PHAS ADSORPTION ISOTHERM ADSORPTION ISOTHEP, MS FOR AROMATIC SOLVENTS . Bcnz:ne Toluene Ethylbenzene m-Xylene lC)'~- ! I I I-..~u4,1 I I .... l'l I I I I .... I ' ' I ; ' I1'1 I I , .,,, 10"~ 10''a 10.2 10.1 10o 101 patial p."e~mre [psia] for additional lnforrrmtion conmct WE.~TA TE$ CA RBON Iht 2150 I..EO Avenue, LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA P0040-1634 Ph (2]3) 722.7500 Far (215) 722.2355 WESTATES CARBON, INC. 2130 LEO AVE. LOS ANGELES, CA. 90040-1634 (213)722-7500 ISOTHERM REPORT CREATED ON 08/28/91 AT 14:30 BY GINA CUSTOMER: MARK FAHAN VAPOR PHASE DESIGN PARAMETERS Temperature of the System loCI .................... 20.000 Total Flow Rate of Air [SCFM] ..................... 100.000 Pressure [psia] .................................. 14.7G0 VAPOR PHASE DESIGN Component Concentration ~GAC/day [ppm] GASOLINE 500.0000 TOTAL CARBON NEEDED 181.47 #GAC/day WESTATES CARBON, INC. 2130 LEO AVE. LOS ANGELES, CA. 90040-1634 (213)722-7500 ISOTHER~M REPORT CREATED ON 08/28/91 AT' 16:00 BY GINA CUSTOMER: MARK PAHAN VAPOR PHASE DESIGN PARAMETERS Temperature of the System [oC] ............. 20. Total Flow Rate of Air [SCFM] ...... ' ...... 100.~§ Pressure [psia] .......... ' .............. ........................ 14.700 VAPOR PHASE DESIGN Component Concentration fGAT/day ............ [ppm] · GASOLINE '-' ' ............. 300.0000 iCS.~48 TOTAL CARBON NEEDED 108.45 #OAC/day WESTATES CARBON, INC. 2130 LEO AVE. LOS ANGET,F.S, CA. 90040-1634 (213)722-7500 ISOTHERM REPORT CREATED ON 08/28/91 AT 15:47 BY GINA CUSTOMER: MARK FAHAN VAPOR PHASE DESIGN PARAMETERS ***************************** Temperature of the System loCI .................... 20.000 Total Flow Rate of Air [SCFM] ..................... 100.000 Prezsure [psia] ......... ......................... 14.700 VAPOR PHASE DESIGN Component Concentration ~GAC/day .......... [ppm] GASOLINE 100.0000 36.050 TOTAL CARBON NEEDED 36.05 ~GAC/day - Installation and Operatin Instructions INSPECTION Inspect the sensor upon receipt of shipment to be certain it is as ordered and not damaged. I1 damag- ed, contact carrier, INSTALLATION General -- The sensing ports of the flow sensor must be correctly positioned for measurement accuracy. The instrument connections on the sensor indicate correct positioning. The side connection is for total or high pressure and should be pointed upstream. The top connection is for static or Iow pressure. Location -- The sensor should be installed in the flowing line with as much straight run of pipe upstream as possible. This will provide a flow pro- file as ideal as possible. A rule of thumb is to allow 10-15 pipe diameters upstream and 5 down. The table below lists recommended up and down piping: PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE Maximum 200 psig at 200°F. UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM DIMENSIONS IN TERMS OF INTERNAL DIAMETER OF PIPE · SEE NOTE .--.1 MINIMUM DIAMETER OF STRAIGHT PiPE UPSTREAM CONDITION UPSTREAM I IN-PLANE I OUT OF PLANEI DOWNSTREAM ONE ELBOW OR TEE 7 9 5 TWO 90° BENDS IN SAME PLANE 8 12 5 TWO 90° BENDS IN DIFFERENT PLANE 18 24 5 REDUCERS OR EXPANDERS 8 8 5 ALL VALVES · SEE NOTE 2 24 24 5 · Note =1' Values shown are reccmmenoeo sDacmg. ,n lefts o! mlefnal d~ameter for normal mOu$1r~al melermg reGu~rements For laDoraloryor n~gn accuracy work aOd 25%~O values ' Note =2:Incluoe5 gale. glODe DIu~ and olner throlthng valves lmaz are omy part~ally oDened. It valve ~51o ~e lully open use values P~oe s~ze change CONTROL VALVES SHOULD BE LOCATED AFTER THE FLOW SENSOR ~'CoPyngh! 1989. OVVYER {NS'TRUMENTS. INC. D W Y E R I N S T R U M E N T'S, I N C. I Telephone 21S/879-8000 P O. BOX 373 · MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA 46360. U.S.A.I Fox219/ST2-9'O57 TelexZSC916 ~ r,, ,,,~,~ Z,~),co,~/~£1 i¥1alJllellellC ....... IJIllerelillal Pressure Magnehelic' Gage SPECIFICATIONS I)imcn~i~m~ 4 .1/4~d~d .X 2 ~/If,',lccp EXPLODED VIEW S J /~ finK,, I,~,,d.J.,,, ,r~,, ...... er es 2000 ,o o,.,,., ...... ,,..., ..... ,, . I p* d,plk~l~d. ,,nc ¢~r ,hl~ ami ,,,, ../~ Ptc~u~c I~ PSt 330 - Caulkm: Fer usc w,h ~ir ur c~mp~lh . Fm Acpcu~cd ,vcf f~nFin~ ~ high c)rlc ~llJ;ll falL' C.IIIJl 111.1~11(I II~LLI hi lJlc ~lJ' ~.l¢c m..) ..d I~' .uh:d,lc I.,r ..u ,k ~/150 I,... I.., h),h,.~n .<'r,k~ .... ~.,.h ~1,, IIAf;K ~fJNN[CTION~ ',~ N I' f 2 Cove~ w,lh zero adiusI assy a Fool screws wilh washef~ (2 req'dJ UClllHI ED 30'dng seal b Adj.sl screw c Fool 4 Bezel d. Finger 5 Diaphragm seali~ plale 260 Scale AssemMy-conslsls o1: 6 Relainingrmg a Mounting sCrewS (2feq'dl 70 Range Sp,ng assembly b Bumper polnler slop (2 req'd) a Clamp selsctew c. Scale b Clamp 330. ~aphfagm Assem~y-conslsls of: c Uoun,,~ sc,ew, 12 ,eq'dl (A,bor press nee,ed ,o Inslal,] t i, /~ ~ d Clampin~ ~ho~ 12 mq'dJ I. Ltnkag~ ~l~.,complele J e ClamR plale scJew b Ftonlplale I Space~12~eq'dJ ~. Diaphragm ' ~h~' g Clampplale . Rea~plalo(~l=hown) . 14 Range Spdng wdh magnel e. Plalewashm [not shown) LO P~ESS ~ 150 ~sh~me Assembly - Conslsls o1: 3~. Mounting J lafdware Kil CO~e4E C t l a FfOAI iewel a. kdaCe[-plpe phig ~'HPT Io lubber lubln9 - % ',~' ~ ~ [ b Locking nul l~mq'd) c ~shbone b. Pipe plug ~'NPT-(2 feq'd) d poJnle~ C. Mou,linglugl3¢eq'd) e Mounting screws 12~eq'd) d. Long screw (3 req'dl I lteli~ assembly (nol shown) e. S~n screw 13 ~eq'd) ~ P,~ofs (2 req'dl (not ShownI Rear Jewel (~of shownl Ordering Instructions: ~[N 51ArarAt[ When c.f[~pnmlin~ ~ilh Ibc h~(h.y ~cga.ling M~uchclic" gag~ pmhlcm~, icier I. , .:II ,,:,I :.,.,l,c:~ In lhi~ ~'icw llc ~:,rc I- indu:Ic u..Icl lllllllJiCl, lll~5111~ I;I11~[:, ;roll illly IFIOL©UIN, FAHAN & ,~IATE,S, INC. ENVlI~(~NMEN ! Al_ MAINIA(~EMENT ATTACHMENT 2. SJVUAPCD-SR ATC PERMIT APPLICATION FORM San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District APPLICATION FOR: · . [x] AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT (ATe) [ ] ATe MODIFICATION [ ] PERMIT TO OPERATE (PTO) 1. PERMIT TO BE ISSUED TO: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. 2. MAILING ADDR3ZSS: ~,~,~,.o. ~,, 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1 c~,.. Bakersfield s~ California z~, c,~,~ 93308 3. LOCATION WHERE TtIE EQUIPM]ENT WILL BE OPERATED: WITHIN 1000 FT. OF A SCHOOL? ,~,r~:300 Baker Street [ l YES [x] No c~y, Bakersfield, California REQUr_.ST COMaU'amY sate< On:SETS: [ ) YEs [~ No 4. GE~mU. NATURE OF nosiNEss: Thrift store 5. EQUIPMENT FOR WHICII APPLICATION IS MADE (Include Permit Nos. if known): Vapor extraction of gasoline hydrocarbons from soil contaminated by leaking underground fuel tank. Hydrocarbons will be removed from the subsurface through extraction well by a vacuum blower and treated by thermal oxidation/catalytic oxidation/carbon absorption prior to emission of residual hydrocarbons to the atmosphere through a lO-foot stack. Project duration is anticipated to be 12 months. 4. IIAVE YOU EVER APPLIED FOR AN ATC OR PTO IN TIle PAST~. [ ] YES [X] NO ATC/PTO N~.: 7. IS TIle PROPERTY ZONED PROPERLY FOR TIlE PROPOSED U~E? [X] YES [. ] NO ~. IS THIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED AS A RESULT OF AN NOV/NTC3 [ ] YES {X] NO NOV/NTC No.: 9. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: TYPE OR PRINT TITLE OF APPLICANT: ~ "~../~ Senior Hydrogeologist/Division Manager 10. TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF APPLICANT: DATE: TELEPIIONE NO: Mark R. Magargee 4-21-99 (661 ) 391-0517 FOR APCD USE ONLY: DATE STAMP FILING FEE RECEIVED: .$. DATE PAID: PROJECT NO.: Southern Regional Office '~ 2700 M St., Suite 275 "Bakersfield, California 93301 * (805) 8610682 * FAX (BO5) 861-2060 I~FIOLGUIN'FAHAN & ~IATIES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 3. COPY OF HFA'S CAP I---tOL(.¢_.JIN, FAHAN & AS LA I' _F$, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 17111 ~ll'(~,(:tl · (:()$1il Mf's;I, (:;dih)rlliil~12liit7 (71,1.) li,l.2-2t-iii(I · I:AX (714) FILE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (APN 016-320-15-00-2) JUNE 17, 1996 Client: Saint Vincent De Paul 310 Baker Street Bakersfield, California 93305 AHenflon: Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl (805) 323-7340 Consultant: Smlth-Gutcher and Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 60706 Bakersfield, California 93386 Project Manager: Mr. Duane R. Smith, RG (805) 871-3207 Contractor: Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc. 3157 Pegasus Drive Bakersfield, California 93308 Project Manager: Mr. Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG (805) 391 ~517 e-mail: Mark_Magargee@hfa.com Kennelh J. Mitchell, REA "t'~'~- ............ Mark R. Magargee. CHG, R(~/ Assi~lanl Geologist Senior Hydrogeologisl I t()lguin, Fahan & Assoclales, h ~c. Holguln, Fohan & Associales, Inc. I- NVIIqI.INMf~'IxJ rAl_ F~I__.ANNI:~I:.t,t:i · .~L~-i(': I--NT S-l-,.c_~ · (GIE(Z)I..C]I(31s-r,.c:i_ ANI-') F:NC.-; (:(,lililfllilllill'lJ ~il(' ,"%"~I'N~.iIIII'IIIN · Ill'ill I-'%lill(' ,%lf(lJl~, * 5;i1(' II('ttli'ililili(Jfl *, Ilill. ilr(Jllll~ 'S'¥ii511(' I::AI lAN &/~%~ ~( ],'Yll ~%, IN(' I~NVII-I(~]NM[zN IAI. MANAI ;l' ix,,~t I,] I ( '.( ih Jr ;I II I AN I ! TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List ol Acronyms 1. Introduction ....................................................................... 2. Site History ......................................................................... 2 3. Regional and Site-Specific Geology and Hydrogeology 3 4. Human Health and Environmental Threat Assessment .... 5 4.1 Characteristics of Gasoline ...................................... 5 4.2 Human Health Threat Assessment .......................... 5 5. Risk Evaluation ................................................................... 5.1 RBCA Tier I Risk Evaluation ....................................... 8 5.2 RBCA Tier 2 Risk Evaluation ....................................... 9 5.3 Remediatlon Goals ..................................................9 6. Estimation of the Mass of Hydrocarbons In the Soils ......... 10 7. Soil Remediation ............................................................... 11 7.1 Feasibility Study - Gasoline-Containing Soils ............ 11 7.1.1 In-Situ Processes ............................................. 11 7.1.2 Ex-Situ Processes (Excavation) ...................... 13 7.2 Feasibility Study Summary ....................................... 13 8. In-Situ Soil Vapor Extraction ............................................... 15 8.1 System Design .......................................................... 15 8.2 Vapor Extraction Test ............................................... 15 8.3 Estimated Time for Soil Remediatlon ....................... 17 8.4 Vapor Extraction System Equipment and Permitting .................................................................. 18 8.5 Vapor Extraction System Monitoring ....................... 18 8.6 Progress Soil Sampling .............................................19 9. Site Closure and Interim Reporting .................................... 10. Health and Safety Plan ...................................................... 21 11. Summary ........................................................................... 22 12. References ....................................................................... 23 SECTION II - FIGURES 1 Site Location Map 2 Plot Plan Showing VES 3 Cross Section A-A' 4 VES Schematic Diagram 5 Expected Vapor Concentration Degradation Over Time SECTION III - SUMMARY TABLES ---I ....summary 0l-~il Sample Analytical Results 2 t-inza~dous Chemical Substances of Occupational Health Concern I-I(-)l_(_.~l Table of Contents I-:/XI-I/XN Page 2 · ~"=~'~'"~, &/X~'~'X. ;1/X'I1!-~%, IN( ' SECTION IV - ATTACHMENTS I RBCA Tier 1 Worksheets and Dose/Response Calculations 2 RBCA Tier 2 Fate and Transport Modeling Worksheets and Dose/Response Calculations 3 RBCA Tier 2 Benzene Cleanup Level Calculations 4 Vapor Extraction Well Installation Procedures 5 Vapor Extraction Well Construction Details 6 Vapor Extraction Test Procedures and Equipment 7 Soil Boring and Well Construction Procedures 8 Health and Safety Plan [i I()l_(-it I:AI lAN &/%%~ X ;l/~l'l-'~'q, IN(' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., (HFA) was contracted by Saint Vincent De Paul, and its representative, Smith-Gutcher and Associates, Inc., (Smith-Gutcher) to prepare a CAP for soil , for the Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store In Bakersfield, California, based on the evaluation of information from previous site assessment activities and remedial Investigations conducted by Smith-Gutcher. The subject site Is located at 300 Baker Street in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California. Based on a review of available data, analytical results, and conversations with Mr. Duane R. Smith, on June 17, 1991, a 550-gallon gasoline UST, dispenser, and associated product piping were removed from the property. Soil samples collected from beneath the location of the UST Indicated concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons. Subsequent site characterization activities Indicate that gasoline-containing soil Is present to a depth of approximately 55 fbg within an approximately 25-foot radius around the former UST at the site. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the previous assessments and Is not anticipated above a depth in excess of 200 fbg. The Impacted soil consists of highly permeable fine-grained to coarse-grained sands and silty sands Interbedded with a significant interval of sandy silts and silts. The known contaminant at the site has been Identified as petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range. The total volume of hydrocarbon-containing soils was estimated to be approximately 3,650 cubic yards, containing an estimated 2,420 pounds of hydrocarbons in the gasoline range. This equates to approximately 390 gallons of gasoline absorbed Into the subsurface. Approximately 485 pounds of the hydrocarbons is estimated to be present beneath the thrift store building. A risk evaluation of the gasoline-containing soils at the site was conducted using ASTM Designation: E-1739 Risk Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (RBCA). The results of RBCA Tier 1 and 2 evaluations are that the indoor air Inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible lifetime lx10-6 exposure levels given the concentration of benzene in the soils beneath the thrift store building, and that mitigation Is required to reduce these concentrations to a permissible residual level, which Is protective of the health of the occupants of the building. An RI/FS was conducled Io assess the feasibility and cost effectiveness of mitigation technologies. The results of the RI/FS analysis are that the time frame for natural biodegrodation is not sufficiently protective of the health of the current occupants of the building, removal of the hydrocarbons through excavation Is not feasible or cost effeclive given the signilictunl der)tl~ al lhe hydrocarbons and the existence of o significonl volume of lhe IW¢,lrocod)ons ben~olh lhe building, ll~e time frame for In-sltu blovenllng Is not r, ufficlenlly I I-i()l.C;I Executive Summary i':Ai lAN Page 2 & A.'&"~ × ~IATI '~q, IN( ' t]NVII'II INMI rxllAI gAl.,IAI'if yJ:l'xll (~;{]~IN,~;I~.II IANI!~, protective o! the health of the current occupants at the building and bloventlng Is not the cost-effective alternative, and In-sltu vapor extraction Is the cost-effective alternative, which Is protective of the health of the current occupants of the building. Based on the physical properties of hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (i.e., high vapor pressure, Iow solubility, and a high Henry's Law constant), In-situ vapor extraction is a very effective technology for mitigating hydrocarbons adsorbed onto soil particles. Treatment is accomplished by extracting VOCs from the subsurface using an extraction blower and treating the extracted vapors utilizing either carbon absorption, thermal oxidation, or catalytic oxidation. A San Joaquln Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District - Southern Region ATC permit will be required prior to operation of the proposed VES. HFA proposes the installation of a pilot-scale well field consisting of seven vapor extraction wells for the removal of gasoline hydrocarbons from the unsaturated zone. Upon Installation of the pilot-scale vapor extraction well field, a soil vapor extraction test will be conducted for the selection of an appropriately sized vacuum blower and emission control system prior to the installation of the full-scale treatment system. Vapors removed from the subsurface may be treated Initially by thermal oxidation. Once vapor concentrations drop to a level where thermal oxidation is no longer economically efficient, the vapors may be treated using catalytic oxidation, and possibly followed again by carbon absorption. After hydrocarbon vapor concentrations reach asymptotic levels, the system will be shut down pending verification soil sampling. Throughout the treatment process, the system will be monitored on a weekly basis In order to optimize its effectiveness and track the progress of hydrocarbon removal from the subsurface. ~ f:A! lAN ~ & ,'%~,( X ;I/~ I'1 t"-;. IN( ' LIST OF ACRONYMS ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists APN Assessor's Parcel Number A ST M American Society of Testing and Materials ATC authority to construct BFDHMD Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes CAP corrective action plan CAS Chemical Abstract Sen/Ice CCR California Code of Regulations CDMG California Division of Mines and Geology cfm cubic feet per minute CRWQCB-CVR California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (5) EPA Environmental Protection Agency ES Emergency Standard fbg feet below grade F S feasibility study GAC granular activated carbon GEM Good Earth Machine hp horse power ins-water Inches of water column vacuum KCWA Kern County Water Agency LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory MDBM Mount Diablo Base and Meridian NFA no further action NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health O&M operations and maintenance PID photoionization detector ppm parts per million ppmv parts per million by volume PTa permit to operate PVC polyvinyl chloride RBCA Risk Based Corrective Action RBSL risk based screening level ROI radius of influence RI remedial investigation scfm standard cubic feet per minute SJVUAPCD-SR San Jooquin Valley Unified Air Pollution District - Southern Region SVE soil vapor exlroction SVET soil vapor extraction test SWRCB Stole, Woler Resources Control Board T L V lhrosl~olcJ limit value TPH Iolol peholeum hydrocarbons T W A lirnc; woighled overage U,*)EPA Uni c:,d Slalos Environmental Protection Agency US l ul ~ I~;r,(ll(itl~l~_;I slo~oge lonk VES V(flI ~{ ~1 ~,~XII(JCIJuI1 system V()(~ v(.d~ j I il(: (:~ (.:1( II ii(; cornpound W I I V w~ .,111 ~ ,~ Itl w 1. INTRODUCTION Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc., (HFA) was contracted by Saint Vincent De Paul and Its representative, Smlth-Gutcher and Associates, Inc., (Smlth-Gutche0 to prepare a CAP for the Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store, located at 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, Kern County, California. The topography at the site is relatively flat, with a slight slope to the southwest (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The subject site is bound on the east by Baker Street, on the south by Chico Street, and on the west and north by commercial properties. The property 'Is located in the southeastern quarter of the southwestern quarter of Section 29, T29S, R28E, MDBM, and is identified as APN 016-32(]-15-00-2. The property Is situated within a developed commercial and light industrial area, interspersed with residential properties. A 550-gallon gasoline US'i, dispenser, and associated product piping were previously removed from the site (see Figure 2 - Plot Plan Showing VES). The properly owner Is Saint Vincent De Paul. The owner contact Is Reverend Ralph Belluomlnlo 310 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California, 93305, (805) 323-7340. The project consultant contact Is Mr. Duane R. Smith, Smlth-Gutcher & Associates, Inc., Post Office Box 607(]6, Bakersfield, California. 93386, (805) 871-3207. The remediation contractor contact Is Mr. Mark R. Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 3157 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (805) 391-0517. Smith-Gutcher completed a soil assessment report dated March 1992, which identified the distribution of hydrocarbons in the soils at the site. The purpose of this CAP for soil, which Is based on the evaluation of Information from previous site assessment activities, Is to determine whether the adsorbed-phase subsurface hydrocarbons in the vadose zone present a health threat or a threat to the environment, and if such a threat exists, to recommend an appropriate mitigation alternative for the gasoline-containing soils. All action taken to remediate the soils at the site will be performed with the approval of the controlling regulatory agencies, which include the BFDHMD and the SJVUAPCD-SR. All permits and approvals from these agencies relating to site mitigation will be obtained prior to underlaking lhe proposed corrective actions for this site. Reverend Ralph Belluominl Saint Vincent De Paul June 17, 1996- Page 2 SITE HISTORY Based on a review of available data, analytical results, and conversations with Mr. Duane Smith, on June 17, 1991, a 550-gallon gasoline US~, dispenser, and associated product piping were removed from the property. The former UST and dispenser were located immediately adjacent to the southwestern corner of the thrift store building (see Figure 2). Soil samples collected from beneath the location of the UST Indicated concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons (see Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results). On January 28, 1992, Smlth-Gutcher advanced four soil borings (TH-1 through TH-4) to a maximum depth of 70 fbg, in and around the area of the former UST (see Figure 2), Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected from the soil borings indicates that gasoline-containing soil is present to a depth of approximately 55 fbg within an approximate 25-foot radius around the former US'[ at the site (see Figure 3 - Cross Section A-A' and Table 1). Gasoline-containing soils are believed to extend to at least 20 feet under the southwestern corner of the thrift store building. Groundwater was not encountered and is not anticipated above a depth in excess of 200 fbg. The Impacted soil consists of highly permeable, fine-grained to coarse-grained sands and silty sands Interbedded with a significant Interval of sandy silts and slits (see Figure 3). !/-~i ~ i(-)i ,( ]1, Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl i :A,i [/\~N,: Saint Vincent De Paul ~ June 17, 1996- Page 3 3. REGIONAL AND SITE-SPECIFIC GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY The site is located in o relatively flat area at an elevation of approximately 415 feet above MSL The slte is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquln Valley. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake bed deposits. These lie .unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 30,000 fbg. Geologic deposits in the study area Include Pleistocene alluvial sediments of the Kern River Formation, which form a homocline dipping gently to the southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of poorly Indurated and dissected fan deposits (CDMG, 1965). The site is an area at the foot of rolling hills reaching a maximum elevation of 900 feet above MSL, located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquln Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The Kern River drains a large area of the southern Sierra Nevada, including the highest part of the range at Mount Whitney. The modern river has cut a channel southeast of the site and provides recharge for groundwater along Its course. Sedimentary geologic formations, observed at the surface and underlying the slte were sourced by the Sierra Nevada and transported via the ancestral Kern River. Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east, and are transported by five major rivers, the southernmost being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 2 miles south of the Kern River. The depth to the regional uncontined aquifer mapped by the KCWA Is approximately 200 tbg at the site, with the direction of groundwater flow to the southwest (KCWA, February 1, 1994). The nearest known occurrence of perched groundwater is 2 miles to the southwest at a depth of 20 fbg in the abandoned Kern River channel to the ancient Kern Lake bed (KCWA, May 1993). In the region of the site, the Tertiary sedimentary sequence from top to bottom is nonmarine Kern River Formalion, nonmarine Chanac Formation. marine Santa Margarita Formation (possibly inlerfingering with Chanac Formation due to the tentative correlation of type $onlo Margarita Formolion wesl o! lhe Son Andreas fault), marine Round Mountain Silt, marine Olcese Sand. marine Freeman Slit. marine Jewelt Sand and Pyramid t4ill member, marine Voddo~ Sated. nor~r'~orine W(Jlker Formalion. at Il-lose, only tho Koln River, Chanac. and S(_~do Mo~(,]~]rito F(~rr~c]li(-)ns o~o imioortont to tho hydrogoology of tho silo,, The Torllary, I i I(')l .(iI, Jl? Reverend Ralph Bolluomlnl i :Al i/\~ Saint Vincent De Paul & x ;l/NFl-Lq. liN( ' Juno 17, 1996- Page 4 nonmarine Kern River formation is unconformably overlain by bouldery terrace deposits of Qualernary Older Alluvium, Two naturally occurring geologic units are present In the near surface at the site. The two natural units are the Tertiary (Miocene to Pliocene), nonmarlne Kern River Formation, and Qualornary (Pleistocene) Older Alluvium. The Older Alluvium forms a thin terrace deposit lying unconformably on the Kern River Formation. Quaternary Older Alluvium: The middle to lower Pleistocene (Barf ow, 1984), Older Alluvium is a flat-lying terrace deposit approximately 5 to 10 feet thick that overlies the erosional surface of the Kern River Formation. The Older Alluvium is composed of very coarse material, with boulders as large as 50 cm In diameter. Clastic material composition includes granltic and dioritic crystalline rocks characteristic of the Sierra Nevada batholiths, quartzite characteristic of pre-batholithic rocks, and volcanic and related rocks such as andesite and dark siliceous agate typical of the Neogene deposits of the Mojave desert. In some locations, caliche rims have developed between clasts. Kern River Fqrmotion: The age of the Kern River Formation includes upper Miocene and Pliocene and possibly Pleistocene. The Kern River Formation Is composed of interstratlfied fanglomeratic deposits and silty claystones. Wlthln the fanglomerates are conglomerate beds with cobbles as large as 20 cm in diameter, and In some areas fanglomerate beds exhibit cross bedding from 2.5 to 5 meters thick. The silty claystone beds, which would serve as Iow-permeability barriers to vertical migration, are laterally continuous to as much as several thousand feet, but are locally truncated by sandy fanglomerate units. Another important factor in considering the potential for migration is the lack of secondary permeability within the Kern River Formation as no secondary cracks, small faults, or gypsum veins are observed. Chanac Formation: The Chanac Formation of upper Miocene age is not exposed on or near the site, but outcrops in 1he cliffs southeast of the site along the Kern River bluffs at Hart Parl~. It is a thinly bedded chalky siltstone exhibiting many secondary cracks and gypsum veins. On-site soil borings indicate thal the alluvium is characterized by highly permeable fine-grained to coarse-groined sand interbedded with lower permeability silt zones ranging In depth from 24 Io 27 lbg, 35 Io 37 fbg, 44'to ,57 fbg, and 63 to 70 fbg. The base of gasoline-containing soils is wilhin lhe silly inlervol ranging in depth from 44 to 57 fbg. Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl Saint Vincent De Paul IN(' June 17.1~6- Page 5 4. HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT ASSESSMENT 4.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF GASOLINE Gasoline is a clear, flammable, volatile liquid with a characteristic odor. It Is a complex mixture of paraffinlc, olefinic, and aromatic hydrocarbons ranging from C4 to C~2 compounds. As many as 250 separate hydrocarbons can be found in various commercial gasolines. A typical modern gasoline composition would be 50 to 80 percent paraffins, 10 to 40 percent aromatics, · and 5 to 10 percent olefins. Gasoline CAS Number: 8006-61-9 Benzene CAS Number: 71-43-2 Toluene CAS Number: 108-88-3 Ethylbenzene CAS Number: 100-41-4 Xylene CAS Number: 1330-20-7 Benzene Chemical Formula: C6FI6 Toluene Chemical Formula: C7H8 Ethylbenzene Chemical Formula: C8H10 Xylene Chemical Formula: C8H10 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF GASOLINE Molecular Weiqht 84 Boiling Point >39°C~ 77-121°C (50% distilled)~ ,,<240°C Melting Point -90.5 to -95.4°C Flash Point -45 to -50°C Autoignilion Temperature 536 to 853°F Explosive Limits 1.4% to 7.6% Vapor Density 3.0 to 4.0 .Specific Gravity 0.72 to 0.76 at 60°F .__S_o. lu__b~ in Wa. ter Insoluble Solubility in Organics Soluble in most common organic solvents 4.2 HUMAN HEALTH THREAT ASSESSMENT Gasoline is o suspected human carcinogen. A TLV of 300 ppm or 900 mg/m3 has been assigned fo go,aline. This value of 300 ppm was assigned based on an average o! 3 percent benzene (10 ppm 1LV) in gasoline. Low-level inhalation exposure to gasoline can cause irrilalion lo ll~e eyes. nose, and respiratory system; headache; and nausea. Acule loxiclly is similar lr)~ rill ~_]asolines. Gasolines act os an anesthetic and are mucous membrane inh~_]bil(]r~l:; 11~ h(]za[d is high because el lhe ease in which t~arrnlul cor~cenholions may I()! .(]1, ~iI' Reverend Ralph Bolluominl :Al II\N Sainl Vinconl De Paul & ,,X.~c.:,( X iIA'I'I-L%. IN(' June 17. 1996-Page6 develop. Inhalation is the most importanl roule of occupational entry. Acute symptoms of inloxication, headache, b~urred ¥1sion, d~zziness, and nausea are the most common symptoms resulting from excessive vapor exposure. Reported responses to gasoline vapors are: 1. eye and throat Irritation within several hours at a concentration of 160 to 270 PPm; 2. eye, nose, and throat Irritation and dizziness wilhin 1 hour at a concentration of 500 to 900 Ppm; and 3. mild anesthesia within 30 minutes at a concentration of 2,000 ppm. Higher concentrations are intoxicating within 4 to 10 minutes. The threshold concentration for immediate mild toxic effect is 900 to 1,000 ppm. Inhalation of high concentrations can cause fatal pulmonary edema. There are repods of toxic neuritis following exposure to gasoline. Repeated or prolonged skin exposure causes dermatitis and can cause blistering of the skin due to gasoline's defaHing' properties. Repeated or prolonged exposure to eyes can cause hyperemla of the conjunctive. Ingestion can cause inebriation, drowsiness, blurred vision, vertigo, confusion, vomiting, and cyanosis. Aspiration after Ingestion causes bronchitis, pneumonia, or edema, which can be fatal. The chemical components of gasoline that are the most dangerous are the volatile aromatics benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (see Table 2 - Hazardous Chemical Substances of Occupational Health Concern for a summary of the physical and chemical properties and associated health hazards). Benzene is the most significant potential health hazard found in gasoline and Is a suspected human carcinogen. A TLV of 10 ppm or 30 mg/m3 has been assigned to benzene. Benzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 1.4 ppm. Low~level Inhalation exposure to benzene can cause irritation to the eyes, nose, and respiratory system; headache; and nausea. A TLV of 100 ppm or 375 mg/m3 has been assigned to toluene. Toluene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2.1 ppm. Low-level Inhalation exposure to toluene can cause fatigue, weakness, confusion, and euphoria. A TLV of 10(] ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to ethylbenzene. Ethylbenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2 ppm. Low-level Inhalation exposure to ethylbenzene can cause irritation to the eyes and mucous membranes. A TLV of 100 ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to xylene. No Iow odor threshold limit has been established for xylene. Low-level inhalation exposure to xylene can cause dizziness, excitement, and drowsiness (see Table 2). IHal Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl F:Ai i/\N Saint Vincent De Paul I?.NVtl:t{ INMFN I Al. MANA(-;I~M[:N I C_~E_')N,~fi~ IL IANTS Estimates of the carcinogenic risks associated with life exposure to various concentrations of benzene In water are: LIFE EXPOSURE CARCINOGENIC RISKS Risk USEPA Concentration CCR ~tle 22 Concentration 10.5 50F~ IOF~ 10.6 5p~ 1~ 10'7 0.5H~ 0.1~ CAG Unit Risk (USEPA): 0.029 (mg/kg/day) -1 Unit Risk (CCR Title 22): 0.1 (mg/kg/day) -1 NIOSH Recommended Standard: 1.0 i~g/m3 TWA ACGIH TLV: 0.1 mg/m3 TWA I ~ ~()~ ,( ~(.II? Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl ~":/%~ ~/\N Saint Vincent De Paul & ,,k%'-~ × ]/XI'i-L'~, IN(' June 17, 1996- Page 8 5. RISK EVALUATION CCR, lille 23, Article 11, Section 2725 requires thai a CAP contain an "assessment of the Impacts" of the unauthorized release and an FS to evaluate and select the most cost-effective corrective action. Within the CAP, the responsible party Is required to recommend target cleanup levels for long-term corrective action to the regulatory agency for concurrence. To assess the Impacts,. a risk evaluation has been conducted in conformance to the ASTM Designation: E-1739 RBCA, LLNL's Recommendations to Improve the Cleanup Process for California's Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks report dated October 16, 1995, and the SWRCB"s Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Technical Review Guidance Document No. 4, dated December 27, 1995. 5.1 RBCA TIER 1 RISK EVALUATION HFA utilized the ASTM E-1739 Tier 1 RBSL Worksheets and Look-Up Tables to assess the lifetime one-in-a-million (lx10-6) health risk for the following exposure pathways: 1, Indoor air Inhalation; 2. outdoor air inhalation; 3. soil volatilization to outdoor air; 4, soil vapor intrusion from soil to buildings; and 5. surface soil Ingestion/dermal/Inhalation. Re-evaluation of the risk to groundwater resources was not conducted in association with this risk evaluation, since there Is more than 150 feet of separation between the deepest known gasoline-containing soils and the first occurrence of groundwater, and Intervening barriers to hydrocarbon migration are present. Benzene concentrations ranging from 2 to 200 mg/kg (equivalent to 2 to 200 ppm) have been detected in soil samples collected from beneath the UST and are known to extend beneath the southwestern corner of the thrift store building. The Tier 1 risk evaluation indicates that these concentrations exceed the RBSL to be protective of the occupants of the building for the air Inhalation exposure pathway (see Attachment 1 for the RBCA Tier 1 worksheets and dose/response calculations for lifetime lx10.6 exposure). In accordance with RBCA, either mitigation is undedaken to reduce the exposure to below 1 ,0.-6 exposure levels, or additional Tier 2 site~specific modeling Is conducted to assess whether ; concentration detected in the soil exceeds the lx10-6 exposure levels at the receptor location for each exposure pathway. This is done by either collecting long-term, site-specific analytical data at each receptor location or by modeling the fate and mobility of the contamination from ils current location to each receptor location. It is important 1o hole lhal lhe California unit cancer risk slope factor for benzene is 0. t 0ng/kg/doy)-I as compared 1o the USEPA slope lacier of 0.029 (rT~g/kg/doy)'l, and lhal the I,'BSI .~ in lbo I or~k UD lables have been odiusted faf application in lhe stole al California. 1 i I( )l .(~( Reverend Ralph Belluomini I :/\1 i,"\N Salnf Vincent De Paul ; X ]/\' I"l .L%, IN(' June 17, 1996-Page9 5.2 RBCA TIER 2 RISK EVALUATION HFA utilized the RBCA contaminate fate and transport modeling algorithms Io assess the site-specific exposure levels at each receptor to determine whether these levels exceed permissible lx10.6 exposure levels. The contaminant fate and transport modeling indicates that because benzene is present at concentrations ranging between 2 and 200 mg/kg beneath the southwestern corner of the thrift store building, the potential benzene exposure level for the indoor air inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible lx10-6 exposure level for commercial use. The contaminant fate and transport model did not Indicate a likelihood for the surface soil ingestion/dermal/inhalation exposure concentrations, or outdoor air Inhalation exposure concentrations to exceed the permissible lx10-6 exposure levels (see Attachment 2 for the RBCA Tier 2 fate and transport modeling worksheets and dose/response calculations for lifetime lx 10-6 exposure). 5.3 REMEDIATION GOALS The BFDHMD is the lead regulatory agency for the site. In general, the BFDHMD.requires the cleanup of hydrocarbon-containing soils to comply with the source removal requirements recommended in the SWRCB's Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Technical Review Guidance Document No. 4, dated December 27, 1995. Source removal Includes the removal of the leaking UST, liquid phase hydrocarbons In the vadose zone, and mobile vapor phase hydrocarbons in the vadose zone. In accordance with the RBCA Tier 1 and 2 risk evaluations, source removal is required to assure that mobile hydrocarbon vapor exposure via 'the Indoor air inhalation pathway does not exceed the permissible lx10-6 exposure level for commercial use. HFA utilized the RBCA Tier 2 contaminate fate and transport modeling algorithms to determine the cleanup level for benzene to reduce the risk to below the permissible lx10-6 exposure level (see Attachment 3 for the RBCA Tier 2 benzene cleanup level calculations for the back calculation of the benzene concentration which is less than the lifetime lx10-6 permissible exposure level). A cleanup level of 0.5 mg/kg for benzene concentrations, In the soil beneath the southwestern corner of the thrift store building will reduce the lifetime exposure level to below 1 x 10-6. 1 I-|C')J ~(~1, Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl Salni VIncenJ De Paul I':AI I/\N June 17, 1996- Page 10 & ,'~%~ X ;I/XI'i:L%, IN(..;. ENVlf~ONMI: FJ I Al MANAC;I~IX,4L--N ! C:I-INSUL [AN'F.c__~ 6. ESTIMATION OF THE MASS OF HYDROCARBONS IN THE SOILS The known contaminant at the site has been ide led as petroleum hydrocarbons In the gasoline range. Based on Smlth-Gutcher's site a: ;sment investigations, hydrocarbons in excess of the benzene cleanup level have been d trained to be present in the subsurface soils at depths ranging from 5 to 55 fbg beneath the 'e, with the lateral limits of hydrocarbons within 25 feet of the UST, including 20 feet beneath '9 southwestern corner of the thrift store building. The total volume of gasoline-containin, .oils is estimated to be approximately 3,650 cubic yards. The total volume of soils with ben i~e concentrations in excess of 10 mg/kg and TPH as gasoline concentrations In excess of 1,0( ~ng/kg is estimated to be approximately 1,050 cubic yards, the total volume of soils with l~zene concentrations between 1 and 10 mg/kg and TPH as gasoline concentrations betw6 ! 1CIO and 1,000 mg/kg is estimated to be approximately 1,050 cubic yards, and the total vol le, of soils with benzene concentrations between 0.5 and 1 mg/kg and TPH'as gasoline cor lntrations between 10 and 100 mg/kg is estimated to be approximately 1,550 cubic yar( l These sells contained an estimated 2,420 pounds of hydrocarbons in the gasoline r( le. This converts into approximately 390gallons of gasoline absorbed Into the !bsurface (see the table below). Approximately 485 pounds of hydrocarbons Is estlm( d to be present beneath the thrift store building. I MASS OF HYDROCARE IS IN SOIL DEPTH CUBIC AVE ~E TPH ABSORBED ABSORBED INTERVAL DIMENSIONS YARDS CON( ?RATION HYDROCARBONS GALLONS (fbg) (fl) , k.Cl) (lbs) 10 1o 50 40 x 15 x 15 x 3.14 1,050 00 2,030 325 7.5 lo 52.5 {45 x 20 x 20 x 3.1 .4) - 1,050 1,050 ;0 340 55 5to55 _(~0_.x 25 x 25 x 3.14) - 2,100 1,550 5 50 10 Total N/A 3,650 A 2,420 390 Total Beneath '. N/A 730 A 485 80 Buildi_n_~. __ _ , N/A = Nol applicable. ] }'l(-)l,(i~[Jll' Reverend Ralph Bolluomlni I':/~] I/\,N~ Saint Vincent Do Paul × IN( ' June 17, 1~6- Page 11 7. SOIL REMEDIATION 7.1 FEASIBILITY STUDY - GASOLINE-CONTAINING SOILS The soil remediation technologies for mitigation of hydrocarbon-containing soils can be divided into in-situ and oboveground, ex-situ processes. Aboveground processes involve excavation end either off-site disposal or surface treatment. Excavation is generally most appropriate for sites where a short remediation time is required, the hydrocarbon-containing soils ore shallow (less then 25 feet deep) and of limited volume within the site, soil permeability is Iow and prevents effective vacuum extraction, bloventing, or bioremediatlon, and/or the contaminant chemistry prohibits In-sltu treatment technologies (i.e., contaminants that have Iow solubility or vapor pressure such os heavy metals, heavy oil, diesel fuel, and some chlorinated organic compounds). In-sltu processes are most appropriate for sites where the presence of surface structures limits excavation options, contaminant chemistry is favorable for, mobilization of the contaminant in the subsurface medium, soil permeability is moderate or high, and the remediation time frame can be extended to 1 year or more. These various treatment technologies are briefly discussed below. 7.1.1 In-Situ Processes 7.1.1.1 Vapor Extraction Based on the physical properties of gasoline (e.g., high vapor pressure, Iow solubility, and a high Henry's Law Constant), In-sltu SVE is a very effective technology for mitigating gasoline adsorbed onto soil particles. Treatment is accomplished by extracting VOCs from the subsurface using an extraction blower and treating the extracted vapors utilizing either carbon absorption, thermal oxidation, or catalytic oxidation. SVE generally removes In excess of 90 percent of the gasoline compounds from the soils. The cost to remove gasoline from soils via SVE is moderate. In addition, the soils can remain undisturbed during treatment. This eliminates the cost of excavation and reparation. Additionally, SVE can contribute to groundwater remediation by allowing volatilization of dissOlved-phase hydrocarbons from the capillary fringe. .7.1.1.2 BJoventing Bioventing is inlended to replenish the oxygen In the Impacted soils, thus promoting an enhanced tale of the natural biodegradation of the hydrocarbons. Bioventing can be conducted In several forms. For passive bloventlng, venting wells are constructed In and around lhe area of impacted soil, and oxygen diffuses from the well bore into the soils, while VOCs degas from lhe soils to the atmosphere by way of the venting wells. For injection bioventing, oxygen is injected into to the impacted soils through the conshuction of injection w(dl,,; in or~d around the area of Impacted soils. For extraction blovenling, clrculcltion of oxygen ,., I ltf)i .(-~1~ Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl i :z\l l/\i~ Soinl Vincenl De Paul & A."--i'~ X ;1~I1 Lq, IN(' June 17, I~6-Page 12 through the impacted soils Is created using a Iow-flow extraction blower. This form of bioventing differs from SVE In that It Is Intended to minimize the extraction of hydrocarbons to the surface, which would require a sophisticated emission control system. Rather, the intention is to regulate the flow of oxygen through the soil so that adequate moisture conditions are maintained for effective biodegradation, and the hydrocarbons are degraded in-situ prior to being extracted to the surface. Therefore, only GAC canisters are generally required for the surface emission control system. The risk with this form of bioventing Is that GAC will ultimately be very expensive if significant quantities of hydrocarbons are extracted. Therefore, the extraction must be "slowed" to a rate permitting complete biodegradation of the hydrocarbons to occur first, and consequently the overall cleanup time is greatly increased as compared to true vapor extraction, 7,1.1.3 Bioremediatic)n This process involves the Injection of oxygen and nutrients Into the subsurface to stimulate the indigenous microorganisms to digest the orgc~nic compounds. Specialized metabolic microorganisms may be added to the treatment zone. Bioremediation is O&M-Intenslve and will impact facility operations. In-situ bloremediation Is most applicable at sites with nonvolatile contaminants and where the subsurface contaminants are readily accessible for biostimulation through surface infiltration networks. 7,1.1.4 Chemical Treatment Two methods generally employed for sites with hydrocarbon-containing soils are soil flushing and oxidation. Soil flushing involves flooding the hydrocarbon-containing interval with a water surfactant mixture and collecting the elutriated solution for treatment. This can be expensive due to the extensive monitoring required and the difficulty In collecting the surfactant solution. These limitations can be overcome by using an oxidizing agent (e.g., hydrogen peroxide) to detoxify the hydrocarbons In the soil matrix. However, because the extent of degradation Is uncertain, the oxidation process is often most applicable as a pre-treatment technique for biological degradation. In general, chemical treatment techniques are still in the development stage and have limited applicabllily at this time. 7.1,1.5 Natural Allenu_a~Lg_n_ Nalural attenuation is lhe process of biodegradation, diffusion, and dispersion, reducing concenhation of the contaminanls of concern to acceptable levels. Natural attenuation is oppropriale al lhose sites where exposure of receptors fo lhe compounds of concern via off, soil. (-]nd groundwajl(:;l palhwc]ys is not likely to occur during the lime frame required for nEJlu~al aller~uation. 1he ~(]le al n(;~h_llOl allenualion varies greatly depending on n~.~me~ous J J(")I ,(' ~1, Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl Saint Vincent De Paul I :,,\1 i,,\,N , June 17. 1996- Page 13 including the properties of the compound of concern and site conditions including soil chemistry, organic content, moisture content, and available oxygen. 7.1.2 Ex-Situ Processes (Excavation) Excavation Is generally most appropriate for undeveloped sites or sites that will be renovated so that buildings or other facilities are not impacted by the excavation. Whether the hydrocarbon-containing soils are then treated on site or disposed of off site is primarily based on space and cost considerations. 7,1.2.t Oft-Site Disoosal Excavation and off-site disposal of soil Is a less desirable alternative as the hydrocarbons or other compounds of concern are not mitigated, but are merely transported to another location with the associated liability intact. 7.1.2.2 On-Site Thermal DesorDtion Excavated soils containing hydrocarbon concentrations above regulatory limits could be. treated with a mobile treatment unit. One such currently available unit Is the Ryan-Murphy, GEM. This technology utilizes a rotary dryer to heat soils to a temperature of 600 to 700°F. VOCs are ducted through a high-temperature baghouse and destroyed, while dried soils are discharged and stockpiled on site for later use as backfill. The GEM Is designed to treat soils with relatively high hydrocarbon concentrations and water saturations below 25 percent. The GEM becomes cost-prohibitive for treating soils with water saturations In the 30-percent range such as the hydrocarbon-containing soils located In the capillary zone at the subject site. 7,12.3 Bioremediation/Land Farming Excavated soils with hydrocarbon concentrations above regulatory limits can be bioremediated on site by stimulating the indigenous bacteria within the soils by adding nutrients and oxygen. The hydrocarbons are then used as a food source for the bacteria and are degraded to carbon dioxide, water, and biomass, This alternative is generally the most cost-effective of the three trealment processes for excavated material; however, extensive open space for conslructing treatment cells is required. 7.2 FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMARY The doplh of hydrocarbon-containing soils and the proximity of structures al the subject site fef~do~ soil oxcovolion and Iroalment (or disposal) improclical. Tho polentlal In-situ IOCfI~'IOIO~'./Jf-;S ir~c;hJcJ(,~ n~h~ral attenuation, biovonting, and SVE, 1he In.:;ilu lochrlologlos of _. _.!~.-~i~ I [C)I .C}I, Reverend Ralph Belluominl I :,'\1 I/\N Saint Vincent De Paul ~ June 17, 1996- Page 14 .i..ud,~ &/~%~ x ],~I1 'L%, IN( ' blare, mediation and chemical treatment are not generally considered to be as cost effective as SVE for the mitigation of gasoline hydrocarbons adsorbed onto unsaturated soils. The cleanup times for the In-situ technologies vary from greatest for natural attenuation, lower for passive bioventing, lower yet tot injection bioventlng, followed by extraction bloventing, and shortest for SVE. Extraction bloventing has an order of magnitude greater cleanup time than SVE. Conversely, the monthly operating, regulatory liaison, and regulatory oversight costs are lowest for natural attenuation, higher for passive bioventing, higher yet for Injection bioventing, followed by extraction bloventing, and highest for SVE. However, the overall project cost Is a combination of these factors. SVE can frequently cost less than extraction bioventing when considering the significant cost of GAC, and the very extended time frame for passive bioventing and Injection bloventlng may result in very significant, long-term regulatory liaison and oversight costs. Natural attenuation may have the lowest direct costs, and site closure may be conditionally issued; however, the long-term social cost of the restricted use of the property Including reduced property values may render this option the most costly, when all costs are considered, The RBCA Tier 2 evaluation Indicates that the selected mitigation technology must have an appropriate time frame to reduce the exposure of benzene through Indoor air Inhalation to the occupants of the thrift store building. Natural attenuation, passive bloventlng, and Injection bioventing will not reduce the concentration of benzene within a time frame, which Is protective of the health of the employees within the thrift store building. Based on the above described site conditions, HFA recommends that the In-situ treatment methods of SVE or extraction bioventing are the most feasible remediatlon technologies for removing hydrocarbons from the unsaturated 7one within a time flame, which is protective of the health of the employees of the thrift store. Due to the highly permeable soil and the volatile nature of the gasoline contamination, the subject project is in essence a textbook example of a site that is well suited for a rapid and successful cleanup through SVE. SVE would greatly shorten the time to complete the treatment and significantly reduce the risk of enormous costs for disposal of spent carbon associated with extraction bioventing. The additional time required to complete extraction bioventing would result in a significant cost associated with performing system O&M and the ongoing quarterly regulatory liaison and reporting including air emissions monitoring and reporting. HFA believes that for this site, SVE has a higher probability al success, a shorter time interval for complelion, and ultimalely presents lower overall cleanup cost than extraction biovenling HFA recommends SVE os lhe cosl-elleclive remedial lechnology thal presenls lhe lowest risk of adverse health effects to the employees of the thrift I ! i()l_(;t Reverend Ralph Bolluominl I :Al lAN Saint Vincent Do Paul & ,,~.~ X :i/~11 L'-¢, IN(' June 17, 1996-Page 15 8. IN-SITU SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION 8.1 SYSTEM DESIGN Based on the results et the FS presented above, an in-sltu VES Is recommended for the mitigation of gasoline-containing soils at the subject site. To expedite the installation of a full-scale VES, HFA recommends that a pilot-scale well field be Installed and a SVET be conducted to determine the ROI for the site, the optimum well spacing, appropriate extraction blower size, and the initial emission control system. Despite the lack of site-specific vapor extraction test data of the effective ROI for the unsaturated zone, the lithology at the site supports an initial assumption of an effective ROI of approximately 25 feet. Therefore, HFA recommends the Initial placement of seven vapor extraction wells (VW-1 through VW-7) (see Figure 2 for proposed vapor extraction well locations). The wells will be constructed of 2-inch-diameter, schedule 40 PVC piping with ,0.03-inch slotted casing packed in aquarium sand. Soil boring VW-1 will be advanced through the former tank location and screened from a depth of 10 to 50 fbg. Three of the soil borings (VW-2 through VW-4) will be ddlled In a triangular pattern at locations approximately 20 feet radially from the former tank, and screened from a depth of 10 to 35' fbg. The other three soil borings (VW-5 through VW-7) will be drilled In a triangular pattern at locations approximately 20 feet radially from the former tank, and screened from a depth of 35 to 55 fbg (see Figure 2 for proposed vapor extraction well locations). This pattern is designed to provide separate vapor extraction wells for the near-surface, highly permeable zone and for the deeper, moderately permeable zone. The wells will be valved so as to be usable as inlet wells during the extraction phase to enhance air flow across the gasoline-impacted zone (see Figure 4 - VES Schematic Diagram and Attachment 4 for the vapor extraction well installation procedures and AHachment 5 for the vapor extraction well construction details). Soil sampling will not be performed during drilling because the vapor extraction wells are positioned within an area that has previously undergone extensive sampling and laboratory analysis. 8.2 VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST Upon completion of lhe installation of the pilot-scale vapor extraction well field, a SVET will be conducled 1o delermine lhe sile-specific ROI for each lithologic zone. The results of the vapor extraction test will be used lo determine whether addilional vapor extraction wells ore required prior to ir~slallalien (Jr~d operolion of lhe tull-scale VES. The SVET is also required by the SJVUAPCI)-~iI~) for trio perrnil to operate the VFS on c] fuji-limo basis In order lo collect dala lo Reverend Ralph Belluominl Salnl Vincent De Paul June 17 1996- Page 16 demonsirole thai lhe air flow from the effluenl stack of lhe system does nol present o health risk 1o employees or the adjacent residential neighborhood. A SVET will be conducted in order to determine the flow rate/vacuum characteristics of the subsurface soil, the ROI surrounding the vapor extraction well, the average intrinsic soil permeability, and the hydrocarbon concentrations within the extracted vapors. The equipment used to conduct the test will include a 3 hp, Sutorbllt Model 4HVL, positive displacement blower capable of generating flow rates of up to 115 cfm at a WHV of 110 ins-water, and two Westates Carbon, Inc., Model VSC-200, activated carbon filters to control volatile organic emissions to the atmosphere. System parameters will be monitored using various magnahelic vacuum gauges, pltot tube and turbometer flow gauges, and a PID (see Attachment 6 for the vapor extraction test procedures and equipment). The SVETs will be conducted using vapor extraction well VW-1 as the extraction well' (see Figure 2). A step test will be performed by extracting soil vapors at three different vacuums for a duration of approximately 20 minutes. Selected vacuum steps will be approximately one-third of the maximum vacuum achieved by the blower. Flow rates and corresponding WHYs and subsurface vacuums will be monitored, and the data will be recorded on a vapor extraction test recording log. The results of the test will be summarized graphically and in tabular form, and the Information will be utilized to calculate an ROI for various flow rates and the Intrinsic soil permeability of the extracted zone. At the beginning and end of the step tests, vapor samples will be collected In TedlarTM bags from each of the extraction wells and analyzed by a California state-certified laboratory for TPH as gasoline and BTEX using EPA Methods 8015 (M) and 8020, respectively. Upon completion of the additional limited SVET, an RI repod will be prepared that provides the final design of the full-scale VES. This information will be submitted to the SJVUAPCD-SR for the ATC permit for the VES. The application contains detailed engineering data on the proposed remedial system. Estimates used to establish design criteria will be presented. Design criteria will include ROI. lithologic parameters (e.g., air permeability), hydrocarbon concentration in the air stream, estimated pore volume turnover, treatment equipment specifications per permit requiremenls (i.e., AIC permit and PTa), and an estimated time for cleanup. J-J(')J.(][ Reverend Ralph Belluomlnt Saint Vincent De Paul J :/~J J/\"~ June 17, 1996- Page 17 &/~.~ X ~1,~ I'1 -~¼. IN(' 8.3 ESTIMATED TIME FOR SOIL REMEDIATION The estimated decrease in effluent vapors from the VES design are generally calculated utilizing a model developed by Johnson et al., which has been reduced to a master curve for gasoline. Essentially, the Johnson master curve predicts the pattern at which soil vapor concentrations exiracted from the subsurface decrease. Where: Q = Flow rate inscfm; m = Mass concentration; t = Time of vapor extraction operation; and W = Mass of contaminants in the subsurface. Utilizing Johnson's master curve for gasoline, It Is possible to estimate the degradation of extracted vapor concentrations over time if the initial concentration, the flow rate from the extraction well, and the mass of contaminants in the subsurface are known, The initial concentration and flow rate are determined fairly accurately during the SVET, and the mass of contaminants is usually estimated from the contaminant Information. About 2,420 pounds of hydrocarbons has been estimated to be present in the unsaturated soil at the site, and a maximum initial concentration of 2,000 ppmv Is estimated given the maximum soil concentrations. To estimate a best-case time for cleanup, an effective subsurface flow rate of 200 scfm and an initial vapor concentration of 2,000 ppmv were utilized, and the vapor concentration over time was calculated for every week Into the remediatlon (see Figure 5-Expected Vapor Concentration Degradation Over Time). As illustrated by Figure 5, the VOCs fall off exponentially, and there is a 90-percent reduction within the first 52 weeks. The vapor concentrations fall to approximately 1,000 ppmv in approximately 6 weeks and to approximately 50 ppmv in 52 weeks. Throughout the cleanup, the determination of the mass of hydrocarbons in the subsurface is the parameter most subject to error because It Is usually dependent on the laboratory results of relatively few samples collected during the site assessment. The data is then averaged and extrapolated over the volume at contaminated soils to determine the mass. However, a more accurale estimate of the mass can be obtained from Johnson's master curve for gasoline after a few months of syslem operational data has been collected. After a few months of operation, the change in lhe vapor concentration during that time period and the corresponding flow rate are known. H is Jhen possible to recalculate the mass of hydrocarbons in lbo subsurl'cJco, arid a beller eslimale of lhe lime required for cleanup can be obtained. ! ! i(")l.('~t Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl I :/\1 li'\,~ Saint Vincent De Paul & A~'E~ X 1/\'I'/"?,. IN( ' June 17.1~6-Page 18 8.4 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AND PERMITTING 1he VES should use a positive displacement blower, or the equivalent, with a capacity delermined by the SVET, but estimated at this time to be approximately 200 scfm at 60 Ins-water. The test will likely indicate that direct-fired thermal oxidation Is the most appropriate and cost-effective emission control system for the Initial treatment of the vapors extracted from the subsurface. When the Inlet concentrations have dropped to a level where supplemental fuel usage rises, then the unit will be switched into a catalytic oxidation mode until soil cleanup is obtained. Installation of the VES will commence after obtaining the following approvals and permits: · FS/CAP approval from the BFDHMD; · an ATC permit/PTa from the SJVUAPCD-SR for the selected treatment equipment; and · a City of Bakersfield Building Permit. Immediately after obtaining the appropriate permits and approvals, the following tasks will be performed: · procurement of all treatment system equipment and materials; and · installation of subsurface piping, treatment system, and treatment compound. 8.5 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM MONITORING Monitoring of the system will consist of the following measurements: · VOCs in extracted vapors; · total flow rate of extracted vapors; · system vacuum generated by the blower; · VOCs of vapors after treatment; and · .system operating temperature. Periodic testing of the VOCs from individual extraction wells will be conducted, and adjustments will be made lo the system to minimize the duration of the cleanup. The VES will be designed, for continuous operation, 24 hours per day. 7 days per week, until the concentration of gasoline hydrocarbons in lhe soils is reduced to less than the BFDHMD-recommended guidelines. The onlicipaled duralion of the remediatlon phase of the project is approximately 1 year from the beginning of the remediation. A more precise time estimate will be provided upon completion of lhe SVEI and revised with monitoring information gathered during the system i l()l.(-';I Reverend Ralph Belluomlni !':,'\1 lAN Saint Vincent De Paul operallon phase. A detailed description of the selected VES will be conlalned In the ATC permit application, which will also contain the results of the SVET. 8.6 PROGRESS SOIL SAMPLING At 12-month Intervals following the Initiation of remedlatlon, progress soil borings will be advanced in order to assess mitigation progress. One soil boring will be drilled through the central area of the gasoline-containing soils. One additional soil boring will be drilled at an intermediate position laterally In the plume to assess the effectiveness of remediatlng the lateral podlons of the gasoline-containing soils. Based on field observations, soil samples collected from each of the progress soil borings will be analyzed for TPH as gasoline and BTEX by a California state-certified laboratory. Analysis of these soil samples will provide the treatment data necessary to assess the effectiveness of the system in reducing the concentrati.ons of gasoline hydrocarbons. HFA will provide quaderly progress reports that detail the remedial field activities, sample collection, analytical results, data analysis, conclusions, and HFA's recommendation of what further remedial activities are required or that the site can be closed once cleanup levels have been achieved. Certified laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documents will be Included (see Attachment 7 for HFA's soil boring and well construction procedures). i(")! .(-il, Reverend Ralph Belluominl :Al lAN Saint Vincent De Paul & A.Ci.%( × ~I/~I'I-L~, IN( ' June 17, 1~6-Page 20 9. SITE CLOSURE AND INTERIM REPORTING Upon approval of this CAP, HFA will submit vapor extraction well permit applications to the BFDHMD. Upon completion of lhe installation of the additional vapor extraction wells, HFA will conduct the SVET. HFA will prepare a summary report that details the results of the SVET and provides the design specifications of the full-scale remediation system, including the selected emission control system for the VES. At the same time, HFA will submit an ATC permit application to the SJVUAPCD-SR for the Installation of the VES. As per BFDHMD policy, quarterly progress reports of the soil remediation system will be prepared until site closure is obtained. The report will include the monitoring requirements specified in the PTa for the VES. Once effluent vapor concentrations from the VES reach a concentration of approximately 50 to 100 ppmv, verification soil borings will be drilled. A sampling work plan will be developed and submitted to the BFDHMD for approval prior to performing this work. Upon approval, verification soil borings will be advanced in the vicinity of previously detected hydrocarbon-containing soils in order to evaluate VES performance and/or verify that the proposed target cleanup goals have been achieved. Following the completion of the verification sampling, a report will be prepared containing the data collected durlHg remediation, the estimated amount of hydrocarbons removed by the VES, the laboratory analytical results of all vapor samples collected during the operation of the VES, and the laboratory analytical results of the verification soil borings. This report will be submitted to the BFDHMD upon its completion. Upon successful completion of the remediation and with the approval of the BFDHMD, HFA will remove all of the surface equipment from the site, remove the piping connecting the wells with the treatment unit, and abandon the wells in accordance wlth BFDHMD protocol. I ;/\! I/XI'xl Saint Vincent De Paul & A.CE~i'X ;IA'I'I ~?,, IN{ ' June 17, 1996- Page 21 10. HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN A health and safety plan has been developed by HFA's Industrial hygienist for City of Bakersfield UST sites. Procedures for conducting all work at the site are outlined In this plan, and site-specific Information Is provided on Its cover page (see Attachment 8 for the health and safety plan). '~1(i i I( )l .(~[ Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl & ,.X.%~ X ]/X I1 2%, IN( ' June 17.1~6- P~g~ 22 11. SUMMARY A risk evaluation of the gasoline-containing soils at the site was conducted using ASTM Designation: E-1739 Risk Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (RBCA). The results of RBCA Tier 1 and 2 evaluations are that the Indoor air Inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible lifetime lx10-6 exposure levels given the concentration of benzene in the soils beneath the thrift store building, and that mitigation is required to reduce these concentrations to a permissible residual level, which Is protective of the health of the occupants of the building. An RI/FS was conducted to assess the feasibility and cost effectiveness of mitigation technologies. The results of the RI/FS analysis are that the time frame for natural blodegradation is not sufficiently protective of the health of the current occupants of the building, removal of'the hydrocarbons through excavation is not feasible or cost effective given the significant depth of the hydrocarbons and the existence of a significant volume of the hydrocarbons beneath the building, the time frame for in-sltu bloventing is not sufficiently protective of the health of the current occupants of the building and bloventlng Is not the cost-effective alternative, and In-situ vapor extraction Is the cost-effective alternative, which Is protective of the health of the current occupants of the building. Based on the available preliminary site assessment data, HFA recommends in-situ vapor extraction for the remedlation of hydrocarbo,n-containlng soils at the site. Vapor effluent from the VES will likely be initially treated utilizing a 200 scfm, direct-fired thermal oxidation unit, with the ability to be converted to catalytic oxidation as concentrations fall, and may eventually be followed by carbon absorption. Upon completion of cleanup operations at the site, soil verification sampling will be performed, and a report documenting the results of the remediation process will be submitted to the BFDHMD. I--i(')1 Reverend Ralph Belluomlnt :Al lAN Saint Vincent De Paul & A.'-~' X ~1/~ l'l .L~,, IN(' June 17. 1996-Page 23 12. REFERENCES Barrow, J.A. 1984. Geologic Map and Cross Se¢lions of the Southeastern San Joaquln Valley, California. United States Geological Survey. Map 1-1496. California Division of Mines and Geology. 1965. Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet. Johnson, P.C., M.W. Kemblowski, and J.D. Colthart. 1990. Quantitative Analysis for the Cleanup of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils by In-Situ Soil Venting. Ground Water. 28(3). Kern County Water Agency. February 1, 1994. 1993 Repod on Water Conditions. Kern County Water Agency. May 1993. 1992 Water Supply Report. Lawrence Llvermore National Laboratories. October 16, 1995. Recommendations to Improve the Cleanup Process for California's Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks Report. State Water Resources Control board. December 27, 1995. Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Technical Review Guidance Document No. 4. MRM:rri (:c; Mr, tbward I-I. W~n(..~,. III. BFDlaMD Mr. [)uarm. R. Srr ll~ Smilh-Oulchor SECTION II FIGURES SITE LOCATIO LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL I:/\1 IJ\N & ,'X."-'i'"-i( X ]/k I't :.~, IN(. ' 310 BAKER STREET LU z_ ASPHALT '~ STORAGE YARD n- SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE UJ m 300 BAKER STREET O rr n VES UNIT I VW-5 DISPENSER ~ FENCE GATE :. -TH-2--VW-6 -- TH-3 ~ ~;VW-1 VW-3 VW-7 ASPHALT PARKING LOT FORMER 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET o 15 30 LEGEND SAINT ~/INCENT DE PAUL )i, SOIL I:~OIm,~(:, SAINT VINCEN1[ DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 I',AKER STREET .~ I'ltOIJ(').%l~l) VAI'OI IJX'IIIACIlON WELL IJAKEFISFIELD, CALIFOFINIA I I LINE OI. CIt( ~'.;!; '.-;liCI'I(')N t:IGLJf~E 2 - PLOT PLAN SHOWING VES ...... vi{,':; ~'HqN(; ltOI~GUIN. FAI:IAN & ASSOCIA'FES, INC. rlilHFT .% I OI H: I~UII [ )IN(-: (PRO. IEC1 ED) FORME Ft WEST-NORTHWEST $50-GALLON / E/ST-NORTHEAST A GASOLINE UST / A' TH-3 TH- 1 TH-2 '~ TH-4 0 --' ':i:':':i:':':~:':':~:':':~:':':~:'~///"~ / / ~" '"'"'"'/~' / '"' / '~' / ~f.~'.~'.~-,..,. 0 :..:.: :..:..-..:.:..:.:::.....:.....:.....: :..: ..:.........:.:':':!:i:':~:':':~:'."::: .'.'. - .- .: .....:.!...: ..... :.....:. · ?:" i ":" .:"F F:'. F:; F:'. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 10 :::::::::::::::l::::::::::::L._ 10 :;:~.:; :.:.:; :..'.:;:-:.'. Z :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: · i'.'. 'i':.sw !(:::!: ': b':~ :':':~:':':~:i':~:':':~:'.".'~: i !!':'i ! i'."!~?-"i! i'.'?!!': :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .-.....: ::::::::::::::::::L":::L":':L'-- 20 'W 40 40 i 50 50 60 -- 60 70 -.- 70 TO=70' ~t£,RIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET VERTICAL_ EXAGGERATION: 3/4 o 10 20 REFERENCE: SMITH-GUTCHER LEGEND SAINT VI ICENT DE PAU~ TH-1 ~ ..... SOIL. BOllING OESISNA I II - ' ~';AINf VlNOFN1 I,)E PAUL THRIFT STORE ~'~o~ec~eol :~)t) 13~q~El~ STREET .',~ .......~, [,'..au,,f:.w~ IiAKI]III;I II I l) CALIFORNIA CONCENIRATIONSIN,,,.~ ~,',,,'~,,l i :"" '*"" I'Ifil.ll'll~ 3 CI ,-r, SECTION A-A' II) = x'4 lot at II(IIIING UI 1,1~ I,JI ~C. I'IEVISION DAIE: JUNE 17, '<250~m ~ VW-I VW-2 ~-3 VW4 ~-5 VW-6 VW.7 A~OSPHERE . EFFLUE~ M~ITORING POINT INFLUENT MONITORING POINT BLOWER WITH ~ OXlOI~R SILENCER T SUPPLEMENTAL FUEL NOT TO SCALE Let;eh, I SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL PRESSURE OR VACUU~ ~AU(iE SAI~ VINCENT DE PAUL THRI~ STORE VALVE 310 BAKER STREET SAMPLE rAP llO~Ol~t, F~ & ~SOC~TES, INC. ~ &/~'-g.~ X ]A~'l~l--:.cg, IN{.' FIGURE 5 - EXPECTED VAPOR CONCENTRATION DEGRADATION OVER TIME SECTION III SUMMARY TABLES I:AI lAN ,~/X.%,~ X ]/\'I1 :'.'4, IN( ' TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE DATE I SAMPLE ~ TPH AS ; i ETHYL- TOTAL i GASOLINE j BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES SOURCE SAMPLEDi DEPTH I.D. I , iREF t (Ibc) ; ' (mc/kg) i (mc/kg)I (mc/kg) . (mc/kg)I (mc/kg) : ANALYTICAL METHOD , 8015 (M) j EPA 8020 METHOD REPORTING LIMIT I VARIES-SEE LABORATORY REPORT iN/A TH-1 '__._6__-_!7_-9_1 j 9.5 i TH-1-9.5 1 800 <0.8 <0 8 ........ _<~:8 ............. _5_.~ .._6.. : !__7. L9_.~ .J ....... 13.5 i TH-1-13.5~ 4 300J <2.] <2 .... <21 189! A-' .............................. ~ .................................................................... 305i B ............... '60i ................ 960 B 1'--'~"'28'92--- 65 .. TH-l-65 j .... 11 0.19 .... -0.~- 0.079 0.287i B 1-28-92 ...... 70 .... , TH'-I~70 ' I ....... ~ .................................................. ' ....... ..................... ND ND ND ND! A TH-2 1-28-92 25 i TH-2-25 2,000' <5 6 <5 3951 B TH-3 __?.2_8792__ ...... .2__0. ....... .T_H;.3-_2__0.- ND __ ND ND ND · ND B _ 1_'2__8-92__2__ ..... _2.5_ _T..H.:3-._2__5 ...... 2_ t 6_°_°_ <2 28 38 4i~ '-~-' 1'28..:.92~ ..... _4.5 ........ T..~:3:~5._ ..... _11_,0_.0_._0. .... 200 1,200 ,~ 0--~' 1, ~-3-0' B 1'28-:9-2- ....... 67 ..... ~. TH-3-60 2 0.34 0.034 0.12 0.374 -'I~-- TH-4 I__._1-.Z2_8-_92~ ...... .2~ J TH-4-25 ND NDI ND ND' ND B I 1-28-92 j 60 i TH-4'60 I NDI 0.013t 0.019 NDI 0.015; g RFF Rnnnrt rnf~rnn~-a = ~. = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Smith-Gulcher and Associales, Inc.'s (Smith-Gutcher's) tank removal sampling dated June 17, 1991. B = Smith-Gulcher's report dated March, 1992. TABLE 2. HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CONCERN l:em~zeC below are chemical substances that may pose an occupational health threat upon exposure. For each chemical substance itemized, the following informatK~, is summanzed for ..; u~Ck referer'~e: - ~,c'cl~C-.aD/e allowable exposure limits F~EL -- recommended exposure limit MP = melting point ,..imits w~en Immediately Oangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) PEL permissible exposure limit FP = flash point - ;on,~tion Potential (IP) TLV = threshold limit value BP -- boiling point - ..G~necic c~emical group (for reference to Attachments 6, 7, and 9) S'i'EL = shod-term exposure limit CVS = cardiovascular system UEL = upper explosive limit CNS = central nervous system ~ ~(' ~--'~ LEL = lower explosive limit Gl = gastrointestinal VP = vapor pressure RBC = red blood cell_ ': ~;~,X~E i ~EL'TLV OTHE~ LIMITS GROUP PROPERTIES PROPERTIES TARGET ORGANS ACUTE/CHRONIC HEALTH E~PECTS CANCE~ i_-,_.--;.=_,-,e ~ 1:0 1 ~pm IOLH: Petroleum based Aromatic odor LEL: 1.3% Blood, CNS, skin, Irritated eyes, nose. and respiratory system: yes i 3,000 ppm UEL: 7.9% bone marrow, eyes, ,headache; nausea; staggered gait: fatigue: I STEL: 5 ppm IP: 9.25 eV respirator'/system lassitude; dermatitis; bone marrow depression; ..-. I VP: 75 mm abdominal pain; leukemia ' MP: 42~ F FP: 12~F BP: 176° F ,Toiue~e ' 200/1(30 ppm IDLH: Petroleum based Aromatic odor LEL: 1.2% CNS, liver, kidney, 'Fatigue, weakness, confusion, euphoria, no t 2,000 ppm UEL: 7.1% skin dizziness, headache, dilated pupils, lacrimation. I IP: 8.82 eV nervousness, muscle fatigue, ins~3mnia. ~ VP: 22mm )arathesia, dermatitis, photophobia MP: -139° F [ FP: 40° F ! BP: 232° F i Et,-,,,,,!bec, ze~e 100/100 ppm IDLH: Petroleum based Aromatic odor LEI..: 1.0<'/o Eyes, skin, CNS, Irritated eyes and respiratory system, no 2,000 ppm UEI..: 6.7% respiratory system burns skin, dermatitis t STEL: 125 ppm IP: 8.76 eV VP: 10mm MP: -139° F I FP: 55° F i BP: 277° F ..'~ .~er-.~ 10(~.'100 i~0m 10LH: Petroleum based Aromatic odor LEL: 1.1% CNS, eyes, Gl trac~, Dizziness; excitement; drowsiness: ! 1,000 ppm UEL: 7.0% blood, liver, incoordination; staggering gait; ! STEL: 150 ppm IP: 8.6 eV kidneys, skin irritating to eyes, nose, and throat: VP: 7mm corneal vacuolization; anorexia; nausea; MP: -13" F vomiting, abdominal pain; dermatitis FP: 63~ F BP: 292~ F SECTION IV ATTACHMENTS Ii I()1.('~1. I:Ai lAN &/~"~ ×.':l/N l'l:'?i, IN(. t:.NVII-:IC.INMI:N I Al MANA(];[:MIJN ! I:;I]INSI II. ! AN I ATTACHMENT 1. RBCA TIER 1 WORKSHEETS AND DOSE/RESPONSE CALCULATIONS Output Table 1 Site Nama: St. V~ce~! De Paul Jcfo Ide~lt/flcatton: SO43 Software: GSI R~A ~e L~t~: ~ke~. CA ~te ~p~ ~ V~: v 1.0 ~: ~ ~ ~er ~ Tmr 1 ~fau~ ~1~ are DEFAULT PARAME~RS ~erag,n~ :~e for ~s ~] 70 t ~um d~at~ (~) A~erag~g ~e ~¢ n~rc~S (~) ~ 8 16 25 I A ~am~at~ ~3 ama (~2) ~ We~ fkg} 70 15 ~ 70 W ~ ~ aff~ ~1 ~m~l to ~ ~e of Wat~ (V~y) 2 1 ~ ~ ~ suni ~ (~) 1.~ ~n~a~ rate ~l~ (~y) ~ ~ 10 ~a.~ G~ter m~ ~e ~ (~) 2.0E~ sudaCe a~e (d~a~} ~2~ 5.~ 2.~ 5.8E~3 5.8E~3 ! G~J~t~ ~fi~mt~ rote (~) 3.0E~1 ~iu~ ~al a~ (~g} 2.1E~ 1.~ ~ G~ ~ ~ (~) 2.5E~ to ~ a~ ~ 1 ~.~ G~ T~ ~ (~) 6.~ EPA ~ ~m f~ ~r (~ ~L ~ ~UE Sw ~ ¢ ~tm ~ ~ (~) U~ ~L ~ ~um rm~ ~ ~t~ FA~E ~ ~ B~ ~ (mC) Ex.ute P~h~ Chr~tc ~ ~ ~n~ ~n~) Va~ ~ays: ' ~ ~1~ ~ ~ (~) 3.0E~ Grou~atm I~ FA~E FA~E ~ Va~ ~ ~ (~) $. 1E~ V~a~fi~t~ to ~r Air FA~E FA~E ~ ~tl ~ (~3) ~ .7 Va~ Int~s~ to Builds FA~E FA~E ~ Fm~ ~ ~n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.01 Volati~ f~ Su~u~ ~ls FA~E ~UE L~ ~ to ~ter (~) 6.1E~ Volafi~ ~d Paq~e Inha~t~ FALSE ~UE ~UE ~ ~ to t~ ~ a~ ~1 (~) 3.0E~ ~w V~ ~tm ~t 0.~ 0.12 0.12 ~.a V~ air ~t~ 0.~ 0~ 0~ ~ BuiM~g ~um~area mt~ (~) 2.0E~ Oi~an~ ReN~mlal ~a~flal ER BuiM~ air ex~ rote (~1) 1 4E~ 2.3E~ off-site Dt~n~ O~Slte Dl~n~ ~Slte ~ F~ ~ ~n~ (~) 1.5E~ 1 e~ F~ ~ fm~ 0.01 G~tm ~ (~) ~UE i~aa~ r~ (~) ~UE ~UE Ta~ H~ ~ 1.~ V~ ~ G~t~ ~ I~ (GSI). 1~. ~ R~ R~. Physical Property Data Vapor Dlffusion log (Koc) or Pressure Molecular Coefficients log(Kd) Henry's Law Constant (@ 20 - 25 C) Solubility Weight In air In water (@ 20 - 25 C) (@ 20 - 25 C) (mm Hg) (@ 20 - 25 C) CAS (g/mole) (crn2/s) (cm2/s) (IAg) (atm-m3) (unitless) Pure (raGA) Pure acid base Num,)er Constituent type MW ref Dair rel Dwat ref Koc ref mol re' Component ref Component ref pKa pKb ref 7:--:3-£ Benzene A 78.1 5 9.30E-02 A 1.10E-05 A 1.58 A 5.29E-03 2.20E-01 A 9.52E+01 4 1.75E~-03 A 1.~.-4~-4 EthyI~enzene A 106.2 5 7.60E-02 A 8.50E-06 A 1.98 A 7.69E-03 3.20E-01 A 1.0OE.01 4 1.52E+02 5 708-88-3 Toluene A 92.4 5 8.50E-02 A 9.40E-06 A 2.13 A 6.25E-03 2.60E-01 A 3.00E+01 4 5.15E+02 29 1330-20-7 Xylene (mixed isomers) A 106.2 5 7.20E-02 A 8.50E-06 A 2.38 A 6.97E-03 2.90E-01 A 7.00E+00 4 1.98E-~32 5 Site Name: St. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Macjargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 S~ftware version: v 1.0 © Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Toxicity Data Reference Slope Dose Factors (mg/kg/day) 1/(mg/kg/day) EPA Weight Is CAS Oral Inhalation Oral Inhalation of Constituent Number Constituent RfD_oral ref RfD.~lnhal rel SF. oral ref SF Inhal ref Evidence Carcinogenic ? 71-43-2 Benzene R 1.70E-O3 R 1.00E-01 A 1.00E-01 A A TRUE 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 1.00E-01 A 1.00E+O0 A R R D FALSE 108-88-3 Toluene 2.00E-01 A,R 4.0OE-01 ~,,F - R R D FALSE 1330-20-7 Xylene (mixed isomers) 2.00E+O0 A,R 3.00E-01 A R R D FALSE Site Name: St. Vincent De Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 So,~'~vare version: v 1.0 © Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Miscellaneous Chemical Data Permissible Relative Detection Limits Half Life Maximum Exposure Absorption Groundwater Soil (First-Order Decay) CAS Contaminant Level Limit PEL/'FLV Factors (mg/L) (mg/kg) (days) Number Constituent MCL(m~/L) reference (m~]/m3) ref Oral Dermal ref re~ Saturated Unsaturated 7~-".3-2 Benzene 1.00E-03 CCR Title 22 3.20E+00 OSHA I 0.5 0.002 C 0.005 S 720 720 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 6.80E-O1 CCR Title 22 4.34E+02 ACGIH I 0.5 0.002 C 0.005 S 228 228 108-85-3 Toluene 1.00E+00 56 CFR 3526 1.47E+02 ACGIH 1 0.5 0.002 C 0.005 S 28 28 1330-20-7 Xytene (mixed isomers) 1.75E+00 CCR Title 22 4.34E+02 ACGIH I 0.5 0.005 C 0.005 S 360 360 Site Name: St. Vincent De Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 SofTware version: v 1.0 © Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Input Screen 7 REPRESENTATIVE COC CONCENTRATIONS IN SOURCE MEDIA (Complete the following table) Representative COC Concentration CO NSTITU ENT in Groundwater in Surface Soil in Subsurface Soil value (mg/L) note value (rog/kg) note value (mg/kg) note iEt~, ~ b~_z_._~_e __ 5.0E-3 2.0E+O I __J 5.0E-3 : 5'OE+O / -I [To-f~ e--~-~--- - 5.0E-3 1 ;'OE+I J / [Xylene (mixed Isomers) 5.0E-3 5.0E+1 I J Site Name: St. Vincent De Paul Completed By: Mark Magargee Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Date Completed: 5/10/1996 © Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. : 1: I'/:J-t I i =l':~-$'~ ~-t-t ~r, I :J ~ i J Tier Name: ~. V~ncenJ De Paul Site L~tion: Bakersfield, CA Complet~ By: Ma~ Magargee 0ate TIER I EXPOSURE CONCE~RATION AND INTAKE CALCU~TION EX~URE PATHWAYS ~:: :'. · , : :.~':~';:f:.::t:.::::~z::, .~?~:::]': ~.f::::~:::.::~:::', ..~.:;~?:~::;(~E~DiFPA~Ay:mA~ - ~ ~ ~E~ (~3) (1)/(2) ~ze~e 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.7E~ 7.0E-2 2.6E-9 E:n~benZe~e 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.7E~ 2.0E-1 7.2E-9 T3~uene 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.7E~ 2.0E-1 7.2E-9 X~ene m~x~ isomer) 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.7E~ 2.0E-1 7.2E-9 ~: A~ = ~ ~ favor (~m) BW = ~ W~t ~g) EF = ~ f~ (~) ~ - ~t ~ e~ ~al: ~291-MVX~2 O G~ ~, ~ (~), I~.~ ~ ~ v~ S~. Vincent De Paul Site L~ation: Bakemfield, CA Co~et~ By: Ma~ Magargee Date Comp~e~: 5'~ 0,'~ 9~ 20~ 5 TIER I EX,SURE CONCE~RA~ON AND I~AKE CALCU~TION PATHWAYS ';., ' :~:'.. :~::(~ECKED. iE~A~A~:~:: ::..: ::: .~:' · =; :.: ::: :: . ~ ~ Nc ~ (~3) (1)/(2) (~xE~Oy~ (~) (~y)(3)X(4) ~a.~; S~uHa~ ~ 2.0E*O 1.0E+4 2.0E~ 7.0E-2 1.4E-5 I 1.4E-5 50E*0 1.0E+4 5.0E~ 2.0E-1 9.8E-5~ 9.8E-5 1OE*I 1.0E~ 1.0E-3 2.0E-1 2.0E~ 2.0E~ :~e~) 5.0E+I 1.4E~ 3.6E-3 2.0E-1 7.0E~ 7.0E~ _ :J:[~-:J-'~li:J':~-$'J:~.'~-'~,~,l::l~l J Tier 1 Worksheet S,te Name: SL Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 TIER 1 PATI-WVAY RISK CALCULATION AIR EXPOSURE r)AT).~VAYS · :; ':::;?:.i~:.. :?:: :::::n (CHECKED iF PATHINAyS ARE ACTiYE} CARCINOGENIC RISK TOXIC EFffECTS (2) Total Carcm<:~lc : (3) InhalafiO~l (4) IncIvfdu81 CDC (5) Total Tox3Cant (6) Inhaletso~l (~, EP, Intake Rate (r'm~l<g/day) SloI3,e Fectm' ~ (2) x (3) Intake Rate (mo/Ag/day) Refere~'x:e Dose j Hazarcl c.4~,~c DroSte OmS~e On-S~e) O~-~e .~e~.ene A 1.4E-5 1.0E-1 1.4E-6 3.9E-5J 1.7E-3 2.3E-2 _E:,h.vlL, enz e n e D 9.8E-5 J 1.0E+0 I 9.8E-5 .Totue~e O 2.0E-4 4.0E-1 4.9E-.4 Xyle~e (mixed isomers) . D 7.0E-4J 3.0E-1 Total Pathway Carcinogenic Risk = J 1.4E-6 [ 0.0E+0 Total Pathway Hazard Index -- 2.6E-2 Sepal: G-291.MVX-452 S<:~e~,are: GSI ~C:A S¢~eac~s~e~ O Gmundwate~ Se~4ces, In,t.. (GSI), 1995. Al I~ Reee~'ved. ve~o'~: v ~ .0 Tier 1 Works~ee; Name: St. Vincenl De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 3 0~' TIER I EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION AND INTAKE CALCULATION D~..~. COe~rACT 1 ) Sourc~ Medium 4) ~ 5) Aveeage D~li~ Intake Rate Co~s'fft.~ue~ts of Conoe~'n SuHace Soil Co~. (mg~g} Ow-,~lte Residential O~-Slle Commercial O~-Site Residential On-S~e 5eczene 5.0E-3 1.0E-5 5.1E-8 Et~'?~>enzene 5.0E-3 2.8E-5 1.4E-7 Tcluene 5.0E-3 2.8E-5 1.4E-7 X¥lene !mixed isomers/ 5.0E-3 2.8E-5 1.4. E-7 NOTE: AB$ = Dermal ab~orptio~ f~ctor (dim) BW ~ Body Weigh! ~g) EF - ~sure f~ue~y (~) ~E = P~ of e~ure ~ = A~ favor CF - Un~s ~ ~ ~ = ~u~ t~e (h~day) SA = Sk~ su~ ar~ AT. A~g~ ~ (~) ED - ~. ~m~ ~) IR - I~ake rote (~day Or m~y) ~r~l: ~291-M~52 G~ R~A ~ G~tm ~ I~. (GSI), 1~. ~ R~ R~ V~: v 1.0 ;t:~*]:~'-flH~l'-'~-'~-'~"~'-'~,~,i:~i Tier I Worksheet 8.1 Site Name: St. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield. CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 TIER I EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION AND INTAKE CALCULATION iSOILEXPOSUREPATHWAY~ ;,' . .: ;:.:~::.:.::. i::~!;~';i'~.~"~t~C~C~I~[eATHI~VAy.~'~AC'~IV~;i~:ii.?.:'-.:::': i~i:;: :;::::': ..:: !.:.;: :='::::...~ : . $UFt~r&C~ $O~LS OR SEDIMENT~: E.~t~m~.~ C.~-,..-,;..;;.m TOTAL PATHWAY IN'TAKE ~c.E$'r~~ 1) Source Medium 4) Exl:x~ure Multio~i~r $) Av~*~e Daily ~ Rede ~ ~ ~ ~ ~en~.ene 5.0E-3 1.7E-7 8.7E-10 52E-8 Et,~¥~benzene 5.0E-3 4.9E-7 2.4E-9 1.4E-7 Toluene 5.0E-3 4.9E-7 2.4E-9 1.4E-7 X71ene (mixed isomers} 5.0E-3 4.9E-7 2.4E-9 1.4E-7 NOTE: ABa = Dermal absorption factor (dim) BW · Body Weight (~g) EF · Exposure frequencey (day~'7~) POE · pc~t of e:~:x~sure I AF · Adhe~ance fact~ CF = Units coniston fact~' ET = Exposure time (h~'s/day) SA · S,k~ sudace area (cr~'2) ~ AT · Averaging time (days) ED - Ex~. dumtlon (y~s) IR = Irffake rate (L/day or rog/day) I Serial: G-291-MVX-.452 Sofw,-am: GS~ RBC..A S¢.'ea<~eet O Gmundwate~ Senates, Inc. (Gal), 1995. Ali Right,, Resemed. Ve~'s~n: v 1.0 Tier 1 Worksheet 8.2 £,;e Name: SL Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Complete<h ~,'10/19~ 2 OF' TIER I PATHWAY RISK CALCULATION SOiL E.XPOSL,~E PA THWAYS . : ' ' n (CHECKED IF PATHwAys ARE ACTIVE) CARCINOGENIC RISK TOXIC ......... EFFECTS (2) Total Carcir~o~enic t (3) Oral (4) tr)dividual COC (5) Total Toxicanl (6) Oral ,:?~ h-~iv.::lual CO(; I~) EPA Intake Rate (rog/kg/day)' SIo~,e Factor Risk (2) x (3) Intake Rate (mg/~g/day) Refe~'ence Dose C a ~citlo~i¢ O~-$1te Constt__.____~t~Je~ts of Concerr~ Clas.~iflcat~on Res,:~.~'ttial Co~Y~n~al (m~day),~l O~$1te Re~"~al Oft-Site CorllrP,~r~el C)~-SI~e Residential O~Site Commercla {t;'x~-(~a¥1 ~e~,te ~e A 5.2E-8 1.0E-1 5.2E-9 1 =~" 5"~"~z ene O 1.4E-7 1.0E-1 I 1,4E-6 Tc~uene DI 1.4E-7 2.0E-1 t Xv.~e~e (,m;xeC iSOmers! 0 1.4E-7 2.0E*0 ' ?.2E-8 Total Pathway Carcinogenic Risk = 0.0E+0 J. ,5.2E-9 Total Pathway Hazard Index = 0.0E~,-0 ,Serial: C~291-MVX-452 Soffwa~: G~ RBC. A O ~tm Se~'tces. Iflc. (GSI). 1995. All RIg~t~ Reset. ed. Tier I Worksheet 8.3 Site Name: St. Vincent De Paul Completed By: Mark Magargee Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Date Completed: 5/10/1996 I of 1 TIER 1 BASELINE RISK SUMMARY TABLE BASELINE CARCINOGENIC RISK BASELINE TOXIC EFFECTS I Risk I 1T°xicity Limit(s)I ~ Limit(s) Individual COC Ris Cumulative COC RIs~ Exceeded?~ Hazard Quotient Hazard Index J Exceeded? PATHWAY .._ V___a_l_u_e. R.!..s__l<.__l Value ; Risk / Value i Limit Value Limit Complete: O.OE+O 1.OF:-S O.OE+O N/A 0 O.OE+O I 1.OE+O 0.0[+0 ! N/A 0 .... ~ ;;; 7 1.0E-6 ~ 1.4E-6 · WA I n J 2.3E-2 1.0E+0 ~ 2.6E-2~ N/A o I Serial: 0 Software: GSi RBC_,A Screadsheet © Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Version: v 1.0 Total Risk for Each Pathway 1.0E.08 , ~i:!:!:i:!iiii!ii:i:i:i'::'~~.~.-d~de~' Z.bb-O2 1~ 7.0E-09 t ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: eh'es4 ,' ..... ~, ~.o~-o~ ¢i '~iI ~.o~-o~ ~ ~ ~~!~ 5.oE 03 0.0E+00 Air Groundwater~Soil 0.0E+00 Exposure Pathway ' Tier 1 Workstnee! 6. I ] S~:e Name: SI. Vincent De Paul Completed By: Mark Magarge~ Si:e Loca:ion: Bakersfield. CA Date Completed: 5/10/1996 I OF 1 I Target Risk (Class A & B) 1.0E-6 O MCL exposure limit? Calculation Option: 1 E SOIL RBSL VALUES Target Risk (Clam C) 1.0E-$ O PEL exposure limil? SURFAC (< 3 FT BGS) 'target Hazard Ouot~t ~.0E,0 RepresentativeI1 RBSL Resu/ts For Complete E, :x)sure/Pathway, (*x' ff ComF rI ' aB.S:, r concentration Ingestion. Inhalation Constr~ction Ac~l~aole Exc~e~ec~ I CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN Soil Leaching to Groundwater X and Dermal Contact × Worker RBSL i ae<~,re~ Caf : Residential: Commercial: Regulatory(MCL): Residential: Commercial: Commerciah ' :CAS No. i Name (mg/l<g) (on-site) (on-site) (on-site) (omsite) (on-si._.~te?.~_. (on-site) (mcj~g) '0' "~io~,7 ,,'~es',e4 7~ -~3-2iBenzene 5.0E-3 NA NA NA NA 9.2E-1 2.4E+1 9.2E-1 O <~ : 0C-4 ~ '4i Ethyfbenzene 5.0E-3 NA NA NA NA >Res >Res >Res O <1 ~ 0~-85-3 ! Toluene 5.0E-3 NA NA NA NA >Res >Res >Res o < 1 ~ 330-20-71Xylene (mixed isomers) 5.0E-3 NA NA NA NA >Res >Res >Res O <1 Software: GSI RBCA Spreadsheet SedaJ: 0 Groundwater Se~ces, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Version: v 1.0 S,:e ..Name: S;. Vincem De Paul Completed By:. Mark Magargee .... $/~a L:..o,~i~_n:_.l~_ _ke~fieid. CA __ Dale Completed: 5/10/1996 I OF' 1 Target Risk (Class A & B) 1.0E-6 O MCL ex~3sure limit? Calculatio~ O1;:~fon: 1 SURSURFACE SOIL RBSL VALUES Target Risk (ClassC) 1.0E-5 OPEL exposure limit? (> 3 FT BGS) Target Hazard Quotient 1.0E+0 RBSL Results Fo~' Complete Expoeure Pathways ("x" If Complete) __ Representative i Soil Volatilization lo i Soil Volatilization to Applicable E×cee0e CONSTITUENTS OF C.~N _C_E:R:N __ ...... ~;~a;Jofl I Soil Leaching lo Groundwater X . Indoor Air X ! Outdoor Air RBSL cl '~ Requ~re<:~ CAF ' Residential: iCommerClal: Regulaton/(MC-t' Resld~n-~-a-I? "E~'(~i~.' '~R~'s~'n~i~::-~--~,~r:n~-e~:~iah' cAs _No._?__~_.. (mo~g) _/.lI (on-s~te) (on-s~te) ): (on-s~le) (on-s~e) (on-s~le) (on-s~te) / (on-s~e) ~7~__-43-2 Benzene i 2.0E+0 NA NA NA NA 5.4E-3 NA i 1.4E+0 i 5.4E-3 n .... 3.7E~-02 00-41-4: Ethylbenzene i 5.0E+0 NA NA NA NA >Res NA >Res >Res o <1 178-88-3. Toluene i 1.0E+1 NA NA NA NA 2.2E+2 NA i >Res = 5.0E+1 -- ==####~ Xylene (mixed isomers) i NA NA' NA , NA 2.9E+2 , NA I >Res Software: GSI RBCA Spreadsheet Sedah 0 Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Resen/ed. Version: v 1.0 ATEACHMENT 2. RBCA TIER 2 FATE AND TRANSPORT MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DOSE/RESPONSE CALCULATIONS T;er 2 Wocks~ee! 8.1 Siie Name: St. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By:. Mark Magargee Date Competed: ~'10/199~ T1ER 2 EXPOSURE CONCENTRA'I1ON AND INTAKE CALCULATION ~.sT ~~~A~ ,~o~ 1) Source Medium 2) N^F Value (m~3/1<01 3) Exl~os~ M~ut'~ 4) Ex~os~l'~ Mu~O~i~' 5~ Av~c'ao~ Da~v In~a~ke Rate ~ Recep~<~ Nc. POE Co,',c. (m<)/n~3) (?) / (2) (~p.x~rxE~E-ov~w~ (~y,~,~ (rr-,~<~,~) 131 × -'-~e~ze~e 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.5E+6 3.7E-8 1.4E-9 7.0E-2 1.2E-1 2.6E-9 : I 7E~C Etr%'!,t'ec: e~'.e 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.5E+6 3.7E-8 1.4E-9 210E-1 2.7E-1 7.2E-9 i 3.9E-:0 x ylec, eT~;~e~e!m~xe~ 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.5E~6 3.7E~ 1.4E-9 2.0E- 1 .. 2.7E- 1 7.2E-9 ~ ~some~) 5.0E-3 1.4E+5 3.5E+6 3.7E~ 1.4E-9 2.0E-1 2.7E-1 7.2E-9 ~: ABS = ~ ~-~ f~ (~m) BW, ~ W~t ~g) EF = ~m f~ (~) ~ = P~t ~ e~ Tier 2 Worksheet 8; S,le Name: S(. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee [:)ate Complete~: 5,'I(3,'19L~ TIER 2 EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION AND INTAKE CALCULATION EXPOSURE ~,TNWAYS ' ": ,',' ,' ': ~"'¥;{: ~':':,; ::'~!'~,,!:;?:n:'(CH,EcK~i~ iF:PATHWAY ==================================================================: .... ' -. "?~!. -~e~'ce~ 1.0E+4 2.~+5 2.0~ 7.~E~ 7.0E.2 1.2E-1 1.4E-5 ~ 9.1E-7 1.4E-5 E:~v~,ecce~e 5.0E+0 J 1.0E+4 2.6E+5 5.0E~ 1.9E-5 ~ 2.0E-1 2.7E-1 J 9.8E-5 J 5.3E~ J 9.8E-5 5.3E~ T:lu~ne 1.0E* 1 J 1.0E~ 2.6E+5 1.0E-3 3.9E-5 { 2.0E-I 2.7E-1 / 2.0E~ [ 1.1E-5 ~ 2.0E~ ~. i E-5 Xy(ene ~m(x~ ,~mem) 5.0E+1 / 1.4E~ 3.0E+5 3.6E-3 1.7E~ ~ 2.0E-1 2.7E-1 / 7.0E~ J 4.6E-5 J 7.0E~ 4.6E-5 ~: ~ = ~ ~ fa~ (Oim) BW. ~ W~t ~g) EF = ~um f~ (~) ~ - ~ ~: ~l-MVX~52 ~: G~ ~A ~ Site Name: St, Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield~ CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 ; OF 3 TIER 2 PATHWAY RISK CALCULATION CARCINOGENIC RISK TOXIC EFFECTS (2) Total Carcinogenic (3) lnhalatiofl (4) Individual CDC (5) Total Tox~nt j (6) Int'~alabo~ (~ Imdt~ot~al CC)C iii EeA In[aka Rate (rt-tg~g/day) SIoDe Factor Risk (2) x (3) Intake Rate (mg/l~g/da¥) Reference Dose I HaZard O~one,nt !5! ,' !51 c~,c~og,~.c On-Site Off-Site On-Site Off-.~te On-Site Off-Site/ I O~-$rte -~,enzene A 1.4E-5 9.1E-7 1.0E-1 1.4E-6 9.1E-8 3.9E-5 2.1E-6 1.7E-3 J 2.3E-2 = : 2E-3 , E?%v~Cenzene D 9.8E-5 5.3E-6 1.0E+0 J 9.8E-5 I 5.3E-6 .Toluene D 2.0E-4 1.1E-5 4.0E-1 4.9E-4 I 2.7E-5 X.Cene imixec! ,somem/ D 7.0E-4 4.6E-5 '3.0E-1 2.3E-3 ! 15E4 TotalPethwayCarclnogenlcRIsk-- I 1.4E-6 , 9.1E-8 TotalPathweyHazardlndex.~ J 2.6E-2 I 1.4~.,3 J O Groundwater Sen4ces. Inc. (GSI), 1995. Al Rights Name: St. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By:. Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 TIER 2 EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION AND INTAKE CALCULATION oE,~u,~,t, co~"r*c'~, I ) Source Medium 4) ~ 5) Average Daih/Intake Rate Co,~stW~ue~t$ ot Concern Surface S~I Co~:. (mg,~g) O~.S~ta Reside~tfal On-Site Commercial O~-S~ta -c'e~'ze~'e 5.0E-3 | 1.0E-5 5.1E-8 ?'vl~enzene 5.0E-3/ 2.8E-5 1.4E-7 c,uene 5.0E-3 2.8E-5 1.4E-7 X.wene (mixeC isomersI 5.0E-3 2.8E-5 1.4E-7 NOTE: ABS = Dermal absorption factor (dim) BW = Bc<~y Weight (kg) EF = ExDosure frequencey (day&~,) POE = Point of e:c:~sure AF = Adhef'ance factor CF - Units coflvemion factor ET = ~q3osure time (hfs/day) SA - Skin surfac~ area AT. Averaging time (day~) ED -, ~ duratk:~l Lyes) IR = Intake rate (L/day or rog/day) Serial: G-291-MVX-,452 GSI RE, CA ~ O Groundwat~ ,~ In¢, (GSI), 1995, N1 Rights Reee,w~d. Veal;on: v 1.0 Tier 2 Worksheet 8.1 Site Name: St Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Ma(~argee Date Completed: 5/10/1996 TIER 2 EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION AND INTAKE CALCULATION su~r~,cE so~s om SEO~MEX~r$: Ex~ Co~¢~tmtf~t TOTAL PATHWAY INTAKE ~:~S1'~~ 1 ) Source Medium 4) ~ $) x~,~ge De~ I, nteke Ra~ (S~m ~ ~ ~ Constituents of Concern Sud'ace Soil Co~c, (mg/~g) ~ Re,~de~'~ ~ ~ C~-S~e ae~de.-,~u ~ ~ O'~-~ae R*~ ~ ~ Benzene 5.0E-3 1.7E-7 8.7E-10 5,2E-8 Eth?~nzene 5.0E-3 4.9E-7 2.4E-9 1,4E-7 Toluene 5.0E-3 4.9E-7 2.4E-9 1.4E-7 X~ene (mix~ i~mers} 5.0E-3 4.9E-7 2.4E-9 1.4E-7 l Tier 2 Worksheet 82 Si:e Name: St. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield. CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5,'10;19?5 2 OF TIER 2 PATHWAY RISK CALCULATION ~OIL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS : .' ..: .: ':':i::i.:'~'i:::i:,:i..ii:: . ~ii '.~, . : ':: ' 1'l! (cHECKED IFpATHwAYS ARE ACTIVE) CARCINOGENIC RISK TOXIC EFFECTS (2) Tolal Carcinogenic (3) Oral (4) Individual CDC (5} Totat ToX',Cant (6) Oral (7) ~nOi.c,=u.a~ CO(; (1) EPA Intake Rate (m~4(g/day) Sk:ce Facffo¢ Risk (2) x (3) Intake Rata (mg~g/day) Ref~ec, ce Dose Haza~ Qucx~e~ !5) ' (6) Cam~oge~ic O~-S/te On-S~te Con$,'/tue~t$ Of COncern Class~ficatk3n Resided/iai C<~'~mercial (m<~/kg-da¥}~.1 O~-Slte Residecfffel O~-Slfe Comme*'ctal O~-Sile Reslde~lal O~-Sl~e Commercta {mg/~g-~a¥) O~-Site aes~e,-~al -=,e- ~:.e r-e A 5.2E-8 1.0E-1 5.2E-9 I --:,".vlbenzer~e O 1.4E-7 1.0E-1~J i 1 4E-6 Tc,bene D 1.4E-7 2.0E-1 I " 7.2E-7 ×?ene ~mixeci isomers/ D 1.4E-7 2.0E+0 I : 7.2E-8 Total Pathway Carcinogenic Risk = 0.0E+0 J 5.2E-9 Total Pathway Hazard Index -- J 0.0E+0 J 2_2E-6 J Serial: G-291-MVX...452 S<~ttwam: G.~ RBCA So~eacsr',e~ O Gro~xh.~tar Sen4ces. Inc. (GSI). 1995. AJ1 Rights ~. Ver,,~,o~: v 1.0 Tier 2 Worksheet 8.3 | Site Name: St. Vincent De Paul Completed By: Mark Magargee Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Date Completed: 5/10/1996 I of 1 TIER 2 BASELINE RISK SUMMARY TABLE BASELINE CARCINOGENIC RISK BASELINE TOXIC EFFECTS Risk I J Toxicity Limit(s) I I Limit(s) _Lnd?i_dua[ .C?_C__RjsJ Cumulative COC Ris~ Exceeded?J Hazard Quotient Hazar_d_ Index ~_E_xceeded? EXPOSURE Maximum Target Total I Target --'~/MaximumiApplicab-I; Total i Applicable/ PATHWAY Value Risk Value i Risk I. Value i Limit Value ' Limit Complete: 1.4E-6 ; 1.0E-6i 1.4E-6 , N/A ri 2.3E-2 1.0E+0 2.6E-2 i N/A 0 Complete: O.OE+O 1.OE-S O.Ofi+O N/A 0 O.OE+O 1.OE+O O.OE+O ! ~/A 0 Complete: 5.2E-9 1.0E-6 J 5.2E-9 , N/A O J 1:4E:6 1.;;:0 'J 2:2E-6 : N/A I' O CRITICAL EXPOSURE PATHWAY ................ 1 0E-6 1 4E-6 J WA n 2 3E-2 ~ 1 0E+0 2 6E-2 ...................... Serial: G-291-MVX. Sofb, vare: GSI RBCA Spre_.actsf~t © Groundwater Se~ices, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Rese~ed. Versk)n: v 1.0 Total Risk for Each Pathway 1.0E-08~:.~:::..:::::~::i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:i~i:i:!:i:i:i:!:i:!:i:!:i:i:i:!:!:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:!] .carcinogenic Risk 3.0E-02 9.0 E- 09 JO:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~a Se des3 [:..::::: ~~-~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: m Sedes4 2.5E-02 .~ 6.0E-09 ~3 3.0E-09 ~ 2.0E-09 5.0E-03 1.0E-09 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 Air Groundwater Soil Exposure Pathway I Tier 2 Workshe~ 9, 1 J $~te Name: S:. Vincent C)e Paul Completed By: Mark Magargee Si,'e Lccaticn: Bakersfield. CA Date Completed: S/10/1996 I OF' 1 Target Risk (Class A & B) 1.0E-6 O MCL exposure limit? Calculation Option: 2 SURFACE SOIL SSTL VALUES Tart Risk (Class C) 1.0E-5 OPEL exposure limit? (< 3 FT' B GS) Target Hazard Quotient 1.0E+0 SSTL Result~ For Complete Ex ~osure Pethwa},s ("x · if Complete) Concentration Ingestion. Inhalation Constructior~ AOpl,cal~e Exc ~eeOe~ CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN Soil Leaching to Groundwater X and Dermal Contact X Worker ..... __S.STL ~e~u,re~ C=C Residential: Commercial: i Regulatory(MOL): Residential: Commercial: Commercial: I CAS No. !Name (reg./kg) (on-site) (o~-site) (omsite) 500 feet (o~site) (on-site) (rog/kg) I -ri' If yes Omy ,f ~es4 lc 7 I-,43-21E~enzene 5.0E-3 NA NA NA 3.0E+2 9.2E-1 2.4E+1 9.2E-1 j o <1 : ~ 00-,41.41 Ethylbenzene 5.0E-3 NA NA NA >Res >Res >Res >Res j O <1 ~ 08-88-3! Toluene 5.0E-3 NA NA NA >Res >Res >Res >Res o <1 ~ 330-20-7! Xylene (mixed isomers) $.0E-3 NA NA NA >Res >Res >Res >Res O < 1 Software: GSI RBCA Spreadsheet SenaJ: G-29~-MVX-452 Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995, All Rights Reserved. Version: v 1.0 S~:e ,wa,me St, Vincem De Paul Completed By:. Mark Magargee .... _.~,je L_oca_!ic~.__Ba. k_e_rsfield. CA Date Completed: 5/1011996 f Target Risk (Class A & B) 1.0E-6 O MCL exposure limit? Calculatio~ (~: SUBSURFACE SOIL SSTL VALUES Target Risk (Class C) l.0E-$ O PELexposurellrnit? ..... (> 3. F~r'_ __ BG .S_)_ Target Hazard Quotient 1.0E+0 SSTL Resuifa For Complete Exposure Pathways ('x' If Complete) ............... Representative I I ~ SSTL Conce,~i~;on I i I Soil Volatilization to X Soil Volatilization to Applicable Exceede C©N$~ENTs OF' CONCERN .... ~_ ___.Sgj!._Leach_i_n_g- to Groundwater i X; ...... _l~_d._o~_~-__A. i- ............ O_~t__d_<~?__A. i_r. SSTL Residential: iCommercial: Regulatory(MCLl Residential: i Commercial: Residential: ' Commercial: ................... ! (on-site) i (on-site) 500 feet : (on-site) (rog/kg) .ri' if yes OnIy ~f 'yes' le~ CAS No. ._Name (mg/~g) · .. (_On-site) i (on-site) ): (on-site) i .............. .- ................... . ....................... 71-,~3-2..8enzene 2.0E+0 NA ! NA NA NA i 5.4E-3 2.2E_+_!__.j__..1.__4_E_+_0__ __ _5.4E-_3 .......... ~ 3.7E+02 .............. ! ! I-- -- i >Res >Res o <1 100-,~_17_ Et_h_Yl.be_nz_ene ...... 5.0E+0 !_ NA I NA NA , NA ~ >Res >Res ; 0 $-_ _88_.-~ _T_o,_u e, e_ _ _ 1'0E+1 i NA i NA NA 'I NA i 2.2E+2 >Res i >Res 2.2E+2 o _<_1_ _ "'~_~'~?~= _)~yt~er~e (mixed isomers) ,: 5.0E+1 j NA NA NA NA j 2.9E+2 >Res i >Res 2.9E+2 o <1 Software: GSI RBCA Spreadsheet Sedal: G-291-MVX-452 Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Version: v 1.0 1,HOLGUIr FAi--IAN & A~-×.'~IA~I'I~:~,, INC. E NVIIqONME N T AL M ANA[~I~ KAF N ! (]ONSUL 1 AN T'S ATTACHMENT 3. RBCA TIER 2 BENZENE CLEANUP LEVEL CALCULATIONS $,;e '.~ame: SI. V,ncen[ De Pau~ Site L~ation: Bakemfield~ CA Complet~ By: Ma~ Magargee Date Co~teted: &'~0,'~ TIER 2 EXPOSURE CONCENTRA~ON AND I~AKE CALCU~TION ~*~* nob i ) ~rce M~ium 2) NAF Value t~o) 3) ~ 4) ~um Muffler :e~.~c~ 50E-1 1.0E+4 2.6E~5 5.0E-5 ~ 1.9E~ 7.0E-2[ 1.2E-1 3.5E-6 j 2.3E.7 35E~ 23E.7 E:-vce~;e~e 50E*0 1.0E+4 2.6E~5 5.0E~~ 1.9E-5 2.0E.1 [ 2.7E-1 9.8E-5~ 5.3E-6 98E-5 53E-6 , c,~ e~e J ~.0E* i 1.0E~ 2.6E+5 1.0E-3 3.9E-5 2.0E-1 2.7E-1 2.0E~ Xvle~e. ,m,x~, :some~), 5.0E+I 1.4E~ 3.0E+5 3.6E-3 1.7E~ 2.0E.1 2.7E-1 7.0E~ 4.6E.5 7.0E~ : 4.6E-5 ; AT = A~ ~ (~) ED = ~. ~m~ (~) IR = Intake ~e ~al: ~1-MVX~52 O G~t~ ~, ~ (~, 1~, ~ ~a ~, V~ v 1.0 Tier 2 Worksheet 8.2 j __ S,te ~ame: SI. Vincent De Paul Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Completed By: Mark Magargee Date Completed: 5/I0/t996 ; O,c 3 TIER 2 PATHWAY RISK CALCULATION CARCINOGENIC RISK TOXIC EFFECTS (2) Total Carcinogenic (3) Inhalal~0n (4) Ir~vfdual CCC (5) Total To,cant (6) Inhalat~3n (7) In~.,,~:~Jal CCC I,) ~=A Intake Rate (h'm/kg/day) S3ope Factor Risk (2) x (3) Intake Rate (mg/l<g/day) Refef'ef',c~ Dose Haza~ OuOOe,-~! fS~ / f6~ c.,,~w*~c On-Site Off-S~e On-S~te Off-Site O~-S~e Off-Site Constituents of Co~ce~l C~asJ,~car.o- Commercial Re~denflal (~I~/I~<$ey).*..I Commercial Re'sldentlal CC',T,,T,~,'¢al Residential ( .m!~q-day) C.o~w'nerc~al O,~.S~te C~es~oe~l~ai 5en;'ene A 3.5E-6 2.3E-7 1.0E-1 3.5E-7 , 2.3E-8 g.8E-6 5.3E-7 1.7E-3 , 5.8E-3 ..F.t~y~benzene DI 9.8E-5 5.3E-6 1.0E.+0/ g. SE-5 i 5.3E-~ Toluene D 2.0E-4 1.1E-5 4.0E-1 4.9E-4 I 2.7E-5 ~(yiene (mixed isomers/ O 7.0E4 4.6E-5 3.0E-1 , 2.3E-3 I ' 1 5E--4 Total Pathway Carclnogenlc RIsk = ~ 3.5E-7 I 2.3E-8 I Total Pathway Hazard lndex -- ~ 8.7E-3 J. 5.0E.-4 Serial: G-291-MVX452 Sotw, am: GS~ O Grouf'm'wate~ Sew,cea, Inc. (GSI). 1995. All Rights Fle~ef~xt. v,~-~-c,-,: v t .0 Tier 2 Worksheet 8.3 Site Name: St. Vincent De Paul Completed By: Mark Magargee Site Location: Bakersfield, CA Date Completed: 5/10/1996 I of 1 TIER 2 BASELINE RISK SUMMARY TABLE BASELINE CARCINOGENIC RISK BASELINE TOXIC EFFECTS I Risk j I Toxicity J Limit(s) I I Limit(s) Individual CCC Risk Cumulative CCC Risk, Exceeded?/ Hazard Quotient _H_a_z_a_r_d_..!n_dex' J Exceeded? EXPOSURE MaXimUm. Target '--'l;°~i--'-i ;r~rg'~--J ........ ~ Total i Applicable/ PATHWAY Value Risk Value ! EisA J J Value ! Limit Value ' Limit J IA IR ~SUREpA-~':t~y-~ ............. ~'~-:~ ~:;;:.~:i-iii~::~:;! !~:'! ':;i~;::~ ~;~i~i~ ~~ ::~.: .:.:..::.:.::: ~ ........... Complete: 3.5E-7 1.0E-6 3.5E-7 ! N/A O 5.8E-3 1.0E+0 8.7E-3 I N/A O GROUNDWATER EXPOSURE PA THWA Y$ i ;~. ::: ;~i: '. :; ::i:' :!:i ~: :,:i::',i::: :::: =::,.:.;: - ........... Complete: O.OE+O :~ 1.OE-~ O.OE+O N/A 0 O.OE+O 1.OE+O O.OE+O ! N/A 0 ::,. ::: : :: :: . . .~7~--"--'--7 ..................... I I ' ~ ~ .... 1.4E-6 1.0E+0 I 2.2E-6 ! N/A O C~RI~ CA_L__EX_PO~S U R E P A THW A Y. (Select ;.ii!i;i.!:~.ii;i;i.i: ;i?~.i::.:;?.:' ;:: :i::.:;i :.;i:ii; :..,......::: ~: ;:.. ,. :' ..... J 1 0E-6 3 5E-7 N/A O 5 8~E a 1 0E+0 8 7E 3 i N/A O Serial: G-291-MVX. Software: GSI RBCA Spteadst~eet © Groundwater Services, Inc. (GSI), 1995. All Rights Reserved. Version: v ~.0 FAHAN & ~~IATI_L%. INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSUL TANTS ATTACHMENT 4. VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION PROCEDURES VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL INSTALLATION PROCEDURES SITING Vapor extraction wells will be positioned as noted In the CAP. DRILLING PROCEDURES Soil borings for Installation of vapor extraction wells will be drilled with an 8-inch-OD hollow-stem auger as specified In the CAP. Cullings from the soil borings will be logged by an experienced environmental geologist under the direct supervision of a state of California registered geologist. The soils will be 'classified according to the standard Unified Soil Classification System. Observations regarding the types and quantities of waste materials encountered and. any PID readings will be logged. All data collected during the drilling of the soil borings will be recorded on individual logs of exploratop/boring. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS The vapor extraction wells will be constructed of 2-Inch-ID PVC casing. The screen length of sloHed casing will be limited to less than 40 feet In the wells. The design of the proposed wells will be according to the Department of Health Services and City of Bakersfield guidance manuals. The specifications are listed In the following table. VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL SPECIFICATIONS Casing Size: Two-Inch ID. ' Casing M~aterlals: Schedule 40 PVC. Filter Pack: Washed aquarium sand extending to no more than 5 feet above the well screen. Sealant: Five feet of sodium bentonite Immediately over the filter pack. Cement and bentonite mixture used as annular sealant from the top of the bentonite seal to the ground surface (2 to 5 percent bentonite by weight). Well Covers: 12~inch-diameter locking aluminum access covers. Screen Length: -MaximUm of 40 feet of 0.03-Inch sloHed well screen. E Ion Well Installation Procedures Vapor Page 2 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS All well design and construction completed during the Investigation will be documented with the following information: · Date/time oi construction; Drilling method; · Well location (:L-0,5 foot); · Well depth (:~0.1 foot); · Drilling and lithologic logs; · Casing material; · Screen material and design; · Casing and screen joint size; · Type of protective cap; · Detailed drawing of well; · Well cap elevation CL-0,5 foot); · Top of casing elevation (:~-O.01 foot); · Screen slot size/length; · Filter pack material and size; · Filter pack placement method; · Sealant materials; · Sealant volume; · Sealant placement method; · Surface seal design/construction; · Soil boring diameter and well casing diameter; and · Relative ground surface elevations (_-~-0.01 foot). FAHAN & A.%~.Xi~IATIL%, IN( ENVIRONMEN1 ~l. MANAGEWEN'! CONS~ ILTANTS ATTACHMENT 5. VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Client Name Sainl Vincent De Paul Project Name .Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store Figure No. N/A Site Address 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California Date Completed Proposed Well Nos. VW-1 Supervised by Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG · ' I~ . _T' TOP WELL CAP t depth of surface seal 2 feet j ~ ~ SURFACE SEAL I type of sudace seal Neat cement ~ annular seal thickness 2 feet ~ ~ ANUULAR SEAL Neat cement ~t~!~ ~ type of annular seal Iow permeability seal thickness 3 feet .~ ~------ type of Iow permeability seal chips LOW PERMEABIUTY SEAL Bentonite ii~ii"~'ill diameter of well casing 2 inches ~_~.__~,__.__~." ~ ~ WELL CAS'NG type of well casing _ Schedule 40 PVC ~ i';?~'.'."! depth of top of gravel pack 7 feet ~.E~ ~"~"-"~ ~ GRAVEL PACK ~-:.-" Aquadum sand ,~__.~_~ type of gravel pack . ~',.' '-', SCREEN depth of top of screen 10 feet ',.:...'..'.,. ~,,--~:::-:-..-..'.,..-..'.... ..........-...~ ...-......-.. depth of well 50 feet depth of borehole 50 feet un, '~UIN. FAIIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3157 Pegasus Drive (805) 391-0517 Bakersfield, California 93308 VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Client Name Sainl Vincent De Paul Project Name Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store Figure No. N/A _ Site Address 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California Well Nos, VW-2 throu,qh VW-4 Date Completed Proposed Supervised by Mark R. Magargee~ CHG~ RG I t [ . T~ I:: TOP WELL CAP ; depth of surface seal 2 feet '~ ~ SURFACE SEAL i type of sudace seal Neat cement annular seal thickness 2 feet ~ ~ ANNULAR SEAL Neat cement ~,:,~ type of annular seal ,~,,.~.~ Iow permeability seal thickness 3 feet ~ LOW PERMEABIETY SEAL type of IOW permeability seal Bentonite chips diameter of well casing 2 inches ~ WELL CASING type of well casing Schedule 40 PVC i ~ GRAVEL PACK depth of top of gravel pack 7 feet · type of gravel pack Aquarium sand : '. ~ ,.', SCREEN depth et top o! screen 10 feet !i ~"~': i screen slot size 0.03 inch ~.:::'2 ~...._ .':..:? ;'/":":'.......,... ~~?i!!'~ depth of well 35 feet ~-" ' '"" :'"' - "'.'7":'.: ,.: .,.: .'~ . _ - :.'..'.' .. -,.'.'.'. diameter of borehole 8 inches depth o! borehoto 35 feet HOLGUIN. FAJ~AN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3157 Pegasus Drive (805) 3gl-0517 Bakersfield, California 93308 VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Client Name Saint Vincent De Paul Project Name Sainl Vincenl De Paul Thrift Store Figure No. N/A Site Address 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California " Well Nos, VW-5 throu,qh VW-7 Date Completed . Proposed -- Supervised by ..Mark R. Magar~ee, CHG, RG , .. ~,. ~-----.~---~~ ~--'-'"~ TOP WELL CAP I ': depth of sudace seal 2 feet -~1 ~ SURFACE SEAL I type of sudace seal Neat cement annular seal thickness 27 feet ~ i~--''~ ANNULAR SEAL i type of annular sealNeat cement Iow permeability seal thickness 3 feet .l ,~ ~'-~--LOW PERMEA~a'UTY SEAL type of Iow permeability seal Bent°hire chips ~iii~~ ~i diameter of well casing 2 inches "~ ~ WELL CASING type of well casing Schedule 40 PVC ~ GRAVEL PACK depth of top of gravel pack 32 feet type of gravel pack . Aquarium sand :iii~iii:~~ ~ ~ SCREEN depth of lop Of screen 35 feet screen slot size 0.03 inch i depth of well 55 feet diameler of borehole 8 inches · -.'....'.. ~'.."i/.."i-' depth o! borehole 55 feet ItOLGUIN, FAItAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3157 Pegasus Drive (805) 391-0517 Bakersfield, California 93308 [I-IOI.GUIN F:AI-IAN & A~%$(×.IATF~S, INC. ENVIRONMEN! AL. MANAGEMENT CONSLILTANTS ATTACHMENT 6. VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT VAPOR MONITORING EQUIPMENT MONITOP, ING EQUIPMENT CONSTITUENT(S) MEASURED EFFECTIVE RANGE 1 - 2.000 ppm OVM PID volatile organic content (as isobutylen~) Dwyer Magnahelic 0 - 0.25 ins-water Series 2000 subsurface vacuum 0 - 1.0 ins-water differential pressure gauges 0 -'2.5 psi . Davis Instruments turbometer emissions stack velocity 0 - 9~999 feet per minute Omega HHP-6150 differential pressure meter WHV 0 - 200 ins-water 150 cfm maximum flow Sutorbilt Model 3ML, 5 hp 140 inches water maximum vapor extraction blower N/A vacuum Westates Model VSC-200 0-100 cfm flow 200 lbs activated carbon filters N/A carbon capacity VARIABLE-RATE FLOW TEST Variable-rate flow tests will be conducted using vapor extraction wells VW-1, VW-2, and VW-5 as the extraction wells. Test procedures consist of connecting the positive displacement blower to a vapor extraction well and measuring the flow rates generated at various WHVs. The measured vacuums and flow rates will be recorded on a vapor extraction test recording log. An Omega Model HHP-6150 differential pressure meter will be used to monitor the WHVs from a port located on the vacuum side of the blower. A Davis Instruments electronic wind speed indicator (turbometer), a Dwyer Series 2000 differential pressure gauge, and a pltot tube will be used to monitor the stack velocity at the outlet of the 2-Inch-ID emissions 'stack. The temperature of the emissions will also be monitored at the outlet of the 2-Inch-ID stack. The stack velocity and temPerature will then be used to calculate the standard volumetric flow rate achieved with the blower. ROI AND INTRINSIC SOIL PERMEABILITY The ROI test will be conducted by connecting the Sutorbllt vacuum blower to each extraction well. In VW-i, operating the blower at three different flow rates as determined In the variable-rate flow test, and monitoring the resultant subsurface vacuum at surrounding monitoring points using Omega HHP-6150 differential pressure gauges. The subsurface and WHVs will be monitored until they stabilize at each flow rate and then recorded in the vapor extra¢lion test recording log. Vapor E ;t Procedures and Equipment Page 2 HFA utlflzes a graphical'method for estimating the ROI that Is based on a modification of the dlstance-drawdown method used in groundwater studies. A formula-based model patterned after Johnson et al.1 is used to determine the Intrinsic soil permeability and other characteristics of the vadose zone. The ROI at each WHV will be graphically determined by plotting the subsurface vacuums measured In Ins-water by the Icg of the distance (ri away from the extraction well. A straight line will then drawn between the points and extended until it Intercepts the zero-vacuum axis. This is the distance at which the subsurface vacuums decrease to atmospheric pressure. The effective ROI for the well Is defined as the distance where 1 percent of the WHV is achieved. The Intrinsic soil permeability (k) will be determined through use of the Johnson equation as specified below. k = (Qtt/H~Patm-P(w)) [Ln(Rw/ROI)/(1-(Patm/P(w))2)] Where: Patm = Atmospheric pressure (1.013 x 106 g/cm-sec2) P(w) = Pressure at the extraction well ROI = Radius of Influence of ex'fraction well Rw = Radius of extraction well k = Intrinsic soil permeability Q = Volumetric flow rate from extraction well p. = Vapor viscosity (1.8 x 10-4 g/cm-sec) H = Length of slotted interval SOIL VAPOR CONCENTRATION During the vapor extraction tests, extracted soil vapors will be monitored for VOCs using a Thomas Model 2107 vapor sampling pump connected to the pressure side of the blower prior to treatment via carbon adsorption through two 200 lb, activated carbon cannisters placed In series. The VOCs of the extracted vapors will be monitored using a PID. The PID will be calibrated to a 100 ppm Isobutylene standard prior to commencing the test. Readings taken with the PID will be used to provide a relative Indication of VOCs within the extracted vapor stream. All constituents will be monitored until stable flow conditions are achieved and then recorded on the vapor extraction test recording Icg. | Johnson. PC,. Komblowsld. MW.. and Collhorl. J.D., 'Ouanlllollve Analysis for the Cleanup o! I{ydfocarbon- ConlomJnoled Soils by ll¥Silu Soil Venting", !~dLg, g, Ll~gl~Ofl Vol. 28. No. 3. McJy - June 1990, Vapor Extractlor st Procedures and Equipment Page 3 In addition to monitoring the extracted vapors with field Instruments, samples of the extracted vapor stream will be collected from wells VW-1, VW-2, and VW-5 at the beginning and end of each test. Laboratory samples will be collected by connecting a l-liter, TedlarTM, bag to the sampling pump via TeflonTM tubing. Prior to collecting the samples from each well, soil vapors will be monitored with the PID until V©Cs In the vapor stream stabilize. The TedlarTM bags will be labeled, sealed, and delivered to a California state-certified laboratory and analyzed for TPH as gasoline and BTEX using EPA Methods 801,5 (M) and 8020, respectively. HOLOU~i~ FAi' lAN ~' & A~ ~"~.×' ]ATFZS, INC. I~NVIRONMEN1 AL MANAGf~MEN] CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 7. SOIL BORING AND WELL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES SOIL BORING AND WELL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES HAND-AUGERING PROCEDURES Each soil boring Is manually drilled utilizing a 2-Inch-OD hand auger manufactured by Xitech Industries. Soil samples are collected with a drive sampler, Which is outfitted with 1.5-Inch by 3-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample is withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. During the drilling process, soil cuttings are field screened for VOCs using a PID calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene. Any soil staining or discoloration Is visually Identified. All data Is recorded on soil boring logs under the supervision of a state of California registered geologist. Soils are c~assified according to the Unified Soi~ Classification System (uScs). Specific geologic and hydrogeologlc information collected Includes depth to groundwater, plasticity, density, stiffness, mineral composition, moisture content, soil type, structure, grain size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. The samples are labeled, sealed, recorded on a chain-of-custody record, and chilled In accordance with the procedures outlined in the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB's) LUFT field manual. Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures are consistent with Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) QA/QC procedures. The samples are transported in a chilled container to a California state-certified hazardous waste testing laboratory. TRUCK-MOUNTED DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES Underground Service Alert of Central California Is notified at least 48 hours before commencement of drilling activities. Each soil boring is manual'ly drilled for the first 4 feet to establish that the area Is clear of subsurface structures. The soil borings are drilled with either a hollow-stem auger or an air rotary bit, and soil samples are collected with a California split-spoon sampler. The sampler is outfiHed wlth 2.5-Inch by 6-Inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample Is withdrawn, the en, ds of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. During the drilling process, soil cullings are field screened for VOCs using a PID calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene. Any soil staining or discoloration is visually identified. All data is recorded on logs of exploratory boring under the supervision of a state of California registered geologist. Soils are classified according to the USCS. Specific geologic and hydrogeologic Information collected Includes depth to groundwater, plasticity, density, stiffness, mineral composition, moisture content, soil type, struclure, grain size. and other features that could affect contaminant transport. The samples are labeled, sealed, recorded on a chain-of-custody record, and chilled in accordance with the procedures outlined in the SWRCB's LUFT field manual. Sample preservation, handling, and hansporlafion procedures are consistent with HFA's QA/QC procedures. The samples are hansporled in o chille(J conlainer lo a California state-cerlifi~d, hazardous waste testing Iobo~alory. Soil Boring Well Construction Procedures Page 2 DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES Befoie each sampling episode, the sampling equipment Is decontaminated using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and two distilled, delonlzed water rinses. The drill string is decontaminated wlth a steam cleaner between each soil boring. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL The cuttings from the soil borings are stored In 55-gallon, Department of Transportation (DOD-approved drums. Each drum Is labeled with the number of the soil boring from which the waste Is taken and the date the waste was generated. The drums are stored at the site of generation until sample analytical results are obtained, at which time the soil is disposed of appropriately. SOIL BORING COMPLETION PROCEDURES All soil borings are either properly abandoned or completed as a well. Abandonment Each soil boring that is not completed as a well is backfllled with bentonite grout, neat cement, concrete, or bentonite chips with a permeability less than that of the surrounding soils. The grout Is placed by the tremle method. Well Construclion Wells are designed according to Depadment of Health Services and State Water Resources Control Board guidance manuals. All well design and construction completed during the investigation are documented with the following Information: · Date/time of construction; · Detailed drawing of well; · Drilling method and drilling fluid used; · Well development procedures; · Well location (+5 feet); · Screen slot size/length; · Well depth (_-H). 1 foot); · Filter pack material and size; · Drilling and lithologic logs; · Filter pack placement method; · Casing material: · Soil boring diameter and well casing diameter; · Screen material and design; · Sealant volume; · Casing and screen joint size; · Sealant placement method; · Type of protective cap; · Sealant materials; and · Top of casing or well cover · Surface seal design/construction. elevation (±0,01 foot); Soil Boring Construction Procedures Page 3 Groundwater Monitoring Wells ~ell Surveying The elevation of the monitoring well cover or top of well casing Is surveyed to an accuracy of +0.01 foot. All measurements are reproduced to assure validity. Well DeveloDment Well development Is conducted by simple pumping If bridging of the screen does not occur. If bridging occurs, well surging is conducted for adequate well production. Well surging is created by the use of surge blocks, bailers, or pumps, whichever method Is most convenient at the time. Only formation water Is used for surging the well. Well 'development continues until non-turbid groundwater Is produced. All purged groundwater Is held on site in covered 55-gallon DOT-approved drums until water sample analytical results are received. DATA REDUCTION The data compiled from the soil borings Is summarized and analyzed. A narrative summary of the soil characteristics is also presented. The logs of exploratory, boring are checked for the following Information: correlation of stratlgraphic units among soil borings; · identification of zones of potentially high hydraulic conductivity; · Identification of the confining formation/layer; · Indication of unusual/unpredlcted geologlc features (fault zones, fracture traces, facies changes, solution channels, buried stream deposits, cross-cUtting structures, plnchout zones, etc.); and · continuity of petrographic features such as sorting, grain-size distribution, cementation, etc. Soil boring/well locations are plotted on a properly scaled map. If~ appropriate, soil stratigraphy of the site is presented in a scaled cross section. Specltic.features that may Impact contaminant migration (e.g., fault zones or impermeable layers) are discussed in narrative form and supplemented with graphical presentations as deemed appropriate. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENt- CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 8. HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMEDIATIONS SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION Site Address: 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California Name of Business Occupying Site: Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store Owner Contact: Reverend Ralph Belluomlnl Owner Tel. #: (805) 323-7340 BFDHMD Contact: Mr. Howard H. Wines, III Tel. #: (805) 326-3979 FIELD ACTIVITIES AND GOALS OF THIS INVESTIGATION: Install seven vapor extraction wells, and conduct vapor extraction treatment of gasoline-containing soils. KNOWN HAZARDS AT THE SITE INCLUDE: Gasoline hydrocarbons KEY PERSONNEL AND RESPONSIBILITIES: NAME RESPONSIBILITIES Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA SITE SAFETY OFFICER - Primarily responsible for site safety, response operations, and protection of the public. Responsible for work site inspections to Identify particular hazards and define (805) 391-0517 site security. Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG PROJECT MANAGER - Primarily responsible for site characterization. The project manager delineates authority, coordinates activities and functions, and directs activities (805) 391-0517 related to mitigative efforts of clean-up contractors. Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA SITE INVESTIGATIVE PERSONNEL - Responsible for actual field work including sampling, monitoring, equipment use, and other (805) 391-0517 related tasks as defined by the project manager. ANTICIPATED WEATHER CONDITIONS FOR THIS AREA DURING THE PROJECT'S DURATION WILL BE: Temp. range: 80-100~F Humidity: 30-60% Ambient temp.: 9(7'F Potential for heat stress: High: X Medium: Low: ANTICIPATED PROTECTION LEVEL DURING THIS PROJECT* Level "D" "Will be upgraded or downgraded to fit situations as they arise. EMERGENCY INFORMATION: All emergency calls: 911 Closest hospital with emergency room: Kern Medical Center Map Showing Route from Site to Hospilal Allached? Yes: X No: HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE REMEDIATIONS This document outlines Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) health and safely plan for City of Bakersfield UST slle remedlatlons. Site-specific Information Is provided on the cover page of this document. This health and safety plan was developed by HFA's Industrial hygienist through consultation of the following documents: · Occupational Safely & Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1910 - "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, Final Ruling," March 1989; · NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA "Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities," October 1985; and · HFA's Corporate Standard Safety Program. This health and safeh/plan Is divided Into the following categories: 1, Job Hazard Assessment; 2. Exposure Monitoring Plan; 3. Personal Protective Equipment; 4. Work Zones and Security Measures; 5. Decontamination and Disposal; 6. Worker Training; and 7. Emergency Procedures. 1. JOB HAZARD ASSESSMENT Immediate tasks at any leaking UST site Include an evaluation of any present or potential threat to public safely. Questions need to be answered regarding the dangers of significant vapor exposures and potential explosion hazards. POTENTIAL CHEMICAL HAZARDS The chemical components of gasoline that are the most dangerous to site workers are the volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and potentially, organic lead. Additionally, solvents such as 1,2-Dlchlorobenzene and 1,2-Dlchloroethane may also be used as cleaning solutions at service stations. The primary health risks associated with each of these chemicals are described below. Gasoline, - Suspected human carcinogen. A TLV of 300 ppm or 9[](] mg/m3 has been assigned to gasoline. This value of 300 ppm was assigned based on an average of 3 percent benzene (10 ppm TLV) in gasoline. Low-level inhalation exposure to gasoline can cause Irritation to the eyes, nose, and respiratory system; headache; and nausea. Health and Safety Plan Page 2 Benzene - Suspected human carcinogen. A TLV of 10 ppm or 30 mg/m3 has been assigned to benzene. Benzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 1.4 ppm. Low-level Inhalation exposure to benzene can cause irritation to the eyes. nose, and respiratory system: headache: and nausea. Toluene - A TLV of 100 ppm or 375 mg/m3 has been assigned to toluene. Toluene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2.1 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to toluene can cause fatigue, weakness, confusion, and euphoria. Ethylbenzene - A TLV of 100 ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to ethylbenzene. Ethylbenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2 ppm. Low-level Inhalation exposure to ethylbenzene can cause Irritation to the eyes and mucous membranes. Xyiene - A TLV or 100 ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to xylene, No Iow odor threshold limit has been established for xyiene. Low-level inhalation exposure to xylene can cause dizziness, excitement, and drowsiness. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene - A TLV of 50 ppm or 306 mg/ma has been assigned to 1,2-dichlorobenzene. 1,2-dlchlorobenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 4.0 ppm. Acute vapor exposure can cause coughing, dizziness, drowsiness, and skin irritation. 1,2-Dichloroethane - A TLV of 200 ppm has been assigned to 1,2-DIchloroethane. No data Is available concerning odor threshold. Acute vapor exposure can cause coughing, dizziness, drowsiness, and skin Irritation. Tetraethyl Lead - A TLV of 0.1 mg/m3 has been assigned to tetraethyl lead. Tetraethyl lead is a colorless or red-dyed liquid at atmospheric conditions. No data is available concerning odor threshold. Acute vapor exposure can cause insomnia, delirium, coma, and skin irritation. POTENTIAL PHYSICAL HAZARDS Soil Vapor Extracfior] - Dangerously high fuel vapor levels will be monitored using an LEL meter. The presence of underground utilities is also of concern and the Underground Service Alert of Northern California will be notified in advance of any drilling work for Identification of all underground utilities in the immediate area. Gasoline hydrocarbons In the contaminated soils In the areas Identified by HFA will be extracted through vapor extraction wells and treated on the surface using a thermal oxidalion/calalytic conversion system. The gasoline hydrocarbons are destroyed at an elficien(:y al greater lhan 99 percent. Potenlial exposure to gasoline hydrocarbons during the vapor exhaclion process is very Iow. Health and Safety Plan Page 3 ,~japllng - Use of personal protective equipment will minimize the potential for exposure of personnel conducting site Investigation activities. Heat stress will be monitored by each Ind~vldua~ and controlled through r~gu~ar work breaks as outlined in the American Conference et Governmental Industrial Hyglenl~its' TLVs for heat stress conditions. I' 2. EXPOSURE MONITORING PLAN Potential exposure hazards found at UST sites primarily Include toxic airborne vapors from leaking USIs. The most dangerous airborne vapor likely to be encountered during ? UST remedlatlon Is benzene. Gasoline vapor concentration levels will be monitored In the ~reathlng: zone with a PID calibrated to benzene. When the action level of 150 ppm (one-half the TLV of gasoline) Is detected in the breathing zone, respiratory protection will be required ufl!izing tull-face or half- face respirators with organic vapor cartridges. Monitoring fei combustible gases will also be performed using an Ll:[~ motor whoa vapor concentrations above 2,000 ppm are detected with the PlD. lbo action leV?l Is 35 percent of the LEL for gasoline vapors or 4,500 ppm. If this level Is attained or exceeded the work party will be IMMEDIATELY withdrawn. 3. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT The level of protection during the site Investigation will usually be level "D. Level "D" protective equipment Includes coveralls, safety boots, safety glasses, gloves, and ~ard hats If drilling or trenching operations are In progress. Upgrading the protection level would be based on airborne benzene~concentratlon levels equal to or exceeding the action level. An upgrade to level "C" protecflo~ would be required if the action level is equaled or exceeded. Additional equipment required for level "C" would be a full-face or half-face air purifying canister-equipped respirator and Tyvek.', suits with taped arm and leg seals. ,.~ If the action level was met or exceeded (35 percent) for the LEL, work ~ould cease until the vapor level was measured to be below 20 percent of the LEL. A fire extinguisher will be maintained on site. Decisions for workers' sa!ety are based on a continual evaluation of existing or changing conditions. Health and Safety Plan Page 4 4. WORK ZONES AND SECURITY MEASURES To facilitate a minimum exposure to dangerous toxic vapors and/or plhyslcal hazards, only authorized persons will be allowed on the Job site. Work zones will be deflhed by HFA staff who will also be responsible for maintaining security within these zones. Only th~ minimum number of personnel necessary for the UST remedlatlon will be present In the work zone. 5. DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL HFA's standard operating procedures establish practices that minimize co~tact with potentially contaminated materials. Decontamination procedures are utilized If there Is suspected or known contamination of equipment, supplies, Instruments, or any ipersonnel surfaces Soap and water will be utilized In removing contaminants from personnel surfaces as well as equipment and instruments. Contaminated wash water will be disposed o~i In accordance with procedures outlined in the BFDHMD guidance document. 6. WORKER TRAINING All HFA employees working on the site will have had, at a minimum, the rei~qulred 40-hour OSHA Training for Hazardous Waste Site Activities (29 CFR 1910, 120), which Includes training In the use of personal protective equipment. Individualized respirator fit testing i~', required of all HFA employees working at the site. 7. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES HFA employees are trained in emergency first aid, and emergency first 6 d provisions will be brought to the site. In the event of overt personnel exposure (I.e., skin c(~ntact, Inhalation, or Ingestion), the victim will be transported to and treated at th!e closest hospital (see Hospital Map). SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES , KERN MEDICAL CENTER" -- [~ ' ' / e ~RAN DiEG! /.~ 1830 FLOWER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (805) 326-2000 z SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL i SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET '~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MAP HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATE;S, INC. MATERIAl. SAFETY DATA SHEEI ,~~p , .,,mo.o'~v~. ~te October 19~1 SE~TION I. ~TERIAL IDENTIFICATION D~CRI~tON: A ~o~ttle ble~ of hTarocarbons for aut~ottve ~uel .O~ER OESI~TIO~S: Pe~rol, ~ ~0~ ~6 619. ~ ~FA~: Avattabte fr~ e~eral ~ECTION !~, INGREDIENTS AND ~ZARDS x t~*Z~eO O~T~ c~n a~es, cyc~oal~es~ a~es,.ar~ttcs and other add~ttves.e· (~ad ~ 0.013 ~/L, phospho~ ~ O.OOl~ g~, sulfur ~ 0.10 ut~. ~y couua~u Eye: ~00 p~/lE be~ene, <5I; see ~ D3606). ~ate eACGIH 1981 ~V (Intended ~en Lest). See also [~alatt~: ~. Ind. HyK. L39 ~1~7 (1978) .eaSe c~pos~tt0~ o~ fuel ts varie~ ~t~ altttu~e a~d T~ 900 seasonal requtr~ents for a l~ltty. ~e blen& ~st ~:~S ~et ~tt~ock requtr~n~. (~ttk~ck ..lndez ~ AS~ 0439.) . ., " )~ttl~atiou at t a~, Initial, de& C >39 spec~:~c &cavity, ~/60 f - 0.72-0.76 50~ distilled - 77-121 ~ltt~ po~t, deg C ~ ~d point .... - <2~0 Eva~rat~on tare ~ - Vapor d~sity (Att-l) .... -- Solubility lu ~ater ..... Insoluble Appearance ~d Odor: A clear, ~btle ltquid vlth a c~tactettsttc ~or ~tch tecoRu&ted at about l0 p~ tn att. (Gaaol&ne ~Y be colote~ ~tth dye.) m m SECTION lV~ FIRE AND EXPLOSION DATA CO~ER UPPER 'F~aSh ~0tnt and Mech,. ~ AU(Ot~tttom Te~p.'I Fla~b~ltty Ltmtts In ~5 ~' " 5~3 ~- -- ~ ~ by v°l~e l,~ 7,6 '~t~ut'shtng ~edta: O~ ch~tcal, c~b~ dt~tde, alcohol fda. Use o[ ~te~ ~y be ineffective to exttn~tah ft~e, but use ~tet spray for c~[[a$ [~te~osed ~en ~posed to heat a~ fl~s. Vapors can [1~ al~ ~rfaces, reach dJat~t tt~ sources ~d f~aa~ back. ~ react vtoXentXy ~th ozt~tttnl F/infighters e~ld ~er sellouts/ned breathtng apparatus a~ fu~ protecttve c~othtn SECTION V, REACTIVITY DATA iThts ts a stable ~terta1 tn closed c~tatnets at r~ t~perature u~er no~l storage a~d ha~d~lnB c~ttto~a. It does not undergo hazasdous ~.ts ts an OSHA Class IA liable liqutg. A mixture of lanolins va~rs and air can be explosive. It is lnc~attble ~tth o~idizini aRentn- lheml-oxtdative deRradattoe can Tteld carb~ ~oxt~e ~d parttelly ~tdtz~ hydrocarbons. ..... G~NIUM FU~LISIIING SILIIOH VI. HEALTtt HAZARD INFORHATION ] tlr 300 ppm (See Sect. II) Inhalation causes Intense burning of the m.cous membr.~nes, throat and resotrato~ trac~ overexposure to vapors can lead to bronchupneu~nia inh~latlon of ht~h conc. can ~-us~"- fatal pul~nary ed~. Repeated or prolonKed skin ~xposure causes ee~t~t~l. cause blistering of skin due to its defattinR properties. E~osure to eyes can cause hype~nla of the conjunctive. Ingestion or excessive vapors can cause inebriation, dr~tness, blurred v~ion, confusion, v~tttng and cyanosts (2000 ppm produce~ ~1~ aneathea$a tn 30 ~n~ cont. are ~ntoxtcat$ng.tn ~ess tt~.) ~plration niter ~estt~ ca~en br~ch~e~ pne~nt~ or edm ~tch can be fats}. FIRST AID: Eye Contact: ~lush thoroughly ~tth ~tng ~atet for ~5 ~n. Xncludtng ~der cycles, Sktn Contact: ~ve coati.ced cIo~htng. ~h affected area ~th ~ap InhaIatton: ~ve to fresh att. ~store breathtng ~ ~~r o~gen ~ needed. InRestton: ~ not t~uce ~tt~, ~ptra:ton ~zard. ~ct Seek pro~t ~d~l ~stst~ce for further trea~nt, obse~atton ~d s~port. SECTION VII, SPILL, LEAK~ AND DISPOSAL PROCEDURES Nottly ~afecy perso~eI o{ leaks or spt1Is. Re.ye sources o~ ~eac or v~de adequate ventilation. CIean-up perso~e1 requ(re protection agnt~t ~q~d tact and vapor ~h~atton. X{ a ieak or sptl1 has not t~tted, ~e rater spray to ~sperse vapors and to protect ~n attesting to acop the lenk~e. ~nt~n hoc a1iov to enter sever or surface racer. Add ahaorbent so~d to s~I sptl~s or restdues and p~ck ~ ~or dtspoaa~. DISPOSAL: [u~ scrap ~ter~a1 tn an appr~ed $nctnetator. ~u~ c~t~nated ~qu$d bY spray:ag tnto ~ tnctnerator. ~o~~a~+ State~ ~d ~caI regulative. SECTION Vlll, SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION Use general and local exhaust ventilation (explosion-proof) to keep vapor~ belov the requirements in the vorkplace, f. espirato~s should be available for nonroutine br emergency use above the TLV. Avoid eye contact by use of chenic~l safety toigles and/or full faceshield vhere lng is possible. ~ear protective clothini appropriate for the ~ork situation to minimize akin contact such as rubber gloves ami boots. Clothinl to be changed daily and laundered. Eyewash fountains, sho~ers and vashin$ facilities should be readily accessible Provide suitable training to those handl/n~ and vorkini vith this m~terial. SECTION iX, SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS AND COI~IENTS _ Score in closed containers In a cool, dry, well-ventilated area avay Iron sources heat, ignition and strong oxid/sins qenta. Protect containers from physical damage. Avoid direct sunlight. Storage must meet requirements o{ OSEA Class IA liquid. Outdoor or detached storage preferred, t~o smoking in areas of uae. Prevent static electric sparks and use explosion-proof electrical services. (Nust meet code.) Avoid skin ~ eye contact. Avoid inhalation of vapors. ~ear clean york clothing dell7 Indoor use of this material requlrgs exhaust ventilation to remove vapors. ICC Fish--'able Liquid. Red Label. I.~RF.I.: Fish--able Llouid DOT 1.0. No. U~ 1203. DOT Classification: F~LE LIOUIU [ .IS 0 - - APPROVALS: CRO , ...... · -_=__~ ..... · ............ Industrial Hygiene ] ................................ ........................... .,and Safety Vd ..,. r/.h _ GI~NI UAf I'UBIJ.S'I/IN(; GASOLINE . ,, ,,~.~..,.,,,.,¥ ,~,.,~ (~* (,,,~ *..,,,(,(~ (' ~,(~,.h, ~ ,~ ~,~ ~, ~,n ((~(W~I (~ ~ va~)(. ~ fl~ ~ ~. wa~ a~)ul the ~V-ST[C ~ ~ (= IS~ ~m~ Ba~ (~ It~ ~ ~l~y.'~ a ILV ~ ~l wa~ t~o~ ~a~s t~ngi~ f~ C~ lo C,, ~. ~ ~m~ ~ ~s J ~1 ot fl~in~ (~ ~~). ~ ~ ~ the hquid ~ ~ 250 ~e ~~s m v~ ~1 ~ is v~nz~. ~ ~I I~ limil mi~l ~ in I~.'" ~~1 ~ i~l~: T~ m~ ~m ~ ~e m ~n ~i~ S~if~ ~avi~ 0.72 Io 0.76 at ~°F ~ ~ ~ 2~ is ~ ~.(" O~ la~ milner has a ~Jf. ~li~ ~n~-], 39'C; ~*C (10% di~l~: I IOoC (50~); im~ I~m~ d 4%. [u~ ~i~ ~ly ~y c~(n up 170'C (~%): 2~oC to 5% ~c~.'" A~l~i~ d 86 ~ ~ ~i~ from ' fla~ ~nC - SOOF (lOOO ~n fillin8 sali~s ~al~ ~t 5% ~i~ ~ ~an 2.5% ~ lim~: 1.3% ~ 6.0% by ~u~ in air z~. wi~ ~e high~ ~z~ ~t~t ~ing 4.8%.'" ~ ~ t~ ~diti~ to ~ ~li~, ~h as ~uNe in w~. ~ is ~ly ~ in ~. ~ ~z~ di~l~ and ~lly ~ di~, am quite toxic. a~ ~e ~lc~. a~ ~1 in ~ ~11 a~ ~t ~ make a n~li8ible ~i~ is a ~ I~ ~4~i~, ~n~ i~l ~ ~i~ lo ~ Ioxici~ u~ ~ ~i6~.~ T~r~hyI A ~ical m~m ~line ~i~on ~ld ~ ~% ~n~ ~ li~e ~al~ ~a~ in ~ ~lin8 ~ ~ ~ine. 14% a~a(i~. ~ 6% ol~ns. ~ mean ~ ~t~ w~ In~~ wi~nic ~, ~i~a ~e~ J~ to ~ a~xi~ly 1%. ~u~ il i$ ~ ~ si~ifi~ in~ r~. ~ ~ ~ ~V is limi~ lo ~lk ~lin8 p~, .~i~ing in ~bli~in8 a ~V? ~ ~~ ~ ~ 8~ ~xicffi~ ~ t~ hi~ ~ilin~ ing~i~ ~i~ might ~ · ~ ~ has ~ ~1~ f~ 142 i~i~l ~~ ~ ~, ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~m~ ~ ~i~m. ~ ~ ~li~ in ~ air ~e ~ v~.,', ~f~ ~~ ~ ~mli~ v~ ~i~ ~ ~, ~e toxiciv is ~milar*-s-- ~ all ~i~. ~ ~ ~lly ~11~ ~ a ~n mo~br ~t ~ ~. As~min~ ~ ~ a~tic ~ a~ m~s ~ i~ ~ ~ IS uni~lifi~ 8% to c~si~ o( ~ h~r~a~s, the average hi~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~1 ~~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~i~t ~ ~ 72.5. ~fom. at 2S'C a~ 76 tom ~. In~lati~ is ~ ~ i~n( ~ ~ ~1 ~. 3~ ~ ~ld ~ ~ ~ ~ m~m'. ~,~aa~c~s~~~~ ~lk ~lin8 ~ ~mli~ ~ ~ Runi~'s'" ~lculafions ~ ~ ~ ~i~v~ ~ I~2~ ~~ ~~ ~t~ ~ ~i~ va~. A STEL o( ~ ~ is al~ mi~ a~a in ~ mi~t~.~n Hi~ ~ ~ ~n8 ia ~10 mi~.*~ ~ ~d ~ i~i~ ~ ~k ~m am ~ ~ ~ ~is ~ e~ ~ ~i~.~ Z ~ ~ I~ ~ ~.. p. ~4. ~ & ~.. ~. ~. ~ ~s. ~ 10% I~. t~ ~[~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ('~.~, (~4 ~) ~ly I.S%, ~J.le ~T o( J~K~ and ~a~ ~ lo ~ 7. I~ t1.1.: m,d H, ~ 16 FtOLGUIN, ]~,~~~ FAHAN & A~SC~;IATF_,S, INC. ENVII::q0NMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONBULTANTB ATTACHMENT 4. COPY OF BFDESD APPROVAL LEI'rER B A K E R S F I E L D FIRE DEPARTMENT July 30, 1996 Mr. Mark Magargee mE CN~EF Holguin, Fahan & Associates MICHAEL I~. KELLY 3157 Pegasus Drive ,~U~N~ST~nVE SERWCES Bakersfield, CA 93308 2101 'H' Streel Bakersfield, tAg3301 RE: CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN, SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 STORE, 300 BAKER STREET SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Magargee: 2101 'H' Streel Bakersfield, CA 93301 ¢o5)a~6-a9,~ This is to notify you that the work plan for the above stated address is satisfactory. FAX (805)39.5-1349 Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of work. PREVENTION SERVICES This Office concurs with the following findings and recommendations stated in the plan: 1715 Chester Ave Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805)326-3951 1. Benzene concentrations ranging from 2 to 200 mg/kg are known to extend FAX (805) 326q357b beneath the southwest comer of the Thdfl Store building. The indoor air inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible exposure level for commercial use ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (based upon ASTM Standard E-1739) given the concentration of benzene in the 1 ? 15 Chester Ave, Bakersfield. CA 93301 SOilS. (805) 326-39?9 FAX (805) 326O576 2. In-situ vapor extraction is the cost-effective alternative which is protective of the IRAINING DIVISION health of the current occupants of the building. 5642 Victor Sheel Bakersfield. CA 93308 3. A pilot-scale well field consisting of seven vapor extraction wells will be installed (805) 399-4697 FAX (~)a~-sT~ as described in the plan. Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct oversight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously approved. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm cc: Reverend Ralph Belluomini Duane R. Smith, RG I.HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC¼TIS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 5. CAPCOA SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT CAPCOA SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT The following is a "Screening Level Risk Assessment" using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA)"Air Toxics Assessment Manual" PTPLU modeling technique. The calculations for excess lifetime cancer risk have been performed for benzene emissions for the 98-percent oxidation efficiency scenario at the maximum Inlet volatile organic compound process stream concentration. The data analysis is based on the unit operating at 3,250 ppmv (25 percent of the LEL) for the entire 12-month duration of the vapor extraction process, with benzene representing 1 percent of the process stream, toluene representing 5 percent, ethyibenzene representing 0.5 percent, and total xylenes representing 25 percent. Actual emission of the volatile aromatics will decay exponentially during the project and represent a significantly lower risk than presented by this analysis. Despite this, the results of the worst-case analysis indicate that the vapor extraction project does not present a public health risk and are as follows: Type Calculation: Benzene Concentration Rr Re PTPLU 3.7' 10-7 5.0* 10-8 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Initigl Soil Vapor Inlet Stream Concentrations TPH as Gasoline = 3,250 ppmv Benzene = 32.5 ppmv Toluene = 162.5 ppmv Ethylbenzene = 16.25 ppmv Total Xylenes = 812.5ppmv Air Flow Blower Rate = 250scfm Blower Rate = (250 cu ft/mln)*(60 mln/hr)*(24 hr/day) = 360,000 cu fi/day CAPCOA Screening Level Risk Assessment Page 2 Total Hydrocarbons Emission (360,000 cu ft/day)/(379.4 cuft/ lbs-mole) = 949 lbs-mole/day (949 .lbs/mole/day)o(3,250 ppm) = 3.08 lbs-mole/day Molecular Weight of Gasoline = 86 lbs/lbs-mole (3.08 lbs-mole/day),(86 lbs/lbs-mole) = 264.9 lbs/day Thermal Oxidation Efficiency = 98% (264.9 lbs/day),(0.02) =5.3 lbs/day Benzene Emission (Based on maximum initial concentration) (949 lbs-mole/day),(32.5 ppm) = 0.0308 lbs-mole/day Molecular Weight of Benzene = 78.1 lbs/lbs-mole (0.0308 lbs-mole/day),(78.1 lbs/lbs-mole) = 2.405 lbs/day Thermal Oxidation Efficiency = 98% (2.405 lbs/day),(0.02) = 0.048 lbs/day Benzene Concentration (0.048 lbs/day)*(1 day/360,000 cu ft)*(454 grams/lbs)*(35.315 cu fl/cu meter) = 0.0021 g/m3 Benzene Emission Rqte (0.0021 grams/cu meter)/(35,315 cu fi/cu meter) = 0,000059 grams/cu ft (0,000059 grams/cu ft)*(0.661 cu fi/sec) = 0.000039 grams/sec PTPLU P~r~meter~ Benzene Emission Rate = 0.048 lb/day PTPLU (Version 2.0) Analysis of concentration as a function of stability and wind speed (California Air Resources Board Modeling Section version) Saint Vincent De Paul Dispersion Model CAPCOA Screening Level Risk Assessment Page 3 Source Conditions Emission-rate = 0.048 lb/day = 0.000039 g/sec Physical stack height = 10.00 fl = 3.05 m Stack gas temperature = 1,200.00°F = 922.04°K Stack gas velocity = 5.31 ft/sec = 1.62 m/sec Stack diameter = 24.00 in = 0.6 m Volume flow rate = 0.458 m^3/sec Buoyancy flux = 0.965 m^4/sec^3 Meteorological Conditions Ambient temperature = 300.00°K Anemometer height = 10.00 m Mixing height = 100.00 m Wind profile exponents: A: 0.15, B: 0.15, C: 0.20, D: 0.25, E: 0.30, F: 0.30 Receptor data Receptor elevation above ground level = 1.00 m Options used Gradual plume rise Buoyancy induced dispersion Urban dispersion coefficients (McEIroy-Pooler) Results - using extrapolated winds CAPCOA screening Level Risk Assessment Page 4 Stability Wind Maximum Distance Effective Speed Concentration of Max. Height (m/sec) (~Jg/m^3) (km) (m) A 0.42 5.61569E-02 0.116 44.6 A 0,67 8.09283E-02 0,077 29.0 A 0,84 9,52141E-02 0.063 23.8 A 1,26 1,77135E-01 0.020 11,9 A 1,67 2,71347E-01 0.016 8,8 A 2,[]9 3,43610E-01 0.014 7,3 A 2,51 3.93634E-01 0.013 6,4 B 0.42 5.61569E-02 0.116 44,6 B 0,67 8.09283E-02 0.077 29,0 B 0,84 9.52141E-02 0.063 23.8 B 1,26 1,77135E-01 0,020 11,9 B 1.67 2.71347E-01 0.016 8,8 B 2,09 3.43610E-01 0.014 7,3 B 2,51 3,93634E-01 0.013 6.4 B 3.35 4,45118E-01 0.011 5,3 B 4,18 4.58122E-01 0.010 4.8 <-- MAX C 1,58 2.15785E-01 0.022 10,5 C 1,97 2.95462E-01 0.019 8,5 C 2,37 3.58687E-01 0.017 7,3 C 3,15 4.38514E-01 0.015 6,0 C 3,94 9.99900E+15 999999.000(3) 3.4 C 5.52 9,99900E+ 15 999999,~3) 3,3 C 7.89 9,99900E+15 999999,000(3) 3,2 C 9,46 9.99900E+15 999999,000(3) 3.2 C 11,83 9.999(]0E+15 999999,000(3) 3,2 D 0,37 5.48211 E-02 0,240 49,8 D 0,59 8,12697E-O2 0.154 32.3 D 0.74 9.68215E-02 0.126 26.4 D 1.11 1,29610E-01 0,089 18,6 D 1,49 1,55344E-(]1 0,070 14.7 D 1,86 1,75616E-01 0,059 12,4 CAPCOA Screening Level Risk Assessment Page 5 D 2.23 1.77512E-01 0.040 10.8 D 2.97 2.68796E-01 0.025 7.4 D '. 3.72 3.18758E-01 0.022 6.2 D 5.20 3.62268E-01 0.019 5.1 :D 7.43 3.62254E-01 0.016 4.3 D 8.92 3.47317E-01 0.016 4.1 D 11.15 3.20028E-01 0.015 3.9 D 14.86 2.76508E-01 0.014 3.6 E 1.40 3.60415E-02 0.250 27.4 E 1.75 3.30780E-02 0.233 25.7 E 2.10 3.08034E-02 0.220 24.4 E 2.80 8.19751E-02 0.056 10.8 E 3.50 1.15509E-01 0.049 8.7 F 1.40 5.07131E-02 0.209 23.3 F 1.75 4.63606E-02 0.195 21.8 F 2.10 4.3[]309E-[]2 0.185 20.7 F 2.80 8.19751E-02 0.056 10.8 F 3.50 1.15509E-01 0.049 8.7 Cgutionary Notes (3) No computation was attempted for this height as the point of maximum concentration is greater than 100 km or less than 1 meter from the source. Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk Rr = (Xi)&*(URi)*(L/70), where; URi = Unit Risk Factor = 5.3* 10-$ (CAPCOA Manual Table 3.15) L/70 = Fraction of Lifetime Exposed = (12/12)/70 = (365 days) Xi = Annual Average Concentration = 0.458122 IJg/cu meter Rr = (0.458122)*(5.3' 10-$)*(0.014) = 3.7' 10-7 Re = (Rr)*(8 hrs/24 hfs)*(240 day/365 days)*(46 yrs/70 yrs) Re = 5.0* 10-8 HOLGUIN, FAHAN i~ & AS_S(X~TF~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 6. EVT PLAN EMISSIONS VERIFICATION TEST PLAN The purpose of this document is to provide the San Joaquln Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District - Southern Region (SJVUAPCD-SR) with an outline of Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) plan for conducting an emissions verification test of a vapor extraction system (VES) consisting of three phases of treatment, initially using a thermal oxidizer treatment system, converting the thermal oxidizer into a catalytic oxidation VES, and completing the soil remediation with a carbon absorption system. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT PERMIT HFA will begin the Source Compliance Demonstration Period for the thermal oxidizer treatment system upon issuance of the Authority To Construct (ATC) permit. HFA will conduct a 3-hour emissions verification test (EVT) within 14 days of the permit's approval. The EVT will be conducted as per the conditions of the ATC permit and the SJVUAPCD-SR's guidance documents for emission verification. All system parameters will be measured on a half-hourly basis during the emissions verification test, and all data will be recorded on a monitoring log. A similar routine shall be followed during the changeover to the second and third phases of treatment using catalytic oxidation and carbon absorption. System monitoring during the test will be conducted as described below (see Figure 3 - VES Schematic for the location of the equlpment and monitoring points, and Figure 4 - VES Process Component Description for a description of the Instruments to be used). CONTROL DEVICE INLET AND OUTLET TEMPERATURE The inlet vapor temperature will be monitored at the sampling port installed upstream of the extraction blower, and the outlet temperature will be monitored from the sampling port Installed in the exhaust stack (see Figure 3). Inlet temperature monitoring will be conducted using a Germanow-Simon, TeI-Tru thermometer rated for 0 to 1017'C, at 1° Increments. Exhaust gas temperature for the thermal oxidizer will be monltored using a thermocouple Inserted 26 Inches above the burner heads. Exhaust gas temperature for the carbon absorption system will be monitored using a Germanow-Simon thermometer. INLET AND OUTLET GAS FLOW RATE The inlet gas flow rate will be measured with a calibrated Magnehelic differential pressure gauge and a stainless-steel flow sensor (pltot tube) that will be Inserted into the 2-Inch-diameter influent flow line immediately downstream of the extraction blower (see Figure 3). Outlet flow EVT Plan Page 2 from the thermal/catalytic oxidizer will be measured with another pitot tube inserted into the exhaust stack. Effluent flow rates from the thermal/catalytic oxidizer will be approximately five times the Influent flow from the venting wells due to the addition of process air In the combustion chamber. Because the carbon absorption process is a closed system, the outlet volumetric flow rate will be equal to the Inlet volumetric flow rate. The inlet gas flow rate will be maintained between 200 and 250 cfm during the 3-hour test of the thermal/catalytic oxidation unit, and between 100 and 125 cfm during the 3-hour test of the carbon absorption unit. INLET PRESSURE Control device inlet pressure will be measured by a Magnehelic pressure gauge mounted on the upstream side of the blower and will be recorded in inches of water column vacuum on a half-hourly basis. INLET AND OUTLET VAPOR CONCENTRATIONS The inlet and outlet vapor concentrations will be monitored in the field on an hourly basis using a Photovac 10S70 portable gas chromatograph calibrated to a gasoline standard. Samples of the inlet and outlet gas will be collected in l-liter TedlarTM bags at 1 hour intervals using a I-liter-per-minute sampling pump. Inlet samples will be collected at the sampling port upstream of the extraction blower, and outlet samples will be collected from the exhaust stack (see Figure 3). Inlet and outlet samples 'will be collected for laboratory analysis at 1-hour intervals during the test. Laboratory samples will be collected In 3-liter TedlarTM bags and analyzed by a California state-certified laboratory for TPH and BTEX using EPA Methods 8015 (M) and 8020, respectively. AMOUNT OF SUPPLEMENTAL FUEL The total amount of supplemental fuel combusted will be read from the natural gas meter, and the standard cubic feet per minute will be determined by averaging over the test period. EMISSIONS VERIFICATION REPORT A report summarizing fne results of the test will be submitted to the SJVUAPCD-SR within 30 calendar days subsequent to completion of the test. ~~. HOLGUIN, ~ FAFIAN ~ & ASS(N~JA-FF_.S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 7. COPY OF HFA CHECK #064 064 HOLGUIN, FAHAN-s*ASsocIATES,*INc' - 2820 PEGASUS DRIVE, SUITE A BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 .... TO ~E ~ ~ . ORDER OF .... _ WE~ FARGO BANK _ State ater Resources Cont Board Division of Clean Water Programs Winston H. Hickox 2014 T Street · Sacramento, California 95814 · (916) 227-4518 Secretary for Mailing Address: P.O. Box 944212 · Sacramento, California · 94244-2120 G~ay Davis Environmental FAX (916) 227-4530 · Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca, gov/-cwphome/ustcf Governor Protection March 16, 1999 /~~ Father Ralph Belluomini .. Saint Vincent De Paul Store Inc ................ 300 Baker St Bakersfield, CA 93305 PRE-APPROVAL OF CORRECTIVE A__C_TI_0NC_ O_ST~S,.~CLAIM NO. 00991~,~_. SITE~giDISi~-S~S'7-J-0-6 BAKER ST, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 I have reviewed your request, received on March 8, 1999, for pre-approval of corrective action costs; I will place these documents in your file for future reference. I have included a copy of the "Cost Pre-Approval Request" form; please use this form in the future for requesting pre-approval of corrective actions costs. With the following provisions, the total cost pre-approved as eligible for reimbursement for completing the June 12, 1998, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. workplan approved by the Bakersfield Fire Department in their December 7, 1998 letter, is $29,425. This pre-approval is for installation of SVE system, 3 month operation and maintenance, verification soil sampling, and all required reporting. (The total amount approved for payment through request number 2 for work at your site that has been directed and approved by the is $ 8,986.) Be aware that this pre-approval does not constitute a decision on reimbursement: all reasonable and necessary corrective action costs for work directed and approved by the will be eligible for reimbursement per the terms of your Letter of Commitment at costs consistent with those pre-approved in this letter. All future costs for corrective action must be approved in writing by Fund staff. Future costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of Article 11, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations. · The actual costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it to remain valid. · The'work products must be acceptable to the Fire Department. · ' If a different scope of work becomes necessary, then you must request pre-approval of costs on the new scope of work. California Environmental Protection Agency RecycledPaper Saint Vincent De Paul Store Inc -2- March 16, 1999 · Although I have referred to the Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. proposal in my pre- approval above, please be aware that you will be entering into a private contract: the State of California cannot compel you to sign any specific contract, This letter pre-approves the costs as presented in the proposal dated December 17, 1998 by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. for conducting the work approved by the Bakersfield Fire Department for implementing the June 12, 1998, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. workplan. Please remember that it is still necessary to submit the actual costs of the work as explained in the Reimbursement Request Instructions to confirm that the costs are consistent with this pre- approval before you will be reimbursed. Please insure thatyour consultant prepares their invoices t~ jnclude.~th~Cr-¢quir~ed~br.eak~d~wn~f-c~sts-~n-a~time~and-materials~basis;-that invoiced tasl~s are consistent with the original proposal, and that reasonable explanations are provided for any changes made in the scope of worl~ or increases in the costs. When the invoices are submitted you must include copies of alh · subcontractor invoices, · technical reports, when available, and · applicable correspondence from the. Please call if you have any questions; I can be reached at (916) 227-4518. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Yulya Davidova, Water Resources Control Engineer TeChnical Review Unit Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Enclosure .~r Howard H. Wines, III Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper L D r December 7, 1998 Reverend Ralph Belluomini Saint Vincent De Paul FIRE CHIEF 3t0'Baker Street '~ RON FRAZE Bakersfield, CA 93305 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H' Street RE: Implementation of Soil Vapor Extraction Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Dear Father Ralph: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H'Street Our records indicate that your former underground storage tank site is currently subject Bakersfield, CA 93301 to Corrective Action Requirements under Article 11 of Title 23 California Code of VOICE (805)326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Regulations concerning leaking underground tanks. PREVENTION SERVICES Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2722(b) of Article 11, you are hereby directed to begin 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 the necessary work at your site within 90 calendar days from the date of this letter. The VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805)326-0576 required work shall include: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Clean Up Fund pre-approved of corrective action costs for, and the installation and three 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 months of operation of the soil vapor extraction system proposed in the Corrective Action VOICE (805) 326-3979 Plan dated June 17, 1996 prepared by Holguin, Fahan & Associates. FAX (805) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION Please be aware that, pursuant to Section 2722(c) of Article 1 l, you are required to have 5642 Victor Ave. an approved workplan on file with this office prior to initiation of any corrective action Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 work. FAX (805) 399-5763 In addition, you are to provide ongoing status reports of all activities involving the progress of this case to this office every 90 days. If you have any questions regarding the provisions of this letter, please call me at 326- 3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services cc: D. Smith M. Magargee Y. Davidova RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: ~ gPr..~ ~~?--- ID# Business Name: Contact Name: (t/o ~/A. b A,,,/I ~ v'~, Business Phone: ~'~; . ?__'~'7. ~'/~ FAX: Inspector's Name: ~ Time of Call: Datei !'~'/?//~ Time: '5~ -~o # Min: Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing [~-~ Retumecl [ ] Contentofcall: ~J~!?~ ~ ('~-~o(~'""cJ ,~,.~3 ~'~G,,~'~ ~' 7~.,~.~ Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT July 28, 1998 FIRE CHIEF Mr. Duane Smith MICHAEL R. KELLY Smith-Gutcher and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 60706 .~,DMINISIRATIYE SER~Yr.S Bakersfield, CA 93386-0706 2101 'H' Street Bake~fleld, CA 93301 (80~) 326-3941 RE: St. Vincent De Paul, 300 Baker Street in Bakersfield FAX (805) 39~1349 AMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SUPPR~ION SERVICE~ 2101 'H" Sffeet Dear Mr. Smith: 8okefsflold, CA 93801 (~05) 326-3941 FAX (805)395-1349 I have reviewed, the Soil Vapor Assessment Report, dated June 12, 1998, prepared by Holguin Fahan & Associates (HFA), for the above referenced site. The soil vapor survey was a supplemental measure pre-approved by the State Water Resources Control Board Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (SWRCB-USTCF) on I~EVENTION SERVICES January 7, 1998. The soil vapor survey was conducted subsequent to further investigation, likewise pre-approved 1715 Chester Ave. Ik:lRers~ld, CA 98801 by the SWRCB-USTCF on August 2 I, 1997, to assess the current conditions of the subsurface soils. That further (805) 326-3951 investigation, consisting of one confirmation soil boring and associated sampling, was previously approved by this FAX (805) 326-0~76 office on June 3, 1997. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Based on the results of the June 12, 1998 Soil Vapor Assessment Report finding that there are 1715 Chestor Ave. "hydrocarbon vapors detected in the near surface soils beneath the thrift store building, HFA recommends that the Bokorsfiold, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 BFDHMD consider requiring 3 months of operation of the soil vapor extraction system proposed in the CAP," this FAX (805) 326-0576 office concurs with that recommendation. The prior approval of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP), originally granted by this office on July 30, 1996, Ti~JNINO DIVISION 5642 Victor Street is hereby amended to specify HFA's current recommendation for 3 months of soil vapor extraction before the Bakersfield, CA 93308 results of which can be considered for site closure purposes. (1305) 399-4697 FAX (805)399-5763 Pre-approval of corrective action costs by the SWRCB-USTCF will, once again, be necessary. However, each of the several stipulations by the SWRCB-USTCF over these past two years have now been met, and this office does not anticipate any further dilatory actions to impede recommendations concurred with at this time. if you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, 111 Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm cc: Father Ralph Belluomini M. Magargee, HFA J. DiGiorgio, SWRCB-USTCF i.--:1 11 ENVjR'o'NMiENTAL iMiANA:GEIV~ ..-Hamrd6us Materials Division - .............. . 1745Ch:ester:Avenue, Suite'S' - t' ~: _~' ~- :- · - - · ., . _.,, B~kersfield, California 9330]~ '~-_,' ' ' - '- --. - ' - ' :' ':=' "... 't';.....' su~ect: :.:: L-SOIL VAPOR ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR 'THE sAINT:VINCENT DE 'PAUL THRIFT STORE-..: ~ 300 BAKERSTREET, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (APN 016~320-15-00-2) " -~ Dear M~. wine~ - 'Holgu~n, Fahan &.~Associates, Inc. (HFA) is please'~ to present Assessment Repod:,'ln 'assOciatiOn. ~ ~e former UST ~ ~e above-referenced sit~._ '~h~'~a~ersfield Fire 'Depa~men¥'' Hazardous Materials-"~iviSio~BF'DHMD) requested an assessment of whether ~e presence of gasoline hydrocarbons in~e.sU.~su[face presents a risk, 0f exposure throu~.h soll~apqr migration to employees ~ ~e site.. This ~epp~ preseots the results of a S°il vapor assessment Conducted adjacent to ~e foUndation of ~e.:~dff store ~ld~ g :' ' bu n . ' ' ~ .... -:--' -' -SITE.DESCRIPTION. t'-'- ....... Th~ Saiht Vincent~De Paul Thrift-Store is located California. The topography~ (see Figure 1 -Sife LocatiOn Map~. ~T~? subject sit~ is bound'on-~e:east by Baker Street, on the S~th by chi~6 sfreet,'and on ~e'west and no~ bY comme[cia! 'properties. The prope~ !S Io~ated in the'southeastern ~U~er 6f the s~uthwestern quarter of Section 29, T29S, R28E, MDBM, and is ~ identified as APN :01G32G'l~2. '.'The prope~ is situated wi~in a developed -c~mm~rc'ia~_aqd light ind6St~i~l.~r~a~.-interspersed -wi~ residential properties. A 55Ggallon g~solJne UST, dispenser, and associated product piping :were previously removed from ~e site (see Figure 2 ' Pict Plan): The prdperN Owner is ~ai~t.V~qcent- De paul. The owner centact ~-R~v~rend Ralph Belluomini.,. 31~ Bak'er dtreet, Bakersfield, California, 9~, (8~) 32G7~: The project consultant contact is ' M~. Duane R. Smith, Smith:Ggtcher & Associates, .Inc. (Smith-Gutcher),:Post ~ffice. Box. ~7~, Bakersfield; California, 93~, (8~)' 87!-3207. The s°il vapor gss~s~-~eht boh~01tant contact'is :t_~.conta~in~t~d~sit~ As~essm~'dt~ ~:-Ph'a's~ i ~ud:it~,: Site-Rem~dia:tiO~:.*~a~ous Waste. Mafia~ement. z ~6u~ '~i~u~roa street' , - ~ve~t~ra:~alifornia 93001 ~ ' ~']. Irvine, calffor~J~"~6~6:-: :" ' '~ ~ .- Bakersfield: ~a~i~r~ia g3~= *[ :~'~e~ix,'~iz~l]a'85008~ ~- ~ ~J~(80~ 652~0~'19~ : : :' : ': -(7r4) 442-666~ : -~: _-%2 :t (~05) 3GI:-~I~Z%~ ~=:'-'-~.-~L ' (602) 957-823~ '' - ' =(aO5) 652:O793~PA~L _ ..:_: ' Z[h~erndt~ f rst~ ~t~hfa c~- ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, Iii BFDHMD FAHAN June 12, 1998 - Page 2 ~ & ASS(X2IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Mr'. Mark R. Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 3157 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (805) 391-0517. BACKGROUND PREVIOUS WORK Based on a review of available data, analytical results, and conversations with Mr. Smith, on June 17, 1991, a 550-gallon gasoline UST, dispenser, and associated product piping were removed from the property. The former UST and dispenser were located immediately adjacent to the southwestern corner of the thrift store building. Soil samples collected from beneath the location of the UST indicated concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons (see Attachment 1 for a summary of previous work). On January 28, 1992, Smith-Gutcher advanced four soil borings (TH-1 through TH-4) to a maximum depth of 70 fbg, in and around the area of the former UST. Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected from the soil borings indicated gasoline-containing soil to a depth of approximately 55 fbg within an approximate 25-foot radius around the former UST at the site (see Attachment 1). Gasoline-containing soils are believed to extend to at least 20 feet beneath the southwestern corner of the thrift store building. Groundwater was not encountered and is not anticipated above a depth in excess of 200 fbg. The impacted soil consists of highly permeable, fine-grained to coarse-grained sands and silty sands interbedded with a significant interval of sandy silts and silts. The known contaminant at the site has been identified as petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range. The total volume of hydrocarbon-containing soils was estimated to be 3ZxS0 cubic yards, containing an estimated 2/120 pounds of hydrocarbons in the gasoline range. This equates to approximately 390 gallons of gasoline absorbed into the subsurface. Approximately 485 pounds of the hydrocarbons is estimated to be present beneath the thrift store building. HFA prepared a CAP dated June 17, 1996, for the site. A risk evaluation of the gasoline-containing soils at the site was conducted using ASTM Designation: E-1739 Risk Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (RBCA). The results of RBCA Tier 1 and 2 evaluations were that the indoor air inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible lifetime lx10-6 exposure levels given the concentration of benzene in the soils beneath the thrift store building, and that mitigation is required to reduce these concentrations to a permissible residual level, which is protective of the health of the occupants of the building. e : HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, Ill BFDHMD FAHAN June 12, 1998 - Page 3 & ASSC IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS An RI/FS was conducted to assess the feasibility and cost effectiveness of mitigation technologies. The results of the RI/FS analysis were that the time frame for natural bi0degradation is not sufficiently protective of the health of the current occupants of the building; removal of the hydrocarbons through excavation is not feasible or cost effective given the significant depth of the hydrocarbons and the existence of a significant volume of the hydrocarbons beneath the building; the time frame for in-situ bioventing is not sufficiently prOtective of the health of the current occupants of the building and bioventing is not the cost-effective alternative; and in-situ vapor extraction is the cost-effective alternative, which is protective of the health of the current occuPants of the building. The BFDHMD, in its case review letter dated July 30, 1996, concurred with the conclusions and recommendations of the CAP and requested that Saint Vincent De Paul initiate active soil remediation in the form of in-situ vapor extraction. Saint Vincent De Paul obtained competitive bids to implement the CAP and submitted these bids to the State Water Resources Control Board/Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (SWRCB/USTCF) for pre-approval of costs. The SWRCB/USTCF, in its letter dated June 4, 1997, denied pre-approval of costs to conduct active soil remediation, and requested performance of additional soils investigation to determine whether current concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons in the soils presented a health risk to the occupants of the building. On September 16, 1997, Smith-Gutcher advanced soil boring TH1 through the location of the former UST to a depth of 45 fbg. Gasoline hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from depths of 15, 20, 30, and 45 fbg (see Attachment 1). Given the results of the soils investigation, significant concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons remained in the soils in and around the former UST including beneath the southwestern corner of the thrift store building. Upon review of the laboratory analytical results, the SWRCB/USTCF requested that a soil vapor assessment be conducted to determine if gasoline hydrocarbon vapors were present in the near-surface soils, which would present a risk of exposure to the occupants of the building. This report presents the results of a soil vapor assessment conducted adjacent to the foundation of the thrift store building. SITE GEOLOGY The site is located in a relatively flat area at an elevation of approximately 415 feet above MSL. The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquin Valley. The surface of the Son Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the ~ ' HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, BFDHMD F/~J-J~N June 12, 1998 - Page 4 & ASSOC T , INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE~MENT CONSULTANTS alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 30,000 fbg. Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments of the Kern River Formation, which form a homocline dipping gently to the southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of poorly indurated and dissected fan 'deposits (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). The site is an area at the foot of rolling hills reaching a maximum elevation of 900 feet above MSL, located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The Kern River drains a large area of the southern Sierra Nevada, including the highest part of the range at Mount Whitney. The modern river has cut a channel southeast of the site and provides recharge for groundwater along its course. Sedimentary geologic formations, observed at the surface and underlying the site were sourced by the Sierra Nevada and transported via the ancestral Kern River. In the region of the site, the Tertiary sedimentary sequence from top to bottom is nonmarine Kern River Formation, nonmarine Chanac Formation, marine Santa Margarita Formation (possibly interfingering with Chanac Formation due to the tentative correlation of type Santa Margarita Formation west of the San Andreas Fault), marine Round Mountain Silt, marine Olcese Sand, marine Freeman Silt, marine Jewett Sand and Pyramid Hill member, marine Vedder Sand, nonmarine Walker Formation. Of these, only the Kern River, Chanac, and Santa Margarita formations are important to the hydrogeology of the site. The Tertiary, nonmarine Kern River Formation is unconformably overlain by bouldery terrace deposits of Quaternary Older Alluvium. Two naturally occurring geologic units are present in the near surface at the site. The two natural units are the Tertiary (Miocene to Pliocene), nonmarine Kern River Formation, and Quaternary (Pleistocene) Older Alluvium. The Older Alluvium forms a thin terrace deposit lying unconformably on the Kern River Formation. QUaternary Older Alluvium: The middle to lower Pleistocene (Bartow, J.A., 1984, Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Southeastern San Joaquin Valley, California, USGS Map 1-1496), Older Alluvium is a flat-lying terrace deposit approximately 5 to 10 feet thick that overlies the erosional surface of the Kern River Formation. The Older Alluvium is composed of very coarse material, with boulders as large as 50 cm in diameter. Clastic material composition includes granitic and dioritic crystalline rocks characteristic of the Sierra Nevada batholiths, quartzite characteristic of pre-batholithic rocks, and volcanic and related rocks such as andesite and dark siliceous HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III FAHAN BFDHMD ~ June 12, 1998 - Page 5 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS agate typical of the Neogene deposits of the Mojave Desert. In some locations, caliche rims have developed between clasts. Kern River Formation: The age of the Kern River Formation includes upper Miocene and Pliocene and possibly Pleistocene. The Kern River Formation is composed of interstratified fanglomeratic deposits and silty claystones. Within the fanglomerates are conglomerate beds with cobbles as large as 20 cm in diameter, and in some areas fanglomerate beds exhibit cross bedding from 2.5 to 5 meters thick. The silty claystone beds, which would serve as Iow-permeability barriers to vertical migration, are laterally continuous to as much as several thousand feet, but are locally truncated by sandy fanglomerate units. Another important factor in considering the potential for migration is the tack of secondary permeability within the Kern River Formation as no secondary cracks, small faults, or gypsum veins are observed. Chanac Formation: The Chanac Formation of upper Miocene age is not exposed on or near the site, but outcrops in the cliffs southeast of the site along the Kern River bluffs at Hart Park. It is a thinly bedded, chalky siltstone exhibiting many secondary cracks and gypsum veins. On-site soil borings indicate that the alluvium is characterized by highly permeable, fine-grained to coarse-grained sand interbedded with lower permeability, silt zones ranging in depth from 24 to 27 fbg, 35 to 37 fbg, 44 to 57 fbg, and 63 to 70 fbg. The base of gasoline-containing soils is within the silty interval ranging in depth from 44 to 57 fbg. SITE HYDROGEOLOGY Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east, and are transported by five major rivers, the southernmost being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 2 miles south of the Kern River. The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer mapped by the Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) is approximately 200 fbg at the site, with the direction of groundwater flow to the southwest (KCWA, 1994, 1993 Report on Water Conditions, February 1, 1994). The nearest known occurrence of perched groundwater is 2 miles to the southwest at a depth of 33 fbg in the abandoned Kern River channel to the ancient Kern Lake bed (KCWA, 1~93, 1992 Water Supply Report, May 1993). SOIL VAPOR ASSESSMENT The objective of this phase of investigation was to assess whether gasoline vapor concentrations are present beneath the foundation of the thrift store building. HFA proposed to HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDHMD ~ FAFL N June ] 2, 1998 - Page 6 ~ & ASS(X2IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS accomplish this through the collection of soil vapor samples at a depth of 3 fbg at four soil vapor sampling locations (G-1 through G-4) around the periphery of the building foundation (see Figure 2 for the soil vapor sampling locations). The vapor samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline, BTEX, and MTBE. SOIL VAPOR INVESTIGATION Prior to conducting the assessment, underground utilities such as water, electrical, and sewer were mapped by Underground Service Alert of Northern California. On May 6, 1998, HFA collected soil vapor samples (G-1 through G-4) around the periphery of the foundation to assess whether gasoline hydrocarbons may be migrating into the thrift store building (see Figure 2). HFA advanced an AMSTM soil gas vapor probe to a depth of 3 fbg at each location. Soil vapors were extracted from that depth through pre-cleaned TeflonTM tubing using a vacuum pump. The soil vapors will be field screened using a PID, with the concentrations recorded on a field log. No VOCs were indicated by the PID. The soil vapors were also collected in pre-cleaned 3-liter TedlarTM bags. The TedlarTM bags were sealed, labeled, and held in an ice chest at a temperature of 4~ while in the field and in transit to HFA Environmental Laboratories. Soil vapor sampling equipment was decontaminated between sampling locations using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and two distilled, deionized water rinses (see Attachment 2 for the soil vapor sampling procedures). The soil vapor samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline using EPA Method 8015 (M) and BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8020. Gasoline hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in soil vapor samples G-1 through G-4. However, TPH as gasoline and benzene concentrations were not detected in soil vapor samples G-1 through G-4 (see Table 1 - Summary of Soil Vapor Survey Analytical Results and Attachment 3 for the laboratory report). Given the results of the soil vapor survey, and in accordance with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Recommendations to Improve the Cleanup Process for California's Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks report dated October 16, 1995; and the SWRCB's Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Technical Review Guidance Document No. 4 dated December 27, 1995, Saint Vincent De Paul requests that the BFDHMD provide written guidance pertaining to the requirement to perform remedial activities at the site. To mitigate the gasoline hydrocarbon vapors detected in the near-surface soils beneath the thrift store building, HFA recommends that the BFDHMD consider requiring 3 months of operation of the soil vapor extraction system proposed in the CAP (see Attachment 1). HOL©UIN, Mr. Howard H, Wines, III FAHAN BFDHMD ~ June 12, 1998 - Page 7 & A. SOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Saint Vincent De Paul, and its representative Smith-Gutcher & Associates, Inc., as it pertains to the referenced property located in Bakersfield, California. The services performed by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., were conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of its profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the state of California. No other warranty is expressed or implied. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., trusts that you will find this Soil Vapor Assessment Report to your satisfaction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (805) 391-0517 or at e-mail address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfa.com. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA ~',~' Mark R. Magargee, Associate Geologist Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rri Enclosures: Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Plot Plan Table 1 - Summary of Soil Vapor Survey Analytical Results Attachment 1 - Summary of Previous Work Attachment 2 - Soil Vapor Sampling Procedures Attachment 3 - Laboratory Report cc: Reverend Ralph Belluomini, Saint Vincent De Paul Mr. Duane R. Smith, Smith-Gutcher HOLGUIN, Mr. Howord H. Winos, BFDHMD F/~I-I/~N June 12, 1998 - Page 8 & A.&oqDCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ~ ":i ':':.':,7:' ~ ~.~: ,.::~ ' ~ ,,,..?~ ..,;. "~~ .'.:~;'::" .:~ :. ~,~~ ~ .:',~...,, .. /' ',~, ~o* ~ ' ' ~-, ~, ~ :'~: h,,,~ ~ '" '-: - " 'i~ . :~ .... LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL O 0.5 1 MILE ~ SAINT VINCENT PAUL THRI~ STORE ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 300 BAKER STREET 0 1,~ 2,~ 3,~ 4,~ 5,~ FE~ ~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA H H ~ I I I 0 0.5 1 KILOMETER. FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP USGS OIL CEN~R T.5 MINUTE SERIES QUADRANGLEI ' ~O~, ~ ~ ~OC~, ~C. ] .~~~~ ~ HOL©UIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDHMD FAH~N June 12, 1998- Page9 & ASSOC~T~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS I-- LLI ILl Z~ ASPHALT -~ STORAGE YARD w SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE Q. O G-2 · FORMER DISPENSER --:~_ _,, G-3 FENCE GATE ,.__ G_~!:_~L~ · G-4 ASPHALT PARKING LOT FORMER 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET 0 15 30 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL · SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING POINT SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: JUNE 12, 1998: RRI ITl TABLE 1. ~ SUMMARY OF SO,L VAPOR SURVEY ANALYT,CAL RESULTS ~ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIADATE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL I ~ SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLED SAMPLE I.D. GASOLINE BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE ~Z (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv)' (ppmv) REF n EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD I 8015 (M) I 8020 N/A o METHOD DETECTION LIMIT I 101 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.04 0.01 N/AEZ~ Former Gasoline UST I 5-6-98 G-1 NDI ND 0.031 0.07 0.08 0.08 A Southern End of Western Sideof Suildin~lI 5-6-98 G-2 ND ND 0.03 0.07 0.07 NDI A Southwestern Cornerof Building I 5-6-98 G-3 ND ND; 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.08 A Western End of Southern Side of Building I 5-6-98 G-4 ND ND 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.09 A ... REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, current report. & ASSOCLATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK ,,~ [ ASPHALT ~ STORAGE YARD >- I-- [.u ~ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE Q. O Q. FORMER DISPENSER '~_.~ FENCE GATE '.--~ -TH-2 ,~, TH'~~TH-4 IA' TH-3 ~TH1 ASPHALT PARKING LOT FORMER 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET 0 15 30 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL )~, SOIL BORING SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA J J LINE OF CROSS SECTION FIGURE I - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIAT~_,S, INC. REVISION DATE: JUNE 12, 1998: RRI I'-- ILl LM I-- 03 rr LLI _z ASPHALT J STORAGE YARD uJ SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE D.. O n- VW-2 VES UNIT ~VW-5 FORMER DISPENSER -- FENCE GATE .... VW-6 .?. iVW-1 VVV-3 VW-7 ASPHALT PARKING LOT FORMER 550-GALLON GASOLINE UST SCALE IN FEET CHICO STREET 0 15 30 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL '~ PROPOSED VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ..... PROPOSED VES PIPING FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN SHOWING VES HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: JUNE 12, 1998: RRI THRIFT STORE BUILDING (PROJECTED) FORMER WEST-NORTHWEST 550-GALLON EAST-NORTHEAST A GASOLINE UST A' TH-3 ~ TH-1 TH-2 ' ~ TH-4 0 ~-.-.-.-.-...-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- ...... ~!ii~i.. . ~l~~ ~~~ 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: _ _ ,..:::,.:::,-:::,..'::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ 30 30 Q. LIJ 40 40 50 50 60 60 70 70 TD=70' HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 3/4 0 10 20 REFERENCE: SMITH-GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., MARCH 1992 LEGEND SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL TH-1 ~ SOIL BORING DESIGNATION ..... 1 ~ '~:'~:: SILTY SAND (SM) SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE ~ BOREHOLE (DASHED WHERE :: :i'i;:i POORLY GRADED SAND (SP) 300 BAKER STREET PROJECTED) ............... : ".:'ili'i'i~:'~ WELL GRADED SAND (SW) BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA #/#~_ TPH AS GASOLINE/BENZENE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (rog/kg) m SILT (ML) FIGURE 3 - GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION A-A' 1-D: X'~ TOTAL BORING DEPTH ND NOT DETECTED HOI,C, UIN, F'AHAN &: ASSOCIATES, ]:NC. REVISION DATE: JUNE 17, 1996: RRI TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH I.D. GASOLINE BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES REF (fbg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) 8020 N/A METHOD REPORTING LIMIT VARIES-SEE LABORATORY REPORTS N/A TH-1 6-17-91 9.5 TH-1-9.5 1',800 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 54.3 A 6-17-91 13.5 TH-1-13.5 4,300 <2 <2 <2 189 A 1-28-92 20 TH-1-20 2,800 <1 <1 3 230 B 1-28-92 30 TH-1-30 1,500 3 110 24 305 B 1-28-92 45 TH-1-45 6,000 110 730 170 960 B 1-28-92 50 TH-l-50 500 7 51 15 88 B 1-28-92 65 TH-1-65 1 0.19 0.1 0.079 0.287 B 1-28-92 70 TH-l-70 ND 0.15 0.044 0.046 0.122 B D-1 6-17-91 2 D-1-2 ND ND ND ND ND A 6-17-91 6 D-1-6 -ND ND ND ND ND A TH-2 1-28-92 25 TH-2-25 2,000 <5 6 <5 395 B TH-3 1-28-92 20 TH-3-20 ND ND ND ND ND B 1-28-92 25 TH-3-25 2,600 <2 28 38 413 B 1-28-92 45 TH-3-45 11,000 200 1,200 300 1,730 B 1-28-92 60 TH-3-60 2 0.34 0.034 0.12 0.374 B 1-28-92 65 TH-3-65 ND 0.015 ND ND ND B TH-4 1-28-92 25 TH-4-25 ND ND ND ND ND B 1-28-92 35 TH-4-35 ND ND ND ND ND B 1-28-92 40 TH-4-40 3 0.056 0.02 0.13 0.255 B 1-28-92 50 TH-4-50 1 0.054 0.11 0.065 0.086 B 1-28-92 55 TH-4-55 ND 0.026 0.068 ND 0.071 B 1-28-92 60 TH-4-60 ND 0.013 0.019 ND 0.015 B TH1 9-16-97 10 TH1 @10' ND ND ND ND ND C 9-16-97 15 TH1 @15' 2,600 ND ND ND ND C 9-16-97 20 TH1@20' 470 ND ND ND 1.3 C 9-16-97 30 TH1 @30' 3.6 ND 0.008 ND 0.26 C 9-16-97 45 TH1 @45' 4,600 33 480 140 800 C REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Smith-Gutcher & Associates, Inc.'s (Smith-Gutcher's) tank removal sampling dated June 17, 1991. B = Smith-Gutcher's report dated March 1992. C = Smith-Gutcher's report dated September 30, 1997. HOLGUIN, - ~ FAHAN ~ & A.oqS(~IATE~, 1NC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2. SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING PROCEDURES SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING PROCEDURES EQUIPMENT OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION AMS Gas Vapor Probe The AMS Gas Vapor Probe (Probe) was designed to extract soil vapor samples from unconsolidated, unsaturated soil zones. The tip of the Probe is constructed of stainless steel and is heat treated and hardened. The tip is a rounded point that forms a diameter just slightly larger than the drive extensions. The tip makes a 5/8-inch-diameter hole, and the extensions are 1/2 inch in diameter. Just above the formed part of the tip, there are a series of small holes that serve as vapor inlet holes. The Probe tip is driven into the ground by one of two methods: the manual slide hammer attachment or an optional electric rotary hammer. Stainless steel extensions are utilized as needed for the Probe. These extensions come in either 3-foot or 4-foot lengths. The extensions are coupled together by a 5/8-inch-OD coupling with 1/2-inch fine thread on the inside. When the drive extensions are coupled together, the ends of the extensions push against each other in the coupling. By doing this, the force of driving is exerted against the extension ends rather than the threads. By adding extensions, the Probe can be inserted to a depth of up to 20 feet. The liner rod is 3/16-inch-OD stainless steel. Once the liner rod is installed inside the extensions, the small couplings protect the vapor inlet holes from filling with dirt and plugging the inside of the extensions. The liner rod, which is included with each extension, is also coupled together with small couplings. After the Probe has been inserted to the desired depth, the drive end and the liner rods are removed, and a vapor extraction tiffing is'installed on the Probe. The vapor extraction tiffing includes a 3/16-inch tubing adapter. A piece of TeflonTM or plastic tubing can be pushed onto the tubing adapter, and the other end is attached to HFA's soil vapor sampler. HFA's Soil Vapor Sampler HFA's soil vapor sampler (SVS) was designed to collect vapor samples from subsurface, unsaturated soils. It consists of an approximately 1.5-foot by 1.5-foot, sealed, black plastic container, and is outfitted with various valves, a flow meter, gages, and a vacuum pump. A schematic diagram of the system is shown in Figure 1. As seen in the diagram, the system functions in two modes (A and B) depending upon the setting of valve 1. In mode A, the flowmeter and vacuum gage are in line with the vacuum pump. The purpose of this mode is, to determine if a good flow of soil vapors is being extracted from both the subsurface and the por Sampling Procedures Page 2 vacuums required for their extraction. Once it has been verified that a flow of vapors is being extracted, a PID or FID should be used to test the vapors from the discharge port. The concentration of vapors will allow a determination to be made as to whether or not to switch to mode B and collect a vapor sample in the TedlarTM bag. VACUUM GAGE TE DLAR BAR If vapors are detected from the system discharge port, valve 1 is switched to mode B, which brings a TedlaFM bag on line to collect a sample of the soil vapors. In mode B, the vacuum pump draws air from the sealed container causing replacement vapors to flow into the container. Since there is a TedlarTM bag in line with the incoming soil vapors, the TedlarTM bag fills up. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES The QA/QC procedures for HFA's manual of the soil vapor sampling system consists of procedures to verify the functioning and cleanliness of the SVS and the validity of data. Diagram 2 shows in detail the QA/QC procedures to be followed in order to ensure the collection of representative soil vapor samples. por Sampling Procedures Page 3 QA/QC FLOW DIAGRAM DIAGRAM 2 YES COLLECTION4 [ REPLACE 11JStNO (see 11.2) (see ~1.3] (s~ 11.51 Verification of the Soil Vapor Sampler Functioning Verification of the functioning of ~he soil vapor sampler is conducted daily and prior to insertion of the probe into the subsurface. Verification of system functioning consists of blocking the air inlet holes on the soil vapor sampling probe and visual confirmation of vacuum increase and flow rate decrease to zero. If the vacuums do not increase and the flow rate does not decrease to zero, a system leak is present. As a result, the source of the problem needs to be identified and corrected, and the test needs to be conducted again. Acceptable test results must be indicated before the equipment is used. pot Sampling Procedures Page 4 Collection of Blank Samples, Field and Lab Blanks Blank samples are collected and tested prior to inserting the Probe into the subsurface in order to ensure that the SVS is clean. Atmospheric air is allowed to flow through the Probe, tubing, and SVS, and is tested ~fl the discharge port with an FID or a PID. If any concentration of VOCs are detected above background levels, the system is cleaned, and all tubing is replaced until no further readings are noted ~ the discharge port. A blank sample is then collected in a TedlarTM bag for later analysis in the laboratory. Verification of Flows from Subsurface Verification of flows from the subsurface is determined in a similar procedure. Subsequent to initial verification and blank sample, the AMS rod is driven to a minimum depth of 3 feet into the subsurface soils. All lines are connected to the soil vapor sampler, and the sampler is switched to mode A. An increase in system vacuums and some flow should occur for a positive result. A diagram showing the operational procedures for collecting a sample of the soil vapor is shown in diagram 1. SVS SYSTEM FLOW DIAGRAM DIAGRAM 1 SUBSURFACE + S~L VAPOR SAMPLER ' I Soi~apor Sampling Procedures Page 5 Collection of Duplicate Samples After the collection of every 10 soil vapor samples, a duplicate sample is also collected, with a minimum of at least 1 per day. Sample Management a. Sample Storage and Preservation Procedures Appropriate preservation methods for soil vapor samples will be employed to maintain the samples' composition from the time of collection to the time of analysis. To preserve soil vapor samples, in is necessary that they be kept cool and in darkness. b. Sample Holding Times Holding time is the length of time a sample can be stored without altering the concentration of an analyte. Soil vapor holding times will be 48 hours or less. c. Sample Labels Field samples must be identified by a sample tag or label. The sample label should include the following information (see Figure 2): · client name; · project name and location; · collector's sample number; · date and time of collection; · name of person collecting sample; · sample location or cross-reference to the sampling plan; · field information or pertinent remarks; · whether or not preservative was added; and · name and address of organization collecting sample. ' ~ por Sampling Procedures Page 6 FIGURE 2. SAMPLE LABEL PRESERVATIVE ADDED? r~YES [~'1NO HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 143 S. Figueroa St., Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 652-0219 d. Chain-Of-Custody Record Chain-of-custody procedures will be followed to document sample possession. A sample is considered in one's custody if it is: · in the person's physical possession; · in the view of the person after he/she has taken possession; · secured by that person so that no one can tamper with the sample; or · secured by that person in an area that is restricted to authorized personnel. The Chain-of-Custody Record contains sample analysis request information that facilitates the transition of samples to the laboratory, The Chain-of-Custody Record is intended to accompany the samples on delivery to the laboratory and should include: · sample number and project name; · signature of collector; · date of collection; · time of collection; · address of site and location of collection; · waste type; · signatures of persons involved in the chain of possession; · · inclusive dates of possession; and · remarks concerning possession. Soil~l~apor Sampling Procedures Page 7 The following information should be supplied by the sample collector for the sample analysis request portion of the Chain-of-Custody Record: · name of the cdlector; · .date and time of collection; · location of sampling points; · name and address (telephone number) of field contact; · sample identification numbers; · type of sample (groundwater, wastewater, soil, etc.); · important and pedinent field information (weather or soil conditions, etc.); · analysis requested on sample(s): and · special handling and/or storage information. Once the sample arrives at the laboratory for analysis, the person receiving the Chain-of-Custody Record must verify reception of the sample by issuing the following information: · name of person receiving sample(s) or signature; · title of person receiving sample(s); · date of arrival of sample(s) at laboratory; · analysis required; and · additional information relative to sample location. DOCUMENTATION Documentation consists of the following: · field soil vapor monitoring logs; · sample analysis request sheets; · chain-of-custody record; · field log books. -~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & ASSC~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 3. LABORATORY REPORT HOLG , FAHAN & AS ES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 143 South Flgueroa S~eet · Ventura, California 93001 · (805) 652-0219 * FAX: (805) 652-0793 REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS May 8, ]998 Page 1 CLIENT, Analyzed By: N. Abadeer Smith / Gutcher Sampled By: K. Mitchell Units: ppm v/v Matrix: Air PROJECT~ St. Vincent De Paul Analyses Method: BTEX: EPA 8020 TPH: 8015-M CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL P~TROL~UM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BT~X DISTINCTION CONSTITUENT TPH- TPH- Ethyl Total Percent Lab Sample Dates Sampled, Gasoline Diesel Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes MTBE Surrogate No. No. Received and Tested RL RL RL RL RL RL RL Recovery 981723 G-1 5/6/98 5/6/98 5/6/98 ND <MRL ND .03 .07 .08 .08 102% 10 .01 .01 .01 .04 .01 981724 G-2 5/6/98 5/6/98 5/6/98 ND <MRL ND .03 .07 .07 ND 100% I0 .01 .01 .01 .04 .01 981725 G-3 5/6/98 5/6/98 5/6/98 ND <MRL ND .05 ~ .06 .09 .08 99% 10 .01 .01 .01 .04 .01 981726 G-4 5/6/98 5/6/98 5/6/98 ND <MRL ND .04 .05 .05 .09 107% 10 .01 .01 .01 .04 .01 RL = Reporting Limit (may vary with Dilution Factor) ND = Not Detected at or above RL Lab Certification: CAELAP #1878; 1/31/00 Laboratory Manager: HOLGU1N, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, IN( ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-681 METHOD BLANK REPORT REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS QC Batch ID: MBA Date Analyzed: 6-May-98 Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Analyzed By: NHA Analysis Method: EPA 8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in ppm Yh, (air) TPH- Ethyl Total Client Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample ID. Matrix tiRZ MRL ICRL MRL ,U,~L MBA Method Blank Air N D 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.09 10 00l 00l 00l ~ 04 Volatile fuel hydrocarbonsare quantita~d against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detecte, d by this from C6 to C15. Analytes reported as ND were not present above thc stated limit of detection. MRL = Method reporting Limit ND: Not detected at or above MRL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP #1878; 1/31/96 Client: Smith/Gutcher Date Analyzed: 6-Maw98 Sample IE): ..MB Matrix: Air Lab No: Method Blank Instrument ID: HP 5890 GC-1 Proiect: ST.Vincent De Paul EPA 8020 for Air Compound ppb ppm V/V* Dilution Factor MR/ MTBE 0.16 0.04 1 0.01 ~enzene u.u/ u.u:z I U.U Toluene O. 14 0.04 1 0.01 Ethylbenzene 0.27 0.06 I 0.01 m&p xylene 0.26 0.06 1 0.03 o-xylene O. 13 0.03 1 0.01 BFB= 93% *ppm V/V = ppb * 23.7 / MW EPA 8015 for Air Compound ppm ppm V/V** Dilution Factor MRL TVPH as 0.026 6 1 10 Gasoline ** ppm V/V = ppm*1000)*23.7/MW ~ /dW of TPH-Gasoline is assumed to be 100gm HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-6810 Date: 6-May-98 Standard ID: SV-I08 Instrument ID: HP-5890 SERIES II Analyst: NHA STDCONC : 100ng/uL Amt Inj. : 30 ul/50 ML Water Water matrix-Continuing Calibration Verificc~tion EPA Method 8020 Compound Ave. CF CF daily ' %RPD Area Conc. (ng) MTBE 1932 1784 8 1.07E+06 600 Benzene 6244 5774 7.5 3.46E+06 600 Toluene 6036 5851 i 3.1 3.51E+06 600 !Ethylbenzene 6970 6687 4.1 4.01E+06' 600 m,p-Xylenes 8525 8172 4.1 4.90E+06 600 o-Xyle[~es 7095 6940 2.2i 4.16E+06 600 4-BFB(Surr.) 7746 7126 8.0 1.78E+06 250 *Must be less than or equal to 15. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Venfura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-6810 Date: 6-May-98 Standard ID: SV-099 Instrument: HP 5890 GC-1 Analyst: NHA Water Matrix-Continuing Calibration Verification EPA Method 8015 Modified r Inj. Amou: 10ul/50 ML Water 8.40E+0~1 Compound Ave. CF CF daily %RPD* TVPH as 2103338 2098788 0.2 Gasoline * Must be less than or equal to 15. HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Yentura, CA ?3003¥(805) 550-7750¥FAX (805) 550-68] 0 Sample ID: Date Analyzed: b-May-98 Lab No: 981729B Mairix : Water Instrument'lD: HP 5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: 1 Matrix Spike Worksheet Injected Amount · 1 uL/10ML WATER STD Concentraion: 100 ng/uL Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) :MTBE 0.00 9.9 · 10 99 :Benzene 0.00 9.8 10 98 kl'oluene 0.00 10.7 10 107 Ethylbenzene 0.00 10.5 10 105 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 10.8 10 108 o-Xylene 0.00 10.7 10 107 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) MTBE 0.00 9.5 10 95 Benzene 0.00 10.1 10 l 01 Toluene 0.00 10.9 10 109 Ethylbenzene 0.00 10.6 10 106 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 10.9 10 109 o-Xylene 0.00 10.8 10 108 Average Recovery & RPD Data 3ompound Average Control %RPD Control Recovery Limits Limits MTBE 97 50-185 4.1 <28 Benzene 100 75-143 3.0 < 15 toluene 108 85-138 1.9 <9 Ethylbenzene 106 81-137 0.9 <8 m,p-Xylenes 109 74-147 0.9 < 12 o-×ylene 108 83-140 0.9 < 10 HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-6810 Sample ID: Date Analyzed: 6-May-98 Lab No: BS&BSD Matrix : Water Instrument ID: HP 5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: 1 Matrix Spike Worksheet Injected Amount: 1 uL/10ML WATER STD Concentraion: 100 ng/uL Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) MTBE 0.00 9.2 . 10 92 ~,enzene 0.00 9.6 10 96 Toluene 0.00 11.1 10 111 Ethylbenzene 0.00 10.9 10 109 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 11.5 10 115 o-Xylene 0.00 11.2 10 112 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) MTBE 0.00 10.2 10 102 Benzene 0.00 9.4 10 94 Toluene 0.00 10.6 10 106 Ethylbenzene 0.00 10.6 10 106 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 10.9 10 109 o-Xylene 0.00 10.7 10 107 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Average Control %RPD Control Recovery Limits Limits MTBE 97 50-185 10.3 <28 Benzene 95 75-143 2.1 <15 l'oluene 109 85-138 4.6 <9 Ethylbenzene 108 81-137 2.8 <8 m,p-Xylenes 112 74-147 5.4 <12 o-Xylene 110 83-140 4.6 <10 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Name 5P'HT'/c/GdT'O-I~A i Project Name Client Contact/Phone No. Con:fac: Code S/¢,7 ~ M/~C¢~ ~¢ ~U~ Send repo~ to: - Holguin, Fahan & Assooa~es. l~c Samplers Name S~~ Date Analyses Requested 3157 Pegasus Drive ~ ~/~~ ~ ' S-~-~ I~ Bakersfield. CA 93308 Sample A~n: ~4~ Matdx (soil, Other Info~ation No. and ~ TU, A OU HFA Date , ~me groundwater (e.g.,samplinglocatlon, depth, Typeof ~ ~ ~ ¢~'0da.) ~ ~our Sam~e ¢ Sa~l~ Sampled air, water) soil ~dng or MW ¢, etc.) Containers 0fl25 t ~ REQUIRED DETECTION LIMITS ~ Santo BaSra C~n~ ~ Sw-~ ~ Ven~ra ~un~ see reverse for required detection limits SAMPLE RECEIPT ~ Y~ NO % Sample Condition Acc~tabte ~ Sample Tem~rature A¢or~nate X PRESERVATIVE ADOED~ ~ ~ All ~mples stor~ overnight at HFA are refdgerat~ at 4~C. Samples are trans~ned the laborato~ in ~le~ fill~ w~th Blue IceTM Delivered to HFA's refrigerator for tempora~ storage on ~ (Initials) ~e~i~~SY: &~r~afion) Oat~ime R~ived By: (Signatur~Organizafion) Dat~ime La~mto~ Na~ & Ci~ ~ehneu:s~ By: (S~natu~'Organizadon) Daytime Re~ived By: (Signatur~Organizatlon) Dat~ime , ~ fl~ u~t~ ~93) RelinQu,sn¢ By: (Signatur¢Organization) Dat~ime Recei~d For ~¢orato~ By: (SigCure/O~anization) Dat~ime Include S~I~I H~ards sample(s)/cooler to: Holguin, Fahan ~ ttes, Inc. * 3157 Pegasus Ddve, "' ' CA 93308 - (805) 391-0517 * F~ ~ (805} 39~-0826 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT .~ CHIE~ January 26, 1998 MICHAEL R. KELLY ADMINISTRATIVE SEWICE$ 2101 'H' Stroet Mr. DuaneSmith Bakersfield. CA 93,301 Smith-Gutcher (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 P.O. Box 60706 Bakersfield, CA 93386-0706 SUI~I~$$1ON 2101 'H' Sh'eet BakorsflelcI, CA93301 RE: Soil Vapor Survey at 300 Baker Street in Bakersfield (80.5) 326-3941 FAX (80,5) 395-13119 Dear Mr. Smith: PREVENTION SEWICES 171 $ Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA93301 This is to notify you that the work plan for the above stated address is (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-O,576 satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of work. ENVII~ONMEN~AL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA93301 Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct (805) 326-3979 ~ - FAX (805)326-0576 oversight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously approved. TI~AINING DIVISION If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. 5642 Victor Street Bakersfield, CA 93308 (805) 399-4697 Sincerely, FAX (805) 399-5763 Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm cc: Rev. Belluomini Cai~EPA Pete Wilson Governor January 7, 1998 State Water Resources Control Board Division of Father Ralph Belluomini Clean Water Saint Vincent De Paul Store Inc Programs 300 Baker St Bakersfield, CA 93305 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 PRE-APPROVAL OF CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS, CLAIM NO. 9910, SITE ADDRESS: 300 BAKER ST, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 2014 T Street. Suite 130 Sacramento, CA The Smith-Gutcher and Associates J~ua~Y-2, 1998 proposal totaling $'2,250 to perform a vapor 95814 survey (4 active soil vapor sample points) and prepare a report of findings is pre-approved subject to (916) 22%7748 FAX (916) 2274530 the following provisions: World \Vide Web http://wx,-,v.s,,Tcb.ca. ® The actual costs and scope ofxvork performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it to gov/--cx~phome/ remain valid. If a different scope of work becomes necessary, then you must request pre- fundhome.htm approval of costs on the ne~v scope of work. · The work products must be acceptable to the Regional Board (and/or local agency). Please remember that it is still necessary to submit the actual costs of the work as explained in the Reimbursement Request Instructions to confirm that the costs are consistent with this pre-approval before you will be reimbursed. To make this easier, insure that your consultant prepares his invoices to match the format of the original estimate, attd provides reasonable explanations for arty changes made itt the scope of work or increases itt the costs. When the invoices are submitted you must include copies of all: · subcontractor invoices, · technical reports, when available, and · applicable correspondence from the oversight agency. If you should have any questions, please contact me at (916) 227-7748. Sin, :erely, ',s DiGiorgio, P.E. ,ciate Water Resources Control Engineer --[e~ :hnical Review Unit Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund cc: Duane Smith, Smith-Gutcher and Associates <~ Howard Wines, Bakersfield Fire Department Our tnission is to preserve and enhance the qualiO' of California's water resources, and Reo'cled paper ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit 'of presem and fim~re generations. SMITH- GUTCHER Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 //~I,,-. January 2, 1998 Mr. James DiGiorgio Cai/EPA State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs .... P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, California 94244-2120 Dear Mr. DiGiorgio: I am requesting pre-approval for an active soil vapor survey at the saint Vincent De Paul Thrill Store site located at 300 Baker Street in Bakersfield, California. The underground storage tank cleanup fund claim number is 009910. I. was informed by' Mr.:Howard Wines of the Bakersfield Fire Department that obtaining three bids"to:tcomplete the~work would nOt be necessary due to cost of the work. .,..- ., : ... I understand that the vapor survey is being required to determine if there are gasoline hydrocarbons in close proximity to the foundation of the building. A risk evaluation of the gasoline containing soils was conducted by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. The results of the evaluation were that the indoor air inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible lifetime l xl0'~ exposure levels given the concentration of benzene in the soils beneath the building and that mitigation is require~ to reduce these concentrations to a permissible level. The Bakersfield Fire Department requested an assessment of whether the presence of gasoline hydrocarbons in the subsurface presents a risk of exposure through soil vapor migration to employees working within the building. This will be accomplished through the collection of soil vapor samples from a depth of 3 below the ground surface at four soil vapor sampling locations. One sampling location will be located directly above the former tank location and the other three locations will be located around the periphery of Mr. James DeGiorgio January 2, 1998 Page 2 the building foundation. An AMS soil gas vapor probe will be advanced to a depth of 3 feet at each location. Soil vapors will be extracted from that depth through pre-cleaned Teflon tubing using a vacuum pump. The vapors will be field screened using a PID meter with the concentrations recorded in a field log. The vapors also will be collected in pre-cleaned 3-liter Tedlar bags. The bags will be sealed, labeled, and held in an ice chest at 4 ° centigrade while in the field and in transit to HFA Environmental Laboratories. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated between sampling locations using a non-phosphate soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and two distilled, dei6nized water rinses. The vapor samples will be analyzed for TPH as gasoline using' EPA Method 8015 and BTXE and MTBE using EPA Method 8020. A soil vapor assessment report will be submitted to the Bakersfield Fire Department approximately one month after the completion of the work. COST ESTIMATE - SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE Soil Vapor Sampling $900.00 (4 locations at 3 feet (~ $225.00/sample location) Laboratory Analysis for TPH as Gasoline with BTXE and MTBE 260.00 (4 samples ~ $65.00/sample) Assessment Report Preparation and Project Management 1,090.00 Total Estimated Cost $2,250.00 SMITIt- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIAIES, INC. Mr. James DeGiorgio January 2, 1998 Page 3 I would like to be contacted as soon as possible as to your approval or dis-approval of the cost for the above described work. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. xO(~~ Yours truly, .~.~:~ ~'~/ DUANE R. 81VIlTH Duane R. Smith No. &581 ~ Registered Geologist State of California No. 3584 DRS/ds ~ cc: Reverend Ralph Belluomini, Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store Mr. Howard Wines, Bakersfield Fire Department C :\WPW IN60\WPDOCS~FILESXFILE$97~S VDP4 LTR SMITIt- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: '~oo ~~-- ID# Business Name: ~"J f'~? ~k~'Z+ ~~ Conta~ N~e: ~~ ~,~,~,~ ~ S~c~ ~d~ Busings Phone: ~ t~ . ~ ~ · ~ ~ 4 ~ F~: Insp~or's N~e: ~ ~ TimeofC~l: Date: 1~/,~/~ Time: ( ~ · Min: /~ Type of C~I: Incoming [ ] Outgoing ~ Returned [ ] Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: -%(::>' ~ August 21, 1997 ~ CaL/EPA ~ Wil~n Governor Father Ralph Belluomini State Water Saint Vincent De Paul Store Inc Resources 300 Baker St. Control Board Bakersfield, CA 93305 Division of Clean Water Programs PRE-APPROVAL OF CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS, CLAIM NO. 9910, SITE ADDRESS: 300 BAKER ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 944212 S~amento, CA I have reviewed your request, received on August 11, 1997, for pre-approval of corrective action costs; I 94244-2120 will place these documents in your file for future reference. I have included a copy of the "Cost Pre- 2014 T Street, Approval Request" form; please use this form in the future for requesting pre-approval of corrective Suite 130 actions costs. Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 227-4374 With the folloWing provisions, the total cost pre-approved as eligible for reimbursement for completing FAX (916)2274530 ' the investigation of the current conditions of the subsurface soils, approved by the Bakersfield Fire World wiae Web Department (Fire Department), is $2,410; see the table below for a breakdown of costs. (The total http://www, swrcb.ca. gov/-~wphome/ amount approved for payment through Request No. 1 for work at your site that has been directed and fundhome.htm approved by the Fire Department is $6,858.) Be aware thai this pre-approval does not constitute a decision on reimbursement: all reasonable and necessary corrective action costs for work directed and approved by the Fire Department will be eligible for re!mbursement per the terms of your Letter of Commitment at costs consistent with those pre-approved lin this letter. } All future costs for corrective action must be approved in writing by Fund staff. Future costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of Article 11, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations. COST PRE-APPROVAL BREAKDOWN Task Amount Pre- Comments ' Approved Laboratory 325 Five soil samples for TPHg/BTEX. Field Work 460 One soil boring to 55 feet to investigate current : condition of the subsurface soils. Report i 700 8 hr. ~ $75/hr Drilling 1250 Submit subcontractor invoices with i reimbursement request. TOTAL PRE-APPROVED $2,410 · The actua! costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it to remain valid. · The work products must be acceptable to the Regional Board. Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and Recycled Paper ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. Father Ralph Belluomini · It is my opinion that it is unnecessary to obtain three bids for this scope of work; the Fund's three : bid requirement is waived for this scdpe ofwork.:' ·If a different scope of work becomes necessary, then you must request pre-approval of costs for the new scope of work. · Although I have referred to the Smith-Gutcher & Associates proposal in my pre-approval above, please be aware that you will be entering into a private contract: the State of California cannot compel you to sign any specific contract. This letter pre-approves the costs as presented in the proposal dated August 5, 1997 by Smith-Gutcher & Associates for conducting the work approved by the Fire Department for implementing the investigation of the current conditions of the subsurface soils. I also want to remind you that the Fund's regulations require that you obtain at least three bids, or a bid waiver from Fund staff, from qualified firms for all necessary corrective action work. The legislation governing the Fund requires that the Fund assist you in procuring contractor and consultant services for corrective action. If you need assistance in contracting for corrective action services, don't hesitate to call me. Please remember that it is still necessary to submit the actual costs of the work as explained in the Reimburs6ment Request Instructions t6 confirm that the costs are consistent with this pre-approval before you will be reimbursed: To make this easier, insure that your consultant prepares his invoices to match the format of the original estimate, and provides reasonable explanations for any changes made in the scope of work or increases in the costs. When the invoices are submitted you must include copies o fall: ·subcontractor invoices, · technical reports, when available, and · applicable correspondence from the Fire Department. -'-Please call4fyou~have-anyquesfions;-I-can be reached at-(916)-2-27-4374c .............................. Sincerely, oRIGINAL SIGNED Martin Clark, Water Resource Control Engineer Technical Review Unit Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Enclosure cc: Mr. Howard Wines, Hazardous Materials Coordinator Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Bakersfield. CA 93301 Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and Recycled Paper ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT FI~C,I~F June 3, 1997 MICHAEL R. KELLY ADMINISTIIAI1VE SEI~ICES 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Duane Sinith sum~ss~on SE~CFa Smith - Gutcher 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93001 P.O. Box 60706 (805) 326-3941 FAX (ms) 095-~349 Bakerslield, CA 93 3 86-0706 ~nnons~mcts RE: Site Characterization Work Plan/bt 300 Baker Street Confirmatiol~ Boring 1715 Chester Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3951 Dear Mr. Slnilh: ,, FAX (805) 326-O516 ,,~ EN¥11~ONMENT.,~.$~:I~VlCE$This is lO notify you that the work plan lbr tile above stated address is lmO, estor^,,e, satisl'hctorv. Please tzive this office s workin,.z davs notice prior to the comnlelmement Bakersfield. CA 93301 ~ ~ ~ .. (805) 326-3979 O1' work. vAX (805) 32643576 m~a~m$1on Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct ~2 V~e~orStro~ oversight bv lhis office will not be accepted, unless previously approved Bokersflollfl, CA 93308 .... (805) 399-4697 lAX (ms) 0994?6,3 !1" you have any questions, please call me at (805) "'~ "o-,,-, Sincerely, Howard H. Wines. iil Hazardous IVlaterials Technician HHW/dlm cc: Rcverand I/elluomini State Water' Father Ralph Belluomini Resources Control Board Saint VincentDe Paul Store Inc '~ ~~ 300 Baker St Division of Bakersfield, CA 93305 Clean Water Programs PRE-APPROVAL OF CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS, CLAIM NO. 9910, Mailing Address: SITE ADDRESS: 300 BAKER ST, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 I have reviewed your request, received on July 3, 1997, for pre-approval of corrective action costs; I 2014 T Street, will place these documents in your file for future reference. I have included a copy of the "Cost Pre- Suite 130 Approval Request" form; please use this form in the future for requesting pre-approval of corrective Sacramento, CA 95~14 actions costs. (916) 227-4374 FAX (916) 227-4530 With the following provisions, the total cost pre-approved as eligible for reimbursement for completing World Wide Web the workplan for further investigation for submittal to the Bakersfield Fire Department, Environmental http://www.swrcb.ca.Services, is $350. (The total amount approved for reimbursement through Request No. 1 for work at gov/~cwphome/ ' fundhome.htm your site that has been directed and approved by the is $6,858.) and necessary corrective action costs for work directed and approved by the will be eligible for reimbursement per the terms of your Letter of Commitment at costs consistent with those pre- approved in this letter. All future costs for corrective action must be approved in writing by Fund staff. Future costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of Article II, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations. ·Once the workplan is approved by the City, please request pre-approval of costs for implementing the workplan · The' actual costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it to remain valid. · The work products must be acceptable to the Regional Board. · It is my opinion that it is unnecessary to obtain three bids for this scope of work; the Fund's three bid requirement is waived for this scope of work. · If a different scope of Work becomes necessary, then you must request pre-approval of costs for the new scope of work. · Although I have referred to the Smith Gutcher & Associates proposal in my pre-approval above, please be aware that you will be entering into a private contract: the State of California cannot compel you to sign any specific contract. Thi's letter pre-approves the costs as presented in the Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and Recycled'Paper ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. Father Ralph Belluomini Saint Vincent De Paul Store Ine -2- proposal dated June 30, 1997 by Smith Gutcher & Associates for preparing the workplan for further investigation for submittal to the Bakersfield Fire Department. I also want to remind you that the Fund's regulations require that you obtain at least three bids, or a bid waiver from Fund staff, from qualified firms for all necessary corrective action work. The legislation governing the Fund requires that the Fund assist you in procuring contractor and consultant services for corrective action. If you need assistance in contracting for corrective action services, don't hesitate to call me. Please remember that it is still necessary to submit the actual costs of the work as explained in the Reimbursement Request Instructions to confirm that the costs are consistent with this pre-approval before you will be reimbursed. To mal~e this easier, insure that your consultant prepares his invoices to match the format of the original estimate, and provides reasonable explanations for any changes made in the scope of work or increases in the costs, lYhen the invoices are submitted you must include copies o fall: · subcontractor invoices, · technical reports, when available, and · applicable correspondence from the. Please call if you have any questions; I can be reached at (916) 227-4374. Sincerely, ORIGINAL S~GNE~ ~ Martin Clark, Water Resource Control Engineer Technical Review Unit Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Enclosure cc: Mr. Howard Wines Hazardous Materials Technician Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Ave 'Bakersfield, CA 93301 ..... Mr,-Duane-R=~Smith Smith-Gutcher & Associates PO Box 60706 Bakersfield, CA 93386-0706 Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and ~7~ Recycled Paper ensure their pr~per all~cati~n and ~~cient use f~r the bene~t ~f present and futur~ generati~ns. SMITH GUTCHER , ,. ..... ' .... . i ...... /iND ASSOCIATES, INC., ~.'~ ?. '~..;,?/.!:~-:;-'~ .~7.; :.,'..'~': .i~...:~.'.~Consulting'Geologists''~ :~ ..... Post Office B. ox~. 60706 , ...... · . . . ., .(805) 87J:3207~.FAX (805) 871-3698' June 30, 1997 Mr. Martin Clark Cal/EP~ State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean_Water Programs P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, California 94244-2120 Subject: Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund, Claim No. 009910, for Saint Vincent De Paul Thrit~ Store, 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Clark: Subsequent to our phone conversation, on. June'30,~. !997, ! am:requesting pre-approval for the preparation of a workplan for'fUrther investigation of the current condmons of the subsurface soils at the Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift StO~e site.located at 300 Bake. r Street in Bakersfield, California. As you are aware, a site characte~i~.~iti0n"study'~va~; Performed a{'the site for a former underground fuel storage tank in March 1992. Gasoline contaminated soil was found from near the surface to a depth of approximately 50 feet. Benzene concentrations range from none detected to 200 rog/kg. A corrective action plan was prepared in June 1996 by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. and in OCtober 1996 a request for proposals was sent to three firms for completion of the remediation work. During the approval process you Were not able to pre-approve the remediation costs since you felt that the data may not reflect current concentrations. You requested data that represents current conditions at the site before conducting any active remediation. Mr. Howard Wines of the Bakersfield Fire Department agreed with this requirement. I discussed the required work with Mr. Wines and will prepare the work plan as soon as I receive your approval of the cost The cost to complete the work plan would be $350.00. Obtaining three Mr. Martin Clark. June 30, 1997 Page 2 bids to complete the work plan would appear to be unnecessary due to the very low cost. I would like fo request a bid waiver for this work. I woUld iike to be contacted as soon as possible as to your approval or dis-approval (verbal if possible) of the cost to prepare the work plan. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Yours truly, Duane R. Smith Registered Geologist State of California No. 3584 DRs/ds cc: ReVerend Ralph Belluomimi, Saint Vincent De Paul Thril~ Store Mr. Howard Wines, Bakersfield Fire Department C:~WPIFIN60~WPDOCSWIL~S~ILE$97~SVDP. LTR SMITH- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Post-it' Fax Note 7671 ~e 4, 1997 ~./oep~, ~ ~e ~ Ph~e S~nt V~cent l~ Pa~ St~ . Stste Wa~r 3~ B~er S~eet R~u~ B~eI4 CA 93305 ............ D~lon of C~ Wa~r D~ R~ ~lluomini: Pmgra~ PRE-APPrOVAL OF CO~WE A~ION COSTS, Ch~ No, 9910, Maili~ A~ Salt V~e~t De Paul S'to~, 300 ~aker Steer, Bake~field, CA P.O. Sa~mto, CA ~4~4~1~0 I haw ~vicw~ yo~ ~quest, received on M~ch 3, 1997, f~ pre-~proval of ~o~miw ~on ~st~; I ~11 plac~ ~e~ doc~ents m yo~ file for futm'e ref~ence. I have m~lMcd a 2014 T S~e~ ~Si~ f~m; ple~ ~ ~iS f~ in ~e ~e for requiting pre. approval of ~tive ~tion 5~i~ 130 $acr~gnto, CA ~sx~ I ~ not able at ~is time ~ pre-approve ~e ~ sub~ for ~tivc ~cdiati~ a yo~ si~. The Coneotiw (91~ 227~74 Action Plm~ (CAP) included ~ yo~ pre-approval wqu~t is b~ed on ~il anMytical ~ta ~m Jmu~ 1992. p~ (~ 16) 227-4~30 During a ~e~t eonva'safion with a r69t'emntative of ~e lead a~y, How~d Wh~ of World Wide Web; Depmmen~ it w~s ag~ ~at data wlfid~ represenks ~e c~t conditiom at ~e site is wa~mted bdore h~:/~.~. ~Muet~g active retaliation at yo~ Plea~ ~quest cost pm-approval for pr~ucing a wo~plm f~ ~¢r inwsfigai~ of~e ~eat eonditi~ of the ~b-~ soils for sub~aal ~ ~e B~ersfield Fire ~ent for appr~al. approved by B~ersfield Fire D~ent, ~e ~s~ for hnpl~g ~¢ wo~ plan are pre-approved, workpl~ is ~plememed ~d ~e c~ent ~Mitions of~e sub-s~ace soils m'e delin~ ~en a new Con'~tive Action Plm~ (C~) should ~ written. A C~ ~it~n ~ a~rdan~ wi~ ~tiele 11, ~ction 2725, Chaptm' 16, Undergomd Smra~ 'rank Regulations will detcmin, wheth~' ~iw cleanup is n~e~, ~em~in* how much ¢le~up is adequate m~d daem~ine what methods or ~mbh~ation of me~, is ~e most ~st-effeetive. All furore cosO for eorre~e a~,a mu~t be ~proved ~ Fu~e cos~ fi~r co~e~e a~n m~t m~ ~e requbem~n~ of Ar~c& 11, Cha~ter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regu~ons. I also w~t m ~d you that ~e F~'s regula~ona require ~at you obta~ at least ~e~ bids, or a bid waiver ~om F~d st~. ~om qu~ ~s for all ac~sm~ ~rre~tive a~fion w~k, F~d requires ~at ~e Fund a~ist you ~ pr~g eon~a~or ~d ~o~ul~xt ~i~s for you n~d ~y assis~ ~ con,acting for eon'~tive ~tion ~ices, don't hesitate Please call if you have ~y ~ucstions; I can be madxed at thc above n~r. Sine.ely, O~IGINAL SIGNED BY Mm~ Clark, ~CE Un&r~d Silage T~ Cleanup Fund Pro~ Enelos~ cc; Mr. ~owm'd W~, H~erdous Mat~s Speeialist B&m'sfield Fi~ D~ent by f~ (805) Mr. Mark Magargee I. Iolguin, .Fahsn, & Associates 3157 PegasusDfive Bakersfield, CA 93308 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Busings N~e: ~ ~ ~ Conta~ N~e: ~ ~'~ ~ ~'/~ ~ Business Phone: ~/G ~ . 4 ~"~- F~: Insp~or's Name: ~~ " Time of C~l: Date': ~/'c~q7 Time: /A ~'~' · Min: /0 Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing [G~ Returned [~- ~//Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: ID# . BusinesS Name: Contact Name: Business Phone: FAX: InspeCtor's Name: Time of Call: Date: Time: # Min: Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing [ ] Returned [ ] Content of Call: Actions Required: Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: , BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ,April 15, 1997 x Reverend Ralph Belluomini Saint Vincent De Paul FiRE CHIEF Bakersfield, CA 93305 ADldINI$11~TIVE SERVIC~ 2101 'H' Street Bal(ersfield. CA 93301 RE: Implementation of Corrective Action Plan (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Dear Reverend Belluomini: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H" Street Bakersfielct, CA93301 Our records indicate that your former underground storage tank site is currently subject to (805)326-3941 CorreCtive Action Requiremems under Article 11 of Title 23 California Code of Regulations FAX (805) 395-1349 concerning leaking underground tanks. ~ON SERV,CES 1715 Chester Ave. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2722(b) of Article 11, you are hereby directed to begin the Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805)326-3951 necessary work at your site within 90 calendar days fi'om the date ofthis letter. The required work FAX (805) 326-0576 shall include: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715che~or^ve. * Clean up fund pre. approval of corrective action costs for, and the installation of Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805)326-3979 seven vapor extraction wells with appropriately sized vacuum blower and FAX (805)326-0576 treatment system pursuant to the Corrective Action Plan, dated June 17, 1996 TRAINING DIVISION prepared by Holguin, Fahan & Associates. 5642 Victor Street Bakersfield, CA 93308 (805) 399.,4697 Please be aware that, pursuant to Section 2722(c) of Article 11, you are required to have an vax (ms)3~-5~ approved workplan on file with this office prior to initiation of any corrective action work. In addition, you are to provide ongoing status reports of all activities involving the progress of this case to this office every 90 days. If you have any questions regarding the provisions of this letter, please call me at 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, llI Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm State Water ReaonYt'~ ' ~. ControiBoard March 5, 1997 .) Z~ , Division of Clean Water Programs Mr. Howard Wines Mailing Adclre~: P.o. ~ox 9442~2 City of Bakersfield Fire Department Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 2014 T Street, Suite 130 Sacramento, CA ' ~5s~4 . Dear Mr. Wines: (916) 227-2784 FAX (916) 2274530 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND PROGRAM; LIST OF World Wide Web: h~p:#www.~eo.~ POSSIBLE CLOSED SITES gov/--~vphome/ fundhome, htm Please indicate below, at the fight of the site address, whether the sites have received closure from your office. Claim No. Site address Closure ~anted? 11591 101 19th Street, Bakersfield 10391 1414 E. California Ave, Bakersfield 10536 1501 E. 19th Street, Bakersfield 9910 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield 8443 601 Brundage Lane, Bakersfield 802 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield If you would like to fax your request, our fax number is (916) 227-4530. Sincerely, ~ ~k, Ahalyst Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund cc: Nancy Camacho, Closure Unit-USTCF Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of Cahfornia's water resources, and ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. Resources · Control Board FATHER RALPH BELLUO~I Division of S~_l-~ VINCENT DE PAUL STORE 1~C Clean Water 300 BAKER ST Programs BAKERSF~LD, CA 93305 Mailing Addre~: P.o. Box 9442t2 .~ UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND, CLAIM NO. 009910, FOR 942~-~n0 SITE ADDRESS~ 300 BAKER ST, BAKERSFIELD 20 ~4 T Street, s,it~ ~0 The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) is able to issue, pursuant to Sa~n'amento, CA 9~4 ' applicable regulations, the enclosed Letter of Commitment (LOC) in an amount not to (916) 227-430'/ exceed $10,000. This LOC is based upon our review of the corrective action costs you FAX (916) 227-4530 reported to have incurred to date. The LOC may be modified by the State Board. World Wide Web: ' http://www.swrcb.ca. gov/~cwphome/ It is very important that you read the terms and conditions in the LOC. The State fundhome.htm Board will take steps to withdraw this LOC after 90 calendar days from the date of , ?' this letter unless you proceed with due diligence withyour cleanup effort. ..~. " NOTE: You must also submit your first reimbursement request for the costs that you . ... reported to have incurred within 90 calendar days from the date of this letter or submit a .," .. '.- written explanation as to the status of the cleanup and when. a reimbursement request can -- ' be expected. Failure to submit a request or an approved explanation may result in the removal of committed funds. Claims filed with the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund far exceed the funding available and it is important that you make use of the funding that has been committed to your cleanup in a timely manner. You ar~reminded that you must comply with alt regulatory agency time schedules.and . requirements and you must obtain three bids for any required corrective action. Only corrective action costs required by the regulatory agency to protect human health, safety and the environment can be claimed for reimbursement. Unless waived in writing, you are required to obtain preapproval of costs for all future corrective action work (form enclosed). If you have any questions on obtaining preapproval of your costs or the three bid requirement, please call Steve Marquez, our engineer assigned to claims in your Region, at (916) 227-0746. Failure to obtain preapproval of your future costs may result in the costs not being reimbursed. i(~1~I.~ Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. ,:SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL STORE INC Page 2 The following documents needed to submit your reimbursement request are enclosed: · "Reimbursement Request Instructions" package. Retain this package for future reimbursement requests. These instructions must be followed when seeking reimbursement for corrective action costs incurred after January 1, 1988. Included in the instruction package are samples of completed reimbursement request forms and spreadsheets. · ? "Bid Summary Sheet" t°. list information on bids received which must be completed and returned. · "Certification of Non-Recovery From Other Sources" which must be returned before any reimbursements can be made. · "Reimbursement Request" forms which you must use to request reimbursement of costs incurred. ·"Spreadsheet" forms which you must use in conjunction with your reimbursement request. ·"Claimant Data Record" (Std. Form 204) which must be completed and returned with your first reimbursement request. We continuously review the status of all active claims. If you do not submit a reimbursement request or fail to proceed with due diligence with the cleanup~ we will take steps to withdraw your LOC. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed documents, please contact Pamela Rarick at (916) 227-2784. Enclosures cc: Mr. Russel Walls Mr. Howard Wines RWQCB, Reg. 5 - Fresno City of Bakersfield 3614 E. Ashlan Ave. Bakersfield City Fire Dept. Fresno, CA 93726 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd FI. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of'California's water resources, and ~ ' ensure the{r proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. LETTER OMMITMENT FOR REIMBUR,~i~ENT OF COSTS CLAIM NO: 009910 AMENDMENT NO: 0 CLAIMANT: SAINT VINCENTDE PAUL STOREINC BALANCE FORWARD: 0 CO-PAYEE: NONE THIS AMOUNT: $10,000 JOINT CLAIMANT: NONE NEW BALANCE: $10,000 FATHER RALPH BELLUOMINI CLAIMANT ADDRESS: 300BAKER ST BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 TAX ID/SSA NO: 9~1678938 Sqbj.ect to ~vailability of funds, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agrees to reimburse SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL STORE INC (Claimant) for eligible corrective action costs at SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL STORE 300 BAKER ST, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 (Site). ~The commitment reflected by this Letter is subject to all of the following terms and conditions: 1. Reimbursement shall not exceed $10,000 unless this amount is subsequently modified in writing by an amended Letter of Commitment. 2. The obligation to pay any sum under this Letter of Commitment is contingent upon availability of funds. In the event that sufficient funds are not available for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the SWRCB, the sWRcB shall not be obligated to make any disbursements hereunder. If any disbursements otherwise due under this Letter of Commitment are deferred because of unavailability of funds, such disbursements will promptly be made when suffTcient funds do become available. Nothing herein sh~.ll be construed to provide the Claimant with a right of priority for disbursement over any other claimant who has a similar Letter of Commitment. 3. All costs for which reimbursement is sought must be eligible for reimbursement and the Claimant must be the person entitled to reimbursement thereof. 4. Claimant must at all times be in compliance with all applicable state laws, rules and regulations and with all terms, conditions, and commitments contained in the Claimant's Application and any supporting documents or in any payment requests submitted by the Claimant. 5. No disbursement under this Letter of Commitment will be made except upon receipt of acceptable Standard Form Payment Requests duly executed by or on behalf of the Claimant. All Payment Requests must be executed by the Claimant or a duly authorized representative who has been approved by the Division of Clean Water Programs. 6.Any and 'all disbursements payable under this Letter of Commitment may be withheld if the Claimant is not in compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 5 above. 7. Neither this Letter of Commitment nor any right thereunder is assignable by the Claimant without the written consent of the SWRCB. In the event of any such assignment, the rights of the assignee shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth in this Letter of Commitment and the SWRCB's consent. 8.This Letter of Commitment may be withdrawn at any time by the SWRCB if completion of corrective action is not performed with reasonable diligence. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Letter of Commitment has been issued by the SWRCB this 1st day of November, ~996. STATE W ' RESOURCES CON OL BOARD GIL$?>ll~ CODING: B~ f esso - 5~9.oz - 30530 ~Mana*~, ~id~r6~d'~to~age T~nk Cleanup Fund Program Chief, Division Administrative Services ~:~t~ SMITH- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.' .q .q · c., :::. ~, .;. ,:~ ~. :.,,,;~4 -: .... Consult/n_ .Geolo_is. ts.;..' ': Post Office Box 60706 ....,.., "' ' RECEIVE~ (805) 871-3207 FAX (,805) 871-3698. ,. NovemberT, 1996 :~ ", ',.:, ' ~q0¥ 1 2 1996 H^Z. MAT. DIV, Mr. Howard Wines Bakersfield City Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Mr. Wines: I recently received your letter, dated October 28, 1996, to Reverend Ralph Belluomini at the Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store (SVDP).. As you are aware, the latter was to inform the SVDP that the remediation needs be done in a timely maqner. I recently completed and sent request for proposals to three firms for completion of the remediation wo, rk. I asked that the request for proposals be returned to Smith-Gutcher and Associates by~ NOv~mb:et'3 I!:' i996.- I also completed a USTCF letter .'-. ~ , ', , L; , . · ...: of commitment data sheet and returfie.d; ~the 'data'sheet to .SWRCB. As you may be aware, SB 562 (Thompson) states that SVDP cannot be forced to conduct assessment/remediation activities until a letter of commitment has been issued by the USTCF and all such activities are pre-approved by the USTCF. This exemption is available to organizations that do not have the financial ability to conduct the activates without funding by the USTCF. It would -b~ a major financial hardship on SVDP to have to start paying for the remediation work prior to knowing that there will be timely reimbursements by the USTCF. At this time I would like to request that the deadline for implementation of the remediation work be delayed until a letter of commitment has been issued and the costs are pe-approved by the USTCF. Mr. Howard Wines November 7, 1996 Page 2 If you have any question, please feel free to call. .. Yours truly, Duane R. Smith Registered Geologist State of California No. 3584 DRS/DS ........ cc: Reverend Ralph Belluomini, Saint Vincent De Paul C:~It7'llTN601II'T'DOCSIFILES'VrlLES961SI'DP. LTR SMITH- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES,. INC. BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT MICHAEL R. KELLY October 28, 1996. 2101 "H'Street Bc~e~;I. CA 93301 (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 39~-!349 Father Ralph Belloumini SUPRON SERVICES 21Ol-~-~eet St. YJncent De Paul ~.c^~33Ol 300 Baker Street (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Bakersfield, Ca 93305 ~,nON S~W~ RE: Corrective Action at 300 Baker Street 1715 Cheste~ Ave. Ba~ersfielcl. CA 93301 (8O5) 326-3951 · FAX (805) 326-0576 Dear Father Ralph: E.~mNum~sEw.:U The intent of this letter is to inform you of the necessary deadlines for 1715 Chester Ave. ~.~e~a. c^ ~3301 work required at the property described above. As a responsible party for (805) 32b-397~ FAX(~) 32~0S7~ a leaking underground tank, you were previously sent a letter from this office on July 30, 1996 notifying you of the required work necessary to remediate ~uN~.Go~$1o. the contamination. We are now requesting that this work, as previously ,5542 Victor Street ~e~a.c^~3~ indicated, be done in a timely manner. (805) 3gq-a697 FAX (805) 39q-5763 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me immediately at 805-326-3979. Sincerely, Howard ~. Wines, Ill Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm cc: Ralph Huey, Haz-Mat Coordinator M. Magargee, HFA BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT July 30, 1996 Mr. Mark Magargee mE CHIEF Holguin, Fahan & Associates MICHAEL E. KELLY 3157 Pegasus Ddve ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Bakersfield, CA 93308 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN, SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 STOR E, ~0~.BAKER-STR'EET---~ SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Magargee: 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 32b-3941 This is to notify you that the work plan for the above stated address is satisfactory. FAX (805) 395-1349 Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of work." PREVENTION SERVICES This office concurs with the following findings and recommendations stated in the pJan: i 715 Chester Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805)326-3951 !. Benzene concentrations ranging from 2 to 200 mg/kg are known to extend FAX (805) 32b-0576 beneath the southwest corner of the Thdft Store building. The indoor air inhalation pathway exceeds the permissible exposure level for commercial use ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (based upon ASTM Standard E-1739) given the concentration of benzene in the 1715 Chester Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301 soils. (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326-0576 2. In-situ vapor extramion is the cost-effective alternative which is protemive of the health of the current occupants of the building. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Street Bakersfield, CA 93308 3. A pilot-scale well field consisting of seven vapor extraction wells will be installed (805) 3(~-4697 FAX (805)399-5763 as described in the plan. Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct oversight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously approved. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Since, rely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/d!m cc: Reverend Ralph Belluomini Duane R. Smith, RG State ~)f California Memorandum TO: Mr. Howard Wines BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT FROM : Pamela Rarick, Analysl~ UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD SUBJECT ; Claims Review Listed below are two claims [hat I would like to review at your office for permit, corrective action compliance, etc. I have tentatively scheduled my review for Thursday, August 15, 1996. Please let me know if you are available on this day~ for any questions I may have regarding compliance. Thank you for your assistance and if you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 227-2784. Claim No. Site Name Si'1;e Address 9910 , Saint Vincent De Paul Store 300 Baker St., Bakersfield 10536 ~ San Joaquin Roofing Co. 1501 E. 19th St,, Bakersfield RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: ~ d~O (~..[<:c/- ID# Business Name: Contact Name: /-~-~ ~~ Business Phone: ~ FAX: (. InspeCtor's Name: ~ Time of Call: Date: / Z//~//~- Time: / ~' c>c~ # Min: ~ Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing-~ Returned [ ] Content of Call: /~.,,'o_/(' ~-~ .Jro ~ ~-<../~,~ ~"~--- ~-~p/~_.~ Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: /~ St. Vincent de Paul 300 BAKER STREET BAKF. RSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93305 ~' November 20, 1995 Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician City of Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Howard Wines, III: In response to your letter of October 24, 1995 we have contacted an environmental firm to do a workplan and will submit it to you as soon as they present it to us. S inc er ely, FIRE SAFETY SERVICES & OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 CHESTER AVE, · BAKERSFIELD, CA · 93301 i~.E. HUEY R.B. TOBIAS, HAZ-MAT COORDINATOR FIRE MARSHAL (805) 326-3979 (805) 326-3951 November 13, 1995 Ms. Lydia Bracco, Team Leader Region 5 Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund State Water Resources Control Board P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, Ca 94244 RE: Claim #9910, St. Vincent De Paul, 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, Ca. Dear Ms. Bracco: On behalf of the claimant, I am forwarding the tax information (enclosed) that should support processing the claim as "Priority B". I hope you will concur with the Priority lB upgrade and issue' the appropriate notification to the claimant at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, / Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm enclosure cc: Father Ralph Belluomini INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING RETURN OF ORGANIZATION EXEMPT FROM INCOME TAX FORM 990 St. Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. YEAR ENDED December 31, 1994 SIGNATURE: One copy of the return should be signed and dated by an authorized officer, and the title of the officer should be entered. A duplicate copy of the return is attached for your files. The return, as you know, was prepared by data made available to but not audited by us. Before executing this return, you should review the information reported thereon to determine that there are no omissions or misstatements of material facts. SU14NARY OF TAX: Form 990 Tax Due $ .00 Overpayment: Refund' Apply to next year's return TOTAL $ .00 The signed .return should be mailed in the enclosed envelope in time to reach its destination, no later than Auq. 15, 1995. We suggest that the return be sent by registered or certified mail with the sender's receipt postmarked to prove th.e gJ~Tc~of R. RANDAll., RIC~,coA~S~ ACC0,I'TNTANT~ CERTIFIEI~ PUBLIC AC ",.. 2001 F STREET, BAlClUlsFn~.I~, CA 911301 (1105) ~27-0204 FAX ~ Under sectio, 5Ol,c, of the Internal ,avenue Cod~e.~):~.b~j~c~[~'g b;4ef,`I ®94 trust or private foundation) or section 4947(a)(1) noneK'erffpt~hb~itable ~d~st Thl, Form is . . Department of t~e TreaSury Open to Public lnle*nal Revenue Service Note: The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satis[y state reporting requirements. Inspection A For the 1994 calendar year, OR tax year period b,e~innin~! ,1994, and ending , 19 B Check if: P¼.~ C Name of organization .D Employer Identification number [] Change of address label o~, , [] Initial tatum pdnt er Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address)l Room/suite E State registration number [] Final return See . [] Amended mt~m" Specific Cit3,, town. or post office, state, and ZIP code · Ins'cue- :? F Check - [] if exemption applJcatio~ State reporting) · is pending G Type of organization---~- [~ Exempt under section 501(c)( ..~ ) · (insert number) OR · [] section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Note: Sect/on 501(c)(3) e'xempt organizations'and 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitab/e trusts MUST attach a comp/eted Schedu/e A (Form 990). H(a) Is this a group return filed for affil!~tes?...' , ' .': .. .. ., . .. . , [] yes [~ No ' I If either box in H is checked "Yes," ante/' four-cligit group exemption number (GEN) · ..... ..~..,/..~ ............. (C) ~s' ~his'~ ~;~te ~tu~'fim~ b~' an 0rgan~aiio" covered by a group ruling? [] Yes [] 'No [] Other (specify) ~. K Check._.hem I~..D .!f.½he o_____~rgan_!za:tion:s gr?s .r.ec_e!p?..a?e normally not more than $25,000. The organization need not file a return with the IRS; but if it received a Form 990 Package in the mail, it should file a return without financial data. Some ~tatee require a complete return. Note: Form 990-EZ may be used by organizations w/th gross receipts/es~ than S100,000 and tota/ assets /ess than $250,000 at end of year. ~'T~I Statement of Revenue.~ Expenses~, , and Chan~es., in Net Assets or Fund Balances I Contributions, gifts, grants and sim lar amounts race ved: ' ~/.x/~ .. ' ' - ................ ~a' ~ O0 ' a uirect public support ............. / · ~x,x~] ' .. · b ndire pub,;=.SUpp ; ' . · :'...'."...' ....... -'. '-.' .' ' .' ' c Government contributions (grants) ........ lc ~/~//~ ..... d Tota, (ad~ I~n'as ~;, t,roug, ~c)(a. ach Sc~;e~u~e--~ee inStru'~tions) ~/××××~ .._ (cash: $: ...... ~7~ O -. nq~cash $" .~ .) .... ~... .......... --~l-d-- ~-- Pro~r;m se~vic;'revenue including g0vemment fees and co.tra~ts (~om Pa. V, ,ne 9~i 2 I .~ q '7 ,~ ~ / '3 .... MemberShip ~;Je-~'and ~ssessrnent, (see in~t-ructions)' . . . ; ....... ' 3 ........ a h investments ' 4 ~,~.._~ . :: . . 4 .Interest oq_sav[.ngs.and temp.orary c s ' . ................. 4 .... 5 Dividends and interest from securities ......... . ...... 5 sa 'Gro re.t ." . '..'..' ..... '.'.'... ,,, "' - . .. :.. ...-::::: '_ .... - · 6b ' b. Less:..rent. al .expense~ ...... _. ................ I I ' ....... ~/./_///,'/~ ." :_ ~.':~_ ..... c Net rental income or (loss) (su~:l:~:a'(~t~ 6b fr-0r~'-Iine ~a) . ; '. ; . . . :.' . . 6c { .... 7 Other investment income (describe · · - - ) 7 - I ' (A) Se~unt es (B) Other Gro "amount from sa e of assets other ' " i ' ' '.' ~ than inventory .''.' . . .... . . .I ' 8a ! . . ~/~/,///z/j . ~' b Less:'~:o'st ~roth'e~'basis a~d sale~-expenses.' i 8b "· "~' '. : . '. c Gain ~r (lo~s) (attach schedule) ....... I ' 8c I - ~//"~//~ - d Net gain or (loss) (combine line 8c. columns (A) and (B))...... ..... · ...... 8..d...J 9 Special events and activities (attact~ schedule--see instructions): a Gro~s revenue (not including $ ': ' " of .' . a"''/////~'///'~//~ :' 'Contributions reported on line la) ......... 9 .~ . b Less: direct expenses other than fundraising expenses . I 9b I i~/_~'4 ........... ¢ Net income or (loss) from special events (subtract line 9b from line ga) ..... I..9..c..J 10a Gross sales of invento iess returns and al owances ' . 10al ~////~/~//'/,~ . ........ ry ............. ~.////~ ................... .. b Less: cost of goods sold ............ [ 10b ] i~ ...... c Gross prot-rt or (loss) from sales of inventory (attach schedule) (subtract line .10b from line 10a). 10c I .. _ 11 Other revenue (from PartVll line103) . . . ;: . ..... . 11 12 Total revenue (add lines ~ d, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6c,"7,'Sd~ gc,'10c, andl"l).' : . . . : .". 12I ~'0,'~'c~ ~ - 13 P~ogram Services (from'iir~e 44, column.(R~see instructions) ........... 13 ~ 14 Management and general (from line.44, column (C}-Ts. es instructions) ..... 14 ~ 15 Fundraising (from line 44, column (D)---see instructions) ............ 15 ,,x, 16 Payments to affiliates (attach schedule--see instructions). . - . ~ ...... 16 17 Total expenses (add lines 16and44, column(A)) . '.. ......... 17 I '~ ~"] -~('~--% r I n from hne 12 18 (' ~'#'..~ ~ ..~ " 18 EXcess or (deficit) for the year (subt act i e 17 · ) ......... 18 ~ '~ 19 Net assets or fund balances at beginning of year (from line 74, column (A)) ' 19 ~ 20 Other changes in net assets or fund balances (attach explanation). ~"r.r~.cT: l: : 20 ~' 21 Net assets or fund balances at end of year (combine lines 18, 19. and 20) ..... 21 For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 1 of the separate instructior~. Cat. No. 11282Y Form 990 (1994) ~.-"~ 1,171 Form 990 (1994) { Page ~ Statement of AJi organizations must complete column (A). Columns (B), (C), and (D) are required for section 501(c)(3) and (4) Functional Expenses organizations and section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trusts but optional for ethers. (See instructions.) 6b, 8b, 9b, I Ob, or 16 of Part I. services and general 23 ... Specific zssistance to individuzls (attach schedule) 23 24 Benefits paid to or for members (attach schedule). 24 , 25. Compensation of officers, directors, etc.. 25 .. · 26 Other salaries and wages ....... 26 /3~, ~' ~. /3~! ~'~';;),, ' ' 27 Pension plan contributions . . .. , . ,' 27 28 Other employee benefits 28 31 Accounting fees ' - 31 34 Telephone . .., : ........ 34 ' ' 35 - Postage and shipping ........ 35 36 Occupancy ' 36 ,~, ,,~O~ ' ~-0,' ,~0 ,~ 37 .. Equipment. rental and maintenance .... 37 ~ ~'~ ~' ! ~'c/' ~' 38 Printing and publications ....... 38 39 Travel ......... . ... . . 39 -. 40 Conferences, conventions, and meetings. 40 .... '. 41 Interest ............ . . 41 42 Depreciation, depletion, etc. (attach schedule) 42 c e '~ , 43e, coml~letingc~lumns(B)-(O),c~rrfthesetotalstolines13.15 . 44 C~ ,~L~ 5 , ~?~' ;Sql Reporting of Joint Costs.--Did you report in column (B) (Program servic'~s) any joint costs from a"combined ' educational campaign and fundraising solicitation? ..... · ....... ' . . ·. . ." ;:" , . · ' [] Yes [~ No If "Yes," enter {i) the aggregate amount of these joint costs $ ; (i~ the amount allocated to Program services $ (iii) the amount allocated to Management and ~eneral $ ; and (iv) the amount allocated to Fundraisin~ $ I=,~f'~llll Statement of Program Service Accomplishments (See instructions.) What is the organization's primary exempt purpose? · ............ : ............................ ; ............... ; ........ Program Service Expenses All organizations must describe their exempt purpose achievements. State the' number of clients served, {Re~uir~llorSOl(c){3)and publications issued, etc. Discuss achievements that are not measurable. (Section 501(c)(3) and (4) organizations tnJst~. ~ut o{)tional Ior and 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trusts must also enter the amount of grants and allocations to others.) (Grants and allocations $ ) (Grants and allocations $ ) e Other pro,ram services (attach schedule) (Grants and allocations $ ' ) f Total of Program Service Expenses (should equal line 44, column (B), ProCram services) ..... · ,.~ 1,172 Form 990 (1S94) Page...'2- ~ Balance sheets` 'Note: Where required, attached'sbhedules ~nd ~mou~¥ts within the description (A) . (B) · column should be for end-of-yea~ amounts only. Beginning of year End of year Assets 45 Cash~0n-interest-bearing .... ~O[ 'J L~2 ' 45 3~, .,.~3 ~'' 46 Savings and temporary cash investments ........... 5 t ~' ) '~........46 ':" ~'~ ~'/,~ ' 47a Accounts receivable .... :47a .......... b *Less: allowance f0r;"d0ubtful ~(Jc'~(jnt~ *~' "."' ." 47b 48a Pledges receivable ........................... 48a b Less: allowance for doubtful accounts . . .* ,48b , , 48cl - 49 Grants receivable '* : ' 49 50 Receivables'~J~e f~n"officers,-;d'ir~ct°~"s-,* tr[J~t~es, ~nd key_e, mp[0~/ees .. ~ .. ' ':'"'r(attach schedule)' ~;--';'--~" .. '. ."'.' '." . ~ "." .'"; . ...... 50 51a Othernotes and loans'receivable (attach'schedule) 51a · b Less: allowance for doubtful ac~:ounts ' . . . [ 51 b 52 Inventories for Sale'or use ....... .' . 53 Prepaid expenses and defen'ed 'charges ............ 53 54 '" Investments~secudties (attach sch'edule) ........... 54 55a Investments--I~r~d,"buildings, and equipment: basis . . ~'';.-~ '~'~' ."." .'~"... 55a ,, '"b 'Less: acc~mulate(J'~l~prec~ati~n'(attach ., ~ .- . schedule) 55b 55c 56 Investments--'°the'r (attach sche~lule). .' .......... 56 57a 'Land~'buildings,"and-eq~iP~ent: basis' . .' ']' 57a ' b'Less:'accumulated dePreciation (att'a~:h schedule) 57b ' " 58 Other assets (describe · ...... ) 58 .59 Total assets (add lines'45 throuc~h 58) (must equal line 75) ' .~' / Liabilities 60 Accounts payable land accrued expenses .... . ..... . ..... :.~.. ~,, L//'7 / ' '7.7/.5. 61 .- Grants'Payable .... - ............... .. 61 62 Support and rev_en.ue des!gnated for future pe~odS (attach schedule) . . 62 63 'Loans from officers, directors, trustees, and key employees (attach schedule). 63 64a Tax-exempt bond liabilities (attach schedule) ..... ~j~ .... ~, 64a b Mortgages and other notes payabie (attach schedule) , 65 Other liabilities (describe · ) 65 ee Total llabilittes (add lines 60 throu~h 65) ~ . .' ........ ~,/~/ Fund Balances or Net Assets Organizations that use fund accounting,· check here I~ [] and complete, lines 67 through 70 and lines 74 and 75 (see instructions). . 67a Current unrestricted fUn'd .... ' ...... ' ' ' ' 67a ' '" b Current restricted fund ............ ,. 67b 68--Land, b~iidings, and equipment fund . .. ..... , . .' .' . . Ii!~ ' 68 69 69 Endowment fund ..... ; .......... . ..... 70 "Other funds (describe I~, ..................... ) 70 Organizations that do not use fund accounting, check here · [] and · ' complete lines 71 through 75'(see instructions). .._ 71 Capital stock or trust-pddciP'~l .... ...... 71 72 Paid-in or capitai'sdrplbs-7..-'i-.'.. '~ ' ~ . '. ~ . .' . . .' . . . 72 73 Retained earnings or accumulated income ..... '. ' ..... 74 Total fund balances·(~r' net assets (add lines 67a through 70 OR lines 71 ~ ,' "- through 73; column (A) must equal line 19 and column (B) must equal '/////~ 75 Total liabiliUes and fund balances/net assets (add lines 66 and Form 990 is available for public inspection and, for some people, serves as the primary or sole source of information about a particular organization. How the public perceives an organization in such cases may be determined by the information presented on its return. Therefore, please make sure the return is complete and accurate and fully describes the organization's programs and accomplishments. 1,173 Form 990 (1994) Page· 4 · ~ L[st of Officers, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees (List each one even if not compensated; see instructions.) (B) T'd:le and average hours per (C) Compensation (01 ~iom to {~ Expense (if not paid, enter empk~fee benei'~t plans & account and other (A) Name and address week devoted to posit/on -0-) dden~ co~pemation allowances Did any officer, director, trustee, or key employee receive aggregate compensation of more than $100,000 from your organization and all related organizations, of which more than $10,000 was provided by the related organizations?. ~. ' [] ~es [~o If "Yes," attach schedulc see instructions. I~b'T'JiTJl Other Information ryes No 76 Did the organization engage in any activity not previously reported to the IRS? If "Yes," attach a detailed description 0f each acti?ity. 76 ' 77 Were any changes made in the organizing or governing documents, but not repo~ted to the IRS? 77 - .If "Yes," attach a conformed copy of the changes· " 78a Did the organization have unrelated business gross income of $1,000 or more during the year covered b'y'this i:etu~'n? 78a I,/" b If "Yes," has it filed a tax return on Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax'Return, for this year? 78b 79 Was there a liquidation, dissolution, termination, or substantial contraction dudng the year? If "Yes,' att3ch a smement; see instructions. 79 BOa Is the organization related (other than by association with a statewide or nationwide organization) through common membership, governing bodies, trustees, officers, etc., to any other ex§m_pt or nonexempt organization? (See instructions.) 80a · . ................................................... and check whether it is exempt OR [] nonexempt. ~la Enter the amount of political expenditures, direct or indirect, as described in the instructions . 181a I ,t~ O N~_.~/- b Did the organization file Form 1120-POL, U.S. Income Tax Return for Certain Political Organizations, for this year? .. 81b " I,/ ~2a Did the organization receive donated services or the use of materials, equ~PD3ent, or facilities at no charge .- or at substantially less than fair rental value? DF¢~(-~G..-e' bL/.I .e-,c'GT'~7/7'2~ '+' j~c./,.~,u4q~tqT,.~ -,-' 82a ~" ' ' b If Yes, you may indicate the value of these items~ere.~)o not inc~'~e t~is amount as ' revenue in Part I or a.s an expense in Part II. (See instructions for reporting in Part III.), 182b I k,..... ~3.. Did the organization comply with the public inspection requirements for returns and eXemption applications? 83' ~4a Did the organization solicit any contributions or gifts that were not tax deductible? ........ 84a b If "Yes," did the organization include with'every solicitation an express statement that such contHbut'ions or gifts were not tax deductible? (See General Instruction M.) "' 84b ~5 Section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6) organ~zations.--a Were substantially all dues nondeductible by members? ..... 85a b Did the organization make only in-house lobbying expenditures of $2,000 or less? " ! 85b /V I/~ Iwf ~iYv:~'; t° either 85a °r 85b' d° n°t c°mplete 85c thr°ugh 85h bel°w unless the °rganizati°n received a ' e or proxy tax owed for the prior year. - . - - - . ....... ';. c Dues, assessments, and similar amounts from members ' . 85c I /k/!~ d Section .... 162(e) lobbying and poli't,cal expenditures . ............. .......... 85d /'q / R. e Aggregate nondeductible amount of section 6033(e)(1)(A) dues notices . . 85e ./NII/A 1' Taxable amount of lobbying and political expenditures (line 85d less 85e' See instn~cfi~n;) ' ~ 85f /"q J ~ g Does the organization elect to pay the-section 6033(e) tax on the amount in 85f?, ~ . . . ; . ,' . 85g , h If section 6033(e)(1)(A) dues notices were sent, does the organization agree to add the amount in 85f to its reasonable · _ estimate of dues allocable to nondeductible lobbying and political expenditures for the following tax year? - · 85h b Gross receipts, included on line 12, for public use of club facilities (See instructions.) 86b · /~J (r~ ~. ~. ~.~. ~. ~."'~. ,, ~7 SecfionSOl(c)(12)organizations.--Enter:aOrossincomefrommembersorshareholders 87a /~///~ b Gross income from'other sources. (D~) not net amounts due or paid to other sources : ' '/~,~ .... . against amounts due or. received from them.) ......... ' .... .. 87b I' ' .... /~/I'/' 1' ~8 At any time during the year, did the organization own a 50% or greater interest in a taxable corporation 0~: oartnershio? If "Yes." comolete Part IX . 88 89 Public interest/aw firms. Attach information described in the instructions. 90 LJst the states with which a copy of_this return is filed · .... ~...L:.L..~....~..~..J .~....:~.' ................... 92 Section 4947¢a)(f)'nonexempt ch¢ta~le trusts tiling Form 990 in lieu o! Form ~041, U.S. ~ncome Tax Return for Estates and Ttust~, check here · [] and enter the amount of tax--exem~t interest received or accrued during the t~ year. · · I 92 I /',///~ Form cjg0 (1994') Page ~;h"~T/.I! Analysis of Incom~-'roducing Activities Enter gross amounts unless otherwise Unrelated business income Exclucled by section 512, 513, or 514 ~ Re~ated or exempt indicated. (A) (B) (C) (D) function income Business code Amount Exclusion code Amount (See instructions.) 93 Program service revenue: c .d e g Fees and contracts from government agencies 94 Membership dues and assessments 95 Interest on savings and temporary cash investments / 5/ ..2~.~ ..- 96 Dividends and interest from securities . 97 Net rental income or (loss) from real estate: ~/~//~/~ ~/~//.~/~~ ~//~'~/~ ~/'x~.~/. a debt-financed-property b not debt-financed property 98 Net rental income or (10ss) from personal property 99 Other investment income ....... 100 Gain or (loss) from'sales of assets other than invento~j 101 Net income or (loss)' from special events 102. Gross prof'~ or (loss)from sales of inventory . 103 Other revenue: a ~'HSu(~,~ C~- (2..~F'ct,~ /~ ~_// - b /~,5F ~&--be--P<3,5~T c ~xkSC._ · ?'75'- d .e 104 Subtotal (add columns (B), (D), and (E')) ~//'~._~/~'~'~'~/. I~) ~//'/~//~//~__~/,/~/~ ..3, o~, .~ ,=~ ~z~, ~)~.~ 105 Total (add line-104 columns (B), (D), and (E)) ............ ' . ,' . . I~' ~ ~0..-~ , ~ Note: (LJne 105 plus line ld, Part I, should equal the amount on line 12, Part I.) ' ~" ~r.b-TaA~Jlll Relationship of Activities to the Accomplishment of Exempt Purposes .: Line No. Explain how each activity for which income is reportbcl in column (E) of Part VII contributed importantly to the accomplishment ~ of the organiz3tion's exempt purposes (other than by providing funds for such purposes). (See instructions.) I;h"Tiill~31 Information Regarding Taxable Subsidiaries (Complete this Part if the "Yes" box on line 88 is checked.) Name, address, and employer identification Percentage of Nature of Total End-of-year number of corpora~on or partnership ownership interest business activities - income assets Unde~ penalties of perjury. I declare that I have exarruned this return, including accoml~arrying schedules and statements..and to t~.e best of my please k~ow~e and belief, it is true. correct, and complete. Declaration of prepare' (oti'le4' than office~) is based on all infom3atJon of wrdch preparer has Sign . ~. ~ow~,~je. Here Signature of office¢ Dam Tit~e Pre~s ~[~ I Dare Checl< if , Preparer's social security no. self- ~'~). · usePreparer'S0nly youmFirm's name (orif serf-employed) ~-~. ~ N~---.~ L,[,-, ~'~ ~C ~l°~d~_,,~, ,4q' i~t CC.~. ~'/~ C, E.I. No. ~ T' (~.'jl~ J Z P code · ~ ~.-~ 0 / and actress ,~OC) J F ~.~,~,~-/~.5 ~ 1,175 SCHEDULE A Or al llnization Exempt Under Secti lt501(c)(3) oM8 No. 545- 7 (Form 99~)) (Except Prtvate Foundation), and Section 501(e), 501(f~, 501(k), or Section 4947{a)(1)Nonexempt Charitable Trust .... Supplementary Information Department of ~e Trea~,~ry InternaJ Revem,~ ~ic~ · MUSt be completed by the above organizations and attached to their Form 990 (or 990-EZ}. Name o f the organization Employer Identtflcat~on nurnb,~ ~ Compensation of the Five Highest Paid Employees Other Than Officers, Directors, and Trustees (See instructions.) (list each one. If there are none, enter "None.'3 (d) Con~butions to (e) Expense (a) Name and address of each en'~31oyee paJd more (b) Title and average houm (c) Compe~sati¢m employee benef~ I~lans & account and other than $50,000 per week devoted to position deferred compensation allowances .~.--.... ~... .................... ...--~ ....................... , Total number of other employees paid 'over .,. $50,000 . . .-.. , . . .. , .. . , · .... ' ~ Compensation of the Five Highest Paid Independent Contractors for Professional Services (See instructions.) (List each one (whether individuals or firms.) (if there are none, enter "None.'3 (a) Name and ad~mss ~f each indeP~:~ent contractor paid more than .$.50~0..00 ....... {b) Type of service .. (c) Compensation ...... -... :.':..' .... '.'- ..... -.-.2..'. .......................................................... .: ~. ............ ___ ........... · ...... · ..... :" .......... :"::'"'-:-":"-:'" ' '" ' """ Total number of others receiving over ,$50,000 for professional services . . . ... .... · ~ Statements AboUt Activities No I Durir~g the year, has the organization attempted to influence national, state, or local legislation, including any attempt to influence public opinion on a legislative matter or referendum? ...... :.' . . . If "Yes,' enter the total expenses paid or incurred in connection with 'the lobbying activities.' · '$ //~ ON ~-'""' Organizations that made an election under section 501(h) by filing Form 5768 must complete Part VI-A. Other organizations checking 'Yes," must complete Part VI-B AND attach a statement giving a detailed description of the lobbying act~v~as. . 2 ' During the year, has the organization, either directly or indirecth/, engaged'in a~y'of the following acts with any of its trustees, directors, officers, creators, key employees, or members of their families, or with any taxable organization with which any such person is affiliated as an officer, director, trustee, m;~jority owner, or principal beneficiary: a Sale, exchange, or lea.sing of pr~3perb/? ....... . ......... b Lending of money or other extension of credit? ...... _.. . ~.. d Payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of exp~nses if mo-re"than $1,0o0)? e Transfer of any part of its income or assets? ...................... ! If the answer to any question is 'Yes," attach a detailed statement exp[nining the transactions. "- .... 3 Does the organization make grants for scholarships, fellowships, student loans, etc.? ......... 4 Attach a statement explaining how the organization determines that individuals or organizations receivin, or loans from it in furtherance of its charitable programs qualify to receive payments. (See instructions.) For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page I of the Inst]'ucflons to Form 990 (or Form.990-EZ}. Cat. No. 11285F Schedule A (Form 9~O) t994 ~2/~4~ 1,193 Scheclul~ ~, (Form;990) 1994 Page 2 ~;~t,~ Reason for Non-Private Foundation Status (See instructions for definitions.) The organization is nora private foundation because it is (please check only ONE applicable box): 5 [] A church, convention of churches, or association of churches. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(~. I 6 [] A school. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(iq. (Also complete Part V, page 3.) ~'-. 7 [] A hospital or a cooperative hospital service organization. Section 170(b)(1)(AXiii). 8 [] A Federal, state, or local government or governmental unit. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(v). 9 [] A medical research organization operated in conjunction with a hospital. Section 170(b)(1)(A)0i~. Enter the hospital's name, city, and state · ......... ' ...................... 10 ' [] An organization operated for the benefit of a college or university owned or operated by a governmental unit. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). (Also complete the Support Schedule below.I 11a [] An organization that normally receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or from the general public. .-- Section 170(b)(1)(AXvQ.. (Also complete the Support Schedule below.) ..................... 11b [] A community trust. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(v~. (Also complete the Support Schedule below.) 12 [] An organization that normally receives: (a) no more than 331/$% of its support from'gross inv6stment'in'come and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses acquired by the organization after June 30; 1975, and (b) more than 33%% of its support from contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from activities related to its charitable, etC., functions--subject to certain exceptions. See section 509(a)(2). (Also complete the Support Schedule below.) 13 - [] An organization that is not controlled by any disqualified persons (other than foundation managers) and supports 6rganizations described in: (1) lines 5 through 12 above; or (2) section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6), if they meet the test of section 509(a)(2)~ (See section 509(a)(3).) Provide the following information about the supported organizations. (See instructions for: Part IV, line 13.) .:: ,. .- (a) Name(s) Of s~i3ported'or~anization(s) ............ '" .... J -' ' .... ' ' ' from above 14 [] An organization organized and operated to test for public safety. Section 509(a)(4). (See insb'uctions.) ......... Supp~rtscheduIe(c~mp~ete~n~yify~uch~~kedab~x~n~~ne~~.11~~r~12ab~v~~)usecash~~neth~d~f~cc~unt~ng~ ......... Note: You may use the worksheet in the instructions for convertinc' from the accrual to the cash method of accountin~l.' Calendar yea~ (or.fiscal.Year_beginning in) . · .... (a) 1993 (13) 1992 -- (c) 1991 '-i -- (cl) 1990 -' I-~ (e) Total ' 15 Gifts. grants, and contributions received. (Do .............................................. .' '-' ..... not include unusual grants. See line 28.) ..... . ~;O . ' -- 16 Membership fees received ......." .- .' 1~ Gross. receipts .. from _ admissions, . ........... '" ' . ........................ merchandise sold or services performed, or furnishing of facilities in any activity that is not a business unrelated to the organization's 18 Gross income from interest, dividends, amounts ...................................... . received from payments on secudtias loans -.'. '- _ · (section 512(a)(5)), rents, royalties, and unrelated business 'taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesse~ acquired by 19 . Net' income from - unrelated business .... 20 Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit · and either paid to it or expended on its behalf 21 . The value of services or facilities ~urnished to the : .... --. " ' organ~tion by a governmental unit without charge.· : ..- .. '"' ' ·" 0o not include the value 0t services or f~cilitie$ .-. . 9ener~ll~ furnished to the public without charge... ' ' 22-Other-income. Attach a schedule. Do' not- '' : .... ....... 23 Totaloflines15through22 ...... 2~? $11 2'5? frO? 9,3~ ?.~H 93ff OfftL 'I 26 Organizations described in lines 10 or 11: ' -" ' a Enter 2% of amount in column (e), line 24 ...... : ............. - · .' · /NJ//dj. b Attach a list (which is not open to public inspection) showing the name of and amount contributed by each person .... (other than a govemmentaJ unit or publicly supported organization) whose total gifts for 1990 through 1993 exceeded the amount shown in line 26a. Enter the sum of all these excess amounts here ....... · (Support Schedule continued on page 3) ~ ~ ~:he<:lu~ A'(Ferrn 990) 1994 Page 3 ~ Support Schedule (continued) (Complete only if you checked a box on line 10, 11, or 12.) " 27' Organizations described on line 12: ~'T/'~'~' a Attach a list, for amounts shown on lines 15, 16, and17, to show the name of, and total amounts received in each year from, each ~- "disqualified person." Enter the sum of such amounts for each year:, . b .Attach a list to show, for 1990 through 1993, the name (~f, and amount included in line 17 for, each person (other than a "disqualified ..... person') from whom the organization received, dudng that year, an amount that was more than the larger of (1) the amount on line 25 for the year or (3) $5,000. Include organizations described in lines 5 through 11, as well as individuals. After computing the difference between the amount received ~nd the larger amount described in (1) or (2), enter the sum of all these differences (the excess amounts) for each~j~_ :.'.~- 28 For an organization'~escdbed in line· 10, 11, or 121 treat received any unusual grants during i990 through 1993, attach a list (which. is not open to public inspection) for each year showing the name of the contributor, the date and amount of th,~gr n!,. and: a brief description of the nature of the grant. Do not include these grants in line 15. (See instructions.) ~.~T/3~ '7' ~ - Private School Questionnaire (To be completed ONLY by schools that checked the box on line 6 in Part IV) /~.. -' :~i'..- 29Does the organization have.a racially nondiscriminatory pollcy toward students by statement in its charter, bylaws, other governing instrument, or in a resolution of its governing body? ............... 30 Does the organization include a statement of its racially nondiscriminatory policy toward students in all its brochures, catalogues, and other wdtten communications with the public dealing with student admissions, - ' * programs;'and scholarships? .::: '. ...... '. .' ' ~' . . .' ............. 31 Has the organization publicized its racially nondiscriminatory policy through newspaper or broadcast media during the pedod of solicitation for students, or dudng the registration pedod if it has no solicitation program, in a way that makes the policy known to ail Parts of the general community it serves?.:' . ' . .............. ' If 'Yes,' please describe[ if 'No," please explain. (If ~/0u need more space, attach a separate statement.) 32 ' Does the organization maintain the following: .............................................................. a Records indicating the racial composition of the student body, faculty, and administrative staff? ..... ' b Records documenting that scholarship,s and other financial essistanc~ are awarded on a'racially nondis'cri~'inatory '- c Copies of all catalogues, brochures,-'announcements,' and other written communications to the public dealing with student admissions, programs, and scholarships? ................. . .... '. d Copies of all material used by the organization or 0n its behalf to Solicit contributions? ..... .... If you answered "No' to any of the above, please explain. (if you need' more space, attach a separate statement.). 33 - Does the organization discriminate by race in any way with respect to: .. .... a Students' dghts or privileges?. ' b "Ad--ions policies? ................................................. - · c Em~oyment of faculty or administrative staff? . , ,~ ......... ; . .-;' .' . ..... d Scholarships or other financial assistance? (See instructions.) ................. f Use of facilities? g Athletic programs?'". ;' . '..,:: , .''. . ; ...................... h Other extracurricular activities? '~- "; .~ ;. '. ." .' . . '. ~ '. . . ~ .... ...... '~'.' . .. ..... If you answered 'Yes' to any of the above, please explain. (If you need more space, attach a separate statement.) ....£~ '.' ..... ~-~_.~.~_.~.~ ...... ~ ......................................................... ; ............................... 34a Does the organization receive any financial aid or assistance from a governmental agency? ....... b Has the organization's dght to such aid ever been revoked or suspended? ............ If you answered "Yes' to either 34a or b, please explain using an attached statement. 35Does the organization certify that it has complied with the applicable requirements of sections 4.01 through 4.05 of Rev. Proc. 75-50, 1975-2 C.B. 587, covering racial nondiscrimination? If "No,' attach an ex See instructions for Part V. ~e~ 1,195 Schedule_ A (Fon'n~ 9<:J0) 1994 Page ~ Lobbying Expenditures by Electing Public Charities (See instructions.) //~ (To be completed ONLY by an eligible organization that filed Form 5768) Chock here I~ a [] If the organization belongs to an affiliated group (see instructions). Check here I,. b [] If you checked a and "limited control" provisions apply (see instructions). " (a) (b) .. Limits on Lobbying Expenditures .. Affiliated group To be completed · ' tot~ls for ALL electing ('rhe term "expenditures" means amounts paid or incurred) organLzaUons 38 Total lobbying expenditures to influence public opinion (grassroots lobbying) . .' -.=..*'. 37 TotaJ lobbying expenditures to influence a legislativ,e body (direct lobbying) ." . · '.":'." . 38 ' Total lobbying expenditures (add lines 36 and 37) ....... 39 Other exempt purpose expenditures (see Part VI-A instructions) ........ 40 'Total exempt purpose expenditures (add lines 38 and 39) (see instructions) ." ."* ." . .' 41 "Lobbying nontaxable amount. Enter the amqunt from t. he, following tab~c '~' if the amount on line 40 is-- * : ' ' The lobbying nontaxable amount 'is--: ..... Not over $500,000. **-: . .'--~.:':*'~'"L j20% of the*am0unt on line 40 "~---:.'*-.:': ..: *.; 1" Over $500,000 but not over $1,000,000.... $100,000 plus 15% of,the excess over.$500,~]00 ' Over $1,0043,000 but not over $1,500,000 - 7 $175,000 plus 10% of the excess over $1,000,000 *l Over $1,500,000 but not over $17,000,000. $225,000 plus 5% of the excess over $1,500,000 / Over $17,000,000 .... :. ; , . $1,000,000, : .......... ' . 42 ' Grassroots nontaxable amount (enter 25% of line 41) ............ 43 i,.Subtract line 42 from line 36. Enter -0- if line 42 is m0'r'e than line* 36 ......... ' - ': '*' ' 44 · Subtract line 41 from line 38, Ente~"-o-'if line 41 is more than line 38 Caution: 1:7lo Form 4720 if there is an amount on either line 43 or fine 44. · ': ' "' ..... a-Year Averaging PeriOd Under Section 501{h) · ~ :,.:,?-: · (Some organizations that made a seCtion 501(h) ~lection do not have to complete all o{ th~ five columns below. · ..+ ,.. ' '.: .-L.. See the instructions for lines 45 through 50.) '" ''=" ......... ~*' ....... ..... ' * '"~*: :* "".'"i, '" LobbYing. E.xpen~iture~ Dafi~lg 4-Year Averaging Period ..... Calendar year (Or' - ........ ' ..... (a) .......... 03) ....... "" (c) ......... (cl) ......... (e) ' -:. fiscal year beginning in) · .- ...... ...... '--1994 ....... 1993 .......... 1992 ......... : 1S91 ........... Total '- ~ Lobbying , nontaxable amount (see ................................................ . ins,t~'uctions) . . : . , .. ;' ..:~ ;....: ;,- ?,:.....:: ... ::... ':.::,.:. ;' .. ~ · ::...,..,.i.~-'_..-.~:::~.~. .~....~.~ ,.:: -. ............ . · 6 Lobbying ,ceilirtg amount (150% of line 45(e)) ~///~ ~/'//~ '" ' :' ~.. .'.:. . .... : · -..'.' - : .;,. ,.... -.. . '... ........ . ~7 __ Total lobbying expenditures (see instructions) · · ~'::;';'" '- '- ..... --" ' ': : ' -" '-" ' ' ': ' :'" ~8 .. Grassroots '. nontaxable amount (see -' -'- ..... · · ' .............. . . ~ . " instructions)' .................. ::'"""' ' .' '" .-, ~ .' ........ : ' ' 50 Grassroots "lobbying expenditures (see · '- ' ...... ' ' '"'" .... ; .... " ' ~ instructions) ....... .. .., :"- -' · "' " · ' ' ~ .' Lobbying Activity by Nonelecting Public Charities ' ..... (For reporting by organizations that did not complete Part VI-A) ' '~'::'"/~/",_ , '~:"':-" .... ' "" ' ':' During the year,'did the organization attempt to'influence national, state or local legislation, including any !Yea No Amount ~ttempt to influence public opinion on a legislative matter or referendum, through the L~se of: a .-' Volunteers' ~ ; .... ' ...... ' ......... '. . . ....... b - Paid staff or management (include compe.nsation in expenses reported on lines c through h) . ..:.;~. . _ .. ~//////////////////~ c-.. Media advertisements " ' ' .... ' ' . . d ~ ' Mailings t0'memb~rs,' legislators,' or the public ..... ' e Publications. or published or broadcast statements' ' ' ....... f . Grants to other organizations for lobbying purposes ................. · Direct contact with legislators, their staffs, government officials, or a legislative body ...... g h Rallies, demonstrations, seminam, conventions, speeches, lectures, or any other me~ns ...... i Total lobbying expenditures (add lines c through h) ................ ~ If 'Yes' to any of the above, also attach a statement giving a detailed description of the lobbying activities. SchedUle A (Form 990) 1994 Pa?e ~ Information Regarding Transfers To and Transactions and Relationships With Noncharitable Exempt Organizations 51 Did the reporting organization directly or indirectly engage in any of the following with any other organization described in section 50,1(c) of the Code (other than section 501(c)(3) organizations) or in section 527, relating to political organizations? a Transfers from the reporting organization to a noncha~itable exempt organization of: Ye~ No (i] Cash .................... ... ........... 51a~ (ii] Other assets . ............. - ................ b Other transactions: - ·" .... (i] Sales of assets to a nonchadtable exempt organization .... (ii] Purchases of assets from a noncharitable exempt organization .............. b(ii') (iii] Rental of facilities or equipment ........................ b(iii) ~" (iv) Reimbursement'arrangements ........................ b{iv) .~.~' (v) Loans or loan guarantees . ......................... b(v} (vi] 'Performance of services or membership.or fundraising solicitations b(vl] c Sharing of facilities, equipment, mailing lists, other assets, or paid employees ........... c d If the answer to any of the above is "Yes," complete the following schedule. Column (b) should always show the fair market vaJue of the goods, other assets, 'or services given by the reporting organization. If the organization, received less than fair market value in any transaction or sharing an'angement, show in column (d) the value of the go<3ds, other assets, or services received. (a) ~) (c) . Line no. Amount involved · Name of nonchadtable exempt organization Description of transfers, transactions, and sharing a~rangements 52a Is the organization directly or indirectly affiliated with, or related to, one or more tax-exempt organizations ' ' described in section 501(c) of the Code (other than section 501(c)(3)) or in section 527? ....... [] Yes ~ No' b tf 'Yes,' complete the following schedule. · . (a) (b) (c) · Name o~ organization Type of organization Description of relationship ST. VINCENT DE PAUL STORE INC. 95-1853364 STATEMENT 1-PART I, LINE 20-OTHER CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES $29,459'~REPRESENTS'THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF DONATED SALVAGE FROM THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE. STATEMENT 2-PART III-PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS CLOTHING, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, FURNITIIRE, BEDDING, 29,460 ETC. GIVEN TO THE POOR AND NEEDY (3,928 PERSONS) FOOD BASKETS GIVEN TO THE POOR AND NEEDY (250 PERSONS) 810 CASH ASSISTANCE GIVEN TO THE POOR AND NEEDY 2,724 (133 PERSONS) 32,994 STATEMENT 3-PART IV, LINE 64-MORTGAGES AND OTHER NOTES PAYABLE MORTGAGE PAYABLE-DELANO STORE BUILDING 43,508 MORTGAGE PAYABLE-TEHACHAPI STORE 141,761 185,269 STATEMENT 4-PART V-OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND TRUSTEES (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) FR. RALPH BELLUOMINI PRESIDENT & BAKERSFIELD, CA DIRECTOR 0 0 0 HOWARD D. COLLINS SECRETARY & BAKERSFIELD, CA DIRECTOR 0 0 0 RITA PARAGRUE TREASURER & BAKERSFIELD, CA DIRECTOR 0 0 0 ' OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS SERVE MINIMAL HOURS WITHOUT COMPENSATION; THEREFORE, NO RECORDS ARE KEPT OF THEIR TIME. ST. VINCENT DE PAUL STORE INC. 95-1853364 STATEMENT 5-PART VIII-RELATIONSHIP OF ACTIVITIES TO EXEMPT PURPOSES LINE NO. EXPLANATION 93 THE SALES THAT GENERATE THE INCOME FROM THE SALVAGE OPERATIONS OF DONATED GOODS ARE THE VERY ESSENCE OF THIS CORPORATION'S EXEMPT PURPOSES BY PROVIDING THE RESOURCES WHICH ARE USED SOLELY IN HELPING THE POOR AND THE NEEDY THROUGHOUT THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD AREA. STATEMENT 6-SCHED A, PART III, LINE 2(C) A MODEST AMOUNT OF OFFICE SPACE IS FURNISHED TO CATHOLIC CHARITIES, INC. AT NO COST TO THEM. STATEMENT 7-SCHED A, PART III, LINE 4~/ APPROXIMATELY 80% OF DISTRIBUTIONS WENT TO THE pOOR AND NEEDY, MOST OF WHOM WERE REFERRALS FROM' THE KERN COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT AND THE OTHERS FROM PRIVATE AGENCIES; THE OTHER 20% WENT TO RECOGNIZED CHARITIES FOR SIMILAR PURPOSES. STATEMENT 8-SCHED A, PART IV, LINE 27 CONTRIBUTION FROM DISQUALIFIED PERSON: MRS. PETER BELLOUMINI 2,000 STATEMENT 9-SCHED A, PART IV, LINE 28 UNUSUAL GRANT RECEIVED FROM 'THE ESTATE OF MARY ABRUNS IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,988 RECEIVED IN 1993. BEQUEST MADE AS PER THE,. WILL OF MARY ABRUNS. ~-' ~ 'J'* ... ~,. App tion for Extension of Time File ,:¢ ',l:'¢ertain Excise, Income, Information, and Other Returns oMeN°. ¢ ' ..~. *~._ ~pires 5-31-95 ,¢~,t0~,~,1 ~ ~[~ ~ File a separate application for each return. ~ - Name Emp oyar idanlilicati0~ num:ar please ~pe or ST. VZNCEN~ DePAU~ S~ORE, ZNC. 95 ! 1853364 print. ~e the oH9inal and one Number an~ s~reet (or P.O. Pox no. ~f ma~l is not deliver~ to s~r~t a~dress) ApL Or suite copy by the due C/O R. RANDA~ RZC~ARDSON ACCOUN~AN~ ZNC. date for ~ling ~ourretum. ~e 2001 ~ ins~cfio~ on C[~, town or ~st office, state, and ZiP code. For a foreign addre~, s~ ins~ons. ~c~. BA~gRSFZg~D, CA 93301 Note: Corporate ;ncome t~ return file~ must use Form 7~ to request an extension of time to file. Pa~ne~hips, REMICs, and t~sts (except those filing Form 990-~ must use Form 8736 to request an extension of time to file. I An extension of time until ...~~..~ ........... 19 ~.~ ...... is requested to file (check only one): ~ Fo~ 706GS~) ~ Fo~ 990-T (401(a) or 408(a) t~st) ~ Fo~ ]042-S ~ Fo~ 6069 ~ Fo~ 8831 ~ Fo~ 706GS~ ~ Fo~ 990-T (trust ot~er th~ above) ~ Form 1120-ND (4951 t~) ~ Fo~ 8612 ~ Fo~ 990 or 990:~ ~ .Ec~ 1041 (~t~)~ee~st~Q~).--.~~2~-. -~--F~ 86~3 ~ Fo~ 990-BL ~ Fo~ 1~1-A ~ Form 4720 ~ Fo~ 8725 ~ Fo~ 990-PF ~ Fo~ 1042 ~ Form 5227 ~ Fo~ 8804 If the organization does not have an office or place of business in the United States, check this box ...... 2aFor calendar year 19 94 or other t~ year beginning ............. and ending .bIf this t~ year is for le~ than 12 months, check reason: ~ Initial ~eturn ~ Final return ~ Change in accounting pedod 3 Has an extension of time to file been previously granted for this t~ yea~ ............ ~ Yes ~ No 4 S~te in detail why you need the extension ...... .~.~.~....~.~._~.Q~...~.~.~.~.~..~.~...~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. ............... ........... ................................ A~ALkAE~.~...A%..~L~..._~[ ~.E...TO_.E~.~.F....~.~F....gg.~.g~., ................................................... ...................... X .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5a If this fo~ ~ for Fo~ 706G~D), 706GS~, 990-BL 99~PF, 990-T, 1041 (estate), 1042, 1120-ND, 4720, 6069, 0. 0 0 8612, 8613, 8725, 88~, or 8831, enter the tentative t~, less any nonrefundable cr~s. S~ instm~ions. S b If this fo~ is for Fo~ 990-PE 990-T, 1041 (estate), 1042, or 8804, enter any refund~le credits and estimat~ t~ payments made. Include any pdor year ove~ayment allowed as a credit ..... S .c Balance due. Subt~ct line 5b from line 5a. Include your payment with this form, or deposit with ~D cou0on if r~uimQ. S~ inst~ctions. ' S 0.0 0 Signature and Verification UnC~ ~i~ of peq~, I d~ that I have ~n~ t~is fo~ in~g a~om~ ~ ~d s:==e~m, ~d to ~e b~t of ~ ~ge it is ~e, co~, and ~mplete: ~ ~at I ~ a~onz~ to prep~e ~ fo~ Signa,ure /' ~ -~-~ ~ n,~e ~ CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCT. Oate> 5/15/95 FILE ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY. T~IRS will show below whether or not your application is approv~ and will return ~e copy. N~We to Applicant--To Be Completed by the IRS e HAVE approv~ your application. Please aRach this form to your return. ~ We HAVE NOT approved your application. However, we have 9~anted a 1OTday grace pedod from the later of the date shown below or the due date of your return ¢ncluding ~y pdor extensions). ~is grace pedod is considered to be a vslid extension 9~[ for elections othe~ise requir~ to be made on a timely return. Ple~e a~ach this form to your return. an extension of ~~e"~e not g~nting the lO-day g~ce period.~ _ . ~We cannot consider your applica~on b~ause it was fil~ after the due dste of the return for.~~extenSion was raquested. AUS $ 5 1995 If you ~nt a ~ ct ~is fo~ to ~ re~m~ to an addre~ o~ ~ ~at s~ a~ve. ¢1~ en[~ the add~ to which the cooy should be ~e ~ea~ 1 ~. :own or ~ o~ce. s~ate, aha ~P coce. For a fcr~ a~r~. s~ For Paperwor~ Reduction Act Notice, see back of form. 301 Cat. ,wa. 119768 Form 2758 RETURN OF ORGANIZATION EXEMPT FROM INCOME TAX FORM 990 St. Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. YEAR ENDED December 3J.~ :1.994 SIGNATURE: One copy of the return should be signed and dated by. an authorized officer, and the title of the officer should be · entered. A duplicate copy of the return is attached for your files. The return, as you know, was prepared by data made available to but not audited by us. Before executing this return, you should review the information reported thereon to determine that there are no omissions or misstatements of material facts. SUMMARY OF TAX: Form 990 Tax Due $ .00 Overpayment: Refund Apply to next year's return TOTAL $ .00 FILING: .. The signed return should be mailed in the enclosed envelope in time to reach its destination, no later than Aug. 15, 1995. We suggest that the return be sent by registered or certified mail with the sender's receipt postmarked to prove th~e~9~of mailing. R. RANDA L mc ARDSON, ACCOUNTANT, INC. CERTIFI~ PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT "'.. / 2001 F STREET, BA~.D, CA 93301 (g059 ~L17-0204 FAX (110S) 32'~i0144 JJj OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990 Retu of Organization Exempt Under section 501(c)of the Internal Revenue Code~xe,~! ~ust or private foundation) or section 4947(a)(1) ndn~e~ This Fo~ Oep~men{ o~ the Tre~u~ O~n to Public Internal R~enue ~ice Note: ~e org~ization may have to use a copy of this tatum to satis~ state mponing requirements. Inspe~on A For the 1994 calendar year, OR tax year period be~innin~ ,1994, and ending , 19 B Ch~k if: p~ C Na~ of o~anization D Employer Identification number ~ Cha~e of ~adr~s ~1 or ,, ~ Fi~l return~ Initial return pflnt~.~o, Number~ooand .... str.t~ ~'K~(°r P.O. ~x if mail~,is not ~eli~er, ~o....~t. addr~)Jl R~su~te E. ~'/~ ~'~G --"State regl~flon number In~¢-~ ~ F Ch~k ~ - ~ ~ exemption appli~tior S~te re~ing) / is peking G T~e of organizafio~ ~ ~empt under s~tion 501(c)( ~ } ~ Onse~ numar) OR ~ ~ s~tion 4947(a)(1) nonexempt chaH~ble trust Note: S~tion ~1(c)~) exempt oGanizations'and ~7(~)(1) nonexempt chagtable INlJl MU~r ~J~h ~ ~omploJ~d ~h~dul~ A (Fo~ ~), H(a) Is this a g~op ~m ~1~ for affiliates?... ,'..' .'~ .... . ....... ~ Yes ~ No ' I If eider ~x in H is ch~k~ "Yes." entg four~igil group exemp~on number (GE~ ~ ..... ~. J~ ............. J A~ounting method: ~ Cash,-'- ~ A~al -" (c) Is' Jhis'~ ~te ~/UM'fil~ b~ an 0~an~aJJon cowr~ ~y a group mli~? ~ Yes ~ ~o ~ O~ (s~) ~ .. K Ch~.he~ ~.~ .~}he o~aq~za~ion,.s gr?~ [~]p~ .am nervily ~t mom man $25.~. ~e organRatJon n~ not file a r~Jum with the IRS; ~ut il ~ r~eiv~ a Fo~ g~O ~c~ge in the ~il, it shou~ fil~ a ~tum without financi~ data. Some ~eJ r~ulre a compJltl tatum. Not~: fo~ ~J0-~ may ~ u$~ by org~ization$ wi~ gross mceipts le~ than ~,000 ~d tot~ assets less than $250,000 at end of year. J~JJ .. Statement of Revenuer Expensest and Chan~es in Net Assets or Fund Balances ! . Contdbmiogs,.gi~s, gran~s,.~od simila(a~ounts received: a Direct public.suppo~_ . . ............. _ ........ b Indirem public.suppo~ ............. . ..... .. c Government contributions (grants) ................ .... d Total (ad~.~ines.~ a throggh 1.c) (a2ach schedul~ee instructions) . .- O O. .2 program.~ewi~? Leyenuejncludi~g govemment~ees and contracts (from Pa~ VII, line 93) ~ g ~,~ 3 Membemhippues and assessments (see inst~mions) .... .; ....... 4 Interest o~.sav[ogs .and temppra~ cash investments 5 Dividends ~d interest from securities 6a Gro~ rents ................ J ~ J " . ..: .... ...::::..~. .. b Less: rental expenses ..... · ........ ~ 6b J · -'. c Net rental income or (Ioss) (subtract line 6b from line 6a) . ; '. . . . . :.- . . ' '. ~ 7 ~her jnves~ent income (describe ~ . - == ~) S~udties (B) Other = ~ Gro~ amount from sale of assets other ~ than invento~ .. ~ ~ ~ ....... .' . ..~ ..... ..'-:_..' . , ...... b Le~: corn 0y other basis and s~les expenses.= 8b '. c Gain or (1o~) (a~ach schedule) ...... d Net gain or goss) (combine line 8c, columns (A} and (B))- . ..-.. ...... ' .... 9 Special events and activities (a~ach schedul~see inst~io~): a .Gross revenue (not including $ ': 'of b Less: direm expenses other than.fundraising expenses[ Jgb ............ c Net income or (loss) from.special events (subtram line 9b from line 9a) ..... 10a ..Gross sales 0f. iqvento~, less returns.an.d.a[lo~anges' ". . . J i0a ................. :.. _ b Le~: cost of goods sold J l0b ........ c Gross pro~R or 0o~) from sales of.invento~ (a~ach s~ule) (sub~m ~ne 10b from line 10a). 11 ~her revenue (from Pa~ VII, line 103) · 12 Total revenue (add lines ~ d, 2, 3,'4, 5, 6c, 7, ed, 9c, 10c, and 11) - ~ ~ 0 13 P~gram sewices (from'line 44, column. (B~see inst~mions) .......... ~ 14 Management and general (from line.44 column (C~ee inst~ons) ..... ~ 15 Fundraising (from line 44, column (D~see inst~mions) ............ ~ 16 Payments to affiliates (a~ach schedul~see inst~ons) ' ' 17 To~l ex.rises (add lines 16 and 44, column (A)) ............ ~ 18 ~ce~ or (deficit) for the year (subtract line 17 from line 12) ......... ~ 19 Net assets or fund balances at beginning of year (from line 74, column (A)) ~ ~ 20 ~her changes in net assets or fund balances (a~ach explan~on). ~ ]I] ~ ~ ~ z 21 Net assets or fund balances at end of ~ear ~combine lines 18, 19. ~d 20) ..... ~ For Pape~ork Redu~on Act Notice, see page I of the sepa~te inst~ctio~ Cat. No. 11282Y Fo~ ~90 (1994) ,~ 1,171 Form cjgo {~.9cJ4) Page ~ Statement of AJI organizations must complete column (A). Columns (B), (C), and (D) are required for section 501(c)(3) and (4) Functional Expenses organizations and section 4947(a)(1} nonexempt charitable trusts but optional for others. (See instructions.) Do not include amounts reported on line ~ (A) Total (e) Program I (C) Management 6b, 8b, 9b, lob, or 16 of Part L,/,//,///~ servicesI and general (D) Fundraising 24 Benefits paid to or for members (attach schedule). 24 ~,~~!;_;,~, 25. Compensation of officers, directors, etc.. 25 26 Othersalades andwages ....... 26 13L~ ~ 1'3q, 3'3':2. .. 27 Pension plan contributions ' 27 28 Other employee benefits ....... 28 31 Accounting fees -. 31 - 34 Telephone . , .. ; ........ 34 "' 35 . Postage and shipping ' 35 36 Occupancy .. .......... 36 /1' ~ ''~ 0 ~ ' ~. 0 ,~ {3 ~ 37 .. Equipment. rental and maintenance .... 37 . ~ ~'~ ~ ' ~ ~'~'~' 38 Pdnting and publications ....... 38 40 Conferences, conventions, and meetings. 40 .... ' 41 Interest ............ . . 41 · · 42 Depreciation, depletion, etc. (attach schedule) 42 e '~ , 43e 44 Total fun~o~al ezpenses (add r~es 22 th'ouch 43) Organizations ..... ....' -',~. Reporting of Joint Costs.---Did you report in column (B) (Program servic'&s) any joint costs from a"combined ' educational campaign and fundraising solicitation? ..... · ....... ' . . ·. . .: :[" . ·. · · [] Yes [~ No if "Yes." enter (i) the aggregate amount of these joint costs $ ; (i~ the amount allocated to Program services $. (iii) the amount ailocated t,o Management and C~eneral $ ; and (iv) the amount allocated to Fundraisin~ $ J:b'Titlll Statement ot' Pro~lram Service Accomplishments (See instructions.) What is the organization's pdmary exempt purpose? ·- ........... ; ............................ ; ............... : ........ Program Service Expenses All organizations must describe their exempt purpose achievements. State the number of clients sewed, P,~luir~t0rS01(c){3) publications issued, etc. Discuss achievements that are not measurable. (Section 501(c)(3) and (4) organizations (4) or~$.. trust~, but ol~tional lor and 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trusts must also enter the amount of grants and allocations to others.) o~ners.) (Grants and allocations $ ) (Grants and allocations $ ) · e Other program services (attach schedule) (Grants and allocations $ ' ) f Total of Program Service Expenses (should equal line 44, column (B), Proc~ram services) ..... · 1,172 Form 990 (1994) Page- ~ Balance sheets. 'Note: Where required, artached'sbhedules Md ~moun'ts within the description (A) (B) ' co/umn shou/d be for end-of-yea~ amounts only. Beginning of year End of year Assets 45 C~sh--n0n-interest-bearing ..... .~Ol,'J ~q~ ~')-~ ........45 .... ~,.~,.~ ~" 46 Savings and temporary cash investments ........... 46 ':' ~',. ~'/,~ '- 47a Accounts receivable ........ 47a b Less: allowance f0~"d0ubtful ~C'6bnt~ '~ -.'- .'- 47b ' ' 48a Pledges receivable ..................... 48a .... b Less: allowance for doubtful accounts 48b 48c 49 Grants receivable : '-. . . '.' . .. '.: . · .......... 49 50 Receivables'~e f~n"0fficers,'~ir~ct0~s-,' tr~t~es, ~nd'keY_empi.~jees .. . ~ .. ...... r(attach schedule)' ~--'7-'7' ...." '.' '." . ~ "." .'"; ....... 50 51a. Other notes and loans' receivable (attach Schedule) J 51a J ' · b Less: allowance foe doubtful accounts ' . . . "J 51bi 51c 52 Inventodesforsale'oruse ........ . T ..... .' ' 53 Prepaid expenses and defe'r~ed Charges ............ 53 54 '" Investments~secudties '(attach sch'edule) ........... 54 55a Investments~l~nd,"buildings, and equipment: basis ........ ~ ......... 55a -- .- .b -Less: accbmulated" ~prec~ati0n '(attach schedule) .... 55b 55c 56 . Investments'--°the'r (attach sche;du{e). .' ............ 56 57a 'Landi' buildingS,"an~ -eqaiPment: basis' . .' '~' J 57a J z/'7 ~ c~ c/O - ~ .. "b Less:iaccumulateddePreciati0n_(att'a(?hschedule) 157b1..'...'.. 58 Other assets (describe ·' ) 58 59 Total assets (add lines 45 throuc, lh 58)/must equal line 75) ' · Liabilities 60 Accounts payable 'and accru, ed_~.expenses .... . ........... 61 "Grants 'payable ................... . 61 62 Support and reven.ue des!gnated f0~' future Ped°dS (attach schedule) . . . 62 63 'Loans from officers, directors, trustees, and key employees (attach schedule). 63 64a Tax-exempt bond liabilities (attach. schedule) ..... r"/~ ..... 64a . b Mortgages and other notes payable (attach schedule) . ~,~'7-~..'7r.,_~ 65 Other liabilities (describe · '" ) 65 66 Total llabilities (add lines 60 throu~lh 65) : . .' ........ o~./~ r~3-~' 66 / ~.,2)1// et'Z-// ., Fund Balances or Net Assets . Organizations that use fund accounting, check here ~- [] and complete lines 67 through 70 and lines 74 and 75 (see instructions). . ... . 67a Current unrestricted fUn'd ..... ' ...... 67a b Current 'restricted fund ............. 67b 68-'Land, b~iidings, and equipment fund .......... ' . . . 68 69 Endowment fund ..... ; .......... . ..... 69 70 ' Other funds (describe I~ ......................... ) 70 Organizations that do not use fund accounting, check here · [] and ~ - · complete lines 71 through 75'(see instructions).~///~//~/ .._ 71 Capital stock or trust-prir~ciP-~J 'i ............... 71 72 Paid-in or capitaJ-s0rplbs-7~'!'.'.. '~ ' ~ . '. ~ . .' . . .' 72 73 Retained earnings or ac~:urnulated income . . '. ~ . '. ' .' .... ~,,,3,~4¢O 73 ?),,~5. ~.~. 74 Total fund balances'~)r'net assets (add lines 67a through 70 OR lines 71 through 73; column {A) must equal line 19 and column (B) must equal 75 Total liabilities and fund balances/net assets (add lines 66 and 7~.} . Form 990 is available for public inspection and, for some people, serves as the primary or sole source of information about a particular organization. How the public perceives an organization in such cases may be determined by the information presented on its return. Therefore~ please make sure the return is complete and accurate and fully describes the organization's programs and accomplishments. '' 12/'14~94 1,173 i Form 990 (1994) Page' 4 :]T~T~r~ List of Officers, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees (List each one even if not compensated; see instructions.) (C) Compensation ID) e--,a'r~b~ to (E) Expense (e) T~le ancl average hours per Of not paid, enter I em~3y~ ba3el'l~ plans & account and other (A) Name and acldress week devoted 1o position -0-) defer~d com,~'~,ation allowances Did any officer, director, trustee, or key employee receive aggregate compensation of more than $100,000 from your organization and ail related organizations, of which more than $10,000 was provided by the related organizations?. · ' [] Yes [~o If "Yes," attach schedu~c see instructions. " I~%'T~a,~l! Other Information No 76 Did the organization engage in any activity not previously reported to the IRS? If "Yes," attach a detailed descdpti0n 0t each actNity. 77 Were any changes made in the organizing or governing documents, but not reported to the IRS? . .If '"Yes," attach a conformed copy of the changes. 78a Did the organization have unrelated business gross income of $1,000 or more during the year covered bY'this ~etu'rn? b If "Yes," has it filed a tax return on Form gg0-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax ·Return, for this year? 79 Was there a liquidation, dissolution, termination, or substantial contraction dudng the year? If "Yes,' attach a statement;, see instructions. 8Oa Is the organization related (other than by association with a statewide or nationwide organization) through common membership, governing bodies, trustees, officers, etc., to any other exgm_pt or nonexempt organization? (See instructions.) b If "Yes," enter the name of the organization · .~/./'q ........... ~..i~.~ .... ~.~'.~.'...~. ' .................................................... and check whether it is [] exempt OR [] nonexempt. 81a. Enter the amount of political expenditures, direct or indirect, as described in the instructions . b Did the organization file Form 1120-POL, U.S. Income Tax Return for Certain Political Organizations, for this y. ear? 82a Did the organization receive donated services or the use of materials, ecluiDment, or facilities at no charge b If Yes," you may indicate the value of these items~ere.~Do not include t~is amount as " f revenue in Part I Or as an expense in Part lt. (See instructions for reporting in Part III.). J 82b J ~" "' 83.. Did the organization comply with the public inspection requirements for returns and exemption applications? 84a Did the organization solicit any contributions or gifts that were not tax deductible? ........ b If "Yes?' did the organization include with' every solicitation an express statement that such contributions or gifts were not tax deductible? (See General Instruction M.) ............ 'i. ' · 85 Section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6) organ~.ations.--a Were substantially all dues nondeductible by members? .... b Did the organization make only in-house lobbying expenditures of $2,000 or less? ........ If "Yes" to either 85a or 85b, do not complete 85c through 85h below unless the organization received a waiver for proxy tax owed for the prior year. d Section 162{e) lobbying and political expenditures ............I t85d /',/J/A e Aggregate nondeductible amount of section 6033(e)(1)(A) dues notices .... .. 8,5e /',J i ~ f Taxable amount of lobbying and political expenditures (line 85d less 85e; See instructions) . 8.5f fXJ i ~ g Does the organization elect to pay the.section 6033(e) tax on the amount in 85f?. ~ . . . : . .' . h If section 6033(e)(1)(A) dues notices were sent, does the organization agree to add the amount in 85f to its reasonable :: . _ estimate of dues allocable to nondeductible lobbying and poiitical expenditures for the following tax year? 86 Section 501(c)(7) organizatfons.~Enter: a Initiation fees and capital'contdbutions included on line 12 . . '.. ~. ' '; '~." . . b Gross receipts, included on line 12, for public use of club facilities (See instructions.) 87 Section 501(c)(12) organ/zaEons.~Entec .a Gross income from members or shareholders b Gross income from'other sources. (DO not net amounts due or paid to other sources · against amounts due or received from them.) ......... '. . . ; '. 88 At any time during the year, did the organization own a 50% or greater interest in a taxable corporation or partnership? Ii' "Yes," complete Part IX ....................... 89 Pub//c/ntere$t/aw firms.---Attach information described in the instructions. (' ' 90 List the states with which a copy of_this return is filed · .... ~,~...L=.!...F~....i~..J~..J .j~-....~.~ ......................... 92 sec*,~ 4947ra)(,)no, .e,,,pt charitable trusts filing Fo; 990 in/ie'~ o/t~'rm 1.'1, 'U.S. ~nc'om'e r& ~'e;; ;T'Estates and r~us,';h;,ck h';r; ~'r-~l and enter the amount of tax-exemot interest received or accrued during the tax yea{. · · [ 92 i /~/./'/~ ~ 1,174 ~2/~,~,~ Form S90 (1994) Page Ii',,~"Ti~Jll Analysis of Income- g Activities Enter gross amounts unless otherwise Unrelated business income Excluded by section 512, 513, or 514(E] Related or exempt indicated. (A) (B) (C) (D) function income 93 Program service revenue: Business code Amount Exclusion code Amount (See instructions.) d' e g Fees and contracts from government agencies '94 Membership dues and assessments 95 Interest on savings and temporary cash investments' / ~/ 96 Dividends and interest from securities . a debt-financed-property b not debt-financed property 98 Net rental income or (loss) from personal property 99 Other investment income 100 Gain or (10ss) fromsales of assets other than inventory 101 Net income or (loss) from special events 102- Gross prof'~ or (loss)from sales of inventory . d e 105 Total (add line.104, columns (B), (D), and (E)) ............ ' . . . . I,,' ~ ~'0.~'~'.' .-~' NOte: (Une 105 plus line ld, Part I, should equal the amount on line 12, Part I.) I:,~1~,~/111 Relationship of Activities to the Accomplishment of Exempt Purposes Line No. Explain how each activity for which income is reported in column (E) of Part VII contributed importantly to the accomplishment · of the organiz~tion"s exempt purposes (other than by providing funds for such purposes). (See instructions.) ~-I~IK~I Information Regarding Taxable Subsidiaries (Complete this Part if the "Yes" box on line 88 is checked.) Name. address, and employer identification Percentage of Nature of Total End-of-year number of corporation or partnership ownership interest' business activities . income assets %; %i · :: Unde~ penalties of perjury', I ¢leclare ~at I have examined this tatum, including ac~3mpany~ng schedules arid statement, s, and to p~ease know~edge and b~ief, it is true, correct, and complete. Declaration of prepaid' (otl'm~ ~an office~ is based on ail information of which prep~re~- has Sign · ~y.~o,~ge. Here s~j~e of o~c~- ~., 'hue Pre13are~$ ~ I Date , Check if , Preparer's sociaJ security no. Paid signature self- eml~loyed 1,. [--] I 5 ,~'_0 Use Only yours if self-employed) ' ST' . ZIP code SCHEDULE A Orgamzation Exempt Under Sectio :L(c)(3) ~ (Form 990) (Except Private Foundation), and Section 501(e), 501(0, 501(k), or Section 4~47(a)(1)Nonexempt Charitable Trust . Supplementary Information -"' Oe~oan~ent of We Tree~ lntemaJ Revenue S~v~, · Must be completed by the above organizations and attached to their Form 990 (or 990-EZ}. I Name of the organization Employer Identification numbe~ · Compensation of the Five Highest Paid Employees Other Than Officers, Directors, and Trustees (See instructions.) {List each one. If there are none, enter "None.'3 (d) Con~butions to (e) ~e (a) Name a~d address of each employee paid more (b) T~e and average hou~(c) Cornpec~atlo~ employee benefit 131a~s & account and other than S50,000 per wee~ devoted to 13esCort deferred c0mpensa~on aJ~wa~ces ................ ....................... ~ ¢oml:~nsation of the Flve Hi~hest Paid Independ~ent Contra~om for Professional (See instructions.) (List each one (whether individuals or firms.) (If there are none, enter "None."} (a) Name and ac~ross Of each independent contractor paid more than $50,0..00 ....... (b) Type of service . (c) Compensation Total number of others receiving over $50,000 for professiona~ services . . . .. .... ~ Statements About Activities " No I Dudr~g the year, has the organization attempted to influence national, state, or local legislation, including any attempt to influence public opinion on a legislative matter or referendum? ...... :.' . . . ff "Yes,' enter the total expenses paid or incurred in co'nnection With 'the Id:)bying activities.' · '$ .... /~ O/~J ~-'~"' Organiyations that made an election under section 501{h) by filing Form 5768 must complete Part VI-A. Other organizations checking "Yes," must complete Part VI-B AND attach a statement giving a detailed description of the lobbying activities. 2 ' During the year, has the orga~iZation,'either direct~ or indirectly, engaged'in a~y'of th'e following acts wi~ 'any of its trustees, directors, officers, creators, key employees, or members of their families, or with any taxable organization with which any such person is affiliated as an officer, director, trustee, majority owner, or principal beneficiary: a Sale, exchange, o¢ leasing of 'Pt~l~erty? ......... · ......... b Lending of money or other extension of credit? ...... ...:__:. _. ~ d Payment of compensation (or payment or ~eimbursement of exp~nses if n:x~r~'than $1,000)? ........ e Transfer of any part of its income or assets? ..................... :. .. If the answer to any question is '"Yes,' attach a detailed statement explaining the transactions. '- .... 3 Does the organization make grants for scholarships, fellowships, student loans, etc.? ......... 4 Attach a statement explaining how the organization determines that individuals or organizations receiving or loans from it in furtherance of its charitable programs qualify to receive 13ayments. (See instructions.) For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page I of the Inst3'ucflons to Form 990 (or Form.990-EZ). Cat. No. 11285F Schedule A (Form 9go) 1994 ~,~ 1,193 Schedule A (Form 990) 1994 Page 2 ~'_~"1'~[~/l Reason for Non-Private Foundation Status (See instructions for definitions.) The organization is not a private foundation because it is (please check only ONE applicable box): 5 [] A church, convention of churches, or association of churches. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(~. I 6 [] A school. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(i0. (Also complete Part V, page 3.) 7 [] A hospital or a cooperative hospital service organization. Section 170(b}(1)(A)(iii). 8 [] A Federal, state, or local government or governmental unit. Section .170(b)(1)(A)(v). ' ' 9 [] A medical research organization operated in conjunction with a hospital. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii0. Enter the hospital'e name, city, and sta~e ·-~..;.;.'..'.....; .... '~ ........ ~ .... ' ....... ~..'~: .... '.~:'....' .... ~'~- .......... ~ ..... ~-'..'.._~..~..-~.~ ..... ~-~. ..... ~.~ ......... ~.~ 10 ' [] An organization operated for the benefit of a college or university owned or operated by a governmental unit. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). (Also complete the Support Schedule below.l 11a [] An organization that normally receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or from the general public. Section 170(b)(1XA}(v~.-(Also complete the Support Schedule below.) 11b [] A community trust. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vO. (AJso complete the Support Schedule below.) 12 [] An organization that normally receives: (a) no more than 33Y~% of its support from 'gross inv6~tment'income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses acquired by the organization after June 30; 1975, and (b) more · . than 3,3'/3% of its support from contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from activities related to its charitable, etc., functions--subject to certain exceptions. See section 509(a)(2). (AJso complete the Support Schedule below.) 13 - [] An organization that is not controlled by any disqualified persons (other than foundation managers) and supports (~rganizations described in: (1) lines 5 through 12 above; or (2) section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6), if they meet the test of section 509(a)(2)~ (See section 509(a)(3).) ............................... Provide the following information about the supported organizations. (See instructions fo[ Part IV, line 13.) .................. ' ......... I {b) Line number .... ,...~ .... (a) Name(s) Of stJi3ported organization(s) ' ': "' ' ' ' .... ":" from above 14 [] An organization organized and operated to test for public safety. Section 509{a)(4). (See inst~'uctions.) ....... Support Schedule (Complete only if you checked a box on line 10-11, or12 above.)Use cash'method of accounting.' ......... Note: You ma)/use the worksheet in the instructions for convertin( from the accrua/to the cash method of accountinq.- Calendar year (or.fiscal year-beginning in) . · (a) 1993 (b) 1992 -- (c) 1991 --~ -- (d) 1990 -' ! -~'ie) Total 15 Gifts, gra~ts, and contributions received. (Do .......... : ................................. ' ....... not include unusual grants. See line 28.) ..... . ~.0'O O .-:: . ........................................... -.. ~9~ O0C 16 Membership fees received ...... . 17 Gross receipts .. from _ admissions, . ..................................... merchandise sold or services performed, or furnishing of facilities in any activity that is not a business unrelated to the organization's ......................... 18 . Gross income from interest, dividends, amounts received from payments on securities loans ::' ~ (section 512(a)(5)), rents, royalties, and ..... unrelated business 'taxable income (]ess section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired by Oq the organizafion after dune 30,1975. .. '~ ~0~ ,~ ~,-? ' ..-'. g, 5~ 1~., Net' income . from- unrelated business :' ' ' · ' activities not included in line 18 .'; ;":.; . -' ".' : ": .... ::"" "'-': ' :: : '" "' ' 20 Tax revenues levied for the organization's benefit ...... . and either paid to it or expended on its behalf 21 The value of services or facilities furnished to the : ..... . organization by a govemmentaJ unit without charge.· : ..- -- - . '.~ '. · " 0o not include the value of services or facilities ' general~ furnished to the public without charge... '. · 22.-Other-income. Attach a schedule. Do' not- '' - : .... ...... -T- include gaJn or (loss) from sale of capitaJ assets ,~,/,~..~. : ..... z. :'. ' '"-:''-' 23 Total of lines15 through 22 ...... -~ 5il' ,~,~c~ c~0¢/ ~,'7,~ ~ 0t"f~.. / 003 24 Line 23 minus line17 ....... .. ~ ?c~/- ~,0~ , ,~,,,.7.07' , ~c~(,p! i 25 Enter 1% of line-23 ........ ~'~' c~,,I 2.'~'? ~,,.~c~"7 ; ,~ c¢O ~".-----------------~.~'~.~.~//~/. '(' 26 OrganizatiOns described in lines 10 or 11: ' '" ' a Enter 2% of amount in column (e), line 24 .................... ' . .: . b Attach a list (which is not open to public inspection) showing the name of and amount contributed by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) whose totaJ gifts for 1990 through 1993 /f,~r exceeded the amount shown in line 26a. Enter the sum of all these excess amounts here · (Support Schedule continued on page 3) 1.194 ,,, Sche~lule A (Form 990) 1994 Page 3 ~ Support Schedule (continued) (Complete only if you checked a box on line 10, 11, or .12.)" 27- Organizations described on line 12: ~Trr'VT a Attach a list, for amounts shown on lines 15, 16, and. 17, to show the name of, and total amounts received in each year from, each - "disqualified person." Enter the sum of such amounts for each year;, ..... ........... ( 992) ............. .... ...... .......... ( 990) ......... ...... . b Attach a list to show, for .1990 through 1993, the name of, and amount included in line 17 for, each person (other than a 'disqualified ...... person') from whom the organization received, during that year, an amount that was more than the larger of {1) the amount on line 25 for the year or (3) $5,000. Include organizations described in lines 5 through 11, as well as individuals. After computing the difference between the amount received ~nd the larger amount described in (1) or (2}, enter the sum of all these differences (the · excess amounts) for each(~j~. :..... 28 For an' organization'~escribed in line-10, 11, or 12, treat received any unusual grants during 1990 through 1993, attach a list (which. is not open to public inspection) for each year showing the name of the contributor, the date and amount of th~grant, and a brief · description of the nature of the grant. Do not include these grants in line 15. (See instructions.) ,~T/3~ T ,~ -' '" ' ~ ' ~ - Private School Ques~lonnaire .... ' ..... - (To be completed ONLY by schools that checked the box on line 6 in Part IV) ,/~/j~' ;:;.'" · 29Does the organization have a racially nondiscriminatory poliCY toward students by statement in its charter, bylaws, other governing instrument, or in a resolution of its governing body? ............... 30 Does the organization include a statement of its racially nondiscriminatory policy toward students in all its. brochures, catalogues, and other wdtten communications with the public dealing with student admissions, - ... - -programs;'and scholarships? .:~ ,'. ...... ', .' ~' . ............... 31 Has the organization publicized its racially nondiscriminatory policy through newspaper or broadcast media during the pedod of solicitation for students, or dudng the registration pedod if it has no solicitation program, in a way that makes the policy known to all Parts of the gene!'al community it serves?.'.' .' , . . ............ If 'Yes,' please descdbe.~ if 'No," please eXplain. (If you need more space, ~ttach a separate statement.) 32 ' Does the organization maintain the following: ............................. ~ .... i .... ~i "~ ..... : :.:., .~:;~,::-: a Records indicating the racial composition of the student body, faculty, and administrative sta~d'/ ·" b Records documenting that scholarshiP,s and other financial assistanc~ are awarded on a'raciaily nondiscriminatory basis? . . . .;' ; . .'.. . . .., -. ...... ;.. . · .............. .. c Copies of all catalogues, brochures,"announcements, and other written communications to the'public dealing with student admissions, prograz'ns, and scholarships? ................ d Copies of all material used by the organization or on its behalf to Solicit contributions? .......... If you answered "No" to any of the above, please explain. (if you needmore space, attach a separate statement.). 33 - Does the organization discriminate by race in any way with respect to: . . a Students' rights or privileges?. ' ' ' ¢ Employment of faculty or administrative staff? . . .~ ...... . ,.. . , -.- .. ...... d Scholarships or other financial assistance? (See instructions.) ................. e Educational policies? " '~ ..... .... ' ..... f Use of facilities? ' ' g Athletic progran~s? "'. ; · '- ..:: · ,' r · ;. · · -... ~-.' . · · ~ .... ....... .-... · h Other extracurricular actNities? "-" --- tf you answered 'Yes' to any of the above, please explain. (If you need more space, attach a separate statement.) 34a Does the organization receive any financial aid or assistance from a governmental agency? ....... b Has the organization's right to such aid ever been revoked or suspended? ............ If you answered 'Yes' to either 34a or b, please explain usin9 an attached statement. 35 Does the organization cert~ that it has complied with the applicable requirements of sections 4.01 through 4.05 of Rev. Proc. 75-50. 1975-2 C.8. 587, covering racial nondiscrimination? If "No,' attach an explanation. {See instructions for Part V. .&i:hedule A (Form 990) 1994 Page ~ Lobbying Expenditures by Electing Public Charities (See instructions.) (To be completed ONLY by an eligible organization that filed Form 5768) Check here · a [] If the organization belongs to an affiliated group (see instructions). Check here · b [] If you checked a and "limited control" provisions apply (see instructions). " Limits on Lobbying Expenditures .. (a) · . . Affiliated group To be completed · ' totals for ALL electing (The term "expenditures" means amounts paid or incurred) organ~auons 38 Total lobbying expenditures to influence public opinion (grassroots lobbying) . "'"' ::'"' I 38 " "" "' 37 Tatal lobbying expenditures to influence a legislative body (direct lobbying) .'- . ~'" -'" · :; I 37 · 38 ' Total lobbying expenditures (add lines 36 and 37) j .' , .' '. '." . ".' :i '. .' ." .' '[ .38 39 Other exempt purpose expenditures (see Part VI-A instructions) ......... ~ 39 41 ': Lobbying nontaxable amount. Enter the amqunt from the, following table---, j . ' 'i~'. ' If the amount On line 40 is-- ~._ ~:i..i The lobbYing ~ontaXable amount'is~ ' ' :'.~.~'. ~ Over o0,0 b,, ,et or,, $1,000,000.... 100.000 p,us of.the exc ' 'Over,l,000,000butnotover,l,500,000-;'$175,000plus10%oftheexcessover,l,000,000 '~.1 ~["41 ~~" Over $1,500,000 but not over $17,000,000. $225,000 plus 5% of the excess over $1,500,000 ! 42 'Grassroots nontaxable amount (enter 25% of line41) .... L' . '.' :.' '. : . '. '} 42 I 44 · Subtract line 41 from line 38. Ente~:'-o--if line 41 is more than line 38 .~' 'j'.' ~ ~' .' '~:.: ~k..4~...j Caution: FTle Form 4720 if there is an amount on either line 43 or line 44. '" ~ "~ :,,~',-,.-~-- - (Some organizations that made a seCtion 501(h) ~lection do not have to complete all of' th~ five ~01umr~s bei0W.'''' .~." · ' "'." · · - ~' ~. - . ": "~" See the instructions for lines 45 through 50.) '." ''~" ...... · ..: .... ................... LobbYing' Expen;:liture~ DU'fi~Ig 4~Year Averaging Period ..... Calendar year (or' - ........ ' ..... (a) .......... (b) .......... (c) ......... (d) ..... (e) ' ,'. fiscal year beginning in) · · ...... ...... --1994 ........ 1993 ......... 1992 ........ : 1991 ........... Total" 45 Lobbying - nontaxable amount (see .......................... ' .................. 48 Lobbying ceilir~j amount (150% of line 45(e)) ~ 48 .. Grassroots', nontaxable amount (see · -' .... '- · :" .............. ~. " 4g Grassroots ceiling amount (150% of line 48(e)). 50 Grassroots ':lobbying expenditures (see · ' ......... ' ' '"": .... -' .... ~ .' Lobbying Activity by Nonelecting Public Charities ..... (For reporting by organizations that did not complete Part VI-A) ~';:"*/~", , '~:'~'- *' * '~"' '"~ Outing the year,-did the organization attempt tO'influence national, state ar local legislation, including any Ye~ No Amount .... ~ttempt to influence public apinion on a legislative matter or referendum, through the L~se of: a Volunteers. b · Paid staff or management (include compe.nsation in expenses reported on lines c through h) . ,.. e Publications. or published or broadcast statements' . .... ' : .' . ". . .", , ,' '~' , f Grants to other organizations for lobbying purposes .......... ' ~" .' . . j". .... g Direct contact with legislators, their sbzffs, government officials, or a legislative body ...... h Rallies, demonstrations, seminars, conventions, speeches, lectures, or any other means .... i Total lobbying expenditures (add lines c through h) ................ If 'Yes' to any of the above, also attach a statement giving a detailed description of the lobbying activities. Schedule A (Form 990) 1994 Page [~ Information Regarding Transfers To and Transactions and Relationships With Noncharitable .... Exempt Organizations .. 51 Did the reporting organization directly or indirectly engage in any of the following with any other organization described in section 501(c) of the Code (other than section 501(c)(3) organizations) or in section 527, relating to political organizations? a Transfers from the reporting organization to a noncharitable exempt organization of: Yes No {~ Cash .................... · ............. 51a~ 0~ Other assets .............................. a(i~ ,,," b Other transactions: - ' ' ...... (~ Sales of assets to a noncharitable exempt organization · b~ (i~ Purchases of assets from a nonchadtable exempt organization .............. b(i~ 0i~ Rental of facilities or equipment ........................ b(iii} (iv) Reimbursement'arrangements ......................... b{iv} (v) Loans or loan guarantees .......................... b(v) {v~ 'Performance of services or membership.or fundraising solicitations ............ b(v~ c Sharing of facilities, equipment, mailing lists, other assets, or paid employees ........... c d If the answer to any of the above is "Yes," complete the following schedule. Column (b) should always show the fair market value of the goods, other assets, or services given by the reporting organization. If the organization received less than fair market value in any transaction or sharing arrangement, show in column (d) the value of the goods, other assets, or services received. (a) (b) (c) (d) Line no. AmOunt involved · Name of noncl~adtable exempt organization Description of transfer, transactions, and shadng a~angeme~$ 52a Is the organization directly or indirectly affiliated with, or related to, one or more tax-exempt organizations described in section 501(c) of the Code (other than section 501(c)(3)) or in section 527? ....... [] Yes ~ No' b If 'Yes." complete the following schedule. (a) r~) (c) Name of organization Type of organization Description of r~ationshlp ST. VINCENT DE PAUL STORE INC. - 95-1853364 STATEMENT 1-PART I, LINE 20-OTHER CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES $29,459"REPRESENTS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF DONATED SALVAGE FROM THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE. STATEMENT 2-PART III-PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS CLOTHING, HOUSEHOLD GOODS, FURNITURE, BEDDING, 29,460 ETC. GIVEN TO THE POOR AND NEEDY (3,928 PERSONS) FOOD BASKETS GIVEN TO THE POOR AND NEEDY (250 PERSONS) 810 CASH ASSISTANCE GIVEN TO THE POOR AND NEEDY 2,724 (133 PERSONS) 32,994 STATEMENT 3-PART IV, LINE 64-MORTGAGES AND OTHER NOTES PAYABLE MORTGAGE PAYABLE-DELANO STORE BUILDING 43;508 MORTGAGE PAYABLE-TEHACHAPI STORE 141,761 185,269 STATEMENT 4-PART V-OFFICERSt DIRECTORS AND TRUSTEES (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) FR. RALPH BELLUOMINI PRESIDENT & BAKERSFIELD, CA DIRECTOR 0 0 0 HOWARD D. COLLINS SECRETARY'& BAKERSFIELD, CA DIRECTOR 0 0 0 RITA PARAGRUE TREASURER & BAKERSFIELD, CA DIRECTOR 0 0 0 -~" OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS SERVE MINIMAL HOURS WITHOUT COMPENSATION; THEREFORE, NO RECORDS ARE KEPT OF THEIR TIME. ST. VINCENT DE PAUL STORE INC. 95-1853364 STATEMENT 5-PART VIII-RELATIONSHIP OF ACTIVITIES TO EXEMPT PURPOSES LINE NO. EXPLANATION 93 THE SALES THAT GENERATE THE INCOME FROM THE SALVAGE OPERATIONS OF DONATED GOODS ARE THE VERY ESSENCE OF THIS CORPORATION'S EXEMPT PURPOSES BY PROVIDING THE RESOURCES WHICH ARE USED SOLELY IN HELPING THE POOR AND THE NEEDY THROUGHOUT THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD AREA. STATEMENT 6-SCHED A, PART III, LINE 2(C) ' A MODEST AMOUNT OF OFFICE SPACE IS FURNISHED TO CATHOLIC CHARITIES, INC. AT NO COST TO THEM. STATEMENT 7-SCHED A, PART III, LINE 4~/ APPROXIMATELY 80% OF DISTRIBUTIONS WENT TO THE POOR AND NEEDY, MOST OF WHOM WERE REFERRALS FROM THE KERN COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT AND THE OTHERS FROM PRIVATE AGENCIES; THE OTHER 20% WENT TO RECOGNIZED CHARITIES FOR SIMILAR PURPOSES. STATEMENT 8-SCHED A, PART IV, LINE 27 CONTRIBUTION FROM DISQUALIFIED PERSON: MRS. PETER BELLOUMINI 2,000 STATEMENT 9-SCHED A, PART IV, LINE 28 UNUSUAL GRANT RECEIVED FROM THE ESTATE OF MARY ABRUNS IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,988 RECEIVED IN 1993. BEQUEST MADE AS PER THE, WILL OF MARY ABRUNS. ~ 27.5.~ ~ ?t.?,~ Applic~on for ~xfension of Time ~-:~j¢~,~f',! t :; ertain Excise, Income, Information, and Other Returns o.~o. ~men~ 0 ~s~?:( ~'~ ~pires 5-31-95 J~a,~e'~ ,d, ~ ~ Firea separate application for each return. ~ Nam~ : Empl0yef idemilicali0n number please~eor ST VZNCEN~ DePAU~ S~OEg [NC 95 ~ 1853364 p~nt. ~e the ' ' ' original a~d one Number an~ street (or P.O. box no. ~f ma~l is not Celivet~ to s;r~t actress) ApL or suite no. co~ybyt~edue C/O R. RANDAg~ RZCHARDSON ACCOUN~AN~ ZNC. dale for filing your return. ~e 2001 F STREET inst~c~o~ on , CiW, town or ~st o~ce. state, an~ ZiP code. For a foreign addre~, s~ ins~ons. ~c~. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Note: Corporate ~ncome t~ return filem must use Form 7~ to request an extension of time to file. Pa~nemhips, REMIC3, and t~sts (except those filing Form 990-~ must use Form 8735 to request an extension of time to file. I An extension of time until ...~~..~ ........... 19 ~.~. ..... is requested to file (check only one): ~ Fo~ 706GS~) ~ Fo~ 990-T (401(a) or a08(a) t~st) ~ Fo~ 1042-S ~ Fo~ 6069 ~ Fo~ 8831 ~ Eo~ 706GS~ ~ Fo~ 990-T (trust other th~ above) ~ Form 1120-ND (4951 t~) ~ Fc~ 8612 ~ Fo~ 990 or 990~ ~ .Ecrm 1041 (~t~)~ee~st~).--.~~2~- -~--F~ 8fi~3 ~ Fo~ 990-EL ~ Fo~ 1~1-A ~ Form 4720 ~ Fo~ 8725 ~ Fo~ 990-PF ~ Fo~ 1042 ~ Form 5227 ~ Fo~ 8804 If the organization does not have an office or place of business in the United States, check this box ...... 2aFor calendar year 19 ..... 94 , or other t~ year beginning ................................ and ending ................................ .bIf this t~ year is for le~ than 12 months, check reason: ~ Initial ~eturn ~ Final return ~ Change in accounting pedod 3 Has an extension of time to file been previously granted for this t~ yea~ ............ ~ Yes ~ No 4 S~te in detail why you need the extension ...... .~.~.~....~.~.._~.~_.~.~.~.~.;..~.~_.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. .......................... ............................... A~ALL.&EL~...A %..~;.~....~[~5....T.0_..E ~.~.g....~ag....gF.~.g~., .................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5a If this fo~ ~ for Fo~ 706CS(D). 706GS~, 990-B~ 990-PF, 990-T, 1041 (estate), 1042, 1120-NO, 4720, 6069, 0.00 8612, 8613, 8725, 8804, or 8831, enter the tentative t~, less any nonrefundable cr~s. S~ instm~ions. b If this fo~ is for Fo~ 990-P~ 990-~ 1041 (estate), 1042, or 8804, enter sny refund~le credits and estimat~ t~ payments made. Include any pdor year ove~ayment allowed as a credit ..... S .c Balance due. Subt~ct line 5b from line Sa. Include your payment with this form, or deposit with ~D coupon if r~uimO. S~ inst~ctions. ' S 0.0 0 Signature and Verification Unc~ ~ of ~eq~. I d~ t~t I have ~n~ t~is fo~ in~g a~m~ ~ ~d sm=e~m. ~d to ~e b~t ol ~ ~ge k is ~e, co~. anO ~m~lete; ~ mat I ~ a~z~ to pre~e ~is fo~ . ../ s,~n,,ur.-/~~ ~ ~,,e~ CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCT. o,,.~ 5/15/95 FILE ORIGINAL AND O~ COPY. T~IRS will show belo~ whether or not your application is approv~ and will return ~e copy. N~e to Applicant--To Be Completed by the IRS e HA~ approv~ your application. Please a~ach this form to your return. ~ We HAV~ NOT a~Droved you¢ 8~licafion. Howe~er. we have g~anted 810-day grace pe~od from the later 'of the date shown below or the due date o~ your return Oncluding ~y pdor extensions). ~is grace pedod is considered to De a v~lid extension o~ for elections othe~ise requir~ to be made on a timely return. Plebe a~ach this form to your return. item ,. ¢o¢ ~ e~tension o¢~gDV~'~ ~ot g~nti~o the ~0-d~y g~c. p~dod. ~ . . . . . ~ ~t.~ ' . ~ O~en ,- ~ If you ~nt a ~ ot ~is fo~ to ~ re~ to an addre~ o~ ~ ~at s~ a~ve. ~1~ ent~ the add~ to which t~e cooy should be ~e ~ Num~ ~ ~ (or P.O. ~x no. il ma,I ,s ~t d~i~ to ~t acorns) ~ ~ c¢ s~te no. O~ I ~, :own or ~ O~Ce. 5~Ate. a~o ~P coce. For a fcr~gn a~r~. s~ ~on~ For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see back of form. Cz.'..we. 11976a Form 2758 301 FIRE SAFETY SERVICES ~ OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAl, SERVICES 1715 CHESTER AVE, * BAKERSFIELD, CA * 93301 R.E. HUEY R.B. TOBIAS, HAZ-MAT COORDINATOR FIRE MARSHAL (805) 326-3979 (805) 326-3951 October 24, 1995 Reverend Father Ralph Belluomini St. Vincent De Paul 310 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Dear Father Ralph: ? As a follow up to our telephone conversation today, this letter serves as an additional reminder that a workplan for corrective action must be submitted to this office for approval within 30 days in order to avoid impending enforcement action. This workplan has been previously requested on November 5, 1992, May 27, 1994, November 3, 1994, and by formal "Notice of Violation" dated February 14, 1995. In addition, I have proposed to the State Water Board Clean-up Fund that your application should be elevated in its priority ranking. If you or your staff can provide me with last year's fiscal report filed with the Registry of Charitable Trusts of state and federal tax records, I will submit it with a request for priority change to the Board. Your submission of a corrective action workplan should effectively satisfy the outstanding violation and provide a mutually acceptable strategy for addressing the required clean-up of the contaminated soil. If you or your environmental consultant or legal counsel would like to discuss the specifics of the workplan,. I would be happy to meet with you or them within the next 30 days. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: ~'~ ~ (~o~: ~'- ID# Business Name: ~ J- ~,~c~-,~- F'~<.. ~( Conta~ N~e: ~ ~'/~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 F~: Business Phone: Inspe~or's N~e: ~ Time of C~I: Date: I~~ Time: /( ~ · Min: / Type of C~I: Incoming [ ] Outgoing [~ Returned [ ] Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: CITY of BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ FIRE SAFETY CONTROL & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISIONS 1715 CHESTER AVE. · BAKERSFIELD, CA · 99301 May 30, 1995 R.E, HUEY RB. TOBIAS, HAZ-MAT COORDINATOR FIRE MARSHAL (805) 326-3979 (805) 326-3951 Louis P. Etcheverry Etcheverry and Noriega Attorneys at Law Commonwealth Plaza 3300 Truxtun Ave., Suite 350 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE:i St. Vincent De Paul Store/UST Remediation Dear Mr. Etcheverry: Thank you for providing me with a copy of the claim application, filed with the State of California, for St. Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. However, what we do need is verification that clean up of gasoline contaminated soil has been initiated. This would be accomplished by submitting a work plan for the corrective action. In May of 1992 this office has approved Vapor Extraction as the corrective action alternative, per the site characterization completed on this property. Although I do understand the tight money restraints of St. Vincent De Paul, we do need to move forward. While the Underground Tank Cleanup Fund, claim application, is being processed by the State Water Resources Control Board, we should at least proceed with the work plan for clean up. This workplan would be completed by the engineering company that you will be using for the clean up. Please make the necessary arrangements to have the workplan for vapor extraction of the gasoline contaminated soil at St. Vincent De Paul's, submitted to this office within 45 days. Sincerely yours,. ~. Ralph"~~ (' Hazardous Materials Coordinator REH/ed cc: Father Ralph Bellomini, St. Vincent De Paul H. Wines Carl Hernandez III, Deputy City Attorney ETCHEVERRY Commonwealth Plaza 3300 Truxtun A~enue, Suite ~$0 "'~'\ i'~ j;r~: ;}~:) r'i ~ Telephone (805) 324-7900 Attorneys at Law Louis P. Etcheverry L ~¥ g 4 ~995 ~ James E. Noriega 8~ Joel T. Andreesen May 15, 1995 RALPH E. HUEY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COORDINATOR 1715 Chester Avenue, #300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Father Ralph Belluomini Dear Mr. Huey: Enclosed is the claim application that was filed with the State by St. Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. If you have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours, · LPE: dst S'~ATE-OF'C,A~FORNIA STATE USE ONLY: Division ;',f Clean Water Programs Underg; 3und Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Program ........................................................................ CMaJl: P. O. B~x 944212 Under§round Storage Tank Cleanup Fund i~ !ii ii i This application provides required information for placement on the UST Cleanup Fund Priority List. Complete and submit this application with all required attachments to the address above. Only one application is to be submitted per cost. Type or print legibily the required information in the applicable sections below. Refer to the PROGRAM INFORMATION and application instructions on the back of each page. A. THIS CLAIM IS BEING FILED BY: g. APPLICATION STATUS PRIOR CLAIM NO.: C. CLAIMANT NAME Saint Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. MAlUNG ADDRESS 300 BAKER STREET CITY STATE ZIP CODE BAKERSFIELD CA 93305 TELEPHONE(805NO. ) 323-2941 D. TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: E. CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NO. Father Ralph Belluomini (805 ) 323-2941 F. CLAIMANT STATUS (Check One): A. ELIGIBLE CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS INCURRED TO DATE FOR COMPLETED WORK: (A) $ 9 t 2 5 4 o 0 0 B. ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS TO COMPLETE WORK CURRENTLY (B) UNDERWAY: C. ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE COSTS TO COMPLETE CORRECTIVE ACTICN: (C) ~ 7 5,0 0 0 o 0 0 tEV]SED ~/g4) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE STA'IE USE ONLY IDENTIFICATION FORM Fill out this Section only if there is a Joint Claimant to be named on this claim. Where multiple owners and operators have incurred or are responsible for different costs at the same site, they can be identified as Joint Claimants. A spouse is not normally considered a Joint Claimant. WHEN A JOINT CLAIM IS SUBMI'I-rED. THE CLAIM IS BASED ON THE LOWEST PRIORITY APPROPRIATE FOR ANY JOINT CLAIMANT. LIST EACH JOINT CLAIMANT AND THEIR APPROPRIATE PRIORITY CLASS: A. JOINT CLAIMANT NAME C. JOINT CLAIMANT IS FILING AS: [ IOW"ER OF,^.~(S) I~O"~^~O"OFT^"K~S) MAILING ADDRESS AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIORITY CLASS: Cl'rY STATE ;~P cooE r-~ A [~ B [~ C r-~ D TELEPHONE( ) NUMBER B. TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. D. DATESFRoM:OF OWNERSHIP/OPERATIONTo: A. JOINT CLAIMANT NAME C. JOINT CLAIMANT IS FILING AS: . [~ OWNER OF TANK(S) [--'~ OPERATOR OF TANK(S) MAILING ADDRESS ~,ND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIORITY CLASS: CITY STATE ZlPCODE ~---~ A [~ B C ~--~ D TELEPHONE( ) NUMBER B. TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. D. DATESFRoM:OF OWNERSHIP/OPERATIONTo: CO -PAYEE IDENTIFICATION FORM Fill out this Section only if a Co-Payee is to be named on this claim. Owners and operators can designate a representative who has advanced funds for cleanup as a Co-Payee. The Co-Payee will be named on the payment. Representatives are usually insurance companies and lending institutions. A copy of the financial agreement between the Co-Payee and the claimant is to be submitted with this claim. ~,. CO-PAYEE NAME MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO. lB. TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. I (REPriSED ~/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 2 A. SITE NAME B' CONTACTPERSONAT SITE Saint Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. Father Ralph Belluomini SITE ADDRESS , C. TELEPHONE NO. 300 Baker Street (805) 323-2941 CITY STATE ZIP CODE D. COUNTY E. COUNTY CODE Bakers field CA 93305 KERN 15 F. SITETYPE (CHECK MORETHAN ONE IF APPLICABLE) G. Bom'd of Equalization No. [] COMMERCIAL [] RESIDENCE [] FARM [:] OTHER- PleaseSpecif¥: TQHY H. DESCRIPTION OF TANK(S) USE [] RESIDENTIAL MOTOR FUEL [] RESIDENTIAL HEATING OIL [] COMMERCIAL HEATING OIL [] AGR,CULTU~L MOTOR FUEL [::] R~L SALE [-X~ OTNER: REMOVED I. DATE RELEASE DISCOVERED J. DATE CORRECTIVE ACTION K. HAS CORRECTIVE ACTION BEEN COMPLETED? WAS INITIATED: 6 - 17- 9 1 [] NO [] YES Date Completed: L. IDENTIFY TANK(S) INVOLVED IN CORRECTIVE ACTION (List Additional Tanks on a Separate Sheet) CHECK IF CHECK IF SWEEPS NO. LOCAL PERMIT NO. CAPACITY SUBSTANCE STORED TANK DATE REMOVED TANK REMOVED REPLACED TANK1 550 Gal. Gasoline [] 6-17-91 [] M~PR~DEABR~DE~R~P~N~NCHR~N~L~cDRDER~FALLA~TI~TIESRELATEDT~mEUNAUTHOR~DRELEASE~MD~SC~Y~F RELEASETOPRESENT. 6-17-91 Gas Tank Removed - Leak Report Filed 11-20-91 Preliminary Site Assessment Required 3-09-92 Site Characterization Completed 11-05-92 Vapor Extraction Option Approved by Local Agency 5-27-94 Notice From Local Agency - No Corrective Action Plan 11-03,94 Notice From Local Agency - Corrective Action Overdue N. A3TACH A SITE MAP DRAWN TO SCALE WHICH INCLUDES A NORTH ARROW AND DISTANCES RELATIVE TO THE NEAREST PUBLIC ROADS, A. LOCAL UST PERMITTING AGENCY B. LOCAL AGENCY CODE Bakersfield Fire Dept. 15021 C. REGIONAL WATER OUAUTY CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB) I O. REGION NO. E. LEAD AGENCY CASE NO. Central ValleyI 5 432 F. LEAD AGENCY PROVIDING OVERSIGHT OF CLEANUP: LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSO~{a Z ardous Saterz a 1 s ..- {oward Wines III Technician (')[~1 RWQCB (2)1:~1 LOCA.LAGENCY (3)I~IJO,NT TELEPHONENUMBER (805 ) 326-3979 (REVISED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 3 A. IF THE CLAIMANT (IN ADOITION TO BEING THE TANK OWNER AND/OR TANK OPERATOR) IS THE PROPERTY OWNER, LIST THE DATE THE SITE WAS ACQUIRED: 19 5 -1 MONTH DAY YEAR B. IF THE SITE WAS ACQUIRED AFTER 1/1/84, LIST THE PERSON(S) FROM WHOM IT WAS ACQUIRED: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE C. IF THE SITE HAS BEEN SOLD, LIST THE PARTY TO WHOM IT WAS SOLD AND THE DATE SOLD: NAME DATE SOLD: Mon~ Day Year ADDRESS TELEPHONE Do IF FILING AS THE TANK OPERATOR, LIST THE DATES Of OPERATION: '19 5 1 '19 9 FROM TO E, SITE OWNERS, TANK OWNERS AND TANK OPERATORS PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING HISTORY Of= THE SITE OWNERS, TANK OWNERS, AND TANK OPERATORS TO THE BEST Of= YOUR KNOWLEDGE. AT A MINIMUM, PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION COVERING THE PERIOD FROM THE DISCOVERY OF THE UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE TO THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMI"FrAL PERIOD PROPERTY OWNER TANK OWNER TANK OPERATOR 1951 St. Vincent De Paul Store, Inc. Same Same FROM NAME NAME NAME 1991 300 Baker Street Same Same TO ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS PERIOD PROPERTY OWNER TANK OWNER TANK OPERATOR FROM NAME NAME NAME TO ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS PERIOD PROPERTY OWNER TANK OWNER TANK OPERATOR FROM NAME NAME NAME TO ADORE. SS ADDRESS ADDRESS PERIOD PROPERTY OWNER TANK OWNER TANK OPERATOR FROM NAME NAME NAME TO ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS (REVtSED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE Please refer to the Program Information Section of this package for Priority Class requirements a'nd doucmentation required to be submitted with this Claim Application to verify priority being claimed. The Priority Class assigned to this claim is based on the priority of the Claimant (identified on Page One), any Joint Claimants (identified on Page 2), and the priority of all other tank owners and operators (identified on Page 4). A. PRIORI'FY OF THE CLAIMANT The Priority Class the Claimant is eligible for: PRIORITY OF JOINT CLAIMANT(S) When there are multiple owners and operators as Joint Claimants, the Priority Class for the claim is based on the lowest priority appropriate for the Claimant and Joint Claimant(s). Identify the priority of any Joint Claimants as listed on Page 2: JOINT CLAIMANT'S NAME .~ Joint' A B C The Priority Class this Claimant is eligible for: I I II II D JOINT CLAIMANT'S NAME The Priority Classthis Joint Claimant is eligible for: ~ .ti ~ B ~ C ~ D C. PRIORITY OF OTHER TANK OWNERS AND OPERATORS When there were other tank owners and operators at the time of the discovery of the unauthorized release, or at the time of application submittal, the Priority Class of the claim is based on the lowest priority appropriate for any of these owners and operators. List the other tank owners and operators at the time of the discovery of the unauthorized release and at the time of application submittal as identified on Page 4. Identify the appropriate Priority Class for each: [-~ A ~--~ a ~--~ C ~ D NAME QF TANK OWNER AT TIME OF DISCOVERY OF RELEASE [~ A ~ S ~-) C [-~ D NAME OF TANK OPERATOR AT TIME OF DISCOVERY OF RELEASE [---] A [--~ B [~ C [---1 D NAME OF TANK OWNER AT 'RME OF APPI ICAT~ON SUBMr~rAL [-~ A ['---~ B ~---~ C [~ D NAME OF TANK OPERATOR AT TIME OF APPIJCAT1ON SUBMrl TAL D. PRIORITY CLASS CLAIMED FOR THIS CLAIM APPLICATION The Priority Class claimed should be the lowest Priority Class appropriate as shown for any of the above. (REVISED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE S Once you have determined the Priority Class for this Claim Application, please fill out the information requested for that Priority Class. Refer to the Program Information Section of this package for the required documentation to support the Priority Class being claimed. DOCUMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE CLAIMANT AND EACH JOINT CLAIMANT. IF CLAIMING CLASS A - RESIDENTIAL, CHECK THIS BOX AND COMPLETE THE APPLICABLE SECTION BELOW: A. B. [~ Check this box if the underground L___J Check this box if the underground storage tank which is the subject of this storage tank which is the subject of this claim contains HOME HEATING OIL and claim contains PETROLEUM and meets meets ALL of the following criteria: ALL of the following criteria: ),- The small home heating oil tank was located at the residefice of · The petroleum underground storage tank was located on the claimant at the time of the discovery of the release; AND property used exclusively for residential purposes at the time of the discovery of the release; AND · The residence was owner-occupied and a single family dwelling or duplex at the time of the discovery of the release; · The petroleum underground storage tank was located at the AND residence of the claimant at the time of the discovery of the release; AND · The tank has a capacity of 1,100 gallons or less, and stores home heating oil for consumptive use on the premises where · The residence was owner-occupied and a single family stored; AND dwelling or duplex at the time of the discovery of the release; AND · The tank is not located on property used for agricultural purposes on and after January 1, 1985; AND · The tank is not a "Farm Tank'' (a tank with a capacity of 1,100 gallons or less which is located on a farm and which stores )~ The tank is not a "Farm Tanl¢ (a tank with a capacity of 1,100 motor vehicle fuel used primarily for agricultural purposes and gallons or less which is located on a farm and which stores not for resale) and has not been used on or after January 1, motor vehicle fuel used primarily for agricultural purposes and 1985, for agricultural purposes. not for resale) and has not been used on or after January 1, 1985, for agricultural purposes. · NOTE: This small home heating oil tank is not subject to the · NOTE: This petroleum underground storage tank is subject permit requirements of Chapter 6.7 of the H&SC. to the permit requirements of Chapter 6.7 of the H&SC. NOTE: REFER TO PROGRAM INFORMATION FOR REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT THE ABOVE CLAIMED STATEMENT. THIS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. REWSED W94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 6. C~G ~ASS SM~ BUS.SS, C~CK ~S BOX ~ CO~ ~ FO~OW~G: B A. CLAIMANT'S BUSINESS NAME B. CLAIMANI"S BUSINESS DESCRIPTION C. DATES OF OPERATION: FPCDM: TO: D. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS E. IS THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA? ~-~ YES ~-~ NO ARE ALL OFFICERS/OWNERS OFTHIS BUSINESS DOMICILED IN CALIFORNIA? ~-~ YES ~ NO ISTHIS BUSINESS INDEPENDENTLY OWNED AND OPERATED? ~ YES [--] NO IS THIS BUSINESS DOMINANT STATEWIDE IN ITS FIELD OF OPERATION? [----J YES [-~ NO F. TYPE OF BUSINESS G. INDUSTRY GROUP/ H. MAXIMUM RECEIP'] LICENSE TYPE AMOUNT I. TYPE OF OWNERSHIP J. AFFILIATED COMPANIES NAME: LOCATION: RELATIONSHIP: I~ ANNUAL GROSS RECEIPTS FOR THE THREE PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS. $ + $ + $ = TOTAL NOTE: REFER TO APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT THE ABOVE CLAIMED STATEMENT. THIS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITFED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. ~ CLAIMING CLASS B LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES AND NONPROFIT ORG~TIONS, ~ ~S BOX ~ CO~ ~ FO~OW~G: A. CLAIMANT'S STATUS Type (i.e. School, Fire) IB. TOTALANNUAL REVENUES $ FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING: NOTE: REFER TO APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT THE ABOVE CLAIMED STATEMENT. THIS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. REVISED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 7 IFCLAIMING CHECK THIS BOX AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWIlqG: CLASS C OTHER BUSINESS, A. CLAIMANT'S BUSINESS NAME J B. CLAIMANT'S BUSINESS DESCRIPTION C. DATES OF OPEHATION: FROM: TO: D. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS E. IS THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA? ~ YES Il NO ARE ALL OFFICERS/OWNERS OF THIS BUSINESS DOMICILED IN CALIFORNIA? ~ YES F'~ NO IS THIS BUSINESS INDEPENDENTLY OWNED AND OPERATED? E~ YES ~ NO IS THIS BUSINESS DOMINANT STATEWIDE IN ITS FIELD OF OPERATIONS? F-"--] YES [~ NO F. '~WPE OF OWNERSHIP G. AFFIUATED COMPANIES NAME: LOCATION: RELATIONSHIP: TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (Including all affiliates): L I NOTE: DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BEING CLAIMED MAY BE REQUIRED. IF CLAIMING CLASS C - LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES AND ORGANIZATIONS, NONPROFIT CHECK THIS BOX AND COMI~LETE THE FOLLOWII'qG: A. CLAIMANT STATUS YYPE (i.e. School, Fire) B. TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: .]. 5 i NOTE: DOCUMENTATION sUpPORTING THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BEING CLAIMED MAY BE REQUIRED. ' ' n~ CLAIMING CLASS D - AI.T. OTIIER TANK OWNERS AND/OR OPERATORS, CI-~CK THIS BOX. NO FURTHER PRIORITY CLASS INFORMATION IS REOUIRED. REVISED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 8 I Federal EPA and state law requires owners and operators of petroleum UST systems, which meet the federal definition of a UST, to show through insurance coverage or,other acceptable mechanisms that they can pay for the costs of cleanup and third party liability caused from an unauthorized release of petroleum from their USTs. To be eligible for reimbursement of corrective action costs, the claimant must be in compliance with applicable financial responsibility requirements imposed by federal and state law. Futher information on financial responsibility can be obtained from the 'Petroleum' Underground Storage Tank Financial Responsibility Guide' available from the Fund. NOTE: If the claimant is not exempt from the requirement, or the corrective action has not been completed and the tank(s) permanently closed in accordance with the applicable statuto~/provisions of Section 25298 of Chapter 6.7 of the H&SC and any applicable local requirements, the claimant is currenUy subject to this requirement. A. ~ IF EXEMPT FROM THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBIUTY REQUIREMENT, CHECK THIS BOX AND IDENTIFY THE BASIS OF THE EXEMPTION (40 CFR Part 280 of the Federal Regulations) AND PROCEED TO THE NEXT PAGE (XI. STATEMENTS). IDENTIFY BASIS FOR EXEMPTION: -'--] ResidentiaJ tank with capacity of 1,100 gallons or tess, storing motor fuel which is not for resale. ~ Tanks for storing heafing oil which is used on-site. ~-~ All tanks owned or operated (nationwLde) were removed p)'ig)' to the dT~)s~e~'lfied below (See 'B') for compliance and not replaced. List date when all tanks were removed: Month Day Year ~ Other (Please identify: B. IF CURRENTLY SUBJECT TO THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBIUTY REQUIREMENT, CHECK THIS BOX AND SUBMIT A COPY OF THE -cERTIFICATE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY' ON FILE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY (Note: This is the agency responsible for issuing the permits to own or operate petroleum tanks pursuant to Section 25284 of the H&SC. These agencies are listed on Attachment C of this package.) IDENTIFY THE DATE SPECIFIED IN THE FEDERAL ACT BY WHICH THE CLAIMANT WAS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH DEMONSTRATING FINANCIAL RESPONSIBIETY: ~-~ JANUARY 2ft, 1989 For all petroleum marketing firms owning 1,000 or more underground storage tanks and all other underground storage tank owners who report a tangibJe net worth of $20 million or more to the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Dun and Bradstreet, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Electrification Administration. OCTOBER 2~, 1989 For all petroleum marketing firms owning 100 to 999 underground storage tanks. ~-~ APRIL 26, 1991 For all petroleum marketing firms owning 13 to 99 underground storage tanks at more than one facility. ~] DECEMBER 31,1993 For al! petroleum underground storage tank owners or operators not described above. FEBRUARY 18, 1994 For all local governmental agencies. C. IDENTIFY THE MECHANISM(S) USED TO DEMONSTRATE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBlUTY. IF USING THE STATE FUND, INDICATE MECHANISM FOR PROVIDING REQUIRED DEDUCTIBLE~ TRUST FUND SURETY BOND GUARANTEE SELF INSURANCE LETTER C~ CREDIT INSURANCE COVERAGE RISK RETENTION GROUP STATE FUND D. ~ CHECK THIS BOX IF THE CLAIMANT IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENT, AND HAS NOT FILED THE 'CERTIFICATE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY' ~q'rH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY. EXPLAIN CIRCUMSTANCES: (REVISED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 9 A. IS THERE AN INSURANCE POUCY IN AFFECT ON THIS SITE? ~-~ YES ] -'! NO B. IF YES, IDENTIFY THE NAME OF THE INSURANCE CARRIER, POLICY NUMBER, AND THE CLAIMS AGENT FAMIL~R WITH THIS SITE: Insurance Carrier Policy Number Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. MZX80586738 Claims Agent Telephone The Lynn Company P.O. Box 1966 (800) 326-5966 Bakersfield, CA 93303 c. / hereby give my authorization to the UST Cleanup Fund to contact and obtain any information deemed necessary from the above -named Insurance Carrier for the purpose of eligibility determination regarding this c/aim. CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE DATE Father Ralph Belluomini PRINT NAME D. IDENTIFY OTHER PERSON(S) WHO MAY HAVE INCURRED COSTS OR WHO MAY HAVE FILED A CLAIM AGAINST THE UST CLEANUP FUND FOR THE SITE WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS CLAIM: N/A Name Telephone Address City, State, Zip Code Name Telephone Address City, State, Zip Code E. DO YOU HAVE ANY KNOWLEDGE Of ANY UTIGATION REGARDING THE SITE THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS CLAIM? II NO [ [ YES - Please Explain: ~EVlS£D 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE lO This checklist is to assist the claimant to ensure that all required documentation is submitted with this application. It is recommended that the claimant label each document with a re[erence to the Claim Application section. It may be necessary to attach additional pages to respond to the questions asked. For example, if the claimant's name consists of a number of persons which do not fit in the space provided, they can be listed on a separate page and labeled "Claimant's Name". CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION l: ESTIMATE OF COSTS If Third Party Compensation costs are being claimed, a copy of the final judgment, court-approved settlement, or arbitration award MUST be submitted. SITEMAP Attachments 1 & 2 A site map drawn to scale which includes a north arrow and distances relative to the nearest public roads MUST be submitted. lDATE CORRECTIVE ACTION INITIATED If the release was discovered prior to January 1,1988, and corrective action was initiated after June 30, 1988, claimant MUST document that corrective action was not directed prior to January 1,1988. lPRIORITY CLASS A Documentation showing that the property was owner-occupied at the time of the discovery of the release (i.e., property tax bill) MUST be submitted. 1 PRIORI'Df CLASS B \ . The annual receipts and supporting documentation that MUST be submitted with this claim application in order to support the request for placement in Class B are described in the PROGRAM INFORMATION of this Application Package. Cities, counties, and districts MUST submit a copy of the annual Report of Financial Transactions as submitted to the State Controller's Office for the latest fiscal year. Nonprofit organizations MUST submit a copy of their annual fiscal report filed with the Registry of Charitable Trust, including all affiliates, for the latest fiscal year, or a copy of their state and federal tax records for the latest fiscal'year, including all affiliates. [~ FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY If the claimant is subject to the financial responsibility requirement, ~ copy of the Certification of Financial Responsibility that is on file with the regulatory agency MUST be submitted. l UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE OF PETROLEUM Att&chment 3 ' Documentation of the discovery and the reporting to the regulatory agency of the unauthorized release of petroleum subject of this claim application MUST be submitted. [~l PERMIT TO OWN AND/OR OPERATE UST Attachment 4 A copy of the permit to own and/or operate the UST(s) issued on or before January 1,1990, or documentation of not being subject to the.requirement as of January 1,1990, or documentation requesting a waiver MUST be submitted. l CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE Attachment 5 Documentation MUST be submitted showing the claimant is in corrective action compliance with corrective action orders and directives of the regulatory agency. CO-PAYEE AGREEMENT .-- A copy of the financial agreement between the claimant and any designated Co-Payee MUST be submitted. 'REWSED lin4) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 11 I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY THA T: 1. I (We) am (are) the owner or operator of an Underground Storage Tank from which there has been an unauthorized release of petroleum for which a claim against the Fund is permissible under Chapter 6.75 of the California Health and Safety Code. 2. Claimant(s) is (are) entitled to submit this claim application for reimbursement from the Fund. 3. All costs claimed herein were incurred after January 1, 1988, are reasonable and necessary, and are eligible for reimbursement from the Fund. 4. Claimant(s) obtained any permits required under Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code when such permits were required, or claimant(s) had filed substanlially complete applications for any permits required on or before January 1, 1990, or claimant(s) have requested the State Board to waive this requirement as a condition of eligibility. 5. Claimant(s) is (are) in compliance with any applicable financial responsibility requirements contained in Article 3, Chapter 18, Division 3, Title, 23, California Code of Regula~ons (Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Regulations). 6. As to all costs claimed which were incurred before the effective date of Cleanup Fund Regulations (December 2, 1991), any corrective action taken by claimant(s) was: 'A. In accordance with applicable provisions of Chapter 6.7 Of the California Health and Safety Code and Subchapter IX of' Chapter 82 of Title 42 of the United States Code and the Federal Regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and B. Consistent with any oral or written orders, directives, approvals or notification of cleanup responsibility issued by state, local or federal agencies having authority or responsibility over underground storage tanks, and consistent with any applicable waste discharge requirements, state policies for water quality control, and water quality control plans. 7. As to all costs claimed which were incurred on or after the effective date of Cleanup Fund Regulations (December 2, 1991): A. Claimant(s), if subject to the permit requirements of Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code, (1) is (are) in compliance with any applicable corrective action requirements established pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 6.75 of the California Health and Safety Code, including .~ny implementing regulations contained in Article 11, Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23, California Code of Regulations; and (2) has (have) notified the appropriate local agency or California Regional Water Quality Control Board of the release which is the subject of this claim and has (have) been required or permitted by such agency or agencies to undertake the corrective action for which reimbursement is sought, and claimant(s) is (are) in compliance with the requirements or any orders or directives issued by such agencies. B. Claimant(s), if not subject to the permit requirements of Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code, meet(s) the conditions specified in Paragraph 6 above. 8. Claimant(s) did not know of the unauthorized release which is the subject of this claim prior to January 1, 1988, or, if such release was known prior to that date, any required corrective action related to that release was initiated on or before June 30, 1988. 9. Claimant(s), if owner(s) of the site involved, does (do) not know of any facts which would preclude any party from whom the site was acquired from filing a claim for reimbursement against the Fund. 10. Claimant(s) understand that the State Board, at its option, may require the transfer and assignment to the State of California, and subrogate the State to, any and all rights which the Claimant(s) may have in recovering corrective action costs from any person or persons responsible or liable for the unauthorized release. Claimant(s) are not entitled to double paymeot of any corrective action or third party compensation claim cost. I (WE) JOINTLY,AND SEVERALLYAGREE THAT: 1. All records pertaining to the claims included in this Claim Application will be retained for a period of at least three years from the date of final payment on the last phase of work reimbursed from the Fund. This three year period of retention shall be extended until completion of any audit in progress at the conclusion of the three year retention period. All such records shall be made available to the State Board or any designated representative thereof upon request. 2. All reimbursements made pursuant to this Claim Application are subject to audit by the State Board or any representative thereof. Claimant(s) will reimburse the State for any costs finally disallowed pursuant to such an audit. :~-VlSED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 12 ..,: ,,~..~.~. .. /:..~ ~. .. .... .... ._, .~ .~ ~.... ........ '::, :. /: I.E~, ~~~~[ l~E.:.~J .... E,E:2.:]L~::'~=.:::=.Ls~: ': ~:..- ':',-~: ....... : -'~ ,~ ' . --'~-~ s .......... ,, .:..:, ~:~~/'~! ~~~E.li ,:, .:, . .~ . : ........ " -~ '.. : --~ .:-~.' ............. , ............ ::": .............. ~ :-~ .:' ..... ~'_.,J~ .. I ~ ~ . =====================, .::. xx:,:-.uc: .%.:-:, ', ,,,:,. ,::.,, ..... .. II ~a,~rcr~,~:~:~" ':1 ..... :~FE'6/~-:~W-:.::-'7 ' P::::' <: ,, .,. / '%: '::-.. "" j":: ' ~ ~ ~ ·~Jl~J L:=~,~ '~"v ....~ .~ "~ ~~ ~.~<~." ' ':~' ~- J~ ~":~':W. .... ~ '_~ .~. '~ ..... ~ ~ · .'" ~~ ..... ' -::;~ ' -' ~ ~' : ..... ~' '~ "'~r ..... ~ ~-':': ~':'--~ . x ,,_. 4{ ". _.=~ =29~ %~E' *//4S)Y~ :i~'~ ¢~~',: ! ' /, /"' ~,-~:' ' '"~ .... ,:~ ..... ¢', .... ,,.::': , · *,, . ~ · ~=~, ":.:~ . ~~~ ~ ....~~-~:~~.-._<.~~l_::~,;.-"- ~' / ~i::~-/'-<~[:w;i.:,~_- , :~:' '". ...... I ...... , · U~ ,.....~:l ~ ~1I .~,, ~/ 28 ~,~ ....- ..................... -,< .... ., .~W-~. ~,~/~d.. ~, .... .. ~ ........... --, -~ ........ /- .... ~-~ :.*- X .~ .~ ... // . __.f~./ ~ ~ /~.-~ I,, ~ _~ ..... .. ~ ........... ~ ..... ~_. _ ~ ~..~ ~--~ . ,. , . !~· :]~ .:~E:::: <...... ,-= ~~-.-:-,c:: '-.~:': .......... ' ........ : ............ , ....... : .... '- ....... 4 ~ ---: ..... ~ ~.-. ~,'..~. v,,,.,,¢~' '" . Ii SCALE I 24000 !C~: (: 1002 ~0~~~ ~OC~: O~ " , SA IN~I' VI NC:EN'~ ])~: PAUL KERN COUN'FY , CALIFORNIA Source of Base Map: U.S.C.S. 0il Ce,Let 7~ Minute Quadrangle F:~:_:re 1 ittachment 1 ", SITE MAP SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE ~-----.~ I D R SMITH & ASSOCIATES -- NOVEMBER 1991 ~" UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ¥ i ii~F~i~;~::~?:::~::::~?~::::::~::::: · ~ ~N~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:?::~.:::::::::::::::::::::~??:~?:~::~?:?. NAME ~F INDIVIDUAL FEI~ HEART . I PHONE I SIGNA~RE,, I ' ; ~ Y f . (L L"...~7 ~ ~;'~ ..~,,t ~' "'~ ~ ' ~ .... /" ~~ REGIONAL BOARD COMPLY OR AGEN~ N~E ~ ~. ,~ . ' ~ ,~,~ss " ' ~ ' ' ' ' ~'"~' ~C' t-'~ ---T~- / T ~.~/ " ~' i ~ i. ' .... F~ILI~ N~E (IF APPLIC~L~ OPE~TOR ~ P~NE ;&c '.'",, I ' ' ~" ~ ~o..ss / ~ ~... ...,,, ?.~;~.. .... ~.... ~ CROSS STR~ ~._.~ ~(~( ....' ~ L~ALAGENCY ~'.~:~ ~-.~A~Y~ME ~NTACTPER~N P~NE ~m ~ , .".. , } - m m REGION~ BOARD P~NE - . ~- ~ ( ~)',. ... ,..~, ~ {1)NAM~ OU~T~ LOST (G~LONS) ~ m ~ UNKNO~ ~ ~ UNKNO~ ~ ~TE DISCHARGE BE~N M~OD USED TO STOP DI~HAR~ (CHECK ~L ~T ~URCE OF DI~HARGE CAUSE(S) ~ ~' ~E~ONEO~Y ~E~ ONE O~Y ~. R~ED~T~~ ~ ~m~D(C~M~OORUNNECE~ ~ ~PU~WAY ~PROPR~N(~ ~ ~VA~&DI~(~) ~ ~F~EP~T~ '~:'. ~ ~8~G~A~ON(I~ :~S~'~ ' ~ ~'~VA~&~EAT(~ ~ .r~P&~TG~N~A~R(G~ ~ .'R~~L~(R~ ~: '" :: ' : ;' '; ' ' ~':: .:' :. · .' ' .- · ..~'.. '~' ;:.7.' '. . /...: :~- .'.5- .--- ..~ . ~,r~..:..?' : .%~,:;.?.~,......-~: ~.: ,:~;: :'~'- .~7 .~,...,. -. :-,~ ~-~ ..":..: ~.~...~::-~:~,F~:;.:'..,~ ;~ . .~ :,~ .- ~ .- ~..~. ' ,:..:~ .. ~ ;': ';: - ." .;-:r3,~ ' :. '.'.:;~:'~;'.:'...;4~- ': :.- ~':;-"" ' 5. ',: :.' :' .' : :".';~.~.-;-..:;;.':~Y-"..: :- "' -- '~ .- . ' ' :~: · .-,..-:~ :. :..~..:,...~: ..:.. ?..~q..::..:: .:,'~j~.?;~:...~ .:~..-?,.~ .-.?~ .;,;: .. ~ :::~ -: . .~..,.'~;:-..~';>.~:~ · ~..~.., .~ .~'~; ~<.~ ...: :. :~.. '-.~.~"~... -: ~'~'~-.~-~7~%~..'.,.Y.: '.. :":~ >.'; ~,;:~'.',~->-:-~ ,'?.-~.;.~'.~.~': · .~..~.~-.,~;~:~:~.~-~:~.~. ':..-~.-.: 8~ ~.~L~..,;~;~;~.~.~-,.. ...... ,~.:~.~s~.~'~:,~,..~,~...:,~,~ :~....--, ~. :,--~-~ ...... ..' -. -' ,.~'~-~T~.~;~' ................. . ~..~'~, · ....~. ,:...- ....... .-::~.~.:~w:.~z;.-.x~.. - ~ * q,700 Flower Street :' , RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM' HEALTHOmCER 8a, ker~leld, California 93305 Leon M He~:~"t~3n, Te~el:~'~3ne (805) 861-3638 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION ·. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Re~..har~ I NTERI M PERMIT PERMI T~i 500 4 1 C TO ~ OPERATE: ISSUED: JULY'i, 1986 EXP I RES: JULY 1, 1989 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY NUMBER OF TANKS= 1 FACILITY: I OWNER: ST. VINCENT DE PAUL I ST. VINCENT DE PAUL 300 BAKER STREET I 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 TANK # AGEIIN YRS) SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING? 1 25 MVF 3 NO NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE ~ ~ ~ POST ON PREMISES DATE PL~MZT C-~3CK LIST RETURNED: · Attachment 4 )3/.10/95 ST VINCENT DE PAUL 215-000-000432 Page 2 <C> Underground Storage Tanks Jl> Permit Information 03/28/85 PERMIT APPLICATION TO OPERATE 500 GAL GAS TANK INSTALLED 1960 06/10/91 PERMIT FOR REMOVAL (A 1504-15) ~2> Monitoring/Tightness Tests <3> Corrective Actions 06/17/91 500 GAL GAS TANK REMOVED, LEAK REPORT FILED 11/20/91 PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT REQ'D 03/09/92 SITE CHARACTERIZATION REC'D 11/05/92 REMEDIAL OPTION APPROVED - VAPOR EXTRACTION <4> Regulatory Enforcement 05/27/94 NOTICE LETTER THAT CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN NOT SUBMITTED. 06/10/94 RESPONSE FROM FR. RALPH THAT HE WILL CONTACT CLEAN UP FUND. 11/03/94 NOV (L16 LETTER) FOR PROGRESS 90 DAYS PAST DUE. Attachment 5 All claimants, including all joint claimants must sign and date this Claim Application. If the claimant has authorized a representative to slgn on their behalf, documentation to this affect must be submitted by the claimant (e.'g. Power of Attorney, signed statement from the claimant). Alt signatures must be original; no reproduced or copied signatures will be accepted. I (WE) HEREBY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL FACTS AND STATEMENTS SET FORTH AS PART OF THIS CLAIM APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY (OUR) KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ExEcUTED AT Bakersfield, CA ON THIS 17th. DAY OF March 19 95 ...9.---" / . · ---~'¢- ',' .-, .V.., ':,'~'~ ,_- ////' '~'2 ~ ~ .... ~_.~.~..,.~/:.' .~' ~.a~ :.-'~c.--';'./~L Father Ra lph' ,~'e 1 luomini PRIED NA~ CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME JOINT CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME JOINT CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME DELIVER COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: OR MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS UST CLEANUP FUND PROGRAM UST CLEANUP FUND PROGRAM 2014 T STREET P.O. BOX 944212 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2120 REVISED 1/94) (SEE FACING PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) PAGE 13 o/c/,a,,y St. Vincent de Paul 300 BAKER ,STREET AKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93305 March 17, 1995 ..... B~__k ~ ~i ~l_d_. _ F $ rD p~partment 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attn: Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator RE: St~ Vincent De Paul Store Inc. Dear Mr. Huey, We have spoken with Duane Smith and we have contracted verbally with Mark Magargee of Holguin Fahan & Associates. They have recommended vapor extraction. Period of time for cleanup shOuld be six months. It also must be noted that to achieve this work, application has been made to the state to assist financially. S lnce~l~y-~- ~ cc: Howard Wines St. Vincent de Paul 300 B^KER STRF. Er B^r.I:.RSWV. LrO, C^L,VORN,^ 93305 ~ '~ ............ '~.:r~-~ ~ MAR 271995 By~ .... _ ...................... March 17, 1995 Bakersfield Fire Department Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attn: Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator RE: St. Vincent De Paul Store Inc. Dear Mr~ Huey, We have spoken with Duane Smith and we have contracted verbally with Mark Magargee of Holguin Fahan & Associates. They have recommended vapor extraction. Period of time for cleanup should be six months. It also must be noted that to achieve this work, application has been made to the state to assist financially. F ~ thqr[~'3 l~h Belluomini . ./cc: Howard Wines E ~ Commonwealth Plaza TCHEVERRY . Telephone (805) 324-7900 Attorneys at Law · Louis P. Etcheverry James E. Noriega Joel T. Andreesen March 16, 1995 aaz ous mT RZA S COOm Z A OR 1715 Chester Avenue #300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: St. Vincent de Paul Store, Inc. Dear Mr. Huey: This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation where I advised you that Monsignor Ralph Belluomini is making application to the state of California to obtain the monies and resources to clear up the hazardous waste problem at the Saint Vincent de Paul thrift store located in Bakersfield, California. It is my understanding that he has already contacted your offices and you are assisting him in this matter. He has assured me that he will take whatever steps are necessary to abate the gasoline contaminated soil at the above- mentioned location. If you have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to give me a call. I hope this letter finds you doing well. .................. very truly ~ours, LPE:dst cc: MonsignOr Belluomini RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Lo. on: ~ ~~- ~D# Business Name:~ - ~'' *¢~-~ o,,~c,- P<,,, ( .. Busin~ Phone: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ( P~: ~ns~or's N~e: ~ ~me M C~I: D=e: ~/~/~ ~ Time: 14 ~ · Min: ~ T~e of.C~l: In.ming [ ] O~going ~] R~umed ~ Time Required.to C°mplete Activity # Min: / ~" CI T Y of BAKER SFIELD "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT February 14, 1995 1715 CHESTER AVENUE U. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 St. Vincent De Paul Store Inc. 310 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Attn: Reverend Ralph Belluomini NOTICE OF VIOLATION - SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE RE: Gasoline contaminated soil at 300 Baker Street, St. Vincent De Paul Thrift Store. Dear Father Belluomini: This is intended to notify you that you are in violation of Section 2722(b) of Article 11 of Title 23, California Code of Regulations concerning the clean up of leaking underground tanks. Our regulatory concern in this matter stem's directly from the Site Characterization Study, performed by Duane R. Smith and Associates in March 1992 which stated that: ...'~he [gasoline contamination] plume is large in diameter and extends well under the store building (see Figure 9, for example). This may present a threat to public safety." (p. 14) On May 19, 1992, you were notified in writing that mitigation of the contamination plume to acceptable levels is required by this office. On November 5, 1992, you were again requested in writing to submit a corrective action plan or at least establish a time schedule for compliance. On May 27, 1994, you were notified in writing that a review of the file indicated that you had not complied with the code requirements. You were most recently notified by Certified Letter on November 3, 1994 that corrective actions to abate the gasoline contaminated soil was to have commenced within 90 days of that letter. Pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 8.60.060, the Hazardous Materials Division of the Bakersfield Fire Department intends to initiate legal action for failure to comply with the previous clean up order. Please respond within 14 days of receipt of this letter as to how you have initiated clean up of the gasoline contaminated soil in order to avoid impending legal action. Sincerely, Hazardous Materials Coordinator cc: Carl Hernandez, III, DepUty City Attorney ~"~ FAX ~ansmittal B A K F. R $ F I ]~ L DCover Sheet CALIFOIL. NIA Bakersfield Fire Dept. Hazardous Materials Division 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 FAX No. (805) 326-0576 · Bus No. (805) 326-3979 Today's Date ,~- /,~ ° 9'J-' Time ~ .' O ? No. of Pages RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Contact Name: Insp~or's N~e: Type of C~I: Incoming [ ] Outgoing Time Required to Complete ActivitY # Min: ~ CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" November 3, 1994 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE M. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Rev. Ralph Belluomini St. Vincent De Paul 310 Baker Street Certified Mall Bakersfield, CA 93305 RE: Gasoline Contamination beneath Thrift Store at 300 Baker Street Dear Father Ralph: Our records indicate that your former underground storage tank site is currently subject to Corrective Action Requirements under Article II of Title 23 California Code of Regulations concerning leaking underground tanks. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2722(b) of Article II, you are hereby directed to begin the necessary work at your site within 90 calendar days from the date of this letter. The required work shall include: Implementation of a Corrective Action Plan based on the vapor extraction remediation option previously approved by this office on May 19, 1992. However, if you or your consultant have an alternate method, you may submit a request to this office for review and approval. Please be aware that, pursuant to Section 2722(c) of Article II, you are required to have an approved workplan on file with this office Prior to initiation of any corrective action work. In addition, you are to provide ongoing status reports of all activities involving the progress of this case to this office every 90 days. If you have any questions regarding the provisions of this letter, please call me at 326- 3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician SENDER: I also wish to receive the · Complete items 1 and/, for additional services.~ - · Complete items 3, b. followin ices (for an extra · Print your name and on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): · Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. [] Addressee's Address d°es not permit' · Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. [] Restricted Delivery .- · The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date Ii delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. e 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number REV~:~I RALPH BELLUOMINI P 390 214 249 ST. [!'VINCENT DE PAUL 4b. Service Type 310 ~BAKER [] Registered [] Insured STREET~i? '" [~£ertified [] COD BAKERSFIELD [] Express Mail [] Return Receipt for , CA '93305 Merchandise 7. Date of Delivery il 5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested and fee is paid) 6. Sigr~rure (Agent) - - PS Form 3811, December 1991 ~U.S. GPO:~SS3--3S~-7~, DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT UNITED STATES PO: ~,L SERVICE Official Business PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, $300 Print your name, address and ZIP Code here · · ..~..,.~..-.~,.~...GitY~ Bakersfiel~.~A.el~. · ~ ,-~'l~hester' ~e_ L,~v_~t~!l #~)0 ~-- ~field, 0~93~01v' ~ ' Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided ,,,,,~os~*,~-~s Do not use for International Mail POSTN. (See Reverse) Sent to REV. RALPH BELLUOMINI Street and No. ST. VINCENT DE PAUL P.O~, State and ZIP Code 310 BAKER STREET ~°§~ERSFIELD, CA $93305 Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Showing to Whom & Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to Whom, Date, and Addressee's Address Postage & Fees Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAiL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECT'L~D OP.TIOI~,AL SERVICES Isee front).' 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier (no extra charge).' 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article, 5. Enter fees for the services requested in tho appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. If return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry, to5603-92-e-0226 CATblOLIC SOCIAl S _ VIC $ 'T 3 B 1 o ^ ~ l~v------_ N K E E E R L. 3 D June 10, 1994 3 5 C - T A z R L Howard H. Wines, III 9 ~ ~ Hazardous Materials Technician 4 E F ~ T City of Bakersfield 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Mr. Wines: Thank you for your letter of May 27, 1994.Will contact Mr. Deaner for information so that the clean up may be done. Sincerely, F~ther Ra ~yB~'l~l ~omini CITY of BAKER SFIELD "WE CARE" May 27, 1994 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE M. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301 ACTING FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Reverend Ralph Belluomini St. Vincent De Paul 310 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Re: Gasoline contamination in soil at 300 Baker Street Dear Father Ralph: A review of the correspondence file shows that you were last notified on November 5, 1992 and were then required to do the following: "Please submit the corrective action plan which includes all the elements and requirements listed in [citation] by November 30, 1992. If... you are unable to submit this required information then contact this office and we shall establish a time schedule for compliance..." Unfortunately, I can't find anything else in your file that indicates you have complied with the code requirements. I'm especially alarmed because so much time has elapsed since our last contact. State money is now available to pay for these types of clean ups. A $10,000 deductible must be met first, then the state will pay for up to an additional $990,000 in clean up expenses. Please contact Dave Deaner at 1-800-831-FUND for details on how to qualify for the state clean up fund. Please also help me update your file by responding within 14 days, in writing, as to how you will address the previous code violation. If you've had difficulties with compliance, I'll need to know that as well. I'm willing to work with you toward gaining compliance with the law, but we do need to resolve this issue at once. Very truly yours, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician cc: R. Huey, Coordinator Hazardous Materials Division RECEIVED. DEC 9 ~ ~992 St. Vincent De Paul HA.'? I~4T. 13{V. 330 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 December 22, 1992 Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Material Coordinator City of Bakersfield 2101 H Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Huey, RE: 016-320-15-00-2 Sorry about the confusion. At the reception of your letters I contacted Duane R. Smith and thought he would do whatever was necessary. Perhaps I was a little too presumptive. I case, as I stated to Duane the corporation is willing to Clean up the contamination but as you can guess we do not have the ~mmediate resources to pay for a total quick clean up. It took four years to save for the tank removal and soil test. Two possible solutions that might be acceptable. One to apply for a government grant to cover the cost of clean up. Secondly, to do the clean up gradually as the money can be accumulated. Bank loans for charitable activities are next to impossible to obtain. Please accept my apologies for the prior confusion. Sincerely yours, ~;c~?fh~ellu°mini FR:se FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. O. JOHNSON November 5· 1992 BAKERSFIELD, 93301 'FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 St. Vincent De Paul 300 Baker Street Bakersfield· CA 93305 Attn: Ralph Bellieomina Subject: Location : 300 Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Known as : 'St. Vincent De Paul Thrift Store 'APN : '016-320-15-00-2 Dear Mr. Bellieomina, -A review o'f the file for the property described above has revealed that you are currently not in compliance with Article 11 of Chapter 16, Title 23; corrective action requirements, underground tank regulations. SPecifically, you have not submitted a corrective action plan (CAP) as required by section 2725(c) Article 11, Title 23 CCR. Please submit the corrective action plan which includes all the elements and requirements listed in section 2725 (d,e.,f, & g) .by November 30, 1992. If further work needs to be performed before a completed CAP can be submitted then the Proper work Plan detailing the additional work and including a time table for complete compliance shall be submitted by November 30, 1992. If you are unable to submit this required information then contact this office and we shall establish a time schedule for compliance, in accordance with section 25299.37(c), Article 4, Chapter 6.75 .California Health & Safety Code. I have attached a copy of the basic requirements for a CAP for your convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, -- Ralph E. HueyU Hazardous Material Coordinator 2725. soil and Water.~Investigati°n Phase. .(a) The Soil and Water Investigation Phase includes the collection and analysis of da~a necessary to assess the nature and vertical and lateral extent of the unauthorized release and to deterInine a cost-effective method of cleanup. b) Using ihfor~nation obtained during the investigation, the responsible party shall propose a Corrective Action Plan. The Corrective Action Plan 'shall consist of those 'activities. determined to be cost-effective. c) The responsible party shall submit the Corrective Action Plan to the regulatory agency for review and concurrence. The regulatory agency shall concur with the Corrective Action P!aa after determining that implementation of the plan will adequately protect human health, safety and the environment and will restore or protect current, or potential beneCicial uses of water. The responsible party shall modify the Corrective Action Plan in response to a final regulatory agency directive. The Corrective Action Plan shall include the fol!owinq elements: (! an assessment of the impacts listed in subsection ~ of this Section; 2) a feasibility study, in accordance ,~ith subsection fl of this Section; and ]) applicable cleanup levels, in accordance 'gith subsection (g) of this Sec%ion. (e) tn assessment of the imoacts shall include, but is not limited to, the following: (1) The physical and chemical characteristics of the hazardous substance .or its constituents, including their toxicity, persistence, and potential for migration in ~ater, soil, and air~ (2) The 'hydrogeologic characteristiCs of the site and the surrounding area where the unauthorized release has migrated or may migrate; (3) The proximity and quality of nearby, surfaCe water or ground water, and the current and potential beneficial uses of these waters; . _ .... t= of residual contamination on (4) The ootentia! =~=~ - nearby surface water and ground water; and f) The responsible party shal.1 conduct a feasibility .study to evaluate alternatives for remedying or mitigating the actual or potential adverse effects of the unauthorized release. Each alternative shall be evaluated for Cost-effectiveness, and the responsible party shall propose to implement the most cost-effective corrective action. For a ires, each ~ecommended alt tire shall be designed to mitigate nuisance conditions and risk !of fire 0r explosion: 2) For sites where the unauthorized re!ease affects or threatens waters with current or potential beneficial uses designated in water quality control plans, the · feasibility study shall also identify and evaluate at least t~o alternatives for restoring or pro~ectinq these beneficial uses; (3) For sites where the unauthorized release affects or threatens waters with no current or potential beneficial uses designated in water quality control plans, the feasibility study shall identify and evaluate at least one alternative to.satisfy paragraph (!) of this subsection. Cleanup levels for ground or surface waters, -affected or threatened by the unauthorized release, shall'comply with the requirements of Section 272!(b) and shall meet the following requirements: (1) For waters with current or potential beneficial uses for which numerical objectives have been designated in water quality control plans, the responsible party shall propose at least two alternatives to achieve these numerical objectives; (2) For waters with current or potential beneficial uses for which no numerical objectives have been designated in water quality control plans, the responsible party r ..~ shall recommend target cleanup levels for !ongLterm corrective actions to the regulatory agency for concurrence. Target cleanup levels shall be based on the impact assessment, prepared in accordance with subsection (e) of this Section. CITY of BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. O. JOHNSON May 19, 1992 BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 St. Vincents De Paul 300 Baker Street Bakersfield, California 93305 Attn: Ralph Bellieomina RE: ReSults of site characterization of the property located at 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California. Dear Mr. Bellieomina, ~his office has reviewed the site characterization report submitted by you for the property located at the above stated address. Laboratory results reveal petroleum hydrocarbons are present in the soil at levels exceeding limits allowable by state guidelines. The Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store is hereby notified that mitigation of the contami-nation plume to acceptable levels is required by this office. This office accepts option 2, listed in the site characterzation .study, vapor extraction, as the most practical method for accomplishing a reduction in the hydrocarbon levels detected at the site. However, if you, or your consultant have an alternate method you wish to employ you may submit a request to this office for review and approval. Please resPond within twenty (20) working days from receipt of this' letter as to your intention regarding this matter and a time table for carrying them out. .- If you.have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. S%ncerel~, .. f/Joe A. Dunwoody ' .~. /_/ Hazardous Material specialist Underground Tank Program D UA NE R. SMI TH · AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Geologists 7201 Fruitvale Extension Bakersfield, California 93308 (805) 589-7861 March 9, 1992 Mr. Joseph A. Dunwoody Hazardous Material Division Bakersfield City Fire Department 2130 G Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Mr. Dunwoody: Enclosed please find one (1) copy of the Site Characterization Study, Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store, 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California, March 1992. If you have any questions, · please feel free to call. Yours truly, Thomas F. Gutcher TFG/tg Enclosure CITY of BAKERSFIELD '.'WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMI~NT 2101 H STREET S. O. JOHNSON January 8 · 'l 9 9 2 BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Thomas F. Gutcher Duane R. Smith and Associates 7201.Fruitvale Extension Bakersfield, CA 93308 RE: Site assessment work plan for the faCility located . at 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield· CA. Dear Mr. Gutc~er, This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to t'he commencement of Work. , Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct over sight by this office will not be accepted· unless previously approved. If you have any questions, Please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, :' /Joe A. Dunwood~-" / ~rdous Material Specialist Underground Tank Program D UA NE R. SMI TH AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Geologists 7201 Fruitvale Extension RECEIVED Bakersfield, California 93308 November 19, 1991 Mr. Joseph A. Dunwoody Hazardous Material Division Bakersfield City Fire Department 2130 G Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Mr. Dunwoody: EncloSed please find one (1) copy of the Site Characterization Work Plan, Saint Vincent De Paul Thrift Store, 300 Baker Street, Bakersfield, California, November 1991. Please inform us of any necessary changes or approval of the work plan so we may schedule drilling. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Yours truly, Registered Geologist " StaGe of California No. 5010 TFG/tg Enclosure UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) ! CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT YES ..~r NO REmRTBEENFILED? ~ YES .,~ NAME OF INDIVIDU~ FILING REPORT ~ PHONE ~ SlGNA~RE REPRESENTING ~ OWNE~OPERATOR ~ REGIONAL BOARD COMPANYOR AGENCY NAME ~ L~ALAGENCY ~ OTHER ADDRESS STRE~ Cl~ STA~ ZIP FACILI~N~E('FAPPLiOABL~ '/-- ---[ ~RATOR (PHONE ) ADDRESS CROSS STREET LOCAL AGENCY AGENCY N~E ~NTACT PERSON PHONE REGION~ BOARD ~ PHONE (1) NAME QUANTI~ LOST (GALLONS) ~ ~' 'UNKNOWN UNKNOWN DATE DIS~VERED. Y HOWDIS~VERED ~ INVENTORY~NTROL ~ SUBSURFACE MONITORING ~ NUtS~CECOND[TIONS DATE DI~HARGE BE~N M~HOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ~L ~AT APPLY) HAS,DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED ? ~ REPAIR TANK ~ CLOSE TANK & FILL IN P~CE ~ CHANGE PROCEDURE SOURCE OF DiSChARGE CAUSE(S) ~ TANK~AK ~ UNKNOWN ~ OVERFILL ~ RUP~R~FAILURE ~ SPILL CHECK ONE ONLY ~ UNDETERMINED ,~¢~SOIL ONLY ~ GROUNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER - (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HAVE AC~ALLY BEEN AFFEC~D) CHECK ONE ONLY ~ NO ACTION TAKEN ~ PRELIMINARYSI~ASSESSMENT~RKP~NSUBMI~ED ~ POLLUTIONCHARACTERI~TION '*~EMEDIATION PLAN ~ CASE CLOSED (CLE~UP ~MPLE~D OR UNNECESSAR~ ~ CLEANUP UNDERWAY CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVATE & DISPOSE (ED) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED B~O DEGRADATION (1~ ~ CAPSI~(CD) ~ EXCAVATE&TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP&TREATGROUNDWATER(G~ REP~CESUPPLY(R~) ~ CONTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ NO ACTION REQUIRED (NA) ~ TREA~ENT AT H~KUP (HU) ~ VENT SOIL (VS) ~ VACUUM EXTRACT (VE) ~THER (O~ RECEIVED lq 1 il 1991 U {kn~'~} ............ FOR A PERMIT ACTIVITY AT a US T FAC ILI TY I N BAKERSFIELD CITY TYPE OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: ~~ ~ r~/~~ / DATE APPLICATION SUBMITTED: APPLICATION SUBMITTED FOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED AT THE FACILITY FACILITY AD D R E S~'~-~~&-~ FACILITY ~ENSUS TRACT: FACILITY PERMIT NUMBER: DESCRIPTIONS OF WORK FOR WHICH PERMIT APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED: ~.~_~., ! ~-Ln~, SPECIALIST GIVEN THE APPLICATION: ~r'r,'~ C-eot5, DATE GIVEN TO THE SPECIALIST: ~-- ': ' '~ ' ' '~z~" : ' ~ NO. .. q.. / RECYCLlNG, DISPOSAL FOaM ~,...:::. ,. 2202 South Miiliken'Avenue Date:'_..- . ;19 :::'.':' Ontario, CA91761" ~:.'. (71'4)',~8~000 ' Job ~ ~ RO.~ ; DESTINATION: A.M.R. 2202 S. Milliken Ave., Ontario, CA 91761 ' SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: /~C ~ --.C~ TIME IN: TIME OUT: ~ Q~ ' GALLONS ~PE NET TONS TOTAL F* S* ~0 ~ ~ ~ ,14 ~&e~ ~ ,o ~ ~ .~4 All fees incurred are per Icad unless specified..',.'1~';~; Terms are net 30 days from date of invoice. ~ ~2~0 B"B 4.93 Contractor's signature represents acceptance of terms for payment, and confirms that tank NO. 7F TANKS ;OTAL NET TON? removal complies with State laws. ~' /'/"~;~~ CONTRACTOR'SSIGNA'fURE *F -- FIBERGLASS ( *S ~TEEL 105 CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL IDES~~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THE REC~I~ AND ACCE~ANCE OF THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED H~ BEEN COMPLETELY DESTROYED FOR SCRAP PURPO~E~ONLY. · /..~ DATE AUT~O.~ZE~ *E.. GENERATOR COPY ,I. ~ . .N. ,1 -: .......... ;.,...,..~.~.;..-;.;...,,.;.;.;--.,.; ............ ;...;.~ ........................................... :.;.,.,.:.:.:-,~..,-,....~,.;....~-~.:a..:~: ~E~ ~p ~ ~ME - ~% .' , ~ I ~NT~TPE~ON ......... ..'/- ~...~,.-:~,' ...... ~E~ C~ ) ~ /.% fi. OPE~TOR.Y' AGENGY ~L~ '.: ~'~AG~OY ~M~ ~NTAOT PER~N P~N~ ' ' ' ~ U~NO~ ~DI~RED. , Y ~WDI~D ~ IN~O~ROL ~ 8U~URF~EM~ITOR~G.. ::~ ~I~E~NDIT~NS /MI ~;"~ DI '":'/ Ol ~ YI 't ~ ~ TA~ST ~ TA~REMOV~ ~ O~R '.-' DI~HARGE BE~N M~OD U~D TO 5~ DI~R~ (CHECK ~ ~T ,I 01 01 ~0~ ~ ~MOVE~ ~ R~ET~K . ~ CL~ET~K ~ ~S ~ ~ IFYES. DA~ ~:'"1 ~' .!: 01roi ~UR~ OF DI~R~ CAUSE(S) T~K~ ~ UN~ ~ OVERFLL ~ RUP~R~AILURE ~ SPl~ ,,PING L~ ~ O~ER ~ ~R~SION ~ UNK~WN ~ O~R ~E~ ONEONLY U~RMINED ~ mlLONLY ~ GR~NDWA~" ~ DRI~INGWAmR-(CHECKONLYFWA~R~HA~Am~YBE~EC~D) ONE O~Y NOA~IONTA~N ~ PflELIMINA~SI~E~ME~R~NSUBM~D ~ ~LLUTI~C~C~fl~N ~ L~ BEI~ ~IRMED ~ PRELIMINA~ SI~ ~E~ME~ UNDERWAY ~. ~~ MONImR~G'~. P~O~ REMEDIATIONP~ ~ CASE~ED(C~UP~MP~DORUNNECE~AR~ ~ .~PU~RWAY" CHE~PROPRIA~TION(S) ~ ~CAVA~&DISPO~(ED) ~ ~MO~F~EP~" ~ EN~B~G~ATION(~ 'C~SI~(OD) ~ ~OAVA~&TREAT(E~ ~ F'U~P&~ATG~UN~A~R(G~ ~ ,~SO~LY(R~' ~.~AI~ENTBARRIER(~) ~ ~T~N~QUIRED(NA) ~ T~A~AT~O~P~U) , . ~. . .::.'~:~' -., :.. :. ::~. , : . : ~,~., . _:' ~ ~ ' .. .'.: .. <:'.. ~ · '.. ~:y :: ...:..; .'.. GIBSON OleG CO., INC. RE: Load Acceptance MANIFEST Dear Customer: This Letter is to inform you that Gibson OII & Refining has the appropriate permits for and has accepted your material for recycling. ,The amount we received wa~~'/¢~.qallons. If this does not agree with your data please notify us within 10 days so that we can resolve any discrepancies. Phone (805) 327-0413 Very truly yours, ~' ~ Gibson Oil & Refining Co., Inc. Customer Service 3300 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200 Bakersfield, CA 93301 A Subsidiary of V.L.S., Inc. 211 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 231 2101 Webster St., Suite 1500 3300 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200 Long Beach, CA 90802 Oakland, CA 94612 Bakersfield, CA 93301 213 / 499-4996 Telex: 664-611 415 / 446-7777 Telex: 338-139 805 / 327-0413 / 800-582-3935 FAX 213 / 499-4960 FAX 415 / 836-4503 FAX 805 / 861-0229 Stat~"ef California---Health and-Welfare-Agency .... Department of Health Services Ple~ Dr~t or ~pe. (Fo~ des~n~ ~r use on el~ .pitch t~e~er). . . Sacramento, California ~ k .' .UNIFORM ' HAZARDOUS' ~. Genera~r's US ~ ID No. ~ , / Manife8t · 2. Page 1 ' . Info.stUn in the shaded areas 3. ~erator'~ Na~=d~ailing~ddrea~ _ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ' . . . . A','~Ie~Ita,B~:N=.... ._.. .... ........... ........ ' 5. ~[ans~o~l Company Name . ~. US ~PA ID Num~e~/ . , C: StateTr~!~'~,~ ~ 7. Transpolar 2 Company Name 8. U~ EPA ID Number E. ~tate~a~'e~,'. ~ ~ - _ 9.jsignated Facili)y Name and Site A~ . . tO. US EPA ID Number G. State Facili~'8~",.. .: 12. Containers 13. Total 14 ..... I. . 11. US DOT Description (Including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) Quantity . Unit , .Waste .o. T~,. ~,,vo, ~,,,./.~ ~ ~ I I I I I I ~' ~ · : ~ T EPAl~her ~ o I I I I I I I . c.L ~ - ~ EPA/~er ~ ~ d. Stale ,. ~ EPAl~her ~ ,. I I I I I I I ~ J. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above K. Handling Codes for Wastes List~ Above . _ U a' ~.. - ' ' ~ . / c. : d. k 15. ~pecial Ha~dli~ I~lr~clions a~d ~dditio~al Information . / ,': : ~ 16. ~ GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name ~ and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transpo~ by highway according to applicable international and ~ national government regulations. ~ If I am a large quantity generator, t cedi~ that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have datelined 0 to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the ~ present and future threat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a small quantity generator, I have made a good faith effo~ to minimize my waste 0 generation and select the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford. Z ~ Printed/Typed Name Signature Month . Day . Year ~ T 17. Transpolar 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials R ~ 0 1~. Tran~poaer 2 ~ck~o~ledge~e~t of Receipt of ~alerials ~ ~ Printed/Typed Name ~. Signature Month Day Year ... . .,... . 19. Discrepancy t~dicatio'~-apace '" I 2~. ~acility Owner or Operator Ce~ificatio~ et receipt of hazardou~ ~alerials coyer'ed by tki~ manilesl~c~pl~ ~oled i~e~9. r Printed/Typed Name Si~ture .~ ~ /~/~//// Month Day Year DHS ~022 A (~8) Do ~ot Write S~low T~is Line EPA 870~22 ~, . · (R~v. 9-8~) Pr~vioas ~dilio~s ar~ obsol~(~ ' Y~IIo~: ?aDF 8~ND~ THI~ COPY ~0 GENEEATOE WITHI~ 30 DAY~ State of Califomia-;-Health"and Welfare Agency I ..... .. _ .-. Department of Health Services Form Approved OMB No. 205 .0:-0~...(Expi~'es 9-30-~1~ . T0xlc-Subatancea Control Division Please, print or type. (Form de$igned~!or use on elitlll~JF-p/tch typewr/ter). "."-'..' ". . : Sacramento California ";'k'.: '- UNIFORM-wASTE HAZARDOUS.MANiFEST.· ~'~lli" Generator's(,~/'~4~US EPA ID No.~.~ ~1/I .:~/ y,.~p~,~t),~" Manifest" . 2..Page.1.. of / I ia "0t"req~iredbY Inf°mlMl~n'll~the ahadedereaa'Federal law. 3. Generator's. Name and Mailing Address. ~-~ . 4A. A%.State Manifea~.l)~cumen~.Numbe~:~:-,:': :.~.,:. · , .. 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number I 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Acld~s 10. US EPA ID Number G. State Facility,s 11. US DOT Description (Including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) Quantity Unit : :~:?:Waate No;. No. Type ~t/Vol . _. II I I,~I E b. Slate':- · A "~'~'~-~-~< '"~Q ...... EPA/Other ~' /:' ! ~.~ /' :, EPA/Other . K, ~landling Codes_for, Wastes. Listed Above ' : 18. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information ...~ ,._ ,.- ..~:.,. · / ._. ::- --:--~ GI=NI=RATOR'S CER'rlPICAT~ON: I hereby declare thai lhe ¢onlent$ st lhia con$ignmenl are tully and accurately describsd above'by proper nhipping name and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all rsspects in proper condition for lrsnsport hy highway according to applicable inlernafio~sl and Printed/Typed Name Signature Month' Day Year T 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials R N A Pri .r~yped Name ~. \ Signature ~ .... /~,~~/~_ Month Day Year PO 18, Trannporler 2 Acknowledgement st Receipt st Materials ~ Printed/Typed Name Signature ~'.~_? Month Day Year E , ,., ...... , . .. ,,.>r ..... I/':1 tg. Discrepancy Indicatidn'Spece A C L TI 20. Facility Owner or Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. y Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year · I I I I I I DHS 8022 A (t/88) Do Not Write Below This Line . EPA 8700---22 .... -, - . (Rev. 9-88) Previous editions are obsolet'm. -. ' YELLOW: GENERATOR RETAINS INVOICE NO: ~-'1 Z~ DATE: E17/26/91 INVOICE JSTOME. NO.:S^'DEP CES, INC. REMITTO: MP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 3400 MANOR STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 FAX: (805) 392-1726 ,3ILL TO: (800) 458-3036 TOLl: FREE SAINT VINCENT DEPAUL CORP (805)393-1151 3ElEl BAKER ST BAKERSFIELD, CA 933e5 ATTN= FATHER RALPH TERMS DUE DATE NET 3~ DAYS ~8/25/91 UNDERGROUND, STORAGE TANK,REMOVAL' FLAT' RATE' I/we. underst'and that INTEREST at the rate of 1 0%' PER'ANNUM will be charged if this invoice is not'paid in 30:~lays. If.:in ttie:e~ent df nonpayment. ii is necessary to refer this, matter to any attorney for collection or to seek legal advice following nonpayment; the prevailing,party:in.any'action shall ' be entitled to recover all reasonable costs and express, including attorneys' fees. incurred. - ' ': - ' :: .~ ENVIRCNMENTAL SERVICES, INC.. .~.,.REMITTO: MP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ~ " BAKERSFIELD, ~ 93308 F~:.(805) 392-1726., 3ILL TO: (8~) 458-3036 TOLL FREE SAINT VINCENT DEPAUL CORP (805)393-1151 3e~ BAKER ST BAKERSFIELD,' CA 933~5 ATTN: FATHER RALPH TERMS ~' DUE DATE NET 30 DAYS 08/25/91 " '""~"; .... 89634219 06/17/91 " ' .... UNDERGR'OUND~STORAGETANK R,EMO~AE 933e5 ' :' ATTN= FATHER RALPH TERMS ~ DUE DATE .. . ~. ': .: ~i~'., . . : ". NET 39 DAYS 98/25/91 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT j~ili,ty Name: .~ ,h~-~ ' I ,. Kern County Permit #: Address: %~ Po~ ~-(=e~, County a: 15 **UNDERGROUND TANK DISPOSITION TRACKING RECORD** This form is to be returned to the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department within 14 days of acceptance of the tank(s) by an approved disposal or recycling facility. The holder of the permit with the number noted above is responsible for insuring that this form is completed and returned. Section I To be filled out by tank removal contractor: Tank Removal Contractor: ~/~ d~/c~- '". Address: 3~PO J,,',, ep./e,..,l,.¢_,,~-~ Phone #:,. ~'5~3~¢"-~//~, · Zip: ,, :~'3~ Date Tank(s) Removed: No. 6'f Tank(s): Section 2 To be filled out by contractor "decontaminating" tank(s): Tank "Decontamination" Contractor: ~ Address: '~ cLr~>/V, x~*~~--- Phone #: ~-'?~:~q~- $ Z i p: .:~-~' Tank Size L.E.L. Tank Size L.E.L. Authorized representative of the contractor certifies by signin9 below that the tank(s) have been decontaminated in accordance with Kern County Environmental He__vices .Department requirements. , ., S i gnatu re Section 3 To be filled out and signed by an authorized representative of the approved disposal or recycling facility accepting the tank(s): Facility Name: AMERICAN METAL RECYCLINGr INC. Address: 2202 SOUTH MIIaLT~EN AVV. I~TTF, Phone #: (714) 988-8000 ONT~RI'O, CALIFORNIA Zip: q176] Date Tank(s) RRc~tve~ .JUL%r 8, 1991 No. of Tank(s): ] Signature: /~y~/~---~ Title: CU~PTnE MANAGER. - (Autl~orized Representative) 2700 '~4" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CAL/FORNIA 93301' (805) 861.3636 · * * MAILIN~ INSTRUCTIONS: Fold and staple. FAX~ (805)861.3429 D UA NE R. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Geo~gis~ 7201 Fruitvale Extension Bakersfield, California 93308 (805) 589-7861 July 3,' 1991 Mrs. Gina Blankenship M P Environmental Services, Inc. 3400 Manor Street Bakersfield, California 93308 Re: Underground. Storage Tank St. Vincent De Paul, Catholic Social Services 300 Baker Street Bakersfield, california Dear Mrs. Blankenship: One underground storage tank was removed on June 17, 1991 from the Saint Vincent De Paul site located at 300 Baker Street in Bakersfield, California. The site is situated in Section 29, T.29S., R.28E., M.D.B.& M. (see Attachment A). One 550 gallon abovegroUnd gasoline tank was removed. It was situated on the property as shown on Attachment B. The dispenser was located about 6 feet from the tank. No products other than gasoline are known to have been stored in this 550 gallon tank. The tank was made of steel and had been in place for many years. The soil around the tank was stained and gasoline odors were noted. Four soil samples were collected from this site. Two soil samples were taken from Test Hole No. 1. The samples were taken at depths of 2 feet and 6 feet below the bottom of the tank. Test Hole No. 1 was located in the center of where the tank had been. Two samples were also taken from Test Hole No. 2 at depths of 2 feet and 6 feet below the piping at the dispenser location. The soil sample locations are shown on Attachment B. Ms. Gina Blankenship M P Environmental Services, Inc. July 8, 1991 Page 2 The soil samples from below the tank location were collected from native soil in a backhoe bucket with a hand-driven core sampler. The test hole at the dispenser location was hand augered and then the hand-driven core sampler was used to collect the samples. The core sampler contained one 2 inch diameter by 2 inch long brass liner. The sampler was driven into native soil using a hand-actuated impact hammer. The brass liner was then removed from the sampler and immediately covered with Teflon seals and polyethylene caps. Each brass liner was then labeled and placed in a polyethylene sample bag. Each sealed sample was placed in an ice chest and retained in a chilled state on blue ice for transport to a state certified laboratory. The drive sampler was thoroughly scrubbed, washed, and rinsed between sample collec- tions. Ail of the soil samples were analyzed for B.T.X.& E. and T.P.H. gasoline by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. The results of the chemical analyses along with the chain of custody record are included as Attachment C. The 2 and 6 foot samples from Test Hole No. 1 contained T.P.H. gasoline concentrations of 1,800 ppm and 4,300 ppm, respectively. Low levels of xylenes were detected in both soil samples. The soil samples from Test Hole No. 2 contained no T.P.H. gasoline or B.T.X.& E. constitu- ents above the minimum reporting level. Based on the 1989 Water Supply Report, published by the Kern County Water Agency, the depth to groundwater beneath the site in the spring of 1989 was about 200+ feet. The site is located over coarse-grained, unconsolidated sand and gravel deposited by the DUANE R. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Ms. Gina Blankenship M P Environmental Services, Inc. July 3, 1991 Page 3 Kern River. The Kern River is located approximately 2 miles northwest of the site. Based o~ the results of this preliminary site assessment, a site characterization study is recommended at the tank location. If you have any questions or if we can be of further service, please feel free to call. ~Yours truly, I~l DUANER. SMITH ~1 Duane R. Smith ~ ~\ N0.3584 /~ ~ Registered Geologist ~~ ~~/ State of California No. 3584 DRS/js Attachments (3) DUANE R. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES SCALE ]:24000 ~ C ] MILE 10~ 0 1000 2000 3~0 4003 5~0 6~ 7000 FEET ~ 5 0 I KILOMETER Source of Base Map: U.S.G.S. Oil Center 7~ Minute quadranSte Attac~ent A TEST HOLE LOCATION ~bkP SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL £NVIRONYENTAL --,-,,,,-,,= LABORATORIES', INC. FETROLEU~ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 32]'-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons D.R. SMITH & ASSOCIATES Date of 7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Report: 06/25/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Lab ~= 7137-1 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-589-7861 Sample Description= ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-300 BAKER ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA= T.H. i @ 2', 6/17/91 @ 1130 SAMPLED BY DUANE'SMITH Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 06/17/91 06/17/91 6-20-91 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituents Units Results Level Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.8 Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.8 Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.8 o-Xylene ug/g 29. 0.8 m-Xylene pg/g 19. 0.8 p-Xylene pg/g 6.3 0.8 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) Hg/g 1800. 200. TEST METHOD: TPH bY D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. As Received Basis Comments= California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 U~nalyst Attachment C ENVIR~NHENTAL LABORATORIES, INO. J. d. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PETROLEUM 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons D.R. SMITH & ASSOCIATES Date of 7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Report: 06/25/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Lab ~: 7137-2 Attn.= DUANE R. SMITH 805-589-7861 Sample Description= ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-300 BAKER ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA= T.H. i @ 6', 6/17/91 @ 1145 SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected= Received @ Lab: Completed: 06/17/91 06/17/91 6-20-91 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituents Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g None Detected 2. Toluene ug/g None Detected 2. Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 2. o-Xylene ug/g 120. 2. m-Xylene ug/g 50. 2. p-Xylene ~g/g 19. 2. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) ~g/g 4300. 400. TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Attachment C ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PETROLEUM 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (605) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons D.R. SMITH & ASSOCIATES Date of 7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Report: 06/25/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Lab $: 7137-3 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-589-7861 Sample Description: ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-300 BAKER ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA: T.H. 2 @ 2', 6/17/91 @ 1200 SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 06/17/91 06/17/91 6-21-91 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituents Units Results Level Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.005 Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.005 Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.005 o-Xylene ug/g. None Detected 0.005 m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.005 p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) ~g/g None Detected 1. TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. As Received Basis Comments: Attachment C ENVIR~NYENTAL LABORATORIES, INC:. J. J. EGIlN, FIEG. CFIEM. EI4GFI. PETROLEU¥ 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (605) 327'-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons D.R. SMITH & ASSOCIATES Date of 7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Report: 06/25/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Lab ~: 7137-4 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-589-7861 Sample Descriptiont ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-300 BAKER ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA~ T.N. 2 @ 6', 6/17/91 @ 1210 SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 06/17/91 06/17/91 6-21-91 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituents Units Results Level Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.05 Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.05 Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.05 o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.05 m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.05 p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.05 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) ~g/g None Detected 1. TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 /Analyst Attachment C LABORATORIES, INC. J. J. EG£1N, FIEG. CHEM. ENGI~. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 9~108 PHONE (805) 3~Z~1911 FAX (805) 327-1918 BTXE/TPH GASOLINE Quality Control Data D.R. SMITH & ASSOCIATES Spike IDs 7087-1 7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Analysis Dates 20-Jun-91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Sample Matrix: Soil Attention: DUANE SMITH Quality Control for Lab Noes 7137-1, 7137-2 Dup Spike Spike Spike Constituent % Rec % Rec RPD Benzene 98.42 96.64 1.83 Toluene 94.07 91.68 2.57 Ethyl Benzene 93.50 90.72 3.02 Qc comments: Attachment C ENWRITNYENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. J. J. EGLIN, REG..CHEM. ENGR. PETROLEU¥ 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 BTXE/TPH GASOLINE Quality Control Data D.R. SMITH & ASSOCIATES Spike ID~ 7096-6 7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Analysis Dater 20-Jun-91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Sample Matrix~ Soil Attention: DUANE SMITH Quality control for Lab Nos= 7137-3, 7137-4 Dup Spike Spike Spike Constituent % Rec % Rec RPD Benzene 97.31 98.30 1.01 Toluene 93.94 93.44 0.53 Ethyl Benzene 90.41 91.90 1.63 Qc comments: Attachment C CI-L~IN OF CUSTODY RECOP./D ---l~___ . Location of Sampling Collector , Client Company: ~/.~//I~.~A~ ~/ Company: D.R. Smith & Associates Company: Address: ~0 1~~. JT. Address: 7201 Fruitvale Ext. Address: Telephone: ( ) Telephone: (805) 589-7861 Telephone: ( ) Bill to Property ~er ( ) Bill to Collector ~) Bill to Client ( ) S~ple No. Date Time Description '.~alysis Requested Laboratory No. t DU~. R. SMTT~ ~ ASSOC=AT=S Sheet /of / June 4, 1991 Saint Vincent De Paul Corporation 300. Baker Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Attention: Father Ralph RE: Underground'Tank R~moval Dear Father Ralph:' Per our telephone conversation of today you will find enclosed a Service Agreement outlining the tasks we will be performing in regards to the underground tank removal project. Please read, sign, and return the first two copies in the envelope provided. The third copy is for your files. We will be submitting the paperwork to obtain the permit on June 5, 1991 and anticipate having the permit in hand· by June 12, 199~. At that time, you will be contacted to set up the actual removal date. Barring any unforseen problems, the removal should be complete in one day. Thank you for choosing M. P. Environmental Services, Inc., and should you have any questions at all please do not hesitate to contact me. Best Regards, Gina Blankenship Contracts Administrator 3400 MANOR STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93.508 (805) 393-1151 (8001 458-3O36 . . .. FAX (805) 5950508 ' ' Customer'Order ~. OrderDate 4) Filin[ of all pape~ork required Co~.obtain" 'sated qloq lq poM~s puc ~mlua u[ ss~lun '3uI 'sa3~aoS imuamuo~ AUa d ~ ua ~tnputq ~ I ~qs ,(etu lOlD~auo3 ~ .~u~a3~o3 suo[ls~nb iUV .'p~o~ osu~3[~ alms ,sJo13ealuoD aid ,<q PalCln~oi P~ P~suooH Kq pmvaj~ aq lan I eqs p~-m~l'olq~mlddu q{tm.aau~psova~ ul pamuuolap aq llmlS sopunv~aq p~oaqop'~l~os,jo ~o~,~[Y.$o~S I~UOmU~aU~ d ~.~ ~u~l~: 'qleop ~mPnluul '~nful Xp~q ~oj so{~d p~}~ al ~{ }qc{q 'p~n~, ~oaoos~oq 'ptq~ ~ue jo sa~mup s~e slsan~ luommoAo~ 1~ aoueHdmoo 'SamltOe] uou~sue~ ~o 's~ammuo~ 's~el 'l~Ualem K snOIA~ ~01 anp so[nam jo luo~ed 19t ldaaxa:luoma~v s~ 7opun suon~tqqo pm~nb~,~l.jo,ao~ WILLIAM H. PARK REGISTEREO GEOLOGIST NO. 2271 3040 19TH STREET, SUITE 10 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 TELEPHONE (805) 327-9681 -- ~)"'~""~-- '~Oc"'~'/ October 17, 1989 Father Ralph St. Vincent De Paul, Catholic Social Services 300 Baker Street Bakersfield, CalifOrnia 93305 Dear Father Ralph: As per your instruction, I have put together a cost estimate to remove the one underground fuel storage tank located at the St. Vincent De Paul property. The cost to remove the tank would be $6,000.00. This cost includes acquiring County and City permits ~ and payment of fees, purging the tank of gasoline vapors, cleaning the tank, and transportation of rinseate to an appropriate disposal facility, coordinate inspections, excavate the tank, disposal of the tank, backfill of excavation, collection of soil samples below the tank, chemical analyses, and a preliminary site assessment which would contain all appropriate paper work on rinseate and tank disposal plus the results of the chemical analyses. If the soil samples show that the tank has not leaked, the assessment would be complete at this time. Gasoline contaminated soil would require further characterization of the site which is not included in the above cost. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to call. ~~ Yours truly, . ;t, I ~,~. ~o~, uq muane R. Smith ~rt '~ ~ l~gistered Geologist k k .. ::,..:.' / ~tate of California No. 3584 ...... ~ ......... '~'""" "' ~ '8 US EPA ID ~": *~?: ..... .,., ~:~.. '*~'.,:-..'~.' ', ..... · .~ .... I I i '-I? I' I -I ~ 9~ Dee gnat~.Fs~l~ Na~ and $~e.A~ ~" -.' . U./. ' .... lO:U. '.' -US EPA ID' Num~r~, _ , ~~. ~. . . ............... ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ' ' ~1. 'g8 ~OT ~,,~, (l~cl"dingP~.Shi~i,~ N,m.. ~,~,rd CI~... ,,d lB ~.m~)-. '~.~ T 0 ' ' --- ~ " ~ ' ¥' ' ' "_ . ..~~.~~ . ' :,~ .~ ' - . ~. ~ '~ :~ .~;:' .~' .~e',~'~ .~:~ ~ ,/2-. '. ,..~ ~'., 1~. ~ -' ' . ' :."' .'-' "" ';' ~ ~m :l~itled, ~:k~d,m~rked, ~n~ I~bel~d, ~nd ~m in ~11 m~e~ts in proper ~ondilion tot tr~n~po~ by hi~hw~y~co~i~i to:a~lli~b~ I~t~tl~l ~d ' '.' ' ~lio~l ~o~t m~ul~tion~. .~ ' ' ..... '.."t.~:.: ~': ~ f-'. '~:'':: "'~'':::''' ' ' ' "'"' It.I ~m ~ I~e qu~nli~ le~er~tor, I ce~i~ lh~t I h~e ~ pro~r~m in pl~e to redu:~ the ~olume'~nd tO~i~i~ lo ~e~onomi~ll~ ~r~li~bl~ ~n~ th~t I h~ve ~el~aed the pt~ti~l~ ~ihod ~t im~l~nl ~tor~.or di~l ~u~l~.~v~il~b~.to m~ ~ ml~lmlie~.the ~re~e~t ~nd fulute thre~l to kum~n he~llh ~nd the environment; OR, il I ~m ~ ~11 q~nli~g~ne~to~, I h~ve*m~de,et~o~ t~h~ffo~tlO'ml~lmiz~t~y~te '- . ~ener~lio~ ~nd ~el~:l lhe ~t ~le m~n~em~nl method thai i~ ~v~il~l~ to ~e ~n~ th~t I Printed/Typed H~me · I ~ion~i~re ' ' ' ' - '.'''' :i"'l' I. I" T 17. Trenspo~er 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt ot Mste~81~ . . . i ~ t '"" '". .:. ~...~. ~: Month,. Day -Yesr A Pri~Typed N~me · ~ 1~. Tr~n~o~ 2 AcAnowl~ment ~f ~c~i~t of M~t~l~ . . -,%. : :-~.':.. :, ,.~ .~:.': '~.,~L,:..,,'~,:,,~.:,::':, :~ ~:~".::,,.'.~.~ '.,.... . L' / ~0. Focil~y ~,or or Opor~lor ~o~ltic~tlon ot receipt of hazardou~ materials coverd by this man~est~e~e~ a~ ~ed:.i~ ~e~-}~,~E.~;~?:b?'~:,~,~{~?.'~.:??.~ ...:.:... .' ', :""" .:. ' '- -' ::." ,. ?.,;' .'-:- :~:::;'~:~'~ ' -!.;: :::.' '::,~.~;:~;~.z~':~;:/:~:'~V:~ :.;... :,~: . . ': ..;:,,. BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT (.,, /,~/c~! BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION ...~_~ ~ Date APPLICATION Application No. In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulations, application is made by: ~ ~/~ - I1.~-I ~ //(~ Name of Company Address to display, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or processes involving or creating con, ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows: Authorized 'l~-presentative /~' Perm~d ........ . .~../../...~./. ~. ~ .................... :.. By ......... .~...../..~....: ........................................................... . Date Fire ~"~J'"J R E C E I V E O J U N ! .~ 199! Ans'U ............ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY Environmental Health ,Services Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEW McC^L~ ~¥. RF_.HS, DmECTOR DIRECTOR Air Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE III WlLIAA~ J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ~3 P~nnim:j & Development Services Department TED JAMES, AICP,'DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT. PERMIT FOR PERMANENT C4:~b~E PERMIT NUMBER A 1504-15 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY FACILITY NA/VIE/ADDRESS: . OVv2qER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: St. Vincent DePaul Thrift Shop St. Vincent DePaul Corp. M.P. Environmental Services 300 Baker Street 300 Baker Street 3400 Manor Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Bakersfield, CA 93305 Bakersfield, CA 93308 .License #613706 Phone: (805) 323-2941 Phone: .(805) 393-1151 · PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES September 10, 1991 1 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE June 10, 1991 Carrie Oeorgi / - Hazardous Materials Specialist .................................... : ....... i ...... . ............................................ POST ON PREMISES ................................................................................................ CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: Ii It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work (i.e., City Fire and Building Departments). ' 2. Pcrmittee must notify the Hazardous Materials Management Program at '(805) 861-3636 two working day~ prior to tank removal or abandonment in place to arrange for required impeclions(s). 3. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health and Fire Department approved method~ as described in Handbook UT-30. 4. It i~ the contractfffs responsibility to know and adhere to all applicable law~ regarding the handling, transportation or treatment of hazardous materials. 5. The tank removal contractor must have a qualified company employee on site supervk~ing the tank removal. The employee must have tank removal experience prior to working unsupervised. 6. If any contractor~ other than those listed on permit and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by.the specialist listed on the permit. Deviation from the submitted application is not allowed. 7. Soil Sampling: a. Tank size lc% than or equal to 1,000 gallor~ - a minimum of two samples mtmt be retrieved from beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. b. Tank siz~ greater than 1,000 to 10,000 gallons - a minimum of four sample~ must be retrieved one-third of the way in from the end~ of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. c. Tank size greater than I0,000 gallons - a minimum of six sample~ must be retrieved one-fourth of the wa), in from the ends of each tank and beneath thc center of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. 8. Soil Sampling (piping area): A minimum of two ~mples mtmt be retrieved at depths of approximately two feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and under the dispenser area. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILrI~ 9. Soil Sample analysis: a. All soil samples retrieved from beneath gasoline (leaded/unleaded) tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, x'~lene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (for gasoline). b. All soil sampies retrieved from beneath die~el tanl~ and appurtenances must be anal.~2ed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (for ~i'i~el) and benzene. c. All soil sample~ retrieved from beneath waste oil tan~ and appunenance~ must be analyzed for total organic halides, lead, oil and grease. d. All soil samples retrieved from beneath crude oil tanl~ and appurtenances must be analyzed for oil and grease. e. Ail soil samples reu:ieved from beneath tank~ and appunenane~ that contain unknown substances must be analyzed for a full range of substances that may have been stored within the tanl~ 10. The following timetable lists pre- and post-tank removal requirements: ACTMTY DIEADLINE Complete permit application submitted At least two wee~ prior to closure to Hazardous Materials Management Program Notifi~tion to inspector listed on permit of date Two wortOng da½s and time of closure and soil sampling .. Transportation and tracing forms sent to Hazardous No later than $ wortdng days for transportation and 14 working Materials Management Program. All hazardous waste days for the tracking form after tank removal manifests must be signed Ivy the receiver of the hazardous waste Sample analysis to Hazardous Materials Management No later than 3 working days after completion of analysis Program 11. Purging/Inerting Conditious: a. Liquid stroll be pumt~d from tank prior to purging such that less than 8 gallons of liquid remain in tanlc (CSH&SC 41700) b. Tank shall be purged through vent pipe discharging at least 10 feet above ground level. (CSH&SC 41700) e. No emission shall result in odors detectable at or beyond property line. (Rule 419) d. No emission shall endanger the health, safety, comfort or repose of any person. (CSH&SC 41700) e. Vent lines shall remain attachea, i to tank until the inspector arrives to authorize removal. RECOMMENDATIONS/GUIDELINES FOR REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAOE TANKS This department is responsible for enforcing the Kern County Ordinance Code, Division 8 and state regulations pertaining to underground storage tank. Representatives from Ibis department respond to job sites during tank removals to ensure that the tanks are safe to remove/close and that the overall job performance is consistent with permit requirements, applicable laws and safety standards. The following guideline~ a~'e offered to clarify the interests and expectations for this clepartment. 1. 2'ob site safety is one of our primary concerns. Excavations are inherently dangerous. It is the contractor's responsibility to know and abide by C. AL-OSHA regulations. The job foreman is responsible for the crew and any subcontractors on the job. As a general rule, workers are not permitted in improperly sloped excavations or when unsafe conditions exist in the hole. Tools and equipment are to be used only for their designed function. For example, backhoe buckets are never substituted for ladders. 2. Properly licensed contractors are assumed to understand the requirements of the permit issued. The job foreman is responsible for knowing and abiding ~ the conditions of the permit. Deviation from the permit cohditions may result in a stop-work order. 3. Individual contractors will be held responsible for their post-removal paperwork. Tracking forms, hazardous waste' manifests and analyses documentation are necessary for each site in order to close a ease file or move it into mitigation. When contractors do not follow through on necessary paperwork, an unmanageable bac~og of incomplete case'~ results. If this continues, processing time for completing new closures will increase. CG:ms ~al$04-1$.ptc 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfi~ t', ~A 9-]305 APP[~ICA'FION FOR PERMrT TO OPERATE RGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of ADpli. cation ('check): ., ~ [~New Facllity [-]Modification of Facility ~Existing Facility OTransfer of Ownership~ A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days ,.,~;61-$- - --$ I ,~- ~3. ?..~ ~//· Facility Name 5~. ~,'/i ~ ~_ :. ¥~'-~ ~..~: .~ ~ ~ ~. /.. .N?. 'of Tanks Type of Business (check): ~]Gasollne Station gOt~,.er. (describe) ~~-~---~'~t Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? ~T~s ~ %__. ' ~.~ , Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? [qYes '~No · ~ ' Facility .Address ',~/?j ~.C,..L~&~- ~:~ Nearest Cross St. T R -SEC-- (~ural Locations ~ly) " ' Owner ~:~ ~d'~o_~ :~-..:..~. '?~\~{ Q o.~/3 Contact Person ,~x~.~{l:l~ Operator, ~- ..~-~/ .e ~ (.~'~: i ~ -~'., Contact Person ~-,~ ~. B. Water to Facility Provided by ~= i,), ~ ":%Llc.-~- Co Depth to-Groundwater ''-7 Soil Characteristics' at Facility ,:.~',~;.~ ~<~ /'7~ Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth DeterminatiOns C. Contractor ~. CA Contractor' s License No. Addr ess --.- Zip - Telephone Proposed Starting Date _ Proposed c~pletion Date Worker' s Compensation Certification ~ ~ Insurer ---- D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications Proposed E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ~ Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular Premium Diesel Waste -StI- F. Chemical Composition of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fuels) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-c°~mUercial name) CAS ~ (if known) Chemical Previously Stored ( if' 'd~'fferent) G. Transfer of Ownership Date of-~-~nsfer ----- Previous Owner -- Previous Facility Name ..... I, accept fully all obligati~3ns of Permit No. __ issued to · I understand that the Pemitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this u~dergrot~d storage facility upon receiving this c~mpleted form. This form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the' best of my knowledge is true and corr.ect. ~[ ........ · . ,. ~' . ,~ .:. ,, ,,"t ' .-, , ~.~/j ,. .... . ,...... (,3,~, ]' '~" .":" . ...... Signature ,/~..2_.C;--q'cqC..~_~/:L. t:.,. ,..jL~._.h~/ (.~{ ~. ,_'~-~-....,_,..,.,.,. .. Title :I , ~_t.-. :..~.~¢(~.---'F? .... Date '~/~ ' ~ ,/ and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of monitoring requirements. Please complete this form and' return to KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided within 30 days of receipt. Check: Yes No A. The packet I received contained: , 1) Cover Letter~" Permit'~Checklist,~ Interim Permit,~Phase I Interim Permit Monitoring Requirements,/Information Sheet~'~Agreement Between owner and Operator), Chapter i5 (KCOC #G-3941), Explanation of Substance Codes, Equipment Lists and. Return Envelope. 2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10. 3) The Following Forms: fa) Inventory Recording Sheet ~b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse .~ -c) Trend Analysis Worksheet 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) / B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I ·Monitoring Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), an~ find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name anc address, substance codesl and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). C. I have the following required equipment (as.described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) 3) Water-finding paste D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining tc Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner of this ~'z,c ~f~ facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between owner and operator). E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility ('if tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at this facility have hac calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registerec device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration Check Form'' found in the Appendix of Handbook). · Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance with procedures desc~bed in ·Handbook #UT-~iO. /)--fg-~- , ~ ~ L ii~n~ture o£ Pe~son- Com~/etinK ~ckli. s~~ _ ' , 1700 Flower Street K~-RN COUN~TY HEALTH DEPART HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION · DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · '* . Vernon S. Reichard INTERIM PERMIT ~ ~ PERMIT#i 5OO41C TO OPERATE: ~/ ' ~ ~ ... "? · ' ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986 EXPI RES: JULY 1, 1989 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY NUMBER OF TANKS-- 1 FACILITY: I OWNER: ST. VINCENT DE pAuL I ST. VINCENT DE PAUL 300 BAKER STREET I 300 BAKER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 TANK # " AGE(IN YRS') '- SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING? 1 25 MVF 3 NO NOTE: ALL .INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE pERMITTING AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE * * * POST ON PREMISES AUG g 5 1986 DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED: · J~JPefmit to Operate ! /._~/~/~/ Date [~]Constructton Permit ! Date l'lJpermlt to abandonl Ho. ~f Tan~s Date ~ended Permit Conditions ~eermtt ~ppttcatton Pore, ~ f . ?ank Shee~, Plo~' ~Appttcatton to Abandon t'anks(s) Date ~nnual Repoct ~ocms · ~Copy '0f Written Contract Be'tve~n Ovner a 'Operi'~or ~lnepect ton Reporte ..... _ ~Corre.~ndence - Received : .... Date ~Cor roo~ndence' - NeLl'ed Sampi Lng/Lab Ri~rCl NVF CMpliance Check (Mew COnitructl'~n Checkltie) ~S~ C~9ltan.e Check (Ney ConltrucCion Checkltlt) ~NVF elan, Check (Ney ConlCruction) OflTD Plan Check (iiv.Conltructlon) ~NVe Plan Check (lxtiting Fact[ltV) S~ Plan Che~ (.Ixlsti~ 'incomplete Application' Peri ~PermiC Application Check,tat eo~nJt ZniCruct tone ~Oiscarded Ttghtneil Tel~ Reouiti --' ~Ci ' Da ti Oaonttort~ wett Consc~uctt'on Oata/~i'~ntts '" -Senate ....................... B i r o ~ i t Da Ca ~ Oroundvacer Drilling, Boring Logo Location De ~ateg ~StatemenC of Underground Conduits ~P~ot P~an ~eatu;Lng AZZ Envt;o~en~a~y SenaLtLve ~Pho=ol ~Cona~ructlon D;avLngs LocatLon: ~a~. =beet BhovLng date ;eceLved and ta~y o~ LnapectZon ~Ht ~cel laneous TANK ~ (FILL OUT.~;EPARATE FOR~ ~_ _~CH TANK) H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaulted ~n-Vault~ ~uDle-Wall ~Si~le~all~ 2. ~ Material ~Car~n Steel ~ Stainless Steel ~ ~l~'inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass~l~ Steel ~ Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~ Concrete ~ ~in~ ~ Bronze ~nk~ ~Other (de~ri~) 3. Pr im ry Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (Gallons) ~nufacturer 4. Tank Secondary Contaim~nt . '- ~Other (descri~): ~u~a~urer: ~ ~ ter ial Thic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~~r ~kyd ~xy ~enolic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~~~o~ ~Other (de~ri~): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection- · ~Galvafiiz~ ~ass-Cl~' ~l~yle~ ~ap ~Vinyl ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): " ' Cath~ic Protection:~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~cr[ficlal ~e ~r~ Syst~ & Equi~ent: 7. Leak D.~tection, .~nitori~, and Interception. a. Ta~: ~Vis~l (vault~ ~nks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wi~ut ~ner ~U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow ~ Monitori~ ~ll(s)* ~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Li~id ~vel ~n~r* ~ Cond~tivit~ ~ Pressure Sen~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitori~ ~11 ~ ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ ~ri~ic Tigh~e~ ~None .~o~ ~er b. Pipit: ~l~-Restricti~ ~ak ~t~tor(s) for Pressuriz~ ~nitori~ S~p wi~ ~ce~y ~al~ C~crete ~ce~y .~lf~ut C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~~tic Liner ~y ~e · ~ri~ ~ & M~el: 8. Tank Tightness ~ / ,. ~i~ ~ ~en Tigh~ess ~sted? ~Yes ~ ~te of ~st Tightne~ Test ~es~[t~ of Test Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank Re. ir ~ ~ Re~ir~? ~Yes :.~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) ~ri~ Re. irs 10. ~e~fill Protection '. rator~ills, Controls, & Visually ~nitors ~vel Fl~t Ga~e ~Fl~t Vent Valv~ ~ Auto Shut- off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other': List ~ & ~el For ~ve ~ices 11. Pipl~ ' a. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~. ~o~ ~terial Thickne~ (t~hes) Dl~eter Manufacturer ~essure ~ti'0n ~Gravity ~proxi~te b. Undergro~ P~pi~ Corrosion Prot~tion : , ~lvaniz~ ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rrent ~crificia1 ~e ~olye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~kno~ ~None ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~l~all ~~etic Liner ~st~ ~ne .~kno~ ~Other (de~ri~): Permi t Questionnaire . Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before returning this form with payment: For PERMIT · IEno ! 0 1. Send all information to Owne_r at the address listed on invoice (if Own~er is different than Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information I. 2. Send all information to Owner at the following corrected address: ~ 3. Send Operator: all information to Name: (Operator can make copy of permit for ~ Owner}. ~